Impact Factor 4.235 | CiteScore 6.4
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 30 April 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00663

Prevalence, Genetic Diversity, and Temporary Shifts of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus Clones in Tehran, Iran: A Molecular–Epidemiological Analysis From 2013 to 2018

Mehdi Goudarzi1*, Nobumichi Kobayashi2, Masoud Dadashi3, Roman Pantůček4, Mohammad Javad Nasiri1, Maryam Fazeli5, Ramin Pouriran6, Hossein Goudarzi1, Mirmohammad Miri7, Anahita Amirpour8 and Sima Sadat Seyedjavadi9
  • 1Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Department of Hygiene, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
  • 3Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
  • 4Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
  • 5Department of Virology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
  • 6School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 7Department of Critical Care and Anesthesiology, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 8Department of Internal Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 9Department of Mycology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

The prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus as an aggressive pathogen resistant to multiple antibiotics causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections is increasing with limited therapeutic options. Macrolide-lincosamide streptogramin B (MLSB) family of antibiotics represents an important alternative therapy for staphylococcal infections. This study was conducted over a period of five years from August 2013 to July 2018 to investigate the prevalence and molecular epidemiology in Iran of inducible resistance in S. aureus. In the current study, 126 inducible methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 106) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) (n = 20) isolates were characterized by in vitro susceptibility analysis, resistance and virulence encoding gene distribution, phenotypic and genotypic analysis of biofilm formation, prophage typing, S. aureus protein A locus (spa) typing, staphylocoagulase (SC) typing, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing, and multilocus sequence typing. Of the 126 isolates, 76 (60.3%) were classified as hospital onset, and 50 (39.7%) were classified as community onset (CO). Biofilm formation was observed in 97 strains (77%). A total of 14 sequence types (STs), 26 spa types, 7 coagulase types, 9 prophage types, 3 agr types (no agr IV), and 9 clonal complexes (CCs) were identified in this study. The prevalence of the inducible MLSB (iMLSB) S. aureus increased from 7.5% (25/335) to 21.7% (38/175) during the study period. The iMLSB MRSA isolates were distributed in nine CCs, whereas the MSSA isolates were less diverse, which mainly belonged to CC22 (7.95%) and CC30 (7.95%). High-level mupirocin-resistant strains belonged to ST85-SCCmec IV/t008 (n = 4), ST5-SCCmec IV/t002 (n = 4), ST239-SCCmec III/t631 (n = 2), and ST8-SCCmec IV/t064 (n = 2) clones, whereas low-level mupirocin-resistant strains belonged to ST15-SCCmec IV/t084 (n = 5), ST239-SCCmec III/t860 (n = 3), and ST22-SCCmec IV/t790 (n = 3) clones. All the fusidic acid–resistant iMLSB isolates were MRSA and belonged to ST15-SCCmec IV/t084 (n = 2), ST239-SCCmec III/t030 (n = 2), ST1-SCCmec V/t6811 (n = 1), ST80-SCCmec IV/t044 (n = 1), and ST59-SCCmec IV/t437 (n = 1). The CC22 that was predominant in 2013–2014 (36% of the isolates) had almost disappeared in 2017–2018, being replaced by the CC8, which represented 39.5% of the 2017–2018 isolates. This is the first description of temporal shifts of iMLSB S. aureus isolates in Iran that identifies predominant clones and treatment options for iMLSB S. aureus–related infections.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most common aggressive pathogen that causes many diseases in humans and animals such as skin and soft tissue infections, osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and endocarditis (Gordon and Lowy, 2008). The expression of virulence factors promoting adhesion needs nutrients, and evasion of host immunologic responses including cell surface components (collagen-binding protein, clumping factor, fibronectin-binding protein, and elastin-binding protein), secreted factors (staphylokinase toxic shock syndrome toxin-1), hemolysin, exfoliative toxins (ETA and ETB), staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), and lipase and Panton–Valentine leukocidin (PVL), besides the presence of antibiotic resistance genes, turns S. aureus into a very pathogenic microorganism (Gordon and Lowy, 2008; Gould et al., 2012).

In addition to the aforementioned, the biofilm-forming of S. aureus strains can play a key role in pathogenesis and resistance to antimicrobials (Luther et al., 2018). The rate of infections due to S. aureus, especially the antibiotic-resistant strains, has dramatically increased recently, which is becoming a serious problem all over the world (Gould et al., 2012). Emerging simultaneous resistance to multiple antibacterial agents underscores the necessity for therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of bacterium-related infections (Pantosti et al., 2007; Dadashi et al., 2018). Although the use of effective antibiotics such as vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin–dalfopristin is considered appropriate for therapy, widespread utilization of these antibiotics has made the current usage of these therapeutic options often unsuccessful (Pantosti et al., 2007; Gould et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012; Dadashi et al., 2018). In recent years, the use of macrolide–lincosamide–streptogramin group B (MLSB) antibiotics has been favored, which is regarded as an alternative approach to treating such infections (Patel et al., 2006). Clindamycin, a member of MLSB family, serves as one such effective therapeutic alternative for treating S. aureus infections, because of its proven efficacy, safety, convenience of administration (parenteral and oral), and excellent pharmacokinetic properties. However, one important issue in clindamycin administration is the potential emergence of inducible clindamycin resistance, which may increase the risk of clinical failure (Chavez-Bueno et al., 2005; Adhikari et al., 2017).

Recent published data indicate that there has been a concurrent worldwide increase in the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in different areas (Abimanyu et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2012). Evidence of epidemiological researches has revealed that iMLSB S. aureus strains are mostly genetically distinct from each other. One of the most prevalent iMLSB S. aureus strains in the United States belongs to sequence type 8 (ST8) strains, whereas in European countries, the majority of iMLSB S. aureus strains circulating was affiliated with the clonal complexes CC5 and CC8 (Ilczyszyn et al., 2016). Many studies across the world have focused on molecular epidemiology and analysis of iMLSB S. aureus strains isolated from the clinic (Lewis and Jorgensen, 2005; Patel et al., 2006; Adhikari et al., 2017). In our country, data on the prevalence or genetic diversity of inducible clindamycin resistance among S. aureus are very unknown, and there have been no published data on the molecular epidemiological characterization of the inducible clindamycin-resistant S. aureus strains in Iran. Here we provide molecular characterization of iMLSB S. aureus strains. With this aim, phenotypic and genotypic resistance patterns, presence of different classes of prophages, biofilm-forming ability, presence of the icaABCD, adhesion genes, and virulence factors were assessed. Then, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), agr, coa, and spa typing methods were used to characterize the genotype of the iMLSB S. aureus strains. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the molecular characterization of the inducible clindamycin-resistant S. aureus strains from Iran.

Materials and Methods

Study Population, Bacterial Isolation, and Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Screening

A total of 1,161 non-duplicated clinical S. aureus isolates were obtained from different clinical specimens including wound, blood, pus, urine, sputum, conjunctivitis, and body fluids from both genders and all age groups of patients, over a period of 5 years from August 2013 to July 2018. This cross-sectional study was conducted in four hospitals affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Loghman, Shohada, Taleghani, Emam Hossein). The processing of all samples was done in 2 h. Among these isolates, 126 S. aureus isolates were identified with iMLSB phenotype based on the routine biochemical techniques such as Gram staining; colony morphology comprising shape, size, color, and hemolysis patterns; catalase test; tube coagulase test; growth on mannitol salt agar; and DNase. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay targeting the S. aureus–specific nuc gene was applied to verify the isolates (Goudarzi et al., 2016b). Staphylococcus aureus strains were studied to identify inducible resistance phenotypes according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) D-zone test. The D-zone test was performed by placing 15 μg erythromycin and 2 μg clindamycin disks at a spaced 15 to 26 mm apart from center to center on the Mueller–Hinton agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) plate inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland-equivalent bacterial suspension. The results also were read at 16 to 18 h incubation at 37°C and ambient air, using transmitted and reflected light; inducible clindamycin resistance was verified if the clindamycin zone of inhibition adjacent to the erythromycin disk (D-shape) was flattened. A confirmatory microdilution broth test was done on all isolates for further confirmation. Briefly, any growth in the same well that contained 4 μg/mL erythromycin and 0.5 μg/mL clindamycin was set as a positive test and vice versa. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was used to perform routine quality control of antibiotic disks. Confirmed isolates were kept into tryptic soy broth (TSB; Merck) with 20% glycerol at −70°C for molecular testing.

Hospital-onset (HO) S. aureus was set if the positive culture of S. aureus was obtained on or after 96 h of admission to a hospital. Community-onset (CO) S. aureus was set if the culture was obtained prior to 4 days of hospitalization with one or more of the following criteria: (1) a history of hospitalization, surgery, dialysis, or residence in a long-term care facility in 12 months prior to culture date or (2) the presence of a central vascular catheter within 2 days before S. aureus culture. Invasive S. aureus infection was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defining isolation of S. aureus from typically sterile body sites such as the blood, bone, fluids (pericardial, joint/synovial, peritoneal, cerebrospinal, and pleural), internal body sites (brain, lymph node, pancreas, ovary, liver, spleen, heart, and kidney), or other normally sterile sites (Goudarzi et al., 2016a). The Ethics Committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran, certified the protocol of this project (IR.SBMU. MSP.REC.1396.412).

Determining Resistance Pattern

Phenotypic methicillin resistance screening was performed by placing the cefoxitin disk (30 μg) on Mueller–Hinton agar (Merck), previously inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland-equivalent bacterial suspension. In vitro susceptibility of the isolates to kanamycin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, quinupristin–dalfopristin, rifampin, tetracycline, linezolid, teicoplanin, amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin, and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (Mast; Merseyside, United Kingdom) was done according to the modified Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar plates, as per CLSI recommendation. The European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoint was used for interpreting the results of fusidic acid and ceftriaxone disks. As specified by the CLSI guidelines, the broth microdilution method was applied for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin and mupirocin. Minimum inhibitory concentration values of 8 to 256 and ≥512 μg/mL were established to show low-level and high-level mupirocin resistance (LLMUPR, HLMUPR) of the strains, in the respective order. As specified by the CLSI guidelines, MIC breakpoints for vancomycin were set as follows: susceptible, ≤2 μg/mL; intermediate, 4–8 μg/mL; and resistant, ≥16 μg/mL. Fusidic acid MICs were specified by the broth microdilution method and interpreted based on EUCAST guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints were set as follows: susceptible, ≤1 μg/mL; and resistant, >1 μg/mL. The S. aureus ATCC 25923 and ATCC 29213 strains were put to test as control strains. Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, United States) provided the study with the powders of antibiotics.

DNA Extraction

To extract DNA, overnight cultures of S. aureus strains on 5% sheep blood agar (Merck) were used by applying the InstaGene Matrix kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States) following the manufacturer’s instructions and adding lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, United States) for bacterial lysis. Gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo, Wilmington, Delaware, United States) were applied, respectively, to test the quality and quantity of isolated S. aureus DNA (Goudarzi et al., 2016a, b). Seemingly, if the purity were appropriated, it would be applied as the template for PCR. Two hundred microliters of elution buffer [10 mM Tris–Cl, 0.5 mM EDTA (pH 9.0)] was applied to elute the extracted DNA, which was then kept at −20°C until use.

Detecting Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants and Virulence Factors

Polymerase chain reaction method was used for genotypic amplification of the mecA gene (Goudarzi et al., 2016a, b). Isolates exhibiting phenotypic resistance to particular antimicrobial agents were put to test for the presence of resistance genes [mecA, vanA, vanB, mupB, mupA, fusA, fusB, fusC, erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), tet(M), ant (4′)-Ia, aac (6′)-Ie/aph (2″), aph (3′)-IIIa] (Castanheira et al., 2010a; Nezhad et al., 2017). Virulence factors involved SE genes (sea, seb, etb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, and sej) (Monday and Bohach, 1999), exfoliative toxin genes (eta and etb), Panton–Valentine leukotoxin genes lukS-PV and lukF-PV (pvl), and toxic shock syndrome toxin genes (tst) (Goudarzi et al., 2016a; Nezhad et al., 2017).

Phenotypic Analysis of Biofilm Formation

Slime production assay or Congo red agar (CRA) method and microtiter plate (MtP) assay were recruited as in vitro methods for the detection of phenotypic biofilm formation. In CRA method, briefly, after preparation of CRA by adding 0.8 g of CR (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, United States) to 1 L of brain heart infusion agar (Merck) and autoclaving it, filters used for add saccharose (36 g) (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, United States) to CRA. Bacteria were inoculated on CRA and incubated at 37°C for 24 h and then overnight at room temperature. Biofilm formation was categorized in four levels based on colony color that strains appeared: (i) strong biofilm producer strains (very black colonies), (ii) moderate biofilm producer strains (black colonies), (iii) weak biofilm producer strains (gray colonies), and (iv) biofilm non-producer strains (red colonies) (Arciola et al., 2002; Yousefi et al., 2016).

The MtP assay as a quantitative method for biofilm detection was carried out as described previously. Concisely, an overnight culture of bacterial isolates in TSB (Merck) containing 1% glucose was diluted to 1:100 with fresh medium. Sterile MtP with flat-bottomed 96-well polystyrene was filled with 200 μL of the diluted culture and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, wells were washed three times with 200 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) to remove planktonic bacteria. Afterward, wells were fixed by 99% methanol, dried at room temperature, and then stained with 0.1% safranin. Safranin dye bound to the adherent cells was dissolved with 1 mL of 95% ethanol per well. As a negative control, 200 μL of TSB–1% glucose was used. The optical density (OD) of each well was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader at a wavelength of 490 nm. Optical density cutoff defined as average OD of negative control + 3 × standard deviation of the negative control. Biofilm formation of strains was analyzed according to the absorbance of the safranin-stained attached cells and interpreted as per the criteria described by Stepanović et al. (2007). Accordingly, the degree of biofilm production was categorized into strong, moderate, weak, or without biofilm. For quality control, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984 strain was used in each run.

Genetic Analysis of Biofilm Formation

Polymerase chain reaction assays for the detection of icaABCD, cna, ebp, fnbB, fnbA, clfB, clfA, and bap genes were performed as described previously (Nemati et al., 2009; Yousefi et al., 2016). Detection of arginine catabolic mobile elements for definitive confirmation of USA300 was performed as previously described by Diep et al. (2008).

Prophage Typing

iMLSB-positive S. aureus were characterized by prophage typing by using multiplex-PCR assay and oligonucleotide primers SGA, SGB, SGF (SGFa and SGFb), SGD, and SGL prophages as explained previously by Pantůček et al. (2004) and Rahimi et al. (2012).

Staphylococcus aureus Protein A Locus (spa) Typing

Staphylococcus aureus isolates underwent spa typing as recommended by Harmsen et al. (2003); all PCR products were Sanger sequenced in both directions. The sequences obtained were edited using the Chromas software (version 1.45; Technelysium, Tewantin, Australia). Ridom SpaServer database1 was applied in order to assign the spa type.

Staphylocoagulase Typing

Four sets of multiplex PCR reactions were used for assigning staphylocoagulase (SC) types (I–X) according to the procedure of Hirose et al. (2010). Set A contained primers for identifying SC types I, II, III, IVa, IVb, Va, and VI, whereas set B contained primers for identifying SC types VII, VIII, and X. Set 3 was used for identifying SC types IX and Vb. SC types IVa and IVb were distinguished using a set of four primers.

SCCmec Typing

The multiplex PCR amplification was done with specific primers for SCCmec typing, as recommended by Boye et al. (2007). The prototype strains applied as control strains for typing were S. aureus ATCC 10442 (type I), S. aureus N315 (type II), S. aureus 85/2082 (type III), S. aureus MW2 (type IV), S. aureus WIS 173 (type V), and S. aureus HDE288 (type VI).

agr Typing

Multiplex PCR was performed for agr-type detection using primer set comprising a common forward primer (pan-agr) and reverse primers (agr1, agr2, agr3, and agr4) specific to each agr group (Gilot et al., 2002).

Multilocus Sequence Typing

All the 126 S. aureus isolates with iMLSB phenotype were further characterized by MLST as described by Enright et al. (2000) by sequencing an internal fragment of seven unlinked housekeeping genes to identify the following allelic profiles: phosphate acetyltransferase (pta), carbamate kinase (arcC), triosephosphate isomerase (tpi), shikimate dehydrogenase (aroE), guanylate kinase (gmk), acetyl-coenzyme A acetyltransferase (yqiL), and glycerol kinase (glp). The purification of PCR products was done by performing the Qiagen PCR purification kit. In addition, the two strands were sequenced on the ABI Prism 377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Perkin-Elmer Co., Foster City, CA, United States). Finally, STs were submitted to the online MLST website through the submission of DNA sequences2.

Ethics Statement

The current study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran (IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1396.700). Written informed consent was obtained from participants.

Results

Isolation and Identification of S. aureus

A total of 126 S. aureus isolates with inducible resistance phenotype were identified, including 106 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 20 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates representing 84.1 and 15.9% of isolates, respectively. Precisely, of 126 iMLSB S. aureus isolates, 41 were collected from female patients (32.6%), and the rest were collected from male patients (85, 67.4%). In the present study, 43 strains (34.1%) were isolated from wound, 32 (25.4%) from blood, 15 (11.9%) from body fluids, 14 (11.1%) from pus, 12 (9.5%) from urine, 7 (5.6%) from sputum, and 3 (2.4%) from conjunctiva. Of the 126 isolates, 76 (60.3%) were classified as HO, and 50 (39.7%) were classified as CO. According to the case notes, the rates of invasive and non-invasive S. aureus with iMLSB phenotype were found to be 37.3 and 62.7%, respectively. The patients’ average age was 38 years. The patients were distributed in four age groups: 21 patients ≤20 years (16.7%), 60 patients between 21 and 45 years (47.6%), 30 patients between 46 and 65 years (23.8%), and 15 patients ≥65 years (11.9%). Regarding the occurrence of inducible resistance in S. aureus strains, data exhibited that most cases belonged to the age groups of 21 to 45 years between 2013 and 2017, whereas in 2018, more than half of the cases were found to be in the age group between 46 and 65 years. Patients with invasive infections and HO were older. Of 21 patients aged ≤20 years, 12 (57.1%) of 60 patients were between 21 and 45 years, 28 (46.7%) of 30 patients were between 46 and 65 years, and 9 (30%) had CO infections. However, among 15 patients aged ≥65 years, only 1 (6.7%) had CO infections. There were also trends toward an increasing incidence of HO infections in elderly patients.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The highest and lowest rates of resistance in 126 S. aureus isolates tested were related to penicillin (91.3%) and fusidic acid (5.6%), respectively. The entire strains were susceptible to teicoplanin, linezolid, and vancomycin. Resistance to tested antibiotics was higher in MRSA than in MSSA. The rate of resistance to the tested antibiotics, with the exception of ciprofloxacin, was higher among HO S. aureus strains across CO S. aureus strains. The frequency of resistance rate among MRSA and MSSA strains to antimicrobial agents is presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Antimicrobial resistance pattern of MRSA and MSSA isolates with iMLSB phenotype.

The entire S. aureus isolates were susceptible to vancomycin such that 15 isolates (11.9%) had MIC ≥ 0.5 μg/mL, 38 (30.2%) had MIC ≥ 1 μg/mL, and 73 (57.9%) exhibited MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL. The data of the microbroth dilution method illustrated that 23 isolates (18.3%) were mupirocin-resistant; of these, 11 (8.7%) and 12 (9.6%) were LLMUPR and HLMUPR, respectively. Of the 126 isolates of S. aureus with iMLSB phenotype, seven (5.6%) were fusidic acid-resistant. In total, 80.2% of isolates (101/126) were multidrug resistance (MDR), and the MDR rate for MRSA isolates (85.8%) was significantly higher than that for MSSA (50%). Information about simultaneous resistance patterns and distribution of clinical samples is presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Resistant pattern and distribution of samples in 126 S. aureus strains isolated from clinical sources.

agr and SCCmec Typing

By using agr typing method, all 126 S. aureus isolates with iMLSB phenotype could be typed agr I–III. Of these isolates tested, 77 (10 MSSA and 67 MRSA) were agr I, 20 (MRSA) were agr II, and 29 (10 MSSA and 19 MRSA) were agr III. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing for MRSA isolates indicated that type IV was the predominant SCCmec type (57.6%, 61/106), followed by SCCmec III (33%, 35/106), SCCmec V (7.5%, 8/106), and SCCmec II (1.9%, 2/106). In addition, no MRSA isolates harbored SCCmec type I.

Determination of Adhesion and Biofilm Production Ability

Biofilm formation was observed in 97 strains (77%) using the CRA and MtP methods, whereas 29 strains (23%) were confirmed as non–biofilm producer strains. Of the total MRSA isolates, MtP detected 18 (17%) as weak, 23 (21.7%) as moderate, and 42 (39.6%) as strong biofilm producers. By CRA, 20 isolates (18.9%) were able to produce biofilm weakly, and 26 (24.5%) and 37 (34.9%) isolates presented moderate and potent biofilm formation, respectively. In MSSA isolates, MtP indicated weak biofilm production in five isolates (25), moderate biofilm production in three (15%), and strong biofilm production in six isolates (30%), whereas CRA detected four isolates (20%) as weak, five (25%) as moderate, and five (25%) as strong biofilm producers. The analysis of icaA-D genes among tested S. aureus strains showed that the most frequently detected gene was icaD (n = 92, 73%), followed by icaA (n = 90, 71.4%), icaB (n = 76, 60.3%), and icaC (n = 67, 53.2%). Overall, six different biofilm patterns were identified. Figure 1 presents the distribution of icaABCD among tested strains. Regarding the presence of adhesion genes, the seven most frequent adhesion-related genes were clfA (93.7%, 118/126) followed by clfB (87.3%, 110/126), fnbB (61.9%, 78/126), cna (57.9%, 73/126), fnbA (54%, 68/126), ebp (50%, 63/126), and bap (3.2%, 8/126), respectively. The adhesion profiles are shown in Figure 1. None of the MSSA strains carried the bap gene. In MSSA strains, three different adhesion patterns including clfA + clfB + fnbB (50%, 10/20), clfA + clfB + fnbB + fnbA + ebp + cna (25%, 5/20), and fnbB + fnbA + cna (25%, 5/20) were observed. Apparently, higher diversity among the adhesion patterns from MRSA (six patterns) than those from MSSA (three patterns) was noticed.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Prophage profiles of 126 Staphylococcus aureus isolates with iMLSB phenotype. (B) icaABCD profiles of inducible clindamycin resistance S. aureus. (C) Adhesion profiles of S. aureus isolates investigated in this study.

Determination of Prophage Types and Toxin and Enterotoxin Encoding Genes

A total of 103 strains (81.7%) of the 126 inducible resistant S. aureus strains tested had one or more virulence genes. The most frequently attained virulence genes were pvl (23.8%, 30/126), followed by sea (19.8%, 25/126), tst (19%, 24/126), sec (11.1%, 14/126), sed (9.5%, 12/126), seg (4.8%, 6/126), seb (4%, 5/126), see (3.2%, 4/126), and eta (2.4%, 3/126), but she, sei, and sej encoding genes were detected in any of the total number of 126 isolates tested. In this analysis, six prophage types were grouped into seven separate prophage profiles. Figure 1 provides a summary data of the number and frequency of prophage profiles among isolates tested.

The data for antibiotic resistance genes in S. aureus strains studied revealed that the most common gene was mecA in 106 strains (84.1%), followed by erm(A) in 43 strains (34.1%), erm(B) in 41 (32.5%), erm(C) in 361 (28.6%), ant (4′)-Ia in 35 (27.8%), tet(M) in 32 (25.4%), aac (6′)-Ie/aph (2′′) in 29 (23%), aph (3′)-IIIa in 17 (13.5%), mupA in 12 (9.5%), fusB in 6 (4.8%) strains, and fusC in 1 strain. vanB, mupB, and fusA genes were not detected in none of experimented isolates.

SC Typing

In the present study, all isolates could be typed by SC typing method. These isolates were distinguished into seven SC types (I–VI). The predominant SC type was III and included 56 isolates (44.4%), followed by II (28.6%, 36/126), IVa (9.5%, 12/126), VI (7.9%, 10/126), I (4%, 5/126), V (4%, 5/126), and IVb (1.6%, 2/126). A total of seven SC types and two types (II and IVa) were detected in MSSA isolates.

MLST and spa Typing

All the isolates were typed by spa and MLST. A total of 26 spa types were attained in the entire 126 S. aureus. The isolates identified as invasive S. aureus were assigned to particular t790, t002, t008, t064, t030, t037, and t631 spa types. For CO, the isolates were assigned to spa types t005, t1869, t019, t021, t10795, t6811, t002, t045, t008, t065, t030, and t037. Among MSSA isolates, the most common spa types were t021, t005, t1869, and t318 representing 35 (7/20), 25 (5/20), 25 (5/20), and 15% (3/20), and among MRSA isolates, the top four spa types were t037, t437, t030, and t008 representing 10.4 (11/106), 9.4 (10/106), 8.5 (9/106), and 7.5% (8/106) of isolates. Multilocus sequence typing identified 14 ST types in both MRSA and MSSA isolates, namely, ST22 (14.3%, 18/126), ST30 (11.9%, 15/126), ST1 (1.6%, 2/126), ST772 (4.8%, 6/126), ST8 (10.3%, 13/126), ST239 (23%, 29/126), ST585 (1.6%, 2/126), ST5 (5.63%, 7/126), ST225 (1.6%, 2/126), ST80 (9.5%, 12/126), ST59 (4.8%, 6/126), ST338 (3.2%, 4/126), ST15 (4%, 5/126), and ST45 (4%, 5/126), which were further grouped into nine CCs including CC1, 5, 8, 15, 22, 30, 45, 59, and 80. Among MSSA, CC22 and CC30 were the dominant clones, each clone with 50% (10/20) of the isolates being assigned to these genotypes, and all were recovered from non-invasive S. aureus and both CO (55%, 11/20) and HO (45%, 9/20) cases. CC8 (41.5%, 44/106), CC80 (11.3%, 124/106), and CC5 (8.5%, 9/106) were the top three CCs in MRSA isolates. Table 3 represents the analysis of S. aureus clones obtained from patients based on invasive and non-invasive infections.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Analysis of S. aureus clones obtained from patients based on invasive and non-invasive infections.

Temporal Changes in Inducible Resistant S. aureus Genotypes

Table 4 gives information about the percentage of inducible resistant S. aureus strains assigned to each CC for each year between 2013 and 2018. The prevalence of inducible resistance S. aureus isolates elevated in the experiment from 19.8% in 2013–2014 to 30.2% in 2017–2018. Apart from 2013 to 2014 in which CC22 genotype was the most prevalent CC among inducible resistance isolates (36%, 9/25), in the remaining years of study (2014–2018), the CC8 isolates were the most predominant genotype. The CC8, as a predominate genotype, was at its most prevalent in 2016–2017 (41.6%, 10/24). Its prevalence increased during the study period from 20% in 2013–2014 (5/25) to 39.5% (15/38) in 2017–2018. By contrast, the prevalence rate of CC22 decreased from 36% in 2013–2014 to 0% in 2017–2018. The CC30, the third predominated CC among our clinical isolates, had its most prevalence in 2017–2018 (18.4%, 7/38). The prevalence of this type varied dramatically each year during 2013–2018; despite a decrease to 8% (2/25) in 2013–2014, a slight increase in the prevalence of this type was noted during 2014–2015 (9.5%, 2/21) and 2015–2016 (16.7%, 3/18), followed by an overall decrease to 4.2% (1/24) in 2016–2017. The prevalence of this type increased to 18.4% (7/38) in 2017–2018.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Distribution of characterized S. aureus isolates with iMLSB phenotype by year.

The first CC45 isolates were found in 2015–2016. The prevalence of this genotype diminished during the study period from 22.2% (4/18) in 2015–2016 to 4.2% (1/24) in 2016–2017 apart from 2017–2018 when no CC45 was detected. The CC45 was the second predominant genotype in 2015–2016 (22.2%, 4/18). The CC15, absent during 2013–2016, was detected during 2016–2017 (8.3%, 2/24), but remained at relatively low prevalence (7.9%, 3/38) in 2017–2018.

The CC59 isolates were not detected between 2013–2014 and 2015–2016. The CC59 isolates were detected for the first time in 2014–2015 (4.8%, 1/21), and increased to 8.3% (2/24) in 2016–2017. This genotype was present at its greatest prevalence in 2017–2018, accounting for 18.4% (7/38) of inducible resistance strains. The prevalence of CC80 varied dramatically during the 5-year period, this genotype was not identified among any of the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 tested strains. In 2013–2014, only 12% (3/25) of isolates exhibited this genotype. An increase in the prevalence of this genotype was noted between 2016 and 2017 to 16.7% (4/24), followed by a decline to 13.2% (5/38) in 2017–2018. The CC5 genotype was present in each year between 2013 and 2018. The highest prevalence of this genotype occurred in 2014–2015 (14.3%, 3/21), followed by 11.1% (2/18) between 2015 and 2016. Overall, the prevalence of this genotype diminished during the study period from 8% (2/25) in 2013–2014 to 2.6% (1/38) in 2017–2018. The CC1 isolates were not identified between 2016 and 2018. It was the third predominant genotype in 2013–2014, accounting for 16% (4/25) of examined isolates, but it dropped to 9.5% (2/21) in 2014–2015 and then indicated an increase in 2015–2016 (11.1%, 2/18).

Observations on Inducible Clindamycin-Resistant S. aureus Clones

The molecular characteristics of the isolates related to each genotype of inducible resistance MRSA and MSSA are shown in Table 5. Meanwhile, the details of each clonal lineage are explained below.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Phenotypic and genotypic typing data for inducible resistance MRSA (n = 106) and MSSA (n = 20) isolates studied in Tehran, Iran, between 2013 and 2018.

CC1

In this study, most of the isolates identified as CC1/ST772-MRSA-V were represented by spa type t10795 (83.3%, 5/6). Among the CC1/ST772-MRSA-V isolates, resistance to aminoglycosides encoded by aac (6)-Ie/aph (2′′) and aph (3)-IIIa, and tetracycline encoded by tet(M) was common. Three isolates (60%) were able to produce biofilm strongly. The finding indicated that fnbB gene was present in all of the CC1 isolates. icaA and icaD were the most prevalent biofilm-related genes. More than half of the isolates (60%) carried pvl genes. The one remaining CC1/ST772-MRSA-V isolate was assigned to spa type t657 and coa type IVa. This isolate exhibited resistance to multiple antibiotics and harbored resistance genes mecA and erm(C); meanwhile, enterotoxin genes sea + seb carried simultaneously. The CC1/ST1-MRSA-V isolates exhibited spa type, t6811. One isolate carried fusc and exhibited resistance to fusidic acid at MIC 32 μg/mL. MDR pattern was detected among these isolates. Both isolates were identified to be biofilm producers albeit weakly. Toxin gene differs from those detected in CC1/ST772-MRSA-V found among the CC1/ST1-MRSA-V isolates, namely, sec. All the isolates exhibited erythromycin resistance encoded by erm(C).

CC5

All CC5/ST5-MRSA-IV isolates were assigned to single spa type t002. This isolates carried the enterotoxin genes sea (42.9%, 3/7) and sed + seg (42.9%, 3/7) and the toxin tst (42.9%, 3/7). Among the CC5/ST5-MRSA-IV isolates, resistance to erythromycin encoded by erm(A), tetracycline encoded by tet(M), and mupirocin encoded by mupA was common. Five of HLMUPR strains, which harbored the mupA gene, belonged to this CC (41.7%, 5/12). Nearly 60% of all isolates that occurred in these clones showed moderate biofilm formation. The remaining 40% were not able to produce biofilm. The top three adhesion-related genes among CC5 isolates were clfA (100%, 9/9), clfB (77.8%, 7/9), ebp (75%, 6/9), and cna (75%, 6/9). Of nine CC5 isolates, icaA and icaD were found in seven isolates, whereas icaB and icaC were detected in six isolates. The other CC5 genotypes identified (CC5/ST225-MRSA-II) were assigned to spa type t045, which exhibited resistance to multiple antibiotics including aminoglycosides resistance encoded by ant (4′)-Ia (2) and aac (6)-Ie/aph (2′′) genes. tst encoding gene was detected in all isolates. All CC5/ST225-MRSA-II showed strong biofilm formation. The predominant prophage profile was SGF + SGFa + SGFb.

CC8

In this study, CC8 was represented by ST8-MRSA-IV (29.6%, 13/44), ST239-MRSA-III (65.9%, 29/44), and ST585-MRSA-III (4.5%, 4/44). spa types t008 (61.5%, 8/13) and t064 (38.5%, 5/13) predominated among the CC8/ST8-MRSA-IV isolates. Among 13 ST8-MRSA-IV strains, 8 isolates harbored the arcA and opp3AB genes and confirmed as USA300. The majority of CC/ST8-MRSA-IV (USA300), as a major global epidemic clone that has been noticed for its rapidity dissemination within the community and hospitals isolates, exhibited resistance to aminoglycosides encoded by aph (3)-IIIa (61.5%, 8/13). Resistance to erythromycin encoded by erm(C) (38.5%, 5/13) and tetracycline encoded by tet(M) (38.5%, 5/13) was also detected in this genotype. Six strains belonging to CC/ST8-MRSA-IV clone demonstrated the HLMUPR phenotype and carried mupA gene. The findings showed that the majority of the isolates (77%, 10/13) was able to produce biofilm, although at different intensities. Nine isolates in this clone harbored the pvl genes (69.2%); the rest of four isolates carried the sed gene (30.8%).

The majority of CC8/ST239-MRSA-III isolates were assigned to spa type t037 (37.9%, 11/29), followed by t030 (31.1%, 9/29), t631 (13.8%, 4/29), t860 (10.3%, 3/29), and t388 (6.9%, 2/29). Resistance to multiple antibiotics simultaneously was identified in this genotype. Fusidic acid resistance encoded by fusc (6.9%, 2/29); tetracycline resistance encoded by tet(K) (41.4%, 12/29); aminoglycoside resistance encoded by ant (4′)-Ia (58.6%, 17/29), aac (6)-Ie/aph (2′′) (37.9%, 11/29), and aph (3)-IIIa (6.9%, 2/29); and mupirocin resistance encoded by mupA (6.9%, 2/29) were also noted. Almost more than half of the isolates carried sea (55.2%, 16/29), 48.3% (14/29) carried tst, and 17.2% (5/29) carried sec only three isolates harboring seg gene. All three ST239-SCCmec III/t860 isolates carried eta and demonstrated the LLMUPR phenotype. The CC8/ST239-MRSA-III isolates displayed high levels of biofilm production (86.2%, 25/29). Regarding the biofilm-related genes, the icaD (70.5%, 31/44) was common, followed by icaA (68.2%, 30/44), icaB (68.2%, 30/44), and icaC (61.4%, 27/44). The top three adhesion-related genes among CC8 isolates were clfA (100%, 44/44), clfB (86.4%, 38/44), and cna (86.4%, 38/44).

Two remaining CC8/ST585-MRSA-III isolates were assigned to spa type t713 and carried multiple resistance genes, that is, tet(M), erm(C), and enterotoxin genes see. Both of these strains indicated strong biofilm formation. The majority of the CC8 isolates was found to harbor SGF + SGFa + SGFb proghages.

CC15

The five CC15/ST15 MRSA-IV isolates identified revealed the same spa, coa, agr, and prophage profile. Fewer than half of the isolates were resistant to fusidic acid encoded by fusB. All CC15/ST15 MRSA-IV isolates carried pvl genes. More than half of the isolates were biofilm producers. All CC15 isolates were positive for fnbB gene, and 80% of the isolates were found to carry all of the biofilm-related genes (icaA-D). One isolate was found to carry none of the tested ica genes. All of the CC15 isolates possessed SGA + SGF + SGFa + SGFb + SGL prophage profile.

CC22

Three spa types t852, t790, and t005 and two spa types t005, t1869 predominated among the CC22/ST22-MRSA-IV isolates (44.4%, 8/18) and CC22/ST22-MSSA (55.6%, 10/18) isolates. Among the MRSA isolates, resistance to erythromycin encoded by erm(C) and aminoglycosides encoded by aac (6)-Ie/aph (2′′) were prevalent, whereas in MSSA isolates resistance to tetracycline encoded by tet(M) and that to aminoglycosides encoded by ant (4)-Ia (3) were common. All the MRSA isolates were biofilm producers, whereas in MSSA isolates half of the isolates were able to produce biofilm. The results indicated that adhesion genes clfA and clfB were detected in all of the MRSA strains, and the most common ica genes were icaA and icaB. All the MSSA isolates carried clfA, clfB, and fnbB simultaneously, and icaA and icaD were the most prevalent biofilm-related genes. The isolates identified as CC22/ST22-MRSA-IV isolates showed a prevalence of 37.5% (3/8) for the pvl and tst genes. One isolate carried sea gene (12.5%, 1/8). The sec gene (30%, 3/10) was the only toxin gene detected among CC22/ST22-MSSA isolates. The carriage of pvl genes was more common among MRSA isolates than among MSSA isolates. The SGB + SGF + SGFa + SGFb prophage profile was detected in the majority of CC22 isolates.

CC30

CC/ST30 isolates were found in both MRSA and MSSA isolates. Among MSRA isolates, the most predominant spa types were t605 and t019, representing 40% (2/5) and 60% (3/5) of isolates. Multiple resistance genes including erm(C), aac (6)-Ie/aph (2′′), aph (3)-IIIa, and tet(M) were identified among tested isolates. More than half of the CC/ST30-MRSA-IV isolates carried pvl, whereas isolates harboring sea were at a relatively low frequency. All CC/ST30-MRSA-IV isolates displayed agr type III and coa type II. Four isolates (80%) were able to produce biofilm, and the remaining 20% were non–biofilm producers. All the MRSA isolates carried biofilm (icaA, icaB, icaC, and icaD) and adhesion (clfA, clfB, and fnbB) related genes. In all the MSSA strains, fnbA, cna, and icaA genes were detected. Among MSSA isolates, spa types t021 and t318 represented 70% (7/10) and 30% (3/10) of isolates. Nearly 90% (9/10) of the CC/ST30-MSSA isolates could form biofilm at different intensities. Various prophage patterns with the majority of SGB (60%, 6/10) were identified among MSSA isolates. The majority of CC/ST30-MSSA isolates exhibited erythromycin resistance encoded by erm(B) (80%, 8/10), and erm(C) (50%, 5/10). The pvl and sed encoding genes were the only toxins produced by this genotype. The SGA + SGB + SGF + SGFa + SGFb + SGL was found as the most predominant prophage profile among CC/ST30-MRSA-IV isolates.

CC45

All ST45-MRSA-IV isolates were assigned a spa type t038, agr I, and coa V. The isolates that exhibited resistance to multiple antibiotics were confirmed among these isolates. More than half of them (60%) were biofilm producers. All of these isolates carried icaB, clfA, clfB, and fnbB encoding genes simultaneously. All ST45-MRSA-IV isolates possessed erm(A) gene. The carriage of aac (6′)-Ie/aph (2′′) gene was found in 60% of isolates. The enterotoxin gene sec was present in 80% of isolates. Among prophage patterns, the SGF + SGFa + SGFb was common.

CC59

Two CC5 MRSA isolates were detected as one with ST59 and another one with ST338. All CC59 isolates indicated a single spa type, t437, coa type VI, and SGB-SGF-SGFa-SGFb phage pattern. All CC59/ST59 isolates were discriminated into SCCmec types IV. Two-thirds of ST59-MRSA-IV isolates carried seb gene; however, no other toxin genes were identified. Three isolates accounting for half (50%) of the entire ST59-MRSA-IV isolates were non–biofilm producers, and only one isolate showed strong biofilm formation. Results also demonstrated that the icaA, icaD, clfA, and clfB genes were detected in all of the CC59 isolates. Almost one-fifth of these isolates were resistant to fusidic acid encoded by fusB gene. Four and two ST59-MRSA-IV isolates carried erm(C) (66.7%) and erm(B) (33.3%), respectively. All CC59/ST338 isolates were assigned into an SCCmec type III. Half of CC59/ST338-MRSA-III isolates harbored see encoding gene. Other toxin-encoding genes were not noticed. The predominant isolates carried erm(B) (75%, 3/4), and aminoglycoside resistance encoded by aph (3)-IIIa was also common among these isolates (50%, 2/4). All of the CC59 isolates possessed SGB + SGF + SGFa + SGFb prophage profile.

CC80

The CC80 isolates exhibited different spa types including t044 (66.7%, 8/12), t131 (33.3%, 4/12). All the ST80-MRSA-IV isolates assigned agr III and coa II. One-fourth of isolates were categorized as non–biofilm producers. The results exhibited that the clfA and clfB genes were explored in the entire CC80 isolates. The gene encoding for icaD (91.7%, 11/12) was the most prevalent biofilm-related gene among isolates.

The carriage of pvl genes was confirmed in one-third of tested isolates. Resistances to aminoglycosides encoded by ant (4′)-Ia (41.7) and aac (6)-Ie/aph (2′′) (33.3), erythromycin encoded by erm(A), and fusidic acid encoded by fusB were common. The most prevalent prophage pattern was SGA + SGB + SGF + SGFa + SGFb + SGL.

Discussion

This cross-sectional study provided several novel findings regarding the prevalence and genetic diversity of iMLSB-positive S. aureus strains isolated from clinical samples. It was observed that there was approximately a threefold increase in the prevalence of iMLSB S. aureus strains, from 7.5 to 21.7%, between 2013 and 2018. In contrast, Chavez-Bueno et al. (2005) suggested a significant decline in the trend for the prevalence of iMLSB phenotype from 93% in 1999 to 7% in 2002. Although our results markedly exhibited an increase in the prevalence of the inducible resistance among clinical S. aureus isolates in Iran, enhanced clinical and laboratory awareness of inducible resistance may also be responsible for this rise. Molecular epidemiology and prevalence of inducible resistance among S. aureus strains change geographically and dynamically (Monecke et al., 2011; Boswihi et al., 2016). In this experiment, the prevalence of iMLSB among S. aureus was found to be 10.9% with 84.1% MRSA and 15.9% MSSA isolates exhibiting iMLSB. This prevalence was lower than the rates reported from Nepal (21%) (Adhikari et al., 2017) and Jordan (76.7%) (Aqel et al., 2017), whereas it was higher than Brazil (7.9%) (Bottega et al., 2014). However, variable rates of iMLSB among S. aureus isolates have been reported in previously published data from Iran ranging from 4.1 to 20.7% (Memariani et al., 2009; Khashei et al., 2018). Regarding the increasing incidence of inducible resistance, our study suggests the necessity to revise the prescription of macrolides, which could cause a decline in resistance patterns. The investigated population and the prevalence of different clones in across various regions of the world could likely explain the striking differences in inducible clindamycin resistance.

In the present experiment, 18.3% of isolates tested were found to be resistant to mupirocin. This prevalence is higher than that reported rate in Jordan (5%) (Aqel et al., 2012) and other reports in France (2.2%) (Desroches et al., 2013) and Greece (1.6%) (Petinaki et al., 2004). A research performed by Abbasi-Montazeri et al. (2013) in Iran notified that 6% of S. aureus strains obtained from burn patients were detected as mupirocin-resistant. A high prevalence of resistance to mupirocin in this experiment indicates that there are unrestricted policies in the use of mupirocin for long periods and/or increasing trends of mupirocin prescription in our setup. Furthermore, we observed that 9.6 and 8.7% isolates had HLMUPR and LLMUPR phenotypes, respectively, which are higher than the rate stated in France (0.8%) (Desroches et al., 2013) and Korea (5%) (Yun et al., 2003). Different prevalence rates of HLMUPR S. aureus were reported from other researchers in Iran, 25% by Shahsavan et al. (2012) and 17% by Abbasi-Montazeri et al. (2013). We found that 9.5% of the examined isolates carried mupA gene, and all of them exhibited an HLMUPR phenotype. Researches from Spain (González-Domínguez et al., 2016) (27.2%) and Iran (Abbasi-Montazeri et al., 2013) (34%) revealed a higher rate of this gene among their S. aureus strains. Contrary to the study of Shahsavan et al. (2012), reporting mupA gene only in MRSA strains with cMLSB phenotype, the present data showed the existence of mupA gene in inducible resistance MRSA strains.

This study indicated that of 126 inducible clindamycin-resistant S. aureus isolates, 5.6% were fusidic acid–resistant, which was similar to those in Canada (7%) and Australia (7%); nonetheless, it was far lower than the values previously reported in Greece (62.4%) and Ireland (19.9%) (Castanheira et al., 2010a, b). In a multicenter experiment performed from 2007 to 2011 in three referral hospitals in Tehran, Iran, of 726 tested S. aureus isolates, 3% of isolates were found to be resistant to fusidic acid (Deotale et al., 2010). In our collections, we found that fusB and fusC were present in six strains and one strain, respectively. A previously studied experiment from China noted a higher rate of fusB gene (10.5%); on the other hand, fusC and fusA genes were not present in any of tested isolates (Yu et al., 2015). These data highlighted that fusB is the predominant determinant responsible for resistance to fusidic acid among S. aureus in Iran. According to previously published data, different fusidic acid resistance rates were reported in both MRSA and MSSA strains. Notably, this study showed that fusidic acid resistance was only seen among MRSA isolates, which were in line with a report of China indicating that the prevalence of fusidic acid resistance among MRSA isolates was significantly higher than that among MSSA isolates (Yu et al., 2015).

According to the evidence, the ability to produce biofilm among S. aureus is diverse, with data ranging within 43 to 88% (Luther et al., 2018). Our results showed that, of the 126 isolates under investigation, 77% of strains could produce biofilm, whereas 23% were confirmed as non–biofilm producer strains. This finding is similar to those in Egypt (83.3%) (Gad et al., 2009), whereas based on a study of Iran biofilm production reported rate was 38.7% (a twofold decrease) (Mirzaee et al., 2014). In this study, the biofilm formability of MRSA isolates (78.3%) was higher than that of MSSA isolates (70%). Apparently, high capability of biofilm formation among MRSA strains was described by conducted studies from India (57.6%) (Mathur et al., 2006), China (66%) (Wang et al., 2010), and South Africa (37.8%) (Samie and Shivambu, 2011).

Data obtained from different studies suggest that the ability of biofilm formation in S. aureus strains is attributed to the expression of a wide range of virulence and adhesion factors of this bacterium (Nemati et al., 2009; Samie and Shivambu, 2011; Luther et al., 2018), but the correlation between the existence of specific virulence factor and biofilm production has been controversial. Researches has shown that ica ABCD and adhesion genes can affect the biofilm formation ability in S. aureus. In this study, the most frequent ica genes were icaD (73%), followed by icaA (71.4%), icaB (60.3%), and icaC (53.2%). According to an analysis by Mirzaee et al. (2014) on 31 clinical S. aureus isolates, icaD, icaA, and icaC genes with the exception of icaB were found in more than half of the isolates tested. In the study of Yousefi et al. (2016), of 39 isolates of S. aureus recovered from UTI patients, 69.2% were biofilm producers, and it was notable that all isolates carried icaA, fnbA, and clfA genes. In the current study, a high percentage of icaABCD genes made up 39.7% of the overall sample, which was close to a recent report in Iran (38.7%) (Mirzaee et al., 2014). The correlation between biofilm formation and the presence of adhesion genes is well established. In present survey, the most prevalent gene was clfA (93.7%), followed by clfB (87.3), fnbB (61.9%), cna (57.9%), fnbA (54%), ebp (50%), and bap (3.2%), respectively. The attained data are consistent with a previous finding from Iran, which has displayed the role of the bap gene in biofilm production rarely. Our findings indicated that isolates with more adhesion and ica encoding genes were strictly associated with biofilm formation. Overall, our data confirmed the high ability of biofilm formation among inducible resistance S. aureus strains, which helps S. aureus to persist in infections. This scenario draws attention from clinicians to use treatment protocols in patients potentially infected with these bacteria.

Based on the results of coa typing, the top three coa types were III (44.4%), II (28.6%), and IVa (9.5%). This result was in contrast with the previous report by Hirose et al. (2010) in Japan, which indicated that coa types II, VII, and I accounted for 91.9%, 3.9%, and 1.7% of isolates. We detected seven SC types (I–VI) among iMLSB S. aureus strains suggesting diverse genetic backgrounds of tested isolates in this region of Iran. In a research involving 157 S. aureus strains from clinical specimens, nine different patterns of coa gene were detected (Afrough et al., 2013). These findings were confirmed by results in Thailand (Janwithayanuchit et al., 2006) and Egypt (Omar et al., 2014) reported previously. Genetic variability in coa gene among studied isolates indicated that it could not be a predictor for specific iMLSB S. aureus strains.

In the present study, the findings revealed that seven different prophage profiles were identified in the isolates studied. A high diversity of prophage patterns among S. aureus isolates has been reported from the United States (Workman et al., 2006), Czech Republic (Pantůček et al., 2004) and Iran (Rahimi et al., 2012). Our data exhibited that SGFa-SGFb (36.5%) and SGB-SGFa-SGFb (31.7%) were the major prophage profiles, which was in accordance with the study of Rahimi et al. (2012). SGF-type prophages are associated with the immune evasion cluster typical for S. aureus isolated from humans (Kahánková et al., 2010). SGA has been reported to be common among pvl-positive MRSA-IV isolates. This finding was consistent with previous research, revealing that all the pvl-positive isolates harbored SGA prophage type (Rahimi et al., 2012). Notably, the PVL was the most frequently encoded toxin in the tested isolates (23.8%). Previously published data from England and the United States (Holmes et al., 2005) indicated that the prevalence of pvl encoding genes among S. aureus was low (1.6%). Nevertheless, previous reports all over the world had shown a high prevalence of pvl among S. aureus strains (Monecke et al., 2011; Boswihi et al., 2016; Goudarzi et al., 2016a). In Iran, the pvl-positive rate ranged from 7.4 to 55.6% in S. aureus isolates. In our research, a relatively low but increasing prevalence of pvl-positive S. aureus strains was noted. According to our report, a recent study from Ireland showed an ascending trend of pvl among MRSA strains (from 0.2 to 8.8%), whereas this trend was diminishing for MSSA strains (20–2.5%) (Shore et al., 2014). Although this difference can, to some extent, reflect the origin of isolates and the type of sample, this could also be because of different pvl-encoding phages among S. aureus strains.

Considering the genes encoding enterotoxins, the data analysis of the current study exhibited that 54.8% of isolates carried one or more SE genes, with the sea (19.8%) and sec (11.1%) genes being the most commonly found. The attained data are consistent with the reports previously obtained from Iran and Turkey estimating enterotoxigenic S. aureus strains in 45 and 62.6% of isolates tested, respectively (Imanifooladi et al., 2007; Aydin et al., 2011). Based on earlier studies, the she, sei, and sej encoding genes were rarely present in S. aureus isolated from clinical samples, and similarly, these genes were not detected in the present survey either.

The present study displayed diversity in the numbers and the molecular types of iMLSB S. aureus clones identified in our health care settings. According to the current results, CC8 was the most prevalent clone in both CO and HO S. aureus isolates. The prevalence of CC8 was increased from 2013–2014 (20%) to 2017–2018 (39.5%). These strains were found in association with pvl-encoding bacteriophage and HLMUPR, which carried mupA gene, which is similar to those reported in Iran (Azimian et al., 2014), Kuwait (Boswihi et al., 2016), and Ireland (Shore et al., 2014). According to evidence, phenotypic and genotypic resistance pattern in the ST8-IV isolates was found to be varied. In accordance with our research, high resistance to aminoglycosides and low resistance to tetracycline in ST8-MRSA isolates were described previously by researchers (Shore et al., 2014; Boswihi et al., 2016). The enterotoxin gene sed was the solo toxin gene detected among the ST8-IV isolates. Variability in the enterotoxin genes within ST8-IV isolates was reported by several investigators (Shore et al., 2014; Boswihi et al., 2016). The detection of the ST8-IV isolates in our study is of concern and highlights transmissibility and rapidity of its spread as an international epidemic MRSA clone in Iran.

ST239-MRSA-III, one of the most successful and persistent clones, was the most predominant genotype in CC8. Multiresistant ST239 clone was previously reported in South American, European, and some Asian countries, including Kuwait and Saudi Arabia (Shore et al., 2014; Boswihi et al., 2016). In this study, ST239 had five important spa types (t030, t037, t631, t860, and 388). The data in this experiment indicated that half of ST239-SCCmec III/t631 strains exhibited HLMUPR phenotype and harbored mupA gene. These findings are in parallel with previous reports from Iran (Goudarzi et al., 2016a) and those reported in India and Kuwait (Abimanyu et al., 2012; Boswihi et al., 2016). All ST239-SCCmec III/t860 strains exhibited the LLMUPR phenotype, which was similar to findings in other countries including China and Kuwait (Boswihi et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2018). According to the molecular typing results, ST239-SCCmec III/030 with 20.5% and ST239-SCCmec III/037 with 25% were recognized as the most common multiresistant ST239- MRSA-III type. These results were consistent with previous research performed by Li et al. (2018), who demonstrated multiresistant ST239-SCCmec III/030 as the most predominant genotype in China from 2005 to 2013, which decreased significantly in 2016. During a 12-year period in Norway, Fossum and Bukholm (2006) indicated ST239 as the most prevalent MRSA clones, which became endemic in hospital environments in Norway. However, molecular characteristics, especially antibiotic resistance gene and virulence factors, of our ST239-MRSA-III strains were similar to those of ST239 strains reported in Kuwait, China, and Saudi Arabia (Lewis and Jorgensen, 2005; Boswihi et al., 2016). The emergence of ST239-MRSA-III may be due to the import of this clone from neighboring countries.

Increasing prevalence rate of CC8 and disappearance of CC22 between 2013 and 2018 highlighted replacement and the changing clonal structure of MRSA in this region of Iran. As summarized in Table 5, pvl encoding genes were detected in two isolates of ST22-SCCmec IV/t852 and one isolate of ST22-SCCmec IV/t005. These pvl-positive genotypes were mainly distributed at some geographic area including England, Australia, Ireland, Kuwait, Iran, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Nepal (Monecke et al., 2011; Shore et al., 2014; Boswihi et al., 2016). Of note, the majority of the ST22-SCCmec IV/t790 isolates was related to the tst gene, demonstrated LLMUPR phenotype, and could exhibit multiresistance. A recent report in Ireland also displayed that most of pvl-positive ST22-MRSA-IV isolates were associated with resistance to gentamicin, trimethoprim, and ciprofloxacin and carried the erm(C), lnu(A), aacA-aphD, aadD, and mupA genes (Shore et al., 2014).

The ST22-MSSA isolates exhibited different antimicrobial resistance patterns including resistance to penicillin, gentamicin, tetracycline, kanamycin, rifampin, tobramycin, and amikacin. Our data are in concordance with a study conducted in Ireland, which reported the prevalence of low frequency of ST22-MSSA/t005 and ST22-MSSA/t1869 strains during the study period from 2002 to 2011. They indicated that ST22-MSSA was resistant to amikacin, ampicillin, fusidic acid, gentamycin, kanamycin, and tobramycin with multiple resistance genes blaZ, aacA-aphD, and dfrS1 detected among these isolates (Shore et al., 2014).

Our data showed that 40% of the CC/ST30 isolates carried pvl, which belonged to MRSA and MSSA strains. PVL-positive CC30/ST30-IV strains have been described in Iran (Goudarzi et al., 2016a, b), Kuwait (Boswihi et al., 2016), and Ireland (Shore et al., 2014). Importantly, the prevalence of CC30/ST30 increased from 8% in 2013 to 18.4% in 2018 in our country. In this connection, Boswihi et al. exhibited ST30 as the second dominant MRSA genotypes in Kuwait hospitals, which decreased from 30% in 2001–2003 to 22% in 2006. They also showed a low prevalence of ST30-IV-MRSA among tested isolates (2.9%) (Boswihi et al., 2016). Surprisingly, all MRSA isolates carried biofilm and adhesion-related genes, and approximately 90% of the MSSA isolates were able to form biofilm at different intensities. In line with our study, Chamon et al. (2015) from Brazil showed biofilm production ability among ST30 strains. They also found bbp gene as a possible marker of this lineage. Congruent with the previous observations (Shore et al., 2014; Boswihi et al., 2016), all of our ST30 isolates belonged to agr type III, with different toxin and antimicrobial resistance patterns noted for this genotype.

As aforementioned, fewer than half of the CC/ST80-MRSA-IV isolates showed aminoglycoside resistance encoded by ant (4′)-Ia, aac (6)-Ie/aph (2′′). Resistance to fusidic acid encoded by fusB was detected in one isolate. These results were different from a previous study conducted in Ireland, which exhibited all CC/ST80-MRSA-IV isolates were resistant to kanamycin and neomycin, encoded by aph (3)-IIIa. In addition, our data revealed that resistances to tetracycline, fusidic acid, and erythromycin encoded by tet(K), fusB, and erm(C), respectively, were frequent among tested isolates (Shore et al., 2014). The variations could be a result of differences in the genetic backgrounds of the S. aureus strains. The prevalence of CC/ST80-MRSA-IV increased from 12% in 2013 to 13.2% in 2018. This increasing rate of ST80-IV raises the concern that this strain is becoming endemic in our hospitals.

Based on the evidence, ST80-IV is acknowledged as a toxigenic virulent isolate. In the present study, pvl-positive CC/ST80-SCCmec/t044 isolates were confirmed by approximately half of the isolates. ST80-MRSA-MRSA isolates harboring the pvl genes were previously reported from Kuwait, Malaysia, Singapore, and Ireland (Shore et al., 2014; Boswihi et al., 2016).

According to previously published data, CC/ST59 has limited geographical spread. In the present research CC/ST59 was present in 10 isolates, accounting for 7.9%. This clone was previously reported in Australia, Ireland, United Kingdom, Korea, Kuwait, and Taiwan (Monecke et al., 2011; Boswihi et al., 2016). In this study, the results revealed that our isolates carried resistance genes at a relatively low level, but erm(C) encoding resistance to erythromycin was noted in more than half of the isolates. Conversely, high frequencies of multiple resistance genes including erm(B), aph (3)-IIIa, and tet(K) were identified among tested isolates of a study performed in Ireland (Shore et al., 2014). Notably, resistance to fusidic acid encoded by fusB was also detected in one isolate, which was similar to the previous report from Ireland (Shore et al., 2014). According to this experiment, 66.7% of the isolates were positive for seb (60.4%) gene. This is inconsistent with the research conducted in Ireland showing that seb gene could be a possible marker of this lineage. The observed frequency of CC59/ST338-SCCmecIII/t437 isolates was in accordance with previous reports, as this genotype is infrequently isolated (Li et al., 2013).

Another clone found among inducible resistance S. aureus strains was ST5-SCCmec IV/t002 (7.1%). Recent studies have shown the presence of CC/ST5- SCCmecIV/t002 clones in Asian and European countries, such as Iran, Japan, Korea, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Ireland, and Australia (Monecke et al., 2011; Boswihi et al., 2016). The present data indicated that the prevalence of CC/ST5- SCCmecIV/t002 diminished during the study from 8% in 2013–2014 to 2.6% in 2017–2018. Conversely, a recent cross-sectional study performed in New Zealand on 3,323 patients from 2005 to 2011 documented seven most frequent MRSA clones. This study also indicated an ST5-SCCmecIV clone, which rapidly displaced ST30-SCCmecIV as the dominant CA-MRSA clone (Williamson et al., 2013). It was also observed that nearly half of ST5-SCCmecIV/t002 isolates were confirmed as HLMUPR strains. The finding of CC/ST5- SCCmecIV/t002 isolates in our screening indicated that resistance was observed for erythromycin encoded by erm(A), tetracycline encoded by tet(M), and mupirocin encoded by mupA. In an experiment conducted in 2010 in China, Song et al. (2013) revealed a different result. They showed a high prevalence of ST5-SCCmecIV/t002 among their clinical S. aureus isolates.

As shown in Table 5, the CC1 isolates belonged to two STs (ST772 and ST1). spa types t10795 and t657 pertained to ST772, whereas spa type t6811 was identified in ST1 isolates. ST772- SCCmecV, which is known as Bengal Bay clone, emerged in Bangladesh and was reported in New Zealand, Nepal, Italy, the United Arab Emirates, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, India, Australia, and Kuwait (Monecke et al., 2011; Shore et al., 2014; Boswihi et al., 2016). This clone was found in 6.4% of the examined isolates. All isolates were multiresistant and carried aac (6)-Ie/aph (2″), aph (3)-IIIa, tet(M), and erm(B). The attained data are in accordance to results of the study of Shore et al. (2014), which reported MDR pattern and carriage of ant (4)-Ia, aac (6)-Ie/aph (2″), and tet(M) genes among CC1/ST772-SCCmecV isolates. The study demonstrated similarities in genetic characteristics including susceptibility to antibiotics and toxin-encoding genes of our ST772-SCCmecV isolates recently reported in Kuwait (Boswihi et al., 2016). Of two CC1/ST1-SCCmecV/t6811 isolates, one isolate carried fusc and exhibited resistance to fusidic acid at MIC 32 μg/mL. Boswihi et al. (2016) previously reported ST1-SCCmecV/t6811 carrying fusC gene from Kuwait.

In contrast to our study, which reported a low prevalence of ST15 (4%), a recent multicenter study performed in 25 European countries documented a relatively high prevalence of ST15 and reported it as the second most frequent clone across most of the European countries (Grundmann et al., 2014). In a study of 568 S. aureus isolates in 11 European countries, researchers reported a low level of this type among the tested isolates (Rolo et al., 2012). Our data demonstrated that all the ST15 isolates were pvl-positive and displayed the LLMUPR phenotype. The analysis of our previous study indicated that the most common mupirocin-resistant MRSA isolates belonged to ST15-SCCmec IV/t084 (Goudarzi et al., 2017), which is in line with the present data. Although ST15 is more frequently detected in MRSA, there are reports that indicate the high distribution of this type among MSSA strains (Monecke et al., 2011; Boswihi et al., 2016). It was notable that all ST15 isolates harbored SCCmec IV, agr type II, and coa type I and belonged to spa type t084. Different antimicrobial resistance patterns were noted among these isolates, which is in accordance with previous studies (Rolo et al., 2012; Grundmann et al., 2014; Goudarzi et al., 2017).

In contrast to a study conducted in Kuwait, which reported CC45 as one of the most epidemics MRSA isolates with different antimicrobial resistance patterns, in the current research, a low frequency of the CC45 (4%) was observed among examined isolates. In a study conducted in the South of Poland, 26.1% of S. aureus isolates were found to be related to CC45 (Ilczyszyn et al., 2016). This ST was at its most prevalent in 2015, when it accounted for 22.2% (4/18) of inducible resistance isolates, reduced to 4.2% (1/24) in 2016, and disappeared in 2017–2018.

The strengths of our research included examining the prevalence and temporal differences in iMLSB S. aureus strains. It was the first study on the molecular characterization of inducible clindamycin-resistant S. aureus strains from Iran. However, the present research had limitations. One limitation of our study was the modest sample size and the impossibility of using typing methods such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). It was not possible either to correlate demographics data with circulating clones owing to a lack of data linking patient characteristics. Another important limitation of our study was clfA- and clfB-negative S. aureus strains, which were unusual and required further analysis using whole-genome sequencing and microarray system.

Conclusion

This was the first report of monitoring the prevalence and characterization of S. aureus isolates with the inducible resistance phenotype in Iran. Our investigation supports a detailed epidemiological survey on the prevalence and temporal differences in iMLSB S. aureus strains. It was ultimately attained that there is a considerable increasing trend for CC8 versus a decreasing trend for CC22. However, we revealed a shift in the clonal composition of MRSA isolates over time with the emphasis on a progressive replacement of CC22 clone by CC8 clones between 2013 and 2018. Indeed, our research indicated that iMLSB S. aureus isolates with similar genetic backgrounds exhibited specific virulence gene profiles, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and biofilm patterns. Increase in S. aureus with inducible resistance phenotype harboring SCCmecIV during the 5-year period makes sense that there is a shift in the iMLSB population from our community to hospital. Therefore, we conclude that there is a need for ongoing and nationwide surveillance studies to further evaluate of S. aureus with inducible resistance phenotype and to prevent these strains from becoming endemic in the Iranian hospitals.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The current study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran (IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1396.700). Written informed consent was obtained from participants.

Author Contributions

MG and HG conceived, designed, and supervised the study. MD, RaP, MN, MF, MM, SS, and AA performed the experiments. NK, RoP, and MG analyzed and interpreted the data. MG, HG, NK, SS, and RoP drafted and written the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported financially by the grant (No. 12688) from Research Deputy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Edet E. Udo (Kuwait University) and Dr. Agnes Marie Sá Figueiredo (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) for providing reference strains of the S. aureus.

Footnotes

  1. ^ http://www.spaserver.ridom.de
  2. ^ https://pubmlst.org/

References

Abbasi-Montazeri, E., Khosravi, A. D., Feizabadi, M. M., Goodarzi, H., Khoramrooz, S. S., Mirzaii, M., et al. (2013). The prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates with high-level mupirocin resistance from patients and personnel in a burn center. Burns 39, 650–654. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abimanyu, N., Murugesan, S., and Krishnan, P. (2012). Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST239 with high-level mupirocin and inducible clindamycin resistance in a tertiary care center in Chennai. South India. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 3412–3413. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01663-12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adhikari, R., Shrestha, S., Barakoti, A., and Amatya, R. (2017). Inducible clindamycin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital. Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC. Infect. Dis. 17:483. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2584-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Afrough, P., Pourmand, M. R., Sarajian, A. A., Saki, M., and Saremy, S. (2013). Molecular investigation of Staphylococcus aureus, coa and spa genes in Ahvaz hospitals, staff nose compared with patients clinical samples. Jundishapur. J. Microbiol. 6:e5377.

Google Scholar

Aqel, A., Alzoubi, H., and Al-Zereini, W. (2017). Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the first study in Jordan. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 11, 350–354. doi: 10.3855/jidc.8316

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aqel, A., Ibrahim, A., and Shehabi, A. (2012). Rare occurrence of mupirocin resistance among clinical Staphylococcus isolates in Jordan. Acta Microbiol. Immun. Hung 59, 239–247. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.59.2012.2.8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arciola, C. R., Campoccia, D., Gamberini, S., Cervellati, M., Donati, E., and Montanaro, L. J. B. (2002). Detection of slime production by means of an optimised Congo red agar plate test based on a colourimetric scale in Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates genotyped for ica locus. Biomaterials 23, 4233–4239. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00171-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aydin, A., Sudagidan, M., and Muratoglu, K. (2011). Prevalence of staphylococcal enterotoxins, toxin genes and genetic-relatedness of foodborne Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in the Marmara Region of Turkey. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 148, 99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.05.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Azimian, A., Havaei, S. A., Ghazvini, K., Khosrojerdi, M., Naderi, M., and Samiee, S. M. (2014). Isolation of PVL/ACME-positive, community acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (USA300) from Iran. J. Med. Microbiol. 2, 100–104.

Google Scholar

Boswihi, S. S., Udo, E. E., and Al-Sweih, N. (2016). Shifts in the clonal distribution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Kuwait hospitals: 1992-2010. PLoS One 11:e0162744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162744

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bottega, A., Rodrigues, M. D. A., Carvalho, F. A., Wagner, T. F., Leal, I. A. S., Santos, S. O. D., et al. (2014). Evaluation of constitutive and inducible resistance to clindamycin in clinical samples of Staphylococcus aureus from a tertiary hospital. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 47, 589–592. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0140-2014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boye, K., Bartels, M. D., Andersen, I. S., Moeller, J. A., and Westh, H. (2007). A new multiplex PCR for easy screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec types I–V. J. Clin. Microbiol. 13, 725–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01720.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castanheira, M., Watters, A. A., Bell, J. M., Turnidge, J. D., and Jones, R. N. (2010a). Fusidic acid resistance rates and prevalence of resistance mechanisms among Staphylococcus spp. isolated in North America and Australia, 2007-2008. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 54, 3614–3617. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01390-09

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castanheira, M., Watters, A. A., Mendes, R. E., Farrell, D. J., and Jones, R. N. (2010b). Occurrence and molecular characterization of fusidic acid resistance mechanisms among Staphylococcus spp. from European countries (2008). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65, 1353–1358. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq094

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chamon, R. C., Iorio, N. L. P., da Silva Ribeiro, S., Cavalcante, F. S., and dos Santos, K. R. N. (2015). Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes from Rio de Janeiro hospitals. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 83, 331–334. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chavez-Bueno, S., Bozdogan, B., Katz, K., Bowlware, K. L., Cushion, N., Cavuoti, D., et al. (2005). Inducible clindamycin resistance and molecular epidemiologic trends of pediatric community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Dallas. Texas. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 49, 2283–2288. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2283-2288.2005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dadashi, M., Nasiri, M. J., Fallah, F., Owlia, P., Hajikhani, B., Emaneini, M., et al. (2018). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 12, 96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deotale, V., Mendiratta, D., Raut, U., and Narang, P. (2010). Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples. Indian. J. Med. Microbiol. 28:124. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.62488

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Desroches, M., Potier, J., Laurent, F., Bourrel, A.-S., Doucet-Populaire, F., Decousser, J.-W., et al. (2013). Prevalence of mupirocin resistance among invasive coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in France: emergence of a mupirocin-resistant MRSA clone harbouring mupA. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68, 1714–1717. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt085

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diep, B. A., Stone, G. G., Basuino, L., Graber, C. J., Miller, A., des Etages, S. A., et al. (2008). The arginine catabolic mobile element and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec linkage: convergence of virulence and resistance in the USA300 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 197, 1523–1530. doi: 10.1086/587907

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enright, M. C., Day, N. P., Davies, C. E., Peacock, S. J., and Spratt, B. G. (2000). Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones ofStaphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 1008–1015.

Google Scholar

Fossum, A., and Bukholm, G. (2006). Increased incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST80, novel ST125 and SCCmecIV in the south-eastern part of Norway during a 12-year period. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12, 627–633. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01467.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gad, G. F. M., El-Feky, M. A., El-Rehewy, M. S., Hassan, M. A., Abolella, H., and El-Baky, R. M. A. (2009). Detection of icaA, icaD genes and biofilm production by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from urinary tract catheterized patients. J. Infect. Dev. Countr. 3, 342–351. doi: 10.3855/jidc.241

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilot, P., Lina, G., Cochard, T., and Poutrel, B. (2002). Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 4060–4067. doi: 10.1128/jcm.40.11.4060-4067.2002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

González-Domínguez, M., Seral, C., Potel, C., Sáenz, Y., Álvarez, M., Torres, C., et al. (2016). Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones with high-level mupirocin resistance. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 85, 213–217. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.02.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gordon, R. J., and Lowy, F. D. (2008). Pathogenesis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46(Suppl. 5), S350–S359. doi: 10.1086/533591

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goudarzi, M., Bahramian, M., Tabrizi, M. S., Udo, E. E., Figueiredo, A. M. S., Fazeli, M., et al. (2017). Genetic diversity of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from burn patients in Iran: ST239-SCCmec III/t037 emerges as the major clone. Microb. Pathog. 105, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.02.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goudarzi, M., Goudarzi, H., Figueiredo, A. M. S., Udo, E. E., Fazeli, M., Asadzadeh, M., et al. (2016a). Molecular characterization of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from intensive care units in Iran: ST22-SCCmec IV/t790 emerges as the major clone. PLoS One 11:e0155529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155529

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goudarzi, M., Seyedjavadi, S. S., Azad, M., Goudarzi, H., and Azimi, H. (2016b). Distribution of spa types, integrons and associated gene cassettes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from intensive care units of hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Arch. Clin. Infect. Dis. 11, 1–11.

Google Scholar

Gould, I. M., David, M. Z., Esposito, S., Garau, J., Lina, G., Mazzei, T., et al. (2012). New insights into meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pathogenesis, treatment and resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 39, 96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grundmann, H., Schouls, L. M., Aanensen, D. M., Pluister, G. N., Tami, A., Chlebowicz, M., et al. (2014). The dynamic changes of dominant clones of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infections in the European region: results of a second structured survey. Euro. Surveill. 19:20987. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.49.20987

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harmsen, D., Claus, H., Witte, W., Rothgänger, J., Claus, H., Turnwald, D., et al. (2003). Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 5442–5448. doi: 10.1128/jcm.41.12.5442-5448.2003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirose, M., Kobayashi, N., Ghosh, S., Paul, S. K., Shen, T., Urushibara, N., et al. (2010). Identification of Staphylocoagulase Genotypes I-X and Discrimination of Type IV and V Subtypes by Multiplex PCR Assay for Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 63, 257–263.

Google Scholar

Holmes, A., Ganner, M., McGuane, S., Pitt, T., Cookson, B., and Kearns, A. (2005). Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes in England and Wales: frequency, characterization, and association with clinical disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 2384–2390. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2384-2390.2005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ilczyszyn, W. M., Sabat, A. J., Akkerboom, V., Szkarlat, A., Klepacka, J., Sowa-Sierant, I., et al. (2016). Clonal structure and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains from invasive infections in paediatric patients from South Poland: association between age, spa types, clonal complexes, and genetic markers. PLoS One 11:e0151937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151937

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imanifooladi, A., Sattari, M., Peerayeh, S. N., Hassan, Z., and Hossainidoust, S. (2007). Detection the Staphylococcus aureus producing enterotoxin isolated from skin infections in hospitalized patients. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 10, 502–505.

Google Scholar

Janwithayanuchit, I., Ngam-Ululert, S., Paungmoung, P., and Rangsipanuratn, W. (2006). Epidemiologic study of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by coagulase gene polymorphism. Scienceasia 32, 127–132. doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2006.32.127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kahánková, J., Pantůček, R., Goerke, C., Růžičková, V., Holochová, P., and Doškař, J. (2010). Multilocus PCR typing strategy for differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus siphoviruses reflecting their modular genome structure. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 2527–2538. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02226.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khashei, R., Malekzadegan, Y., Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie, H., and Razavi, Z. (2018). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B resistance among clinical isolates of staphylococci in southwest of Iran. BMC. Res. Notes 11:711. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3817-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis, J. S., and Jorgensen, J. H. (2005). Inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned? Clin. Infect. Dis. 40, 280–285. doi: 10.1086/426894

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Wang, L., Ip, M., Sun, M., Sun, J., Huang, G., et al. (2013). Molecular and clinical characteristics of clonal complex 59 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Mainland China. PLoS One 8:e70602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070602

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Sun, S., Yang, C., Chen, H., Yin, Y., Li, H., et al. (2018). The changing pattern of population structure of Staphylococcus aureus from bacteremia in China from 2013 to 2016: ST239-030-MRSA replaced by ST59-t437. Front. Microbiol. 9:332. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00332

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, B., Mai, J., Liu, Y., Huang, Y., Zhong, H., Xie, Y., et al. (2018). Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from women and Children in Guangzhou. China. Front. Microbiol. 9:2790. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02790

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luther, M. K., Parente, D. M., Caffrey, A. R., Daffinee, K. E., Lopes, V. V., Martin, E. T., et al. (2018). Clinical and genetic risk factors for biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e2252–e2217. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02252-17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathur, T., Singhal, S., Khan, S., Upadhyay, D., Fatma, T., and Rattan, A. (2006). Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of staphylococci: an evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 24:25. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.19890

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Memariani, M., Pourmand, M., Shirazi, M., Dallal, M., Abdossamadi, Z., and Mardani, N. (2009). The importance of inducible clindamycin resistance in enterotoxin positive S. aureus isolated from clinical samples. Tehran. Univ. Med. J. 67, 250–256.

Google Scholar

Mirzaee, M., Najar-Peerayeh, S., Behmanesh, M., Forouzandeh-Moghadam, M., and Ghasemian, A.-M. (2014). Detection of intracellular adhesion (ica) gene and biofilm formation Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical blood cultures. J. Med. Bacteriol. 3, 1–7.

Google Scholar

Monday, S. R., and Bohach, G. A. (1999). Use of multiplex PCR to detect classical and newly described pyrogenic toxin genes in staphylococcal isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 3411–3414.

Google Scholar

Monecke, S., Coombs, G., Shore, A. C., Coleman, D. C., Akpaka, P., Borg, M., et al. (2011). A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 6:e17936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017936

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nemati, M., Hermans, K., Devriese, L. A., Maes, D., and Haesebrouck, F. (2009). Screening of genes encoding adhesion factors and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from poultry. Avian. Pathol. 38, 513–517. doi: 10.1080/03079450903349212

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nezhad, R. R., Meybodi, S. M., Rezaee, R., Goudarzi, M., and Fazeli, M. (2017). Molecular characterization and resistance profile of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in intensive care unit. Tehran-Iran. Jundishapur. J. Microbiol. 10:e41666. doi: 10.5812/jjm.41666

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Omar, N. Y., Ali, H. A. S., Harfoush, R. A. H., and El Khayat, E. H. (2014). Molecular typing of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates on the basis of protein A and coagulase gene polymorphisms. Int. J. Microbiol. 2014:650328. doi: 10.1155/2014/650328

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pantosti, A., Sanchini, A., and Monaco, M. (2007). Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Future Microbiol. 2, 323–334. doi: 10.2217/17460913.2.3.323

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pantůček, R., Doškař, J., Růžičková, V., Kašpárek, P., Oráčová, E., Kvardova, V., et al. (2004). Identification of bacteriophage types and their carriage in Staphylococcus aureus. Arch. Virol. 149, 1689–1703. doi: 10.1007/s00705-004-0335-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patel, M., Waites, K. B., Moser, S. A., Cloud, G. A., and Hoesley, C. J. (2006). Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance among community-and hospital-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 2481–2484. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02582-05

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petinaki, E., Spiliopoulou, I., Kontos, F., Maniati, M., Bersos, Z., Stakias, N., et al. (2004). Clonal dissemination of mupirocin-resistant staphylococci in Greek hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53, 105–108. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rahimi, F., Bouzari, M., Katouli, M., and Pourshafie, M. R. (2012). Prophage and antibiotic resistance profiles of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Iran. Arch. Virol. 157, 1807–1811. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1361-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolo, J., Miragaia, M., Turlej-Rogacka, A., Empel, J., Bouchami, O., Faria, N. A., et al. (2012). High genetic diversity among community-associated Staphylococcus aureus in Europe: results from a multicenter study. PLoS One 7:e34768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034768

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Samie, A., and Shivambu, N. (2011). Biofilm production and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from HIV and AIDS patients in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10, 14625–14636. doi: 10.5897/AJB11.1287

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shahsavan, S., Emaneini, M., Khoshgnab, B. N., Khoramian, B., Asadollahi, P., Aligholi, M., et al. (2012). A high prevalence of mupirocin and macrolide resistance determinant among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from burnt patients. Burns 38, 378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shore, A. C., Tecklenborg, S. C., Brennan, G. I., Ehricht, R., Monecke, S., and Coleman, D. C. (2014). Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive Staphylococcus aureus in Ireland from 2002 to 2011: 21 clones, frequent importation of clones, temporal shifts of predominant methicillin-resistant S. aureus clones, and increasing multiresistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52, 859–870. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02799-13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, Y., Du, X., Li, T., Zhu, Y., and Li, M. (2013). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from different clinical specimens of inpatients at a teaching hospital in Shanghai between 2005 and 2010. J. Med. Microbiol. 62, 274–282. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.050971-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stepanović, S., Vuković, D., Hola, V., Bonaventura, G. D., Djukić, S., Ćirković, I., et al. (2007). Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 115, 891–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Huang, G., Wang, C., Deng, L., et al. (2012). Multidrug-resistant clones of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Chinese children and the resistance genes to clindamycin and mupirocin. J. Med. Microbiol. 61, 1240–1247. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.042663-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Yu, F., Yang, L., Li, Q., Zeng, X. Z., and Xu, Y. (2010). Prevalence of virulence genes and biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates associated with lower respiratory infection. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 4, 2566–2569.

Google Scholar

Williamson, D. A., Roberts, S. A., Ritchie, S. R., Coombs, G. W., Fraser, J. D., and Heffernan, H. (2013). Clinical and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in New Zealand: rapid emergence of sequence type 5 (ST5)-SCCmec-IV as the dominant community-associated MRSA clone. PLoS One 8:e62020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Workman, M., Nigro, O. D., and Steward, G. F. (2006). Identification of prophagein Hawaiian coastal water isolate of Staphylococcus Aureus. J. Young. Investig. 15, 1–8.

Google Scholar

Yousefi, M., Pourmand, M. R., Fallah, F., Hashemi, A., Mashhadi, R., and Nazari-Alam, A. (2016). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation in urinary tract infection. Iran J. Public Health 45:485.

Google Scholar

Yu, F., Liu, Y., Lu, C., Jinnan, L., Qi, X., Ding, Y., et al. (2015). Dissemination of fusidic acid resistance among Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. BMC. Microbiol. 15:210. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0552-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yun, H.-J., Lee, S. W., Yoon, G. M., Kim, S. Y., Choi, S., Lee, Y. S., et al. (2003). Prevalence and mechanisms of low-and high-level mupirocin resistance in staphylococci isolated from a Korean hospital. J Antimicrob. Chemother. 51, 619–623. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg140

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: methicillin-resistant S. aureus, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, inducible resistance, staphylocoagulase, SCCmec, agr allotype, MLST

Citation: Goudarzi M, Kobayashi N, Dadashi M, Pantůček R, Nasiri MJ, Fazeli M, Pouriran R, Goudarzi H, Miri M, Amirpour A and Seyedjavadi SS (2020) Prevalence, Genetic Diversity, and Temporary Shifts of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus Clones in Tehran, Iran: A Molecular–Epidemiological Analysis From 2013 to 2018. Front. Microbiol. 11:663. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00663

Received: 22 August 2019; Accepted: 23 March 2020;
Published: 30 April 2020.

Edited by:

Ilana L. B. C. Camargo, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Kiiyukia Matthews Ciira, Mount Kenya University, Kenya
Artur J. Sabat, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands

Copyright © 2020 Goudarzi, Kobayashi, Dadashi, Pantůček, Nasiri, Fazeli, Pouriran, Goudarzi, Miri, Amirpour and Seyedjavadi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mehdi Goudarzi, gudarzim@yahoo.com; m.goudarzi@sbmu.ac.ir