Degradation of Acephate and Its Intermediate Methamidophos: Mechanisms and Biochemical Pathways

Abstract

Acephate is an organophosphate pesticide that has been widely used to control insect pests in agricultural fields for decades. However, its use has been partially restricted in many countries due to its toxic intermediate product methamidophos. Long term exposure to acephate and methamidophos in non-target organisms results in severe poisonous effects, which has raised public concern and demand for the removal of these pollutants from the environment. In this paper, the toxicological effects of acephate and/or methamidophos on aquatic and land animals, including humans are reviewed, as these effects promote the necessity of removing acephate from the environment. Physicochemical degradation mechanisms of acephate and/or methamidophos are explored and explained, such as photo-Fenton, ultraviolet/titanium dioxide (UV/TiO₂) photocatalysis, and ultrasonic ozonation. Compared with physicochemical methods, the microbial degradation of acephate and methamidophos is emerging as an eco-friendly method that can be used for large-scale treatment. In recent years, microorganisms capable of degrading methamidophos or acephate have been isolated, including Hyphomicrobium sp., Penicillium oxalicum, Luteibacter jiangsuensis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacillus subtilis. Enzymes related to acephate and/or methamidophos biodegradation include phosphotriesterase, paraoxonase 1, and carboxylesterase. Furthermore, several genes encoding organophosphorus degrading enzymes have been identified, such as opd, mpd, and ophc2. However, few reviews have focused on the biochemical pathways and molecular mechanisms of acephate and methamidophos. In this review, the mechanisms and degradation pathways of acephate and methamidophos are summarized in order to provide a new way of thinking for the study of the degradation of acephate and methamidophos.

Introduction

Organophosphate compounds (OPs) are one of the most widely used pesticides because of their broad spectrum, specificity, and high efficiency toward insects and pests (Mulla et al., 2020). Acephate and methamidophos are two of the most common and efficient OPs that are used for pest control in agriculture (Maia et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2015; Pan et al., 2015).

Acephate [O, S-dimethyl-acetyl-phosphoramidothioate, molecular weight (MW) = 183.17] (Figure 1) is a systemic insecticide that effectively controls various pests on ornamental plants, cotton, beans, and head lettuce as well as parasites on mammalians. It is a good substitute because it is less toxic than methamidophos (Mahajna et al., 1997). Acephate is a class II “moderately hazardous” pesticide, but methamidophos is classified as a class IV “highly toxic” pesticide (World Health Organization [WHO], 2009). Acephate is highly water-soluble and can easily contaminate groundwater and soil, which is also easily absorbed by plants and accumulated in edible parts of plants (Mohapatra et al., 2011; Syed et al., 2014).

FIGURE 1

Methamidophos (O, S-dimethyl phosphoramidothioate, MW = 141.12) (Figure 1) is also a systemic insecticide effective against chewing and sucking insects and is one of the intermediate products of acephate (Farag et al., 2012; Araoud et al., 2016). Methamidophos mainly leads to enzyme inactivation by phosphorylation of the serine residues of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) active site (Lugokenski et al., 2012). It exerts high toxicity not only through the persistent inhibition of AChE but also through the complex blocking action on neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), which is different from the inhibition of AChE (Di et al., 2004). In addition, methamidophos can inhibit the activity of carboxylase in cells (Mahajna et al., 1997). Because of its high efficiency, methamidophos was extensively used in large amounts in many parts of the world before 2013. Methamidophos has been restricted in China since 2013 but is still extensively used in many other developing countries (Araoud et al., 2016).

Acephate and methamidophos are used in enormous quantities because of their high efficiency in agriculture and other industrial purposes, which leads them to remain in various environments for many years (Konstantinou et al., 2006; Lugokenski et al., 2012; Dar et al., 2020). Acephate and methamidophos have both hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties that assist them easy movement between water and soil (He et al., 2017). Studies have shown that methamidophos residues may decrease the total microbial biomass carbon and fungal biomass (Li et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008). In recent years, acephate and methamidophos have been detected in a variety of vegetables and fruits (Mohapatra et al., 2011; Syed et al., 2014; Andrade et al., 2015). At present, acephate and methamidophos have become a focus of public concern due to the harmful effects of pesticide exposure on invertebrates, mammals, and humans (Yao et al., 2018). The human body has limited metabolic capacity for acephate and methamidophos, and it may results in hyperglycemia, lipid metabolism disorder, DNA damage, increased oxidative stress, and risk of carcinogenesis after long-term exposure (Chang et al., 2009).

In recent years, many researchers have studied the different degradation processes for the removal of acephate and methamidophos from polluted environments. photo-Fenton processes, UV/TiO₂, ultrasonic ozonation, and ionizing irradiation, etc. are widely studied for acephate or methamidophos (Dai et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Zheng et al., 2016). Efficient and environmentally friendly microbial degradation has been considered as the most promising remediation method (Cycoń and Piotrowska-Seget, 2016; Bhatt et al., 2019; Pang et al., 2020; Feng et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Several degrading microorganisms with partial or complete degradation capacity of acephate or methamidophos have been isolated and characterized, such as Lysinibacillus fusiformis, Pseudomonas sp., Pseudomonas pseudo alcaligenes, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas azotoformans, and Pseudomonas putida (Lin et al., 2016; Maddela and Venkateswarlu, 2017; Singh et al., 2017, 2020).

Furthermore, there are many studies on the degradation pathways of acephate and methamidophos as well as studies on related functional genes and enzymes (Li et al., 2007; Shen et al., 2010; Chino-Flores et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2018). Microorganisms metabolize pesticides through their respective degradation pathways, and the metabolic capacity of microorganisms can be improved by recombination technology (Pinjari et al., 2013; Arora et al., 2017; Cycoń et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2020). Microbial degradation of acephate and methamidophos is a potential tool for large-scale pollutant removal. Thus, biodegradation of acephate and methamidophos also should be concerned. We emphasize the role of physicochemical degradation and biodegradation for large-scale treatment of acephate and/or methamidophos contamination. However, few reviews have focused on the degradation mechanisms and biochemical pathways of acephate and methamidophos (Maqbool et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2019). We emphasize the role of biodegradation for large-scale treatment of acephate and/or methamidophos contamination.

This paper reviews (I) the toxicity of acephate and methamidophos, and their removal; (II) the different oxidation or reduction methods of physicochemical degradation; (III) the different types of natural degradation strains, or genetically engineered microorganisms; (IV) the organophosphorus degrading enzymes and their encoding genes.

Toxic Effects of Acephate and Methamidophos

The extensive use and long term exposure to acephate and methamidophos results in the cumulative effect of these compounds release into the environment, which consequently results in the direct or indirect poisoning of non-target organisms. We summarize the toxic effects of acephate and methamidophos on aquatic and land animals, including humans in Table 1.

Zebrafish is a commonly used model test organism due to its advantages of high genetic and organ system homology to humans, external fertilization, high fecundity, and transparency in early adulthood (Liu et al., 2018). It has reported that methamidophos exposure may affect neurodevelopmental genes and activate intracellular apoptosis, leading to early developmental neurodamage in zebrafish (He et al., 2017). The brain may be an important target of methamidophos toxicity in zebrafish, revealing the potential neurotoxicity of methamidophos to other aquatic species and humans (Rodríguez et al., 2012; Peng et al., 2015; He et al., 2017). Zebrafish embryo development retardation, larval deformities, and decreased chorionic surface tension were also induced by exposure to acephate (Liu et al., 2018). Since acephate and methamidophos are prone to accumulate in water, large quantities of residual pesticides are frequently exposed to and ingested by aquatic organisms. Water is the source of life, and pesticide residues in water can also pass to other living beings through the food chain.

Drosophila is also a model test organism that has amazing similarities in gene structure and function with higher vertebrates. Acephate contamination at higher concentrations than 5 g/mL can cause DNA damage and mortality in the fruit fly, and it may disrupt the balance of oxidase and antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase (CAT), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), cytochrome P450 (CYP450), AChE, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Rajak et al., 2017). Chronic toxicity of acephate to honeybees is characterized by weight loss and esterase inhibition (Yao et al., 2018). Earthworms exposed to soil containing acephate also experience oxidative stress, characterized by lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, DNA damage, and changes in antioxidant enzyme status (Phugare et al., 2012). Acephate not only significantly reduces the antioxidant capacity of bird liver and kidney but also increases lipid peroxidation, interleukin and tumor necrosis factor in both organs and also affects the immune response (Tripathi et al., 2012; Farag et al., 2017). Methamidophos had a toxic effect on the number of viable counts, morphology, and histological changes of corpus luteal cells and progesterone production in bovines (Afzal et al., 2011).

Overuse of acephate and methamidophos can lead to an increase in high blood sugar, impaired metabolism, DNA damage, reproductive barriers, and cancer in rats (Maia et al., 2011; Araoud et al., 2016; Ribeiro et al., 2016). Acephate alters glucose metabolism in pregnant and lactating rats and predisposes their offspring to type 2 diabetes in adulthood (Ribeiro et al., 2016). Exposure to acephate may lead to metabolic disorders in mice, whereas changes in some endogenous metabolites lead to kidney damage and disrupt normal metabolic processes in rats, including glucose, nucleic acid, and protein metabolism (Hao et al., 2012). Methamidophos can cause lesions in the testis and epididymis, characterized by obstruction of spermatogenesis in the testis and severe edema in the epididymis, respectively (Farag et al., 2012). Methamidophos can cause DNA damage at different stages of spermatogenesis and reduce sperm quality in mice through acrosomal response and fertilization ability assessment (Urióstegui-Acosta et al., 2014). In addition, methamidophos also decreases the expression of zonula occludens protein 2 (ZO-2) in sperm cells of spermatic tubules, induces phosphorylation of ZO-2, and occludens in the testes. It also reduces the interactions between these proteins assessed by immunoprecipitation, which leads to reproductive toxicity in male mice (Ortega-Olvera et al., 2018).

The human body can be very vulnerable when exposed to methamidophos or acephate. Acephate could be a genotoxin, which would make it a severe threat to human health. It can cause chromosomal changes and DNA damage in human lymphocytes (Özkan et al., 2009). Moreover, it is suggested that acephate also exhibits cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on human sperm by disrupting sperm motility, cell membrane integrity, and sperm volume (Dhanushka and Peiris, 2017). In addition, methamidophos increases the generation of oxidative stress in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Ramirez-Vargas et al., 2017). The accumulation caused by the widespread use of acephate and methamidophos has led to toxic effects among many biological systems and has caused many health problems. Growing concern about the accumulation of pesticide residues in our food, soil, and wastewater has led to a great deal of interest in their removal.

Physicochemical Degradation Methods of Acephate and Methamidophos

Physical adsorption and chemical degradation methods were first proposed to remove acephate and methamidophos from the environment. The advantages of physical adsorption and chemical degradation methods lie in their broad spectrum of pollutants, their adaptability to the environment, and their effectiveness. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are a more efficient composite technology that combines the advantages of different physicochemical degradation methods to more efficiently remove methamidophos and acephate; examples of these methods include photo-Fenton process, UV/TiO₂, and ultrasonic ozonation (Dai et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2015; Zheng et al., 2016).

Physicochemical Degradation of Acephate

Physicochemical methods play an important role in the degradation of acephate. In the absence of surfactants, colloidal manganese dioxide has been shown to degrade acephate by oxidation (Qamruzzaman, and Nasar, 2014). Ultrasonic degradation is a physical degradation method with simple operation and few byproducts, whose main mechanisms are mechanical bond breaking and free radical reaction. When the ultrasonic power is high enough, the liquid produces instantaneous negative pressure, local high temperature, and a high-pressure environment, which finally cause water molecules to break up and become strong oxidants, such as hydrogen peroxide radicals (•OOH) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH) (Shriwas and Gogate, 2011; Golash and Gogate, 2012). Ultrasound and ozonization have synergistic effects in complex systems. The degradation efficiency of acephate ozonization can be increased from 60.6 to 87.6% in 60 min with 160 kHz ultrasound irradiation because it can improve the oxidizability of nitrogen atoms (Wang et al., 2015). Under visible light irradiation, nanocomposite Co₃O₄/McM-41 can completely remove acephate in 40 min (50 mg/L) or 60 min (100 mg/L) (AbuKhadra et al., 2020). Under the same conditions of Co₃O₄/McM-41, ZnFe₂O₄–TiO₂ can remove 89.5% of acephate within 120 min, and the optimal value of the photocatalyst and H₂O₂ dosage of this degradation is 2.0 g/L and 8 mmol/L, respectively (Fu et al., 2012). TiO₂ is often used as a catalyst due to its advantages of low cost, good chemical stability, and high catalytic activity. Compared to Sr/TiO₂–PCFM, which is not modified, the modified Sr/TiO₂–PCFM shows preferential degradation of acephate and can degrade target pollutants more quickly and efficiently (Liu et al., 2019). Furthermore, photocatalyst Fe₃O₄@SiO₂@mTiO₂ has a larger surface area and a stronger magnetic response, which can effectively degrade acephate, omethoate, and other organophosphorus pesticides (Zheng et al., 2016). The photocatalytic degradation rate of acephate (675 g.a.i./h) was shown to be 93.5% in a field trial after adding cerium-doped nano titanium dioxide (TiO₂/Ce) (2400 g.a.i./h) for 20 h (Liu et al., 2015). TiO₂ is a potential and efficient chemical catalyst for the removal of environmental pesticide residues, which deserves further study. In addition, a combination of multiple degradation methods may improve the degradation efficiency.

The degradation of acephate mainly involves the destruction of N-C, P-N, P-S, or P-O bonds and the generation of the main intermediate products O-methl-N-acetylphosphoramidate and the more toxic methamidophos (as shown in Figure 2). Previous researchers have used ⁶⁰Co irradiation, which has led to many studies on the degradation efficiency, degradation pathways, and degradation dynamics (Sun et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2018). Chemical degradation mainly results in the generation of free radicals in the medium, such as and negative hydrogen ions (•H) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH) (Yang et al., 2015). Reducing and oxidizing free radicals play different roles in the degradation of acephate and methamidophos, so negative hydrogen ions (•H) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH) have different reaction kinetics from acephate, which leads to two different degradation pathways of acephate (Zhao et al., 2009). Negative hydrogen ions (•H) degrade acephate more quickly but produce fewer inorganic ions, while hydroxyl radicals (•OH) catalyze over more steps to produce more inorganic ions. As nucleophiles, negative hydrogen ions (•H) may first attack the P = O and C = O bonds, causing the electrons to delocalize and form temporary conjugated systems in the O-P-N-C-O bonds. When the P-N bond is disconnected, the acephate is subsequently formed with ammonium ions () and formic acid. At the same time, the C-S and C-O bonds of the product methamidophos are broken successively, resulting in phosphoric acid, sulfate radical, and a methyl group. In contrast, hydroxyl radicals (•OH) are strong electrophilic reagents that first attack the negatively charged S, O, and N atoms of acephate. As a result, the fracture of the P-N bond produces acetamide and phosphoric acid. The break between the P-N bond and the P-S bond produces acetaminophosphoric acid, which then produces acetamide, phosphoric acid, or ethanedioic acid. Whether in the presence of negative hydrogen ions (•H) or hydroxyl radicals (•OH), acephate will eventually be completely degraded to inorganic salts.

FIGURE 2

Physicochemical Degradation of Methamidophos

Many physicochemical degradation methods have been developed for the degradation of methamidophos, which is very important for the removal of pesticide residues in the environment. Reductive hydrogen ions radicals (•H) can catalyze the degradation of acephate, but they cannot catalyze the degradation of methamidophos (Zhao et al., 2009). In contrast, oxidizing hydroxyl radicals (•OH) can catalyze not only the degradation of acephate but also the degradation of methamidophos (Zhao et al., 2009). Gamma irradiation can effectively degrade methamidophos into inorganic ions in aqueous solution by promoting the generation of hydroxyl radicals (•OH) in water (Zhao et al., 2009). Combined use of multiple degradation methods is a trend to improve degradation efficiency. The catalysis of methamidophos by UV and TiO₂ has been studied. Under UV irradiation, nano TiO₂ catalyzed 95% degradation of methamidophos within 4 h (Dai et al., 2008). In another study, the best degradation rate of methamidophos in water using nano TiO₂ in the first 5 min reached 83.55%, which was significantly faster than the degradation reported by other studies (Zhang et al., 2006). It was found that the degradation efficiency increased with the increasing temperature and pH of the medium when the optimal amount of TiO₂ was 12 g/L (Liu et al., 2009). It was also proved that the microwave degradation method is an effective method to remove methamidophos. In the presence of K₂S₂O₈, over 96% of methamidophos can be degraded by microwave irradiation within 6 min, while the MW/K₂S₂O₈ corresponding kinetic equations, half-life (t_1/2) and the pseudofirst-order rate constants are lnC = −0.757t + 5.9, R² = 0.9776; 0.916 min and 0.757/min, respectively (Zhang et al., 2009). Even in acidic environments, the electrolysis of the Pb/PbO₂ electrode can better facilitate the removal of methamidophos (Martiìnez-Huitle et al., 2008). Electrode materials play a key role in electrolysis and influence the type of byproducts; thus, subsequent research on electrode materials is of great significance for electrochemical degradation. In addition, an adsorption material with good removal performance of methamidophos was obtained through modifying the structure and morphology of natural zeolite with 25 mmol/L hexadecyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide (HDTMA) (Alvarez-García et al., 2020). Adsorption is considered to be a low-cost and simple water separation process, but it still needs to improve its material structure to enhance its adsorption capacity.

The possible photodegradation pathways of methamidophos catalyzed by TiO₂ is shown in Figure 3 and first involves the cracking of P-S, P-N, and P-O bonds. When the P-S and P-O bonds of methamidophos are broken, P atoms react with methyl radicals to form [amino (methylsulfanyl) phosphoryl] methane and [amino (methoxy) phosphoryl] methane, which are further oxidized to P-formylphosphonamiddothioate and phosphine carboxylic acid, respectively. When the P-N bond of methamidophos is broken, an O, S-dimethyl phosphonothioate dimer is generated, which is more prone to further degradation. The intermediate products 1-aminoethanol and trimethoxymethane form the products acetamide and dimethoxymethanol, respectively, resulting in complete mineralization. Phosphoric acid is the main final product.

FIGURE 3

Potential Microorganisms in Acephate and Methamidophos Degradation

There is growing interest in microbiological degradation technologies because of the risk to life of pesticide residues, which provide cheap and efficient acephate and methamidophos detoxification to complement expensive chemical methods. Microbial degradation is a potential way to decontaminate pesticide-contaminated sites (Chen et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2018; Zhan et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019; Bhatt et al., 2020a). Biodegradation microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, yeasts, and algae can be obtained by enrichment culture and recombination technology (Pinjari et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2014; Birolli et al., 2019; Bhatt et al., 2020b). At present, many researchers are looking for effective acephate or methamidophos degrading microorganisms through enrichment culture, including sewage treatment systems, organophosphorus contaminated areas, industries, and agricultural fields (Chen et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2012; Li et al., 2014; Mohan and Naveena, 2015; Lin et al., 2016). To date, only a small number of microorganisms have been isolated and identified that can fully mineralize or degrade acephate or methamidophos, as shown in Table 2.

Acephate-Degrading Microorganisms

Acephate is degraded in two main ways, including through methamidophos or O-methyl-N-acetylphosphoramidate. Pseudomonas sp. Ind01 was able to degrade acephate by promoting the first step of acephate mineralization but could not utilize the methamidophos, which is involved in the process of O-methyl-N-acetylphosphoramidate (Pinjari et al., 2012). Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes PS-5 also completely transforms acephate into O-methyl-N-acetylphosphoramidate, even in the presence of heavy metal ions Cu²⁺, Fe³⁺, and humic acid (Singh et al., 2017). Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is-6, a biodegradable strain isolated from soil, can use acephate as a sole source of carbon, phosphorus, and energy and showed 92% degradation of acephate (1000 mg/L) in 7 days. This strain not only degrades acephate but is also able to efficiently degrade other pesticides like dimethoate, parathion, methyl parathion, chlorpyrifos, and malathion. Thus, P. aeruginosa strain Is-6 shows high degradation ability in contaminated soil, indicating its potential in environmental remediation (Ramu and Seetharaman, 2014). Mohan and Naveena (2015) isolated five bacterial strains, which are identified as Bacillus cereus ADI-10, Nibacillus fusiformis ADI-01, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes ADI-03, Pseudomonas sp. ADI-04, and Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes ADI-06. These strains could efficiently grow and degrade acephate at 500 mg/L without any additional carbon source and were further utilized to analyze the mechanism of acephate degradation. In comparison to single bacterial cultures, the use of a combined culture of multiple strains in bioremediation was found to be more effective in terms of better metabolic and pollutant removal capabilities (Bhatt et al., 2020c; Li et al., 2020; Zhan et al., 2020). Phugare et al. (2012) reported the degradation of acephate by a bacterial consortium composed of Exiguobacterium sp. BCH4 and Rhodococcus sp. BCH2, which was capable of degrading 75.85% of 50 mg/L acephate. Microbial fixation is beneficial to the improvement of microbial utilization and degradation efficiency (Zang et al., 2013). In another study, recombinant Escherichia coli containing organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) encoding plasmid was immobilized at a low temperature in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) cryogel to form a biocatalyst with high activity, stability, and mechanical strength (Hong and Raushel, 1999). Fungi can be potential degrading microorganisms due to their extensive mycelium networks and low specificity of degrading enzymes, but only Mucor sp. has been found to be able to degrade methamidophos and acephate (Zang et al., 2013; Maqbool et al., 2016). However, many degrading microorganisms have not yet been tested in the field, which is much needed for social progress.

As shown in Figure 4, there is a diversity of acephate degradation pathways in microorganisms. Under the catalysis of carboxylesterase enzymes, acephate first releases the acetate residue to form the main product methamidophos (Pinjari et al., 2012). The product methamidophos is then hydrolyzed to produce methyl dihydrogen phosphate, S-methyl dihydrogen thiophosphate, or O-methylphosphoramidate with the catalysis of phosphotriesterase (PTE), and eventually phosphoric acid is generated. In the process of biodegradation, PTE plays a primary role in catalyzing the first step of acephate degradation. The breaking of the P-S and P-O bonds of acephate and its intermediates is mainly dependent on the hydrolysis of PTE (Chae et al., 1994; Lai et al., 1995). With the catalysis of PTE, acephate is hydrolyzed to O-methyl-N-acetylphosphoramidate or S-methyl phosphoramidate. The amino group is hydrolyzed by the phosphoamide hydrolase enzyme and releases ions (Ramu and Seetharaman, 2014). S-methyl phosphoramidate is eventually catalyzed to produce phosphorous acid, phosphenic amides, or phosphorous acid of lower molecular mass.

FIGURE 4

Methamidophos-Degrading Microorganisms

Hyphomicrobium sp. MAP-1 can be grown using methamidophos as its sole source of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, which can completely degrade 3000 mg/L of methamidophos within 84 h under optimum conditions (pH 7.0 and temperature 30°C) (Wang et al., 2010). Penicillium oxalicum ZHJ6 can degrade 99.9% of 1000 mg/L methamidophos within 12 days by co-metabolizing ethanol, glucose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, starch, and dextrin as carbon sources (Zhao et al., 2010). Acinetobacter sp., Pseudomonas stutzeri, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can degrade 80% of 500 mg/L of methamidophos in 3 days under optimal conditions (pH 7.0 and temperature 30–35°C), which can not only use glucose, fructose, ethanol, and gal as carbon sources and energy but can also degrade various organophosphorus (Li et al., 2014). Isolated Luteibacter jiangsuensis sp. nov. can effectively use methamidophos as the sole carbon source (Wang et al., 2011). The intracellular degrading enzymes of methamidophos have been preliminarily discovered, and the optimum conditions have been explored using the response surface method (Wang et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013). Interestingly, some bacteria can degrade a series of organophosphorus pesticides including methamidophos, such as Aspergillus sp., Enterobacter ludwigi M2, and Brevundimonas faecalis MA-B12 (Zhao et al., 2014; Adelowo et al., 2015; Jiang et al., 2019). In particular, Sphingobium sp. K22212 and Sphingobium sp. Cam5-1 could only degrade organophosphorus insecticides with P-S bonds (Ahn et al., 2018). Few microorganisms can degrade acephate or methamidophos, or even completely mineralize them. Some bacteria only have partial degradation abilities, in which case, the combination of multiple strains can have a better degradation effect. Therefore, more strains capable of adapting to the environment and of high degradation need to be discovered.

As shown in Figure 5, only one pathway of methamidophos degradation has been identified in microorganisms. Like acephate degradation, PTE and phosphoamide hydrolase are involved in the intracellular degradation. The P-N bond of methamidophos is first hydrolyzed by phosphoamide hydrolase. With the hydrolysis of PTE, the products O, S-dimethyl hydrogen thiophosphate generate phosphoric acid, methyl mercaptan, and methanol with the breaking of P-O and P-S bonds. In particular, methyl mercaptan in methamidophos degradation bacteria generates further dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide, which are not found in the acephate biodegradation pathway.

FIGURE 5

Molecular Mechanism of Acephate and Methamidophos Degradation

Degrading Enzymes of Acephate and Methamidophos

Acephate and methamidophos are highly toxic organophosphate pesticides for long term use, and their microbial degradation (including molecular and genetic mechanism) has attracted extensive attention due to its ecofriendly effectiveness (Scott et al., 2008). In addition, many biodegradable bacteria are effective in laboratory liquid media, but have poor degradation ability in field soil (Chen et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2020; Mishra et al., 2020). Therefore, more powerful enzymatic and genetic engineering techniques need to be applied. In the past, many researchers have focused on extracting PTE from microbial cells, most of which come from microorganisms and a few from other animals (Liu et al., 2017).

Microorganisms play an important role in promoting the degradation of these organophosphorus pesticides, and PTE (EC 3.1.8.1) is an effective tool to degrade organophosphorus pesticides. PTE has the stereoselectivity to degrade organophosphorus pesticides and tends to degrade (S_p)-isomers of acephate and methamidophos (Chae et al., 1994; Hong and Raushel, 1999). Most studies of bacterial PTE have shown extensive pH activity, and PTE purified from two bacterial strains Pseudomonas aeruginosa F10B and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. insidiosum SBL11 reached peak activity at the pH value of 9.0 (Das and Singh, 2006). Another form of PTE was isolated from Pseudomonas monteilii, and phosphotriestercoroxon was the only phosphorus source (Horne et al., 2002). PTE isolated from the soil bacterium Pseudomonas diminuta significantly promoted the hydrolysis of organophosphate triester bonds (Ghanem and Raushel, 2005). Phosphotriesterase OPHC2, isolated from Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes and belonging to the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily, had unusual heat resistance and some OP degradation ability (Gotthard et al., 2013).

The production of degrading enzymes is responsible for the resistance in many animals, and the enzymes or genes involved in organophosphorus degradation and resistance are summarized in Table 3. The evolutionary relationships among the functional enzymes involved in the degradation of organophosphate pesticides are shown in Figure 6. In addition to phosphotriesterase, other enzymes that detoxify organophosphorus pesticides are also being isolated, such as paraoxonase 1 (PON1), parathion hydrolase, and somanase (Kumar et al., 2018). As an A-esterase, PON1 can detoxify organophosphate pesticides in the phase-I metabolism of the liver. The PON1-L55M and PON1-Q192R genotypes, the two most important coding region polymorphisms of PON1, are related to the occurrence of Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Androutsopoulos et al., 2011). Through quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis, acetylcholinesterase 2 (AChE2) and esterase 1 (EST1) were found to be metabolic enzymes involved in the process of allogenic biological detoxification of organophosphate pesticides; increased synthesis of these enzymes can distinguish between organophosphorus-resistant and -susceptible populations (Brito et al., 2017). Acetylcholinesterase (AChE, 3.1.1.7), isolated from Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), is tolerant to organophosphate pesticides, and it can significantly improve the resistance ability of Schizaphis graminum (Gao and Zhu, 2002). A high biotechnology potential phosphotriesterase-like lactonase (PLL) has been isolated, encoded by Vmut 2255 in the hyperthermoacidophilic crenarchaeon Vulcanisaeta moutnovskia (VmutPLL) (Kallnik et al., 2014). A Phe362Tyr mutation in the AChE gene of Lepeophtheirus salmonis protects from pesticide toxicity (Helgesen et al., 2019). Cattle ticks, also known as Boophilus microplus, generally have resistance to the main organophosphate pesticides. Research that isolated acetyl cholinesterase cDNA from Boophilus microplus indicates that it can encode a 62 kDa protein. After translation and modification, acetylcholinesterase can develop resistance to organophosphate pesticides (Baxter and Barker, 1998). Rumen ecosystems are made up of a variety of microorganisms and protozoa that produce enzymes that help to detoxify toxic compounds in the rumen, such as organophosphate pesticides. The cow rumen bacterial esterase gene (est5S) is 1098 bp long, encodes a protein with 366 amino acid residues, and has a molecular weight of 40 kDa. The enzyme has great potential in cleaning up contaminated pesticides (Kambiranda et al., 2009). Enzymes isolated from insects can also be used for the biodegradation of organophosphate pesticides.

FIGURE 6

Enzymes that are fixed can generally be used to improve efficiency. In the presence of appropriate immobilization, the degradation effect of the degrading enzyme is slightly better than that of the free enzyme, with a higher reuse rate and easier preservation (Jesionowski et al., 2014; Doraiswamy et al., 2019). After a series of tests, it was determined that Wax Encapsulated Organophosphate Hydrolase (WEOH) can be retained for 1 year under normal temperature, with an activity reduction of 10% (Muthyala and Gundala, 2019). More methods to improve the degradation efficiency and reuse efficiency of enzymes need to be developed.

Genes Encoding Degrading Enzymes of Acephate and Methamidophos

Biodegradability is determined by genes, and genetic engineering technology may be used to carry out gene recombination and to enhance biodegradability. Therefore, it is very important to extract resistance genes. To date, many genes encoding organophosphorus degrading enzymes have been found, which will be of great support for the promotion of organophosphorus biodegradation, such as opd, mpd, and ophc2.

The gene opd is a widely studied gene. The opdE gene has been isolated from Enterobacter sp. cons002, which has a wide range of degrading activities against organophosphorus pesticides (Chino-Flores et al., 2012). The gene opdE consists of 753 bp and encodes a protein of 25 kDa (Chino-Flores et al., 2012). The sequential mutation and screening of OPH encoding genes in specific codons by saturation mutagenesis can improve the degradation ability of OPH mutated enzymes on the P-S bonds of organophosphorus pesticides (Schofield and DiNovo, 2010). Through genetic engineering technology, the opd gene cloned from Brevundimonas mututa was isogenously expressed in the acephate-mineralizing strain Pseudomonas sp. Ind01, suggesting that the engineered strain could degrade a variety of OP insecticides (Pinjari et al., 2013).

The mpd and ophc2 genes are also very important in degradation. The gene mpd has a low similarity with the opd gene, and the mpd gene encoded enzyme can degrade organophosphorus pesticides such as parathion and fenitrothion (Cui et al., 2001). The mpd gene was first cloned from Plesiomonas sp. strain M6 and then cloned from Sphingomonas sp. strain dsp-2 (Cui et al., 2001; Li et al., 2007). The gene ophc2 has a size of 975 bp, and its homology is less than 50% compared with other organophosphorus hydrolase genes in GenBank (Wu et al., 2004). The gene ophc2 was successfully heterogeneously expressed in Pichia pastoris and Escherichia coli by gene cloning (Chu et al., 2006; Shen et al., 2010). The emergence of metagenomics technology will rapidly promote the discovery of degrading microorganisms at the gene level and gradually replace the arduous enrichment and culture method (Jeffries et al., 2018). With the increase of people’s knowledge of the application of enzymes, more and more new biocatalysts with functional properties have been studied.

Acephate and Methamidophos Resistance

Due to the frequent use of acephate/methamidophos in agriculture over a long period of time, insect resistance to insecticides is on the rise. There are two molecular mechanisms for Plutella xylostella resistance, including the reduction in target sensitivity and the increase in detoxification. The acephate resistance of resistant varieties of diamondback moth Plutella xylostella was 47 times higher than that of sensitive varieties because of the metabolic detoxification mediated by GST and sensitivity reduction of AChEs (Sonoda and Igaki, 2010). Further research found that A298S and G324A mutations in AChE1 of Plutella xylostella also reduced the sensitivity to methamidophos (Sonoda and Igaki, 2010). In addition, CYP450 can directly detoxify OP compounds by catalyzing oxidation/reduction reactions, and esterase can hydrolyze OP pesticides. In a laboratory study, the increase of esterase activity was an important reason for acephate resistance enhancement in Indian brown planthoppers (Malathi et al., 2017).

There is a significant correlation between mutation frequency and resistance level in natural populations. The first two carboxylesterase genes (coe1 and coe2) were isolated from Bemisia tabaci, in which coe1 was overexpressed (about 4-fold) in the organophosphate-resistant strain. Sufficient data and biochemical evidence support that increased coe1 and coe2 activity is involved in Bemisia tabaci resistance to organophosphate insecticides (Alon et al., 2008). The resistance of organophosphate in biotype B is closely related to the point mutation in ace1 and ace2 acetylcholinesterase. By comparison of nucleic acids and derived amino acid sequences, there are only silent nucleotide polymorphisms in the ace2 strain and only one mutation in the ace1 strain, namely, Phe392Trp (Phe331 in Torpedo californica) (Alon et al., 2008). Under pressure from organophosphate pesticides, G137D mutations in the carboxylesterase E3 gene in the New World screwworm are associated with a general form of resistance to acetylcholinesterase through the metabolic detoxification of pesticides (Da Silva et al., 2011). Carboxylesterase gene amplification can increase the organophosphate resistance of Culex pipiens. The amplified carboxylesterase gene of Culex pipiens resistance was originally collected in Cyprus. Genomic DNA fragments containing two loci encoding the carboxylesterase alleles A5 and B5 have been cloned and sequenced; the gene spacer is 3.7 Kb in length in the A5-B5 amplituter (Buss and Callaghan, 2004). In the case of continuous use of organophosphate pesticides, some organisms will become more and more resistant to them.

In addition, insect resistance can also be induced under artificial conditions. One researcher screened 25 generations of mutant Laodelphax striatellus to obtain insect cross-resistance to acephate, deltamethrin, imidacloprid, methomyl, carbosulfan, and diazinon (Xu et al., 2014). In addition, the cross resistance of Laodelphax striatellus may also be related to the participation of CYP450s and esterases, and the overexpression of CYP6AY3v2, CYP306A2v2, CYP353D1v2, and LSCE36 genes (Xu et al., 2014). Insecticide-detoxifying carboxylesterase (CE) was shown to metabolize acephate and is controlled by the gene CpCE-1 of wild Cydia pomonella (CP) (Yang et al., 2014). Earthworms promote the detoxification of methamidophos mainly through their own biosorption and syntropy, especially the biodegradation of enzymes released in the soil (Zhou et al., 2008). The emergence of insect resistance is the result of organisms gradually adapting to acephate and methamidophos, which is beneficial to the extraction of resistance genes and the screening of new biodegradation agents.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

In modern agricultural production, acephate and methamidophos play important roles in controlling pests and increasing the crop yield. However, improper use of acephate and methamidophos can lead to critical environmental pollution and life-threatening health problems due to the high toxicity of methamidophos to non-target organisms. Many physicochemical methods have been developed and applied for the remediation of acephate and methamidophos, but they are thought to be too expensive to use on a large scale. Therefore, microbial degradation is considered to be a better and effective degradation method for acephate and methamidophos. Microorganisms capable of metabolizing acephate and methamidophos have been isolated, but further studies are needed, such as the continued development and utilization of degrading enzymes, the development of engineered degrading microorganisms, and overcoming environmental complexity. Microbial degradation kinetics, degradation pathways, and related enzymes and functional genes need to be further studied, as this is conducive to the in situ repair of methamidophos and methamidophos. Therefore, in order to understand the genetic analysis of acephate and its related catabolic genes, we need to use advanced molecular technologies such as metagenomics, proteomics, and transcriptome analysis to reveal the missing links and evolutionary mechanism and metabolic pathway involved in the process of bio-degradation. In the future, metagenomics will serve as a useful tool to predict microbial degradation in polluted habitats and may facilitate the practical application of acephate and methamidophos degrading microorganisms from various contaminated sites.

References

• 1

  AbuKhadraM. R.MohamedA. S.El-SherbeenyA. M.ElmeligyM. A. (2020). Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of acephate pesticide over MCM-41/Co3O4 nanocomposite synthesized from rice husk silica gel and Peach leaves.J. Hazard. Mater.389:122129. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122129

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AdelowoF. E.AmudaO. S.GiwaA. A.OnawumiO.AndfalanaO. O. E. O. (2015). Biodegradation of organophosphonates by Aspergillus specie.Orient. J. Chem.31165–171. 10.13005/ojc/31

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AfzalG. S.RizviF.ZarghamK. M.KhanA. (2011). Toxic effects of cypermethrin and methamidophos on bovine corpus luteal cells and progesterone production.Exp. Toxicol. Pathol.63131–135. 10.1016/j.etp.2009.10.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AhnJ.LeeS.KimS.YouJ.HanB.WeonH.et al (2018). Biodegradation of organophosphorus insecticides with P-S bonds by two Sphingobium sp. strains.Int. Biodeter. Biodegr.13259–65. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.05.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AlonM.AlonF.NauenR.MorinS. (2008). Organophosphates’ resistance in the B-biotype of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is associated with a point mutation in an ace1-type acetylcholinesterase and overexpression of carboxylesterase.Insect Biochem. Mol.38940–949. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.07.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Alvarez-GarcíaS.Ramírez-GarcíaJ. J.Granados-CorreaF.Granados-CorreaF.Sánchez-MezaJ. C. (2020). Structural and textural influences of surfactant-modified zeolitic materials over the methamidophos adsorption behavior.Sci. Technol.55619–634. 10.1080/01496395.2019.1568476

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AndradeG. C. R. M.MonteiroS. H.FranciscoJ. G.FigueiredoL. A.BotelhoR. G.TornisieloV. L. (2015). Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and dynamic multiple reaction monitoring method for determining multiple pesticide residues in tomato.Food Chem.17557–65. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.105

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AndroutsopoulosV. P.KanavourasK.TsatsakisA. M. (2011). Role of paraoxonase 1 (PON1) in organophosphate metabolism: implications in neurodegenerative diseases.Toxicol. Appl. Pharm.256418–424. 10.1016/j.taap.2011.08.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AraoudM.NeffetiF.DoukiW.KhaledL.NajjarM. F.KenaniA.et al (2016). Toxic effects of methamidophos on paraoxonase 1 activity and on rat kidney and liver and ameliorating effects of alpha-tocopherol.Environ. Toxicol.31842–854. 10.1002/tox.22095

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  AroraP. K.SrivastavaA.GargS. K.SinghV. P. (2017). Recent advances in degradation of chloronitrophenols.Bioresour. Technol.250902–909. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BaxterG. D.BarkerS. C. (1998). Acetylcholinesterase cDNA of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus: characterisation and role in organophosphate resistance.Insect Biochem. Mol.28581–589. 10.1016/S0965-1748(98)00034-34

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BhattP.BhattK.HuangY.LinZ.ChenS. (2020a). Esterase is a powerful tool for the biodegradation of pyrethroid insecticides.Chemosphere244:125507. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125507

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BhattP.HuangY.ReneE. R.KumarA. J.ChenS. (2020b). Mechanism of allethrin biodegradation by a newly isolated Sphingomonas trueperi strain CW3 from wastewater sludge.Bioresour. Technol.305:123074. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123074

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BhattP.ReneE. R.KumarA. J.ZhangW.ChenS. (2020c). Binding interaction of allethrin with esterase: bioremediation potential and mechanism.Bioresour. Technol.310:123845. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123845

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BhattP.HuangY.ZhanH.ChenS. (2019). Insight into microbial applications for the biodegradation of pyrethroid insecticides.Front. Microbiol.10:1778. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01778

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BirolliW. G.LimaR. N.PortoA. L. M. (2019). Applications of marine-derived microorganisms and their enzymes in biocatalysis and biotransformation, the underexplored potentials.Front. Microbiol.10:1453. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01453

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BritoL. G.de Oliveira NeryL.da Silva BarbieriF.HuaccaM. E. F.dos Santos PereiraS.da SilvaR. R.et al (2017). Molecular quantitative assay for esterase-mediated organophosphate resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus.Ticks Tick Borne Dis.8725–732. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.05.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BussD. S.CallaghanA. (2004). Molecular comparisons of the Culex pipiens (L.) complex esterase gene amplicons.Insect Biochem. Mol.34433–441. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.02.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  CarvalhoR. K.RodriguesT. C.JúniorW. D.MotaG. M. P.AndersenM. L.Mazaro-CostaR. (2020). Short- and long-term exposure to methamidophos impairs spermatogenesis in mice.Reprod. Biol.10.1016/j.repbio.2020.05.003[Epub ahead of print].

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  ChaeM. Y.PostulaJ. F.RaushelF. M. (1994). Stereospecific enzymatic hydrolysis of phosphorus-sulfur bonds in chiral organphosphatetriesters.Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.121473–1478. 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80516-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  ChangA. S.MontesanoM. A.BarrD. B.ThomasJ.GellerR. J. (2009). Urinary elimination kinetics of acephate and its metabolite, methamidophos, in urine after acute ingestion.J. Med. Toxicol.568–72. 10.1007/BF03161090

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  ChenS.ChangC.DengY.AnS.DongY. H.ZhouJ.et al (2014). Fenpropathrin biodegradation pathway in Bacillus sp. DG-02 and its potential for bioremediation of pyrethroid-contaminated soils.J. Agric. Food Chem.622147–2157. 10.1021/jf404908j

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  ChenS.DengY.ChangC.LeeJ.ChengY.CuiZ.et al (2015). Pathway and kinetics of cyhalothrin biodegradation by Bacillus thuringiensis strain ZS-19.Sci. Rep.5:8784. 10.1038/srep08784

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  ChenS.DongY. H.ChangC.DengY.XiF. Z.ZhongG.et al (2013). Characterization of a novel cyfluthrin-degrading bacterial strain Brevibacterium aureum and its biochemical degradation pathway.Bioresour. Technol.13216–23. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  ChenS.LiuC.PengC.LiuH.HuM.ZhongG. (2012). Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos and its hydrolysis product 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol by a new fungal strain Cladosporium cladosporioides Hu-01.PLoS One7:e47205. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047205

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  Chino-FloresC.Dantán-GonzálezE.Vázquez-RamosA.Tinoco-ValenciaR.Díaz-MéndezR.Sánchez-SalinasE.et al (2012). Isolation of the opdE gene that encodes for a new hydrolase of Enterobacter sp. capable of degrading organophosphorus pesticides.Biodegradation23387–397. 10.1007/s10532-011-9517-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  ChuX. Y.WuN. F.DengM. J.TianJ.YaoB.FanY. L. (2006). Expression of organophosphorus hydrolase OPHC2 in Pichia pastoris: purification and characterization.Protein Expres. Purif.499–14. 10.1016/j.pep.2006.03.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  CuiZ. L.LiS. P.FuG. P. (2001). Isolation of methyl parathion-degrading strain M6 and cloning of the methyl parathion hydrolase gene.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.104922–4925. 10.1128/AEM.67.10.4922-4925.2001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  CycońM.MrozikA.Piotrowska-SegetZ. (2017). Bioaugmentation as a strategy for the remediation of pesticide-polluted soil: a review.Chemosphere17252–71. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.129

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  CycońM.Piotrowska-SegetZ. (2016). Pyrethroid-degrading microorganisms and their potential for the bioremediation of contaminated soils: a review.Front. Microbiol.7:1463. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01463

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  Da SilvaN. M.de CarvalhoR. A.de Azeredo-EspinA. M. L. (2011). Acetylcholinesterase cDNA sequencing and identification of mutations associated with organophosphate resistance in Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae).Vet. Parasitol.177190–195. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  DaiK.PengT. Y.ChenH.ZhangR. X.ZhangY. X. (2008). Photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of commercial methamidophos in aqueous titania suspension.Environ. Sci. Technol.421505–1510. 10.1021/es702268p

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  DarM. A.KaushikG.FranciscoJ.ChiuJ. F. (2020). “Pollution status and biodegradation of organophosphate pesticides in the environment,” in Abatement of Environmental Pollutants, edsPardeepS.AjayK.AnweshaB. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 25–66. 10.1016/b978-0-12-818095-2.00002-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  DasS.SinghD. K. (2006). Purification and characterization of phosphotriesterases from Pseudomonas aeruginosa F10B and Clavibactermichiganense subsp. insidiosum SBL11.Can. J. Microbiol.52157–168. 10.1139/w05-113

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  DhanushkaM. A. T.PeirisL. D. C. (2017). Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of acephate on human sperm.J. Toxicol.20171–6. 10.1155/2017/3874817

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  DiA. S.BernardiG.MercuriN. B. (2004). Methamidophos transiently inhibits neuronal nicotinic receptors of rat substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons via open channel block.Neurosci. Lett.369208–213. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.074

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  DoraiswamyN.SarathiM.PennathurG. (2019). Cross-linked esterase aggregates (CLEAs) using nanoparticles as immobilization matrix.Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol.49270–278. 10.1080/10826068.2018.1536993

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  FaragA. T.RadwanA. H.EweidahM. H.ElmazoudyR. H.El-SebaeA. (2012). Evaluation of male-mediated reproductive toxic effects of methamidophos in the mouse.Andrologia44116–124. 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01113.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  FaragM. R.AlagawanyM.DhamaK. (2017). Flaxseed oil alleviates toxic effects of subacute exposure to acephate on liver and kidney of broiler chicks.Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv.1261–70. 10.3923/ajava.2017.61.70

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  FengY.HuangY.ZhanH.BhattH.ChenS. (2020). An overview of strobilurin fungicide degradation: current status and future perspective.Front. Microbiol.10:389. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00389

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  FuW. N.WangY. H.HeC.ZhaoJ. L. (2012). Photocatalytic degradation of acephate on ZnFe2O4-TiO2 photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation.J. Adv. Oxid. Technol.1177–182. 10.1515/jaots-2012-0120

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  GaoJ. R.ZhuK. Y. (2002). Increased expression of an acetylcholinesterase gene may confer organophosphate resistance in the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae).Pestic. Biochem. Phys.73164–173. 10.1016/S0048-3575(02)00105-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  GaoY.ChenS.HuM.HuQ.LuoJ.LiY. (2012). Purification and characterization of a novel chlorpyrifos hydrolase from Cladosporium cladosporioides Hu-01.PLoS One7:e38137. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038137

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  GhanemE.RaushelF. (2005). Detoxification of organophosphate nerve agents by bacterial phosphotriesterase.Toxicol. Appl. Pharm.207459–470. 10.1016/j.taap.2005.02.025

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  GolashN.GogateP. R. (2012). Degradation of dichlorvos containing wastewaters using sonochemical reactors.Ultrason. Sonochem.191051–1060. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.02.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  GotthardG.HiblotJ.GonzalezD.EliasM.ChabriereE. (2013). Structural and enzymatic characterization of the phosphotriesterase OPHC2 from Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes.PLoS One8:e77995. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077995

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  HaoD. F.XuW.WangH.DuL. F.YangJ. D.ZhaoX. J.et al (2012). Metabolomic analysis of the toxic effect of chronic low-dose exposure to acephate on rats using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.Ecotoxixol. Environ. Saf.8325–33. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.06.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  HeX. W.GaoJ. W.DongT. Y.ChenM. J.ZhouK.ChangC. X.et al (2017). Developmental neurotoxicity of methamidophos in the embryo-larval stages of zebrafish.Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health14:23. 10.3390/ijerph14010023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  HelgesenK. O.RøysetK.AspehaugV.JansenP. A. (2019). The protective effect of the Phe362Tyr mutation in salmon lice’ (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) AChE when exposed to full-scale azamethiphos bath treatments.Aquaculture505517–522. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.03.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  HongS.RaushelF. M. (1999). Stereochemical preferences for chiral substrates by the bacterial phosphotriesterase.Chem. Biol. Interact.119–120225–234. 10.1016/S0009-2797(99)00031-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  HorneI.HarcourtR. L.SutherlandT. D.RussellR. J.OakeshottJ. G. (2002). Isolation of a Pseudomonas monteilli strain with a novel phosphotriesterase.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.20651–55. 10.1016/S0378-1097(01)00518-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  HuangY.LinZ.ZhangW.PangS.BhattP.ReneE. R.et al (2020). New insights into the microbial degradation of D-cyphenothrin in contaminated water/soil environments.Microorganisms8:473. 10.3390/microorganisms8040473

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  HuangY.ZhanH.BhattP.ChenS. (2019). Paraquat degradation from contaminated environments: current achievements and perspectives.Front. Microbiol.10:1754. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01754

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  HuangY. Y.ZhaoR. B.HungY. C.GaoH. Y.ZhangP. H.WangY.et al (2018). The mechanisms and process of acephate degradation by hydroxyl radical and hydrated electron.Saudi J. Biol. Sci.25226–233. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  JeffriesT. C.RayuS.NielsenU. N.LaiK.IjazA.NazariesL.et al (2018). Metagenomic functional potential predicts degradation rates of a model organophosphorus xenobiotic in pesticide contaminated soils.Front. Microbiol.9:147. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00147

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  JesionowskiT.ZdartaJ.KrajewskaB. (2014). Enzyme immobilization by adsorption: a review.Adsorption.20801–821. 10.1007/s10450-014-9623-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  JiangB.ZhangN. N.XingY.LianL. N.ChenY. T.ZhangD. Y.et al (2019). Microbial degradation of organophosphorus pesticides: novel degraders, kinetics, functional genes, and genotoxicity assessment.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.2621668–21681. 10.1007/s11356-019-05135-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  KallnikV.BunescuA.SayerC.BräsenC.WohlgemuthR.LittlechildJ.et al (2014). Characterization of a phosphotriesterase-like lactonase from the hyperthermoacidophilic crenarchaeon Vulcanisaetamoutnovskia.J. Biotechnol.19011–17. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.026

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  KambirandaD. M.Asraful-IslamS. M.ChoK. M.MathR. K.LeeY. H.KimH.et al (2009). Expression of esterase gene in yeast for organophosphates biodegradation.Pestic. Biochem. Phys.9415–20. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2009.02.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  KonstantinouI. K.HelaD. G.AlbanisT. A. (2006). The status of pesticide pollution in surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels.Environ. Pollut.141555–570. 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.07.024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  KumarS.KaushikG.DarM. A.NimeshS.López-chukenU. J.Villarreal-chiuJ. F. (2018). Microbial degradation of organophosphate pesticides: a review.Pedosphere28190–208. 10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60017-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  KumarV.UpadhyayN.KumaraV.SharmaS. (2015). A review on sample preparation and chromatographic determination of acephate and methamidophos in different samples.Arab. J. Chem.8624–631. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.12.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  LaiK.StolowichN. J.WildJ. R. (1995). Characterization of P-S bond hydrolysis in organophosphorothioate pesticides by organophosphorus hydrolase.Arch. Biochem. Biophys.31859–64. 10.1006/abbi.1995.1204

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  LiD. D.YuanY. Z.ChenY. L.LiN.LiJ. L.ZhengY. L.et al (2014). Isolation and characterization of three bacterium strains for biodegradation of methamidophos.Adv. Mater. Res.955–959235–238. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.955-959.235

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  LiJ.WuC.ChenS. H.LuQ.ShimH.HuangX.et al (2020). Enriching indigenous microbial consortia as a promising strategy for xenobiotics’ cleanup.J. Clean. Prod.261:121234. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121234

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  LiX. H.HeJ.LiS. P. (2007). Isolation of a chlorpyrifos-degrading bacterium, Sphingomonas sp. strain Dsp-2, and cloning of the mpd gene.Res. Microbiol.158143–149. 10.1016/j.resmic.2006.11.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  LiX. Y.ZhangH. W.WuM. N.ZhangY.ZhangC. G. (2008). Effect of methamidophos on soil fungi community in microcosms by plate count, DGGE and clone library analysis.J. Environ. Sci.20619–625. 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62103-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  LinW. T.HuangZ.LiX. Z.LiuM. H.ChengY. J. (2016). Bio-remediation of acephate-Pb(II) compound contaminants by Bacillus subtilis FZUL-33.J. Environ. Sci. China4594–99. 10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  LinZ.ZhangW.PangS.HuangY.MishraS.BhattP.et al (2020). Current approaches to and future perspectives on methomyl degradation in contaminated soil/water environments.Molecules25:738. 10.3390/molecules25030738

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  LiuW.ChenS. F.ZhaoW.ZhangS. J. (2009). Titanium dioxide mediated photocatalytic degradation of methamidophos in aqueous phase.J. Hazard. Mater.164154–160. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.140

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  LiuX. L.LiangM. J.LiuY. H.FanX. J. (2017). Directed evolution and secretory expression of a pyrethroid-hydrolyzing esterase with enhanced catalytic activity and thermostability.Microb. Cell Fact16:81. 10.1186/s12934-017-0698-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  LiuX. Y.WangL. F.ZhouX. M.LiuK. L.BaiL. Y.ZhouX. G. (2015). Photocatalytic degradation of acephate in pakchoi, Brassica chinensis, with Ce-doped TiO2.J. Environ. Sci. Health B50331–337. 10.1080/03601234.2015.1000177

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  LiuX. Y.ZhangQ. P.LiS. B.MiP.ChenD. Y.ZhaoX.et al (2018). Developmental toxicity and neurotoxicity of synthetic organic insecticides in zebrafish (Danio rerio): a comparative study of deltamethrin, acephate, and thiamethoxam.Chemosphere19916–25. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.176

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  LiuZ. S.ZhangY.KongL. W.LiuL.LuoJ.LiuB. Y.et al (2019). Preparation and preferential photocatalytic degradation of acephate by using the composite photocatalyst Sr/TiO2-PCFM.Chem. Eng. J.374852–862. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.06.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  LugokenskiT. H.GubertP.BuenoD. C.NogaraP. A.SaraivaR. D. A.BarcelosR. P.et al (2012). Effect of different oximes on rat and human cholinesterases inhibited by methamidophos: a comparativein vitro andin silico study.Basic Clin. Pharmacol.111362–370. 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2012.00912.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  MaddelaN. R.VenkateswarluK. (2017). “Bacterial utilization of Acephate and Buprofezin,” in Insecticides-Soil Microbiota Interactions, edsMaddelaN. R.VenkateswarluK. (Cham: Springer), 87–101. 10.1007/978-3-319-66589-4_10

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  MahajnaM.QuistadG. B.CasidaJ. E. (1997). Acephate insecticide toxicity: safety conferred by inhibition of the bioactivating carboxyamidase by the metabolite methamidophos.Chem. Res. Toxicol.1064–69. 10.1021/tx9601420

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  MaiaL. O.JúniorW. D.CarvalhoL. S.JesusL. R.PaivaG. D.AraujoP.et al (2011). Association of methamidophos and sleep loss on reproductive toxicity of male mice.Environ. Toxicol. Phar.32155–161. 10.1016/j.etap.2011.04.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  MalathiV. M.JalaliS. K.GowdaD. K. S.MohanM.VenkatesanT. (2017). Establishing the role of detoxifying enzymes in field-evolved resistance to various insecticides in the brown planthopper (Nilaparvatalugens) in South India.Insect Sci.2435–46. 10.1111/1744-7917.12254

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  MaqboolZ.HussainS.ImranM.MahmoodF.ShahzadT.AhmedZ.et al (2016). Perspectives of using fungi as bioresource for bioremediation of pesticides in the environment: a critical review.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.2316904–16925. 10.1007/s11356-016-7003-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  Martiìnez-HuitleC. A.De BattistiA.FerroS.ReynaS.Cerro-LoìpezM.QuiroM. A. (2008). Removal of the pesticide methamidophos from aqueous solutions by electrooxidation using Pb/PbO2, Ti/SnO2, and Si/BDD Electrodes.Environ. Sci. Technol.426929–6935. 10.1021/es8008419

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  MishraS.ZhangW.LinZ.PangS.HuangY.BhattP.et al (2020). Carbofuran toxicity and its microbial degradation in contaminated environments.Chemosphere259:127419. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127419

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  MohanN.NaveenaL. (2015). Isolation and determination of efficacy of acephate degrading bacteria from agricultural soil.J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol.910–20. 10.9790/2402-09321020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  MohapatraS.AhujaA. K.DeepaM.SharmaD. (2011). Residues of acephate and its metabolite methamidophos in/on mango fruit (Mangiferaindica L.).B. Environ. Contam. Tox.86101–104. 10.1007/s00128-010-0154-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  MullaS. I.AmeenF.TalwarM. P.EqaniS. A. M. A. S.SaxenaR. N. B. G.TallurP. N.et al (2020). “Organophosphate pesticides: impact on environment, toxicity, and their degradation,” in Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety, edsBharagavaR. N.SaxenaS. (Cham: Springer), 10.1007/978-981-13-1891-7_13

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  MuthyalaV. R.GundalaP. H. (2019). The wax encapsulated organophosphate hydrolase (WEO) displays prolonged shelf-life and effective in decontamination of methyl parathion and sarin.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India B89631–637. 10.1007/s40011-018-0977-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  Ortega-OlveraJ. M.WinklerR.Quintanilla-VegaB.ShibayamaM.Chávez-MunguíaB.Martín-TapiaD.et al (2018). The organophosphate pesticide methamidophos opens the blood-testis barrier and covalently binds to ZO-2 in mice.Toxicol. Appl. Pharm.360257–272. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.10.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  ÖzkanD.YüzbaşıoǧluD.ÜnalF.YılmazS.AksoyH. (2009). Evaluation of the cytogenetic damage induced by the organophosphorous insecticide acephate.Cytotechnology5973–80. 10.1007/s10616-009-9195-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  PanR.ChenH.WangC.WangQ.JiangY. (2015). Enantioselective dissipation of acephate and its metabolite, methamidophos, during tea cultivation, manufacturing, and infusion.J. Agric. Food Chem.631300–1308. 10.1021/jf504916b

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  PangS.LinZ.ZhangW.MishraS.BhattP.ChenS. (2020). Insights into the microbial degradation and biochemical mechanisms of neonicotinoids.Front. Microbiol.11:868. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00868

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  PengH. F.BaoX. D.ZhangY.HuangL.HuangH. Q. (2015). Identification of differentially expressed proteins of brain tissue in response to methamidophos in flounder (Paralichthysolivaceus).Fish Shellf. Immun.44555–565. 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.03.028

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  PhugareS. S.GaikwadY. B.JadhavJ. P. (2012). Biodegradation of acephate using a developed bacterial consortium and toxicological analysis using earthworms (Lumbricusterrestris) as a model animal.Int. Biodeter. Biodegr.691–9. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.11.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  PinjariA. B.NovikovB.RezenomY. H.RussellD. H.WalesM. E.SiddavattamD. (2012). Mineralization of acephate, a recalcitrant organophosphate insecticide is initiated by a Pseudomonad in environmental samples.PLoS One7:e31963. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031963

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  PinjariA. B.PandeyJ. P.KamireddyS.SiddavattamD. (2013). Expression and subcellular localization of organophosphate hydrolase in acephate-degrading Pseudomonas sp. strain Ind01 and its use as a potential biocatalyst for elimination of organophosphate insecticides.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.5763–68. 10.1111/lam.12080

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  QamruzzamanNasarA. (2014). Degradation of acephate by colloidal manganese dioxide in the absence and presence of surfactants.Desalin. Water Treat.82155–2164. 10.1080/19443994.2014.937752

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  RajakP.DuttaM.KhatunS.MandiM.RoyS. (2017). Exploring hazards of acute exposure of Acephate in Drosophila melanogaster and search for l-ascorbic acid mediated defense in it.J. Hazard Mater.321690–702. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.067

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  Ramirez-VargasM. A.Huerta-BeristainG.Guzman-GuzmanI. P.Alarcon-RomeroL. D. C.Flores-AlfaroE.Rojas-GarciaA. E.et al (2017). Methamidophos induces cytotoxicity and oxidative stress in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Environ. Toxicol.32147–155. 10.1002/tox.22220

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  RamuS.SeetharamanB. (2014). Biodegradation of acephate and methamidophos by a soil bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain Is-6.J. Environ. Sci. Health B4923–34. 10.1080/03601234.2013.836868

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  RibeiroT. A.PratesK. V.PavanelloA.MaltaA.TófoloL. P.MartinsI. P.et al (2016). Acephate exposure during a perinatal life program to type 2 diabetes.Toxicology37212–21. 10.1016/j.tox.2016.10.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  RodríguezT.de JoodeB. V. W.LindhC. H.RojasM.LundbergI.WesselingC. (2012). Assessment of long-term and recent pesticide exposure among rural school children in Nicaragua.Occup. Environ. Med.69119–125. 10.1136/oem.2010.062539

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  SchofieldD. A.DiNovoA. A. (2010). Generation of a mutagenized organophosphorus hydrolase for the biodegradation of the organophosphate pesticides malathion and demeton-S.J. Appl. Microbiol.109548–557. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04672.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  ScottC.PandeyG.HartleyC. J.JacksonC. J.CheesmanM. J.TaylorM. C.et al (2008). The enzymatic basis for pesticide bioremediation.Indian J. Microbiol.4865–79. 10.1007/s12088-008-0007-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  ShenY.LuP.MeiH.YuH.HongQ.LiS. (2010). Isolation of a methyl parathion-degrading strain Stenotrophomonas sp. SMSP-1 and cloning of the ophc2 gene.Biodegradation21785–792. 10.1007/s10532-010-9343-9342

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  ShriwasA. K.GogateP. R. (2011). Ultrasonic degradation of methyl parathion in aqueous solutions: intensification using additives and scale up aspects.Sep. Purif. Technol.791–7. 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  SinghS.KumarV.SinglaS.SharmaM.SinghD. P.PrasadR.et al (2020). Kinetic study of the biodegradation of acephate by indigenous soil bacterial isolates in the presence of humic acid and metal ions.Biomolecular10:433. 10.3390/biom10030433

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  SinghS.KumarV.UpadhyayN.SinghJ.SinglaS.DattaS. (2017). Efficient biodegradation of acephate by pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes PS-5 in the presence and absence of heavy metal ions [Cu(II) and Fe(III)], and humic acid.3 Biotech.7:262. 10.1007/s13205-017-0900-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  SonodaS.IgakiC. (2010). Characterization of acephate resistance in the diamondback moth plutellaxylostella.Pestic. Biochem. Phys.98121–127. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2010.05.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  SunW.ChenL.ZhangY.WangJ. (2015). Synergistic effect of ozonation and ionizing radiation for PVA decomposition.J. Environ. Sci. China3463–67. 10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.020

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  SyedJ. H.AlamdarA.MohammadA.AhadK.ShabirZ.AhmedH.et al (2014). Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Pakistan: a review of the occurrence and associated human health risks.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.2113367–13393. 10.1007/s11356-014-3117-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  TakayasuT.YamamotoH.IshidaY.NosakabM.KuninakabY.ShimadabE.et al (2019). Postmortem distribution of acephate and its metabolite methamidophos in body fluids and organ tissues of an intoxication case.Forensic. Sci. Int.300e38–e43. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  TripathiS. M.ThakerA. M.JoshiC. G.SankhalaL. N. (2012). Acephateimmunotoxicity in White Leghorn cockerel chicks upon experimental exposure.Environ. Toxicol. Phar.34192–199. 10.1016/j.etap.2012.04.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  Urióstegui-AcostaM.Hernández-OchoaI.Sánchez-GutiérrezM.Piña-GuzmánB.Rafael-VázquezL.Solís-HerediaM. J.et al (2014). Methamidophos alters sperm function and DNA at different stages of spermatogenesis in mice.Toxicol. Appl. Pharm.279391–400. 10.1016/j.taap.2014.06.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  WangB.ZhuC. P.GongR. H.ZhuJ.HuangB.XuF.et al (2015). Degradation of acephate using combined ultrasonic and ozonation method.Water Sci. Eng.8233–238. 10.1016/j.wse.2015.03.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  WangL.WangG. L.LiS. P.JiangJ. D. (2011). Luteibacter jiangsuensis sp. nov.: a methamidophos-degrading bacterium isolated from a methamidophos-manufacturing factory.Curr. Microbiol.62289–295. 10.1007/s00284-010-9707-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  WangL.WenY.GuoX. Q.WangG. L.LiS. P.JiangJ. D. (2010). Degradation of methamidophos by Hyphomicrobium species MAP-1 and the biochemical degradation pathway.Biodegradation21513–523. 10.1007/s10532-009-9320-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  WangM. C.LiuY. H.WangQ.GongM.HuaX. M.PangY. J.et al (2008). Impacts of methamidophos on the biochemical, catabolic, and genetic characteristics of soil microbial communities.Soil Biol. Biochem.40778–788. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.10.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  WangS. H.ZhangC.YanY. C. (2012). Biodegradation of methyl parathion and p-nitrophenol by a newly isolated Agrobacterium sp. strain Yw12.Biodegradation23107–116. 10.1007/s10532-011-9490-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  World Health Organization [WHO] (2009). The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification.Geneva: WHO.

  • Google Scholar

• 119

  WuN. F.DengM. J.LiangG. Y.ChuX. Y.YaoB.FanY. L. (2004). Cloning and expression of ophc2, a new organphosphorus hydrolase gene.Chin. Sci. Bull.491245–1249. 10.1360/04wc0146

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  XuL.WuM.HanZ. J. (2014). Biochemical and molecular characterisation and cross-resistance in field and laboratory chlorpyrifos-resistant strains of Laodelphaxstriatellus (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) from eastern China.Pest Manag. Sci.701118–1129. 10.1002/ps.3657

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  YangJ.FengY.ZhanH.LiuJ.YangF.ZhangK.et al (2018). Characterization of a pyrethroid-degrading Pseudomonas fulva strain P31 and biochemical degradation pathway of D-phenothrin.Front. Microbiol.9:1003. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  YangJ.GaoY. P.LiuW. H.GeW.ZhaoR. B. (2015). The degradation and mineralization of acephate by ionization irradiation.Environ. Prog. Sustain.34324–332. 10.1002/ep.11983

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  YangX. Q.LiuJ. Y.LiX. C.ChenM. H.ZhangY. L. (2014). Key amino acid associated with acephate detoxification by Cydiapomonella carboxylesterase based on molecular dynamics with alanine scanning and site-directed mutagenesis.J. Chem. Inf. Model.541356–1370. 10.1021/ci500159q

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  YaoJ.ZhuY. C.AdamczykJ.LuttrellR. (2018). Influences of acephate and mixtures with other commonly used pesticides on honey bee (Apis mellifera) survival and detoxification enzyme activities.Comp. Biochem. Phys. C2099–17. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2018.03.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  ZangS. Y.YinL. L.MaY.WangT. T.WuH. X. (2013). Removal of acephate and Hg2+ in compounding wastewater with immobilized microorganism.Adv. Mater. Res.838–8412400–2403. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.838-841.2400

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  ZhanH.HuangY.LinZ.BhattP.ChenS. (2020). New insights into the microbial degradation and catalytic mechanism of synthetic pyrethroids.Environ. Res.182:109138. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109138

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  ZhanH.WangH.LiaoL.FengY.FanX.ZhangL. H.et al (2018). Kinetics and novel degradation pathway of permethrin in Acinetobacter baumannii ZH-14.Front. Microbiol.9:98. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00098

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  ZhangJ.LuL.ChenF.ChenL.YinJ.HuangX. (2018). Detoxification of diphenyl ether herbicide lactofen by Bacillus sp. Za and enantioselective characteristics of an esterase gene lacE.J. Hazard Mater.341336–345. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.064

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  ZhangL.YanF.ShuM. M.LiQ.ZhaoZ. Y. (2009). Investigation of the degradation behaviour of methamidophos under microwave irradiation.Desalination247396–402. 10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  ZhangL.YanF.WangY. N.GuoX. J.ZhangP. (2006). Photocatalytic degradation of methamidophos by UV irradiation in the presence of Nano-TiO2.Inorgan. Mater.421379–1387. 10.1134/S002016850612017X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  ZhangN.GuoQ. Q.LiuX. F.SongK.WangS.WangM. X.et al (2013). Optimization of liquid culture conditions of methamidophos degrading enzyme from Staphylococcus rosehbach.Appl. Mech. Mater.303–3062683–2686. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.303-306.2683

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  ZhangW.LinZ.PangS.BhattP.ChenS. (2020). Insights into the biodegradation of lindane (γ-hexacholocyclohexane) using a microbial system.Front. Microbiol.11:522. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00522

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  ZhaoR. B.BaoH. Y.LiuY. X. (2010). Isolation and characterization of Penicillium oxalicum ZHJ6 for biodegradation of methamidophos.Agr. Sci. China9695–703. 10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60145-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  ZhaoR. B.BaoH. Y.XiaL. Y. (2009). γ -Irradiation degradation of methamidophos.Chin. J. Chem.91749–1754. 10.1002/cjoc.200990294

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  ZhaoY.ZhaoP.WangY.QiW. J. (2014). Isolation, identification, and characterization of an organophosphorous pesticide degrading bacterium, Enterobacter ludwigii M2.Adv. Mater. Res.1051398–403. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1051.398

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  ZhengL. L.PiF. W.WangY. F.XuH.ZhangY. Z.SunX. L. (2016). Photocatalytic degradation of acephate, omethoate, and methyl parathion by Fe3O4@SiO2@mTiO2nanomicrospheres.J. Hazard Mater.31511–22. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.064

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  ZhouQ. X.WangM.LiangJ. D. (2008). Ecological detoxification of methamidophos by earthworms in phaiozem co-contaminated with acetochlor and copper.Appl. Soil Ecol.40138–145. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.03.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar