ATP-sensitive peptide-based coacervates for intracellular delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides

Despite advances in the fields of lipoplexes, metal nanoparticles, and other nucleic acid carriers, intracellular delivery of DNA/RNA therapeutics remains a pressing area of molecular medicine. The existing delivery systems have limitations in terms of stability, efficacy, or toxicity. Peptide-based coacervates have recently emerged as a promising alternative. They offer several advantages, including easy DNA/RNA incorporation, low toxicity, and the ability to penetrate membranes. However, they have one main drawback: inefficient intracellular unpacking. In this study, we present a novel approach to programmed drug release from peptide-based coacervates. We used a previously described intrinsically disordered histidine-rich peptide as a coacervate scaffold and introduced a viral or human protein-derived ATP-responsive module into its sequence. We assembled the coacervates by mixing the resulting peptides with RNA and a model oligonucleotide (ODN), plasmid DNA, or mRNA in a pseudophysiological buffer. The admixtures of labeled peptides and ODN enabled monitoring coacervate formation and dynamics using fluorescence microscopy. The coacervates were relatively stable in ATP-free environments and underwent rearrangements involving the partial release of the ODN in the presence of ATP. The coacervates penetrated HEK293 cells within 4 hours and released the ODN into the cytoplasm within 20 h. They were inferior to the ATP-insensitive (control) peptide in delivery assays with plasmid DNA and mRNA but outperformed the control peptide in assays with the ODN. Our preliminary results suggest that ATP-sensitive coacervates have potential as ODN carriers.

1 Introduction

Efficient intracellular delivery of nucleic acid (NA) fragments and derivatives is important for fundamental research and therapeutic strategies involving the use of antisense oligonucleotides, synthetic small interfering RNA, guide RNA, etc., for mRNA targeting or gene editing (Sabatos-Peyton et al., 2010; Vickery et al., 2011; Bartolucci et al., 2022). Liposomal, polymeric and micellar nanoparticles are commonly used as delivery vehicles for mRNA or antisense oligonucleotides (Lorscheider et al., 2021; Pacheco et al., 2023). Their limitations include the lack of biodegradation, low bioavailability toxicity, etc. (Chong et al., 2014; Gupta et al., 2019; Kumawat et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022).

Coacervate-based delivery systems are a promising modern alternative to classical (liposomal or polymeric) nanoparticles. NA incorporation occurs throughout the coacervate volume due to multiple weak electrostatic interactions and is characterized by high efficiency. Furthermore, coacervates effectively protect therapeutic NAs from biodegradation (Sun et al., 2022). The main advantages of coacervates over classical nanoparticles include biocompatibility, ease of cell penetration, and low cytotoxicity (Jo et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2020). In addition to delivering NAs or low-molecular-weight agents to tumor cells (Liu et al., 2022), coacervates and similar hydrogel-type systems have been used to deliver protein growth factors to damaged tissues (Kim et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2018). These applications demonstrate the potential of coacervates in regenerative medicine, oncotherapy, and allergy treatment.

Of the peptide-based coacervates being considered as delivery systems, HBpep coacervates are the most thoroughly characterized (Lim et al., 2018; 2020; Shebanova et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022; 2025; Liu et al., 2023; Pramanik et al., 2025). The HBpep sequence (GHGVY GHGVY GHGPY GHGPY GHGLY W), derived from the squid beak protein HBP (Tan et al., 2015), shows high propensity for coacervation due to multiple His and Gly residues (Blocher and Perry, 2017). The coacervates successfully delivered therapeutic agents into cells but remained stable for several days, resulting in inefficient drug release (Lim et al., 2018). To solve this problem, Sun et al. modified the peptide design to make it redox-sensitive (Sun et al., 2022). Specifically, they inserted a single Lys residue into HBpep, which shifted the optimal pH for coacervation from 7.5 to 9.0, and masked this Lys residue with a redox-sensitive (disulfide bond-containing) “self-destructive” moiety. The resulting HBpep variant (HBpep-SR) formed coacervates that readily incorporated guest macromolecules at pH 6.5 and released them after crossing the cellular membrane in response to intracellular glutathione. The only drawback of this approach is the complexity of HBpep-SR synthesis.

Here, we report a different approach to fine-tuning coacervates for efficient drug release. To facilitate intracellular disassembly, we introduced an ATP-sensitive module into the HBpep sequence. This modification is compatible with the standard peptide synthesis and thus might be more convenient than HBpep-SR. We report the selection of an optimal ATP-sensitive module and verification of its effect on the coacervate packing and unpacking.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Peptides, oligonucleotide, plasmids, and mRNA

Oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ODN) 22AG (purity >95%, HPLC), labeled with dichloro-diphenyl-fluorescein (SIMA) was obtained from Litekh (Russia).

pCMV-Fluc, the PGL4-based plasmid with the Firefly luciferase (FLuc) gene under the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, was obtained from Promega (United States).

pEGFP-N1(GenBank Accession #U55762), the pCDNA3.1-based plasmid with the enhanced green fluorescence protein (GFP) gene under the CMV promoter, was obtained from CLONOTECH Laboratories, Inc. (United States).

Torula yeast-derived mixed-sequence RNA (random RNA) was purchased from HiMedia Laboratories (Thane, India).

mRNA Fluc was prepared as follows. To obtain a DNA template for in vitro transcription, we designed a construct encoding Fluc with beta-globin 3′-and 5′-UTRs, which have been proposed previously for mRNA vaccines (Mueller and Fine, 2021), under the T7 promoter:

TAATACGACTCACTATAGAATAAACTAGTATTCTTCTGGTCCCCACAGACTCAGAGAGAACCCGCCACCATGN_xTGATGAGCTGCCTTCTGCGGGGCTTGCCTTCTGGCCATGCCCTTCTTCTCTCCCTTGCACCTGTACCTCTTGGTCTTTGAATAAAGCCTGAGTAGGAAGGCGGCCGC

Bold, T7 promoter; Italics, UTRs; underlined, start/stop codones, N_x – the Fluc coding sequence. The Fluc fragment was amplified from pCMV-Fluc, and other fragments were assembled from synthetic ODNs.

The T7-FLuc construct was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, United States). The resulting plasmid was transformed into E. coli Top10 competent cells, and the cells were grown overnight on an ampicillin-containing agar at 37 °C. Colony PCR screening was performed using M13F/M13R primers. Selected clones were incubated overnight. Then, the plasmid was isolated using the Plasmid Midi Kit (Qualigen, United States), and its sequence was verified by Sanger sequencing.

In vitro transcription was performed using the “In Vitro mRNA Synthesis Kit (with m7GmAmG)” kit (Biolabmix, Russia), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, substituting ΨTP for UTP. The resulting RNA was isolated using the DR-50 kit for DNA and RNA isolation from reaction mixtures. Polyadenylation was then performed using the mRNA Poly(A) Tailing Kit (Invitrogen, United States), following to the manufacturer’s protocol. The transcript length before polyadenylation was verified by electrophoresis in 1% agarose.

Peptides were synthesized using the Fmoc strategy and standard protocols for the solid-phase peptide synthesis with microwave treatment of the reaction mixture (Vedekhina et al., 2024) on a Liberty Blue Synthesizer (CEM Corporation, Matthews, United States).

2.2 Coacervate assembly, ATP-sensitivity assays, and microscopy imaging

To assemble the coacervates, a water solution of the HBpep-ATP peptide (99% unlabeled and 1% FITC-labeled) was supplemented with random RNA and SIMA-22AG in a 10 mM Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 150 mM NaCl, achieving final concentrations of 5 mg/mL (peptide), 3 mg/mL (RNA) and 10 μM (ODN). We assessed the sensitivity of the peptide coacervates to ATP by measuring the number of coacervates and their size as at different ATP concentrations (2.5–20 mM). Coacervates were visualized using an Eclipse Ti2 microscope (Nikon, Japan) with FITC excitation at 488 nm and a cut-off filter of 520 nm or with SIMA excitation in the 531 nm and a cut-off filter of 555 nm. ImageJ (Fiji) software, version 1.54d, was used to analyze the colocalization of FITC-peptides and SIMA-22AG. The DropletCalc program (Shtork et al., 2025) was used to estimate the radii and the total area of the coacervate projections S_t, which, in the first approximation, can be linked to coacervate number N and the average radius r_av: S_t $\sim$ Nπr_av². The S_t values were normalized by the area of the glass support, and the resulting normalized values (%) are indicative of the coacervate fraction.

The efficiency of SIMA-22AG loading into coacervates was calculated as a percentage of SIMA-positive (red) pixels within FITC-positive (green) droplets normalized by the mean droplet:intial solution SIMA intensity ratio. Relative SIMA intensities and the pixel fraction were calculated using the ImageJ analysis tools (Fiji software, version 1.54d).

2.3 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP)

FRAP experiments were performed using an Olympus FV3000 microscope equipped with a ×40 objective lens. The FITC-labeled peptide HBpep-ATP-1 in the coacervate was excited using an argon laser at 488 nm, and the emission signals were collected within the 500–530 nm range. HBpep-ATP-1 photobleaching was performed using a 10x pulse of a laser (488 nm) at 10% intensity for the FITC-peptide (40 s) through half of the coacervate (10–12 μm). After photobleaching, images were acquired at a rate of 3.2 s per frame and at 1% intensity every min during the first 10–15 min and then every 5 min. The fluorescence intensity of the bleached area over time was calculated using ImageJ (Fiji software, version 1.54d) and normalized by the intensity of the nearby non-bleached droplet.

2.4 Cytotoxicity assays

The viability of coacervate-treated HEK-293 cells was assessed by using the EZBlue™ Cell Assay Kit (HiMedia Laboratories, India). HEK-293 cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 5% CO₂ and 37 °C, tested for mycoplasma infection, and grown in a 96-well plate in DMEM (PanEco, Russia) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PanEco, Russia), 2 mM glutamine (PanEco, Russia), and 10% FBS (HyClone GE Healthcare, United States).

After incubating for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO₂, 100 µL of medium were removed from each well. Then, 100 µL of freshly prepared suspensions of HBpep-ATP peptide and random RNA coacervates at various concentrations (from 0.04 to 2.5 mg/mL of peptide, respectively) were added to the medium. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C, 10 μL of EZBlue™ Solution (HiMedia Laboratories, India) was added to the each well, and the cells were incubated for 2 more hours. Fluorescence was then measured at 560 nm excitation (EX) and590 nm emission (EM) 4 and 24 h after adding the peptides using an Infinite M200 PRO plate reader (Tecan, Switzerland).

2.5 Coacervate-based transfection and verification of its efficiency

HEK-293 cells were grown in a 96-well plate as described above to a confluency of ∼60%. For SIMA-22AG delivery,100 μL of freshly prepared suspensions of oligonucleotide-loaded peptide coacervates (2 μM oligonucleotide, 1 mg/mL HBpep-ATP peptides, 0.5 mg/mL random RNA) were added to each well after removing the medium. After 4 h of incubation, the solution was removed, and the cells were washed twice with PBS. Then 100 μL of fresh medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, antibiotics) was added, and the cells were incubated for an additional 20 h at 37 °C. Penetration and unpacking of the coacervates were monitored using the JuLI™ Stage imaging system (NanoEntek, South Korea).

To deliver EGFP- or Fluc-encoding plasmid DNAs (pDNAs) or the Fluc-encoding mRNA, DMEM was replaced with 90 μL of OptiMEM. Next, 10 μL of freshly prepared pDNA- or mRNA-loaded peptide coacervates (0.5 mg/mL HBpep-ATP variants, 0.3 mg/mL RNA, 10 μg/mL pDNA or mRNA) were added. Lipofectamine™ and MessengerMAX™ (Invitrogen, United States) were used as control transfection reagents, and the respective procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. After 4 h of incubation, the transfection solutions were replaced with fresh medium, and the cells were incubated for additional 24 h (EGFP) or 48 h (Fluc). The EGFP fluorescent signal was detected using the JuLI™ Stage imaging system (NanoEntek, South Korea). Fluc transfection was assessed using the One-Glow Luciferase Assay System (Promega, United States), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The luciferase luminescent signal was measured using an Infinite M200 PRO plate reader (Tecan, Switzerland).

3 Results and discussion

We aimed to obtain HBpep-based peptides that assemble into ATP-sensitive coacervates for ATP-driven intracellular disassembly. The ability of ATP to solubilize peptides and proteins is due to its amphiphilic nature. The combination of a charged fragment (phosphate) and an aromatic fragment (nucleobase) enables ATP to disrupt typical coacervate contacts, including π-π/π-cation interactions between aromatic residues and the cationic amino acid residues, as well as ionic bonds, van der Waals interactions, and hydrogen bonds (Nott et al., 2015; Riback et al., 2017; Vernon et al., 2018; Chiu et al., 2020).

We searched for short ATP-binding motifs to introduce into the HBpep sequence and selected consensus motifs that are overrepresented in human kinases (Xiao et al., 2013) and fragments of viral proteins (Mujeeb et al., 1994; Titolo et al., 1999; Scholz, 2003). Motif 1 (the P-loop sequence GxxxxGK) was identified by screening biotin-labeled peptides from all human ATP-binding proteins, and motif 2 (HRDxKxxN) was derived exclusively from kinases (Xiao et al., 2013). The viral motifs include the ATP-binding sites of the terminase subunit pUL56 of the human cytomegalovirus (Scholz, 2003) (motifs 3, 4, and 5) and the helicase of the human papillomavirus type 11 E1 (Titolo et al., 1999) (motif 6). Table 1 shows the sequences of the resulting peptides with the ATP-binding modules (HBpep-ATP-1–6), as well as the control peptide lacking the ATP module (HBpep-contr). Initially, we added each ATP-sensitive module to the C-terminus of the peptide (HBpep-ATP-1–6). After the first round of assays, we selected a leader, and added its analog with the ATP-module shifted to the N-terminus (HBpep-ATP-1Nt) to the peptide set.

Table 1

Table 1. Sequences of HBpep-ATP variants.

To facilitate imaging of the coacervates, the peptides were labeled at their N-termini with a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) residue, which fluoresces in the green range of the spectrum. The labeled peptides were then mixed 1:99 with the unlabeled peptides. Random RNA was added to stimulate coacervation. In line with previous reports for HBpep (Harrison and Shorter, 2017), peptide coacervation was inefficient in weakly acidic aqueous solutions and in the absence of RNA (Figure 1A). After adding RNA in a pH 7.4 buffer, peptides HBpep-ATP-1(Nt), HBpep-ATP-3, and HBpep-ATP-6 (Supplementary Figures S1, S2) exhibited good coacervation, similar to HBpep-ATP-contr (Supplementary Figures S3). The resulting coacervates appeared as brightly colored, mobile, micrometer-sized droplets that partially wetted the glass surface (Figure 1A). Their circularity was ≥0.8. The coacervates were stable in ATP-free solutions for at least 24 h. HBpep-ATP-2 separated with RNA, but some of the resulting droplets had irregular shapes (circularity ≤0.6), which suggests gelation or solidification. In the cases of HBpep-ATP-4 and HBpep-ATP-5, phase separation was minor (Supplementary Figure S4). We conclude that ATP-sensitive motifs 2, 4, and 5, but not motifs 1, 3, and 6, hamper droplet formation.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Biophysical characterization of HBpep-ATP variants. (A) Conditions for coacervation of HBpep-ATPs. (B,C) Fluorescence micrographs (B) and recovery curves (C) of HBpep-ATP-1. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of n = 3 independent experiments. (D) Colocalization of FITC-HBpep-ATP-1 (green) and SIMA-22AG (red). (E) Fractions of coacervates, calculated based on their total projection area, at different ATP concentrations. (F) Coacervate size at different of ATP concentrations.

The liquid state of the observed droplets was confirmed using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) (Figures 1B,C). A fragment of a droplet from the FITC-labeled HBpep-ATP-1-containing sample was bleached, and the fluorescence recovery was monitored for 30 min. Representative images are shown in Figure 1B. The recovery reached ≈65% (Figure 1C) and was moderately slow, with an apparent tau_1/2 of 190 ± 30 s, which is consistent with the dense liquid state. Therefore, the observed droplets are indeed coacervates rather than solid aggregates.

To verify the ability of coacervates to incorporate nucleic acid therapeutics, we used a G-quadruplex-forming fragment of human telomeric repeats (GGGTTA)₃GGG (22AG) as a model ODN. Quadruplexes have recently emerged as a promising new type of anticancer drug candidates. The first FDA-approved therapeutic of this type (World Health Organization, 2024), Imetelstat (RYTELO™), is a lipid-conjugated oligonucleotide (Carloni et al., 2021; Keam, 2024) that inhibits telomerase and can be regarded as a 22AG mimic.

The SIMA-labeled model ODN (SIMA-22AG), that fluoresces in the red channel, was added to a mixture of unlabeled and FITC-labeled peptides at pH 7.4. This had no significant effect on the morphology of the coacervates visualized in the green channel (Supplementary Figures S1-S3). The colocalization of coacervates in the red and green channels (Figure 1D) confirms the ODN incorporation. A few ODN-free droplets were observed, and the colocalization seemed to be incomplete for small droplets, likely due to their rapid movement revealed by visual screening. Nevertheless, the apparent colocalization was within the range of 75%–90% for all HBpep variants, and the ODN loading efficiency (60% ± 20% for HBpep-ATP-1, 40% ± 3% for HBpep-ATP-3, 15% ± 2% for HBpep-ATP-6, 38% ± 9% for HBpep-ATP-1Nt, and 40% ± 10% for HBpep-ATP-contr) varied in accordance with the total coacervate projection area (Figure 1E).

Next, we tested the efficiency of ATP-driven coacervate unpacking in vitro at ATP concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 20 mM. Coacervates of all peptides, except HBpep-contr, with random RNA and SIMA-labeled ODN showed clear, dose-dependent disassembly (Supplementary Figure S1-S3). It was evident from the analysis of the total coacervate projection area (Figure 1E). In contrast, the ATP-dependence of HBpep-contr coacervates was irregular and the least pronounced (Figure 1E; Supplementary Figure S3). HBpep-ATP-3 coacervates also exhibited an ATP-dependent decrease in average coacervate size (Figure 1F; Supplementary Figure S2).

Before testing the coacervates as intracellular delivery vehicles, we evaluated their cytotoxicity. Figure 2A summarizes their effects on the viability of HEK293 cells. Most of the coacervates were nontoxic at concentrations up to 1 mg/mL, with CC₅₀ values exceeding 1.25 mg/mL in all cases.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of HBpep-ATPs and intracellular delivery of different types of nucleic acids. (A) Cytotoxicity of HBpep-ATPs on HEK293 cells. (B) Intracellular delivery of SIMA-22AG: representative fluorescence microscopy images. Arrows mark coacervates in different states: green, intact coacervates; yellow, the disassembly begins (the cargo label is visible but remains mostly colocalized with the peptide label); red, the cargo is released. (C) Kinetic curves summarizing the release of SIMA-22AG from HBpep-ATP-1/HBpep-ATP-1Nt/HBpep-contr in HEK-293. The curves were normalized by the ODN loading efficiency. (D) Intracellular delivery of luciferase-encoding mRNA and luciferase-encoding plasmid pCMV-Fluc evaluated by using luciferase assays (gray) and the delivery of EGFP-encoding plasmid pEGFP-N1 evaluated by fluorescence microscopy (green). (E) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of HEK-293 cells transfected with pEGFP-N1 within HBpep-contr, HBpep-ATP-1, and HBpep-ATP-1Nt coacervates (the images were taken 24 h after transfection).

Next, we tested the coacervate-based delivery of the model oligonucleotide 22AG to HEK293 cells. We monitored the internalization of FITC-labeled HBpep-ATP-based coacervates (green) and SIMA-labeled 22AG (red) using fluorescence microscopy in real time (Figure 2B; Supplementary Figures S5-S7). The resulting kinetic curves are shown in Figure 2C. HBpep-ATP-3- and HBpep-ATP-6-based coacervates either failed to enter cells or were rather unstable in the biological media (despite the reasonable stability in PBS) and disassembled prior to cellular uptake. HBpep-contr-based coacervates entered cells but remained stable after the uptake for 24 h and showed inefficient 22AG release (Supplementary Figure S5). HBpep-ATP-1-based coacervates entered cells within 4 h and released SIMA-22AG into the cytoplasm within 20 h (Supplementary Figure S6). Thus, HBpep-ATP-1 was the most promising peptide from the initial set with the ATP module at the C-terminus. Because the position of the module can affect the peptide’s physical properties and performance in delivery assays, we obtained an HBpep-ATP-1 analog, HBpep-ATP-1Nt, with the same kinase-derived ATP module at the N-terminus, and repeated all the experiments. The performance of HBpep-ATP-1Nt in vitro was mostly similar to that of HBpep-ATP-1 (Figures 1D,E; Supplementary Figure S1), while in HEK-293 cells it slightly outperformed HBpep-ATP-1 in oligonucleotide delivery assays (Figures 2B,C; Supplementary Figures S6, S7).

Finally, we examined the potential use of the new coacervates in delivering long therapeutic nucleic acids, such as mRNA or DNA, which are being used more frequently as vaccine components. To do so, we used a model mRNA that encodes the Firefly luciferase reporter protein (FLuc), a model plasmid that contains the same reporter gene (pCMV-Fluc), and a plasmid that encodes green fluorescent protein (pEGFP-N1). We assessed the efficiency of mRNA/pCMV-Fluc delivery to HEK293 cells in HBpep-ATP-1 coacervates using standard luciferase assays, and the efficiency of pEGFP-N1 delivery in HBpep-ATP-1, HBpep-ATP-1Nt, or HBpep-contr coacervates using fluorescence microscopy imaging 1 day after transfection (Figure 2D). For the control assays, we used standard transfection reagents Messenger Max and Lipofectamine 3,000 for mRNA and DNA, respectively. HBpep-ATP-1 substantially underperformed to the known transfectants in Fluc assays and was inferior to HBpep-contr in pEGFP delivery assays. HBpep-ATP-1Nt slightly outperformed HBpep-ATP-1 in the pEGFP assays but was still substantially inferior to HBpep-contr.

To gain insight into possible reasons for the poor performance of HBpep-ATP-1 in the plasmid delivery assay compared to the ODN delivery assay, we performed additional FRAP experiments with 22AG-loaded and pEGFP-loaded coacervates (Supplementary Figure S8) and compared the results to those obtained for the cargo-free coacervates (Figure 1B). ODN 22AG caused no substantial changes in the recovery kinetics of FITC-HBpep-ATP-1 (tau_1/2 = 220 ± 20 s), whereas pEGFP slowed it down significantly (tau_1/2 = 440 ± 30 s). The latter result suggests reduced diffusion within coacervates, which suggests reduced DNA release and may partly explain reduced expression.

Thus, HBpep-contr is suitable for the intracellular delivery of the lengthy DNA/RNA, probably because such a cargo can be released in an ATP-independent manner. In contrast, the ATP module-containing peptides HBpep-ATP-1 and HBpep-ATP-1Nt are tuned for short oligonucleotides. Lengthy nucleic acids can form multiple transient interactions with the ATP modules, yielding coacervates of increased density, which may account for inefficient unpacking. Thus, future studies of the coacervates could include determination of the threshold nucleic acid size and the optimization of the peptide:nucleic acid ratio. Additionally, the mixed-sequence random RNA could be substituted for a more appropriate homogeneous biopolymer.

To summarize, we have demonstrated that HBpep-ATPs form coacervates that incorporate different NAs. These cargo-loaded coacervates are engulfed by HEK293 cells and disassemble, supposedly due to the relatively high intracellular ATP levels (0.2–15.8 mM (Greiner and Glonek, 2021)), releasing the cargo into the cytosol. The precise uptake mechanism of such peptide coacervates awaits clarification. Based on the previous studies of other coacervates, lipid-raft-mediated endocytosis appears to be the likely one (Vedekhina et al., 2025). The coacervates based on HBpep variants with the human kinase-derived ATP module were superior to unmodified HBpep in assays with the model ODN 22AG, making them promising platforms for intracellular delivery of short oligonucleotide therapeutics.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

TV: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. VA: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. NP: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. EM: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. SA: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. VS: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. MB: Methodology, Writing – original draft. PB: Writing – original draft, Methodology. AV: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 24-25-00441.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2026.1767656/full#supplementary-material

References

Bartolucci, D., Pession, A., Hrelia, P., and Tonelli, R. (2022). Precision anti-cancer medicines by oligonucleotide therapeutics in clinical research targeting undruggable proteins and non-coding RNAs. Pharmaceutics 14, 1453. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14071453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blocher, W. C., and Perry, S. L. (2017). Complex coacervate-based materials for biomedicine. WIREs Nanomedicine Nanobiotechnology 9. doi:10.1002/wnan.1442

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carloni, L. E., Wechselberger, R., and De Vijlder, T. (2021). Characterization of in vitro G-Quadruplex formation of imetelstat telomerase inhibitor. Nucleic Acid. Ther. 31, 341–350. doi:10.1089/nat.2020.0918

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chiu, Y.-P., Sun, Y.-C., Qiu, D.-C., Lin, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-Q., Kuo, J.-C., et al. (2020). Liquid-liquid phase separation and extracellular multivalent interactions in the tale of galectin-3. Nat. Commun. 11, 1229. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15007-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chong, Y., Ma, Y., Shen, H., Tu, X., Zhou, X., Xu, J., et al. (2014). The in vitro and in vivo toxicity of graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials 35, 5041–5048. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Greiner, J. V., and Glonek, T. (2021). Intracellular ATP concentration and implication for cellular evolution. Biol. (Basel). 10, 1166. doi:10.3390/biology10111166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, N., Rai, D. B., Jangid, A. K., and Kulhari, H. (2019). A review of theranostics applications and toxicities of carbon nanomaterials. Curr. Drug Metab. 20, 506–532. doi:10.2174/1389200219666180925094515

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harrison, A. F., and Shorter, J. (2017). RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in health and disease. Biochem. J. 474, 1417–1438. doi:10.1042/BCJ20160499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jo, H., Gajendiran, M., and Kim, K. (2019). Development of polymer coacersome structure with enhanced colloidal stability for therapeutic protein delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 19, e1900207. doi:10.1002/mabi.201900207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keam, S. J. (2024). Imetelstat: first approval. Drugs 84, 1149–1155. doi:10.1007/s40265-024-02080-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, S., Kim, J., Gajendiran, M., Yoon, M., Hwang, M. P., Wang, Y., et al. (2018). Enhanced skull bone regeneration by sustained release of BMP-2 in interpenetrating composite hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 19, 4239–4249. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumawat, M. K., Thakur, M., Bahadur, R., Kaku, T. R. S. P., Suchitta, A., Ninawe, A., et al. (2019). Preparation of graphene oxide-graphene quantum dots hybrid and its application in cancer theranostics. Mat. Sci. Eng. C 103, 109774. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109774

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, Z. W., Ping, Y., and Miserez, A. (2018). Glucose-Responsive peptide coacervates with high encapsulation efficiency for controlled release of insulin. Bioconjug. Chem. 29, 2176–2180. doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, Z. W., Varma, V. B., Ramanujan, R. V., and Miserez, A. (2020). Magnetically responsive peptide coacervates for dual hyperthermia and chemotherapy treatments of liver cancer. Acta Biomater. 110, 221–230. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J.-F., Wee, Y., Luo, S.-D., Chang, S.-F., Jia, S., Feng, S.-W., et al. (2022). Proanthocyanidins-loaded complex coacervates-based drug delivery attenuates oral squamous cell carcinoma cells metastatic potential through down-regulating the Akt signaling pathway. Front. Oncol. 12, 1001126. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1001126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Spruijt, E., Miserez, A., and Langer, R. (2023). Peptide-based liquid droplets as emerging delivery vehicles. Nat. Rev. Mat. 8, 139–141. doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00528-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lorscheider, M., Gaudin, A., Nakhlé, J., Veiman, K.-L., Richard, J., and Chassaing, C. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in the delivery of cancer therapeutics: update on recent progress. Ther. Deliv. 12, 55–76. doi:10.4155/tde-2020-0079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Y.-J., Lan, Y.-H., Chuang, C.-C., Lu, W.-T., Chan, L.-Y., Hsu, P.-W., et al. (2020). Injectable thermo-sensitive Chitosan Hydrogel containing CPT-11-Loaded EGFR-Targeted graphene oxide and SLP2 shRNA for localized Drug/Gene delivery in glioblastoma therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7111. doi:10.3390/ijms21197111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mueller, L., and Fine, G. D. (2021). Methods of treating cancer with a PD-1 axis binding antagonist and an RNA vaccine. U.S. Pat. app. No 2021/0346485. Available online at: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/0e/91/90/c28abae4a4b4da/US20210346485A1.pdf.

Google Scholar

Mujeeb, A., Bishop, K., Peterlin, B. M., Turck, C., Parslow, T. G., and James, T. L. (1994). NMR structure of a biologically active peptide containing the RNA-Binding domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91, 8248–8252. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.17.8248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nott, T. J., Petsalaki, E., Farber, P., Jervis, D., Fussner, E., Plochowietz, A., et al. (2015). Phase transition of a disordered nuage protein generates environmentally responsive membraneless organelles. Mol. Cell 57, 936–947. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pacheco, C., Baião, A., Ding, T., Cui, W., and Sarmento, B. (2023). Recent advances in long-acting drug delivery systems for anticancer drug. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 194, 114724. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.114724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pramanik, U., Das, A., Brown, E. M., Struckman, H. L., Wang, H., Stealey, S., et al. (2025). Histidine-rich enantiomeric peptide coacervates enhance antigen sequestration and presentation to T cells. Chem. Sci. 16, 7523–7536. doi:10.1039/D5SC01163A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riback, J. A., Katanski, C. D., Kear-Scott, J. L., Pilipenko, E. V., Rojek, A. E., Sosnick, T. R., et al. (2017). Stress-Triggered phase separation is an adaptive, evolutionarily tuned response. Cell 168, 1028–1040.e19. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabatos-Peyton, C. A., Verhagen, J., and Wraith, D. C. (2010). Antigen-specific immunotherapy of autoimmune and allergic diseases. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 22, 609–615. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2010.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scholz, B., Rechter, S., Drach, J. C., Townsend, L. B., and Bogner, E. (2003). Identification of the ATP-binding site in the terminase subunit pUL56 of human cytomegalovirus. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1426–1433. doi:10.1093/nar/gkg229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shebanova, A., Perrin, Q., Gudlur, S., Sun, Y., Lim, Z. W., Sun, R., et al. (2022). Cellular uptake of his-rich peptide coacervates occurs by a macropinocytosis-like mechanism. doi:10.1101/2022.08.04.502757

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shtork, A. S., Pavlova, I. I., Svetlova, J. I., Iudin, M. S., Grafskaia, E. N., Manuvera, V. A., et al. (2025). Quantitative analysis of biomolecular condensates on a modified support. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 51, 273–284. doi:10.1134/S1068162025010182

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Lau, S. Y., Lim, Z. W., Chang, S. C., Ghadessy, F., Partridge, A., et al. (2022). Phase-separating peptides for direct cytosolic delivery and redox-activated release of macromolecular therapeutics. Nat. Chem. 14, 274–283. doi:10.1038/s41557-021-00854-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Wu, X., Li, J., Verma, C. S., Yu, J., and Miserez, A. (2025). Peptide-Based complex coacervates stabilized by Cation−π interactions for cell engineering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 4284–4295. doi:10.1021/jacs.4c14469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, Y., Hoon, S., Guerette, P. A., Wei, W., Ghadban, A., Hao, C., et al. (2015). Infiltration of chitin by protein coacervates defines the squid beak mechanical gradient. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 488–495. doi:10.1038/nchembio.1833

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Titolo, S., Pelletier, A., Sauvé, F., Brault, K., Wardrop, E., White, P. W., et al. (1999). Role of the ATP-Binding domain of the human papillomavirus type 11 E1 helicase in E2-Dependent binding to the origin. J. Virol. 73, 5282–5293. doi:10.1128/JVI.73.7.5282-5293.1999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vedekhina, T., Svetlova, J., Pavlova, I., Barinov, N., Alieva, S., Malakhova, E., et al. (2024). Cross-Effects in folding and phase transitions of hnRNP A1 and C9Orf72 RNA G4 in vitro. Molecules 29, 4369. doi:10.3390/molecules29184369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vedekhina, T., Pavlova, I., Svetlova, J., Khomyakova, J., and Varizhuk, A. (2025). Intracellular transport of monomeric peptides, (Poly)Peptide-Based coacervates and fibrils: mechanisms and prospects for drug delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 11015. doi:10.3390/ijms262211015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vernon, R. M., Chong, P. A., Tsang, B., Kim, T. H., Bah, A., Farber, P., et al. (2018). Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation. Elife 7, e31486. doi:10.7554/eLife.31486

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vickery, B. P., Scurlock, A. M., Jones, S. M., and Burks, A. W. (2011). Mechanisms of immune tolerance relevant to food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 127, 576–584. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Guo, H., Xu, H., Chen, Y., Zhao, G., and Yu, H. (2022). The role of graphene oxide nanocarriers in treating gliomas. Front. Oncol. 12, 736177. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.736177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2024). New drug therapy approvals. Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/media/184967/download (Accessed December 14, 2025).

Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Wang, Z., Cai, P., Jiang, T., Li, Y., Yuan, Y., et al. (2018). Dual delivery of bFGF- and NGF-Binding coacervate confers neuroprotection by promoting neuronal proliferation. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 47, 948–956. doi:10.1159/000490139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, Y., Guo, L., Jiang, X., and Wang, Y. (2013). Proteome-Wide discovery and characterizations of nucleotide-binding proteins with affinity-labeled chemical probes. Anal. Chem. 85, 3198–3206. doi:10.1021/ac303383c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, W., Jakimowicz, M. D., Zampetakis, I., Neely, S., Scarpa, F., Davis, S. A., et al. (2020). Biopolymeric coacervate microvectors for the delivery of functional proteins to cells. Adv. Biosyst. 4, e2000101. doi:10.1002/adbi.202000101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar