REVIEW article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 19 November 2021

Sec. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Brain-aging

Volume 13 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.780489

Emerging Impact of Non-coding RNAs in the Pathology of Stroke

  • 1. Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • 2. Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

  • 3. Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq

  • 4. Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany

  • 5. Skull Base Research Center, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University Hospital, Tehra, Iran

Article metrics

View details

10

Citations

3,5k

Views

1,7k

Downloads

Abstract

Ischemic stroke (IS) is an acute cerebral vascular event with high mortality and morbidity. Though the precise pathophysiologic routes leading to this condition are not entirely clarified, growing evidence from animal and human experiments has exhibited the impact of non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of IS. Various lncRNAs namely MALAT1, linc-SLC22A2, linc-OBP2B-1, linc_luo_1172, linc-DHFRL1-4, SNHG15, linc-FAM98A-3, H19, MEG3, ANRIL, MIAT, and GAS5 are possibly involved in the pathogenesis of IS. Meanwhile, lots of miRNAs contribute in this process. Differential expression of lncRNAs and miRNAs in the sera of IS patients versus unaffected individuals has endowed these transcripts the aptitude to distinguish at risk patients. Despite conduction of comprehensive assays for evaluation of the influence of lncRNAs/miRNAs in the pathogenesis of IS, therapeutic impacts of these transcripts in IS have not been clarified. In the present paper, we review the impact of lncRNAs/miRNAs in the pathobiology of IS through assessment of evidence provided by human and animal studies.

Introduction

Ischemic stroke (IS) is an acute cerebrovascular event with high mortality and morbidity. This disorder is the third most frequent cause of mortality in Western regions of the world (Feigin et al., 2015). Current treatments for IS include thrombolysis, mechanical thromboectomy and neuroprotective therapies (Liaw and Liebeskind, 2020). Although the exact pathophysiologic routes leading to this condition are not entirely clarified, growing evidence from animal and human experiments has exhibited the impact of non-coding transcripts in the pathogenesis of IS (Zhu et al., 2019). These transcripts are highly variable in the terms of size, function, genomic location and conservation, yet in a broad classification they can be categorized based on their size to small versus long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Small non-coding RNAs have some subclasses among them are microRNAs (miRNAs). Both lncRNAs and miRNAs have regulatory impacts on gene expression but via different routes. Being firstly discovered in 1993 in C. elegans (Lee et al., 1993), miRNAs comprise an ever-growing type of non-coding RNAs that target specific sequences in the 3′ untranslated regions of genes, then decreasing their expression via mRNA degradation or translation blocking (O’Brien et al., 2018). These transcripts are about 22 nucleotides in length. They can hypothetically target almost any gene in the human genome. However, the extent of miRNA response elements complementarity defines their route of action, i.e., AGO2-dependent cleavage of target transcript or RISC-associated translational suppression (Jo et al., 2015). Besides, a number of miRNAs might influence gene expression at transcriptional and post-transcriptional stages within the nucleus (O’Brien et al., 2018). However, this mode of action has not been fully discovered. The dynamic nature of miRNA-associated gene regulation potentiates them as tools for regulation of gene expression in a cell type/situation-specific mode since several events such as alternative splicing events, polyadenylation state and the presence of cell type-specific RNA binding proteins affect miRNA response elements (O’Brien et al., 2018). LncRNAs are another group of transcripts with fundamental roles in the regulation of gene transcription via several modes including acting as signal, decoy molecules, scaffolds, guide and enhancer transcripts. The chief mode action of lncRNAs is their role in the regulation of transcription in reaction to numerous stimuli through acting as molecular signals (Fang and Fullwood, 2016). Although they generally do not have open reading frame, many of them have similar characteristics with protein-coding genes among them are the presence of 5′ cap, poly A tail and alternative splicing events (Cheng et al., 2005; Derrien et al., 2012). Through participating in chromatin configuration alteration, interaction with chromatin structures, acting as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) or natural antisense lncRNAs, lncRNAs contribute in the pathogenesis of human disorders (Fang and Fullwood, 2016). Figure 1 depicts the role of a number of non-coding RNAs in the pathobiology of IS through different signaling pathways particularly PI3K/AKT and NF-κβ.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

A schematic representation of the interaction between non-coding RNAs and various signaling cascades in ischemic stroke (IS). Differential expression of lncRNAs as well as miRNAs could have an important role in the pathogenesis of IS. Various miRNAs such as miR-19a, miR-122, miR-148a, miR-320d, and miR-4429 via targeting Akt, PI3K, Ras, and IKK could modulate expression of genes leukocytes, thus affecting the course of IS. In addition, miR-497 by regulating the expression levels of Bcl-2 and Bcl-w could induce ischemic neuronal death. Additionally, lncRNA H19 via directly targeting P53 could suppress neurogenesis following IS through p53/Notch1 axis. Furthermore, MEG3 could promote cell survival and reduce cell apoptosis via modulating the expression of Sema3A. Besides, KCNQ1OT1 through modulating the expression of FOXO3 could enhance brain injury and induce autophagy in IS.

Human Studies

Long Non-coding RNAs and Ischemic Stroke

Assessment of expression of lncRNAs has been the focus of numerous studies conducted in human subjects. For instance, a high throughput study has been performed on blood specimens of patients with IS and controls who have been matched with cases in terms of vascular risk factors. The study has revealed differential expression of approximately 300 lncRNAs between IS group and male controls, while 97 lncRNAs have been differentially expressed between IS group and female controls. Notably, some of differentially expressed lncRNAs have been shown to reside in genomic regions formerly recognized as IS risk loci namely lipoprotein, lipoprotein(a)-like 2, ABO blood group, prostaglandin 12 synthase, and α-adducins (Dykstra-Aiello et al., 2016). Another study has reported distinct lncRNAs signatures in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) among patients with IS, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and healthy subjects. Notably, expressions of linc-DHFRL1-4, SNHG15, and linc-FAM98A-3 have been substantially increased in IS patients versus healthy controls and TIA patients. Expression of linc-FAM98A-3 has been returned to normal level by day 7, whereas SNHG15 levels have been continued to be high during the follow-up period, demonstrating the capability of lncRNAs to observe IS dynamics (Deng et al., 2018). Another microarray-based assay has reported up-regulation of 560 and down-regulation of 690 lncRNAs in IS patients versus controls among them have been lncRNAs ENST00000568297, ENST00000568243, and NR_046084. Dysregulated lncRNAs have been predicted to partake in IS pathology by modulating central miRNAs, mRNAs, or IS-associated pathways (Guo et al., 2018). Assessment of lncRNA signature at two time points after IS has revealed differential expression of 3,009 and 2,034 lncRNAs 24 h and 7 days after IS, respectively. These results have shown the impact of IS on lncRNA signature at both the acute and subacute phases. Notably, expression of lncRNAs in the processing and presentation processes of antigens have been increased at 24 h and returned to basal amounts on day 7 following IS. Besides, expressions of inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels and GABAergic synapses have been decreased on day 7 following IS (Zhu et al., 2018). Levels of H19 in the circulation of patients with IS have been positively correlated with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale Scores of the patients in in three time points following stroke attack. Mechanistically, H19 silencing could reduce expression of neurogenesis related proteins. In addition, H19 precludes the development of neurogenesis after IS via p53/Notch1 pathway (Wang et al., 2019a). Another experiment has reported association between H19 and Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) subclasses of atherosclerotic patients. Forced over-expression of H19 has enhanced ACP5 expression, increased cell proliferation and blocked cell apoptosis. Up-regulation of H19 has increased the plaque size in the animal model, thus H19 participates in the atherosclerotic processes and surges the risk of IS through increasing ACP5 levels (Huang et al., 2019). RMST is another up-regulated lncRNA in the plasma specimens of IS patients (Hou and Cheng, 2018). A previous study in Chinese Han population has shown over-expression of ANRIL in IS patients parallel with down-regulation of CDKN2A. The rs2383207 and rs1333049 SNPs have been associated with risk of IS in male subjects (Yang et al., 2018). Another study has reported higher levels of ANRIL in patients with the atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke compared with AF patients without IS. Serum levels of ANRIL have been correlated with the NIHSS and the mRS scores (Zeng and Jin, 2020). Table 1 gives a summary of human studies reporting elevation of lncRNAs in IS.

TABLE 1

lncRNAsThe specimen typesNumbers of clinical specimensCell modelsTargets/RegulatorsSignaling pathwaysFunctionReferences
ANRILBlood71 IS patients and 71 normal controls.CDKN2AANRIL has a role in pathology of IS.Yang et al., 2018
ANRILSerum132 AF patients with IS and 254 AF without ISSerum ANRIL is a marker in AF with IS.Zeng and Jin, 2020
GAS5Blood509 IS patients and 668 healthy controlsGAS5 overexpression is associated with increased IS risk.Zheng et al., 2018
H1985 IS patients and 85 healthy controlsVSMC and HUVECsACP5H19 has enhanced ACP5 expression, increased cell proliferation and blocked cell apoptosis.Huang et al., 2019
H19plasma40 patients with acute ischemic stroke and 25 controlsp53p53/Notch1 pathwayH19 represses neurogenesis following IS via p53/Notch1 axis.Wang et al., 2019a
H19Plasma, neutrophils, and lymphocytes36 patients with anterior circulation ischemia, and 25 normal subjectsBV2 cellsHDAC1H19 induces neuroinflammatory responses.Wang et al., 2017
KCNQ1OT1Blood42 IS patients and 40 healthy controlsN2aFOXO3miR−200a/FOXO3/ATG7 pathwayKCNQ1OT1 expression enhanced brain injury and induced autophagy in IS.Wang et al., 2019a
linc-SLC22A2, linc-OBP2B-1, linc_luo_1172Blood133 IS patients and 133 controlsDykstra-Aiello et al., 2016
linc-DHFRL1-4, SNHG15 and linc-FAM98A-3Blood206 IS patients, 55 TIA patients and 179 controlsDeng et al., 2018
lncRNA-ENST00000568297, lncRNA-ENST00000568243, NR_046084Blood50 IS patients and 50 controlsBCG5, FOXJ3, MAP3K5PI3K-Akt, p53 pathway, AMPK pathwayLncRNA-ENST00000568297 and lncRNA-ENST00000568243 Are possible diagnostic biomarkers for IS.Guo et al., 2018
lnc-CRKL-2, lnc-NTRK3-4serum100 AMS patients and 100 healthy controlsThese new lncRNAs are markers for the detection of AMS.Xu et al., 2020
MALAT1Serum40 CIS patients and 40 healthy controlsHBMECsVEGFAmiR-205-5p/VEGFA PathwayMALAT1 preserves angiogenic properties of HBMECs under OGD/R circumstances.Gao et al., 2020
MEG3PBMCs20 IS patients and 20 controls.mouse brain neuroma cell line, N2amiR-424-5p, Sema3AMAPKMEG3 enhances cell survival and decreased cell apoptosis.Xiang et al., 2020
MIATBlood189 IS patients and 189 healthy controlsMIAT is a biomarker for discriminating IS patients from healthy persons.Zhu et al., 2018
RMSTplasma10 AIS patients and 10 controlshippocampal cellsRMST induces ischemic brain injury and disrupts neurological function.Hou and Cheng, 2018
SCARNA10, TERC, LINC01481Blood10 IS and 5 controlsThese LncRNAs play an important role in peripheral immune system changes after IS.Zhu et al., 2019

Human studies showing elevation of lncRNAs in IS.

Contrary to two mentioned studies in the previous section, Feng et al. have demonstrated decreased levels of ANRIL in plasma specimens of patients with acute IS patients versus controls (Feng et al., 2019). ZFAS1 is another down-regulated lncRNA in IS patients. Moreover, expression of ZFAS1 in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke has been lower compared with those with non-LAA stroke and controls. In addition, ZFAS1 expression has been lower in the small vessel occlusion group compared with cardioembolism (Wang et al., 2019b). FLJ23867, H3F3AP6, TNPO1P1 are also among lncRNAs which are down-regulated in IS PBMCs compared with control PBMCs (Zhu et al., 2019). An lncRNA profiling using RNA-seq method and subsequent KEGG pathway and gene ontology (GO) enrichment assays have shown down-regulation of RPS6KA2-AS1 and lnc-CALM1-7 in exosomes retrieved from sera of patients with acute minor IS (Xu et al., 2020). Table 2 gives a summary of human studies that displayed under-expression of lncRNAs in IS.

TABLE 2

lncRNAsThe specimen typesNumbers of clinical specimensFunctionReferences
ANRILBlood126 AIS patients and 125 controlsThe reduced expression of ANRIL was related with higher risk of IS, higher disease severity and high inflammatory responses in acute IS patients.Feng et al., 2019
NR_036641, ENST0000079667, ENST00000507442Blood133 IS patients and 133 controlsDykstra-Aiello et al., 2016
ZFAS1176 IS patients and 111 controlsZFAS1 had an appropriate diagnostic value for large-artery atherosclerosis strokeWang et al., 2019b
FLJ23867, H3F3AP6, TNPO1P1Blood10 ischemic stroke and 5 controlsThese LncRNAs play an important role in peripheral immune system alterations after IS.Zhu et al., 2019
RPS6KA2-AS1, lnc-CALM1-7serum100 AMS patients and 100 healthy controlsThese new lncRNAs are biomarkers AMS.Xu et al., 2020

Summary of clinical investigations reporting under-expression of lncRNAs in IS.

ANRIL low-expression has been determined as a marker of better recurrence-free survival in of AF patients with IS. Based on the outcomes of Cox regression model, serum levels of ANRIL, NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, infarct volume, and smoking have been the risk factors for AF with IS (Zeng and Jin, 2020). Another study has reported that down-regulation of ANRIL in acute IS can differentiate these patients from healthy subjects with area under curve (AUC) of 0.759. Besides, expression levels of this lncRNA has been negatively correlated with NIHSS score and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations, while being positively correlated with IL-10 concentrations (Feng et al., 2019). Down-regulation of ZFAS1 could predict risk of LAA strokes. Based on the results of receiver operating characteristic curve, ZFAS1 has 89.39% sensitivity in distinguishing LAA stroke patients from controls (Wang et al., 2019b). Another biomarker discovery study in PBMCs of IS patients has demonstrated AUC values of 0.73, 0.74, and 0.69 for ENST00000568297, ENST00000568243 and NR_046084, respectively (Deng et al., 2018). Moreover, MIAT levels in IS patients have been remarkably increased in correlation with NIHSS scores, mRS, hs-CRP and infarct size. Based on the results of ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves, MIAT has been suggested as a possible marker for distinguishing IS patients from the healthy subjects with AUC value of 0.842. Moreover, patients with over-expression of MIAT had a comparatively poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis has shown the potential of MIAT as an independent prognostic biomarker of functional outcome and mortality of IS (Zhu et al., 2018). Table 3 gives a brief review of investigations that reported diagnostic/prognostic role of lncRNAs in IS.

TABLE 3

SamplesArea under curveSensitivitySpecificityKaplan-Meier analysisUnivariate cox regressionMultivariate cox regressionReferences
Blood specimens from 126 AIS patients and 125 controls0.759 for ANRIL72.2% for ANRIL71.2% for ANRILFeng et al., 2019
Blood specimens from 206 Ischemic stroke patients in the acute phase, 55 transient ischemic attack patients and 179 healthy controls0.711 for linc-DHFRL1-4, 0.756 for SNHG15, 0.659 for linc-FAM98A-30.687 for linc-DHFRL1-4, 0.594 for SNHG15, 0.594 for linc-FAM98A-30.719 for linc-DHFRL1-4, 0.844 for SNHG15, 0.688 for linc-FAM98A-3Deng et al., 2018
Blood specimens from 50 patients with IS and 50 controls0.733 for ENST00000568297, 0.743 for ENST00000568243, 0.690 for NR_04608464.8% for ENST00000568297, 70.5% for ENST00000568243, 61.5% for NR_04608463.6% for ENST00000568297, 69.5% for ENST00000568243, 69.2% for NR_046084Guo et al., 2018
176 IS patients and 111 controls0.727 for ZFAS189.39 for ZFAS148.65 for ZFAS1ZFAS1 low expression was associated with risk of LAA strokes.Wang et al., 2019b
Blood specimens from 71 IS patients and 71 normal controls.0.642 for ANRIL0.663 for ANRIL0.538 for ANRILYang et al., 2018
Blood specimens from 189 IS patients and 189 healthy controls0.842 for MIAT74.1% for MIAT80.4% for MIATPatients with over-expression of MIAT had a higher mortality compared with the low-MIAT patients. High MIAT was associated with poor prognosis.Elevated MIAT Has been associated with IS.MIAT was an independent prognostic indicator of functional consequences and mortality.Zhu et al., 2018
Serum specimens from 132 AF patients with IS and 254 AF without IS0.826 for ANRIL76.6% for ANRIL81.4% for ANRILPatients with lower lncRNA ANRIL expression had higher relapse-free survival compared with the high−expression group.Serum ANRIL expression, NIHSS score, infarct size, and smoking were the risk factors for AF with IS.Serum ANRIL expression and smoking were independent risk factors for AF with IS.Zeng and Jin, 2020

Diagnostic/prognostic role of lncRNAs in stroke.

MicroRNAs and Stroke

Expression of miR-205-5p has been surged in the serum specimens of CIS patients and human brain microvascular endothelial cells under oxygen glucose deprivation/re-oxygenation. Besides, this condition has interfered with the tube formation of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. miR-205-5p knock-down has enhanced proliferation and angiogenic capacity of endothelial cells to resist oxygen glucose deprivation/re-oxygenation injury (Gao et al., 2020). The relationship between upper limb recovery after IS and miRNA signature has been assessed by another group. Authors have discovered lower levels of miR-371-3p, miR-524, miR-520g, miR-1255A, miR-453, and miR-583, while upper levels of miR-941, miR-449b, and miR-581 in good recover group compared with poor recovery group. These miRNAs have been shown to congregate on pathways related with axon guidance, developmental processes and carcinogenesis (Edwardson et al., 2018b). Expression of let-7e-5p has also been shown to be elevated in IS patients compared with control subjects. Over-expression of let-7e-5p has been associated with elevated probability of IS. This miRNA has been suggested to influence expression of four genes enriched in the MAPK pathway including CASP3 and NLK (Huang et al., 2016). miRNA levels might also distinguish IS patients from those with hemorrhagic stroke (HS). Leung et al. have demonstrated higher median plasma levels of miR-124-3p in acute phase of HS patients compared with similar phase of IS, while miR-16 had the opposite trend. Both miRNAs have been suggested as diagnostic markers for discrimination of HS from IS (Leung et al., 2014). A high throughput miRNA profiling in IS has reported differential expression of 115 miRNAs between IS cases and healthy controls. These transcripts have been linked with axon guidance, glioma, MAPK, mTOR and Erb-B signaling pathways. miR-32-3p, miR-106-5p, and miR-532-5p have been the first ranked ones (Li et al., 2015). Table 4 provides the summary of researches which reported elevation of miRNAs in IS.

TABLE 4

microRNAThe specimen typesNumbers of clinical specimensCellsTargets/RegulatorsSignaling pathwaysFunctionReferences
let-7e-5pBlood302 IS patients and 302 healthy controlsU937 cell lineCASP3 and NLKMAPK signaling pathwayLet-7e-5p might be a useful noninvasive marker for the diagnosis of IS.Huang et al., 2016
miR-145Blood32 IS patients and 18 healthy controlsKLF4/5MiR-145 might serve as a useful biomarker and therapy for IS.Gan et al., 2012
miR-363, miR-487bBlood24 AIS patients and 24 controlMAP2K4toll-like receptor signaling pathwayThese miRNA may regulate leukocyte gene expression.Jickling et al., 2014
miR-125b-2, miR-27a, miR-422a, miR-488 and miR-627Blood169 stroke patients, 24 healthy controls, and 94 individuals with metabolic syndromeThese miRNAs may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for IS.Sepramaniam et al., 2014
miR-9-5p, miR-9-3p, miR-107, miR-124-3p, and miR-128-3pCSF21 IS patients and 21 controlsThese miRNAs show the ischemia-related brain damage.Sørensen et al., 2017
miR-17-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-27b-3p, miR-93-5pExtracellular Vesicle in blood34 non-stroke and 139 stroke patientsstress/hypoxia and repair pathwaysThese miRNAs profile shows the development of cerebral SVD.van Kralingen et al., 2019
hsa-miR-4656, hsa-miR-432, hsa-miR-503, hsa-miR-376c, hsa-miR-130a-3p and hsa-miR-487bPBMCs20 IS patients and 19 healthy controlsTGFB3, CELSR2 and ITM2CThese miRNAs regulate immune responses.Bam et al., 2018
let-7bPlasma197 IS patients and 50 controlsLet-7b might serve as a useful noninvasive marker for the diagnosis of IS.Long et al., 2013
miR-124-3p and miR-16Plasma74 IS and 19 HSmiR-124-3p and miR-16 Expression levels may be the potential circulating biomarker to distinguish hemorrhagic stroke and IS.Leung et al., 2014
miR-222, miR-218, and miR-185Plasma106 AIS patients and 110 controlsThese miRNAs might serve as promising and independent biomarkers for risk of AIS.Jin and Xing, 2017
hsa-miR-106b-5P, hsa-miR-4306Plasma136 AIS patients and 116 healthy controlsEnhanced expression of hsa-miR-106b-5P and hsa-miR-4306 in plasma may be novel biomarkers for the early detection of AIS.Wang et al., 2014
miR-16Plasma40 HACI patients and 30 healthy controls.The high expression of miR-16 in plasma were related to TOAST and OCSP criteria.Tian et al., 2016
miR-143-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-125a-5pPlasma200 IS patients and 100 healthy controlsA combination of miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-143-3p might have clinical utility as an early diagnostic biomarker.Tiedt et al., 2017
miR-125b-5p and miR-206Plasma94 AIS patients with or without endovascular treatmentmiR-125b-5p and miR-206 levels are related with stroke severity.van Kralingen et al., 2019
miR-371-3p and miR-520gPlasma27 IS patientsThese miRNAs are markers of neural repair.Edwardson et al., 2018a
miR-205-5pSerum40 CIS patients and 40 healthy controlsHBMECsMALAT1-miR-205-5p inhibits proliferation of endothelial cells.Gao et al., 2020
miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-17-5pSerum106 AIS patients and 120 healthy controlsCombination of miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-17-5p may be a potential AIS biomarker.Wu et al., 2015
miR-15a and miR-16Serum20 CLI patients, 122 T2D+ CLI patients, and 43 healthy controlsCirculating proangiogenic cells (PACs), VSMCs, and pericytesVEGF-A and AKT3AKT signaling pathwaymiR-15a/16 induces PAC survival and migration, and increases migratory capacity of PACsSpinetti et al., 2013
miR-145Serum146 AIS patients and 96 controlMiR-145 might serve as a useful biomarker and therapy for IS.Jia et al., 2015
miR-9 and miR-124Serum65 AIS patients and 66 controlSerum exosomal miR-9 and miR-124 are markers for AIS.Ji et al., 2016
miR-223Serum50 AIS patients and 33 controlExosomal miR-223 levels are associated with acute IS.Chen et al., 2017
miR-146bSerum128 AIS patients and 102 controlElevated serum miR-146b expression might be a potential biomarker for AIS evaluation.Chen et al., 2018b
miR32-3p, miR-106b-5p, miR-423-5p, miR-451a, miR-1246, miR-1299, miR-3149, and miR-4739Serum117 AIS patients and 82 healthy controlsThese miRNAs may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for IS.Li et al., 2015
miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-181a-5p and miR-21-5pSerum177 IS, 81 TIA patients and 42 controls.Enhanced expression of miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p and miR-21–5p might distinguish between IS and TIA.Wu et al., 2017
PC-3p-57664, PC-5p-12969, hsa-miR-122-5p and hsa-miR-211-5pSerum34 IS patients and 11 healthy controls. postmortem specimens from 10 IS brains and 10 control brainslymphoblastoid cell lineThese miRNAs are biomarkers for IS.Vijayan et al., 2018
let-7eserum and cerebral spinal fluid72 IS patients and 51 healthy controlslet-7e Expression levels in serum may be the potential circulating biomarker for the acute stage of ischemic stroke.Peng et al., 2015

Summary of human studies reporting elevation of miRNAs in IS.

Blood amounts of miR-30a and miR-126 have been substantially decreased in all assessed patients with IS until 24 weeks. Circulating let-7b has been decreased in patients with LAA compared with healthy subjects, while circulating let-7b have been higher in patients with other kinds of IS until 24 weeks. Notably, aberrant miRNAs levels have been resolved 48 weeks after IS onset in all patients. Authors have suggested that miR-30a might affect IS through modulation of RhoB and beclin-1. Moreover, miR-126 and let-7 can contribute in this process through modulation of VCAM-1 and inflammatory responses, respectively (Long et al., 2013). Another investigation has demonstrated that miRNA signature reveal not only the chronological development of IS but also the specific reasons for development of IS. Authors have suggested a 32-miRNA panel that can distinguish stroke etiologies during the acute phase. Moreover, miR-125b-2, miR-27a, miR-422a, miR-488, and miR-627 have been constantly dysregulated in acute stroke independent of age or severity or underlying metabolic background (Sepramaniam et al., 2014). Table 5 provides outcome of human studies reporting down-regulation of miRNAs in IS.

TABLE 5

microRNAThe specimen typesNumbers of clinical specimensCell lineTargets/RegulatorsSignaling pathwaysFunctionReferences
miR-145Primary astrocytes from ratsAQP4miR-145 protects astrocytes from damage.Zheng et al., 2017
miR-122, miR-148a, let-7i, miR-19a, miR-320d, miR-4429Blood24 AIS patients and 24 controlGFR, RAS, PI3K, AKT, IKKNF-κβ signalingThese miRNA may regulate leukocyte gene expression in IS.Jickling et al., 2014
miR-574-3pBlood55 chronic stroke patients and 2360 controlsDBNDD2 and ELOVL1neurometabolic and chronic neuronal injury response pathwaysmiR-574-3p has a role in regulating chronic brain and systemic cellular response to strokeSalinas et al., 2019
miRNA-660-5pExtracellular Vesicle in blood34 non-stroke and 139 stroke patientsThis miRNA associated with pathophysiology of ISvan Kralingen et al., 2019
hsa-miR-874-3pPBMCs20 IS patients and 19 healthy controlsIL12A and IL12Bhsa-miR-874-3p involves in the immune system alteration during IS pathophysiologyBam et al., 2018
miR-30a and miR-126Plasma197 IS patients and 50 controlsmiR-30a and miR-126 are markers of IS.Long et al., 2013
miR-126, miR-130a, and miR-378Plasma106 AIS patients and 110 controlsThese miRNAs might serve as promising and independent biomarkers for risk of AIS.Jin and Xing, 2017
hsa-miR-320e, hsa-miR-320dPlasma136 AIS patients and 116 healthy controlsReduced expression of hsa-miR-320e and hsa-miR-320d is marker for early detection of AIS.Wang et al., 2014
let-7i-3p and miR-23a-3pPlasma10 AIS patients and 10 healthy controlsThese miRNAs associated with the peculiarities of clinical manifestations of ISZhanin et al., 2018
miR-195Plasma96 AIS patientsC57BL/6 mice, BV2 microglial cells and HEK293T cellsCX3CL1 and CX3CR1CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling pathwaymiR-195 has neuroprotective roles.Guang et al., 2019
miR-449b, miR-519b, miR-581, miR-616, miR-892b, miR-941, miR-1179, miR-1292, and miR-1296Plasma27 IS patientsThese miRNAs show neural repair.Edwardson et al., 2018a
miR23a and miR-221Serum146 AIS patients and 96 controlJia et al., 2015
miR-124, miR-9Serum31 AIS patients and 11 controlMMP-9Serum miR-124, miR-9 inhibit neuroinflammation and brain injury.Liu et al., 2015
miR-224-3p, miR377-5p, miR-518b, miR-532-5p, and miR-1913Serum117 AIS patients and 82 healthy controlsThese miRNAs in serum may be markers for IS.Li et al., 2015
miR-146aSerum44 IS patients and 22 controlsmiR-146a was decreased in patients with more severe conditions.Kotb et al., 2019
miR-1228-5p, miR-1268a, miR-1268b, miR-4433b-3p, miR-6090, miR-6752-5p, and miR6803-5pSerum86 IS patients and 45 controlsThese miRNAs forecast the risk of cerebrovascular disorder before the onset of IS.Sonoda et al., 2019
hsa-miR-22–3p, PC-3p-32463, hsa-miR-30d-5p and hsa-miR-23a-3pSerum34 IS patients and 11 healthy controls. postmortem specimens from 10 IS brains and 10 control brainslymphoblastoid cell lineThese miRNAs could be used as biomarkers for IS.Vijayan et al., 2018

Summary of human studies reporting down-regulation of miRNAs in IS.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of miRNAs have been appraised in IS. Elevated serum amounts of miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-17-5p in acute IS patients could be used as diagnostic markers. Based on the multivariate logistic regression analysis, serum miR-17-5p levels could discriminate the presence of acute IS. miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-17-5p had AUC values of 0.698, 0.82, and 0.784, respectively. Combination of three miRNAs increased the AUC value to 0.845 (Wu et al., 2015). ROC curve analysis has revealed AUC values of 0.91, 0.91, 0.92, and 0.93 for plasma miR-30a levels, at 24 h, 1, 4, and 24 weeks, respectively. These values have been 0.93, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.91 for miR-126 at these time points, respectively. Taken together, miR-30a, miR-126 and let-7b can be suitable biomarkers for IS (Long et al., 2013). Expression levels of miR-145 and miR-210 have been remarkably elevated in IS patients with robust AUC values of 0.90 and 1.0, respectively. Yet, dysregulation of miR-145 and miR-210 has not been exclusive for the acute phase as they have been also up-regulated in recovery phase (Sepramaniam et al., 2014). Table 6 provides summary of studies reporting diagnostic/prognostic role of miRNAs in IS.

TABLE 6

Sample numberArea under curveSensitivitySpecificityKaplan-Meier analysisUnivariate cox regressionMultivariate cox regressionReferences
Plasma specimens from 197 IS patients and 50 controls0.91 for miR-30 0.92 for miR-126 0.93 for let-7b80% for miR-30, 84% for miR-126, 84% for let-7b94% for miR-30, 92% for miR-126, 92% for let-7bLong et al., 2013
serum and cerebral spinal fluid specimens from 72 IS patients and 51 healthy controls0.86 for let-7e82.8%73.4%Peng et al., 2015
Blood specimens from 302 IS patients and 302 healthy controls0.82 for let-7e-5pHuang et al., 2016
Serum specimens from 106 AIS patients and 120 healthy controls0.698 for miR-15a, 0.82 for miR-16, and 0.784 for miR-17-5pSerum miR-17-5p is an independent marker for AIS.Wu et al., 2015
Plasma specimens from 74 IS and 19 HS0.70 for miR-124-3p, 0.59 for miR-1668.4% for miR-124-3p, 94.7% for miR-1671.2% for miR-124-3p, 35.1% for miR-16NIHSS, platelet count and the plasma levels of miR-124-3p were significant predictors of HS.Leung et al., 2014
Plasma specimens from 106 AIS patients and 110 controls0.767 for combined miRNAs87.7% for combined miRNAs54.5% for combined miRNAsmiR-126, miR-130a, miR-378, miR-222, miR-218, and miR-185 were predicting factors for risk of AIS.miR-126 and miR-130a were protective factors for AIS. miR-222, miR-218, and miR-185 were risk factors for AIS.Jin and Xing, 2017
Serum specimens from 146 AIS patients and 96 control0.896 for miR-145, 0.816 for miR-23a, 0.819 for miR-221Jia et al., 2015
Serum specimens from 65 AIS patients and 66 control0.8026 for miR-9, 0.6976 for miR-124Ji et al., 2016
Serum specimens from 50 AIS patients and 33 control0.859 for miR-22384.0% for miR-22378.8% for miR-223Circulating exosomal miR-223 is risk factor for IS.Chen et al., 2017
Serum specimens from 128 AIS patients and 102 control0.863 for combination of hs-CRP and miR-146bChen et al., 2018b
Blood specimens from 169 stroke patients, 24 healthy controls, and 94 individuals with metabolic syndrome0.95 for miR-125b-2, 0.89 for miR-27a, 0.92 for miR-422a, 0.87 for miR-488, 0.84 for miR-627Sepramaniam et al., 2014
Plasma specimens from 136 AIS patients and 116 healthy controls0.962 for hsa-miR-106b-5P; 0.952 for hsa-miR-4306; 0.981 for hsa-miR-320e; 0.987 for hsa-miR-320dWang et al., 2014
Plasma specimens from 40 HACI patients and 30 healthy controls.0.775 for miR-1669.7% for miR-1687% for miR-16Patients with higher expression of MiR-16 were associated with poor prognosis.Tian et al., 2016
Plasma specimens from 200 IS patients and 100 healthy controls.0.93 for combination of miR-143-3p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-125a-5p85.6% for combination of miR-143-3p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-125a-5p76.3% for combination of miR-143-3p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-125a-5pTiedt et al., 2017
Serum specimens from 177 IS, 81 TIA patients and 42 controls.0.883 for combination of miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-181a-5p and miR-21–5pmiR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p and miR-21–5p levels were independently associated with IS. miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p and miR-181a-5p levels were associated with TIA.Enhanced miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-181a-5p and miR-21–5p levels were closely associated with IS, and enhanced miR23b-3p, miR-29b-3p and miR-181a-5p levels were associated with TIA.Wu et al., 2017
Serum specimens from 86 IS patients and 45 controls0.95 for combination of miR-1268b, miR-4433b-3p, and miR-6803-5p84% for combination of miR-1268b, miR-4433b-3p, and miR-6803-5p98% for combination of miR-1268b, miR-4433b-3p, and miR-6803-5pSonoda et al., 2019
Plasma specimens from 94 AIS patients with or without endovascular treatment0.735 for miR125b-5p86.36% for miR125b-5p55.36% for miR125b-5pHigher expression of miR125b-5p associated with an unfavorable outcome.van Kralingen et al., 2019

Diagnostic/prognostic role of miRNAs in IS.

Animal Studies

Investigations in animal models of IS have provided valuable data about the mechanisms of involvement of lncRNAs/miRNAs in IS and possible application of targeted therapies against these transcripts. For instance, expression of RMST has been elevated in primary hippocampal neurons exposed with oxygen-glucose deprivation and in animal models of IS induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). RMST silencing has amended brain injury in the mentioned animal model and attenuated hippocampal neuron defects (Hou and Cheng, 2018). H19 is another up-regulated lncRNA in animal models of IS whose silencing has diminished the size of brain tissue damage following middle cerebral artery obstruction and reperfusion and ameliorated the neurological defects. Mechanistically, H19 silencing could reduce expression of neurogenesis related proteins. Taken together, H19 precludes the development of neurogenesis after IS via p53/Notch1 pathway (Wang et al., 2019a). A throughput miRNA sequencing in infarcted brain regions after regional cerebral ischemia has shown up-regulation of 20 miRNAs while down-regulation of 17 miRNAs in the infarct area among them have been miR-211-5p, miR-183-5p, miR-182, and miR-96-5p which have been functionally related with some important pathways in the neurons (Duan et al., 2019). Table 7 summarizes the data regarding the roles of up-regulated non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of IS as revealed by animal studies.

TABLE 7

lncRNAs/miRNAsAnimal modelsCellsTargets/RegulatorsSignalingFunctionReferences
RMSTMCAO mouse modelhippocampal cellsRMST induces ischemic brain injury and disrupts neurological function.Hou and Cheng, 2018
GAS5brain tissues of C57BL/6 J micemiR-137Notch1 signaling pathwayGAS5 is a ceRNA for miR-137 to control Notch1.Chen et al., 2018a
Nespasbrain tissues of C57BL/6 J miceMouse BV2 microglial cellsTAK1NF-κB signalingNespas induces Neuroinflammation Through inhibiting NF-κB ActivationDeng et al., 2019
MALAT1brain cortex of C57BL/6 J micecortical neurons of miceBeclin1, miR-30aMALAT1 induces ischemic injury and autophagy.Guo et al., 2017
H19C57BL/6 J micemiR-675, IGF1R, pS6 kinaseIGF1 signaling pathway, mTOR pathwayH19 knockdown mice indicated amelioration on the performance of a skilled, cortical dependent motor task.Wang et al., 2020b
MaclpilC57BL/6 miceLCP1Maclpil regulates the migration of macrophage and phagocytosis by LCP1.Wang et al., 2020b
MEG3C57BL/6 J miceN2a cellmiR-21miR-21/PDCD4 pathwayMEG3 promotes ischemic damage and disrupts overall neurological levels.Zheng et al., 2017
MALAT1C57BL/6J miceMouse BMECs and N2A cellsBim and E-selectinapoptotic pathwaysMalat1 expression reduced ischemia-induced endothelial cell death in vitroZhang et al., 2017b
MEG3SD ratsBDNF, NGF and bFGFWnt/β-catenin signaling pathwayMEG3 reduced nerve growth and enhanced neurological damage.You and You, 2019
MEG3SD ratsrat brain microvascular endothelial cellsNOX4p53/NOX4 pathwayMEG3 was an important regulator of apoptosis.Zhan et al., 2017
ANRILWistar ratsneural cellsVEGFNF-κB signaling pathwayANRIL increases VEGF and induces angiogenesis.Zhang et al., 2017a
H19Wistar ratsNeural stem cell (NSC)SUZ12, EZH2, miR-675oxidative response, NF-κβ signalingH19 expression induces the proliferation and neuronal differentiation of NSCs.Wang et al., 2020b
H19C57BL/6J micep53p53/Notch1 pathwayH19 represses neurogenesis after IS.Wang et al., 2019a
MALAT1C57BL/6 J micePrimary astrocytesAQP4, miR-145MALAT1 induced cerebral ischemia-reperfusion damage.Wang et al., 2020a
H19, Lnc-EF094477 and LncBC090003Wistar ratsNeural progenitor cells (NPCs)H19 regulated post-stroke neurogenesis.Liu et al., 2019
GAS5C57BL/6 mice293 TMAP4K4GAS5 induses neuron cell apoptosis and nerve injury in ischemic stroke through inhibiting DNMT3B-dependent MAP4K4 methylationDeng et al., 2020b
MEG3MCAO ratsOGD/R-treated neurocytesmiR-485 and AIM2MEG3/miR-485/AIM2 axisMEG3 induces cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury through elevating pyroptosis by targeting miR-485/AIM2 axisLiang et al., 2020
miR-211-5p, miR-183-5p, miR-182 and miR-96-5pBrain of 10 Rat MCAO model and 10 controlsPPFIA1, SLC7A1, NTRK2, KDM48Ras, cGMP-PKG and phospholipase D signaling pathwaysThese miRNAs may control cell proliferation and apoptosis via the cGMP-PKG signaling pathway.Duan et al., 2019
miR-669c-3pPrimary cortical neuron cultures and Primary microglial cultures from C57BL/6 J neonatal miceN2a cell lineMyD88toll-like receptor signaling pathwaymiR-669c overexpression modulates the inflammatory responses.Kolosowska et al., 2020
miR-3473bbrain tissues from CD-1 miceBV2 microglial cellsSOCS3The expression of miR-3473b activates microglial and the inflammation and induces neuroinflammation.Wang et al., 2018
miR-26aBrain tissues from 48 SD ratsHIF-1a and VEGFPI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathwaymiR-26a controls cell proliferation and angiogenesis.Liang et al., 2018b
miR17-92C57BL/6J miceSVZ neural progenitor cellsPTENShh signaling pathwaymiR17-92 induces the proliferation and viability of SVZ neural progenitor cells.Liu et al., 2013
miR-92amicehuman endothelial cellsintegrin subunit alpha5miR-92a increased angiogenesis and functional recovery of injured tissue.Bonauer et al., 2009
miR-497C57/B6 micemouse neuroblastoma (N2A) cellsbcl-2 and bcl-wischemia-induced cell death signaling pathwaymiR-497 induces ischemic neuronal death.Yin et al., 2010
miR-130aBrain tissue from SD ratsneuronsXIAPmiR−130a inhibits the proliferation, viability, and differentiation of NSCs.Deng et al., 2020a
miR-125bplasma and brain tissue specimens from 50 SD ratsPC-12 cell lineCK2αCK2α/NADPH Oxidase Signaling pathwaymiRNA-125b increases cerebral ischemia injury.Liang et al., 2018b
miR-223-5pprimary cortical neurons from Wistar rat, SD ratscortical neuronsNCKX2miR-223-5p amended ischemic damage and enhanced neurological function.Cuomo et al., 2019
miR-155C57BL/6 miceendothelial cellsDhx40, Dync1i1, Zfp652, Agtr1aproangiogenic signaling pathwaymiR-155 reduces blood flow and cerebral microvasculature.Caballero-Garrido et al., 2015
miR-155C57BL/6 miceMir-155 promotes ischemia/reperfusion induced brain injury and hemorrhagic transformationSuofu et al., 2020

Summary of animal studies which displayed elevation of lncRNAs and miRNAs in stroke.

Meg3 is a down-regulated lncRNA after IS. Up-regulation of Meg3 has inhibited functional recovery and diminished capillary mass after IS. On the other hand, its silencing has amended brain lesions and enhanced angiogenesis after IS. Meg3 exerts these functions through inhibiting notch pathway (Liu et al., 2017). Expression of lncRNA-1810034E14Rik has also been down-regulated in LPS-exposed or oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced microglial cells. Up-regulation of 1810034E14Rik has reduced the infarct volume, ameliorated brain injury in MCAO model and decreased production of inflammatory cytokines both in the animal model and in microglial cells. Besides, 1810034E14Rik up-regulation could block the induction of microglial cells and suppress p65 phosphorylation of p65 (Qu et al., 2019). The above-mentioned examples indicate that down-regulation of lncRNAs in IS might be a compensative mechanism for amelioration of neuron damage or can be directly participate in the pathogenic mechanisms during IS. Table 8 summarizes the data regarding the roles of down-regulated non-coding RNAs in the pathogenesis of IS as revealed by animal studies.

TABLE 8

lncRNAs/miRNAsAnimal modelsCellsTargets/RegulatorsSignaling pathwaysFunctionReferences
Meg3268 adult male Sprague–Dawley ratsHMEC-1NICD, Hes-1, and Hey-1Notch PathwayMeg3 inhibits brain lesions, promotes neurological outcomes and induces angiogenesis after ISLiu et al., 2017
LncRNA-1810034E14RikC57BL/6 miceprimary microglial cellsNF-κB pathway1810034E14Rik upregulation decreased the expression of inflammatory cytokines in IS animal and inhibited the microglial cellsQu et al., 2019
HOTTIPC57BL/6 micePrimary cortical neuronsmiR-143miR-143/hexokinase 2 pathwayHOTTIP expression reduced ischemic injury and attenuated glycolytic metabolism in neuronsLiang et al., 2018a
Lnc-M64384, Lnc-MRAK013682, Lnc-MRAK051099Wistar ratsNeural progenitor cells (NPCs)Theses lncRNA may use as an therapy for amelioration of neurological functions.Liu et al., 2019
lncRNA RianC57BL/6 miceN2a cell line (mouse)miR-144-3pRian/miR-144-3p/GATA3 signalingRian inhibits cell apoptosis from cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by Rian/miR-144-3p/GATA3 signalingYao et al., 2020
miR-10b-3p and miR-217-5pBrain of 10 Rat MCAO model and 10 controlsPPFIA1, SLC7A1, NTRK2, KDM48Ras signaling pathway, cGMP-PKG signaling pathway, phospholipase D signaling pathwayThese miRNAs may control cell proliferation and apoptosis via the cGMP-PKG signaling pathwayDuan et al., 2019
miR-424plasma and ipsilateral brain tissue from C57/BL6 miceBV2 microglial cellCDC25A, cyclin D1, and CDK6miR-424 suppresses neuronal apoptosis and microglia activationZhao et al., 2013
miR-126-3p and miR-126-5pICR miceSPRED1, VEGFA, and p-Raf-1MAP kinase pathway, VEGFA/SPRED1/raf-1 signaling pathwaymiR-126-3p reduces the OGD/R-induced apoptosis and enhances cell survival.Xiao et al., 2020
miRNA-12660 ICR miceHUVECsPTPN9AKT and ERK signaling pathwaysmiRNA-126 reduces brain atrophy size and enhances neurobehavioral function.Qu et al., 2019
miR-2216 SD ratsrat pheochromo- cytoma cell lineTNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, MIP-2 and PGE2p38 MAPK pathwaymiRNA-22 inhibits the inflammatory factors in vitro.Dong et al., 2019
miR-652SD ratsSH-SY5Y cell linNOX2ROS pathwaymiR-652 inhibited NOX2 expression, reduced NOX activity and ROS level and enhanced apoptosisZuo et al., 2020
miR-3552blood and brain specimens from 7 brain specimens from MCAO rats and 5 brain specimens from sham-operated ratsCASP3apoptosis pathwaymiR-3552 might regulate apoptosis by CASP3Li et al., 2020
miR-103SD ratsHUVECsVEGFmiR-103 inhibits the increase of tube length and the migration of cells and ischemic stroke angiogenesis, and enhances infarction volumeShi et al., 2018
miR-195SD ratscerebral cortex cells RCCNCKLF5JNK signaling pathwaymiR-195 upregulation suppresses cerebral infarction, loss of neuronal cells, and induces synaptic plasticityChang et al., 2020
miR-122Blood specimens from SD ratsVcam1, Nos2, Pla2g2agranulocyte/agranulocyte adhesion and diapedesis, leukocyte extravasation, eicosanoid signaling and atherosclerosis signalingmiR-122 upregulation enhances stroke outcomes.Liu da et al., 2016
miR-579-3pbrain tissue from SD ratsneuronsNRIP1NF-êB pathwaymiR-579-3p has neuroprotective effect and reduces inflammation and apoptosis.Jia et al., 2020
miR-7a-5pspontaneously hypertensive rats, C57BL/6 micePC12 cellsα-SynmiR-7a-5p improved ischemic brain damage.Kim et al., 2018
miR-219Serum and brain tissue from Wistar ratsNMDAmiR-219 modulated ischemia by NMDA.Silva et al., 2017
miR-99aC57BL/6 miceneuro-2a cellscyclin D1 and CDK6miR-99a decreased neuronal injury after cerebral I/R.Tao et al., 2015
miR-126SD ratsadipose derived stem cells (ADSCs)miR-126 induced neurogenesis and vasculogenesis, and suppresses microglial activation and inflammatory response after ischemic stroke.Geng et al., 2019
miR-130a-3pMCAO/R miceSH-SY5Y and N2a cellsDAPK1H19/miR-130a-3p/DAPK1 axismiR-130a-3p controls apoptosis in SH-SY5Y and N2a cells as well as on cerebral damage by I/R.Feng et al., 2021

Summary of animal studies which displayed down-regulation of lncRNAs and miRNAs in stroke.

Discussion

A wealth of information about the role of non-coding RNAs in the development of IS has been obtained from combination of RNA-sequencing assays and bioinformatics assays such as GO, KEGG pathway enrichment assays and network analyses. These kinds of studies not only exhibited dysregulation of these transcripts, but also provided mechanistical insights about their route of actions. Generally, non-coding RNAs might participate in the pathophysiology of IS through different routes. As a number of differentially expressed lncRNAs between IS patients and healthy controls map to genomic loci near IS-associated genes, regulation of gene expression through cis-acting modes is a possible route. Another possible mechanism of contribution of lncRNAs in the pathology of IS is their ceRNA role. MEG3/miR-424-5p, KCNQ1OT1/miR-200a and MALAT1/miR-205-5p are few examples of interplay between lncRNAs and miRNAs in the context of IS.

Aberrant expression of non-coding RNAs in IS patients might be due to the presence of a number of genomic variants within the coding genes as demonstrated for ANRIL lncRNA. This lncRNA is among the mostly assessed lncRNAs in IS. However, the results of all studies are not consistent in this regard. Such inconsistency might be due to phase of sampling during the course of IS or the presence of other confounding parameters. The presence of lncRNAs in the serum specimens and exosomes extracted from these specimens facilitates diagnosis of IS and its clinical variants using this noninvasive route of sampling.

MicroRNAs contribute in the pathogenesis of IS through modulation of genes implicated in the atherosclerosis or inflammatory responses. Exosomal miRNAs might affect communication between several types of cells including endothelial and smooth muscle cells. IS-related circulating miRNAs might hypothetically exert similar functions. Yet, this hypothesis should be judged in upcoming studies. Peripheral expression of miRNAs can be used to differentiate IS patients from healthy subjects or IS patients from other related conditions such as HS. Moreover, their signature might predict recovery from IS-related clinical signs.

The observed sex-biased pattern of differentially expression of lncRNAs (Dykstra-Aiello et al., 2016) might determine different pathogenic processes for the evolution of IS among men and women which should be further examined. Moreover, a number of investigations have displayed specific lncRNA signatures at certain time points following IS, demonstrating the specific roles of lncRNAs in each step of pathogenic processes following IS.

In spite of conduction of various functional studies to unravel the role of non-coding RNAs in IS, therapeutic application of these transcripts have not been clarified. Therefore, future investigation should appraise the possibility of using these transcripts as therapeutic targets in IS. Another limitation of most of mentioned studies is their relatively small sample sizes and lack of simultaneous appraisal of exposures and outcomes in cross-sectional studies. Application of non-coding RNAs as therapeutic targets for IS has faced some challenges in terms of safe delivery of the drug to specific targets, avoidance of off-target effects and determination of best time for intervention. This filed is still in its infancy.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

SG-F wrote the manuscript and revised it. MT designed the study and supervised it. NA, ZS-F, and BH collected the data and designed the figures and the tables. All authors approved the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer RE declared a shared affiliation with several of the authors, SG-F, ZS-F, and NA, to the handling editor at the time of the review.

Abbreviations

  • AF

    atrial fibrillation

  • AUC

    area under curve

  • ceRNAs

    competing endogenous RNAs

  • GO

    gene ontology

  • HS

    hemorrhagic stroke

  • hs-CRP

    high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

  • IS

    Ischemic stroke

  • LAA

    large-artery atherosclerosis

  • lncRNAs

    long non-coding RNAs

  • MCAO

    middle cerebral artery occlusion

  • miRNAs

    microRNAs

  • NIHSS

    NIH Stroke Scale

  • PBMCs

    peripheral blood mononuclear cells

  • ROC

    receiver operating characteristic

  • TIA

    transient ischemic attack.

References

  • 1

    BamM.YangX.SenS.ZumbrunE. E.DennisL.ZhangJ.et al (2018). Characterization of dysregulated miRNA in Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from ischemic stroke patients.Mol. Neurobiol.5514191429. 10.1007/s12035-016-0347-8

  • 2

    BonauerA.CarmonaG.IwasakiM.MioneM.KoyanagiM.FischerA.et al (2009). MicroRNA-92a controls angiogenesis and functional recovery of ischemic tissues in mice.Science32417101713. 10.1126/science.1174381

  • 3

    Caballero-GarridoE.Pena-PhilippidesJ. C.LordkipanidzeT.BraginD.YangY.ErhardtE. B.et al (2015). In vivo inhibition of miR-155 promotes recovery after experimental mouse stroke.J. Neurosci.351244612464. 10.1523/jneurosci.1641-15.2015

  • 4

    ChangL.ZhangW.ShiS.PengY.WangD.ZhangL.et al (2020). microRNA-195 attenuates neuronal apoptosis in rats with ischemic stroke through inhibiting KLF5-mediated activation of the JNK signaling pathway.Mol. Med.26:31. 10.1186/s10020-020-00150-w

  • 5

    ChenF.ZhangL.WangE.ZhangC.LiX. (2018a). LncRNA GAS5 regulates ischemic stroke as a competing endogenous RNA for miR-137 to regulate the Notch1 signaling pathway.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.496184190. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.022

  • 6

    ChenY.SongY.HuangJ.QuM.ZhangY.GengJ.et al (2017). Increased circulating exosomal miRNA-223 is associated with acute ischemic stroke.Front. Neurol.8:57. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00057

  • 7

    ChenZ.WangK.HuangJ.ZhengG.LvY.LuoN.et al (2018b). Upregulated serum MiR-146b serves as a biomarker for acute ischemic stroke.Cell. Physiol. Biochem.45397405. 10.1159/000486916

  • 8

    ChengJ.KapranovP.DrenkowJ.DikeS.BrubakerS.PatelS.et al (2005). Transcriptional maps of 10 human chromosomes at 5-nucleotide resolution.Science30811491154. 10.1126/science.1108625

  • 9

    CuomoO.CepparuloP.AnzilottiS.SeraniA.SirabellaR.BrancaccioP.et al (2019). Anti-miR-223-5p ameliorates ischemic damage and improves neurological function by preventing NCKX2 downregulation after ischemia in rats.Mol. Therapy Nucleic Acids1810631071. 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.10.022

  • 10

    DengQ.-W.LiS.WangH.SunH.-L.ZuoL.GuZ.-T.et al (2018). Differential long noncoding RNA expressions in peripheral blood mononuclear cells for detection of acute ischemic stroke.Clin. Sci.13215971614. 10.1042/cs20180411

  • 11

    DengW.FanC.ZhaoY.MaoY.LiJ.ZhangY.et al (2020a). MicroRNA-130a regulates neurological deficit and angiogenesis in rats with ischaemic stroke by targeting XIAP.J. Cell Mol. Med.241098711000. 10.1111/jcmm.15732

  • 12

    DengY.ChenD.GaoF.LvH.ZhangG.SunX.et al (2020b). Silencing of long non-coding RNA GAS5 suppresses neuron cell apoptosis and nerve injury in ischemic stroke through inhibiting DNMT3B-Dependent MAP4K4 methylation.Trans. Stroke Res.11950966. 10.1007/s12975-019-00770-3

  • 13

    DengY.ChenD.WangL.GaoF.JinB.LvH.et al (2019). Silencing of long noncoding RNA nespas aggravates microglial cell death and neuroinflammation in ischemic stroke.Stroke5018501858. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023376

  • 14

    DerrienT.JohnsonR.BussottiG.TanzerA.DjebaliS.TilgnerH.et al (2012). The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression.Genome Res.2217751789. 10.1101/gr.132159.111

  • 15

    DongH.CuiB.HaoX. (2019). MicroRNA-22 alleviates inflammation in ischemic stroke via p38 MAPK pathways.Mol. Med. Rep.20735744. 10.3892/mmr.2019.10269

  • 16

    DuanX.GanJ.PengD. Y.BaoQ.XiaoL.WeiL.et al (2019). Identification and functional analysis of microRNAs in rats following focal cerebral ischemia injury.Mol. Med. Rep.1941754184. 10.3892/mmr.2019.10073

  • 17

    Dykstra-AielloC.JicklingG. C.AnderB. P.ShroffN.ZhanX.LiuD.et al (2016). Altered expression of long noncoding RNAs in blood after ischemic stroke and proximity to putative stroke risk loci.Stroke4728962903. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013869

  • 18

    EdwardsonM. A.ZhongX.CheemaA.DromerickA. (2018a). Plasma microRNA markers of upper limb recovery following human stroke.J. Clin. Trans. Sci.2:45. 10.1017/cts.2018.176

  • 19

    EdwardsonM. A.ZhongX.FiandacaM. S.FederoffH. J.CheemaA. K.DromerickA. W. (2018b). Plasma microRNA markers of upper limb recovery following human stroke.Sci. Rep.8:12558.

  • 20

    FangY.FullwoodM. J. (2016). Roles, functions, and mechanisms of long non-coding RNAs in cancer.Genom. Proteom. Bioinform.144254. 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.09.006

  • 21

    FeiginV. L.KrishnamurthiR. V.ParmarP.NorrvingB.MensahG. A.BennettD. A.et al (2015). Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990-2013: the GBD 2013 study.Neuroepidemiology45161176. 10.1159/000441085

  • 22

    FengL.GuoJ.AiF. (2019). Circulating long noncoding RNA ANRIL downregulation correlates with increased risk, higher disease severity and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with acute ischemic stroke.J. Clin. Lab. Anal.33:e22629. 10.1002/jcla.22629

  • 23

    FengM.ZhuX.ZhuoC. (2021). H19/miR-130a-3p/DAPK1 axis regulates the pathophysiology of neonatal hypoxic-ischemia encephalopathy.Neurosci. Res.1635262. 10.1016/j.neures.2020.03.005

  • 24

    GanC.WangC.TanK. (2012). Circulatory microRNA-145 expression is increased in cerebral ischemia.Genet. Mol. Res.11147152. 10.4238/2012.January.27.1

  • 25

    GaoC.ZhangC.-C.YangH.-X.HaoY.-N. (2020). MALAT1 protected the angiogenesis function of human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) under oxygen glucose deprivation/re-oxygenation (OGD/R) challenge by interacting with miR-205-5p/VEGFA pathway.Neuroscience435135145. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.027

  • 26

    GengW.TangH.LuoS.LvY.LiangD.KangX.et al (2019). Exosomes from miRNA-126-modified ADSCs promotes functional recovery after stroke in rats by improving neurogenesis and suppressing microglia activation.Am. J. Transl. Res.11780792.

  • 27

    GuangY.ZhendongL.LuW.XinC.XiaoxiongW.QiD.et al (2019). MicroRNA-195 protection against focal cerebral ischemia by targeting CX3CR1.J. Neurosurg. JNS13114451454. 10.3171/2018.5.JNS173061

  • 28

    GuoD.MaJ.YanL.LiT.LiZ.HanX.et al (2017). Down-Regulation of lncrna MALAT1 attenuates neuronal cell death through suppressing beclin1-dependent autophagy by regulating Mir-30a in cerebral ischemic stroke.Cell. Physiol. Biochem.43182194. 10.1159/000480337

  • 29

    GuoX.YangJ.LiangB.ShenT.YanY.HuangS.et al (2018). Identification of novel LncRNA biomarkers and construction of LncRNA-Related networks in han chinese patients with ischemic stroke.Cell. Physiol. Biochem.5021572175. 10.1159/000495058

  • 30

    HouX.-X.ChengH. (2018). Long non-coding RNA RMST silencing protects against middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO)-induced ischemic stroke.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.49526022608. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.087

  • 31

    HuangS.LvZ.GuoY.LiL.ZhangY.ZhouL.et al (2016). Identification of blood Let-7e-5p as a biomarker for ischemic stroke.PLoS One11:e0163951. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163951

  • 32

    HuangY.WangL.MaoY.NanG. (2019). Long noncoding RNA-H19 contributes to atherosclerosis and induces ischemic stroke via the upregulation of acid phosphatase 5.Front. Neurol.10:32. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00032

  • 33

    JiQ.JiY.PengJ.ZhouX.ChenX.ZhaoH.et al (2016). Increased brain-specific MiR-9 and MiR-124 in the serum exosomes of acute ischemic stroke patients.PLoS One11:e0163645. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163645

  • 34

    JiaJ.CuiY.TanZ.MaW.JiangY. (2020). MicroRNA-579-3p exerts neuroprotective effects against ischemic stroke via anti-inflammation and anti-apoptosis.Neuropsychiatric Dis. Treatment1612291238. 10.2147/ndt.s240698

  • 35

    JiaL.HaoF.WangW.QuY. (2015). Circulating miR-145 is associated with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in acute ischemic stroke patients.Cell Biochem. Funct.33314319. 10.1002/cbf.3116

  • 36

    JicklingG. C.AnderB. P.ZhanX.NoblettD.StamovaB.LiuD. (2014). microRNA expression in peripheral blood cells following acute ischemic stroke and their predicted gene targets.PLoS One9:e99283. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099283

  • 37

    JinF.XingJ. (2017). Circulating pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic microRNA expressions in patients with acute ischemic stroke and their association with disease severity.Neurol. Sci.3820152023. 10.1007/s10072-017-3071-x

  • 38

    JoM. H.ShinS.JungS.-R.KimE.SongJ.-J.HohngS. (2015). Human Argonaute 2 has diverse reaction pathways on target RNAs.Mol. Cell59117124. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.027

  • 39

    KimT.MehtaS. L.Morris-BlancoK. C.ChokkallaA. K.ChelluboinaB.LopezM.et al (2018). The microRNA miR-7a-5p ameliorates ischemic brain damage by repressing α-synuclein.Sci. Signal.11:eaat4285. 10.1126/scisignal.aat4285

  • 40

    KolosowskaN.GotkiewiczM.DhunganaH.GiudiceL.GiugnoR.BoxD.et al (2020). Intracerebral overexpression of miR-669c is protective in mouse ischemic stroke model by targeting MyD88 and inducing alternative microglial/macrophage activation.J. Neuroinflamm.17:194. 10.1186/s12974-020-01870-w

  • 41

    KotbH. G.IbrahimA. H.MohamedE. F.AliO. M.HassaneinN.BadawyD.et al (2019). The expression of microRNA 146a in patients with ischemic stroke: an observational study.Int. J. Gen. Med.12273278. 10.2147/IJGM.S213535

  • 42

    LeeR. C.FeinbaumR. L.AmbrosV. (1993). The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14.Cell75843854. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y

  • 43

    LeungL. Y.ChanC. P.LeungY. K.JiangH. L.AbrigoJ. M.Wang deF.et al (2014). Comparison of miR-124-3p and miR-16 for early diagnosis of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke.Clin. Chim. Acta433139144. 10.1016/j.cca.2014.03.007

  • 44

    LiL.DongL.ZhaoJ.HeW.ChuB.ZhangJ.et al (2020). Circulating miRNA-3552 as a potential biomarker for ischemic stroke in rats.BioMed. Res. Int.2020:4501393. 10.1155/2020/4501393

  • 45

    LiP.TengF.GaoF.ZhangM.WuJ.ZhangC. (2015). Identification of circulating MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for detecting acute ischemic stroke.Cell Mol. Neurobiol.35433447.

  • 46

    LiangJ.WangQ.LiJ.-Q.GuoT.YuD. (2020). Long non-coding RNA MEG3 promotes cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury through increasing pyroptosis by targeting miR-485/AIM2 axis.Exp. Neurol.325:113139. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113139

  • 47

    LiangY.XuJ.WangY.TangJ. Y.YangS. L.XiangH. G.et al (2018a). Inhibition of MiRNA-125b decreases cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by targeting CK2α/NADPH oxidase signaling.Cell. Physiol. Biochem.4518181826. 10.1159/000487873

  • 48

    LiangZ.ChiY. J.LinG. Q.LuoS. H.JiangQ. Y.ChenY. K. (2018b). MiRNA-26a promotes angiogenesis in a rat model of cerebral infarction via PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathway.Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.2234853492. 10.26355/eurrev_201806_15175

  • 49

    LiawN.LiebeskindD. (2020). Emerging therapies in acute ischemic stroke.F1000Res9:F1000 Faculty Rev-546.

  • 50

    LiuJ.LiQ.ZhangK.-S.HuB.NiuX.ZhouS.-M.et al (2017). Downregulation of the long non-coding RNA Meg3 promotes angiogenesis after ischemic brain injury by activating notch signaling.Mol. Neurobiol.5481798190. 10.1007/s12035-016-0270-z

  • 51

    LiuX. S.ChoppM.WangX. L.ZhangL.Hozeska-SolgotA.TangT.et al (2013). MicroRNA-17-92 cluster mediates the proliferation and survival of neural progenitor cells after stroke.J. Biol. Chem.2881247812488. 10.1074/jbc.M112.449025

  • 52

    LiuX. S.FanB.WangX.ChoppM.ZhangZ. G. (2019). “Differential long noncoding RNA and messenger RNA expression profiling and functional network analysis in stroke-induced neurogenesis,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE).

  • 53

    LiuY.ZhangJ.HanR.LiuH.SunD.LiuX. (2015). Downregulation of serum brain specific microRNA is associated with inflammation and infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke.J. Clin. Neurosci.22291295. 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.042

  • 54

    Liu daZ.JicklingG. C.AnderB. P.HullH.ZhanX.CoxC.et al (2016). Elevating microRNA-122 in blood improves outcomes after temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.3613741383. 10.1177/0271678X15610786

  • 55

    LongG.WangF.LiH.YinZ.SandipC.LouY.et al (2013). Circulating miR-30a, miR-126 and let-7b as biomarker for ischemic stroke in humans.BMC Neurol.13:178. 10.1186/1471-2377-13-178

  • 56

    O’BrienJ.HayderH.ZayedY.PengC. (2018). Overview of microRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of actions, and circulation.Front. Endocrin.9:402. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00402

  • 57

    PengG.YuanY.WuS.HeF.HuY.LuoB. (2015). MicroRNA let-7e is a potential circulating biomarker of acute stage ischemic stroke.Trans. Stroke Res.6437445. 10.1007/s12975-015-0422-x

  • 58

    QuM.PanJ.WangL.ZhouP.SongY.WangS.et al (2019). MicroRNA-126 regulates angiogenesis and neurogenesis in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia.Mol. Therapy Nucleic Acids161525. 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.02.002

  • 59

    SalinasJ.LinH.AparicoH. J.HuanT.LiuC.RongJ.et al (2019). Whole blood microRNA expression associated with stroke: results from the framingham heart study.PLoS One14:e0219261. 10.1371/journal.pone.0219261

  • 60

    SepramaniamS.TanJ.-R.TanK.-S.DeSilvaD. A.TavintharanS.WoonF.-P.et al (2014). Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers of acute stroke.Int. J. Mol. Sci.1514181432.

  • 61

    ShiF.-P.WangX.-H.ZhangH.-X.ShangM.-M.LiuX.-X.SunH.-M.et al (2018). MiR-103 regulates the angiogenesis of ischemic stroke rats by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci.21318324. 10.22038/IJBMS.2018.27267.6657

  • 62

    SilvaC. I.NovaisP. C.RodriguesA. R.CarvalhoC. A. M.ColliB. O.CarlottiC. G.Jr.et al (2017). Expression of NMDA receptor and microRNA-219 in rats submitted to cerebral ischemia associated with alcoholism.Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria753035. 10.1590/0004-282X20160188

  • 63

    SonodaT.MatsuzakiJ.YamamotoY.SakuraiT.AokiY.TakizawaS.et al (2019). Serum MicroRNA-Based risk prediction for stroke.Stroke5015101518. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023648

  • 64

    SørensenS. S.NygaardA.-B.CarlsenA. L.HeegaardN. H. H.BakM.ChristensenT. (2017). Elevation of brain-enriched miRNAs in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with acute ischemic stroke.Biomarker Res.5:24. 10.1186/s40364-017-0104-9

  • 65

    SpinettiG.FortunatoO.CaporaliA.ShantikumarS.MarchettiM.MeloniM.et al (2013). MicroRNA-15a and microRNA-16 impair human circulating proangiogenic cell functions and are increased in the proangiogenic cells and serum of patients with critical limb ischemia.Circ. Res.112335346. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300418

  • 66

    SuofuY.WangX.HeY.LiF.ZhangY.CarlisleD. L.et al (2020). Mir-155 knockout protects against ischemia/reperfusion-induced brain injury and hemorrhagic transformation.NeuroReport31235239. 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001382

  • 67

    TaoZ.ZhaoH.WangR.LiuP.YanF.ZhangC.et al (2015). Neuroprotective effect of microRNA-99a against focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice.J. Neurol. Sci.355113119. 10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.036

  • 68

    TianC.LiZ.YangZ.HuangQ.LiuJ.HongB. (2016). Plasma MicroRNA-16 is a biomarker for diagnosis, stratification, and prognosis of hyperacute cerebral infarction.PLoS One11:e0166688. 10.1371/journal.pone.0166688

  • 69

    TiedtS.PrestelM.MalikR.SchieferdeckerN.DueringM.KautzkyV.et al (2017). RNA-Seq identifies circulating miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-143-3p as potential biomarkers for acute ischemic stroke.Circ. Res.121970980. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311572

  • 70

    van KralingenJ. C.McFallA.OrdE. N. J.CoyleT. F.BissettM.McClureJ. D.et al (2019). Altered extracellular vesicle microRNA expression in ischemic stroke and small vessel disease.Trans. Stroke Res.10495508. 10.1007/s12975-018-0682-3

  • 71

    VijayanM.KumarS.YinX.ZaferD.ChananaV.CengizP.et al (2018). Identification of novel circulatory microRNA signatures linked to patients with ischemic stroke.Hum. Mol. Genet.2723182329. 10.1093/hmg/ddy136

  • 72

    WangH.ZhengX.JinJ.ZhengL.GuanT.HuoY.et al (2020a). LncRNA MALAT1 silencing protects against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury through miR-145 to regulate AQP4.J. Biomed. Sci.27:40. 10.1186/s12929-020-00635-0

  • 73

    WangJ.CaoB.ZhaoH.GaoY.LuoY.ChenY.et al (2019a). Long noncoding RNA H19 prevents neurogenesis in ischemic stroke through p53/Notch1 pathway.Brain Res. Bull.150111117. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.05.009

  • 74

    WangJ.RuanJ.ZhuM.YangJ.DuS.XuP.et al (2019b). Predictive value of long noncoding RNA ZFAS1 in patients with ischemic stroke.Clin. Exp. Hypertens41615621. 10.1080/10641963.2018.1529774

  • 75

    WangJ.ZhaoH.FanZ.LiG.MaQ.TaoZ.et al (2017). Long noncoding RNA H19 promotes neuroinflammation in ischemic stroke by driving histone deacetylase 1-Dependent M1 microglial polarization.Stroke4822112221. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017387

  • 76

    WangW.SunG.ZhangL.ShiL.ZengY. (2014). Circulating microRNAs as novel potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of acute stroke in humans.J. Stroke Cereb. Dis.2326072613. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.06.002

  • 77

    WangX.ChenS.NiJ.ChengJ.JiaJ.ZhenX. (2018). miRNA-3473b contributes to neuroinflammation following cerebral ischemia.Cell Death Dis.9:11. 10.1038/s41419-017-0014-7

  • 78

    WangY.LuoY.YaoY.JiY.FengL.DuF.et al (2020b). Silencing the lncRNA Maclpil in pro-inflammatory macrophages attenuates acute experimental ischemic stroke via LCP1 in mice.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.40747759. 10.1177/0271678X19836118

  • 79

    WuJ.DuK.LuX. (2015). Elevated expressions of serum miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-17-5p are associated with acute ischemic stroke.Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med.82107121079.

  • 80

    WuJ.FanC. L.MaL. J.LiuT.WangC.SongJ. X.et al (2017). Distinctive expression signatures of serum microRNAs in ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack patients.Thrombosis Haemostasis1179921001. 10.1160/TH16-08-0606

  • 81

    XiangY.ZhangY.XiaY.ZhaoH.LiuA.ChenY. (2020). LncRNA MEG3 targeting miR-424-5p via MAPK signaling pathway mediates neuronal apoptosis in ischemic stroke.Aging1231563174. 10.18632/aging.102790

  • 82

    XiaoZ. H.WangL.GanP.HeJ.YanB. C.DingL. D. (2020). Dynamic changes in miR-126 expression in the hippocampus and penumbra following experimental transient global and focal cerebral ischemia–reperfusion.Neurochem. Res.4511071119. 10.1007/s11064-020-02986-4

  • 83

    XuX.ZhuangC.ChenL. (2020). Exosomal long non-coding RNA expression from serum of patients with acute minor stroke.Neuropsychiatric Dis. Treatment16:153. 10.2147/NDT.S230332

  • 84

    YangJ.GuL.GuoX.HuangJ.ChenZ.HuangG.et al (2018). LncRNA ANRIL expression and ANRIL gene polymorphisms contribute to the risk of ischemic stroke in the chinese han population.Cell Mol. Neurobiol.3812531269. 10.1007/s10571-018-0593-6

  • 85

    YaoP.LiY.-L.ChenY.ShenW.WuK.-Y.XuW.-H. (2020). Overexpression of long non-coding RNA Rian attenuates cell apoptosis from cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury via Rian/miR-144-3p/GATA3 signaling.Gene737:144411. 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144411

  • 86

    YinK.-J.DengZ.HuangH.HamblinM.XieC.ZhangJ.et al (2010). miR-497 regulates neuronal death in mouse brain after transient focal cerebral ischemia.Neurobiol. Dis.381726. 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.12.021

  • 87

    YouD.YouH. (2019). Repression of long non-coding RNA MEG3 restores nerve growth and alleviates neurological impairment after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model.Biomed. Pharmacotherapy11114471457. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.067

  • 88

    ZengW.JinJ. (2020). The correlation of serum long non-coding RNA ANRIL with risk factors, functional outcome, and prognosis in atrial fibrillation patients with ischemic stroke.J. Clin. Lab. Anal.34:e23352. 10.1002/jcla.23352

  • 89

    ZhanR.XuK.PanJ.XuQ.XuS.ShenJ. (2017). Long noncoding RNA MEG3 mediated angiogenesis after cerebral infarction through regulating p53/NOX4 axis.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.490700706. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.06.104

  • 90

    ZhangB.WangD.JiT.-F.ShiL.YuJ.-L. (2017a). Overexpression of lncRNA ANRIL up-regulates VEGF expression and promotes angiogenesis of diabetes mellitus combined with cerebral infarction by activating NF-κB signaling pathway in a rat model.Oncotarget81734717359. 10.18632/oncotarget.14468

  • 91

    ZhangX.TangX.LiuK.HamblinM. H.YinK.-J. (2017b). Long noncoding RNA Malat1 regulates cerebrovascular pathologies in ischemic stroke.J. Neurosci.3717971806. 10.1523/jneurosci.3389-16.2017

  • 92

    ZhaninI. S.GusarV. A.TimofeevaA. T.PinelisV. G.AsanovA. Y. (2018). MicroRNA expression profile in patients in the early stages of ischemic stroke.Neurol. Neuropsychiatry Psychosomat.107278. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.018

  • 93

    ZhaoH.WangJ.GaoL.WangR.LiuX.GaoZ.et al (2013). MiRNA-424 protects against permanent focal cerebral ischemia injury in mice involving suppressing microglia activation.Stroke4417061713. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000504

  • 94

    ZhengL.ChengW.WangX.YangZ.ZhouX.PanC. (2017). Overexpression of MicroRNA-145 ameliorates astrocyte injury by targeting aquaporin 4 in cerebral ischemic stroke.BioMed. Res. Int.2017:9530951. 10.1155/2017/9530951

  • 95

    ZhengZ.LiuS.WangC.HanX. (2018). A functional polymorphism rs145204276 in the promoter of long noncoding RNA GAS5 is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke.J. Stroke Cereb. Dis.2735353541. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.08.016

  • 96

    ZhuM.LiN.LuoP.JingW.WenX.LiangC.et al (2018). Peripheral blood leukocyte expression of lncRNA MIAT and its diagnostic and prognostic value in ischemic stroke.J. Stroke Cereb. Dis.27326337. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.09.009

  • 97

    ZhuW.TianL.YueX.LiuJ.FuY.YanY. (2019). LncRNA expression profiling of ischemic stroke during the transition from the acute to subacute stage.Front. Neurol.10:36. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00036

  • 98

    ZuoM.-L.WangA.-P.SongG.-L.YangZ.-B. (2020). miR-652 protects rats from cerebral ischemia/reperfusion oxidative stress injury by directly targeting NOX2.Biomed. Pharmacotherapy.124:109860. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109860

Summary

Keywords

lncRNA, miRNA, stroke, expression, biomarker

Citation

Ghafouri-Fard S, Shirvani-Farsani Z, Hussen BM, Taheri M and Arefian N (2021) Emerging Impact of Non-coding RNAs in the Pathology of Stroke. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:780489. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.780489

Received

21 September 2021

Accepted

28 October 2021

Published

19 November 2021

Volume

13 - 2021

Edited by

Li Li, Capital Medical University, China

Reviewed by

Laurent Metzinger, University of Picardie Jules Verne, France; Atefe Abak, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran; Ilgiz Fanilevich Gareev, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China; Hazha Hidayat, Salahaddin University, Iraq; Reyhane Eghtedarian, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Mohammad Taheri, Noormohammad Arefian,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics