Magnesium: potential roles in neurovascular disease
- 1Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 3The Roxanna Todd Hodges Comprehensive Stroke Clinic, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 4Department of Neurology, UCLA Stroke Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Objective: Magnesium therapy has been studied extensively in pre-clinical and clinical trials in multiple organ systems. Cerebrovascular diseases may benefit from its neuroprotective properties. This review summarizes current studies of magnesium in a wide range of neurovascular diseases.
Methods: We searched relevant terms in the National Library of Medicine PubMed database and selected research including basic science, translational reports, meta-analyses, and clinical studies.
Results: Studies examining magnesium administration in ischemic stroke have failed to show any benefit in clinical outcome. Data on magnesium for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are limited. Preliminary investigations in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were promising, but definitive studies did not reveal differences in clinical outcome between magnesium and placebo-treated groups. Studies examining magnesium administration in global ischemia following cardiac arrest suggest a trend toward improved clinical outcome. The strongest evidence for clinically relevant neuroprotection following magnesium administration derives from studies of pre-term infants and patients undergoing cardiac bypass and carotid endarterectomy procedures. Magnesium was found to have an excellent safety profile across all investigations.
Conclusion: Magnesium is easy to administer and possesses a favorable safety profile. Its utility as a neuroprotectant in cardiac surgery, carotid endarterectomy, and pre-term infant hypoxia remain promising. Value as a therapeutic agent in ischemic stroke, ICH, and SAH is unclear and appears to be limited by late administration. Ongoing clinical trials assessing magnesium administration in the first hours following symptom onset may help clarify the role of magnesium therapy in these disease processes.
Cerebrovascular diseases are the fourth leading cause of death in the United States, claiming one life every 4 minutes and affecting 15 million people worldwide yearly (1, 2). The identification of safe, effective, inexpensive, and easily applicable treatments is of enormous public health importance. Cerebral ischemia is the most common neurovascular disease, followed by intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Although these disorders have distinct mechanisms of brain injury, the neurovascular unit is principally affected in each. Treatments targeting both neuronal and vascular mechanisms may have efficacy in wide-ranging processes.
Magnesium (Mg) exhibits beneficial effects through both neuronal and vascular mechanisms, rendering it an attractive therapeutic agent in cerebrovascular diseases. Mg, an essential element for life, is found in virtually every biological system. All cells require Mg as an essential ion that allows ATP to be biologically active in DNA and RNA synthesis. Unique among neuroprotective agents, Mg has shown potential efficacy in a wide variety of clinical settings.
This review aims to summarize the current state of clinical knowledge regarding Mg therapy in the setting of cerebrovascular diseases. We begin with a brief summary of pre-clinical data. However, extensive review of experimental results is beyond the scope of the article. We focus on reported clinical trials and meta-analyses, segregated according to disease process. We conclude with a discussion of a current clinical trial and future directions in research.
Pre-Clinical Data for Magnesium
Mg exhibits multiple complementary neuroprotective mechanisms. Physiological extracellular Mg concentrations (250–1000 μmol/L) inhibit glutamate release (3), potentiate adenosine-mediated inhibition of glutamate release (4), restore blood–brain-barrier (BBB) integrity, decrease brain edema (5), and non-competitively antagonize NMDA receptor activation via blockage of voltage-dependent calcium channels (6). In rat brain injury models, intracellular Mg has been linked to alterations in cerebral energy metabolism and inhibition of mitochondrial function (7). Finally by competing with calcium at voltage-gated calcium channels in intracellular and cell surface membranes and by serving as an antagonist at N-type, P-type, and L-type channels, Mg impedes calcium influx into ischemic neurons and prevents a recognized final common pathway for cell death (8).
Mg possesses vasoactive properties, which can improve cerebral blood flow via interactions with the regional vasculature and more distant effects in the heart and systemic circulation. In the cerebral vasculature, Mg exhibits direct effects on large, medium, and small vessels by inhibiting the actions of endothelin-1, neuropeptide Y, and angiotensin II (9, 10). In rabbit models, inhibition of L-type smooth muscle Ca channels suggests a potential role in vasospasm prevention (11). Augmentation of cerebral blood flow via vasodilatation results in improved outcomes following experimental middle cerebral artery occlusion in animal models (12). Systemically, Mg promotes vasodilatation by increasing synthesis of prostacyclin and inhibition of angiotensin (13). Mg also augments cardiac output, increasing cardiac index despite a mild transient lowering of systemic blood pressure (14).
Evaluation of Physiological Magnesium Concentration
Low serum Mg levels (<0.76 mmol/L), coupled with advanced atherosclerosis, are associated with a 3.29-fold increased adjusted risk of adverse cerebrovascular events (95% CI 1.34–7.90, p = 0.009) (15) and promote coronary and carotid atherosclerosis (16). These studies did not demonstrate a correlation between serum Mg levels and Glasgow Coma Scale. However, lower cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Mg levels were present in patients with ischemic strokes compared to controls (p = 0.006) and established a positive association between mortality after 7 days and significantly lower CSF levels of Mg (p = 0.002) (17). During cardiac bypass surgery (CABG), intra-operative serum Mg levels were found to be low during an initial stage of the operation (18).
The ability of Mg to permeate intact BBB and enter CSF spaces has remained controversial. Initial studies on preeclampsia patients revealed that CSF concentrations were only modestly but consistently elevated in patients who received intravenous Mg therapy (19). Brain penetration of Mg is thought to be enhanced by BBB dysfunction (20). However, patients with chronic neurological diseases with presumed mild BBB disruption do not have significant differences in CSF Mg concentrations compared to healthy controls (21). In addition, patients with acute neurological injury and induced intravenous hypermagnesemia were shown to produce only modest increases in CSF levels of total and ionized Mg (22).
Clinical Trials of Magnesium Sulfate in Neurovascular Disease
Six phase 2 trials have examined Mg sulfate administration in ischemic stroke (23–28). Each of the phase 2 trials demonstrated safety with Mg, but did not demonstrate improved clinical outcome with Mg. A meta-analysis of four of the phase 2 randomized controlled trials with analogous data in 162 patients found a trend toward improved clinical outcome, with late disability or death seen in 44.3% of Mg sulfate patients compared with 52.7% of placebo patients (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.35–1.26) (29). Furthermore, individual phase 2 trials optimized a dosing regimen to achieve target doubling of serum Mg levels and demonstrated feasibility of pre-hospital initiation of therapy (24, 27).
The largest study to date that examined Mg therapy in acute ischemic stroke was the phase 3 intravenous magnesium efficacy in stroke (IMAGES) trial (28). IMAGES enrolled 2589 patients within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomized to either 20 g Mg sulfate (4 g bolus followed by 16 g maintenance given over 24 h) or matched placebo treatment. The primary endpoint as measured by death and disability at 3 months and identified by the joint binary outcome of Barthel score <95 and a modified Rankin score (mRS) >1, did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.80–1.13).
Intravenous magnesium efficacy in stroke had three critical shortcomings. First was late enrollment with median time to treatment of 7 h. Only 71 patients (3.1% of the entire IMAGES cohort) were enrolled within 3 h of onset and only 16 (0.6%) were enrolled in the first 2 h. Second, IMAGES required that a patient’s deficit be persistent for at least 1 h before enrollment could occur, precluding initiation of Mg within the first 60 min of stroke onset. Third, as Mg is an endogenous ion and Mg serum levels were not evaluated nor hypomagnesemia screened, it is unclear whether there was a difference in Mg levels between the Mg and control group.
And although aggregate results did not demonstrate improved clinical outcome with Mg, the trial suggested a potential benefit in patients who were administered treatment at earlier time points. Among patients enrolled in the first 3 h, favorable trends were noted: a non-disabled outcome (mRS 0–1) was achieved in 45.9% of Mg patients vs. 33.3% of placebo patients and death was observed in 26% of placebo vs. 19% of Mg patients (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.23–1.92) (28). These trends allowed the possibility that a sufficiently powered trial utilizing earlier administration of Mg could provide evidence for potential efficacy of Mg in ischemic stroke.
The largest study to date examining Mg in ICH is IMAGES. Use of Mg prior to brain imaging resulted in 168 (8.3%) of the total enrolled patients being diagnosed as ICH. The point estimate of effect in reducing death or disability was favorable (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.41–1.74) in this cohort, although the sample size was too small to draw definitive conclusions (28). Of particular relevance to ICH are the vasodilatory and antihypertensive effects of Mg. At the dose tested in IMAGES and FAST-MAG, Mg can lower systolic blood pressure by 3–4 mm Hg. Although failing to meet its primary outcome, INTERACT2 did show a trend suggesting decreased death and major disability with intensive blood control (p = 0.06) and did show significantly lower mRS via ordinal analysis (p = 0.04) (30). Whether Mg can improve clinical outcome in ICH through blood pressure control or neuroprotection remains to be seen.
In the FAST-MAG Phase 3 trial, initial evaluation of the first 750 enrolled patients yielded 24% of patients with a final diagnosis of ICH, which anticipates a subgroup of approximately 400 patients to further explore potential benefit of Mg in ICH.
Delayed Cerebral Infarction after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Hypomagnesemia occurs in about 50% of SAH patients and is associated with a high risk of delayed cerebral ischemia and poor 3-month outcome. The promise of Mg as both a neuroprotective and vasodilatory agent led to clinical pilot trials in aneurysmal SAH where Mg administration was associated with reductions in symptomatic vasospasm and favorable trends in clinical outcome (31, 32). These pilot trials led to the magnesium and acetylsalicylic acid in subarachnoid hemorrhage (MASH-1) trial, a European phase 2b trial that randomized 283 patients with aneurysmal SAH to Mg sulfate (64 mmol/L/day) or placebo. Mg therapy tended to reduce the incidence of delayed cerebral infarction on 3-month head CT by 34% (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.38–1.14) and the 3-month risk of death or disability by 23% (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.54–1.09). However, only improvement in excellent outcome as assessed by Rankin scores of 0 was significant (33).
Unfortunately, subsequent phase 3 SAH trials have not been confirmatory. In IMASH (Hong Kong Coordinating Center), 327 patients with aneurysmal SAH within 48 h of onset were randomized to serum Mg concentrations twice that of baseline or placebo therapy for 10–14 days. Serum Mg levels were significantly higher in the Mg group (1.67 mmol/L) than the placebo group (0.91 mmol/L) (p < 0.001). Primary 6-month favorable outcome rates – measured by an extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5–8 – in the Mg (64%) and placebo group (63%) were similar (OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.7–1.6). Secondary outcome measures – Rankin scores (<2), Barthel Index (>85), clinical vasospasm, decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale (≥2), and relevant complications – were similar between the two groups (34).
The subsequent phase 3 MASH-2 trial (1204 patients, Netherlands Coordinating Center) also revealed no difference between patients treated with 64 mmol/day of Mg sulfate or placebo therapy. Inclusion criteria required aneurysm presence and participation within 4 days of onset. Duration of Mg treatment was 20 days post SAH-onset or until hospital discharge. Primary outcome was dichotomized. Poor outcome, defined as 3-month Rankin scores of 4–6, was similar for the Mg (26.2%) and placebo groups (25.3%) (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.85–1.25). Distribution of Rankin scores was not statistically different between the two groups. Subgroup analysis did not identify specific subgroups that might have benefited from Mg (35).
The time window for Mg administration may have limited the potential efficacy of Mg in these trials. The mean time to initiation of therapy was 31.7 h in IMASH and 33 h in MASH-2. However, the processes leading to delayed cerebral ischemia after vasospasm may be present by that time, and this latency may not have been detrimental. Another possible contributor to lack of efficacy may be BBB penetration. Large, acute ischemic strokes typically open the BBB over substantial regions, allowing CSF penetration of Mg. However, the vasospasm associated with SAH is of subacute onset and may be associated with less disruption of the BBB at the time of ischemia. Therefore, Mg may not be able to effectively cross into the CSF spaces at relevant time points. Further complicating the analyses is that serum Mg levels were not measured as study parameters in MASH-2.
Global Cerebral Ischemia after Cardiac Arrest
Pre-hospital administration of magnesium sulfate showed favorable trends toward neuroprotection in resuscitated cardiac arrest patients in the brain-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) trial. The B-CPR trial tested Mg sulfate and diazepam in a 2 × 2 factorial, placebo-controlled design. Paramedic personnel randomized subjects and administered study medications to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients immediately following return of spontaneous circulation. Three hundred patients were randomized to intravenous Mg sulfate (2 g) or placebo, and then to diazepam (10 mg) or placebo. Treatment was administered in the field by paramedics but was not continued during hospitalization. Patients receiving Mg demonstrated significantly higher serum Mg levels (3.0 mg/dL in the Mg group vs. 2.1 mg/dL in the placebo group).
The pre-specified primary outcome measure of awakening at any time by 3 months after cardiac arrest was seen in 46.7% of patients treated with Mg and 37.3% of those treated with placebo (risk difference 9.3%, CI = 6.4–25.1%). The diazepam cohort showed no evidence of treatment effect. No adverse effects of pre-hospital administration of Mg sulfate therapy were noted. Limitations of this study included failure of randomization to produce balanced treatment groups and uncertainty as to whether continuation of treatments may have altered final outcomes (36).
Pre-Term Infant Hypoxic–Ischemic Injury and Intraventricular Hemorrhage
Pre-term infants are at high risk of hypoxic–ischemic perinatal brain injury and resultant cerebral palsy or death. Although a small, early trial (MAGnet) suggested increased mortality (37) and other trials raised concerns for possible lenticulostriate vasculopathy and intraventricular hemorrhage (38), subsequent larger trials have allayed these concerns and indicated a neuroprotective benefit of Mg in averting fetal brain injury in pre-term deliveries. Meta-analyses have demonstrated reduced mortality in the cohort of infants that received Mg (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.61–0.89) (39) and shown that antenatal Mg given to women at risk of pre-term birth substantially reduced the risk of cerebral palsy in their child (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.54–0.87) and gross motor dysfunction (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.44–0.85) (40).
Three large randomized controlled trials have investigated the neuroprotective effects of Mg on the fetal brain when administered to mothers within 24 h of pre-term delivery. In ACTOMgS04 Trial, evaluation at 2 years showed lower frequency of gross motor dysfunction (3.4% Mg vs. 6.6% placebo; RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.29–0.91) and combined death or substantial gross motor dysfunction (17.0% Mg vs. 22.7% placebo; RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59–0.96) in the Mg cohort (41). In the PREMAG Trial, infants receiving Mg demonstrated trends toward a decreased frequency of severe white matter injury (10.0% Mg vs. 11.7% placebo; OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.47–1.31) and total mortality (9.4% Mg vs. 10.4% placebo; OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.44–1.44) (42). Finally, a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial showed that infants treated with Mg had significantly less frequent moderate or severe cerebral palsy (1.9% Mg vs. 3.5% placebo; RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.32–0.95), suggesting a potential neuroprotective role for Mg in pre-term infants who survive (43).
Mg has also been promising for prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in pre-term infants. In a prospective study of 125 patients, 4 g of Mg sulfate and aminophylline was added to corticosteroids and ritodrine to treat newborns born before 30 weeks. This group was compared to newborns only receiving the standard regimen of corticosteroids and ritodrine. The rate of intraventricular hemorrhage in the Mg and aminophylline group was significantly lower (5.1%) than that of the control group (20.6%) (p < 0.001) (44).
The greater capacity for BBB penetration in pre-term infants may account for the substantial differences in neuroprotective efficacy between infants and adults treated with Mg sulfate therapy. However, Mg toxicity must be monitored in pre-term infants, who may be more vulnerable than adults owing to underdeveloped renal function and greater BBB penetration.
Cardiac Bypass Surgery and Intra-Operative Brain Ischemia
Neuropsychological dysfunction is evident in up to 50–80% of CABG patients at the time of hospital discharge. Hypomagnesemia may result in cardiac tachyarrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation, which may contribute to intra-operative hypoperfusion and subsequent neurological deficits. The Cleveland Clinic trial randomized 350 patients undergoing elective CABG to intra-operative Mg sulfate or placebo treatment that was continued for the first 24 post-operative hours. Patients received a 2-g loading dose and subsequent titration of a continuous infusion to maintain serum Mg levels at twice normal. The Mg cohort demonstrated significantly lower frequencies of neurologic decline and neurologic death at 96 h after surgery, when compared to the placebo-treated group (p = 0.01). At 3 months post-operatively, there were no performance differences between groups. This long-term data may reflect a test ceiling effect, as placebo patients appeared to improve over time (45).
Carotid Endarterectomy and Neuroprotection
A preliminary prospective dose escalation study in 80 patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy established that Mg and placebo groups had statistically significant different serum levels of Mg (p < 0.01) and no significant difference in adverse events (p = 0.66) (46). The neuroprotective effect of Mg in carotid endarterectomy was evaluated in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of 108 patients. Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were divided into three stratified levels of Mg dosing (total intra-operative infusions of 10, 18, and 20 g) or placebo treatment. Another 35 patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy served as controls. Overall, patients treated with Mg had less post-operative neurocognitive impairment than those administered placebo (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.10–0.74, p = 0.01). However, stratification by Mg levels did not affect outcomes in a dose-dependant manner. In fact, the low-dose Mg groups (10 and 18 g) demonstrated the greatest improvement (OR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.02–0.50, p = 0.01), whereas the high-dose Mg group (20 g) showed no difference when compared to the placebo-treated cohort (47).
Future Directions for Magnesium in Cerebrovascular Disease
As outlined in Table 1, magnesium therapy has demonstrated evidence of clinically relevant of clinically relevant neuroprotection in neurovascular disorders and procedures including global cerebral ischemia, pre-term neonatal hypoxia, carotid endarterectomy, and CABG. To date, however, pre-clinical promise has not translated to effective therapy in acute ischemic stroke, ICH, and SAH.
Over the past several decades, more than 70 neuroprotective agents have been tested in randomized controlled clinical trials in acute ischemic stroke (48). Several agents, including Mg, have shown promising preliminary results followed by disappointing outcomes in definitive phase III trials. No neuroprotective therapy has been approved by the FDA for an indication of ischemic stroke. Leading neuroscientists have identified four key design failures in prior human clinical trials of neuroprotectants: (1) failure to select patients who will respond to the mechanisms of action of the study drug, (2) failure to administer study agents at neuroprotective doses in humans, (3) failure to employ sample sizes large enough to detect modest benefits of a study agent, and (4) failure to treat patients early enough after stroke onset (48–57). These four areas of design failure have now been addressed in more recent, sophisticated trials, starting with FAST-MAG. Primary results have yet to be published.
Future directions for Mg are likely to include combination neuroprotectant therapy. Mg may hold some benefit to ischemic stroke patients treated with reperfusion therapies, by preserving threatened brain tissue until restoration of blood flow. This hypothesis will be tested in sub-analyses of FAST-MAG where approximately 400 randomized patients will have received thrombolysis (58). In addition, studies have demonstrated an additive benefit when Mg is combined with hypothermia in rat ischemic stroke models (59–61). Currently, hypothermia combined with intravenous thrombolysis is being studied in a phase 3 clinical trial. Future treatment paradigms may include combination strategies with pre-hospital Mg administration and hypothermia followed by intravenous thrombolysis. The established safety profile of Mg may lead to an emerging role as a promising adjunct treatment. Sub-analyses from the completed FAST-MAG trial, coupled with the established body of research, will help determine Mg’s future role in cerebrovascular disease.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Jason J. Chang has no funding sources to disclose. William J. Mack is supported by a KL2 Grant through the SC CTSI (NIH/NCRR/NCATS) Grant #KL2RR031991, a beginning grant in aid through the American Heart Association (12BGIA8700001), and the Carol W. Harvey Memorial Chair of Research Grant through the Brain Aneurysm Foundation. Jeffrey L. Saver has no funding sources to disclose. Nerses Sanossian is supported by a Grant from the Roxanna Todd Hodges Foundation and Joachim Splichal.
1. World Stroke Campaign: Facts and Figures [Internet] (2014). [cited 2014 Apr 3]. Availbale from: http://www.worldstrokecampaign.org/Facts/Pages/StrokeFacts.aspx
2. Stroke Facts: Stroke in the United States [Internet] (2009). [cited 2014 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/stroke/facts.htm
3. Smith DA, Connick JH, Stone TW. Effect of changing extracellular levels of magnesium on spontaneous activity and glutamate release in the mouse neocortical slice. Br J Pharmacol (1989) 97:475–82. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb11975.x
5. Imer M, Omay B, Uzunkol A, Erdem T, Sabanci PA, Karasu A, et al. Effect of magnesium, MK-801 and combination of magnesium and MK-801 on blood-brain barrier permeability and brain edema after experimental traumatic diffuse brain injury. Neurol Res (2009) 31:977–81. doi:10.1179/174313209X385617
9. Kemp PA, Gardiner SM, Bennett T, Rubin PC. Magnesium sulphate reverses the carotid vasoconstriction caused by endothelin-I, angiotensin II and neuropeptide-Y, but not that caused by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, in conscious rats. Clin Sci (1993) 85:175–81.
10. Kemp PA, Gardiner SM, March JE, Rubin PC, Bennett T. Assessment of the effects of endothelin-1 and magnesium sulphate on regional blood flows in conscious rats, by the coloured microsphere reference technique. Br J Pharmacol (1999) 126:621–6.
11. Sharma N, Cho DH, Kim SY, Bhattarai JP, Hwang PH, Han SK. Magnesium sulfate suppresses L-type calcium currents on the basilar artery smooth muscle cells in rabbits. Neurol Res (2012) 34:291–6. doi:10.1179/1743132812Y.0000000016
12. Izumi Y, Roussel S, Pinard E, Seylaz J. Reduction of infarct volume by magnesium after middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (1991) 11:1025–30. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1991.170
13. Chakraborti S, Chakraborti T, Mandal M, Mandal A, Das S, Ghosh S. Protective role of magnesium in cardiovascular diseases: a review. Mol Cell Biochem (2002) 238:163–79. doi:10.1023/A:1019998702946
15. Amighi J, Sabeti S, Schlager O, Mlekusch W, Exner M, Lalouschek W, et al. Low serum magnesium predicts neurological events in patients with advanced atherosclerosis. Stroke (2004) 35:22–7. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000105928.95124.1F
16. Liao F, Folsom AR, Brancati FL. Is low magnesium concentration a risk factor for coronary heart disease? The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Am Heart J (1998) 136:480–90. doi:10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70224-8
17. Bayir A, Ak A, Kara H, Sahin TK. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid magnesium levels, Glasgow coma scores, and in-hospital mortality in patients with acute stroke. Biol Trace Elem Res (2009) 130:7–12. doi:10.1007/s12011-009-8318-9
18. Pasternak K, Wronska J, Dabrowski W, Sztanke M. Blood magnesium concentration and dopamine or dobutamine infusion demand in patients during CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) with normovolemic haemodilution. Magnes Res (2006) 19:261–7. doi:10.1684/mrh.2006.0070
19. Thurnau GR, Kemp DB, Jarvis A. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of magnesium in patients with preeclampsia after treatment with intravenous magnesium sulfate: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1987) 157:1435–8. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80239-9
21. Kapaki E, Segditsa J, Papageorgiou C. Zinc, copper and magnesium concentration in serum and CSF of patients with neurological disorders. Acta Neurol Scand (1989) 79:373–8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03803.x
22. McKee JA, Brewer RP, Macy GE, Phillips-Bute B, Campbell KA, Borel CO, et al. Analysis of the brain bioavailability of peripherally administered magnesium sulfate: a study in humans with acute brain injury undergoing prolonged induced hypermagnesemia. Crit Care Med (2005) 33:661–6. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000156293.35868.B2
26. Lampl Y, Gilad R, Geva D, Eshel Y, Sadeh M. Intravenous administration of magnesium sulfate in acute stroke: a randomized double-blind study. Clin Neuropharmacol (2001) 24:11–5. doi:10.1097/00002826-200101000-00003
27. Saver JL, Kidwell C, Eckstein M, Starkman S; FAST-MAG Pilot Trial Investigators. Prehospital neuroprotective therapy for acute stroke: results of the field administration of stroke therapy-magnesium (FAST-MAG) pilot trial. Stroke (2004) 35:e106–8. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000124458.98123.52
28. Muir KW, Lees KR, Ford I, Davis S; Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke (IMAGES) Study Investigators. Magnesium efficacy in stroke study, magnesium for acute stroke (intravenous magnesium efficacy in stroke trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2004) 363:439–45. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15490-1
30. Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, Wang J, Stapf C, Delcourt C, et al. Rapid blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med (2013) 368:2355–65. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214609
31. Veyna RS, Seyfried D, Burke DG, Zimmerman C, Mlynarek M, Nichols V, et al. Magnesium sulfate therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg (2002) 96:510–4. doi:10.3171/jns.2002.96.3.0510
32. Wong GK, Chan MT, Boet R, Poon WS, Gin T. Intravenous magnesium sulfate after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective randomized pilot study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol (2006) 18:142–8. doi:10.1097/00008506-200604000-00009
33. van den Bergh WM, Algra A, van Kooten F, Dirven CM, van Gijn J, Vermeulen M, et al. Magnesium sulfate in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke (2005) 36:1011–5. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000160801.96998.57
34. Wong GK, Poon WS, Chan MT, Boet R, Gin T, Ng SC, et al. Intravenous magnesium sulphate for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (IMASH): a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial. Stroke (2010) 41:921–6. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571125
35. Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Vandertop WP, van Kooten F, Kuijsten HA, Boiten J, et al. Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (2012) 380:44–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60724-7
36. Longstreth WT Jr, Fahrenbruch CE, Olsufka M, Walsh TR, Copass MK, Cobb LA. Randomized clinical trial of magnesium, diazepam, or both after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Neurology (2002) 59:506–14. doi:10.1212/WNL.59.4.506
37. Mittendorf R, Covert R, Boman J, Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Siegler M. Is tocolytic magnesium sulphate associated with increased total paediatric mortality? Lancet (1997) 350:1517–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)24047-X
38. Basu SK, Chickajajur V, Lopez V, Bhutada A, Pagala M, Rastogi S. Immediate clinical outcomes in preterm neonates receiving antenatal magnesium for neuroprotection. J Perinat Med (2012) 40:185–9. doi:10.1515/JPM.2011.094
39. Wolf HT, Hegaard HK, Greisen G, Huusom L, Hedegaard M. Treatment with magnesium sulphate in pre-term birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Obstet Gynaecol (2012) 32:135–40. doi:10.3109/01443615.2011.638999
40. Doyle LW, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Marret S. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and neurologic outcome in preterm infants: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol (2009) 113:1327–33. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a60495
41. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Doyle LW, Haslam RR; Australasian Collaborative Trial of Magnesium Sulphate Collaborative. Effect of magnesium sulfate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA (2003) 290:2669–76. doi:10.1001/jama.290.20.2669
42. Marret S, Marpeau L, Zupan-Simunek V, Eurin D, Leveque C, Hellot MF, et al. Magnesium sulphate given before very-preterm birth to protect infant brain: the randomised controlled PREMAG trial*. BJOG (2007) 114:310–8. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01162.x
43. Rouse DJ, Hirtz DG, Thom E, Varner MW, Spong CY, Mercer BM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med (2008) 359:895–905. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0801187
44. Di Renzo GC, Mignosa M, Gerli S, Burnelli L, Luzi G, Clerici G, et al. The combined maternal administration of magnesium sulfate and aminophylline reduces intraventricular hemorrhage in very preterm neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2005) 192:433–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.078
45. Bhudia SK, Cosgrove DM, Naugle RI, Rajeswaran J, Lam BK, Walton E, et al. Magnesium as a neuroprotectant in cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2006) 131:853–61. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.11.018
46. Chiu C, Heyer EJ, Rampersad AD, Zurica J, Ornstein E, Sahlein DH, et al. High dose magnesium infusions are not associated with increased pressor requirements after carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery (2006) 58:71–7. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000190662.71046.66
47. Mack WJ, Kellner CP, Sahlein DH, Ducruet AF, Kim GH, Mocco J, et al. Intraoperative magnesium infusion during carotid endarterectomy: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Neurosurg (2009) 110:961–7. doi:10.3171/2008.9.17671
52. De Keyser J, Sulter G, Luiten PG. Clinical trials with neuroprotective drugs in acute ischaemic stroke: are we doing the right thing? Trends Neurosci (1999) 22:535–40. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01463-0
57. Ferguson KN, Kidwell CS, Starkman S, Saver JL. Hyperacute treatment initiation in neuroprotective agent stroke trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis (2004) 13:109–12. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.04.001
59. Campbell K, Meloni BP, Zhu H, Knuckey NW. Magnesium treatment and spontaneous mild hypothermia after transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Brain Res Bull (2008) 77:320–2. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.08.017
60. Zhu H, Meloni BP, Moore SR, Majda BT, Knuckey NW. Intravenous administration of magnesium is only neuroprotective following transient global ischemia when present with post-ischemic mild hypothermia. Brain Res (2004) 1014:53–60. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2004.03.073
61. Song W, Wu YM, Ji Z, Ji YB, Wang SN, Pan SY. Intra-carotid cold magnesium sulfate infusion induces selective cerebral hypothermia and neuroprotection in rats with transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Neurol Sci (2012) 34(4):479–86. doi:10.1007/s10072-012-1064-3
Keywords: magnesium, neuroprotection, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, all cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Citation: Chang JJ, Mack WJ, Saver JL and Sanossian N (2014) Magnesium: potential roles in neurovascular disease. Front. Neurol. 5:52. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00052
Received: 03 February 2014; Accepted: 28 March 2014;
Published online: 15 April 2014.
Edited by:Yuko Y. Palesch, Medical University of South Carolina, USA
Reviewed by:Daniel Bereczki, Semmelweis University, Hungary
Bin Jiang, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, China
Copyright: © 2014 Chang, Mack, Saver and Sanossian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jason J. Chang, University of Southern California, LAC+USC Medical Center 11, 1100 North State Street, A4E117, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org