Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Neurol., 27 May 2022
Sec. Neuroinfectious Diseases
Volume 13 - 2022 |

Dysautonomia in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review on Clinical Course, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

Francisco Carmona-Torre1,2,3 Ane Mínguez-Olaondo4,5,6,7,8* Alba López-Bravo9,10 Beatriz Tijero7,11,12 Vesselina Grozeva13 Michaela Walcker5 Harkaitz Azkune-Galparsoro6,14,15 Adolfo López de Munain4,5,6,7,8,15 Ana Belen Alcaide2,16 Jorge Quiroga2,3,17,18 Jose Luis del Pozo1,2,3 Juan Carlos Gómez-Esteban5,7,8,11,12,15
  • 1Infectious Disease Service, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • 2COVID-19 Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • 3Immune and Infectious Inflammatory Diseases Research, IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
  • 4Neurology Department, Donostia University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA, San Sebastián, Spain
  • 5ATHENEA Neuroclinics, Policlínica Gipuzkoa Grupo Quironsalud, Donostia, Spain
  • 6Neuroscience Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastián, Spain
  • 7Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
  • 8Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  • 9Neurology Department, Hospital Reina Sofía de Tudela-OSASUNBIDEA, Tudela, Spain
  • 10Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS-A), Zaragoza, Spain
  • 11Neurodegenerative Diseases Group Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
  • 12Neurology Department, Cruces University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA, Barakaldo, Spain
  • 13Neurology Practice, Polyclinic Mladost 1, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 14Infectious Disease Department, Donostia University Hospital-OSAKIDETZA, San Sebastián, Spain
  • 15Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
  • 16Pulmonary Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • 17Internal Medicine Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • 18Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Introduction: On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization sounded the COVID-19 pandemic alarm. While efforts in the first few months focused on reducing the mortality of infected patients, there is increasing data on the effects of long-term infection (Post-COVID-19 condition). Among the different symptoms described after acute infection, those derived from autonomic dysfunction are especially frequent and limiting.

Objective: To conduct a narrative review synthesizing current evidence of the signs and symptoms of dysautonomia in patients diagnosed with COVID-19, together with a compilation of available treatment guidelines.

Results: Autonomic dysfunction associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection occurs at different temporal stages. Some of the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms include direct tissue damage, immune dysregulation, hormonal disturbances, elevated cytokine levels, and persistent low-grade infection. Acute autonomic dysfunction has a direct impact on the mortality risk, given its repercussions on the respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological systems. Iatrogenic autonomic dysfunction is a side effect caused by the drugs used and/or admission to the intensive care unit. Finally, late dysautonomia occurs in 2.5% of patients with Post-COVID-19 condition. While orthostatic hypotension and neurally-mediated syncope should be considered, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) appears to be the most common autonomic phenotype among these patients. A review of diagnostic and treatment guidelines focused on each type of dysautonomic condition was done.

Conclusion: Symptoms deriving from autonomic dysfunction involvement are common in those affected by COVID-19. These symptoms have a great impact on the quality of life both in the short and medium to long term. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of Post-COVID manifestations that affect the autonomic nervous system, and targeted therapeutic management could help reduce the sequelae of COVID-19, especially if we act in the earliest phases of the disease.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has created a pandemic, generally known as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with devastating effect on the health and economy of the entire world population. The first cases of COVID-19 were reported in Wuhan, China, in November 2019, and the first cases in North America and Europe in January 2020 (1). By February 2022, more than 430 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and more than 5.9 million deaths had been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) (, as of February 27, 2022). About 80% of COVID-19 cases are paucisymptomatic and mild, and many patients recover within 2–4 weeks. However, severe pneumonia and critical multi-organ failure may occur in 15 and 5% of cases, respectively (2). Although there is a wealth of information on the clinical manifestations, therapeutic management and short-term consequences of the infection, there is less information on the residual symptoms that occur and persist in patients who have overcome acute infection but experience long-term multiorgan complications (3). These manifestations were detected from the very outset of the pandemic, and indeed, the existence of persistent symptoms (i.e., long COVID-19) after acute infection has been noted since April 2020 (4). Post-COVID symptoms are very heterogeneous and affect and involve multiple systems. Numerous pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed that include, but are not limited to, direct or indirect invasion of the virus into the brain, immune dysregulation, hormonal disturbances, elevated cytokine levels due to immune reaction leading to chronic inflammation, direct tissue damage, and persistent low-grade infection.

The actual number of those affected who manifest symptoms after the acute episode of COVID-19 is unknown; however, in a survey carried out by the UK Government Office for National Statistics in November 2020, around 20% of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 reported symptoms that persisted 5 weeks or more after acute infection, and 10% reported symptoms lasting 12 weeks or more (3).

Frequently reported residual effects of the SARS-CoV-2 virus include a wide array of pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical manifestations, including nervous system and neurocognitive disorders, mental health disorders, cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, skin disorders, and signs and symptoms associated with poor general wellbeing, including malaise, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and reduced quality of life. The most common neurocognitive symptoms reported are difficulties concentrating, memory deficits and cognitive impairment (5). Follow-ups conducted in Germany and the United Kingdom found post–COVID-19 neuropsychiatric symptoms in 20–70% of patients, including young adults (6). Systemic and neurocognitive deficits may last only weeks but can potentially lead to lifelong disability (2).

In a prospective study conducted in 3,762 participants from 56 countries with confirmed (diagnostic/antibody-positive; 1,020) or suspected (diagnostic/antibody-negative or untested; 2,742) COVID-19, it was found that more than 91% of participants continued to have symptoms at 7-month follow-up, mainly systemic and neurologic/cognitive symptoms. The most frequent symptoms after month 6 were fatigue, Post-exertional malaise, and cognitive dysfunction. Relapse or recurrence of symptoms, triggered primarily by exercise, physical or mental activity, and stress (7), were experienced by 85.9% of participants (95% CI, 84.8–87.0%).

In individuals at low risk of COVID-19 mortality with ongoing symptoms, 70% have impairment in one or more organs 4 months after the initial COVID-19 symptoms, including the heart (26%), lungs (11%), kidneys (4%), liver (28%), pancreas (40%) and spleen (4%) (8). Furthermore, persistent symptoms (>6 weeks) have been reported in 19% of 39 fully vaccinated healthcare workers after breakthrough infections (9).

Some studies indicate that disease severity correlates with worse and more prolonged neurologic symptoms (10, 11), while other studies have found no such correlation (5, 12).

Several symptoms are impacted by the autonomic nervous system, with fatigue described as one of the major clinical features of dysautonomia in patients with COVID-19 (13). Dysautonomia has been broadly defined as a condition where changes in the functioning of one or more components of the autonomic nervous system adversely affect health (14). Despite its prevalence, the relationship between Post-COVID symptoms and dysautonomic features has not been well-studied.

Changes in the Criteria for the Classification of the Symptomatic Phases of COVID-19

The United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (15) has defined several symptomatic phases of COVID-19 useful for the conduction and comparison of different studies, and established the following operational definitions based on the timing of signs and symptoms after illness onset. These are as follows:

Acute COVID-19: signs and symptoms present up to 4 weeks after illness onset.

Ongoing symptomatic COVID-19: signs and symptoms of COVID-19 persist from 4 to 12 weeks after illness onset.

Post-COVID-19 syndrome: signs and symptoms that develop during or after an infection compatible with COVID-19, continue beyond 12 weeks and are not explained by an alternative diagnosis once active infection or reinfection has been ruled out.

Prolonged COVID/“long-COVID”/“Post-acute sequelae” of COVID (PASC) includes both ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (4–12 weeks) and Post-COVID-19 syndrome (12 weeks or more).

Diagnostic criteria for Post-acute phase sequelae (PASC) of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may affect 20–60% of patients (16), were subsequently proposed (17). The term “neuro-PASC” refers to diagnostic criteria related to neurologic sequelae, including dysautonomia mentioned above. In this context, the neurologic symptoms or development of sequelae due to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist beyond 4 weeks after the onset of acute symptoms. Subacute neuro-PASC corresponds to neurologic symptoms and abnormalities present from 4 to 12 weeks after the acute phase of COVID-19, while chronic neuro-PACS refers to neurologic symptoms and abnormalities persisting or present beyond 12 weeks and not attributable to alternative diagnoses (2).

Finally, in the last consensus communication published on 6 October 2021, the WHO using a robust Delphi methodology, published a clinical case definition of the Post-COVID-19 condition reached by Delphi consensus (18) (Box 1).

Box 1. Clinical case definition of Post-COVID-19 condition.

Post-COVID-19 condition occurs in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, usually 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 with symptoms that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis. Common symptoms include, but are not limited to, fatigue, shortness of breath, and cognitive dysfunction, and generally have an impact on everyday functioning. Symptoms might be new onset following initial recovery from an acute COVID-19 episode or persist from the initial illness. Symptoms might also fluctuate or relapse over time. A separate definition might be applicable for children.


There is no minimum number of symptoms required for diagnosis; symptoms involving different organs systems and clusters have been described.

Despite these efforts to define the picture, there is a clear need at the neurologic level to acquire a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of these symptoms in order to improve the therapeutic management of the different clinical pictures, in which autonomic dysfunction triggered in patients after COVID-19 (19) is of special interest.

Dysautonomia Definition

The autonomic nervous system, which innervates all organs of the body, maintains biological homeostasis at rest and in response to stress through an intricate network of central and peripheral neurons that work automatically. Autonomic disorders can manifest in a variety of ways: deafferentation of the central autonomic centers can alter the degree or timing of peripheral autonomic effectors; autonomic efferent neuron lesions can reduce or suppress autonomic responses; and drugs or antibodies acting on autonomic neuron receptors can produce a variety of physiological phenomena ranging from hyperfunction to hypofunction and loss of function (20).

Since the autonomic nervous system is an integrative system, the clinical approach to autonomic disorders should be holistic. Rarely does the patient present with a single, clearly explained and easily identifiable symptom (20).

The search for autonomic disorders requires a careful and thorough medical history. The goals of the assessment are to identify whether there is an autonomic disorder, to locate and define its distribution, and to measure its severity. It is especially important to detect severe and treatable disorders (20).

Socio-Economic Impact of Autonomic Dysfunction in COVID-19

The number of people with the Post-COVID-19 condition remains uncertain. Recent reports indicate that ~20–60% of COVID-19 patients experience persistent symptoms, as stated above (16), which means that between 86 and 258 million of the more than 430 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 (, as of February 27, 2022) would have persistent symptoms. This gives us an idea of the enormous impact of the Post-COVID-19 condition. Assuming dysautonomic symptoms occur in 2.5% of Post-COVID-19 patients (21, 22), ~2.15–6.45 million people experience Post-COVID-19 dysautonomia worldwide. This chilling statistic gives some idea of the significance of this symptomatology and of the need to deepen our understanding of it.

The socio-economic impact of COVID-19 is largely related to the development of Post-COVID fatigue, autonomic and neurohemodynamic impairment (13). The potential scale of Post-COVID-19 syndrome in lower-risk individuals, who represent up to 80% of the population, calls for urgent policies in all countries to monitor and treat the long-term implications of COVID-19 and to mitigate its impact on healthcare utilization and the economy (8). According to data from an online survey of people with suspected and confirmed COVID-19, at 7 months after suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection, 45.2% of patients required a reduction in working hours and 22.3% were not working due to illness (7).

There is a strong association between fatigue and Post-COVID anxiety, even in the absence of a preexisting diagnosis of depression or anxiety (23).

Little is known about the prognosis of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). It is estimated that about 80% of all patients with POTS improved and 60% had minimal residual symptoms during ~5 years (24). Addressing the needs of Post-COVID-19 patients will therefore require a significant investment in resources and funding both for clinical care and research. Action is needed during this window of opportunity in the interest of reducing or shortening the impact of symptoms in these patients (25) and thus promoting their earliest possible social and occupational reintegration.

This article reviews the available scientific evidence on dysautonomic symptoms during the disease, as well as the evidence on the management of the most prevalent syndromes.


Methodological differences in the assessment of dysautonomia in the different published studies, as well as the variations in study design, prevent us from comparing them directly. We have performed a critical narrative review with a synthesis of the current publications on the subject.

We conducted a Non-systematic literature search of the PubMed database in January 2022 for published manuscripts on dysautonomia and COVID-19. The research strategy included the key terms “dysautonomia AND COVID-19” and “autonomic symptoms AND COVID-19”. Six of the authors (F C-T, A M-O, A L-B, BT, VG, MW) independently reviewed the publications and selected those that met the inclusion criteria. Duplicate publications were removed by manual checking. Studies eligible for inclusion were all types of articles published in English or Spanish, human-centered, with well-defined COVID-19-related descriptions of dysautonomic signs and symptoms.

Studies lacking a clear description of the diagnostic criteria for dysautonomia or COVID-19 were excluded. Study protocols, publications that did not specifically mention dysautonomia or did not focus on dysautonomia in COVID-19, as well as those published in a language other than English or Spanish were excluded (Figure 1). The text has been completed with publications obtained from PubMed that were considered relevant. Figures 2, 3 were prepared using the tool.


Figure 1. Flow chart of the study.


Figure 2. Proposed COVID-19 pathways to the central nervous system. Adapted from the article by Yachou Y et al. (26).


Figure 3. Main dysautonomic changes in severe COVID-19 infection. Information extracted from the text and based on the article by Rangon et al. (27). Upward and downward pointing arrows indicate increase and decrease, respectively. Double arrows indicate important variations. Recording hemodynamic changes and detailed neurologic examinations are both standard clinical practice but are of the utmost importance in patients with COVID-19 and manifestations suggestive of autonomic dysfunction.

Possible Routes of Entry of the Virus

It is thought that part of the neurologic symptomatology may be due to invasion of the central nervous system (CNS) by SARS-CoV-2. The same hypothesis was considered in the 1918 influenza pandemic when an association between influenza, encephalitis lethargica, and postencephalitic parkinsonism was observed (28). It is known that SARS-CoV-2 penetrates the olfactory mucosa, causing loss of smell, and may invade the brain tissue by migrating from the cribriform plate along the olfactory tract, or by the vagal or trigeminal pathways (26, 29) (Figure 2).

Another hypothesis is that the virus could cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) which is disrupted or becomes more permeable through the action of inflammatory cytokines and/or monocytes (30). The virus can reach the brain tissue through the circumventricular organs (midline structures around the third and fourth ventricles).

Once inside the CNS, SARS-CoV-2-related neuronal damage can be induced either by direct cell invasion, mediated by a virus protein binding to the endothelial acetylcholine receptor, or by a cytokine-mediated dysimmune mechanism (31). Low-grade inflammation in small vessels is also thought to play a role (32). This is most likely facilitated by the inflammatory reflex and the autonomic brainstem reflex (27, 33).

The Role of Dysautonomia in the Clinical Course of COVID-19

COVID-19 is especially life-threatening in the elderly and in those with any of a variety of chronic medical conditions. Pneumonitis and pulmonary dysfunction usually dominate the clinical picture, but it is clear that COVID-19 significantly affects other body organ systems, including the heart, gut, kidneys, and brain (14, 34). One hypothesis contends that this heightened risk may be caused by the development of dysautonomia (14).

It is not clear whether infection-associated dysautonomia is the direct result of the action of the virus on autonomic nervous system (ANS) structures or a consequence of postinfectious immune-mediated processes (34, 35).

The ANS has traditionally been viewed as consisting of the sympathetic nervous system, the parasympathetic nervous system, and the enteric nervous system. Over the past century, however, the neuroendocrine and neuroimmune systems have come to the fore, prompting a change of nomenclature to “extended autonomic system (EAS)”. Additional facets include the sympathetic adrenergic system, for which adrenaline is the key effector; the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis; arginine vasopressin; the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, with angiotensin II and aldosterone as the main effectors; and the cholinergic anti-inflammatory and sympathetic inflammasome pathways. A hierarchical brain network—the central autonomic network—regulates these systems; embedded within it are components of the Chrousos/Gold “stress system” (14).

Acute, coordinated alterations in homeostatic settings (allostasis) can be crucial for surviving stressors. Allostatic states however also increase wear and tear on both the effectors and the target organs. Intense or long-term EAS activation in the setting of chronically decreased homeostatic efficiencies (dyshomeostasis), associated with aging and chronic disorders, can prolong or intensify allostatic load, and eventually lower the thresholds for a variety of vicious cycles (positive feedback loops) that can be lethal. This phenomenon could explain the close correlation of COVID-19 mortality with age and multiple organ involvement in the disease (14).

Orthostatic intolerance, sudomotor, gastrointestinal and pupillomotor disorders are described as common complications of COVID-19, together with low tolerance for environmental conditions, and sexual dysfunction (36). Figure 3 shows the most prevalent symptoms of dysautonomia in severe COVID-19 (27).

Autonomic dysfunction associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection occurs at different temporal stages. Acute autonomic dysfunction is due to axonal damage or cardiopulmonary involvement. Iatrogenic autonomic dysfunction is a side effect caused by the drugs used and/or admission to the intensive care unit (37). Finally, late dysautonomia occurs in the Post-COVID-19 condition. Cardiovascular involvement, especially POTS, and to a lesser extent neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (NOH), has been more frequently observed in these latter patients. The aspects that we consider to be the most important in each phase are, in chronological order:

Acute-Subacute Autonomic Dysfunction

Among other things, activation of the EAS in the context of acute COVID-19 increases myocardial oxygen consumption and glucose levels, depletes energy, lowers thresholds for arrhythmias, induces hypokalemia and hyponatremia, may promote renal ischemic injury and intravascular thrombosis, and can induce a form of stress cardiomyopathy. Imbalances in the inflammasome system can contribute to cytokine storms (14, 34). All these changes, facilitated by dysautonomia, generate a series of manifestations at different levels. We summarize below the neurologic, cardiovascular and respiratory manifestations.

Neurologic Manifestations

Like Post-Chikungunya syndrome in 2006, as well as other viral infections and vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune response leading to Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS) or other neurologic manifestations of an autoimmune nature. By the end of 2020, at least 220 patients with GBS or its variants following COVID-19 infection have been reported. GBS subtype was specified in 152 as acute inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (AIDP), 118 cases; acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) in 13; acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) in 11; Miller-Fisher Syndrome in 7; polyneuritis cranialis (PNC) in 2; and the pharyngeal-cervical-brachial variant in 1. No cases of Bickerstaff encephalitis were found (38).

It has been shown that antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 can cross-react with peripheral myelin causing GBS (39). GBS usually manifests with a florid picture of clinical dysautonomia that includes the presence of hemodynamic instability, urinary retention, gastroplegia, paralytic ileus or refractory hypertension (40).

In most patients who develop GBS, the time gap between COVID-19 infection and GBS is very short, which not only complicates treatment, but could also result in a poor prognostic clinical sign for development of severe autonomic dysfunction (41) without early detection and appropriate therapeutic management.

It is speculated that the pathogenesis of Miller Fisher syndrome following SARS-CoV-2 infection is mediated by neurotropism or aberrant activation of the immune system, with production of circulating antibodies similar to GDq1B in idiopathic Miller Fisher syndrome (42).

An increased incidence of acute motor and sensory and axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) is also associated with COVID-19 infection, which may present with autonomic dysfunction, especially in cases with greater axonal involvement (25, 43, 44).

Pupillary light reflex (PLR) is under the control of the autonomic nervous system. Pupil dilation is innervated by the sympathetic nervous system and pupil constriction by the parasympathetic nervous system (45). Using PRL to assess autonomic dysfunction in patients with acute COVID-19 infection varies according to the severity of clinical presentation. In an observational, cross-sectional study, higher values of pupillary dilation velocity and baseline pupil diameter were reported in 20 Non-critically-ill COVID-19 patients in the acute phase of the disease (31). Regarding critically-ill COVID-19 patients, a study in 18 patients with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation for >48 h did not find, after statistical correction for possible confounders (i.e., sedation), significant differences in PLR dynamics between SARS-CoV-2-infected patients and those suffering from respiratory failure due to other causes (46).

Cardiovascular Manifestations

Characteristics of cardiovascular involvement in patients with COVID-19 may include myocardial lesions (myocarditis), vasculitis-like syndromes, atherothrombotic manifestations and autonomic dysfunction (47).

Maladaptive functions of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) constitute another plausible pathophysiological mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection–related tissue damage, probably related to central autonomic network dysfunction mentioned above. The RAAS is composed of a cascade of regulatory peptides that participate in key physiological processes in the body, including fluid and electrolyte balance, blood pressure regulation, vascular permeability, and tissue growth. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has emerged as a potent counter-regulator of the RAAS pathway. ACE2 cleaves angiotensin I into inactive angiotensin 1–9 and degrades angiotensin II to angiotensin 1–7, which has vasodilatory, antiproliferative, antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory and sympathoinhibitory effects through binding to the Mas receptor (14, 4850). Angiotensin II promotes vasoconstriction, fibrosis, hypertrophy and inflammation by binding to angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1-R) and mediating sympathoexcitation. Internalization of SARS-CoV-2 leads to inhibition of ACE2 activity and progressive depletion of membrane-bound ACE2, with ACE1/ACE2 imbalance and increased angiotensin II (50).

Fluctuating blood pressure could be explained by acute dysautonomia secondary to afferent baroreflex failure, a syndrome characterized by very labile blood pressures in which severe hypertensive crises alternate with hypotensive episodes. This phenomenon has previously been observed as a consequence of radiation therapy of the cervical region or more rarely after surgery for Glomus caroticum or brainstem tumors (51, 52). SARS-CoV-2 is known to have a tropism for the medullary structures of the CNS, including the ventrolateral part and the nucleus tractus solitarius, where the ACE2 receptor is highly expressed (53).

The pathophysiology of COVID-19–related myocarditis is thought to be a combination of direct viral injury and cardiac damage due to the host immune response (54). In addition, toxic effects of endogenous or exogenous catecholamines may show a pattern of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (14).

Cardiac arrhythmias, including new-onset atrial fibrillation, heart block, and ventricular arrhythmias, are prevalent, occurring in 17% of hospitalized patients and 44% of patients in the ICU setting (34). Atrial arrhythmias are more common among patients who required mechanical ventilation than among those who did not (17.7 vs. 1.9%) (34).

Respiratory Manifestations

Impaired exercise tolerance is multifactorial and related to cardiac sympathetic predominance, decreased response to both sympathetic and parasympathetic stimuli that alter cardiovascular and pulmonary function, muscle tone, and impaired exercise tolerance (55). Airway sensory receptors channel information to the central nervous system, which regulates breathing and other parameters of lung function. This degree of crosstalk is achieved through three distinct airway receptors: C-fiber receptors, rapidly adapting receptors, and slowly adapting receptors. There are also deflation-activated receptors (mechano-receptors) (55).

The parasympathetic nervous system regulates pulmonary mucous production, airway smooth muscle tone, ciliary motility and transport, mucous secretion, cough reflexes and also local pulmonary inflammation and immunity (55).

SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced stress can activate the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) leading to neurohormonal stimulation and activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines with further development of sympathetic storm. Sympathetic overactivation in COVID-19 is correlated with increase in capillary pulmonary leakage, alveolar damage, and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (56). However, it is very likely that respiratory distress is not only the result of inflammation and structural lung damage, but also of damage caused by the virus to the respiratory centers of the brain, making the management of these patients difficult (26).

The exact pathophysiological mechanism behind the “happy” hypoxemia phenomenon is still unknown. Patients with severe glossopharyngeal or vagus nerve lesions due to neck tumors or congenital neuropathies have reported a disconnect between the perceived degree of hypoxia and dyspnea after the development of pneumonia. Possible damage to hypoxia-sensitive afferent neurons in persons with COVID-19 could be due to cytokine storm or the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 on mitochondria or nerve fibers. The brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and pathoanatomic studies in fatal cases of COVID-19 are so far inconsistent in this regard and do not provide a pathophysiological correlate to satisfactorily explain the absence of dyspnea in these patients (57).

Other Manifestations

The incidence of gastrointestinal manifestations has ranged from 12 to 61% in patients with COVID-19 (34). In a recent meta-analysis of 29 studies, the pooled prevalence of individual symptoms was reported to include that of anorexia (21%), nausea and/or vomiting (7%), diarrhea (9%), and abdominal pain (3%) (58).

In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, hypokalemia is frequent and is also associated with increased mortality. Low serum potassium may reflect increased aldosterone-mediated sodium/ potassium exchange in the kidneys, as well as endogenous and exogenously administered epinephrine (14). ACE2 expression has been reported in the endocrine pancreas, albeit inconsistently. Direct binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 on β-cells could contribute to insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia. The increase in counterregulatory hormones that contributes to hepatic glucose production, decreased insulin secretion, ketogenesis and insulin resistance (34) promotes hyperglycemia in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospitalization and has been related to adverse prognosis (14).

Drug-Induced Autonomic Impairment and/or ICU Admission

Cardiac arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and life-threatening atrioventricular block, can be induced by drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19. Among the drugs used, especially at the beginning of the pandemic, are chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, macrolides (azithromycin) and quinolones that can cause Torsades de Pointes-type arrhythmias or other lethal arrhythmias as a potential consequence of QT prolongation. Other drugs with arrhythmogenic potential include other antiviral agents such as lopinavir/ritonavir, favipiravir, immunomodulatory treatments as tocilizumab, fingolimod, the anesthetic propofol, the antiemetic domperidone, class IA and III antiarrhythmics and the antipsychotic haloperidol, used in the initial phases of the pandemic mainly to combat the so-called cytokine storm. Drug combinations, especially QT-prolonging agents, used in the early stages may have induced increased arrhythmogenicity and secondary lethality (59). We suspect that all these events are facilitated by disorders in the autonomic system.

Many critically ill COVID-19 patients often have previous comorbidities, which together with acute comorbidities such as electrolyte disturbances (hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia), fever, systemic inflammation and excess autonomic lability contributes to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (47, 59).

Dysautonomia in Post-COVID-19 Condition

Dysautonomic symptoms observed after SARS-CoV-2 infection are similar to those described after other viral infections such as mumps, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C, Epstein-Barr, or Coxsackie type B virus (60, 61). In the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic of 2002–2004 [8,422 cases and 916 deaths (11% mortality)], one study reported that 40% of patients (67% female) still had chronic fatigue nearly 2 years after infection (62). Studies utilizing autonomic reflex testing in post-SARS syndrome are scarce. One study of 14 patients (85% female) demonstrated an abnormal 30:15 ratio on active stand testing in 4/14 (29%) patients at 6 months Post-infection, with three reporting orthostatic intolerance (63). The 2012 coronavirus epidemic caused by the Middle East respiratory syndrome virus (MERS) was more limited and resulted in 2,468 cases and 851 deaths (34% mortality), but to our knowledge there are no reports of autonomic impairment following MERS (1).

Approximately 2.5% of patients with infection suffered Post-COVID-19 autonomic dysfunction (21, 22). In an observational cohort study involving 205 patients with confirmed or probable COVID-19 infection who met specific eligibility criteria (hospitalization, life-limiting symptoms beyond 12 weeks, desaturation < =95% on a Harvard step test, or chest pain with electrocardiographic changes during acute illness) a high prevalence (25%) of Post-COVID dysautonomia (64) was shown. Dysautonomia was defined as a resting heart rate (HR) >75 bpm, HR increase with exercise <89 bpm, and HR recovery <25 bpm 1 min after exercise (64) and was associated with objective functional limitations (reduced work rate and peak oxygen consumption and a steeper VE/VCO2 slope), but was not associated with subjective symptoms or limitations (64).

Orthostatic Intolerance Syndromes

It has been proposed that some symptoms of the post COVID-19 condition may be related to a virus- or immune-mediated disruption to the autonomic nervous system, resulting in transient or long-term orthostatic intolerance syndromes. It is well established that some cases of autonomic disorders such as NOH and POTS are associated with autoantibodies against α-/β-adrenoceptors and muscarinic receptors (6570).

When a healthy person stands upright, blood pools in the pelvis and legs, reducing venous return to the heart. This is detected by cardiac and aortic baroreceptors, which respond by increasing sympathetic and adrenergic tone (mediated by noradrenaline and epinephrine/adrenaline, respectively). This results in tachycardia to compensate for the reduction in stroke volume and is followed by vasoconstriction in the splanchnic vascular bed, which increases the venous return to the heart (69).

Orthostatic intolerance is the inability to tolerate the upright posture because of symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion or sympathetic activation, or both, which are relieved by recumbency (71). In orthostatic intolerance, the release of epinephrine and norepinephrine causes pronounced tachycardia, which is experienced as palpitations, breathlessness, and chest pain. Very high catecholamine levels can lead to paradoxical vasodilatation, sympathetic activity withdrawal and activation of the vagus nerve, resulting in hypotension, dizziness and ultimately, syncope (69).

Orthostatic intolerance syndromes include neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, neuromediated syncope and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and even orthostatic hypotension and neurally-mediated syncope should be considered. Since POTS appears to be the most common autonomic phenotype among PACS patients (1), the explanation of this feature has been expanded.

Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension (NOH)

Defined as a reduction of systolic blood pressure of at least 20 mmHg or a reduction in diastolic blood pressure of at least 10 mmHg within 3 min of active standing or head-up tilt on a tilt table (7173). Approximately one third of persistent orthostatic hypotension is neurogenic (20). It is due to reduced norepinephrine release from postganglionic sympathetic nerves, resulting in defective vasoconstriction when assuming the upright position. It is most frequent in patients with diabetes mellitus, neurodegenerative disorders and small fiber neuropathies (73).

Neuromediated Syncope (Particularly Vasovagal Syncope)

This is the most common cause of syncope. The median number of episodes over a lifetime is 3, with a recurrence rate of 30% at 30 months (74).

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS)

POTS is a disorder in which patients frequently experience symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in response to postural stressors, despite autonomic reflexes that are generally preserved (71). The main POTS mechanisms are impaired sympathetically- mediated vasoconstriction in the lower limbs (neuropathic POTS), excessive cardiac sympathoexcitation response (hyperadrenergic POTS), volume dysregulation, joint hypermobility, and physical deconditioning. POTS is characterized by an increase of 30 bpm or more over baseline or a sustained heart rate of more than 120 bpm, according to current standing criteria, and symptoms associated with orthostatic intolerance without a drop in blood pressure (Appendix 1) (71). There may be an overlap between POTS and other disorders, in particular, orthostatic hypotension, vasovagal syncope, panic disorders, psychogenic pseudosyncope, chronic fatigue syndrome, Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, mast cell activation disorder and cardiac arrhythmias and should be considered in complex cases (71, 75).

Symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion that may occur with any of the disorders of orthostatic intolerance include lightheadedness, dizziness, presyncope, vision and hearing changes, lower limb or generalized weakness, and cognitive difficulties (often vaguely termed brain fog). Symptoms of sympathoexcitation that distinguish POTS from orthostatic hypotension include palpitations, chest pain, dyspnea, tremulousness, sweating, pallor, nausea, diarrhea, and coldness of the extremities (Appendix 2) (76).

The affected population is usually young and predominantly female (77). Prevalence estimates are imprecise and there are no European data available to our knowledge. In the USA, estimates range from 0.2 to 1.0% in the general population. The onset of POTS may be precipitated by typical immunological stressors such as viral infection (20–50% of patients), frequently of the upper respiratory or gastrointestinal tract, vaccination (70), trauma, pregnancy, surgery, cardiovascular deconditioning (78) or even after a period of intense psychosocial stress. However, in a considerable number of patients with POTS, there is no clear identifiable trigger (79). Cardiac symptoms include chest pain, palpitations, exercise intolerance and orthostatic intolerance. More than 90% of patients with POTS have at least one gastrointestinal (GI) symptom, with nausea, abdominal pain, and bloating being the most common (80). Other symptoms that frequently accompany POTS include fatigue, “mental confusion”, headache, temporomandibular joint disorder, fibromyalgia and sleep disturbances (81) and others listed by organ system in Appendix 3. It is recommended that all patients presenting with signs or symptoms of POTS should be evaluated to rule out the diagnosis of POTS (7, 82).

These syndromes may be exacerbated by hypovolemia resulting either from the initial infection or physical deconditioning following prolonged bed rest in the intensive care unit; prolonged bed rest leads to reduced cardiac output and stroke volume, hypovolemia, baroreflex dysfunction and decreased sympathetic responsiveness (69).

Other Symptoms

Other more Non-specific symptoms such as palpitations, tachycardia during mild exertion, “resting heart rate increase” (11%), chest pains/discomfort (16%), labile blood pressure, new-onset hypertension (1%), gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, bloating, nausea/vomiting (16%), gastroparesis, constipation or loose stools), sleep disorders (11%), flushing (5%), peripheral vasoconstriction, sweating abnormalities (17%), temperature intolerance and even unexplained low-grade fever are also thought to be due to autonomic dysfunction (1, 83) and their presence in any person after SARS CoV2 infection should prompt a thorough examination for possible autonomic dysfunction (69).

Sinus tachycardia, episodic sinus bradycardia and sinus pauses have been described as manifestations of autonomic dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 infection (84). Pupillary responses were impaired in patients recovering from COVID-19 vs. healthy controls, showing a larger resting-state pupil diameter and higher pupil contraction velocity, and lower values of dilatation latency and duration of pupil constriction (45).

Detection and Diagnosis of Dysautonomia in COVID-19

A very detailed anamnesis with a thorough medical history is essential to obtain all the necessary information from the patient. Therefore, questions should be asked about different aspects. Frequent comorbidities include migraine and other headaches, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, visceral hypersensitivity, gastrointestinal dysmotility, chronic fatigue, insomnia, fibromyalgia, and often autoimmune diseases (71, 85). The histories of SARS-CoV-2 survivors with persistent autonomic dysfunction may reveal frequent episodes of fainting, dizziness, lightheadedness, and/or palpitations, revealing underlying hypotensive susceptibility or prior orthostatic intolerance syndrome (85, 86). Unexplained dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain, persistent dizziness, diarrhea, recurrent presyncope episodes, anxiety, panic attacks with low-threshold emotional triggers or symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, among others, have been observed (69, 71). These patterns may be explained by autonomic instability and may be a consequence of deconditioning, hypovolemia and immune-mediated or viral neuropathy (69). Although the exact etiology is unknown, it is thought that patients with dysautonomia have a less favorable body composition compared to those without dysautonomia (higher body mass index and waist circumference) (64).

The quantity and diversity of the symptoms mentioned are the reason why, among the proposed Neuro-PASC diagnostic criteria, orthostatic intolerance and cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary manifestations are regarded as significant and related to autonomic dysfunction (2).

In Post-COVID patients with suspected dysautonomia, the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale 31 (COMPASS-31) questionnaire is a sensitive tool to test the likelihood of autonomic dysfunction. This questionnaire has been previously applied to COVID-19 survivors, who showed significantly higher scores than controls, with an optimal cut-point for ruling out cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction of 13.25 (85).

Parameters related to heart rate variability and blood pressure in sitting and standing positions seem to be another key element in the detection of dysautonomia in patients with COVID-19 (20). Sinus tachycardia, episodic sinus bradycardia, and sinus pauses have been described as autonomic dysfunction manifestations in patients with COVID-19 infection (84). Table 1 offers a simple guideline for monitoring blood pressure and heart rate in this context.


Table 1. Interpretation of blood pressure and heart rate measurements in the event of clinical suspicion of orthostatic hypotension (20) and after differential diagnosis with vertigo, postural instability, ataxia, weakness of leg muscles, and osteoarthritis with weight-bearing musculoskeletal pain.

Blood tests (including complete blood count, renal function, B-type natriuretic peptide, electrolytes, thyroid stimulating hormone, and morning cortisol), resting 12-lead ECG, and the 6-min walking test should be routinely evaluated (85).

Holter ECG monitoring, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, cardiothoracic imaging (chest X-ray, chest Computed Tomography, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance) and exercise testing are also invaluable diagnostic tools for the study of Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 complications (61, 85). It has been suggested that remote electrophysiological monitoring or long-term telemonitoring could be a very useful tracking tool after hospital discharge, especially in patients who have been critically ill (47, 59).

Active standing and/or head-up tilt tests are very useful for evaluating PASC patients, especially in individuals with inappropriate/orthostatic tachycardia, unexplained syncope, or syndromes of orthostatic intolerance. Other autonomic function tests include the Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, and sweat function testing (85). Sudomotor function is an indirect index of sympathetic cholinergic Non-myelinated C-fiber activity, since sweat glands lack parasympathetic innervation (31). It can be assessed using Sudoscan, which allows estimation of electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) (31, 87). Abnormal ESC results suggest autonomic small fiber neuropathy and require confirmation with other validated techniques of sudomotor function, such as QSART testing and skin biopsy (1).

A feature of PASC patients with POTS-like symptoms is a high prevalence of specific circulating autoantibodies, including G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) antibodies (such as adrenergic, muscarinic and angiotensin II type-1 receptors) and the ganglionic neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (g-AChR) (75). Other recognized autoantibodies in POTS include circulating anti-nuclear, anti-thyroid, anti-NMDA-type glutamate receptor, anti-cardiac protein, anti-phospholipid, and Sjögren's antibodies (61, 71, 75, 85). Although neither sensitive nor specific, autoantibody testing can be helpful in selected cases. Specific tests for mast cell activation syndrome may also be considered in PASC patients with flushing episodes, frequent headaches, and persistent gastrointestinal symptoms (85).

Schematic summary of the diagnostic management of a suspected Post-COVID condition is shown in Figure 4.


Figure 4. General indications for examining chronic symptoms described after COVID-19 (61, 75, 85). DD, Differential diagnosis; ANAs, antinuclear antibodies; BP, Blood pressure; h, hours; ECG, electrocardiogram; min, minutes; HT, Hypertensive; hT, Hypotensive; HR, Heart Rate; NT-proBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; CT, Computed Tomography; POTS, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; COMPASS-31, Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale 31 questionnaire; NA, Noradrenaline; ADH, Vasopressin.

Possible Treatments for Dysautonomia in COVID-19

Cardiovascular Dysautonomic Involvement

When there is cardiovascular dysautonomia, the following order is recommended (55, 85, 88).

1/Physical reconditioning:

◦ Progressive aerobic exercise training programs.

◦ Use of compression accessories.

◦ Water and salt intake.

◦ Drinking water before getting up in the morning.

◦ Sleeping with the head raised in bed.

◦ Avoid situations that may exacerbate symptoms (sleep deprivation, exposure to heat, alcohol intake or large meals).

RECOMMENDATION: At the onset of prodromal symptoms and to delay/prevent vasovagal syncope, perform physical maneuvers such as crossing legs, tensing muscles and squatting.

2/ In case of insufficient or complementary Non-pharmacological measures in patients with severe refractory symptoms (Table 2).


Table 2. Therapeutic options in case of insufficient non-pharmacological measures or as a supplement in patients with serious refractory symptoms.

Because of the tendency for blood pressure to fluctuate, as explained above, it is important to maintain a euvolemic state and avoid excessive fluid administration during episodes of hypotension, with gradual titration of vasopressors to avoid excessive blood pressure, and to use short-acting antihypertensive drugs in hypertensive crises (89).

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

There are some more specific management protocols available to help treat POTS. The aspects mentioned below represent a summary of the nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic options available for the management of POTS. For more detail, it is advisable to consult documents that address these issues in greater depth (90, 91).

Non-pharmacologic measures: There is no Class I recommendation. The Class IIA recommendation is based on physical training to avoid chronicity of symptoms. Indications based on the management of orthostatic intolerance syndromes, such as educating the patient about the pathology, simple isometric, aerobic and resistance exercises, ensuring fluid replacement (2–3 liters of water per day, avoiding caffeine and alcohol) and one or two additional teaspoons of salt per day are maintained (Class IIB), as well as moving carefully from a lying or sitting to a standing position and avoiding exacerbating factors such as prolonged standing, hot environments and dehydration, using waist-high compression garments and assessing the need for fluid expanders if hypovolemia is considered to be a dominant symptom, among others (69, 90). Long-term repeated saline infusions are not recommended (78).

Pharmacologic measures: Midodrine, beta-blockers, fludrocortisone, pyridostigmine, clonidine and alpha-methyldopa (Class IIB) (69). The only drugs that have demonstrated benefits in randomized trials are propranolol and pyridostigmine (71). Since there is no good evidence in this regard, polypharmacy is frequent; the overall effects of drug therapy however are modest. Likewise, it is recommended to discontinue the intake of noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors such as duloxetine, nortriptyline, and tapentadol. It should also be considered whether the indication of fludrocortisone, midodrine, clonidine methyldopa or propranolol is necessary, bearing in mind that these drugs are not usually very well tolerated (69, 91).

A schematic proposal for the management of orthostatic intolerance is set out in Table 3.


Table 3. Therapeutic proposal for orthostatic intolerance and intended effects (71, 73).

Other Therapeutic Options

Other therapeutic options include Non-invasive neuromodulation (especially transcranial direct current stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and vagus nerve stimulation) which could be used in patients with COVID-19 and autonomic dysfunction (92). It seems that it may on the one hand reduce the impact of the infection by stimulating regions involved in the regulation of systemic anti-inflammatory and/or autonomic responses, prevent neuroinflammation and aid recovery of breathing, and, on the other, improve the symptoms of musculoskeletal pain, systemic fatigue, physical and cognitive rehabilitation after the disease, even if it has been critical, as well as treat the distress generated by the disease (92).

Key Points

• Dysautonomia, present in at least 2.5% of COVID-19 patients, is clinically similar to dysautonomia secondary to other viral infections. The prevalence of Post-COVID dysautonomia could rise to 25% in those patients who met specific eligibility criteria (hospitalization, life-limiting symptoms beyond 12 weeks and so on).

• Potentials mechanism of autonomic impairment caused by SARS CoV2 are based on direct tissue damage, immune dysregulation, hormonal disturbances, elevated cytokine levels due to immune reaction leading to chronic inflammation, and persistent low-grade infection. The EAS with allostasis and dyshomeostasis may partially explain the mortality and multi-organ involvement in COVID-19 patients.

• The major socioeconomic impact of symptom persistence after COVID-19 infection stems from fatigue, autonomic and neurohemodynamic involvement, hence the need for early intervention in these areas.

• Dysautonomic involvement secondary to COVID-19 may be acute-subacute, caused by drugs and/or ICU admission, and chronic, as in the Post-COVID-19 condition, due to orthostatic intolerance syndromes of autoimmune origin.

• A careful neurologic assessment is necessary in any patient with findings compatible with autonomic dysfunction following SARS CoV-2 infection.

• Protocols for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of autonomic dysfunction are mainly aimed at avoiding triggers of orthostatic intolerance by means of pharmacologic and Non-pharmacologic measures.


Some limitations need to be acknowledged in the interpretation of our results. First, this is not a systematic review. We limited our scope to selected articles which we believed could be the most representative ones. Secondly, we relied on PubMed only for our search strategy. Among the strengths of our study, we analyzed an important quantity of articles highlighting the most relevant research on COVID-19 and dysautonomia.


Two years after the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients affected by this disease continue to manifest patterns of neurological involvement attributable to autonomic dysfunction. This could be the result of a multifactorial etiology deriving from physical deconditioning after time spent isolated in home, hospital wards or intensive care units, hypovolemia, virus-mediated neuropathy, or an immune response secondary to infection. One of the consequences is that a high percentage of patients with COVID-19 do not make a full return to work due to residual symptoms. The socioeconomic impact is considerable and could be significantly reduced with an appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic protocol for the underlying autonomic dysfunction. Considering the wide dissemination of COVID-19 worldwide and the extraordinary dissemination of the SARS-CoV2 omicron variant and its emerging subvariants, it would appear to be imperative to adopt measures that, in addition to containing the spread of the virus, also help improve the acute management of infected patients and prevent and/or reduce the long-term sequelae of the infection.

Among these measures, one would be improving access to autonomic testing for early diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction. This would allow early treatment, reducing the associated morbidity and mortality and thus containing its personal and socioeconomic impact.

At the same time, the sheer scale of the infection and of the Post-COVID-19 syndrome presents a unique opportunity to add to our knowledge and understanding of the specific mechanisms responsible for orthostatic intolerance, POTS-like symptoms, and their duration. It is particularly noteworthy that the comprehension of the mechanisms of self-immunity could generate new pathophysiological hypotheses applicable to other disorders with which could share clinical similarities such as chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia. This improvement in awareness may turn out to help ameliorate diagnostic accuracy in these entities, currently very diffuse and poorly managed. Hence the value of studying in depth the clinical pictures found in patients with the Post-COVID-19 syndrome, especially Post-COVID-19-POTS condition, for which a special effort is required in terms of clinical care and resources devoted to their research.

A better recognition of dysautonomia will help to improve the management of COVID-19 in all its phases, providing information for possible diagnostic and therapeutic tools applicable not only to these patients, but also to those affected by other pathologies with physiopathological similarities (other viral conditions, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and so on). We therefore recommend further studies to explore the prevalence, pathophysiology, clinical features, and treatment approach in patients with COVID-19-related dysautonomia.

Author Contributions

FC-T and AM-O: literature review, data processing and analyses, interpretation of results, language editing, review and drafting of the first manuscript, and interpretation of results. AL-B, BT, VG, and MW: literature review, data processing, and interpretation of results. HA-G, AL, AA, JQ, and JP: critical revision of the manuscript. JG-E: conception and design of the article, literature review, interpretation of results, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


We would like to dedicate this article to all our healthcare colleagues, with whom we continue to work tirelessly during this COVID-19 pandemic. We hope that this review will facilitate understanding and the management of patients with dysautonomia in the context of COVID-19. Also, we would like to express our gratitude to our family members for their support and understanding of our dedication to our daily work and patients.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


ACE2, Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; ADH, Vasopressin; AIDP, Acute inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy; AMAN, Acute motor axonal neuropathy; AMSAN, Acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy; ANS, Autonomic nervous system; AT1-R, Angiotensin II receptor type 1; BBB, Blood-brain barrier; BP, Blood pressure (mmHg); CI, Confidence Interval; CNS, Central nervous system; COMPASS-31, Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale 31; COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019; CT, Computed tomography; EAS, Extended autonomic system; ECG, Electrocardiogram; ESC, Electrochemical skin conductance; g-AChR, Ganglionic neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; GBS, Guillain Barré; Syndrome, ; GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor; HR, Heart rate; HT, Hypertensive; hT, Hypotensive; hTO, Orthostatic hypotension; ICU, Intensive care unit; MasR, Mas receptor; MERS, Middle East respiratory syndrome; min, Minutes; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; MSA, Multiple system atrophy; NA, Noradrenaline; NICE, The United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; NOH, Neurogenic Orthostatic hypotension; NT-proBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; PASC, Post-acute sequelae of COVID; PLR, Pupillary light reflex; PNC, Polyneuritis cranialis; PNS, Peripheral nervous system; POTS, Postural tachycardia syndrome; QSART, Quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing; RAAS, The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; SARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SARS, Severe acute respiratory syndrome; SNS, Sympathetic nervous system; WHO, World Health Organization.


1. Larsen NW, Stiles LE, Miglis MG. Preparing for the long-haul: autonomic complications of COVID-19. Auton Neurosci. (2021) 235:102841. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102841

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Moghimi N, di Napoli M, Biller J, Siegler JE, Shekhar R, McCullough LD, et al. The neurological manifestations of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2021) 21:44. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01130-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Venkatesan P. NICE guideline on long COVID. Lancet Respir Med. (2021) 9:129–38. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00031-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Carfi A, Bernabei R, Landi F, Gemelli Against C-P-ACSG. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. (2020) 324:603–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Groff D, Sun A, Ssentongo AE, Ba DM, Parsons N, Poudel GR, et al. Short-term and long-term rates of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e2128568. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Boldrini M, Canoll PD, Klein RS. How COVID-19 affects the brain. JAMA Psychiatry. (2021) 78:682–3. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re'em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. (2021) 38:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dennis A, Wamil M, Alberts J, Oben J, Cuthbertson DJ, Wootton D, et al. Multiorgan impairment in low-risk individuals with Post-COVID-19 syndrome: a prospective, community-based study. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e048391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bergwerk M, Gonen T, Lustig Y, Amit S, Lipsitch M, Cohen C, et al. Covid-19 Breakthrough Infections in vaccinated health care workers. N Engl J Med. (2021) 385:1474–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, Adams A, Harvey O, McLean L, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol. (2021) 93:1013–22. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. LaVergne SM, Stromberg S, Baxter BA, Webb TL, Dutt TS, Berry K, et al. A longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 biorepository for COVID-19 survivors with and without post-acute sequelae. BMC Infect Dis. (2021) 21:677. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06359-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Moreno-Perez O, Merino E, Leon-Ramirez JM, Andres M, Ramos JM, Arenas-Jimenez J, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Incidence and risk factors: a mediterranean cohort study. J Infect. (2021) 82:378–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lo YL. COVID-19, fatigue, and dysautonomia. J Med Virol. (2021) 93:1213. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26552

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Goldstein DS. The extended autonomic system, dyshomeostasis, and COVID-19. Clin Auton Res. (2020) 30:299–315. doi: 10.1007/s10286-020-00714-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. (NICE) NIfHaCE,. COVID-19 Rapid Guideline: Managing The Long-Term Effects of COVID-19. (2021). Available online at: (accessed June, 2021).

Google Scholar

16. Dixit NM, Churchill A, Nsair A, Hsu JJ. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and the cardiovascular system: what is known? Am Heart J Plus. (2021) 5:100025. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kalter L. Fauci introduces new acronym for long COVID at white house briefing. Medscape. (2021, February 24). Available online at: (accessed April 8, 2022).

Google Scholar

18. Soriano JB, Murthy S, Marshall JC, Relan P, Diaz JV. A clinical case definition of Post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. (2021). doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Miglis MG, Goodman BP, Chemali KR, Stiles L. Re: 'Post-COVID-19 chronic symptoms' by Davido et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2021) 27:494. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.08.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Cheshire WP Jr. Autonomic history, examination, and laboratory evaluation. Continuum. (2020) 26:25–43. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000815

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Romero-Sanchez CM, Diaz-Maroto I, Fernandez-Diaz E, Sanchez-Larsen A, Layos-Romero A, Garcia-Garcia J, et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: the ALBACOVID registry. Neurology. (2020) 95:e1060–e70. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Misra S, Kolappa K, Prasad M, Radhakrishnan D, Thakur KT, Solomon T, et al. Frequency of neurologic manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. (2021) 97:e2269–e81. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012930

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Townsend L, Moloney D, Finucane C, McCarthy K, Bergin C, Bannan C, et al. Fatigue following COVID-19 infection is not associated with autonomic dysfunction. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0247280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sandroni P, Opfer-Gehrking TL, McPhee BR, Low PA. Postural tachycardia syndrome: clinical features and follow-up study. Mayo Clin Proc. (1999) 74:1106–10. doi: 10.4065/74.11.1106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Raj SR, Arnold AC, Barboi A, Claydon VE, Limberg JK, Lucci VM, et al. Long-COVID postural tachycardia syndrome: an American autonomic society statement. Clin Auton Res. (2021) 31:365–8. doi: 10.1007/s10286-021-00798-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yachou Y, El Idrissi A, Belapasov V, Ait Benali S. Neuroinvasion, neurotropic, and neuroinflammatory events of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the neurological manifestations in COVID-19 patients. Neurol Sci. (2020) 41:2657–69. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04575-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Rangon CM, Krantic S, Moyse E, Fougere B. The vagal autonomic pathway of COVID-19 at the crossroad of Alzheimer's disease and aging: a review of knowledge. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. (2020) 4:537–51. doi: 10.3233/ADR-200273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Cocoros NM, Svensson E, Szepligeti SK, Vestergaard SV, Szentkuti P, Thomsen RW, et al. Long-term risk of parkinson disease following influenza and other infections. JAMA Neurol. (2021) 78:1461–70. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Meinhardt J, Radke J, Dittmayer C, Franz J, Thomas C, Mothes R, et al. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat Neurosci. (2021) 24:168–75. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00758-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Synowiec A, Szczepa?ski A, Barreto-Duran E, Lie LK, Pyrc K. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): a Systemic Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2021) 34:e00133–20. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00133-20

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bellavia S, Scala I, Luigetti M, Brunetti V, Gabrielli M, Verme LZD, et al. Instrumental evaluation of COVID-19 related dysautonomia in non-critically-ill patients: An observational, cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:586. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245861

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Novak P, Mukerji SS, Alabsi HS, Systrom D, Marciano SP, Felsenstein D, et al. Multisystem Involvement in Post-Acute Sequelae of Coronavirus Disease 19. Ann Neurol. (2022) 9:367–79. doi: 10.1002/ana.26286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Tracey KJ. The inflammatory reflex. Nature. (2002) 420:853–9. doi: 10.1038/nature01321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Sehgal K, Nair N, Mahajan S, Sehrawat TS, et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Nat Med. (2020) 26:1017–32. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0968-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Vallée A. Dysautonomia and implications for anosmia in long COVID-19 disease. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:5514. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Buoite Stella A, Furlanis G, Frezza NA, Valentinotti R, Ajcevic M, Manganotti P. Autonomic dysfunction in Post-COVID patients with and witfhout neurological symptoms: a prospective multidomain observational study. J Neurol. (2022) 269:587–96. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10735-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Stanbro M, Gray BH, Kellicut DC. Carotidynia: revisiting an unfamiliar entity. Ann Vasc Surg. (2011) 25:1144–53. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Finsterer J, Scorza FA. Guillain-Barre syndrome in 220 patients with COVID-19. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg. (2021) 57:55. doi: 10.1186/s41983-021-00310-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Seixas R, Campoamor D, Lopes J, Bernardo T, Nzwalo H, Pascoalinho D. Occurrence of guillain-barre syndrome during the initial symptomatic phase of COVID-19 disease: coincidence or consequence? Cureus. (2021) 13:e19655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Uncini A, Vallat JM, Jacobs BC. Guillain-barre syndrome in SARS-CoV-2 infection: an instant systematic review of the first six months of pandemic. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2020) 91:1105–10. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kajumba MM, Kolls BJ, Koltai DC, Kaddumukasa M, Kaddumukasa M, Laskowitz DT. COVID-19-associated guillain-barre syndrome: Atypical para-infectious profile, symptom overlap, and increased risk of severe neurological complications. SN Compr Clin Med. (2020) 2:2702–14. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00646-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Biswas S, Ghosh R, Mandal A, Pandit A, Roy D, Sengupta S, et al. COVID-19 Induced miller fisher syndrome presenting with autonomic dysfunction: a unique case report and review of literature. Neurohospitalist. (2022) 12:111–6. doi: 10.1177/19418744211016709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Filosto M, Cotti Piccinelli S, Gazzina S, Foresti C, Frigeni B, Servalli MC, et al. Guillain-Barre syndrome and COVID-19: an observational multicentre study from two Italian hotspot regions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2021) 92:751–6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324837

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Arcila-Londono X, Lewis RA. Guillain-Barre syndrome. Semin Neurol. (2012) 32:179–86. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329196

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Karahan M, Demirtas AA, Hazar L, Erdem S, Ava S, Dursun ME, et al. Autonomic dysfunction detection by an automatic pupillometer as a non-invasive test in patients recovered from COVID-19. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2021) 259:2821–6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05209-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Vrettou CS, Korompoki E, Sarri K, Papachatzakis I, Theodorakopoulou M, Chrysanthopoulou E, et al. Pupillometry in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective study. Clin Auton Res. (2020) 30:563–5. doi: 10.1007/s10286-020-00737-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Briguglio M, Porta M, Zuffada F, Bona AR, Crespi T, Pino F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Aiming for the heart: a multicenter italian perspective about cardiovascular issues in COVID-19. Front Physiol. (2020) 11:571367. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.571367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW, Board T, Kay P, Wroblewski BM, et al. One- and two-stage surgical revision of peri-prosthetic joint infection of the hip: a pooled individual participant data analysis of 44 cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol. (2018) 33:933–46. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0377-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Xie Y, Xu E, Bowe B, Al-Aly Z. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. (2022) 28:583–90. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01689-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Porzionato A, Emmi A, Barbon S, Boscolo-Berto R, Stecco C, Stocco E, et al. Sympathetic activation: a potential link between comorbidities and COVID-19. FEBS J. (2020) 287:3681–8. doi: 10.1111/febs.15481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Biaggioni I, Shibao CA, Diedrich A, Muldowney JAS 3rd, Laffer CL, Jordan J. Blood pressure management in afferent baroreflex failure: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 74:2939–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Kaufmann H, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Palma JA. Baroreflex dysfunction. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:163–78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1509723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Montalvan V, Lee J, Bueso T, de Toledo J, Rivas K. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2020) 194:105921. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Siripanthong B, Nazarian S, Muser D, Deo R, Santangeli P, Khanji MY, et al. Recognizing COVID-19-related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management. Heart Rhythm. (2020) 17:1463–71. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Becker RC. Autonomic dysfunction in SARS-COV-2 infection acute and long-term implications COVID-19 editor's page series. J Thromb Thrombolysis. (2021) 52:692–707. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02549-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Al-Kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, Qusti S, Alshammari EM, Gyebi GA, Batiha GE. Covid-19-induced dysautonomia: a menace of sympathetic storm. ASN Neuro. (2021) 13:17590914211057635. doi: 10.1177/17590914211057635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Gonzalez-Duarte A, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L. Is 'happy hypoxia' in COVID-19 a disorder of autonomic interoception? A hypothesis. Clin Auton Res. (2020) 30:331–3. doi: 10.1007/s10286-020-00715-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Mao R, Qiu Y, He JS, Tan JY, Li XH, Liang J, et al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 5:667–78. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30126-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Manolis AS, Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Apostolopoulos EJ, Papatheou D, Melita H. COVID-19 infection and cardiac arrhythmias. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 30:451–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2020.08.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Billman GE. The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance. Front Physiol. (2013) 4:26. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Davido B, Seang S, Tubiana R, de Truchis P. Post-COVID-19 chronic symptoms: a postinfectious entity? Clin Microbiol Infect. (2020) 26:1448–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Lam MH, Wing YK, Yu MW, Leung CM, Ma RC, Kong AP, et al. Mental morbidities and chronic fatigue in severe acute respiratory syndrome survivors: long-term follow-up. Arch Intern Med. (2009) 169:2142–7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Lau ST, Yu WC, Mok NS, Tsui PT, Tong WL, Cheng SW. Tachycardia amongst subjects recovering from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Int J Cardiol. (2005) 100:167–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.06.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Ladlow P, O'Sullivan O, Houston A, Barker-Davies R, May S, Mills D, et al. Dysautonomia following COVID-19 is not associated with subjective limitations or symptoms but is associated with objective functional limitations. Heart Rhythm. (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Li H, Kem DC, Reim S, Khan M, Vanderlinde-Wood M, Zillner C, et al. Agonistic autoantibodies as vasodilators in orthostatic hypotension: a new mechanism. Hypertension. (2012) 59:402–8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.184937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Fedorowski A, Li H, Yu X, Koelsch KA, Harris VM, Liles C, et al. Antiadrenergic autoimmunity in postural tachycardia syndrome. Europace. (2017) 19:1211–9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Li H, Yu X, Liles C, Khan M, Vanderlinde-Wood M, Galloway A, et al. Autoimmune basis for postural tachycardia syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc. (2014) 3:e000755. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000755

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Yu X, Stavrakis S, Hill MA, Huang S, Reim S, Li H, et al. Autoantibody activation of beta-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors contributes to an “autoimmune” orthostatic hypotension. J Am Soc Hypertens. (2012) 6:40–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.10.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Dani M, Dirksen A, Taraborrelli P, Torocastro M, Panagopoulos D, Sutton R, et al. Autonomic dysfunction in 'long COVID': rationale, physiology and management strategies. Clin Med. (2021) 21:e63–e7. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0896

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Ruzieh M, Batizy L, Dasa O, Oostra C, Grubb B. The role of autoantibodies in the syndromes of orthostatic intolerance: a systematic review. Scand Cardiovasc J. (2017) 51:243–7. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2017.1355068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Cutsforth-Gregory JK. Postural tachycardia syndrome and neurally mediated syncope. Continuum. (2020) 26:93–115. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Francois C, Shibao CA, Biaggioni I, Duhig AM, McLeod K, Ogbonnaya A, et al. Six-month use of droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Mov Disord Clin Pract. (2019) 6:235–42. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Palma JA, Kaufmann H. Management of orthostatic hypotension. Continuum. (2020) 26:154–77. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Baron-Esquivias G, Morillo CA. Definitive pacing therapy in patients with neuromediated syncope. Lessons from the SPAIN study. Rev Esp Cardiol. (2018) 71:320–2. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.10.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Fedorowski A. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: clinical presentation, aetiology and management. J Intern Med. (2019) 285:352–66. doi: 10.1111/joim.12852

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Johansson M, Stahlberg M, Runold M, Nygren-Bonnier M, Nilsson J, Olshansky B, et al. Long-Haul Post-COVID-19 symptoms presenting as a variant of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Swedish experience. JACC Case Rep. (2021) 3:573–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Thieben MJ, Sandroni P, Sletten DM, Benrud-Larson LM, Fealey RD, Vernino S, et al. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: the Mayo clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc. (2007) 82:308–13. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)61027-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Bryarly M, Phillips LT, Fu Q, Vernino S, Levine BD. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 73:1207–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Olshansky B, Cannom D, Fedorowski A, Stewart J, Gibbons C, Sutton R, et al. Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): a critical assessment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. (2020) 63:263–70. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Tu Y, Abell TL, Raj SR, Mar PL. Mechanisms and management of gastrointestinal symptoms in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. (2020) 32:e14031. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Goldstein DS. The possible association between COVID-19 and postural tachycardia syndrome. Heart Rhythm. (2021) 18:508–9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Agarwal AK, Garg R, Ritch A, Sarkar P. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Postgrad Med J. (2007) 83:478–80. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.055046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Nath A. Neurologic manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Continuum. (2021) 27:1051–65. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Kanjwal K, Jamal S, Kichloo A, Grubb BP. New-onset postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome following coronavirus disease 2019 infection. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. (2020) 11:4302–4. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.111102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Bisaccia G, Ricci F, Recce V, Serio A, Iannetti G, Chahal AA, et al. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction: what do we know? J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. (2021) 8:156. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8110156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Shouman K, Vanichkachorn G, Cheshire WP, Suarez MD, Shelly S, Lamotte GJ, et al. Autonomic dysfunction following COVID-19 infection: an early experience. Clin Auton Res. (2021) 31:385–94. doi: 10.1007/s10286-021-00803-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Hinduja A, Moutairou A, Calvet JH. Sudomotor dysfunction in patients recovered from COVID-19. Neurophysiol Clin. (2021) 51:193–6. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Chilazi M, Duffy EY, Thakkar A, Michos ED. COVID and Cardiovascular disease: what we know in 2021. Curr Atheroscler Rep. (2021) 23:37. doi: 10.1007/s11883-021-00935-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Eshak N, Abdelnabi M, Ball S, Elgwairi E, Creed K, Test V, et al. Dysautonomia: an overlooked neurological manifestation in a critically ill COVID-19 patient. Am J Med Sci. (2020) 360:427–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Fu Q, Levine BD. Exercise and non-pharmacological treatment of POTS. Auton Neurosci. (2018) 215:20–7. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Miller AJ, Raj SR. Pharmacotherapy for postural tachycardia syndrome. Auton Neurosci. (2018) 215:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Baptista AF, Baltar A, Okano AH, Moreira A, Campos ACP, Fernandes AM, et al. Applications of non-invasive neuromodulation for the management of disorders related to COVID-19. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:573718. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.573718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dysautonomia, Post-COVID-19 condition, socioeconomic impact, orthostatic intolerance syndromes, POTS, diagnosis, management

Citation: Carmona-Torre F, Mínguez-Olaondo A, López-Bravo A, Tijero B, Grozeva V, Walcker M, Azkune-Galparsoro H, López de Munain A, Alcaide AB, Quiroga J, del Pozo JL and Gómez-Esteban JC (2022) Dysautonomia in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review on Clinical Course, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies. Front. Neurol. 13:886609. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.886609

Received: 28 February 2022; Accepted: 28 March 2022;
Published: 27 May 2022.

Edited by:

Beatrice Paradiso, Dolo Hospital, Italy

Reviewed by:

Philip L. Mar, Saint Louis University, United States
Anna Hohler, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, United States

Copyright © 2022 Carmona-Torre, Mínguez-Olaondo, López-Bravo, Tijero, Grozeva, Walcker, Azkune-Galparsoro, López de Munain, Alcaide, Quiroga, del Pozo and Gómez-Esteban. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ane Mínguez-Olaondo,

These authors share senior authorship