The effect of exercise intervention on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Quantitative evaluation of the effect of exercise intervention in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Methods: The CNKI, WOS, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched by computer, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise intervention in ALS were screened out according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PICOS principle. Stata 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 12 RCTs including 430 participants were included. Meta-analysis results show that exercise intervention can significantly improve the overall function, walking test (WT) distance and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) of ALS patients (p < 0.05). However, exercise interventions did not show significant effects on fatigue, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in ALS patients (p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that resistance exercise is the most effective intervention for improving the function of ALS patients, while aerobic exercise is the most effective intervention for improving FVC in ALS patients.

Conclusion: Exercise intervention in ALS has a positive effect, but due to the small number of included studies and possible heterogeneity, risk of bias and sensitivity issues, further research is needed.

1 Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive, lethal motor neuron disease. It usually involves upper motor neurons (brain, brainstem, spinal cord) and lower motor neurons (cranial nerve nuclei, anterior horn cells of the spinal cord) and manifests mainly as muscle weakness, atrophy, dysarthria and dysphagia (1, 2). ALS most often develops between the ages of 50 and 60 and most patients die within 3–5 years from respiratory paralysis or lung infection (3).

Although ALS is still a disease that cannot be completely cured at present, there are many ways to improve patients’ quality of life and slow down disease progression, such as nutritional management (4), assisted breathing (5), psychotherapy (6) and medication (7). However, the aforementioned strategies may have some limitations, such as being highly passive, causing side effects, and having limited functional improvement (1, 8). For example, assisted ventilation typically relies on devices such as ventilators to help patients breathe, which restricts their range of activities and independence in daily life (1). In addition, pharmacological treatments often come with side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and dizziness, and long-term use may potentially cause damage to liver and kidney functions (9). Moreover, the above treatments mainly focus on alleviating local symptoms in ALS patients. For instance, nutritional management emphasizes providing the necessary material basis for the body, assisted ventilation targets only respiratory function support, and psychological therapy primarily aims to adjust the patient’s psychological state and alleviate emotional issues to improve quality of life. However, these approaches have insufficient impact on enhancing the patients’ overall physical condition, improving daily physiological functions, and ultimately, on improving quality of life.

As research continues to advance, moderate exercise tailored to the patient’s disease stage and physical condition is considered beneficial for ALS patients (10). For example, strength exercises to slow down weakness, flexibility exercises to reduce contractures, and prolonged activities such as walking to maintain endurance (11). Patients with ALS are often physically weak and frequently experience complications such as muscle atrophy, muscle spasms, respiratory difficulties, and sensory abnormalities (12, 13). Therefore, traditional medical advice for ALS patients usually emphasizes avoidance of exercise to prevent injury and exacerbation of the condition due to exercise (14, 15). However, most studies (16, 17) recommend that patients with neuromuscular diseases engage in moderate exercise tailored to their condition to maintain physical function and improve quality of life. The reason is that increasing the content of mitochondria in the muscles can enhance blood flow to the muscles, thereby maintaining and enhancing muscle strength, which in turn helps to maintain their ability to perform daily activities (16, 17). Therefore, the results of current studies on the effects of exercise on ALS patients and the relationship between the two are inconsistent. In addition, studies by Kilmer (14) and Francis et al. (18) have concluded that the effect of exercise on ALS patients is controversial.

In fact, studies (19–21) have already used systematic reviews and meta-analyses to explore the effects of exercise interventions on ALS. However, these studies included a variety of exercise types, such as aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, combined exercise, and respiratory muscle training. Yet, they fell short in investigating which type of exercise is more beneficial for ALS patients. In other words, the relationship between exercise type and outcome measures is unclear, and it is uncertain which type of exercise can better promote the improvement of specific indicators. Therefore, they are unable to provide a more precise exercise guideline for ALS patients. Therefore, this study systematically searched for studies related to exercise interventions for ALS, and explored the effects of exercise interventions for ALS through systematic review and meta-analysis. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the effects of different types of exercise interventions and to clarify the associations between exercise types and outcome measures in ALS patients. This study is used to facilitate health care workers to understand the risks and benefits of exercise in order to develop a safe and appropriate exercise plan.

2 Methods

The study was written and reported in strict accordance with the PRISMA 2020 entry list (22) for the search strategy, selection criteria, data extraction, bias assessment and mathematical statistics.

2.1 Search strategy

One researcher conducted the relevant literature search in English and Chinese. The search terms “amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),” “motor neuron disease (MND)” and “Lou Gehrig” were combined with “sport,” “exercise,” “training” and “fitness” in CNKI, Web of Science (WOS), PubMed and Scopus. The search time frame is from the creation of this database to November 2022.

2.2 Selection criteria

This study was designed with inclusion and exclusion criteria based on the PICOS principles (23). Inclusion criteria: (1) The subjects were patients with ALS; (2) The trial measures were any forms of exercise intervention; (3) The control measures included daily activities, usual care, stretching exercises, neuro-rehabilitation therapy and placebo exercise; (4) The outcome variables included at least one of ALS function, fatigue, WT (walk test), MIP (maximum inspiratory pressure), MEP (maximum expiratory pressure), FVC (forced vital capacity), PEF (peak expiratory flow rate); (5) The study design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Exclusion criteria: (1) Animal experiments, case reports, single-group experiments, quasi-experimental designs; (2) Positive controls in multi-arm studies; (3) Reviews, abstracts, letters, commentaries; (4) Incomplete data information on outcome variables; (5) Combined interventions that include exercise, such as the combination of exercise and nutrition; (6) Repeated publications for the same subjects, including only literature of relatively high quality. The selection process follows the order of title, abstract, figure, and full text. The literature was screened by two researchers independently according to the selection criteria, and the screened literature was secondarily assessed by two other researchers, and if there was a dispute, it was mutually agreed in a group discussion.

2.3 Data extraction

The data extract includes the first author, publication date, study design, participant characteristics, exercise protocol and outcome variables. For this study, the extracts were entered into Excel 2010 and saved. The data extraction was carried out independently by two researchers, and the extraction was secondarily assessed by two other researchers, and if there were controversial issues, a group discussion was held to decide jointly.

2.4 Quality assessment

This study used the risk of bias assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration Network (24, 25) to assess the risk of bias for RCTs. The tool assesses six aspects of random methods, blinding, allocation concealment, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting of findings and other biases. Two researchers judged independently on the basis of the assessment tool, and where there were serious disagreements, the entries were discussed with a third researcher.

2.5 Data analysis

This study used Stata 12.0 software for data processing and statistical analysis. The models were selected by heterogeneity tests to test for combined effects. The Q-test and I² statistic were used to test for between-study heterogeneity. If I² < 50% and p > 0.1, the between-study heterogeneity was considered small and a fixed-effects model was selected for analysis; if I² ≥ 50% and p ≤ 0.1, the between-study heterogeneity was considered large and a random-effects model was selected for analysis. This study explores the effects of different exercise types on ALS through subgroup analysis. This study explored the sources of heterogeneity through one-way meta-regression analysis. The study was tested for publication bias through Egger linear regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the “metainf” command for the one-by-one elimination method. Effect sizes for continuous variable information are expressed using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are used to express the estimated intervals of the overall parameters constructed from the sample statistics. The level of heterogeneity was set at α = 0.1 and the rest of the tests at α = 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Selection results

In this study, 238 documents were retrieved, including 20 Chinese documents and 218 English documents. The retrieved literature was imported into EndNote X9 software for de-duplication, resulting in 160 documents. A total of 12 documents were selected for inclusion. The literature screening process is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Flow chart for literature screening.

3.2 Data extraction results

Publication dates for the included studies were 2001 (26) to 2021 (27). A total of 430 participants were included in the meta-analysis to explore the effects of exercise interventions to improve ALS, including 222 in the test group and 208 in the control group. The mean age of the test group was 50.7 (28) ~ 63.2 (11) years old and the mean age of the control group was 53.4 (29) ~ 62.1 (30) years old. The proportion of females in the test group was 25.0% (11, 28) ~ 61.1% (27) and 25.0% (28) ~53.3% (30) of females in the control group. Participants were obtained from eight countries: Canada (31), Israeli (26, 27), Italy (32, 33), Australia (28, 29), United Kingdom (34), United States (30, 35), Portugal (11), and the Netherlands (36), of which studies with samples of ALS patients from Israel, Italy, Australia, and the United States included two each. Six studies (11, 26, 31–33) used the ALS Functional Scale (ALSFRS) as the standard for clinical judgment of ALS patients; five studies (27, 28, 30, 35, 36) based the diagnosis on the revised El-Escorial criteria; and the remaining one study (29) only indicated that the enrolled ALS patients had a clinical diagnosis, without mentioning the specific criteria. The exercise intervention program in the test group consisted of four types of aerobic exercise (11), resistance exercise (26, 31, 33), combined exercise (27, 28, 32, 36), and respiratory muscle training (29, 30, 34, 35). The exercise period was 5 weeks (32) ~52 weeks (26), the frequency of exercise was 2 times/week (26, 34) ~21 times/week (29), and the duration of each session was 10 min (29, 34) ~60 min (32). The participants in the control group mainly performed stretching exercises (27, 31), daily activities (26, 28), nursing training (11), and so on. All included studies collected relevant data immediately after the intervention. Among them, 11 studies (11, 26–28, 30–36) assessed the ALS function of the participants; 6 studies (26, 27, 31, 32, 34, 36) evaluated the fatigue level of the participants; 2 studies (27, 32) assessed the walking ability of the participants; 3 studies (27, 29, 34) evaluated the maximum inspiratory pressure of the participants; 7 studies (11, 27, 29, 33–36) assessed the forced vital capacity of the participants; 2 studies (34, 35) evaluated the peak expiratory flow rate of the participants; 2 studies (27, 35) assessed the maximum expiratory pressure of the participants. In addition, no studies reported adverse reactions among the participants. The basic characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1. Basic characteristics of the included documents.

3.3 Quality assessment results

The majority of included studies reported blinded methods, there was no selective reporting of study results, and it is unclear whether other biases existed. However, most studies did not report methods of randomization and allocation concealment, and most studies had ALS patient dropouts. The primary reason for ALS patients to discontinue exercise is due to physical discomfort caused by disease progression. ALS is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. As the condition worsens, patients experience increasing muscle weakness and atrophy, which may rapidly render them unable to perform exercises they were previously capable of. Moreover, exercise increases the body’s demand for oxygen. Given that patients may have insufficient respiratory function, they could experience dyspnea and shortness of breath during exercise. These symptoms can severely impact the exercise experience and even pose a threat to life, thereby forcing them to stop exercising. The results of the quality assessment of the included studies are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Table 2. Results of the quality assessment of the included studies.

3.4 Meta-analysis results

The results of the heterogeneity test (Table 3) showed that there was a large heterogeneity in ALS function, fatigue, FVC and PEF (I² > 50%, p < 0.1), so the random effects model was used for the main effects test; WT, MIP and MEP had lower heterogeneity (I² < 50%, p > 0.1), so the fixed effects model was used for the main effects test. The results of the main effects test (Table 3) showed that the exercise intervention significantly improved the function of ALS patients [SMD = 0.499, 95% CI = (0.055, 0.943), Z = 2.20, p = 0.028], increased the distance of WT [SMD = 0.967, 95% CI = (0.448, 1.487), Z = 3.65, p = 0.000], and increased MEP [SMD = 0.500, 95% CI = (0.043, 0.957), Z = 2.14, p = 0.032]. However, for fatigue, MIP, FVC, and PEF, the effects of exercise intervention were poor (p > 0.05). The meta-analysis results of exercise intervention for ALS are detailed in Supplementary material 1.

Table 3

Table 3. Meta-analysis of the effects of exercise intervention for ALS.

3.5 Subgroup analysis

Due to the relative paucity of included studies in WT, MIP, MEP and PEF, subgroup analyses were not invariably performed, so this study investigated the effect of different exercise types on the intervention of ALS using ALS function, fatigue and FVC as dependent variables and exercise type as independent variables, respectively. The results of the heterogeneity test (Table 4) showed that there was a large heterogeneity in the studies of combined exercise interventions for ALS function (I² > 50%, p < 0.1), which were analyzed using a random effects model; the remaining studies of exercise intervention outcome variables had a lower heterogeneity (I² < 50%, p > 0.1), so they were all analyzed using a fixed effects model. Both aerobic and resistance exercise were able to significantly improve the function of ALS patients (p < 0.05), with resistance exercise having the largest effect size (SMD = 0.686), while combined exercise and respiratory muscle training were not effective interventions for the function of ALS patients (p > 0.05). The effects of resistance exercise, combined exercise, and respiratory muscle training on alleviating fatigue in ALS patients were not significant (p > 0.05). Aerobic exercise significantly improved FVC in ALS patients (p < 0.05), while resistance exercise, combined exercise and respiratory muscle training were not effective interventions for FVC in ALS patients (p > 0.05). The subgroup analysis results of exercise intervention for ALS are detailed in Supplementary material 2.

Table 4

Table 4. Subgroup analysis of the effect of different exercise types on ALS.

3.6 Sources of heterogeneity

The results of the heterogeneity test showed that there is still a large heterogeneity among the included studies, so the sources of heterogeneity among the included studies remain to be explored. In this study, the effect size of ALS function was used as the dependent variable, and the study characteristics such as publication date, sample size, age of subjects, proportion of females, nationality of subjects, types of exercise, intervention period, frequency of intervention, and duration of exercise were coded as independent variables, and the sources of heterogeneity were explored by univariate meta-regression analysis. The results (Table 5) show that the underlying characteristic variables of the included studies were not a source of heterogeneity between studies of ALS function (p > 0.05), and the age of the subjects (t = −0.23, p = 0.051) reached borderline significant effects and may be a source of heterogeneity between included studies. However, more heterogeneity is not the result of a single factor, but may be the result of multiple factors acting together.

Table 5

Table 5. Results of one-way meta-regression analysis.

3.7 Publication bias test

The reliability of the results of the meta-analysis depends on the presence of bias in the included studies. This study used Egger linear regression for publication bias test. Egger linear regression is a quantitative test for the presence of publication bias to compensate for the lack of subjective judgments in funnel plots (37). The Egger linear regression model constructs a linear regression equation with the effect size as the dependent variable and the precision of the effect estimate as the independent variable, and the intercept of the regression equation is the offset, and the closer it is to 0, the less likely there is publication bias, and if p > 0.05 and the 95% CI contains 0, then there is no publication bias (37). Given the relatively few studies included in WT, MIP, MEP, and PEF, it was inconvenient to perform publication bias tests, so only Egger linear regression analyses were performed for ALS function, fatigue, and FVC. The results (Table 6) showed that p < 0.05 and 95% CI included 0 for ALS function, indicating the possibility of publication bias in the included studies; fatigue and FVC p > 0.05 and 95% CI included 0, indicating the absence of publication bias in the included studies.

Table 6

Table 6. Egger linear regression publication bias test.

3.8 Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis is an important method used in meta-analysis to assess the robustness and reliability of the combined results and to assess whether the combined results have been significantly changed by the influence of a particular study. In this study, a combined effects test was performed by excluding each study with the help of the “metainf” command, and the estimated range of the SMD for ALS function was found to be −0.256 ~ 10.629, the estimated range of the lower 95% CI was −0.898 ~ 6.572, and the estimated range of the upper 95% CI was 0.202 ~ 14.686, so there may be sensitivity issues with inclusion in the study. In this study, by retrospectively included studies, the studies that caused instability in the combined results were found to be Plowman and Watts et al. (30), Plowman and Tabor-Gray et al. (35) and van Groenestijn et al. (36). After excluding three papers, the results of the combined effects test were similar to those of the main effects test and the results were relatively stable.

4 Discussion

The results of the meta-analysis indicate that exercise intervention can improve the function of patients with ALS, increasing the distance of the WT and the maximum MEP. However, exercise intervention is not effective for MIP, FVC, PEF, and fatigue. Further subgroup analysis showed that resistance exercise was the most effective intervention for function in ALS patients, and aerobic exercise was the most effective intervention for FVC in ALS patients. The results of this study are similar to those of the systematic review and meta-analysis by Lui and Byl (38) and Meng et al. (21), both of which support the beneficial effects of moderate exercise in ALS patients. Quality grading of evidence in evidence-based medicine (39) suggests that meta-analysis based on RCTs is the highest level of evidence in clinical practice guidelines. In contrast, the study by Lui and Byl (38) was limited by the paucity of original studies and the inclusion of both animal models and human subjects for analysis, which somewhat reduced the accuracy of the findings. Therefore, researchers have also called for the need for a large number of RCTs to explore the effects of exercise interventions in ALS patients.

The results of the subgroup analysis showed that both aerobic and resistance exercise had a significant effect on function in ALS patients, with resistance exercise having the best effect. While Meng et al. (21) concluded that aerobic exercise had the best effect on ALS patients. Meng et al. (21) included only seven RCTs for combined effects tests and only one study with aerobic and resistance exercise interventions, respectively. Single-study comparisons may ignore the influence of demographic characteristics such as age, gender and duration of illness in the original study, creating a degree of uncertainty in the findings. Clawson et al. (40) explained why resistance training intervention is superior to aerobic exercise. This study evaluated the safety and tolerability of aerobic and resistance exercise in people with ALS and showed that both exercises are safe and tolerable for people with ALS. At the same time, the study noted that resistance exercise showed higher adherence and therefore more effective intervention time in the 24-week intervention, and therefore its intervention was most effective.

The motor neuron lesions caused by ALS lead to atrophy and functional decline of skeletal muscles, including respiratory muscles, making mobility difficult and often feeling fatigue, weakness and low energy (29, 34, 41). Respiratory exercise has been reported to have a beneficial effect on motor neuron disease (42). Clawson et al. (40) also demonstrated that aerobic and resistance exercise is safe and tolerable for ALS patients and does not increase fatigue in ALS patients. Therefore, a large number of studies have focused on investigating the effects of exercise interventions on physical and respiratory function in ALS patients, as well as analyzing the safety and tolerability of exercise by monitoring fatigue after exercise interventions. Meta- analysis results showed that exercise interventions helped to improve physical function and increase walking distances in ALS patients, with more prominent improvements in resistance exercise and aerobic exercise in particular. In addition, Meng et al. (21) showed that ALS patients did not further increase fatigue due to exercise interventions. Our study found that exercise intervention does not increase fatigue in ALS patients, further supporting that exercise therapy is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated by patients with ALS.

Fatigue is a common and potentially debilitating symptom in ALS patients, and subjective measures of fatigue are significantly and negatively correlated with patients’ quality of life (43, 44). Fatigue is mainly caused by ALS or its complications (respiratory failure, speech disorders, malnutrition, etc.) and is exacerbated by factors such as sleep disturbances, depression and anxiety, lack of activity, physical pain and mental disorders (26, 45). Studies related to exercise interventions in neurological disorders (46–48) have shown that moderate exercise can increase muscle mass and muscle strength, improve physiological function, enhance the ability to perform daily living activities and delay disease progression in patients. In addition, exercise interventions have positive effects on improving sleep disorders (49), depression and anxiety (50), and physical pain (51). Based on the above evidence, this study concludes that exercise interventions not only do not exacerbate fatigue in ALS patients, but may also significantly improve quality of life. The results are certainly encouraging and provide an evidence-based basis for promoting improvements in physical function through exercise therapy for ALS patients.

For ALS patients, normal respiratory function is reduced or even lost due to atrophy of the external intercostal muscles involved in breathing, as well as stiffness of the thoracic joints, which limits respiratory movements (52). Improving respiratory impairment in ALS patients through exercise can help improve the quality of survival, but the results of related studies are more controversial. A meta-analysis by Rahmati and Malakoutinia (20) showed that aerobic exercise, resistance exercise and combined exercise were not effective in improving respiratory function in ALS patients. A meta-analysis by Meng et al. (21) showed that exercise can improve FVC in ALS patients. In a meta-analysis by Ferreira et al. (42), which included both multiple sclerosis (MS) and ALS patients, a combined effects test showed that MEP and MIP were improved by respiratory muscle training in both MS and ALS patients, but the effect of the intervention was not significant for FVC in MS and ALS patients. The results of this study showed that exercise intervention helped to promote the improvement of MEP in ALS patients, but was not significant for MIP, FVC and PEF. In addition, for the first time, aerobic exercise was shown to be effective in promoting the improvement of FVC in ALS patients through subgroup analysis. Previous studies (53, 54) have shown that diaphragmatic pacing facilitated by exercise increases the amplitude of diaphragmatic movement, increases muscle thickness, improves ventilation and delays the decline in FVC. However, in ALS patients with restricted mobility, diaphragmatic pacing can cause venous thrombosis (53, 54). Eidenberger et al. (55) also showed that the evidence for improving respiratory function in ALS patients through respiratory muscle training is still insufficient. The relative paucity of studies included in this study and the large heterogeneity of some of the indicators also make it difficult to demonstrate the positive effects of exercise interventions on respiratory function in ALS patients.

Skeletal muscle is an important tissue involved in the development of ALS disease through the activation of retrograde signaling cascades that degrade motor neurons (56). The health and function of skeletal muscle is influenced by satellite cells, mitochondria and micoRNA (56). Based on the role of skeletal muscle in the development of ALS, it can be hypothesized that exercise improves muscle function and delays muscle decay by improving motor neurons. Metallothioneins (MTs) are strong scavengers of reactive oxygen species and have some neurotropic activity, so exercise may have a beneficial effect on spinal cord motor neurons in ALS patients due to the induction of MTs (52). Hashimoto et al. (57) showed that regular exercise on a treadmill increased the mRNA expression levels of MTs in mice and promoted the accumulation of MTs in the spinal cord, while promoting an enhanced immune response to MTs in astrocytes. Kassa et al. (58) also showed a potential neuroprotective effect of exercise in ALS patients, with exercise significantly improving microglia activation when damage to motor neurons was less severe. In addition, Lei and Huang (2) suggested that moderate exercise has a protective effect on motor neurons in ALS patients and can improve muscle function and disease progression in ALS patients through the expression of glucose transporter protein and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Based on the key findings of this study, it is recommended that a comprehensive and effective treatment plan for ALS patients can be provided by integrating personalized exercise programs with professional multidisciplinary support. Firstly, ALS patients are advised to engage in moderate exercise and select the appropriate type of exercise according to their actual conditions, aiming to enhance their overall quality of life and physical capabilities. Secondly, when formulating an exercise plan, it is essential to consider the patient’s specific health status and functional level to ensure the safety and suitability of the exercises, to prevent exercise-related injuries, and to ensure that the exercise does not exacerbate the patient’s sense of fatigue. Lastly, this study encourages collaboration among multidisciplinary teams to provide education on exercise interventions to patients and their families, helping them understand the benefits and potential risks associated with exercise, and offering psychological support to assist patients in dealing with the emotional and psychological challenges posed by ALS.

However, this study still has the following limitations. Firstly, most of the included studies did not explicitly report the methods of randomization and measures of allocation concealment, and most of the studies had subject dropouts, presenting a potential risk of bias. Secondly, the research on ALS function was affected by publication bias and sensitivity issues. Thirdly, there were relatively few studies included regarding WT, MIP, MEP, and PEF, thus further exploration of the impact of exercise intervention on ALS is warranted. Finally, due to the limitations in the number of original studies, this study has only conducted subgroup analyses based on exercise type and has not yet analyzed other factors such as intervention duration, duration of each intervention session, and participant demographics. Therefore, it is not possible to provide more precise evidence at this stage. We hope that future studies will expand the pool of original research and further supplement the evidence for exercise interventions in ALS.

5 Conclusion

Exercise interventions can improve function, increase WT distance and MEP in ALS patients. Of these, resistance exercise was the most effective intervention for function in ALS patients, and aerobic exercise was the most effective intervention for FVC in ALS patients. This study recommends that a comprehensive and effective treatment plan for ALS patients can be provided by integrating personalized exercise programs with professional multidisciplinary support. However, due to the small number of included studies and possible issues of heterogeneity, risk of bias and sensitivity, the effects of the exercise intervention ALS need to be further explored.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

SR: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. XC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SH: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. XF: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Investigation, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. PS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1499407/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Guo, YQ, Li, S, Zhang, HH, and Wu, YM. Advance in pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (review). Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. (2017) 23:685–9.

Google Scholar

2. Lei, Y, and Huang, X. Research advances in exercise therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Chin J Rehab Med. (2020) 35:238–43.

Google Scholar

3. Van Harten, ACM, Phatnani, H, and Przedborski, S. Non-cell-autonomous pathogenic mechanisms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Trends Neurosci. (2021) 44:658–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2021.04.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Cuffaro, F, Lamminpää, I, Niccolai, E, and Amedei, A. Nutritional and microbiota-based approaches in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: from prevention to treatment. Nutrients. (2024) 17:102. doi: 10.3390/nu17010102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Norris, SP, Likanje, MFN, and Andrews, JA. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis:update on clinical management. Curr Opin Neurol. (2020) 33:641–8. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000864

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Oh, J, An, J, Park, K, and Park, Y. Psychosocial interventions for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and motor neuron disease and their caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Nurs. (2024) 23:75. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01721-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Arti, AK, Singh, M, Arora, S, Dhiman, S, Satija, S, and Singh, TG. Pharmacotherapy of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an insight. Plant Arch. (2019) 19:1385–97.

Google Scholar

8. Tzeplaeff, L, Wilfling, S, Requardt, MV, and Herdick, M. Current state and future directions in the therapy of ALS. Cells. (2023) 12:1523. doi: 10.3390/cells12111523

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gordon, PH. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. CNS Drugs. (2011) 25:1–15. doi: 10.2165/11586000-000000000-00000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fenili, G, Scaricamazza, S, Ferri, A, Valle, C, and Paronetto, MP. Physical exercise in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a potential co-adjuvant therapeutic option to counteract disease progression. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2024) 12:1421566. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1421566

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Braga, ACM, Pinto, A, Pinto, S, and de Carvalho, M. The role of moderate aerobic exercise as determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in ALS. Neurol Res Int. (2018) 2018:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2018/8218697

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wijesekera, LC, and Nigel, LP. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2009) 4:1–22. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-4-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Zarei, S, Carr, K, Reiley, L, Diaz, K, Guerra, O, Altamirano, PF, et al. A comprehensive review of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Surg Neurol Int. (2015) 6:171. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.169561

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kilmer, DD. Response to resistive strengthening exercise training in humans with neuromuscular disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. (2002) 81:S121–6. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200211001-00013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhao, TT, and Ding, SZ. ALS, skeletal muscle ageing and exercise. J Tianjin Univ Sport. (2006) 26:329–32.

Google Scholar

16. Aitkens, SG, McCrory, MA, Kilmer, DD, and Bernauer, EM. Moderate resistance exercise program: its effect in slowly progressive neuromuscular disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1993) 74:711–5. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90031-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Milner-Brown, HS, and Miller, RG. Muscle strengthening through high-resistance weight training in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1988) 69:14–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

18. Francis, K, Bach, JR, and DeLisa, JA. Evaluation and rehabilitation of patients with adult motor neuron disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1999) 80:951–63. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90089-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhu, Y, Xu, Y, Xuan, R, Huang, J, István, B, Fekete, G, et al. Mixed comparison of different exercise interventions for function, respiratory, fatigue, and quality of life in adults with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. (2022) 14:919059. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.919059

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Rahmati, M, and Malakoutinia, F. Aerobic, resistance and combined exercise training for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. (2021) 113:12–28. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.04.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Meng, L, Li, X, Li, C, Tsang, RC, Chen, Y, Ge, Y, et al. Effects of exercise in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. (2020) 99:801–10. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001419

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement:an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. (2021) 88:105906–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Costantino, G, Montano, N, and Casazza, G. When should we change our clinical practice based on the results of a clinical study? Searching for evidence: PICOS and PubMed. Intern Emerg Med. (2015) 10:525–7. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1225-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Cumpston, M, Li, T, Page, MJ, Chandler, J, Welch, VA, Higgins, JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 10:ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Tarsilla, M. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. J Multidiscip Eval. (2010) 6:142–8. doi: 10.56645/jmde.v6i14.284

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Drory, VE, Goltsman, E, Reznik, JG, Mosek, A, and Korczyn, AD. The value of muscle exercise in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. (2001) 191:133–7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(01)00610-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Kalron, A, Mahameed, I, Weiss, I, Rosengarten, D, Balmor, GR, Heching, M, et al. Effects of a 12-week combined aerobic and strength training program in ambulatory patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. (2021) 268:1857–66. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10354-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Ferri, A, Lanfranconi, F, Corna, G, Bonazzi, R, Marchese, S, Magnoni, A, et al. Tailored exercise training counteracts muscle disuse and attenuates reductions in physical function in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:1537. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Cheah, BC, Boland, RA, Brodaty, NE, Zoing, MC, Jeffery, SE, McKenzie, DK, et al. INSPIRATIonAL–INSPIRAtory muscle training in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. (2009) 10:384–92. doi: 10.3109/17482960903082218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Plowman, EK, Watts, SA, Tabor, L, Robison, R, Gaziano, J, Domer, AS, et al. Impact of expiratory strength training in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. (2016) 54:48–53. doi: 10.1002/mus.24990

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bello-Haas, VD, Florence, JM, Kloos, AD, Scheirbecker, J, Lopate, G, Hayes, SM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of resistance exercise in individuals with ALS. Neurology. (2007) 68:2003–7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000264418.92308.a4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Merico, A, Cavinato, M, Gregorio, C, Lacatena, A, Gioia, E, Piccione, F, et al. Effects of combined endurance and resistance training in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a pilot, randomized, controlled study. Eur J Transl Myol. (2018) 28:7278. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7278

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Lunetta, C, Lizio, A, Sansone, VA, Cellotto, NM, Maestri, E, Bettinelli, M, et al. Strictly monitored exercise programs reduce motor deterioration in ALS: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. (2016) 263:52–60. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7924-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Pinto, S, Swash, M, and de Carvalho, M. Respiratory exercise in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. (2012) 13:33–43. doi: 10.3109/17482968.2011.626052

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Plowman, EK, Tabor-Gray, L, Rosado, KM, Vasilopoulos, T, Robison, R, Chapin, JL, et al. Impact of expiratory strength training in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: results of a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Muscle Nerve. (2019) 59:40–6. doi: 10.1002/mus.26292

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. van Groenestijn, AC, Schröder, CD, van Eijk, RP, Veldink, JH, Kruitwagen-van Reenen, ET, Groothuis, JT, et al. Aerobic exercise therapy in ambulatory patients with ALS: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2019) 33:153–64. doi: 10.1177/1545968319826051

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Shi, P, Li, CY, and Sun, JY. Effects of air pollutant exposure on lung function in exercisers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2022) 26:462–70. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202201_27871

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Lui, AJ, and Byl, NN. A systematic review of the effect of moderate intensity exercise on function and disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Phys Ther. (2009) 33:68–87. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31819912d0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Owens, DK, Lohr, KN, Atkins, D, Treadwell, JR, Reston, JT, Bass, EB, et al. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program. J Clin Epidemiol. (2010) 63:513–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Clawson, LL, Cudkowicz, M, Krivickas, L, Brooks, BR, Sanjak, M, Allred, P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of resistance and endurance exercise in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. (2018) 19:250–8. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2017.1404108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lo Coco, D, and La Bella, V. Fatigue, sleep, and nocturnal complaints in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. (2012) 19:760–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03637.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ferreira, GD, Costa, ACC, Plentz, RD, Coronel, CC, and Sbruzzi, G. Respiratory training improved ventilatory function and respiratory muscle strength in patients with multiple sclerosis and lateral amyotrophic sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. (2016) 102:221–8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.01.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lou, JS. Fatigue in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. (2008) 19:533–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2008.02.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. McElhiney, MC, Rabkin, JG, Gordon, PH, Goetz, R, and Mitsumoto, H. Prevalence of fatigue and depression in ALS patients and change over time. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2009) 80:1146–9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.163246

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Gibbons, C, Pagnini, F, Friede, T, and Young, CA. Treatment of fatigue in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018) 2018:CD011005–35. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011005.pub2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Li, QP, Han, BR, and Chen, X. Summary of the best evidence for exercise in frail older people. Chin Nurs Res. (2020) 34:1681–7.

Google Scholar

47. Cabanas-Valdés, R, Bagur-Calafat, C, Girabent-Farrés, M, Caballero-Gómez, FM, Hernández-Valiño, M, and Urrútia, CG. The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. (2016) 30:1024–33. doi: 10.1177/0269215515609414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Liu, Z, Hsu, FC, Trombetti, A, King, AC, Liu, CK, Manini, TM, et al. Effect of 24-month physical activity on cognitive frailty and the role of inflammation: the LIFE randomized clinical trial. BMC Med. (2018) 16:185–10. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1174-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Gong, MJ, Tan, SJ, Sun, YQ, Wu, Y, and Hu, XF. Meta-analysis of sleep architecture in adults with exercise intervention sleep disorders. J Capit Uni Phys Educ Sports. (2021) 33:276–84.

Google Scholar

50. Wei, DX. The relationship between tai chi exercise and mental health: a meta-analytic study. J Fujian Normal Univ. (2011) 27:111–6.

Google Scholar

51. Zhao, YF, Wo, CN, and Yu, MT. Current status of exercise interventions for physical pain during pregnancy. Chin J Modern Nurs. (2016) 22:2787–90.

Google Scholar

52. Shan, SH, Zhang, YL, Luo, YM, and Li, BH. Research advances in the care of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with respiratory impairment. Chin J Nurs. (2020) 55:1431–5.

Google Scholar

53. Onders, RP, Elmo, M, Kaplan, C, Katirji, B, and Schilz, R. Extended use of diaphragm pacing in patients with unilateral or bilateral diaphragm dysfunction: a new therapeutic option. Surgery. (2014) 156:776–86. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Rezania, K, Gottlieb, O, Guralnick, A, Prachand, V, Sweitzer, BJ, Vigneswaran, W, et al. Venous thromboembolism after diaphragm pacing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. (2014) 50:863–5. doi: 10.1002/mus.24420

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Eidenberger, M, and Nowotny, S. Inspiratory muscle training in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation. (2014) 35:349–61. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141148

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Tsitkanou, S, Della Gatta, PA, and Russell, AP. Skeletal muscle satellite cells, mitochondria, and MicroRNAs: their involvement in the pathogenesis of ALS. Front Physiol. (2016) 7:403–11. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Hashimoto, K, Hayashi, Y, Inuzuka, T, and Hozumi, I. Exercise induces metallothioneins in mouse spinal cord. Neuroscience. (2009) 163:244–51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.05.067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Kassa, RM, Bonafede, R, Boschi, F, Bentivoglio, M, and Mariotti, R. Effect of physical exercise and anabolic steroid treatment on spinal motoneurons and surrounding glia of wild-type and ALS mice. Brain Res. (2017) 1657:269–78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.12.029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar