You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 29 January 2026

Sec. Neurorehabilitation

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1708066

Urinary incontinence, core morphology and their impact on balance and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: an observational study

  • 1. Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Department of Physiotherapy, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain

  • 2. Fundación Esclerosis Múltiple de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Article metrics

View details

776

Views

55

Downloads

Abstract

Introduction Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic condition affecting the central nervous system, often leading to urinary incontinence (UI), balance disturbances, and fatigue. This study examines the relationship between UI, core muscle morphology, balance, and fatigue in patients with MS (PwMS) to inform rehabilitation strategies. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 27 PwMS (17 with UI and 10 without). Abdominal muscle thickness (transversus abdominis (TA), internal obliques, and external obliques) was assessed via ultrasound. UI-related Quality of Life was evaluated using questionnaires (ICIQ-SF and I-QOL), balance was assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and fatigue was measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). Results Significant correlations were observed between UI, TA thickness during contraction and balance with the TIS demonstrating greater sensitivity than the BBS. PwMS with UI exhibited reduced TA thickness and poorer scores in balance and fatigue, particularly in the cognitive subscale of the MFIS. Logistic regression revealed that the severity of UI predicts functional balance, with an overall model accuracy of 70.8%. Conclusions Core dysfunction may link UI, balance and fatigue in PwMS. Strengthening the TA and pelvic floor muscles should be a rehabilitation priority to improve UI, postural stability, and daily function.

Introduction

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, demyelinating, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease affecting the central nervous system (1). It is one of the leading causes of non-traumatic neurological disability in young adults aged 20 to 40 years. With a global prevalence exceeding 2.8 million individuals (2), its multifactorial aetiology involves genetic, immunological, and infectious factors (3). MS symptoms are diverse, affecting physical, cognitive, and emotional domains, significantly interfering with daily activities. Among these symptoms, fatigue, balance impairments, and urinary dysfunctions such as urgency, frequency, and urinary incontinence (UI) are particularly significant (4, 5). Urinary dysfunctions, including UI, affect approximately 60.4% of patients, with some cohorts reporting rates as high as 73.45% (6), making it one of the most frequent and debilitating complications.

Micturition control relies on a complex interaction between pelvic floor musculature and the passive stabilizing system, structures that also play a key role in postural control and respiration (7). The core, anatomically defined as a pressure cylindrical structure bounded by the diaphragm superiorly, the pelvic floor inferiorly, the deep abdominal muscles anteriorly, and the thoracolumbar fascia posteriorly, is essential for maintaining overall stability and functionality (8). In healthy individuals, a relationship has been described between pelvic floor dysfunction, including UI, and the activity of deep abdominal muscles (9, 10). The increase in intra-abdominal pressure through manoeuvres such as the Valsalva manoeuvre or coughing raises intra-abdominal pressure, which can lead to stress urinary incontinence, as well as gas or faecal incontinence, if the pelvic floor muscles are hypotonic and fail to provide retention. However, in the MS population, information regarding the connection between urinary dysfunction, core morphology, and its potential effects on balance and fatigue is limited (11, 12).

The evaluation of core morphology and its relationship with motor and urinary functions has been facilitated by the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging (USI). This non-invasive, high-precision technique enables detailed analysis of the deep abdominopelvic musculature, overcoming limitations of other measurement tools (13, 14). In this context, USI emerges as a key tool to explore how morphological changes in the core may contribute to UI and its functional repercussions in patient with MS (PwMS).

This study focuses on analyzing the relationships between UI, core morphology, balance and fatigue in PwMS, utilizing advanced tools such as musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging and specific functional scales. The results could provide relevant insights for designing comprehensive rehabilitation strategies aimed not only at improving urinary dysfunction but also optimizing postural control and reducing fatigue, thereby significantly enhancing the quality of life in this population.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in individuals with MS, adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki (15) and the Personal Data Protection and Digital Rights Guarantee Act (Organic Law 3/2018) (16). The study followed the methodological guidelines of Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (17) to ensure research quality. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Madrid (code: 24/024-E). Participants were recruited through the Madrid Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FEMM) and were thoroughly informed about the study.

Inclusion criteria included age between 18 and 70 years, a confirmed MS diagnosis based on 2017 McDonald’s criteria with disease progression of over 2 years, an EDSS score (18) between 2 and 7.5, stable medical treatment for at least 6 months, and no cognitive impairment (score ≥24 on the Mini-Mental Test) (19). Participants were required to present UI because of neurological impairment caused by MS. UI was identified using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form (ICIQ-SF) with any total score greater than 0 considered indicative of UI, in accordance with the original instrument guidance. Exclusion criteria were other neurological or musculoskeletal conditions, factors that could interfere with the study, UI preceding the MS diagnosis, or steroid treatment within the last 6 months. Participant recruitment and allocation are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart illustrating participant selection for a study. Thirty assessed for eligibility. Three excluded: one due to no confirmed diagnosis, two for comorbidities. Twenty-seven included, with seventeen having UI and ten without UI.

Flow diagram of participant recruitment and allocation. UI, Urinary incontinence.

Variables included age, weight, and height as independent variables. Dependent variables included UI-related quality of life, assessed using the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) and ICIQ-SF. The I-QOL is a self-reported, 22-item questionnaire measuring the impact of incontinence on a 0–100 scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (20). The ICIQ-SF assesses the severity of incontinence through three symptom-related items (frequency, amount of leakage and overall impact) and an additional question identifying situations of urine leakage (e.g., coughing or sneezing, physical activity, sudden urgency, or no obvious reason). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity (21).

Balance was evaluated using the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The TIS has a maximum score of 23 and assesses seated trunk control and segmental stability making it particularly suitable for detecting postural impairments in functional sitting positions. It comprises three subscales: static balance (TIS-ST), dynamic balance (TIS-DYN), and coordination (TIS-COOR) with higher scores indicating better postural stability (22). The BBS consists of 14 items with a total score of 56, evaluating functional balance in a standing position, with higher scores reflecting better balance (23). The use of both scales enabled the capture of complementary aspects of postural control: segmental trunk performance and overall standing balance.

Fatigue was measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), a 21-item scale providing total and subscale scores across physical, cognitive, and psychosocial domains, where higher values indicate greater fatigue impact (24).

Baseline descriptive data were recorded to classify participants into groups with and without UI. Questionnaires, ultrasound measurements, and balance and fatigue tests were all completed in a single 40-min session during routine treatment visits at FEMM.

Core muscle morphology was assessed using a portable VSCAN® ultrasound device (GE Healthcare). Participants were positioned supine with comfortable hip and knee flexion. Generous gel was applied to minimize transducer pressure, and a high-frequency linear transducer was oriented transversely at the umbilical zone to visualize external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and transversus abdominis (TA). Images were acquired at relaxed end-expiration when feasible, applying minimal probe pressure. Measurements included the thickness of TA, IO, and EO at rest and during contraction (25). All scans were performed by a single trained examiner following Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) standards to minimize measurement bias. For each condition, three measurements were obtained and averaged to ensure accuracy (26–29) (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

Four ultrasound images of the abdomen display muscle layers labeled as EO (External Oblique), IO (Internal Oblique), TrA (Transversus Abdominis), and RA (Rectus Abdominis). Yellow lines and asterisks highlight specific areas or references. Adjacent is a photo of an abdomen marked with yellow lines pointing to various parts, providing a contextual correlation with the ultrasound images.

Ultrasound protocol for the evaluation of the anterolateral abdominal wall. Probe positioning for ultrasound assessment of the anterolateral abdominal wall (A). The umbilical line, marked with a yellow arrow (→), is used as the reference for locating the lateral abdominal muscles and rectus abdominis, indicated on the skin with rectangles (▭), stars (*), and a horizontal yellow line (—). (B,C) show rest and contraction images of the lateral muscles, while (D,E) illustrate the same conditions for the rectus abdominis. EO, external oblique; IO, internal oblique; TrA, transversus abdominis; RA, rectus abdominis.

Statistical analysis

For the statistical analysis, a comparison of the studied variables was conducted between PwMS who presented UI and those who did not. As the data did not follow a normal distribution, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. Spearman’s correlation was applied to evaluate the relationships between UI, core morphology, balance, and fatigue. Following Hopkins et al. (30), the following levels of correlation were established: trivial (r < 0.1), low (r ≥ 0.1 < 0.3), moderate (r ≥ 0.3 < 0.5), high (r ≥ 0.5 < 0.7), very high (r ≥ 0.7 < 0.9), and nearly perfect (r ≥ 0.9). A statistical significance level of p < 0.05 was considered.

To analyze the relationship between the severity of UI and postural balance, a binary logistic regression was performed. Functional balance, assessed with the BBS, was categorized as “low functional balance” (scores ≤45) or “good functional balance” (scores >45) (31). The predictor variable was the score obtained on the ICIQ-SF. The enter method was used, with entry and removal criteria set at 0.05 and 0.10, respectively. The model’s ability to correctly classify cases was evaluated using the classification table, the χ2 statistic for model coefficients, and pseudo-R2 values (32).

To ensure adequate precision in the results, the sample size was calculated using GRANMO© software. A sample of 29 participants was required to achieve a significance level of 0.05 and a statistical power greater than 0.8, assuming a correlation coefficient of 0.5.

Results

A total of 27 were included in the study. Data were collected on age, sex, weight, height, and type of MS. Seventeen reported having stress incontinence and 10 did not have incontinence. The sociodemographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Variable No incontinence (n = 10) Incontinence (n = 17) p-value
x̅ ± SD x̅ ± SD
Age (years) 50.70 ± 8.99 45.94 ± 12.03 0.280
Weight (kg) 73.95 ± 9.30 70.24 ± 15.46 0.513
Height (cm) 173.20 ± 8.04 168.71 ± 7.89 0.174
Sex (M/F) 4/6 6/11 1.000
MS Type 0.568
Relapsing–remitting 8 12
Secondary progressive 0 2
Primary progressive 2 3

Demographic and clinical characteristics by urinary incontinence status.

Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables are expressed as absolute frequencies. p-values correspond to Mann–Whitney U test (continuous variables), Fisher’s exact test (Sex), and Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test (MS Type). UI, urinary incontinence; MS, Multiple Sclerosis; M, male; F, female; x̅, Mean; SD, standard deviation.

The relationship between the two UI quality-of-life questionnaires (ICIQ-SF and I-QOL) and the balance and fatigue scales was analyzed. The ICIQ-SF demonstrated a very high correlation with the TIS-ST score and a high correlation with the global TIS score and TIS-COOR. A moderate correlation was found with TIS-DYN and the BBS. The I-QOL showed a high correlation with the TIS and TIS-ST, and a moderate correlation with TIS-DYN; however, no significant correlation was observed with the BBS or TIS-COOR.

Regarding fatigue, the ICIQ-SF demonstrated a high correlation with overall fatigue as well as with the cognitive subscale of the MFIS, and a moderate correlation with the physical subscale of the MFIS. The I-QOL showed a moderate correlation with the MFIS and its physical subscale, and a high correlation with the cognitive subscale of the MFIS.

When analyzing correlations by subgroups based on the presence or absence of UI, the TIS, TIS-ST, and TIS-DYN showed high to very high correlations with the ICIQ-SF in the group of patients with incontinence. No significant correlations were found in the continent group. These results are presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Group Measure TIS-ST r (p) TIS-DYN r (p) TIS-COOR r (p) BBS r (p) MFIS-total r (p) MFIS-physical r (p) MFIS-cognitive r (p) MFIS-psychosocial r (p)
TOTAL ICIQ-SF −0.63 (p < 0.001) −0.73 (p < 0.001) −0.49 (p = 0.01) −0.54 (p = 0.01) −0.48 (p = 0.02) 0.52 (p = 0.01) 0.49 (p = 0.01) 0.51 (p = 0.01)
TOTAL I-QOL 0.62 (p = 0.001) 0.64 (p < 0.001) −0.47 (p = 0.02) 0.39 (p = 0.63) 0.36 (p = 0.88) −0.45 (p = 0.03) −0.31 (p = 0.01) −0.57 (p = 0.003)
PwMS with UI ICIQ-SF −0.58 (p = 0.01) −0.64 (p = 0.01) −0.46 (p = 0.01) −0.45 (p = 0.07) −0.21 (p = 0.42) 0.44 (p = 0.07) 0.51 (p = 0.04) 0.27 (p = 0.29)
PwMS with UI I-QOL 0.44 (p = 0.07) 0.45 (p = 0.07) 0.31 (p = 0.22) 0.19 (p = 0.46) 0.18 (p = 0.49) −0.45 (p = 0.07) −0.33 (p = 0.19) −0.42 (p = 0.10)
PwMS without UI ICIQ-SF −0.15 (p = 0.68) 0.00 (p = 1.00) −0.13 (p = 0.71) 0.10 (p = 0.78) −0.27 (p = 0.45) 0.32 (p = 0.36) 0.34 (p = 0.34) 0.25 (p = 0.48)
PwMS without UI I-QOL −0.20 (p = 0.57) −0.12 (p = 0.75) −0.40 (p = 0.25) −0.04 (p = 0.92) 0.53 (p = 0.11) 0.49 (p = 0.15) −0.31 (p = 0.01) 0.18 (p = 0.62)

Relationship between incontinence-related quality of life, balance, and fatigue.

TIS, Trunk Impairment Scale; TIS-ST: Trunk Impairment Scale – Static subscale; TIS-DYN, Trunk Impairment Scale – Dynamic subscale; TIS-COOR, Trunk Impairment Scale – Coordination subscale; BBS, Berg Balance Scale; MFIS, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; MFIS-Total, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale—Total score; MFIS-Physical, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale—Physical subscale; MFIS-Cognitive, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale—Cognitive subscale; MFIS-Psychosocial, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale – Psychosocial subscale; ICIQ, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form; I-QOL, Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire; PwMS with UI, patient with Multiple sclerosis with Urinary Incontinence; PwMS without UI, patient with Multiple sclerosis without Urinary Incontinence; p, p-value. Bold values indicate statistical significance, which was set at p < 0.05.

The relationship between abdominal muscle thickness, measured via ultrasound, and UI-related quality of life was also analyzed. A high correlation was found between the thickness of the IO during contraction and the ICIQ-SF score, and a moderate correlation was observed with IO thickness at rest. A moderate correlation was also established between the ICIQ-SF score and the TA thickness at rest. However, no significant correlation was found with the TA thickness during contraction or with the EO thickness at rest or during contraction. The I-QOL showed a moderate correlation only with EO thickness at rest.

As shown in Table 3, when dividing participants into groups based on the presence or absence of incontinence, a very high correlation was found in the contraction of the TA measured via ultrasound. Specifically, a greater thickness of the TA during contraction was strongly correlated with fewer incontinence symptoms.

Table 3

Group Measure TA-REST r (p) IO-REST r (p) EO-REST r (p) TA-CONT r (p) IO-CONT r (p) EO-CONT r (p)
TOTAL ICIQ-SF −0.380 (p = 0.06) −0.428 (p = 0.03) −0.226 (p = 0.27) 0.033 (p = 0.877) −0.504 (p = 0.01) −0.234 (p = 0.231)
TOTAL I-QOL 0.283 (p = 0.17) 0.247 (p = 0.23) 0.348 (p = 0.08) −0.043 (p = 0.83) 0.341 (p = 0.09) 0.258 (p = 0.21)
PwMS with UI ICIQ-SF −0.164 (p = 0.528) −0.311 (p = 0.224) 0.012 (p = 0.964) −0.577 (p = 0.015) −0.049 (p = 0.850) 0.144 (p = 0.581)
PwMS with UI I-QOL −0.273 (p = 0.445) −0.102 (p = 0.779) −0.110 (p = 0.763) −0.124 (p = 0.732) −0.285 (p = 0.424) −0.221 (p = 0.539)
PwMS without UI ICIQ-SF −0.015 (p = 0.953) −0.071 (p = 0.785) −0.169 (p = 0.517) 0.394 (p = 0.118) −0.344 (p = 0.176) −0.251 (p = 0.331)
PwMS without UI I-QOL −0.303 (p = 0.396) −0.370 (p = 0.292) −0.144 (p = 0.692) −0.288 (p = 0.420) −0.514 (p = 0.128) −0.069 (p = 0.851)

Relationship between incontinence-related quality of life and abdominal muscle thickness.

TA-REST, Transversus abdominis at rest; IO-REST, Internal oblique at rest; EO-REST, External oblique at rest; TA-CONT, Transversus abdominis during contraction; IO-CONT, Internal oblique during contraction; EO-CONT, External oblique during contraction; ICIQ-SF, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form; I-QOL, Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire; PwMS with UI, patient with Multiple sclerosis with Urinary Incontinence; PwMS without UI, patient with Multiple Sclerosis without Urinary Incontinence; p, p-value. Bold values indicate statistical significance, which was set at p < 0.05.

Table 4 shows the results of the comparison of all variables conducted between the group of patients with incontinence and those without using the Mann–Whitney U test. The results indicate that PwMS who experience incontinence exhibit higher levels of fatigue, reflected in the overall MFIS score and the cognitive subscale. They also demonstrate poorer balance, as measured by the BBS, and reduced muscle thickness (in mm) in the TA at rest and the IO at rest.

Table 4

Variable Median (IQR)–PwMS without UI Median (IQR)–PwMS with UI Mann–Whitney U p-value
MFIS-total 40 (13) 50 (25) 44.000 p = 0.039
MFIS-physical 27 (9.25) 30 (9.5) 59.500 p = 0.199
MFIS-cognitive 11 (9.25) 18 (15) 37.500 p = 0.017
MFIS-psychosocial 3.5 (3.25) 5 (4.5) 66.000 p = 0.335
TIS-total 14.5 (4) 12 (6) 58.000 p = 0.171
TIS-ST 4 (1) 3 (1.5) 53.000 p = 0.083
TIS-DYN 7 (1.25) 6 (3) 67.500 p = 0.366
TIS-COOR 4 (1.25) 3 (2) 61.000 p = 0.191
BBS 46 (8.5) 40 (10) 38.500 p = 0.019
TA-REST 0.325 (0.17) 0.200 (0.14) 39.000 p = 0.021
IO-REST 0.750 (0.43) 0.480 (0.20) 37.500 p = 0.017
EO-REST 0.385 (0.53) 0.350 (0.30) 62.500 p = 0.258
TA-CONT 0.430 (0.24) 0.320 (0.32) 61.000 p = 0.228
IO-CONT 0.865 (0.70) 0.780 (0.34) 52.500 p = 0.103
EO-CONT 0.490 (0.50) 0.400 (0.38) 71.000 p = 0.482

Comparison between results of PwMS with and without UI expressed as median (interquartile range).

MFIS, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; MFIS-Total, Total score; MFIS-Physical, Physical subscale; MFIS-Cognitive, Cognitive subscale; MFIS-Psychosocial, Psychosocial subscale; TIS, Trunk Impairment Scale; TIS-ST, Static subscale; TIS-DYN, Dynamic subscale; TIS-COOR, Coordination subscale; BBS, Berg Balance Scale; TA-REST, Transversus abdominis at rest; IO-REST, Internal oblique at rest; EO-REST, External oblique at rest; TA-CONT, Transversus abdominis during contraction; IO-CONT, Internal oblique during contraction; thickness of muscles measured in mm; EO-CONT, External oblique during contraction; IQR, interquartile range; PwMS with UI, patient with Multiple sclerosis with Urinary Incontinence; PwMS without UI, patient with Multiple Sclerosis without Urinary Incontinence; p, p-value. Bold values indicate statistical significance, which was set at p < 0.05.

A binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate whether the score on the ICIQ-SF predicts functional balance. BBS was dichotomized, the 45-point threshold corresponds to the original and most widely used cut-off for identifying increased fall risk in the BBS (23, 33), although it is not specific to MS. As shown in Table 5, the model indicated that the ICIQ-SF had a marginally significant inverse relationship with the likelihood of achieving good functional balance (B = −0.183, p = 0.054, Exp(B) = 0.833). The overall predictive capacity of the model was 70.8% (χ2 = 4.574, p = 0.032), with pseudo-R2 values indicating a moderate contribution of the ICIQ-SF. These results suggest that the severity of UI may influence postural balance, although other factors should also be considered.

Table 5

Variable B SE Wald df p Exp(B) 95% CI for Exp(B)
ICIQ-SF −0.18 0.10 3.71 1 p = 0.054 0.83 [0.69, 1.01]
BBS 0.84 0.72 1.37 1 p = 0.241 2.32

Binary logistic regression to evaluate ICIQ-SF as a predictor of balance.

ICIQ-SF, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form; BBS, Berg Balance Scale; B, regression coefficient; SE, standard error; Wald, Wald statistic; df, degrees of freedom; p, p-value; Exp(B), odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Discussion

In this study, 27 PwMS were evaluated, 17 of whom presented with stress UI. The results indicate that UI-related quality of life, assessed using the ICIQ-SF and I-QOL questionnaires, was significantly correlated with balance (TIS, BBS) and fatigue (MFIS) scales. Specifically, the ICIQ-SF showed a high correlation with balance and fatigue scores in the incontinent group, suggesting that this condition may be associated with greater postural control impairments and higher fatigue levels. Additionally, the analysis of TA muscle thickness during contraction revealed a negative correlation with ICIQ scores in PwMS with UI, emphasizing the importance of this muscle in postural control and incontinence severity.

Pelvic floor strengthening, including the TA, has been shown to effectively improve UI (34, 35). Its thickness during contraction appears to be more closely related to UI severity than other core muscles (36). The findings of the present study reinforce the hypothesis that core weakness may serve as a link between UI, fatigue, and balance (37). Moreover, the lack of a significant relationship between UI and EO thickness highlights the importance of targeting specific muscles in intervention strategies (34–36).

Regarding balance, patients with UI scored lower on the BBS, consistent with previous studies, such as that by Soll et al. (12), which reported an increased risk of falls in this population. However, the relationship between UI and postural control was captured more precisely by the TIS, which showed a significant correlation with the ICIQ-SF, particularly in the static balance subscale (−0.725). This suggests that the TIS, with its focus on segmental trunk control in functional positions, is more sensitive in detecting postural impairments related to incontinence than the BBS (38, 39), which evaluates global balance. Furthermore, the significant correlation between the TIS and the ICIQ-SF was observed only in the incontinent group, suggesting that these patients face greater challenges in activities requiring postural stability, such as position changes or daily tasks (40).

In contrast, the correlations between the I-QOL and the balance and fatigue scales were lower compared to the ICIQ-SF. This may be attributed to the I-QOL measuring the impact of incontinence on quality of life, which is influenced by multiple factors such as lower limb functionality (41) and the ability to perform transfers (42), whereas the ICIQ-SF directly assesses incontinence severity (43). This finding underscores that the core’s impact is more directly reflected in symptom severity than in the overall perception of quality of life.

The logistic regression analysis indicated that the severity of UI, as measured by the ICIQ-SF, could be a significant predictor of functional balance, as evaluated by the BBS. This result suggests that interventions aimed at improving core musculature and reducing incontinence symptoms could positively impact the functional balance of patients with MS, although further studies are required to confirm this relationship (12, 44).

This study offers relevant findings but presents several limitations. First, although the sample size calculation indicated 29 participants, only 27 were analyzed, slightly reducing statistical power, especially for subgroup correlations. However, observed effect sizes suggest a modest impact on primary associations. Second, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference; longitudinal studies are needed for stronger evidence. Third, multiple correlations were explored without formal multiplicity correction due to the study’s exploratory nature and limited sample, so marginal p-values should be interpreted cautiously. Similarly, logistic regression results are limited by BBS dichotomization and small sample size, which restricted model stability and adjustment for confounders.

The cohort included different MS phenotypes, introducing heterogeneity. Analyses were not stratified to preserve power, larger cohorts are proposed to address this. Additionally, potential confounders (physical activity, BMI, disease duration, spasticity, medication) were not recorded or adjusted for, despite their known influence on fatigue, balance, and urinary symptoms. Larger, stratified cohorts and multivariable models are recommended to confirm and refine these preliminary associations.

In conclusion, these findings highlight the importance of core musculature, particularly the TA, in the relationship between UI, balance, and quality of life in patients with MS. Targeted interventions focusing on TA and pelvic floor strengthening could not only improve incontinence symptoms but also enhance postural stability and functionality in this population, offering a promising therapeutic approach.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Madrid. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

CE-B: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, Methodology. LG-R: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. C-BQ-E: Resources, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation. J-MT-T: Resources, Writing – original draft, Validation, Investigation. MC-S: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Software, Data curation. JL-R: Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. MP-S: Supervision, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1708066/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.

    Amatya B Khan F Galea M . Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 1:CD012732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012732.pub2,

  • 2.

    Walton C King R Rechtman L Kaye W Leray E Marrie RA et al . Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: insights from the atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler. (2020) 26:181621. doi: 10.1177/1352458520970841,

  • 3.

    Ömerhoca S Akkaş S İçen N . Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. (2018) 55:S19. doi: 10.29399/npa.23418

  • 4.

    Sanchez-Ruiz R de la Plaza San Frutos M Sosa-Reina M Sanz-Esteban I García-Arrabé M Estrada-Barranco C . Associations between respiratory function, balance, postural control, and fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis: an observational study. Front Public Health. (2024) 12:1332417. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332417

  • 5.

    Aguilar-Zafra S Del Corral T Montero-González N de-Gabriel-Hierro A López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I . Urinary incontinence and impaired physical function are associated with expiratory muscle weakness in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. (2022) 44:35319. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1867908,

  • 6.

    Khalaf K Coyne K Globe D Armstrong E Malone D Burks J . Lower urinary tract symptom prevalence and management among patients with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. (2015) 17:1425. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2013-040,

  • 7.

    Hodges P Sapsford R Pengel L . Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol Urodyn. (2007) 26:36271. doi: 10.1002/nau.20232,

  • 8.

    Bergmark A . Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. (1989) 230:154. doi: 10.3109/17453678909154177,

  • 9.

    Ghroubi S Jelassi O Abidi S Trabelsi E Ben Ayed H Chlif M . Association between isokinetic abdominal muscle strength, pelvic floor muscle strength and stress urinary incontinence severity. Prog Urol. (2022) 32:72734. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.04.005,

  • 10.

    Madill S McLean L . Relationship between abdominal and pelvic floor muscle activation and intravaginal pressure during pelvic floor muscle contractions in healthy continent women. Neurourol Urodyn. (2006) 25:72230. doi: 10.1002/nau.20285,

  • 11.

    Milinis K Young C . Systematic review of the influence of spasticity on quality of life in adults with chronic neurological conditions. Disabil Rehabil. (2016) 38:143141. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1106592,

  • 12.

    Soll R Greenberg T Dolev M Kalron A . The association between bladder dysfunction, balance and falls in women with multiple sclerosis: the specific contribution of fear of falling. Gait Posture. (2021) 88:2527. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.06.010,

  • 13.

    Romero-Morales C de la Cueva-Reguera M Miñambres-Vallejo B Ruiz-Ruiz B Calvo-Lobo C Casado-Hernández I . Ultrasound assessment of the abdominal wall muscles in women with and without primary dysmenorrhea: a cross-sectional study. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). (2020) 10:166. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10030166,

  • 14.

    Koppenhaver S Hebert J Fritz J Parent E Teyhen D Magel J . Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2009) 90:8794. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.022,

  • 15.

    World Medical Association . Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. (2013) 310:21914. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053

  • 16.

    Reino de España . Ley Orgánica 3/2018, de 5 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos Personales y garantía de los derechos digitales. Boletín Oficial del Estado. (2018):119551857.

  • 17.

    von Elm E Altman D Egger M Pocock S Gøtzsche P Vandenbroucke J . The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Rev Esp Salud Publica. (2008) 82:2519. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

  • 18.

    Kurtzke J . Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. (1983) 33:144452.

  • 19.

    Folstein M Folstein S McHugh P . «Mini-mental state». A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. (1975) 12:18998.

  • 20.

    Wagner T Patrick D Bavendam T Martin M Buesching D . Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology. (1996) 47:6771; discussion 71-72. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80384-7,

  • 21.

    Avery K Donovan J Peters T Shaw C Gotoh M Abrams P . ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. (2004) 23:32230. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041,

  • 22.

    Verheyden G Nieuwboer A Mertin J Preger R Kiekens C De Weerdt W . The trunk impairment scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil. (2004) 18:32634. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr733oa,

  • 23.

    Berg K Wood-Dauphinee S Williams J Maki B . Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. (1992) 83:S7S11.

  • 24.

    Fisk J Ritvo P Ross L Haase D Marrie T Schlech W . Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. Clin Infect Dis. (1994) 18:S7983. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S79

  • 25.

    Nabavi N Mosallanezhad Z Haghighatkhah H Mohseni Bandpeid M . Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasonography to measure transverse abdominis and multifidus muscle dimensions. Iran J Radiol. (2014) 11:e21008. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.21008,

  • 26.

    Whittaker J Thompson J Teyhen D Hodges P . Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of pelvic floor muscle function. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. (2007) 37:48798. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2548,

  • 27.

    Colby Mangum L Henderson K Murray K Saliba S . Ultrasound assessment of the transverse abdominis during functional movement. J Ultrasound Med. (2018) 37:12251231. doi: 10.1002/jum.14466

  • 28.

    Dietz H . Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2004) 23:61525. doi: 10.1002/uog.1072,

  • 29.

    Peng Q Jones R Shishido K Constantinou C . Ultrasound evaluation of dynamic responses of female pelvic floor muscles. Ultrasound Med Biol. (2007) 33:34252. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.08.020,

  • 30.

    Hopkins WG Marshall SW Batterham AM Hanin J . Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2009) 41:313. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278,

  • 31.

    Doğan A Mengüllüoğlu M Özgirgin N . Evaluation of the effect of ankle-foot orthosis use on balance and mobility in hemiparetic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. (2011) 33:14339. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.533243,

  • 32.

    Nagelkerke N . A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. (1991) 78:6912.

  • 33.

    Lima CA Ricci NA Nogueira EC Perracini MR . The Berg balance scale as a clinical screening tool to predict fall risk in older adults: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. (2018) 104:38394. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.02.002,

  • 34.

    Sapouna V Thanopoulou S Papriakas D Papakosta S Sakopoulou M Zachariou D et al . Pelvic floor muscle training and its benefits for multiple sclerosis patients suffering from urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Cureus. (2023) 15:e47086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47086,

  • 35.

    Altunan B Gundogdu AA Ozcaglayan TIK Unal A Turgut N . The effect of pelvic floor exercise program on incontinence and sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients. Int Urol Nephrol. (2021) 53:105965. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02804-y,

  • 36.

    Tajiri K Huo M Maruyama H . Effects of co-contraction of both transverse abdominal muscle and pelvic floor muscle exercises for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. (2014) 26:11613. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1161,

  • 37.

    Jaekel AK Watzek J Nielsen J Butscher AL Zöhrer P Schmitz F et al . Neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms, fatigue, and depression—are there correlations in persons with multiple sclerosis?Biomedicine. (2023) 11:2193. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082193,

  • 38.

    Verheyden G Nieuwboer A De Wit L Feys H Schuback B Baert I et al . Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2007) 78:6948. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.101642,

  • 39.

    Monticone M Ambrosini E Verheyden G Brivio F Brunati R Longoni L et al . Development of the Italian version of the trunk impairment scale in subjects with acute and chronic stroke. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Disabil Rehabil. (2019) 41:6673. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1373409,

  • 40.

    Yates A . Continence issues in individuals living with multiple sclerosis. Br J Nurs. (2021) 30:7004. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.12.700,

  • 41.

    Abakay H Doğan H Yetkin M Güç A Talay Çaltekin H Demir ÇM . The effects of incontinence on functionality, disability, and quality of life in male and female patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2022) 66:104010. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104010

  • 42.

    Yıldız N Akkoç Y Ersöz M Gündüz B Erhan B Yesil H et al . Cross-sectional study of urinary problems in adults with cerebral palsy: awareness and impact on the quality of life. Neurol Sci. (2017) 38:1193203. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2948-z

  • 43.

    van de Vaart H Falconer C Quail D Timlin L Manning M Tincello D et al . Patient reported outcomes tools in an observational study of female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. (2010) 29:34853. doi: 10.1002/nau.20722,

  • 44.

    Finlayson ML Peterson EW Cho CC . Risk factors for falling among people aged 45 to 90 years with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2006) 87:12749. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.002

Summary

Keywords

balance, core muscle morphology, fatigue, multiple sclerosis, urinary incontinence

Citation

Estrada-Barranco C, García-Ruano L, Quilca-Esparza C-B, Tito-Torres J-M, Castel-Sánchez M, López-Ruiz J and de la Plaza-San Frutos M (2026) Urinary incontinence, core morphology and their impact on balance and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: an observational study. Front. Neurol. 17:1708066. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1708066

Received

18 September 2025

Revised

09 January 2026

Accepted

15 January 2026

Published

29 January 2026

Volume

17 - 2026

Edited by

Cancheng Li, Beihang University, China

Reviewed by

Pelin Vural, Istanbul Medipol University, Türkiye

Shanshan Qu, Peking University Sixth Hospital, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Javier López-Ruiz,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics