Skip to main content


Front. Neurosci., 31 March 2016
Sec. Neuroendocrine Science
Volume 10 - 2016 |

Electrophysiology of Hypothalamic Magnocellular Neurons In vitro: A Rhythmic Drive in Organotypic Cultures and Acute Slices

  • 1U1215, Neurocentre Magendie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Bordeaux, France
  • 2Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

Hypothalamic neurohormones are released in a pulsatile manner. The mechanisms of this pulsatility remain poorly understood and several hypotheses are available, depending upon the neuroendocrine system considered. Among these systems, hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal magnocellular neurons have been early-considered models, as they typically display an electrical activity consisting of bursts of action potentials that is optimal for the release of boluses of the neurohormones oxytocin and vasopressin. The cellular mechanisms underlying this bursting behavior have been studied in vitro, using either acute slices of the adult hypothalamus, or organotypic cultures of neonatal hypothalamic tissue. We have recently proposed, from experiments in organotypic cultures, that specific central pattern generator networks, upstream of magnocellular neurons, determine their bursting activity. Here, we have tested whether a similar hypothesis can be derived from in vitro experiments in acute slices of the adult hypothalamus. To this aim we have screened our electrophysiological recordings of the magnocellular neurons, previously obtained from acute slices, with an analysis of autocorrelation of action potentials to detect a rhythmic drive as we recently did for organotypic cultures. This confirmed that the bursting behavior of magnocellular neurons is governed by central pattern generator networks whose rhythmic drive, and thus probably integrity, is however less satisfactorily preserved in the acute slices from adult brains.


The neurohypophyseal release of oxytocin (OT) and vasopressin (VP) by magnocellular neurons of the paraventricular and supraoptic (SON) nuclei is best achieved by action potentials (APs) emitted in bursts. This allows the secretion of a bolus of bioactive product (Poulain and Wakerley, 1982) and prevents secretory fatigue associated with continuous firing (Ingram et al., 1982). This feature made the magnocellular neuron system a remarkable model to study the mechanisms of stimulus-secretion coupling (Nordmann, 1983). A wealth of electrophysiological works (Brown et al., 2013) questioned the underlying mechanisms of the bursting activity displayed by the OT (high frequency bursts (HFBs) of APs) and the VP (phasic activity) neurons. These activities were alternatively attributed either to some intrinsic properties of these neurons, or to their synaptic afferent control.

Concerning the involvement of intrinsic properties of these neurons, it was suggested that the depolarizing after-potential (DAP) leads to sustained AP discharges in VP neurons (Andrew and Dudek, 1983; Armstrong et al., 1994; Ghamari-Langroudi and Bourque, 1998) while it sustains brief spike discharges in OT neurons (Armstrong and Stern, 1998). It was also suggested in OT neurons that the after-hyperpolarization (AHP) limits the firing of high frequency discharges (Teruyama and Armstrong, 2005), and that the hyper polarizing after-potential (HAP) generates a spike frequency adaptation (Israel and Poulain, 2000). Finally, we showed that some OT neurons display a low-threshold activated calcium current, presumably a T-current, responsible for the post-inhibitory rebounds triggering APs, and therefore up-regulating bursting activity in these neurons (Israel et al., 2008). A detailed account of the contributions of intrinsic properties to the bursting activity is available elsewhere (Armstrong et al., 2010).

Concerning the involvement of the synaptic afferent control in the generation of the bursting activity in magnocellular neurons, a detailed analysis at single-cell level was required, and in vitro models were preferred, and above all, the freshly prepared (acute) slices of the rat hypothalamus. Unfortunately, HFBs were only exceptionally observed in the OT neurons from acute slices (Israel and Poulain, 2015). This is not entirely surprising because these HFBs, triggering the release of OT for the milk-ejection reflex (Poulain and Wakerley, 1982; Brown et al., 2013), are provoked by the continuous suckling itself relayed to the OT neurons by sensory afferents that are inevitably severed when preparing acute hypothalamic slices.

In parallel to using the acute slice model (Israel and Poulain, 2000), we have therefore also explored another in vitro model, the organotypic culture of hypothalamic slices obtained from newborn rats (Gähwiler et al., 1978; Jourdain et al., 1996, 1998; Israel et al., 2010). In this model, which includes the SON and its adjacent areas, the OT and the VP neurons remain connected to their local intrahypothalamic regulatory networks allowing them to have an electrical activity similar to that seen in vivo (Israel and Poulain, 2015). Especially, OT neurons spontaneously display the coordinated HFBs of APs that are typically triggered by suckling in the adult lactating female rat, suggesting the existence and/or survival of a local glutamatergic burst-generator network in the organotypic culture (Jourdain et al., 1998). We very recently (Israel et al., 2014) provided evidence that this in vitro activity is physiological, due to a female-specific central pattern generator (CPG) whose rhythmic drive is visible when the raw electrophysiological recordings of the OT neurons are subjected to an autocorrelation analysis of the APs (AAA).

To further validate the hypothesis of a CPG drive of magnocellular neurons, as observed in cultured neonatal tissue, we have here reanalyzed using AAA our previous recordings obtained from the OT and the VP neurons in the model of the acute slice of adult hypothalamus. In parallel, we have also analyzed additional recordings from organotypic cultures. We confirm the hypothesis of a CPG drive in the acute slice model. However, in our hands, OT and VP neurons often appear disconnected from their respective CPGs in acute hypothalamic slices, whereas this connection generally appears preserved in the organotypic culture model. This paves the way to further in vivo explorations of cellular mechanisms of neuroendocrine pulsatility.

Materials and Methods


Timed-pregnant, 10- to 12-week old, female Wistar rats (C.E.R.J., Le Genest Saint Isle, France) were received at G16 and housed in our animal facility (lights on from 0730–1930). Animals from acknowledged parturitions were used. The day of birth was designated lactational/postnatal day 1 (L1/P1), and litters were adjusted to 10 pups on L2/P2. For the acute slice experiments the dams were used at L5 or L21. For the organotypic culture experiments, female pups were used on P5, P7, P9, or P12. All efforts were made to reduce the number of animals used and any distress caused by the procedures, in strict compliance with the European Union recommendations (2010/63/EU) and as approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (authorization number A33-063-090) and the local ethical committee of Bordeaux University.

Acute Slices

As detailed previously (Israel and Poulain, 2000), dams on L5 or L21 were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane and decapitated. The brain was quickly dissected out and immersed in ice-cold oxygenated (95% O2–5% CO2) perfusion medium for 1 min. The composition of the perfusion medium was as follows (in mM): 125 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.24 MgSO4, 1.3 KH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, and 11 glucose. The brain was then blocked into a cube containing the bilateral hypothalamus, thalamus and medial amygdalae, the cube was fixed with cyanoacrylate glue on the top of the holder of a vibroslicer (MacIlwain; Campden Instruments, Lafayette, IN, USA) and three coronal slices (400 μm-thick) were cut and transferred onto a filter paper (optic lens neutral cleaner) in contact with a ramp-style interface recording chamber. The medium was perfused using a peristaltic pump (Gibson, Lexington, KY, USA) at a rate of 1 ml min−1 and at constant temperature (32 ± 0.5°C). The slices were kept oxygenated with humidified 95% O2–5% CO2. The electrophysiological session started following a 1.5 h-long equilibration period. The microelectrode was positioned into the SON with a micromanipulator (Microcontrôle) under visual control using a dissecting microscope. The electrode was lowered in 1 μm with a piezoelectric microdrive (Nanostepper).

Organotypic Cultures

Cultures were prepared using the roller tube method as described previously (Jourdain et al., 1996, 1998; Israel et al., 2010). Briefly, pups were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane and decapitated. Tissue blocks including the bilateral anterior hypothalamus and amygdalae were coronally sliced at 350 μm. The slices spanning the anterior hypothalamic area were selected, bisected along the third ventricle, the amygdalar tissue lateral to central/medial nuclei was removed, and each half was placed on individual glass coverslips coated with heparinized chicken plasma (Cocalico no. 30-030-5L, Reamstown, PA, USA) coagulated by drops of thrombin (Merck no. 112374). The coverslip was inserted into a plastic flat-bottomed tube (Nunc no. 055054, Roskilde, Denmark) containing 750 μl of a medium consisting of 50% Eagle's basal medium (Gibco no. 21540026, Fisher Bioblock, Illkirsh, France), 25% heat-inactivated horse serum (Gibco no. 26050088, Fisher Bioblock) and 25% Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS; Gibco no. 24020091, Fisher Bioblock) enriched with glucose (7.5 mg ml−1) and 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma no. G7513), pH 7.4 (290–295 mOsm). No antibiotics were used. The tubes were inserted into a roller drum at 37°C and rotated at ±15 turns.h−1. The medium was replaced twice per week. The cultures were allowed to flatten and stabilize for at least 4 weeks before electrophysiological recording became possible. For the recording session, the slice was transferred to a temperature-controlled chamber (36 ± 0.2°C) fixed to the stage of an inverted microscope (Diaphot; Nikon). The microelectrode was positioned using oleic micromanipulators (Narishige). The slices were perfused (0.7 ml.min−1) with Yamamoto's solution (in mM: 125 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 MgSO4, 1.25 KH2PO4, 5 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, 5 glucose, 10 HEPES, pH 7.25, 293–295 mOsm. We performed our recordings of the VP neurons in cultures from P9 pups where they are more abundant (Jourdain et al., 1996, 1998; Israel et al., 2010). Hyperosmolality was produced by addition of mannitol.


As detailed previously (Jourdain et al., 1996, 1998; Israel and Poulain, 2000; Israel et al., 2010), intracellular potentials (current clamp recording) from neurons were recorded through a single microelectrode (tip diameter: 0.1 μm) using an Axoclamp-2A (Molecular Devices, Union City, CA, USA), which also permitted injection of currents. Electrical signals were visualized on a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS 2012B; Beaverton, OR, USA), recorded and stored on a hard disk using pClamp 9 software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA) and a Digidata 1300 interface (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The AAA (Buchanan, 1999; Israel et al., 2014) was used to evaluate the periodicity as well as the regularity in neuronal activity. Episodes of OT and VP neuron activity of 3–5 min in duration were analyzed using custom scripts run within Spike2 software for Windows (CED, UK). Autocorrelograms were constructed from the spike trains of OT/VP cells converted to event times by setting a voltage threshold at half-amplitude of action potentials. For each event, the numbers of events occurring in consecutive 0.1-s bins were counted over a 20-s time period for OT cells and 60-s time period for VP cells. This procedure produced a periodic function with decaying oscillations. The periodicity of the rhythmic activity was obtained by measuring the lags from time 0 to the second peak on autocorrelograms. Measuring the peak-to-trough amplitude of the second peak on autocorrelograms assessed the Quality of the Rhythmic Activity (QRA) of OT/VP cells. Its value (denoted a) could potentially range from 0 to 1. A perfectly stable rhythm would have a QRA value of 1. Values are expressed as means ± SEM and analyzed using the Student's t-test with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

Identification of Recorded Neurons

As detailed previously (Jourdain et al., 1996, 1998; Israel and Poulain, 2000; Israel et al., 2010), recording electrodes contained 0.5% biocytin (Sigma-Aldrich) injected at the end of the intracellular recording session using hyperpolarizing current pulses (±0.5 nA, 0.4 s, 2 Hz, 10–20 min). The tissues were fixed in a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.15% picric acid in 0.1M phosphate buffer (PB) (acute slices, overnight at 4°C; organotypic cultures, 2 h at room temperature). Acute slices were also cryoprotected at 4°C in PB containing 20% sucrose, embedded in Tissue-Teck and sectioned (at 25 μm) in a cryostat (Microm, Francheville, France). Tissues then underwent triple-labeling immunocytochemistry including a first-step incubation with Texas Red-conjugated streptavidin (diluted 1:1000; Biosys, France), a mouse monoclonal antiserum to OT-associated neurophysin (diluted 1:2000; PS38 anti-OT-Np; ATTC No. ATCCRL1950, Rockville, MD, USA; kindly provided by Dr H. Gainer, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; see Ben-Barak et al., 1985) and either a polyclonal rabbit antiserum to vasopressin-associated neurophysin (VP-Np; diluted 1:2000; kindly provided by Dr A. Robinson, University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA; see Roberts et al., 1991) or a polyclonal guinea pig antiserum to VP (1:800; Bachem No. T-5048; Bubendorf, Switzerland), followed by a second-step incubation with respective FITC-linked anti-rabbit IgGs and AMCA-linked anti-mouse or anti-guinea pig IgGs, all produced in goats or donkeys (Jackson Immunoreserach Europe, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK). Observation was with a Leica DMR epifluorescence microscope with appropriate filters (Leica Microsystems, Nanterre, France).


Activity of OT Neurons in Acute Hypothalamic Slices

We re-examined through AAA our previous recordings (Israel and Poulain, 2000) of OT neurons obtained in acute hypothalamic slices from lactating female rats taken on L5 or L21. Out of the 285 OT neurons recorded, each from a different SON section, only 67 cells displayed a stable resting membrane potential for more than 1 h and these were consequently selected for analysis (L5, n = 15; L21, n = 52). In acute slices from L21 rats, about 70% of the OT neurons (38/52 cells) remained silent in spite of a relatively depolarized resting potential (Figure 1A), the remaining neurons displaying continuous firing. In acute slices from L5 rats, most of the OT neurons (≈70%; 11/15 cells) recorded displayed continuous firing (Figure 1B). We selected ten of these continuously firing cells for AAA (L5, n = 3; L21, n = 7), which revealed no rhythmic drive in any of them (inset in Figure 1B). Of the 285 OT neurons recorded, an overwhelming majority (99.3%) never displayed HFBs of APs. Only two OT neurons from L5 slices displayed HFBs reminiscent of those described in vivo and in organotypic cultures (Figure 1C; Israel and Poulain, 2015). In these two bursting cells, trains of APs were initiated by a summation of EPSPs, the majority of the APs within a train were triggered by EPSPs, and a detailed analysis revealed that EPSPs initiated the HFBs (Figure 1C). The AAA was run on the recording of sufficient duration (320 s) of one of these two spontaneously bursting cells, which clearly revealed an activity supported by a CPG drive with a cycling period (cp = 9.7 s) and a quality of rhythmic activity (QRA; a = 0.23) similar to that seen (Israel et al., 2014) for the OT neurons in the organotypic cultures (insert in Figure 1C).


Figure 1. Electrical activity in OT neurons in hypothalamic acute slices. (A) A silent OT cell displaying rare action potentials (APs, asterisks) was subjected to two depolarizing challenges (insets). Left inset, a brief positive current pulse (50 ms, 0.1 nA; red trace; expanded from the large arrowhead) triggered a 10 s-long decaying burst of APs (the small arrowhead shows the DAP maintaining firing). Right inset, glutamate (GLU) in the perfusion medium (10−5 M, 30 s) induced a strong depolarization triggering a sustained firing. (B) A continuously active OT neuron with irregular firing with no rhythmic drive from the APs autocorrelation analysis (inset). (C) Exceptional example of a truly bursting OT neuron. Top, rate-meter showing the high-frequency burst (HFB) of action potentials (star). Middle, respective raw recording and associated autocorrelogram (inset) showing rhythmic drive. Bottom, expanded traces showing the importance of the EPSPs (arrowheads) in initiating the burst (left) and HFB (right) and triggering the APs within the burst (middle) (note that APs were truncated in the right trace).

Activity of OT Neurons in Organotypic Cultures

Briefly, as reported recently (Israel et al., 2014), in about 90% of the organotypic cultures, all the OT neurons burst in a highly coordinated manner and their individual activity according to AAA appears to be driven by a CPG network (96/107 cultures from P5 animals examined harbored bursting OT neurons). However, in the remaining 10% of the cultures, the OT neurons do not display HFBs of APs, nor qualify for a rhythmic drive when their activity is subjected to the AAA. When these neurons are challenged with the OT peptide (n = 6; Figure 2A) or the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline (n = 6; Figure 2B) to induce robust bursting (Jourdain et al., 1998; Israel et al., 2014), their activity remains unchanged and the AAA reveals no rhythmic drive either before or during the challenges (Figure 2).


Figure 2. Electrical activity in OT neurons in organotypic cultures. Examples of two spontaneously firing cells that did not change their pattern of activity under bath application of (A) the OT peptide (10−5 M) or (B) the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline (Bic; 10−5 M). No rhythmic drive was detected by the AAA (insets) either before or during the application of the burst-inducing agents.

Activity of VP Neurons in Acute Hypothalamic Slices

In the following, by convention, the activity of VP neurons will be referred to as truly phasic when the AAA revealed a CPG drive, and phasic-like when the AAA did not. We re-examined through AAA our previous (Israel and Poulain, 2000) recordings of VP neuron activity in acute hypothalamic slices from nursing female rats taken on L5 and L21. These magnocellular neurons were identified post-hoc as VP neurons each recorded from a different SON section (L5, n = 21; L21, n = 57). Irrespective of lactation day, about half (37/78 cells; 47%) of the VP neurons had a low resting membrane potential close to −58 mV and remained silent, displaying only a few spontaneous APs (Figure 3A). These cells were healthy as they generated a brief burst of APs in response to a short electrical stimulation, a robust firing following bath application of glutamate, and a continuous activity when depolarized above spike threshold (Figure 3A). When these various patterns of activity were subjected to the AAA, no rhythmic drive was detected (n = 4 cells for glutamate pulse; n = 10 cells for depolarization-induced firing). The remaining population (41/78 cells) of VP neurons had a more depolarized resting membrane potential (≈−50 mV) and spontaneously displayed phasic-like activity (Figure 3B). There was a great cell-to-cell heterogeneity in the firing patterns that were made of irregular long bursts (10–200 s in length) interspersed with silent periods of varying duration (10–300 s in length) (Figure 3B), and two sub-populations clearly emerged with respect to their mean burst-duration (20–50 s and 75–150 s). When subjected to the AAA, only the short-burst (20–50 s) population qualified for a CPG drive (cp = 41.3 ± 16.1 s; a = 0.36 ± 11) (short-burst n = 8; long-burst, n = 17) (Figures 3C, 4) and this population also exhibited a more robust excitatory synaptic activity (Figure 4C). It is noteworthy that in these neurons APs were essentially triggered by EPSPs (Figure 4A, lower trace).


Figure 3. Electrical activities in VP neurons in hypothalamic acute slices. (A) A silent VP cell displaying action potentials only if subjected to depolarizing challenges. Top trace, left inset, sustained firing in response to kainate (k) in perfusion medium (10−5 M; 30 s); right inset, a train of APs (expanded trace; truncated) in response to a brief positive current pulse (0.2 s, 0.15 nA; red arrow). Bottom trace, the same neuron when depolarized by constant current injection (red trace, arrowhead) now displays a prolonged firing in response to a brief current pulse (0.1 s, 0.1 nA) (left inset, expanded from arrow). Note absence of rhythmic drive (right inset). (B) Three examples of phasic-like activities displayed by VP neurons. Neuron 1, bursts and silent periods of irregular duration. Neuron 2, bursts and silent periods of similar duration. Neuron 3, short and long bursts, irregular silent periods. Autocorrelograms show no rhythmic drive. (C) A truly phasic activity sustained by a rhythmic drive.


Figure 4. Electrical activities in VP neurons in hypothalamic acute slices. Mechanisms of burst generation in spontaneously active neurons (A) with and (B) without rhythmic drive (autocorrelograms in the insets). The raw recordings (upper traces) are expanded (lower traces) to reveal that the first AP in the burst is triggered by an EPSP (arrowheads) and is followed by a DAP (arrow) in (B) only (APs are truncated in B). The subsequent APs in the burst are essentially triggered by EPSPS in (A) and by both EPSPs and DAPs in (B). Note in the samples of inter-burst activity (stars) magnified in (C) the heightened synaptic activity in (A) reflected by the cumulative frequencies of EPSPs' intervals and amplitudes (mean amplitudes in dashed frame). The histogram shows that phasic-like neurons display EPSPs at lower frequency (Hz) and smaller amplitude (q) (green column = 100% for both frequency and amplitude of events recorded in truly rhythmic neurons; n = 4 each).

Activity of the VP Neurons in Organotypic Cultures

The electrical activity of VP neurons in organotypic cultures was re-examined through AAA. To this end we used the VP neurons identified in our previous studies carried out in organotypic cultures (Israel et al., 2010, 2014), representing a total of 147 VP neurons each recorded from a different culture. Among those, 67% (98/147 cells) spontaneously displayed a slow and irregular firing pattern (varying from 0.5 to 10 Hz) and the AAA (n = 6) revealed that this activity had no underlying rhythmic drive (Figure 5A). Increasing the osmolality from 295 to 320 mOsm (hyper-osmotic stimulus; +25 mOsm) in all cases turned this slow firing pattern into a typical phasic activity that the AAA clearly identified as a sequence of rhythmic oscillations with a cycling period of about 30 s (mean ± SEM; 33.7 ± 3.9 s; n = 6; Figure 5A). The remaining VP neurons (33%; 49/147 cells), in our iso-osmotic conditions (295 mOsm), spontaneously displayed phasic activity, made of more or less regular bursts interspersed by silent periods, that the AAA again identified in all cases as a rhythmic firing pattern with a cycling period varying from 12 to 58 s (31.7 ± 12.1 s; mean ± SD; n = 15 neurons; Figure 5B). When spontaneous (at 295 mOsm) and induced (by 320 mOsm) phasic activities were compared, the quality of the rhythmic activity (or QRA) was higher in hyper-osmotic medium [spontaneous (n = 5) 0.23 ± 0.05 vs. induced (n = 5) 0.39 ± 0.08; mean ± SD; P < 0.001; Student's t-test]. Finally, in all cases the phasic activity, either spontaneous or induced, was blocked by the AMPA-kainate receptors antagonist CNQX, supporting the notion that it is determined by glutamatergic afferent synaptic inputs rather than by an intrinsic neuronal property (Figure 5B). All these results are summarized in Table 1.


Figure 5. Electrical activities in VP neurons in hypothalamic organotypic cultures. (A) Transition from irregular (top, control medium) to phasic (bottom, +25 mOsm medium) activity in a VP neuron by a hyperosmotic stimulus. Note rhythmic drive [with a cycling period (c.p.) of 28 s] in phasic firing-mode only. (B) Increase in rhythm quality in a spontaneously phasic VP neuron (top, control medium) by a hyperosmotic stimulus (middle, +25 mOsm medium) and the dependence of phasic firing on glutamatergic inputs (bottom). Note that hyperosmolality increases the cycling period (c.p.) and the quality of the rhythm (a), while CNQX (10−6 M) abolishes spiking and rhythmic drive (depolarization by two successive current injections (arrowheads) induces spontaneous firing not supported by a rhythmic drive).


Table 1. Electrophysiological activity of hypothalamic magnocellular neurons in vitro.


Our own previous (Jourdain et al., 1996, 1998; Israel and Poulain, 2000; Israel et al., 2010, 2014) data have now been reconsidered in the light of our recent hypothesis on the existence of specific CPGs driving neuroendocrine magnocellular neurons (Israel et al., 2014). These data suggest that if the HFBs of APs that are typical of these secretory cells are well visible in the organotypic culture model, such a CPG-driven rhythmic activity is also present, even if not as commonly observed, in acute slices. There is a straightforward, albeit not exclusive, explanation for the lack of a strict parallelism between the outcomes of the two in vitro models, especially concerning OT neurons. Presumably, an anatomical link between the CPGs and the magnocellular neurons is severed during the preparation of acute slices, whereas this link is preserved, at least in part, during the harvest of the tissue from the newborns (Israel et al., 2014). Conceivably, because neonatal and adult brains were cut at the same standard thickness of about 350–400 μm, more neurons, and therefore more networks, are harvested in the pups compared to the adults, and as a consequence, the networks and their emerging properties that govern the secretory activity of magnocellular neurons will be more often observed from neonatal preparations.

In the acute slice model, the bursting pattern of the OT neurons that is necessary for their motor output (contraction of the myometrium and the mammary myoepithelial cells) was seen in only 2 out of 285 cells, that roughly corresponds to 1% of the (bilateral) slices collected. Considering the anatomical distance in adult brains between the SON in the one hand, and the posterior periventricular area that seems determinant for burst generation (Israel et al., 2014) in the other hand, it is likely that 99% of the slices have a significantly deafferented SON. In line with this possibility, the synaptic activity in acute slices is dramatically reduced to miniature events (Israel and Poulain, 2015), suggesting that in our hands most of the afferent axons including those of the CPG network are severed during the preparation of these slices.

Likewise in the acute slice model a number of the VP neurons appear to have no link to a CPG drive, because their activity do not qualify for periodicity as revealed by the AAA. Yet, a significant proportion of them spontaneously displayed as here defined a phasic-like activity (long-burst neurons). Most probably, this phasic-like activity is essentially due to an intrinsic property of the VP neurons, the depolarizing afterpotential (DAP) (Andrew and Dudek, 1983; Sabatier et al., 2004), as it could be observed in the acute slices even when synaptic transmission is blocked (Hatton, 1982). In this phasic-like firing mode, successive DAPs establish a plateau membrane potential bringing the cell to firing threshold; this is observed when the cells are quite depolarized (Armstrong et al., 1994) with respect to their normal resting value (Figure 3A, lower trace), and consequently fire APs spontaneously. In organotypic cultures, 60% of VP cells displaying a spontaneous phasic activity did not show DAPs (see Figure 7B in Israel et al., 2010) and pharmacological blockade of the latter did not significantly alter the phasic pattern (Israel et al., 2010). Again, DAPs were ineffective at generating a sustained firing in cells at their normal resting potential (near -50 mV; see Figure 7E in Israel et al., 2010). Thus, this non-periodic, phasic-like activity is probably non-physiological and can also be evoked in OT neurons (Israel and Poulain, 2015). Accordingly, we previously showed (Israel et al., 2010) that the various parameters of this phasic-like activity (burst duration, mean intra-burst firing frequency, mean burst duration and mean silent duration) differ from those displayed by the VP neurons in vivo or in organotypic cultures. Indeed, in most acute slices the synaptic activity recorded from magnocellular neurons was low and the AAA did not detect any underlying rhythm. Conversely in the remaining slices, VP neurons displaying short bursts of APs and a phasic firing mode clearly supported by a CPG also expressed a more robust synaptic activity. These short-burst VP neurons are the only type to be observed both in vitro and in vivo (see Figure 4 in Israel et al., 2010) and their activity is thus likely to correspond to a physiological behavior. In these cases, local CPG networks present in the surroundings of the SON (Brown et al., 2013) most probably remained intact at tissue harvest. This fits with data from in vivo studies in which glutamate receptors antagonists blocked the phasic activity in the VP neurons (Nissen et al., 1994, 1995; Brown et al., 2004), clearly suggesting the critical role of the afferents to these cells.

By studying a large series of organotypic cultures, we noticed that about 10% of these cultures harbored healthy, spontaneously firing, but non-bursting OT neurons (Israel et al., 2014). These OT neurons did not change their activity when challenged with the OT peptide itself or with the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline, two procedures known to elicit strong bursting activity (Jourdain et al., 1998; Israel et al., 2014), and when analyzed through AAA, their activity either before or during the challenge, accordingly showed no rhythmic drive. This suggests that the OT-CPG network is absent in about 10% of the cultures, compared to 99% for acute slices obtained in our hands from adult brains.

The organotypic culture model, here, allowed us to get a deeper insight into the mechanism generating the phasic activity in the short-burst VP neurons. The phasic activity was spontaneously displayed or could be evoked by a hyperosmotic challenge. In both cases, the rhythmic pattern of activity could be blocked with a glutamate receptors antagonist, and appeared driven by a rhythmic network as revealed by AAA. In contrast, the sporadic activity of the short-burst VP neurons before hyperosmotic challenge showed no underlying rhythmic drive when subjected to AAA. Altogether, these observations suggest that the osmotic stimulus gates the CPG activity to the effector neuroendocrine cells (Figure 6), although a precise mechanism remains to be fully explored.


Figure 6. Schematic diagram of functional state transition of the secretomotor OT and VP neurons in vitro. As visible in our acute slice model (dashed red frame) and in our organotypic culture model (black frame), the transition from random firing to the typical neurosecretory bursting/phasic pattern is either inherent (a, developmentally active: OT neurons) or gated (b, elicited by sensory stimuli: VP neurons). The acute slice model in most cases (99% for OT neurons, 70% for VP neurons) does not include the generator network. See Conclusion.


Contributions of the Experimental Models

Both experimental models used here have inherent limitations that must be borne in mind when interpreting our observations and delineating their impact. The acute slice model is a strict reflection of the adult organization of the networks, but the recorded cells are partially deafferented. The organotypic model offers a more stabilized preparation, but a number of regulatory networks are certainly not in place at the time of tissue harvest. In this case, the spontaneous bursting recorded in OT neurons may reflect the autonomous activity of a dedicated neural network (referred to as OT-Central Pattern Generator, OT-CPG) producing fictive neurosecretory activity, in a way similar to the fictive motor patterns produced by CPGs located in the brainstem or spinal cord (Grillner, 2003). Therefore, the acute slices and the cultures cannot be strictly compared (Figure 6), especially when the role of the integrative properties of the magnocellular neurons are to be considered.

Our data, gathered in vitro and ex vivo, suggest that afferent rhythmic CPG networks govern the high frequency activity in OT and VP neurons. Our data also suggest that although the VP-CPG and OT-CPG networks are quite different, their functional output, the bursts of APs triggering the release of the neurohormones, is essentially the same. These considerations concerning the sole magnocellular neurons illustrate the progressively appreciated diversity of the mechanisms underlying the activity of neuroendocrine systems, as discussed below.

Contributions to the Understanding of the Activity of Neuroendocrine Systems

Most of what is known of the in vivo electrophysiological activity of neuroendocrine cells is derived from the study of the magnocellular hypothalamo-neurohypophysial neurons (Brown et al., 2013). These neurons are fine models for the study of the stimulus-secretion coupling, and their episodic firing, at a high frequency necessary for neurosecretion, appears to be a universal mechanism of peptidergic neurotransmission (Hökfelt et al., 2003). It is therefore expected that to trigger a secretory pulse of anterior pituitary hormone, the parvicellular adenohypophysiotrophic neurons have a similar activity. This, however, is still unknown, due to the overwhelming difficulty of in vivo “blind” recording of parvicellular neurons: they have a smaller size, are more dispersed, their various sub-populations often intermingle, and the occurrence of a pulse of anterior pituitary hormone in basal physiological conditions is less immediately accessible than, for example, reflex-milk ejection.

Yet, it was early observed in vivo that every pulse of anterior pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) strictly correlates with volleys of high frequency multiunit electrical activity (MUA volleys) in the mediobasal hypothalamus (Knobil, 1999). These MUA volleys are thought to reflect the activity of the afferent network responsible for the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), the so-called GnRH pulse-generator (Ezzat et al., 2015). The notion discussed here that CPGs drive secretory OT and VP neurons, thus recalls the presumptive organization of the network responsible for the pulsatile secretion of LH.

In the case of pituitary prolactin secretion, a different mechanism seems to be at work, the hormone being under tonic inhibitory control by dopaminergic tubero-infundibular (TIDA) neurons; a constant release of inhibitory dopamine keeps prolactin secretion low, with transient interruptions of this neuroendocrine tonus allowing pulsatile secretion (Grattan, 2015). Recent ex vivo studies in the rat have analyzed the electrical activity of TIDA neurons in acute slices and subjected the recordings to an AAA (Lyons et al., 2010). It appeared that TIDA neurons in control conditions display a synchronized robust, high-quality rhythmic activity dependent upon gap-junction coupling. In this case, an afferent CPG drive is not necessary to generate a rhythmic behavior, which is an emerging property of the neuroendocrine TIDA cell network. However, it was also shown that the sole direct post-synaptic action of thyroliberin could induce TIDA neurons to abruptly switch from rhythmic to tonic firing mode. This suggests that modulatory afferent networks control abrupt transitions in functional state, recalling what we saw in organotypic cultures for VP neurons switching from irregular to true phasic activity under hyperosmotic challenge (Figures 5, 6).

The pulsatile ultradian secretion of corticotrophin (ACTH) does not appear to depend on a rhythmic hypothalamic neuroendocrine drive. A strong corpus of physiological studies together with mathematical modeling indeed suggests that a sub-hypothalamic feedforward/feedback (ACTH/corticosterone) endocrine oscillator is sufficient to explain pulsatility (Russell et al., 2015). In this case, the global hypothalamic drive through the neurohormone corticoliberin (CRH) would rather be tonic/permissive than phasic/causal, and the associated electrical activity of CRH neurons remains to be established.

Altogether, these data suggest that the hypothesis of an exclusive CPG drive of follower neuroendocrine cells, such as that suggested by our studies, may not be generalized to every neuroendocrine axes or at least not to every circumstances of their activation. This would fit with the diversity in the modalities of the hypothalamic neuroendocrine control of the anterior pituitary. Nevertheless, a clearer picture concerning magnocellular and parvicellular neurons will be provided by AAA of their in vivo activity in adult animals with a monitored pituitary output. Of particular interest would be situations expected to require functional state transitions (Figure 6) to produce large secretory responses such as osmotic/hemorrhage challenge, stress-induced ACTH release, suckling-induced prolactin/OT release, or pulse/surge of LH. This would allow a better understanding of the contribution of endogenous and network properties to the adaptive responses of these cells. An excellent thorough discussion of this topic is available elsewhere (Lyons and Broberger, 2014).

Contributions to the Understanding of the Organization of the Hypothalamus

Neuroendocrine cells are the final output neurons in their networks and have their targets outside the blood-brain-barrier. This arrangement early prompted an analogy with the output units of the locomotor circuits, i.e., the alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord (Harris, 1955; Markakis, 2002; Watts, 2015; Figure 7). More recently (Thompson and Swanson, 2003), an extensive analysis of intra-hypothalamic connectivity has proposed the existence of a meta-network responsible for the coordination of neuroendocrine and behavioral systems. This proposed “hypothalamic visceromotor pattern generator” (HVPG) network includes an extended CPG hosted by the rostral half of the periventricular continuum (PeV). As remarked by the authors, this disposition of the HVPG along a liquor compartment and near its motor targets indeed recalls the similar location of the spinal locomotor CPG along the central canal (Grillner, 2003; McCrea and Rybak, 2008), which reflects current efforts to comprehend the basic organization of the forebrain (Croizier et al., 2015).


Figure 7. Analogy between the locomotor and neuroendocrine circuits. Motor neurons and neuroendocrine cells are output units driven by central pattern generator (CPG) networks. CPGs generate the specific electrical firing required for secretion of neurotransmitters/neurohormones and the desired action of the effector structure: skeletal muscle for alpha-motor neurons, uterus and mammary myoepithelial cells in the case of magnocellular oxytocin (OT) neurons. The presumptive “OT-CPG” necessary for the milk-ejection reflex may be a two-level CPG comprising a rhythmogenic component in interaction with a pattern-forming component, the output of which being bursting activity. The secretomotor unit is mainly a follower of the CPG output triggering neurosecretion. BBB, blood-brain-barrier. For details, see the Conclusion.

The concept of a HVPG thus makes the testable prediction of the existence of rhythmic networks in the PeV, which we have indirectly met. Indeed, by removing the PeV from the tissue slices harvested for organotypic culture, we rendered OT neurons non-bursting and their afferent activity non-rhythmic in AAA (Israel et al., 2014). This indicates that at least part of the OT-CPG resides in the PeV, but provides little information on its architecture. The responses of OT neurons in culture to inhibition-blockade by bicuculline and excitation-blockade by CNQX (Israel et al., 2014) further suggest that the organization of the OT-CPG resembles the “two-level organization” proposed for the spinal locomotor CPG (Perret and Cabelguen, 1980; McCrea and Rybak, 2008) and the brainstem respiratory CPG (Feldman et al., 1990). Indeed, bicuculline transformed bursting activity into robust oscillations, revealing a glutamatergic rhythm generator entirely blocked by CNQX, as well as revealing a GABAergic pattern formation circuitry responsible for OT activation (Figure 7). Concerning the VP-CPGs in culture, neither PeV removal nor bicuculline impacted rhythmic activity in VP neurons (Israel et al., 2014). This indicates that the VP-CPGs are separate from the OT-CPGs, can work independently from the periventricular HVPG, and likely are “satellite systems” of the magnocellular nuclei (Bourque, 2008). Our studies have however provided little insight into their architecture, precise location, and functional interplay with the cellular properties of VP neurons.

Future Directions

Our present studies in acute slices and organotypic cultures constitute an initial effort to decrypt some structure-function relationships in the magnocellular neuroendocrine circuits, complementing current efforts to decipher the electrical behavior of hypothalamic neuroendocrine cells (Osterstock et al., 2010; Murphy et al., 2012; MacGregor and Leng, 2013; Wamsteeker Cusulin et al., 2013; Ohkubo et al., 2014; Briffaud et al., 2015; Iremonger and Herbison, 2015; Royo et al., 2015). Although, this ideally at some point requires analysis and manipulations of the neuroendocrine networks in vivo (Campos and Herbison, 2014), a wealth of ex vivo studies should also continue to provide irreplaceable information.

To further progress in that direction concerning neuroendocrine magnocellular neurons, it seems important to confirm and extend our ex vivo observations in acute tissue slices from adult animals, at least for VP neurons and their response to an osmotic challenge. More difficult to predict is how to preserve in acute slices of lactating female rats the putative PeV rhythmic afferent drive of OT neurons. This may require the investigation of various orientation planes of the slices, e.g., as done for GnRH neurons (Constantin et al., 2012), but without guarantee. Indeed, our very low success rate with this acute model may also be indicative of the difficulty to maintain the bursting of OT neurons in an abruptly deafferented adult network that was functionally activated by suckling, as opposed to an incompletely afferented, immature and autonomously active OT-CPG core network after several weeks of recovery in vitro. However, there might be permanent ongoing activity in the PeV continuum that could be recovered from acute slices sagittaly cut along the third ventricle, as predicted (Thompson and Swanson, 2003). It may be worth searching for this in rat hypothalamic slices loaded with a calcium indicator, or at best in murine transgenic models. Ideally, one may want to perform in parallel, or combined, electrophysiological recording and calcium imaging in specific models. For example, mouse lines could be engineered and crossed for having, neurons upstream of OT cells become fluorescent, and an encoded indicator expressed in glutamatergic (VGLUT2-expressing) neurons. Sagittal periventricular acute slices in such brains may reveal parts of the rhythmogenic network driving OT neurons. In sum, the possibilities offered are many (Candlish et al., 2015; Sternson et al., 2016), provided that the in vivo electrical properties of OT neurons in nursing lactating mice are known, which will require repetition of a substantial amount of work in this animal species. The same approaches could allow refined analyses in the organotypic culture model, as well as in vivo studies including direct monitoring of cell activity using deep-brain imaging from the third ventricle in conscious animals (Sternson et al., 2016). All this applying to VP neurons in relation with their osmoregulatory networks, their position in the brain and relation to the blood-brain-barrier forming glia.

In conclusion, whatever the exact architecture of the systems driving the magnocellular neurons, and to what extent generalization will be possible, these hypothalamic cells keep offering renewed opportunities to advance our knowledge of the mechanisms of neuroendocrine regulations and peptidergic neurotransmission.

Author Contributions

JI performed experiments. PC initiated the project. JI, SO, and PC analyzed data, discussed the results and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.


This research was supported by INSERM, La Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (Equipe FRM grant to SO) and the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR, France; grant ANR 11-BSV1-021-lipobrain-03 to PC).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank Drs. Jean-Marie Cabelguen, Aude Panatier, and Mark Sherwood (all at U1215 INSERM) for reading the manuscript. The research described benefited from generous gifts of antisera from Drs. H. Gainer (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and A.G. Robinson (UCLA, CA, USA) and from the assistance of Nathalie Dupuis and Jennifer Dudit.


Andrew, R. D., and Dudek, F. E. (1983). Burst discharge in mammalian neuroendocrine cells involves an intrinsic regenerative mechanism. Science 221, 1050–1052. doi: 10.1126/science.6879204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armstrong, W. E., Smith, B. N., and Tian, M. (1994). Electrophysiological characteristics of immunochemically identified rat oxytocin and vasopressin neurones in vitro. J. Physiol. 475, 115–128. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armstrong, W. E., and Stern, J. E. (1998). Electrophysiological distinctions between oxytocin and vasopressin neurons in the supraoptic nucleus. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 449, 67–77. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4871-3_7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armstrong, W. E., Wang, L., Li, C., and Teruyama, R. (2010). Performance, properties and plasticity of identified oxytocin and vasopressin neurones in vitro. J. Neuroendocrinol. 22, 330–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.01989.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ben-Barak, Y., Russell, J. T., Whitnall, M. H., Ozato, K., and Gainer, H. (1985). Neurophysin in the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system: I. production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies. J. Neurosci. 5, 81–97.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Bourque, C. W. (2008). Central mechanisms of osmosensation and systemic osmoregulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 519–531. doi: 10.1038/nrn2400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Briffaud, V., Williams, P., Courty, J., and Broberger, C. (2015). Excitation of tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons by oxytocin: crosstalk in the control of lactation. J. Neurosci. 35, 4229–4237. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2633-14.2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, C. H., Bains, J. S., Ludwig, M., and Stern, J. E. (2013). Physiological regulation of magnocellular neurosecretory cell activity: integration of intrinsic, local and afferent mechanisms. J. Neuroendocrinol. 25, 678–710. doi: 10.1111/jne.12051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, C. H., Bull, P. M., and Bourque, C. W. (2004). Phasic bursts in rat magnocellular neurosecretory cells are not intrinsically regenerative in vivo. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 2977–2983. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03408.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. T. (1999). Commissural interneurons in rhythm generation and intersegmental coupling in the lamprey spinal cord. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 2037–2045.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Campos, P., and Herbison, A. E. (2014). Optogenetic activation of GnRH neurons reveals minimal requirements for pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 18387–18392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415226112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Candlish, M., De Angelis, R., Götz, V., and Boehm, U. (2015). Gene Targeting in Neuroendocrinology. Compr. Physiol. 5, 1645–1676. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Constantin, S., Piet, R., Iremonger, K., Hwa Yeo, S., Clarkson, J., Porteous, R., et al. (2012). GnRH neuron firing and response to GABA in vitro depend on acute brain slice thickness and orientation. Endocrinology 153, 3758–3769. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Croizier, S., Chometton, S., Fellmann, D., and Risold, P. Y. (2015). Characterization of a mammalian prosencephalic functional plan. Front. Neuroanat. 8:161. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ezzat, A., Pereira, A., and Clarke, I. J. (2015). Kisspeptin is a component of the pulse generator for GnRH secretion in female sheep but not the pulse generator. Endocrinology 156, 1828–1837. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feldman, J. L., Smith, J. C., Ellenberger, H. H., Connelly, C. A., Liu, G. S., Greer, J. J., et al. (1990). Neurogenesis of respiratory rhythm and pattern: emerging concepts. Am. J. Physiol. 259, R879–R886.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Gähwiler, B. H., Sandoz, P., and Dreifuss, J. J. (1978). Neurones with synchronous bursting discharges in organ cultures of the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus area. Brain Res. 151, 245–253. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90882-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghamari-Langroudi, M., and Bourque, C. W. (1998). Caesium blocks depolarizing after-potentials and phasic firing in rat supraoptic neurones. J. Physiol. 510, 165–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.165bz.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grattan, D. R. (2015). 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: the hypothalamo-prolactin axis. J. Endocrinol. 226, T101–T122. doi: 10.1530/joe-15-0213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grillner, S. (2003). The motor infrastructure: from ion channels to neuronal networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 573–586. doi: 10.1038/nrn1137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harris, G. W. (1955). The function of the pituitary stalk. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 97, 358–375.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hatton, G. I. (1982). Phasic bursting activity of rat paraventricular neurones in the absence of synaptic transmission. J. Physiol. 327, 273–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hökfelt, T., Bartfai, T., and Bloom, F. (2003). Neuropeptides: opportunities for drug discovery. Lancet Neurol. 2, 463–472. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00482-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ingram, C. D., Bicknell, R. J., Brown, D., and Leng, G. (1982). Rapid fatigue of neuropeptide secretion during continual electrical stimulation. Neuroendocrinology 35, 424–428. doi: 10.1159/000123418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iremonger, K. J., and Herbison, A. E. (2015). Multitasking in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron dendrites. Neuroendocrinology 102, 1–7. doi: 10.1159/000368364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Israel, J. M., Cabelguen, J. M., Le Masson, G., Oliet, S. H., and Ciofi, P. (2014). Neonatal testosterone suppresses a neuroendocrine pulse generator required for reproduction. Nat. Commun. 5:3285. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Israel, J. M., and Poulain, D. A. (2000). 17ß-Oestradiol modulates in vitro electrical properties and responses to kainate of oxytocin neurones in lactating rats. J. Physiol. 524, 457–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-2-00457.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Israel, J. M., and Poulain, D. A. (2015). “Oxytocin neurons during suckling: Lessons to be gleaned from organotypic cultures,” in Neurophysiology of Neuroendocrine Neurons, Vol. 3, International Neuroendocrine Masterclass Series, eds W. E. Armstrong and J. G. Tasker (series eds J. A. Russell and W. E. Armstrong) (New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell), 29–62.

Israel, J. M., Poulain, D. A., and Oliet, S. H. R. (2008). Oxytocin-induced postinhibitory rebound firing facilitates bursting activity in oxytocin neurons. J. Neurosci. 28, 385–394. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5198-07.2008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Israel, J. M., Poulain, D. A., and Oliet, S. H. R. (2010). Glutamatergic inputs contribute to phasic activity in vasopressin neurons. J. Neurosci. 30, 1221–1232. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2948-09.2010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jourdain, P., Israel, J. M., Dupouy, B., Oliet, S. H., Allard, M., Vitiello, S., et al. (1998). Evidence for a hypothalamic oxytocin-sensitive pattern- generating network governing oxytocin neurons in vitro. J. Neurosci. 18, 6641–6649.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Jourdain, P., Poulain, D. A., Theodosis, D. T., and Israel, J. M. (1996). Electrical properties of oxytocin neurons in organotypic cultures from postnatal rat hypothalamus. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 2772–2785.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Knobil, E. (1999). The wisdom of the body revisited. News Physiol. Sci. 14, 1–11.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Lyons, D. J., and Broberger, C. (2014). TIDAL WAVES: network mechanisms in the neuroendocrine control of prolactin release. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 35, 420–438. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Lyons, D. J., Horjales-Araujo, E., and Broberger, C. (2010). Synchronized network oscillations in rat tuberoinfundibular dopamine neurons: switch to tonic discharge by thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Neuron 65, 217–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacGregor, D. J., and Leng, G. (2013). Spike triggered hormone secretion in vasopressin cells; a model investigation of mechanism and heterogeneous population function. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9:e1003187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Markakis, E. A. (2002). Development of the neuroendocrine hypothalamus. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 23, 257–291. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3022(02)00003-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCrea, D. A., and Rybak, I. A. (2008). Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation. Brain Res. Rev. 57, 134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murphy, D., Konopacka, A., Hindmarch, C., Paton, J. F., Sweedler, J. V., Gillette, M. U., et al. (2012). The hypothalamic-neurohypophyseal system: from genome to physiology. J. Neuroendocrinol. 24, 539–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02241.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nissen, R., Hu, B., and Renaud, L. P. (1994). N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors antagonist ketamine selectively attenuates spontaneous phasic activity of supraoptic vasopressin neurons in vivo. Neuroscience 59, 115–120. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90103-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nissen, R., Hu, B., and Renaud, L. P. (1995). Regulation of spontaneous phasic firing of rat supraoptic vasopressin neurones in vivo by glutamate receptors. J. Physiol. 484, 415–424. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nordmann, J. J. (1983). Stimulus-secretion coupling. Prog. Brain Res. 60, 281–304. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)64397-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohkubo, J., Ohbuchi, T., Yoshimura, M., Maruyama, T., Ishikura, T., Matsuura, T., et al. (2014). Electrophysiological effects of kainic acid on vasopressin-enhanced green fluorescent protein and oxytocin-monomeric red fluorescent protein 1 neurones isolated from the supraoptic nucleus in transgenic rats. J. Neuroendocrinol. 26, 43–51. doi: 10.1111/jne.12128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osterstock, G., Escobar, P., Mitutsova, V., Gouty-Colomer, L. A., Fontanaud, P., Molino, F., et al. (2010). Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone-releasing hormone neurons is direct in the arcuate nucleus. PLoS ONE 5:9159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perret, C., and Cabelguen, J. M. (1980). Main characteristics of the hindlimb locomotor cycle in the decorticate cat with special reference to bifunctional muscles. Brain Res. 187, 333–352. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90207-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poulain, D. A., and Wakerley, J. B. (1982). Electrophysiology of hypothalamic magnocellular neurones secreting oxytocin and vasopressin. Neuroscience 5, 773–808. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90044-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roberts, M. M., Robinson, A. G., Hoffman, G. E., and Fitzsimmons, M. D. (1991). Vasopressin transport regulation is coupled to synthesis rate. Neuroendocrinology 53, 416–422. doi: 10.1159/000125750

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Royo, J. M., Brown, C. H., Leng, G., and MacGregor, D. J. (2015). Oxytocin neurones: intrinsic mechanisms governing the regularity of spiking activity. J. Neuroendocrinol. doi: 10.1111/jne.12358

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Russell, G. M., Kalafatakis, K., and Lightman, S. L. (2015). The importance of biological oscillators for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity and tissue glucocorticoid response: coordinating stress and neurobehavioural adaptation. J. Neuroendocrinol. 27, 378–388. doi: 10.1111/jne.12247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabatier, N., Brown, C. H., Ludwig, M., and Leng, G. (2004). Phasic spike patterning in rat supraoptic neurones in vivo and in vitro. J. Physiol. 558, 161–180. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sternson, S. M., Atasoy, D., Betley, J. N., Henry, F. E., and Xu, S. (2016). An emerging technology framework for the neurobiology of appetite. Cell Metab. 23, 234–253. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teruyama, R., and Armstrong, W. E. (2005). Enhancement of calcium-dependent afterpotentials in oxytocin neurons of the rat supraoptic nucleus during lactation. J. Physiol. 566, 505–518. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.085985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, R. H., and Swanson, L. W. (2003). Structural characterization of a hypothalamic visceromotor pattern generator network. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 41, 153–202. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(02)00232-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wamsteeker Cusulin, J. I., Füzesi, T., Watts, A. G., and Bains, J. S. (2013). Characterization of corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of Crh-IRES-Cre mutant mice. PLoS ONE 8:64943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064943

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watts, A. G. (2015). 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: the structure of the neuroendocrine hypothalamus: the neuroanatomical legacy of Geoffrey Harris. J. Endocrinol. 226, T25–T39. doi: 10.1530/joe-15-0157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: burst firing, oxytocin, pulse generator, supraoptic nucleus, vasopressin

Citation: Israel J-M, Oliet SH and Ciofi P (2016) Electrophysiology of Hypothalamic Magnocellular Neurons In vitro: A Rhythmic Drive in Organotypic Cultures and Acute Slices. Front. Neurosci. 10:109. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00109

Received: 14 January 2016; Accepted: 07 March 2016;
Published: 31 March 2016.

Edited by:

Sebastien G. Bouret, University of Southern California, USA

Reviewed by:

Oline K. Ronnekleiv, Oregon Health and Science University, USA
Vance Trudeau, University of Ottawa, Canada

Copyright © 2016 Israel, Oliet and Ciofi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Philippe Ciofi,