MINI REVIEW article
Measures of CNS-Autonomic Interaction and Responsiveness in Disorder of Consciousness
- 1Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, GIGA Institute, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- 2S. Anna Institute, Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation, Crotone, Italy
- 3Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- 4Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Maternal/Child Sciences, Polyclinic Hospital San Martino IRCCS, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated functional interactions between autonomic (ANS) and brain (CNS) structures involved in higher brain functions, including attention and conscious processes. These interactions have been described by the Central Autonomic Network (CAN), a concept model based on the brain-heart two-way integrated interaction. Heart rate variability (HRV) measures proved reliable as non-invasive descriptors of the ANS-CNS function setup and are thought to reflect higher brain functions. Autonomic function, ANS-mediated responsiveness and the ANS-CNS interaction qualify as possible independent indicators for clinical functional assessment and prognosis in Disorders of Consciousness (DoC). HRV has proved helpful to investigate residual responsiveness in DoC and predict clinical recovery. Variability due to internal (e.g., homeostatic and circadian processes) and environmental factors remains a key independent variable and systematic research with this regard is warranted. The interest in bidirectional ANS-CNS interactions in a variety of physiopathological conditions is growing, however, these interactions have not been extensively investigated in DoC. In this brief review we illustrate the potentiality of brain-heart investigation by means of HRV analysis in assessing patients with DoC. The authors’ opinion is that this easy, inexpensive and non-invasive approach may provide useful information in the clinical assessment of this challenging patient population.
Clinical evidence and neuroimaging research have documented retained modular brain activation and responsiveness in patients with Disorder of Consciousness (DoC) following brain injury even in the absence of integrated large-network processes known to sustain consciousness (Laureys et al., 2002; Bekinschtein et al., 2004, 2011; Owen et al., 2006; Monti, 2012; Naro et al., 2015; Box 1). In this respect, residual responsiveness in DoC appears to be mediated by varying network interactions (Riganello et al., 2013, 2015c; Crone et al., 2017; Duclos et al., 2017). Activation restricted to lower-level primary sensory cortices without involvement of higher-order associative cortices has been described in vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) (Soddu et al., 2015; Marino et al., 2017). Partially preserved activation in higher-order associative cortices has been demonstrated in Minimally Conscious State (MCS) (Di Perri et al., 2013, 2016; Demertzi et al., 2015), whereas restoration of thalamocortical connectivity has shown to relate to consciousness recovery (Laureys et al., 2000; Monti et al., 2014). A large amount of research by means of neuroimaging techniques has revealed that several aspects of relatively high-level functions, including sensory and linguistic processing and learning dynamics, can survive and remain operative in DoC (Aubinet C- HBM 2018, Laureys et al., 2007; Boly et al., 2008; Majerus et al., 2009; Bruno et al., 2010).
Box 1. Brain injury can result in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) characterized by arousal and spontaneous eye-opening in the absence of any sign of awareness, finalized action or communication.
Levels of residual responsiveness define the Minimally Conscious State (MCS) (Giacino et al., 2004). A 2006 provocative report presented the case of a VS/UWS subject able to engage in mental tasks as indicated by her fMRI patterns of brain activations (Owen et al., 2006). Levels of responsiveness involving higher brain functions have been observed in subjects otherwise classified as VS/UWS according to clinical criteria (Laureys et al., 2007; Boly et al., 2008; Bruno et al., 2010; Owen, 2014; Pistoia et al., 2016; Riganello et al., 2018b). These observations were mostly based on regional brain activation in response to stimulus conditions in controlled setups; stimulus-related functional changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) function have also been described. Still highly debated, e.g., in subjects in a VS/UWS, these observations challenge the current definitions and our understanding of both responsiveness and consciousness, with an impact on the clinical decision-making process (Laureys et al., 2010; Riganello et al., 2016, 2018a, 2018b). The extent to which regional brain activations can be considered equivalent to, or compatible with behavioral responses in indicating (residual or covert) consciousness remains controversial and the current standards by which patients surviving severe brain injury should be regarded as being conscious or unconscious have been questioned (Celesia, 2013; Celesia and Sannita, 2013). In this respect, scientific research has introduced novel criteria of evaluation not yet fully integrated in the current nosography of disorders of consciousness (DoC), which is now undergoing a tacit, but not uncontroversial, revision (Monti and Sannita, 2016).
Neuroimaging studies have further shown functional interaction between autonomic nervous structures [i.e., the parasympathetic and sympathetic branch of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS)] and the neuronal networks involved in higher brain functions, including attention and conscious processes (Napadow et al., 2008; Thayer et al., 2012; Ruiz Vargas et al., 2016; Valenza et al., 2017). Heart Rate Variability (HRV), that is the physiological phenomenon of variation in the time interval between consecutive heartbeats, is thought to reflect the complex interaction between brain and cardiovascular system (Thayer and Lane, 2009; Ernst, 2017). HRV entropy, a measure of the complexity of HRV, has shown to discriminate VS/UWS and MCS patients and was found to correlate with the ANS functional status (Riganello et al., 2018b).
In agreement with this line of observation, indices of ANS functions have proved reliable in detecting responsiveness and predicting recovery following neuro-rehabilitation in VS/UWS (Wijnen et al., 2006; Riganello et al., 2015a). There is growing evidence that ANS function can be monitored non-invasively and neuroimaging studies have provided evidence of the two-way interplay between heart and brain. As a result, interest in the bidirectional ANS-CNS interaction in a variety of physiopathological conditions is growing (de Morree et al., 2013; Riganello et al., 2014; Bassi and Bozzali, 2015; Chen et al., 2017; Doehner et al., 2018), however, the ANS-CNS interaction in DoC has so far not been extensively investigated.
ANS-CNS Interaction in DOC
A concept model Central Autonomic Network (CAN) (Benarroch, 2007b) has been proposed to describe the ANS-CNS two-way interaction and the continuous modulation of homeostatic processes and allostatic adaptation to internal or external requirements (Friedman, 2007; Thayer et al., 2012; Riganello, 2016). Its functional organization involves the forebrain (anterior cingulate, nucleus accumbens, insula, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hypothalamus with bidirectional interactions between rostral and caudal systems), brainstem (periaqueductal gray, parabrachial nucleus, nucleus of the solitary tract, and the reticular formation of ventrolateral medulla). At spinal level it operates via neuronal projections of segmental reflexive ANS control (Figure 1). These structures receive converging visceral and nociceptive inputs (including those from thermo- and muscle receptors) and generate stimulus-specific patterns of autonomic response via projections to preganglionic sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons (Saper, 2002; Benarroch, 2007a). The forebrain and brainstem are involved in the modulation of autonomic output in response to pain and to emotional, behavioral, or “cognitive” stimuli (Hagemann et al., 2003; Berntson and Cacioppo, 2004; Thayer and Sternberg, 2006; Friedman, 2007; Thayer and Lane, 2009; Riganello et al., 2012a).
Figure 1. Central Autonomic Network (CAN) hierarchical organization and interconnections. Parasympathetic output is mediated mainly by the nucleus of the vagus and nucleus ambiguous. Sympathetic output is mainly mediated by the intermediolateral column cell.
Heart Rate Variability and Heart/Brain Interplay
HRV measures (i.e., variables analyzed in time domain, frequency domain and non-linear measurements) describe the ANS functional setup, and are thought to reflect higher brain functions - at least to some extent - and to qualify as independent indicators of CNS-ANS interaction (Napadow et al., 2008; Thayer and Lane, 2009; Thayer et al., 2012; Tonhajzerova et al., 2012) (Box 2 and Table 1). HRV measures reflect the activity of physiological factors modulating the heart rhythm and its adaptation to changing conditions (Carney et al., 2005; Garan, 2009; Shaffer et al., 2014). The vagus nerve is the major channel involved in the afferent neurological signals relayed from the heart and other visceral organs to the brain, including the baroreflex signals (de Lartigue, 2014). Brain morphological variants in the right striatal and limbic structures involved in the ANS functional organization were found to associate with differences in cardiac vagal function (Thayer and Lane, 2000; Napadow et al., 2008; Critchley, 2009; Lane et al., 2009) and to significantly contribute in the information flow in all frequency bands during sleep (Faes et al., 2014). In the absence of cardiac disorders, stimulus- or condition-related HRV changes are in the range of physiological variability and require processing in the time and frequency domains or by geometrical or non-linear methods to be identified (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, 1996; Rajendra Acharya et al., 2006). HRV methodologies benefit from being easy to record, inexpensive and non-invasive as compared to neuroimaging techniques. HRV measures are obtained from a signal (the heart tachogram) with excellent signal-to-noise ratio; procedures for sophisticated data analyses are usable without substantial loss in information (Nait-Ali, 2009). HRV is easier to apply than alternative techniques for ANS investigation (cardiac norepinephrine spillover, microneurographic techniques, or direct recording from skeletal muscle) (Berne et al., 1992; Esler, 1993; Wallin and Charkoudian, 2007). It is particularly applicable in studies on large subject samples or under experimental conditions where accurate laboratory procedures are not possible, such as in case of limited/null collaboration (e.g., in intensive/semi-intensive care units or in DoC) (Mowery et al., 2008; Norris et al., 2008a, 2008b; Ryan et al., 2011).
Box 2. HRV – Heart rate variability is defined as the R-R interval fluctuation of normal sinus beats around its average value.
HRV is analyzed in time domain, frequency domain and by non-linear methods both in short (usually 5 min) and long-time recordings (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, 1996). ANS functional contributions can be differentiated by analyses in the frequency domain, usually in three frequency band: High Frequency (HF) (0.15–0.5 Hz), Low Frequency (LF) (0.04–0.15 HZ), and (VLF) Very Low Frequency band (0.0033–0.04). The power, relative power and peak of each frequency band, the normalized value of HF (nuHF) and LF (nuLF) and the ratio between HF and LF (LF/HF) are the parameters usually considered. HF reflects parasympathetic activity as the HR variations related to the respiratory cycle. LF (0.04–0.15 Hz) mainly reflects baroreceptor activity during resting conditions and is known also as “baroreceptor range” (Malliani, 1995); it reflects contributions from both the parasympathetic and sympathetic systems and blood pressure regulation via baroreceptors and the baroreceptor activity in resting conditions (Malliani, 1995; Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, 1996; Berntson et al., 2007; Lehrer, 2007). The parasympathetic system affects heart rhythms down to 0.05 Hz, while the sympathetic system does not seem to generate rhythms above ∼0.1 Hz. In humans, the delay in the feedback loops of baroreflex system have distinctive high-amplitude peak in the HRV power spectrum around 0.1 Hz (Vaschillo et al., 2011; Lehrer and Eddie, 2013) due to the feedback loops between heart and brain (deBoer et al., 1987; Baselli et al., 1994). There is some evidence for an association between VLF band (0.0033–0.04 Hz) and all-cause mortality (Shaffer et al., 2014), however, the physiological mechanisms responsible for activity within this band are not clear although probably related to thermoregulation, the renin-angiotensin system, and other hormonal factors (Akselrod et al., 1981; Cerutti, 1995; Claydon and Krassioukov, 2008). The LF/HF ratio has controversial interpretations, with the LF power possibly generated by the sympathetic, the HF power by the parasympathetic system and their ratio indicating both parasympathetic or sympathetic dominance (Pagani et al., 1984; Montano et al., 1994). HRV descriptors are also derivable by non-linear methods. Development in the non-linear theories provides new instruments to analyse the entropy domain [such as the simple or approximate entropy (ApEn)], better describe the complexity, irregularity or randomness of HRV and its changes, the non-linear temporal relationships with other metrics such as functional connectivity, and extract information about the complexity of the two way brain-heart interaction (Norris et al., 2006; Ryan et al., 2011; Shaffer et al., 2014; Riganello et al., 2018b).
HRV and DOC
HRV is a possible index of consciousness attention (Babo-Rebelo et al., 2016; Cobos et al., 2019) and emotional states (Shi et al., 2017) in healthy subjects. The interaction between consciousness, attention and HRV has been documented in patients with DoC. VS/UWS and MCS subjects were more likely to respond to standard visual and auditory stimuli when the HRV normalized unit of LF (nuLF) ranged between 10–70 and LF peaked around 0.1 Hz (Riganello et al., 2013), thus suggesting a functional relationship between responsiveness and the sympatho-vagal balance; a correlation between HRV parameters and improvement of consciousness has been documented, and higher value of nuLF associated to a better outcome in VS/UWS patients (Riganello et al., 2015a; Wijnen et al., 2006).
In frequency domain, HRV total power (TP) as well as LF and HF power were found significantly decreased in patients with Glasgow Coma Outcome Extended (GOSE) (Weir et al., 2012) score <5 (Hendén et al., 2014).
A correlation between HRV entropy (index of the brain-heart interaction complexity) and brain activation has been also described. Approximate Entropy (ApEn) values were lower in VS/UWS patients than in healthy control whereas no differences were found for all linear parameters [Root Mean Square of Successive Differences between normal heartbeats (RMSSD), Standard Deviation of RR peak (SDRR)] (Sarà et al., 2008). We have recently found lower Multiscale Entropy (MSE) values in VS/UWS than in MCS, which correlated with the Coma Recovery Scale (CSR-R) total score. A functional connectivity pattern involving the CAN system has been documented, thus proposing HRV entropy as an indirect tool to measure and monitor connectivity changes in this neural system (Riganello et al., 2018b). In a Evoked Response Potential (ERP) study based on nociceptive repeated laser stimulation MCS showed partially preserved cortical activations, higher ERP γ-power magnitude and Standard Deviation of Normal-to-Normal intervals (SDNN) compared to VS/UWS patients (Calabrò et al., 2017). Other studies on nociceptive stimulation documented a correlation between the level of consciousness and HRV-entropy (Riganello et al., 2018a; Tobaldini et al., 2018), with lower values of entropy detected in VS/UWS than in MCS patients or in healthy subjects, and correlated to the CRS-R total scores (Riganello et al., 2018a). The above results indicate a decrease of complexity in the modulation of the response to noxious stimuli in VS/UWS subjects and a less complex ANS modulation in the two way brain-heart interaction compared to MCS.
Similar results have been observed in response to complex (musical) stimuli. Music interventions were associated with favorable behavioral and physiological responses in several studies, however, methodological quality and outcomes were heterogeneous (Grimm and Kreutz, 2018). After 14-day of music stimulation SDNN and RMSSD of VS/UWS patients increased, indicating the activity of the cardiovascular system was enhanced (Lee et al., 2011). Contrasting observations were found in the direction of the RMSSD values in a work on MCS and VS/UWS patient, who were presented live preferred music and live improvised music (O’Kelly and Magee, 2013). A significant decrease in entropy was observed in VS/UWS subjects listening to four musical pieces of different structural complexity, whereas no differences between the same selected musical pieces were observed in healthy controls under comparable experimental conditions (Riganello et al., 2015b). The quality (positive or negative) of the emotional responses was correlated to extreme (low or high) nuLF values (Riganello et al., 2010). Higher values in both time and frequency domain were observed during affective than during non-affective auditory stimulation in VS/UWS patients suggesting the possibility to discriminate between different stimuli (Machado et al., 2007; Gutiérrez et al., 2010).
The clinical and scientific evidence suggests a diagnostic and prognostic relevance of HRV parameters in DoC of different aetiologies (e.g., traumatic brain injury (TBI), haemorrhagic, and anoxic) (Keren et al., 2005; King et al., 2009; Ryan et al., 2011; Almeida et al., 2017). Decreased values in the different domains of HRV analysis has been associated with worsened heath condition. HRV parameters extracted in the time domain (SDNN, SDNN index, and RMSSD) were also found decreased after TBI in the absence of major DoC (Rapenne et al., 2001; DeGiorgio et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2017) and associated to clinical worsening and to mortality in the acute phase (Morris et al., 2006; Norris et al., 2006; Mowery et al., 2008; King et al., 2009). In children, suppression of LF and HF bands of the power spectrum were associated with brain death and poor outcome (Goldstein et al., 1993, 1998) and decreases in LF/HF was correlated with increases in intracranial pressure and mortality (Biswas et al., 2000). In TBI adults, decreased LF, HF, LF/HF, and TP were associated with brain death, increased mortality, increased intracranial pressure, and poor outcome (Winchell and Hoyt, 1997; Rapenne et al., 2001; Papaioannou et al., 2006). Reduced HRV complexity has proved to be an independent predictor of mortality (Batchinsky et al., 2007). Decreased ApEn values have been associated to increased mortality in acute TBI (Papaioannou et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2016) and the MSE was found to identify trauma patients at risk of in-hospital death, and predicts mortality independent of probability of survival based on location and mechanism of injury (Norris et al., 2008a, 2008b).
Comment and Perspectives
The CAN model of ANS-CNS functional interaction is helpful to describe the phenomena underlying residual responsiveness in DoC within the framework of homeostatic and allostatic organization, at least in part and to a degree of pathophysiological approximation (Friedman, 2007; Shen et al., 2016; Thome et al., 2017). The suitability of HRV analysis in detecting residual (covert) brain function in DoC has been documented (Wijnen et al., 2006; Gutiérrez et al., 2010; Riganello, 2016; Garbarino and Sannita, 2015). Autonomic function, ANS-mediated responsiveness and the ANS-CNS interaction qualify as possible independent indicators for clinical functional assessment, diagnosis and prognosis in DoC (King et al., 2009; Ryan et al., 2011; Sannita, 2015; Riganello, 2016). In a reversed perspective, research on the residual modular functions in DoC can provide unique information about brain mechanisms/functions and ANS-CNS interplay that can be investigated in these patients under experimental conditions that are rigorously controlled (Monti, 2012; Riganello et al., 2012b; Sannita, 2014; Shen et al., 2016; Chennu et al., 2017; Kiryachkov et al., 2017).
Brain function is modulated by complex neural networks and non-neuronal factors which interact with each other, individually or collectively account for inter/intra-individual variability, and reflect/depend on the circadian rhythms and the wakefulness/sleep alternation (Bullock, 1970; Sannita, 2006; Garbarino et al., 2014, 2019; Soddu and Bassetti, 2017). The HRV concomitants of the major shift toward sympathetic activation associated to peak cortisol levels at the morning sleep-to-wake transition are an example in this regard (Bilan et al., 2005; Boudreau et al., 2011, 2012). HRV proved reliable in investigating the ANS-CNS functional interaction underlying residual responsiveness in VS/UWS or MCS subjects (Wijnen et al., 2006; Gutiérrez et al., 2010; Candelieri et al., 2011; Sannita, 2015; Riganello, 2016). CNS and ANS setups, however, change over time spontaneously or due to homeostatic or allostatic requirements with different timing and latencies. HRV measures at rest and in response to stimulus conditions have higher time resolution and reflect rapid changes better than clinical or neuroimaging markers of damage, with greater variability during the day (Bekinschtein et al., 2009; Candelieri et al., 2011; Riganello et al., 2013, 2015c; Abbate et al., 2014; Sannita, 2015; Blume et al., 2017). Time appears to be a source of variability adding to the variety of environmental factors (light and noise in hospital settings, timing of medication or non-pharmacologic interventions, co-morbidities, etc.) also needing consideration, both as co-determinants of the circadian rhythms (Soddu and Bassetti, 2017) and in view of the ANS major role in internal environment constancy and adaptation that are fundamental to homeostasis. Systematic investigation is still lacking and appears advisable.
FR, SKL, CDP, VP, WS, and SL have equally collaborate to this work with substantial, direct and intellectual contribute, and approved it for publication.
This work was supported by the University Hospital of Liège, the French Speaking Community Concerted Research Action (ARC 12-17/01), the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FRS-FNRS), the German Research Society (DFG), Human Brain Project (EU-H2020-fetflagship-hbp-sga1-ga720270), Luminous project (EU-H2020-fetopen-ga686764), the James McDonnell Foundation, Mind Science Foundation, IAP research network P7/06 of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy), the European Commission, the Public Utility Foundation “Université Européenne du Travail,” and “Fondazione Europea di Ricerca Biomedica”. SKL is a FRS-FNRS research fellow. SL is research director at FRS-FNRS.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbate, C., Trimarchi, P. D., Basile, I., Mazzucchi, A., and Devalle, G. (2014). Sensory stimulation for patients with disorders of consciousness: from stimulation to rehabilitation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:616. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00616
Akselrod, S., Gordon, D., Ubel, F. A., Shannon, D. C., Berger, A. C., and Cohen, R. J. (1981). Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213, 220–222. doi: 10.1126/science.6166045
Almeida, R., Dias, C., Silva, M. E., and Rocha, A. P. (2017). “ARFIMA-GARCH modeling of HRV: clinical application in acute brain injury,” in Complexity and Nonlinearity in Cardiovascular Signals, eds R. Barbieri, E. P. Scilingo, and G. Valenza (Cham: Springer), 451–468. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58709-7_17
Babo-Rebelo, M., Richter, C. G., and Tallon-Baudry, C. (2016). Neural responses to heartbeats in the default network encode the self in spontaneous thoughts. J. Neurosci. 36, 7829–7840. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0262-16.2016
Baselli, G., Cerutti, S., Badilini, F., Biancardi, L., Porta, A., Pagani, M., et al. (1994). Model for the assessment of heart period and arterial pressure variability interactions and of respiration influences. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 32, 143–152. doi: 10.1007/bf02518911
Bassi, A., and Bozzali, M. (2015). Potential interactions between the autonomic nervous system and higher level functions in neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. Front. Neurol. 6:182. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00182
Batchinsky, A. I., Cancio, L. C., Salinas, J., Kuusela, T., Cooke, W. H., Wang, J. J., et al. (2007). Prehospital loss of R-to-R interval complexity is associated with mortality in trauma patients. J. Trauma 63, 512–518. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d2f0
Bekinschtein, T., Niklison, J., Sigman, L., Manes, F., Leiguarda, R., Armony, J., et al. (2004). Emotion processing in the minimally conscious state. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 75, 788–788. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.034876
Bekinschtein, T. A., Manes, F. F., Villarreal, M., Owen, A. M., and Della Maggiore, V. (2011). Functional imaging reveals movement preparatory activity in the vegetative state. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:5. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00005
Berntson, G. G., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). “Heart rate variability: stress and psychiatric conditions,” in Dynamic Electrocardiography, eds M. Malik and A. J. Camm (New York, NY: Blackwell/Futura), 57–64.
Bilan, A., Witczak, A., Palusiński, R., Myśliński, W., and Hanzlik, J. (2005). Circadian rhythm of spectral indices of heart rate variability in healthy subjects. J. Electrocardiol. 38, 239–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.01.012
Biswas, A. K., Scott, W. A., Sommerauer, J. F., and Luckett, P. M. (2000). Heart rate variability after acute traumatic brain injury in children. Crit. Care Med. 28, 3907–3912. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200012000-00030
Blume, C., Lechinger, J., Santhi, N., del Giudice, R, Gnjezda, M. T., Pichler, G., et al. (2017). Significance of circadian rhythms in severely brain-injured patients: A clue to consciousness? Neurology 88, 1933–1941. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003942
Boly, M., Faymonville, M.-E., Schnakers, C., Peigneux, P., Lambermont, B., Phillips, C., et al. (2008). Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. 7, 1013–1020. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70219-9
Boudreau, P., Dumont, G., Kin, N. M., Walker, C.-D., and Boivin, D. B. (2011). Correlation of heart rate variability and circadian markers in humans. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011, 681–682.
Boudreau, P., Yeh, W. H., Dumont, G. A., and Boivin, D. B. (2012). A circadian rhythm in heart rate variability contributes to the increased cardiac sympathovagal response to awakening in the morning. Chronobiol. Int. 29, 757–768. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.674592
Bruno, M.-A., Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Schnakers, C., Boly, M., Gosseries, O., Demertzi, A., et al. (2010). Visual fixation in the vegetative state: an observational case series PET study. BMC Neurol. 10:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-35
Calabrò, R. S., Naro, A., Manuli, A., Leo, A., Luca, R. D., Buono, V. L., et al. (2017). Pain perception in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness: What can limbic system tell us? Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 454–462. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.12.011
Candelieri, A., Cortese, M. D., Dolce, G., Riganello, F., and Sannita, W. G. (2011). Visual pursuit: within-day variability in the severe disorder of consciousness. J. Neurotrauma 28, 2013–2017. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1885
Carney, R. M., Blumenthal, J. A., Freedland, K. E., Stein, P. K., Howells, W. B., Berkman, L. F., et al. (2005). Low heart rate variability and the effect of depression on post–myocardial infarction mortality. Arch. Intern. Med. 165, 1486–1491. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1486
Cerutti, S. (1995). Spectral Analysis of the Heart Rate Variability Signal. Available at: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10014992161/ (accessed November 25, 2018).
Chennu, S., Annen, J., Wannez, S., Thibaut, A., Chatelle, C., Cassol, H., et al. (2017). Brain networks predict metabolism, diagnosis and prognosis at the bedside in disorders of consciousness. Brain 140, 2120–2132. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx163
Claydon, V. E., and Krassioukov, A. V. (2008). Clinical correlates of frequency analyses of cardiovascular control after spinal cord injury. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294, H668–H678. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00869.2007
Cobos, M. I., Guerra, P. M., Vila, J., and Chica, A. B. (2019). Heart-rate modulations reveal attention and consciousness interactions: COBOS ET AL. Psychophysiology 56, e13295. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13295
Crone, J. S., Bio, B. J., Vespa, P. M., Lutkenhoff, E. S., and Monti, M. M. (2017). Restoration of thalamo-cortical connectivity after brain injury: recovery of consciousness, complex behavior, or passage of time? J. Neurosci. Res. 96, 671–687. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24115
de Morree, H. M., Szabó, B. M., Rutten, G.-J., and Kop, W. J. (2013). Central nervous system involvement in the autonomic responses to psychological distress. Neth. Heart J. 21, 64–69. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0351-1
deBoer, R. W., Karemaker, J. M., and Strackee, J. (1987). Hemodynamic fluctuations and baroreflex sensitivity in humans: a beat-to-beat model. Am. J. Physiol. 253, H680–H689. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1987.253.3.H680
DeGiorgio, C. M., Miller, P., Meymandi, S., Chin, A., Epps, J., Gordon, S., et al. (2010). RMSSD, a measure of heart rate variability, is associated with risk factors for sudep: the SUDEP-7 inventory. Epilepsy Behav. 19, 78–81. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.06.011
Demertzi, A., Antonopoulos, G., Heine, L., Voss, H. U., Crone, J. S., de Los Angeles, C., et al. (2015). Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain 138, 2619–2631. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv169
Di Perri, C., Bahri, M. A., Amico, E., Thibaut, A., Heine, L., Antonopoulos, G., et al. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness in patients who have emerged from a minimally conscious state: a cross-sectional multimodal imaging study. Lancet Neurol. 15, 830–842. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00111-3
Di Perri, C., Bastianello, S., Bartsch, A. J., Pistarini, C., Maggioni, G., Magrassi, L., et al. (2013). Limbic hyperconnectivity in the vegetative state. Neurology 81, 1417–1424. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a43b78
Doehner, W., Ural, D., Haeusler, K. G., Čelutkienė, J., Bestetti, R., Cavusoglu, Y., et al. (2018). Heart and brain interaction in patients with heart failure: overview and proposal for a taxonomy. A position paper from the Study Group on Heart and Brain Interaction of the Heart Failure Association. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 20, 199–215. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1100
Duclos, C., Dumont, M., Arbour, C., Paquet, J., Blais, H., Menon, D. K., et al. (2017). Parallel recovery of consciousness and sleep in acute traumatic brain injury. Neurology 88, 268–275. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003508
Esler, M. (1993). Clinical application of noradrenaline spillover methodology: delineation of regional human sympathetic nervous responses. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 73, 243–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1993.tb00579.x
Gao, L., Smielewski, P., Czosnyka, M., and Ercole, A. (2016). Cerebrovascular signal complexity six hours after intensive care unit admission correlates with outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 33, 2011–2018. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4228
Garbarino, S., Lanteri, P., Feeling, N. R., Jarczok, M. N., Quintana, D. S., Koenig, J., et al. (2019). Circadian rhythms, sleep, and the autonomic nervous system: a position paper. J. Psychophysiol. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000236
Giacino, J. T., Kalmar, K., and Whyte, J. (2004). The JFK coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 2020–2029. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033
Goldstein, B., DeKing, D., DeLong, D. J., Kempski, M. H., Cox, C., Kelly, M. M., et al. (1993). Autonomic cardiovascular state after severe brain injury and brain death in children. Crit. Care Med. 21, 228–233.
Goldstein, B., Fiser, D. H., Kelly, M. M., Mickelsen, D., Ruttimann, U., and Pollack, M. M. (1998). Decomplexification in critical illness and injury: relationship between heart rate variability, severity of illness, and outcome. Crit. Care Med. 26, 352–357. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00040
Gutiérrez, J., Machado, C., Estévez, M., Olivares, A., Hernández, H., Perez, J., et al. (2010). Heart rate variability changes induced by auditory stimulation in persistent vegetative state. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 9, 357–362. doi: 10.1515/IJDHD.2010.041
Hendén, P. L., Söndergaard, S., Rydenhag, B., Reinsfelt, B., Ricksten, S.-E., and Aneman, A. (2014). Can baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability predict late neurological outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury? J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 26, 50–59. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3182a47b62
Keren, O., Yupatov, S., Radai, M. M., Elad-Yarum, R., Faraggi, D., Abboud, S., et al. (2005). Heart rate variability (HRV) of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the post-insult sub-acute period. Brain Inj. 19, 605–611. doi: 10.1080/02699050400024946
King, D. R., Ogilvie, M. P., Pereira, B. M., Chang, Y., Manning, R. J., Conner, J. A., et al. (2009). Heart rate variability as a triage tool in patients with trauma during prehospital helicopter transport. J. Trauma 67, 436–440. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ad67de
Kiryachkov, Y., Shelkunova, I., Shelkunova, I. G., Kolesov, D. L., and Danilec, V. V. (2017). MON-P025: association between heart rate variability measures and energy homeostasis in patients with vegetative status: a prospective clinical cohort pilot study. Clin. Nutr. 36:S188.
Laureys, S., Celesia, G. G., Cohadon, F., Lavrijsen, J., León-Carrión, J., Sannita, W. G., et al. (2010). Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 8:68. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-68
Laureys, S., Faymonville, M.-E., Luxen, A., Lamy, M., Franck, G., and Maquet, P. (2000). Restoration of thalamocortical connectivity after recovery from persistent vegetative state. Lancet 355, 1790–1791. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02271-6
Laureys, S., Faymonville, M. E., Peigneux, P., Damas, P., Lambermont, B., Del Fiore, G., et al. (2002). Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state. Neuroimage 17, 732–741. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1236
Lee, Y.-C., Lei, C.-Y., Shih, Y.-S., Zhang, W.-C., Wang, H.-M., Tseng, C.-L., et al. (2011). “HRV response of vegetative state patient with music therapy,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, 1701–1704. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090488
Lehrer, P., and Eddie, D. (2013). Dynamic processes in regulation and some implications for biofeedback and biobehavioral interventions. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 38, 143–155. doi: 10.1007/s10484-013-9217-6
Machado, C., Korein, J., Aubert, E., Bosch, J., Alvarez, M. A., Rodríguez, R., et al. (2007). Recognizing a Mother’s voice in the persistent vegetative state. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 38, 124–126. doi: 10.1177/155005940703800306
Majerus, S., Bruno, M.-A., Schnakers, C., Giacino, J. T., and Laureys, S. (2009). “The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients,” in Progress in Brain Research, ed. S. Laureys, N. D. Schiff, and A. M. Owen (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 49–61. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17705-1
Marino, S., Bonanno, L., Ciurleo, R., Baglieri, A., Morabito, R., Guerrera, S., et al. (2017). Functional evaluation of awareness in vegetative and minimally conscious state. Open Neuroimaging J. 11, 17–25. doi: 10.2174/1874440001711010017
Montano, N., Ruscone, T. G., Porta, A., Lombardi, F., Pagani, M., and Malliani, A. (1994). Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation 90, 1826–1831. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.4.1826
Monti, M. M., Rosenberg, M., Finoia, P., Kamau, E., Pickard, J. D., and Owen, A. M. (2014). Thalamo-frontal connectivity mediates top-down cognitive functions in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 84, 167–173. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001123
Morris, J. A., Norris, P. R., Ozdas, A., Waitman, L. R., Harrell, F. E., Williams, A. E., et al. (2006). Reduced heart rate variability: an indicator of cardiac uncoupling and diminished physiologic reserve in 1,425 trauma patients. J. Trauma 60, 1165–1173. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000220384.04978.3b
Mowery, N. T., Norris, P. R., Riordan, W., Jenkins, J. M., Williams, A. E., and Morris, J. A. (2008). Cardiac uncoupling and heart rate variability are associated with intracranial hypertension and mortality: a study of 145 trauma patients with continuous monitoring. J. Trauma 65, 621–627. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181837980
Napadow, V., Dhond, R., Conti, G., Makris, N., Brown, E. N., and Barbieri, R. (2008). Brain correlates of autonomic modulation: combining heart rate variability with fMRI. Neuroimage 42, 169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.238
Naro, A., Leo, A., Bramanti, P., and Calabrò, R. S. (2015). Moving toward conscious pain processing detection in chronic disorders of consciousness: anterior cingulate cortex neuromodulation. J. Pain 16, 1022–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.06.014
Norris, P. R., Anderson, S. M., Jenkins, J. M., Williams, A. E., and Morris, J. A. (2008a). Heart rate multiscale entropy at three hours predicts hospital mortality in 3,154 trauma patients. Shock 30, 17–22. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318164e4d0
Norris, P. R., Stein, P. K., and Morris, J. A. (2008b). Reduced heart rate multiscale entropy predicts death in critical illness: a study of physiologic complexity in 285 trauma patients. J. Crit. Care 23, 399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.001
Norris, P. R., Ozdas, A., Cao, H., Williams, A. E., Harrell, F. E., Jenkins, J. M., et al. (2006). Cardiac uncoupling and heart rate variability stratify ICU patients by mortality: a study of 2088 trauma patients. Ann. Surg. 243, 804–812.
Pagani, M., Lombardi, F., Guzzetti, S., Sandrone, G., Rimoldi, O., Malfatto, G., et al. (1984). Power spectral density of heart rate variability as an index of sympatho-vagal interaction in normal and hypertensive subjects. J. Hypertens. Suppl. 2, S383–S385.
Papaioannou, V., Giannakou, M., Maglaveras, N., Sofianos, E., and Giala, M. (2008). Investigation of heart rate and blood pressure variability, baroreflex sensitivity, and approximate entropy in acute brain injury patients. J. Crit. Care 23, 380–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.04.006
Papaioannou, V. E., Maglaveras, N., Houvarda, I., Antoniadou, E., and Vretzakis, G. (2006). Investigation of altered heart rate variability, nonlinear properties of heart rate signals, and organ dysfunction longitudinally over time in intensive care unit patients. J. Crit. Care 21, 95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.12.007
Pistoia, F., Sacco, S., Stewart, J., Sarà, M., Carolei, A., Pistoia, F., et al. (2016). Disorders of consciousness: painless or painful conditions?—Evidence from neuroimaging studies. Brain Sci. 6:E47. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6040047
Rapenne, T., Moreau, D., Lenfant, F., Vernet, M., Boggio, V., Cottin, Y., et al. (2001). Could heart rate variability predict outcome in patients with severe head injury? A pilot study. J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 13, 260–268. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200107000-00016
Riganello, F. (2016). “Responsiveness and the autonomic control–CNS two-way interaction in disorders of consciousness,” in Brain Function and Responsiveness in Disorders of Consciousness, eds M. M. Monti and W. G. Sannita (Cham: Springer), 145–155. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21425-2_11
Riganello, F., Candelieri, A., Quintieri, M., Conforti, D., and Dolce, G. (2010). Heart rate variability: an index of brain processing in vegetative state? An artificial intelligence, data mining study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 2024–2034. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.010
Riganello, F., Chatelle, C., Schnakers, C., and Laureys, S. (2018a). Heart Rate Variability as an indicator of nociceptive pain in disorders of consciousness? J. Pain Symptom Manage. 57, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.016
Riganello, F., Cortese, M. D., Arcuri, F., Dolce, G., Lucca, L. F., and Sannita, W. G. (2015a). Autonomic nervous system functional state, neuro-rehabiliation, and outcome in disorders of consciousness. J. Neurotrauma 32, 1071–1077.
Riganello, F., Cortese, M. D., Arcuri, F., Quintieri, M., and Dolce, G. (2015b). How Can music influence the autonomic nervous system response in patients with severe disorder of consciousness? Front. Neurosci. 9:461. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00461
Riganello, F., Cortese, M. D., Dolce, G., Lucca, L. F., and Sannita, W. G. (2015c). The autonomic system functional state predicts responsiveness in DOC. J. Neurotrauma 32, 1071–1077. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3539
Riganello, F., Cortese, M. D., Dolce, G., and Sannita, W. G. (2013). Visual pursuit response in the severe disorder of consciousness: modulation by the central autonomic system and a predictive model. BMC Neurol. 13:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-164
Riganello, F., Dolce, G., and Sannita, W. (2012a). Heart rate variability and the central autonomic network in the severe disorder of consciousness. J. Rehabil. Med. 44, 495–501. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0975
Riganello, F., Garbarino, S., and Sannita, W. G. (2012b). Heart rate variability, homeostasis, and brain function: a tutorial and review of application. J. Psychophysiol. 26, 178–203. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000080
Riganello, F., Larroque, S. K., Bahri, M. A., Heine, L., Martial, C., Carrière, M., et al. (2018b). A heartbeat away from consciousness: heart rate variability entropy can discriminate disorders of consciousness and is correlated with resting-state fMRI brain connectivity of the central autonomic network. Front. Neurol 9:769. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00769
Riganello, F., Macri, S., Alleva, E., Petrini, C., Soddu, A., Leòn-Carriòn, J., et al. (2016). Pain perception in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome may challenge the interruption of artificial nutrition and hydration: neuroethics in action. Front. Neurol. 7:202. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00202
Ruiz Vargas, E., Sörös, P., Shoemaker, J. K., and Hachinski, V. (2016). Human cerebral circuitry related to cardiac control: a neuroimaging meta-analysis: cardiac control. Ann. Neurol. 79, 709–716. doi: 10.1002/ana.24642
Ryan, M. L., Thorson, C. M., Otero, C. A., Vu, T., and Proctor, K. G. (2011). Clinical applications of heart rate variability in the triage and assessment of traumatically injured patients. Anesthesiol. Res. Pract. 2011:e416590. doi: 10.1155/2011/416590
Saper, C. B. (2002). The central autonomic nervous system: conscious visceral perception and autonomic pattern generation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 433–469. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.032502.111311
Sarà, M., Sebastiano, F., Sacco, S., Pistoia, F., Onorati, P., Albertini, G., et al. (2008). Heart rate non linear dynamics in patients with persistent vegetative state: a preliminary report. Brain Inj. 22, 33–37. doi: 10.1080/02699050701810670
Shaffer, F., McCraty, R., and Zerr, C. L. (2014). A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability. Front Psychol. 5:1040. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040
Shen, D., Cui, L., Shen, Z., Garbarino, S., Sannita, W. G., and Stevens, R. D. (2016). Resting brain activity in disorders of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 84, 1272–1280.
Shi, H., Yang, L., Zhao, L., Su, Z., Mao, X., Zhang, L., et al. (2017). Differences of heart rate variability between happiness and sadness emotion states: a pilot study. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 37, 527–539. doi: 10.1007/s40846-017-0238-0
Soddu, A., Gómez, F., Heine, L., Di Perri, C., Bahri, M. A., Voss, H. U., et al. (2015). Correlation between resting state fMRI total neuronal activity and PET metabolism in healthy controls and patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Behav. 6:e00424. doi: 10.1002/brb3.424
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996). Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 93, 1043–1065. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.5.1043
Thayer, J. F., Åhs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J. J., and Wager, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 747–756. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009
Thayer, J. F., and Lane, R. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 33, 81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.004
Thome, J., Densmore, M., Frewen, P. A., McKinnon, M. C., Théberge, J., Nicholson, A. A., et al. (2017). Desynchronization of autonomic response and central autonomic network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder: CAN Connectivity and HRV in PTSD. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 27–40. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23340
Tobaldini, E., Toschi-Dias, E., Trimarchi, P. D., Brena, N., Comanducci, A., Casarotto, S., et al. (2018). Cardiac autonomic responses to nociceptive stimuli in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness. Clin. Neurophysiol. 129, 1083–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.01.068
Tonhajzerova, I., Ondrejka, I., Turianikova, Z., Javorka, K., Calkovska, A., and Javorka, M. (2012). “Heart rate variability: an index of the brain–heart interaction,” in Tachycardia, ed. T. Yamad (Rijeka: Intech), 185–202.
Valenza, G., Duggento, A., Passamonti, L., Diciotti, S., Tessa, C., Barbieri, R., et al. (2017). “Resting-state brain correlates of instantaneous autonomic outflow,” in Proceedings of the 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), (Seogwipo: IEEE), 3325–3328.
Vaschillo, E. G., Vaschillo, B., Pandina, R. J., and Bates, M. E. (2011). Resonances in the cardiovascular system caused by rhythmical muscle tension: rhythmical muscle tension and resonance. Psychophysiology 48, 927–936. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01156.x
Wallin, B. G., and Charkoudian, N. (2007). Sympathetic neural control of integrated cardiovascular function: insights from measurement of human sympathetic nerve activity. Muscle Nerve 36, 595–614. doi: 10.1002/mus.20831
Weir, J., Steyerberg, E. W., Butcher, I., Lu, J., Lingsma, H. F., McHugh, G. S., et al. (2012). Does the extended glasgow outcome scale add value to the conventional Glasgow outcome scale? J. Neurotrauma 29, 53–58. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2137
Wijnen, V. J., Heutink, M., van Boxtel, G. J., Eilander, H. J., and de Gelder, B. (2006). Autonomic reactivity to sensory stimulation is related to consciousness level after severe traumatic brain injury. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 1794–1807. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.006
Winchell, R. J., and Hoyt, D. B. (1997). Analysis of heart-rate variability: a noninvasive predictor of death and poor outcome in patients with severe head injury. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 43, 927–933. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199712000-00010
Keywords: central autonomic network, autonomic nervous system, disorders of consciousness, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, heart rate variability
Citation: Riganello F, Larroque SK, Di Perri C, Prada V, Sannita WG and Laureys S (2019) Measures of CNS-Autonomic Interaction and Responsiveness in Disorder of Consciousness. Front. Neurosci. 13:530. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00530
Received: 24 December 2018; Accepted: 08 May 2019;
Published: 21 June 2019.
Edited by:Yoko Nagai, University of Sussex, United Kingdom
Reviewed by:Cristina Ottaviani, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Herbert Jelinek, Charles Sturt University, Australia
Copyright © 2019 Riganello, Larroque, Di Perri, Prada, Sannita and Laureys. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Francesco Riganello, email@example.com