In the original article, there was an error. The psychometric scale used to measure the depression scores was the “Beck Depression Inventory” and not the “Beck Depression Inventory II.”
A correction has been made to the Materials and Methods, subsection Sociodemographic and Psychological Scales:
“Subjects filled a questionnaire to characterize gender, age, educational level, handedness, and ethnic origin. Weight and height were also measured to prevent the inclusion of participants with an unhealthy body mass index. Subjects were assessed with the 10-items Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) (Cohen et al., 1983; Morgado et al., 2013), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (Beck et al., 1988), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (Beck et al., 1996). PSS-10 measures the extent to which participants perceived their life as unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded during the previous month. The higher the score, the greater the intensity of perceived stress. BAI measures the severity of an individual's anxiety during the previous week. Scores lower than 8 indicate minimal anxiety. Scores higher than 7, 15, and 25 indicate mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. BDI measures the severity of depression and can be used as a screening tool. Scores lower than 14 indicate minimal depression. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.”
A correction has also been made to Results, subsection Psychological Assessment:
“The stress group revealed higher levels of perceived stress (mean ± standard deviation 15.07 ± 5.23) than the control group (8.64 ± 5.27) as assessed by PSS-10 [t(27) = 3.30, p = 0.003, effect size d = 1.27]. No statistically significant differences were found for BAI (U = 117.50, p = 0.591) and BDI (U = 134.00, p = 0.217) between groups.”
Lastly, a correction has been made to the Abbreviations section:
“ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; GLM, general linear model; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; PSS-10, 10-items Perceived Stress Scale; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
1
BeckA. T.EpsteinN.BrownG.SteerR. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.56, 893–897. 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
2
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BallR.RanieriW. (1996). Comparison of beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J. Pers. Assess.67, 588–597. 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13
3
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav.24:385. 10.2307/2136404
4
MorgadoP.FreitasD.BessaJ. M.SousaN.CerqueiraJ. J. (2013). Perceived stress in obsessive–compulsive disorder is related with obsessive but not compulsive symptoms. Front. Psychiatry4:21. 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00021
Summary
Keywords
stress, decision-making, cognition, magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI, reward, human, food
Citation
Ferreira S, Veiga C, Moreira P, Magalhães R, Coelho A, Marques P, Portugal-Nunes C, Sousa N and Morgado P (2019) Corrigendum: Reduced Hedonic Valuation of Rewards and Unaffected Cognitive Regulation in Chronic Stress. Front. Neurosci. 13:1252. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01252
Received
04 November 2019
Accepted
05 November 2019
Published
22 November 2019
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
13 - 2019
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Ferreira, Veiga, Moreira, Magalhães, Coelho, Marques, Portugal-Nunes, Sousa and Morgado.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pedro Morgado pedromorgado@med.uminho.pt
This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.