Impact Factor 2.634 | CiteScore 2.6
More on impact ›

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Pediatr., 17 July 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00396

A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children

P. Thirumal1*, B. Sumathi2 and D. Nirmala2
  • 1Gastroenterology Clinic, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India
  • 2Gastroenterology, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Chennai, India

Background: Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) was a relatively uncommon and easily misdiagnosed clinical entity in children. The diagnosis of this condition was often delayed due to lack of clinical suspicion. Only case series were available and no definitive treatment was postulated. Here, we share our experience of SRUS in our institute and reviewed the literature published so far.

Aim: To study the clinical profile and treatment response of Solitary Rectal ulcer Syndrome in Children (SRUS).

Materials: The clinical profile and 1 year follow up response of the diagnosed cases of SRUS over a period of 5 years was retrospectively collected from medical record department.

Results: The median age of presentation among 24 children was 8 years with majority (75%) above 5 years. All children presented with intermittent rectal bleeding with median duration of 5.5 months. The other presenting symptoms documented were hard stool (79%), mucorrhea (70%), and abdominal pain (58%). One child presented with rectal prolapse. On colonoscopy, 46% had single ulcer while another 46% had multiple ulcers and 8% had polypoidal lesion. All lesions were within distal rectum and had characteristic histological pattern. All children were treated with conventional treatment like dietary fibers and laxatives along with toilet training. About 75% children attained remission and 25% had relapse but responded with corticosteroid enema. None required surgery.

Conclusion: Conventional treatments itself induce and maintain remission in most of SRUS patients if treatment is instituted at the earliest. Thus, early suspicion and diagnosis is needed to achieve remission.

Introduction

Bleeding per rectum is one of the common presenting complaints seen in pediatric clinic. The common differential diagnosis are infectious/allergic colitis, colonic polyps, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), anal fissure and rare conditions like rectal colopathy, vascular ectasia. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is often missed at early clinical presentation due to lack of clinical suspicion and usually diagnosed lately.

SRUS is a benign chronic disorder often related to abnormal defecation or straining during defecation. It was well-recognized in the adult population with an incidence of 1 in 100,000 (1) and less common in childhood period. Lack of distinct clinical presentation and varying symptomology, diagnosis is often delayed if not suspected. And since it is a masquerader of IBD and polyps, misdiagnosis may lead to treatment disaster and unwanted surgery. Only few case reports and case series have been reported so far in children. We report a series of 24 children with SRUS and their treatment response.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis of case records during the period 2012–2017 was done at Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Institute of Child Health, Chennai, India. Histologically confirmed SRUS cases were selected and informations such as demographic profile, clinical presentations, routine investigations (complete hemogram, renal function test, stool, and urine routine) and colonoscopic findings were obtained from medical record department. In addition to this, type of treatment, and its response over follow-up period of 1 year were analyzed.

Results

Total number of children with SRUS was 24. The median age of presentation was 8 years ranging between 5 and 12 years with Male to Female ratio of 1:1.1. Intermittent rectal bleeding was the presenting complaint in all cases. Mucorrhea (70.8%) and abdominal pain (58.3%) were the associated symptoms. The median duration from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was 5.5 months (IQR 3.0–7.75) with 70 percent of children had symptoms for < 6 months duration. Straining at defecation and passage of hard stool was present in 19 (79.1%) and there was a need for digital evacuation in 27% of children. Four children (16.6%) presented with diarrhea. Rectal prolapse was documented in one child. Anemia (Hb < 10 gm/dl) was most commonly seen in 79.1% of cases. The colonoscopy findings revealed that 11 (45.8%) children had single ulcer in the anterior wall of rectum, another 11 (45.8%) children had multiple ulcers and two children (8.3%) had polypoidal lesion (Table 1). Size of ulcers ranged from 0.5 to 4 cm in diameter but majority were 1–1.5 cms in diameter (Figure 1). All the lesions were in rectum and within 5–10 cms from anal verge. Histology finding documented were presence of fibromuscular obliteration in all cases (100%) followed by surface ulceration with minimal inflammation in 22 (92%) and hypertropic muscularis mucosa with splayed fibers in 21 (87.5%) (Figure 2). A mixed inflammatory infiltrate was also encountered in 3 cases, but cryptitis or crypt abscesses and chronic changes characteristic of IBD were not seen in any biopsies.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic profile, clinical presentation, colonoscopy findings and histological findings (N = 24).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Colonoscopic Findings in SRUS: (A) Polypoidal mass like lesion. (B) Well-demarcated ulcer in rectum.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Histology (H & E) Findings in SRUS. (A) Complete ulceration of lining mucosa. (B) Obliteration of the lamina propria by fibromuscular proliferation of the muscularis mucosa admitting with few inflammatory cell composed of lymphocytes and plasma cells.

All children with constipation were treated with dietary fibers (age in years + 5 g per day), toilet training and followed by laxatives like Polyethylene glycol—PEG 3,350 (0.5–1 g/kg once daily) or Lactulose (1 ml/kg twice daily initially then titrated to achieve 2 soft stools per day) or Liquid paraffin 1 ml/kg/day oral solution for 4–8 weeks. Parents were reassured of the benign nature of the disease and need for regular toilet habits to prevent relapses. About 18 children out of 24 (75%) responded to above treatment and maintained remission till the follow up period of 1 year. Six children (25%) had recurrent rectal bleeding and were treated with corticosteroid rectal enema for 5–7 days. One child had profuse recurrent rectal bleeding despite medical therapy and was referred to higher center for Argon Plasma coagulation. But the child was lost to follow-up. None of our children required surgery (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Treatments and its response (N = 24).

Discussion

In the year 1829, Cruveilhier (2) had reported four unusual cases of rectal ulcers. Lloyd-Davis used the term “solitary ulcers of the rectum” in the late 1930s. The disease became widely recognized after a review of 68 cases by Madigan et al. (3) Later, Rutter et al. (4) also reported the detailed pathogenic concept of the disease. Solitary rectal ulcer is a misnomer since only 40% of patients had ulcer and others presentations were hyperemic mucosa to broad-based polypoidal lesions. Lesions may be of varying size and shape and ulcer may be solitary or multiple (5) and may involve sigmoid colon also.

High index of clinical suspicion is needed and diagnosis is based on symptomatology in combination with endoscopic and histological findings. The pathophysiology of SRUS is incompletely understood. Inappropriate contraction of the puborectalis muscle, chronic mechanical, and ischemic trauma, inflammation by hard stools and rectal mucosal prolapse have been commonly implicated (6).

In the present study, majority (75%) of children were aged more than 5 years at the time of presentation as comparable with other cases series (79) and youngest patient in our study was 1.5 years. Our series observed slight female predominance in contrast to Suresh et al. (7) and Kennedy et al. (10).

Intermittent rectal bleeding and/or mucorrhea were the commonest presentation similar to other reported series (7, 1115) Predisposing factors for SRUS like constipation (hard stool), straining during defecation were present in majority of case series (7, 12, 1416). The other presenting symptom which signifies rectal diseases like tenesmus, rectal prolapse were present in varying proportions (7, 12, 1417). One of the importance and significant observation was that median time interval between onset of index symptoms to diagnosis was 5.5 months in our study series whereas, it was found to be ranging from 6 months to 3.2 years in the other series reviewed (Table 3). The reason for our early diagnosis may be due to early clinical suspicion and evaluation for SRUS earliest at after ruling out common causes. Clinical symptoms in favor of SRUS were features of dyssynergic defecation such as straining during defecation, hard stool, sensation of incomplete evacuation, and digital evacuation.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Summary of case series reported in literature over past 20 years.

The next work-up was sigmoidoscopy with biopsy to rule out IBD. Endoscopic findings suggestive of SRUS were discrete well-demarcated single or multiple ulcers/erythema in contrast to continuous, symmetrical erythema/hyperemia mucosa with/without ulceration, and loss of vascular pattern in ulcerative colitis. Typical histological findings were fibrous obliteration of the lamina propria, streaming of fibroblasts, and muscle fibers between crypts, thickening or hyperplasia of muscularis mucosa, branching, and distorted glandular crypts, surface ulceration with minimal inflammation (7). Thus, diagnosis was ascertained by combination of clinical symptoms, colonoscopic findings, and histological examination.

Treatment was not standarized and various medicationas and surgical procedures had been tried (22, 23). Response to treatment was not consistent in the reviewed cases series (Table 3). Treatment should include reassurance of the patient and parents that the lesion is benign and chronic. High-fiber diet and appropriate toilet training in young and biofeedback therapy (24) in adolescents had shown encouraging results. Sucralfate enema may be effective in some patients (25) Sulfasalazine (26) and corticosteroids (8, 11) had been tried with varying response. Other treatment modalities include endoscopic application of human fibrin sealant (27), laser therapy (28), argon plasma coagulation (20). In contrast to other case series, we had observed remission in 75% of children with conventional treatment of laxative along with toilet training and only 25% needed rectal corticosteroid enema to achieve remission. Traditional squatting position for defecation and fiber rich staple food intake practices in our region may be a reason for achieving high remission by conventional treatment.

On reviewing case series published over past 20 years (Table 3), the major difference we observed in our present study was that early diagnosis and treatment by conventional methods itself achieve remission and decreases the morbidities due to SRUS in significant proportion.

Conclusion

We conclude that conventional treatments itself induce and maintain remission in most of SRUS patients if treatment is instituted at the earliest. Hence, early suspicion and diagnosis of SRUS must be considered in a child with bleeding per rectum.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Author Contributions

PT: data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing. BS: guidance on manuscript writing. DN: revision and final approval. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge medical record department staff members for their support to collect data.

References

1. Martin CJ, Parks TG, Biggart JD. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in Northern Ireland. 1971-1980. Br J Surg. (1981) 68:744–7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800681021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Cruveilhier J. Ulcere chronique du rectum. Anatomie Pathologique du Corps Humain. Paris: JB Bailliere (1829). p. 1829–42.

Google Scholar

3. Madigan MR, Morson BC. Solitary ulcer of the rectum. Gut. (1969) 10:871–81. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.11.871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Rutter KR, Riddell RH. The solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Clin Gastroenterol. (1975) 4:505–30.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

5. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Church JM, Lavery IC, Oakley JR, Milsom JW. Clinical conundrum of solitary rectal ulcer. Dis Colon Rectum. (1992) 35:227–34. doi: 10.1007/BF02051012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ertem D, Acar Y, Karaa EK, Pehlivanoglu E. A rare and often unrecognized cause of hematochezia and tenesmus in childhood: solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Pediatrics. (2002) 110:e79. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.6.e79

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Suresh N, Ganesh R, Sathiyasekaran M. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a case series. Indian Pediatr. (2010) 47:1059–61. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0177-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Dehghani SM, Haghighat M, Imanieh MH, Geramizadeh B. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a prospective study of cases from southern Iran. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2008) 20:93–5. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f1cbb6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gabra HO, Roberts JP, Variend S, Shawis RN. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children. A report of three cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg. (2005) 15:213–6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-821180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kennedy DK, Hughes ES, Masterton JP. The natural history of benign ulcer of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. (1977) 144:718–20.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

11. Urganci N, Kalyoncu D, Eken KG. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a report of six cases. Gut Liver. (2013) 7:752–5. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2013.7.6.752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Perito ER, Mileti E, Dalal DH, Cho SJ, Ferrell LD, McCracken M, et al. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2012) 54:266–70. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318240bba5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kowalska-Duplaga K, Lazowska-Przeorek I, Karolewska-Bochenek K, Woynarowski M, Czaja-Bulsa G, Stawarski A, et al. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a case series study. In: Kowalska-Duplaga K, Lazowska-Przeorek I, Karolewska-Bochenek K, Woynarowski M, Czaja-Bulsa G, Stawarski A, Pieczarkowski S, Hapyn E, Jozefczuk J, Korczowski B, Szaflarska-Poplawska A, editors. Clinical Research and Practice. Cham: Springer (2017). p. 105–12. doi: 10.1007/5584_2017_2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Dehghani SM, Bahmanyar M, Geramizadeh B, Alizadeh A, Haghighat M. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: is it really a rare condition in children? World J Clin Pediatr. (2016) 5:343–8. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i3.343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Poddar U, Yachha SK, Krishnani N, Kumari N, Srivastava A, Sarma MS. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a report of 140 cases. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2020) 71:29–33. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Dehghani SM, Haghighat M, Imanieh MH, Geramizadeh B. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children. Turk J Pediatr. (2000) 42:56–60.

Google Scholar

17. Blackburn C, McDermott M, Bourke B. Clinical presentation of and outcome for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2012) 54:263–5. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31823014c0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Godbole P, Botterill I, Newell SJ, Sagar PM, Stringer MD. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children. J R Coll Surg Edinb. (2000) 45:411–4.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. de Carpi JM, Vilar P, Varea V. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in childhood: a rare, benign, and probably misdiagnosed cause of rectal bleeding. Report of three cases. Dis Colon Rectum. (2007) 50:534–9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0720-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Somani SK, Ghosh A, Avasthi G, Goyal R, Gupta P. Healing of a bleeding solitary rectal ulcer with multiple sessions of argon plasma. Gastrointest Endosc. (2010) 71:578–82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Anjum MN, Cheema HA, Malik HS, Hashmi MA. Clinical spectrum of solitary rectal ulcer in children presenting with per-rectal bleed. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. (2017) 29:74–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Haray PN, Morris-Stiff GJ, Foster ME. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome–an underdiagnosed condition. Int J Colorectal Dis. (1997) 12:313–5. doi: 10.1007/s003840050113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Dehghani SM, Malekpour A, Haghighat M. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a literature review. World J Gastroenterol. (2012) 18:6541–5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Results of behavioral treatment (biofeedback) for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. (2001) 44:72–6. doi: 10.1007/BF02234824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zargar SA, Khuroo MS, Mahajan R. Sucralfate retention enemas in solitary rectal ulcer. Dis Colon Rectum. (1991) 34:455–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02049928

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kumar M, Puri AS, Srivastava R, Yachha SK. Solitary rectal ulcer in a child treated with local sulfasalazine. Indian Pediatr. (1994) 31:1553–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

27. Ederle A, Bulighin G, Orlandi PG, Pilati S. Endoscopic application of human fibrin sealant in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Endoscopy. (1992) 24:736–7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Rau BK, Harikrishnan KM, Krishna S. Laser therapy of solitary rectal ulcers: a new concept. Ann Acad Med Singapore. (1994) 23:27–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: bleeding per rectum, mucorrhea, constipation, solitary rectal ulcer, children

Citation: Thirumal P, Sumathi B and Nirmala D (2020) A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children. Front. Pediatr. 8:396. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00396

Received: 05 March 2020; Accepted: 10 June 2020;
Published: 17 July 2020.

Edited by:

Jorge Amil Dias, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Portugal

Reviewed by:

Victor Manuel Navas-López, Hospital Materno-Infantil, Spain
Vinoth Boopathy, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College & Hospital, India

Copyright © 2020 Thirumal, Sumathi and Nirmala. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: P. Thirumal, drthirugastro@gmail.com