Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg., 21 July 2022
Sec. Surgical Oncology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927787

The impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on the prognosis of colorectal cancer

Ting Jiang1 Kun Liu1 Zexin Chen1,2*
  • 1Department of Blood Transfusion, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Clinical Laboratory Dignostics (Ministry of Education), College of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Background: There is no consensus on the effect of red blood cell transfusion on colorectal cancer (CRC). This study examined the impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on postoperative complications, recurrence, and mortality in patients with CRC.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 219 CRC patients admitted to Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, and Chongqing University Central Hospital from 2008 to 2019 were divided into transfusion (n = 75) and non-transfusion (n = 144) groups. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the effects of blood transfusion on the severity of postoperative complications in patients with CRC, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed to analyze the effects of blood transfusion on postoperative death and recurrence.

Results: Twenty-two (29.33%) patients in the transfusion group were intermediate or advanced severity of postoperative complications, 31 (41.33%) patients died in the transfusion group, and 55 (73.33%) patients occurred recurrence of the CRC, with the median follow-up time being 24.57(14.50,36.37) months. Our result showed that perioperative red blood cell transfusion was associated with an increased risk of intermediate or advanced severity of postoperative complications in CRC patients [odds ratio (OR) = 3.368, 95% CI, 1.146–9.901]. And perioperative red blood cell transfusion increased the risk of postoperative death [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.747, 95% CI, 1.048–7.205] and recurrence in patients with CRC (HR = 2.168, 95% CI, 1.192–3.943).

Conclusion: Our finding demonstrated that perioperative red blood cell transfusion was associated with severity of complications, recurrence, and death in CRC patients. However, further studies are still needed to confirm the adverse effects of red blood cell transfusions in CRC patients.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumor of the digestive tract, ranking the 3rd most common cancer in males and the 2nd most common cancer in females (1, 2). CRC is also the 4th most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with 1.8 million new cases are diagnosed annually worldwide, about 900,000 individuals die from this malignancy (1, 3). It is reported that about 50% of patients with CRC will have recurrence and distant metastasis after radical resection (4). The 5-year survival rate of patients with early colorectal cancer is ideal, at about 90%, while the 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrence and metastasis of colorectal cancer is less than 12% (5). It is critical to quarry the factors that may affect the prognosis of CRC to improve the survival of CRC patients.

Patients with CRC often require blood transfusions due to the presence of iron deficiency anemia or chronic blood loss (6). Perioperative transfusion rates in CRC patients range from 10% to 68% (7). Previous studies have suggested a link between transfusion and worse cancer outcomes (8, 9), whereas others found transfusion was not associated with the prognosis of cancer patients (10), or argue that there may be a link, but that it is likely to be noncausally related to blood transfusion (11). Red blood cell transfusion is an important aspect of blood component therapy (12). Red blood cell transfusion can improve tissue oxygenation and can be used to treat hospitalized patients with acute and chronic anemia. The use of red blood cell transfusion during surgery has also saved countless lives (12, 13). However, there is little consensus exists about the actual effects of red blood cell transfusions in general, and even less so in CRC as a separate entity. Given the conflicting result between perioperative blood transfusion and oncologic outcomes and limited studies on red blood cell transfusions, this study was performed.

Herein, current study was to examine the impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on severity of postoperative complications, recurrence, and death in CRC patients. This study may provide a valuable clinical reference for perioperative red blood cell transfusion in CRC patients and prognosis improvement.

Methods

Design and study population

In this retrospective cohort study, 241 patients at Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, and Chongqing University Central Hospital who underwent CRC resection were collected between 2008 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were presented as: (1) age ≥18 years old; (2) colonoscopy and histopathologic biopsy confirmed CRC; (3) elective surgical treatment; (4) The laboratory, pathological examination, and outcome data were complete. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with distant metastasis or recurrent cancer; (2) death during the perioperative period; (3) patients with other metabolic diseases such as diabetes, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, etc.; (4) patients complicated with other tumors; (5) patients with coagulation dysfunction or other blood system diseases; (6) patients who had taken other investigational drugs or was participating in other clinical studies within 1 month prior to study inclusion. Finally, 219 CRC patients were included, 75 received a blood transfusion during the perioperative period, which was called the transfusion group. The 144 patients who did not receive a blood transfusion during perioperative period were referred to as the non-transfusion group.

Data collection

Data were collected, including (1) demographics: age (year), gender; (2) disease status: tumor site, tumor size (cm3), tumor differentiation, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification; (3) surgical situation: surgical methods, operation time (min), intraoperative blood loss (ml); preoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy; postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy; (4) laboratory events: hemoglobin, albumin; (5) follow-up period (month).

Variables and outcome measures

The perioperative period refers to the duration from when the patient decides to receive surgery until the basic recovery period after surgery; this includes the time before, during, and after surgery.

The severity of surgical complications

The severity of complications was assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification system was used to determine. Grade 1 included minor risk events that do not require treatment (analgesic, antipyretic, antiemetic, and antidiarrheal drugs or drugs required for lower urinary tract infection were except). Grade 2 complications referred to the potentially life-threatening complications that required intervention or more than twice the median length of hospital stay. Grade 2 was divided into 2 subgroups according to the aggressiveness of the complications chosen for treatment; grade 2a complications required only medications and grade 2b required an invasive procedure. Grade 3 indicated the complications resulting in permanent disability or organ resection. Grade 4 complication were defined as the death of a patient due to a complication (14). In this study, grade 1 was as low severity of complication, grades 2 and above were as intermediate and advanced severity.

Tumor recurrence

Tumor recurrence was defined as any radiologic or histologic evidence of tumor growth in the previous surgical field or distant organs (15).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD), and t-test was used for comparison between groups. Skewed distribution was exhibited as [M (Q1, Q3)], and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparison between groups. The categorical variables were described by N (%), the ordered categorical variables were tested by the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and the disordered categorical variables were tested by chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression were used to analyze the effects of blood transfusion on postoperative complication severity in patients with CRC, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression was applied for analyzing the effects of blood transfusion on postoperative death and recurrence. All statistical tests were two-tailed test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, North Carolina) for the statistical analysis.

Results

Comparison of clinical characteristics of included study subjects

Among the 219 enrolled patients, 75 (34.25%) were in the transfusion group and 144 (65.75%) were in the non-transfusion group. The median follow-up time of the 219 patients was 24.57 months. The mean age of the transfusion group was higher than that of the non-transfusion group (t = −3.970, P < 0.001). The distribution of tumor sites was different between the transfusion group and the non-transfusion group (χ2 = 15.356, P < 0.001). Tumors in the transfusion group were larger than those in the non-transfusion group (Z = 5.130, P < 0.001). The degree of tumor differentiation in the transfused group was higher than that in the non-transfused group (Z = 3.202, P = 0.001). The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the transfusion group was higher than that in the non-transfusion group (Z = 5.101, P < 0.001). The hemoglobin of the transfusion group was lower than that of the non-transfusion group (t = 11.350, P < 0.001). Albumin in the transfusion group was lower than that in the non-transfusion group (t = 6.720, P < 0.001) (Table 1). An overview of this study and the data collection selection are described in Figure 1. The survival curves estimated by different ages, tumor sizes, TNM stage, hemoglobin levels, and albumin levels were plotted in Supplementary Figure S1–S5.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The flow chart of data collection.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the transfusion and non-transfusion groups.

Prognosis analysis of transfusion group and non-transfusion group

The severity of postoperative complications in 22 (29.33%) patients in the transfusion group and 16 (11.11%) patients in the non-transfusion group were intermediate or advanced. The proportion of intermediate or advanced complications in the transfusion group was higher than that in the non-transfusion group (χ2 = 11.416, P = 0.001). Thirty-one (41.33%) patients in the transfusion group died during the follow-up period, while 11 (7.64%) patients in the non-transfusion group died during the follow-up period. The mortality rate in the transfusion group was higher than that in the non-transfusion group (χ2 = 36.121, P < 0.001). Fifty-five (73.33%) patients in the transfusion group relapsed during the follow-up period, and 34 (23.61%) patients in the non-transfusion group relapsed during the follow-up period. The recurrence rate in the transfusion group was higher than that in the non-transfusion group (χ2 = 50.540, P < 0.001) (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Analysis of prognosis of blood transfusion group and non-transfusion group.

Effects of blood transfusion on postoperative complications in patients with CRC

Univariate Logistic regression results showed that the risk of postoperative complications with intermediate or higher severity in the transfusion group was 3.321 times higher than that in the non-transfusion group [odds ratio (OR) = 3.321, 95% CI, 1.618–6.817]. Multivariate Logistic regression results indicated that after adjusting for age and gender, the risk of postoperative complications of intermediate or higher severity in the transfusion group was 2.915 times higher than that in the non-transfusion group (OR = 2.915, 95% CI, 1.376–6.179). After adjusting for age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, tumor differentiation, ASA classification, and TNM classification, the risk of a medium-high risk of postoperative complication severity in the transfusion group was 2.860 times higher than that in the non-transfusion group (OR = 2.860, 95% CI, 1.130–7.243). After adjusting for age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, tumor differentiation, ASA classification, TNM stage, hemoglobin, and albumin, the risk of the severity of postoperative complications in the transfusion group was 3.368 times higher than that in the non-transfusion group (OR = 3.368, 95% CI, 1.146–9.901) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The effect of blood transfusion on postoperative complications.

Effect of blood transfusion on mortality in patients with CRC

Survival curve results showed that the survival time of the transfusion group was shorter than that of the non-transfusion group (log-rank test, P < 0.001) (Figure 3). Cox regression was used to analyze the effect of blood transfusion on postoperative mortality of patients with CRC. Univariate Cox regression showed that the risk of postoperative death in the transfusion group was 6.327-fold higher than that in the non-transfusion group (HR = 6.327, 95% CI, 3.174–12.611). After adjusting for age and sex, multivariate cox regression results showed that the risk of postoperative death in the transfusion group was 5.337 times higher than that in the non-transfusion group (HR = 5.337, 95% CI, 2.622–10.866). After adjusting for age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, tumor differentiation, ASA classification, and TNM stage, the risk of postoperative death in the transfusion group was 3.232-fold higher than that in the non-transfusion group (HR = 3.232, 95% CI, 1.496–6.983). After adjusting for age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, tumor differentiation, ASA classification, TNM stage, hemoglobin, and albumin, the risk of postoperative death in the transfusion group was 2.747 times higher than that in the non-transfusion group (HR = 2.747, 95% CI, 1.048–7.205) (Figure 4).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Survival curves of death between the transfused and non-transfused group.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The effect of blood transfusion on postoperative death.

Effect of blood transfusion on recurrence in patients with CRC

Survival curve results demonstrated that the survival time of the transfusion group was shorter than that of the non-transfusion group (log-rank test, P < 0.001) (Figure 5). COX regression was used to analyze the effect of blood transfusion on the postoperative recurrence of colorectal cancer patients. The univariate COX regression results showed that the risk of recurrence in the blood transfusion group was 3.792 times that of the non-transfusion group (HR = 3.792, 95% CI, 2.469–5.826). Multivariate COX regression results showed that after controlling for age and gender, the risk of recurrence after the blood transfusion group was 2.349 times that of the non-transfusion group (HR = 2.349, 95% CI, 1.493–3.695). After adjusting for age, sex, tumor location, tumor size, and tumor differentiation, the risk of recurrence in the blood transfusion group was 2.178 times that of the non-transfusion group (HR = 2.178, 95% CI, 1.351–3.511). After adjusting for age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, tumor differentiation, ASA classification, and TNM staging, the risk of postoperative recurrence in the blood transfusion group was 2.117 times that of the non-transfusion group (HR = 2.117, 95% CI, 1.276–3.511). After adjusting for age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, tumor differentiation, ASA classification, TNM staging, hemoglobin, and albumin, the risk of recurrence in the blood transfusion group was 2.168 times that of the non-transfusion group (HR = 2.168, 95% CI, 1.192–3.943) (Figure 6).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Survival curves of the recurrence between the transfused and non-transfused groups.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. The effect of blood transfusion on postoperative recurrence.

Discussion

Few studies evaluating the effect of red blood cell transfusion on CRC (9). This study was conducted to examine whether perioperative red blood cell transfusions is associated with poor outcomes in CRC patients. Our study indicated perioperative red blood cell transfusion had negative impacts on the complications, recurrence, and mortality in patients with CRC. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion increased intermediate or higher severity of complications and the risk of postoperative death and recurrence in patients with CRC. The effect of transfusions on clinical outcomes was similar in studies published in earlier (2000–2009) and (2010–2020) decades, which supports the repeatability and consistency of our results.

The result of this study showed that perioperative red blood cell transfusion increased the risk of postoperative death in CRC patients. A previous study (9) showed a significantly higher mortality rate in CRC patients with perioperative packed red blood cell transfusions. Similarly, Qiu et al. (16) found that perioperative blood transfusion increased postoperative mortality in CRC patients. A meta-analysis (17) suggested that in patients with CRC undergoing surgery, allogeneic red blood cell transfusions are associated with an increased mortality. It is hypothesized that the detrimental effect of blood transfusion on cancer outcomes results from immunological derangements, including changes in circulating lymphocytes, helper T-cell, suppressor T-cell ratios, and B-cell function (18). Results of a propensity score analysis of 4,030 patients showed patients with the larger volume of perioperative transfusions were associated with a greater chance of mortality (19). We speculate that the effect of transfusion volume may be related to surgical complexity and aggressiveness of cancer, reflecting perioperative course and disease severity rather than the amount of transfusion per se (20). Further research concerning the effect of red blood cell transfusions volume on prognosis may also be necessary.

A study (16) by Qiu et al. found that the local recurrence rate of transfused patients was significantly higher than those of non-transfused patients, which is consistent with our results. During the perioperative period, global inflammation results in a reduced state of host tumor immunosurveillance, increasing the risk of recurrence of micrometastases that expand or fail to eradicate the minimal residual disease (21, 22). In addition, intraoperative tumor management increases the load of circulating malignant cells, which may lead to long-distance spread. Transfusion further exacerbates this pro-tumor environment (23). Nevertheless, the impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on the risk of cancer recurrence needed further evaluation.

Our study demonstrated that perioperative red blood cell transfusion increased the severity of postoperative complications. This finding is supported by observations reported by other authors (2426). Tamini et al. (26) found that blood transfusion is associated with severe postoperative complications following colectomy in CRC patients. Study (25) by Papageorge et al. indicated that preoperative transfusion was an independent predictor of complications in CRC patients with mild and moderate anemia.

Our findings provide additional insights into the relationship between blood transfusion and postoperative tumor outcomes in CRC patients. This article reminds us of the importance of proper blood management for patients with CRC. Actively entangle the anemia of patients with CRC, minimize the loss of blood during the perioperative period, take other favorable measures to increase hemoglobin levels, reduce the need for perioperative blood transfusion, and improve the clinical prognosis of patients with CRC.

The current study has several limitations. First, given the retrospective and non-randomized small sample design, we cannot ascertain causation but merely an association between perioperative red blood cell transfusion and prognosis of CRC. Second, because of the different sources of blood, it might be possible that this causes a selection bias. Further research should explore the discrepancy. Furthermore, conclusions about tumor recurrence need to be interpreted with caution because of the short follow-up period. Finally, potential confounding factors may affect our results. Future prospective studies with long follow-up times and large sample sizes are needed to demonstrate or disprove the effect of red blood cell transfusion on the outcomes in CRC patients.

Conclusion

In our study, the use of perioperative red blood cell transfusion was associated with postoperative complications, recurrence, and mortality in patients with CRC. Our results may serve as an important clinical reflection of blood transfusion for CRC patients. However, further studies are needed to explain the adverse effects of red blood cell transfusions in CRC patients.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Chongqing Emergency Medical Center. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

TJ, KL and ZC designed the study. TJ and KL wrote the manuscript. ZC collected, analyzed and interpreted the data. ZC critically reviewed, edited and approved the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.927787/full#supplementary-material.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer. (2021) 149:778–89. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019) 16(12):713–32. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: rectal cancer, version 6.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. (2020) 18(7):806–15. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Liu F, Xiao XL, Liu YJ, Xu RH, Zhou WJ, Xu HC, et al. CircRNA_0084927 promotes colorectal cancer progression by regulating miRNA-20b-3p/glutathione S-transferase mu 5 axis. World J Gastroenterol. (2021) 27(36):6064–78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i36.6064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hung CM, Chen JJ, Zeng BY, Zeng BS, Chen YW, Suen MW, et al. Efficacy of different interventions to reduce pre- or perioperative blood transfusion rate in patients with colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont). (2021) 28(4):3214–26. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28040279

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kaneko M, Sasaki S, Ishimaru K, Terai E, Nakayama H, Watanabe T. The impact of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion on survival in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. (2015) 35(6):3553–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Cata JP, Wang H, Gottumukkala V, Reuben J, Sessler DI. Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions. Br J Anaesth. (2013) 110(5):690–701. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Amri R, Dinaux AM, Leijssen LGJ, Kunitake H, Bordeianou LG, Berger DL. Do packed red blood cell transfusions really worsen oncologic outcomes in colon cancer? Surgery. (2017) 162(3):586–91. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Warschkow R, Guller U, Koberle D, Muller SA, Steffen T, Thurnheer M, et al. Perioperative blood transfusions do not impact overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg. (2014) 259(1):131–8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318287ab4d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Jenkins C, Lowenfels AB. Blood transfusion and colorectal cancer outcome. Ann Surg. (2015) 261(3):e80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Garraud O, Cognasse F, Tissot JD, Chavarin P, Laperche S, Morel P, et al. Improving platelet transfusion safety: biomedical and technical considerations. Blood Transfus. (2016) 14(2):109–22. doi: 10.2450/2015.0042-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Bennett S, Baker LK, Martel G, Shorr R, Pawlik TM, Tinmouth A, et al. The impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing liver resection: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). (2017) 19(4):321–30. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.12.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. (2004) 240(2):205–13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kwon HY, Kim BR, Kim YW. Association of preoperative anemia and perioperative allogenic red blood cell transfusion with oncologic outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Curr Oncol (Toronto, Ont). (2019) 26(3):e357–e66. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4983

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Qiu L, Wang DR, Zhang XY, Gao S, Li XX, Sun GP, et al. Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on immune function and prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Transfus Apher Sci. (2016) 54(2):235–41. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2015.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Acheson AG, Brookes MJ, Spahn DR. Effects of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. (2012) 256(2):235–44. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825b35d5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Weber RS, Jabbour N, Martin RC. 2nd. Anemia and transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. (2008) 15(1):34–45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9502-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wu HL, Tai YH, Lin SP, Chan MY, Chen HH, Chang KY. The impact of blood transfusion on recurrence and mortality following colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis of 4,030 patients. Sci Rep. (2018) 8(1):13345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31662-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Glance LG, Dick AW, Mukamel DB, Fleming FJ, Zollo RA, Wissler R, et al. Association between intraoperative blood transfusion and mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. (2011) 114(2):283–92. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182054d06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Park JH, Watt DG, Roxburgh CS, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Colorectal cancer, systemic inflammation, and outcome: staging the tumor and staging the host. Ann Surg. (2016) 263(2):326–36. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bork U, Grützmann R, Rahbari NN, Schölch S, Distler M, Reissfelder C, et al. Prognostic relevance of minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. (2014) 20(30):10296–304. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Deeb AP, Aquina CT, Monson JRT, Blumberg N, Becerra AZ, Fleming FJ. Allogeneic leukocyte-reduced red blood cell transfusion is associated with postoperative infectious complications and cancer recurrence after colon cancer resection. Dig Surg. (2020) 37(2):163–70. doi: 10.1159/000498865

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, et al. Blood transfusions in colorectal cancer surgery: incidence, outcomes, and predictive factors: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Am J Surg. (2013) 206(6):1024–32; discussion 32-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Papageorge CM, Kennedy GD, Carchman EH. Preoperative blood transfusion is a predictor of worse short-term postoperative outcomes after colectomy. Surgery. (2017) 161(4):1067–75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Tamini N, Deghi G, Gianotti L, Braga M, Nespoli L. Colon cancer surgery: does preoperative blood transfusion influence short-term postoperative outcomes? J Invest Surg. (2020) 34:1–5. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1731634

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: perioperative, red blood cell transfusion, prognosis, colorectal cancer, severity

Citation: Jiang T, Liu K and Chen Z (2022) The impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Front. Surg. 9:927787. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.927787

Received: 25 April 2022; Accepted: 6 July 2022;
Published: 21 July 2022.

Edited by:

Duilio Pagano, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies (ISMETT), Italy

Reviewed by:

Giulia Turri, University of Verona, Italy
Vincenzo Lizzi, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, Italy

© 2022 Jiang, Liu and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zexin Chen czx1123cq@163.com

Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Surgical Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

Download