Abstract
Background:
Epidermoid cysts (ECs) are one of the most common causes of secondary trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). However, most previous studies have primarily focused on whether complete tumor resection was achieved, and few studies have discussed the primary goal of pain relief.
Objective:
The present study provides intraoperative strategies for trigeminal nerve (TN) management in patients with TGN secondary to an EC and observed long-term follow-up outcomes.
Methods:
A total of 69 patients with TGN secondary to an EC at our hospitals were included (January 2011–June 2021). The same surgical team performed all surgeries using a retrosigmoid approach. After EC removal, different methods for TN management were used, including microvascular decompression (MVD), sharp capsulectomy, nerve combing and embedded cholesterol crystal excision. The epidemiological, clinical, and surgical data were extracted.
Results:
The total EC removal rate was 92.8% (64/69). All patients achieved initial pain relief postoperatively, and 12 patients (17.4%) experienced varying degrees of hemifacial hypesthesia, which was relieved within 3–6 months. Three patients (4.3%) reported partial pain recurrence within a median follow-up period of 5.5 (0.5–10.5) years, which was relieved completely after low-dose carbamazepine administration.
Conclusion:
The primary goal of surgical tumor removal for patients with TGN secondary to an EC is relief of the main symptom of tormenting pain. The selection of an appropriate strategy for TN, including MVD, sharp capsulectomy, nerve combing or embedded cholesterol crystal excision, should depend on the patient's situation.
Introduction
The incidence of intracranial epidermal cysts (ECs), also named intracranial cholesteatomas, accounts for approximately 1% of all intracranial tumors (1–3), and these tumors primarily occur in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) (4, 5). EC is one of the main causes of secondary trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) (6, 7). The curative goal of patients with TGN secondary to an EC is tumor removal with recurrence prevention and avoidance of complications (8–10). However, the primary goal of treatment in patients with TGN as the first or main symptom is relief of the tormenting pain (11, 12). When pain is not relieved, even complete resection of the tumor should be considered a treatment failure, at least from the patient's perspective. Therefore, the relief of pain, reduction of facial numbness and other symptoms of cranial nerve (CN) injury, and prevention of TGN recurrence using appropriate approaches for trigeminal nerve (TN) management during the process of tumor resection are more important than tumor resection. Few studies have summarized and discussed experience and practice in this respect. This article summarizes our 10-year experience and practice in the treatment of 69 patients with TGN secondary to an EC and discusses the preferred management strategies.
Methods
Patient characteristics
All patients who underwent surgery for TGN at our hospitals from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2021, were reviewed retrospectively. The diagnosis of TGN was made in 2,048 cases according to the criteria for classic TGN (13.1.1) of the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3 (ICHD-3). As part of the routine clinical management of TGN, all patients underwent a preoperative three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D-TOF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. In cases of prepontine cistern enlargement or abnormal signals, contrast enhancement or 3D fast imaging using steady-state acquisition (3D-FIESTA) was applied (Figure 1) (13). Of the 2,048 consecutive TGN cases, the EC was diagnosed secondary to TGN in 76 cases preoperatively, surgically and pathologically. By the end of June 2021, seven patients were lost to follow-up, and 69 were ultimately included in this study for analysis. Seventeen of the 69 patients had undergone other surgical treatments (percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation, percutaneous ball compression or γ-knife surgery) before admission to our hospitals, and nine of these patients had obvious postblock hypesthesia. The ethics committee of the two hospitals involved approved this study. The patient data were anonymous, and informed consent was not necessary.
Figure 1
Anatomical observations and surgical procedures
All patients underwent treatment with a standard suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. After the release of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) under a microscope and retraction of the cerebellar hemisphere, a pearl-like space-occupying lesion with an intact capsule was observed at the CPA. The TN, facial-acoustic nerve, and lower CNs were compressed and encapsulated. After opening the arachnoid membrane, intracapsular resection was performed as the primary procedure, including clearing of the cholesteatomatous tumor tissue in all corners using an aspirator and dissector and the tumor tissue on the tentorium cerebellum and in the contralateral prepontine cistern by adjusting the angle of the microscope. For tumor capsules attached to the brain stem, compulsory resection was not performed to avoid damaging the penetrating vessel, which results in severe consequences. In cases where the tumor wrapped the facial-acoustic, abduction and trochlear nerves, a small aspirator tube with a well-controlled suction force was used because these nerves are thin and delicate, and excessive suction could cause direct damage. The adhered tumor capsule was cut and removed via sharp dissection. After clear and complete tumor removal, primary attention was focused on the management of the TN root. Different surgical procedures for TN management were performed according to the type classification, as discussed below.
Type I
There were 49 cases of this type, consisting of only an EC without vascular involvement of the TN. Eighteen cases were type Ia, in which the main portion of the tumor was located in the prepontine cistern, and the TN was pushed from the inside to the outside and became distorted but was not completely encapsuled by the tumor. When the arachnoid membrane was opened, the TN root was directly observed, and the running direction of the fiber was seen clearly. The first step in these cases was clearing the tumor portion in the CPA. TN management started by examining and clearing the root entrance/exit zone and the portion entering the Meckel cave, especially the ventral side of the nerve, to avoid missing the tumor outside of the direct surgical microscopic field. The tumor capsule attached to the TN was removed via sharp dissection using microscopic scissors (Figure 2, Supplementary Video S1).
Figure 2
Twenty-four cases were type Ib, in which the tumor tissue completely encapsulated the nerve. After retraction of the cerebellum, only the tumor was visualized directly in most cases, but the facial-acoustic nerve was seen in some cases. After partial clearing of the tumor, the normally flat TN cisternal segment had become cylindrically round like an electrical pole, with a layer of capsule-like tissue on the surface. The longitudinal nerve fibers could not be clearly identified. Simple tumor resection in cases of severe TN root invasion by the tumor may not relieve pain completely. The nerve combing procedure was applied to release the TN cisternal segment in 11 patients by making 4–8 incisions along the longitudinal axis using a homemade combing knife (Figure 3, Supplementary Video S2).
Figure 3
Seven cases were type Ic. Because there may be cholesterol crystals in this type of EC tumor, these stone-like hard substances may be embedded in the TN root, and sharp dissection with microscopic scissors is required to achieve sufficient decompression (Figure 4, Supplementary Video S3).
Figure 4
Type II
There were 20 cases of this type, in which the TN root contacted the blood vessel during EC excision. Thirteen of these cases were type IIa, in which an offending artery (OA) was found, and microvascular decompression (MVD) was performed (Figure 5, Supplementary Video S4). The remaining 7 cases were type IIb, in which an offending vein (OV) was found. OVs smaller than 1 mm were usually snipped after electrocoagulation, and MVD was used for relatively thick OVs (Figure 6, Supplementary Video S5).
Figure 5
Figure 6
Follow-up evaluations were performed 6 and 12 months post-operatively and then annually thereafter and included routine physical examination, MRI and facial sensory testing in most cases. Telephone interviews were performed if the patients failed to visit our clinic at the scheduled time. In addition to other CN complications, we primarily evaluated the initial pain relief, pain recurrence, and any type of sensory disturbance using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score and the facial numbness score (14). Complete pain relief was defined as a BNI pain score of I. Partial pain relief was defined as a BNI pain score of II or III.
Results
Sixty-nine of the 2,048 cases were included in the study. The mean age of the 69 EC patients was 49.8 (17–77) years. Most patients were women (68%, 47/69). The mean disease duration was 61.5 (1–480) months, and the mean follow-up duration was 5.5 (0.5–10.5) years. The affected areas and other clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
| Cohort size (n = 69) | |
|---|---|
| Affected side, No. (%) | |
|  Right | 27 (39.1%) |
|  Left | 42 (60.9%) |
| Symptom | |
| Cranial nerve V | |
|  TGN territory involved | |
|   V1 | 6 |
|   V2 | 9 |
|   V3 | 13 |
|   V1 + 2 | 5 |
|   V2 + 3 | 26 |
|   V1 + 2 + 3 | 10 |
|  Post-block hypesthesia | 9 |
| Cranial nerve VII | |
|  Hemifacial spasm | 3 |
| Cranial nerve VIII | |
|  Hearing difficulty | 5 |
|  Tinnitus | 3 |
Clinical characteristics of the patients.
All patients had sutures removed and were discharged 5–7 days post-operatively. Immediate and complete pain relief (BNI pain score I) was achieved in all 69 cases. Postoperative MRI demonstrated total resection in 64 cases and subtotal resection in the other five cases because the tumors on the supratentorial and contralateral CPA parts were relatively large. The main complication was unilateral facial hypesthesia, which occurred as a new symptom or exacerbation of the original bradyesthesia in 12 cases, including three of the 11 type Ib EC patients who underwent combing. This bradyesthesia was relieved 3–6 months post-operatively in all patients. Other presenting complications included acute subdural hematoma in three cases (detected on routine CT checkup 24 h post-operatively), which presented as a thin-layer hematoma with no clinical symptoms and were absorbed spontaneously within one month in all cases, aseptic meningitis in eight cases, diplopia in seven cases, including trochlear nerve injury in four cases and abducens nerve injury in three cases, and hearing loss in five cases. During the follow-up period of 0.5–10.5 years, no significant enlargement of the tumor was observed in the five patients in whom subtotal resection was achieved. Three patients (4.35%) reported partial pain recurrence (BNI pain score II–III) two and three years post-operatively. Treatment for recurrence in these patients included the use of low-dose carbamazepine (<200 mg/d), which provided a satisfactory analgesic effect. Pain-free survival was defined as the time to recurrence of facial pain after surgery. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed based on pain-free survival (Figure 7). The different types of TN involvement and the occurrence of related complications are shown in Table 2.
Figure 7
Table 2
| Subtotal (n = 5) | CN complications (n = 20a) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV (n = 4) | V (n = 12) | VI (n = 3) | VII (n = 5) | ||
| Type I | |||||
|  a (n = 18) | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
|  b (n = 24) | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | |
|  c (n = 7) | 2 | ||||
| Type II | |||||
|  a (n = 13) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
|  b (n = 7) | 1 | ||||
Different types of TN involvement and the occurrence of related CN complications and surgical outcomes.
As some patients had injury to multiple cranial nerves after operation, the sum of the cranial nerve cases (n = 24) is larger than the total number of the complication cases (n = 20).
Discussion
The occurrence of ECs in the CPA is rare, but we have treated numerous cases at our TGN center because the most common onset symptom is TGN. The 69 patients with TGN secondary to an EC included in our series were primarily characterized by a young mean age, pain in the V2 and V3 regions, and a similar onset of symptoms and typical vascular compression presenting as simple TGN (15). The total tumor removal rate was 92.8% (64/69). The simple lateral suboccipital retrosigmoid approach may not expose the distal part of the tumor, and the combined use of the anterior transpetrosal approach or combined transpetrosal approach may be necessary (16, 17); alternatively, endoscopy may be a better means of completely removing the tumor (18, 19). However, a combined approach in this area may cause unexpectedly extensive trauma and require more surgical time. The incidences of perioperative complications, sequalae and tumor recurrence were low in our series. Other than the symptoms of TGN, the symptoms of injury to other CNs, such as diplopia, were restored within approximately six months in most cases. While restoration of hearing loss is relatively difficult, unilateral hearing loss does not have a significant impact on daily activities.
The key for the successful treatment of TGN secondary to an EC is pain relief. The immediate pain relief rate was 100% in our study, and long-term follow-up observation only revealed partial pain recurrence in three cases (4.3%). The incidence of nerve-related complications was also low. Hemifacial hypesthesia was the main symptom, but its postoperative clinical presentation was mild and caused an insignificant impact on patients' daily activities. The symptoms were relieved in 3–6 months in most patients.
A few studies have reported research on TGN secondary to an EC. Kabata (2002) analyzed 28 cases and emphasized that straightening the neuraxis by cutting and removing the adherent tumor capsule and arachnoid membrane was mandatory for the relief of pain and prevention of pain recurrence. With a mean follow-up period of 11.5 years, they detected pain recurrence symptoms in three patients (10.7%). However, their postoperative TN injury rate was as high as 64.3% (18/28). Together with other CN (III-V) injuries, the overall incidence accounted for approximately two-thirds of all patients. Therefore, an excellent outcome was achieved in only 57.1% (16/28) (20). Guo (2011) reported 48 similar cases in which TGN was not relieved after surgery in two cases (a second surgery was performed), and pain recurred in another patient. They noted that resecting the attachment of the tumor capsule to CN V was critical for relieving pain, although this method may damage the nerve (21). Other studies on ECs have only reported intracranial resection of the tumors, with few cases of TGN as the onset symptom (22, 23). These studies demonstrate that the pain relief rate in the management of TGN secondary to an EC is not sufficient, and the rate of TN injury remains high. The etiology of TGN secondary to an EC must be identified and eliminated to achieve the goal of pain relief.
The pathogenesis of TGN secondary to an EC is likely related to the following three conditions: (1) nerve compression from vascular compression; (2) direct compression of the nerve by the tumor; and (3) irritation of the chemicals within the EC or aseptic inflammation of the TN. These factors may work independently or synergistically on the TN to cause demyelination of the nerve and formation of pseudosynaptic connections, which ultimately result in abnormal TN tactile conduction (23, 24).
The principle of our surgical strategy for TN management is removal of the above factors.
- 1.
Strategy for TGN management. Some researchers have advocated conservative management strategies for ECs involving the CN (25). We partially agree that caution should be taken in handling CNs other than the TN, such as the trochlear, abduction, facial and auditory nerves, and use of an aspirator should be avoided. However, pain relief is the primary goal, and we advocate a more positive attitude in treating the TN using a proper method. The present study primarily describes three strategies for TGN management in different situations: (1) sharp dissection of the tumor capsule adhering to the nerve; (2) excision of embedded cholesterol crystals; and (3) combing of the nerve wrapped by the pseudocapsule inside the tumor. Lagares reported that TNs within ECs may undergo pathological changes, including axonal loss and demyelination, with the presence of abundant collagen infiltrates and myelin debris. Myelin-denuded axons have been found in close apposition in some areas, allowing axon-to-axon interactions (26). These findings are consistent with those of previous studies on patients with vascular compression-related TGN. Therefore, nerve combing is generally used instead of MVD when no OV is found (27–29). We used nerve combing to destroy the pseudomembrane formed after nerve demyelination and release the pseudomembrane wrapping the nerve to ensure pain relief.
- 2.
OVs may cause TGN in EC patients. The only controversy is that some researchers believe that the OV is the only cause (30). We found that 30% (20/69) of the cases in our series had OVs, which we carefully examined. An attentive review of the TN by 3D-TOF MRI may be helpful, especially near the TN root entry/exit zone and Meckel cave. With respect to OV management, an OV smaller than 1 mm in diameter may be sacrificed by cutting after cauterization, but removal should be avoided for relatively large OVs (>2 mm in diameter) to reduce hemorrhage and the risk of infarction, which is different from the opinion advocated in most studies that all TGN-related OVs should be sacrificed.
The present study has some limitations. First, it was only a retrospective study. Second, TN combing is an innovative method that has not been generally accepted. Therefore, more studies are required to provide verification of its efficacy and long-term outcomes.
Conclusion
The primary goal of EC removal as a treatment is relief of the tormenting pain. Caution should be taken to avoid oversight of any possible OVs for decompression. The selection of an appropriate strategy for TGN, including sharp capsulectomy, nerve combing or embedded cholesterol crystal excision, should depend on the extent of tumor invasion into the TN.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Suplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospitals. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
Author contributions
ZZ and FY performed the data analyses, wrote the manuscript. ZZ and WW revised the manuscript and contributed equally to this work. YW contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation. SCK helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions. JY was the operator and contributed to the conception of the study. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported, in part, by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#81,671,201 by Jia Yin and #81,871,598 by Yuhai Wang). Tenth people's hospital clinical research funding (YNCR2A002) by Jia Yin.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.930261/full#supplementary-material.
References
1.
GonzalezAG. Differential diagnosis of tumors at the cerebellopontine recess. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. (1948) 83:187–212. PMID:
2.
HamelEFroweinRAKarimi-NejadA. Intracranial intradural epidermoids and dermoids. Surgical results of 38 cases. Neurosurg Rev. (1980) 3:215–9. 10.1007/BF01650025
3.
UlrichJ. Intracranial epidermoids: a study on their distribution and spread. J Neurosurg. (1964) 21:1051–8. 10.3171/jns.1964.21.12.1051
4.
RubinGScienzaRPasqualinARostaLDa PianR. Craniocerebral epidermoids and dermoids. A review of 44 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (1989) 97:1–16. 10.1007/BF01577734
5.
YamakawaKShitaraNGenkaSManakaSTakakuraK. Clinical course and surgical prognosis of 33 cases of intracranial epidermoid tumors. Neurosurgery. (1989) 24:568–73. 10.1227/00006123-198904000-00013
6.
MohantyAVenkatramaSKRaoBRChandramouliBAJayakumarPNDasBS. Experience with cerebellopontine angle epidermoids. Neurosurgery. (1997) 40:24–30. 10.1097/00006123-199701000-00004
7.
SchieferTKLinkMJ. Epidermoids of the cerebellopontine angle: a 20-year experience. Surg Neurol. (2008) 70:584–90. 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.12.021
8.
OgleznevKGrigoryanYSlavinKV. Parapontine epidermoid tumours presenting as trigeminal neuralgias: anatomical findings and operative results. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (1991) 110:116–9. 10.1007/BF01400677
9.
TalacchiASalaFAlessandriniFTurazziSBricoloA. Assessment and surgical management of posterior fossa epidermoid tumors: report of 28 cases. Neurosurgery. (1998) 42:242–52. 10.1097/00006123-199802000-00020
10.
VernonVNaikHGuhaA. Surgical management of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts: an institutional experience of 10 years. Br J Neurosurg. (2022) 36(2):203–12. 10.1080/02688697.2020.1867058
11.
Revuelta-GutiérrezRDÃaz-Romero PazRFVales-HidalgoLOHinojosa-GonzálezRBarges-CollJ. Cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts. Experience of 43 cases with long-term follow-up. Cir Cir. (2009) 77:257–65. PMID:
12.
ZhangYQYuFZhaoZYMenXZShiW. Surgical treatment of secondary trigeminal neuralgia induced by cerebellopontine angle tumors: a single-center experience. World Neurosurg. (2020) 141:e508–13. 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.226
13.
NguyenJBAhktarNDelgadoPNLoweLH. Magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of intracranial epidermoid tumors. Crit Rev Comput Tomogr. (2004) 45:389–427. 10.3109/10408370490903543
14.
PinziVMarchettiMDe MartinECuccariniVTramacereIGhielmettiFet alMultisession radiosurgery for intracranial meningioma treatment: study protocol of a single arm, monocenter, prospective trial. Radiat Oncol. (2020) 15:26. 10.1186/s13014-020-1478-7
15.
YuFYinJ. Young-onset trigeminal neuralgia: a clinical study and literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (2021) 163:1617–21. 10.1007/s00701-021-04848-6
16.
DarrouzetVFranco-VidalVHiltonMNguyenDQLacher-FougereSGuerinJet alSurgery of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts: role of the widened retrolabyrinthine approach combined with endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2004) 131:120–5. 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.02.023
17.
SakamotoHKohnoMMatsushimaKIchimasuNNakajimaNYoshinoM. Importance of appropriate surgical approach selection for radical resection of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts with preservation of cranial nerve functions: our experience of 54 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (2021) 163:2465–74. 10.1007/s00701-021-04840-0
18.
CecchiniGSorensonTJGraffeoCSVitaleGDi BiaseF. Two-operator endoscopic resection of left cerebellopontine angle epidermoid. World Neurosurg. (2019) 132:398. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.008
19.
HuZGuanFKangTHuangHDaiBZhuGet alWhole course neuroendoscopic resection of cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. (2016) 77:381–8. 10.1055/s-0035-1558818
20.
KobataHKondoAIwasakiK. Cerebellopontine angle epidermoids presenting with cranial nerve hyperactive dysfunction: pathogenesis and long-term surgical results in 30 patients. Neurosurgery. (2002) 50:276–86. 10.1097/00006123-200202000-00008
21.
GuoZOuyangHChengZ. Surgical treatment of parapontine epidermoid cysts presenting with trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci. (2011) 18:344–6. 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.07.110
22.
ShenCCWangYCWeiSHChangCSChanYCLeuCH. Microsurgical management of intracranial epidermoid cysts. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). (1998) 61:313–23. PMID:
23.
HasegawaMNouriMNagahisaSYoshidaKAdachiKInamasuJet alCerebellopontine angle epidermoid cysts: clinical presentations and surgical outcome. Neurosurg Rev. (2016) 39:259–67. 10.1007/s10143-015-0684-5
24.
HowngSLKwanALHwangSLChienTC. Intracranial epidermoid cysts. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. (1990) 6(2):81–7. PMID:
25.
FarhoudAKhedrWAboul-EneinH. Surgical resection of cerebellopontine epidermoid cysts: limitations and outcome. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. (2018) 79:167–72. 10.1055/s-0037-1606220
26.
LagaresARivasJJJiménezLCicuendezMAvendañoC. Central demyelination in the pathogenesis of trigeminal neuralgia associated with cerebellopontine angle tumors: case report with ultrastructural trigeminal root analysis. Neurosurgery. (2010) 66:E841–842. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367550.30165.A7
27.
JieHXuanchenZDehengLKunGFengyangXXiangCet alThe long-term outcome of nerve combing for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (2013) 155:1703–8. 10.1007/s00701-013-1804-z
28.
KoALOzpinarALeeARaslanAMMcCartneySBurchielKJ. Long-term efficacy and safety of internal neurolysis for trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression. J Neurosurg. (2015) 122:1048–57. 10.3171/2014.12.JNS14469
29.
UrculoEEluaAArrazolaMTorresPTorresSUndabeitiaJ. Trigeminal root massage in microsurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia patients without arterial compression: when, how and why. Neurocirugia (Astur: Engl Ed). (2020) 31:53–63. 10.1016/j.neucir.2019.07.003
30.
XiaLZhongJZhuJWangYNDouNNLiuMXet alCholesteatoma of cerebellopontine angle presented as trigeminal neuralgia. J Craniofac Surg. (2014) 25:1540–2. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000778
Summary
Keywords
Cerebellopontine angle, epidermoid cyst, trigeminal neuralgia, management strategy, trigeminal nerve
Citation
Zhang Z, Wang W, Yu F, Kwok SC, Wang Y and Yin J (2022) Strategies for intraoperative management of the trigeminal nerve and long-term follow-up outcomes in patients with trigeminal neuralgia secondary to an intracranial epidermoid cyst. Front. Surg. 9:930261. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.930261
Received
12 May 2022
Accepted
14 July 2022
Published
28 July 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited by
Philipp Taussky, Harvard Medical School, United States
Reviewed by
Basil Erwin Grüter, Aarau Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland Brandon Sherrod, The University of Utah, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Zhang, Yu, Yu, Kwok, Wang and Yin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jia Yin jianyiyin@hotmail.com
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
‡This author share first authorship.
Speciality Section: This article was submitted to Neurosurgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.