Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Surg., 22 August 2023
Sec. Neurosurgery
Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1227473

Case report: Impact of mixed reality on anatomical understanding and surgical planning in a complex fourth ventricular tumor extending to the lamina quadrigemina

  • Department of Neurosurgery and Clinical Neurocenter, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Background and importance: Tumors of the fourth ventricle account for 1%–5% of all intracranial neoplastic lesions and present with different configurations and anatomical challenges. Microsurgery represents the primary therapeutic strategy for the majority of fourth ventricular tumors, and adequate anatomical understanding and visualization are paramount to surgical planning and success. The authors present the case of a young patient with a complex fourth ventricular tumor, whose surgery was successfully planned using a novel mixed reality (MxR) system.

Case description: We present a case of a 31-year-old woman with a lesion extending from the fourth ventricle to the lamina quadrigemina and causing symptomatic hydrocephalus occlusus. Through the combined use of routine 2D images and an interactive 3D anatomical model, an interhemispheric transtentorial approach was used to remove 98% of the lesion with successful functional outcomes.

Conclusions: The application of advanced 3D visualization with a novel MxR system to the surgical planning of a complex fourth ventricular lesion proved relevant in designing the best surgical approach and trajectory to better identify potential intraoperative challenges and rehearse the patient-specific anatomy. The present case report endorses the implementation of advanced 3D visualization in routine perioperative practice.

Introduction

To date, the primary therapeutic strategy for tumors of the fourth ventricle is microsurgical removal (13). Lesions of the fourth ventricle may present with a wide range of anatomical variations and are in close proximity with extremely eloquent structures in the context of the anatomical complexity of the posterior fossa. Therefore, surgical planning is fundamental to tailor the microsurgical approach for complex fourth ventricular lesions, and it may not be optimal if planned based on two-dimensional (2D) images only. The application of three-dimensional (3D) visualization using mixed reality (MxR) may offer a better anatomical understanding, and it has an emerging application in neurosurgery (4). Furthermore, diverse MxR systems have been developed, and initial experience on their implementation in the perioperative phase has been gathered (57). The advantages of patient-specific interactive 3D anatomical models may be multiple and range over the design of the optimal surgical approach and intraoperative corridor, a realistic and comprehensive understanding of the close anatomical structures, and the pre-operative rehearsal and anticipation of the intraoperative challenges (8, 9).

The authors describe a successful surgical approach for a complex fourth ventricular tumor extending until the lamina quadrigemina and infiltrating the basal veins designed using a novel mixed reality system.

Case description

A 31-year-old woman presented with a 5-day history of double vision in all directions, holocephalic headaches, and nausea. Radiologic workup showed a hyperintense lesion extending from the fourth ventricle to the lamina quadrigemina and causing a hydrocephalus occlusus (Figure 1). An external ventricular drainage (EVD) was immediately inserted, and 1 day after, the resection of the ventricular mass was scheduled.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Diagnostic MRI study documenting a partially contrasted lesion of the IV ventricle with cystic components and infiltration of the vermis: (A) sagittal T1 with contrast; (B) sagittal T2.

Surgical strategy and patient positioning were discussed based on routinely used 2D DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) images and further analyzed using 3D MxR technology.

Mixed reality system

The novel MxR system utilized for holographic rendering and 3D visualization consisted of different components (Figure 2). The primary component was a CE-certified cloud environment (Lumi, Augmedit bv, Naarden, Netherlands) providing a direct MxR output using a validated expanding mesh algorithm (Disior, Helsinki, Finland) (10, 11). The Lumi cloud environment had associated applications for MxR glasses, which represented the second component of the system and the main tool for 3D visualization of the hologram (Hololens 2, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Schematic overview of the MxR system in all its components, starting from the imaging source, passing through the cloud-based storage and the strategies used for holographic rendering and ending with the visualization methods of the MxR output.

Hologram rendering

2D DICOM images from an external institution were loaded in a completely anonymized form on the novel CE-certified cloud environment (Lumi by Augmedit bv, Utrecht, Netherlands) starting from the acquisition of an axial T1 MPRAGE with contrast medium (Siemens Skyra 3 T MRI, TR = 1,800 ms, 168 slices, slice thickness = 1.0 mm, acquisition matrix = 256 × 232, FOV: 90.62, pixel spacing: 0.48828125). The magnetic resonance study was automatically segmented on the platform to highlight the skin, skull, brain, ventricular system, and tumor. Following the automatic segmentation, the tumor was further refined by means of manual segmentation on 3D Slicer (3D Slicer image computing platform | 3D Slicer) (12).

Hologram interactive 3D visualization

Through the MxR glasses, the primary user could visualize the hologram in 3D and interact with it and project it onto the real anatomy of the patient, manually matching it using her head to review and plan surgical positioning and the approach (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. 3D holographic rendering of the IV-ventricular lesion (green) and the intraoperative trajectory (red line) on the coronal (A), sagittal (B), axial (C), and a free (D) plane. Case report-specific application of MxR in the intraoperative environment showing the view of the operator wearing the MxR glasses and interacting with the hologram while matching it with the patient's head (E).

Surgical strategy

To manage the increased intracranial pressure caused by an occluded hydrocephalus due to the mass effect, a right frontal EVD was inserted a day prior to the removal of the tumor.

Based on the combined analysis of 2D images and, most importantly, the 3D model, the patient underwent a parietal craniotomy with a subsequent interhemispheric transtentorial approach to the fourth ventricle. The MxR-3D visualization of the venous anatomy and the relationship of the tumor with the ventricular system was decisive in choosing a right parietal craniotomy to release maximally the right parietal vein frontally. This approach granted a straight trajectory posteriorly from the right parietal vein and right in the axis of the tumor. The 3D holographic visualization greatly helped in planning and rehearsing a surgical trajectory that could avoid the risk of injury of the basal cerebral veins. Furthermore, surgical planning with the 3D hologram endorsed the need to open the tentorium parallel to the straight sinus to achieve better intraoperative vision and control of the tumor (Figure 4). Patient positioning was designed according to the MxR planning, and the patient was positioned three-quarters prone with the head secured in a skull clamp slightly elevated and tilted toward the floor. A linear occipito–parietal incision along the midline was the approach chosen.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Intraoperative visualization of the falcotentorial margin (A), the small opening of the tentorium (B), the presentation of the tumor (C), and the IV ventricle after resection of the lesion (D).

To confirm gross–total resection of the tumor, an intraoperative MRI was performed, revealing 98% removal of the lesion with a small remnant at the tectal level, which was too adherent to the great vein of Galen to be safely removed.

Discussion

Fourth ventricular tumors account for 1%–5% of all intracranial neoplastic lesions and represent two-third of the lesions of the ventricular system (1, 2). To date, the classical and oldest approach to removing tumors of the fourth ventricle is the median suboccipital approach, which allows access to lesions of the cerebellar hemispheres, vermis, and medulla (1, 13). This approach is beneficial for extended anatomical exposure, enabling good surgical orientation and intraoperative manipulation. However, it is potentially associated with more tissue injury, the risk of sinus damage, and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (14). Another relevant surgical approach to lesions of the fourth ventricle is the telovelar approach, which exploits the natural space of the cerebellomedullary fissure to expose the tela choroidea and the inferior medullary velum (14, 15). The telovelar approach provides good access to the lateral recess, but exposing the posterolateral and the superolateral recesses is challenging and may require the removal of the cerebellar tonsils (14). The median suboccipital and telovelar approaches may be performed in a standard fashion or slightly modified depending on the anatomical presentation and extension of a fourth ventricular tumor. In order to tailor the surgical approach in a lesion-specific manner, an accurate pre-operative study of the anatomy of the lesions and their relationship with the surrounding structures is fundamental. In this regard, implementing augmented reality and modern 3D visualization techniques in neurosurgery has been qualitatively beneficial (16). Furthermore, applying MxR to surgical planning of complex cases gives the benefit of a non-threatening environment for less experienced surgeons, who can rehearse the procedure, foresee intraoperative difficulties, and increase surgical confidence (4).

The authors reported a complex case for which the use of MxR with an interactive patient-specific 3D anatomical model in adjunct with routine 2D images proved advantageous in gathering a better anatomical understanding and customizing the surgical approach and the intraoperative trajectory. Furthermore, surgical planning with MxR allowed a distinct patient positioning and a more realistic pre-operative analysis of the intraoperative surgical risks and challenges.

Conclusion

The application of advanced 3D visualization with a novel MxR system to the surgical planning of a complex fourth ventricular lesion proved relevant to designing the best surgical approach and trajectory to better identify potential intraoperative challenges and rehearse the patient-specific anatomy. The present case report endorses the implementation of advanced 3D visualization in routine perioperative practice.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval were not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article was obtained from the individual(s).

Author contributions

EC and TD have made a substantial contribution to the concept and design of the article. LR and DB have helped with the acquisition and interpretation of data for the article. EC drafted the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work is part of “SURGENT” under the auspices of University Medicine Zurich/Hochschulmedizin Zürich, SURGENT project (UZH—Hochschulmedizin Zürich).

Conflict of interest

TD is a co-founder and the CMO of Augmedit bv, an augmented reality company.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1227473/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1

Authors provided the possibility to visualize the hologram with a smartphone by scanning the QRCode provided below. The hologram is protected by a PIN: 715-899.

References

1. Sufianov R, Pitskhelauri D, Bykanov A. Fourth ventricle tumors: a review of series treated with microsurgical technique. Front Surg. (2022) 9:915253. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.915253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Cohen AR. Surgical disorders of the fourth ventricle. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science (1996). p. 94–143.

3. Bertalanffy H, Krayenbuhl N. Ventricular tumors. In: Winn HR, editor. Youmans neurological surgery. 6th ed. New York: Elsevier (2011). p. 1537.

4. Zhang C, Gao H, Liu Z, Huang H. The potential value of mixed reality in neurosurgery. J Craniofac Surg. (2021) 32(3):940–3. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Incekara F, Smits M, Dirven C, Vincent A. Clinical feasibility of a wearable mixed-reality device in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. (2018) 118:e422–7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Cartucho J, Shapira D, Ashrafian H, Giannarou S. Multimodal mixed reality visualisation for intraoperative surgical guidance. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. (2020) 15(5):819–26. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02165-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chiacchiaretta P, Perrucci MG, Caulo M, Navarra R, Baldiraghi G, Rolandi D, et al. A dedicated tool for presurgical mapping of brain tumors and mixed-reality navigation during neurosurgery. J Digit Imaging. (2022) 35(3):704–13. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00609-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Jean WC, Yang Y, Srivastava A, Tai AX, Herur-Raman A, Kim HJ, et al. Study of comparative surgical exposure to the petroclival region using patient-specific, petroclival meningioma virtual reality models. Neurosurg Focus. (2021) 51(2):E13. doi: 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS201036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zawy Alsofy S, Sakellaropoulou I, Nakamura M, Ewelt C, Salma A, Lewitz M, et al. Impact of virtual reality in arterial anatomy detection and surgical planning in patients with unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Brain Sci. (2020) 10:963. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120963

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. van Doormaal JAM, Fick T, Ali M, Köllen M, van der Kuijp V, van Doormaal TPC. Fully automatic adaptive meshing based segmentation of the ventricular system for augmented reality visualization and navigation. World Neurosurg. (2021) 156:e9–24. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Fick T, Doormaal JAM van, Tosic L, van Zoest RJ, Meulstee JW, Hoving EW, et al. Fully automatic brain tumor segmentation for 3D evaluation in augmented reality. Neurosurg Focus. (2021) 51(2):E14. doi: 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. (2012) 30(9):1323–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yaşargil MG. Microneurosurgery in 4 volumes IVB. Stuttgart, NY: Thieme (1996). p. 63–4.

14. Mussi AC, Matushita H, Andrade FG, Rhoton AL. Surgical approaches to IV ventricle—anatomical study. Childs Nerv Syst. (2015) 31:1807–14. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2809-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Tamriover N, Ulm AJ, Rhoton AL Jr, Yasuda A. Comparison of the transvermian and telovelar approaches to the fourth ventricle. J Neurosurg. (2004) 101:484–98. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mikhail M, Mithani K, Ibrahim GM. Presurgical and intraoperative augmented reality in neuro–oncologic surgery: clinical experiences and limitations. World Neurosurg. (2019) 128:268–76. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mixed reality, 3D visualization, fourth ventricle, tumors of the IV ventricle, posterior fossa microneurosurgery

Citation: Colombo E, Bektas D, Regli L and van Doormaal T (2023) Case report: Impact of mixed reality on anatomical understanding and surgical planning in a complex fourth ventricular tumor extending to the lamina quadrigemina. Front. Surg. 10:1227473. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1227473

Received: 24 May 2023; Accepted: 21 July 2023;
Published: 22 August 2023.

Edited by:

Mohamad Bydon, Mayo Clinic, United States

Reviewed by:

Toki Saito, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan
Antonio Ferretti, University of Studies G. d’Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy

© 2023 Colombo, Bektas, Regli and van Doormaal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Elisa Colombo Elisa.colombo@usz.ch

Download