Comparison of Visceral Fat Accumulation and Metabolome Markers among Cats of Varying BCS and Novel Classification of Feline Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome

Introduction

The prevalence of obesity and its associated metabolic diseases has been a growing concern and has become the global epidemic in veterinary medicine (1–4). Obesity is an excessive accumulation of triglyceride (TG) in adipose tissues, due to an energy imbalance where energy intake exceeds energy expenditure. Adipose tissue is not only a mere inert fuel storage but also an important secretory and endocrine organ that actively releases substances, “adiopokines.” Adipokines are involved in a wide array of physiological processes including glucose (GLU) and lipid homeostasis, blood pressure, body weight regulations, and immune functions (5, 6). The dysregulated synthesis of “harmful” adipokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) (7), interleukin-6, and of “beneficial” adipokines, such as adiponectin (ADN) (8) and leptin (9), is involved in the development of obesity-associated syndrome. Obesity-associated diseases include diabetes mellitus (DM), insulin (INS) resistance, lipid profile abnormalities, orthopedic diseases, cardiorespiratory diseases, neoplasia, and shortened life span (10, 11). Even before obesity-associated diseases are clinically apparent, evidences of oxidative stress and low-grade chronic inflammation are present due to increased lipid peroxidation and proinflammatory adipokine secretion from growing adipose tissues. Increased oxidative stress affects adipokine production, and dysregulated production of adipokines plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-associated diseases (11, 12). In humans, continued elevation of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) results in decreased secretion of INS and dysfunction of pancreatic β cells, which in turn, leads to the development of DM: a phenomenon termed as lipotoxicity (13, 14).

One of many major consequences of obesity in humans is metabolic syndrome (MS). MS is defined as the set of risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease, one of the most serious lifestyle-related diseases in humans. These metabolic risk factors have extracted enormous burden on national health-care systems and budgets in an increasing numbers of countries (15) and have been the major focus of international research. During the late 1980s, many studies focused on such collection of symptoms in order to define lifestyle diseases. Syndrome X, defined by Reaven (16), included INS resistance, hypertension, GLU intolerance, and hypertriglyceridemia. “The deadly quartet,” described by Kaplan (17), included GLU intolerance, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and upper-body obesity. DeFronzo and Ferannini (18) recognized that INS resistance was commonly associated with such conditions and proposed the term “insulin resistance syndrome.” Then, Matsuzawa et al. (19) proposed the pathophysiological importance of visceral fat deposition in the development of metabolic dysfunctions and introduced the term “visceral fat syndrome.” The above four pathophysiological concepts shared similar conditions such as INS resistance, GLU intolerance, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and obesity, and later referred to as the “metabolic syndrome.” In 2006, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) published a consensus guideline (20), describing a list of diagnostic criteria for MS (Table 1). The diagnostic criteria included waist circumference (WC), TG, cholesterol, GLU concentrations, blood pressure, and the reference values for each criterion. In humans, each component of MS is an independent risk factor for arteriosclerosis, chronic kidney disease, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (21). A set of MS diagnostic criteria is a useful tool in preventative medicine as it alerts for an implementation of early environmental, medical, and lifestyle interventions.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Human metabolic syndrome diagnostic criteria (20).

As in humans, obesity-associated diseases and metabolic abnormalities are common in dogs and cats (22, 23). Similar pathophysiological path and disease progression to the development of MS are expected in companion animals. In cats, obesity is associated with the development of INS resistance (24) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (25–28) and is considered a good human MS model (29). Whereas in dogs, symptoms such as obesity, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia are commonly seen but are not considered to directly precede the development of INS resistance and DM (30) In fact, over 50% of DM cases in dogs are type 1, whereas type 2 is much more common in feline (80–95% DM cases) (31). Therefore, the use of the term “metabolic syndrome” in dogs can be considered a misconception (30, 32).

Such species-difference is due to the unique characteristics of feline GLU and lipid metabolism (33). Cats lack one of the rate-limiting enzymes that mediate glycolysis in the liver (34). Hexokinases mediate the conversion of GLU to GLU-6-phosphate as the first step of glycolysis. Hexokinases I–III are present in cats as in dogs and are most active in low blood GLU concentration. Unlike in dogs, lack of hexokinase IV (glucokinase) in cats causes inability to process blood GLU at high concentration and a subsequent accumulation of excess energy as TG in adipose tissues. Additionally, the expression levels of mRNA associated with INS signaling pathway, such as INS receptor substrate-1, INS receptor substrate-2, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase P-85 alpha in classical INS-responsive tissues, were significantly lower in cats when compared to those in dogs (35). Furthermore, ADN, an adipokine that improves INS sensitivity, was also lower in cats at normal state (35) and with weight gain (36). Unlike in dogs that maintain circulating ADN even with weight gain (36), ADN seems to play more important role in the development of obesity-related metabolic disturbances in cats. Together, these evidences suggest that cats inherently have lower ability to process GLU, are predisposed to obesity and INS resistance, and to visceral obesity-induced lipid metabolism abnormality just as in humans.

In humans, early detection and intervention of weight gain is crucial under the management of preemptive and preventive medicine. It is advised that weight status and health status of at-risk individuals be closely monitored using quantitative parameters such as body mass index (BMI) (37, 38), blood pressure, cholesterol and GLU levels, and WC size as instructed by IDF guidelines (20). Many publications and organizations offer helpful guidelines to promote healthy lifestyle changes including healthy eating, moderate exercise, and stress reduction (39–42). However, in veterinary medicine, there is no consensus on objective biochemical and mechanical parameters and their reference values to classify the weight status. A commonly accepted evaluation method of weight status is Body Condition Score (BCS) (43, 44), which is a semi-quantitative assessment method employing subjective visual observation and palpation of an observer. Such evaluation method is a useful initial screening tool, but subject to interobserver variations and underestimation of the body fat level. Furthermore, it does not reflect the true metabolic and health status of a companion animal because it does not directly measure adipose status. Many evidences suggest the significance of adipose status, such as adipose depot distribution (subcutaneous vs visceral) and adipocyte size (small vs large) in adipokine synthesis and metabolic health (8, 45). In humans, anthropometric measurements such as BMI and WC are considered to correlate well with adipose status (46, 47), but such measurements are not yet available in veterinary medicine. Quantitative, objective measurement methods of body composition in companion animals have been researched in scientific studies. They include ultrasound imaging, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and deuterium oxide dilution method (48, 49) They show good reliability in determining body composition in dogs and cats, but highly inaccessible in veterinary practices. Additionally, most of them measure total body fat and do not quantitatively distinguish between subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Previously, many researchers have introduced various quantitative parameters such as lipid concentrations (50, 51), lipoprotein profiles (52, 53) oxidized low-density lipoprotein (54), and their reference values to evaluate the quality of weight gain.

Practical methods of overweight/obesity diagnosis and classification, employing such measurable biochemical parameters, which reliably reflect adipose status, true metabolic and health status in cats, are in need.

The aim of this manuscript is twofold. First, it presents our preliminary feline obesity study evaluating biochemical and mechanical changes associated with weight gain. In this study, we observed the effects of weight gain on energy metabolism using metabolome markers, such as ADN and proinflammatory cytokines in correlation with other common biochemical parameters in 14 clinically healthy cats of varying BCS. Further, we evaluated the visceral fat accumulation via CT imaging and laparoscopic examination and assessed adipocyte type and size histologically in three cats of varying BCS. Second, it proposes the novel diagnostic and classification method of feline obesity and MS, based on the established diagnostic criteria of human MS and our preliminary study data. A set of objective, quantitative biomarkers necessary for early diagnosis and classification of feline obesity is introduced. By defining stage, degree, and quality of weight gain, a guide for interventions (exercise, therapeutic diet, and medications) appropriate for each stage of weight status can be established. Together, they present a feline-specific classification of obesity and MS.

Animals and Methods

Animals

Sixteen client-owned cats (0–16 years old; female: n = 5; male: n = 11) of varying BCS from 6 veterinary hospitals in Kanto area were entered into the study. After medical evaluation, clinically healthy 14 subjects were assigned to 4 groups based on the 5-point scale BCS system (31, 32) described as follows: BCS 1, very thin; BCS 2, underweight; BCS 3, ideal; BCS 4, overweight; and BCS 5, obese. Seven subjects fell into the BCS 3 category, five subjects in BCS 4, and two subjects were in BCS 5. Ethical approval was obtained from the Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University Animal Research Committee. Informed consent was obtained from each client.

Plasma Analysis

Pre-prandial blood was collected from jugular vein into heparinized plastic tubes. These samples were immediately centrifuged at 1,700 × g for 10 min at 4°C to obtain plasma, and the samples were stored at −80°C until use. Plasma GLU, TG, total cholesterol (TC) concentrations and plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities were measured using autoanalyzer (JCA-BM2250, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with the manufacturer’s reagents at Monolis Inc., Tokyo, Japan. Plasma non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations were measured with a commercial kit (NEFA-C test, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Plasma INS and ADN concentrations were measured with a commercial kit (Cat Insulin ELISA kit, Shibatagi Co., Ltd., Gunma, Japan; Mouse/Rat Adiponectin ELISA kit, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Statistical analysis for plasma parameters was performed by Mann–Whitney U-test (p < 0.01).

Laparoscopic Evaluation

Laparoscopic abdominal evaluations of three representative feline subjects (one each from BCS 3, 4, and 5 groups) were performed. Each subject was premedicated with intravenous injections of atropine sulfate at a dose of 0.025 mg/kg, butorphanol at 0.1 mg/kg, diazepam at 0.3 mg/kg, and cefazolin at 20 mg/kg. Anesthetic induction was done using thiopental sodium injection (12.5 mg/kg) and maintained with 2% end-tidal concentration of isoflurane administered via endotracheal intubation. Intraoperatively, each subject was administered intravenous fluids at a maintenance dose.

Laparoscopic procedure was performed as described previously (55) using rigid telescope 30° (KARL STORZ Endoscopy Japan, Tokyo), 5 mm trocar–cannulas (Olympus Medical systems, Tokyo), light sources (Xenon nova 175, KARL STORZ Endoscopy Japan, Tokyo), automatic carbon dioxide (CO₂) insufflator (Electronic Endoflator, KARL STORZ Endoscopy Japan, Tokyo), and video imaging systems (LMD-2450 MD, Sony Corporation, Tokyo). A two-port entry ventral midline approach was performed with a telescope placed through the first 5-mm-cannula at 1 cm caudal to the umbilicus. The second 3-mm cannula was placed at 2–3 cm lateral to the midline on either side. With the use of 5-mm cup biopsy forceps, the edge of a liver lobe was gently grabbed, twisted, and retracted toward the instrument port. Care was taken to avoid rough handling that may lead to excessive hemorrhage and tearing. The same procedure was repeated for intraabominal fat (omental fat). Subcutaneous fat was collected at the time of trocar insertion at the site of abdominal incision.

CT Imaging

The same three subjects used for laparoscopic evaluation were maintained under anesthesia as described above for CT imaging of the abdomen. All CT images were obtained using a multi-slice CT (BrightSpeed 8 rows, GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). Imaging conditions were as follows: a tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current of 118 mA, and imaging slice thickness of 1.25 mm. Scanned images were reconstructed by RETRO recon reconstruction function of the CT scanner, then processed using a built-in scanner.

Biopsy Tissues

Parts of liver, omental, and subcutaneous fat were fixed with 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. Cut sections (4 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for histological examination. Formalin-fixed tissues were also frozen, sectioned at 10-µm thickness, and stained with oil red O. Specimen preparation and histopathological evaluation were performed by one clinical pathologist.

Results

Table 2 shows the results of plasma biochemical measurements. Mean concentration of ADN in BCS 3 cats was significantly higher than those in BCS 4. ADN concentration of 1 subject in BCS 5 showed over 16-fold and 4-fold decrease compared to those in BCS 3 and BCS 4 groups, respectively. Conversely, TNFα concentration of BCS 5 (1 subject) was over 11-times and 9-times higher than those in BCS 3 and BCS 4, respectively. Similarly, TG and NEFA concentrations showed increasing tendency with increasing weight status.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Comparison of plasma parameters between cats of Body Condition Score (BCS) 3, 4, and 5 groups.

Figure 1 shows three representative cross-sectional CT images (BCS 3, 4, and 5) at the level of renal pelvis. Fat mass, appearing as black image (blue arrow), is visibly thicker in overweight (BCS 4) and obese (BCS 5) cats than in ideal cat (BCS 3), occupying more space relative to the abdominal organs. Furthermore, subcutaneous fat represented by arrow head is visibly thicker in BCS 5 than in BCS 4, and in BCS 4 than in BCS 3.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Comparison of cross-sectional abdominal computed tomography (CT) images at the level of renal pelvis among BCS 3, 4, and 5 cats. Cross-sectional abdominal CT images at the level of renal pelvis are presented: (A) BCS 3 cat; (B) BCS 4 cat; and (C) BCS 5 cat. Arrows point to intra-abdominal area (visceral fat), and arrowheads point to subcutaneous area. Note with increasing BCS, visceral fat (appeared as black area, arrow) volume increases, occupying more spaces relative to abdominal organs. Subcutaneous fat depot (arrow head) also increases with increasing BCS.

Figure 2 shows the side-by-side comparison of histological images of liver as follows: (A) normal cat liver, oil red O stained; (B) obese cat liver, oil red O stained. As evident, there is no significant finding noted in normal cat liver sample. In obese cat liver, there is an increase in small lipid droplets (shown in orange color, oil o red) at lobular margin. Final histopathological diagnosis was concluded as “lipid droplet accumulation in lobular marginal hepatocytes with no signs of hepatic lipidosis” in obese cat (BCS 5). The liver was accumulating lipids but was not showing pathology as evidenced by the normal activity levels of ALT and AST.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Histological comparison of biopsied liver tissues between normal [Body Condition Score (BCS) 3] and obese (BCS 5) cats (oil o red stained): (A) BCS 3 (B) BCS 5. Note the increased level of lipid droplets (stained in red) in BCS 5 liver tissue.

Figure 3 shows the side-by-side comparisons of HE-stained histological images of subcutaneous and intra-abdominal (omental) fat as follows: (A) normal cat subcutaneous fat, (B) obese cat subcutaneous fat, (C) normal cat omental fat, and (D) obese cat omental fat. Regardless of fat location, there were visibly less adipocytes per field in obese cat samples and larger size adipocytes compared to those in normal cat samples.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Histological comparison of subcutaneous and omental fat between normal [Body Condition Score (BCS) 3] and obese (BCS 5) cats: (A) omental fat, BCS 3; (B) ometal fat, BCS 5; (C) subcutaneous fat, BCS 3; and (D) subcutaneous fat, BCS 5. Note the increased adipocyte size (emphasized with dotted lines) and decreased number of adipocytes with increased BCS.

Discussion

In our preliminary feline study, changes in adipose depot distribution and adipocyte sizes in correlation with changes in BCS and metabolome markers were evaluated.

The results showed that with increasing BCS, body fat distribution and adipocyte size shifted from subcutaneous to visceral, and small to large size, respectively. Previous studies suggest the significance of adipose depot distribution (subcutaneous vs visceral) and adipocyte size (small vs large) and age (immature vs mature) (56) in ADN synthesis and secretion (8, 41).

Evidently, our overweight/obese subjects showed lower circulating ADN concentration and more TNFα concentration, showing the mutually antagonizing relationship of ADN and TNFα in concordance with the previous studies (57–59). The decline in ADN concentration, and increase in adipocyte hypertrophy and VAT appeared earlier than changes in liver tissues and common biochemical predictors, such as GLU, liver values, and lipid markers, were evident. Decline in ADN, “beneficial adipokine,” and elevation in TNFα, “harmful adipokine,” in overweight and obese cats, with visceral fat accumulation and adipocyte hypertrophy, support the positive correlation between visceral obesity, metabolic disturbances, and degree of pathology in feline obesity.

Based on our preliminary study data and previously established human diagnostic criteria (Table 1), we further propose a new “Feline metabolic syndrome diagnostic criteria” (Table 3) and a novel “classification of feline obesity” (Figure 4). Note that central (abdominal) obesity, which is easily assessed by WC in humans, is replaced by BCS. Furthermore, we added ADN as the last criterion as an indicator of visceral fat volume (central obesity) and metabolic health. Unlike in humans, evaluation of weight status using height (m) and weight (kg), as described by BMI, is not practical in cats due to the breed and conformation variations. Instead, 5 or 9 scale BCS (43, 44) is used. In our new classification (Figure 4), “secondary obesity” denotes weight gain induced by endocrine or genetic causes. It requires medical management of underlying diseases and is beyond the scope of this manuscript. “Primary obesity” is of our interest and is further divided into “simple” and “pathological” obesity (obesity disease) based on the presence of obesity-associated symptoms. “Obesity disease” is then divided into “visceral fat obesity” and “subcutaneous fat obesity” based on the location of adipose tissue depot. With progressive and excessive accumulation of VAT, cats are at a higher risk of developing MS. In humans, WC is considered a strong predictor of intra-abdominal fat (visceral fat). In cats, ADN concentration is suggested as the biomarker for visceral fat accumulation associated with MS.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Feline metabolic syndrome diagnostic criteria.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Classification of feline obesity. A flow chart showing classification of feline obesity as a guide for early diagnosis and intervention. Obesity is classified by (A) its cause, (B) presence of associated disease, and (C) location of fat depot.

Adiponectin is a cytokine secreted by adipocytes. It is involved in GLU and lipid metabolism and exerts direct effects on vasculatures, thus positively influences the metabolic health of individuals (27). It modulates the expression of fatty acid transport proteins in liver and skeletal muscle and stimulates fatty acid oxidation and GLU utilization via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (60). AMPK is a sensor of cellular energy status and mediates the effects of adipokines in food intake, body weight, and GLU and lipid metabolism (61). It has protective effects against obesity and INS resistance (61, 62). Additionally, AMPK activation suppresses oxidative stress and inflammatory processes, which are the characteristics commonly seen in obese individuals. ADN also exerts anti-inflammatory actions via inhibition of macrophage activity and C-reactive protein, TNFα production, and action. It is considered the “beneficial” adipokine, and its decline in plasma is associated with disease processes, such as obesity, INS resistant type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease in humans (7, 27). Unlike other adiopokines, secretion and circulating levels of ADN are inversely proportional to body fat mass (63). Low level of circulating ADN is associated with obesity and MS (5). Generally, it is considered to circulate at levels inversely proportional to body fat content. In fact, ADN concentration increases with an increase in SAT, which generally consists of small adipocytes (64) but decreases with increased visceral fat accumulation (8, 45). Therefore, low circulating ADN is considered a strong predictor of visceral fat obesity, associated with GLU and lipid metabolism abnormalities, and can be used as the diagnostic tool for MS.

Conclusion

As for many other non-communicable diseases, the optimal management of MS is prevention. Successful identification of risk factors and classification of feline obesity can be useful guides when establishing early intervention and management. Our study results support our novel “classification of feline obesity” (Figure 4) and “Feline metabolic syndrome diagnostic criteria” (Table 3), suggesting the need to complement ADN measurement with VAT volume to better understand the pathogenesis of metabolic disturbances in the feline population. Changes in ADN and VAT seemed to reflect the pathophysiological derangements leading to MS much earlier than the common biochemical predictors such as GLU, liver values, NEFA, TG, and TC.

This was a preliminary study to validate our novel classification and diagnostic criteria of feline obesity and MS. Limitations of our study include small number of samples and biological and environmental variables (age, genetics, diet, and exercise), which are inevitable when client-owned animals are utilized. Also, there is no established reference value for feline ADN, thus we used comparison of values among individuals from various BCS. Furthermore, in this study, changes in amounts of SAT and VAT, adipocyte size, and numbers were only visually evaluated. More refined quantitative studies employing direct measurement of adipocytes (45), BIA (65), DEXA (66), or special calculations to measure SAT and VAT volumes (67) on controlled subjects should be performed in the future. In human medicine, a combination of CT scanning and body fat analysis software is often utilized to measure body fat in MS management. No such software specialized for body fat measurement has been developed for veterinary subjects. However, the application of human body fat analysis software has been shown to be useful in a study conducted by Kobayashi et al. (67). Such further studies will help establish reference values for feline ADN concentration and VAT volume that reflect the degree of pathology.

Metabolic syndrome represents a cluster of medical conditions and is considered an optimal target of preemptive medicine. In preemptive medicine, multifaceted factors such as genomics, metabolomics, and environmental associations need to be elucidated. Establishment of diagnostic criteria based on such data will facilitate early diagnosis and interventions and may serve as an established model in the field of veterinary preemptive medicine.

Author Contributions

YO contributed to the conception and design of the work and drafted the work. MK and MS contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. TA contributed to the design of the work and final approval of the version to be publication. All authors read and approved the final work.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Masaki Michishita for contributing his expertise in histological analysis and diagnoses of the biopsied tissues. We would also like to thank Dr. Koh Kawasumi for his contribution in sample collection and laboratory analysis.

Abbreviations

ADN, adiponectin; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; BCS, Body Condition Score; CT, computed tomography; DEXA, c; DM, diabetes mellitus; GLU, glucose; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; INS, insulin; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MS, metabolic syndrome; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acid; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; WC, waist circumference.

References

1. Edney AT, Smith PM. Study of obesity in dogs visiting veterinary practices in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec (1986) 118:391–6. doi: 10.1136/vr.118.14.391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lund E, Armstrong P, Kirk C, Klausner J. Prevalence and risk factors for obesity in adult dogs from private US veterinary practices. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med (2006) 4:177–86.

Google Scholar

3. McGreevy PD, Thompson PC, Pride C, Fawcett A, Grasi T, Jones B. Prevalence of obesity in dogs examined by Australian veterinary practices and the risk factors involved. Vet Rec (2005) 156(22):695–702. doi:10.1136/vr.156.22.695

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mori N, Iwasaki E, Okada Y, Kawasumi K, Arai T. Overall prevalence of feline overweight/obesity in Japan as determined from a cross-sectional sample pool of healthy veterinary clinic-visiting cats in Japan. Turk J Vet Anim Sci (2016) 40:304–12. doi:10.3906/vet-1502-31

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Trayhurn P, Wood IS. Signaling role of adipose tissue: adipokines and inflammation in obesity. Biochem Soc Trans (2005) 33:1078–81. doi:10.1042/BST20051078

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Trayhurn P, Bing C, Wood IS. Adipose tissue and adipokines – energy regulation from the human perspective. J Nutr (2006) 136(7 Suppl):1935S–9S.

Google Scholar

7. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Arita Y, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, Okamoto Y, et al. Novel modulator for endothelial adhesion molecules: adipocyte-derived plasma protein adiponectin. Circulation (1999) 100:2473–6. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.100.25.2473

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kantartzis K, Rittig K, Balletshofer B, Machann J, Schick F, Porubska K, et al. The relationships of plasma adiponectin with a favorable lipid profile, decreased inflammation, and less ectopic fat accumulation depend on adiposity. Clin Chem (2006) 52(10):1934–42. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.067397

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kershaw EE, Flier JS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2004) 89(6):2548–56. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Toll PW, Yamka RM, Schoenherr WD, Hand MS. Obesity. 5th ed. In: Hand MS, Thatcher CD, Remillard RL, Roudebush P, Novotny BJ, editors. Small Animal Clinical Nutrition. Topeka, KS: Mark Morris Institute (2010). p. 501–42.

Google Scholar

11. German AJ, Ryan VH, German AC, Wood IS, Trayhurn P. Obesity, its associated disorders and the role of inflammatory adipokines in companion animals. Vet J (2010) 185(1):4–9. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Sommer G, Garten A, Petzold S, Beck-Sickinger AG, Bluher M, Stunvoll M, et al. Visfatin/PBEF/Nampt: structure, regulation and potential function of a novel adipokine. Clin Sci (2008) 115:13–23. doi:10.1042/CS20070226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. DeFroinzo RA. Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: the missing links. The Claude Bernard Lecture 2009. Diabetologia (2010) 53:1270–87. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1684-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gehmann W, Elsner M, Lenzen S. Role of metabolically generated reactive oxygen species for lipotoxicity in pancreatic β-cells. Diabetes Obes Metab (2012) 12(Suppl 2):149–58. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01265.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Boudreau DM, Malone DC, Raebel MA, Fishman PA, Nichols GA, Feldstein AC, et al. Health care utilization and costs by metabolic syndrome risk factors. Metab Syndr Relat Disord (2009) 7(4):305–14. doi:10.1089/met.2008.0070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes (1998) 37:1595–607. doi:10.2337/diab.37.12.1595

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kaplan NM. The deadly quartet. Upper-body obesity, glucose intolerance, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension. Arch Intern Med (1989) 149:1514–20. doi:10.1001/archinte.1989.00390070054005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. DeFronzo RA, Ferannini E. Insulin resistance. A multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care (1991) 149:1514–20.

Google Scholar

19. Matsuzawa Y, Funahashi T, Nakamura T. Molecular mechanism of metabolic syndrome X; contribution of adipocytokines adipocyte-derived bioactive substances. Ann N Y Acad Sci (1999) 892:146–54. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07793.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. The IDF Consensus Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. (2006). Available from: http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/IDF_Meta_def_final.pdf

Google Scholar

21. Han TS, Lean ME. A clinical perspective of obesity, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis (2016) 5:2048004016633371. doi:10.1177/2048004016633371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Muranaka S, Mori N, Hatano Y, Saito TR, Lee P, Kojima M, et al. Obesity induced changes to plasma adiponectin concentration and cholesterol lipoprotein composition profile in cats. Res Vet Sci (2010) 91:358–61. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.09.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mori N, Takemitsu H, Okada Y, Yamamoto I, Arai T. A comparison of metabolic parameters between obese and non-obese healthy domestic dogs in Japan. Asian J Anim Vet Adv (2013) 8:863–73. doi:10.3923/ajava.2013.863.873

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Brennan CL, Hoenig M, Ferguston DC. GLUT4 but not BLUT1 expression decreases early in the development of feline obesity. Domest Anim Endocrinol (2004) 26:291–301. doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2003.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Scarlett JM, Donoghue S. Association between body condition and disease in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc (1998) 212:1725–31.

Google Scholar

26. Hoenig M, Thomaseth K, Waldron M, Ferguson DC. Insulin sensitivity, fat distribution, and adipocytokine response to different diets in lean and obese cats before and after weight loss. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol (2007) 292:227–34. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00313.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Laflamme DP. Companion animals symposium: obesity in dogs and cats: what is wrong with being fat? J Anim Sci (2012) 90:1653–62. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Osto M, Luts TA. Translational value of animal models of obesity – focus on dogs and cats. Eur J Pharmacol (2015) 759:240–52. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Van de Velde H, Janssens GPJ, de Rooster H, Polis I, Peters I, Ducatelle R, et al. The cat as a model for human obesity: insights into depot-specific inflammation associated with feline obesity. Br J Nutr (2013) 110(7):1326–35. doi:10.1017/S0007114513000226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Verkest KR. Is the metabolic syndrome a useful clinical concept in dogs? A review of the evidence. Vet J (2014) 199:24–30. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.057

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Rand JS. Current understanding of feline diabetes mellitus: part 1, pathogenesis. J Feline Med Surg (1999) 1:143–53. doi:10.1016/S1098-612X(99)90203-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Nelson RW, Reusch CE. Classification and etiology of diabetes in dogs and cats. J Endocrinol (2014) 222(3):T1–9. doi:10.1530/JOE-14-0202

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Hoenig M. Carbohydrate metabolism and pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus in dogs and cats. Prog Mol Biol Trans Sci (2014) 121:377–412. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800101-1.00012-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Tanaka A, Inoue A, Takeguchi A, Washizu T, Bonkobara M, Arai T. Comparison of expression of glucokinase gene and activities of enzymes related to glucose metabolism in livers between dogs and cats. Vet Res Commun (2005) 29:477–85. doi:10.1007/s11259-005-1868-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Mori A, Lee P, Takemitsu H, Sako T, Arai T. Comparison of insulin signaling gene expression in insulin sensitive tissues between cats and dogs. Vet Res Commun (2005) 33:211–26. doi:10.1007/s11259-008-9168-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Verkest KR, Rand JS, Fleeman LM, Morton JM, Richards AA, Rose FJ, et al. Distinct adiponectin profiles might contribute to differences in susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in dogs and humans. Domest Anim Endocrinol (2011) 41:67–73. doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2011.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Keys A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura N, Taylor HL. Indices of relative weight and obesity. J Chronic Dis (1972) 25(6):329–43. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(72)90027-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Garrow JS, Webster J. Quetelet’s index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. Int J Obes (1985) 9(2):147–53.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

39. American Heart Association. Prevention and Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome. Heart.com. Retrieved from: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/MetabolicSyndrome/Prevention-and-Treatment-of-Metabolic-Syndrome_UCM_301927_Article.jsp#.WJQPyPOZngE (accessed January 16, 2017).

Google Scholar

40. NIH national heart, lung, and blood institute. How Can Metabolic Syndrome Be Prevented? NIH.gov. Retrieved from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/ms/prevention (accessed January 16, 2017).

Google Scholar

41. Lindström J, Louheranta A, Mannelin M. The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS): lifestyle intervention and 3-year results on diet and physical activity. Diabetes Care (2003) 26:3230–6. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.12.3230

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension (2003) 42(6):1206–52. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Baldwin S, Bartges KJ, Buffington T, Freeman LM, Grabow M, Legred J, et al. AAHA nutritional assessment guidelines for dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc (2010) 46(4):285–96. doi:10.5326/0460285

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Thatcher CD, Hand MS, Remillard RL. Small animal clinical nutrition: an iterative process. 5th ed. In: Hand MS, Thatcher CD, Remillard RL, Roudebush P, Novotny BJ, editors. Small Animal Clinical Nutrition. Topeka, KS: Mark Morris Institute (2010). p. 3–21.

Google Scholar

45. Meyer LK, Ciaraldi TP, Henry RR, Wittgrove AC, Phillips SA. Adipose tissue depot and cell size dependency of adiponectin synthesis and secretion in human obesity. Adipocyte (2013) 2(4):217–26. doi:10.4161/adip.24953

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Brambilla P, Bedogni G, Moreno LA, Goran MI, Gutin B, Fox KR, et al. Crossvalidation of anthropometry against magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in children. Int J Obes (2006) 30(1):23–30. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Camhi SM, Bray GA, Bouchard C, Greenway FL, Johnson WD, Newton RL, et al. The relationship of waist circumference and BMI to visceral, subcutaneous, and total body fat: sex and race differences. Obesity (2011) 19(2):402–8. doi:10.1038/oby.2010.248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Kullberg J, Brandberg J, Angelhed JE, Frimmel H, Bergelin E, Strid L, et al. Whole-body adipose tissue analysis: comparison of MRI, CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometery. Br J Radiol (2009) 82:123–30. doi:10.1259/bjr/80083156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Mawby DI, Bartges JW, d’Avignon A, Laflamme DP, Moyers TD, Cottrell T. Comparison of various methods for estimating fat in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc (2004) 40(2):109–14. doi:10.5326/0400109

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Watson TDG, Barrie J. Lipoprotein metabolism and hyperlipidemia in the dog and cat-a review. J Small Anim Pract (1993) 34:479–87. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.1993.tb03519.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Johnson MC. Hyperlipidemia disorders in dogs. Compend Contin Educ Vet (2005) 27:361–4.

Google Scholar

52. Jericó MM, De Camargo CF, Kajihara K, Moreira MA, Gonzales R, Machado FL, et al. Chromatographic analysis of lipid fractions in healthy dogs and dogs with obesity or hyperadrenocorticism. J Vet Diagn Invest (2009) 21:203–7. doi:10.1177/104063870902100204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Mori N, Lee P, Kondo K, Kido T, Saito T, Arai T. Potential use of cholesterol lipoprotein profile to confirm obesity status in dogs. Vet Res Commun (2011) 35:223–35. doi:10.1007/s11259-011-9466-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Mori N, Okada Y, Tsuchida N, Hatano Y, Habara M, Ishikawa S, et al. Preliminary analysis of modified low-density lipoproteins in the serum of healthy and obese dogs and cats. Front Vet Sci (2015) 2:34. doi:10.3389/fvets.2015.00034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Avrutis O, Friedman SJ, Meshoulm J, Haskel L, Adler S. Safety and success of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech (2000) 10:200–7. doi:10.1097/00019509-200008000-00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Körner A, Wabitsch M, Seidel B, Fischer-Posovszky P, Berthold A, Stumvoll M, et al. Adiponectin expression in humans is dependent on differentiation of adipocytes and down-regulated by humoral serum components of high molecular weight. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2005) 337(2):540–50. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.09.064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Bruun JM, Lihn AS, Verdich C, Pedersen SB, Toubro S, Astrup A, et al. Regulation of adiponectin by adipose tissue-derived cytokines: in vivo and in vitro investigations in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2003) 285:E527–33. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00110.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Ouchi N, Kihara S, Arita Y, Okamoto Y, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, et al. Adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived plasma protein, inhibits endothelial NF-kappa signaling through a cAMP-dependent pathway. Circulation (2000) 102:1296–301. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.102.11.1296

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Hoenig M, McGoldrick JB, de Beer M, Demacker PN, Ferguson DC. Activity and tissue-specific expression of lipases and tumor-necrosis factor α in lean and obese cats. Domest Anim Endocrinol (2006) 30(4):333–44. doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2005.09.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Chandran M, Phillips SA, Ciaraldi T, Henry RR. Adiponectin: more than just another fat cell hormone? Diabetes Care (2003) 26(8):2442–50. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.8.2442

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Kahn BB, Alquier T, Carling D, Hardie DG. AMP-activated protein kinase: ancient energy review gauge provides clues to modern understanding of metabolism. Cell Metab (2005) 1(1):15–25. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2004.12.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Balsan GA, Vieira JL, Oliveira AM, Portal VL. Relationship between adiponectin, obesity and insulin resistance. Rev Assoc Med Bras (2015) 61(1):72–80. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.61.01.072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Takahashi M, Maeda K, Miyagawa J, et al. Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1999) 257(1):79–83. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1999.0255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Bjornvad CR, Rand JS, Tan HY, Jensen KS, Rose FJ, Armstrong PJ, et al. Obesity and sex influence insulin resistance and total multimer adiponectin levels in adult neutered domestic shorthair client-owned cats. Domest Anim Endocrinol (2014) 47:55–64. doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2013.11.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Borges NC, Vanconcellos RS, Carciofi AC, Gonçalves KN, Paula FJ, Filho DE, et al. DXA, bioelectrical impedance, ultrasonography and biometry for the estimation of fat and lean mass in cats during weight loss. BMC Vet Res (2012) 8:111. doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-111

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Buelund LE, Nielse DH, McEvoy FJ, Svalastoga EL, Bjornvad CR. Measurement of body composition in cats using computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Vet Radiol Ultrasound (2011) 52(2):179–84. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01765.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M, Shinomiya M. A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography. Int J Obes (2002) 26:398–402. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar