CITE SCORE 1.94
2017 edition, Scopus 2018

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

This article is part of the Research Topic

Canine Olfactory Detection

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Vet. Sci. | doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00345

Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario

 Astrid R. Concha1*,  Claire M. Guest2,  Robert Harris2,  Tom Pike3, Alexandre Feugier4, Helen Zulch3, 5 and  Daniel S. Mills3
  • 1Animal Scent Detection Consultancy and Research, Chile
  • 2Medical Detection Dogs, United Kingdom
  • 3University of Lincoln, United Kingdom
  • 4Royal Canin, France
  • 5Dogs trust, United Kingdom

Dogs’ abilities to respond to concentrations of odorant molecules are generally deemed superior to electronic sensors. This sensitivity has been used traditionally in many areas; but is a more recent innovation within the medical field. As a bio-detection sensor for human diseases such as cancer and infections, dogs often need to detect volatile organic compounds in bodily fluids such as urine and blood. Although the limits of olfactory sensitivity in dogs have been studied since the 1960s, there is a gap in our knowledge concerning these limits in relation to the concentration of odorants presented in a fluid phase. Therefore the aim of this study was to estimate olfactory detection thresholds to an inert substance, amyl acetate presented in a liquid phase. Ten dogs were trained in a “Go/No go” single scent-detection task using an eight-choice carousel apparatus. They were trained to respond to the presence of solutions of amyl acetate diluted to varying degrees in mineral oil by sitting in front of the positive sample, and not responding to the seven other control samples. Training and testing took place in an indoor room with the same handler throughout using a food reward. After 30 weeks of training, using a forward chaining technique, dogs were tested for their sensitivity. The handler did not assist the dog during the search and was blind to the concentration of amyl acetate tested and the position of the target in the carousel. The global olfactory threshold trend for each dog was estimated by fitting a least-squares logistic curve to the association between the proportion of true positives and amyl acetate concentration. Results show an olfactory detection threshold for fluid mixtures ranging from 40 parts per billion to 1.5 parts per trillion. There was considerable inter-dog difference in sensitivity, even though all dogs were trained in the same way and worked without the assistance of the handler. This variation highlights factors to be considered in future work assessing olfactory detection performance by dogs.

Keywords: Olfactory thresholds, Sensitivity, detection, Amyl acetate, accuracy

Received: 23 Aug 2018; Accepted: 27 Dec 2018.

Edited by:

Emily Patterson-Kane, American Veterinary Medical Association, United States

Reviewed by:

Mitsuaki Ohta, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Japan
Lowell P. Waggoner, Auburn University, United States  

Copyright: © 2018 Concha, Guest, Harris, Pike, Feugier, Zulch and Mills. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Astrid R. Concha, Animal Scent Detection Consultancy and Research, Santiago, Chile, animalscentdetection@gmail.com