Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Antibiot.

Sec. Enhanced Epidemiology and Preventive Strategies

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frabi.2025.1632264

This article is part of the Research TopicAntimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in Foodborne PathogensView all articles

Zoonotic Potential of ESBL-Producing Coliforms in Pastorally Managed Ruminants with Subclinical Mastitis in Plateau State, Nigeria

Provisionally accepted
Ebere  Roseann AgusiEbere Roseann Agusi1*Kenneth  Nnamdi AnueyiaguKenneth Nnamdi Anueyiagu2,3*Dennis  KabantiyokDennis Kabantiyok4Grace  Mebi AyanbimpeGrace Mebi Ayanbimpe5Eugene  Ifeanyichukwu IkehEugene Ifeanyichukwu Ikeh5
  • 1Biotechnology Centre, National Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, Jos, Nigeria, Jos, Nigeria
  • 2National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Vom, Nigeria
  • 3Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, NVRI Vom, Jos, Nigeria
  • 4Fleming Laboratory, Diagnostic Services Department, National Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, Jos, Nigeria
  • 5Department of Microbiology, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Environmental coliform bacteria are frequently the cause of subclinical mastitis (SCM), a serious health issue in the dairy industry. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- producing coliforms in livestock are a serious public health concern, particularly in environments where people and animals coexist. With an emphasis on their zoonotic and One Health implications, this study sought to evaluate the incidence of SCM and the occurrence of ESBL-producing coliforms in ruminants in Plateau State, Nigeria. Methods: The California Mastitis Test (CMT) was used to screen 287 milk samples that were taken from cows, ewes, and does. Standard microbiological methods were used to identify the bacterial isolates from CMT-positive samples. The presence of resistance genes (blaTEM and blaCTX-M) was ascertained by PCR, and ESBL production was confirmed phenotypically. Phylogenetic analysis showed genetic diversity and possible horizontal gene transfer among isolates. Results: Out of 287 milk samples, 79 (27.5%) had subclinical mastitis through the CMT, with a higher prevalence recorded in does 18(22.8%) while ewes and cows recorded 23(29.1%), and 38(48.1%) respectively. Of the 79 CMT-positive samples, the following isolates were identified: Citrobacter freundii (6.3%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (21.6%), K. oxytoca (2.5%), K. aerogenes (6.3%), and E. coli, being the most prevalent in cows (71%). Through PCR, 46 isolates expressed two important ESBL genes, blaTEM and blaCTX-M. Conclusion: A possible zoonotic reservoir for antibiotic resistance in Nigeria is highlighted by the increased frequency of ESBL-producing coliforms in ruminants with SCM. These results highlight the necessity of implementing integrated One Health initiatives, such as public education, surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship, in order to reduce the risk of resistant pathogen transmission from animals to people.

Keywords: Subclinical mastitis, ESBL-producing coliforms, antimicrobial resistance, One Health, zoonosis, Ruminants, Nigeria

Received: 21 May 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Agusi, Anueyiagu, Kabantiyok, Ayanbimpe and Ikeh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Ebere Roseann Agusi, Biotechnology Centre, National Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, Jos, Nigeria, Jos, Nigeria
Kenneth Nnamdi Anueyiagu, National Veterinary Research Institute (NVRI), Vom, Nigeria

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.