We noticed an error in one of our presented analyses. One mismatched brain image was accidentally included in the voxel-based-morphometry (VBM) analysis. Thus, arousal and valence values were consecutively not properly assigned to the morphological brain data of the other included participants. Of three analyses implemented in this study (VSLM, ROI-based), only the VBM analysis was affected but the others remain untouched. Therefore, we re-conducted the whole VBM analysis with the correct allocation of data. The corrected results showed changes in the whole-brain and regional correlations compared to the originally presented results. However, the correlations in the expected areas of the original manuscript remain significant for arousal and valence difference scores.
Fortunately, these results do not impact the main implications and neither invalidate the conclusions derived from the study nor introduce differing directions of inference. The right superior frontal gyrus (SFG/BA9) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC/BA32) remain significant at whole-brain p < 0.001 uncorrected level, and the ROI analysis still showed significant correlations with gray matter intensities in the right SFG (BA9).
The corrected results affect Figures 6, 7, Tables 5, 6, and small parts in results and discussion which are attached below.
Figure 6
Figure 7
Table 5
| Region | BA | Coordinates | F peak | p (unc) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| (A) AROUSAL | ||||||
| Superior Temporal Gyrus R | 21 | 67.5 | −1.5 | −13.5 | 30.50 | <0.001 |
| Inferior Parietal Gyrus R | 2 | 57 | −28.5 | 55.5 | 23.07 | <0.001 |
| Angular Gyrus R | 40 | 58.5 | −51 | 30 | 20.57 | <0.001 |
| Rolandic Operculum L | 13 | −47 | −4 | 13 | 20.11 | <0.001 |
| Inferior Frontal Gyrus R | 47 | 41 | 27 | −12 | 18.73 | <0.001 |
| 54 | 43.5 | −13.5 | 16.12 | <0.001 | ||
| Mid Occipital Gyrus L | 39 | −52.5 | −73.5 | 13.5 | 18.65 | <0.001 |
| Orbital Gyrus R | 11 | 7.5 | 52.5 | −22.5 | 11.83 | <0.001 |
| Inferior Parietal Gyrus L | 40 | −55.5 | −34.5 | 48 | 15.71 | <0.001 |
| Superior Parietal Gyrus L | 40 | −37.5 | −64.5 | 58.5 | 14.83 | <0.001 |
| Superior Frontal Gyrus R | 9 | 6 | 52.5 | 25.5 | 15.33 | <0.001 |
| Anterior Cingulate R | 32 | 1.5 | 48 | 13.5 | 14.82 | <0.001 |
| Mid Frontal Gyrus R | 10 | 33 | 55.5 | 27 | 14.86 | <0.001 |
| 46 | 45 | 54 | 9 | 11.64 | <0.001 | |
| Mid Frontal Gyrus L | 8 | −25.5 | 33 | 46.5 | 14.04 | <0.001 |
| Superior Frontal Gyrus R | 10 | 36 | 55.5 | 9 | 10.96 | <0.001 |
| Parahippocampal Gyrus R | 34 | 15 | −9 | −22.5 | 10.56 | <0.001 |
| Superior Frontal Gyrus L | 10 | −3 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.58 | <0.001 |
| (B) VALENCE | ||||||
| Mid Temporal Gyrus R | 21 | 64.5 | −1.5 | −15 | 37.87 | <0.001 |
| Parahippocampal Gyrus R | 28 | 22.5 | −9 | −27 | 22.70 | <0.001 |
| Inferior Parietal Gyrus R | 2 | 57 | −28.5 | 55.5 | 22.26 | <0.001 |
| Angular Gyrus R | 40 | 60 | −52.5 | 28.5 | 17.18 | <0.001 |
| Mid Temporal Gyrus R | 39 | 54 | −60 | 21 | 13.27 | <0.001 |
| Inferior Frontal Operculum R | 9 | 43.5 | 9 | 36 | 16.42 | <0.001 |
| Inferior Frontal Gyrus R | 47 | 42 | 28.5 | −13.5 | 10.38 | <0.001 |
| Parahippocampal Gyrus L | – | −24 | −1.5 | −30 | 15.41 | <0.001 |
| Superior Parietal Gyrus R | 40 | 40.5 | −55.5 | 58.5 | 15.12 | <0.001 |
| Mid Frontal Gyrus R | 10 | 33 | 55.5 | 27 | 14.84 | <0.001 |
| Superior Frontal Gyrus R | 11 | 7.5 | 54 | −22.5 | 10.16 | <0.001 |
| Rolandic Operculum L | 13 | −46.5 | −3 | 12 | 13.91 | <0.001 |
| Superior Frontal Gyrus R | 9 | 4.5 | 54 | 24 | 12.87 | <0.001 |
| Anterior Cingulate L | 32 | 0 | 49.5 | 13.5 | 12.26 | <0.001 |
| Mid Frontal Gyrus L | 8 | −25.5 | 33 | 46.5 | 12.72 | <0.001 |
| Postcentral Gyrus L | 40 | −54 | −34.5 | 54 | 12.63 | <0.001 |
| Mid Frontal Gyrus R | 46 | 46.5 | 54 | 10.5 | 12.02 | <0.001 |
| Lingual Gyrus L | 30 | −16.5 | −40.5 | −9 | 11.29 | <0.001 |
| Superior Temporal L | 20 | −45 | −9 | −16.5 | 11.30 | <0.001 |
| Superior Frontal L | 10 | −3 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.59 | <0.001 |
Whole brain Patterns of GM volume correlated with task performance in controls.
VBM, voxel-based morphometry; BA, Brodmann area; R, right; L, left; GM, gray matter.
Table 6
| Region | BA | Coordinates | F peak | p (FWE-cor) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| (A) AROUSAL | ||||||
| Superior Frontal Gyrus R | 9 | 19.5 | 40.5 | 25.5 | 8.57 | 0.037 |
| (B) VALENCE | ||||||
| Superior Frontal Gyrus R | 9 | 19.5 | 40.5 | 25.5 | 8.74 | 0.035 |
Regional brain Patterns of GM volume correlated with task performance in controls.
VBM, voxel-based morphometry; BA, Brodmann area; R, right; L, left; GM, gray matter; FWE, family-wise error correction.
The authors deeply regret this error and apologize for any confusion it might have caused.
Results
The sentence in the results section for the arousal scores
“… more specifically the right SFG (BA 9–32; see Figure 6A), left insula, basal ganglia and mid temporal gyrus, and bilateral cerebellum (See Table 5A for MNI coordinates).”
should be replaced by:
“… more specifically the right SFG (BA 9–32, see Figure 6A), orbital gyrus, leftmiddle occipital gyrus, right angular gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, left rolandic operculum, right inferior parietal cortex and bilateral mid-frontal gyrus (See Table 5A for MNI coordinates).”
The sentence in the results section for the valence scores
“For the valence domain, this relation appeared at the left SFG (BA 9–32; see Figure 6B), right SFG, left mid and inferior frontal gyri, temporal cortex, parietal cortex, basal ganglia and cerebellum (See Table 6B, for MNI coordinates).”
should be replaced by:
“For the valence domain, this relation appeared at the left SFG (BA10; see Figure 6B), right SFG (BA9) including ACC (BA32), left mid and inferior frontal gyri, temporal cortex, parietal cortex, parahippocampal gyri and opercula (See Table 6B, for MNI coordinates).”
Discussion
The sentences in the discussion section:
“For arousal REAPPself, we found positive associations with more subcortical regions as the insula, whereas valence was associated with highly cognitive areas as the middle and inferior frontal gyrus, as well as with the inferior parietal lobule. Although both of the constructs are assumed to be difficult to separate in the subjective experience (Kuppens et al., 2013), the obtained results lead to the assumption that arousal down-regulation comprise the involvement of limbic regions mainly related to emotional awareness and physiological responding, whereas valence down-regulation is a more elaborated process, in which highly cognitive regions are involved (Citron et al., 2014).”
should be replaced by:
“For arousal REAPPself, we found positive associations with the right orbital gyrus and left middle occipital gyrus whereas the down-regulation of both (valence and arousal) were associated with highly cognitive areas as the middle and inferior frontal gyrus, as well as with the inferior parietal lobule. Although both of the constructs are assumed to be difficult to separate in the subjective experience (Kuppens et al., 2013), the obtained results lead to the assumption that arousal down-regulation comprise the involvement of limbic regions mainly related to emotional awareness and multisensory integration (Ongur and Price, 2000). In contrast, the down-regulation of both arousal and valence is an elaborated process, in which highly cognitive regions are involved. These findings are in accordance with an earlier report, in which arousal and valence are described as separable dimensions (Citron et al., 2014).”
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
CitronF. M.GrayM. A.CritchleyH. D.WeekesB. S.FerstlE. C. (2014). Emotional valence and arousal affect reading in an interactive way: neuroimaging evidence for an approach-withdrawal framework. Neuropsychologia56, 79–89. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.002
2
KuppensP.TuerlinckxF.RussellJ. A.BarrettL. F. (2013). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychol. Bull. 139, 917–940. 10.1037/a0030811
3
OngurD.PriceJ. L. (2000). The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cereb. Cortex10, 206–219. 10.1093/cercor/10.3.206
Summary
Keywords
right SFG, reappraisal, VBM, VLSM, lesion
Citation
Falquez R, Couto B, Ibanez A, Freitag MT, Berger M, Arens EA, Lang S and Barnow S (2014) Corrigendum: Detaching from the negative by reappraisal: the role of right superior frontal gyrus (BA9/32). Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:264. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00264
Received
03 July 2014
Accepted
17 July 2014
Published
22 August 2014
Volume
8 - 2014
Edited and reviewed by
Sergio Ruiz, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Chile
Copyright
© 2014 Falquez, Couto, Ibanez, Freitag, Berger, Arens, Lang and Barnow.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: rosalux.falquez@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de
This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.