ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Behav. Neurosci.
Sec. Learning and Memory
Sex Differences in Taste Neophobia and Conditioned Aversion Across Fluid Administration Methods
Ron Gerbi
Oran Rahamim
Elor Arieli
Amit Worcel
Anan Moran
Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Rodent studies of the taste system commonly employ two methods of taste administration (MOA): active licking from spouts or intra-oral cannula (IOC) deliveries. While bottle drinking preserves natural consumption behavior, IOC administration, where animals receive liquids passively into their oral cavity, provides precise temporal control of stimulus delivery but limits the reliability of measuring voluntary intake and hedonic response. To overcome these limitations, a third method, nose-poke for IOC delivery (NP-IOC), was introduced. In NP-IOC, each taste is delivered through the IOC following an active nose poke, thus combining voluntary decision-making with temporal precision. Whether NP-IOC preserves natural taste-guided behavior, however, remains unknown. Here, we examined how NP-IOC affects taste neophobia (the reluctance to consume novel tastes) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA, avoidance of a taste paired with malaise). Rats received water either via standard bottle licking (control) or through the NP-IOC system. Following habituation, animals were tested for neophobia using low-neophobic (LN) sucrose or high-neophobic (HN) saccharin solutions, followed by CTA training via lithium chloride injection. Our results showed sexual differences in neophobia using NP-IOC: males preserved the expected difference between LN and HN tastes, whereas females showed attenuated neophobia, eliminating the typical HN avoidance observed with bottle administration. Nevertheless, CTA learning remained robust across sexes and MOAs. Deeper analysis of this seemingly similar learned aversion, however, revealed again sex differences: while male rats showed strong CTA regardless of pre-CTA consumption, females maintained a correlation between pre-and post-CTA consumption under both MOAs, suggesting sex-specific taste learning patterns. These findings support the use of NP-IOC in taste research that requires both precise stimulus control and voluntary behavior, while also underscoring the necessity of exploring divergent behavioral strategies and the associated brain circuits in males and females.
Summary
Keywords
conditioned taste aversion, Decision Making, Food Administration, Learning, neophobia, rat, sex differences, Taste
Received
05 December 2025
Accepted
17 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Gerbi, Rahamim, Arieli, Worcel and Moran. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anan Moran
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.