Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

Sec. Individual and Social Behaviors

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing companion animal welfare through advanced behavioral management strategiesView all 5 articles

Enhancing companion animal welfare through advanced behavioral management strategies

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada
  • 2Department of Physiology, Ankara Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi, Ankara, Türkiye
  • 3The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 4Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, Campus Universitário, Instituto Universitario Egas Moniz Centro de Investigacao Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz, Caparica, Portugal
  • 5Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Our research topic brings together four studies that explore different aspects of this challenge by adopting a comprehensive approach to companion animal behavioral management. In this collection, Sonowal et al. (2025) compared scented and non-scented chew toys to evaluate their effect on chewing and mouthing behaviors in puppies, which are among the most common developmental issues faced by caregivers during critical bonding periods. Although these behaviors are largely normal communicatory and exploratory behaviors, they are frequently reported as problematic and can strain the human-animal bond at a sensitive stage of development. Authors showed that sensory enhanced toys significantly increased puppy engagement and reduced the need for caregiver prompting during observed sessions. Interestingly, while the frequency of unwanted chewing did not change over the course of the intervention, caregivers reported perceiving mouthing as less problematic. This finding highlights the importance of how caregivers experience and interpret behavior when managing behavioral problems in companion animals and offers a valuable insight for veterinary behavioral medicine regarding the key role of caregiver perspectives.Distinguishing primary behavioral disorders from those arising secondary to medical conditions such as pain is one of the most challenging areas in behavioral medicine and was addressed by Kwik et al. (2025) within our research topic. Their case series revealed that maladaptive pain was present in 70% of dogs referred for behavioral complaints when assessed using a multimodal approach. This finding carries important implications for clinical practice and raises important questions such as: "How often are animals diagnosed with behavioral problems before pain is thoroughly investigated?" and "How frequently do behavior modification efforts fail because an underlying pain remains untreated?". Their study demonstrates that multimodal treatment addressing both pain and behavior led to recovery in most cases, which highlights the inseparable relationship between medical and behavioral assessment. It further underscores the significant welfare consequences of diagnostic delay, resulting in unnecessary animal suffering and caregiver distress.Feline behavioral management is the focus of two interesting studies in this collection. In order to better understand undesired scratching in domestic cats, Salgirli Demirbas et al. (2024) employed a multifactorial approach and identified the risk factors that contribute to this behavior. Their findings provide valuable insight into the environmental, social and individual factors that influence when normal feline behavior becomes problematic in the domestic setting. They identified stress as a leading contributor to undesired scratching, with specific risk factors including the presence of children in the household, high levels of play and nocturnal activity as well as personality traits such as aggression or disruptiveness. The authors emphasize that scratching, while a normal species-typical behavior, becomes problematic when underlying stressors are not adequately addressed. This etiological perspective is complemented by the Endersby et al. (2024), who present a largescale, controlled evaluation of a pheromone-impregnated collar for the management of multiple feline behavioral problems. With nearly 500 cats included, the findings provide robust evidence that continuous pheromone delivery can significantly reduce behavioral problems such as inappropriate urination, destructive scratching and inter-cat conflict, with trends toward improvement in fear-related behaviors. These results are particularly important, as these behaviors are among the most commonly reported problems in the companion cat population and represent predominant reasons for relinquishment and, in some cases, euthanasia. Their study highlights the value of pheromonal signals in reducing stress by promoting emotional stability in cats and demonstrates how effective pheromone messaging can be in managing a range of behavioral problems.Collectively, the studies in this Research Topic highlight a number of fundamental concepts that deserve to be included into standard clinical practice. These include the critical importance of systematic pain assessment in cases presenting with behavioral change; recognition that caregiver perceptions and expectations may be influential determinants of treatment success and must be addressed; the value of identifying risk factors to inform management strategies and the role of sensory modulation as a foundational strategy for supporting emotional well-being of companion animals. This collection supports the view that advancing the field requires moving beyond simplistic approaches toward integrative frameworks and adaptive expectations, with evidencebased strategies that enhance quality of life and strengthen the human-animal bond.

Keywords: Behavioral management, Companion animal, human-animal bond, Problem behavior, welfare

Received: 05 Jan 2026; Accepted: 27 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Salgirli Demi̇rbas, McPeake, Pereira and De Jaeger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Xavier De Jaeger

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.