Abstract
Lignin is known to limit the enzyme-mediated hydrolysis of biomass by both restricting substrate swelling and binding to the enzymes. Pretreated mechanical pulp (MP) made from Aspen wood chips was incubated with either 16% sodium sulfite or 32% sodium percarbonate to incorporate similar amounts of sulfonic and carboxylic acid groups onto the lignin (60 mmol/kg substrate) present in the pulp without resulting in significant delignification. When Simon’s stain was used to assess potential enzyme accessibility to the cellulose, it was apparent that both post-treatments enhanced accessibility and cellulose hydrolysis. To further elucidate how acid group addition might influence potential enzyme binding to lignin, Protease Treated Lignin (PTL) was isolated from the original and modified mechanical pulps and added to a cellulose rich, delignified Kraft pulp. As anticipated, the PTLs from both the oxidized and sulfonated substrates proved less inhibitory and adsorbed less enzymes than did the PTL derived from the original pulp. Subsequent analyses indicated that both the sulfonated and oxidized lignin samples contained less phenolic hydroxyl groups, resulting in enhanced hydrophilicity and a more negative charge which decreased the non-productive binding of the cellulase enzymes to the lignin.
Introduction
Lignin has been proven to be a significant obstacle when trying to carry out effective enzyme-mediated hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Past work has shown that this lignin inhibits hydrolysis by the two major mechanisms its presence limiting substrate swelling, consequently restricting cellulose accessibility, as well lignin binding to the cellulolytic enzymes and limiting their activities (; ; ; ). Although lignin removal has been shown to be an effective way to enhance enzyme-mediated cellulose hydrolysis (), to date, no cost-effective delignification-based methods have been commercialized, primarily due to the cost associated with the use of chemicals (). As a result, a considerable amount of work has focused on trying to mitigate lignins inhibitory effect by modifying it, such as using relatively mild reaction conditions that incorporate acid groups onto the lignin macromolecule, consequently enhancing cellulose hydrolysis without the need for complete delignification (; ; ; ; ).
Oxidation and sulfonation have been the most common methods used as this modifies the lignin structure and charge by the incorporation of acid groups. Both approaches are widely used by the pulp and paper sector, with alkaline oxidation predominantly used to remove residual lignin from unbleached Kraft pulp (; ) and sulfonation predominantly used to soften the lignin prior to mechanically pulping wood chips (). More recently, oxidation and sulfonation treatments, which result in the incorporation of carboxylic and sulfonic acid groups, respectively, have been incorporated into pretreatment methods to enhance accessibility to the cellulose while retaining the hemicellulose and lignin components (; ; , ). For example, incorporating acid groups onto the lignin has been shown to both enhance fiber swelling, consequently increasing enzyme accessibility to the cellulose (), as well as reducing lignin-enzyme interaction resulting from hydrophobic (), ionic (), and hydrogen bond interactions (; ). As a result of these treatments the lignin also becomes more hydrophilic, reducing the tendency for it to hydrophobically bind to enzymes (). The deprotonation of the acid groups generates a negative charge, facilitating the electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged lignin and cellulase enzymes (; ).
Despite these insights the benefits of acid group integration on biomass deconstruction have yet to be fully resolved. For example, how the structure and characteristic of the sulfonic (strong acid) and carboxylic (weak acid) acids influences cellulose hydrolysis (; ; ) while, at the same time, raising the pH level might have the potential to further ionize the acid groups attached to the lignin. As this has been shown to increase the hydrophilicity and negative charge, it might also facilitate the repulsion between lignin and the negatively charged cellulases (; ).
In the work reported here, similar amounts of carboxylic and sulfonic acid groups were incorporated onto the lignin present in pretreated mechanical pulps. The research described in the manuscript helped better elucidate the beneficial effect of sulfonic and carboxylic acid group addition to lignin in terms of enzyme accessibility/deconstruction to/off cellulose. Both the oxidized and sulfonated lignin samples were shown to be less inhibitory to cellulose hydrolysis and also adsorbed less enzymes. The sulfonated and oxidized lignin contained more acid groups and aliphatic hydroxyl groups and less phenolic hydroxyl groups. This enhanced lignin hydrophilicity and increased the negative charge, decreasing the non-productive binding of cellulases to lignin.
Materials and Methods
Biomass and Chemicals
Aspen wood chips were obtained from a pulp mill in Western Canada and the chips were screened using a 2.5 × 2.5 cm and 5.0 × 5.0 cm mesh. During the water-based pretreatment, the chips were heated at 170°C for 1 h, according to . The pretreated Aspen was subsequently subject to mechanical pulping/refining using a twin-gear juicer (super angel juicer model 8500) in a total volume of 10 L of water. The acid wash of the pretreated Aspen mechanical pulp (MP) was conducted according to . The cellulose-rich delignified Kraft pulp was donated by Fortress Ltd. The protease enzymes, sodium percarbonate, sodium sulfite and anhydrous ether were all purchased from Millipore Sigma (Oakville, Canada).
Alkaline Oxidation and Neutral Sulfonation of Pretreated Aspen
Twenty gram of pretreated and acid-washed mechanical pulp was incubated overnight with either 16% sodium sulfite or 32% sodium percarbonate at a10% solid loading in a 60°C water bath. The substrates were washed with water after the reactions and stored at 4°C for further analyses.
Enzymatic Hydrolysis
Cellic CTec 3 cellulase mixture used for enzymatic hydrolysis has a protein content of 208.9 mg/mL and cellulase activity of FPU/mL. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the substrates at a 2% solids loading was performed in 2 mL screwcap centrifuge tubes containing sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 4.8 and pH 6) and the Cellic CTec 3 (in duplicate). The tubes were incubated in a rotating incubator at 50°C and the released sugars measured using a glucose analyzer (YSI 2700 Select Biochemistry Analyzer) after 6, 24, and 48 h of hydrolysis. Prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, the protein content of the Cellic CTec 3 preparation was measured using the ninhydrin essay, according to .
Substrate Characterizations
The chemical composition of the substrates was analyzed according to the Klason protocol using TAPPI standard method T222, as described by . The accessibility of the cellulose to enzymes was measured by the modified Simon’s stain method using the high molecular weight fraction of Direct Orange 15 dye, according to . The conductometric titration of acid groups was conducted using a modified version of the method developed by .
Protease Treated Lignin (PTL) Isolation
The PTL was isolated from the biomass substrates using the method previously described by . In brief, the pretreated substrates were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis using the Cellic CTec 3 preparation at 2% solids and protein loading of 30 mg/g cellulose at 50°C for 72 h. The hydrolysis residue was centrifuged, washed and subjected to a second round of enzymatic hydrolysis using the same conditions, followed by centrifugation and washing. This residue was incubated with protease (1 U/mL) in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7) at 37°C for 24 h and subsequently transferred to a 90°C water bath for 2 h to deactivate the protease. After washing, the protease treated lignin (PTL) was passed through a 40-mesh screen and freeze-dried.
Enzymatic Mild Acidolysis Lignin (EMAL) Isolation
The EMAL lignin was extracted from the protease treated lignin (PTL) samples. In brief, the freeze-dried PTL was subject to mild acidolysis in an acidic aqueous dioxane solution (85% Dioxane: 15% water, 0.01M HCl) under reflux at 87°C for 3 h. The mixture was then centrifuged (5,000 rpm, 5 min) and the supernatant collected and precipitated in anhydrous ether. After the lignin had settled it was filtered through a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, washed with anhydrous ether and dried in a 40°C vacuum oven.
Hydrophobicity Test of Lignin
The hydrophobicity of the protease treated lignin (PTL) samples was estimated by their adoption to Rose Bengal dye, according to .
Zeta Potential Measurement of Lignin
The Zeta potential values were determined in triplicate using a Zeta-Meter 3.0 + (ZETA-METER, INC., Staunton, VA). Samples were dispersed in 50 mM Na-acetate buffer (pH 4.8 and pH 6) before measurement.
Adsorption of Lignin to Advanced Enzyme Cocktail (Cellic CTec3)
The adsorption of the enzymes present in the Cellic CTec3 to the isolated protease treated lignin (PTL) samples was performed at 10°C in 2.0 mL crew-cap centrifuge tubes using 1ml of sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 4.8 and pH 6). Vials containing 1% (w/v) lignin and enzymes (0.5 mg/mL) were incubated for 3 h, followed by centrifugation and the supernatant collected. The protein content of the supernatants was measured by the ninhydrin method according to , using BSA as the protein standard. The amount of enzyme adsorbed onto the lignin was determined as the difference between the initial enzyme loading and the free enzyme present in the supernatant.
Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
The molecular weight of EMAL lignin samples was analyzed by GPC using an Agilent 1100 equipped with an optilab T-rEX differential refractive index detector (dRI, Wyatt Tech. CA, United States) and poly(styrenesulfonate) as standard and DMSO/LiBr (0.5% w/v) as eluent at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Prior to analysis, 10 mg of lignin was dissolved in 1 ml DMSO/BrLi (0.5% w/v), left at room temperature for 48 h and filtered through 0.45 μm PTFE filters. The data were collected and analyzed using ASTRA 6.0 software.
31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (31P NMR)
The types and amount of hydroxyl groups located on the EMAL lignin was analyzed by 31P NMR using a Bruker Avance 300 MHz spectrometer, according to the method described by . Chromium (III) acetylacetonate and N-hydroxy-5- norbornene-2,3-dicarboximide were selected as the respective relaxation reagent and internal standard and they were dissolved in pyridine/CDCl3 mixture (1.6:1, v/v) at concentrations of 5.6 and 9.0 mg/mL, respectively. 20 mg of dried EMAL lignin was dissolved in 400 μL of pyridine/CDCl3 mixture, where 100 μL of internal standard solution, 40 μL of relaxation reagent solution, and 50 μL of 2-chloro- 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,2,3-dioxaphospholane (TMDP) were added prior to 31P NMR analysis. An inverse gated decoupling pulse was used with the following parameters; number of scans 800, relaxation delay 5 s, acquisition time 1.4 s, pulse length 6 μs, and 90° pulse width.
Results and Discussion
The Influence of Lignin Sulfonation and Oxidation on Cellulose Accessibility and Enzymatic Hydrolysis
As we anticipated that the presence of hemicellulose and the inherent acid groups (e.g., cinnamic acids and acetyl groups) associated with the biomass might also influence substrate swelling (; ) and cellulose hydrolysis, a pretreatment step was first carried out at 170°C, to primarily solubilize the hemicellulose while minimizing lignin condensation (; ). The pretreated Aspen slurry was subsequently pulped using a twin-gear juicer to simulate mechanical pulping. As initial conductometric titration had indicated that the pretreated mechanical pulp (MP) still contained some weak acids, the pulp was subsequently acid washed to remove any residual uronic acid groups that were potentially located on the residual hemicellulose (). After this series of treatments, the pulps contained less than 10% hemicellulose and any associated acid groups were below detectable levels (Table 1). The subsequent alkaline oxidation and neutral sulfonation reactions of acid group-free pulp was carried out using sodium percarbonate (Na2CO3 ⋅ 1.5 H2O2) and sodium sulfite (Na2SO3), respectively, as alkaline oxidation and neutral sulfonation had previously been shown to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated pulps (; ). As we hoped to modify the lignin rather than remove it, the reaction was carried out at 60°C to minimize solubilizing the more hydrophilic oxidized/sulfonated lignin. As summarized in Table 1, a chemical loading of 16% sodium sulfite and 32% sodium percarbonate resulted in the incorporation of similar amounts of sulfonic and carboxylic acid groups (60 mmol/kg) while recovering more than 90% of the original water-insoluble component (Table 1). As described earlier , sulfonation also increased the exposure of carboxylic acid groups, likely due to the cleavage of ester linkages between lignin and hemicellulose.
TABLE 1
| Sample | Pretreatment yield (%) | Chemical composition | Substrate characteristics | |||||
| Glucan (%) | Xylan (%) | Lignin (%) | Sulfonic acid groups (mmol/kg) | Carboxylic acid groups (mmol/kg) | Total acid groups (mmol/kg) | DO dye adsorption (mg/g dry substrate) | ||
| Unmodified MP | 100.0 | 63 ± 1 | 7 ± 0 | 30 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 84 |
| Sulfonated MP | 93.0 | 67 ± 2 | 4 ± 1 | 29 ± 0 | 44 ± 6 | 20 ± 5 | 64 ± 3 | 93 |
| Oxidized MP | 91.6 | 67 ± 0 | 5 ± 0 | 29 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 59 ± 1 | 59 ± 1 | 95 |
Chemical composition and characteristics of unmodified, sulfonated and oxidized mechanical pulps (MP) derived from pretreated Aspen chips.
Earlier work had shown that acid group addition to the lignin enhanced substrate swelling, resulting in both increased enzyme accessibility and hydrolysis of the cellulose (). As the Simon’s stain method has been successfully used (; ) to predict the cellulose accessibility to cellulase enzymes () by measuring substrate’s adsorption to Directed Orange (DO) dye, when this method was used it was apparent that sulfonation and oxidation both increased the accessibility of all three pretreated mechanical pulps (Table 1), likely due to enhanced substrate swelling resulting from lignin modification. It was also apparent that the sulfonation and oxidation treatments enhanced enzyme-mediated cellulose hydrolysis (Figure 1) with the oxidized substrate being more susceptible, despite the fact that both pulps had similar amounts of lignin and acid groups (Table 1). However, as has been suggested previously (), it is likely that the majority of the carboxylic acid groups present in the sulfonated substrate were located on the hemicellulose component, while the carboxylic acid groups associated with the oxidized substrate were associated more with the lignin.
FIGURE 1
Previous work had suggested that hydrolysis could be enhanced at an elevated pH by further deprotonating the acid groups and consequently increasing the lignin’s hydrophilicity and negative charge (; ). However, the hydrolysis of both the control and modified substrates was only slightly enhanced when it was carried out at pH 6 (Figure 1). To ensure that activity of the cellulases was not compromised by the use of an elevated pH, a cellulose-rich delignified Kraft pulp was hydrolyzed at both pH 4.8 and pH 6 (Figure 2). As observed previously, it was apparent that slightly better hydrolysis was achieved at pH 4.8, (; ).
FIGURE 2
The Isolation, Characterization and Influence of Control and Modified Lignin on Enzymatic Hydrolysis
As previous work had shown that lignin inhibits enzyme-mediated hydrolysis of cellulose by both limiting the swelling of the substrate and binding with the enzymes, we next tried to differentiate how sulfonation and oxidation might influence these two mechanisms. As it is difficult to extract lignin from biomass substrates without modifying it, Protease Treated Lignin (PTL) has often been used to represent the lignin present in pretreated biomass (; ). This method uses a cellulase cocktail to remove the carbohydrate components to produce a lignin-rich residue which is subsequently treated with protease to remove the enzymes. Despite the removal of much of the carbohydrate by the enzyme treatment, it should be noted that some residual material was still associated with the lignin (Table 2). When the modified PTL’s were add to the hydrolysis of a cellulose-rich Kraft pulp (at 1:1 ratio), at both pH 4.8 and 6 (Figure 3), it was apparent that the modified PTLs were both less inhibitory with better cellulose hydrolysis achieved at pH 6. When the adsorption isotherms of the cellulases enzyme in the presence of the PTLs were measured at pH 4.8 and pH 6, it was apparent that sulfonation and oxidation both decreased the extent of adsorption between the enzymes and the modified lignin (Table 2). Although somewhat unexpected, it is likely that the observed increase in hydrolysis observed at the higher pH was due to the decreased non-productive binding of the enzymes to the lignin.
TABLE 2
| Sample | Chemical composition | Binding strength at pH 4.8 (mL/g lignin) | Binding strength at pH 6 (mL/g lignin) | Hydrophobicity (L/g) | Zeta potential at pH 4.8 | Zeta potential at pH 6 | |
| Glucan (%) | Lignin (%) | ||||||
| Unmodified MP | 30 ± 2 | 70 ± 1 | 95.2 | 87.0 | 1.14 | 6 ± 0 | 0 ± 1 |
| Sulfonated MP | 28 ± 1 | 74 ± 2 | 80.6 | 54.9 | 0.80 | −6 ± 1 | −8 ± 1 |
| Oxidized MP | 29 ± 1 | 72 ± 2 | 74.1 | 47.6 | 0.46 | 0 ± 1 | −6 ± 3 |
Chemical composition, potential adsorption of cellulases, hydrophobicity (assessed by Rose Bengal adsorption) and negative charge (assessed by Zeta Potential) of lignins isolated from unmodified, sulfonated, and oxidized mechanical pulps (MP).
FIGURE 3
As acid groups addition is known to influence both the hydrophilicity and negative charge of the lignin, consequently decreasing enzyme binding (), we next wanted to confirm these earlier observations using Rose Bengal method and Zeta potential measurements (; ; ). It was apparent that sulfonic and carboxylic acid group addition to the lignin significantly enhanced its hydrophilicity and negative charge (Table 2) with the decrease in the Zeta potential of the oxidized PTL at pH 6 indicating more carboxylic acid group disassociation.
As it was possible that the residual cellulose associated with each of the PTL samples might influence lignin analysis and its structure, we also used the Enzymatic Mild Acidolysis Lignin (EMAL) method to isolate lignin at relatively high yields without changing its structure and properties (). Subsequent Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) analysis of the EMAL samples indicated that both sulfonation and oxidation resulted in a slight increase in the molecular weight of the lignin components, suggesting that the lignin underwent mild re-polymerization reaction under alkali conditions (; Table 3 and Figure 4). Previous work has used 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) analysis to successfully quantify the amount and type of hydroxyl groups (–OH) located on the aromatic and aliphatic structures of lignin (). As previous studies had indicated that Syringyl lignin is much easier to remove than Guaiacyl lignin, during the pretreatment of hardwood biomass (; ), it was likely that a small amount of syringyl subunit lignin was removed during oxidation and sulfonation (Table 1). Interestingly, both sulfonation and oxidation resulted in a slight increase in the aliphatic hydroxyl group content of the lignin which was probably due to the cleavage of the ester groups connecting the lignin aliphatic chain and carbohydrates during the sulfonation and oxidation of lignin (). The observed increase in the carboxylic acid groups attached to the EMAL lignin further confirmed that lignin oxidation had occurred (Table 3). When the observed changes in the hydroxyl group content of the lignin was compared to the extent of cellulose hydrolysis, it was apparent that those substrates whose lignin contained more aliphatic hydroxyl groups and less phenolic hydroxyl groups were more easily hydrolyzed (Figures 1, 3 and Table 3). This was consistent with previous studies which had suggested that the aliphatic hydroxyl groups in the lignin made it more hydrophilic, thereby reducing enzyme binding. In contrast, a greater amount of phenolic hydroxyl groups appeared to enhance enzyme binding (; ).
TABLE 3
| Sample | Molecular Weight | Hydroxyl groups as determined by 31P NMR (mmol/g) | |||||||
| Mn (kDa) | Mw (kDa) | PDI | Aliphatic −OH | Syringyl phenolic −OH | Guaiacyl phenolic −OH | p-Hydroxy phenyl phenolic −OH | Total phenolic −OH | −COOH | |
| Unmodified MP | 2.3 | 47.5 | 20.9 | 4.19 | 1.11 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 2.12 | 0.10 |
| Sulfonated MP | 3.1 | 60.6 | 19.4 | 4.35 | 0.94 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 1.82 | 0.05 |
| Oxidized MP | 1.4 | 53.5 | 38.0 | 4.53 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 1.80 | 0.19 |
Molecular weight and hydroxyl group content of the lignin extracted from unmodified, sulfonated and oxidized pre-hydrolyzed mechanical pulps (MP).
FIGURE 4
Conclusion
Lignin is known to inhibit effective enzyme-mediated hydrolysis of biomass by both restricting substrate swelling and by binding with cellulase enzymes. Both enzyme accessibility and cellulose hydrolysis could be enhanced by the addition of sulfonic and carboxylic acid groups onto the lignin present in biomass substrates. It was apparent that both oxidation and sulfonation decreased the extent of enzyme binding with the reduction in the number of phenolic hydroxyl groups as well as the incorporation of acid groups enhancing lignin hydrophilicity, consequently enhancing cellulose hydrolysis.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
JW, RC, MT, and JS designed the study. JW wrote the manuscript with the support from RC and JS. JW performed the experiments. L-YL, SR, KK, and CK contributed to the experimental section. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We thank for financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST). We would also like to thank Novozymes (Davis, CA) for proving the enzymes used in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AyyachamyM.GuptaV. K.CliffeF. E.TuohyM. G. (2013). Enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass.Lab. Protoc. Fungal Biol.13475–481. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2356-0_44
2
BenY.DoucetJ.KaliaguineS.KoktaB. V. (1993). Effect of chemical pretreatment on chemical characteristics of steam explosion pulps of aspen.J. Wood Chem. Technol.24349–369. 10.1080/02773819308020522
3
BerlinA.BalakshinM.GilkesN.KadlaJ.MaximenkoV.KuboS.et al (2006). Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations.J. Biotechnol.125198–209. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.02.021
4
BöråsL.GatenholmP. (1999). Surface properties of mechanical pulps prepared under various sulfonation conditions and preheating time.Holzforschung53429–434. 10.1515/HF.1999.071
5
ChandraR. P.ChuQ. L.HuJ.ZhongN.LinM.LeeJ. S.et al (2016). The influence of lignin on steam pretreatment and mechanical pulping of poplar to achieve high sugar recovery and ease of enzymatic hydrolysis.Bioresour. Technol.199135–141. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.019
6
ChandraR. P.EwanickS. M.ChungP. A.Au-YeungK.Del RioL.et al (2009). Comparison of methods to assess the enzyme accessibility and hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates.Biotechnol. Lett.311217–1222. 10.1007/s10529-009-9993-5
7
ChandraR. P.SaddlerJ. N. (2012). Use of the simons’ staining technique to assess cellulose accessibility in pretreated substrates.Ind. Biotechnol.8230–237. 10.1089/ind.2012.0016
8
ChuQ.ChandraR. P.KimC. S.SaddlerJ. N. (2017). Alkali-oxygen impregnation prior to steam pretreating poplar wood chips enhances selective lignin modification and removal while maximizing carbohydrate recovery, cellulose accessibility, and enzymatic hydrolysis.ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.54011–4017. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b03169
9
CrestiniC.ArgyropoulosD. S. (1997). Structural analysis of wheat straw lignin by quantitative 31P and 2D NMR spectroscopy. The occurrence of ester bonds and α-O-4 substructures.J. Agric. Food Chem.451212–1219. 10.1021/jf960568k
10
DasP.StoR. B.AreaM. C.RagauskasA. J. (2019). Effects of one-step alkaline and two-step alkaline / dilute acid and alkaline / steam explosion pretreatments on the structure of isolated pine lignin.Biomass Bioenergy120350–358. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.029
11
Del RioL. F.ChandraR. P.SaddlerJ. N. (2011). The effects of increasing swelling and anionic charges on the enzymatic hydrolysis of organosolv-pretreated softwoods at low enzyme loadings.Biotechnol. Bioeng.1081549–1558. 10.1002/bit.23090
12
ErikssonT.BörjessonJ.TjerneldF. (2002). Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose.Enzyme Microb. Technol.31353–364. 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00134-5
13
FengelD.WegenerG. (1989). Wood: Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions.Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 10.1007/BF02608943
14
GarroteG.DomÃnguezH.ParajóJ. C. (2001). Study on the deacetylation of hemicelluloses during the hydrothermal processing of Eucalyptus wood.Holz als Roh – und Werkst.5953–59. 10.1007/s001070050473
15
GuerraA.FilpponenI.LuciaL. A.SaquingC.BaumbergerS.ArgyropoulosD. S. (2006). Toward a better understanding of the lignin isolation process from wood.J. Agric. Food Chem.545939–5947. 10.1021/jf060722v
16
HuangY.SunS.HuangC.YongQ.ElderT.TuM. (2017). Biotechnology for Biofuels Stimulation and inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by organosolv lignins as determined by zeta potential and hydrophobicity.Biotechnol. Biofuels171–11. 10.1186/s13068-017-0853-6
17
JuX.GregoC.ZhangX. (2013). Specific effects of fiber size and fiber swelling on biomass substrate surface area and enzymatic digestibility.Bioresour. Technol.144232–239. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.100
18
KalliolaA.KuitunenS.LiitiäT.RovioS.Ohra-AhoT.VuorinenT.et al (2011). Lignin oxidation mechanisms under oxygen delignification conditions. Part 1. Results from direct analyses.Holzforschung65567–574. 10.1515/HF.2011.101
19
KatzS.BeatsonR. P. (1984). The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulfite pulps.Sven. Papperstidning8748–53. 10.3183/npprj-1993-08-01-p048-052
20
KumarL.ArantesV.ChandraR.SaddlerJ. (2012). The lignin present in steam pretreated softwood binds enzymes and limits cellulose accessibility.Bioresour. Technol.103201–208. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.091
21
KumarL.ChandraR.SaddlerJ. (2011). Influence of steam pretreatment severity on post-treatments used to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwoods at low enzyme loadings.Biotechnol. Bioeng.1082300–2311. 10.1002/bit.23185
22
LanT. Q.LouH.ZhuJ. Y. (2013). Enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses should be conducted at elevated pH 5.2–6.2.Bioenerg. Res.6476–485. 10.1007/s12155-012-9273-4
23
LiH.SaeedA.JahanM. S.NiY.Van HeiningenA. (2010). Hemicellulose removal from hardwood chips in the pre-hydrolysis step of the kraft-based dissolving pulp production process.J. Wood Chem. Technol.3048–60. 10.1080/02773810903419227
24
LiM.PuY.RagauskasA. J. (2016). Current understanding of the correlation of lignin structure with biomass recalcitrance.Front. Chem.4:45. 10.3389/fchem.2016.00045
25
LouH.ZhuJ. Y.LanT. Q.LaiH.QiuX. (2013). PH-induced lignin surface modification to reduce nonspecific cellulase binding and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses.ChemSusChem6919–927. 10.1002/cssc.201200859
26
MengQ.FuS.LiB.LuciaL. A. (2015). The Impact of xylanase and hot acid pretreatment on hexas in eucalyptus kraft pulp bleaching.J. Wood Chem. Technol.21239–250. 10.1080/02773813.2014.902967
27
MokY. K.ArantesV.SaddlerJ. N. (2015). A NaBH<inf>4</inf> coupled ninhydrin-based assay for the quantification of protein/enzymes during the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass.Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.1761564–1580. 10.1007/s12010-015-1662-7
28
MooneyC. A.MansfieldS. D.TouhyM. G.SaddlerJ. N. (1998). The effect of initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods.Bioresour. Technol.64113–119. 10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00181-8
29
NakagameS. (2010). The Influence of Lignin on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Pretreated Biomass SubstratesUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver. Available online at: https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0071453.
30
NakagameS.ChandraR. P.KadlaJ. F.SaddlerJ. N. (2011a). Enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by increasing the carboxylic acid content of the associated lignin.Biotechnol. Bioeng.108538–548. 10.1002/bit.22981
31
NakagameS.ChandraR. P.KadlaJ. F.SaddlerJ. N. (2011b). The isolation, characterization and effect of lignin isolated from steam pretreated Douglas-fir on the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose.Bioresour. Technol.1024507–4517. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.082
32
NakagameS.ChandraR. P.SaddlerJ. N. (2010). The effect of isolated lignins, obtained from a range of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates, on enzymatic hydrolysis.Biotechnol. Bioeng.105871–879. 10.1002/bit.22626
33
PanX. (2008). Role of functional groups in lignin inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose.J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy225–32. 10.1166/jbmb.2008.005
34
PuY.CaoS.RagauskasA. J. (2011). Application of quantitative 31P NMR in biomass lignin and biofuel precursors characterization.Energy Environ. Sci.4:3154. 10.1039/c1ee01201k
35
RahikainenJ. L.Martin-SampedroR.HeikkinenH.RovioS.MarjamaaK.TamminenT.et al (2013). Inhibitory effect of lignin during cellulose bioconversion: the effect of lignin chemistry on non-productive enzyme adsorption.Bioresour. Technol.133270–278. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.075
36
ReeseE. T.MandelsM. (1980). Stability of the cellulase of trichoderma reesei under use conditions.Biotechnol. Bioeng.22323–335. 10.1002/bit.260220207
37
SewaltV. J. H.GlasserW. G.BeaucheminK. A. (1997). Lignin impact on fiber degradation 3. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives.J. Agric. Food Chem.451823–1828. 10.1021/jf9608074
38
SjöströmE.JansonT.HaglundP.EnströmB. (1965). The Acidic Groups In Wood and Pulp as Measured by Ion Exchange. In Journal of Polymer Science Part C: Polymer Symposia.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library, 221–241.
39
SongY.ChandraR.ZhangX.TanT.SaddlerJ. (2019). Comparing deep eutectic solvent (DES) to Hydrotropes for their ability to enhance the fractionation and enzymatic hydrolysis of willow and corn stover.Sustain. Energy Fuels31329–1337. 10.1039/C8SE00617B
40
StoneJ. E.ScallanA. M.DoneferE.AhlgrenE. (1969). Digestibility as a simple function of a molecule of similar size to a cellulase enzyme.Adv. Chem. Series69219–241. 10.1021/ba-1969-0095.ch013
41
TakadaM.ChandraR.WuJ.SaddlerJ. N. (2020). The influence of lignin on the effectiveness of using a chemithermomechanical pulping based process to pretreat softwood chips and pellets prior to enzymatic hydrolysis.Bioresour. Technol.302:122895. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122895
42
WuJ.ChandraR.SaddlerJ. (2019). Alkali-oxygen treatment prior to the mechanical pulping of hardwood enhances enzymatic hydrolysis and carbohydrate recovery through selective lignin modification.Sustain. Energy Fuels3227–236. 10.1039/C8SE00452H
43
WuJ.ChandraR.TakadaM.DelP.HoK.SooC.et al (2020). Alkaline sulfonation and thermomechanical pulping pretreatment of softwood chips and pellets to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis.Bioresour. Technol.315:123789. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123789
44
YangB.BoussaidA.MansfieldS. D.GreggD. J.SaddlerJ. N. (2002). Fast and efficient alkaline peroxide treatment to enhance the enzymatic digestibility of steam-exploded softwood substrates.Biotechnol. Bioeng.77678–684. 10.1002/bit.10159
45
YangQ.PanX. (2016). Correlation between lignin physicochemical properties and inhibition to enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose.Biotechnol. Bioeng.1131213–1224. 10.1002/bit.25903
46
YangR.LuciaL.RagauskasA. J.JameelH. (2003). Oxygen delignification chemistry and its impact on pulp fibers.J. Wood Chem. Technol.2313–29. 10.1081/WCT-120018613
47
YuX.AtallaR. H. (1998). A staining technique for evaluating the pore structure variations of microcrystalline cellulose powders.Powder Technol.98135–138. 10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00024-2
48
YuZ.GwakK. S.TreasureT.JameelH.ChangH. M.ParkS. (2014). Effect of lignin chemistry on the enzymatic hydrolysis of woody biomass.ChemSusChem71942–1950. 10.1002/cssc.201400042
49
YuanY.ZhaiR.LiY.ChenX.JinM. (2018). Developing fast enzyme recycling strategy through elucidating enzyme adsorption kinetics on alkali and acid pretreated corn stover.Biotechnol. Biofuels111–12. 10.1186/s13068-018-1315-5
Summary
Keywords
lignin, oxidation, sulfonation, cellulase enzymes, non-productive binding, pH
Citation
Wu J, Chandra RP, Takada M, Liu L-Y, Renneckar S, Kim KH, Kim CS and Saddler JN (2020) Enhancing Enzyme-Mediated Cellulose Hydrolysis by Incorporating Acid Groups Onto the Lignin During Biomass Pretreatment. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8:608835. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.608835
Received
21 September 2020
Accepted
26 October 2020
Published
13 November 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Chunbao (Charles) Xu, Western University, Canada
Reviewed by
Sujit Jagtap, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; Samarthya Bhagia, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Wu, Chandra, Takada, Liu, Renneckar, Kim, Kim and Saddler.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Richard P. Chandra, richardchandra77@gmail.comJack N. Saddler, jack.saddler@ubc.ca
This article was submitted to Industrial Biotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.