Novel Bioactive Glass-Modified Hybrid Composite Resin: Mechanical Properties, Biocompatibility, and Antibacterial and Remineralizing Activity

Abstract

Secondary caries seriously limits the lifetime of composite resin. However, integrating all desirable properties (i.e., mechanical, antibacterial, bioactivity, and biocompatibility) into one composite resin is still challenging. Herein, a novel bioactive glass (BAG)-modified hybrid composite resin has been successfully developed to simultaneously achieve excellent mechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities. When the mass fractions of BAG particles were added from 8 to 23 wt %, the original mechanical properties of the composite resin, including flexural strength and compressive strength, were not obviously affected without compromising the degree of conversion. Although the BAG incorporation of mass fractions of 16 wt % to 23 wt % in composite resins reduced cell viability, the viability could be recovered to normal by adjusting the pH value. Moreover, the BAG-modified composite resins that were obtained showed good antibacterial effects against Streptococcus mutans and enhanced remineralizing activity on demineralized dentin surfaces with increasing incorporation of BAG particles. The possible mechanisms for antibacterial and remineralizing activity might be closely related to the release of bioactive ions (Ca²⁺, Si⁴⁺), suggesting that its antibacterial and biological properties can be controlled by modulating the amounts of bioactive ions. The capability to balance the mechanical properties, cytotoxicity, antibacterial activity, and bioactivity makes the BAG-modified composite resin a promising prospect for clinical application. Our findings provide insight into better design and intelligent fabrication of bioactive composite resins.

Introduction

Dental caries is one of the most prevalent bacterial infectious diseases worldwide and usually leads to defects in dental hard tissue. Over the past decades, due to its unique advantages such as simple operation, minimal invasiveness, and excellent esthetic restorative effects, direct composite resin filling has been the main treatment method to repair dental hard tissue defects. However, a higher annual failure rate has been reported for posterior composite resin restorations than for amalgam restorations, which is attributed primarily to secondary caries (Kopperud et al., 2012; Opdam et al., 2014; Astvaldsdottir et al., 2015). Generally, secondary caries occur on the tooth after composite resin filling because oral biofilm bacteria are more likely to accumulate on the surface of resin restorations, leading to demineralization of dental hard tissues due to acid production, thus destroying the tooth structure and further providing a way for bacterial invasion (Arun et al., 2021). Since secondary caries limit the lifetime of composite resin, it is urgent to endow composite resin with antibacterial properties and remineralizing capability. However, currently, integrating multiple desirable properties (e.g., high strength, antibacterial activity, remineralizing ability, and biocompatibility) into one composite resin is still challenging.

Over the past decade, to combat secondary caries, numerous efforts have been devoted to synthesizing various antibacterial monomers with quaternary ammonium salts or incorporating antibacterial drugs/fillers [e.g., chlorhexidine, fluoride, zinc oxide (ZnO), and silver (Ag)] into the resin matrix to improve the antibacterial properties (Cheng et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2014; Cocco et al., 2015; Farrugia and Camilleri, 2015; Arun et al., 2021). However, the antibacterial effect of Ag- or ZnO nanoparticle (NP)-based composite resins has been reported not to be long-lasting, and the release of antibacterial agents (e.g., monomer/drug/Ag⁺) would impair the mechanical properties and increase the risk of damage to human health. Moreover, these antibacterial monomer/drug/metal oxide NPs have no remineralizing ability, largely impeding their development as composite resins (Cocco et al., 2015; Arun et al., 2021). Recently, promising alternatives such as bioactive ceramic particles [e.g., calcium phosphate nanoparticles (NACPs), bioactive glass (BAG), zinc-doped phosphate-based glass] have been exploited as inorganic fillers to construct orthodontic adhesives or composite resins, which have been found to achieve both antibacterial and remineralizing effects (Liu et al., 2018; Par et al., 2019b; Bhadila et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020). Among bioactive ceramic particles, BAG has attracted increasing interest in dental applications such as toothpaste, dentin desensitizers, orthodontic adhesives, and experimental composite resins (Wang et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2016; Al-Eesa et al., 2019; Aponso et al., 2019; Par et al., 2019a). In particular, BAG-based composites have been reported to inhibit bacterial biofilm penetration into marginal gaps of simulated tooth restorations, showing great potential to eliminate secondary tooth decay after composite resin restorations (Khvostenko et al., 2016). Nevertheless, the incorporation of bioactive materials may reduce the physical properties of composite resin and cause toxic effects (Kurata et al., 2011; Korkut et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2017). Despite a few studies focused on developing BAG-based bioactive composite resins (Korkut et al., 2016), it is still unclear whether the antibacterial effect is dependent on direct contact with bacteria or the release of substances (e.g., Ca²⁺ or Si⁴⁺ ions). In addition, the potential risk for the application of BAG to composite resin remains elusive. To date, a systematic understanding of the influence of precise composition control of BAG fillers on their mechanical, antibacterial, remineralizing, and biological effects is still lacking. More importantly, the related antibacterial, remineralizing, and biological mechanisms of BAG-modified composite resins have not been completely elucidated, making it difficult to further improve their mechanical performance and enhance their antibacterial and remineralizing activities.

Herein, in this work, we developed a novel bioactive hybrid composite resin with good mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, and antibacterial and remineralizing activity. Subsequently, the regulatory effects of BAG incorporation on the comprehensive properties of the as-prepared composite resins were systematically investigated. Moreover, a possible antibacterial, remineralizing, and cytotoxicity mechanism of bioactive composite resins was proposed based on ion release and pH value. Overall, the BAG-modified composite resins obtained were highly promising composite resin systems for achieving both antibacterial and remineralizing activity with low cytotoxicity, providing insights into better design and intelligent fabrication of bioactive composite resins.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of BAG-Modified Hybrid Composite Resin

The experimental BAG-modified composite resins were prepared by mixing the resin matrix and inorganic fillers containing various mass fractions of BAG particles (0, 8, 16, and 23%) by DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH (Hamburg, Germany). As shown in Table 1, the as-prepared composite resins had filler/resin ratios similar to the ratios used in commercial composite resin systems (EcuSphere^TM; DMG, Hamburg, Germany). The matrix resins were formulated from commercially available monomers and the components of the photoinitiator system (EcuSphere^TM; DMG, Hamburg, Germany). The surface silanized barium glass filler and the fumed silica were formulated from commercially available inorganic fillers (EcuSphere^TM; DMG), and 45S5 BAG particles with an average particle size of 7.26 μm were provided by Beijing Datsing Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. (Beijing Datsing Company, Beijing, China). Briefly, the photoinitiator and organic amine activator were added to the resin monomer mixture and then the viscous resin matrix was obtained. Subsequently, BAG particles were incorporated into inorganic fillers at 0, 8, 16, and 23 wt % by replacing the same amount of silanized barium glass filler with a total filler load maintained at 76 wt %, and then the inorganic fillers were mixed with the resin matrix using a centrifugal mixing device (Speed-Mixer DAC 150 FVZ, Hauschild, Germany). Finally, four kinds of BAG-modified composite resins were prepared, which were designated BAG0 (control), BAG8, BAG16, and BAG23 according to the weight fractions of incorporated BAG particles. Microstructural characterization and element analysis of the as-prepared composite resins were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping (Mira3, Tescan, Czechia).

Flexural Strength Testing

According to the requirement of ISO 4049 (Standardization IOF, 2019), bar-shaped test specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were fabricated in stainless-steel split molds and cured by visible light in five overlapping sections on each upper and lower side. After 24-h storage in distilled water at 37°C, five specimens for each composite type were conducted to a three-point bending test using a universal testing machine (Lloyd Instruments Ltd., Fareham Hants, United Kingdom) at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Flexural strength was calculated in megapascals (MPa) with the following equation:

where σ_f is the flexural strength, P is the load at fracture (N), L is the specimen span (mm), b is the specimen width (mm), and d is the specimen height (mm).

Compressive Strength Testing

Cylindrical-shaped test specimens with 4 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height were prepared in stainless-steel split molds and cured by visible light in five overlapping sections on each upper and lower side and stored in water at 37°C prior to test. After 24 h, five specimens from each composite type were tested using a universal testing machine (Lloyd Instruments Ltd., Fareham Hants, United Kingdom) at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Compressive strength was determined in MPa with the following equation:

where σ_c is the compressive strength, P is the maximum load at fracture (N), S is the specimen cross-section area (mm²), and r is the specimen cross-sectional radius (mm).

Microhardness Testing

Five disk-shaped specimens 6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness were prepared for each composite resin group. The Vickers microhardness of each composite type was measured on the test specimen surface by a microhardness tester (Shanghai Taiming Optical Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with a 50 gf load (0.490 N) for 15 s. The Vickers microhardness was calculated from the expression HV = 0.1891 F/d², where HV is the Vickers hardness, F is the test load (N), and d is the mean value of the indentation’s diagonal lengths (μm).

Degree of Conversion

The as-prepared composite samples (n = 3/group) were completely cured by visible light for 30 s. The uncured samples were pressed into KBr pellets (d = 1 cm) using spectroscopically pure KBr. The DC was determined by a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (IR/Nicolet 6700, Thermo Fisher, United States). The spectra of unpolymerized and polymerized composite specimens were recorded at room temperature, corrected by subtracting the background and then converted into the absorbance mode. The DC (%) was calculated using the relative change in the peak height of the spectral band at 1638 cm^–1 (aliphatic C = C stretching), and the band at 1610 cm^–1 (aromatic C = C stretching) was used as a reference. DC was calculated according to the following equation:

Agar Diffusion Test for Cytotoxicity

According to ISO 10993-5 and ISO 7045 (Standardization IOF, 2009, 2011), the agar diffusion test as a cytotoxicity barrier testing method was performed for the non-specific cytotoxicity of the leachable components of the as-prepared composite specimens after diffusion through agar. Disk-shaped specimens 6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness were used for cytotoxicity analysis. In detail, L929 cells (Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) were propagated in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM) (Gibco, United States) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, United States). Cell suspensions (2.5 × 10⁵ cells/ml) were seeded in cell culture dishes (Corning, NY, United States) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO₂. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with 10 ml of freshly prepared agar medium containing 2 × MEM, and then 10 ml of neutral red solution (0.01% in phosphate-buffered saline, San Aisi Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was added to the solidified culture medium in the dark for 20 min. The test specimens were placed on the agar surface along with the positive (polyvinylchloride containing organotin additive sheet) and negative controls (high-density polytetrafluoroethylene sheet) in the same cell culture dish. After 24 h of incubation, as shown in Tables 2–4, the decolorization index, lysis index, and cytotoxicity scoring grade were assessed under an optical microscope (Olympus, Japan) according to ISO 7405.

MTT Assay for Cytotoxicity

According to ISO 10993.5 and ISO 10993.12 (Standardization IOF, 2009, 2012), disk-shaped specimens 6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness were fabricated. To prepare the extracts of the experimental composite resins, the as-prepared composite specimens were fully immersed in MEM with 10% FBS under sterile conditions at 37°C for 24 h based on a ratio of 3 cm²/ml [surface area of the sample to volume of extraction vehicle]. The extracts were diluted by twofold serial dilutions in the culture medium and resulted in the following concentrations: 12.5, 25, 50, and 100%. The pH value of the extract of each type of composite resin was measured with an ultrabasic benchtop pH meter (Denver Instrument Co., United States). To clarify the role of pH values on the cytotoxicity, 1 N HCl was added into the extracts slowly, with stirring, to adjust the pH value of the extracts to neutral. Cytotoxicity was assessed by using the MTT assay. Briefly, L929 cells were seeded in 96-well plates for 24 h and then treated with different concentrations of extracts of four kinds of experimental composite resins at 12.5, 25, 50, and 100% for 24 h. Following 24 h of treatment, MTT solution (20 μl, 5 mg/ml) (Amresco, Solon, OH, United States) was added to each well and incubated for an additional 4 h in a 37°C incubator. Subsequently, 150 μl of DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance at 570 nm and 630 nm was measured by a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States).

Determination of Ion Release and Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of four experimental composite resins was evaluated using both direct contact and indirect methods of measuring the antibacterial effects of extracts. Streptococcus mutans (UA159) was obtained from Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (Shanghai, China). Disk-shaped specimens 6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness were used for antibacterial activity measurement. In detail, S. mutans (UA159) at a density of 1 × 10⁶ colony-forming units (CFU)/ml in 0.2 ml was seeded on the surface of as-prepared composite specimens in a sterilized 24-well plate containing brain heart infusion (BHI) (1.8 ml/well) (Difco Laboratories, United States) at 37°C under standard anaerobic conditions (80% N₂, 10% H₂, 10% CO₂) for 24 h. After incubation for 24 h, the bacterial suspension was collected from the experimental composite resins. Following dilution with BHI, 0.1 ml of bacterial suspension was placed on a BHI agar plate and further incubated for 24 h; subsequently, the number of bacterial CFU was counted according to previous studies (He et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2017). Furthermore, to determine whether the factors released by the experimental composite resin had antibacterial effects, each type of composite resin specimen was immersed in BHI (2 ml) for 24 h and 72 h. Subsequently, the BHI extracts of composite resins were collected to culture S. mutans for 24 h. Then, the bacterial suspension was diluted and placed on agar plates. The bacterial CFU were counted after culturing for 24 h. S. mutans was seeded on each type of composite resin at 37°C under standard anaerobic conditions. After being cultured for 24 h, the bacterial samples on the composite resin were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde, followed by progressive dehydration with anhydrous ethanol, critical-point drying, and gold spraying. The bacterial morphology and adhesion were characterized by SEM (Hitachi S-3400N, Hitachi, Japan). In addition, the concentrations of Si and Ca in the BHI extracts of the as-prepared composite resin specimens after 24 and 72 h were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Agilent Technologies 5100, Agilent Technologies Co., Ltd., United States).

Determination of Dentin Remineralization

Dentin remineralization was studied in vitro using simulated body fluid (SBF). SBF with a pH of 7.4 was prepared by dissolving the reagent chemicals NaCl, NaHCO₃, KCl, K₂HPO₄⋅3H₂O, MgCl₂⋅6H₂O, CaCl₂, and Na₂SO₄ in deionized water according to a previous study (Mariano et al., 2009). Disk-shaped resin specimens (diameter: 6 mm, height: 4 mm) with different loadings of BAG were prepared. Human teeth were extracted, and the first premolars for orthodontic treatment needs from patients at the Department of Oral Surgery, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were collected and cleaned. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Each tooth was sectioned to obtain 1-mm-thick dentin disks along its horizontal axis below the enamel–dentin junction using a hard tissue slicer (Leica SP1600, Leica, Germany). Prior to use in the experiment, all dentin disk specimens were washed with 0.5% NaClO for 5 min and sterilized with an excess of deionized water and 70% ethanol for 20 min. Subsequently, all dentin disk specimens were completely demineralized in 10% phosphoric acid for 12 h at 25°C (Tezvergil-Mutluay et al., 2017). Each type of cured composite resin specimen was immersed with one demineralized dentin disk specimen in SBF at pH 7.4 and 37°C for 21 days without changing the aqueous medium (Xie et al., 2008). After immersion, all dentin samples were dried at room temperature and cleaned with acetone, and then the dentine surface morphology was observed and analyzed by SEM-EDS (Mira3, Tescan, Czechia).

Results

Characterization of Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of BAG-Modified Composite Resin

As shown in Figure 1, SEM-EDS elemental mapping showed a uniform elemental distribution of Ca, Na, and Si in the BAG-modified composite resins, and the relative content of each element in the experimental composite resins increased with increasing BAG content. After immersion in deionized water for 24 h, the flexural strength and the compression strength in the composite resin were not obviously reduced by the addition of up to 23 wt % BAG particles (Figures 2A,B). When the mass ratio of BAG particles incorporated into the composite was 8 wt %, there was no significant difference in the microhardness between the BAG8 group (50.9 ± 1.93) and the control group (48.33 ± 5.18) (p > 0.05). When the mass ratio of incorporated BAG particles was increased to 16 and 23 wt %, the microhardness was significantly lower than the microhardness of the control group and the BAG8 group (p < 0.05) (Figure 2C). Furthermore, after immersion in cell or bacterial culture medium for 24 h, both extracts of composite resin without BAG particles exhibited a pH between 7.2 and 7.4 and increased to 8.8–8.9 for the BAG23 groups, showing a dose-dependent increase in the pH value with increasing BAG incorporation (Figures 2D,E). Moreover, the degree of conversion (DC) value was not affected in the experimental resin system by increasing the BAG amounts (Figure 2F).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

Biocompatibility Assessment of BAG-Modified Composite Resin

According to ISO 10993.5 (Standardization IOF, 2009), an in vitro cytotoxicity assay is the first test to evaluate the biocompatibility of biomaterials for medical use. Therefore, two test methods, the agar diffusion test and MTT assay, were used in this study. In the agar diffusion test, the cytotoxic potential of the leachable contents of the test samples was determined after diffusion through an agarose layer by scoring the decolorization area and assessing cell lysis of the cell culture. The decolorization zones in the different groups are presented in Figure 3. The cytotoxicity scoring grade based on the decolorization index and the cell lysis index for the different groups are shown in Table 5. The negative control showed no cellular decolorization and lysis, while the positive control caused severe cellular decolorization and lysis with a cytotoxicity score of 3. In the various experimental composite resin groups, increasing the amount of BAG fillers from 0 to 23 wt % resulted in a progressive increase in the values of the decolorization index and the lysis index. The BAG8 group showed no cytotoxicity, while the BAG16 group had slight cytotoxicity with a cytotoxicity score of 1, and the BAG23 group had moderate cytotoxicity with a cytotoxicity score of 2 (Table 5).

FIGURE 3

Furthermore, the MTT assay was used to study the effect of the extracts from the BAG-modified composite resins on cell viability. As shown in Figure 4A, 12.5–50% extracts of all BAG-modified composite resins did not significantly alter cell viability when compared to the negative control, while 100% extracts of the composite resins with 16 or 23% BAG incorporation significantly reduced cell viability until the addition of a decrease to 8%. However, no concentration-dependent increase in cytotoxicity was observed in the presence of the extracts of all BAG groups. To clarify the role of alkaline pH values in the cytotoxicity of BAG-modified composite resins, the pH value of the extracts of all BAG groups was adjusted to neutral. Interestingly, following exposure to the neutral 100% extracts of BAG16 and BAG23, the cell viability became equal to the cell viability of the control (Figure 4B), suggesting that the cytotoxicity of BAG-modified composite resins might be attributed primarily to the increase in extracellular pH values.

FIGURE 4

Antimicrobial Activity and Ion Release of BAG-Modified Composite Resin

The direct antibacterial effect of various BAG-modified composite resins was determined by counting bacterial colonies. As shown in Figure 5, after growing on the surface of BAG-modified composite resin for 24 h, the number of S. mutans colonies was significantly lower than the number of S. mutans colonies of unmodified composite resin (p < 0.01). In addition, a dose-dependent decrease in bacterial colonies was observed in the modified composite resins containing various amounts of BAG microparticles, suggesting that the addition of BAG can effectively improve the antibacterial performance of the composite resin. Moreover, to clarify whether the antibacterial effect depends on indirect action by soluble factors, various composite resin samples were extracted in bacterial culture medium for 24 and 72 h. Figure 6 indicates that 24 h of extracts from composite resins incorporated with different concentrations of BAG could obviously inhibit the growth of S. mutans in a concentration-dependent manner. The difference in the average number of bacterial colonies between composite resins with various amounts of BAG was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Similar inhibition was also observed in the groups treated with 72 h of extracts from BAG-modified composite resins, and the antibacterial effect in the 72-h extract group was significantly stronger than the antibacterial effect of the 24-h extract group (p < 0.05).

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

The amounts of Ca and Si ions in the BHI extracts of each type of composite resin were determined and are presented in Figure 7. Si⁴⁺ release from the 24-h BHI extracts of experimental composite resins increased from 3.03 ± 0.12 μg/ml to 39.93 ± 1.45 μg/ml with the addition of BAG from 0 to 23 wt %, and Ca²⁺ release from the 24-h extracts increased from 10.37 ± 2.50 μg/ml to 35.97 ± 6.03 μg/ml with BAG incorporation from 0 to 23 wt %. In addition, there were significant differences in Si ion content between the 24-h extracts from BAG-modified composite resins and the 72-h extract group (p < 0.05), while no obvious difference was observed in Ca²⁺ release between the 24-h extract group and the 72-h extract group (p > 0.05).

FIGURE 7

The bacterial adhesion and morphology of S. mutans on the surface of various composite resins was determined by SEM. Figure 8 reveals that S. mutans adhered well to the surface of unmodified composite resin, and the bacterial morphology was not changed, showing a typical and well-ordered chain-like arrangement. By contrast, the bacterial morphology and structure of S. mutans adhered to the surface of the BAG-modified composite resins obviously changed with increasing mass ratio of BAG incorporated into composite resins.

FIGURE 8

Remineralizing Capability of BAG-Modified Composite Resin

After immersing various BAG-modified composite resins with demineralized dentin disks in SBF for 21 days, the surface microstructure and elemental analysis of the dentin were observed by SEM-EDS. The uniform and smooth morphology of dentin was observed immediately after demineralized treatment or immersion in the blank SBF for 21 days (Figures 9A,B). Additionally, dentin tubules were clearly visible on the surface of demineralized dentin in the unmodified composite resin group (Figure 9C). By contrast, after immersion with various BAG-incorporated composite resins in SBF for 21 days, with increasing BAG amounts, an increasing number of dentin tubules were occluded by the mineralized layer (Figures 9D–F). According to the EDX analysis, a completely demineralized dentin surface immersed in SBF for 21 days showed that calcium was rarely observed. However, with the increase in the content of BAG incorporation, the amounts of calcium and phosphate gradually increased on the dentin surface, indicating that occluding deposits observed in each experimental group were calcium-rich mineralized layers and showing that BAG-modified composite resins have good remineralizing properties.

FIGURE 9

Discussion

The present study successfully developed a novel bioactive hybrid composite resin with antibacterial and remineralizing activity by incorporating different weight fractions of BAG particles. SEM-EDS mapping indicated that BAG particles were homogeneously distributed in the resin matrix (Figure 1). Mechanical properties such as compressive strength, flexural strength, and microhardness are important for load-bearing applications of composite resin; thus, incorporation of BAG particles into the composite resin to achieve antibacterial and remineralizing functions should not sacrifice the mechanical properties of the composite resin. In this study, the flexural strength of the experimental composite resin containing 0 to 23 wt % BAG particles fulfilled the requirement of ISO 4049 for a minimum flexural strength of 80 MPa (Figure 2A; Standardization IOF, 2019). Moreover, our findings further showed that increasing the amount of BAG particles did not affect the short-term compressive and flexural strengths of the composite resin and resulted in only a slight decline in microhardness (Figures 2A–C), which is consistent with other previous studies reporting that the mechanical properties did not differ among various composite resins containing BAG particles with 0–15 wt % (Khvostenko et al., 2013). Moreover, a previous study also reported that dental resins containing biostable glass filler (SiO₂, Ba₂O₃, and Al₂O₃) had higher hardness than the dental resins containing BAG filler due to their higher resistance to wear (Proença et al., 2020), suggesting that the decrease in microhardness of BAG-modified composite resins might be attributed to a lower ratio of barium glass filler. By contrast, a continuous reduction in the flexural strength and modulus of the composite resin was observed with increasing BAG content and aging (Yang et al., 2013; Par et al., 2019b). Generally, the mechanical properties of composite resins were largely dependent on polymerization of the resinous matrix, inorganic fillers and filler/matrix interface (Par et al., 2019b). BAG fillers have been reported to have a direct inhibitory effect on the polymerization of Bis-GMA resin systems because of surface oxides (Par et al., 2019a,b), but our data showed that the DC for the as-prepared resin system was not compromised by the addition of BAG fillers up to 23 wt % (Figure 2F). A possible explanation is that the larger BAG microparticles used in our study had fewer surface oxides than the smaller BAG particles in other studies (Par et al., 2019b). Moreover, incorporating a low content of larger BAG microparticles (∼7.26 μm) and a high content of smaller barium glass microparticles (∼0.7 μm) might increase the fracture toughness of the composite resin by crack deflection or bridging (Khvostenko et al., 2013; Kundie et al., 2018). Thus, the mechanism underlying the negligible effect of BAG incorporation on compressive and flexural strengths might be attributed to a higher content of hybrid inorganic fillers and a higher DC of resin matrix.

Investigation of the biocompatibility of the novel composite resin is a pre-requisite before clinical use. In compliance with the ISO standards (Standardization IOF, 2009, 2011), both the agar diffusion test and MTT assay were selected to evaluate the cytotoxicity of dental composite resins based on different endpoints in this study. Specifically, the agar diffusion test, as a well-established cytotoxicity barrier test in dentistry, is commonly used to determine cell membrane integrity by mimicking the penetration of leachable substances released from dental materials through the dentin/mucosal membrane barrier. The MTT assay was used to detect mitochondrial activity by simulating the leachable constituents extracted from dental materials (Kilic et al., 2012). The agar diffusion test results showed that the cytotoxicity score of the experimental composite resins with a low (8–16 wt %) mass fraction of BAG filler was grade 0–1, which falls within the acceptable range for medical devices (Standardization IOF, 2009, 2011), but when the mass ratio of BAG filler increased up to 23%, the cytotoxicity score was grade 2, indicating increasing cell membrane permeability with increasing BAG incorporation (Table 5). Additionally, the cell metabolic activity could be reduced significantly by exposure to the extracts of composite resins with 16–23 wt % BAG fillers (Figure 4A). In other previous studies, the major reason for cytotoxicity was attributed predominantly to the release of residual monomers, not to the presence of the BAG fillers (Salehi et al., 2015; Balhaddad et al., 2019). However, our data showed that neither the unmodified composite resins nor the modified composite resins with 8 wt % BAG exhibited cytotoxicity, reflecting that the level of residual monomers released from our experimental resin matrix would not be sufficient to cause cytotoxic effects. As the degradation of BAG was accompanied by the release of alkali metal ions and an increase in pH in the local microenvironment, a higher pH value might be the prominent factor affecting the cytotoxicity of BAG-modified composite resins. The range of the optimal pH values for cell growth is considered to be between 7.4 and 7.8 (Wang et al., 2015). However, the pH values in the extracts of the four experimental composite resins reached 9.0 when the addition of BAG was 16–23 wt % (Figure 2D). Because the in vitro cell culture system lacks the buffering capacity of the in vivo environment, the pH value of the in vitro test system could be adjusted to the normal level to simulate the in vivo environment (Wang et al., 2015; Willbold et al., 2017). After adjusting the pH value of the extracts of BAG16 and BAG23 to 7.4, the cell viability recovered significantly up to 100% above (Figure 4B).

As composite resins were usually shown to accumulate more biofilms and plaque than other restorative materials (Singh et al., 2009), it is highly desirable to develop composite resins with antibacterial activity to inhibit bacteria and combat secondary caries. Many previous studies, including ours, have found that BAG particles have strong antibacterial effects on a variety of bacteria and biofilms due to ion release (e.g., Ca, P, Na, and Si ions) and the pH elevation of the surrounding environment (Xu et al., 2015; Kargozar et al., 2018; Bauer et al., 2019). BAG particles were also reported to be able to insert into bacterial membranes like a needle, leading to the destruction of the cell walls of bacteria (Hu et al., 2009). However, it is still not clear whether this antibacterial behavior could be affected when the BAG particles were embedded in the composite resin matrix as a filler. In the present study, S. mutans, as one of the major caries-related species, was chosen to represent the dominant streptococci genus in dental biofilms. Our data showed that all the composites containing BAG particles significantly reduced the CFU of S. mutans and inhibited bacterial growth on the surface of composite resins (Figure 5), consistent with other studies, which showed that the addition of BAG particles into composite resins yielded a significant inhibition of Escherichia coli and S. mutans and reduced the bacterial penetration depth into the interface tooth resins (Khvostenko et al., 2013, 2016; Chatzistavrou et al., 2015). To explore the role of direct surface contact or soluble factor release in its antibacterial action, each composite resin sample with the same specification in the above direct contact antibacterial experiment was extracted in bacterial culture medium for 24 and 72 h, and then the extracts were used to culture S. mutans for 24 h. The results showed that the 72-h extracts of various BAG-modified composite resins had better antibacterial effects than the 24-h extract groups with obvious dose- and time-dependent bacterial inhibition (Figure 6). Correspondingly, we found that the antibacterial effects of the extracts of BAG-modified composite resins were higher than the antibacterial effects of the direct contact groups at the same aqueous pH value (Figures 5, 6), suggesting that the antibacterial mechanism of the BAG-modified composite resin was attributed dominantly to the cumulative effects of ion release, not just the increase in pH value or direct surface contact. This conclusion was further supported by the results from the pH measurements and the ion release in the BHI extracts. Figure 2E shows that the pH values in the extracts of BAG-modified composite resin groups were approximately 8.04–8.87, which fell within the S. mutans-tolerated pH range of 4–10 described in the literature (Nakajo et al., 2006). Based on ICP-MS analysis, a significant dose-dependent increase in the release of Si⁴⁺ and Ca²⁺ was observed in the BHI extracts of experimental composite resins with increasing BAG amounts, especially the Si ions released from the composite resin with 23 wt % BAG, which were more than 10 times higher than the Si ions released from the control without BAG (Figure 7), suggesting that the combined action of Si⁴⁺ and Ca²⁺ release is the main factor contributing to the antibacterial properties of BAG-modified composite resin. The release of Si⁴⁺ or Ca²⁺ from BAG has also been suggested to prohibit bacterial growth by causing perturbations of the membrane potential of bacteria or attacking target sites on the cell membranes of bacteria in many previous studies (Keenan et al., 2017; Drago et al., 2018; Aponso et al., 2019; Dai et al., 2020). Consistently, our SEM data further showed that on the surface of composite resins containing 8 and 16 wt % BAG, the long-chain-like structure of S. mutans gradually disintegrated into a short-chain shape. Especially on the surface of composite resins containing 23 wt % BAG, the long-chain structure basically disappeared, indicating that the incorporation of BAG could not only reduce the number of bacteria adhered to the composite resin surface but also disturb the morphology and structure of bacteria (Figure 8).

Secondary caries could lead to dentin demineralization by bacterial acids in carious lesions; therefore, in addition to the antibacterial ability, the ideal composite resin should have excellent mineralizing capability to inhibit secondary caries and thus extend the lifetime of restoration. BAG has been proven to promote dentin remineralization in many previous studies (Bakry et al., 2014a,b; Mehta et al., 2014), so BAG has been added to toothpaste, anti-carious gel and dentin desensitizer for clinical use. Once BAG particles were used to modify the composite resin, it was critical that these particles embedded in the resin matrix could continue to exert bioactivity. A previous study reported that the hydroxylapatite layer could be formed on the surface of dental adhesive containing 20 wt % BAG particles after immersion in PBS for 21 days (Taubock et al., 2014), but the direct effects of BAG-modified composite resins on dentin remineralization were rarely highlighted. In this study, the capability of inducing remineralization was evaluated by exploring the surface structure and chemical composition of demineralized dentin surfaces of tooth slices mixed with BAG-modified composite resins upon soaking in SBF for 21 days. Our SEM results (Figure 9) showed that the demineralized dentin surfaces were covered with a Ca-P-containing layer following immersion with 16–23 wt % BAG-modified composite resins in SBF solutions, while the dentin surfaces showed clearly visible dentin tubules in the control without BAG-modified composite resins. In addition, with increasing amounts of BAG particles within the composite resin, the amounts of Ca and P gradually increased on the demineralized dentin surface, indicating that the incorporation of the BAG particles into the resin matrix could also exert bioactivity and promote dentin remineralization. Materials containing released Ca, P, and Si ions have been widely accepted to be favorable for remineralization (Cheng et al., 2017; Fernando et al., 2017). A previous study focused on the effects of the addition of BAG in polymer constructs on bioactivity and found that the precipitation of mineralized layers on the surface of materials was ascribed to a well-defined ion exchange mechanism between metal cations (Na⁺ and Ca²⁺) in the BAG and hydronium ions (H₃O⁺) in the surrounding fluid (Serio et al., 2019). Therefore, in SBF solution, the enhanced remineralization on the demineralized dentin surface was attributed mainly to the release of bioactive ions from BAG and the change in the local microenvironment. Taken together, the above data suggest that the BAG-modified composite resin has both remineralizing and antibacterial capabilities, which could be regulated by the controllable release of bioactive ions (Si⁴⁺ and Ca²⁺).

There are several limitations of this study. First, the decline in mechanical properties with aging has been reported in a previous study (Par et al., 2019b); thus, testing the mechanical properties of composite resins immersed in water for a long time (e.g., 30, 60, or 90 days) might be more suitable for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of the material. Second, it would be more appropriate to detect the antibacterial effects of BAG-modified composite resin on biofilms and investigate their remineralization ability using in situ or in vitro models under clinically relevant conditions, which would make the conclusions on the antibacterial and remineralizing properties more accurate.

Conclusion

In summary, a novel BAG-modified hybrid composite resin was developed with excellent biocompatibility and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities. When the mass fractions of BAG particles were added from 8 to 23 wt %, the original mechanical properties of the composite resin, including flexural strength and compressive strength, were not obviously affected without compromising the DC. Although the BAG incorporation of mass fractions of 16–23 wt % in composite resins reduced cell viability, the cell viability could be recovered by the regulation of pH values. The synthesized BAG-modified composite resins showed good antibacterial effects against S. mutans and enhanced remineralization activity on demineralized dentin surfaces in a concentration-dependent manner. The possible mechanisms of antibacterial activity and dentin remineralization might be closely related to the release of bioactive ions, suggesting that the BAG antibacterial and biological properties can be controlled by regulating the amounts of bioactive ions. The capability to balance the mechanical properties, cytotoxicity, antibacterial activity, and bioactivity makes BAG-modified composite resin a promising prospect for clinical application.

References

• 1

  Al-EesaN. A.KarpukhinaN.HillR. G.JohalA.WongF. S. L. (2019). Bioactive glass composite for orthodontic adhesives–formation and characterisation of apatites using MAS-NMR and SEM.Dent. Mater.35597–605. 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AponsoS.UmmadiJ. G.DavisH.FerracaneJ.KoleyD. (2019). A chemical approach to optimizing bioactive glass dental composites.J. Dent. Res.98194–199. 10.1177/0022034518809086

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  ArunD.Adikari MudiyanselageD.Gulam MohamedR.LiddellM.Monsur HassanN. M.SharmaD. (2021). Does the addition of zinc oxide nanoparticles improve the antibacterial properties of direct dental composite resins? A systematic review.Materials14:40. 10.3390/ma14010040

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AstvaldsdottirA.DagerhamnJ.Van DijkenJ. W.Naimi-AkbarA.Sandborgh-EnglundG.TranaeusS.et al (2015). Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults–a systematic review.J. Dent.43934–954. 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BakryA. STakahashiH.OtsukiM.TagamiJ. (2014a). Evaluation of new treatment for incipient enamel demineralization using 45S5 bioglass.Dent. Mater.30314–320. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  BakryA. S.MarghalaniH. Y.AminO. A.TagamiJ. (2014b). The effect of a bioglass paste on enamel exposed to erosive challenge.J. Dent.421458–1463. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BalhaddadA. A.KansaraA. A.HidanD.WeirM. D.XuH. H. K.MeloM.a.S (2019). Toward dental caries: exploring nanoparticle-based platforms and calcium phosphate compounds for dental restorative materials.Bioact. Mater.443–55. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BauerJ.SilvaE. S. A.CarvalhoE. M.FerreiraP. V. C.CarvalhoC. N.MansoA. P.et al (2019). Dentin pretreatment with 45S5 and niobophosphate bioactive glass: effects on pH, antibacterial, mechanical properties of the interface and microtensile bond strength.J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.90374–380. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  BhadilaG.WangX.ZhouW.MenonD.MeloM.a.SMontanerS.et al (2020). Novel low-shrinkage-stress nanocomposite with remineralization and antibacterial abilities to protect marginal enamel under biofilm.J. Dent.99:103406. 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103406

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  ChatzistavrouX.VelamakanniS.DirenzoK.LefkelidouA.FennoJ. C.KasugaT.et al (2015). Designing dental composites with bioactive and bactericidal properties.Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl.52267–272. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.062

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  ChengL.WeirM. D.XuH. H.AntonucciJ. M.KraigsleyA. M.LinN. J.et al (2012). Antibacterial amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomposites with a quaternary ammonium dimethacrylate and silver nanoparticles.Dent. Mater.28561–572. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  ChengL.ZhangK.ZhangN.MeloM.a.SWeirM. D.ZhouX. D.et al (2017). Developing a new generation of antimicrobial and bioactive dental resins.J. Dent. Res.96855–863. 10.1177/0022034517709739

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  CoccoA. R.Da RosaW. L. D. O.Da SilvaA. F.LundR. G.PivaE. (2015). A systematic review about antibacterial monomers used in dental adhesive systems: current status and further prospects.Dent. Mater.311345–1362. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.155

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  DaiL. L.MeiM. L.ChuC. H.LoE. C. M. (2020). Antibacterial effect of a new bioactive glass on cariogenic bacteria.Arch. Oral Biol.117:104833. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104833

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  DragoL.ToscanoM.BottagisioM. (2018). Recent evidence on bioactive glass antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity: a mini-review.Materials (Basel)11:326. 10.3390/ma11020326

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  FarrugiaC.CamilleriJ. (2015). Antimicrobial properties of conventional restorative filling materials and advances in antimicrobial properties of composite resins and glass ionomer cements-A literature review.Dent. Mater.31e89–e99.

  • Google Scholar

• 17

  FernandoD.AttikN.Pradelle-PlasseN.JacksonP.GrosgogeatB.ColonP. (2017). Bioactive glass for dentin remineralization: a systematic review.Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl.761369–1377. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.083

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  HeJ.ZhuX.QiZ.WangC.MaoX.ZhuC.et al (2015). Killing dental pathogens using antibacterial graphene oxide.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces75605–5611. 10.1021/acsami.5b01069

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  HuS.ChangJ.LiuM.NingC. (2009). Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass.J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.20281–286. 10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  KargozarS.MontazerianM.HamzehlouS.KimH. W.BainoF. (2018). Mesoporous bioactive glasses: promising platforms for antibacterial strategies.Acta Biomater.811–19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.052

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  KeenanT. J.PlacekL. M.HallM. M.WrenA. W. (2017). Antibacterial and antifungal potential of Ga-bioactive glass and Ga-bioactive glass/polymeric hydrogel composites.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.1051102–1113. 10.1002/jbm.b.33655

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  KhvostenkoD.HiltonT.FerracaneJ.MitchellJ.KruzicJ. (2016). Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.Dent. Mater.3273–81. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  KhvostenkoD.MitchellJ.HiltonT.FerracaneJ.KruzicJ. (2013). Mechanical performance of novel bioactive glass containing dental restorative composites.Dent. Mater.291139–1148. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.207

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  KilicD.KesimS.LimanN.SumerZ.OzturkA. J. B.EquipmentB. (2012). In vitro comparison of the effects of dental filling materials on mouse fibroblasts.Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip.263155–3162. 10.5504/bbeq.2012.0030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  KopperudS. E.TveitA. B.GaardenT.SandvikL.EspelidI. (2012). Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure.Eur. J. Oral Sci.120539–548. 10.1111/eos.12004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  KorkutE.TorlakE.AltunsoyM. (2016). Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of dental resin composite containing bioactive glass.J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater.14e296–e301.

  • Google Scholar

• 27

  KundieF.AzhariC. H.MuchtarA.AhmadZ.a (2018). Effects of filler size on the mechanical properties of polymer-filled dental composites: a review of recent developments.J. Phys. Sci.29141–165.

  • Google Scholar

• 28

  KurataS.HamadaN.KanazawaA.EndoT. (2011). Study on antibacterial dental resin using tri-n-butyl (4-vinylbenzyl) phosphonium chloride.Dent. Mater. J.30960–966. 10.4012/dmj.2011-157

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  LeeM. J.SeoY. B.SeoJ. Y.RyuJ. H.AhnH. J.KimK. M.et al (2020). Development of a bioactive flowable resin composite containing a zinc-doped phosphate-based glass.Nanomaterials (Basel)10:2311. 10.3390/nano10112311

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  LiuY.ZhangL.NiuL. N.YuT.XuH. H. K.WeirM. D.et al (2018). Antibacterial and remineralizing orthodontic adhesive containing quaternary ammonium resin monomer and amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles.J. Dent.7253–63. 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  MarianoN.OliveiraR.FernandesM.RigoE. J. M. (2009). Corrosion behavior of pure titanium in artificial saliva solution.Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)14878–880. 10.1590/s1517-70762009000200010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  MehtaA. B.KumariV.JoseR.IzadikhahV. (2014). Remineralization potential of bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on initial carious lesion: an in-vitro pH-cycling study.J. Conserv. Dent.173–7. 10.4103/0972-0707.124085

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  NakajoK.KomoriR.IshikawaS.UenoT.SuzukiY.IwamiY.et al (2006). Resistance to acidic and alkaline environments in the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis.Oral Microbiol. Immunol.21283–288. 10.1111/j.1399-302x.2006.00289.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  OpdamN. J.Van De SandeF. H.BronkhorstE.CenciM. S.BottenbergP.PallesenU.et al (2014). Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Dent. Res.93943–949. 10.1177/0022034514544217

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  ParM.SpanovicN.TaubockT. T.AttinT.TarleZ. (2019a). Degree of conversion of experimental resin composites containing bioactive glass 45S5: the effect of post-cure heating.Sci. Rep.9:17245.

  • Google Scholar

• 36

  ParM.TarleZ.HickelR.IlieN. (2019b). Mechanical properties of experimental composites containing bioactive glass after artificial aging in water and ethanol.Clin. Oral Investig.232733–2741. 10.1007/s00784-018-2713-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  ProençaM.a.MCarvalhoE. M.E SilvaA. S.RibeiroG.a.CFerreiraP. V. C.CarvalhoC. N.et al (2020). Orthodontic resin containing bioactive glass: preparation, physicochemical characterization, antimicrobial activity, bioactivity and bonding to enamel.Int. J. Adh. Adh.99:102575. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102575

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  SalehiS.GwinnerF.MitchellJ. C.PfeiferC.FerracaneJ. L. (2015). Cytotoxicity of resin composites containing bioactive glass fillers.Dent. Mater.31195–203.

  • Google Scholar

• 39

  SerioF.MiolaM.VerneE.PisignanoD.BoccacciniA. R.LiveraniL. (2019). Electrospun filaments embedding bioactive glass particles with ion release and enhanced mineralization.Nanomaterials (Basel)9:182. 10.3390/nano9020182

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  SinghJ.KhalichiP.CvitkovitchD. G.SanterreJ. P. (2009). Composite resin degradation products from BisGMA monomer modulate the expression of genes associated with biofilm formation and other virulence factors in Streptococcus mutans.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A88551–560. 10.1002/jbm.a.31879

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  Standardization IOF (2009). ISO 10993-5: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 5: Tests for in Vitro Cytotoxicity.Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Standardization IOF (2011). ISO 7045: Pan Head Screws With Type H or Type Z Cross Recess—Product Grade A.Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • Google Scholar

• 43

  Standardization IOF (2012). ISO 10993-12: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 12: Sample Preparation and Reference Materials.Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • Google Scholar

• 44

  Standardization IOF (2019). ISO 4049: Dentistry—Polymer-Based Restorative Materials.Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • Google Scholar

• 45

  TaubockT. T.ZehnderM.SchweizerT.StarkW. J.AttinT.MohnD. (2014). Functionalizing a dentin bonding resin to become bioactive.Dent. Mater.30868–875. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  Tezvergil-MutluayA.Seseogullari-DirihanR.FeitosaV. P.CamaG.BrauerD. S.SauroS. (2017). Effects of composites containing bioactive glasses on demineralized dentin.J. Dent. Res.96999–1005. 10.1177/0022034517709464

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  WangJ.WitteF.XiT.ZhengY.YangK.YangY.et al (2015). Recommendation for modifying current cytotoxicity testing standards for biodegradable magnesium-based materials.Acta Biomater.21237–249. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  WangZ.SaY.SauroS.ChenH.XingW.MaX.et al (2010). Effect of desensitising toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion: a dentine permeability measurement and SEM in vitro study.J. Dent.38400–410. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  WillboldE.WeizbauerA.LoosA.SeitzJ. M.AngrisaniN.WindhagenH.et al (2017). Magnesium alloys: a stony pathway from intensive research to clinical reality. Different test methods and approval-related considerations.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A105329–347. 10.1002/jbm.a.35893

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  XieD.ZhaoJ.WengY.ParkJ. G.JiangH.PlattJ. A. (2008). Bioactive glass-ionomer cement with potential therapeutic function to dentin capping mineralization.Eur. J. Oral Sci.116479–487. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00562.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  XuY. T.WuQ.ChenY. M.SmalesR. J.ShiS. Y.WangM. T. (2015). Antimicrobial effects of a bioactive glass combined with fluoride or triclosan on Streptococcus mutans biofilm.Arch. Oral Biol.601059–1065. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.03.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  YangS.-Y.KimS.-H.ChoiS.-Y.KimK.-M. (2016). Acid neutralizing ability and shear bond strength using orthodontic adhesives containing three different types of bioactive glass.Materials9:125. 10.3390/ma9030125

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  YangS.-Y.PiaoY.-Z.KimS.-M.LeeY.-K.KimK.-N.KimK.-M. (2013). Acid neutralizing, mechanical and physical properties of pit and fissure sealants containing melt-derived 45S5 bioactive glass.Dent. Mater.291228–1235.

  • Google Scholar

• 54

  YuY.JinG.XueY.WangD.LiuX.SunJ. (2017). Multifunctions of dual Zn/Mg ion co-implanted titanium on osteogenesis, angiogenesis and bacteria inhibition for dental implants.Acta Biomater.49590–603.

  • Google Scholar

• 55

  ZhangJ. F.WuR.FanY.LiaoS.WangY.WenZ. T.et al (2014). Antibacterial dental composites with chlorhexidine and mesoporous silica.J. Dent. Res.931283–1289.

  • Google Scholar