Abstract
The association between blood viscosity and pathological conditions involving a number of organ systems is well known. However, how the body measures and maintains appropriate blood viscosity is not well-described. The literature endorsing the function of the carotid sinus as a site of baroreception can be traced back to some of the earliest descriptions of digital pressure on the neck producing a drop in blood delivery to the brain. For the last 30 years, improved computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations of blood flow within the carotid sinus have demonstrated a more nuanced understanding of the changes in the region as it relates to changes in conventional metrics of cardiovascular function, including blood pressure. We suggest that the unique flow patterns within the carotid sinus may make it an ideal site to transduce flow data that can, in turn, enable real-time measurement of blood viscosity. The recent characterization of the PIEZO receptor family in the sinus vessel wall may provide a biological basis for this characterization. When coupled with other biomarkers of cardiovascular performance and descriptions of the blood rheology unique to the sinus region, this represents a novel venue for bioinspired design that may enable end-users to manipulate and optimize blood flow.
Descriptions of the Carotid Sinus Physiology Throughout History
“I have gained the conviction through repeated and careful observations, that the slowing of the pulse when pressure is applied on the carotid is a frequent finding, in healthy, as well as in sick persons.” ().
-Heinrich Irenaeus Quincke
The Carotid Bifurcation Before the “Carotid Sinus”
In 1875 Quincke, a German physician responsible for introducing the lumbar puncture, spoke of the commonly held association between compression of the carotid bifurcation and decreased cardiac output. The association between the very immediate effects of compression of the vessels in the neck and a drop in global blood flow has been noted for a very long time. (The Greek word for “stupefy”, “karos”, provides the basis for our modern “carotid.”). Indeed, Rufus of Ephesus, circa 50 AD, described the almost immediate change in blood flow and mentation when the vessels in the neck were compressed (). For the 1,800 years that ensued, the notion that there was a profound slowing of the heart rate with compression of the neck vessels was attributed, somewhat correctly, to the nerves adjacent to the carotid (; ). As the heart rate was noted to decrease with manipulation of the dilated portion of the internal carotid, the vagus nerve was taken for granted up until the 1920s as being responsible for transmitting this signal to the autonomic nervous system.
The Current Paradigm of the Carotid Sinus as a Baroreceptor
It was Heinrich Ewald Hering in 1924 (Zimmer, 2004) who, through a series of experiments with over a hundred dogs, rationalized the anatomy and function of the carotid sinus and its nerve as it is currently understood. He observed that internal direct mechanical application of a pressure stimulus to the carotid sinus region using a brass probe had similar effects as direct electrical stimulation to the sinus. He realized that the nerve found to insert in the adventitia was distinct from the vagus nerve. Furthermore, he demonstrated that the electrical stimulation of this nerve also elicited the same effect as a clamp applied to the sinus–a reduction of heart rate and vasodilation with a resultant drop in blood pressure. The presumption is that this “vagal” parasympathetic effect does not originate in the vagus nerve. The role of the carotid sinus in global perfusion was further supported by Hering’s observation that systemic blood pressure reduced with increased pressure within the sinus itself (). His pursuit of a nerve responsible for mediating these observed cardiovascular responses led him to the eponymous Hering’s nerve, also known as the carotid sinus nerve, and helped complete our contemporary understanding of baroreception.
The Clinical Need for a Novel Biomarker of Blood Viscosity
The predictive relevance of blood viscosity in the literature has been suspected to be intrinsically germane to many disease processes. Types of problems where blood viscosity appears to play some pathophysiologic role include immunologic diseases (), inflammatory diseases (), hemolytic anemias (, ; ), hearing loss (; ), diabetes (; ; ), renal disorders (), sickle cell disease (), and cerebrovascular disease (). However, the association between cardiovascular disease and blood viscosity has been looked at most extensively throughout the literature (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ).
In an attempt to determine whether increased blood viscosity has any predictive value as a biomarker in the setting of cardiovascular disease, Peters () compiled blood viscosity data from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC). The SHEEC (Woodward et al., 2007) included participants without known cardiovascular disease recruited across Scotland from two different cohorts of men and women, one group from 1984–1987 and the other from north Glasgow in 1989, 1992, and 1995. For this prospective study, they compiled the data in the hopes of creating an ASSIGN (Assessing Cardiovascular Risk Using SIGN Guidelines) cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk score. By taking venous blood samples, they calculated the relative blood and plasma viscosities. They uncovered a statistically significant association between cardiovascular and all-cause risk with blood viscosity, particularly plasma viscosity. More importantly, the study demonstrated that even when controlling for the normal increases in viscosity associated with age, sex, and other known cardiovascular risks, viscosity had predictive value in ultimate scoring for mortality risk.
In another study () from Sweden, patients with no known cardiovascular disease were recruited into a study whereby hematocrit was related to long-term outcomes. After controlling for other known causes of cardiovascular mortality, they found an association between elevated sedimentation rate – a broad measure of inflammation – and elevated hematocrit. Remarkably, the association remained nearly as robust 26 years after enrollment as it did 10 years after enrollment. This study further corroborates the notion that blood viscosity may have predictive value independent of other known causes of cardiovascular mortality. The authors conclude that their findings support the theory that “hematocrit, plasma viscosity, and inflammation may increase… morbidity and mortality by promoting thrombotic complications and… atherosclerosis.” Based on its robust and long-lasting association, the authors argue that blood viscosity should be an independent prognostic indicator for cardiovascular events and mortality.
While increasing plasma viscosity leading to increased end-organ dysfunction may make intuitive sense, the question arises: “How does the body detect ‘optimal’ blood viscosity?” Is there an apparatus that can be described as the body’s own viscometer? Is that structure able, by virtue of its structure and function, to shed light on the rheology of global blood flow? Is this structure involved in the function of other organs whose functions titrate the fluid components involved in comprising blood viscosity?
The Carotid Sinus as a Viscometer
The role of the carotid sinus as a pressure sensor is well-known (). The present review discusses the intrinsic function of the carotid sinus as it relates to blood rheology and to the microanatomical apparatus responsible for initiation of its action. This review does not focus on the extensive and important work by many in the field of endothelial mechanobiology (a field which owes a great deal to Peter F. Davies for much of our understanding of the mechanics of endothelial transduction). This review is not a comprehensive review of the entire downstream pathway that follows after sinus activation – a pathway that we believe involves the vagus nerve and further neuromodulation by the central nervous system. Here, we aim to present aspects of the structure and function of the carotid sinus that may support its role as a blood viscometer.
As applied physiologists, clinicians manipulate cardiovascular homeostasis on a gross scale. For example, during carotid endarterectomy surgeries, glycopyrrolate is often given at the time of anesthetic induction to attenuate the reflex bradycardia that often ensues after carotid stent deployment. Despite our familiarity with this mechanism, clinicians often overlook the blood flow characteristics within the carotid sinus that may have a role in maintaining hemodynamics. This review presents recent improvements in our understanding of the blood rheology and microphysiology of the carotid sinus to enhance the clinician’s working knowledge. Considering the function of the carotid sinus and its possible role as a sensory organ may provide the basis for bioinspired design of devices that better enable clinicians to read, interpret, and manage blood viscosity.
The Unique Flow and Shear Stress Characteristics of the Carotid Sinus
The salience of carotid ultrasound to anesthetic management is increasing. In many centers, carotid Doppler studies are part of the preoperative workup for many major surgeries. For patients undergoing cardiac surgery, carotid ultrasound is a cost-effective, non-invasive screening tool that most anesthesiologists probably take for granted and view as having somewhat of a distant relevance to patient evaluation. However, data obtained by carotid Doppler is now used to guide blood flow (Weber et al., 2016) and stratify delirium risk () in the immediate postoperative period, as well as for a longer-term perspective relating to post-operative cognitive dysfunction ().
The Flow Dynamics Within the Carotid Sinus
The advent of clinically useful ultrasound examinations of the carotids created a need for a greater in-depth appreciation for the hemodynamic uniqueness of the sinus region. The very specific location of the sinus, immediately distal to the carotid bifurcation at the internal carotid artery inlet and above the level of the heart, lends its flow characteristics to vary over the cardiac cycle. The first comprehensive descriptions of the unique flow within the carotid sinus were first consolidated in 1983 (). The sinus is unique for the region of “flow separation” from the non-dividing wall at the origin of the internal carotid (,; ). Firstly, there is an effective coalescing of the flow streamlines in the origin of the internal carotid that results from the flow separation away from the non-dividing wall (Figure 1). Essentially, the flow vectors orient toward the carotid dividing wall and “make room” for the region of swirling, or recirculation, within the dilated region (Figure 2; ). This results in constant flow shear against the dividing wall throughout the cardiac cycle. Secondly, this high-velocity flow (Figure 2A) at the dividing wall leads to persistent reduced shear stress at the non-dividing wall of the sinus where the carotid sinus inserts into the adventitia. Lastly, the vortex of the fluid within the sinus, Figures 2B,C, causes alternating levels of shear stress “impulses” that change in the magnitude and polarity over the cardiac cycle. Direction change of wall shear stress (WSS) can be observed in Figure 2D, which results in oscillations of stress throughout the cardiac cycle. Interestingly, it is the oscillations from WSS that have long been accepted as the inciting factor for atheroma formation in this portion of the internal carotid (; ; ; ). It is therefore not surprising that the carotid atherosclerotic plaque is often found in the sinus ().
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Flow dynamics inside the carotid artery at deceleration, (A) axial velocity profiles, (B) three-dimensional representation of axial velocity profile at 4, (C) representation of circulatory flow vectors at 4, (D) wall shear stress values along the outer carotid wall (
The advent of open-source platforms for computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations led to a more quantitative, data-driven understanding of the flow characteristics of the carotid vessels, especially of the shear stress-related flow patterns within the sinus (
The key parameter in triggering non-Newtonian effects is the shear rate, which depends on local fluid dynamics of the blood at any specific location. Shear-thinning is a property observed during low shear rate (low velocity gradient) in which the apparent viscosity increases as the velocity gradient (shear rate) decreases. Alternatively, at high shear rate, the apparent viscosity decreases until it reaches a constant viscosity value and it behaves Newtonian. Due to the Fahraeus-Lindqvist effect, the apparent viscosity further decreases in smaller vessels with diameters between 30 to 300 μm (Truskey et al., 2004).
Milos (
FIGURE 3

Wall shear stress (in Pa) on carotid bifurcations of differing geometries obtained by CFD (left), MPL (middle), k-NN (right) algorithms (
Extracting data from simulations has also led to parameters previously only available from Doppler data (
A more recent advancement is Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) which utilizes the Doppler data to visually construct the flow lines within the sinus. VFI is a robust method for obtaining 2D images of the velocity vector profiles well-suited for areas with vortical flow such as the sinus. The real advantage to this method is that the forward (i.e., toward the brain) vs. reverse flow can be depicted simultaneously, allowing for measurement of the degree of turbulence within the region of recirculation (
Mechanotransduction by the Carotid Sinus
The Role of Shear Stress Mechanotransduction
The unique blood flow at the sinus creates flow patterns and shear forces that are transduced to the central nervous system. The term mechanotransduction refers to the transmission of a physical extracellular input or trigger to a cellular output. The physical forces that lead to these biological responses include direct cellular contact with shear forces, changes in transmembrane voltage, and mechanical stretch. The pervasive role of mechanotransduction in so many in vivo processes cannot be overstated. In the literature, there is a role for mechanotransduction in voluntary urination (
Amongst the physical phenomena that serve as the triggers for mechanotransduction in endothelial cells, the most important is shear stress. Shear stress is defined as the force created when two adjacent parcels of fluid are traveling adjacent to each other at different velocities. The force created between the parcels by this difference in speed at the point of contact between them is shear. In the case of simple laminar flow (i.e., blood flow direction parallels the vessel wall), the blood velocity profile is fastest at the center of the lumen, and the velocity decreases in a series of concentric circles approaching zero flow when in contact with the endothelial surface.
The local environment of the sinus leads to a region of recirculation which makes one ponder the relationship between its structure and function. The structure of the sinus is a dilation just distal to a bifurcation. This dilation creates a sudden expansion, and it leads to disturbance of the flow and vortex formation (
The characteristics of the shear stress patterns specific to the sinus have been studied extensively since these patterns are believed to underlie the pathophysiology for atherogenesis in the carotid. The regions noted to have the highest incidence are often associated with the lowest WSS (Zhang et al., 2012). The region of low WSS may independently cause intimal-medial thickening (
The region of the lowest WSS is a consequence of the disruption of laminar flow in the sinus described by Ku. This area of lowest WSS correlates with the region of highest shear oscillation (Zhang et al., 2012). To describe this, Ku posited the Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI) (
FIGURE 4

(A) Time-averaged wall shear stress, (B) oscillatory shear index on carotid artery. ICA, internal carotid artery; ECA, external carotid artery; CCA, common carotid artery; and CS, carotid sinus (
The Role of PIEZO Receptors in Mechanotransduction of Flow
The roles of the carotid sinus apparatus in various homeostatic functions such as “cross-talk” (Wilson et al., 1990;
To further support the basis of the role of the PIEZO receptors in a model of cellular transduction of mechanical stimulus,
TABLE 1
| Organ | PIEZO1 Cells | PIEZO2 Cells |
| Bladder | 206 | 206 |
| Brain | 23 | 9 |
| Cerebellum | 8 | 9 |
| Colon | 69 | 66 |
| Dorsal Root Ganglia | 13 | 478 |
| Heart | 15 | 6 |
| Kidney | 74 | 13 |
| Lung | 407 | 506 |
| Skeletal Muscle | 13 | 6 |
| Skin | 165 | 16 |
| Small Intestine | 25 | 19 |
| Stomach | 43 | 35 |
PIEZO-containing cell numbers found in adult mice organs (
PIEZO Receptor and Shear Stress From Blood Flow
There is increasing emphasis on the fundamental role of the PEIZO1 receptor in health and disease. In the commentary by
Similarly, in the case of the endothelial cell, the PIEZO1 receptor may enable the endothelium to serve its role as both a responder to and shaper of blood flow necessary for development and function throughout life. In a mouse model with mutated PIEZO1 activity (
When detecting regions of locally created secondary flows, the PIEZO receptors are well suited to detecting endothelial flow data (
FIGURE 5

The role of PIEZO1 receptors in alignment of endothelial cells during cardiovascular embryological development (
The pivotal role of the PIEZO receptor in the detection of endothelial flow data rather than blood pressure, per se, is demonstrated when considering how vasculature will remodel in response to chronic changes. In the study by
In addition to the possible role of the PIEZO receptor in vascular remodeling, elucidating the possible role of the PIEZO receptor in the proper functioning of the endothelium may suggest a line of inquiry aimed at examining the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic disease in the carotid sinus that results from the blood flow patterns unique to it. In the comprehensive review by Gimbrone, they discuss studies that compared atheroprone geometries such as the carotid sinus with its “oscillatory” flow patterns to atheroprotective geometries such as the distal internal carotid that have more consistent laminar flow (
The activation physics of the PIEZO receptor is also particularly well-suited to the type of flow unique to the sinus region described above. The recirculatory region results in secondary flows that repeatedly cause shear oscillation patterns that create a cohort of vibrations detected at the endothelium (
PIEZO and the Effect on Red Blood Cell Morphology
The role of the PIEZO1 receptor in blood rheology may be seen in the effects on the red blood cells themselves when the receptor function is altered. Blood viscosity and other flow parameters change with blood temperature, local microenvironments both inside and outside the cell, iron and hemoglobin state, as well as the size of the vessel and flow rate (
The possible role of the PIEZO receptor in blood flow homeostasis is supported by PIEZO1 mutations that lead to erythrocyte changes. In the work by Cahalan (
The PIEZO Receptor and the Carotid Sinus
More specific to the sinus region, the recent evidence produced by Zeng et al. (2018) for the preponderance of PEIZO1 and PEIZO2 receptors in the carotid sinus represents a significant shift in researchers’ understanding the role of mechanotransduction in baroreception. Using a murine model, they injected fluorescent Cholera Toxin B (CTB) underneath the serosa of the sinus region. With the understanding of the location of the baroreceptor cell bodies in the nodose and petrosal ganglia, they quantified the number of CTB-labeled cells that expressed PIEZO1 or PIEZO2 transcripts. Of the total 95 cells that were labeled, six were PIEZO1 positive, and eight were PIEZO2 positive. Then they took knock-out mice for both alleles of the PIEZO genes and administered both phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside. Essentially, the expected baroreceptor reflex was abolished with either drug. Knock-out mice with wild type PIEZO-intact phenotype who were awake and ambulating had a significantly higher average blood pressure and lability with a slightly higher average heart rate than their normal counterparts. This clinical picture is similar to the syndrome of “baroreceptor failure” described in the literature. Given this, the presence of the PIEZO receptor may be fundamental to the function of the carotid sinus.
Discussion
With the discovery of PIEZO channel aggregation in the sinus region, the carotid sinus may eventually be characterized as a sensory organ in its own right. The uniqueness of the flow in that region combined with the receptor population exquisitely suited to detect it lends itself well to efforts to modulate the action of the carotid sinus to effect cardiovascular changes. The PIEZO receptor family was described by Coste in 2010 and has since been recognized in a remarkable array of cells in which mechanotransduction serves as a nidus for cellular activity. More developments in the PIEZO receptor’s role in baroreceptor mechanism are anticipated.
The variety of organ systems now known to employ the PIEZO channel in converting shear forces into physiologic responses has led to a better understanding of mediators of its activation (Wu et al., 2017a). Wu categorizes the effectors of PIEZO function into those that affect the shear effects on the membrane (i.e., the cell) to which the channel is attached, or the channel itself. Examples of known mediators of PIEZO function that alter the membrane and therefore shear properties include pH, cell hydration, osmotic pressure, and lipid composition. Direct channel mediators include pH, voltage, resting membrane potential, and isolated protein and pharmacologic mediators. For example, the isolation of a molecular agonist named Yoda1 (Syeda et al., 2015), which shortens the inactive state of PIEZO1, raises the possibility that there may be a method by which its inactivation kinetics may be manipulated. These mediators each represent potential methods by which the sinus region can be monitored and altered, and therefore another venue by which carotid sinus effects can be studied.
Furthermore, thanks to advances in researchers’ ability to mine large datasets, biological associations between the PIEZO gene and the carotid sinus can uncover other potential avenues for inquiry. An example of this is Phenoscanner (Staley et al., 2016;
Numerous rheology studies have been conducted to understand the complex properties of blood (Thurston, 1973, 1976, 1979;
Understanding the Carotid Sinus to Achieve Homeostatic State and Future Directions
By quantifying the means by which the body “sees” blood flow, novel and more precise viscosity biomarkers may one day be available to clinicians. These, in turn, could facilitate care of patients undergoing resuscitation of their blood volume in order to better meet their needs. For example, when reconstituting blood volume lost during surgery, consideration for blood viscosity (itself a main component of the shear properties of blood)–in addition to volume and oxygen delivery–may facilitate improved outcomes and more cost-effective administration. Further supporting the sinus region’s possible suitability in this regard,
When considering the parameters that affect the activity of the PIEZO receptor and their location, possibly useful endpoints that reflect shear forces caused by blood flow can be studied. One means to approach this is to consider the known mutations in PIEZO genes and the diseases with which they are associated. Any reader with an interest in a more comprehensive review beyond the scope of this piece on physiologic force transduction as mediated by the PIEZO receptor is encouraged to read the review of the current state of knowledge by
Looking at the location, morphology, distinctive flow patterns, and PIEZO receptor population of the carotid sinus, we are suggesting that the sinus may be a site of blood viscosity transduction. Given the presence on both the red blood cells and well as the vessel walls, a mutation of the PIEZO receptor may associate comorbid conditions such as anemia with cardiovascular disease that markedly alters blood viscosity–something we see when seeking links in genotype with phenotype. A mutation in the PIEZO receptor that affects the ability to accurately capture the fluid dynamics inside the sinus can alter feedback mechanisms mediated by the autonomic nervous system. This, in turn, can lead to a cardiovascular response that does not appropriately meet the real blood flow and metabolic needs of the patient.
Consider a theoretical mutation in the PIEZO1 receptor where the decrease in blood viscosity with decreased hematocrit is a well-described association (
In patients with aberrant blood viscosity of various etiologies, optimization of rheologic parameters, in addition to titrating to pressures, may enable more patient-specific management of blood flow. When trying to understand the physiological machinery the human body uses to detect and maintain hematologic homeostasis, clinicians may better mimic what the autonomic nervous system does to optimize viscosity and, therefore, perfusion. In emulating the apparent physiology utilized at the sinus to characterize blood’s viscometric and shear stress properties, we can design devices that better aid management of patients with compromised blood delivery, or mitigate the effects pathophysiologic shear patterns have on the carotid vessel walls. Certainly, the fact that the location of the carotid vessels in the neck lends itself to easy visualization by non-invasive methods, including ultrasound, facilitates this. By using parameters like sinus geometry and blood velocity that can be easily obtained by a Doppler scan, recent machine learning algorithms based on deep learning can be used to guide physicians. Administration of blood products, blood expanders, and other agents to either increase or decrease blood viscosity can be titrated to specific WSS parameters and, ultimately, affect viscosity homeostasis.
Statements
Author contributions
AI and CB contributed to the conceptualization, writing (original draft), manuscript review, and editing. RN, TB, DN, and NP contributed to conceptualization, manuscript review, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
References
1
AndaniR.KhanY. S. (2020). “Anatomy, head and neck, carotid sinus,” in StatPearls, (Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing).
2
AndolfoI.RosatoB. E.MannaF.De RosaG.MarraR.GambaleA.et al (2020). Gain-of-function mutations in PIEZO1 directly impair hepatic iron metabolism via the inhibition of the BMP/SMADs pathway.Am. J. Hematol.95188–197. 10.1002/ajh.25683
3
ArzaniA. (2018). Accounting for residence-time in blood rheology models: do we really need non-Newtonian blood flow modelling in large arteries?J. R. Soc. Interface15:20180486. 10.1098/rsif.2018.0486
4
BaiT.LiY.XiaJ.JiangY.ZhangL.WangH.et al (2017). Piezo2: a candidate biomarker for visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome?J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil.23453–463. 10.5056/jnm16114
5
BargerA. C.FarhiE. R.CantJ. R. (1984). Modulation of renal baroreceptor function by catecholamines and salt intake in the conscious dog.Clin. Exp. Hypertens. A6287–298. 10.3109/10641968409062566
6
BeechD. J.KalliA. C. (2019). Force sensing by piezo channels in cardiovascular health and disease.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.392228–2239. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313348
7
BernardiM. H.WahrmannM.DworschakM.KietaiblC.RistlR.Edlinger-StangerM.et al (2019). Carotid artery blood flow velocities during open-heart surgery and its association with delirium: a prospective, observational pilot study.Medicine (Baltimore)98:e18234. 10.1097/MD.0000000000018234
8
BilgiC.AtalikK. (2019). Numerical investigation of the effects of blood rheology and wall elasticity in abdominal aortic aneurysm under pulsatile flow conditions.Biorheology5651–71. 10.3233/BIR-180202
9
BilgiC.AtalikK. (2020). Effects of blood viscoelasticity on pulsatile hemodynamics in arterial aneurysms.J. Nonnewtonian Fluid Mech.279:104263. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.104263
10
BowersA. S.ReidH. L.GreenidgeA.LandisC.ReidM. (2013). Blood viscosity and the expression of inflammatory and adhesion markers in homozygous sickle cell disease subjects with chronic leg ulcers.PLoS One8:e68929. 10.1371/journal.pone.0068929
11
BowersA. S. A.DuncanW. W.PeppleD. J. (2018). Erythrocyte aggregation and blood viscosity is similar in homozygous sickle cell disease patients with and without leg ulcers.Int. J. Angiol.2735–38. 10.1055/s-0037-1608901
12
BuyanN.AkcaboyM.GoktasT.KulaS.NazlielB.CakarN.et al (2017). Effects of whole blood viscosity and plasma NOx on cardiac function and cerebral blood flow in children with chronic kidney disease.Turk. J. Med. Sci.471482–1491. 10.3906/sag-1609-33
13
CahalanS. M.LukacsV.RanadeS. S.ChienS.BandellM.PatapoutianA. (2015). Piezo1 links mechanical forces to red blood cell volume.Elife4:e07370. 10.7554/eLife.07370
14
CekirdekciE. I.BuganB. (2020). Whole blood viscosity in microvascular angina and coronary artery disease: significance and utility.Rev. Port. Cardiol.3917–23. 10.1016/j.repc.2019.04.008
15
CelikT.YilmazM. I.BaltaS.OzturkC.UnalH. U.AparciM.et al (2017). The relationship between plasma whole blood viscosity and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease.Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost.23663–670. 10.1177/1076029616634888
16
ChenX.KimJ. K.Sala-MercadoJ. A.HammondR. L.SwamyG.ScisloT. J.et al (2007). Identification of the total peripheral resistance baroreflex impulse response from spontaneous hemodynamic variability: validation by chronic arterial baroreceptor denervation.Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.20071051–1054. 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352475
17
ChengA. L.PahlevanN. M.RinderknechtD. G.WoodJ. C.GharibM. (2018a). Experimental investigation of the effect of non-Newtonian behavior of blood flow in the Fontan circulation.Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids68184–192. 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.12.009
18
ChengA. L.PahlevanN. M.WoodJ. C. (2018b). Non-newtonian behavior significantly affects hemodynamic efficiency in a four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance Fontan model.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.71:A622.
19
ChengA. L.WeeC. P.PahlevanN. M.WoodJ. C. (2019). A 4D flow MRI evaluation of the impact of shear-dependent fluid viscosity on in vitro Fontan circulation flow.Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.317H1243–H1253.
20
ChevalierG.SinatraS. T.OschmanJ. L.DelanyR. M. (2013). Earthing (grounding) the human body reduces blood viscosity-a major factor in cardiovascular disease.J. Altern. Complement Med.19102–110. 10.1089/acm.2011.0820
21
ChienS. (1975). Biophysical behavior of red cells in suspensions.Red Blood Cell21031–1133. 10.1016/b978-0-12-677202-9.50019-8
22
CibisM.PottersW. V.SelwanessM.GijsenF. J.FrancoO. H.Arias LorzaA. M.et al (2016). Relation between wall shear stress and carotid artery wall thickening MRI versus CFD.J. Biomech.49735–741. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.004
23
ColemanP. R.LayA. J.TingK. K.ZhaoY.LiJ.JarrahS.et al (2020). YAP and the RhoC regulator ARHGAP18, are required to mediate flow-dependent endothelial cell alignment.Cell Commun. Signal.18:18. 10.1186/s12964-020-0511-7
24
ColeridgeH. M.ColeridgeJ. C. (1980). Cardiovascular afferents involved in regulation of peripheral vessels.Annu. Rev. Physiol.42413–427. 10.1146/annurev.ph.42.030180.002213
25
CosteB. (2012). [Piezo proteins form a new class of mechanically activated ion channels].Med. Sci. (Paris)281056–1057. 10.1051/medsci/20122812012
26
CosteB.MathurJ.SchmidtM.EarleyT. J.RanadeS.PetrusM. J.et al (2010). Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels.Science33055–60. 10.1126/science.1193270
27
DaiY.QianY.ZhangM.LiY.LvP.TangX.et al (2019). Associations between local haemodynamics and carotid intraplaque haemorrhage with different stenosis severities: a preliminary study based on MRI and CFD.J. Clin. Neurosci.66220–225. 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.041
28
de VecchisR.CiccarelliA.CioppaC. (2010). Intima-media thickness of internal carotid arteries and total carotid plaque area: two surrogate endpoints of which the former has to be considered a weaker putative measure of subclinical atherosclerosis compared with the latter.J. Cardiovasc. Med. (Hagerstown)11:325. 10.2459/01.JCM.0000369376.83887.7b
29
DemolombeS.DupratF.HonoreE.PatelA. (2013). Slower Piezo1 inactivation in dehydrated hereditary stomatocytosis (xerocytosis).Biophys. J.105833–834. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.07.018
30
DingZ.WangK.LiJ.CongX. (2001). Flow field and oscillatory shear stress in a tuning-fork-shaped model of the average human carotid bifurcation.J. Biomech.341555–1562. 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00148-8
31
DongJ.WongK. K.TuJ. (2013). Hemodynamics analysis of patient-specific carotid bifurcation: a CFD model of downstream peripheral vascular impedance.Int. J. Numer. Method. Biomed. Eng.29476–491. 10.1002/cnm.2529
32
DouguetD.PatelA.XuA.VanhoutteP. M.HonoreE. (2019). Piezo ion channels in cardiovascular mechanobiology.Trends Pharmacol. Sci.40956–970. 10.1016/j.tips.2019.10.002
33
DupireJ.SocolM.ViallatA. (2012). Full dynamics of a red blood cell in shear flow.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10920808–20813. 10.1073/pnas.1210236109
34
EliasM. F.TorresR. V.DaveyA. (2019). Carotid artery blood flow velocities and cognitive performance: forecasting cognitive decline.Am. J. Hypertens.32237–239. 10.1093/ajh/hpy184
35
EnginM.GuvencO. (2020). Investigation of the predictive values of triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio and whole blood viscosity with regard to severe peripheral or carotid artery disease in patients scheduled for coronary bypass.Heart Surg. Forum23E310–E314. 10.1532/hsf.2991
36
FengB.GuoT. (2019). Visceral pain from colon and rectum: the mechanotransduction and biomechanics.J. Neural Transm. (Vienna).127415–429. 10.1007/s00702-019-02088-8
37
Garcia CallejoF. J.De Paula VernettaC.Platero ZamarrenoA.OrtsA. M.Velert VilaM. M.Morera PerezC.et al (2006). [Blood viscosity profile in rapidly progressive sensorineural hearing loss with positive Western-blot].Acta Otorrinolaringol. Esp.5790–95. 10.1016/s0001-6519(06)78668-x
38
GatesP. E.GurungA.MazzaroL.AizawaK.ElyasS.StrainW. D.et al (2018). Measurement of wall shear stress exerted by flowing blood in the human carotid artery: ultrasound doppler velocimetry and echo particle image velocimetry.Ultrasound Med. Biol.441392–1401. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.02.013
39
GimbroneM. A.Jr.Garcia-CardenaG. (2016). Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis.Circ. Res.118620–636. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306301
40
GlickG.CovellJ. W. (1968). Relative importance of the carotid and aortic baroreceptors in the reflex control of heart rate.Am. J. Physiol.214955–961. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1968.214.5.955
41
GoddiA.BortolottoC.FiorinaI.RacitiM. V.FanizzaM.TurpiniE.et al (2017). High-frame rate vector flow imaging of the carotid bifurcation.Insights Imaging8319–328. 10.1007/s13244-017-0554-5
42
GodwinL.TariqM. A.CraneJ. S. (2020). “Histology, capillary,” in StatPearls, (Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing).
43
GudmundssonM.NordborgE.BengtssonB. A.BjelleA. (1993). Plasma viscosity in giant cell arteritis as a predictor of disease activity.Ann. Rheum. Dis.52104–109. 10.1136/ard.52.2.104
44
GulevskaiaT. S.MorgunovV. A.AnufrievP. L. (2007). [Carotid sinus atherosclerosis].Arkh. Patol.6925–32. 10.1016/0021-9150(89)90155-x
45
GuoS.JiangP.LiuJ.YangX.JiangC.LiY.et al (2018). A comparative CFD analysis of common carotid fusiform aneurysm in canine models and vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysm in human patients.Int. Angiol.3732–40. 10.23736/S0392-9590.17.03869-X
46
HildesheimerM.BlochF.MuchnikC.RubinsteinM. (1990). Blood viscosity and sensorineural hearing loss.Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.116820–823. 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870070068012
47
HirataY.SakataN.InoueT.YasumoriK.YasakaM.OkadaY. (2011). Histopathological features with angiographic correlates of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion: impact of plaque compositions. Clinical article.J. Neurosurg.115350–358. 10.3171/2011.3.JNS101434
48
HuthE. J.MurrayT. J. (2006). Medicine in Quotations : Views of Health and Disease Through the Ages.Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians.
49
IraceC.CorteseC.FiaschiE.CaralloC.FarinaroE.GnassoA. (2004). Wall shear stress is associated with intima-media thickness and carotid atherosclerosis in subjects at low coronary heart disease risk.Stroke35464–468. 10.1161/01.STR.0000111597.34179.47
50
IskanderA. J.NaftalovichR.YangX. (2020). The carotid sinus acts as a mechanotransducer of shear oscillation rather than a baroreceptor.Med. Hypotheses134:109441. 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109441
51
JamaatiH.NazariM.DarooeiR.GhafariT.RaoufyM. R. (2016). Role of shear stress in ventilator-induced lung injury.Lancet Respir. Med.4e41–e42. 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30159-X
52
JungJ. H.ChaeY. J.LeeD. H.ChoY. I.KoM. M.ParkS. K.et al (2017). Changes in whole blood viscosity during hemodialysis and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease.Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc.65285–297. 10.3233/CH-16183
53
KamatM. A.BlackshawJ. A.YoungR.SurendranP.BurgessS.DaneshJ.et al (2019). PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations.Bioinformatics354851–4853. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz469
54
KarnerG.PerktoldK.HoferM.LiepschD. (1999). Flow characteristics in an anatomically realistic compliant carotid artery bifurcation model.Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin.2171–185. 10.1080/10255849908907986
55
KatakamiN. (2016). Utility of carotid wall shear stress as a predictor of coronary atherosclerosis.J. Atheroscler. Thromb.23290–291. 10.5551/jat.ED029
56
KenyeresP.JuricskayI.TarsolyP.KesmarkyG.MuhlD.TothK.et al (2008). Low hematocrit per blood viscosity ratio as a mortality risk factor in coronary heart disease.Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc.3851–56.
57
KhanM. O.SteinmanD. A.Valen-SendstadK. (2017). Non-Newtonian versus numerical rheology: practical impact of shear-thinning on the prediction of stable and unstable flows in intracranial aneurysms.Int. J. Numer. Method Biomed. Eng.33. 10.1002/cnm.2836
58
KlugP. P.LessinL. S.RadiceP. (1974). Rheological aspects of sickle cell disease.Arch. Intern. Med.133577–590. 10.1001/archinte.1974.00320160071007
59
KuD. N.GiddensD. P. (1983). Pulsatile flow in a model carotid bifurcation.Arteriosclerosis331–39. 10.1161/01.atv.3.1.31
60
KuD. N.GiddensD. P. (1987). Laser Doppler anemometer measurements of pulsatile flow in a model carotid bifurcation.J. Biomech.20407–421. 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90048-0
61
KuD. N.GiddensD. P.PhillipsD. J.StrandnessD. E.Jr. (1985a). Hemodynamics of the normal human carotid bifurcation: in vitro and in vivo studies.Ultrasound Med. Biol.1113–26. 10.1016/0301-5629(85)90003-1
62
KuD. N.GiddensD. P.ZarinsC. K.GlagovS. (1985b). Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress.Arteriosclerosis5293–302. 10.1161/01.atv.5.3.293
63
KucukalE.ManY.HillA.LiuS.BodeA.AnR.et al (2020). Whole blood viscosity and red blood cell adhesion: potential biomarkers for targeted and curative therapies in sickle cell disease.Am. J. Hematol.951246–1256. 10.1002/ajh.25933
64
LeeS. W.SteinmanD. A. (2007). On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation.J. Biomech. Eng.129273–278. 10.1115/1.2540836
65
LeeU. Y.KimC. I.ChungG. H.JungJ.KwakH. S. (2020). Hemodynamic changes in the carotid artery after infusion of normal saline using computational fluid dynamics.Diagnostics (Basel)10:473. 10.3390/diagnostics10070473
66
LeisserC.KaufmannT. A.FeltgenN.SchumacherM.SchmoorC.MeckelS. (2015). Distribution of internal carotid artery plaque locations among patients with central retinal artery occlusion in the Eagle study population.Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.2531227–1230. 10.1007/s00417-014-2804-2
67
LewisA. H.CuiA. F.McDonaldM. F.GrandlJ. (2017). Transduction of repetitive mechanical stimuli by Piezo1 and Piezo2 ion channels.Cell Rep.192572–2585. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.079
68
LewisA. H.GrandlJ. (2015). Mechanical sensitivity of Piezo1 ion channels can be tuned by cellular membrane tension.Elife4:e12088. 10.7554/eLife.12088
69
LiJ.HouB.BeechD. J. (2015). Endothelial Piezo1: life depends on it.Channels (Austin)91–2. 10.4161/19336950.2014.986623
70
LiJ.HouB.TumovaS.MurakiK.BrunsA.LudlowM. J.et al (2014). Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force.Nature515279–282. 10.1038/nature13701
71
LiuZ.ZhaoY.WangX.ZhangH.CuiY.DiaoY.et al (2016). Low carotid artery wall shear stress is independently associated with brain white-matter hyperintensities and cognitive impairment in older patients.Atherosclerosis24778–86. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.02.003
72
LoweG. D. (1992). Blood viscosity and cardiovascular disease.Thromb. Haemost.67494–498. 10.1055/s-0038-1648479
73
LuD.KassabG. S. (2011). Role of shear stress and stretch in vascular mechanobiology.J. R. Soc. Interface81379–1385. 10.1098/rsif.2011.0177
74
MalekA. M.AlperS. L.IzumoS. (1999). Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.JAMA2822035–2042. 10.1001/jama.282.21.2035
75
MarshallI.ZhaoS.PapathanasopoulouP.HoskinsP.XuY. (2004). MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models.J. Biomech.37679–687. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.032
76
McCainM. L.ParkerK. K. (2011). Mechanotransduction: the role of mechanical stress, myocyte shape, and cytoskeletal architecture on cardiac function.Pflugers Arch.46289–104. 10.1007/s00424-011-0951-4
77
MilosR.DejanP.NenadF. (2011). Mining data from CFD simulation for aneurysm and carotid bifurcation models.Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.20118311–8314. 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6092049
78
MukhopadhyayS.StowersL. (2020). Choosing to urinate. Circuits and mechanisms underlying voluntary urination.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.60129–135. 10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.004
79
MunsterA. B.ThaparA.DaviesA. H. (2016). History of carotid stroke.Stroke47e66–e69. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012044
80
MurthyS. E.DubinA. E.PatapoutianA. (2017). Piezos thrive under pressure: mechanically activated ion channels in health and disease.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.18771–783. 10.1038/nrm.2017.92
81
NakanishiN.SuzukiK.TataraK. (2004). Haematocrit and risk of development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged Japanese men.Diabet. Med.21476–482. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01152.x
82
NguyenK. T.ClarkC. D.ChancellorT. J.PapavassiliouD. V. (2008). Carotid geometry effects on blood flow and on risk for vascular disease.J. Biomech.4111–19. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.08.012
83
NobleP. B.PascoeC. D.LanB.ItoS.KistemakerL. E.TatlerA. L.et al (2014). Airway smooth muscle in asthma: linking contraction and mechanotransduction to disease pathogenesis and remodelling.Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther.2996–107. 10.1016/j.pupt.2014.07.005
84
NwoseE. U. (2010). Whole blood viscosity assessment issues IV: prevalence in acute phase inflammation.N. Am. J. Med. Sci.2353–358. 10.4297/najms.2010.2353
85
OuisuwanS.BuranakarlC. (2005). Effects of cyclosporin A on blood pressure, baroreceptor reflex and renal function in dogs.Vet. Res. Commun.29201–213. 10.1023/b:verc.0000047507.85689.90
86
PerktoldK.ReschM.FlorianH. (1991). Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model.J. Biomech. Eng.113464–475. 10.1115/1.2895428
87
PerssonP. B.KirchheimH. R. (1991). Baroreceptor Reflexes : Integrative Functions and Clinical Aspects.New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
88
PetersS. A.WoodwardM.RumleyA.Tunstall-PedoeH. D.LoweG. D. (2017). Plasma and blood viscosity in the prediction of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort Study.Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol.24161–167. 10.1177/2047487316672004
89
PorzionatoA.MacchiV.SteccoC.De CaroR. (2019). The carotid sinus nerve-structure, function, and clinical implications.Anat. Rec. (Hoboken)302575–587. 10.1002/ar.23829
90
QuemadaD. (1981). A rheological model for studying the hematocrit dependence of red cell-red cell and red cell-protein interactions in blood.Biorheology18501–516. 10.3233/bir-1981-183-615
91
RetailleauK.DupratF.ArhatteM.RanadeS. S.PeyronnetR.MartinsJ. R.et al (2015). Piezo1 in smooth muscle cells is involved in hypertension-dependent arterial remodeling.Cell Rep.131161–1171. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.072
92
RichardsR. S.NwoseE. U. (2010). Blood viscosity at different stages of diabetes pathogenesis.Br. J. Biomed. Sci.6767–70. 10.1080/09674845.2010.11730293
93
RisoeC.TanW.SmisethO. A. (1994). Effect of carotid sinus baroreceptor reflex on hepatic and splenic vascular capacitance in vagotomized dogs.Am. J. Physiol.266(4 Pt 2) H1528–H1533. 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.266.4.H1528
94
RodeB.ShiJ.EndeshN.DrinkhillM. J.WebsterP. J.LotteauS. J.et al (2017). Piezo1 channels sense whole body physical activity to reset cardiovascular homeostasis and enhance performance.Nat. Commun.8:350. 10.1038/s41467-017-00429-3
95
SabaL.BhavsarA. V.GuptaA.MtuiE. E.GiambroneA. E.BaradaranH.et al (2015). Automated calcium burden measurement in internal carotid artery plaque with CT: a hierarchical adaptive approach.Int. Angiol.34290–305.
96
SanzeniA.KattaS.PetzoldB.PruittB. L.GoodmanM. B.VergassolaM. (2019). Somatosensory neurons integrate the geometry of skin deformation and mechanotransduction channels to shape touch sensing.Elife8:e43226. 10.7554/eLife.43226
97
SazonovaO. V.IsenbergB. C.HerrmannJ.LeeK. L.PurwadaA.ValentineA. D.et al (2015). Extracellular matrix presentation modulates vascular smooth muscle cell mechanotransduction.Matrix Biol.4136–43. 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.11.001
98
SchiapaccassaA.MaranhaoP. A.de SouzaM.PanazzoloD. G.Nogueira NetoJ. F.BouskelaE.et al (2019). 30-days effects of vildagliptin on vascular function, plasma viscosity, inflammation, oxidative stress, and intestinal peptides on drug-naive women with diabetes and obesity: a randomized head-to-head metformin-controlled study.Diabetol. Metab. Syndr.11:70. 10.1186/s13098-019-0466-2
99
SkrettebergP. T.BodegardJ.KjeldsenS. E.ErikssenG.ThaulowE.SandvikL.et al (2010). Interaction between inflammation and blood viscosity predicts cardiovascular mortality.Scand. Cardiovasc. J.44107–112. 10.1080/14017430903171248
100
SloopG. D.WeidmanJ. J.St CyrJ. A. (2018). Perspective: interesterified triglycerides, the recent increase in deaths from heart disease, and elevated blood viscosity.Ther. Adv. Cardiovasc. Dis.1223–28. 10.1177/1753944717745507
101
SongS. H.KimJ. H.LeeJ. H.YunY. M.ChoiD. H.KimH. Y. (2017). Elevated blood viscosity is associated with cerebral small vessel disease in patients with acute ischemic stroke.BMC Neurol.17:20. 10.1186/s12883-017-0808-3
102
StaleyJ. R.BlackshawJ.KamatM. A.EllisS.SurendranP.SunB. B.et al (2016). PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype-phenotype associations.Bioinformatics323207–3209. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw373
103
SuiB.GaoP.LinY.JingL.SunS.QinH. (2015). Hemodynamic parameters distribution of upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques in carotid artery with different stenosis: a MRI and CFD study.Acta Radiol.56347–354. 10.1177/0284185114526713
104
SyedaR.XuJ.DubinA. E.CosteB.MathurJ.HuynhT.et al (2015). Chemical activation of the mechanotransduction channel Piezo1.Elife4:e07369. 10.7554/eLife.07369
105
ThurstonG. B. (1973). Frequency and shear rate dependence of viscoelasticity of human blood.Biorheology10375–381. 10.3233/bir-1973-10311
106
ThurstonG. B. (1976). The effects of frequency of oscillatory flow on the impedance of rigid, blood-filled tubes.Biorheology13191–199. 10.3233/bir-1976-13306
107
ThurstonG. B. (1979). Rheological parameters for the viscosity viscoelasticity and thixotropy of blood.Biorheology16149–162. 10.3233/bir-1979-16303
108
TruskeyG. A.YuanF.KatzD. F. (2004). Transport Phenomena in Biological Systems.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
109
WeberU.GlassfordN. J.EastwoodG. M.BellomoR.HiltonA. K. (2016). A Pilot assessment of carotid and brachial artery blood flow estimation using ultrasound doppler in cardiac surgery patients.J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.30141–148. 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.06.025
110
WeiH.ChengA. L.PahlevanN. M. (2020). On the significance of blood flow shear-rate-dependency in modeling of Fontan hemodynamics.Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids841–4. 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2020.05.011
111
WeiZ.Singh-GryzbonS.TrustyP. M.HuddlestonC.ZhangY.FogelM. A.et al (2020). Non-Newtonian effects on patient-specific modeling of fontan hemodynamics.Ann. Biomed. Eng.482204–2217. 10.1007/s10439-020-02527-8
112
WeinbaumS.DuanY.ThiM. M.YouL. (2011). An integrative review of mechanotransduction in endothelial, epithelial (Renal) and dendritic cells (Osteocytes).Cell. Mol. Bioeng.4510–537. 10.1007/s12195-011-0179-6
113
WestcottE. B.SegalS. S. (2013). Perivascular innervation: a multiplicity of roles in vasomotor control and myoendothelial signaling.Microcirculation20217–238. 10.1111/micc.12035
114
WilsonJ. R.LanoceV.FreyM. J.FerraroN. (1990). Arterial baroreceptor control of peripheral vascular resistance in experimental heart failure.Am Heart J1191122–1130. 10.1016/s0002-8703(05)80243-1
115
WoodwardM.BrindleP.Tunstall-PedoeH.SIGN Group on Risk Estimation (2007). Adding social deprivation and family history to cardiovascular risk assessment: the ASSIGN score from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC).Heart93172–176. 10.1136/hrt.2006.108167
116
WozniakM. A.ChenC. S. (2009). Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.1034–43. 10.1038/nrm2592
117
WuJ.LewisA. H.GrandlJ. (2017a). Touch, tension, and transduction–the function and regulation of Piezo Ion Channels.Trends Biochem. Sci.4257–71. 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.004
118
WuJ.YoungM.LewisA. H.MartfeldA. N.KalmetaB.GrandlJ. (2017b). Inactivation of mechanically activated Piezo1 ion channels is determined by the C-terminal extracellular domain and the inner pore helix.Cell Rep.212357–2366. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.120
119
XuP.LiuX.ZhangH.GhistaD.ZhangD.ShiC.et al (2018). Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol.171581–1597. 10.1007/s10237-018-1045-4
120
YangJ.ZhangJ.YangH.LiK.LeiX.XuC. (2016). The potential role of Piezo2 in the mediation of visceral sensation.Neurosci. Lett.630158–163. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.07.058
121
YeleswarapuK. K. (1996). Evaluation of Continuum Models for Characterizing the Constitutive Behavior of Blood.Ph.D. Thesis. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
122
ZengW. Z.MarshallK. L.MinS.DaouI.ChapleauM. W.AbboudF. M.et al (2018). PIEZOs mediate neuronal sensing of blood pressure and the baroreceptor reflex.Science362464–467. 10.1126/science.aau6324
123
ZhangB.MaY.DingF. (2018). Evaluation of spatial distribution and characterization of wall shear stress in carotid sinus based on two-dimensional color Doppler imaging.Biomed. Eng. Online17:141. 10.1186/s12938-018-0589-y
124
ZhangC.XieS.LiS.PuF.DengX.FanY.et al (2012). Flow patterns and wall shear stress distribution in human internal carotid arteries: the geometric effect on the risk for stenoses.J. Biomech.4583–89. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.001
125
ZhangD.XuP.QiaoH.LiuX.LuoL.HuangW.et al (2018). Carotid DSA based CFD simulation in assessing the patient with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a preliminary study.Biomed. Eng. Online17:31. 10.1186/s12938-018-0465-9
126
ZhangH.LiuH.DongY.WangJ.ZhaoY.CuiY.et al (2018). Low carotid wall shear stress independently accelerates the progression of cognitive impairment and white matter lesions in the elderly.Oncotarget911402–11413. 10.18632/oncotarget.23191
127
ZhangY.FurusawaT.SiaS. F.UmezuM.QianY. (2013). Proposition of an outflow boundary approach for carotid artery stenosis CFD simulation.Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin.16488–494. 10.1080/10255842.2011.625358
128
ZhengW.GrachevaE. O.BagriantsevS. N. (2019). A hydrophobic gate in the inner pore helix is the major determinant of inactivation in mechanosensitive Piezo channels.Elife8:e44003. 10.7554/eLife.44003
129
ZimmerH. G. (2004). Heinrich Ewald Hering and the carotid sinus reflex.Clin. Cardiol.27485–486. 10.1002/clc.4960270813
Summary
Keywords
baroreceptor, blood flow, viscosity, PIEZO receptor, carotid sinus
Citation
Iskander A, Bilgi C, Naftalovich R, Hacihaliloglu I, Berkman T, Naftalovich D and Pahlevan N (2021) The Rheology of the Carotid Sinus: A Path Toward Bioinspired Intervention. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:678048. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.678048
Received
08 March 2021
Accepted
05 May 2021
Published
10 June 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Jian Yang, Wuyi University, China
Reviewed by
Nitesh Kumar, Manipal Institute of Technology, India; Salvatore Andrea Pullano, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Italy
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Iskander, Bilgi, Naftalovich, Hacihaliloglu, Berkman, Naftalovich and Pahlevan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Andrew Iskander, andrew.iskander@wmchealth.org
This article was submitted to Bionics and Biomimetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.