Abstract
Bone is a preferred site for both primary and metastasis tumors. Current diagnosis of osteopathia typically relies on noninvasive skeleton radiography technology. However, due to the limited resolution of ionizing radiation, accurate diagnosis and effective identification impairment areas are still lacking. Near-infrared (NIR) bioimaging, especially in the NIR-II (1000-1700 nm) regions, can provide high sensitivity and spatiotemporal resolution bioimaging compared to the conventional radiography. Thus, NIR bioimaging affords intraoperative visualization and imaging-guided surgery, aiming to overcome challenges associated with theranostics of osteopathia and bone tumors. The present review aimed to summarize the latest evidence on the use of NIR probes for the targeting bone imaging. We further highlight the recent advances in bone photoX (X presents thermal, dynamic, and immuno) therapy through NIR probes, in particular combination with other customized therapeutic agents could provide high-efficiency treatment for bone tumors.
Introduction
Bone tumors are generally classified into orthotopic tumors and metastatic tumors. Osteosarcoma is the most common orthotopic bone cancer and the third most common cancer among children and adolescents (). Bone is also a preferred site for tumor hematogenous metastasis such as breast, prostate, or lung cancer. There are more than 600,000 cases of bone metastases diagnosed every year in the United States in older adults (>40 years of age) (). Hence, it is necessary to diagnose the disease in an early stage and personalize treatments based on patient’s individual variability (). Currently, varieties of imaging techniques are used in the clinical practice, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission tomography (SPECT). However, CT and MRI often require high doses of contrast agents; PET and SPECT require radioactive tracers, increasing the safety concern (; Tsien, 2003). Thus, a noninvasive, accurate, and efficient diagnosis and therapeutic response monitoring of bone cancer are urgently needed in order to meet the needs of the clinician.
Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging (700–1700 nm), which benefits from minimal tissue absorption, scattering, and auto-fluorescence, is favorable for in vivo imaging with a high signal-to-background ratio (SBR) (Teitelbaum, 2000; ; ; Zhu et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2017). Compared to traditional diagnosis modalities, NIR fluorescence imaging offers advantages in biosafety, imaging resolution, and speed (). This technique could integrate multiplexing of signals and evaluate interactions between bone-specific molecular targets, the microenvironment, and tumor metastasis (). Recently, the discovery of NIR-II (1,000–1700 nm) imaging modality further increases the penetration depth and imaging contrast compared with NIR-I (700–1,000 nm) window (Zhu et al., 2018; Zhu S. et al., 2019), providing improved in vivo imaging quality for deep tissue visualization (Xu et al., 2021).
There are several unsolved issues in traditional imaging modalities. First, overwhelming binding affinity of the imaging probe results in excessive deposition of the probe in the bone cortex, thus blurring the imaging resolution of cancellous bone (). This phenomenon can affect the precise assessment of the bone state and fail to diagnose the tiny lesions (). Second, bone disease and other relative diseases may affect the local skeletal condition in terms of bone mineral density, organizational change, and other characteristic diagnostic markers, further increasing the difficulties in disease diagnosis (). The collection of per-lesion basis image features is the vital evidence, which can be used to determine lesion-wise response (Yip and Jeraj, 2014). At last, it is still difficult to accurately differentiate between osteogenic and osteoclastic states in the lesion marginal area which is the most desirable information for clinicians (). These phenomena hinder the application of imaging diagnosis in clinic. The advent of the NIR fluorescent probe promises to lead bone imaging diagnosis out of the current predicament. This review article starts with the bone physiology and bone tumor microenvironment and then summarizes the synthesis and categories of imaging mechanism of current NIR probes with bone targeting ability. We further discuss the bone cancer diagnosis by NIR probes and photoX therapy of bone cancer by NIR probes. The challenges of bone-targeting NIR probes are also discussed.
The Bone Physiology and Bone Tumor Microenvironment
Bone is composed of three main cell types, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes, which are responsible for maintaining structure through precise remodeling (). Osteoblasts, derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the bone marrow, could synthesize and secrete the organic bone matrix. The organic bone matrix is composed of type I collagen (90%), non-collagenous proteins, water, and hydroxyapatite (). Mature osteoclasts derived from monocytes could solubilize the bone matrix via acidification and also resorb mineralized bone (). Osteoclasts bind to the bone matrix via integrin receptors in the osteoclast membrane. Osteoclasts express cathepsin K and other enzymes that aid the acidified resorption of bone (Teitelbaum, 2000). The osteocytes lie in lacunae within the mineralized bone and have extensive filopodial processes in the canaliculi of mineralized bone (). Whereas the earliest functions proposed for osteocytes were mechanosensing and removal of their perilacunar matrix, an unanticipated function was the osteocyte-producing factors that could regulate both bone cells and distant organs (e.g., kidney) (). Besides cell composition, the primary mineral content of bone is hydroxyapatite [Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2], which is approximately 200 Å in their largest dimension. The calcium- and phosphate-binding proteins, including osteocalcin, osteopontin, and bone sialoprotein, contribute to regulate hydroxyapatite crystallization and ordered deposition of minerals ().
The bone microenvironment is composed of bone marrow and a mineralized extracellular matrix (Yang et al., 2020). The most exceptional aspect of the bone metastasis biology is that the developmental sites include the host hematopoietically active red marrow () and the subversion of the osteolysis and osteogenesis processes (). Nonetheless, the tumor microenvironment (TME) is much more complicated than bone microenvironment, including molecular elements, signaling pathways, and mechanical properties (). In addition, the bone marrow MSCs in the tumor microenvironment help tumor cells evade the immune attack by avoiding the immune recognition and instigating an immunosuppressive TME (; ). Biological signals contribute to the pathogenesis of cancer (), while physical factors (tissue architecture, matrix stiffness) change phenotypes of cancer cells (). Collectively, much less is known on the molecular mechanism of bone TME. Investigating these parameters is essential to understanding the disease and guiding the development of future therapeutic strategies.
Fluorescence Probes With Targeting Bone Characteristic
Synthesis
There are 50–70% inorganic substances in bone, among which hydroxyapatite (HA) is the main component of inorganic minerals in bone tissue and is also the most important target for bone fluorescence imaging. Anionic ligands such as phosphate- and carboxylate-rich compounds were designed to chelate to the Ca2+ of bone. Different targeting groups have different ligands, which were conjugated with fluorescence dyes to endow these molecules with bone-targeting properties (Gao et al., 2020).
Bisphosphonates (BPs) and analogs are widely used bone-targeting ligands. Due to their high affinity to Ca2+ ions, BPs could rapidly localize into bone minerals (). The P-C-P moiety is responsible for the strong affinity between BPs and hydroxyapatite through tridentate-binding sites, increasing the resistance of BPs to chemical and enzymatic degradation (; ). To label bone-binding ligands with NIR probes, the cross-linked BP nanoparticles were covalently conjugated with NHS-activated NIR dye Cy7 (; ). The BP particles, which enhanced photostability and biocompatibility of the fluorescence dye, possessed higher inhibition activity than alendronate () and exhibited affinity to the chicken embryo bones () (Figure 1). Further research demonstrated the poly(MA-PEG-BP) NPs prolonged half-life and preferential uptake in areas of bone with high activity ().
FIGURE 1
Aspartic acid-rich polypeptides, such as Asp8 (Wang et al., 2007), Asp7 (), Asp6 (Takahashi et al., 2008), and (AspSerSer)6 (Zhang et al., 2012), have bone-targeting characteristics. This bone-specific targeting is based on the peptide’s high affinity for hydroxyapatite, which is related to the physicochemical properties of acidic amino acid in polypeptide (Takahashi, 2016). Asp8 has a stronger affinity for smaller lattices than mature lattices, which may be related to its folded structure (Wang et al., 2007). In particular, octapeptide Asp8 is a commonly used targeting ligand for bone-resorption surface, preferentially for the binding of highly crystallized hydroxyapatite (Wang et al., 2007). The strength of its binding depends on the density of aspartic acid unit, and higher density results in stronger affinity with bone. Although the bone-binding strength of Asp8 is relatively weaker than BPs (Wang et al., 2007), the facile synthesis and chemical modification of the Asp8 are essential for practical applications. Wang et al. used the Asp8 as a bone-targeting ligand to deliver NIR photothermal agents (dendritic platinumcopper alloy nanoparticles) to bone tissues for targeting photothermal therapy (PTT) of bone tumors (Wang et al., 2017). Using the affinities between iminodiacetate and phosphonates for bone minerals, two types of bifunctional contrast agents were recently reported to target bone tissue (Zhang et al., 2020; ). In order to modify the physicochemical properties of fluorescence dye, the phosphonates or other affinities were also incorporated into the fluorophore, which promoted the bone-targeting potency and in vivo performance (; ).
Tetracycline is another hydroxyapatite-targeting compound, while its side effects limited the clinical/laboratory-scale usage (Xie et al., 2018). Currently, tetracycline derivatives are exploited to reduce the side effects of tetracycline. For example, a tetracycline derivative bound to IRDye 800CW () and a calcium-chelating tetracycline derivative (IRDye 680RD BoneTag) () were introduced to image sites of bone remodeling. Nevertheless, taking account of the side effects, there is no application of tetracycline derivatives in bone tumors.
There are other bone-targeting ligands that can be potentially applied to bone cancer imaging (e.g., succinic acid) (). In addition, a variety of carboxylate-containing ligands or polymers can also deliver the bone-targeting feature to the probes. Nanoparticles modified with nitrodiacetic acid exhibited a strong bone-binding affinity (Wang et al., 2016). The formation of bone-binding moiety depends on the spatial distance between the carboxyl groups, and nitrodiacetic acid has three-fold bone-binding affinity than nitrodipropionic acid (). Due to their high bone-binding affinity, biological safety, stability, and hydrophilicity, these bone-targeting groups are extensively used in bone-targeting imaging.
Targeting Bone Composition and Imaging Quality
For precisely discriminating bone cancer, the designed fluorescent probes should selectively target bone mineral (), osteoblast (), osteoclast (), and bone marrow (). Previous studies have proved that the charge and hydrophobicity of targeted fluorophores are essential in the biodistribution, blood circulation, organ accumulation, and clearance route of intravenously administered contrast agents (). Currently, alendronate (Ald) conjugated to the surface of DOX/Ag2S QDs, guiding the probe specifically deposited in bone mineral, while inhibiting cancer-associated osteolysis. The NIR-II fluorescence imaging could outline the delivery process of DOX (). Rare earth-doped nanoparticles (RENPs) (coated with DSPE-mPEG) showed the distribution in cancellous and compact bone with NIR-II signal, due to the unique hydroxyapatite mineral-binding ability (∼88%). In this process, the circulating leukocytes may promote the NIR-II probes into the bone (). However, the shortcoming of RENPs is its avoidable accumulation in prejudicial reticuloendothelial system and metabolism pathway in vivo like other PEG-encapsulated nanoparticles (). Tumor invasion during skeletal metastatic progression shows osteogenetic and osteolytic features. Lin et al. evaluated the conjugation of IR-783 with a synthetic modified α5-binding peptide in the α5β1L-CyTE777 probe to osteoblast cells. The results demonstrated that α5β1L-CyTE777 specifically monitored osteoblastic differentiation (). During the renal carcinoma and breast cancer metastases, the osteolytic lesion is the primary feature. A previous study showed that P800SO3 strongly bounded to active osteoclasts, allowing for visualizing osteolytic lesions under NIR-I fluorescence imaging (). As expected, the location of high osteoclastic activity was clearly marked by the probe in hind limbs and spine of mice, consistent with the histological examination. The tumor cells in bone, especially the metastasis tumor cells, preferentially travel to and colonize the epiphysis of long bones, which has massive bone marrow with a remarkably high rate of bone turnover (; ). The rich microenvironment of bone marrow facilitates survival of cancer cells and mediates drug resistance (). Chen et al. verified that small polymer nanoparticles of ∼15 nm diameter showed fast accumulation and long-term retention in bone. Further results of bone sections by confocal microscopy indicated that poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) functionalized polymer dots (Pdots-PSMA) were largely distributed in the endothelial cells of sinusoidal vessels in bone marrow () (Figure 2). Collectively, the difference of targeting the position of bone between Pdots and RENPs might depend on the diameter of nanoparticles.
FIGURE 2
Imaging quality is an important indicator to evaluate whether NIR technology can be applied in the clinical setting. With the development of bone-targeting probes, the NIR signal intensity of bone can reach 20-fold than that of surrounding tissues (). However, early generation of NIR fluorescent probes suffered from nonspecific accumulation in the soft tissues, liver, and intestines (). The newer generation of the bone-targeting probe provided high-performance intraosseous tumor imaging. The fluorescently outlined bone tumor boundary was identical to the histologically confirmed boundary (). The higher binding affinity of bone-targeting probes will afford higher SBR, thus improving the imaging quality (). However, it is difficult for cell-targeting probes to achieve comparable SBR to HA-targeting probes. In the first attempt to image osteocytes, the fluorescence intensity of the targeted cells was only 5–7 times higher than that of the control cells (). Recent investigation promoted the SBR of the bone cell–targeting probe to 18, which is sufficient to provide valuable diagnosis information (). The current NIR probes have higher sensitivity and resolution than the traditional X-ray and MR imaging modalities, potentially enabling the early diagnosis of intraosseous lesions in clinic ().
Although NIR bioimaging has shown remarkable results in bone imagingthe challenge remains that the tissue boundary is not clearly defined (). This phenomenon is partially caused by tissue scattering and limited penetration depth of NIR bioimaging (). The application of NIR-II fluorescent dye in bone imaging fundamentally overcomes the aforementioned limitations. The SBR of the NIR-II dye administrated tumor model was significantly improved, and tumor lesions less than 1 mm can be clearly detected (Zhou et al., 2020) (Figure 3). This deep penetration depth and high imaging contrast allow NIR-II probes to clearly outline the small indentation in the bone and precisely determine the status of bone osteoporosis in mice, which is more sensitive than the commonly used quantitative computed tomography (QCT) (Zhang et al., 2021). Recently, NIR-II nano-gold probes provided a relatively rapid bone deposition rate and fast excretion feature, enabling an increased penetration depth up to 6 mm () (Figure 4). Together, NIR-II probes with higher imaging quality and penetration depth are promising in bone imaging, bone cancer diagnosis, bone state judgment, etc.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
Bone Cancer Diagnosis by NIR Probes
Bone-related cancers have been divided into primary bone tumor (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma) and bone metastases (lung tumor, breast cancer, prostatic cancer, etc.) (). Currently, it is still challenging to accurately locate and diagnose the bone cancers (). The clinician commonly prefers plain radiography to diagnose malignant bone tumors. However, only obviously positive radiographic indicator to malignancy of bone tumors can promote further inspection, usually causing considerable bone damage (). At the beginning of tumor colonization, tumor cells and the bone marrow microenvironment synergistically regulate tumor growth, mainly including osteoclast activation and slightly dissolve hydroxyapatite (). When the bone-targeting probe was applied as a diagnosis method, tiny changes in bone density could be clearly visualized, providing valuable information for early diagnosis (). Furthermore, the indistinguishable boundaries of bone tumors force surgeons to strike a balance between reducing positive margin rates and preserving the function of bone (). In contrast, we hypothesize that future examination of bone tumors will rely on NIR bioimaging, providing accurate tumor margin information in both pre- and intraoperative processes.
The commonest bone cancer is osteosarcoma with rare histologic subtypes, and it is challenging to differentiate the clinicopathologic features with commoner subtypes (Whelan and Davis, 2018). Both non-targeted and targeted NIR bioimaging were applied to visualize the bone tumors. The non-targeted approach benefits bone tumors with abundant blood vessels, and typical examples are primary tumor of knee and partial metastatic tumor (Wuisman and Grunert, 1994). The targeted approach provides potential to distinguish cancer cells from normal tissue on a cellular level (). A noteworthy case was reported by Predina et al., in which a complete osteosarcoma resection was performed under the real-time NIR imaging navigation with 5 mg/kg of indocyanine green (ICG) injection (). In their follow-up report, Predina et al. documented a non-randomized, open-label study with all patients suspicious of osteosarcoma metastasis. Results indicated that bone tumors, which were difficult to be detected by traditional examination, were clearly visualized by ICG imaging, especially for the metastatic tumor with a size less than 1 cm. They further carried out a clinical trial with several sets of bone tumors to verify the preoperative NIR imaging-guided diagnosis and postoperative assessment of tumor status () (Figure 5). Although the employment of the NIR guidance system increased average surgical time, NIR bioimaging can clearly outline the anatomical structures preoperatively and intraoperatively, avoiding the unnecessary damage of nerve, blood vessel, lymph, and other adjacent tissues. In spite of the impressive output achieved, the injected doses of ICG were 10 times more than the standard clinical dosage for subcutaneous administration, which is common in the range between 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg (). In addition, another challenge is the translation of preoperative images into the patient’s physical anatomy in the clinical setting.
FIGURE 5
Bone metastasis of malignant tumors is the one of most crucial points that cause difficult treatment. A series of pathological processes occur during malignant tumor cells migrate to bone sites. These processes include tumor cells invasion and angiogenesis, tumor cells release into the vessels and/or lymphatics, implantation of tumor cells in the bone followed by their proliferation, and induction of osteolytic fracture (). It is essential to early detect and locate tiny bone metastasis to avoid further spread of tumor cells. Lim et al. synthesized a P800SO3 probe with inherent bone-targeting ability (). The P800SO3 bioimaging clearly outlined ∼3-mm bone-metastasis tumor and distinguished the tumor margin from the surrounding normal sites. They further applied P800SO3 in the examination of the bone metastasis of breast cancer in the mice model (). The metastatic tumor was fluorescently visualized in the bone marrow around the cortical bone in both the rib and proximal tibia. Odontogenic tumor is also a special type of intraosseous tumor. Morlandt applied IRDye800-labeled cetuximab antibody to target ameloblastoma in vivo and in vitro (), showing higher SBR (2.35–4.12) than the IgG group (1.34–2.40). Collectively, we suggested the noninvasive NIR fluorescence could potentially be used as a diagnostic strategy for primary bone cancer and bone metastasis in the future clinic.
Although clinical trials of NIR fluorescence imaging have produced impressive results, the penetration depth is still limited. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is also a promising noninvasive imaging modality with maximum penetration depth over several centimeters. Spirou et al. have demonstrated that PAI is capable of sensitive detection of thermally induced changes at depths of up to 30–50 mm using ex vivo liver tissue (). Photoacoustic signal has been found to be sensitive to minor variations in cortical bone density (). Further research suggested that photoacoustic imaging could differentiate cancellous and cortical bone without drilling or disrupting the pedicle, potentially allowing for spinal fusion surgery (). Jana Humbert et al. demonstrated that photoacoustic tomography monitoring of ICG-labeled liposomes in the murine bone marrow cavity provided an imaging depth over 4 mm (). The combination of PAI and fluorescence imaging will be the future direction in the diagnosis and assessment of bone metastases, targeted drug delivery, bone marrow-derived diseases, and bone physiology.
PhotoX Therapy of Bone Cancer by NIR Probes
The clinical symptoms of primary bone tumors and bone metastases include pathological fracture, neurological compression, and skeletal-related events, bringing severe physical suffering to the patient. Besides surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are widely applied in clinic, but drug resistance and considerable systemic side effects may result in tumor recurrence and endless suffering to patients (). Therefore, NIR photoX therapies (photothermal, photodynamic, photoimmuno) have been developed as effective therapeutic methods, providing minimally invasive damage to normal tissues.
Photothermal therapy is on account of the photothermal effect of photothermal transduction agents (PTAs) that can transform light energy into heat so that locally damage the plasmalemma of tumor (). Currently, NIR-responsive biomaterials have been extensively developed as PTT agents for osteosarcoma treatment and/or as bone-regenerating agents for bone repair, such as carbon dots (NIR-II) (), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (NIR-II) (), black phosphorus nanosheets (NIR-I) (Yang et al., 2018), graphene oxide (NIR-I) (), copper-based chalcogenides (NIR-I) (). Jiang et al. introduced the zoledronate as an extra targeting group while preserved the superparamagnetic iron oxide as the magnetic targeting group to enhance the osteosarcoma-targeting ability (). In vivo studies substantiated that dual-targeting groups could produce better local PTAs accumulation for PTT, significantly inhibiting the growth of breast cancer cells in the tibia. The PTT effectiveness is largely dependent on the penetration depth of applied lasers while bone tissue generally blocks the light, particularly in short wavelength. Liu et al. designed a type of graphene quantum dots (named 9T-GQD) with high-efficiency NIR-II light absorption to improve the penetration depth of PTT (). The high photothermal conversion efficacy (33.45%) of 9T-GQD could significantly reduce the applied laser power. The tumor ablation by NIR-II PTT in the mice model was confirmed by histological examination. Of note, there was negligible damage to the surrounding normal tissues.
NIR photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a high-efficiency clinical treatment strategy for bone-related tumors with minimal side effects, high biosafety, and high controllability (). The effect of PDT relies on the concentration of photosensitizer (PS) at the treatment site, thus requiring a higher targeting ability to enhance the therapeutic efficiency and reduce the administrated PS dosage (). Generally, the PS agents of PDT are efficient fluorophores, capable of both PDT and fluorescence bioimaging ability (Xu et al., 2018). Boron dipyrromethene (BODIPY), as a typical potential PS, has great advantages of intense absorption at a relatively long wavelength, long triplet excited-state lifetime, and excellent photostability (). However, the application of BODIPY is limited by its hydrophobic rigid structure (). Zhu et al. synthesized an NIR triphenylamine-grafted BODIPY derivative (BDPTPA) by the nanoprecipitation approach, thus obtaining water-soluble and stable BDPTPA NPs with high singlet oxygen yield (35.2%) and a wide absorption range (600–1,100 nm) (Zhu J. et al., 2019). The as-prepared BDPTPA NPs enabled osteosarcoma ablation both in vivo and in vitro. Clinically available ICG is considered as an impressive NIR-I dye with PDT ability (). Tsukanishi et al. designed ICG-loaded lactosomes for imaging-guided PDT (Tsukanishi et al., 2014). The deficiency of ICG-loaded nanocarriers was their long-term retention in the body circulation. Zeng et al. loaded the 4-carboxyl-butyl-triphenyl-phosphonium bromide (TPP, a mitochondria targeting group) and ICG in polyethylene imine-modified PEGylated nano-graphene oxide (GO), producing a nanoformula that could induce mitochondrial stress damage in tumor by NIR-I imaging-guided PDT (Zeng et al., 2021) (Figure 6). The nanoformula was fluorescently observed to accumulate in the tumor site 24 h post-administration, leading to the notable tumor (143b osteosarcoma) elimination with apoptosis and necrosis.
FIGURE 6
Combining PDT with PTT is a synergistic strategy for improving the treatment efficacy of cancers (). PDT/PTT combination therapy was experimentally confirmed to be effective to bone tumors. In detail, membrane damage caused by PTT can enhance the effect of singlet oxygen produced by PDT in tumor by reducing the defense capability of the membrane system (Zhu J. et al., 2019). Despite of the remarkable progress, rare imaging-guided PDT was achieved in orthotopic bone tumors, given the penetration limitation of light. Future laboratory-scale and preclinical therapeutic efforts should comprehensively consider PTT/PDT/imaging combination agents to achieve an optimal diagnosis/therapeutic outcome.
Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is an emerging therapy strategy which uses a targeting antibody chemically conjugated with a photoabsorber/photosensitizer. The laser excitation could cause the locally targeted cancer cells to swell and burst, inducing necrotic cell death. The released contents from tumor cells could promote the activation of immune response and establish the long-term immunity for destroying tumor cells (; ). NIR-PIT has been successfully applied against brain tumors through AC133mAb conjugated with IR700, efficiently targeting the AC133 + glioblastoma stem cells, inducing the rapid tumor cell death and shrinkage of tumor in nude mice (). Report has proved that NIR light (810 nm with 35.1 mW/cm2 power density) could transmit the bone with the maximum penetration thickness approximately 5 mm (; ). Nakamura et al. evaluated the PIT efficacy through pan-IR700 probe on the A431-luc-bearing tumor mice covering a bovine rib, and the positive results indicated that the NIR-PIT was potential in bone cancer therapy ().
Perspective and Challenges
Numerous novel NIR fluorophores have been developed and evaluated in bone cancer because fluorescence imaging in the near-infrared window is a highly promising technique for biomedical applications with deeper tissue penetration capability and higher SBR (Zhu S. et al., 2019). However, there are still some issues that remain to be resolved before the probes can be used in clinical diagnosis. First, current bone tumor diagnostic probes mainly target minerals (e.g., hydroxyapatite), while the tumor cell–targeting probes are still lacking (). This situation leads to the failure of probe-related drug delivery and direct treatment of the bone tumor. As a result, it is essential to develop NIR fluorophores with high targeting ability to bone cancers, and exploiting bone cancer cell–targeting probes is likely critical to precisely decide the diagnosis/therapeutic efficiency. Second, probes with immunotherapy function play an indispensable role in cancer treatment (van der Meel et al., 2019). With the development of immumo/gene bone cancer therapy (; ; Wang et al., 2020), the combination with photoX (e.g., thermal and dynamic) therapy is a promising option for bone cancer treatment. Third, new bone tumor targets need to be systematically screened. It is of great significance for clinicians to conduct early diagnosis, boundary determination, postoperative evaluation, and long-term follow-up using efficient imaging systems. Given the diversity at different stages of bone tumors, the next decade should enrich the library of targeting probes. The advances in NIR imaging modality need to be coupled with innovations in fluorophores and imaging systems, and future development on these points will provide promising options in the diagnosis and therapy of bone tumors.
Statements
Author contributions
QC and ZL summarized and wrote the article. BL, JJ, XL, WM, and SZ commented and revised the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the Department of Finance of Jilin Province, China (Grant numbers JCSZ2019378-3 and JCSZ2020304-15) and Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (20200404108YY).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
ArmstrongA. J.AnandA.EdenbrandtL.BondessonE.BjartellA.WidmarkA.et al (2018). Phase 3 Assessment of the Automated Bone Scan Index as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker of Overall Survival in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol.4 (7), 944–951. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1093
2
BaljerB. C.KolheS.ChanC. D.NicoliF.GhanbashaA.BrookesM. J.et al (2020). Advances in Image Enhancement for Sarcoma Surgery. Cancer Lett.483, 1–11. 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.03.029
3
BaoK.NasrK. A.HyunH.LeeJ. H.GravierJ.GibbsS. L.et al (2015). Charge and Hydrophobicity Effects of NIR Fluorophores on Bone-specific Imaging. Theranostics5 (6), 609–617. 10.7150/thno.11222
4
BonewaldL. F. (1999). Establishment and Characterization of an Osteocyte-like Cell Line, MLO-Y4. J. Bone Mineral Metab.17 (1), 61–65. 10.1007/s007740050066
5
BoniL.DavidG.ManganoA.DionigiG.RauseiS.SpampattiS.et al (2015). Clinical Applications of Indocyanine green (ICG) Enhanced Fluorescence in Laparoscopic Surgery. Surg. Endosc.29 (7), 2046–2055. 10.1007/s00464-014-3895-x
6
BuckD. W.2ndDumanianG. A. (2012). Bone Biology and Physiology. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.129 (6), 1314–1320. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824eca94
7
BussardK. M.OkitaN.SharkeyN.NeubergerT.WebbA.MastroA. M. (2010). Localization of Osteoblast Inflammatory Cytokines MCP-1 and VEGF to the Matrix of the Trabecula of the Femur, a Target Area for Metastatic Breast Cancer Cell Colonization. Clin. Exp. Metastasis27 (5), 331–340. 10.1007/s10585-010-9330-3
8
CarinaV.CostaV.SartoriM.BellaviaD.De LucaA.RaimondiL.et al (2019). Adjuvant Biophysical Therapies in Osteosarcoma. Cancers11 (3), 348. 10.3390/cancers11030348
9
ChenD.LiuY.ZhangZ.LiuZ.FangX.HeS.et al (2021). NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging Reveals Bone Marrow Retention of Small Polymer Nanoparticles. Nano Lett.21 (1), 798–805. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04543
10
ChoN.KoS.ShokeenM. (2021). Preclinical Development of Near-Infrared-Labeled CD38-Targeted Daratumumab for Optical Imaging of CD38 in Multiple Myeloma. Mol. Imaging Biol.23 (2), 186–195. 10.1007/s11307-020-01542-4
11
ChoN.ShokeenM. (2019). Changing Landscape of Optical Imaging in Skeletal Metastases. J. Bone Oncol.17, 100249. 10.1016/j.jbo.2019.100249
12
ClarkeB. (2008). Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology. Cjasn3 (Suppl. 3Suppl 3), S131–S139. 10.2215/cjn.04151206
13
ComşaŞ.CiuculescuF.RaicaM. (2012). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Tumor Cell Cooperation in Breast Cancer Vasculogenesis. Mol. Med. Rep.5 (5), 1175–1180. 10.3892/mmr.2012.796
14
CowlesE. A.KovarJ. L.CurtisE. T.XuH.OthmanS. F. (2013). Near-infrared Optical Imaging for Monitoring the Regeneration of Osteogenic Tissue-Engineered Constructs. BioResearch Open Access2 (3), 186–191. 10.1089/biores.2013.0005
15
DangW.LiT.LiB.MaH.ZhaiD.WangX.et al (2018). A Bifunctional Scaffold with CuFeSe2 Nanocrystals for Tumor Therapy and Bone Reconstruction. Biomaterials160, 92–106. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.020
16
DashB. S.DasS.ChenJ.-P. (2021). Photosensitizer-Functionalized Nanocomposites for Light-Activated Cancer Theranostics. Ijms22 (13), 6658. 10.3390/ijms22136658
17
de Melo-DiogoD.Pais-SilvaC.DiasD. R.MoreiraA. F.CorreiaI. J. (2017). Strategies to Improve Cancer Photothermal Therapy Mediated by Nanomaterials. Adv. Healthc. Mater.6 (10), 1700073. 10.1002/adhm.201700073
18
FergusonJ. L.TurnerS. P. (2018). Bone Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment Principles. Am. Fam. Physician98 (4), 205–213.
19
GaoX.LiL.CaiX.HuangQ.XiaoJ.ChengJ. (2020). Targeting Nanoparticles for Diagnosis and Therapy of Bone Tumors: Opportunities and Challenges. Biomaterials265, 120404. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120404
20
GengB.QinH.ShenW.LiP.FangF.LiX.et al (2020). Carbon dot/WS2 Heterojunctions for NIR-II Enhanced Photothermal Therapy of Osteosarcoma and Bone Regeneration. Chem. Eng. J.383, 123102. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123102
21
GluzE.MizrahiD. M.MargelS. (2013). Synthesis and Characterization of New Poly(ethylene Glycol)bisphosphonate Vinylic Monomer and Non-fluorescent and NIR-Fluorescent Bisphosphonate Micrometer-Sized Particles. Polymer54 (2), 565–571. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.071
22
GluzE.Rudnick-GlickS.MizrahiD. M.ChenR.MargelS. (2014). New Biodegradable Bisphosphonate Vinylic Monomers and Near Infrared Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Polym. Adv. Technol.25 (5), 499–506. 10.1002/pat.3247
23
GonzalezH.HagerlingC.WerbZ. (2018). Roles of the Immune System in Cancer: from Tumor Initiation to Metastatic Progression. Genes Dev.32 (19-20), 1267–1284. 10.1101/gad.314617.118
24
GuY.-P.CuiR.ZhangZ.-L.XieZ.-X.PangD.-W. (2012). Ultrasmall Near-Infrared Ag2Se Quantum Dots with Tunable Fluorescence for In Vivo Imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134 (1), 79–82. 10.1021/ja2089553
25
HarmatysK. M.ColeE. L.SmithB. D. (2013). In Vivo Imaging of Bone Using a Deep-Red Fluorescent Molecular Probe Bearing Multiple Iminodiacetate Groups. Mol. Pharmaceutics10 (11), 4263–4271. 10.1021/mp400357v
26
HarrisonK. D.CooperD. M. L. (2015). Modalities for Visualization of Cortical Bone Remodeling: The Past, Present, and Future. Front. Endocrinol.6, 122. 10.3389/fendo.2015.00122
27
HartN. S.FitzgeraldM. (2016). A New Perspective on Delivery of Red-Near-Infrared Light Therapy for Disorders of the Brain. Discov. Med.22 (120), 147–156. Available at: https://www.discoverymedicine.com/Nathan-S-Hart/2016/09/a-new-perspective-on-delivery-of-red-near-infrared-light-therapy-for-disorders-of-the-brain/.
28
HashimotoR.MinoshimaM.KikutaJ.YariS.BullS. D.IshiiM.et al (2020). An Acid‐Activatable Fluorescence Probe for Imaging Osteocytic Bone Resorption Activity in Deep Bone Cavities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59 (47), 20996–21000. 10.1002/anie.202006388
29
HeS.ChenS.LiD.WuY.ZhangX.LiuJ.et al (2019). High Affinity to Skeleton Rare Earth Doped Nanoparticles for Near-Infrared II Imaging. Nano Lett.19 (5), 2985–2992. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00140
30
HumbertJ.WillO.Peñate-MedinaT.Peñate-MedinaO.JansenO.BothM.et al (2020). Comparison of Photoacoustic and Fluorescence Tomography for the In Vivo Imaging of ICG-Labelled Liposomes in the Medullary Cavity in Mice. Photoacoustics20, 100210. 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100210
31
HyunH.WadaH.BaoK.GravierJ.YadavY.LaramieM.et al (2014). Phosphonated Near-Infrared Fluorophores for Biomedical Imaging of Bone. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.53 (40), 10668–10672. 10.1002/anie.201404930
32
JiangP.ZhuC.-N.ZhangZ.-L.TianZ.-Q.PangD.-W. (2012). Water-soluble Ag2S Quantum Dots for Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging In Vivo. Biomaterials33 (20), 5130–5135. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.059
33
JiangT.YuX.CarboneE. J.NelsonC.KanH. M.LoK. W.-H. (2014). Poly Aspartic Acid Peptide-Linked PLGA Based Nanoscale Particles: Potential for Bone-Targeting Drug Delivery Applications. Int. J. Pharmaceutics475 (1-2), 547–557. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.08.067
34
JiangZ.LiJ.ChenS.GuoQ.JingZ.HuangB.et al (2020). Zoledronate and SPIO Dual-Targeting Nanoparticles Loaded with ICG for Photothermal Therapy of Breast Cancer Tibial Metastasis. Sci. Rep.10 (1), 13675. 10.1038/s41598-020-70659-x
35
JingH.WeidensteinerC.ReichardtW.GaedickeS.ZhuX.GrosuA.-L.et al (2016). Imaging and Selective Elimination of Glioblastoma Stem Cells with Theranostic Near-Infrared-Labeled CD133-specific Antibodies. Theranostics6 (6), 862–874. 10.7150/thno.12890
36
KagerL.TamamyanG.BielackS. (2017). Novel Insights and Therapeutic Interventions for Pediatric Osteosarcoma. Future Oncol.13 (4), 357–368. 10.2217/fon-2016-0261
37
Karamzade-ZiaratiN.Manafi-FaridR.AtaeiniaB.LangstegerW.PirichC.MottaghyF. M.et al (2019). Molecular Imaging of Bone Metastases Using Tumor-Targeted Tracers. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging63 (2), 136–149. 10.23736/s1824-4785.19.03206-0
38
KobayashiH.ChoykeP. L. (2019). Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy of Cancer. Acc. Chem. Res.52 (8), 2332–2339. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00273
39
KobayashiH.GriffithsG. L.ChoykeP. L. (2020). Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy: Photoactivatable Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs). Bioconjug. Chem.31 (1), 28–36. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00546
40
KovarJ. L.XuX.DraneyD.CuppA.SimpsonM. A.Michael OliveD. (2011). Near-infrared-labeled Tetracycline Derivative Is an Effective Marker of Bone Deposition in Mice. Anal. Biochem.416 (2), 167–173. 10.1016/j.ab.2011.05.011
41
KricunM. E. (1985). Red-yellow Marrow Conversion: its Effect on the Location of Some Solitary Bone Lesions. Skeletal Radiol.14 (1), 10–19. 10.1007/bf00361188
42
KrzeszinskiJ. Y.WanY. (2015). New Therapeutic Targets for Cancer Bone Metastasis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.36 (6), 360–373. 10.1016/j.tips.2015.04.006
43
LandiL.D’IncàF.GelibterA.ChiariR.GrossiF.DelmonteA.et al (2019). Bone Metastases and Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. J. Immunotherapy Cancer7 (1), 316. 10.1186/s40425-019-0793-8
44
LashkariB.MandelisA. (2014). Coregistered Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Signatures of Early Bone Density Variations. J. Biomed. Opt.19 (3), 036015. 10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036015
45
LiB.WongM.PavlakisN. (2014). Treatment and Prevention of Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence for Clinical Practice. Jcm3 (1), 1–24. 10.3390/jcm3010001
46
LiC.ZhangY.ChenG.HuF.ZhaoK.WangQ. (2017). Engineered Multifunctional Nanomedicine for Simultaneous Stereotactic Chemotherapy and Inhibited Osteolysis in an Orthotopic Model of Bone Metastasis. Adv. Mater.29 (13), 1605754. 10.1002/adma.201605754
47
LiD.LiuQ.QiQ.ShiH.HsuE. C.ChenW.et al (2020). Gold Nanoclusters for NIR‐II Fluorescence Imaging of Bones. Small16 (43), 2003851. 10.1002/smll.202003851
48
LimW.KimB.JoG.YangD. H.ParkM. H.HyunH. (2020). Bioluminescence and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Detection of Metastatic Bone Tumors. Lasers Med. Sci.35 (1), 115–120. 10.1007/s10103-019-02801-9
49
LimW.SohnH.KoY.ParkM.KimB.JoD.et al (2017). Real-time In Vivo Imaging of Metastatic Bone Tumors with a Targeted Near-Infrared Fluorophore. Oncotarget8 (39), 65770–65777. 10.18632/oncotarget.20187
50
LinC.-C.ChangW. H.-S.ChengT.-M.ChiuL.-H.WangY.-H.LinC.-A. J.et al (2020). Two New, Near-Infrared, Fluorescent Probes as Potential Tools for Imaging Bone Repair. Sci. Rep.10 (1), 2580. 10.1038/s41598-020-59522-1
51
LinZ.LiuY.MaX.HuS.ZhangJ.WuQ.et al (2015). Photothermal Ablation of Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using PEGylated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Sci. Rep.5 (1), 11709. 10.1038/srep11709
52
LiuH.LiC.QianY.HuL.FangJ.TongW.et al (2020). Magnetic-induced Graphene Quantum Dots for Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy in the Second Near-Infrared Window. Biomaterials232, 119700. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119700
53
LiuL.RuanZ.LiT.YuanP.YanL. (2016). Near Infrared Imaging-Guided Photodynamic Therapy under an Extremely Low Energy of Light by Galactose Targeted Amphiphilic Polypeptide Micelle Encapsulating BODIPY-Br2. Biomater. Sci.4 (11), 1638–1645. 10.1039/c6bm00581k
54
LiuY.BhattaraiP.DaiZ.ChenX. (2019). Photothermal Therapy and Photoacoustic Imaging via Nanotheranostics in Fighting Cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev.48 (7), 2053–2108. 10.1039/c8cs00618k
55
LiuY.ChenM.ZhaoY.LvS.ZhengD.LiuD.et al (2021). A Novel D‐A‐D Photosensitizer for Efficient NIR Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy. Chembiochem22 (12), 2161–2167. 10.1002/cbic.202100107
56
MarianiG.GipponiM.MorescoL.VillaG.BartolomeiM.MazzarolG.et al (2002). Radioguided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma. J. Nucl. Med.43 (6), 811–827. 10.1002/jmri.10.120
57
MarksS. C.OdgrenP. R. (2002). “Structure and Development of the Skeleton,” in Principles of Bone Biology. Editors BilezikianJ. P.RaiszL. G.RodanG. A.. Second Edition (San Diego: Academic Press), 3–15. 10.1016/b978-012098652-1.50103-7
58
MbeunkuiF.JohannD. J.Jr. (2009). Cancer and the Tumor Microenvironment: a Review of an Essential Relationship. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.63 (4), 571–582. 10.1007/s00280-008-0881-9
59
MeadsM. B.HazlehurstL. A.DaltonW. S. (2008). The Bone Marrow Microenvironment as a Tumor Sanctuary and Contributor to Drug Resistance. Clin. Cancer Res.14 (9), 2519–2526. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2223
60
MizrahiD. M.Ziv-PolatO.PerlsteinB.GluzE.MargelS. (2011). Synthesis, Fluorescence and Biodistribution of a Bone-Targeted Near-Infrared Conjugate. Eur. J. Med. Chem.46 (10), 5175–5183. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.08.040
61
MolinaE. R.ChimL. K.BarriosS.LudwigJ. A.MikosA. G. (2020). Modeling the Tumor Microenvironment and Pathogenic Signaling in Bone Sarcoma. Tissue Eng. B: Rev.26 (3), 249–271. 10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0302
62
MorimotoA.KikutaJ.NishikawaK.SudoT.UenakaM.FuruyaM.et al (2021). SLPI Is a Critical Mediator that Controls PTH-Induced Bone Formation. Nat. Commun.12 (1). 10.1038/s41467-021-22402-x
63
MorlandtA. B.MooreL. S.JohnsonA. O.SmithC. M.StevensT. M.WarramJ. M.et al (2020). Fluorescently Labeled Cetuximab-IRDye800 for Guided Surgical Excision of Ameloblastoma: A Proof of Principle Study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.78 (10), 1736–1747. 10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.022
64
MundyG. R. (2002). Metastasis to Bone: Causes, Consequences and Therapeutic Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer2 (8), 584–593. 10.1038/nrc867
65
NakamuraY. A.OkuyamaS.FurusawaA.NagayaT.FujimuraD.OkadaR.et al (2019). Near‐infrared Photoimmunotherapy through Bone. Cancer Sci.110 (12), 3689–3694. 10.1111/cas.14203
66
NealeJ. R.RichterN. B.MertenK. E.TaylorK. G.SinghS.WaiteL. C.et al (2009). ChemInform Abstract: Bone Selective Effect of an Estradiol Conjugate with a Novel Tetracycline-Derived Bone-Targeting Agent. ChemInform40. 10.1002/chin.200925180
67
OuY.GuoX. L. (2007). Tumor Stem Cells and Drug Resistance. Sheng Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan38 (2), 115–119. 10.1038/nrc1590
68
PangY.FuY.LiC.WuZ.CaoW.HuX.et al (2020). Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticles for Ameliorating Breast Cancer-Associated Osteolysis. Nano Lett.20 (2), 829–840. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02916
69
PapapoulosS. E. (2008). Bisphosphonates: How Do They Work?Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.22 (5), 831–847. 10.1016/j.beem.2008.07.001
70
ParkJ. Y.HanJ.JungH. S.LeeG.KimH. J.ChoG.-S.et al (2019). Synthetic Probes for In Vitro Purification and In Vivo Tracking of Hepatocytes Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Biomaterials222, 119431. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119431
71
Parrish-NovakJ.HollandE. C.OlsonJ. M. (2015). Image-Guided Tumor Resection. Cancer J.21 (3), 206–212. 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000113
72
PeroskyJ. E.PetersonJ. R.EbodaO. N.MorrisM. D.WangS. C.LeviB.et al (2014). Early Detection of Heterotopic Ossification Using Near-Infrared Optical Imaging Reveals Dynamic Turnover and Progression of Mineralization Following Achilles Tenotomy and Burn Injury. J. Orthop. Res.32 (11), 1416–1423. 10.1002/jor.22697
73
PredinaJ. D.KeatingJ.NewtonA.CorbettC.XiaL.ShinM.et al (2019). A Clinical Trial of Intraoperative Near‐infrared Imaging to Assess Tumor Extent and Identify Residual Disease during Anterior Mediastinal Tumor Resection. Cancer125 (5), 807–817. 10.1002/cncr.31851
74
PredinaJ.NewtonA.DesphandeC.SinghalS. (2018). Near-infrared I-ntraoperative I-maging during R-esection of an A-nterior M-ediastinal S-oft T-issue S-arcoma. Mol. Clin. Onc8 (1), 86–88. 10.3892/mco.2017.1491
75
RiceA. J.CortesE.LachowskiD.CheungB. C. H.KarimS. A.MortonJ. P.et al (2017). Matrix Stiffness Induces Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Promotes Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Oncogenesis6 (7), e352. 10.1038/oncsis.2017.54
76
RiquelmeM. A.CardenasE. R.JiangJ. X. (2020). Osteocytes and Bone Metastasis. Front. Endocrinol.11, 567844. 10.3389/fendo.2020.567844
77
RoblingA. G.BonewaldL. F. (2020). The Osteocyte: New Insights. Annu. Rev. Physiol.82, 485–506. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034332
78
RubinE. H.AllenJ. D.NowakJ. A.BatesS. E. (2014). Developing Precision Medicine in a Global World. Clin. Cancer Res.20 (6), 1419–1427. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0091
79
Rudnick-GlickS.Corem-SalkmonE.GrinbergI.YehudaR.MargelS. (2015). Near IR Fluorescent Conjugated Poly(ethylene Glycol)bisphosphonate Nanoparticles for In Vivo Bone Targeting in a Young Mouse Model. J. Nanobiotechnol13 (1), 80. 10.1186/s12951-015-0126-0
80
RussellR. G. G. (2011). Bisphosphonates: The First 40years. Bone49 (1), 2–19. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.04.022
81
ShubertJ.Lediju BellM. A. (2018). Photoacoustic Imaging of a Human Vertebra: Implications for Guiding Spinal Fusion Surgeries. Phys. Med. Biol.63 (14), 144001. 10.1088/1361-6560/aacdd3
82
ShuppA. B.KolbA. D.BussardK. M. (2020). “Novel Techniques to Study the Bone-Tumor Microenvironment,” in Tumor Microenvironment: Recent Advances. Editor BirbrairA. (Cham: Springer International Publishing)), 1–18. 10.1007/978-3-030-35727-6_1
83
SimpsonE.BrownH. L. (2018). Understanding Osteosarcomas. JAAPA (Montvale, N.J.)31 (8), 15–19. 10.1097/01.JAA.0000541477.24116.8d
84
SlooterM. D.BierauK.ChanA. B.LöwikC. W. G. M. (2015). Near Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Early Detection, Monitoring and Improved Intervention of Diseases Involving the Joint. Connect. Tissue Res.56 (2), 153–160. 10.3109/03008207.2015.1012586
85
SoodguptaD.PanD.CuiG.SenpanA.YangX.LuL.et al (2015). Small Molecule MYC Inhibitor Conjugated to Integrin-Targeted Nanoparticles Extends Survival in a Mouse Model of Disseminated Multiple Myeloma. Mol. Cancer Ther.14 (6), 1286–1294. 10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-14-0774-t
86
SpirouG. M.VitkinI. A.WilsonB. C.WhelanW. M.HenrichsP. M.MehtaK.et al (2004). Development and Testing of an Optoacoustic Imaging System for Monitoring and Guiding Prostate Cancer Therapies. Proc. SPIE - Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.5. 10.1117/12.535360
87
SunW.ZhaoX.FanJ.DuJ.PengX. (2019). Boron Dipyrromethene Nano‐Photosensitizers for Anticancer Phototherapies. Small15 (32), 1804927. 10.1002/smll.201804927
88
SunY.QuC.ChenH.HeM.TangC.ShouK.et al (2016). Novel Benzo-Bis(1,2,5-Thiadiazole) Fluorophores for In Vivo NIR-II Imaging of Cancer. Chem. Sci.7 (9), 6203–6207. 10.1039/c6sc01561a
89
TakahashiT. (2016). Improved Therapeutic Efficacy in Bone and Joint Disorders by Targeted Drug Delivery to Bone. Yakugaku Zasshi136 (11), 1501–1508. 10.1248/yakushi.16-00178
90
TakahashiT.YokogawaK.SakuraN.NomuraM.KobayashiS.MiyamotoK.-i. (2008). Bone-targeting of Quinolones Conjugated with an Acidic Oligopeptide. Pharm. Res.25 (12), 2881–2888. 10.1007/s11095-008-9605-4
91
TeitelbaumS. L. (2000). Bone Resorption by Osteoclasts. Science289 (5484), 1504–1508. 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504
92
TsienR. Y. (2003). Imagining Imaging's Future. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel BiolSuppl, SS16–21. 10.1038/nrm1196
93
TsukanishiT.FunayamaT.OzekiE.HaraI.AbeT.OnishiS.et al (2014). Indocyanine Green-lactosome and Near-Infrared Light-Based Intraoperative Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy for Metastatic Bone Tumors. J. Photopol. Sci. Technol.27, 449–452. 10.2494/photopolymer.27.449
94
van der MeelR.SulheimE.ShiY.KiesslingF.MulderW. J. M.LammersT. (2019). Smart Cancer Nanomedicine. Nat. Nanotechnol.14 (11), 1007–1017. 10.1038/s41565-019-0567-y
95
WangD.MillerS. C.ShlyakhtenkoL. S.PortilloA. M.LiuX.-M.PapangkornK.et al (2007). Osteotropic Peptide that Differentiates Functional Domains of the Skeleton. Bioconjug. Chem.18 (5), 1375–1378. 10.1021/bc7002132
96
WangK.GuY.LiaoY.BangS.DonnellyC. R.ChenO.et al (2020). PD-1 Blockade Inhibits Osteoclast Formation and Murine Bone Cancer Pain. J. Clin. Invest.130 (7), 3603–3620. 10.1172/jci133334
97
WangY.JiangC.HeW.AiK.RenX.LiuL.et al (2016). Targeted Imaging of Damaged Bone In Vivo with Gemstone Spectral Computed Tomography. ACS Nano10 (4), 4164–4172. 10.1021/acsnano.5b07401
98
WangY.YangJ.LiuH.WangX.ZhouZ.HuangQ.et al (2017). Osteotropic Peptide-Mediated Bone Targeting for Photothermal Treatment of Bone Tumors. Biomaterials114, 97–105. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.010
99
WhelanJ. S.DavisL. E. (2018). Osteosarcoma, Chondrosarcoma, and Chordoma. Jco36 (2), 188–193. 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.1743
100
WuismanP.GrunertJ. (1994). Transpositions des vaisseaux permettant d'éviter les plasties en rotation ou les amputations lors du traitement des tumeurs malignes primitives du genou. Revue de chirurgie orthopédique et réparatrice de l'apparell moteur80 (8), 720–727. RCO-12-1994-80-8-0035-1040-101019-ART84.
101
XieY.LiuC.HuangH.HuangJ.DengA.ZouP.et al (2018). Bone-targeted Delivery of Simvastatin-Loaded PEG-PLGA Micelles Conjugated with Tetracycline for Osteoporosis Treatment. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res.8 (5), 1090–1102. 10.1007/s13346-018-0561-1
102
XuW.WangD.TangB. Z. (2021). NIR‐II AIEgens: A Win-Win Integration towards Bioapplications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60 (14), 7476–7487. 10.1002/anie.202005899
103
XuY.FengT.YangT.WeiH.YangH.LiG.et al (2018). Utilizing Intramolecular Photoinduced Electron Transfer to Enhance Photothermal Tumor Treatment of Aza-BODIPY-Based Near-Infrared Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter.10 (19), 16299–16307. 10.1021/acsami.8b03568
104
YangB.YinJ.ChenY.PanS.YaoH.GaoY.et al (2018). 2D-Black-Phosphorus-Reinforced 3D-Printed Scaffolds:A Stepwise Countermeasure for Osteosarcoma. Adv. Mater.30 (10), 1705611. 10.1002/adma.201705611
105
YangC.TianY.ZhaoF.ChenZ.SuP.LiY.et al (2020). Bone Microenvironment and Osteosarcoma Metastasis. Ijms21 (19), 6985. 10.3390/ijms21196985
106
YangQ.MaZ.WangH.ZhouB.ZhuS.ZhongY.et al (2017). Rational Design of Molecular Fluorophores for Biological Imaging in the NIR-II Window. Adv. Mater.29 (12), 1605497. 10.1002/adma.201605497
107
YipS.JerajR. (2014). Use of Articulated Registration for Response Assessment of Individual Metastatic Bone Lesions. Phys. Med. Biol.59 (6), 1501–1514. 10.1088/0031-9155/59/6/1501
108
ZengW.-N.YuQ.-P.WangD.LiuJ.-L.YangQ.-J.ZhouZ.-K.et al (2021). Mitochondria-targeting Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites for Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Synergistic Phototherapy of Drug-Resistant Osteosarcoma. J. Nanobiotechnol19 (1), 79. 10.1186/s12951-021-00831-6
109
ZhangG.GuoB.WuH.TangT.ZhangB.-T.ZhengL.et al (2012). A Delivery System Targeting Bone Formation Surfaces to Facilitate RNAi-Based Anabolic Therapy. Nat. Med.18 (2), 307–314. 10.1038/nm.2617
110
ZhangW.DengW.ZhangH.SunX.HuangT.WangW.et al (2020). Bioorthogonal-targeted 1064 Nm Excitation Theranostic Nanoplatform for Precise NIR-IIa Fluorescence Imaging Guided Efficient NIR-II Photothermal Therapy. Biomaterials243, 119934. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119934
111
ZhangX.JiA.WangZ.LouH.LiJ.ZhengL.et al (2021). Azide-Dye Unexpected Bone Targeting for Near-Infrared Window II Osteoporosis Imaging. J. Med. Chem.64 (15), 11543–11553. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00839
112
ZhaoJ.-Y.ChenG.GuY.-P.CuiR.ZhangZ.-L.YuZ.-L.et al (2016). Ultrasmall Magnetically Engineered Ag2Se Quantum Dots for Instant Efficient Labeling and Whole-Body High-Resolution Multimodal Real-Time Tracking of Cell-Derived Microvesicles. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138 (6), 1893–1903. 10.1021/jacs.5b10340
113
ZhouH.YiW.LiA.WangB.DingQ.XueL.et al (2019). Specific Small-Molecule NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging of Osteosarcoma and Lung Metastasis. Adv. Healthc. Mater.9 (1), e1901224. 10.1002/adhm.201901224
114
ZhouH.YiW.LiA.WangB.DingQ.XueL.et al (2020). Specific Small-Molecule NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging of Osteosarcoma and Lung Metastasis. Adv. Healthc. Mater.9 (1), e1901224. 10.1002/adhm.201901224
115
ZhuC.-N.JiangP.ZhangZ.-L.ZhuD.-L.TianZ.-Q.PangD.-W. (2013). Ag2Se Quantum Dots with Tunable Emission in the Second Near-Infrared Window. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter.5 (4), 1186–1189. 10.1021/am303110x
116
ZhuJ.ZouJ.ZhangZ.ZhangJ.SunY.DongX.et al (2019a). An NIR Triphenylamine Grafted BODIPY Derivative with High Photothermal Conversion Efficiency and Singlet Oxygen Generation for Imaging Guided Phototherapy. Mater. Chem. Front.3. 10.1039/c9qm00044e
117
ZhuS.HuZ.TianR.YungB. C.YangQ.ZhaoS.et al (2018). Repurposing Cyanine NIR-I Dyes Accelerates Clinical Translation of Near-Infrared-II (NIR-II) Bioimaging. Adv. Mater.30, 1802546. 10.1002/adma.201802546
118
ZhuS.TianR.AntarisA. L.ChenX.DaiH. (2019b). Near‐Infrared‐II Molecular Dyes for Cancer Imaging and Surgery. Adv. Mater.31 (24), 1900321. 10.1002/adma.201900321
Summary
Keywords
bone tumor, osteopathia, near-infrared probe, diagnosis, photoX therapy
Citation
Cai Q, Li Z, Li B, Jiang J, Li X, Meng W and Zhu S (2021) Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of Bone Cancer Using Near-Infrared Lights. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:771153. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.771153
Received
06 September 2021
Accepted
29 September 2021
Published
18 November 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Yao Sun, Central China Normal University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Cai, Li, Li, Jiang, Li, Meng and Zhu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Weiyan Meng, mengwy@jlu.edu.cn; Shoujun Zhu, sjzhu@jlu.edu.cn
† These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Nanobiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.