Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB), induced by the foxy Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), is still one of the top killers worldwide among infectious diseases. Although several antibiotics have been developed to significantly relieve the tuberculosis epidemics worldwide, there are still several important scientific challenges for tuberculosis. As one of the most critical issues for tuberculosis control, the accurate and timely diagnosis of tuberculosis is critical for the following therapy of tuberculosis and thus responsible for the effective control of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Current tuberculosis diagnostic methods in clinic are still facing the difficulties that they can’t provide the rapid diagnostic results with high sensitivity and accuracy, which therefore requires the development of more effective novel diagnostic strategies. In recent decades, nanomaterials have been proved to show promising potentials for novel nanobiosensor construction based on their outstanding physical, chemical and biological properties. Taking these promising advantages, nanomaterial-based biosensors show the potential to allow the rapid, sensitive and accurate tuberculosis diagnosis. Here, aiming to increase the development of more effective tuberculosis diagnostic strategy, we summarized the current progress of nanobiosensors for potential tuberculosis diagnosis application. We discussed the different kind diagnostic targets for tuberculosis diagnosis based on nanobiosensors, ranging from the detection of bacterial components from M. tuberculosis, such as DNA and proteins, to the host immunological responses, such as specific cytokine production, and to the direct whole cell detection of M. tuberculosis. We believe that this review would enhance our understandings of nanobiosensors for potential tuberculosis diagnosis, and further promote the future research on nanobiosensor-based tuberculosis diagnosis to benefit the more effective control of tuberculosis epidemic.
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by the foxy Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), remains to be one of the most catastrophic diseases since human history. According to the global TB report in 2021, the newly diagnosed cases of TB were up to 10 million with an estimated 1.4 million deaths in 2020 (). Although numerous advances have been made in understanding of the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment, TB is still one of the top 10 causes of death among diseases worldwide, ranking above HIV/AIDS. Although several antibiotics have been developed to significantly relieve the TB epidemics, there are still several important scientific issues for TB. As one of the most critical issues for the control of TB and drug-resistant TB epidemics, the diagnosis of TB is critical for the timely therapy of TB.
Currently, there are several conventional methods that are widely used for Mtb detection or TB diagnosis, which have made plenty of contributions in the control of TB epidemic. However, these current TB diagnostic methods are still facing some difficulties that they can’t provide the rapid diagnostic results with high sensitivity and accuracy simultaneously. Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear microscopy is the most common used method for clinical TB diagnosis, which is inexpensive with low bio-safety standards, but it shows restricted sensitivity when the bacterial load of Mtb is lower than 10,000 organisms/ml in sputum samples (; ). Mycobacterial cultures is a very accurate TB diagnotic strategy that offers improved sensitivity up to 60%, but it is time consuming and needs a bio-safety level-3 laboratory theoretically, which introduces severe constrains on the prompt TB diagnosis (; ; ; ; ; ). The reactive tuberculin skin testing (TST) and interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) provide methods for the detection of latent TB (LTB) through targeting memory T-cell receptor previously-sensitized by prior TB infection. TST is inexpensive and widely used, but it requires 48–72 h to obtain the results based on two patient visits and the results are very easily to be disturbed by some non-Mycobacterial (NTM). IGRAs based detection method possesses high sensitivity and specificity, but it might introduce false positive diagnosis in subjects with high concentration of IFN-γ. The high cost and the requirement of special laboratory settings and well-trained staffs also partially restrict the application of IGRAs. The Xpert Mtb/RIF assay, a new rapid diagnostic test based on nucleic acid amplification, works very well in diagnostic of Mtb and rifampicin resistance in 2 h (), but it is not only restricted by its relatively low sensitivity and high false positivity rates in same specific conditions (), but also show limitations for the diagnosis and management of polyresistant pulmonary tuberculosis ().
In recent decades, nanomaterials are widely used in biomedical fields and have been developed for tissue regeneration (), anti-infection () (), antitumor (). Based on their excellent physical, chemical and biological properties, nanomaterials have also been proved to show great potential in the development of new detection technologies. For example, designed a method for the determination of fiber-optic gold nanolinked adsorbents based on PCR-free DNA from human gastric tumor tissues and cell lines, which has shown good sensitivity, accuracy and short detection, and can be used as an alternative to PCR with great potential for diagnostic biosensor fabrication.
In addition to the relevant detection of viral and cancer factors, more and more nanomaterials with attractive functions have been developed as promising tools for sensitive, rapid and accurate detection for TB related-samples as the unique properties of nanomaterials. Such manipulations enable nanomaterials to operate specific analytical functions and hence their applications as biosensors (), which might benefit the development of novel TB diagnostic strategies. In this review, we systemically summarized the current progress of nanobiosensors for potential TB diagnosis application. Firstly, we introduced the basic principles of how nanobiosensor works for potential diagnosis. In the second part, we seperately discussed the current progress of nanobiosensors targeting DNA and protein of Mtb for TB diagnosis. Thirdly, we also introduced the development of nanobiosensors for Mtb infection associated cytokins production, followed the current progress of nanobiosensors for whole cell of Mtb analysis. At last, we discussed the perspectives of the functional nanobiosensors for potential tuberculosis diagnosis, which might promote the following research on nanobiosensor-based TB diagnosis and further benefit the development of diagnostic strategy for more effective control of TB epidemic.
How nanobiosensor works for potential diagnosis
The landscape of TB diagnostic strategy is still restricted by the lack of ideal strategy with low cost, high sensitivity, accurate and rapid diagnosis. The development of nanotechnology allows the possible development of nanobiosensors, which allow the detection of biological molecules or components. A nanomaterial based biosensor is actually a kind of integrated device that basically consists of a biological recognition element, transducer, and processor, which can specifically recognize the target bio-analytes we prefer to be detected.
As shown in Figure 1, the target bio-analytes include nucleic acids (DNA, RNA), proteins such as enzymes, antibodies and antigens, immune cell cytokines, and whole cells (bacterial or virus), which can be captured by complementary bio-recognition probes. The typical biological recognition element for nanobiosensors is always formed by some nanomaterials, biomacromolecules (such as nucleic acid and proteins), polymers and even cells, which can be applied to specifically recognize the target bio-analytes. By establishing the linkage between specific and efficient bio-interaction with corresponding signals (such as electrical, fluorometric, luminometric or colorimetric signals), the levels or activities of elements involved in the biological recognition can be converted into specific signals by the transducers, which can be further amplified, quantified, displayed and analyzed (; ). Depending on the different detection parameter and theory, transducers could be classified into different strategies, such as optical (like SPR), piezoelectric (such as quartz crystal microbalance), electrochemical, thermometric, magnetic or micromechanical signal (). At last, the processor could translate the transducer signals into qualitative or quantitative data that could reflect the levels or activities of the targeted bio-analytes.
FIGURE 1
Taking the advantages of various unique properties like large loading volume, better electrical communication ability, stability and heat conductivity, combining nanomaterials with transducers could significantly enhance the diagnostics sensitivity, which makes nano-biosensing detection method a promising strategy for TB diagnosis. Up to now, two widely known approaches are always applied to design nanobiosensors: i.e., the modification of electrode surfaces by nanomaterials (Approach 1, example is presented as Figure 2A), or the fabrication of signal nanoprobes by nanomaterials to enhance generated signal (Approach 2, example is presented as Figure 2B). There are also some nanobiosensors constructed using both amplification approaches (hybrid biosensing, i.e., Approach 3, example is presented as Figure 2C). We also introduced the examples for the specific principles for these basic approaches as shown as in Figure 2. Nano-biosensing diagnostics about TB detection contain different kinds of bio-analytes, such as DNA, protein, cytokines and even whole bacteria. In this review, the most recent research advances in the field of nano-based biosensors developed for TB detection were summarized.
FIGURE 2
Nanobiosensors targeting DNA of Mtb for TB diagnosis
In recent decades, the methods for DNA detection has attracted increasing attentions for early diagnosis of diseases. The DNA contents of Mtb can be detected by some techniques, and some most widely used techniques are polymerase chain reaction (
As mentioned before, researchers usually develop nano-biosensors detection methods for TB detection based on the Approach 1–3 alone or together.
To increase the sensitivity of TB diagnostic method,
In comparison with other DNA-templated metal NPs, the synthesis of DNA-templated CuNPs is more convenient and significantly faster (
In addition to using varies kinds of nanoparticles, nanowires can also be introduced to develop TB nanobiosensors. A nanostructure platform was constructed by combining the gold electrode, nanowires of polypyrrole (nw-PPy), dendrimers PAMAM and ferrocene as well as DNA probe (
And to improve the detection efficacy, researchers developed many kinds of nano-biosensors based on the detection of TB DNA through electrode modification by functional nanomaterials (see Table 1). However, those diagnostic methods still need to be validated with clinical samples. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this AuNPs-assisted colorimetric detection method,
TABLE 1
| Modified electrode | Probe | Signal detection method | Linear range | LOD/Sensitivity | Reaction time | References (publication years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLG/GNus | ssDNA | SPR | — | 24.5 fM | — | |
| FLG/GNrs | ssDNA | SPR | — | 8.2 pM | — | |
| GCE-ZnO-AuNPs | ssDNA | DPV | 2.5–250 pM | 1.8 pM | 45 min | |
| Gold electrode/nw-PPy | (Mutated) rpoB gene | SWV | 1 aM–100 fM | 0.36 aM | 30 min | |
| SPs-G-nano-C60/NG + CPs-bitoin-adivin-AuNPs/GCE + TOAB | IS6110 | DPV | 10 fM–10 nM | 3 fM | 4 h | |
| CuNPs | IS6110 | Fluorescence stokes shift | 10–100 fg/μl | 5 fg/μl | ||
| 3D graphene-GNrs | IS6110 | EIS | 10 fM–100 nM | — | — | |
| Gold electrode/CPs + SPs/AuNPs/PAn-rGO | IS6110 | DPV | 0.1 pM-10 nM | 50 fM | 2.5 h | |
| SPCE/NH2-GO/CdSe QDs | PNA-DNA | DPV | 10 pM-100 nM | 0.895 pM | 50 min | |
| Gold nanotubes array electrode platform | ssDNA | DPV | 10–10^5 pg/μl | 10 pg/μl | 50 min | |
| CdSe QDs-SA/MCH/probe DNA/AuNPs/GCEs + msp I | DNA | SWV | 10 fM–1 nM | 8.7 fM | 6 h | |
| MWCNTs-PPy-PAMAM-Fc | rpoB gene | SWV | 1 pM–100 nM | 0.3 fM | 60 min | |
| Ru-GO/Fc-ssDNA | Mutated rpoB gene | ECL | 0.1–100 nM | 0.04 nM | 50 min | |
| GCE/rGO–AuNPs-PANI nano-composite | DNA | DPV | 1 fM–1 nM | 1.0 fM | 4 h |
Comparison of the performance of different kinds of DNA nanobiosensors.
Note: PAn, means polyaniline; rGO, means reduced graphene oxide; SPCE, means screen-printed carbon electrode; NH2-GO, means amino group functionalized graphene oxide; QDs, means quantum dots; MCH, means 6-mercapto-1-hexanol; MWCNTs, means multiwalled carbon nanotubes; PAMAM, means poly (amidoamine) dendrimers; Fc means ferrocene; Ru-GO, means ruthenium (II) complex functionalized graphene oxide; DPV, means Differential pulse Voltammetry; SWV, means Square Wave Voltammetry; EIS, means Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy; ECL, means electrochemiluminescence.
In recent years, nucleic acid testing strategies have been widely developed and used worldwide under the COVID-19 epemdics, which also remind the potentials of nucleic acid testing strategies for other disease diagnosis. For the DNA analysis of Mtb, samples are very important issues as most clinical samples might didn’t have Mtb DNA contents. The most available and non-invasive samples for pulmonary TB analysis based on the DNA is the sputum sample, which requires DNA extraction procedures for further DNA analysis. Unlike the typical polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, most nanobiosensors don’t need amplification precodures and allow the direct analysis of DNA samples with shorten analysis time after the successful fabrication of nanobiosensors. But the times and costs used for the complicated nanobiosensor preparation should be a disadvantages compared with the PCR strategy. Moreover, the DNA from dead Mtb could also be detected by the DNA analysis methods, which therefore remind that the DNA detection method should act as auxiliary strategies for the current clinical diagnostic strategies.
Detection of Mtb proteins by functional nanobiosensors
Nanobiosensors targeting CFP10/ESAT6
Although DNA detection possesses the advantage of high sensitivity as well as high specificity, it requires preparation of DNA samples that needs special instruments, which cannot meet rapid diagnostic needs. Moreover, DNA detection could not effectively distinguish TB patients from latent TB patients. Therefore, some researchers pay more attentions to the protein detection that naturally secreted by Mtb, which allows the rapid diagnosis for the timely treatment of TB. To date, various kinds of proteins has involved in for target biomarkers of Mtb, such as the 6-kDa early secreted antigenic target (ESAT6) (
Comparative genomics analysis has revealed that the CFP10 and ESAT6 are encoded by the Rv3874 and Rv3875 genes, respectively. These genes are located in the region of difference-1 (RD-1) of the virulent Mtb genome but are absent in all strains of vaccine-BCG strains (
Similar to DNA detection, the pivotal part of nano-biosensor development for protein detection is biosensor modification. As early as in 2016, Noremylia’s laboratory has developed a G-interdigital electrode (IDE)/CFP10-ESAT6 aptamer/DNA-AuNPs based system as multi-channel piezoelectric quartz crystal (MSPQC) sensor to detect the combination protein of CFP10-ESAT6 (
Additionally, Noremylia and co-workers developed a (CdSe-ZnS QD/silica NPs (SiNPs)/SPCE)-modified electrode as nanobiosensors to detect CFP10-ESAT6 fusion protein (
Researchers also designed a CFP10-ESAT6 targeted aptamer-graphene (GP)-PAn-screen-printed gold electrode to detect the CFP10-ESAT6 fusion protein (
In addition to biosensor modification, researchers also tried to develop a label-free method for biosensor preparation to detect the CFP10-ESAT6 fusion protein, which might allow more convenience for TB diagnosis (
There are also publications about ESAT6 or CEP10 detection separately.
Similarly, nanobiosensors can also be designed to detect CFP-10 alone. Researchers used Fe3O4@Ag/GPQDs to modify the GCE electrode for the formation of a sandwich complex on the electrode surface, which could be used for DPV signal collection. This nanoscale sensing platform allows synergetic electrochemical performance based on the properties of the three nanomaterials: Firstly, Fe3O4 nanomaterials could increase the surface/volume ratio of the nanobiosensor; then, Ag nanomaterials could enhance the electrical conductivity of the nanobiosensor; and GQD could load more anti-CFP-10 antibody onto the nanobiosensor. But the electrochemical nanoimmunosensor showed a linear range (5–5.0 × 105 ng/ml) and a LOD value of 0.33 ng/ml, which was a relatively low sensitivity comparing with other nanobiosensors (
The electrochemical nanobiosensor detection method developed by
Nanobiosensors targeting MPT64
MPT64, a 24-kDa protein only secreted by Mtb in the early/middle growth stage (
Guo’s team also developed an aptamer-based voltammetric nanobiosensor for MPT64 detection by using synergistic signal amplification strategy based on a novel GO@Fe3O4@Pt nanocomposite (
In addition, AuNPs-C60-PAn was also used as a kind of nanoprobes for redox analysis by detecting MPT64 antigen with high sensitivity, which showed linear range of 0.02–1,000 pg/ml and a LOD value of 20 fg/ml. This strategy showed current response was up to 15.58 μA when the concentration of MPT64 in clinical samples was as low as 0.2 pg/ml, whereas the current response in negative control was almost negligible (
However, the synthesis processes of nanomaterial for these electrochemical nanobiosensors detection method, especially for the nanobiosensor fabrication processes, were relatively complicated and the detection sensitivity, efficacy and selectivity also need to be further confirmed by more clinical sample analysis. Conceivably, these nanobiosensor assays for MPT64 detection demonstrate large potentials in providing new evidences for the rapid diagnosis of Mtb infection.
Nanobiosensors targeting Ag85B
Ag85 proteins are one of the most immunogenic antigens obtained from Mtb culture filtrate (
By analyzing the above Mtb-specific proteins, the sensitivity and accuracy of TB diagnosis can be significantly enhanced by combining with some other diagnostic tools. As these target proteins can be secreted into environments and further transfered into different parts of body, different kinds of samples, such as blood samples (serum or plasma) and sputum samples, can be applied for protein analysis. Due to the complicated protein contents in serum or plasma samples, the specificity of nanobiosensors is of vital importance for Mtb-specific protein analysis. However, there are some target proteins that might be disturbed by the TB vaccine-BCG vaccination, such as Ag85b, which is both expressed and secreted by BCG and Mtb. Thus, developing nanobiosensors that can simultaneously detect different kinds of Mtb-specific proteins might be an attractive strategy for more sensitive and accurate TB diagnosis.
Detection of cytokines by nanobiosensors
Cytokines, some small peptides or glycoproteins, are synthesized and secreted by immune cells and certain non-immune cells. Cytokines have a variety of biological functions, such as regulating cell growth, differentiation and maturation, immune response, inflammation, wound healing, tumor growth and function maintenance (
In a fluorescence nanobiosensor, when biometric elements or targeted biomolecules are labeled by fluorescent labels, the fluorescence intensity is used to reveal how strong about the interactions between the biometric molecules and the target biomolecules.
In another study, biosensors based on hairpin structures of oligonucleotides, single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSB), copper nanoparticles (CuNPs), and silica nanoparticles coated with Streptavidin were synthesized (
In addition to the above nanibiosensors, other teams have also designed different fluorescence aptamer sensors with excellent characteristics such as high sensitivity and strong specificity (
TABLE 2
| Biosensor devices | Active analytical layer | Linear range | LOD/Sensitivity | Reaction time | References (publication years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescent aptasensor | PPi-Ce CPNs/Cu NPs | 1–100 fg/ml | 0.25 fg/ml | — | |
| Fluorescent aptasensor | Oligonucleotide-SNPs-streptavidin-SSB-CuNPs | 10–4,000 pg/ml − | 1 pg/ml | 55 min | |
| Fluorescent aptasensor | Fe3O4-aptamer 1/IFN-γ/aptamer 2/dsDNA | 0.169–169 × 105 pg/ml | 2.95 × 10–3 pg/ml | ||
| Fluorescent aptasensor | Fe3O4-aptamer 1/IFN-γ/aptamer 2-PBiB-pBIEM | 3.38 × 10−5–8.44 × 105 pg/ml | 3 × 10−3 pg/ml | ||
| Electrochemical aptasensor | Au-Gra/dsDNA/IFN-γ/[Ru(NH3)6]3+/SP-Au@Fe3O4 | 0.003 ng/ml | 1 h | ||
| Electrochemical aptasensor | {H2/H1} n/IFN-γ/CP/(+)AuNPs/Nf | 50 fM–3.0 pM | 16.3 fM | 200 min | |
| Electrochemical aptasensor | GE/aptamer/IFN-γ/Exo I and Exo III | 16.9–8.44 × 105 pg/ml | 11.8 pg/ml | — | |
| Electrochemical aptasensor | Au IDE/ACP/HDT-MCH | 375–1860 pg/ml | 195 pg/ml | 35 min | ( |
| Electrochemical DNAzyme biosensor | T-DNA/MCH/CP/AuNCs-Gr@ZIF-8/GCE | 0.0169–844 pg/ml | 0.01 pg/ml | ||
| DNA photoacoustic nanosensor | Streptavidin-coated SPR chip-IFN-γR2-IFN-γR1-IFN-γ | 10–2,000 pg/ml | KD1 2.8 × 106 pg/ml KD2 5.3 × 106 pg/ml | ||
| Electrochemical immunosensor | AJP graphene IDE-anti-IFN-γ-BSA-Tween-20-fish gelatin | 100–5,000 pg/ml | 25 pg/ml | 60 min |
Comparison of the analytical performance of nanobiosensors for the analysis of cytokines.
In addition to fluorescent aptamer sensors, there are electrochemical sensors, which are sensing devices that couple biometric elements to electrode sensors. The transducer then converts biometric events into electrical signals. A novel electrochemical aptamer sensor for IFN-γ detection was developed based on exonuclease-catalyzed target recycling and TdT mediated cascade signal amplification (
Additionally,
To be honest, cytokine detection of IFN-γ is not a highly specific method for TB diagnosis as IFN-γ is widely involved in different diseases, which means that it is very difficult to distinguish TB from other diseases based on IFN-γ detection. Thus, it is very important to explore more specific strategies for TB diagnosis, which might be achieved by the simultaneous detection of several different kinds of cytokines.
Nanomaterial-based biosensors can also be developed for multiple cytokines detection at the same time. For example, a team synthesized a graphene immunosensor based on aerosol jet printing (AJP) that can monitor two different cytokines: IFN-γ and IL10 (
Up to now, the low contents of specific markers in human serum still dramatically restricted the diagnosis of LTBI. Yang’s group have recently introduced several different methods based on nanobiosensors for potential LTBI diagnosis. Firstly, a novel ECL-biosensing platform was developed for the detection of multiple LTBI markers, including IFN-γ and IL-2 (
There are also clinical TB diagnostic methods that targeting the cytokine analysis, such as the IGRAs test, which detects the IFN-γ releases with few cross reactions with non-Mycobacterial or BCG infections. But it is worth to note that this method might also introduce false results in some subjects with inherent high IFN-γ production. Thus, it is a trend to develop new methods for multiple cytokine analysis, and among the current techniques, nanobiosensing techniques provide strong potentials for multiple cytokine analysis in potential TB diagnosis. But how to screen new Mtb-specific cytokines as new targets for analysis combining with IFN-γ remains a big challange. In theory, the direct analysis of plasma or serum cytokines of patients without antigen stimulation would be more easily to be disturbed by other diseased conditions. Thus, the development of new nanobiosensors should also be directed to detect the cytokine released from the PBMC of patients upon Mtb antigen stimulation.
Direct whole cell detection of Mtb by nanobiosensors
In addition to DNA, secreted proteins and cytokines, researchers also introduced whole cell detection method for Mtb diagnosis. Teresa and co-workers used a magnetoresistive (MR) biosensors to detect BCG bacteria with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), functionalized with specific antibodies (Abs) and bioconjugated with BCG bacterial cells through three steps: A) capture Abs and control Abs were attached to the surface of MR-biochip, respectively; and then a baseline MR signal was registered; B) a immunoassay following a sandwich format labeled by MNPs and functionalized with polyclonal biotin was conjugated with anti-Mtb detection Abs to bioconjugate with the target bacterial cells; C) the non-bound MNPs were then washed out and the signals from labeled targets could be recorded. It is worth to note that the BCG binding specificity is not 100%, but there are significant differences for the MR voltages between positive sample and negative control (
In addition,
In addition to the measure of electrical signal, magnetic nanoparticle based colorimetric biosensing assay (NCBA) can also be developed to detect acid-fast bacilli (AFB). Among that method, MNPs were coated by glycan, which allowed the effective capture of Mtb by glycan-glycoprotein interactions that didn’t require the use of the much more expensive antibodies or aptamers. The detection procedure was greatly simplified when compared to other signal detection methods such as electrical and fluorometric signal. More importantly, the detection results based on NCBA method showed 100% agreement with the results obtained by Xpert Mtb/RIF for all 500 tested samples, however, with much shorter time (10–20 min) and much cheaper costs (almost $0.10 per test), which might be more easily used for TB diagnosis in some developing and undeveloped countries (
In theory, the detection of whole cell of Mtb requires the existence of Mtb in the anayzed samples. Thus, the clinical analysis of whole cell of Mtb always performed in the sputum from potential pulmonary TB, such as the Mycobacterial culture analysis of Mtb in clinic. We need to know that there indeed exist potential biosafty issues for the use of sputum samples with live Mtb inside, which therefore requires strict laboratory conditions with high biosafety levels. Therefore, unlike the analysis of DNA, proteins or cytokines in the blood samples, the whole cell of Mtb analysis from sputum samples need to be strictky done in BSL-3 or at least BSL2+ labs. If new nanobiosensors are developed for whole cell of Mtb analysis, these nanobiosensors and their corresponding detecting instruments should also be set in the high biosafety labs, which might introduce more costs and biosafet issues.
Perspectives and conclusion
As one of the most urgent public health issues, TB causes millions of deaths every year, ranking above AIDS. Thus, how to control the TB epidemic remains a big challenge. For rapid and effective therapy of TB patients, the diagnosis of TB is the most important issues, which therefore requires rapid and accurate TB diagnosis method. However, the current methods for TB, latent TB or drug-resistance TB diagnosis is not sensitive, rapid and accurate enough, which urges us to develop more sensitive, rapid and effective diagnosis strategy.
Taking the advantages of outstanding physical, chemical and biological properties, nanomaterials have been proved to show promising potentials for novel nanobiosensor construction. Here, we summarized the current progress of nanobiosensors for potential TB diagnosis application. Due to the unique properties of TB infection, most of the current diagnostic method based on nanotechnology is focused on the detection of Mtb components, such as the DNA and proteins released from Mtb. The positive signals for the nanobiosensor indicate the presence of DNA and proteins from Mtb in the sample and also indirectly indicate the infection of the sample sources. The detection of the DNA and protein of Mtb by nanobiosensor is much more specific for TB diagnosis than that of cytokine detection. Whole cell detection of Mtb is also more specific than cytokine-based detection methods. This is caused by the fact that cytokines are always involved in different diseases, which means that they are not specific for TB. Therefore, we prefer to suggest that the cytokine detection should act as a ancillary method combining with other methods, which would allow more accurate diagnosis of TB.
Another important issue is that the sample for analysis is also critical for the clinical application of nanobiosensors. The detection of the DNA contents and proteins of Mtb, or the detection of cytokines allow the analysis of some very easily obtained samples, such as serum, plasma or blood cells. However, the detection of whole cell of Mtb requires the samples containing Mtb, such as the alveolar lavage fluid or the tissues from the infection site. It is widely known that the tissue samples and the alveolar lavage fluid samples are much more difficult to be obtained. Additionally, the samples with Mtb inside are very dangerous infectious samples that should be carefully treated in specific labs, such as BSL3 labs or BSL2 labs with strict controlled conditions. Thus, although the whole cell detection method could provide direct evidences for the presence of Mtb in samples, it is still very difficult to be popularized in hospitals. It is worth to note that the sample collection and storage strategies are also very important for the rapid, accurate and sensitive analysis of TB by nanobiosensors. As different sample collection and storage strategies might result in different detection results, developing standardized sample collection and storage protocols should also be recognized as an important part for the furture clinical application of nanobiosensors for TB diagnosis.
In some countries with high TB burdens, access to fast, simple, cheap and reliable diagnostic strategies is one of the most important and urgent issues in controlling TB. The combination of nanotechnology and biosensing technology have indicated strong potentials to develop Mtb detection and for potential management in clinical diagnosis. In this review, we summarized a variety of nanobiosensors that are designed to detect different TB targets from nucleic acid to the whole bacteria. These methods offer great prospects in the development of rapid TB biosensing strategies with high sensitivity and accuracy. However, there are still some remaining shortcomings as following: 1) although the sensitivity and specificity seem to be satisfactory, most of those methods are lack of clinical detection data which could directly verify their clinical application prospect; 2) most of the fabrication procedures for those nanobiosensors are too complicated, which might affect the repeatability and applicability of these methods for clinical uses; 3) due to more attentions are needed to be paid in the development of inexpensive devices with high efficiency for the diagnosis of TB in latent phase; 4) most of those assays contain only one detection target which might result in false negative results in clinical detection.
Moreover, although lots of different nanobiosensors have been developed in recent decades for laboratorial analysis of TB associated samples, we can’t deny that the current progress of nanobiosensors is still far from the clinical application. The current clinical diagnostic methods, such as Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear microscopy, Mycobacterial cultures, tuberculin skin testing (TST), interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) and Xpert Mtb/RIF assay have been widely proved to be effective in TB diagnosis, which dramatically enhanced the ability of hospitals for the rapid treatment of TB, latent TB and drug-resistant TB. Some iconography techniques, such as X-ray and computerized tomography (CT), also significantly contribute to TB diagnosis by providing direct graphic evidences for active TB. Although some works have demonstrated the enhanced sensitivity of some novel nanobiosensors for clinical sample analysis beyond the current clinical strategy, their accuracy and sensitivity remain to be further confirmed in larger corhorts.
The current clinical diagnostic methods have developed very mature detection instruments that are suitable for clinical uses, however, the development of laboratorial instruments for nanobiosensors that are suitable for clinical uses also remain a critical issue for the future uses of nanobiosensors. Although some clinical detection strategies, such as IGRAs and Xpert Mtb/RIF assay, are restricted by the high cost issues for widely uses worldwide, the complicated materials and procedures in most reported nanobiosensing methods might also introduce the high cost issues for potential clinical uses of nanobiosensor in the future TB diagnosis. Thus, more attentions are still needed to be paid into the development of novel nanobiosensors with low cost and high sensitivity that are suitable for clinical uses.
We prospect that in the following decades, some simple and portable diagnostic strategies that are capable of multi-target detection will be evolved for TB diagnosis based on the nanobiosensing methods. With these expectations and hopes in mind, the final application of nanobiosensors from bench to clinical diagnosis would promote the pace on the road of global objectives for TB control.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
XY, SF, and YM drafted and revised the manuscript and contributed equally to this work, HC and J-FX helped to revise the manuscript, JP, WW and GC were responsible for leading this work and revising the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Medical Research Funding of Guangdong (A2019286), Science and Technology Project of Zhongshan (2019B1056, to WW), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272348), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515011223), Project of Educational Commission of Guangdong Province of China (2021KTSCX038), Funds for Ph.D. researchers of Guangdong Medical University in 2021 (4SG21236G) and Discipline construction project of Guangdong Medical University (4SG21229GDGFY01).
Acknowledgments
We tender our apologies to those authors whose deserving research was not cited in this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AagaardC.GovaertsM.MeikleV.VallecilloA. J.Gutierrez-PabelloJ. A.Suarez-GüemesF.et al (2006). Optimizing antigen cocktails for detection of Mycobacterium bovis in herds with different prevalences of bovine tuberculosis: ESAT6-CFP10 mixture shows optimal sensitivity and specificity. J. Clin. Microbiol.44, 4326–4335. 10.1128/jcm.01184-06
2
Abu-SalahK. M.ZourobM. M.MouffoukF.AlrokayanS. A.AlaameryM. A.AnsariA. A. (2015). DNA-based nanobiosensors as an emerging platform for detection of disease. Sensors (Basel)15, 14539–14568. 10.3390/s150614539
3
AbubakarI.PimpinL.AritiC.BeynonR.MangtaniP.SterneJ. A.et al (2013). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence on the duration of protection by bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination against tuberculosis. Health Technol. Assess.17, 1–372. v-vi. 10.3310/hta17370
4
AlotaibiB.El-MasryT. A.ElekhnawyE.El-KademA. H.SalehA.NegmW. A.et al (2022). Aqueous core epigallocatechin gallate PLGA nanocapsules: Characterization, antibacterial activity against uropathogens, and in vivo reno-protective effect in cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity. Drug Deliv. (Lond).29, 1848–1862. 10.1080/10717544.2022.2083725
5
ArendS. M.Van SoolingenD. (2018). Performance of Xpert Mtb/RIF ultra: A matter of dead or alive. Lancet Infect. Dis.18, 8–10. 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30695-3
6
AroraJ.KumarG.VermaA. K.BhallaM.SarinR.MyneeduV. P. (2015). Utility of MPT64 antigen detection for rapid confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J. Glob. Infect. Dis.7, 66–69. 10.4103/0974-777x.154443
7
AzmiU. Z. M.YusofN. A.AbdullahJ.MohammadF.AhmadS. a. A.SuraiyaS.et al (2021). Aptasensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum utilising CFP10-ESAT6 protein as a selective biomarker. Nanomater. (Basel)11, 2446. 10.3390/nano11092446
8
BaiL.ChenY.BaiY.ChenY.ZhouJ.HuangA. (2017). Fullerene-doped polyaniline as new redox nanoprobe and catalyst in electrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis MPT64 antigen in human serum. Biomaterials133, 11–19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.010
9
BaiL.ChenY.LiuX.ZhouJ.CaoJ.HouL.et al (2019). Ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis IS6110 fragment using gold nanoparticles decorated fullerene nanoparticles/nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheet as signal tags. Anal. Chim. Acta X.1080, 75–83. 10.1016/j.aca.2019.06.043
10
BaoT.WenM.WenW.ZhangX.WangS. (2019). Ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor of interferon-gamma based on gold nanoclusters-graphene@zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 and layered-branched hybridization chain reaction. Sensors Actuators B Chem.296, 126606. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.083
11
BarrosoT. G.MartinsR. C.FernandesE.CardosoS.RivasJ.FreitasP. P. (2018). Detection of BCG bacteria using a magnetoresistive biosensor: A step towards a fully electronic platform for tuberculosis point-of-care detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. X.100, 259–265. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.09.004
12
BehrM. A.WilsonM. A.GillW. P.SalamonH.SchoolnikG. K.RaneS.et al (1999). Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by whole-genome DNA microarray. Science284, 1520–1523. 10.1126/science.284.5419.1520
13
BlakemoreR.StoryE.HelbD.KopJ.BanadaP.OwensM. R.et al (2010). Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Xpert Mtb/RIF assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.48, 2495–2501. 10.1128/jcm.00128-10
14
CheN.QuY.ZhangC.ZhangL.ZhangH. (2016). Double staining of bacilli and antigen Ag85B improves the accuracy of the pathological diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Clin. Pathol.69, 600–606. 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203244
15
ChenP.PengW.QuR.HeY.LiuT.HuangJ.et al (2022). Fluorescence aptasensor of tuberculosis interferon-gamma in clinical samples regulated by steric hindrance and selective identification. Anal. Chem.94, 9122–9129. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01530
16
ChenY.LiY.YangY.WuF.CaoJ.BaiL. (2017). A polyaniline-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as a redox nanoprobe in a voltammetric DNA biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microchim. Acta184, 1801–1808. 10.1007/s00604-017-2184-5
17
ChenY.LiuX.GuoS.CaoJ.ZhouJ.ZuoJ.et al (2019). A sandwich-type electrochemical aptasensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis MPT64 antigen detection using C(60)NPs decorated N-CNTs/GO nanocomposite coupled with conductive PEI-functionalized metal-organic framework. Biomaterials216, 119253. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119253
18
DahiyaB.PrasadT.SinghV.KhanA.KamraE.MorP.et al (2020). Diagnosis of tuberculosis by nanoparticle-based immuno-PCR assay based on mycobacterial MPT64 and CFP-10 detection. Nanomedicine (Lond)15, 2609–2624. 10.2217/nnm-2020-0258
19
DesikanP. (2013). Sputum smear microscopy in tuberculosis: Is it still relevant?Indian J. Med. Res.137, 442–444.
20
DingS.MosherC.LeeX. Y.DasS. R.CargillA. A.TangX.et al (2017). Rapid and label-free detection of interferon gamma via an electrochemical aptasensor comprising a ternary surface monolayer on a gold interdigitated electrode array. ACS Sens.2, 210–217. 10.1021/acssensors.6b00581
21
DiouaniM. F.OuerghiO.RefaiA.BelgacemK.TliliC.LaouiniD.et al (2017). Detection of ESAT-6 by a label free miniature immuno-electrochemical biosensor as a diagnostic tool for tuberculosis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C74, 465–470. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.051
22
DolinP. J.RaviglioneM. C.KochiA. (1994). Global tuberculosis incidence and mortality during 1990-2000. Bull. World Health Organ.72, 213–220.
23
El-SamadonyH.AlthaniA.TageldinM. A.AzzazyH. M. E. (2017). Nanodiagnostics for tuberculosis detection. Expert Rev. Mol. diagn.17, 427–443. 10.1080/14737159.2017.1308825
24
El-SamadonyH.AzzazyH. M. E.TageldinM. A.AshourM. E.DerazI. M.ElmaghrabyT. (2019). Nanogold assay improves accuracy of conventional TB diagnostics. Lung197, 241–247. 10.1007/s00408-018-00194-0
25
FukushimaM.KakinumaK.HayashiH.NagaiH.ItoK.KawaguchiR. (2003). Detection and identification of Mycobacterium species isolates by DNA microarray. J. Clin. Microbiol.41, 2605–2615. 10.1128/jcm.41.6.2605-2615.2003
26
GongW.WuX. (2021). Differential diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis: A key to a successful tuberculosis control strategy. Front. Microbiol.12, 745592. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.745592
27
GordonS. V.BroschR.BillaultA.GarnierT.EiglmeierK.ColeS. T. (1999). Identification of variable regions in the genomes of tubercle bacilli using bacterial artificial chromosome arrays. Mol. Microbiol.32, 643–655. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01383.x
28
GouD.XieG.LiY.ZhangX.ChenH. (2018). Voltammetric immunoassay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis secretory protein MPT64 based on a synergistic amplification strategy using rolling circle amplification and a gold electrode modified with graphene oxide, Fe(3)O(4) and Pt nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta185, 436. 10.1007/s00604-018-2972-6
29
GuptaS.KakkarV. (2018). Recent technological advancements in tuberculosis diagnostics - a review. Biosens. Bioelectron. X.115, 14–29. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.05.017
30
GuthulaL. S.YehK. T.HuangW. L.ChenC. H.ChenY. L.HuangC. J.et al (2022). Quantitative and amplification-free detection of SOCS-1 CpG methylation percentage analyses in gastric cancer by fiber optic nanoplasmonic biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. X.214, 114540. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114540
31
HatamiZ.RaghebE.JalaliF.TabriziM. A.ShamsipurM. (2020). Zinc oxide-gold nanocomposite as a proper platform for label-free DNA biosensor. Bioelectrochemistry133, 107458. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107458
32
HeF.XiongY.LiuJ.TongF.YanD. (2016). Construction of Au-IDE/CFP10-ESAT6 aptamer/DNA-AuNPs MSPQC for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biosens. Bioelectron. X.77, 799–804. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.054
33
HopmeierD.LampejoT.RycroftJ.TiberiS.MelzerM. (2020). The limitations of the Cepheid GeneXpert® Mtb/Rif assay for the diagnosis and management of polyresistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Pract.7-8, 100038. 10.1016/j.clinpr.2020.100038
34
JiangY.LiuH.WanK. (2014). MPT64 polymorphisms of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains suggest ongoing immune evasion. Tuberc. (Edinb)94, 712–714. 10.1016/j.tube.2014.08.013
35
KhoderR.Korri-YoussoufiH. (2020). E-DNA biosensors of M. tuberculosis based on nanostructured polypyrrole. Mater. Sci. Eng. C108, 110371. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110371
36
KimE. J.KimE. B.LeeS. W.CheonS. A.KimH. J.LeeJ.et al (2017). An easy and sensitive sandwich assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ag85B antigen using quantum dots and gold nanorods. Biosens. Bioelectron. X.87, 150–156. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.08.034
37
KormaW.MihretA.ChangY.TarekegnA.TegegnM.TuhaA.et al (2020). Antigen-specific cytokine and chemokine gene expression for diagnosing latent and active tuberculosis. Diagn. (Basel)10, 716. 10.3390/diagnostics10090716
38
LiF.YuY.LiQ.ZhouM.CuiH. (2014). A homogeneous signal-on strategy for the detection of rpoB genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on electrochemiluminescent graphene oxide and ferrocene quenching. Anal. Chem.86, 1608–1613. 10.1021/ac403281g
39
LiH.SongS.WenM.BaoT.WuZ.XiongH.et al (2019a). A novel label-free electrochemical impedance aptasensor for highly sensitive detection of human interferon-gamma based on target-induced exonuclease inhibition. Biosens. Bioelectron.142, 111532. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111532
40
LiJ.HuK.ZhangZ.TengX.ZhangX. (2019b). Click DNA cycling in combination with gold nanoparticles loaded with quadruplex DNA motifs enable sensitive electrochemical quantitation of the tuberculosis-associated biomarker CFP-10 in sputum. Microchim. Acta186, 662. 10.1007/s00604-019-3780-3
41
LiL.YuanY.ChenY.ZhangP.BaiY.BaiL. (2018a). Aptamer based voltammetric biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen ESAT-6 using a nanohybrid material composed of reduced graphene oxide and a metal-organic framework. Microchim. Acta185, 379. 10.1007/s00604-018-2884-5
42
LiN.HuangX.SunD.YuW.TanW.LuoZ.et al (2018b). Dual-aptamer-based voltammetric biosensor for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen MPT64 by using a gold electrode modified with a peroxidase loaded composite consisting of gold nanoparticles and a Zr(IV)/terephthalate metal-organic framework. Microchim. Acta185, 543. 10.1007/s00604-018-3081-2
43
LinH. Y.ZengY. T.LinC. J.HarrounS. G.AnandA.ChangL.et al (2022). Partial carbonization of quercetin boosts the antiviral activity against H1N1 influenza A virus. J. Colloid Interface Sci.622, 481–493. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.124
44
LiongM.HoangA. N.ChungJ.GuralN.FordC. B.MinC.et al (2013). Magnetic barcode assay for genetic detection of pathogens. Nat. Commun.4, 1752. 10.1038/ncomms2745
45
LiuC.JiangD.XiangG.LiuL.LiuF.PuX. (2014). An electrochemical DNA biosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, based on signal amplification of graphene and a gold nanoparticle-polyaniline nanocomposite. Analyst139, 5460–5465. 10.1039/c4an00976b
46
LiuC.XiangG.JiangD.LiuL.LiuF.LuoF.et al (2015). An electrochemical aptasensor for detection of IFN-γ using graphene and a dual signal amplification strategy based on the exonuclease-mediated surface-initiated enzymatic polymerization. Analyst140, 7784–7791. 10.1039/c5an01591j
47
LiuR.WangC.HuJ.SuY.LvY. (2018). DNA-templated copper nanoparticles: Versatile platform for label-free bioassays. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.105, 436–452. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.003
48
LuoJ.ZhangM.YanB.LiF.GuanS.ChangK.et al (2019). Diagnostic performance of plasma cytokine biosignature combination and MCP-1 as individual biomarkers for differentiating stages Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J. Infect.78, 281–291. 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.10.017
49
MahairasG. G.SaboP. J.HickeyM. J.SinghD. C.StoverC. K. (1996). Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis. J. Bacteriol.178, 1274–1282. 10.1128/jb.178.5.1274-1282.1996
50
MalenH.SoftelandT.WikerH. G. (2008). Antigen analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv culture filtrate proteins. Scand. J. Immunol.67, 245–252. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.02064.x
51
Mat ZaidM. H.AbdullahJ.YusofN. A.SulaimanY.WasohH.Md NohM. F.et al (2017). PNA biosensor based on reduced graphene oxide/water soluble quantum dots for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sensors Actuators B Chem.241, 1024–1034. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.045
52
MiaoX.KoC. N.VellaisamyK.LiZ.YangG.LeungC. H.et al (2017). A cyclometalated iridium(III) complex used as a conductor for the electrochemical sensing of IFN-γ. Sci. Rep.7, 42740. 10.1038/srep42740
53
MiodekA.MejriN.GomgnimbouM.SolaC.Korri-YoussoufiH. (2015). E-DNA sensor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on electrochemical assembly of nanomaterials (MWCNTs/PPy/PAMAM). Anal. Chem.87, 9257–9264. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01761
54
Mohd AzmiU. Z.YusofN. A.AbdullahJ.Alang AhmadS. A.Mohd FaudziF. N.Ahmad RastonN. H.et al (2021). Portable electrochemical immunosensor for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis secreted protein CFP10-ESAT6 in clinical sputum samples. Microchim. Acta188, 20. 10.1007/s00604-020-04669-x
55
Mohd AzmiU. Z.YusofN. A.KusninN.AbdullahJ.SuraiyaS.OngP. S.et al (2018). Sandwich electrochemical immunosensor for early detection of tuberculosis based on graphene/polyaniline-modified screen-printed gold electrode. Sensors (Basel)18, 3926. 10.3390/s18113926
56
Mohd BakhoriN.YusofN. A.AbdullahJ.WasohH.Ab RahmanS. K.Abd RahmanS. F. (2019). Surface enhanced CdSe/ZnS QD/SiNP electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by combination of CFP10-ESAT6 for better diagnostic specificity. Mater. (Basel)13, 149. 10.3390/ma13010149
57
MoralesJ.PawleR. H.AkkilicN.LuoY.XavierselvanM.AlbokhariR.et al (2019). DNA-based photoacoustic nanosensor for interferon gamma detection. ACS Sens.4, 1313–1322. 10.1021/acssensors.9b00209
58
OnyangoR. O. (2011). State of the globe: Tracking tuberculosis is the test of time. J. Glob. Infect. Dis.3, 1–3. 10.4103/0974-777x.77287
59
PahwaR.HedauS.JainS.JainN.AroraV. M.KumarN.et al (2005). Assessment of possible tuberculous lymphadenopathy by PCR compared to non-molecular methods. J. Med. Microbiol.54, 873–878. 10.1099/jmm.0.45904-0
60
ParateK.RangnekarS. V.JingD.Mendivelso-PerezD. L.DingS.SecorE. B.et al (2020). Aerosol-jet-printed graphene immunosensor for label-free cytokine monitoring in serum. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces12, 8592–8603. 10.1021/acsami.9b22183
61
PerezD. J.PatinoE. B.OrozcoJ. (2022). Electrochemical nanobiosensors as point‐of‐care testing solution to cytokines measurement limitations. Electroanalysis34, 184–211. 10.1002/elan.202100237
62
PerumalV.SaheedM. S. M.MohamedN. M.SaheedM. S. M.MurtheS. S.GopinathS. C. B.et al (2018). Gold nanorod embedded novel 3D graphene nanocomposite for selective bio-capture in rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biosens. Bioelectron. X.116, 116–122. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.05.042
63
PourgholaminejadA.AghdamiN.BaharvandH.MoazzeniS. M. (2016). The effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines on immunophenotype, differentiation capacity and immunomodulatory functions of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cytokine85, 51–60. 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.06.003
64
PrabowoB. A.PurwidyantriA.LiuB.LaiH. C.LiuK. C. (2021). Gold nanoparticle-assisted plasmonic enhancement for DNA detection on a graphene-based portable surface plasmon resonance sensor. Nanotechnology32, 095503. 10.1088/1361-6528/abcd62
65
QinL.ZhengR.MaZ.FengY.LiuZ.YangH.et al (2009). The selection and application of ssDNA aptamers against MPT64 protein in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.47, 405–411. 10.1515/cclm.2009.097
66
RaiM.IngleA. P.BirlaS.YadavA.SantosC. A. (2016). Strategic role of selected noble metal nanoparticles in medicine. Crit. Rev. Microbiol.42, 696–719. 10.3109/1040841X.2015.1018131
67
RenshawP. S.PanagiotidouP.WhelanA.GordonS. V.HewinsonR. G.WilliamsonR. A.et al (2002). Conclusive evidence that the major T-cell antigens of theMycobacterium tuberculosis complex ESAT-6 and CFP-10 form a tight, 1:1 complex and characterization of the structural properties of ESAT-6, CFP-10, and the ESAT-6·CFP-10 complex. J. Biol. Chem.277, 21598–21603. 10.1074/jbc.m201625200
68
SaengdeeP.ChaisriratanakulW.BunjongpruW.SripumkhaiW.SrisuwanA.HruanunC.et al (2016). A silicon nitride ISFET based immunosensor for Ag85B detection of tuberculosis. Analyst141, 5767–5775. 10.1039/c6an00568c
69
Sanjuan-JimenezR.MorataP.BermúdezP.BravoM. J.ColmeneroJ. D. (2013). Comparative clinical study of different multiplex real time PCR strategies for the simultaneous differential diagnosis between extrapulmonary tuberculosis and focal complications of brucellosis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.7, e2593. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002593
70
SmithI. (2003). Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis and molecular determinants of virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.16, 463–496. 10.1128/cmr.16.3.463-496.2003
71
SteingartK. R.NgV.HenryM.HopewellP. C.RamsayA.CunninghamJ.et al (2006). Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: A systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis.6, 664–674. 10.1016/s1473-3099(06)70602-8
72
SudburyE. L.CliffordV.MessinaN. L.SongR.CurtisN. (2020). Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific cytokine biomarkers to differentiate active TB and LTBI: A systematic review. J. Infect.81, 873–881. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.09.032
73
SunW.YuanS.HuangH.LiuN.TanY. (2017). A label-free biosensor based on localized surface plasmon resonance for diagnosis of tuberculosis. J. Microbiol. Methods142, 41–45. 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.09.007
74
TaghdisiS. M.DaneshN. M.RamezaniM.Yazdian-RobatiR.AbnousK. (2017). An amplified fluorescent aptasensor based on single-stranded DNA binding protein, copper and silica nanoparticles for sensitive detection of interferon-gamma. Anal. Chim. Acta X.984, 162–167. 10.1016/j.aca.2017.06.032
75
ToratiS. R.ReddyV.YoonS. S.KimC. (2016). Electrochemical biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection based on gold nanotubes array electrode platform. Biosens. Bioelectron. X.78, 483–488. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.098
76
TsaiT. T.ChenC. A.Yi-Ju HoN.YangS.ChenC. F. (2019). Fluorescent double-stranded DNA-templated copper nanoprobes for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. ACS Sens.4, 2885–2892. 10.1021/acssensors.9b01163
77
TufaL. T.OhS.TranV. T.KimJ.JeongK.-J.ParkT. J.et al (2018). Electrochemical immunosensor using nanotriplex of graphene quantum dots, Fe3O4, and Ag nanoparticles for tuberculosis. Electrochimica Acta290, 369–377. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.108
78
VinuesaV.BorrasR.BrionesM. L.ClariM. A.CresencioV.GimenezE.et al (2018). Performance of a highly sensitive Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex real-time PCR assay for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a low-prevalence setting: A prospective intervention study. J. Clin. Microbiol.56, e00116 18. 10.1128/jcm.00116-18
79
VordermeierH. M.WhelanA.CockleP. J.FarrantL.PalmerN.HewinsonR. G. (2001). Use of synthetic peptides derived from the antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 for differential diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in cattle. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.8, 571–578. 10.1128/cdli.8.3.571-578.2001
80
WangF. A.LakshmipriyaT.GopinathS. C. B. (2018). Red spectral shift in sensitive colorimetric detection of tuberculosis by ESAT-6 antigen-antibody complex: A new strategy with gold nanoparticle. Nanoscale Res. Lett.13, 331. 10.1186/s11671-018-2753-5
81
WangH.ZhengX.ZhangY.HuangJ.ZhouW.LiX.et al (2021). The endocrine role of bone: Novel functions of bone-derived cytokines. Biochem. Pharmacol.183, 114308. 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114308
82
WangL.ZhangH.RuanY.ChinD. P.XiaY.ChengS.et al (2014). Tuberculosis prevalence in China, 1990-2010; a longitudinal analysis of national survey data. Lancet383, 2057–2064. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62639-2
83
WangQ.BoshoffH. I. M.HarrisonJ. R.RayP. C.GreenS. R.WyattP. G.et al (2020). PE/PPE proteins mediate nutrient transport across the outer membrane of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science367, 1147–1151. 10.1126/science.aav5912
84
WangW.ChenC.YingY.LvS.WangY.ZhangX.et al (2022). Smart PdH@MnO(2) yolk-shell nanostructures for spatiotemporally synchronous targeted hydrogen delivery and oxygen-elevated phototherapy of melanoma. ACS Nano16, 5597–5614. 10.1021/acsnano.1c10450
85
WeldinghK.AndersenP. (2008). ESAT-6/CFP10 skin test predicts disease in M. tuberculosis-infected Guinea pigs. PLoS One3, e1978. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001978
86
WelinA.BjörnsdottirH.WintherM.ChristensonK.OpreaT.KarlssonA.et al (2015). CFP-10 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis selectively activates human neutrophils through a pertussis toxin-sensitive chemotactic receptor. Infect. Immun.83, 205–213. 10.1128/iai.02493-14
87
WenD.LiuQ.CuiY.KongJ.YangH.LiuQ. (2018). DNA based click polymerization for ultrasensitive IFN-γ fluorescent detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem.276, 279–287. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.08.122
88
WenD.LiuQ.LiL.YangH.KongJ. (2019). Ultrasensitive aptamer fluorometric detection of IFN-γ by dual atom transfer radical polymerization amplification. Sensors Actuators B Chem.295, 40–48. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.036
89
World HealthO. (2015a). Accelerating progress on HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis and neglected tropical diseases: A new agenda for 2016-2030. Geneva: World Health Organization.
90
World HealthO. (2015b). Global tuberculosis report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization.
91
World HealthO. (2021). Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization.
92
XuJ. N.ChenJ. P.ChenD. L. (2012). Serodiagnosis efficacy and immunogenicity of the fusion protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis composed of the 10-kilodalton culture filtrate protein, ESAT-6, and the extracellular domain fragment of PPE68. Clin. Vaccine Immunol.19, 536–544. 10.1128/cvi.05708-11
93
XueH.ZhangZ.LinZ.SuJ.PanayiA. C.XiongY.et al (2022). Enhanced tissue regeneration through immunomodulation of angiogenesis and osteogenesis with a multifaceted nanohybrid modified bioactive scaffold. Bioact. Mat.18, 552–568. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.023
94
YinX.ZhengL.LinL.HuY.ZhengF.HuY.et al (2013). Commercial MPT64-based tests for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: A meta-analysis. J. Infect.67, 369–377. 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.06.009
95
ZhangC.LouJ.TuW.BaoJ.DaiZ. (2015). Ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensing for DNA using quantum dots combined with restriction endonuclease. Analyst140, 506–511. 10.1039/c4an01284d
96
ZhangW.ShuQ.ZhaoZ.FanJ.LyonC. J.ZelaznyA. M.et al (2018). Antigen 85B peptidomic analysis allows species-specific mycobacterial identification. Clin. Proteomics15, 1. 10.1186/s12014-017-9177-6
97
ZhangX.FengY.DuanS.SuL.ZhangJ.HeF. (2019). Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv electrochemical sensor mediated by aptamer and AuNPs-DNA. ACS Sens.4, 849–855. 10.1021/acssensors.8b01230
98
ZhouB.HaoY.ChenS.YangP. (2019). A quartz crystal microbalance modified with antibody-coated silver nanoparticles acting as mass signal amplifiers for real-time monitoring of three latent tuberculosis infection biomarkers. Microchim. Acta186, 212. 10.1007/s00604-019-3319-7
99
ZhouB.ZhuM.HaoY.YangP. (2017a). Potential-resolved electrochemiluminescence for simultaneous determination of triple latent tuberculosis infection markers. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces9, 30536–30542. 10.1021/acsami.7b10343
100
ZhouB.ZhuM.QiuY.YangP. (2017b). Novel electrochemiluminescence-sensing platform for the precise analysis of multiple latent tuberculosis infection markers. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces9, 18493–18500. 10.1021/acsami.7b03211
Summary
Keywords
nanomaterials, nanobiosensor, tuberculosis, diagnosis, recent progress
Citation
Yang X, Fan S, Ma Y, Chen H, Xu J-F, Pi J, Wang W and Chen G (2022) Current progress of functional nanobiosensors for potential tuberculosis diagnosis: The novel way for TB control?. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:1036678. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036678
Received
05 September 2022
Accepted
02 December 2022
Published
15 December 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Mingqiang Li, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China
Reviewed by
Nan-Fu Chiu, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
Qing Huang, Army Medical University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Yang, Fan, Ma, Chen, Xu, Pi, Wang and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jiang Pi, jiangpi@gdmu.edu.cn; Wandang Wang, wangwandang@126.com; Guanghui Chen, chenguanghui416@sina.com
† These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Biomaterials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.