Abstract
Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogels have been widely used in various biomedical applications, especially in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, for their excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. GelMA crosslinks to form a hydrogel when exposed to light irradiation in the presence of photoinitiators. The mechanical characteristics of GelMA hydrogels are highly tunable by changing the crosslinking conditions, including the GelMA polymer concentration, degree of methacrylation, light wavelength and intensity, and light exposure time et al. In this regard, GelMA hydrogels can be adjusted to closely resemble the native extracellular matrix (ECM) properties for the specific functions of target tissues. Therefore, this review focuses on the applications of GelMA hydrogels for bioengineering human vascular networks in vitro and in vivo. Since most tissues require vasculature to provide nutrients and oxygen to individual cells, timely vascularization is critical to the success of tissue- and cell-based therapies. Recent research has demonstrated the robust formation of human vascular networks by embedding human vascular endothelial cells and perivascular mesenchymal cells in GelMA hydrogels. Vascular cell-laden GelMA hydrogels can be microfabricated using different methodologies and integrated with microfluidic devices to generate a vasculature-on-a-chip system for disease modeling or drug screening. Bioengineered vascular networks can also serve as build-in vasculature to ensure the adequate oxygenation of thick tissue-engineered constructs. Meanwhile, several reports used GelMA hydrogels as implantable materials to deliver therapeutic cells aiming to rebuild the vasculature in ischemic wounds for repairing tissue injuries. Here, we intend to reveal present work trends and provide new insights into the development of clinically relevant applications based on vascularized GelMA hydrogels.
Introduction
The majority of tissues in the body require blood flow to provide nutrients and oxygen to individual cells (Rouwkema et al., 2008). Because the diffusion limit of oxygen through biological tissues is around 100–200 μm, proximity to the capillary is essential for cell survival (). The vascular densities are even higher in high-metabolic-rate organs, such as hearts and livers. In these organs, approximately every parenchymal cell is in direct contact with at least one microvessel to meet the metabolic demand (). Vascular disorders can occur at any level of the hierarchical vascular network (Udan et al., 2013). Genetic defects in critical genes of vascular development generally result in early embryonic lethal (). In adults, diminished or absent blood flow causes ischemic injury, resulting in the inability to maintain cell viability, build-up of metabolic waste products, and eventual leakage of proteolytic enzymes into the surrounding tissues (; Qadura et al., 2018; ). Ischemic injury happening in vital organs immediately leads to life-threatening diseases. The causes of ischemic injury vary widely in different conditions. For example, coronary artery disease is caused by narrowed coronary arteries which supply blood to the heart muscle (). Ischemic stroke occurs when a blood clot blocks or narrows an artery leading to the brain (Tsao et al., 2022). Chronic metabolic disorders and aging generally increase the risk of vascular disorders, including congestive heart failure, stroke, critical limb ischemia, and diabetic-related retinopathy and nephropathy (; ; ; Tsao et al., 2022). In the United States, vascular disorders lead to severe complications of cardiovascular diseases, which have remained the leading cause of mortality (Tsao et al., 2022).
Ischemic diseases caused by the blockage of major arteries are predominately treated by surgical bypass interventions, mainly using vascular grafts to revascularize downstream tissues (Zeltsman and Acker, 2002). Notwithstanding the benefit produced by these surgical procedures, inadequate revascularization remains a common outcome due to the inability to regenerate microvascular beds in the ischemic areas (). For years, considerable effort has been focused on delivering pro-angiogenic growth factors, genes, and vascular progenitor cells to promote local revascularization (Rafii and Lyden, 2003; ). These strategies recently gained significant progression from the interdisciplinary knowledge of stem cell biology and biomaterial engineering (Rouwkema et al., 2008; ; ).
Tissue engineering holds great promise in regenerative medicine as a means to generate competent tissues that can be transplanted to replace damaged body parts. However, despite remarkable pre-clinical progress, translation of tissue engineering products into clinical practice still faces a myriad of difficulties. One major challenge is the necessity to integrate complex three-dimensional. (3D) vascular networks into bioengineered constructs to sustain the transplantation of engineered tissues (Rouwkema et al., 2008; ; Wang et al., 2019). Avascular tissue-engineered constructs are very likely to struggle after in vivo transplantation due to limited oxygen and nutrient supply. Studies have consistently shown that the ingrowth of pre-existing host microvessels is insufficient to ensure appropriate vascularization of implanted tissues (Rademakers et al., 2019). To achieve rapid and complete vascularization of thick engineered tissues, constructs would need some kind of built-in vasculature ().
Cell transplantation also requires a strategy to ensure adequate oxygenation, nutrient delivery, and removal of waste products to achieve successful cell engraftment. Injection of several therapeutic cell types, including the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes, hepatocytes, and pancreatic beta cells, have been shown to survive and function significantly better with built-in vasculature (Takebe et al., 2013; ; Vlahos et al., 2017). Over the last two decades, researchers have resorted to exploiting the inherent blood vessel-forming ability of vascular progenitor cells in an effort to incorporate such built-in vascular networks (; Wang et al., 2019). The options for clinically available human vascular progenitor cells were covered in our previous review article (Wang et al., 2019). Currently, consensus still holds that bioengineering vascular networks remain a priority in cell- and tissue-based regenerative medicine. The use of proper biomaterials as a vehicle to facilitate vasculogenesis is central to this effort.
This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the recent progress in utilizing gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) for bioengineering human vascular networks. We cover the advantages of GelMA compared to other natural or synthetic hydrogels regarding the compatibility of vessel formation. GelMA-based in vitro and in vivo strategies to construct functional vascular networks are also reviewed with a particular interest in their therapeutic applications.
Synthesis and preparation of gelatin methacrylate
GelMA is modified from gelatin, the hydrolyzed product of collagen at high temperatures. GelMA is synthesized by adding methacrylate groups to the amine-containing side-groups of gelatin, which becomes a photocrosslinkable biopolymer (Figure 1) (; ). This reaction is achieved by adding methacrylic anhydride (MA) dropwise into a gelatin solution under vigorous stirring. Final concentrations of MA between 1 and 10% (v/v) are commonly used in reported studies. Higher MA concentration results in a higher degree of methacrylation (defined as the ratio of functionalized to original amino groups and measured by 1H-NMR spectroscop) (). Unreacted MA and additional by-products are removed by dialysis against deionized water using 12–14 kDa cut-off dialysis tubes. The dialyzed GelMA solution is freeze-lyophilized to form a foam (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1
The usage of GelMA starts with the preparation of GelMA precursor solution. Lyophilized GelMA foam can be dissolved in warm biological buffers (i.e., PBS, normal saline, and cell culture media) to a concentration of up to 20% (w/v). This GelMA precursor solution is stable at room temperature for several weeks. GelMA crosslinking occurs in the presence of photoinitiators and the irritation of visible or ultraviolet (UV) light matching the photoinitiators (Figure 1A). Common photoinitiators compatible with biological applications are Irgacure 2959 (for UV light) and Lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP; for visible light; absorbance at 400 nm) (Sharifi et al., 2021).
The mechanical property, water retention, and degradability of GelMA hydrogel are highly tunable (). In general, the usage of GelMA with a higher methacrylate degree and the higher GelMA polymer concentration in the precursor solution produce a stiff hydrogel with a slow degradation rate. A higher light illumination intensity also achieves a stronger crosslinked GelMA hydrogel. Other crucial parameters for controlling photocrosslinking include the choice of photoinitiators, the light wavelength and intensity, the distance and the presence of biological cells/tissues between the light source and GelMA solution, and the overall exposure time. In practice, we suggest titrating the light exposure time to optimize the GelMA hydrogel properties while keeping the other parameters constant.
For cell-laden GelMA hydrogels, the cell viability is significantly influenced by the choice of photocrosslinking conditions and is highly dependent on the cell types. Overcrosslinked GelMA hydrogels significantly impair vascular morphogenesis (; ). We observed several critical steps of vascularization are compromised if the matrix is too stiff, including the loss of vascular cell viability, the failure of cell spreading and migration, and the lack of host-graft cellular interactions in general (; ; , ; ). For supporting vascularization of human vascular cells (a combination of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells), a soft GelMA hydrogel with a compressive modulus around 2 kPa was tested to be optimal ().
Advantage of gelatin methacrylate hydrogel for bioengineering vascular network
The use of polymeric hydrogels is now a common practice in bioengineering vascular networks. Over the last decade, a variety of natural extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived hydrogel biomaterials have been shown to be compatible with human endothelial cell-mediated vascular morphogenesis, including Matrigel, type-I collagen, and fibrin gels (). However, the properties of these natural ECM hydrogels are not always ideal for regenerative medicine applications. For example, Matrigel is not suitable for clinical use because it is derived from murine tumors (). Fibrin gels have limitations such as poor mechanical stability or suboptimal durability. Collagen hydrogels also have limitations in terms of extensive contraction, poor mechanical properties, and rapid degradation, all of which challenge their utilization as permanent graft material (Schneider-Barthold et al., 2016). Moreover, full polymerization of most natural ECM formulations at body temperature does not occur immediately, which may compromise gel-cell confinement if implanted in highly mobile tissues such as skeletal muscles or myocardium ().
Conversely, some synthetic hydrogels, such as poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), have more substantial mechanical properties but inherently lack cell-responsive features, which limits their applicability in tissue engineering (Wang et al., 2021). The addition of RGD and MMP-responsive peptides had been shown to improve the biodegradability of PEGDA hydrogels and support vascularization (). Previously, synthetic polymers and nanogels were used to encapsulate cells for in vivo delivery to demonstrate their safety and efficacy (Tang et al., 2017; ; ). Notwithstanding the benefit of these new materials, the translational usage of synthetic materials faced obstacles due to the limited data on their long-term biocompatibility. The physiological effects of their breakdown products need a thorough validation before clinical usage.
In response to these limitations, the search for improving the properties of naturally occurring ECM hydrogels has become a field of great interest. This can be achieved by chemical functionalization of ECM proteins to improve the usability of biomaterials (Tallawi et al., 2015). In this regard, GelMA is a functionalized natural (gelatin) hydrogel, and therefore shares the advantages of both natural and synthetic hydrogels. By simply modifying the degree of methacrylation, both the porosity and the degradability of GelMA hydrogel can be tuned to achieve desirable mechanical robustness without compromising cellular biocompatibility (). These tunable mechanical properties have allowed us to fabricate GelMA hydrogels with slower in vivo contraction and degradation rates than collagen-type 1 gels, which are common limitations shared by the majority of natural hydrogels. Also, GelMA hydrogels are based on gelatin, which is an inexpensive denatured collagen product that can be derived from a variety of sources, making it a potentially attractive material for tissue engineering applications (). The presence of natural gelatin in GelMA should provide natural cell binding motifs and degradation sites, which, in principle, should facilitate cellular behavior. In addition, GelMA formulation can polymerize very rapidly (with 15 s upon exposure to UV light in the presence of a photoinitiator) and proposed that this rapid polymerization would be a critical feature to avoid hydrogel dissemination at the implantation site (; ). Degraded products of GelMA hydrogel are simply gelatin peptides, which are parts of natural ECM components and are non-cytotoxic or non-immunogenic. More importantly, GelMA provides a permissive environment for vascular morphogenesis, making it an ideal biomaterial for bioengineering vascular networks ().
Versatility is another advantage of GelMA hydrogels. GelMA can be used together with other natural ECM or synthetic materials to further adjust its biological or mechanical properties (Xiao et al., 2019). For example, supplementing GelMA hydrogels with fibronectin and laminin, two major basement membrane components, improves the cell spreading and migration of endothelial cells. GelMA can be mixed with other acrylated/methacrylated materials to form a photocrosslinkable co-polymers. For example, adding PEGDA or methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) into GelMA hydrogel increases the mechanical stiffness and long-term stability, making the composite hydrogels more ideal for 3D bioprinting (; Wang Y. et al., 2018; Velasco-Rodriguez et al., 2021). Other methacrylated materials that were tested to be comparable with GelMA include methacrylated collagen, chitosan, alginate, and dextran (; ; ; ; ).
In vitro application of vascularized gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
Vascular morphogenesis in bulk gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
The suitability of GelMA hydrogels for bioengineering human vascular networks was first shown in 2012 by . Human cord blood-derived endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were used as vascular progenitor cells. The cell-laden hydrogel was prepared by resuspending cells in a GelMA precursor solution and followed by UV photocrosslinking. In this study, GelMA hydrogels were formulated in a shape of a disk (10 mm in diameter; 200 µl in volume). Cell-laden hydrogels were cultured in a medium supplemented with pro-angiogenic factors (i.e., VEGF-A and FGF-2). In this condition, a robust formation of human vascular networks was observed after 7–10 days in vitro cultivation (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Relative soft GelMA hydrogels are ideal since the formation of vascular networks requires active cell migration and matrix remodeling. The permissive hydrogel stiffness that allows human vascular morphogenesis was determined to be 2–5 kPa in this study (). Both endothelial and mesenchymal cell types were shown to be essential in building functional blood vessels. ECFCs form the lumens lining the capillary networks and express typical endothelial markers, CD31 and VE-cadherin (Figure 2). The presence of MSCs was crucial for the stabilization of ECFC-lined networks. α-Smooth muscle actin (αSMA)-expressing MSCs were visualized both in proximity and adjacent to the capillary structures, suggesting an ongoing process of perivascular coverage of capillaries (Figure 2A). Some MSCs differentiated into mature pericytes expressing smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (sm-MHC) (Figure 2B). Analyses of the cell-laden GelMA hydrogels at 3, 6, and 10 days of culture revealed a progressive process of lumen morphogenesis (Figures 2C,D). This process involved an initial accumulation of endothelial intracellular vacuoles on day 3 (Figure 2C), which were intracellularly arranged into rows and present in most of the ECFC-lined capillary structures. By day 6, some of the larger vacuoles had fused, forming large, intracellular luminal structures. On day 10, hollow ECFC-lined lumens were unequivocally identified and uniformly distributed in discrete locations within the capillary-like structures (Figure 2D) ().
Established vascular networks in GelMA hydrogels still undergo active remodeling and reorganization. The microvessel densities of capillary structures can change depending on: 1) the metabolic demands of cell/gel constructs, 2) the overall oxygen tension (normoxia or hypoxia), 3) the presence of pro-angiogenic factors, 4) the maturity of endothelial cells, and 5) the durability of hydrogels (; Wang et al., 2015). In general, the vascular networks in GelMA hydrogels could be maintained in regular culture conditions for 1–2 months (). The presence of intraluminal flow (via medium perfusion) can further extend the durability of vascular networks (Wang X. et al., 2018).
Microfabrication
Based on the success of vascularizing bulk GelMA hydrogels, microfabrication technologies were introduced to build more sophisticated engineered tissues (Figure 3). Patterned cell-laden GelMA hydrogels can be achieved by photolithography (Figure 3A). In brief, a GelMA precursor solution containing cells was photocrosslinked between two glass substrates with the spacers of desired height. UV illumination was applied through a photo mask. Only the UV exposed regions were crosslinked into hydrogels while the unexposed regions (masker areas) were removed by washing. used this technique to create cell-laden hydrogel consisting of microconstructs and found enhance endothelial cell alignment and morphogenesis into highly organized endothelial cord structures. The same methodology had been adapted to produce defined microconstructs with variable geometries. For examples, cell encapsulated in hydrogel bricks can be fabricated with controlled sizes and cell densities (). These cell bricks can be used as building blocks to assemble more complicated tissues (Qi et al., 2013) or as injectable cell vehicles (). Photolithography can also apply to create build-in channels or porous networks in bulk GelMA hydrogels, aiming to improve the cell migration and oxygen/nutrient transportation in scale-up engineered tissues (). Interestingly, endothelial cells tend to align along the microtopologic pattern of these channels and form organized vascular networks, implying the potential of controlling the vascular patterning through fabricated microconstructs () (Figure 3A).
FIGURE 3
Cell-laden microfibers have been widely used in biomedical applications, especially in the fields of tissue engineering, 3D cell culture, and cell transplantation (). In this category, GelMA microfibers can be fabricated by a microfluidic-assisted extrusion system with UV illumination [ fabricated coaxial microfibers by co-extrusion of GelMA and alginate solutions through a concentric printhead into a CaCl2 solution]. GelMA served as the core (to provide a favorable 3-D microenvironment for cells) and alginate served as the sheath (to support and confine the GelMA hydrogel in the core to allow for subsequent UV cross-linking). These microfibers could be used to assemble layered microfibrous scaffold as a vascular bed by encapsulating endothelial cells in the microfibers.
GelMA has become an attractive ink material for 3D bioprinting technology due to its excellent biocompatibility, tunable rheology, and rapid crosslinking (; Rajabi et al., 2021). The applications of GelMA in 3D bioprinting are categorized into two main types. First, GelMA can be used to prepare cell-laden microgels as modular bioinks for 3D bioprinting (Xu et al., 2020). Cell encapsulated GelMA microshperes can be produced by the microfluidic droplet generation (). GelMA precursor solution flowing through a microfluidic junction with mineral oil is extruded into tiny droplets. With the aid of UV light, the microspheres were solidified (). Cell embedded in GelMA microspheres are protected from the mechanical damages during 3D printing, resulting in improved cell viability.
Second, GelMA can be used directly for printing microconstructs and microchannels. printed GelMA into a porous scaffold to release pro-angiogenetic platelet-rich plasma. This 3D-printed scaffold was implanted in mice to demonstrate an enhanced angiogenic potential while not inducing fibrosis (Figure 3B). Nulty et al. tested several bioinks (i.e., alginate, fibrin, and GelMA) to produce prevascularized bone grafts containing human endothelial cells and bone marrow stromal cells (). Only fibrin and GelMA hydrogels allowed the formation of vascularized constructs. Implantation of vascularized bone grafts in rat femoral defects induced bone regeneration and achieved bone healing in 12 weeks. Jia et al. designed a multilayered coaxial nozzle to print a formulated cell-responsive bioink consisting of GelMA, sodium alginate, and 4-arm poly (ethylene glycol)-tetra-acrylate (PEGTA) to create perfusable hollow tubes. The printed structures were built sequentially by ionic crosslinking of alginate and covalent crosslinking of GelMA/PEGTA with Irgacure 2959 and UV irradiation. The alginate parts were removed by EDTA treatment, leaving a highly porous hydrogel scaffold. This scaffold provided a favorable microenvironment that supported the proliferation and early maturation of gel-encapsulated vascular cells as well as the bioprinting of complex 3D vasculature.
GelMA with different mechanical strengths (achieved by the degree of methacrylation or photocrosslinking time) can be integrated in one 3D printed construct to biomimetic the properties of biological tissues. For example, utilized an extrusion-based direct-writing bioprinting strategy for fabricating perusable vascularized bone construct. Cell-laden GelMA cylinder rods were deposited layer-by-layer to mimic bone-like architecture. The inner core containing a mixture of human endothelial cells and MSCs was printed with a GelMA hydrogel with low stiffness. The fast degradation of the inner core hydrogel allowed for forming perfused central lumen. The inner core was surrounded by GelMA cylinder rods of higher mechanical stiffness, which match the mechanical environment in bone matrix. A gradient of VEGF proteins and silicate nanoparticles was established during bioprinting to guide the angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Increasing angiogenic or osteogenic gene expressions such as CD31, Col1, ALP, OCN, and OPN was observed in this bioprinted bone scaffold.
To improve the structural fidelity of 3D bioprinting, recently developed the void-free 3D printing (VF-3DP) method. In this process, a templating bioink (i.e., 7.5 wt% gelatin) was printed side by side with a biocompatible matrix bioink (i.e., 5% GelMA), followed by photocrosslinking of the whole constructs. The gelatin template was washed out by incubating the printed materials at 37°C, leaving the GelMA hydrogel reminded. Importantly, human endothelial cells can be encapsulated in the GelMA hydrogel with high cell viability. This study demonstrated the bioprinting of hydrogel-based microfluidics with customized flow patterns and endothelialization, with the potential to fabricate self-supported perfusable hydrogel constructs.
Microfluidic vasculature-on-a chip
ECM hydrogels have been used as matrix to bioengineer microvascular networks in the cell culture chambers or channels in microfluidic devices (Smith and Gerecht, 2014). Successfully vascularized chip devices can be used for drug screenings and are sometimes referred to as “vasculature-on-a chip” (; ; Tomasina et al., 2019; ). In this application, the usage of GelMA allowed the investigators to tune the matrix stiffness, which critically regulates the diameters, densities, and barrier functionalities of capillary networks ().
Vascularization in microfluidic-based platforms is commonly achieved by polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) device (; ). In general, a vascular chamber is fabricated by PDMS material with inlet and outlet channels. Vascular-forming cells are loaded with hydrogels into the vascular chamber. The device is connected to an external pump to circulate oxygenized culture medium. Within 7–10 days, vascular cells assemble into vascular networks with interconnective lumens linked to the inlet and outlet channels, resulting in the medium perfusion inside the vascular lumens (). Across all on-chip models, the key features are providing continuous physiological flow and precisely controlling the input and output components. The microfluidics can be designed with variable geometries or multiple chambers to mimic physiological or pathological conditions. For example, Nguyen et al. established a coculture of cancer cells in a chip-based vascular network to study the mechanism of tumor vascular invasion (Figure 3C) (). However, since the PDMS materials are not biodegradable, these PDMS-made vascular devices cannot be used to generate engineered tissue constructs for transplantation.
Perfusable vasculature with complex hierarchical networks can be fabricated by using sacrificial templates. demonstrated the fabrication of 3D structures made from 3D printing of sugar glass scaffolds. The scaffolds were embedded in a cell-laden hydrogels (i.e., GelMA). The sacrificial template print was then dissolved and flushed with water, leaving a patterned channel network with perfusable lumens (). Cells can then be seeded on the wall of the channels, creating an endothelialized vascular bed. This method is notably attractive due to its flexibility in accommodating a variety of stromal/parenchymal cell type as well as ECM material. Other sacrificial materials have improved on this initial work, but the overall workflow is similar (; ). Recently, , improved the fabrication by using laser-sintered carbohydrate powders which allows the printing of more complicated 3D sacrificial structures. utilized sacrificial printing to generate an interconnected vascular network that perfuses throughout a thick (centi-meter scale) engineered construct of human cells. The build-in channel network improves cell proliferation and cell metabolism through fluid convection (). These scalable strategies are ideal for the fabrication, perfusion culture and volumetric analysis of large tissue-like constructs with complex and hierarchical vascular architectures (Song H. et al., 2018; Redd et al., 2019).
In vivo application of gelatin methacrylate hydrogels for therapeutic vascularization
Recent tissue engineering methods have been applied to a variety of diseases, including cardiovascular disease, bone disease, and neuronal disease (; Rouwkema et al., 2008; ). Especially, GelMA hydrogel has been developed as a promising strategy for therapeutic cell delivery to injury sites due to its high biocompatibility. Neovascularization is critical for the onset of the regenerative process (Rodrigues et al., 2019). The new circulation in healing wounds establishes a pro-regenerative niche and brings in the supplement of oxygen/nutrients, as well as stem/progenitor cells and supporting cells from both bone marrow and surrounding tissues. In this regard, GelMA was reported in several publications to be an ideal vehicle to deliver vascular progenitor cells and pro-angiogenic factors for in vivo vascularization. Over the past decades, various cell types, including human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), MSCs, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), and ECFCs within GelMA hydrogel have proved to increased therapeutic effects on cardiovascular diseases compared to those without the hydrogel system.
Transplantation of vascularized cell-laden gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
The success of in vitro vascular formation in hydrogel constructs does not guarantee the grafts will anastomose with the blood vessels and achieve perfusion by host circulation after in vivo transplantation. The properties of implant materials must be considered, including their immunogenicity, biodegradability, and the tendency to provoke foreign body reactions (; Song R. et al., 2018). first demonstrated the suitability of a photopolymerizable GelMA hydrogel to support in vivo vascularization of human vascular networks. Surgically implantation of prevascularized GelMA hydrogels (i.e., vascular networks assembled by human ECFCs and MSCs) into immunodeficient mice results in a rapid formation of functional anastomoses between the bioengineered human vascular network and the mouse vasculature. Histological examination carried out by hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) staining revealed numerous human blood vessels containing mouse erythrocytes throughout the GelMA grafts. Furthermore, it is shown that the degree of methacrylation of the GelMA can be used to modulate the cellular behavior and the extent of vascular network formation. Soft GelMA grafts allowed a uniformly distributed vascularization, while microvessels were mainly restricted to the periphery of the constructs made of stiffer GelMA hydrogels. Meanwhile, non-perfused human-ECFC-lined capillary-like structures were mainly observed in the center of implants, suggesting an ongoing process of connection between the human preformed capillaries and the mouse perfused vessels coming from the surrounding host tissues. GelMA hydrogels that are too stiff will delay the in-growth of host vessels, resulting in poor vascularization and necrosis in bulk implants. Build-in microchannels or porous structures might be considered for the scaling up of bioengineered tissue grafts.
The recruitment of host myeloid cells is necessary in ECFC/MSC-mediated neovascularization (). Two types of myeloid cells, neutrophils and macrophages, were determined to be critical mediators of graft vascularization. Non-inflammatory host neutrophils were recently found to be indispensable for vascularization through the secretion of pro-angiogenetic factors, modulation of the inflammatory response, and remodeling of the ECM matrix (). Tissue macrophages were known to promote angiogenesis and mediate vascular anastomosis between host and graft vessels (). showed that the interaction of host myeloid cells with the cell-laden GelMA constructs was significantly altered by the degree of GelMA polymerization. Significantly less penetration (but more accumulation in the boundary) of both murine neutrophils and macrophages in constructs that were crosslinked for a more extended period. This is important because accessibility of host cells is critical for ECFC-mediated vasculogenesis, sprouting of host microvessels via angiogenesis, and ultimately formation of anastomosis between bioengineered vessels and host sprouts.
In situ photocrosslinking of gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
In situ polymerization of cell-laden GelMA hydrogels following its injection in vivo has been demonstrated by . They performed the transdermal polymerization of GelMA through the skins of mice and pigs (Figure 4). The light can be transmitted (15–40% transmission) through the skin of nude mice using a UV lamp system with a wavelength between 320 and 500 nm. This spectrum includes blue and violet visible light (380–500 nm) and UVA light (315–400 nm), but not more harmful UVB and UVC light. They found that the skin of mice after 15–90 s UV exposure had a similar number of apoptotic cells as compared to the skin of unexposed mice. Meanwhile, the GelMA hydrogels can be polymerized by transdermal UV illumination for only 15 s. Therefore, they concluded that the operating range of UV light exposure required for in situ photopolymerization was deemed sufficiently safe.
FIGURE 4
Human ECFCs and MSCs delivered by transdermal polymerization of GelMA achieved a robust formation of vascular networks in vivo (Figures 4C,D) (). They modulated the vascularization process via adjusting the initial UV exposure time (15–45 s range) and found that increased GelMA crosslinking decreased the vascular density and average lumen size. Compared with the surgical implantation of ex vivo cell-laden GelMA, enabling hydrogel injection and in situ polymerization would be more desirable because 1) it would eliminate the need for surgical incisions, 2) enable the cell-laden hydrogel solution to acquire complex shapes and precise dimensions in situ, prior to polymerization, and 3) improve intimate contact of the polymer with the surface micro-roughness of the tissue at the implantation site. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrates that implants containing assembled human vascular networks fail to engraft efficiently owing to their inability to engage non-inflammatory host neutrophils upon implantation into mice (). By contrast, injecting the unassembled single cell suspension of vascular progenitor cells the achieved better vascularization by actively engaging host neutrophils. The same result was also observed by showing that the transdermal polymerization of cell-laden GelMA formed high vascular densities than the transplantation of premade GelMA constructs.
Rapid in situ photocrosslinking of GelMA hydrogels is ideal for delivering therapeutic cells into constantly moving tissues and organs, like the skeleton muscles and hearts. Our recent study demonstrated the application of GelMA to deliver human vascular progenitor cells into ischemic heart muscles (). Low cell retention and engraftment are the major obstacles to achieving a significant functional benefit following cell-based therapy for myocardial infarction (MI) (). Given that the heart is a contractile pump, beating hearts actively push therapeutic cells injected in liquid vehicles out of the myocardium, resulting in a rapid loss of cell retention (Teng et al., 2006; Terrovitis et al., 2009; Vrtovec et al., 2013; ; ; ; ). In our study, the intramyocardial injection of human ECFCs and MSCs resuspended in a GelMA precursor solution followed by transmyocardial UV illumination, resulting in an in-situ photocrosslinked hydrogel that effectively retains the cells inside the ischemic myocardial tissue (Figure 4E) (). This approach maintained high viability and cell retention, providing a significant advantage over cells injected in liquid or unmodified ECM gels (Figure 4F). We demonstrated that the beneficial myocardial remodeling and stabilization of cardiac functions post-MI was enabled by the engrafted cells via the engagement and polarization of host pro-regenerative neutrophils through TGFβ signaling. Regarding the translational potential, the cell/gel mixture can be delivered through a minimally invasive catheter-mediated procedure. In human patients, this method can be achieved by a long catheter threaded through the peripheral blood vessels into the left ventricle, where the cells are injected through the endocardium (Suncion et al., 2014). In general, this approach is less invasive because it could avoid open-chest surgery. Also, UV light illumination could be delivered through a fiber-optic system together with the catheter (Roche et al., 2015).
In vivo delivery of pro-angiogenic agents
GelMA hydrogels have been used to encapsulate organic or inorganic compounds to improve therapeutic effectiveness in vascular diseases (; ). These factors could be therapeutic proteins, bioactive lipids, metabolites, and extracellular matrix elements (; ; Tang et al., 2022). For example, Quint et al. (2021) performed in vivo printing of GelMA-based scaffolds composed of VEGF-bound Laponite. Laponite nanoclay was used to deliver pro-angiogenic proteins for sustained slow release. The GelMA bioink was extruded through a handheld printer with a UV LED light to fill volumetric muscle loss injuries. Neovascularization followed with new myofiber formation was observed. Zhang et al. (2021) synthesized a photocrosslinked decellularized amniotic membrane (dHAMMA) and blended it with GelMA hydrogels. This GelMA-dHAMMA composite hydrogel was used as biomimetic skin-substitute tissues for slow releasing pro-regenerative factors from decellularized matrix. They successfully demonstrated that GelMA-dHAMMA promoted angiogenesis and fibroblast proliferation, resulting in accelerated wound healing. Yan et al. (2021) incorporated a microbial lipopeptide, called surfactin, in GelMA hydrogel to treat diabetic wounds. Surfactin increased the mechanical properties of GelMA hydrogel and accelerated diabetic wound healing via regulating macrophage polarization and promoting angiogenesis. Recently, Tang et al., 2022 created a GelMA patch to deliver MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) to ischemic heart muscles. EVs-laden GelMA had a remarkably therapeutic effect in a myocardial infarction mouse model. This hydrogel inhibited apoptosis of cells in the infarct zone and increased angiogenesis and myogenesis. Overall, the applications based on GelMA hydrogels to release therapeutic agents are numerous. Many of these studies target the acute wound healing process, including angiogenesis, inflammation, and fibrogenesis, and aim to modulate a pro-regenerative microenvironment through bioengineering approaches.
Conclusion and perspectives
Since the first synthesis of GelMA by , the usage of GelMA hydrogels in biomedical applications has advanced rapidly. From 2013 to 2021, more than one thousand GelMA-related papers were published (based on Pubmed search), and the number of publications increased annually. The popularity of GelMA is mainly due to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability, making it ideal for various biomedical applications. Meanwhile, GelMA integrates well with the growth of new technologies like 3D printing and microfluidics, resulting in many exciting progresses. Over the last decade, GelMA has been adapted to applications in almost all aspects of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine by targeting various types of tissues and organs. Here, we summarized trends followed by investigators with regard to the use of GelMA hydrogels for bioengineering human vascular networks. We highlighted the design principles to make GelMA hydrogels suitable for vascular morphogenesis based on our knowledge of vascular biology. We also emphasize the key factors that govern the functional vascularization of GelMA-based vascular constructs after transplantation in vivo. Potential topics that we briefly mentioned but are worth further investigation are the development of visible light-based photocrosslinking systems (; Sharifi et al., 2021) and the advances in the GelMA-based composite materials (; ; ). In addition, research efforts will continue on the multiplex functionalities of GelMA-based biomaterials. More advanced GelMA-based hydrogels aiming for clinical translations can be expected to be available in the near future.
Statements
Author contributions
G-BI and R-ZL conceived and designed the project, analyzed the data, discussed and edited the results and wrote the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AisenbreyE. A.MurphyW. L. (2020). Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel. Nat. Rev. Mat.5, 539–551. 10.1038/s41578-020-0199-8
2
AlexaR. L.CucuruzA.GhițulicăC.-D.VoicuG.BalahuraL.DinescuS.et al (2022). 3D printable composite biomaterials based on GelMA and hydroxyapatite powders doped with cerium ions for bone tissue regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 1841. 10.3390/ijms23031841
3
AndersonJ. M.RodriguezA.ChangD. T. (2008). Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin. Immunol.20, 86–100. 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004
4
AssarM. E.AnguloJ.Rodríguez‐MañasL. (2016). Diabetes and ageing‐induced vascular inflammation. J. Physiol.594, 2125–2146. 10.1113/jp270841
5
BertassoniL. E.CecconiM.ManoharanV.NikkhahM.HjortnaesJ.CristinoA. L.et al (2014). Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab. Chip14, 2202–2211. 10.1039/c4lc00030g
6
BoudinaS.AbelE. D. (2007). Diabetic cardiomyopathy revisited. Circulation115, 3213–3223. 10.1161/circulationaha.106.679597
7
BriquezP. S.CleggL. E.MartinoM. M.GabhannF. M.HubbellJ. A. (2016). Design principles for therapeutic angiogenic materials. Nat. Rev. Mat.1, 15006. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.6
8
ByambaaB.AnnabiN.YueK.SantiagoG. T.AlvarezM. M.JiaW.et al (2017). Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv. Healthc. Mat.6, 1700015. 10.1002/adhm.201700015
9
CarmelietP. (2003). Blood vessels and nerves: Common signals, pathways and diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet.4, 710–720. 10.1038/nrg1158
10
CarmelietP.JainR. K. (2011). Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature473, 298–307. 10.1038/nature10144
11
ChenJ.ZhouX.SunW.ZhangZ.TengW.WangF.et al (2022). Vascular derived ECM improves therapeutic index of BMP‐2 and drives vascularized bone regeneration. Small18, 2107991. 10.1002/smll.202107991
12
ChenY.LinR.QiH.YangY.BaeH.Melero‐MartinJ. M.et al (2012). Functional human vascular network generated in photocrosslinkable gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mat.22, 2027–2039. 10.1002/adfm.201101662
13
ChongJ. J. H.YangX.DonC. W.MinamiE.LiuY.-W.WeyersJ. J.et al (2014). Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature510, 273–277. 10.1038/nature13233
14
ChuangC.-H.LinR.-Z.Melero-MartinJ. M.ChenY.-C. (2018). Comparison of covalently and physically cross-linked collagen hydrogels on mediating vascular network formation for engineering adipose tissue. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol.46, S434–S447. 10.1080/21691401.2018.1499660
15
ChuangC.-H.LinR.-Z.TienH.-W.ChuY.-C.LiY.-C.Melero-MartinJ. M.et al (2015). Enzymatic regulation of functional vascular networks using gelatin hydrogels. Acta Biomater.19, 85–99. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.024
16
CrisostomoV.BaezC.AbadJ. L.SanchezB.AlvarezV.RosadoR.et al (2019). Dose-dependent improvement of cardiac function in a swine model of acute myocardial infarction after intracoronary administration of allogeneic heart-derived cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther.10, 152. 10.1186/s13287-019-1237-6
17
CuiX.TangJ.HartantoY.ZhangJ.BiJ.DaiS.et al (2018). NIPAM-Based microgel microenvironment regulates the therapeutic function of cardiac stromal cells. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces10, 37783–37796. 10.1021/acsami.8b09757
18
DokkenB. B. (2008). The pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: Beyond blood pressure and lipids. Diabetes Spectr.21, 160–165. 10.2337/diaspect.21.3.160
19
FantinA.VieiraJ. M.GestriG.DentiL.SchwarzQ.PrykhozhijS.et al (2010). Tissue macrophages act as cellular chaperones for vascular anastomosis downstream of VEGF-mediated endothelial tip cell induction. Blood116, 829–840. 10.1182/blood-2009-12-257832
20
FrancoC.GerhardtH. (2012). Blood vessels on a chip. Nature488, 465–466. 10.1038/488465a
21
GaharwarA. K.SinghI.KhademhosseiniA. (2020). Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mat.5, 686–705. 10.1038/s41578-020-0209-x
22
HasanyM.TalebianS.SadatS.RanjbarN.MehraliM.WallaceG. G.et al (2021). Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of alginate methacrylate (ALMA)-based hydrogels: Current advances and challenges. Appl. Mat. Today24, 101150. 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101150
23
HendersonA. R.ChoiH.LeeE. (2020). Blood and lymphatic vasculatures on-chip platforms and their applications for organ-specific in vitro modeling. Micromachines (Basel).11, 147. 10.3390/mi11020147
24
HessC. N.HuangZ.PatelM. R.BaumgartnerI.BergerJ. S.BlomsterJ. I.et al (2019). Acute limb ischemia in peripheral artery disease. Circulation140, 556–565. 10.1161/circulationaha.119.039773
25
HongX.LuoA. C.DoulamisI.OhN.NidodelMelero-MartinP. J. J. M.LinR.-Z. (2022). Enhanced intramyocardial vascular cell delivery promotes post-myocardial infarction healing by polarizing pro-regenerative neutrophils. BioRxiv. BIORXIV/2022/497378.
26
IbanezR. I. R.AmaralR.SimpsonC. R.CaseyS. M.ReisR. L.MarquesA. P.et al (2022). 3D printed scaffolds incorporated with platelet‐rich plasma show enhanced angiogenic potential while not inducing fibrosis. Adv. Funct. Mat.32, 2109915. 10.1002/adfm.202109915
27
IchiharaY.KanekoM.YamaharaK.KoulouroudiasM.SatoN.UppalR.et al (2018). Self-assembling peptide hydrogel enables instant epicardial coating of the heart with mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of heart failure. Biomaterials154, 12–23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.050
28
KatarzynaR. (2017). Adult stem cell therapy for cardiac repair in patients after acute myocardial infarction leading to ischemic heart failure: An overview of evidence from the recent clinical trials. Curr. Cardiol. Rev.13, 223–231. 10.2174/1573403x13666170502103833
29
Kazemzadeh‐NarbatM.RouwkemaJ.AnnabiN.ChengH.GhaderiM.ChaB.et al (2017). Engineering photocrosslinkable bicomponent hydrogel constructs for creating 3D vascularized bone. Adv. Healthc. Mat.6, 1601122. 10.1002/adhm.201601122
30
KesslerL.GehrkeS.WinnefeldM.HuberB.HochE.WalterT.et al (2017). Methacrylated gelatin/hyaluronan-based hydrogels for soft tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng.8, 204173141774415. 10.1177/2041731417744157
31
KimJ.HopeC. M.GantumurN.PerkinsG. B.SteadS. O.YueZ.et al (2020). Encapsulation of human natural and induced regulatory T‐cells in IL‐2 and CCL1 supplemented alginate‐GelMA hydrogel for 3D bioprinting. Adv. Funct. Mat.30, 2000544. 10.1002/adfm.202000544
32
KimS.KimW.LimS.JeonJ. S. (2017). Vasculature-on-A-chip for in vitro disease models. Bioeng. (Basel).4, 8. 10.3390/bioengineering4010008
33
KinstlingerI. S.CalderonG. A.RoyseM. K.MeansA. K.GrigoryanB.MillerJ. S. (2021). Perfusion and endothelialization of engineered tissues with patterned vascular networks. Nat. Protoc.16, 3089–3113. 10.1038/s41596-021-00533-1
34
KinstlingerI. S.SaxtonS. H.CalderonG. A.RuizK. V.YalackiD. R.DemeP. R.et al (2020). Generation of model tissues with dendritic vascular networks via sacrificial laser-sintered carbohydrate templates. Nat. Biomed. Eng.4, 916–932. 10.1038/s41551-020-0566-1
35
KlotzB. J.GawlittaD.RosenbergA. J.MaldaJ.MelchelsF. P. W. (2016). Gelatin-Methacryloyl hydrogels: Towards biofabrication-based tissue repair. Trends Biotechnol.34, 394–407. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.002
36
KolawoleO. M.LauW. M.KhutoryanskiyV. V. (2018). Methacrylated chitosan as a polymer with enhanced mucoadhesive properties for transmucosal drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. X.550, 123–129. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.034
37
KoleskyD. B.HomanK. A.Skylar-ScottM. A.LewisJ. A. (2016). Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113, 3179–3184. 10.1073/pnas.1521342113
38
KoleskyD. B.TrubyR. L.GladmanA. S.BusbeeT. A.HomanK. A.LewisJ. A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell‐laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mat.26, 3124–3130. 10.1002/adma.201305506
39
KuoK.-C.LinR.-Z.TienH.-W.WuP.-Y.LiY.-C.Melero-MartinJ. M.et al (2015). Bioengineering vascularized tissue constructs using an injectable cell-laden enzymatically crosslinked collagen hydrogel derived from dermal extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater.27, 151–166. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.002
40
KurianA. G.SinghR. K.PatelK. D.LeeJ.-H.KimH.-W. (2021). Multifunctional GelMA platforms with nanomaterials for advanced tissue therapeutics. Bioact. Mat.8, 267–295. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.027
41
LiJ.HuS.ZhuD.HuangK.MeiX.AbadB. L.et al (2021). All roads lead to rome (the heart): Cell retention and outcomes from various delivery routes of cell therapy products to the heart. J. Am. Heart Assoc.10, e020402. 10.1161/jaha.120.020402
42
LiangJ.DijkstraP. J.PootA. A.GrijpmaD. W. (2022). Hybrid hydrogels based on methacrylate-functionalized gelatin (GelMA) and synthetic polymers. Biomed. Mat. Devices, 1–11. 10.1007/s44174-022-00023-2
43
LinR.-Z.ChenY.-C.Moreno-LunaR.KhademhosseiniA.Melero-MartinJ. M. (2013). Transdermal regulation of vascular network bioengineering using a photopolymerizable methacrylated gelatin hydrogel. Biomaterials34, 6785–6796. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.060
44
LinR.-Z.LeeC. N.Moreno-LunaR.NeumeyerJ.PiekarskiB.ZhouP.et al (2017). Host non-inflammatory neutrophils mediate the engraftment of bioengineered vascular networks. Nat. Biomed. Eng.1, 0081. 10.1038/s41551-017-0081
45
LiuJ.ZhengH.PohP. S. P.MachensH.-G.SchillingA. F. (2015). Hydrogels for engineering of perfusable vascular networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci.16, 15997–16016. 10.3390/ijms160715997
46
LiuT.WengW.ZhangY.SunX.YangH. (2020). Applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels in microfluidic technique-assisted tissue engineering. Molecules25, 5305. 10.3390/molecules25225305
47
LiuW.ZhongZ.HuN.ZhouY.MaggioL.MiriA. K.et al (2018). Coaxial extrusion bioprinting of 3D microfibrous constructs with cell-favorable gelatin methacryloyl microenvironments. Biofabrication10, 024102. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa9d44
48
LiuY.Chan-ParkM. B. (2010). A biomimetic hydrogel based on methacrylated dextran-graft-lysine and gelatin for 3D smooth muscle cell culture. Biomaterials31, 1158–1170. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.040
49
LiuZ.MikraniR.ZubairH. M.TalebA.NaveedM.BaigM. M. F. A.et al (2020). Systemic and local delivery of mesenchymal stem cells for heart renovation: Challenges and innovations. Eur. J. Pharmacol.876, 173049. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173049
50
LoessnerD.MeinertC.KaemmererE.MartineL. C.YueK.LevettP. A.et al (2016). Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl–based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms. Nat. Protoc.11, 727–746. 10.1038/nprot.2016.037
51
LorenteS.HautefeuilleM.Sanchez-CedilloA. (2020). The liver, a functionalized vascular structure. Sci. Rep.10, 16194. 10.1038/s41598-020-73208-8
52
LovettM.LeeK.EdwardsA.KaplanD. L. (2009). Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev.15, 353–370. 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0085
53
MandryckyC. J.HowardC. C.RaynerS. G.ShinY. J.ZhengY. (2021). Organ-on-a-chip systems for vascular biology. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.159, 1–13. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2021.06.002
54
Melero-MartinJ. M.KhanZ. A.PicardA.WuX.ParuchuriS.BischoffJ. (2007). In vivo vasculogenic potential of human blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Blood109, 4761–4768. 10.1182/blood-2006-12-062471
55
Melero-MartinJ. M.ObaldiaM. E. D.AllenP.DudleyA. C.KlagsbrunM.BischoffJ. (2010). Host myeloid cells are necessary for creating bioengineered human vascular networks in vivo. Tissue Eng. Part A16, 2457–2466. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0024
56
MenaschéP. (2018). Cell therapy trials for heart regeneration — Lessons learned and future directions. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.15, 659–671. 10.1038/s41569-018-0013-0
57
MillerJ. S.StevensK. R.YangM. T.BakerB. M.NguyenD.-H. T.CohenD. M.et al (2012). Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Mat.11, 768–774. 10.1038/nmat3357
58
MohamedM. G. A.KheiriS.IslamS.KumarH.YangA.KimK. (2019). An integrated microfluidic flow-focusing platform for on-chip fabrication and filtration of cell-laden microgels. Lab. Chip19, 1621–1632. 10.1039/c9lc00073a
59
MoonJ. J.HahnM. S.KimI.NsiahB. A.WestJ. L. (2009). Micropatterning of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels with biomolecules to regulate and guide endothelial morphogenesis. Tissue Eng. Part A15, 579–585. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0196
60
NakatsuM. N.HughesC. C. W. (2008). An optimized three-dimensional in vitro model for the analysis of angiogenesis. Methods Enzymol.443, 65–82. 10.1016/s0076-6879(08)02004-1
61
NguyenD.-H. T.LeeE.AlimpertiS.NorgardR. J.WongA.LeeJ. J.-K.et al (2019). A biomimetic pancreatic cancer on-chip reveals endothelial ablation via ALK7 signaling. Sci. Adv.5, eaav6789. 10.1126/sciadv.aav6789
62
NicholJ. W.KoshyS. T.BaeH.HwangC. M.YamanlarS.KhademhosseiniA. (2010). Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials31, 5536–5544. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
63
NikkhahM.EshakN.ZorlutunaP.AnnabiN.CastelloM.KimK.et al (2012). Directed endothelial cell morphogenesis in micropatterned gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials33, 9009–9018. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.068
64
NoshadiI.HongS.SullivanK. E.SaniE. S.Portillo-LaraR.TamayolA.et al (2017). In vitro and in vivo analysis of visible light crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomater. Sci.5, 2093–2105. 10.1039/c7bm00110j
65
NovoselE. C.KleinhansC.KlugerP. J. (2011). Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.63, 300–311. 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.004
66
NowbarA. N.GittoM.HowardJ. P.FrancisD. P.Al-LameeR. (2019). Mortality from ischemic heart disease. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes12, e005375. 10.1161/circoutcomes.118.005375
67
NultyJ.FreemanF. E.BroweD. C.BurdisR.AhernD. P.PitaccoP.et al (2021). 3D bioprinting of prevascularised implants for the repair of critically-sized bone defects. Acta Biomater.126, 154–169. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.003
68
O’ConnorC.BradyE.ZhengY.MooreE.StevensK. R. (2022). Engineering the multiscale complexity of vascular networks. Nat. Rev. Mat.7, 702–716. 10.1038/s41578-022-00447-8
69
OnoeH.TakeuchiS. (2015). Cell-laden microfibers for bottom-up tissue engineering. Drug Discov. Today20, 236–246. 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.018
70
OuyangL.ArmstrongJ. P. K.ChenQ.LinY.StevensM. M. (2020). Void‐free 3D bioprinting for in situ endothelialization and microfluidic perfusion. Adv. Funct. Mat.30, 1908349. 10.1002/adfm.201908349
71
ParkC.KimT. M.MalikA. B. (2013). Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell and vascular development. Circ. Res.112, 1380–1400. 10.1161/circresaha.113.301078
72
PhanD. T. T.WangX.CraverB. M.SobrinoA.ZhaoD.ChenJ. C.et al (2017). A vascularized and perfused organ-on-a-chip platform for large-scale drug screening applications. Lab. Chip17, 511–520. 10.1039/c6lc01422d
73
QaduraM.TerenziD. C.VermaS.Al‐OmranM.HessD. A. (2018). Concise review: Cell therapy for critical limb ischemia: An integrated review of preclinical and clinical studies. Stem Cells36, 161–171. 10.1002/stem.2751
74
QiH.GhodousiM.DuY.GrunC.BaeH.YinP.et al (2013). DNA-directed self-assembly of shape-controlled hydrogels. Nat. Commun.4, 2275. 10.1038/ncomms3275
75
QuintJ. P.MostafaviA.EndoY.PanayiA.RussellC. S.NourmahnadA.et al (2021). In vivo printing of nanoenabled scaffolds for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. Adv. Healthc. Mat.10, 2002152. 10.1002/adhm.202002152
76
RademakersT.HorvathJ. M.BlitterswijkC. A.LaPointeV. L. S. (2019). Oxygen and nutrient delivery in tissue engineering: Approaches to graft vascularization. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med.13, 1815–1829. 10.1002/term.2932
77
RafiiS.LydenD. (2003). Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat. Med.9, 702–712. 10.1038/nm0603-702
78
RajabiN.RezaeiA.KharazihaM.Bakhsheshi-RadH. R.LuoH.RamaKrishnaS.et al (2021). Recent advances on bioprinted gelatin methacrylate-based hydrogels for tissue repair. Tissue Eng. Part A27, 679–702. 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0350
79
ReddM. A.ZeinstraN.QinW.WeiW.MartinsonA.WangY.et al (2019). Patterned human microvascular grafts enable rapid vascularization and increase perfusion in infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Commun.10, 584. 10.1038/s41467-019-08388-7
80
RocheE. T.FabozzoA.LeeY.PolygerinosP.FriehsI.SchusterL.et al (2015). A light-reflecting balloon catheter for atraumatic tissue defect repair. Sci. Transl. Med.7, 306ra149. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2406
81
RodriguesM.KosaricN.BonhamC. A.GurtnerG. C. (2019). Wound healing: A cellular perspective. Physiol. Rev.99, 665–706. 10.1152/physrev.00067.2017
82
RouwkemaJ.RivronN. C.BlitterswijkC. A. (2008). Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol.26, 434–441. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009
83
Schneider-BartholdC.BaganzS.WilhelmiM.ScheperT.PepelanovaI. (2016). Hydrogels based on collagen and fibrin – frontiers and applications. Bionanomaterials17, 3–12. 10.1515/bnm-2015-0025
84
SharifiS.SharifiH.AkbariA.ChodoshJ. (2021). Systematic optimization of visible light-induced crosslinking conditions of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA). Sci. Rep.11, 23276. 10.1038/s41598-021-02830-x
85
SmithQ.GerechtS. (2014). Going with the flow: Microfluidic platforms in vascular tissue engineering. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.3, 42–50. 10.1016/j.coche.2013.11.001
86
SongH.RummaR. T.OzakiC. K.EdelmanE. R.ChenC. S. (2018). Vascular tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and clinical promise. Cell Stem Cell22, 340–354. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.009
87
SongR.MurphyM.LiC.TingK.SooC.ZhengZ. (2018). Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications. Drug Des. devel. Ther.12, 3117–3145. 10.2147/dddt.s165440
88
SuncionV. Y.GhersinE.FishmanJ. E.ZambranoJ. P.KarantalisV.MandelN.et al (2014). Does transendocardial injection of mesenchymal stem cells improve myocardial function locally or globally?Circ. Res.114, 1292–1301. 10.1161/circresaha.114.302854
89
TakebeT.SekineK.EnomuraM.KoikeH.KimuraM.OgaeriT.et al (2013). Vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nature499, 481–484. 10.1038/nature12271
90
TallawiM.RoselliniE.BarbaniN.CasconeM. G.RaiR.Saint-PierreG.et al (2015). Strategies for the chemical and biological functionalization of scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: A review. J. R. Soc. Interface12, 20150254. 10.1098/rsif.2015.0254
91
TangJ.CuiX.CaranasosT. G.HensleyM. T.VandergriffA. C.HartantoY.et al (2017). Heart repair using nanogel-encapsulated human cardiac stem cells in mice and pigs with myocardial infarction. Acs Nano11, 9738–9749. 10.1021/acsnano.7b01008
92
TangJ.CuiX.ZhangZ.XuY.GuoJ.SolimanB. G.et al (2022). Injection‐free delivery of MSC‐derived extracellular vesicles for myocardial infarction therapeutics. Adv. Healthc. Mat.11, 2100312. 10.1002/adhm.202100312
93
TengC. J.LuoJ.ChiuR. C. J.Shum-TimD. (2006). Massive mechanical loss of microspheres with direct intramyocardial injection in the beating heart: Implications for cellular cardiomyoplasty. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.132, 628–632. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.05.034
94
TerrovitisJ.LautamäkiR.BoniosM.FoxJ.EnglesJ. M.YuJ.et al (2009). Noninvasive quantification and optimization of acute cell retention by in vivo positron emission tomography after intramyocardial cardiac-derived stem cell delivery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54, 1619–1626. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.097
95
TomasinaC.BodetT.MotaC.MoroniL.Camarero-EspinosaS. (2019). Bioprinting vasculature: Materials, cells and emergent techniques. Materials12, 2701. 10.3390/ma12172701
96
TsaoC. W.AdayA. W.AlmarzooqZ. I.AlonsoA.BeatonA. Z.BittencourtM. S.et al (2022). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: A report from the American heart association. Circulation145, e153–e639. 10.1161/cir.0000000000001052
97
UdanR. S.CulverJ. C.DickinsonM. E. (2013). Understanding vascular development. WIREs. Dev. Biol.2, 327–346. 10.1002/wdev.91
98
Velasco-RodriguezB.Diaz-VidalT.Rosales-RiveraL. C.García-GonzálezC. A.Alvarez-LorenzoC.Al-ModlejA.et al (2021). Hybrid methacrylated gelatin and hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds. Preparation and systematic characterization for prospective tissue engineering applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 6758. 10.3390/ijms22136758
99
VlahosA. E.CoberN.SeftonM. V. (2017). Modular tissue engineering for the vascularization of subcutaneously transplanted pancreatic islets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.114, 9337–9342. 10.1073/pnas.1619216114
100
VrtovecB.PoglajenG.LezaicL.SeverM.DomanovicD.CernelcP.et al (2013). Effects of intracoronary CD34+ stem cell transplantation in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Circ. Res.112, 165–173. 10.1161/circresaha.112.276519
101
WangK.LinR.-Z.Melero-MartinJ. M. (2019). Bioengineering human vascular networks: Trends and directions in endothelial and perivascular cell sources. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.76, 421–439. 10.1007/s00018-018-2939-0
102
WangX.PhanD. T. T.SobrinoA.GeorgeS. C.HughesC. C. W.LeeA. P. (2015). Engineering anastomosis between living capillary networks and endothelial cell-lined microfluidic channels. Lab. Chip16, 282–290. 10.1039/c5lc01050k
103
WangX.SunQ.PeiJ. (2018). Microfluidic-based 3D engineered microvascular networks and their applications in vascularized microtumor models. Micromachines (Basel).9, 493. 10.3390/mi9100493
104
WangY.KankalaR. K.OuC.ChenA.YangZ. (2021). Advances in hydrogel-based vascularized tissues for tissue repair and drug screening. Bioact. Mat.9, 198–220. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.005
105
WangY.MaM.WangJ.ZhangW.LuW.GaoY.et al (2018). Development of a photo-crosslinking, biodegradable GelMA/PEGDA hydrogel for guided bone regeneration materials. Materials11, 1345. 10.3390/ma11081345
106
XiaoS.ZhaoT.WangJ.WangC.DuJ.YingL.et al (2019). Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)-Based hydrogels for cell transplantation: An effective strategy for tissue engineering. Stem Cell Rev. Rep.15, 664–679. 10.1007/s12015-019-09893-4
107
XuP.JiangF.ZhangH.YinR.CenL.ZhangW. (2020). Calcium carbonate/gelatin methacrylate microspheres for 3D cell culture in bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part C. Methods26, 418–432. 10.1089/ten.tec.2020.0064
108
YanL.HanK.PangB.JinH.ZhaoX.XuX.et al (2021). Surfactin-reinforced gelatin methacrylate hydrogel accelerates diabetic wound healing by regulating the macrophage polarization and promoting angiogenesis. Chem. Eng. J.414, 128836. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128836
109
ZeltsmanD.AckerM. A. (2002). Surgical management of heart failure: An overview. Annu. Rev. Med.53, 383–391. 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104101
110
ZhangQ.ChangC.QianC.XiaoW.ZhuH.GuoJ.et al (2021). Photo-crosslinkable amniotic membrane hydrogel for skin defect healing. Acta Biomater.125, 197–207. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.043
Summary
Keywords
vascularization, endothelial cells, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)
Citation
Im G-B and Lin R-Z (2022) Bioengineering for vascularization: Trends and directions of photocrosslinkable gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:1053491. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1053491
Received
25 September 2022
Accepted
03 November 2022
Published
17 November 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Muhammad Rizwan, Michigan Technological University, United States
Reviewed by
Betül Çelebi Saltik, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Yi-Chen Ethan Li, Feng Chia University, Taiwan
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Im and Lin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ruei-Zeng Lin, ruei-zeng.lin@childrens.harvard.edu
This article was submitted to Biomaterials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.