ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11 August 2023

Sec. Biomaterials

Volume 11 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1226680

Tumor-targeted bioactive nanoprobes visualizing of hydrogen peroxide for forecasting chemotherapy-exacerbated malignant prognosis

  • 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Bio Medical Diagnostics, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China

  • 2. Zhengzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Zhengzhou, China

  • 3. School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China

Abstract

Introduction: Fluorescent visualization of hydrogen peroxide in the tumor microenvironment (TME) is conducive to predicting malignant prognosis after chemotherapy. Two photon microscopy has been employed for in vivo hydrogen peroxide detection owing to its advantages of deep penetration and low phototoxicity.

Methods: In this study, a two-photon fluorescent probe (TPFP) was protected by mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) and masked by cloaking the cancer cell membranes (CM), forming a tumor-targeted bioactive nanoprobe, termed MSN@TPFP@CM.

Results: This multifunctional nanoprobe allowed for the effective and selective detection of excessive hydrogen peroxide production in chemotherapeutic Etoposide (VP-16)-challenged tumor cells using two-photon microscopy. After specific accumulation in tumors, VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM monitored tumor-specific hydrogen peroxide levels and revealed a positive correlation between oxidative stress in the TME and chemotherapy-exacerbated malignant prognosis.

Discussion: Given the recent translation of fluorescent imaging into early clinical trials and the high biocompatibility of bioactive nanoprobes, our approach may pave the way for specific imaging of oxidative stress in solid tumors after treatment and provide a promising technology for malignant prognosis predictions.

1 Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are considered secondary messengers in biological organisms and are critical for the regulation of pathological and physiological processes, such as cell growth and differentiation, immune response, and aging (; ; ). Mounting evidence suggest that continuous production, transformation, and consumption of ROS can promote pro-survival and pro-proliferative pathways, and metabolic adaptation of tumor cells to the tumor microenvironment (TME) (; ; ; ; ). Recently, aberrant production of ROS in the TME has been associated with cancer malignant prognosis, especially in chemotherapy-exacerbated malignant prognosis (; ). Under such conditions, sublethal levels of ROS induced by chemotherapeutics can help propagate, amplify, and effectively create a mutagenic and oncogenic field that facilitates tumor repopulation and acts as a springboard for metastatic tumor cells (; ; ). Therefore, monitoring ROS levels in the TME is conducive for understanding cancer progression and developing novel therapeutics.

As the most stable ROS, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has a lifetime of up to a few minutes and can diffuse across biological membranes, thereby functioning as an ideal biomarker for cancer progression (; ; ; ). Electrochemistry and luminescence are the two major strategies for the quantification of H2O2 in living systems (). The former measures extracellular H2O2 in an invasive manner and is affected by biofouling (; ; ). Whereas, the latter method is suitable for extracellular and intracellular H2O2 with the advantages of noninvasiveness, simple operation, high sensitivity, and excellent spatiotemporal resolution (; ; ; ). To overcome limited light penetration depth, two-photon microscopy (TPM) has been employed for H2O2 detection with less phototoxicity and lower self-absorption, which facilitates real-time measurements in vivo (; ; ; ; ). Additionally, as a benefit of nanotechnology, nanoparticulate probes have been widely developed for the efficient imaging of H2O2 in cancer owing to their specific tumoral targeting, higher penetration, and good stability (; ; ; ; ). Therefore, it is necessary to develop a novel two-photon fluorescent nanoprobe with near-infrared (NIR) emission to monitor H2O2 during cancer chemotherapy.

In this study, we created a tumor-targeting bioactive nanoprobe which facilitated two-photon fluorescence imaging to visualize H2O2 during cancer chemotherapy (Scheme 1). We incorporated an H2O2-responsive two-photon fluorescent probe (TPFP) into mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), which were then coated with cancer cell membranes to form bioactive nanoprobes named MSN@TPFP@CMs. After loading with chemotherapeutic Etoposide (VP-16), this multifunctional nanoprobe allowed the effective and selective detection of excessive H2O2 production in chemotherapy-challenged tumor cells through two-photon microscopy. Importantly, VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs preferably accumulated in tumors and monitored tumor-specific H2O2 levels in a subcutaneous breast cancer mouse model without immediate or delayed toxic effect, revealing a positive correlation between endogenous H2O2 in the TME and chemotherapy-exacerbated repopulation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Two-photon fluorescence detection of H2O2 in the TME may be an appealing strategy for predicting poor prognosis after cancer chemotherapy, including recurrence and metastasis.

SCHEME 1

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Fabrication of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs

A solution of the H2O2-responsive probe TPFP was prepared based on previous studies. MSNs were synthesized as follows: 0.12 g cetrimonium tosylate (CTAT), 0.03 g triethanolamine (TEAH3), and 10 mL deionized water were mixed and stirred at 80°C for 30 min. Subsequently, a solution of 1.0 g tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEO) was added dropwise to the surfactant solution. The resulting mixture was stirred at 80°C for another 4 h at 1,000 rpm. The products were collected by centrifugation (10,000 rpm 30 min), washed three times with ethanol, and subsequently refluxed in an ethanol solution of NH4NO3 (1% w/v) for 12 h. Briefly, we used VP-16 and TPFP (1:20 mass ratio) dissolved in DMSO for the co-loading of the probes. To configure probes containing different ratios of chemotherapeutic components, the mass ratio of VP-16 to TPFP was adjusted to 0.5:20, 1:20, and 2:20 to prepare VP-16-MSN@TPFP (L), VP-16-MSN@TPFP (M), and VP-16-MSN@TPFP (H). The nanoparticles were collected by high-speed centrifugation and resuspended in the aqueous phase. Subsequently, VP-16-MSN@TPFP was mixed with CM derived from 4T1 cells, sonicated with heating for 5 min, and subsequently extruded through 200 nm polycarbonate membranes to obtain VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs.

2.2 Characterization of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs

The morphology of the MSNs was characterized using a JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEOL, Ltd., Japan) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM; FEI Quanta 200F). The hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential of the nanoparticles in water and PBS were characterized using a Nano-ZS 90 Nanosizer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, United Kingdom). UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded using a U-3310 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Japan). Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was used to characterize the protein composition of nanoparticles. Stability experiments were performed by measuring the nanoprobes in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) plus 10% FBS for 7 days using dynamic light scattering (DLS).

2.3 Cell culture and in vitro analysis

The mouse breast cancer 4T1 cell line was cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS along with penicillin and streptomycin at 100–100 U/mL, respectively. Cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2-95% air atmosphere.

For the detection of exogenous H2O2, 4T1 cells were incubated with nanoprobes at 37°C for 30 min, images of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs in live cells were investigated via spectral confocal multiphoton microscopy (Olympus FV1000-IX81) with a high-performance model titanium-sapphire laser source (Maitai, Spectra-Physics, United States), with the emission ranging from 575 to 630 nm. The excitation wavelength was 860 nm with a constant intensity.

2.3.1 Chemo-malignant prognosis cell model

Single-cell suspensions of chemotherapy-challenged cells were collected using trypsin after 12 h of treatment with VP-16 (2.5 μg/mL). The chemotherapy-challenged cells were re-inoculated in 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 104/well, and the cells were collected after 24 h to obtain whole cell protein lysates. After determining the protein concentration of the samples using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA)method, the Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) content in each treatment group was measured using a COX2 ELISA assay kit (ab210574). Additionally, the culture medium supernatant was collected for the determination of Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) using an ELISA kit (ab287802).

2.3.2 Measurement of tumor cell repopulation with bioluminescence imaging

We constructed a chemo-repopulation cell model based on the fact that the luciferase activity of Fluc-labeled 4T1 cells was tightly correlated with cell number. The 4T1-Fluc cells (100 cells) were seeded with differentially agents-treated 4T1 cells (1 × 104) in 24-well plates. During the co-culture period (12–14 days), the culture medium was replaced with fresh 5% FBS DMEM every 3 days. Finally, to measure the luciferase activity of 4T1-Fluc, 0.15 mg/mL D-Luciferin potassium in PBS was added to each well before bioluminescence imaging.

2.3.3 Measurement of tumor cell metastasis with transwell assay

For the transwell assay, 4T1 cells were seeded into up-chamber of 8 μm pore size in six-well plates. Subsequently, 1.5 mL chemo-challenged 4T1 cell (5 × 104) medium was added into the lower chamber of every well and 500 μL serum free DMEM containing 4T1 cells (3 × 104) was added into the up-chamber. After 20–24 h, 4T1 cells remaining in the inserts were gently removed using cotton swabs. Migratory 4T1s were fixed in 90% ethanol and stained with crystal violet. The number of migratory 4T1s was measured by counting the cells from five random fields under a microscope.

2.3.4 Correlation analysis

The mean fluorescence intensity from flow cytometry of H2O2 levels in chemotherapy-challenged cells, PEG2 levels, and COX2 levels were plotted to analyze the correlation between H2O2 and chemo-repopulation/metastatic cells.

2.4 Animals and in vivo analysis

2.4.1 Chemo-malignant prognosis in 4T1 mouse model

All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for the Use of Experimental Animals of the Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology of the Chinese Academy of Science (Suzhou, Jiangsu, China). Initially, Balb/C NuNu approximately 18 g each) female mice (n = 8) aged four–six weeks were obtained from Cavens Biogle (suzhou) Model Animal Research Co., Ltd. A xenograft tumor model was established by subcutaneous injection of 1 × 106 4T1 cells into the right mammary fat pads.

When the tumor size reached approximately 150 mm3, the nanoprobes (0.1 mg/kg based on VP-16) were administered intravenously. For the chemo-malignant prognosis in the 4T1 mouse model, tumor volumes and body weights were recorded every alternate day after the first injection. Mice were sacrificed 14 days after chemotherapeutic stimulation and lung tissue was collected to count the number of pulmonary metastatic nodules. Additionally, 12 h after the intravenous injection of nanoprobes, the tumor site fluorescence signal was monitored using In-Vivo Xtreme II™. Subsequently, the number of pulmonary metastatic nodules versus the in vivo fluorescence signal of the TPFP was plotted to analyze the correlation between chemo-malignant prognosis and H2O2 levels.

2.4.2 In vivo biodistribution and biosafety

The 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were injected with VP-16-MSN@TPFP or VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM solutions (2 mg/kg based on TPFP). The fluorescence intensity of the TPFP in each organ sample was measured. The fluorescence intensity was converted to TPFP mass to investigate the organ distribution 12 h after administration. After treatment for 14 days, the mice were sacrificed, and the main organs (liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, and lungs) were collected for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain to analyze the pathophysiology. Biochemical parameter indices were also tested for acute toxicological assay.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Student’s t-test was used to analyze the differences between two groups. Differences between more than two groups were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance. Simple linear regression was used to analyze the correlation between H2O2 signals and the expression level of COX2, PEG2 and their ratios. Sample sizes (n) and p-values (p) for all statistical analyses are indicated in figures and figure legends. Data were analyzed using statistical software OriginPro 2021b. In all cases, p < 0.05 represents a statistically significant difference.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Preparation and characterization of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs

Mesoporous silica materials (MSNs) were prepared as previously reported. The SEM and TEM images revealed monodisperse spherical MSNs with a diameter of 80 nm (Figure 1A; Figure 1B). The prepared MSNs were loaded with the ROS-responsive fluorescent probe TPFP and chemotherapeutic VP-16 to form VP-16-MSN@TPFP. Release results show that simultaneous release of the two components can be achieved (Supplementary Figure S2). Subsequently, 4T1 breast cancer CM were isolated and coated with VP-16-MSN@TPFP to prepare VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs. As shown in Figure 1C, the bioactive materials possess a core–shell structure with an MSN core enclosed in a smooth membrane shell. Consistently, a slight increase in hydrodynamic diameter and a decrease in surface charge were observed after CM coating (Figure 1D; Figure 1E). Protein electrophoresis demonstrated the presence of membrane proteins on VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs (Figure 1F), suggesting the successful integration of the cell membrane-coated nanoplatforms. Additionally, stability experiments in 10% FBS-containing medium confirmed that VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs exhibited little aggregation after 7 days of incubation (Supplementary Figure S1).

FIGURE 1

3.2 Spectroscopic studies of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs

Before the in vitro and in vivo experiments, a series of optical experiments were performed to evaluate VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM for ROS-responsive imaging properties. The absorption spectra showed a characteristic absorption of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM in phosphate buffer saline at 428 nm and no significant absorption at 560 nm. After adding H2O2 (100 μM) to the solution for 30 min, the absorption spectra showed a decrease at 428 nm and concomitant absorption at 560 nm (Figure 2A). In contrast, the fluorescence emission spectra showed that excitation at 560 nm after the addition of H2O2 resulted in an emission peak at 699 nm (Figure 2B). Quantitative studies have shown that the fluorescence intensity of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM can be used for the determination of in vitro and in vivo hydrogen peroxide concentration (Supplementary Figure S3, S4). Subsequently, we evaluated the imaging function of the prepared VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM in 4T1 cells. As shown in Figure 2C, the fluorescence of TPFP and VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM was found in the cytoplasm and represented H2O2 levels, indicating that VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM was suitable for intracellular H2O2 analysis.

FIGURE 2

3.3 The correlation of H2O2 level in VP-16-treated cell with repopulation/metastasis in vitro

To ascertain the correlation between H2O2 levels and repopulation/metastasis in vitro in VP-16-treated cells, we conducted the chemotherapy-exacerbated repopulation/metastasis models in vitro by appropriate VP-16 stimulation (Figure 3A). Cell viability results showed that co-culturing 4T1 cells in six-well plates 12 h post-chemostimulation with all three materials caused significant cell death at 72 h (Figure 3B). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs was measured using flow cytometry 12 h after the chemotherapeutic challenge (Supplementary Figure S5). The levels of intracellular COX2 and PGE2 in the culture medium were assayed on day 2. Increased levels of both the components were observed with increasing levels of VP-16 (Supplementary Figure S6, S7). Cell repopulation and cell migration assays showed that VP-16-stimulated cells shaped a microenvironment conducive to cell repopulation and metastasis by increasing components such as the inflammatory protein COX2 and cytokine PGE2 (Figures 3E–G). The intracellular fluorescence signal after treatment with nanoprobes was measured using flow cytometry. These data are consistent with the changes in COX2 protein expression and PGE2 secretion during chemotherapy. Correlation analysis showed that the MFI of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs-treated cells was highly positively correlated with COX2 expression levels (Pearson r:0.9210, p < 0.001) (Figure 3D) and PGE2 levels (Pearson r:0.9821, p < 0.001) (Figure 3C), confirming that VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CMs might provide valuable information for the evaluation of repopulation/metastasis after chemotherapy.

FIGURE 3

3.4 The correlation of post-chemotherapy ROS with tumor prognosis

We established a 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse model to evaluate H2O2 detection using VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM. We examined the H2O2 signals at the tumor site after intravenous treatment with VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM or a mixture of VP-16 and TPFP. The results showed that, compared to free small molecules, VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM could achieve up to 12 h of H2O2 monitoring at the tumor site owing to better tumor targeting and retention (Supplementary Figure S8). To further validate the advantages of the cell membrane-cloaked nanoprobe, we compared the distribution characteristics of VP-16-MSN@TPFP and VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM. The results showed that the cell membrane-cloaked nanoprobes accumulated more at the tumor site after 12 h of i.v. administration, thus facilitating better in vivo monitoring (Supplementary Figure S8). We treated the tumor-bearing mice with a single dose of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM (Figure 4A). At the non-therapeutic stimulation dose, the growth rate of the tumor was higher than that of cells treated with MSN@TPFP@CM, and more metastatic nodules were found (Figure 4B; Figure 4C). Subsequently, the relationship between the H2O2 levels at the tumor site port-chemo with umor growth rate (TGR) or metastatic nodules was compared between MSN@TPFP@CM and VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM. We observed more pulmonary metastatic nodules (PMN) in the lungs of VP-16-stimulated mice, and the TGRwas higher than in mice without chemotherapy (Figure 4D; Figure 4E). Both PMN and TGR fitted well when conducting correlation analysis with the H2O2 signal of the orthotopic tumor (Figure 4F; Figure 4G).

FIGURE 4

3.5 In vivo bio-safety assays

Biosafety is a prerequisite for the clinical translation of biomaterials. Therefore, we examined the body weight, serum biochemical index, and histology of the major organs to evaluate the systemic toxicity of VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM. No weight loss was observed in the VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM group compared to the saline control group (Figure 5A). The levels of serum chemistry indices, including albumin (ALB), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and Serum creatinine (CRE), did not change remarkably in any of the VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM groups (Figure 5B). Furthermore, H&E staining of the liver, spleen, kidney, lung, and heart indicated the absence of pathological damage to the major organs during exposure (Figure 5C). Collectively, these results indicated that VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM is biologically safe.

FIGURE 5

4 Conclusion

In summary, we developed an MSN-protected H2O2 imaging system that preserved the responsiveness of TPFP to ROS and achieved spatiotemporal synergy between chemotherapy and malignant prognosis prediction in breast cancer. Notably, VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM was highly specific towards H2O2. Furthermore, VP-16-MSN@TPFP@CM exhibited a higher fluorescence enhancement than VP-16-MSN@TPFP in vivo, which was achieved by homologous cancer membrane cloaking with better tumor targeting and immune system evasion. Our results suggest that this probe could enable the evaluation of H2O2 pathology in chemotherapeutic cancer models and provide new insights into oxidative stress during chemotherapy. Given the recent translation of fluorescent imaging into early clinical trials and the high biocompatibility of the nanoprobe with further refinement, our approach paved the way for specific imaging of oxidative stress in solid tumors after treatment and provided a promising technology for precise prognostic predictions.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee for the Use of Experimental Animals of the Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology of the Chinese Academy of Science (Suzhou, Jiangsu, China).

Author contributions

FZ and YJ contributed to the collection of experimental data. FZ, YJ, FC, and YZ analyzed the data. FZ, YJ, LL, and ZC contributed to writing and revising the manuscript. LL and ZC supervised the research. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2021YFB3602200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82172077, 22201298, 62027825, and 82071066), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (No. ZR2022QB243), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2021M702414), Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program (20210508003RQ), the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team of Jiangsu Province (JSSCTD202145), Cross disciplinary Research Fund of Shanghai Ninth people’s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong university School of Medicine (JYJC202010).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1226680/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AghamiriZ. S.MohsenniaM.Rafiee-PourH.-A. (2019). Immobilization of cytochrome c on polyaniline/polypyrrole/carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotube/glassy carbon electrode: biosensor fabrication. J. Solid State Electrochem.23, 22332242. 10.1007/s10008-019-04300-x

  • 2

    BondonN.DurandD.Hadj-KaddourK.AliL. M. A.BoukherroubR.BettacheN.et al (2022). Photosensitivity of different nanodiamond-PMO nanoparticles in two-photon-excited photodynamic therapy. Life (Basel)12, 2044. 10.3390/life12122044

  • 3

    ChenY.GuoH. C.GongW.QinL. Y.AleyasinH.RatanR. R.et al (2013). Recent advances in two-photon imaging: technology developments and biomedical applications. Chin. Opt. Lett.11, 011703011710. 10.3788/col201311.011703

  • 4

    CircuM. L.AwT. Y. (2010). Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med.48, 749762. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.12.022

  • 5

    DuyC.LiM.TeaterM.MeydanC.Garrett-BakelmanF. E.LeeT. C.et al (2021). Chemotherapy induces senescence-like resilient cells capable of initiating AML recurrence. Cancer Discov.11, 15421561. 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1375

  • 6

    GuoH.AleyasinH.DickinsonB. C.Haskew-LaytonR. E.RatanR. R. (2014). Recent advances in hydrogen peroxide imaging for biological applications. Cell Biosci.4, 64. 10.1186/2045-3701-4-64

  • 7

    GuoH.AleyasinH.HowardS. S.DickinsonB. C.LinV. S.Haskew-LaytonR. E.et al (2013). Two-photon fluorescence imaging of intracellular hydrogen peroxide with chemoselective fluorescent probes. J. Biomed. Opt.18, 106002. 10.1117/1.jbo.18.10.106002

  • 8

    GuptaG. P.MassaguéJ. (2006). Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell127, 679695. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001

  • 9

    HalliwellB.ClementM. V.LongL. H. (2000). Hydrogen peroxide in the human body. FEBS Lett.486, 1013. 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)02197-9

  • 10

    HaoY.LiZ.DingN.TangX.ZhangC. (2022). A new near-infrared fluorescence probe synthesized from IR-783 for detection and bioimaging of hydrogen peroxide in vitro and in vivo. Spectrochimica Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.268, 120642. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120642

  • 11

    JensenP. K. (1966). Antimycin-insensitive oxidation of succinate and reduced nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide in electron-transport particles. I. pH dependency and hydrogen peroxide formation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta122, 157166. 10.1016/0926-6593(66)90057-9

  • 12

    JiangM.-J.GuD.-N.DaiJ.-J.HuangQ.TianL. (2020). Dark side of cytotoxic therapy: chemoradiation-induced cell death and tumor repopulation. Trends Cancer6, 419431. 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.01.018

  • 13

    JungH. S.VerwilstP.KimW. Y.KimJ. S. (2016). Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for the detection of humidity or water content. Chem. Soc. Rev.45, 12421256. 10.1039/c5cs00494b

  • 14

    KamataH.HondaS.MaedaS.ChangL.HirataH.KarinM. (2005). Reactive oxygen species promote TNFα-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases. Cell120, 649661. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.041

  • 15

    LambertA. W.PattabiramanD. R.WeinbergR. A. (2017). Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell168, 670691. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.037

  • 16

    LiH.YaoQ.FanJ.DuJ.WangJ.PengX. (2017). A two-photon NIR-to-NIR fluorescent probe for imaging hydrogen peroxide in living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron.94, 536543. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.039

  • 17

    LiawJ. W.KuoC. Y.TsaiS. W. (2021). The effect of quasi-spherical gold nanoparticles on two-photon induced reactive oxygen species for cell damage. Nanomater. (Basel)11, 1180. 10.3390/nano11051180

  • 18

    LinM. T.BealM. F. (2006). Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature443, 787795. 10.1038/nature05292

  • 19

    LiouG.-Y.StorzP. (2010). Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic. Res.44, 479496. 10.3109/10715761003667554

  • 20

    LiuW.WangB.ZhouM.LiuD.ChenF.ZhaoX.et al (2023). Redox dysregulation in the tumor microenvironment contributes to cancer metastasis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. [Advance online publication]. 10.1089/ars.2023.0272

  • 21

    LuJ.JiL.YuY. (2021). Rational design of a selective and sensitive “turn-on” fluorescent probe for monitoring and imaging hydrogen peroxide in living cells. RSC Adv.11, 3509335098. 10.1039/d1ra06620j

  • 22

    MajiS. K.YuS.ChungK.Sekkarapatti RamasamyM.LimJ. W.WangJ.et al (2018). Synergistic nanozymetic activity of hybrid gold bipyramid-molybdenum disulfide Core@Shell nanostructures for two-photon imaging and anticancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces10, 4206842076. 10.1021/acsami.8b15443

  • 23

    MarcuL. G. (2014). Tumour repopulation and the role of abortive division in squamous cell carcinomas during chemotherapy. Cell Prolif.47, 318325. 10.1111/cpr.12108

  • 24

    SaggarJ. K.TannockI. F. (2015). Chemotherapy rescues hypoxic tumor cells and induces their reoxygenation and repopulation-an effect that is inhibited by the hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302. Clin. Cancer Res.21, 21072114. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-2298

  • 25

    SchieberM.ChandelN. S. (2014). ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Biol.24, R453R462. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034

  • 26

    ShaoD.LiM.WangZ.ZhengX.LaoY. H.ChangZ.et al (2018). Bioinspired diselenide-bridged mesoporous silica nanoparticles for dual-responsive protein delivery. Adv. Mater30, e1801198. 10.1002/adma.201801198

  • 27

    ShiY. J.ZhangG. J.LuZ. Y.YingY. C.JiaH. L.XiP. (2018). Advances in multiphoton microscopy technologies. Chin. Opt.11, 296306. 10.3788/co.20181103.0296

  • 28

    SongM. J.HwangS. W.WhangD. (2010). Non-enzymatic electrochemical CuO nanoflowers sensor for hydrogen peroxide detection. Talanta80, 16481652. 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.09.061

  • 29

    VermaR.FosterR. E.HorganK.MounseyK.NixonH.SmalleN.et al (2016). Lymphocyte depletion and repopulation after chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res.18, 10. 10.1186/s13058-015-0669-x

  • 30

    WangL.HouX.FangH.YangX. (2022). Boronate-based fluorescent probes as a prominent tool for H2O2 sensing and recognition. Curr. Med. Chem.29, 24762489. 10.2174/0929867328666210902101642

  • 31

    WangZ.ChangZ. M.ShaoD.ZhangF.ChenF.LiL.et al (2019). Janus gold triangle-mesoporous silica nanoplatforms for hypoxia-activated radio-chemo-photothermal therapy of liver cancer. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces11, 3475534765. 10.1021/acsami.9b12879

  • 32

    ZhanX.YuX.LiB.ZhouR.FangQ.WuY. (2022). Quantifying H2O2 by ratiometric fluorescence sensor platform of N-GQDs/rhodamine B in the presence of thioglycolic acid under the catalysis of Fe3+. Spectrochimica Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.275, 121191. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121191

  • 33

    ZhangF.JiaY.ZhengX.ShaoD.ZhaoY.WangZ.et al (2019). Janus nanocarrier-based co-delivery of doxorubicin and berberine weakens chemotherapy-exacerbated hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. Acta Biomater.100, 352364. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.034

  • 34

    ZhaoY.HuY.HouJ.JiaZ.ZhongD.ZhouS.et al (2019). Electrochemical biointerface based on electrodeposition AuNPs on 3D graphene aerogel: direct electron transfer of Cytochrome c and hydrogen peroxide sensing. J. Electroanal. Chem.842, 1623. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.04.052

  • 35

    ZhouR.PengQ.WanD.YuC.ZhangY.HouY.et al (2021). Construction of a lysosome-targetable ratiometric fluorescent probe for H2O2 tracing and imaging in living cells and an inflamed model. RSC Adv.11, 2403224037. 10.1039/d1ra04026j

Summary

Keywords

bioactive, nanoprobe, cancer, hydrogen peroxide, chemotherapy

Citation

Zhang F, Jia Y, Chen F, Zhao Y, Li L and Chang Z (2023) Tumor-targeted bioactive nanoprobes visualizing of hydrogen peroxide for forecasting chemotherapy-exacerbated malignant prognosis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11:1226680. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1226680

Received

22 May 2023

Accepted

17 July 2023

Published

11 August 2023

Volume

11 - 2023

Edited by

Jie Tang, The University of Queensland, Australia

Reviewed by

Bing Sun, The University of Queensland, Australia

Zhengying Gu, East China Normal University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Li Li, ; Zhimin Chang,

† These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics