Non-human primate: the new frontier model of female reproductive engineering

Abstract

Reproductive engineering encompasses a range of advanced tissue engineering techniques aimed at addressing infertility that is non-curable with current assisted reproductive technology (ART). The use of animal models has been crucial for these advancements, with a notable preference for non-human primates (NHPs) given their genetic, anatomical, and physiological similarities to humans. Therefore, NHPs are invaluable for studying reproductive engineering. Thus, in reproductive studies, NHPs bridge the anatomical and physiological gaps between rodent models and humans. Their shared features with humans, such as menstrual cycles, placentation, and hormonal regulation, allow for more accurate modeling of reproductive physiology and pathology. These traits make NHPs indispensable in the exploration of reproductive engineering, including infertility treatments, genetic engineering, and uterine transplantation. Reproductive engineering is a transformative field that addresses infertility and enhances reproductive health. By leveraging the unique traits of NHPs, researchers can deepen their understanding of reproductive processes and refine ART techniques for human use. Advances in genetic engineering have enabled the creation of transgenic NHP models, which have been used to modify genes to investigate roles for various purposes, and the process, as mentioned earlier, is closely related to the ART technique, including fertility, embryogenesis, and pregnancy. Therefore, the relation to reproductive studies and the necessity of the NHP model are prerequisites for reproductive engineering. The engineering of NHPs is critically related to integrating ethical practices and exploring complementary methodologies. This review overviews the types of NHP frequently used and studies using NHP for reproductive engineering. These studies may suggest a broader way to use NHP for reproductive engineering.

1 Introduction

Despite significant advancements in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), often exemplified by in vitro fertilization (IVF), infertility rates have progressively increased among women. The causes of infertility vary and include ovarian aging, increased human longevity, survival after chemotherapy, delayed marriage, and conditions affecting younger women, such as premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). Although many infertility issues have been addressed and resolved through ART, certain limitations persist, and new challenges continue to emerge due to evolving social and biological factors.

Several studies have used human and animal models to address these limitations. Rodents are the most commonly used reproductive models because of their advantages, including shorter gestation periods, relatively large litter sizes, lower costs, and ease of access during breeding. However, despite these benefits, significant anatomical and reproductive physiological differences between rodents and humans limit the applicability of these findings for scientific interpretation and therapeutic advancements. These limitations have driven the need for models resembling human reproductive and endocrine systems. Non-human primates (NHPs) outperform rodent models due to several key human physiological and reproductive similarities. NHPs have been adopted for primary and therapeutic advancements in various fields, including tissue engineering applications. In the realm of reproduction, tissue engineering intersects with what is commonly referred to as reproductive engineering. This discipline encompasses many fields, including embryo and stem cell research, reproductive tract engineering, ARTs, and the generation of transgenic marmosets through genetic manipulation.

Here, we review some studies on reproductive engineering using nonhuman primates (NHPs), focusing on marmosets.

2 NHP as a reproductive study model

NHPs serve as crucial reproductive research models due to their genetic, anatomical, and physiological similarities to humans. Their reproductive systems, endocrine cycles, and gestational processes are more similar to those of humans than traditional rodent models, making them invaluable for studies in which direct human experimentation is not feasible.

NHPs have facilitated advanced investigations into fertility preservation, embryology, ART, and the effects of genetic and environmental factors on reproduction. Species such as the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) are particularly favored for reproductive studies because of their short gestation periods and suitability for genetic manipulation. These characteristics make NHPs essential for bridging the gap between preclinical studies in rodents and human clinical applications, advancing fundamental science and therapeutic innovations in reproductive health (Yun et al., 2016) (Table 1).

Rhesus monkeys and cynomolgus monkeys have menstrual cycles remarkably similar to humans. This is crucial for studying female reproductive biology, hormonal regulation, and disorders related to menstruation, ovulation, and pregnancy. The hormonal signaling in NHPs, such as estrogen, progesterone, and luteinizing hormone (LH), aligns more closely with that of humans than rodents, which makes NHPs ideal for studying hormonal regulation in reproductive technologies. NHPs have a more comparable reproductive lifespan and fertility pattern to humans, unlike rodents, which have much shorter cycles and faster aging processes. This makes NHPs particularly useful for studying age-related fertility decline, menopause, and related treatments. The gestation period in NHPs is also closer to humans, allowing for more accurate modeling of pregnancy, fetal development, and complications such as preeclampsia or ectopic pregnancies. Conversely, rodents have much shorter gestation periods and are less ideal for long-term gestational studies. These characteristics of NHP considered them more susceptible to certain human-specific reproductive disorders, such as endometriosis and ovarian cancer, making them superior models for understanding these diseases and testing potential treatments. The molecular and genetic profiles of NHPs are far more similar to those of humans than rodents. This allows for studying disease mechanisms at the molecular level in ways that rodent models cannot fully replicate.

NHPs provide a unique and invaluable platform for reproductive engineering. Their use in research enhances the accuracy of studies and improves their successful translation into human therapies, making them indispensable in this field.

3 Types of NHPs

NHPs used in reproductive research and other biomedical fields are categorized into two primary groups: New World Monkeys and Old World Monkeys, with a few excellent ape species occasionally included (Mattison and Vaughan, 2017). Each type offers unique advantages and is selected based on the specific requirements of the study. New World monkeys are preferred because of their ease of handling, shorter reproductive cycles, and emerging genetic tools (e.g., marmosets). Old World monkeys are favored because of their physiological and anatomical similarities to humans, making them highly relevant for advanced reproductive studies. Great Apes are limited in use due to ethical constraints but are occasionally studied for insights into human-like reproductive processes. Each type is selected based on the study’s specific goals, balancing relevance to human biology, ethical considerations, and practical factors such as cost and maintenance. The representative NHP types have been discussed ahead.

3.1 New World Monkeys

New World monkeys, or platyrrhines, are diverse primates native to Central and South America. They represent one of the two major branches of simian primates, along with the Old World monkeys and apes (catarrhines). “Platyrrhine” means “flat-nosed,” referring to their characteristic broad, outward-facing nostrils. These monkeys are known for their arboreal lifestyles, adaptations to forest environments, and diverse social behaviors.

3.1.1 Common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)

Marmosets are compact primates, weighing approximately 300–500 g. Their small size makes them easier to house, transport, and handle in laboratory settings than larger primates like macaques. Their short reproductive cycles (∼4.5 months) enable faster breeding and the generation of multiple offspring in a shorter time frame, accelerating genetic and developmental studies (Tardif et al., 2003). Marmosets’ hormonal cycles and reproductive physiology are similar to those of humans, making them an excellent model for studying human reproductive biology, fertility, and ART. They regularly produce twins or even triplets, allowing researchers to study sibling interactions and development (Riesche et al., 2018). Their high fertility and genetic manipulability make them an ideal candidate for transgenic studies (Abe et al., 2021). Marmosets are also used to study the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and hormonal responses due to their endocrine system similarities with humans (Pryce et al., 2002). Additionally, they require less space, food, and specialized care than larger primates, such as macaques and baboons, making them cost-effective for long-term studies. Although they are not as closely related to humans as Old World monkeys, they are sufficiently similar for many types of biomedical research.

These features make New World monkeys invaluable in various scientific disciplines, bridging the gap between rodent models and larger primates. Their versatility and low resource demands ensure their continued importance as critical model organisms in modern research.

3.2 Old World monkeys (catarrhines)

Old World monkeys (Catarrhines) belong to the superfamily Cercopithecoidea and are primarily distributed across Africa and Asia. They form one of the two major branches of simian primates alongside New World monkeys (Platyrrhines). “Old World” refers to their geographic origins in the Eastern Hemisphere.

3.2.1 Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta)

Rhesus monkeys share approximately 93% of their DNA with humans, making them valuable models for studying human biology (Wolfe, 1983). Their menstrual cycles (28–32 days) and reproductive physiology, including hormonal profiles, are highly analogous to those of humans (Weinbauer et al., 2008). They have been extensively studied in the contexts of IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), embryo transfer, menopause, ovarian reserve, and aging-related infertility (Wei et al., 2021). Additionally, they are used to examine early embryonic development, placental function, and maternal-fetal interactions (Niu et al., 2019).

Decades of research have established robust datasets on their reproductive anatomy, physiology, and developmental biology. Standardized protocols and widespread familiarity among researchers have facilitated consistent and reproducible results.

3.2.2 Cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis)

Cynomolgus monkeys have reproductive anatomy and physiology comparable to those of rhesus macaques. They are often more accessible and cost-effective, particularly in regions where they are commonly bred. They are widely used to evaluate reproductive toxicity and the safety of hormonal and contraceptive therapies (Jarvis et al., 2010; Li X. T. et al., 2023). Treatments targeting reproductive hormones, such as estrogen and progesterone, have been tested and validated in these monkeys (Williams et al., 2001). They are also easier to handle and maintain than are rhesus macaques.

3.2.3 Baboon (Papio spp.)

The larger body size of baboons allows for surgical intervention and in-depth studies of reproductive organs. Their reproductive systems closely resemble those of humans, making them particularly valuable for pregnancy-related studies (Bauer, 2015). They investigate the pathophysiology, progression, and treatment of endometriosis, fetal growth, placental biology, and maternal-fetal nutrient exchange (Nyachieo et al., 2007). Researchers also examine conditions such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and spontaneous abortion. Their size and reproductive biology make them ideal for studying conditions challenging to replicate in smaller species or rodents (D'Hooghe et al., 2004). years of research have yielded detailed knowledge regarding baboons’ reproductive cycles and hormone profiles.

4 Applications of NHPs in reproductive engineering

NHPs play a crucial role in reproductive research by bridging the gap between rodent models and human clinical studies. Their close genetic and physiological similarities to humans make them indispensable for advancing reproductive science. Below are some notable applications of NHPs in this field.

4.1 Assisted reproductive technology (ART)

NHPs, particularly rhesus macaques and marmosets (Buse et al., 2008), are critical in advancing ART, including IVF (Arthur Chang and Chan, 2011). Optimized protocols for these species, including oocyte retrieval, embryo culture, and transfer, are vital for their conservation and study and serve as highly translational models for human fertility treatments (Bavister et al., 1984; Ramsey and Hanna, 2019). These studies provide insights into human reproduction due to the close physiological and genetic similarities between NHPs and humans (Table 2).

A significant contribution of NHP research lies in overcoming challenges associated with male infertility. Precision techniques such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), which involves the direct injection of a single sperm into an oocyte, have been refined using NHP models (Mitalipov et al., 2001; Nusser et al., 2001). These advancements have improved success rates in cases of severe male infertility, including azoospermia (absence of sperm in semen) or poor sperm motility. In an in vitro follicular maturation setting, optimal culture conditions and ratios of gonadotropin treatment were reported in a rhesus monkey model (Kim et al., 2016). NHP research also supports the development of pre-implantation genetic testing and optimization of cryopreservation methods to ensure high-quality gametes and embryos for IVF procedures (Sun et al., 2008; Ma et al., 2016; Motohashi and Ishibashi, 2016; Curnow and Hayes, 2019; Ma et al., 2019). These innovations directly inform clinical practice, benefiting individuals and couples facing infertility challenges.

4.2 Fertility preservation

Studies on cryopreservation techniques in NHPs have significantly advanced fertility preservation strategies for humans, particularly for individuals facing fertility risks from medical treatments such as chemotherapy (Table 3). Freezing and thawing of sperm, oocytes, and embryos in NHPs offer valuable insights into optimizing protocols for preserving gamete and embryo viability after thawing and minimizing damage caused by ice crystal formation or osmotic stress (Morrell and Hodges, 1998; Jahnukainen et al., 2007; Motohashi and Ishibashi, 2016; Fayomi et al., 2019). These refinements enhance the preservation of human fertility, making options such as embryo or oocyte banking more reliable.

Additionally, NHP models have been instrumental in pioneering ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation (Brito et al., 2017). Research using these models has demonstrated the feasibility of grafting freeze-thawed ovarian tissue to restore endocrine function and fertility (Lee et al., 2017). This technique holds particular promise for patients with prepubertal cancer or women unable to undergo conventional fertility preservation methods. Successes in rhesus macaques and other NHPs have laid the groundwork for translating ovarian tissue transplantation into human clinical applications, where it can restore hormone production, menstrual cycles, and the potential for natural conception.

These advancements underscore the critical role of NHP research in developing innovative fertility preservation techniques, offering hope to individuals facing medical conditions that compromise their reproductive health.

4.3 Pluripotent stem cells and germline engineering

NHPs have been pivotal in advancing stem cell research, primarily through deriving gametes from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) (Mishra et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2023). Various embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) lines have been derived from NHPs (Fang et al., 2014; Honda et al., 2017; Kishimoto et al., 2021). By leveraging their close genetic and physiological similarities to humans, NHPs provide critical insights into germline development and serve as a robust model for translating findings into human medicine (Hayashi et al., 2012) (Table 4).

Researchers have successfully reprogrammed iPSCs and ESCs into germline-like cells in NHPs, enabling detailed investigations into mechanisms regulating spermatogenesis and oogenesis (Makar and Sasaki, 2020). These studies have identified key signaling pathways and genetic factors required for proper germ cell differentiation (Sasaki et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018). They also offer a controlled environment for exploring interactions between germline cells and their surrounding somatic niches, which are essential for gamete maturation (Seita et al., 2023).

The ability to derive functional gametes from stem cells represents a groundbreaking advancement in addressing infertility. This research offers hope for future therapeutic interventions for individuals with conditions such as gonadal dysgenesis, cancer treatment-induced gonadal damage, or genetic mutations impairing germ cell production (Tan et al., 2021; Roodgar et al., 2022). By generating gametes in vitro, researchers aim to restore fertility in cases where native germ cells are absent or non-functional.

NHP models are also instrumental in ensuring the safety and efficacy of these approaches, particularly in validating whether stem cell-derived gametes can undergo regular fertilization and produce healthy offspring (Rodriguez-Polo and Behr, 2022). These findings are critical for clinical applications, ensuring these techniques are robust and applicable to human reproductive medicine.

4.4 Female reproductive tract (FRT) engineering

Tissue engineering of NHPs has opened new frontiers in reproductive medicine by providing a platform for the development of artificial uterine and ovarian tissues. These advances could replace damaged reproductive organs and enhance the success of ART (Johannesson et al., 2012) (Table 5).

4.4.1 Artificial ovarian tissue

Researchers have focused on engineering functional ovarian tissues that mimic the ovaries’ natural hormonal and gametogenic functions. Artificial ovarian constructs have been developed using NHP models by incorporating ovarian cells or follicles into biocompatible scaffolds (Chen et al., 2021). These scaffolds provide structural support while facilitating cell survival, vascularization, and follicular maturation (Kim et al., 2022).

This technology could benefit individuals who have lost ovarian function owing to conditions such as POI, cancer treatment, or age-related decline. By restoring endocrine activity, these artificial tissues can support natural hormonal cycles, and the maturation of enclosed follicles may offer an alternative source of oocytes for IVF.

4.4.2 Artificial uterine tissue

Studies using NHPs have explored the engineering of artificial uterine tissues. Researchers have attempted to create a functional uterine environment that supports embryo implantation and development by combining endometrial cells with bioengineered scaffolds. These studies are critical for individuals with uterine abnormalities, such as Asherman syndrome or congenital uterine malformations, which impair fertility (Kirejczyk et al., 2021). Artificial uterine constructs could provide an option for women who are unable to conceive because of uterine damage, offering hope for biological parenthood without relying on surrogacy.

4.4.3 NHPs as models for clinical translation

Owing to their physiological similarities to humans, NHPs are an ideal model for developing and testing tissue engineering technologies (Daadi et al., 2014). They provide critical data on the biocompatibility, functionality, and long-term viability of artificial tissues in the reproductive context (Stejskalova et al., 2021). Research on NHPs has ensured that these engineered constructs can be integrated with native tissues, support normal reproductive processes, and maintain safety before clinical application in humans (Ma et al., 2021).

4.5 Reproductive endocrinology, infertility, and pregnancy

NHPs have advanced our understanding of hormonal reproductive regulation. They offer insight into diagnosing and treating human reproductive disorders (Fazleabas, 2006; Kyama et al., 2007; Taylor et al., 2017). Their close resemblance to human reproductive physiology makes them invaluable for studying complex hormonal interactions during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and related conditions (Braundmeier et al., 2012) (Table 6).

PCOS studies in NHPs have examined the effects of excess androgens on follicular development and insulin resistance, thereby providing a preclinical model for testing treatments (Abbott et al., 1998; Abbott et al., 2017). Similarly, NHP studies on menstrual physiology and endometrial lesions have advanced our understanding of the inflammatory and hormonal mechanisms underlying endometriosis (Barrier et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2009).

In particular, marmosets have contributed significantly to understanding hormone signaling between the mother and fetus (Barnett et al., 2006). These studies have revealed how maternal hormones, such as progesterone and cortisol, influence fetal development, placental function, and labor timing (Einspanier et al., 1997; Rutherford et al., 2014). Disruptions in these signaling pathways are implicated in pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, preterm birth, and intrauterine growth restriction (Wedi et al., 2011).

For instance, research on maternal cortisol regulation in marmosets has highlighted its role in programming fetal stress responses and metabolism, which may have long-term implications for offspring health. These studies provide a foundation for developing interventions to mitigate pregnancy-related complications in humans.

4.6 Developmental studies

Studies of early embryonic development in NHPs have provided crucial data on implantation and developmental milestones, offering insights into miscarriage and congenital disorders (Table 7). Research on NHPs has revealed the molecular and cellular processes underlying embryonic attachment to the uterine lining and trophoblast invasion (Zhou et al., 1993), which are crucial for successful implantation (Tardif and Bales, 2004; Ochoa-Bernal and Fazleabas, 2020). These findings help clarify the causes of implantation failure, which is a significant factor in infertility and early pregnancy loss. NHP models allow a detailed examination of embryonic genome activation, cell differentiation, and the formation of critical structures, such as the blastocyst and germ layers (Bergmann et al., 2022; Zhai et al., 2022; Gong et al., 2023; Li X. T. et al., 2023). Insights from these studies are essential to understand how disruptions during early development contribute to miscarriages or congenital disorders.

4.7 Reproductive aging

NHP models, such as macaques, have been used to study ovarian aging, menopause, and associated health issues. These models help researchers explore potential interventions to extend reproductive lifespan or mitigate age-related infertility (Hernandez-Lopez et al., 2012). Studies on rhesus macaques have helped to identify biomarkers of ovarian reserves, aiding fertility assessments in humans (Alberts et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2021) (Table 8).

Macaques exhibit reproductive aging patterns similar to humans, including a decline in ovarian reserve, irregular menstrual cycles, and eventual menopause. Research using these models has provided critical insights into mechanisms underlying ovarian aging and menopause (Brenner et al., 2004). Studies in rhesus macaques have highlighted the decline in follicular quantity and quality with age, along with changes in hormone levels (e.g., estradiol, progesterone, and FSH) that mirror human menopausal transitions (Downs and Urbanski, 2006; Johnson and Kapsalis, 2008). NHP models have also been used to explore the systemic effects of ovarian aging, such as increased risks of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive decline (Garber et al., 2020). These parallels make them ideal models for studying postmenopausal health.

4.8 Transcriptomic analyses of the NHP model

Transcriptomic analyses of NHP models have revolutionized our understanding of gene expression dynamics in reproduction, development, aging, and disease (Wang S. et al., 2020; Bergmann et al., 2022) (Table 9). These studies have provided insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying normal physiological and pathological conditions by analyzing a full range of RNA transcripts (Han et al., 2022; Tu et al., 2022).

Transcriptomic analyses of NHPs have examined age-related changes in various tissues, including ovaries, testes, brain, and muscles (Xu et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2024). Comparative transcriptomic analyses between NHPs and humans can help identify evolutionary changes in gene expression that may explain species-specific traits, including cognitive abilities, immune responses, and reproductive strategies.

4.9 Generation of transgenic NHPs

NHP embryos have been used to refine CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing techniques and test the precision and safety of this technology in correcting genetic mutations (Nusser et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015; Sato et al., 2016; Kumita et al., 2019; Abe et al., 2021; Ryu et al., 2022; Seita et al., 2023). Generating genetically modified marmosets enables researchers to study gene functions related to reproduction and developmental biology, such as genes controlling spermatogenesis or the ovarian reserve (Sasaki et al., 2009; Yoshimatsu et al., 2019; Tomioka et al., 2020; Drummer et al., 2021).

These studies are valuable in addressing infertility associated with hereditary diseases or genetic mutations. Moreover, research involving NHPs ensures these methods are safe and effective before transitioning to human clinical applications (Table 10).

4.10 Ethical consideration

Non-human primates (NHPs) use in reproductive engineering, particularly in fields like assisted reproductive technology (ART) and stem cell research, raises several ethical concerns related to animal welfare. These concerns stem from the study’s complexity, the procedures’ invasiveness, and the potential for suffering in NHPs. For the welfare of the NHP, the following points should be considered.

Reproductive engineering techniques often involve highly invasive procedures such as oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, or hormonal manipulation. To minimize distress and harm, these procedures should be performed with the utmost care and precision, ideally under anesthesia or appropriate analgesia, and only when necessary for the research objectives. Effective anesthesia and analgesia should be administered to minimize pain and discomfort, and the animals should be monitored continuously to detect signs of distress or discomfort. Where possible, researchers should explore non-invasive or minimally invasive techniques to gather data, such as non-invasive imaging, blood or urine analysis, and genomic studies.

Genetic modifications (e.g., CRISPR) for reproductive engineering in NHPs raise additional ethical concerns, especially regarding unintended genetic consequences and the long-term impact on animal welfare. Ethical review is crucial to ensure that such experiments are conducted with appropriate safeguards and that potential risks are minimized.

Ethical considerations regarding using NHPs in reproductive engineering are complex but crucial. They revolve around minimizing harm, ensuring scientific necessity, and providing appropriate animal care throughout their lives. Ethical guidelines, such as those offered by IACUCs and institutional review boards, exist to ensure that NHPs are treated with respect, their welfare is a top priority, and their use is scientifically justified. Adhering to these principles ensures humane treatment and enhances the credibility and legitimacy of the research.

5 Discussion

Reproductive tissue engineering in non-human primates (NHPs) is a critical area of research that focuses on developing new methods to restore, replace, or enhance reproductive function using tissue engineering techniques. This research has significant implications for improving treatments for infertility, reproductive disorders, and advancing technologies like assisted reproductive technology (ART) and gene editing. NHPs are particularly valuable in this field because their reproductive systems are highly similar to humans, making them an ideal model for studying complex reproductive processes.

NHPs are critical models in reproductive studies because of their physiological and genetic similarity to humans. Unlike rodent models, NHPs share similar endocrine profiles, reproductive cycles, and placental structures, essential for translating findings into human applications. The advent of transgenic NHPs has further expanded the possibilities for understanding and addressing complex reproductive disorders. These models facilitate testing innovative ART techniques, such as in vitro gametogenesis and uterine bioengineering, under conditions that closely mimic human biology.

One of the major goals of reproductive tissue engineering is to regenerate or replace damaged ovarian tissue, which is critical for female fertility. NHPs have been used to test bioengineered ovarian tissues created from stem cells or decellularized ovarian matrices. These engineered tissues can potentially restore fertility in females who have experienced ovarian failure due to aging, chemotherapy, or genetic conditions.

In NHPs, researchers have investigated how bioengineered ovaries support the maturation of oocytes (eggs) and follicle development in vitro. This is an essential step toward creating functional ovarian tissue that can support healthy egg production for ART or fertility preservation.

For women suffering from uterine disorders like Asherman’s syndrome or dysfunctional endometrium, tissue engineering can offer solutions by regenerating the uterine lining (endometrium). NHPs are used to study the implantation process of embryos and the role of the endometrial tissue in successful pregnancy. Tissue-engineered endometrial models derived from stem cells could 1 day be used to treat women with damaged or non-functional uterine linings. Tissue-engineered models of the uterus or endometrium are being studied to improve understanding of embryo implantation, a crucial step in pregnancy. By using NHPs, researchers can explore how various factors, such as hormones or immune responses, influence implantation success and pregnancy outcomes.

Depending on the experimental objective, different NHP species have unique advantages in reproductive research. Marmosets, for example, are small-bodied primates with short gestation periods and frequent twin births, making them ideal for genetic studies. Their rapid reproductive cycles allow the generation of transgenic animals to study specific gene functions during reproduction and early embryonic development. Larger primates have anatomical and physiological features, including uterine size and structure, that closely resemble those of humans. They are preferred for studies involving surgical procedures, such as uterine transplantation, and for developing techniques to improve implantation and pregnancy outcomes.

With the emergence of the NHP model, ethical considerations should be discussed to ensure humane treatment and minimize suffering in experimental settings. Many reproductive engineering procedures, such as oocyte retrieval, embryo culture, and genetic manipulation, are invasive. Ethical guidelines emphasize minimizing harm and ensuring proper pain management, as well as following the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement). Clear guidelines for genetic modification and reproductive experimentation using NHPs, particularly the use of artificial embryos, are essential.

CRISPR-based gene editing in NHPs holds promise for treating genetic infertility disorders or diseases like cystic fibrosis, which impact reproductive organs. Research is focused on editing the genes of sperm or eggs before fertilization to correct genetic defects and potentially eliminate hereditary diseases.

Reproductive engineering using NHP models may lead to further advances in various fields. The application of CRISPR-Cas9 and other precise gene editing technologies to create targeted modifications in NHPs can accelerate the development of genetic tools. These technologies can also be used to explore artificial uteri and tissue engineering to study the implantation and gestation processes in vitro. Additionally, long-term follow-ups of transgenic NHPs should be conducted to assess their health, fertility, and genetic stability across generations.

6 Conclusion

Reproductive tissue engineering in NHPs is a rapidly advancing field with the potential to revolutionize fertility treatments and our understanding of reproductive biology. By using NHPs as models, researchers can develop more effective ART techniques, regenerative therapies, and personalized treatments for reproductive disorders. However, this work must be balanced with careful ethical considerations, particularly regarding animal welfare and the long-term implications of using advanced technologies like gene editing.

References

• 1

  Abbott D. H. Dumesic D. A. Eisner J. R. Colman R. J. Kemnitz J. W. (1998). Insights into the development of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) from studies of prenatally androgenized female rhesus monkeys. Trends Endocrinol. Metabolism9(2), 62–67. 10.1016/S1043-2760(98)00019-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  Abbott D. H. Rayome B. H. Dumesic D. A. Lewis K. C. Edwards A. K. Wallen K. et al (2017). Clustering of PCOS-like traits in naturally hyperandrogenic female rhesus monkeys. Hum. Reprod.32 (4), 923–936. 10.1093/humrep/dex036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  Abbott D. H. Tarantal A. F. Dumesic D. A. (2009). Fetal, infant, adolescent and adult phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome in prenatally androgenized female rhesus monkeys. Am. J. Primatol.71 (9), 776–784. 10.1002/ajp.20679

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  Abe Y. Nakao H. Goto M. Tamano M. Koebis M. Nakao K. et al (2021). Efficient marmoset genome engineering by autologous embryo transfer and CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 20234. 10.1038/s41598-021-99656-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  Albert S. Wistuba J. Eildermann K. Ehmcke J. Schlatt S. Gromoll J. et al (2012). Comparative marker analysis after isolation and culture of testicular cells from the immature marmoset. Cells Tissues Organs196 (6), 543–554. 10.1159/000339010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Alberts S. C. Altmann J. Brockman D. K. Cords M. Fedigan L. M. Pusey A. et al (2013). Reproductive aging patterns in primates reveal that humans are distinct. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110 (33), 13440–13445. 10.1073/pnas.1311857110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  Appt S. E. Clarkson T. B. Hoyer P. B. Kock N. D. Goode A. K. May M. C. et al (2010). Experimental induction of reduced ovarian reserve in a nonhuman primate model (Macaca fascicularis). Comp. Med.60 (5), 380–388.

  • Google Scholar

• 8

  Arthur Chang T. C. Chan A. W. (2011). Assisted reproductive technology in nonhuman primates. Methods Mol. Biol.770, 337–363. 10.1007/978-1-61779-210-6_13

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  Barnett D. K. Bunnell T. M. Millar R. P. Abbott D. H. (2006). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone II stimulates female sexual behavior in marmoset monkeys. Endocrinology147 (1), 615–623. 10.1210/en.2005-0662

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  Barrier B. F. Dick E. J. Jr. Butler S. D. Hubbard G. B. (2007). Endometriosis involving the ileocaecal junction with regional lymph node involvement in the baboon--striking pathological finding identical between the human and the baboon: a case report. Hum. Reprod.22 (1), 272–274. 10.1093/humrep/del352

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  Bauer C. (2015). The baboon (Papio sp.) as a model for female reproduction studies as a model for female reproduction studies. Contraception92 (2), 120–123. 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  Bauman M. D. Lesh T. A. Rowland D. J. Schumann C. M. Smucny J. Kukis D. L. et al (2019). Preliminary evidence of increased striatal dopamine in a nonhuman primate model of maternal immune activation. Transl. Psychiatry9 (1), 135. 10.1038/s41398-019-0449-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  Bavister B. D. Boatman D. E. Collins K. Dierschke D. J. Eisele S. G. (1984). Birth of rhesus monkey infant after in vitro fertilization and nonsurgical embryo transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.81 (7), 2218–2222. 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2218

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  Bergmann S. Penfold C. A. Slatery E. Siriwardena D. Drummer C. Clark S. et al (2022). Spatial profiling of early primate gastrulation in utero. Nature609 (7925), 136–143. 10.1038/s41586-022-04953-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  Boroviak T. Stirparo G. G. Dietmann S. Hernando-Herraez I. Mohammed H. Reik W. et al (2018). Single cell transcriptome analysis of human, marmoset and mouse embryos reveals common and divergent features of preimplantation development. Development145 (21), dev167833. 10.1242/dev.167833

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  Braundmeier A. Jackson K. Hastings J. Koehler J. Nowak R. Fazleabas A. (2012). Induction of endometriosis alters the peripheral and endometrial regulatory T cell population in the non-human primate. Hum. Reprod.27 (6), 1712–1722. 10.1093/humrep/des083

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  Brenner C. A. Nichols S. M. Jacoby E. S. Bavister B. D. (2004). Non-human primates as a model for reproductive aging and human infertility. Gynecol. Obstetric Investigation57 (1), 21–23.

  • Google Scholar

• 18

  Brito A. B. Lopes C. T. D. Rodrigues A. P. R. de Figueiredo J. R. Domingues S. F. S. dos Santos R. R. (2017). Vitrification of ovarian tissue from non-human primates. Acta Sci. Veterinariae45, 13. 10.22456/1679-9216.80757

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  Buse E. Zöller M. Van Esch E. (2008). The macaque ovary, with special reference to the cynomolgus macaque. Toxicol. Pathol.36 (7), 24s–66s. 10.1177/0192623308327407

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  Chen H. Xia K. Huang W. Li H. Wang C. Ma Y. et al (2021). Autologous transplantation of thecal stem cells restores ovarian function in nonhuman primates. Cell Discov.7 (1), 75. 10.1038/s41421-021-00291-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  Chen Y. Niu Y. Li Y. Ai Z. Kang Y. Shi H. et al (2015). Generation of cynomolgus monkey chimeric fetuses using embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell17 (1), 116–124. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.06.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  Curnow E. Hayes E. (2019). In vitro culture of embryos from the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis). Methods Mol. Biol.2006, 321–339. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9566-0_22

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  Daadi M. M. Barberi T. Shi Q. Lanford R. E. (2014). Nonhuman primate models in translational regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Dev.23 (1), 83–87. 10.1089/scd.2014.0374

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  De Miguel-Gomez L. Sehic E. Thoren E. Ahlstrom J. Rabe H. Oltean M. et al (2024). Toward human uterus tissue engineering: uterine decellularization in a non-human primate species. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.10.1111/aogs.15030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  D'Hooghe T. M. Hill J. A. Mwenda J. M. (2004). A critical review of the use and application of the baboon as a model for research in women's reproductive health. Gynecol. Obstetric Investigation57 (1), 5–6.

  • Google Scholar

• 26

  Domingues S. F. S. Leao D. L. Monteiro F. O. B. (2023). Ultrasonography of the neotropical primate female reproductive system. Front. Vet. Sci.10, 1214509. 10.3389/fvets.2023.1214509

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  Downs J. L. Urbanski H. F. (2006). Neuroendocrine changes in the aging reproductive axis of female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Biol. Reprod.75 (4), 539–546. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.051839

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  Drummer C. Vogt E. J. Heistermann M. Roshani B. Becker T. Matz-Rensing K. et al (2021). Generation and breeding of EGFP-transgenic marmoset monkeys: cell chimerism and implications for disease modeling. Cells10 (3), 505. 10.3390/cells10030505

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  Du Y. Bagnjuk K. Lawson M. S. Xu J. Mayerhofer A. (2018). Acetylcholine and necroptosis are players in follicular development in primates. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 6166. 10.1038/s41598-018-24661-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  Einspanier A. Zarreh-Hoshyari-Khah M. R. Balvers M. Kerr L. Fuhrmann K. Ivell R. (1997). Local relaxin biosynthesis in the ovary and uterus through the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy in the female marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Hum. Reprod.12 (6), 1325–1337. 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1325

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  Fang R. Liu K. Zhao Y. Li H. Zhu D. Du Y. et al (2014). Generation of naive induced pluripotent stem cells from rhesus monkey fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell15 (4), 488–497. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.09.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  Fayomi A. P. Peters K. Sukhwani M. Valli-Pulaski H. Shetty G. Meistrich M. L. et al (2019). Autologous grafting of cryopreserved prepubertal rhesus testis produces sperm and offspring. Science363 (6433), 1314–1319. 10.1126/science.aav2914

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  Fazleabas A. T. (2006). A baboon model for inducing endometriosis. Methods Mol. Med.121, 95–99. 10.1385/1-59259-983-4:093

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  Fazleabas A. T. Brudney A. Gurates B. Chai D. Bulun S. (2002). A modified baboon model for endometriosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.955, 308–317. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02791.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  Garber P. A. Mckenney A. Bartling-John E. Bicca-Marques J. C. De la Fuente M. F. Abreu F. et al (2020). Life in a harsh environment: the effects of age, sex, reproductive condition, and season on hair cortisol concentration in a wild non-human primate. Peerj8, e9365. 10.7717/peerj.9365

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  Gong Y. Bai B. Sun N. Ci B. Shao H. Zhang T. et al (2023). Ex utero monkey embryogenesis from blastocyst to early organogenesis. Cell186 (10), 2092–2110.e23. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  Han L. Wei X. Liu C. Volpe G. Zhuang Z. Zou X. et al (2022). Cell transcriptomic atlas of the non-human primate Macaca fascicularis. Nature604 (7907), 723–731. 10.1038/s41586-022-04587-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  Hayashi Y. Saitou M. Yamanaka S. (2012). Germline development from human pluripotent stem cells toward disease modeling of infertility. Fertil. Steril.97 (6), 1250–1259. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  Hernandez-Lopez L. Cerda-Molina A. L. Diaz-Diaz G. Chavira-Bolanos R. Mondragon-Ceballos R. (2012). Aging-related reproductive decline in the male spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi). J. Med. Primatol.41 (2), 115–121. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2011.00528.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  Hirayama R. Taketsuru H. Nakatsukasa E. Natsume R. Saito N. Adachi S. et al (2023). Production of marmoset eggs and embryos from xenotransplant ovary tissues. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 18196. 10.1038/s41598-023-45224-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  Honda A. Kawano Y. Izu H. Choijookhuu N. Honsho K. Nakamura T. et al (2017). Discrimination of stem cell status after subjecting cynomolgus monkey pluripotent stem cells to naive conversion. Sci. Rep.7, 45285. 10.1038/srep45285

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Jahnukainen K. Ehmcke J. Hergenrother S. D. Schlatt S. (2007). Effect of cold storage and cryopreservation of immature non-human primate testicular tissue on spermatogonial stem cell potential in xenografts. Hum. Reprod.22 (4), 1060–1067. 10.1093/humrep/del471

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  Jarvis P. Srivastav S. Vogelwedde E. Stewart J. Mitchard T. Weinbauer G. F. (2010). The cynomolgus monkey as a model for developmental toxicity studies: variability of pregnancy losses, statistical power estimates, and group size considerations. Birth Defects Res. Part B-Developmental Reproductive Toxicol.89 (3), 175–187. 10.1002/bdrb.20234

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  Johannesson L. Enskog A. Dahm-Kahler P. Hanafy A. Chai D. C. Mwenda J. M. et al (2012). Uterus transplantation in a non-human primate: long-term follow-up after autologous transplantation. Hum. Reprod.27 (6), 1640–1648. 10.1093/humrep/des093

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  Johnson R. L. Kapsalis E. (2008). Heterogeneity of reproductive aging in free-ranging female rhesus macaques. Interdiscip. Top. Gerontol.36, 62–79. 10.1159/000137680

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  Kanda A. Nobukiyo A. Yoshioka M. Hatakeyama T. Sotomaru Y. (2018). Quality of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) oocytes collected after ovarian stimulation. Theriogenology106, 221–226. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  Kim Y. Y. Kang B. C. Yun J. W. Ahn J. H. Kim Y. J. Kim H. et al (2019). Expression of transcripts in marmoset oocytes retrieved during follicle isolation without gonadotropin induction. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (5), 1133. 10.3390/ijms20051133

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  Kim Y. Y. Kim S. W. Kim E. Kim Y. J. Kang B. C. Ku S. Y. (2024). Transcriptomic profiling of reproductive age marmoset monkey ovaries. Reprod. Sci.31 (1), 81–95. 10.1007/s43032-023-01342-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  Kim Y. Y. Yun J. W. Kim J. M. Park C. G. Rosenwaks Z. Liu H. C. et al (2016). Gonadotropin ratio affects the in vitro growth of rhesus ovarian preantral follicles. J. Investigative Med.64 (4), 888–893. 10.1136/jim-2015-000001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  Kim Y. Y. Yun J. W. Kim S. W. Kim H. Kang B. C. Ku S. Y. (2022). Synergistic promoting effects of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein and matrix on the in vitro follicular maturation of marmoset follicles. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med.19 (1), 93–103. 10.1007/s13770-021-00387-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  Kirejczyk S. Pinelli C. Gonzalez O. Kumar S. Dick E. Gumber S. (2021). Urogenital lesions in nonhuman primates at 2 national primate research centers. Veterinary Pathol.58 (1), 147–160. 10.1177/0300985820971752

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  Kishimoto K. Shimada A. Shinohara H. Takahashi T. Yamada Y. Higuchi Y. et al (2021). Establishment of novel common marmoset embryonic stem cell lines under various conditions. Stem Cell Res.53, 102252. 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102252

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  Kumita W. Sato K. Suzuki Y. Kurotaki Y. Harada T. Zhou Y. et al (2019). Efficient generation of Knock-in/Knock-out marmoset embryo via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 12719. 10.1038/s41598-019-49110-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  Kyama C. M. Mihalyi A. Chai D. Simsa P. Mwenda J. M. D'Hooghe T. M. (2007). Baboon model for the study of endometriosis. Womens Health (Lond)3 (5), 637–646. 10.2217/17455057.3.5.637

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  Lee D. M. Thomas C. M. Xu F. H. Yeoman R. R. Xu J. Stouffer R. L. et al (2017). Subcutaneous ovarian tissue transplantation in nonhuman primates: duration of endocrine function and normalcy of subsequent offspring as demonstrated by reproductive competence, oocyte production, and telomere length. J. Assisted Reproduction Genet.34 (11), 1427–1434. 10.1007/s10815-017-1019-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  Lee D. S. Kang Y. H. R. Ruiz-Lambides A. V. Higham J. P. (2021). The observed pattern and hidden process of female reproductive trajectories across the life span in a non-human primate. J. Anim. Ecol.90 (12), 2901–2914. 10.1111/1365-2656.13590

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  Li J. Zhu Q. Cao J. Liu Y. Lu Y. Sun Y. et al (2023a). Cynomolgus monkey embryo model captures gastrulation and early pregnancy. Cell Stem Cell30 (4), 362–377.e7. 10.1016/j.stem.2023.03.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  Li M. Brokaw A. Furuta A. M. Coler B. Obregon-Perko V. Chahroudi A. et al (2021). Non-human primate models to investigate mechanisms of infection-associated fetal and pediatric injury, teratogenesis and stillbirth. Front. Genet.12, 680342. 10.3389/fgene.2021.680342

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  Li X. T. Santos R. Bernal J. E. Li D. D. Hargaden M. Khan N. K. (2023b). Biology and postnatal development of organ systems of cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). J. Med. Primatology52 (1), 64–78. 10.1111/jmp.12622

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  Liu D. Wang X. He D. Sun C. He X. Yan L. et al (2018). Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals the existence of naive and primed pluripotency in pre-implantation rhesus monkey embryos. Genome Res.28 (10), 1481–1493. 10.1101/gr.233437.117

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  Liu H. Chen Y. Niu Y. Zhang K. Kang Y. Ge W. et al (2014). TALEN-mediated gene mutagenesis in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys. Cell Stem Cell14 (3), 323–328. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  Lu H. Jing Y. Zhang C. Ma S. Zhang W. Huang D. et al (2024). Aging hallmarks of the primate ovary revealed by spatiotemporal transcriptomics. Protein Cell15 (5), 364–384. 10.1093/procel/pwad063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  Lundberg P. S. Moskowitz G. J. Bellacose C. Demirel E. Trau H. A. Duffy D. M. (2020). Granulosa cell proliferation is inhibited by PGE2 in the primate ovulatory follicle. Animal Cells Syst.24 (3), 125–135. 10.1080/19768354.2020.1764385

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  Ma H. Zhai J. Wan H. Jiang X. Wang X. Wang L. et al (2019). In vitro culture of cynomolgus monkey embryos beyond early gastrulation. Science366 (6467), eaax7890. 10.1126/science.aax7890

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  Ma Y. Li J. Wang G. Ke Q. Qiu S. Gao L. et al (2016). Efficient production of cynomolgus monkeys with a toolbox of enhanced assisted reproductive technologies. Sci. Rep.6, 25888. 10.1038/srep25888

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  Ma Y. Zhang Y. Chen J. Li L. Liu X. Zhang L. et al (2021). Mesenchymal stem cell-based bioengineered constructs enhance vaginal repair in ovariectomized rhesus monkeys. Biomaterials275, 120863. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120863

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  Makar K. Sasaki K. (2020). Roadmap of germline development and in vitro gametogenesis from pluripotent stem cells. Andrology8 (4), 842–851. 10.1111/andr.12726

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  Mattison J. A. Vaughan K. L. (2017). An overview of nonhuman primates in aging research. Exp. Gerontol.94, 41–45. 10.1016/j.exger.2016.12.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  Mishra A. Qiu Z. Farnsworth S. L. Hemmi J. J. Li M. Pickering A. V. et al (2016). Induced pluripotent stem cells from nonhuman primates. Methods Mol. Biol.1357, 183–193. 10.1007/7651_2014_159

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  Mitalipov S. M. Yeoman R. R. Kuo H. C. Wolf D. P. (2001). Developmental potential of ICSI-produced rhesus monkey embryos on co-culture or in sequential media. Fertil. Steril.76(3), S266–S267. 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02798-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  Morrell J. M. Hodges J. K. (1998). Cryopreservation of non-human primate sperm: priorities for future research. Anim. Reprod. Sci.53 (1-4), 43–63. 10.1016/s0378-4320(98)00126-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  Motohashi H. H. Ishibashi H. (2016). Cryopreservation of ovaries from neonatal marmoset monkeys. Exp. Anim.65 (3), 189–196. 10.1538/expanim.15-0097

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  Niu Y. Shen B. Cui Y. Chen Y. Wang J. Wang L. et al (2014). Generation of gene-modified cynomolgus monkey via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting in one-cell embryos. Cell156 (4), 836–843. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  Niu Y. Sun N. Li C. Lei Y. Huang Z. Wu J. et al (2019). Dissecting primate early post-implantation development using long-term in vitro embryo culture. Science366 (6467), eaaw5754. 10.1126/science.aaw5754

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  Nusser K. D. Mitalipov S. Widmann A. Gerami-Naini B. Yeoman R. R. Wolf D. P. (2001). Developmental competence of oocytes after ICSI in the rhesus monkey. Hum. Reprod.16 (1), 130–137. 10.1093/humrep/16.1.130

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  Nyachieo A. Chai D. C. Deprest J. Mwenda J. M. D'Hooghe T. M. (2007). The baboon as a research model for the study of endometrial biology, uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. Gynecol. Obstetric Investigation64 (3), 149–155. 10.1159/000101739

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  Ochoa-Bernal M. A. Fazleabas A. T. (2020). Physiologic events of embryo implantation and decidualization in human and non-human primates. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21 (6), 1973. 10.3390/ijms21061973

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  Pipes L. Li S. Bozinoski M. Palermo R. Peng X. Blood P. et al (2013). The non-human primate reference transcriptome resource (NHPRTR) for comparative functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res.41 (Database issue), D906–D914. 10.1093/nar/gks1268

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  Pryce C. R. Palme R. Feldon J. (2002). Development of pituitary-adrenal endocrine function in the marmoset monkey: infant hypercortisolism is the norm. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.87 (2), 691–699. 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8244

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  Qu J. Yang F. Zhu T. Wang Y. Fang W. Ding Y. et al (2022). A reference single-cell regulomic and transcriptomic map of cynomolgus monkeys. Nat. Commun.13 (1), 4069. 10.1038/s41467-022-31770-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  Ramsey C. Hanna C. (2019). In vitro culture of rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) embryos. Methods Mol. Biol.2006, 341–353. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9566-0_23

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  Ravisankar S. Hanna C. B. Brooks K. E. Murphy M. J. Redmayne N. Ryu J. et al (2021). Metabolomics analysis of follicular fluid coupled with oocyte aspiration reveals importance of glucocorticoids in primate preovulatory follicle competency. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 6506. 10.1038/s41598-021-85704-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  Riesche L. Tardif S. D. Ross C. N. deMartelly V. A. Ziegler T. Rutherford J. N. (2018). The common marmoset monkey: avenues for exploring the prenatal, placental, and postnatal mechanisms in developmental programming of pediatric obesity. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.314 (5), R684–R692. 10.1152/ajpregu.00164.2017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  Rodriguez-Polo I. Behr R. (2022). Non-human primate pluripotent stem cells for the preclinical testing of regenerative therapies. Neural Regen. Res.17 (9), 1867–1874. 10.4103/1673-5374.335689

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  Roodgar M. Suchy F. P. Nguyen L. H. Bajpai V. K. Sinha R. Vilches-Moure J. G. et al (2022). Chimpanzee and pig-tailed macaque iPSCs: improved culture and generation of primate cross-species embryos. Cell Rep.40 (9), 111264. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111264

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  Rutherford J. N. deMartelly V. A. Layne Colon D. G. Ross C. N. Tardif S. D. (2014). Developmental origins of pregnancy loss in the adult female common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). PLoS One9 (5), e96845. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096845

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  Ryu J. Statz J. P. Chan W. Burch F. C. Brigande J. V. Kempton B. et al (2022). CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the MYO7A gene in rhesus macaque embryos to generate a primate model of Usher syndrome type 1B. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 10036. 10.1038/s41598-022-13689-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  Ryu J. Statz J. P. Chan W. Oyama K. Custer M. Wienisch M. et al (2024). Generation of rhesus macaque embryos with expanded CAG trinucleotide repeats in the huntingtin gene. Cells13 (10), 829. 10.3390/cells13100829

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  Sadeghi N. Uboh N. Ross C. N. McCarrey J. R. Hermann B. P. (2025). Best practices for cryopreserving sperm in Nonhuman Primates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep.15 (1), 3947. 10.1038/s41598-025-88226-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  Sargent J. Roberts V. D'Souza K. Wright A. Gaffney J. Frias A. (2020). Micro-anatomic alterations of the placenta in a non-human primate model of gestational protein-restriction. PLoS One15 (7), e0235840. 10.1371/journal.pone.0235840

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  Sasaki E. Suemizu H. Shimada A. Hanazawa K. Oiwa R. Kamioka M. et al (2009). Generation of transgenic non-human primates with germline transmission. Nature459 (7246), 523–527. 10.1038/nature08090

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  Sasaki K. Nakamura T. Okamoto K. Yabuta Y. Iwatani C. Tsuchiya H. et al (2016). The germ cell fate of cynomolgus monkeys is specified in the nascent amnion. Dev. Cell39 (2), 169–185. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.09.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  Sato K. Oiwa R. Kumita W. Henry R. Sakuma T. Ito R. et al (2016). Generation of a nonhuman primate model of severe combined immunodeficiency using highly efficient genome editing. Cell Stem Cell19 (1), 127–138. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  Schmidt J. K. Mean K. D. Dusek B. M. Hinkle H. M. Puntney R. C. Alexander E. S. et al (2021). Comparative computer-assisted sperm analysis in non-human primates. J. Med. Primatol.50 (2), 108–119. 10.1111/jmp.12510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  Seita Y. Cheng K. McCarrey J. R. Yadu N. Cheeseman I. H. Bagwell A. et al (2023). Efficient generation of marmoset primordial germ cell-like cells using induced pluripotent stem cells. Elife12, e82263. 10.7554/eLife.82263

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  Seita Y. Tsukiyama T. Iwatani C. Tsuchiya H. Matsushita J. Azami T. et al (2016). Generation of transgenic cynomolgus monkeys that express green fluorescent protein throughout the whole body. Sci. Rep.6, 24868. 10.1038/srep24868

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  Shiozawa S. Nakajima M. Okahara J. Kuortaki Y. Kisa F. Yoshimatsu S. et al (2020). Primed to naive-like conversion of the common marmoset embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev.29 (12), 761–773. 10.1089/scd.2019.0259

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  Sosa E. Chen D. Rojas E. J. Hennebold J. D. Peters K. A. Wu Z. et al (2018). Differentiation of primate primordial germ cell-like cells following transplantation into the adult gonadal niche. Nat. Commun.9 (1), 5339. 10.1038/s41467-018-07740-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  Stejskalova A. Vankelecom H. Sourouni M. Ho M. Y. Gotte M. Almquist B. D. (2021). In vitro modelling of the physiological and diseased female reproductive system. Acta Biomater.132, 288–312. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  Sun Q. Dong J. Yang W. T. Jin Y. J. Yang M. Y. Wang Y. et al (2008). Efficient reproduction of cynomolgus monkey using pronuclear embryo transfer technique. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105 (35), 12956–12960. 10.1073/pnas.0805639105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  Tachibana M. Sparman M. Ramsey C. Ma H. Lee H. S. Penedo M. C. et al (2012). Generation of chimeric rhesus monkeys. Cell148 (1-2), 285–295. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  Tan T. Wu J. Si C. Dai S. Zhang Y. Sun N. et al (2021). Chimeric contribution of human extended pluripotent stem cells to monkey embryos ex vivo. Cell184 (8), 2020–2032.e14. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  Tardif S. D. Bales K. L. (2004). Relations among birth condition, maternal condition, and postnatal growth in captive common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). Am. J. Primatology62 (2), 83–94. 10.1002/ajp.20009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  Tardif S. D. Smucny D. A. Abbott D. H. Mansfield K. Schultz-Darken N. Yamamoto M. E. (2003). Reproduction in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Comp. Med.53 (4), 364–368.

  • Google Scholar

• 105

  Taylor H. S. Alderman Iii M. D'Hooghe T. M. Fazleabas A. T. Duleba A. J. (2017). Effect of simvastatin on baboon endometriosis. Biol. Reprod.97 (1), 32–38. 10.1093/biolre/iox058

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  Tomioka I. Nagai Y. Seki K. (2020). Generation of common marmoset model lines of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Front. Neurosci.14, 548002. 10.3389/fnins.2020.548002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  Tu W. Ni D. D. Yang H. Zhao F. Y. Yang C. Zhao X. H. et al (2022). Deciphering the dynamics of the ovarian reserve in cynomolgus monkey through a quantitative morphometric study. Sci. Bull.67 (18), 1854–1859. 10.1016/j.scib.2022.08.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  VandeVoort C. A. Chaffin C. L. Schall P. Z. Latham K. E. (2024). Dynamic changes in gene expression of growing nonhuman primate antral follicles. Physiol. Genomics56 (11), 764–775. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00023.2024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  Wang C. Mavrogianis P. A. Fazleabas A. T. (2009). Endometriosis is associated with progesterone resistance in the baboon (Papio anubis) oviduct: evidence based on the localization of oviductal glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1)1. Biol. Reprod.80 (2), 272–278. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.072496

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  Wang J. Fu X. Yan Y. Li S. Duan Y. Marie Inglis B. et al (2020a). In vitro differentiation of rhesus macaque bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived MSCs into hepatocyte-like cells. Exp. Ther. Med.20 (1), 251–260. 10.3892/etm.2020.8676

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  Wang K. Yao X. Lin S. Q. Zhu X. Q. Pan X. H. Ruan G. P. (2024). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of highly active mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of senescence of rhesus monkey ovary. Stem Cell Res. Ther.15 (1), 14. 10.1186/s13287-023-03631-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  Wang S. Zheng Y. Li J. Yu Y. Zhang W. Song M. et al (2020b). Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of primate ovarian aging. Cell180 (3), 585–600.e19. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  Wedi E. Nayudu P. L. Michelmann H. W. (2011). A case report of spontaneous opening of congenitally fused labia in a female common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) followed by pregnancy and birth of twins. J. Med. Primatol.40 (5), 351–353. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2011.00477.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  Wei H. Liu X. Yuan J. Li L. Zhang D. Guo X. et al (2015). Age-specific gene expression profiles of rhesus monkey ovaries detected by microarray analysis. Biomed. Res. Int.2015, 1–15. 10.1155/2015/625192

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  Wei Y. Yu R. Cheng S. Zhou P. Mo S. He C. et al (2023). Single-cell profiling of mouse and primate ovaries identifies high levels of EGFR for stromal cells in ovarian aging. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids31, 1–12. 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.11.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  Wei Y. L. She Z. Y. Huang T. Zhang H. T. Wang X. R. (2021). Male reproductive systems of Macaca mulatta: gonadal development, spermatogenesis and applications in spermatogonia stem cell transplantation. Res. Vet. Sci.137, 127–137. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.04.033

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  Weinbauer G. F. Niehoff M. Niehaus M. Srivastav S. Fuchs A. Van Esch E. et al (2008). Physiology and endocrinology of the ovarian cycle in macaques. Toxicol. Pathol.36 (7S), 7S–23S. 10.1177/0192623308327412

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  Williams N. I. Caston-Balderrama A. L. Helmreich D. L. Parfitt D. B. Nosbisch C. Cameron J. L. (2001). Longitudinal changes in reproductive hormones and menstrual cyclicity in cynomolgus monkeys during strenuous exercise training: abrupt transition to exercise-induced amenorrhea. Endocrinology142 (6), 2381–2389. 10.1210/en.142.6.2381

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  Wolfe L. D. (1983). Reproductive-biology of Japanese and rhesus macaques. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.60 (2), 271–272.

  • Google Scholar

• 120

  Wu J. Kang Y. Luo X. Dai S. Shi Y. Li Z. et al (2024). Long-term in vivo chimeric cells tracking in non-human primate. Protein Cell15 (3), 207–222. 10.1093/procel/pwad049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  Wu J. Shi Y. Yang S. Tang Z. Li Z. Li Z. et al (2023). Current state of stem cell research in non-human primates: an overview. Med. Rev.3 (4), 277–304. 10.1515/mr-2023-0035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  Xu F. Stouffer R. L. Muller J. Hennebold J. D. Wright J. W. Bahar A. et al (2011). Dynamics of the transcriptome in the primate ovulatory follicle. Mol. Hum. Reprod.17 (3), 152–165. 10.1093/molehr/gaq089

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  Xu M. West-Farrell E. R. Stouffer R. L. Shea L. D. Woodruff T. K. Zelinski M. B. (2009). Encapsulated three-dimensional culture supports development of nonhuman primate secondary follicles. Biol. Reprod.81 (3), 587–594. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.074732

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  Yan L. Tu W. Zhao X. Wan H. Wu J. Zhao Y. et al (2024). Stem cell transplantation extends the reproductive life span of naturally aging cynomolgus monkeys. Cell Discov.10 (1), 111. 10.1038/s41421-024-00726-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  Yoshimatsu S. Okahara J. Sone T. Takeda Y. Nakamura M. Sasaki E. et al (2019). Robust and efficient knock-in in embryonic stem cells and early-stage embryos of the common marmoset using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 1528. 10.1038/s41598-018-37990-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  Yun J. W. Kim Y. Y. Ahn J. H. Kang B. C. Ku S. Y. (2016). Use of nonhuman primates for the development of bioengineered female reproductive organs. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med.13 (4), 323–334. 10.1007/s13770-016-9091-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  Zhai J. Xu Y. Wan H. Yan R. Guo J. Skory R. et al (2023). Neurulation of the cynomolgus monkey embryo achieved from 3D blastocyst culture. Cell186 (10), 2078–2091.e18. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  Zhai J. L. Guo J. Wan H. F. Qi L. Q. Liu L. Z. Xiao Z. Y. et al (2022). Primate gastrulation and early organogenesis at single-cell resolution. Nature612 (7941), 732–738. 10.1038/s41586-022-05526-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  Zhao Z. H. Li C. Y. Meng T. G. Wang Y. Liu W. B. Li A. et al (2020). Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals regulation of fetal ovary development in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Cell Discov.6 (1), 97. 10.1038/s41421-020-00219-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  Zhou Y. Chiu K. Brescia R. J. Combs C. A. Katz M. A. Kitzmiller J. L. et al (1993). Increased depth of trophoblast invasion after chronic constriction of the lower aorta in rhesus monkeys. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.169 (1), 224–229. 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90172-f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar