Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biosensors and Biomolecular Electronics

A Machine Learning Model for Assessing Fetal Health During Pregnancy

Provisionally accepted
Arshad  Kalathil AshikArshad Kalathil Ashik1*Robert  GutierrezRobert Gutierrez1Fidha  AshrafFidha Ashraf2Tricia  AdjeiTricia Adjei1Sohini  PatelSohini Patel3Isabella  AbatiIsabella Abati3Zhenhua  YuZhenhua Yu4Saksham  DhawanSaksham Dhawan1Jia  LiJia Li1Khondaker A.  MamunKhondaker A. Mamun5Thomas  ReddyhoffThomas Reddyhoff1Daniele  DiniDaniele Dini1Christoph  LeesChristoph Lees3Ravi  VaidyanathanRavi Vaidyanathan1
  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2BX, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR5 6GD, Preston, United Kingdom
  • 3Institute of Reproductive Developmental Biology, Department of Metabolism Digestion and Reproduction, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, London, W12 0HS, London, United Kingdom
  • 4Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • 5Department of Computer Science and Engineering, United International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

There is a global imperative to end stillbirths, particularly in low middle income countries (LMICs), which suffer from disproportionate incidence. Sudden changes in fetal movement (FM) patterns often precede a crisis, which, if flagged, can trigger life-saving intervention. Existing means of FM tracking, however, are based on outdated understanding which have remained unchanged for decades. The current standard for monitoring FM out-of-clinic remains maternal perception, which suffers from subjectivity and has little impact in reducing stillbirth or poor perinatal outcomes. Ultrasound can trace FM and trigger intervention but is administered sporadically over the course of pregnancy and demands clinician expertise and resources; frequent use is not feasible, particularly in LMICs. Wearable FM monitors have been proposed for FM empirical movement monitoring, however, clinical impact remains negligible due to homogeneous sensing modalities and lack of clinical validation. Herein, a multimodal vibrational-acoustic sensor array consisting of piezoelectric and acoustic sensing modalities is validated for use in a wearable FM. 25 pregnant participants were recruited to record vibrational-acoustic data from the array in parallel with ultrasound scanning. Categorised fetal movements were recorded by a clinician, and several machine learning models were investigated to validate the sensors to track FM. An ensemble RUSBoost model combined with concatenated sensor data inputs was implemented, yielding FM prediction with precision and recall of 0.44 and 0.61, demonstrating the feasibility of the vibroacoustic sensor array to monitor FM. Inexpensive off-the-shelf sensors comprising the array provide a basis for the development of a fully wearable FM monitor that can be used in LMICs.

Keywords: acoustic sensing modalities, Fetal Movement, FM, piezoelectric, Rusboost model, vibrational-acoustic sensor array, vibroacoustic sensor array

Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 04 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kalathil Ashik, Gutierrez, Ashraf, Adjei, Patel, Abati, Yu, Dhawan, Li, Mamun, Reddyhoff, Dini, Lees and Vaidyanathan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Arshad Kalathil Ashik

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.