Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12 January 2026

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1748343

This article is part of the Research TopicTransformative Biomaterials: Advances in Bone Repair Techniques and ApplicationsView all articles

Biofunctional response of a synthetic ceramic of 99.9% tricalcium phosphate associated with a heterologous fibrin biopolymer and infrared photobiomodulation

Carlos Henrique Bertoni Reis,Carlos Henrique Bertoni Reis1,2Brenda Thaynne Lima de MatosBrenda Thaynne Lima de Matos1Cleuber Rodrigo de Souza Bueno,Cleuber Rodrigo de Souza Bueno3,4Benedito Barraviera,,Benedito Barraviera5,6,7Rui Seabra Ferreira Júnior,,Rui Seabra Ferreira Júnior5,6,7Paulo Srgio da Silva SantosPaulo Sérgio da Silva Santos8Marco Antonio Hungaro DuarteMarco Antonio Hungaro Duarte9Murilo Priori AlcaldeMurilo Priori Alcalde9Dayane Maria Braz NogueiraDayane Maria Braz Nogueira10Geraldo Marco Rosa JúniorGeraldo Marco Rosa Júnior3Daniela Vieira Buchaim,,Daniela Vieira Buchaim3,4,11Rogrio Leone Buchaim,
Rogério Leone Buchaim1,11*
  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
  • 2Beneficent Hospital (HBU), University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Marilia, Brazil
  • 3Department of Anatomy, Medical and Dentistry School, University Center of Adamantina (FAI), Adamantina, Brazil
  • 4Department of Anatomy, Dentistry School, Faculty of the Midwest Paulista (FACOP), Piratininga, Brazil
  • 5Center for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals (CEVAP), São Paulo State University (Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
  • 6Medical School, São Paulo State University (Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
  • 7CTS-CEVAP (Center for Translational Science and Biopharmaceutical Development), São Paulo State University (Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil
  • 8Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), Bauru, Brazil
  • 9Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FOB/USP), Bauru, Brazil
  • 10Postgraduate Program in Applied Dental Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB/USP), University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
  • 11Graduate Program in Anatomy of Domestic and Wild Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), São Paulo, Brazil

Bioproducts and biomaterials for repairing large bone defects hold significant promise in translational research, particularly within Medicine and Dentistry. This study investigated a novel biocomplex comprising a synthetic tricalcium phosphate biomaterial (B), a heterologous fibrin biopolymer formulation (F), and an intraoperative photobiomodulation (PBM) protocol to enhance critical-sized bone defect repair in rats. Sixty male Wistar rats were randomly allocated to six groups (n = 10 per group): CG (blood clot control), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (biomaterial + fibrin), and PBFG (PBM + biomaterial + fibrin). An 8.0 mm critical-sized defect was surgically created in the parietal bone of each animal; groups PCG, PFG, and PBFG received PBM using an 808 nm infrared laser at 100 mW output power intraoperatively. Animals were euthanized at 14 and 42 days post-surgery, followed by assessments of bone repair using micro-CT, histomorphological and morphometric analyses, and immunohistochemistry. Micro-CT analyses showed progressive defect repair across all groups, with notable closure in CG (clot alone) and PFG (PBM + fibrin). Biomaterial particles in BFG and PBFG obscured radiographic visualization of new bone formation. At 14 days, significant differences emerged between CG and both PFG and PBFG (p < 0.05), with no other intergroup differences. By 42 days, CG exhibited significant differences from PFG and PBFG (p < 0.05), alongside differences between PFG and BFG, and BFG and PBFG; remaining comparisons were non-significant. Immunohistochemical markers of bone remodeling were present in all groups, indicating active repair processes. In conclusion, the combination of fibrin biopolymer and PBM proved effective in promoting bone repair and neogenesis in critical calvarial defects.

1 Introduction

The management of large bone defects has still been a challenging problem for medical and dental specialties due to the complexity of available treatments, significant morbidity and high incidence of late complications (Kamal et al., 2019; Kurowiak et al., 2025). Combined with an increasing prevalence of trauma, congenital anomalies and degenerative diseases that can compromise the restoration of bone architecture, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine seek to develop reconstructive therapies to regenerate lost bone and restore its function (Cunha F. B. et al., 2021; Santoro et al., 2025). Among the various reconstructive methods, autogenous grafting provides the most favorable repair conditions, as it combines all the characteristics required for bone regeneration in terms of osteoconduction, osteoinduction and osteogenesis (McAllister and Haghighat, 2007; Yoshikawa et al., 2009; Inchingolo et al., 2022).

However, there are several factors that limit their application, including the risk of morbidity at the donor site and limited tissue availability, which allows advances in the development and improvement of new biomaterials (Bigham-sadegh and Oryan, 2015; McGovern et al., 2018; Schindeler et al., 2018). In view of this, in recent decades, bone substitutes have been the subject of intense research, with the aim of overcoming the limitations resulting from graft harvesting or the use of bone banks, and thus assisting and accelerating the regenerative process, repairing the lesion with new tissue with native morphofunctional characteristics (Fernández-Bodereau et al., 2019; Steijvers et al., 2022; Ferraz, 2023).

Given the wide diversity of commercially available biomaterials, previous studies have presented scientific evidence and predictability of clinical success in the use of synthetic ceramics (Shi et al., 2018; Latimer et al., 2021; De Pace et al., 2025; Duarte et al., 2025; Rajasekar et al., 2025). The biomaterial QualyBone TCP (β-TCP; QualyLive®, Amadora, Portugal) is a synthetic ceramic, containing 99.9% tricalcium phosphate, whose main objective is to fill bone defects or cavities, in the search for bone regeneration and growth, stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts. In addition, there is no immunological or infection risk, it is a radiopaque material and easy to manipulate clinically, a fact that allows for a reduction in surgery time (Reis et al., 2022; Mahesh Saurabh Juneja, 2024).

Thus, the physicochemical properties of these ceramics give the biomaterial remarkable characteristics for providing biomechanical support to cells, ensuring bone growth (Šponer et al., 2011; Vaiani et al., 2023). Although this method is clinically established, a new therapeutic approach for bone regeneration is currently being employed with the use of specialized tissue constructions to achieve a synergistic effect and better overall properties when compared to conventional grafting techniques (Borie et al., 2015; Mendoza-Cerezo et al., 2023).

Among the tissue engineering constructions for bone repair, the association of three-dimensional scaffolds is based on the attempt to mimic the native bone microstructure, facilitating the recruitment of osteogenic cells, growth factors in situ and promoting the synthesis of new mineralized bone matrix (Kim et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2019). In this context, natural biopolymers, such as fibrin sealants, have become ideal candidates for use in combination with particulate bone grafts (Khalili et al., 2024). This is because it enables the manufacture of multifunctional scaffolds that stop bleeding through homeostatic mechanisms, increase resistance to shear stress, graft stability in the surgical bed, a preponderant factor in preventing micromotion, and provide longer cellular support during the entire bone repair process, increasing the graft success rate (Kolehmainen and Willerth, 2012; de Oliveira et al., 2020).

The fibrin sealant precursors, fibrinogen and thrombin, interact in the final stages of the blood coagulation cascade resulting in a cross-linked fibrin matrix, a temporary structure necessary to support healing and tissue remodeling (Zubairova et al., 2015). In addition, fibrin specifically binds to numerous proteins and growth factors released in response to injury, through interactions with specific cell surface receptors, a preponderant factor to play an active role in the repair process (Noori et al., 2017; Li et al., 2024). Most preparations consist of plasma blood components, which allows them to be classified according to the method of obtaining fibrinogen, in autologous or homologous fibrin sealants. However, autologous formulations become unviable in seriously injured patients or in unforeseen emergencies, and homologous formulations with high added value and risk of viral transmission (Taniguchi et al., 2022).

The identification of these methodological limitations prompted the team of researchers at the Center for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals (CEVAP, Sao Paulo State University UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil) to develop a modified version of these preparations as an effective, safe and affordable alternative. Thus, human fibrinogen was replaced by plasma fibrinogen from large animals, Bubalus bubalis, and thrombin by serine protease, extracted from the venom, Crotalus durissus terrificus (Ferreira et al., 2017). Initially, the protein concentrations of serine protease and heterologous cryoprecipitate were designed for the treatment of chronic venous ulcers and peripheral nerve repair, as an alternative to conventional sutures, presenting satisfactory preclinical and clinical results (Buchaim et al., 2015; Biscola et al., 2017). In fact, the excellent biocompatibility, controllable biodegradability, intrinsic bioactivity and many other unique characteristics make this therapeutic formulation viable and attractive for other areas such as tissue bioengineering and regenerative medicine (Song et al., 2018). Thus, improvements in research and the use of new technologies have directed the applicability of heterologous fibrin sealant as a three-dimensional scaffold in bone reconstruction, a delivery system for biologically active molecules and support for mesenchymal stem cells, which led to the change of name to heterologous fibrin biopolymer (Barros et al., 2009; Machado et al., 2015; Buchaim et al., 2019).

In the search for improved results in reconstructive surgical interventions that require tissue repair, several extraoperative therapeutic modalities have been researched. Among non-invasive treatments, laser photobiomodulation (PBM) has been widely used in several clinical conditions in order to accelerate tissue regeneration and modulate inflammatory processes in cells with functional deficits (Pinheiro and Gerbi, 2006; De Freitas and Hamblin, 2016; Hamblin, 2016; de Freitas Dutra Júnior et al., 2022). Not unlike what occurs in bone tissue, PBM has been shown to be effective in modulating biochemical reactions, increasing the supply of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), cell membrane permeability, enabling calcium influx, stimulating cell differentiation and proliferation, regulating growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines, inducing collagen synthesis and remodeling, and angiogenesis (Nejatifard et al., 2021).

This sum of cellular events stimulated by PBM causes the injured bone tissue to reestablish its homeostasis, that is, the normalization of its shape and function, leading to morphofunctional regeneration (Kazancioglu et al., 2013; Rosso et al., 2017; Dias et al., 2023; Rodrigo et al., 2023). Our team has employed a PBM protocol with satisfactory results, but which requires several applications. In addition, there is a need to reformulate the concentrations of the fibrin biopolymer blood components to achieve a less dense three-dimensional mesh, which provides a microenvironment more conducive to cell migration, to achieve ideal characteristics such as a scaffold, providing agglutination of the particulate graft and preventing invagination of surrounding soft tissues, promoting guided tissue regeneration without the use of membranes.

Despite extensive investigation of photobiomodulation (PBM) for bone repair, current evidence remains fragmented, with heterogeneous wavelengths, doses, and application schedules leading to inconsistent outcomes and preventing robust dose–response generalizations or clinical standardization. Likewise, β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) ceramics are widely recognized as osteoconductive, resorbable bone substitutes, yet their integration with advanced bioactive scaffolds is still being optimized to improve defect filling and long-term biomechanical performance. In parallel, a heterologous fibrin biopolymer derived from buffalo cryoprecipitate and snake venom serine protease has emerged as a versatile hemostatic, adhesive, and scaffold material, with growing experimental and clinical evidence supporting its application in nerve and bone regeneration, but with limited data on formulations with reduced fibrinogen content in critical-sized bone defects. Therefore, there is a compelling need to investigate whether a single-session intraoperative PBM protocol, applied at a well-defined infrared dose, can act synergistically with a 99.9% β-TCP ceramic and a low-fibrinogen heterologous fibrin biopolymer to enhance early bone regeneration in critical calvarial defects, potentially informing more standardized and translatable regenerative strategies.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Ethical aspects

The research project was approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee (CEUA) of the Bauru School of Dentistry–University of São Paulo (FOB-USP) Protocol 005/2020 dated 1/14/2021 (amendment 9/19/2023). The sample size was determined a priori following the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement), prioritizing the minimum number of animals necessary to achieve reliable, statistically significant results while maintaining data integrity (Cornwell, 2015; MacArthur Clark, 2018). This approach was informed by previous experiments conducted by our research group using comparable critical-sized calvarial defect models and treatment protocols, which consistently demonstrated robust differences in new bone formation between treatment and control groups using cohorts of 5–10 animals per group/time point (Pomini et al., 2022; Rossi et al., 2024). Based on these precedents, which yielded effect sizes typically exceeding d = 1.0 for key comparisons and ANOVA F-values >5.0 (p < 0.01), we determined that n = 10 animals per group (5 per time point) provided adequate statistical power (>80%) to detect meaningful treatment effects at α = 0.05, thereby avoiding excess animal use while ensuring experimental validity (Buchaim et al., 2022).

2.2 Experimental design

Sixty adults male Wistar Hannover rats (Rattus norvegicus), aged 90 days and weighing approximately 330 g, were used. They were obtained from the Bioterium of the University of Sao Paulo - USP (Ribeirao Preto, Brazil) and kept in the Bioterium of the Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB/USP, Bauru, Brazil). The animals were kept in conventional cages with rodent food and filtered water “ad libitum”, in air-conditioned environment with exhaust fan, controlled light-dark period of 12 h each, average temperature of 22 °C, and all provisions for monitoring the animals were followed.

The rats were randomly divided into six groups according to the type of defect filling and photobiomodulation treatment: CG (Clot group); PCG (PBM + Clot); FG (Fibrin group); PFG (PBM + FG); BFG (Biomaterial group + Fibrin); PBFG (PBM + Biomaterial + F) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Experimental design diagram showing the process involving sixty adult male Wistar rats. Stage A describes inclusion criteria. Stage B depicts an experimental model with an eight-millimeter bone defect in calvaria. Stage C illustrates randomization and treatment groups: CG (control group, n=20), FG (fiber group, n=20), BFG (biofiber group, n=20), and their subdivisions (PCG, PFG, BFG, PFBG) each with n=10. The process ends with transoperative PBM treatment.

Figure 1. Experimental design schematic. (A) Inclusion criteria: 60 male Wistar rats (90 days, ∼330 g). (B) 8 mm critical-sized calvarial defect model. (C) Six experimental groups (n = 10): CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin). PBM applied at five points (808 nm, 100 mW, single session).

2.3 Treatments

2.3.1 Tricalcium phosphate ceramic (β-TCP)

QualyBone TCP (QualyLive®, Amadora, Portugal) is a synthetic porous ceramic primarily designed for filling bone defects or cavities. It consists of 99.9% tricalcium phosphate and holds the Conformité Européenne (CE0120) certification, or “European Conformity”, a mandatory seal for any manufacturer, European or otherwise, wishing to sell products within European territory. This certification ensures compliance with a defined set of parameters aligned with European Union standards. Additionally, it meets the ISO 13485:2016 certification requirements for the design and manufacture of sterile synthetic bone substitutes. The granulation used is medium, ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 mm.

2.3.2 Heterologous fibrin biopolymer

The heterologous fibrin biopolymer, previously called fibrin sealant derived from snake venom, was provided by the Center for the Study of Venoms and Venomous Animals at São Paulo State University (CEVAP, UNESP/Botucatu, Brazil). The composition and application method are thoroughly described in patent BR 102014011432-7, granted on 6 July 2022, by the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI).

The biopolymer consists of three distinct solutions that are thawed, combined, and homogenized before application. The first solution exhibits thrombin-like properties (gyroxin) and is derived from the venom of Crotalus durissis terrificus, with calcium chloride serving as the diluent. The second solution contains fibrinogen (cryoprecipitate), extracted from the blood of Bubalus bubalis, the buffalo.

In this study, we used the protocol by Pomini et al. (2022) (Pomini et al., 2023) with equal proportions of the three components (20 µL of each), presenting a reduced concentration of fibrinogen, in relation to the initial studies with the fibrin biopolymer in bone regeneration (Vigliar et al., 2024).

2.3.3 Laser photobiomodulation therapy protocol

The PCG, PFG, and PBFG groups underwent low-level laser therapy treatment with the Therapy EC equipment (DMC®, São Carlos, Brazil). The equipment allows the application of infrared laser at a single wavelength of 808 nm. The Therapy EC used in this PBM protocol is registered with the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa) under number 80030819013, serial number 48555, manufactured in 03/2022, batch 0041. The samples were irradiated directly onto the skin of the surgical area, without the use of optical fibers, with a distance between the laser tip and the bone tissue of the calvaria of approximately 2 mm.

The laser irradiation was performed in continuous-wave mode in the infrared spectrum, using gallium–aluminum–arsenide (GaAlAs) as the active medium. The beam area of the device, according to the manufacturer, was 0.0984 cm2, with an output power of 100 mW, resulting in an irradiance of 1.016 W/cm2 at the target. The energy density was 60.98 J/cm2 per point, with an exposure time of 60 s per point. The irradiation was applied at four sites on the defect surface in a clockwise pattern (12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock), as well as at a central point, in a single session. Each point received an energy dose of 6 J, totaling 30 J across the entire treated area. Only one application was performed in the immediate postoperative period, after performing the surgical suture, on the skin in the area (de Freitas et al., 2018; Pomini et al., 2023).

The dosimetry calculation describes laser therapy parameters: output power P=100 mW (equivalent to 0.1 W), beam area A=0.0984 cm2, irradiance I=1.016 W/cm2, and exposure time t=60 s per point. Energy delivered to each point is calculated as E=P×t. Substituting values: E=0.1 W ×60 s =6 J. This represents the total energy deposited at the treatment site. Fluence, or energy density, is F=EA. Thus, F=6J0.0984cm2=60.98 J/cm2, quantifying energy per unit area for tissue interaction. Irradiance is I=PA=0.1W0.0984cm2=1.016 W/cm2, confirming power density at the target and consistency across parameters.

2.4 Experimental surgery

The surgical procedures were conducted in the surgery laboratory of the Bioterium at the Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB-USP). During the experimental surgery, the animals underwent general intraperitoneal anesthesia in the lower left abdominal quadrant. This was achieved through a combination of the sedative ketamine hydrochloride (80 mg/kg of body weight; Dopalen®, Sespo Indústria e Comércio Ltda, SP, Brazil) and the muscle relaxant xylazine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg of body weight; Anasedan®, Sespo Indústria e Comércio Ltda, SP, Brazil), under strict monitoring.

Following anesthesia, trichotomy was performed using a hair trimmer (Philips® Multigroom QG3250, SP, Brazil) in the frontal-parietal bone region, between the external ear pavilions. The specimens were then weighed using an analytical scale (MicroNal® Precision Equipment, SP, Brazil). Antisepsis of the shaved region, including the surrounding fur, was carried out using a 10% topical solution of Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone Iodine PVPI (Povidine® Antisséptico, Vic Pharma, Brazil). The surgical procedure was conducted independently on a sterile-covered bench, with new materials used for each specimen.

The animals were secured to the operating table in the ventral decubitus position. A 4 cm semilunar incision was then made using a No. 15 carbon steel scalpel blade (Embramac®, Campinas, Brazil) in the tegument. The periosteum was meticulously detached with a syndesmotome and reflected along with adjacent tissues, exposing the external surface of the parietal bones. A circular osteotomy, 8.0 mm in diameter, was performed at the center of the parietal bones using a trephine drill (Neodent®, Curitiba, Brazil) attached to a contra-angle handpiece (Driller®, Carapicuíba, Brazil) and powered by an electric micromotor (Driller® BLM 600 Baby, Carapicuíba, Brazil). The procedure was conducted at low speed (1,500 rpm) under continuous and abundant irrigation with sterile saline solution (0.9%) to prevent thermal-induced bone necrosis. This technique ensured the removal of a smooth, rounded bone fragment without spicules, while preserving the integrity of the dura mater and brain.

In the CG and PCG groups, the defects were created but remained unfilled, allowing only clot formation. In the FG and PFG groups, the defects were treated with CEVAP fibrin biopolymer. Meanwhile, in the BFG and PBFG groups, the defects were filled with tricalcium phosphate ceramic integrated into the CEVAP fibrin biopolymer. Prior to application, the biomaterial was precisely weighed on an analytical balance (Micronal® Precision Equipment, São Paulo, Brazil) to ensure complete filling of the surgical cavity (0.08 g).

After complete polymerization of the biopolymer with the ceramic, the resulting compound was carefully transferred to the defect site without exerting pressure on the brain. Following this step, all experimental groups were subdivided based on whether they received PBM treatment. The surgical area tissues were repositioned to ensure that the periosteum adequately covered the cavities. The integument was then sutured using simple stitches with 4-0 silk thread (Ethicon®, Johnson & Johnson, São Paulo, Brazil). The area was meticulously cleaned with gauze moistened in a topical antiseptic solution containing 2% chlorhexidine (Riohex®, Rioquímica, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil).

In the PCG, PFG, and PBFG groups, the laser was applied perpendicularly at four distinct points on the defect surface in a clockwise manner (12 o’clock, 3 o’clock, 6 o’clock, and 9 o’clock), along with an additional central point, in a single session. The animals were placed in lateral decubitus within their cages and exposed to incandescent light to facilitate full anesthetic recovery. Immediately after the surgical procedure, they received a single dose of the antibiotic Flotril® 2.5% (Schering-Plough, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) at 0.2 mL/kg and the analgesic Dipirona Analgex V® (Agener União, São Paulo, Brazil) at 0.06 mL/kg via intramuscular injection. The analgesic regimen continued for 3 days, supplemented by acetaminophen (Paracetamol, Generic medication, Medley, São Paulo, Brazil) at 200 mg/kg, with six drops per animal dissolved in the drinking water until euthanasia.

Throughout the experiment, the animals were monitored for clinical signs of pain by assessing changes in behavior, including apathy, depression, aggression, or hyperexcitability—key indicators deviating from their usual demeanor. Observations also included alterations in gait, posture, and facial expressions. Additionally, food and water intake, physical condition, clinical symptoms, and overall behavior were systematically evaluated.

2.5 Surgical procedure for tissue collection

At 14- and 42-day post-surgery, five animals from each group were weighed and euthanized according to the general anesthetic overdose method, administering a triple dose (240 mg/kg ketamine + 30 mg/kg xylazine). Once death was confirmed, the defect region of each specimen was carefully extracted, ensuring the preservation of supraperiosteal soft tissues. The samples were then fixed in a 10% formalin solution with phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 48 h before being sent for computed microtomography analysis.

2.6 X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)

Following fixation in formalin, the specimens underwent X-ray beam scanning using a SkyScan 1174v2 computed microtomography system (Bruker-microCT®, Kontich, Belgium) at the Bauru School of Dentistry (Endodontics). The Cone-Beam X-ray sources were operated at 50 kV and 800 μA, utilizing a Cu + Al filter. Each specimen was carefully placed in tubes, positioned, and securely fixed within the appropriate sample holder using utility wax to ensure stabilization and prevent movement during scanning.

The samples were rotated 360° with a rotation step of 0.5, achieving an isotropic resolution of 19.6 µm, with an acquisition time of 41 min and 32 s per specimen. The resulting images were processed and reconstructed using specialized software, including 64Bits270013 (Bruker®, Kontich, Belgium) and NRecon® (version 1.6.8.0, SkyScan Bruker-microCT), generating approximately 1,000–1,100 slices based on the defined anatomical parameters. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization was conducted using Data Viewer® (version 1.4.4, 64-bit) for linear measurements of coronal, transaxial, and sagittal axes, along with CTvox® (version 2.4.0 r868, Bruker Micro CT) for enhanced image analysis, facilitating qualitative assessment of newly formed bone tissue.

2.7 Histotechnical processing

After acquiring the microtomographic images, the specimens were rinsed in running water for 24 h and then subjected to demineralization using an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution. This solution contained 4.13% Tritiplex® III (Merck KGaA, Hessen, Germany) and 0.44% sodium hydroxide (Labsynth, São Paulo, Brazil), with weekly solution changes over approximately 42 days. During these intervals, radiographic analyses were conducted using Insight adult IP-21 F-Speed periapical film (Carestream® Carestream Health, New York, United States) to verify the progression of demineralization.

Once complete demineralization was confirmed, the specimens underwent dehydration through a graded series of ethyl alcohol concentrations, followed by diaphanization in xylene and embedding in Histosec® paraffin (Merck, Hessen, Germany). Subsequently, semi-serial coronal sections were prepared, focusing on the central defect region, using a Leica® RM2245 semi-automatic microtome (Leica Biosystems®, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were cut at a thickness of 5 µm for subsequent staining with hematoxylin-eosin (HE), Masson’s trichrome (MT), Picrosirius-red (PRS), and immunostaining procedures.

2.8 Histomorphologic and histomorphometric analysis

For the histomorphological assessment of bone defect areas, the entire extent of the defect was considered in all specimens to analyze the bone repair pattern across all groups. This allowed for the evaluation of granulation tissue presence, inflammatory infiltrate, the formation and quality of immature or mature/lamellar bone, and the degree of newly formed tissue filling.

To achieve this, four semi-serial sections of the surgical bed from each defect were examined under an Olympus® BX50 light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), with images captured using ×4 and ×20 objectives and a digital camera (Olympus DP 71®, Tokyo, Japan). The imaging process was conducted using the DP Controller® 3.2.1.276 software (2001–2006, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), configured to a resolution of 4,080 × 3,072 pixels and 30% spot size, in the Anatomy Research Laboratory of the Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB-USP).

Volume density (VVi) represents the fraction of volume occupied by specific components—such as graft material, inflammatory infiltrate, connective tissue, bone tissue, and bone marrow—within the total defect site (graft + reactive tissue). In histological sections, this is expressed as an area fraction, defined by VVi = AAi. The volume density assessment followed a structured protocol. Images encompassing the entire defect were captured using a ×4 objective and saved in TIFF format. The defect was then reconstructed in Adobe Photoshop CS6. Subsequently, the images were analyzed in AxioVision® software (version 4.8, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), where the total analyzed area (A) and the area occupied by each constituent within the defect (Ai) were measured using pixel-based quantification. The volume density (VVi) of each structural component was determined by the equation: VVi = AAi = Ai/A × 100 (Weibel, 1969).

2.9 Birefringence analysis of collagen content of bone defects

Picrosirius-red stained sections were examined under polarized light to assess the quality and quantity of the newly formed organic matrix throughout the defect healing periods. Defect images were captured using a Leica DFC 310FX high-resolution digital camera (Leica®, Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) connected to a Leica DM IRBE confocal laser microscope and LAS 4.0.0 image acquisition system (Leica®, Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) at the Centro Integrado de Pesquisas (CIP, FOB-USP).

To evaluate collagen quality based on the birefringence of fiber bundle organization, the central defect fields were analyzed under a polarized light microscope at ×10 magnification. Three histological fields, representing the entire defect extension, were imaged. To prevent interference in fiber quantification, all residual bone within these fields were removed using Adobe Photoshop CS6 software.

The images were then processed in AxioVision® imaging software (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH, Jena, Deutschland). Through the interactive Processing-Segmentation-Threshold tool, the RGB color pattern was defined for each structure. Bone tissue was distinguished by its random and disorganized fibrillar arrangement, with polarization colors varying from red-orange (indicating poorly organized bone) to bright green/yellow (denoting lamellar bone), depending on fiber width (Bossini et al., 2012; Costa et al., 2019; Nogueira et al., 2022).

2.10 Immunohistochemical analysis

For immunohistochemical analysis, histological sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a graded ethanol series (100° - 100° - 100° - 90° - 70° GL). Antigen retrieval was carried out by immersing the histological slides in citrate buffer (Spring Bioscience) within a pressurized chamber (Decloaking Chamber®, Biocare Medical) at 95 °C for 20 min. Following each stage of the immunohistochemical reaction, the slides were rinsed in PBS 0.1 M, pH 7.4 (Sigma Aldrich®).

Next, the slides were incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 1 h to block endogenous peroxidase, followed by immersion in 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma Aldrich®) for 12 h to minimize nonspecific binding. Samples from each experimental group were divided into four batches, with each batch incubated with one of the following primary antibodies: BMP-2 Ab-AF5163 (Affinity Bioreagents®, Golden, CO, USA, batch 15v8605), VEGFA Ab-AF5131 (Affinity Bioreagents®, Golden, CO, USA, batch 63m6093), BMP-4 Ab-AF5175 (Affinity Bioreagents®, Golden, CO, USA, batch 60g7275), OSTEOCALCIN Ab-DF12303 (Affinity Bioreagents®, Golden, CO, USA, batch 85n2245), and ACP-5 Ab-DF6989 (Affinity Bioreagents®, Golden, CO, USA, batch 70b0275) (Nogueira et al., 2025).

The sections were subsequently treated with a biotinylated anti-mouse/rabbit IgG secondary antibody generated in horse (BA-1400, Vector Laboratories) for 2 h, followed by incubation with streptavidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (SA-5004, Vector Laboratories®) for 1 h.

For visualization, the reaction was developed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (SK-4105, Vector Laboratories®) as the chromogen. Counterstaining with Harris hematoxylin was applied to samples for VEGF, OCN, TRAP, BMP2, and BMP4 detection, enhancing immunostained cell visibility. The slides then underwent ethanol dehydration, diaphanization in xylene, and final mounting with coverslips and mounting medium (Fisher Scientific®).

As a negative control, the specimens underwent identical procedures but without primary antibody application. Immunohistochemical analysis was conducted by a blind researcher (CR), with the region of interest encompassing the full extent of the bone defect.

2.11 Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA to assess differences among treatment groups at each time point. The assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were verified with the Shapiro–Wilk and Bartlett tests, respectively, at a 5% significance level. Upon finding a significant overall effect, effect size was estimated using eta-squared (η2), calculated as the ratio of the between-group sum of squares to the total sum of squares, to quantify the proportion of variance explained by treatment. Subsequently, post hoc mean comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test, and Cohen’s d was calculated for selected pairwise contrasts to determine the magnitude of differences in new bone formation between groups. Intragroup comparisons between 14 and 42 days were conducted using the Student’s t-test, with corresponding Cohen’s d values. All analyses were carried out in GraphPad Prism (version 8), adopting p < 0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance.

3 Results

No changes in the animals’ behavior were observed beyond the usual post-surgical pattern for critical calvarial bone defects. The medication was administered on the scheduled days, and no animal died before the planned euthanasia.

3.1 X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)

At 14 days postoperatively, micro-CT images demonstrate the progression of defect repair, primarily in the clot-filled group (CG) and the group treated with fibrin biopolymer combined with low-power laser (PFG). Due to their radiopacity, biomaterial particles hinder the visualization of new bone formation in the BFG and PBFG groups. The hypodense cavity, corresponding to the critical bone defect, can be qualitatively observed, laterally delimited by the hyperdense bone border and irregular hyperdense regions associated with centripetal bone neoformation. Similarly, in the BFG and PBFG groups, visualization is challenging due to the presence of the hyperdense biomaterial (Figure 2).

Figure 2
CT scans displaying transaxial and coronal views of different conditions, labeled CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG. Red and yellow arrows highlight key areas in the first, fourth, fifth, and sixth rows.

Figure 2. Micro-CT images (transaxial/coronal views) of 8 mm calvarial defects at 14 days post-surgery. CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin). Yellow arrows: β-TCP particles. Red arrows: centripetal new bone formation.

Microtomographic images of animals at the 42-day mark demonstrate a more advanced stage of defect repair, particularly in the clot-filled groups (CG) and the group treated with fibrin biopolymer combined with low-level laser (PFB), exhibiting a more organized structure compared to the 14-day micro-CT. Visually, distinguishing new bone formation from biomaterial particles in the BFG and PBFG groups remains challenging. However, due to the increased mineralization and radiopacity relative to the 14-day period, new bone formation can be observed around the biomaterial (Figure 3).

Figure 3
CT scans in two orientations, transaxial and coronal, of five different samples labeled CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG. Arrows indicate specific areas in each scan, with red arrows for CG, PCG, and PFG, and yellow arrows for BFG and PBFG, highlighting structural differences.

Figure 3. Micro-CT images (transaxial/coronal views) of 8 mm calvarial defects at 42 days post-surgery. CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin). Yellow arrows: β-TCP particles. Red arrows: increased mineralization/new bone around remnants.

3.2 Histomorphological analysis (HE, MT and PRS)

The images demonstrate newly formed bone growth, with multiple gaps containing osteocytes, arranged in a disorganized, non-lamellar structure, and collagen fibers oriented in various directions. Greater evidence of bone growth and maturation is also observed near the defect’s edge, progressing in a centripetal manner.

In both staining methods (HE and Masson’s Trichrome), during the 14-day period, the groups that exhibited the most significant new bone formation were PBFG, PFG, and PCG, all undergoing photobiomodulation. In groups containing biomaterial (BFG and PBFG), reactive tissue formation and small-scale bone neoformation were observed between biomaterial particles, following a centripetal pattern and appearing more prominently at the edges of the bone defect. In the groups where fibrin biopolymer was present alone (FG and PFG), it was observed within connective tissue as hyperchromatic corpuscles, alongside a discrete inflammatory infiltrate. The distinction between mature bone and primary bone tissue was evident in all groups (Figures 4, 5).

Figure 4
Histological images depicting tissue samples at 14 and 42 days for different groups: CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG. Each group shows low and high magnification with pink and purple staining, highlighting structural changes over time.

Figure 4. Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining of 8 mm calvarial defects. 14 and 42 days post-surgery (4× left, 20× inset right). CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin). Scale bars: 1–2 mm (4×), 200 μm (20×). Note enhanced neoformation in PBM groups and particle encapsulation (BFG/PBFG) at 42 days.

Figure 5
Histological images of different tissue samples, stained with Masson's trichrome and picrosirius red, displayed over 14 and 42 days. The left column features Masson's trichrome stain in blue and red, showing connective tissue and muscle fibers. The right column shows picrosirius red stain, highlighting collagen fibers in red and yellow. Samples labeled CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG demonstrate tissue changes over time, with scale bars included for reference.

Figure 5. Masson’s trichrome (MT) and picrosirius red (PRS) staining under polarized light (20×) of 8 mm calvarial defects at 14/42 days. CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin). Scale bar: 500 μm. PRS: red-orange (immature collagen, 14 days); yellow-green increase (lamellar bone, 42 days; prominent in PBM groups).

At 42 days, more advanced bone growth was observed, though the division between mature and immature bone was less distinct at the wound edge. The newly formed bone tissue exhibited greater organization, yet peripheral regions remained disorganized. In the biomaterial-containing groups (BFG and PBFG), centripetal bone formation around biomaterial particles was more pronounced, with some particles becoming completely encapsulated by bone tissue. In fibrin biopolymer-containing groups (FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG), angiogenesis was more prominent than in other groups, particularly those subjected to photobiomodulation (PFG and PBFG) (Figures 4, 5).

The histochemical evaluation of collagen fibers enables the study of the structural arrangement and maturation stage of collagen fibrils within the newly formed bone matrix, where birefringence brightness intensity is directly related to the maturation process. To assess collagen maturation, varying birefringence patterns—green, yellow, and red—were observed in the affected regions. Thicker, more anisotropic collagen fibers exhibited birefringence in hues ranging from orange to red, while thinner, disorganized fibers displayed shades of yellow to green. In groups undergoing photobiomodulation treatment (PBFG, PFG, PCG), qualitative findings indicated improved organization and maturation of collagen fibers, characterized by predominant orange-red birefringence and a reduced presence of fibers with green-spectrum birefringence, suggesting a decrease in immature, thinner fibers (Figure 5).

Over the 14-day period, histological images of PRS revealed a predominance of colors associated with thin and disorganized collagen fibers in the bone neoformation area, characteristic of immature bones. The presence of yellowish-green birefringence was minimal and sporadic. By day 42, a notable increase in these yellowish-green hues was observed, indicating the progression of bone maturation in the neoformation regions. The groups showing the highest presence of yellowish-green birefringence were those treated with trans surgical low-level laser (PBFG, PFG, PCG), as well as the group that received fibrin biopolymer (FG) (Figure 5).

3.3 Immunohistochemistry analysis

The immunohistochemical technique used to detect VEGF, OCN, TRAP, BMP2, and BMP4 showed high specificity in detecting these proteins, which was confirmed by the total absence of staining in the negative control. In the VEGF immunostaining, positive staining for angiogenic growth factor was observed in all groups, being more pronounced in the groups with the presence of fibrin biopolymer (FG and PFG) at 14 and 42 days. In the OCN immunostaining, positive staining for this transcription factor was observed in the tissue and around the biomaterial particles of the BFG and PBFG groups at 14 and 42 days (Figures 6, 7).

Figure 6
Microscopic images showing tissue samples under various conditions. Columns represent VEGF and OCN staining at 14 and 42 days, while rows denote different sample groups: CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG. Arrows and stars indicate specific areas of interest within the tissues.

Figure 6. Immunohistochemistry for VEGF (top) and OCN (bottom) in 8 mm calvarial defects at 14/42 days (20×). CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin). Yellow stars: β-TCP particles. Red arrows: positive immunostaining. Scale bar: 200 μm. Enhanced VEGF (FG/PFG); OCN around β-TCP (BFG/PBFG).

Figure 7
Microscopic images arranged in a grid showing tissue samples stained purple, labeled by treatment groups (CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, PBFG) and days (14, 42) for TRAP, BMP2, and BMP4. Red arrows and yellow stars indicate specific features, possibly regions of interest or highlight differences between treatments and time points.

Figure 7. Immunohistochemistry for TRAP, BMP2, and BMP4 in 8 mm calvarial defects at 14/42 days (20×). CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin). Yellow stars: β-TCP particles. Red arrows: positive immunostaining. Scale bar: 200 μm. Prominent BMP expression in PFG/PBFG.

3.4 Statistical analysis

In the 14-day period, there was a significant difference between the CG in relation to the PFG and PBFG groups (p ≤ 0.05). In the comparative analysis between the other groups, there was no significant difference (Table 1; Figure 8).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Percentage (%) of new bone tissue formed in the 14-day experimental period.

Figure 8
Bar chart on the left shows new bone percentage for groups CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG at 14 days. All groups have around 30-40 percent new bone, with a significant difference marked between CG and PBFG. To the right, a plot shows 95 percent confidence intervals for differences between group means, using Tukey’s method, demonstrating interval overlap and significance levels.

Figure 8. Means and standard deviations of the percentage of newly formed bone tissue after a 14-day experimental period. Asterisk (*) indicates significant differences between groups (p ≤ 0.05). CG (Clot group); PCG (PBM + Clot); FG (Fibrin group); PFG (PBM + FG); BFG (Biomaterial group + Fibrin); PBFG (PBM + Biomaterial + F).

At 14 days, one-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of treatment on the percentage of newly formed bone (F(5,24) = 5.99, p = 0.001), with a large effect size (η2 = 0.56), indicating that approximately 56% of the variance in early bone formation was attributable to the different filling materials and PBM protocols. Groups treated with PBM in combination with fibrin (PFG) or with the full biocomplex (PBFG) exhibited higher percentages of newly formed bone compared with the clot control: PFG showed 36.4% ± 4.67% versus 27.0% ± 1.87% in CG, with a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.64), whereas PBFG reached 37.8% ± 2.28% compared with 27.0% ± 1.87% in CG, yielding an extremely large effect size (Cohen’s d = 5.18).

In the 42-day period, there was a significant difference between the CG in relation to the PFG and PBFG, as well as between the PFG vs. BFG and BFG vs. PBFG (p ≤ 0.05). In the comparative analysis between the other groups, there was no significant difference (Table 2; Figure 9).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Means and standard deviations of the percentage (%) of new bone tissue formed in the experimental period of 42 days.

Figure 9
Bar graph and confidence interval chart comparing new bone formation percentages across six groups over 42 days. Groups CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG show varying results. Statistical significance is indicated by asterisks. The confidence interval chart uses Tukey’s method for mean differences between group pairs, showing intervals on a horizontal scale from negative twenty to twenty with dots representing column mean differences.

Figure 9. Means and standard deviations of the percentage of newly formed bone tissue after a 42-day experimental period. Asterisks (*, ** and ***) indicate significant difference between groups (p ≤ 0.05). CG (Clot group); PCG (PBM + Clot); FG (Fibrin group); PFG (PBM + FG); BFG (Biomaterial group + Fibrin); PBFG (PBM + Biomaterial + F).

At 42 days, the treatment effect on new bone formation remained significant (F (5,24) = 6.06, p = 0.0009), with a large effect size (η2 = 0.56), demonstrating that roughly 56% of the variance in late bone regeneration was explained by the treatment modalities. PFG presented 59.6% ± 5.50% of newly formed bone compared with 48.6% ± 4.34% in CG (Cohen’s d = 2.22), while PBFG reached 58.1% ± 3.54% versus 48.6% ± 4.34% in CG (Cohen’s d = 2.40); additionally, PBFG showed higher new bone formation than BFG (58.1% ± 3.54% vs. 50.1% ± 1.58%; Cohen’s d = 2.92), underscoring the substantial incremental benefit of associating PBM with β-TCP and fibrin in critical calvarial defects.

When comparing the experimental periods, 14 vs. 42 days, in each of the groups, there was a significant difference between the two periods in all groups (Figure 10).

Figure 10
Bar graphs showing new bone percentage over two periods, 14 days and 42 days, for six groups labeled CG, PCG, FG, PFG, BFG, and PBFG. Each graph shows an increase from 14 to 42 days. Bars are marked with letters a and b, indicating statistically different results.

Figure 10. Temporal evolution of new bone formation (mean ± SD) across groups at 14 vs. 42 days. Different lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant intragroup differences (p < 0.05; Student’s t-test). CG (clot), PCG (PBM + clot), FG (fibrin), PFG (PBM + fibrin), BFG (β-TCP + fibrin), PBFG (PBM+β-TCP + fibrin).

4 Discussion

The purpose of this preclinical research was to assess the effectiveness of a novel biocomplex combining tricalcium phosphate-based synthetic biomaterial, a new heterologous fibrin biopolymer formulation, and an intraoperative photobiomodulation protocol for treating critical bone defects. The association of fibrin biopolymer with the transoperative photobiomodulation protocol was effective, improving the process of new bone formation.

Fourteen days after surgery, micro-CT images revealed progress in bone repair, especially in the CG and PFG groups. In the BFG and PBFG groups, the radiopaque biomaterial hindered clear visualization of new bone formation, although the defect cavity remained qualitatively observable. Bone formation occurred primarily at the edges of the defect, as evidenced by similar studies (Santos et al., 2015; Tu et al., 2022). Traditional approaches for assessing and measuring bone growth in calcium phosphate (CaP) scaffolds using micro-CT imaging often present limitations, highlighting the need for standardized evaluation protocols to ensure consistency and comparability across studies. While the research conducted by Lewin et al. (2017) marked a step forward, the authors emphasized the ongoing need to refine segmentation techniques for tabletop micro-CT images to more accurately quantify bone formation within CaP scaffolds (Lewin et al., 2017).

At 42 days, micro-CT images show more advanced bone repair, especially in CG and PFB groups, with a better-organized structure than at 14 days. Although distinguishing new bone from biomaterial in BFG and PBFG groups remains difficult, increased mineralization allows observation of bone formation around the biomaterial. The result we found is typical of repair processes with biocompatible materials, providing tissue organization in more advanced periods of post-operative time (Liang et al., 2021; Otto et al., 2021; Bu et al., 2024). The bone repair process increases radiopacity, due to an increase in the amount of calcium (Bilvinaite et al., 2022).

β-TCP remnants positively modulated biomineralization through controlled degradation, releasing Ca2+ and PO43- ions that created a supersaturated microenvironment conducive to hydroxyapatite nucleation and matrix mineralization. This osteoconductive mechanism was evidenced by upregulated OCN immunostaining surrounding particles (Figure 6), enhanced BMP2/4 expression in PBFG/PFG groups, and histomorphometric demonstration of 19.5% greater bone volume in PBFG versus CG (58.1% ± 3.54% vs. 48.6% ± 4.34%; p < 0.05), despite micro-CT quantification limitations due to biomaterial radiopacity (Garcia et al., 2022).

Histomorphologically, within a period of 14 days, the PBFG, PFG and PCG groups (treated with PBM) showed new bone formation. In groups with biomaterial (BFG and PBFG), reactive tissue and limited bone formation appeared between particles in a centripetal pattern, mainly at the edges of the defect. In groups with only fibrin biopolymer (FG and PFG), it was seen as hyperchromatic bodies within connective tissue, accompanied by mild inflammation. The distinction between mature and primary bone was clear across all groups. Reactive connective tissue presents a mild inflammatory reaction, typical of the initial phases of bone repair, with no evidence of foreign body reaction to the grafted biomaterials, as demonstrated in studies involving ceramics and fibrin derivatives (Batool et al., 2021; Reis et al., 2022; Amani et al., 2024). Laser therapy (PBM) shows a milder response and local neovascularization, important for incorporation or integration of grafts (De Marco et al., 2022; Klassmann et al., 2023).

At 42 days, bone growth advanced, though mature and immature areas blurred at wound edges. BFG and PBFG showed stronger centripetal formation, with some biomaterial fully encased. Angiogenesis increased in all fibrin groups, especially with photobiomodulation. In rats, non-critical bone defects are completely repaired in approximately 6 weeks (Vicentis et al., 2025). In our study, we used critical 8 mm defects in the calvaria, which do not repair until the end of the experiment. In this way, we can evaluate the performance of isolated or combined grafts, in addition to PBM, and it was possible to observe histological results compatible with previous studies by our group (Rossi et al., 2024) or other researchers (Costa De-Moraes et al., 2025), of more organized bone and integration with ceramic particles (Yoshikawa et al., 2009). The fibrin biopolymer was not evidenced in this period (Karp et al., 2004; Noori et al., 2017; Bighetti et al., 2024).

Histochemical analysis of collagen fibers (Picrosirius-red staining, PRS) revealed that birefringence intensity correlates with fibril maturation. Orange-red hues indicated thicker, organized fibers, while green-yellow suggested immature, disorganized ones. In PBM-treated groups (PBFG, PFG, PCG), collagen showed improved maturation and organization, with more orange-red and fewer green-spectrum fibers. PRS, when paired with polarized light microscopy (PLM), effectively highlights collagen fibers due to their birefringence, offering superior clarity over conventional stains. PLM further reveals fiber orientation, classification, and distribution, essential for evaluating collagen changes. This affordable and straightforward method effectively identifies collagen fibers and maps their distribution, clearly distinguishing type I collagen from the green-stained type III (Gerbi et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021).

The immunohistochemical method effectively detected VEGF, OCN, TRAP, BMP2, and BMP4, with no staining in negative controls confirming its specificity. VEGF staining was observed in all groups, especially in FG and PFG on 14 and 42 days. OCN expression appeared in tissues and around biomaterial in BFG and PBFG at the same time points. VEGF was analyzed due to its central role in angiogenesis—the formation of new blood vessels—which is vital for bone healing (Grosso et al., 2023). In cases of bone damage or defects, sufficient vascularization is necessary to deliver oxygen, nutrients, and reparative cells to the affected area (Shineh et al., 2023). Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), also known as photobiomodulation (PBM), has been investigated for its ability to enhance VEGF expression, which may boost blood vessel formation and speed up both healing and bone regeneration (Berni et al., 2023; Tamimi et al., 2025).

Osteocalcin (OCN) serves as a reliable indicator of osteoblast function, signaling that bone matrix mineralization is actively occurring—a critical factor for evaluating the progression and quality of bone regeneration (Indarwulan et al., 2024). In addition, OCN ranks among the most prevalent non-collagenous proteins in bone and plays a key role in the maturation of bone tissue (Mergoni et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2024). OCN immunostaining may represent an osteoblastic attraction that occurred due to the action of ceramics and fibrin biopolymer, favoring cell migration and proliferation due to its three-dimensional structural characteristics and porosity, essential in the recomposition of injured tissues (Wang et al., 2023).

BMP2 and BMP4, members of the TGF-β family, signal the initiation of osteogenic activity, reflecting new bone formation. They play key roles in driving stem cells to differentiate into osteoblasts, enhancing bone matrix mineralization, and boosting overall bone-forming processes. Representative labeling by BMPs was evidenced in this study, mainly in PFG and PBFG, groups that contained fibrin and PBM in both. Their association has been previously studied, with promising results (de Oliveira Gonçalves et al., 2016; Reis et al., 2022), in lesions of bone tissue or others, such as nerves (Cunha X. et al., 2021; Rodrigo et al., 2024) and skin (Medrado et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2023). TRAP marking, especially at 14 days, indicates the presence of the bone remodeling or degradation process, which is consistent with research on the same topic (Saito et al., 2011; Schini et al., 2023).

Quantitatively, after statistical analysis, it was observed that in the 14-day period there was a significant difference between the CG in relation to the PFG and PBFG groups (p ≤ 0.05). In the 42-day period, there was a significant difference between the CG in relation to the PFG and PBFG, as well as between the PFG vs. BFG and BFG vs. PBFG (p ≤ 0.05). Therefore, PBM with LLLT was a factor that contributed to increasing the percentage of new bone formed, regardless of the type of treatment used. The association of fibrin biopolymer favors insertion into the cavity, hemostasis and forms an active biocomplex (Buchaim et al., 2022; Reis et al., 2022), providing an ideal microenvironment for cell growth and angiogenic factors (Huang et al., 2018). Furthermore, it can be hypothesized that the smaller amount of fibrinogen that we used in this study, in the composition of FB, may have formed a less dense fibrin network (Kim et al., 2014; Vasconcelos et al., 2016; Abas et al., 2022), which was necessary for the initial use of FB as peripheral nerve glue (Buchaim et al., 2015).

Therefore, photobiomodulation (PBM) administered via an 808 nm infrared laser (100 mW, 1.016 W/cm2, 60.98 J/cm2 per point), used in this preclinical experimental protocol, presents a main mechanism involving the absorption of photons by cytochrome c oxidase in mitochondrial membranes. This photonic stimulation increases ATP generation, alters membrane dynamics, and facilitates calcium influx, collectively shaping essential biochemical pathways in bone tissue (Dong et al., 2022). These combined effects mitigate inflammatory responses, trigger angiogenic activity, and expedite bone repair, corroborated by pronounced orange-red birefringence in PRS and elevated immunohistochemical signals in PBM-treated specimens. For critical calvarial defects, the protocol adopted in this study enhances the microenvironment established by the heterologous fibrin biopolymer and β-TCP, promoting Ca/PO4 ion liberation that drives hydroxyapatite nucleation and supports a higher yield of new bone formation (Rodrigues Júnior et al., 2025).

Therefore, the use of combined therapies in this study can be envisaged as clinical perspectives. Fibrin biopolymer should enter phase III of clinical studies soon, with its phase II completed for use in chronic venous ulcers (Abbade et al., 2020). PBM is already reality, but its protocols are diverse and not standardized. Ceramics are constantly being tested and marketed, as is the case in this study with QualyBone TCP (QualyLive®, Amadora, Portugal).

A primary limitation of this study is the absence of quantitative biomechanical characterization of the newly formed bone tissue, which precludes direct assessment of its mechanical quality and functional competence. While histomorphometric analysis demonstrated substantial increases in bone volume (η2 = 0.56; Cohen’s d = 2.22–5.18), the quantity of regenerated tissue does not necessarily correlate with its biomechanical integrity (Karpiński et al., 2022), as emphasized in recent investigations of β-TCP admixtures in bone cements where compressive strength varied significantly with ceramic concentration (>2% β-TCP maintained favorable properties up to 10% admixture) (Szabelski et al., 2024a, 2024b). Similarly, micro-CT quantification was inherently limited by the radiopacity of QualyBone® β-TCP particles (0.5–1.0 mm), which obscured precise volumetric assessment of new bone formation in BFG and PBFG groups, consistent with established challenges in calcium phosphate scaffold imaging that necessitate complementary histological validation. Future studies should incorporate nanoindentation, three-point bending, or micro-computed tomography with dual-energy scanning to evaluate elastic modulus, ultimate strength, and fracture toughness of the regenerated bone-biomaterial interface.

5 Conclusion

This in vivo study aimed to evaluate an intraoperative photobiomodulation protocol combined with a novel biocomplex composed of synthetic tricalcium phosphate ceramic (99.9% β-TCP) and a heterologous fibrin biopolymer in critical calvarial defects in rats. Single-session intraoperative photobiomodulation (PBM) significantly promoted new bone formation within the surgical cavity, with the PBFG group exhibiting a 19.5% increase compared to the CG group (58.1 ± 3.54 vs. 48.6 ± 4.34). This enhanced bone regeneration was primarily associated with the heterologous fibrin biopolymer formulation, which utilized a lower fibrinogen concentration relative to previous bone repair studies. The results of the associations of PBM, FB and β-TCP are promising and have translational potential, after a phase III clinical study of FB, which can be used clinically.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee (CEUA) of the Bauru School of Dentistry–University of São Paulo (FOB-USP) Protocol 005/2020 dated 1/14/2021 (amendment 9/19/2023). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

CR: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. BM: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. CB: Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. BB: Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. RF: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing. PS: Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Visualization. MD: Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Visualization. MA: Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Visualization. DN: Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. GR: Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. DB: Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Visualization. RB: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. RF is a CNPq (The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) PQ1D research fellow (No. 301608/2022-9). PS is a CNPq PQ2 research fellow (No. 305654/2023-3). RB is a CNPq PQ1C research fellow (No. 302545/2025-5). MD is a CNPq PQ1B research fellow 304153/2024-9. Center for Translational Science and Biopharmaceutical Development (FAPESP Proc. No 2021/11936-3) and Lyofilizaion multi-user equipment (EMU -FAPESP Proc. No. 2023/16514-5).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the technical support of Cirilo Francisco Santos Neto (University of Marilia, Marilia, Brazil) and Laboratório Ellinger for making the histological slides.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abas, S., Kuiper, J. H., Roberts, S., McCarthy, H., Williams, M., Bing, A., et al. (2022). Osteochondral lesions of the ankle treated with bone marrow concentrate with hyaluronan and fibrin: a single-centre study. Cells 11, 629. doi:10.3390/cells11040629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abbade, L. P. F., Ferreira Jr, R. S., Dos Santos, L. D., and Barraviera, B. (2020). Chronic venous ulcers: a review on treatment with fibrin sealant and prognostic advances using proteomic strategies. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 26, e20190101. doi:10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2019-0101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amani, H., Alipour, M., Shahriari, E., and Taboas, J. M. (2024). Immunomodulatory biomaterials: tailoring surface properties to mitigate foreign body reaction and enhance tissue regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 13, e2401253. doi:10.1002/adhm.202401253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barros, L. C., Ferreira, R. S., Barraviera, S. R. C. S., Stolf, H. O., Thomazini-Santos, I. A., Mendes-Giannini, M. J. S., et al. (2009). A new fibrin sealant from crotalus durissus terrificus venom: applications in medicine. J. Toxicol. Environ. Heal. - Part B Crit. Rev. 12, 553–571. doi:10.1080/10937400903442514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Batool, F., Özçelik, H., Stutz, C., Gegout, P. Y., Benkirane-Jessel, N., Petit, C., et al. (2021). Modulation of immune-inflammatory responses through surface modifications of biomaterials to promote bone healing and regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. 12, 20417314211041428. doi:10.1177/20417314211041428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berni, M., Brancato, A. M., Torriani, C., Bina, V., Annunziata, S., Cornella, E., et al. (2023). The role of low-level laser therapy in bone healing: systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 7094. doi:10.3390/ijms24087094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bigham-sadegh, A., and Oryan, A. (2015). Selection of animal models for pre-clinical strategies in evaluating the fracture healing, bone graft substitutes and bone tissue regeneration and engineering fracture healing, bone graft substitutes and bone tissue regeneration. Connect. Tissue Res. 56, 175–194. doi:10.3109/03008207.2015.1027341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bighetti, A. C. C., Cestari, T. M., Paini, S., Pomini, K. T., Buchaim, D. V., Ortiz, R. C., et al. (2024). Efficacy and safety of a new heterologous fibrin biopolymer on socket bone healing after tooth extraction: an experimental pre-clinical study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 51, 1–17. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bilvinaite, G., Drukteinis, S., Brukiene, V., and Rajasekharan, S. (2022). Immediate and long-term radiopacity and surface morphology of hydraulic calcium silicate-based materials. Materials 15, 1–12. doi:10.3390/ma15196635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biscola, N. P., Cartarozzi, L. P., Ulian-Benitez, S., Barbizan, R., Castro, M. V., Spejo, A. B., et al. (2017). Multiple uses of fibrin sealant for nervous system treatment following injury and disease. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 23, 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40409-017-0103-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borie, E., Oliví, D. G., Orsi, I. A., Garlet, K., Weber, B., Beltrán, V., et al. (2015). Platelet-rich fibrin application in dentistry: a literature review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8, 7922–7929.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Bossini, P. S., Rennó, A. C. M., Ribeiro, D. A., Fangel, R., Ribeiro, A. C., Lahoz, M. de A., et al. (2012). Low level laser therapy (830nm) improves bone repair in osteoporotic rats: similar outcomes at two different dosages. Exp. Gerontol. 47, 136–142. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2011.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bu, P., Peng, R., Zhang, J., He, Z., Gou, S., Liu, X., et al. (2024). A one-stone-two–birds strategy for intervertebral disc repair: constructing a reductive chelation hydrogel to mitigate oxidative stress and promote disc matrix reconstruction. Adv. Mater. 37, e2411290. doi:10.1002/adma.202411290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchaim, R. L., Andreo, J. C., Barraviera, B., Ferreira Junior, R. S., Buchaim, D. V., Rosa Junior, G. M., et al. (2015). Effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on peripheral nerve regeneration using fibrin glue derived from snake venom. Injury 46, 655–660. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchaim, D., Cassaro, C., Shindo, J., Coletta, B., Pomini, K., Rosso, M., et al. (2019). Unique hetetologous fibrin biopolymer with hemostatic, adhesive, sealant, scaffold and drug delivery properties – a systematic review. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl Trop. Dis. 26, 1–15.

Google Scholar

Buchaim, D. V., Andreo, J. C., Pomini, K. T., Barraviera, B., Ferreira, R. S., Duarte, M. A. H., et al. (2022). A biocomplex to repair experimental critical size defects associated with photobiomodulation therapy. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 28, 1–14. doi:10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2021-0056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cornwell, J. (2015). The 3Rs and humane experimental technique: implementing change robert. Nurs. Stand. 29, 24–25. doi:10.7748/ns.29.26.24.s25

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costa De-Moraes, S. L., Lima, F. C. A., Sartoretto, S. C., Ghiraldini, B., Bezerra, F. J. B., Nunes, P. S., et al. (2025). Histomorphometric and microtomographic evaluation of hydroxyapatite coated implants and L-PRF in over drilled bone sites in sheep. Sci. Rep. 15, 1–14. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-98126-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costa, G. M., Araujo, S. L., Xavier, F. A. F., De Morais, G. B., De Moraes Silveira, J. A., De Araújo Viana, D., et al. (2019). Picrosirius red and Masson’s trichrome staining techniques as tools for detection of collagen fibers in the skin of dogs with endocrine dermatopathologies. Cienc. Anim. Bras. 20, 1–10. doi:10.1590/1089-6891v20e-55398

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cunha, F. B., Pomini, K. T., Plepis, A. M. de G., Martins, V. da C. A., Machado, E. G., de Moraes, R., et al. (2021). In vivo biological behavior of polymer scaffolds of natural origin in the bone repair process. Molecules 26, 1598. doi:10.3390/molecules26061598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cunha, X., Ana, M., Correa, C., Bruna, D. A., Alves, S., Iqbal, H. M. N., et al. (2021). Efficacy of low - level laser therapy in nerve injury repair — a new era in therapeutic agents and regenerative treatments. Neurol. Sci. 42, 4029–4043. doi:10.1007/s10072-021-05478-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Freitas, L. F., and Hamblin, M. R. (2016). Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 1–37. doi:10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2561201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Freitas Dutra Júnior, E., Hidd, S. M. C. M., Amaral, M. M., Filho, A. L. M. M., Assis, L., Ferreira, R. S., et al. (2022). Treatment of partial injury of the calcaneus tendon with heterologous fibrin biopolymer and/or photobiomodulation in rats. Lasers Med. Sci. 37, 971–981. doi:10.1007/s10103-021-03341-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Freitas, N. R., Guerrini, L. B., Esper, L. A., Sbrana, M. C., Dalben, G. da S., Soares, S., et al. (2018). Evaluation of photobiomodulation therapy associated with guided bone regeneration in critical size defects. In vivo study. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 26, 1–11. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0244

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Marco, A. C., Torquato, L. C., Ribeiro, T. C., Nunes, C. M., Bernardo, D. V., Maciel, C. C. M., et al. (2022). Effect of photobiomodulation therapy associated with biphasic phosphate calcium on bone repair: a histomorphometric study in rats. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 13, e33. doi:10.34172/jlms.2022.33

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Oliveira, C. T. B., Leonel, B. C., de Oliveira, A. C., de Brito Paiva, M., Ramos, J., Barraviera, B., et al. (2020). Effects of fibrin sealant and bone fragments on defect regeneration performed on rat tibiae: an experimental study. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 104, 103662. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Oliveira Gonçalves, J., Buchaim, D., de Souza Bueno, C., Pomini, K., Barraviera, B., Júnior, R., et al. (2016). Effects of low-level laser therapy on autogenous bone graft stabilized with a new heterologous fibrin sealant. J. Photochem Photobiol. B 162, 663–668. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.07.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Pace, R., Molinari, S., Mazzoni, E., and Perale, G. (2025). Bone regeneration: a review of current treatment strategies. J. Clin. Med. 14, 1–38. doi:10.3390/jcm14061838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dias, F. J., Cury, D. P., Dias, P. E., Borie, E., Alarcón-Apablaza, J., Lezcano, M. F., et al. (2023). Effects of low-level laser therapy and purified natural latex (Hevea brasiliensis) protein on injured sciatic nerve in rodents: Morpho-functional analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 14031. doi:10.3390/ijms241814031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, S., Zhang, Y., Mei, Y., Zhang, Y., Hao, Y., Liang, B., et al. (2022). Researching progress on bio-reactive electrogenic materials with electrophysiological activity for enhanced bone regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.921284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duarte, N. D., Frigério, P. B., Chica, G. E. A., Okamoto, R., Buchaim, R. L., Buchaim, D. V., et al. (2025). Biomaterials for guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration: a review. Dent. J. 13, 1–20. doi:10.3390/dj13040179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernández-Bodereau, E., Dedossi, G., Asencio, V. O., Fernández-Domínguez, M., Gehrke, S. A., Aragoneses, J. M., et al. (2019). Comparison of different bone filling materials and resorbable membranes by means of micro-tomography. A preliminary study in rabbits. Materials 12, 1197. doi:10.3390/ma12081197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferraz, M. P. (2023). Bone grafts in dental medicine: an overview of autografts, allografts and synthetic materials. Materials 16, 1–22. doi:10.3390/ma16114117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferreira, R. S., de Barros, L. C., Abbade, L. P. F., Barraviera, S. R. C. S., Silvares, M. R. C., de Pontes, L. G., et al. (2017). Heterologous fibrin sealant derived from snake venom: from bench to bedside - an overview. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 23, 1–12. doi:10.1186/s40409-017-0109-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garcia, D. C., Mingrone, L. E., and Sá, M. J. C. de (2022). Evaluation of osseointegration and bone healing using pure-phase β - TCP ceramic implant in bone critical defects. A systematic review. Front. Vet. Sci. 9, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.859920

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gerbi, M. E. M. D. M., Miranda, J. M., De Arruda, J. A. A., Moreno, L. M. M., Carneiro, V. S. M., Brasilino, N. C., et al. (2018). Photobiomodulation therapy in bone repair associated with bone morphogenetic proteins and guided bone regeneration: a histomorphometric study. Photomed. Laser Surg. 36, 581–588. doi:10.1089/pho.2017.4421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grosso, A., Lunger, A., Burger, M. G., Briquez, P. S., Mai, F., Hubbell, J. A., et al. (2023). VEGF dose controls the coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis in engineered bone. npj Regen. Med. 8, 1–15. doi:10.1038/s41536-023-00288-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamblin, M. R. (2016). Photobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy. J. Biophot. 9, 1122–1124. doi:10.1002/jbio.201670113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, X., Das, R., Patel, A., and Duc Nguyen, T. (2018). Physical stimulations for bone and cartilage regeneration. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 4, 216–237. doi:10.1007/s40883-018-0064-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Inchingolo, F., Hazballa, D., Inchingolo, A. D., Malcangi, G., Marinelli, G., Mancini, A., et al. (2022). Innovative concepts and recent breakthrough for engineered graft and constructs for bone regeneration: a literature systematic review. Materials 15, 1–43. doi:10.3390/ma15031120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Indarwulan, N., Savitri, M., Ashariati, A., Bintoro, S. U. Y., Diansyah, M. N., Amrita, P. N. A., et al. (2024). Bone mineral density, C-Terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, and osteocalcin as monitoring parameters of bone remodeling in CML patients undergoing imatinib therapy: a basic science and clinical review. Diseases 12, 275. doi:10.3390/diseases12110275

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamal, A. F., Siahaan, S. H., and Fiolin, J. (2019). Various dosages of BMP-2 for management of massive. Arch. Bone Jt. Surg. 498, 498–505.

Google Scholar

Karp, J. M., Sarraf, F., Shoichet, M. S., and Davies, J. E. (2004). Fibrin-filled scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering: an in vivo study. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A 71, 162–171. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karpiński, R., Szabelski, J., Krakowski, P., Jojczuk, M., Jonak, J., and Nogalski, A. (2022). Evaluation of the effect of selected physiological fluid contaminants on the mechanical properties of selected medium-viscosity PMMA bone cements. Materials 15, 2197. doi:10.3390/ma15062197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kazancioglu, H. O., Ezirganli, S., Aydin, M. S., and Dds, Þ. (2013). Effects of laser and ozone therapies on bone healing in the calvarial defects. J. Craniofac. Surg. 24, 2141–2146. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a244ae

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khalili, M. R., Molafilabi, A., Mousazadeh, S., Mehrabi, A., Kiani, J., Brouki Milan, P., et al. (2024). Development of in situ forming autologous fibrin scaffold incorporating synthetic teriparatide peptide for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Artif. Organs 47, 707–718. doi:10.1177/03913988241262907

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, B. S., Sung, H. M., You, H. K., and Lee, J. (2014). Effects of fibrinogen concentration on fibrin glue and bone powder scaffolds in bone regeneration. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 118, 469–475. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.03.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klassmann, F. A., Ervolino, E., Kluppel, L. E., Theodoro, L. H., Mulinari-Santos, G., and Garcia, V. G. (2023). A randomised trial of the bone formation after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite (Cerabone®) and Photobiomodulation: histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysis. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 15, e542–e550. doi:10.4317/jced.60594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kolehmainen, K., and Willerth, S. M. (2012). Preparation of 3D fibrin scaffolds for stem cell culture applications. J. Vis. Exp., 6–10. doi:10.3791/3641

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurowiak, J., Piesik, K., and Klekiel, T. (2025). Current state of knowledge regarding the treatment of cranial bone defects: an overview. Materials 18, 1–22. doi:10.3390/ma18092021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Latimer, J. M., Maekawa, S., Yao, Y., Wu, D. T., Chen, M., and Giannobile, W. V. (2021). Regenerative medicine technologies to treat dental, oral, and craniofacial defects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 1–27. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.704048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, Y. C., Chan, Y. H., Hsieh, S. C., Lew, W. Z., and Feng, S. W. (2019). Comparing the osteogenic potentials and bone regeneration capacities of bone marrow and dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells in a rabbit calvarial bone defect model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5015. doi:10.3390/ijms20205015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewin, S., Barba, A., Persson, C., Franch, J., Ginebra, M. P., and Öhman-Mägi, C. (2017). Evaluation of bone formation in calcium phosphate scaffolds with μcT-method validation using SEM. Biomed. Mater. 12, 065005. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/aa801d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Dan, X., Chen, H., Li, T., Liu, B., Ju, Y., et al. (2024). Developing fibrin-based biomaterials/scaffolds in tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 40, 597–623. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, W., Ding, P., Li, G., Lu, E., and Zhao, Z. (2021). Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles facilitate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation within sagittal suture during expansion in rats. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 15, 905–917. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S299641

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Xu, M. Y., Wu, J., Zhang, H., Yang, L., Lun, D. X., et al. (2021). Picrosirius-polarization method for collagen fiber detection in tendons: a mini-review. Orthop. Surg. 13, 701–707. doi:10.1111/os.12627

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacArthur Clark, J. (2018). The 3Rs in research: a contemporary approach to replacement, reduction and refinement. Br. J. Nutr. 120, S1–S7. doi:10.1017/S0007114517002227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Machado, E. G., Issa, J. P. M., Figueiredo, F. A. T. de, Santos, G. R. dos, Galdeano, E. A., Alves, M. C., et al. (2015). A new heterologous fibrin sealant as scaffold to recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and natural latex proteins for the repair of tibial bone defects. Acta Histochem 117, 288–296. doi:10.1016/j.acthis.2015.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahesh Saurabh Juneja, L. (2024). Preparing the bony bed: socket grafting with TCP bone graft, innovations for tomorrow’s radiant smiles. Int. J. Sci. Res. 13, 953–958. doi:10.21275/es24329173556

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McAllister, B. S., and Haghighat, K. (2007). Bone augmentation techniques. J. Periodontol. 78, 377–396. doi:10.1902/jop.2007.060048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McGovern, J. A., Griffin, M., and Hutmacher, D. W. (2018). Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease. DMM Dis. Model. Mech. 11, dmm033084. doi:10.1242/dmm.033084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medrado, A. P., Prates, A., Santos, E. T., Regina, S., Reis, A., and Andrade, Z. A. (2008). Influence of laser photobiomodulation upon connective tissue remodeling during wound healing. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 92, 144–152. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.05.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mendoza-Cerezo, L., Rodríguez-Rego, J. M., Soriano-Carrera, A., Marcos-Romero, A. C., and Macías-García, A. (2023). Fabrication and characterisation of bioglass and hydroxyapatite-filled scaffolds. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 144, 105937. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mergoni, G., Vescovi, P., Sala, R., Merigo, E., Passerini, P., Maestri, R., et al. (2016). The effect of laser therapy on the expression of osteocalcin and osteopontin after tooth extraction in rats treated with zoledronate and dexamethasone. Support. Care Cancer 24, 807–813. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2847-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nejatifard, M., Asefi, S., Jamali, R., Hamblin, M. R., and Fekrazad, R. (2021). Probable positive effects of the photobiomodulation as an adjunctive treatment in COVID-19: a systematic review. Cytokine 137, 155312. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nogueira, D. M. B., Figadoli, A. L. de F., Alcantara, P. L., Pomini, K. T., Santos German, I. J., Reis, C. H. B., et al. (2022). Biological behavior of xenogenic scaffolds in alcohol-induced rats: Histomorphometric and picrosirius red staining analysis. Polymers 14, 1–15. doi:10.3390/polym14030584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nogueira, D. M. B., Rosso, M. P. de O., Santos, P. S. da S., Sousa-Neto, M. D., Silva-Sousa, A. C., Soares, C. T., et al. (2025). Biological behavior of bioactive glasses SinGlass (45S5) and SinGlass high (F18) in the repair of critical bone defects. Biomolecules 15, 1–18. doi:10.3390/biom15010112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noori, A., Ashrafi, S. J., Vaez-Ghaemi, R., Hatamian-Zaremi, A., and Webster, T. J. (2017). A review of fibrin and fibrin composites for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomedicine 12, 4937–4961. doi:10.2147/IJN.S124671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Otto, L., Wolint, P., Bopp, A., Woloszyk, A., Becker, A. S., Boss, A., et al. (2021). 3D-microtissue derived secretome as a cell-free approach for enhanced mineralization of scaffolds in the chorioallantoic membrane model. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–15. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84123-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinheiro, A., and Gerbi, M. (2006). Photo-engineering of bone repair processes. Photomed. Laser Surg. 24, 169–178. doi:10.1089/pho.2006.24.169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pomini, K. T., Buchaim, D. V., Bighetti, A. C. C., Andreo, J. C., Rosso, M. P. de O., Escudero, J. S. B., et al. (2022). Use of photobiomodulation combined with fibrin sealant and bone substitute improving the bone repair of critical defects. Polymers 14, 4170. doi:10.3390/polym14194170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pomini, K. T., Buchaim, D. V., Bighetti, A. C. C., Hamzé, A. L., Reis, C. H. B., Duarte, M. A. H., et al. (2023). Tissue bioengineering with fibrin scaffolds and deproteinized bone matrix associated or not with the transoperative laser photobiomodulation protocol. Molecules 28, 407. doi:10.3390/molecules28010407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rajasekar, V., Abdalla, M. M., Huang, M., Neelakantan, P., and Yiu, C. K. Y. (2025). Next-generation biomaterials for vital pulp therapy: exploring biological properties and dentin regeneration mechanisms. Bioengineering 12, 1–18. doi:10.3390/bioengineering12030248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reis, C. H. B., Buchaim, R. L., Pomini, K. T., Hamzé, A. L., Zattiti, I. V., Duarte, M. A. H., et al. (2022). Effects of a biocomplex formed by two scaffold biomaterials, Hydroxyapatite/Tricalcium phosphate ceramic and fibrin biopolymer, with photobiomodulation, on bone repair. Polymers 14, 2075. doi:10.3390/polym14102075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigo, C., Bueno, D. S., Clara, M., Tonin, C., Buchaim, D. V., Barraviera, B., et al. (2023). Morphofunctional improvement of the facial nerve and muscles with repair using heterologous fibrin biopolymer and photobiomodulation. Pharmaceuticals 16, 653. doi:10.3390/ph16050653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigo, C., Bueno, D. S., Buchaim, D. V., Barraviera, B., Cini, M. A., Kuga, M. C., et al. (2024). Delayed repair of the facial nerve and its negative impacts on nerve and muscle regeneration. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 30, e20230093. doi:10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2023-0093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodrigues Júnior, S. J., dos Santos, L. C., Buchaim, D. V., Duarte, M. A. H., Alcalde, M. P., Barraviera, B., et al. (2025). Efficacy of three-dimensional bioactive composites in long bone repair with photobiomodulation. Materials 18, 1704. doi:10.3390/ma18081704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rossi, J. de O., Araujo, E. M. C., Camargo, M. E. C., Ferreira Junior, R. S., Barraviera, B., Miglino, M. A., et al. (2024). Effectiveness of the association of fibrin scaffolds, nanohydroxyapatite, and photobiomodulation with simultaneous low-level red and infrared lasers in bone repair. Materials 17, 4351. doi:10.3390/ma17174351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosso, M. P. D. O., Rosa Júnior, G. M., Buchaim, D. V., German, I. J. S., Pomini, K. T., de Souza, R. G., et al. (2017). Stimulation of morphofunctional repair of the facial nerve with photobiomodulation, using the end-to-side technique or a new heterologous fibrin sealant. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 175, 20–28. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.08.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saito, C. T. M. H., Gulinelli, J. L., Panzarini, S. R., Garcia, V. G., Okamoto, R., Okamoto, T., et al. (2011). Effect of low-level laser therapy on the healing process after tooth replantation: a histomorphometrical and immunohistochemical analysis. Dent. Traumatol. 27, 30–39. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2010.00946.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santoro, A., Voto, A., Fortino, L., Guida, R., Laudisio, C., Cillo, M., et al. (2025). Bone defect treatment in regenerative medicine: exploring natural and synthetic bone substitutes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 1–26. doi:10.3390/ijms26073085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santos, T. de S., Abuna, R. P. F., de Almeida, A. L. G., Beloti, M. M., and Rosa, A. L. (2015). Effect of collagen sponge and fibrin glue on bone repair. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 23, 623–628. doi:10.1590/1678-775720150374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schindeler, A., Mills, R. J., Bobyn, J. D., and Little, D. G. (2018). Preclinical models for orthopedic research and bone tissue engineering. J. Orthop. Res. 36, 832–840. doi:10.1002/jor.23824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schini, M., Vilaca, T., Gossiel, F., Salam, S., Eastell, R., and Cells, B. (2023). Bone turnover markers: basic biology to clinical applications. Endocr. Rev. 44, 417–473. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnac031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, M., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Tang, C., Miron, R. J., and Zhang, Y. (2018). Deproteinized bovine bone matrix induces osteoblast differentiation via macrophage polarization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A 106, 1236–1246. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shineh, G., Patel, K., Mobaraki, M., and Tayebi, L. (2023). Functional approaches in promoting vascularization and angiogenesis in bone critical-sized defects via delivery of cells, growth factors, drugs, and particles. J. Funct. Biomater. 14, 99. doi:10.3390/jfb14020099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, N. C., De Alexandria, F. E. D., Assis, L., Filho, A. L. M. M., Ferreira, R. S., Barraviera, B., et al. (2023). LED photobiomodulation therapy associated with heterologous fibrin biopolymer optimizes wound repair in rats. Res. Biomed. Eng. 39, 335–347. doi:10.1007/s42600-023-00258-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, R., Murphy, M., Li, C., Ting, K., Soo, C., and Zheng, Z. (2018). Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 12, 3117–3145. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S165440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Šponer, P., Strnadová, M., and Urban, K. (2011). In vivo behaviour of low-temperature calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite: Comparison with deproteinised bovine bone. Int. Orthop. 35, 1553–1560. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1113-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Steijvers, E., Ghei, A., and Xia, Z. (2022). Manufacturing artificial bone allografts: a perspective. Biomater. Transl. 3, 65–80. doi:10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szabelski, J., Karpi, R., Falkowicz, K., Jojczuk, M., Nogalski, A., Przekora, A., et al. (2024a). Effect of various admixtures on selected mechanical properties of medium viscosity bone cements: part 1 – α/β tricalcium phosphate (TCP). Compos. Struct. 343, 118306. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118306

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szabelski, J., Karpi, R., Falkowicz, K., Jojczuk, M., Nogalski, A., Przekora, A., et al. (2024b). Effect of various admixtures on selected mechanical properties of medium viscosity bone cements: part 2 – hydroxyapatite. Compos. Struct. 343, 118308. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118308

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamimi, R., Benisi, S. Z., Boroujeni, M. E., and Torkamani, M. J. (2025). Review on the molecular mechanisms of low-level laser therapy: gene expression and signaling pathways. Lasers Med. Sci. 40, 160. doi:10.1007/s10103-025-04393-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Taniguchi, Y., Matsubayashi, Y., Ikeda, T., Kato, S., Doi, T., Oshima, Y., et al. (2022). Clinical feasibility of completely autologous fibrin glue in spine surgery. Spine Surg. Relat. Res. 6, 388–394. doi:10.22603/ssrr.2021-0190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tu, C., Bajwa, A., Shi, A., Wu, G., and Wang, J. (2022). Effect of fibrin glue on the healing efficacy of deproteinized bovine bone and autologous bone in critical-sized calvarial defects in rats. Clin. Oral Investig. 26, 2491–2502. doi:10.1007/s00784-021-04217-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaiani, L., Boccaccio, A., Uva, A. E., Palumbo, G., Piccininni, A., Guglielmi, P., et al. (2023). Ceramic materials for biomedical applications: an overview on properties and fabrication processes. J. Funct. Biomater. 14, 146. doi:10.3390/jfb14030146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasconcelos, D. M., Gonçalves, R. M., Almeida, C. R., Pereira, I. O., Oliveira, M. I., Neves, N., et al. (2016). Fibrinogen scaffolds with immunomodulatory properties promote in vivo bone regeneration. Biomaterials 111, 163–178. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vicentis, G., Fernandes, O., Gomes, B., Heboyan, A., and Fernandes, J. (2025). Histological and morphometrical evaluation of non-critical bone defects after treatment with biomaterial and bisphosphonates. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 30, e491–e498. doi:10.4317/medoral

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vigliar, M. F. R., Marega, L. F., Duarte, M. A. H., Alcalde, M. P., Rosso, M. P. de O., Ferreira Junior, R. S., et al. (2024). Photobiomodulation therapy improves repair of bone defects filled by inorganic bone matrix and fibrin heterologous biopolymer. Bioengineering 11, 78. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11010078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Ma, Y., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Liu, G., Wang, P., et al. (2023). A novel decellularized matrix of Wnt signaling-activated osteocytes accelerates the repair of critical-sized parietal bone defects with osteoclastogenesis, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis. Bioact. Mater. 21, 110–128. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.07.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Tang, P., Yang, K., Guo, S., Tang, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2024). Regulation of bone homeostasis by traditional Chinese medicine active scaffolds and enhancement for the osteoporosis bone regeneration. J. Ethnopharmacol. 329, 118141. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2024.118141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weibel, E. R. (1969). Stereological principles for morphometry in electron microscopic cytology. Int. Rev. Cytol. 26, 235–302. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61637-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshikawa, H., Tamai, N., Murase, T., and Myoui, A. (2009). Interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering. J. R. Soc. Interface 6, S341–S348. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0425.focus

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, B., Xu, W., Liu, J., Ding, J., and Chen, X. (2019). Osteoinductive agents-incorporated three-dimensional biphasic polymer scaffold for synergistic bone regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 986–995. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zubairova, L. D., Nabiullina, R. M., Nagaswami, C., Zuev, Y. F., Mustafin, I. G., Litvinov, R. I., et al. (2015). Circulating microparticles alter formation, structure, and properties of fibrin clots. Sci. Rep. 5, 17611. doi:10.1038/srep17611

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: biocompatible materials, bone regeneration, bone repair, fibrin biopolymer, fibrin glue, fibrin sealant, low-level laser therapy, photobiomodulation

Citation: Reis CHB, de Matos BTL, Bueno CRdS, Barraviera B, Ferreira Júnior RS, da Silva Santos PS, Duarte MAH, Alcalde MP, Nogueira DMB, Rosa Júnior GM, Buchaim DV and Buchaim RL (2026) Biofunctional response of a synthetic ceramic of 99.9% tricalcium phosphate associated with a heterologous fibrin biopolymer and infrared photobiomodulation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 13:1748343. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1748343

Received: 17 November 2025; Accepted: 16 December 2025;
Published: 12 January 2026.

Edited by:

Jakub Szabelski, Lublin University of Technology, Poland

Reviewed by:

Garimella Adithya, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
Hussein Jawad, University of Baghdad, Iraq

Copyright © 2026 Reis, de Matos, Bueno, Barraviera, Ferreira Júnior, da Silva Santos, Duarte, Alcalde, Nogueira, Rosa Júnior, Buchaim and Buchaim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rogério Leone Buchaim, cm9nZXJpb0Bmb2IudXNwLmJy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.