ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biofabrication
This article is part of the Research TopicBiomechanics, technology, and athletic performance: pathways to sustainable healthView all 8 articles
Is Palpation Essential in The Digital Era of Orthotic Designing?
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 2Centre for Biomedical Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 3Australian Research Council Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 4Biomechanics & Spine Research Group at the Centre for Children’s Health Research, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 5iOrthotics, Brisbane, Queensland 4030, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 6Healthia Limited, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 7Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia, Sydney, Australia
- 8School of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 9School of Education, Faculty of Creative Industries, Education, and Social Justice, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 10School of Design, Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 11School of Architecture, Industrial Design and Planning, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, Gold coast, Australia
- 12QUT Business School, Centre for Decent Work and Industry (CDWI), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
- 13QUT Design Lab, Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4059, Australia, Brisbane, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Custom foot orthotics require identification of anatomical landmarks in the foot to facilitate accurate alignment and precise foot measurements. Traditionally, these landmarks are identified through manual palpation, however, with the advent of digital scanning, it may not be necessary. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether guidance from manual palpation to identify anatomical landmarks affects (a) reliability of foot measurements and (b) consistency in digitally designed orthotic insoles. For reliability, 3D foot scans were obtained under non-weight-bearing (NWB) (n=24) and weight-bearing (WB) (n=24) conditions from 12 healthy adult participants (9 females and 3 males; age 29 ± 4 years; height 164 ± 8 cm; weight 60 ± 6 kg). 15 key dorsal and plantar foot measurements were extracted based on the palpation-guided and scan-derived landmarks. Following this, a preliminary assessment of orthotic design consistency was evaluated using a reference participant (n=1), with 24 orthotic insoles designed (3 designers designed insoles using scan-derived and palpation-guided landmarks (by 3 podiatrists), in NWB and WB). Intra-and inter-user reliability of palpation-guided landmarks were good to excellent (ICC = 0.90-1). Measurements for scan-derived landmarking showed good to excellent intra-user reliability (0.83-0.92) but poor to moderate inter-user reliability (0.31-0.75) for clinically relevant plantar measurements. While palpation improves landmark reliability, translating these into consistent orthotic designs requires clinical expertise and standardised design workflows. Palpation, while not always essential, improves landmarking identification in variable clinical conditions. Collaborative training and further studies across varied clinician and designer experience levels are essential to optimize digital orthotic design.
Keywords: 3D scanning, Foot, Landmarks, Orthotics, Palpation
Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Chhikara, Morrison, Wille, Herath, Evans, Hartley, Teixeira, Hughes, Haskell, Beatson, Chamorro-Koc, Little and Suresh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Komal Chhikara
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
