Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CORRECTION article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12 January 2026

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 14 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1769505

Correction: The impact of architectural modifications on relative resistance to fluid flow in ventricular catheters

This article is a correction to:

  1. The impact of architectural modifications on relative resistance to fluid flow in ventricular catheters

    1. Read original article
Rajesh Kumar MadhavanRajesh Kumar Madhavan1Ahmad FaryamiAhmad Faryami2Nathan TappenNathan Tappen3Pranav GopalakrishnanPranav Gopalakrishnan4Shaheer H. AjazShaheer H. Ajaz2Christopher RobertsChristopher Roberts3Carolyn Harris Carolyn Harris3*
  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
  • 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
  • 3Department of Chemical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
  • 4School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States

A Correction on
The impact of architectural modifications on relative resistance to fluid flow in ventricular catheters

by Madhavan RK, Faryami A, Tappen N, Gopalakrishnan P, Ajaz SH, Roberts C and Harris C (2025). Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12:1519499. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1519499

Author Christopher Roberts was omitted as an author in the published article. The correct author list reads:

Rajesh Kumar Madhavan1, Ahmad Faryami2, Nathan Tappen3, Pranav Gopalakrishnan4, Shaheer H. Ajaz2, Christopher Roberts3, Carolyn Harris3,*

The Author Contributions Statement has been corrected to read:

RM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. AF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. NT: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. PG: Writing–original draft, Writing – review and editing. SA: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. CR: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. CH: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: ventricular catheter (VC), catheter resistance, bench top model, catheter architecture and design, hydrocephalus

Citation: Madhavan RK, Faryami A, Tappen N, Gopalakrishnan P, Ajaz SH, Roberts C and Harris C (2026) Correction: The impact of architectural modifications on relative resistance to fluid flow in ventricular catheters. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 14:1769505. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1769505

Received: 17 December 2025; Accepted: 02 January 2026;
Published: 12 January 2026.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2026 Madhavan, Faryami, Tappen, Gopalakrishnan, Ajaz, Roberts and Harris. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Carolyn Harris, Y2FoYXJyaXNAd2F5bmUuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.