Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Mechanical Polarity as a Driver of Bone Regeneration: A Multiscale Framework Linking Tension, Mechanotransduction and Cortical Apposition

Provisionally accepted
Anna  Ewa Ewa KucAnna Ewa Ewa Kuc1*Jacek  KotułaJacek Kotuła1Natalia  KucNatalia Kuc2Joanna  LisJoanna Lis1Beata  KawalaBeata Kawala1Michal  SarulMichal Sarul1Magdalena  SulewskaMagdalena Sulewska2
  • 1Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
  • 2Uniwersytet Medyczny w Bialymstoku, Bialystok, Poland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Mechanical loading is a fundamental regulator of bone remodeling, yet most conceptual models still focus on the magnitude of strain rather than its polarity. Here we propose a unified mechanobiological framework in which tensile-strain–dominant microenvironments act as primary drivers of cortical bone apposition, whereas compression-dominant fields predispose tissues to resorption and structural thinning. We synthesize evidence from long-bone bending, distraction osteogenesis, craniofacial suture biology, osteocyte mechanotransduction, and the periodontal ligament–alveolar complex to show that tensile strain consistently correlates with angiogenic activation, osteoblast lineage recruitment, and matrix deposition. We illustrate how subtle changes in load direction and boundary conditions can invert strain polarity in cortical regions that are classically considered "at risk" under bending or transverse displacement. We integrate these mechanical observations with canonical signaling pathways to outline a multiscale law of tension-guided bone adaptation and propose testable predictions for regenerative strategies. This perspective reframes bone mechanobiology around strain polarity and provides a conceptual scaffold for designing load-based interventions that exploit tensile fields to drive cortical regeneration across skeletal sites.

Keywords: Bone Remodeling, Finite Element Modeling, mechanobiology, osteocyte mechanotransduction, strain polarity, Tensile strain

Received: 19 Dec 2025; Accepted: 10 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Ewa Kuc, Kotuła, Kuc, Lis, Kawala, Sarul and Sulewska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Anna Ewa Ewa Kuc

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.