Elisa Castagnola
Kendall H. Lee
Davide Ricci- 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, United States
- 2Institute for Micromanufacturing, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, United States
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, United States
- 4Bioengineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- 5Department of Neurologic Surgery, Myo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- 6Department of Naval, Electrical, Electronic, and Telecommunications Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Carbon microelectrodes for neurochemical sensing
Carbon is widely regarded as an optimal material for electrochemical detection of neurotransmitters because it combines biocompatibility, high sensitivity to redox-active species, rapid electron-transfer kinetics, and excellent electrochemical stability, making it well suited for fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) (Rafi and Zestos, 2021; Cao et al., 2019; Castagnola et al., 2010; Puthongkham and Venton, 2020; Roberts and Sombers, 2018). FSCV enables real-time detection of electroactive neurotransmitters such as dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT), and adenosine (AD) with sub-second resolution, revealing release and uptake dynamics relevant to neurological and psychiatric disorders (Huffman and Venton, 2009; Robinson et al., 2003; Venton and Cao, 2020; Swamy and Venton, 2007; Abdalla et al., 2017; At et al., 2015; Wood and Hashemi, 2013).
Carbon fiber microelectrodes (CFMEs) are considered the gold standard for FSCV: their ultrasmall diameters (5–10 µm), flexibility, and favorable electrochemical properties allow minimally invasive implantation and sensitive recording of transient neurochemical events with high spatiotemporal resolution (Devi et al., 2021; Bucher and Wightman, 2015; Alyamni et al.; Kozai et al., 2015). However, manual fabrication limits scalability and consistency, and chronic use is hindered by fouling and over-oxidation of the carbon surface, which progressively degrade mechanical and electrochemical performance (Kozai et al., 2015; Patel et al., 2020; Takmakov et al., 2010). Waveform strategies that extend the anodic limit can improve sensitivity and reduce fouling but accelerate oxidative etching, creating a trade-off between sensitivity and durability (Takmakov et al., 2010; Heien et al., 2003).
More recently, efforts to integrate neurochemical sensing into flexible neural probes for simultaneous electrophysiological recordings have led to the development of carbon-based microelectrode arrays (MEAs) incorporating glassy carbon (GC) (Castagnola et al., 2023; Castagnola et al., 2022; Castagnola et al., 2024), graphene (Li et al., 2022; Qi et al., 2025), or boron-doped diamond (BDD) (Fan et al., 2020; Castagnola et al., 2021; Castagnola et al., 2018) on flexible substrates. These devices support FSCV while providing reliable neural recordings. However, most designs still rely on metal interconnects, raising concerns about long-term reliability under chronic, high-frequency electrochemical cycling. “All”-GC-MEAs (Faul et al., 2024; Nimbalkar et al., 2018), which use GC for both electrodes and interconnects, mitigate these issues and exhibit excellent electrochemical stability, although further optimization is required to maintain scalability at very small feature sizes.
This Research Topic highlights advances in materials and fabrication strategies aimed at improving the chronic performance of CFMEs, enabling scalable batch manufacturing, and developing high-density GC-based MEAs capable of multimodal, multichannel recording with durable long-term stability.
Alyamni et al. present a comprehensive review of the design, fabrication, and applications of CFMEs and related carbon-based sensors, including GC and nanomaterial-enhanced electrodes. The review emphasizes progress in materials science and electrochemical methodologies to improve sensitivity, selectivity, and biocompatibility. It also details surface-modification strategies that mitigate fouling and enhance detection performance, as well as scalable manufacturing approaches—such as 3D printing and laser-induced graphene—that provide versatile, cost-effective solutions for fabricating carbon microelectrodes. Furthermore, the authors examine how electrode size, material choice, and coating chemistry influence tissue response and long-term stability. Clinical applications discussed include Parkinson’s disease, depression, and addiction research, underscoring the translational potential of these sensors. Overall, the review positions CFMEs as a rapidly advancing platform for neurochemical monitoring, while noting persistent challenges related to reproducibility, chronic stability, and scalable batch fabrication.
Kwon et al. address a key challenge in maintaining stable FSCV performance during chronic recordings with conventional 7 µm CFMEs. To enhance mechanical robustness and long-term functionality, they developed 30 µm CFMEs and used electrochemical etching to create cone-shaped tips (Figures 1a–c). The in vitro and in vivo performance of 7 μm, 30 µm bare, and 30 µm cone-shaped CFMEs was compared using FSCV, alongside assessments of electrode longevity and brain-tissue response. Although 30 µm bare CFMEs demonstrated a 2.7-fold increase in sensitivity relative to 7 µm electrodes, in vivo DA detection decreased, likely due to greater insertion-induced tissue damage. Cone-shaped modification reversed this effect, producing a 3.7-fold increase in in vivo DA signal and reduced glial activation. Importantly, accelerated oxidative-etching tests under prolonged FSCV scanning revealed a 4.7-fold increase in lifespan compared with 7 µm CFMEs (Figures 1d,e). Collectively, these findings show that cone-shaped, larger-diameter CFMEs preserve low tissue damage and high in vivo sensitivity while extending lifespan compared with 7 µm microelectrodes, highlighting their suitability for chronic neurotransmitter monitoring.
Figure 1. (a–e) adapted from (Kwon et al.). (a) Schematic of the homemade electrochemical etching system to create cone-shaped CFMEs. (b,c); (d–e) Long term electrochemical durability of 7 μm and 30 µm cone-shaped CFMEs. SEM images of 7 μm (d) and 30 µm cone-shaped (e) CFMEs after continuous FSCV waveform application. (f–i) Adapted from (Siwakoti et al.). (f) Batch fabricated fGCF and fGCF arrays in a Si3N4 coated 4 in wafer before being released; (g) Optical picture of fGCF array with six GCFs at 170 μm each; (h) Optical picture of a released fGCF array; (i) Optical picture of fGCF (10 µm wide, 10 µm thick); (j-o) Adapted from (Sellen et al.). (j–k) Comparison of FSCV detection performance for 5-HT and DA using single- and double-pyrolyzed GC microelectrodes. (j) Comparison of 5-HT oxidation peak current measured using FSCV for the 2 GC conditions. (k) Comparison of DA oxidation peak current measured using FSCV for the 2 GC conditions. (l) Background current of a GC microelectrode obtained with a single pyrolysis step, measured before and after application of the FSCV waveform used for DA detection at 50 Hz for 30 consecutive hours. (m) Optical image of a GC-MEA shank with a magnified view of the stimulated electrodes (single pyrolysis, blue) versus non-stimulated electrodes. (n) Background current of a GC microelectrode obtained with double pyrolysis. (o) Optical image of a GC-MEA shank with a magnified view of the stimulated electrodes (double pyrolysis, red) versus non-stimulated electrodes.
Siwakoti et al. address the reproducibility and scalability limitations of manually fabricated CFMEs by introducing a double-etching microfabrication process for batch production of 10 μm × 10 µm full-GC fibers (fGCFs) and arrays composed entirely of homogeneous GC pyrolyzed from an SU-8 precursor (Figures 1f–i). Each fGCF incorporates a 2 µm low-stress silicon nitride bottom insulator and SU-8 top encapsulation, leaving a 150 μm GC segment exposed for sensing. Fabrication on 4-inch silicon wafers yielded up to 80 single or array devices per batch, demonstrating consistent scalability and reproducibility. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) confirmed uniform insulation and structural integrity, while electrochemical testing showed high conductivity, low impedance, and a wide potential window suitable for in vitro and in vivo sensing. Finite-element simulations guided optimization of the fGCF geometry for self-penetration up to 3 mm into the mouse striatum. In vivo, fGCFs detected both phasic DA via FSCV and tonic DA levels via square-wave voltammetry, while inducing minimal tissue damage. Their sensitivity, scalable fabrication, and self-supporting insertion capability make fGCFs promising minimally invasive sensors for multi-timescale DA monitoring.
Sellen et al. investigate next-generation “all”-GC-MEAs by examining the properties of GC both as a conductor and as a sensing material. The study evaluates how GC thickness, trace width, and trace length influence electrical behavior under single versus double pyrolysis, while simultaneously assessing how a second pyrolysis cycle affects GC performance as a neurochemical sensor. Sheet resistance, structural ordering (Raman/XRD), and FSCV sensing of DA and 5-HT were systematically assessed. Double pyrolysis caused ∼20% shrinkage and ∼88% higher sheet resistance, yet preserved structural integrity, electrochemical stability, and FSCV performance. Although GC shows higher resistance than ultrathin metal traces at very small widths, its resistance approaches metal-like values at 5–10 μm, supporting its feasibility for miniaturized interconnects. At the same time, the second pyrolysis cycle maintained sensing performance for both DA and 5-HT and preserved electrical stability under prolonged oxidative-etching FSCV tests (Figures 1j–o). Overall, this work provides key design guidance and shows that GC can reliably serve as both interconnect and sensing material, helping enable the next-generation of high-density “all”-GC-MEAs.
Together, this Research Topic highlights recent advances in carbon-based neurochemical interfaces, including progress in improving CFME chronic performance and in the batch fabrication of GC-based microsensors.
Author contributions
EC: Writing – original draft. KL: Writing – review and editing. DR: Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abdalla, A., Atcherley, C. W., Pathirathna, P., Samaranayake, S., Qiang, B., Peña, E., et al. (2017). In vivo ambient serotonin measurements at carbon-fiber microelectrodes. Anal. Chemistry 89, 9703–9711. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01257
Atcherley, C. W., Wood, K. M., Parent, K. L., Hashemi, P., and Heien, M. L. (2015). The coaction of tonic and phasic dopamine dynamics. Chem. Commun. 51, 2235–2238. doi:10.1039/c4cc06165a
Bucher, E. S., and Wightman, R. M. (2015). Electrochemical analysis of neurotransmitters. Annu. Review Analytical Chemistry 8, 239–261. doi:10.1146/annurev-anchem-071114-040426
Cao, Q., Puthongkham, P., and Venton, B. J. (2019). New insights into optimizing chemical and 3D surface structures of carbon electrodes for neurotransmitter detection. Anal. Methods 11, 247–261. doi:10.1039/C8AY02472C
Castagnola, E., Ansaldo, A., Fadiga, L., and Ricci, D. (2010). Chemical vapour deposited carbon nanotube coated microelectrodes for intracortical neural recording. Physica Status Solidi (B) 247, 2703–2707. doi:10.1002/pssb.201000217
Castagnola, E., Vahidi, N. W., Nimbalkar, S., Rudraraju, S., Thielk, M., Zucchini, E., et al. (2018). In vivo dopamine detection and single unit recordings using intracortical glassy carbon microelectrode arrays. MRS Advances 3, 1629–1634. doi:10.1557/adv.2018.98
Castagnola, E., Thongpang, S., Hirabayashi, M., Nava, G., Nimbalkar, S., Nguyen, T., et al. (2021). Glassy carbon microelectrode arrays enable voltage-peak separated simultaneous detection of dopamine and serotonin using fast Scan cyclic voltammetry. Analyst 146, 3955–3970. doi:10.1039/d1an00425e
Castagnola, E., Robbins, E. M., Wu, B., Pwint, M. Y., Garg, R., Cohen-Karni, T., et al. (2022). Flexible glassy carbon multielectrode array for in vivo multisite detection of tonic and phasic dopamine concentrations. Biosensors 12, 540. doi:10.3390/bios12070540
Castagnola, E., Robbins, E. M., Krahe, D. D., Wu, B., Pwint, M. Y., Cao, Q., et al. (2023). Stable in-vivo electrochemical sensing of tonic serotonin levels using PEDOT/CNT-coated glassy carbon flexible microelectrode arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 230, 115242. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2023.115242
Castagnola, E., Cao, Q., Robbins, E., Wu, B., Pwint, M. Y., Siwakoti, U., et al. (2024). Glassy carbon fiber-like multielectrode arrays for neurochemical sensing and electrophysiology recording. Adv. Mater. Technol. 10, 2400863. doi:10.1002/admt.202400863
Devi, M., Vomero, M., Fuhrer, E., Castagnola, E., Gueli, C., Nimbalkar, S., et al. (2021). Carbon-based neural electrodes: promises and challenges. J. Neural Eng. 18, 041007. doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac1e45
Fan, B., Rusinek, C. A., Thompson, C. H., Setien, M., Guo, Y., Rechenberg, R., et al. (2020). Flexible, diamond-based microelectrodes fabricated using the diamond growth side for neural sensing. Microsystems and Nanoengineering 6, 42. doi:10.1038/s41378-020-0155-1
Faul, E.-B. A., Broussard, A. M., Rivera, D. R., Pwint, M. Y., Wu, B., Cao, Q., et al. (2024). Batch fabrication of microelectrode arrays with glassy carbon microelectrodes and interconnections for neurochemical sensing: promises and challenges. Micromachines 15, 277. doi:10.3390/mi15020277
Heien, M. L., Phillips, P. E., Stuber, G. D., Seipel, A. T., and Wightman, R. M. (2003). Overoxidation of carbon-fiber microelectrodes enhances dopamine adsorption and increases sensitivity. Analyst 128, 1413–1419. doi:10.1039/b307024g
Huffman, M. L., and Venton, B. J. (2009). Carbon-fiber microelectrodes for in vivo applications. Analyst 134, 18–24. doi:10.1039/b807563h
Kozai, T. D., Jaquins-Gerstl, A. S., Vazquez, A. L., Michael, A. C., and Cui, X. T. (2015). Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 6, 48–67. doi:10.1021/cn500256e
Li, J., Liu, Y., Yuan, L., Zhang, B., Bishop, E. S., Wang, K., et al. (2022). A tissue-like neurotransmitter sensor for the brain and gut. Nature 606, 94–101. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04615-2
Nimbalkar, S., Castagnola, E., Balasubramani, A., Scarpellini, A., Samejima, S., Khorasani, A., et al. (2018). Ultra-capacitive carbon neural probe allows simultaneous long-term electrical stimulations and high-resolution neurotransmitter detection. Sci. Reports 8, 6958. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25198-x
Patel, P. R., Popov, P., Caldwell, C. M., Welle, E. J., Egert, D., Pettibone, J. R., et al. (2020). High density carbon fiber arrays for chronic electrophysiology, fast scan cyclic voltammetry, and correlative anatomy. J. Neural Eng. 17, 056029. doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abb1f6
Puthongkham, P., and Venton, B. J. (2020). Recent advances in fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. Analyst 145, 1087–1102. doi:10.1039/c9an01925a
Qi, Y., Jang, D., Ryu, J., Bai, T., Shin, Y., Gu, W., et al. (2025). Stabilized carbon coating on microelectrodes for scalable and interoperable neurotransmitter sensing. Nat. Commun. 16, 3300. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58388-z
Rafi, H., and Zestos, A. G. (2021). Recent advances in FSCV detection of neurochemicals via waveform and carbon microelectrode modification. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 057520. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac0064
Roberts, J. G., and Sombers, L. A. (2018). Fast scan cyclic voltammetry: Chemical sensing in the brain and beyond. Anal. Chemistry 90, 490–504. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04732
Robinson, D. L., Venton, B. J., Heien, M. L., and Wightman, R. M. (2003). Detecting subsecond dopamine release with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in vivo. Clin. Chemistry 49, 1763–1773. doi:10.1373/49.10.1763
Swamy, B. K., and Venton, B. J. (2007). Subsecond detection of physiological adenosine concentrations using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. Anal. Chemistry 79, 744–750. doi:10.1021/ac061820i
Takmakov, P., Zachek, M. K., Keithley, R. B., Walsh, P. L., Donley, C., McCarty, G. S., et al. (2010). Carbon microelectrodes with a renewable surface. Anal. Chemistry 82, 2020–2028. doi:10.1021/ac902753x
Venton, B. J., and Cao, Q. (2020). Fundamentals of fast-scan cyclic voltammetry for dopamine detection. Analyst 145, 1158–1168. doi:10.1039/c9an01586h
Keywords: carbon fiber microelectrodes, dopamine, fast scan cyclic voltammetry, glassy carbon, pyrolysis, serotonin
Citation: Castagnola E, Lee KH and Ricci D (2026) Editorial: Carbon microelectrodes for neurochemical sensing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 14:1799334. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1799334
Received: 29 January 2026; Accepted: 02 February 2026;
Published: 06 February 2026.
Edited and reviewed by:
Gianni Ciofani, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), ItalyCopyright © 2026 Castagnola, Lee and Ricci. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elisa Castagnola, ZWxpc2FAbGF0ZWNoLmVkdQ==; Kendall H. Lee, bGVlLmtlbmRhbGxAbWF5by5lZHU=; Davide Ricci, ZGF2aWRlLnJpY2NpQHVuaWdlLml0