ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 16 March 2021

Sec. Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention

Volume 8 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.630102

The Potential Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Study

  • 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • 2. Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • 3. School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 4. Department of Physical Therapy, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 6. Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 7. Joint Commission of Taiwan, New Taipei City, Taiwan

Abstract

Background and Purpose: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has high mortality rate, which needs more research. This multi-center study aims to evaluate potential risk factors for mortality in patients after IHCA.

Methods: Data for this study retrospectively enrolled IHCA patients from 14 regional hospitals, two district hospitals, and five medical centers between 2013 June and 2018 December. The study enrolled 5,306 patients and there were 2,871 patients in subgroup of intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency room (ER), and 1,894 patients in subgroup of general wards.

Results: As for overall IHCA patients, odds ratio (OR) for mortality was higher in older patients (OR = 1.69; 95% CI:1.33–2.14), those treated with ventilator (OR = 1.79; 95% CI:1.36–2.38) and vasoactive agents (OR = 1.88; 95% CI:1.45–2.46). Whereas, better survival was reported in IHCA patients with initial rhythm as ventricular tachycardia (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.21–0.50) and ventricular fibrillation (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.16–0.42). With regard to ICU and ER subgroup, there was no mortality difference among different nursing shifts, whereas for patients in general wards, overnight shift (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.07–3.11) leads to poor outcome.

Conclusion: For IHCA patients, old age, receiving ventilator support and vasoactive agents reported poor survival. Overnight shift had poor survival for IHCA patients in general wards, despite no significance in overall and ICU/ER subgroups.

Introduction

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has high mortality rate (1). The majority of data are derived from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry, which reported 9 to 10 IHCA cases per 1,000 admissions from 2008 to 2017 (2, 3).

Despite successful resuscitation, only few resuscitated patients have good neurologic conditions at discharge (4). Targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest remains the primary neuroprotective approach following cardiac arrest (5, 6).

Compared to other critical cardiovascular conditions, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and OHCA, IHCA has received little attention (1). Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the potential risk factors for mortality in patients after IHCA.

Methods

This cross-sectional study analyzed the IHCA data set of The Taiwan Clinical Performance Indicator (TCPI) system, which was founded by the Joint Commission of Taiwan (JCT) in 2011. The Human Research Committee of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital approved this study.

Data Source and Study Population

This registered multicenter study retrospectively enrolled IHCA patients from 14 regional hospitals, two district hospitals, and five medical centers between June 2013 and December 2018. A total of 7,731 cases were included. We excluded patients with undetermined sex, age younger than 18 years, with a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, and those not receiving resuscitation. JCT staff supervised this registry and checked the numbers of IHCA patients to confirm that all IHCA patients in enrolled hospitals were included in this study. Finally, 5,306 patients were included in the analysis (Figure 1). The IHCA event locations were collected including intensive care unit (including coronary care units), emergent department, ordinary ward, examination room, postoperative recovery room, outpatient department, operating theater or coronary angiography laboratory and others. Total 54.1% of IHCA occurred in ICU/ER and 35.7% of IHCA occurred in general ward. Only 10.2% of IHCA occurred in examination room, postoperative recovery room, outpatient department, operating theater or coronary angiography laboratory, etc. Finally, there were 2,871 and 1,894 patients in the ICU/ER subgroup and general ward subgroup, respectively. Fetal arrhythmia was defined brady-arrhythmias or tachy-arrhythmias leading to sudden cardiac death (7). Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are kinds of fetal arrhythmia.

Figure 1

Indications for TTM, Ventilator and Vasoactive Therapy

TTM has been recommended for post-resuscitation care of comatose patients after CA event (6, 8). Intubation and ventilator therapy are indicated for cardiac arrest patients not responsive, ineffective or not possible to bag-mask ventilation, and were needed for protected airway (9). The use of the vasopressors were recommended for the resuscitation of cardiac arrest patients in current guideline (10).

Statistical Analysis

For data analysis, SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) was used. Percentile values were used to express categorical data, analyzed using the chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for significant variables, including sex, age, hospital level, direct cause, and initial rhythm. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The patients' basic characteristics are listed in Table 1. The majority of the initially detected rhythms were pulseless electrical activity (PEA) (41.6%) and asystole (27.5%), and the leading cause of IHCA was fatal arrythmia (35.7%).

Table 1

VariablesTotal
(N=5,306)
Survival
(N=821)
Death
(N=4,485)
P-value
SexMale3,335(62.9%)494(60.2%)2,841(63.3%)0.0836
Female1,971(37.2%)327(39.8%)1,644(36.7%)
Age<702,537(47.8%)440(53.6%)2,097(46.8%)0.0003
≥702,769(52.2%)381(46.4%)2,388(53.2%)
Hospital levelMedical center2,588(48.8%)309(37.6%)2,279(50.8%)<0.0001
Regional/district hospital2,718(51.2%)512(62.4%)2,206(49.2 %)
Hospital volume for admission(N = average people per month)N < 1,000575(10.8%)79(9.6%)496(11.1%)<0.0001
1,000 ≤ N < 2,0001,070(20.2%)196(23.9%)874(19.5%)
2,000 ≤ N < 3,0001,027(19.4%)219(26.7%)808(18.0%)
N ≥ 3,0002,634(49.6%)327(39.8%)2,307(51.4%)
Hospital volume for emergency department(N = average people per month)N < 3,000324(6.1%)33(4.0%)291(6.5%)<0.0001
3,000 ≤ N < 5,0001,771(33.4%)335(40.8%)1,436(32.0%)
5000 ≤ N < 7,0001,454(27.4%)282(34.4%)1,172(26.1%)
N ≥ 7,0001,757(33.1%)171(20.8%)1,586(35.4%)
Total beds per hospital<500974(18.4%)145(17.7%)829(18.5%)0.0024
500–1,0001,600(30.2%)289(35.2%)1,311(29.2%)
≥1,0002,732(51.5%)387(47.1%)2,345(52.3%)
Event time2013–20163,456(65.1%)459(55.9%)2,997(66.8%)<0.0001
Years2017–20181,850(34.9%)362(44.1%)1,488(33.2%)
MonthsMarch to May1,334(25.1%)220(26.8%)1,114(24.8%)0.5994
June to August1,216(22.9%)177(21.6%)1,039(23.2%)
September to November1,247(23.5%)193(23.5%)1,054(23.5%)
December to February1,509(28.4%)231(28.1%)1,278(28.5%)
Office hourOffice hour3,384(63.8%)547(66.6%)2,837(63.3%)0.0647
Non-office hour1,922(36.2%)274(33.4%)1,648(36.7%)
Shift08:00~16:001,913(36.1%)337(41.1%)1,576(35.1%)<0.0001
16:00~24:001,489(28.1%)274(33.4%)1,215(27.1%)
24:00~08:001,904(35.9%)210(25.6%)1,694(37.8%)
Event locationIntensive care unit1,866(35.2%)257(31.3%)1,609(35.9%)<0.0001
Examination room360(6.8%)89(10.8%)271(6.0%)
Emergent department1,005(18.9%)170(20.7%)835(18.6%)
Ordinary ward1,894(35.7%)273(33.3%)1,621(36.1%)
Others181(3.4%)32(3.9%)149(3.3%)
WitnessWith4,560(85.9%)781(95.1%)3,779(84.3%)<0.0001
With treatment/ procedure before ALS4,194(79.0%)694(84.5%)3,500(78.0%)<0.0001
 Intravascular catheter3,816(71.9%)640(78.0%)3,176(70.8%)<0.0001
 Intravascular medication2,932(55.3%)455(55.4%)2,477(55.2%)0.9191
 Electrocardiogram monitor2,708(51.0%)448(54.6%)2,260(50.4%)0.0277
 Intubation1,615(30.4%)213(25.9%)1,402(31.3%)0.0023
 Ventilator1,513(28.5%)200(24.4%)1,313(29.3%)0.0041
 Intracardiac pacemaker or defibrillator105(2.0%)19(2.3%)86(1.9%)0.4530
 Arterial line747(14.1%)109(13.3%)638(14.2%)0.4724
Cause of IHCA
 Fatal arrythmia1,893(35.7%)366(44.6%)1,527(34.1%)<0.0001
 Hypotension658(12.4%)56(6.8%)602(13.4%)
 Respiratory depression792(14.9%)118(14.4%)674(15.0%)
 Metabolism180(3.4%)21(2.6%)159(3.6%)
 Myocardial ischemia/infarction389(7.3%)55(6.7%)334(7.5%)
 Others1,394(26.3%)205(25.0%)1,189(26.5%)
ALS item
 Chest compression4,696(88.5%)727(88.6%)3,969(88.5%)0.9634
 Electrical discharge1,118(21.1%)309(37.6%)809(18.0%)<0.0001
 Airway management3,422(64.5%)543(66.1%)2,879(64.2%)0.2838
 Vasoactive agents4,132(77.9%)579(70.5%)3,553(79.2%)<0.0001
Vital sign before ALS
 ConsciousWith597(11.3%)102(12.4%)495(11.0%)0.3430
Without4,377(82.5%)674(82.1%)3,703(82.6%)
 RespirationWith1,564(29.5%)250(30.5%)1,314(29.3%)0.4768
Without3,384(63.8%)523(63.7%)2,861(63.8%)
 PulsePresent1,382(26.1%)226(27.5%)1,156(25.8%)0.5364
Absent3,565(67.2%)543(66.1%)3,022(67.4%)
Initial rhythm
 Ventricular fibrillation276(5.2%)94(11.5%)182(4.1%)<0.0001
 Ventricular tachycardia548(10.3%)179(21.8%)369(8.2%)
 Asystole1,457(27.5%)155(18.9%)1,302(29.1%)
 Pulseless electrical activity2,205(41.6%)267(32.5%)1,938(43.2%)
 Bradycardia717(13.5%)102(12.4%)615(13.7%)
 Perfusing rhythm94(1.8%)22(2.7%)72(1.6%)
Start in-hospital resuscitation teamsYes2,148(67.9%)392(67.6%)1,756(67.9%)0.8822
Reason of CPR terminationDeath1,378(26.0%)0(0.0%)1,378(30.7%)<0.0001
Medical futility498(9.4%)13(1.6%)485(10.8%)
DNR949(17.9%)15(1.8%)934(20.8%)
ROSC2,447(46.1%)787(95.9%)1,660(37.0%)
Mechanical support (ECMO)34(0.6%)6(0.7%)28(0.6%)
Targeted temperature managementWith24(0.5%)9(1.1%)15(0.3%)0.0028

Basic characteristics of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a multicenter cohort study.

ALS, advanced life support; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNR, do-not-resuscitate; ECMO, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; IHCA, in-hospital cardiac arrest; ROSC, Return of spontaneous circulation.

Survival ratios of IHCA patients according to basic characteristics are shown in Figure 2. There was no sex difference in survival ratios (Figure 2A). Factors for poor survival included old age (Figure 2B), medical center (Figure 2C), large hospital volume for admission with >3,000 patients per month on average (Figure 2D), and total beds >1,000 (Figure 2F). Events occurring between 24:00 and 08:00 had poor outcomes (Figure 2J). Events occurring at the ICU showed poor outcomes, whereas events at the examination room showed better outcomes (Figure 2K). Moreover, better survival was reported in patients with a witness during the attack (Figure 2L).

Figure 2

Figure 3 includes survival ratios of treatment or procedure before ALS and ALS-associated items. The survival ratio with different causes of IHCA and other managements are reported in Figure 4. Fatal arrhythmia as the cause of IHCA had better survival (Figure 4A). Patients who underwent TTM had better outcomes (Figure 4B). Initially-detected ventricular fibrillation (VF) was associated with better survival ratios (Figure 4D). Moreover, there was no difference in survival between patients with and without in-hospital resuscitation teams (Figure 4C).

Figure 3

Figure 4

The basic characteristics of the general ward and ICU/ER subgroups are reported in Table 2. The general ward subgroup had more patients aged >70 years and more IHCA events occurring during overnight shifts. The ICU/ER subgroup had more IHCA events occurring during office hours, more witnessed IHCA patients, and more patients receiving treatment or procedure before ALS. Moreover, the proportion of starting in-hospital resuscitation teams was higher in the general subgroup.

Table 2

VariablesGeneral wards
(N=1,894)
ICU/ER
(N=2,871)
P-value
SexMale1,181(62.4%)1,847(64.3%)0.1650
Female713(37.7%)1,024(35.7%)
Age<70797(42.1%)1,480(51.6%)<0.0001
≥701,097(57.9%)1,391(48.5%)
Hospital levelMedical center904(47.7%)1,509(52.6%)0.0025
Regional/district hospital990(52.3%)1,362(47.4%)
Hospital volume for admission(N = average people per month)N < 1,000176(9.3%)377(13.1%)<0.0001
1,000 ≤ N < 2,000359(19.0%)621(21.6%)
2,000 ≤ N < 3,000401(21.2%)381(13.3%)
N ≥ 3,000958(50.6%)1492(52.0%)
Hospital volume for emergency department(N = average people per month)N < 3,000217(11.5%)398(13.9%)0.1466
3,000 ≤ N < 5,000531(28.0%)799(27.8%)
5,000 ≤ N < 7,000498(26.3%)704(24.5%)
N ≥ 7,000648(34.2%)979(34.1%)
Total beds per hospital<500266(14.0%)666(23.2%)<0.0001
500–1,000723(38.2%)730(25.4%)
≥1,000905(47.8%)1,475(51.4%)
Event time
 Years2013–20161,187(62.7%)1891(65.9%)0.0241
2017–2018707(37.3%)980(34.1%)
 MonthsMarch to May461(24.3%)723(25.2%)0.1264
June to August468(24.7%)637(22.2%)
September to November421(22.2%)699(24.4%)
December to February544(28.7%)812(28.3%)
 Office hourOffice hour1,118(59.0%)1897(66.1%)<0.0001
Non office hour776(41.0%)974(33.9%)
 Shift08:00~16:00601(31.7%)1046(36.4%)<0.0001
16:00~24:00501(26.5%)848(29.5%)
24:00~08:00792(41.8%)977(34.0%)
WitnessWith1,569(82.8%)2,511(87.5%)<0.0001
 With treatment/ procedure before ALS1,454(76.8%)2,318(80.7%)0.0010
 Intravascular catheter1,314(69.4%)2,139(74.5%)0.0001
 Intravascular medication828(43.7%)1,835(63.9%)<0.0001
 Electrocardiogram monitor430(22.7%)1,985(69.1%)<0.0001
 Intubation129(6.8%)1,324(46.1%)<0.0001
 Ventilator117(6.2%)1,248(43.5%)<0.0001
 Intracardiac pacemaker or defibrillator12(0.6%)75(2.6%)<0.0001
 Arterial line19(1.0%)643(22.4%)<0.0001
Cause of IHCA
 Fatal arrythmia528(27.9%)1,214(42.3%)<0.0001
 Hypotension152(8.0%)446(15.5%)
 Respiratory depression451(23.8%)286(10.0%)
 Metabolism49(2.6%)113(3.9%)
 Myocardial ischemia/infarction104(5.5%)205(7.1%)
 Others610(32.2%)607(21.1%)
ALS item
 Chest compression1,678(88.6%)2,523(87.9%)0.4535
 Electrical discharge304(16.1%)658(22.9%)<0.0001
 Airway management1,490(78.7%)1,576(54.9%)<0.0001
 Vasoactive agents1,384(73.1%)2,338(81.4%)<0.0001
Vital sign before ALS
 ConsciousWith187(9.9%)338(11.8%)0.0002
Without1,615(85.3%)2,325(81.0%)
 RespirationWith415(21.9%)990(34.5%)<0.0001
Without1,377(72.7%)1,659(57.8%)
 PulsePresent429(22.7%)806(28.1%)<0.0001
Absent1,361(71.9%)1,847(64.3%)
Initial rhythm
 Ventricular fibrillation72(3.8%)171(6.0%)<0.0001
 Ventricular tachycardia109(5.8%)366(12.8%)
 Asystole794(41.9%)514(17.9%)
 Pulseless electrical activity706(37.3%)1293(45.0%)
 Bradycardia165(8.7%)489(17.0%)
 Perfusing rhythm48(2.5%)38(1.3%)
Start in-hospital resuscitation teamsYes1,051(55.5%)863(30.1%)<0.0001
Reason of CPR terminationDeath479(25.3%)751(26.2%)0.0016
Medical futility164(8.7%)289(10.1%)
DNR386(20.4%)504(17.6%)
ROSC863(45.6%)1,305(45.5%)
Mechanical support2(0.1%)22(0.8%)
Targeted temperature management70.37%120.42%0.7954

Basic characteristics of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in subgroups of general wards and intensive care unit/emergency room.

ALS, advanced life support; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNR, do not resuscitate; IHCA, in-hospital cardiac arrest; ROSC, Return of spontaneous circulation.

In the multivariable logistic regression model, OR for mortality was higher in older patients, those receiving ventilator support before ALS, and those receiving vasoactive agents during ALS in the overall IHCA patient group (Table 3). On the contrary, patients with respiratory depression as the cause of IHCA, rather than hypotension showed better outcomes. In the ICU/ER subgroup (Table 3), better survival was reported in patients with respiratory depression rather than hypotension as the cause of IHCA, and patients with initially detected VT and VF had better outcome. For the general ward subgroup, patients with older age and attacks occurring between 24:00 and 08:00 (compared to 08:00–17:00) had poor outcomes. Moreover, initial rhythms of VT and VF were shown to reduce the mortality risk in IHCA patients in overall, ICU/ER and general ward subgroups.

Table 3

Overall
(N=5,306)
ICU and ER
(N=2,871)
General Ward
(N=1,894)
VariablesAdjusted ORP-valueAdjusted ORP-valueAdjusted ORP-value
(95% CI)(95% CI)(95% CI)
Male1.26 (1.00–1.60)0.05251.40 (1.01–1.95)0.04561.18 (0.78–1.81)0.4335
Age ≥701.69 (1.33–2.14)<0.00011.48 (1.07–2.06)0.01962.24 (1.47–3.42)0.0002
Hospital level-Medical center1.53 (1.12–2.08)0.00721.57 (1.02–2.43)0.04121.27 (0.71–2.26)0.4238
Non-office hour1.27 (0.99–1.61)0.05681.15 (0.82–1.62)0.40831.27 (0.82–1.95)0.2847
Shift (Reference: 08:00~17:00)
 24:00~08:001.24 (0.92–1.66)0.15850.59 (0.32–1.10)0.09661.83 (1.07–3.11)0.0268
 17:00~24:000.81 (0.62–1.06)0.12100.67 (0.40–1.12)0.12630.97 (0.60–1.58)0.9028
 With witness0.43 (0.16–1.11)0.08031.02 (0.10–11.06)0.98490.47 (0.16–1.41)0.1783
Treatment/ procedure before ALS
 Intravascular catheter0.93 (0.67–1.30)0.67630.65 (0.38–1.12)0.12231.14 (0.64–2.04)0.6604
 Intravascular medication1.31 (1.00–1.70)0.04631.72 (1.18–2.52)0.00471.07 (0.67–1.69)0.7826
 Ventilator1.79 (1.36–2.38)<0.00011.95 (1.36–2.79)0.00031.03 (0.43–2.50)0.9467
 Intracardiac pacemaker or defibrillator1.99 (0.94–4.19)0.07061.97 (0.80–4.87)0.14030.74 (0.07–8.12)0.8055
Cause (Reference: Hypotension)
 Myocardial ischemia/infarction0.91 (0.56–1.47)0.69450.68 (0.33–1.40)0.29941.44 (0.52–3.97)0.4798
 Metabolism0.69 (0.39–1.23)0.20700.39 (0.18–0.83)0.01491.01 (0.30–3.40)0.9846
 Respiratory depression0.59 (0.40–0.87)0.00710.37 (0.21–0.67)0.00100.72 (0.37–1.42)0.3418
 Fatal arrythmia0.56 (0.39–0.82)0.00260.39 (0.23–0.67)0.00050.56 (0.27–1.16)0.1195
ALS order
 Chest compression1.06 (0.73–1.54)0.76521.24 (0.75–2.04)0.39911.51 (0.70–3.24)0.2921
 Electrical discharge0.88 (0.64–1.20)0.40020.87 (0.56–1.34)0.52401.08 (0.61–1.92)0.7988
 Airway management0.96 (0.74–1.26)0.78830.92 (0.64–1.34)0.67530.90 (0.53–1.54)0.7064
 Vasoactive agents1.88 (1.45–2.46)<0.00011.77 (1.22–2.59)0.00301.74 (1.07–2.83)0.0250
 With Respiration0.93 (0.72–1.22)0.60860.88 (0.61–1.27)0.50270.93 (0.55–1.58)0.7989
Initial rhythm (Reference: Asystole)
 Perfusing rhythm0.71 (0.32–1.55)0.38790.46 (0.12–1.79)0.25971.10 (0.35–3.47)0.8652
 Bradycardia0.62 (0.42–0.91)0.01560.70 (0.39–1.27)0.24170.63 (0.32–1.26)0.1923
 PEA0.79 (0.56–1.12)0.18110.84 (0.48–1.46)0.53020.84 (0.49–1.45)0.5393
 Ventricular Tachycardia0.32 (0.21–0.50)<0.00010.32 (0.16–0.62)0.00070.28 (0.12–0.67)0.0044
 Ventricular Fibrillation0.26 (0.16–0.42)<0.00010.24 (0.11–0.51)0.00020.34 (0.15–0.81)0.0149
 Start in-hospital resuscitation teams1.21 (0.93–1.56)0.15121.27 (0.90–1.81)0.17810.59 (0.27–1.28)0.1781

Multivariable logistic regression model on survival of IHCA patients. (N = 5,306).

Discussion

This multicenter cohort study analyzed the association between IHCA patients and healthcare-related risk factors. Compared to the previous GWTG-R cohort data from the United States (U.S.) involving IHCA patients with a mean age of 66 years, our patients' mean age was 68 years and 62.9% of our patients were male (Table 1), whereas in the GWTG-R, 58% were male. The presenting rhythm in the GWTG-R was most often non-shockable (81%), which was comparable to our study finding showing that 82.6% of the patients had a non-shockable rhythm (1, 2). Survival to hospital discharge was ~25% in GWTG-R, whereas in our study, this was 15.5% (2). Previous study had a 7-year follow-up between 2000 and 2007, with 507 medical/surgical participating hospitals, and total 86,748 IHCA patients. It indicated lower survival during night hours in comparison with event occurred during day/evening hours (11). In comparison with this large sample size, our study followed 6 years, and had relatively small sample size with only 7,731 cases, however, our study analyzed the differences between survival and death subgroups to get information about the potential risk factors for IHCA mortality, in addition to the focus on the association between survival and event time. Preceding evidence indicated a 3% increase in in-hospital survival rates among IHCA patients between 2000 and 2004 (12). Moreover, advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training and adherence contributed to better outcome of IHCA patients (13). Whereas, in comparison to previous study (11), rate of survival to discharge in overnight shift was not improved (14.7 vs. 11.03%), which might be attributed to hospital level and disease severity.

Old Age Is a Predictor of Worse Overall Outcome

Age is one of the predictors of the Cardiac Arrest Survival Post Resuscitation In-hospital Score (CASPRI) score. A previous study indicated that increased age is associated with poor survival, especially for patients aged >70 years (1, 14). One single-center analysis of IHCA outcomes indicated that younger patients were more likely to survive the initial IHCA (15), which supported our study finding that age ≥70 years (OR= 1.69; 95% CI:1.33–2.14) (Table 3) was a predictor of worse overall outcome.

Overnight Shift in General Wards Increased Mortality Risk of IHCA Patients

The patient-to-nurse ratio should be <9:1 in medical centers, 12:1 in regional hospitals, and 15:1 in district hospitals, according to Taiwan's local medical law standards. However, in Taiwan, the actual patient-to-nurse ratio is approximately 10–11:1 in general wards for day shifts and 20–30:1 for night shifts. This workload is five times higher than that of institutions in Europe or the U.S (16, 17).

Previous research reported 31% mortality for a 8:1 ratio for patients within 30 days of hospitalization (18, 19). Our study reported that overnight shift was associated with increased mortality of IHCA patients in general wards, which could be attributed to the highly disproportionate patient-to-nurse ratios and overload for overnight nursing staff in general wards (20). Previous study with a large sample size with 86,748 IHCA patients (58, 593 cases during day/evening hours; 28,155 cases during night hours) indicated lower survival during night hours in comparison with event occurred during day/evening hours (11), which supported our result.

Initially-Detected VT/VF and Respiratory Depression as the Direct Cause of IHCA had Better Survival

Compared to all rhythms and non-shockable rhythms, VF and pulseless VT showed better survival and were two to three times more likely to survive to hospital discharge (1, 21). Higher prevalence of respiratory insufficiency was shown if the duration of preceding hospitalization was longer (22). Pre-existing data indicated that attempts at intubation may delay timely defibrillation and interruption in chest compressions, contributing to poor outcomes (23). However, in patients with respiratory depression as the cause of IHCA, intubation was not associated with worse survival (24).

Our study reported that patients with respiratory depression as the cause of IHCA had better survival in overall cohort and ICU/ER subgroup, but not in general ward subgroup. This result might be due to the fact that predictable or avoidable cardiac arrest may occur if patients had respiratory depression as the direct cause of IHCA events, and whether timely intubation affect survival.

IHCA Patients With a Witness Showed Better Survival, and No Survival Difference Was Noted Between Patients With and Without In-Hospital Resuscitation Teams

Many IHCA cases are considered preventable or avoidable, and witnessed IHCA events are associated with improved outcomes (25, 26). Our study reported that witnessed IHCA patients in the ICU/ER subgroup did not have better outcomes, whereas the overall cohort and general ward subgroup showed better outcomes. This difference could be attributed to the existence of well-monitored settings and alarm systems in ICU/ER to offer timely response, despite the absence of a witness.

Early detected cardiac arrest events in monitored settings and early warning systems are associated with improved outcomes (27, 28). Event location at an examination room showed better outcomes in our study (Figure 2K). In our study, there was no survival difference between patients with and without in-hospital resuscitation teams (Figure 4C) (Table 3). This result is the contribution of well-trained staff, with sufficient skills to respond to possible preventable IHCA events in usual care.

Study Limitations

First, our data were acquired from a unified medical record sheet filled out by professional practitioners, and information on comorbidities, past medical history, and underlying diseases were unavailable. Thus, post-resuscitation survival predictor such as CASPRI score could not be calculated. Second, detailed information such as definite collapse time, vital sign before resuscitation, and initial rhythm at collapse were not shown if IHCA events occurred in situations without monitor or witness. Moreover, resuscitation time, other interventions or devices and additional medical therapy were not documented. Finally, this was a multicenter, registered study, thus, future prospective randomized studies are required to confirm our findings. Finally, patients who underwent TTM had better outcomes, and this result was associated with the impact of TTM on post-resuscitation development rather than selection bias. However, this study enrolled IHCA patients between 2013 June and 2018 December, whereas national health insurance in Taiwan did not covered TTM until 2018 June. Selection bias might exist once life expectancy and economic issue were considered, however, there was no difference in terms of proportion of hypotension as cause of IHCA regardless receiving TTM or not (with: 16.67%; without: 12.38%, P = 0.5293). Furthermore, compared with previous study more than one decade ago, despite the improvement in ACLS training, rate of survival to discharge in overnight shift was not improved, which might be attributed to hospital level and disease severity. However, the evaluation of disease severity was our limitation.

Study Strengths

This large registered multicenter study for adult IHCA patients enrolled different hospital levels and evaluated potential risk factors for mortality in patients after IHCA. Previous large sample size study focused on the association between survival and event time, thus it divided IHCA patients into events occurred during night hours and during day/evening hours (1). Our study analyzed the differences between survival and death subgroups to get information about the potential risk factors for IHCA mortality. Moreover, comparison between general wards and ICU/ER subgroups also strengthened the impact of patient-to-nurse ratios on survival for IHCA patients. The finding that overnight shift increased the mortality risk of IHCA patients in general wards or in both ICU and ER prompts the effort to achieve better work environments and decrease patient-to-nurse ratios in the future.

Conclusions

IHCA patients, including those in ICUs, ERs, and general wards, who are receiving ventilator support and vasoactive agents had poor survival. Better survival was observed in patients with VT and VF as initial rhythms. However, old age had a negative effect on overall survival. Overnight shifts were associated with poor survival in the general ward subgroup, although no significance was found in the overall cohort and ICU/ER subgroup. Thus, efforts to decrease patient-to-nurse ratios during overnights shift might improve survival in patients after IHCA.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital approved this study (No. VGHKS19- EM 12-01). Written informed consent was not required for this study as the JCT dataset consists of de-identified secondary data for research purposes.Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

W-CH: concept and design. S-YW and E-HY: acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. M-TW: drafting of the manuscript. W-CH and DY: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. S-YW and E-HY: statistical analysis. W-CH: administrative, technical, or material support. W-CH and H-HL: supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, VGHKS19-EM12-01.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mister Chiu Yong Chih for his expert statistical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.

    AndersenLWHolmbergMJBergKMDonninoMWGranfeldtA. In-hospital cardiac arrest: a review. JAMA. (2019) 321:1200–10. 10.1001/jama.2019.1696

  • 2.

    MerchantRMYangLBeckerLBBergRANadkarniVNicholGet al. Incidence of treated cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients in the United States. Crit Care Med. (2011) 39:2401–6. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182257459

  • 3.

    HolmbergMRossCFitzmauriceGMChanPDuval-ArnouldJGrossestreuerAVet al. Incidence of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Abstract presented at: American Heart Association Resuscitation Science Symposium.Chicago, IL (2018).

  • 4.

    BellettiABenedettoUPutzuAMartinoEABiondi-ZoccaiGAngeliniGDet al. Vasopressors during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med. (2018) 46:e443–51. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003049

  • 5.

    SoarJCallawayCWAibikiMBottigerBWBrooksSCDeakinCDet al. Part 4: Advanced life support: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Resuscitation. (2015) 95:e71–120. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000273

  • 6.

    CallawayCWDonninoMWFinkELGeocadinRGGolanEKernKBet al. Part 8: post-cardiac arrest care: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. (2015) 132:S465–82. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000262

  • 7.

    UeyamaTMoritaniKShimizuAKakugawaHMatsuzakiM. Lethal arrhythmias–etiological view and therapeutic approach. Nihon Rinsho. (2002) 60:1269–77.

  • 8.

    PeberdyMACallawayCWNeumarRWGeocadinRGZimmermanJLDonninoMet al. Part 9: post-cardiac arrest care: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. (2010) 122:S768–86. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971002

  • 9.

    Part 8: advanced challenges in resuscitation. Section 2: toxicology in ECC. European Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation. (2000) 46:261–6. 10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00287-2

  • 10.

    Link MarkSBerkow LaurenCKudenchuk PeterJHalperin HenryRHess ErikPMoitra VivekKet al. Part 7: adult advanced cardiovascular life support. Circulation. (2015) 132:S444–64. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261

  • 11.

    PeberdyMAOrnatoJPLarkinGLBraithwaiteRSKashnerTMCareySMet al. Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest during nights and weekends. JAMA. (2008) 299:785–92. 10.1001/jama.299.7.785

  • 12.

    MorrisonLJNeumarRWZimmermanJLLinkMSNewbyLKMcMullanPWJr.et al. Strategies for improving survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States: 2013 consensus recommendations: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2013) 127:1538–63. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828b2770

  • 13.

    MorettiMACesarLANusbacherAKernKBTimermanSRamiresJA. Advanced cardiac life support training improves long-term survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. (2007) 72:458–65. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.06.039

  • 14.

    ChanPSSpertusJAKrumholzHMBergRALiYSassonCet al. A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Arch Intern Med. (2012) 172:947–53. 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2050

  • 15.

    RileyLEMehtaHJLascanoJ. Single-center in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. Indian J Crit Care Med. (2020) 24:44–8. 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23327

  • 16.

    LiangYWChenWYLeeJLHuangLC. Nurse staffing, direct nursing care hours and patient mortality in Taiwan: the longitudinal analysis of hospital nurse staffing and patient outcome study. BMC Health Serv Res. (2012) 12:44. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-44

  • 17.

    Central News Agency. Taiwan: Majority of Taiwan Hospitals Facing Shortage of Nurses: Poll. Available online at: http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?id=1576842. (accessed April 21, 2011)

  • 18.

    AikenLHClarkeSPSloaneDMSochalskiJSilberJH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA. (2002) 288:1987–93. 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987

  • 19.

    LiangYWTsaySFChenWY. Effects of nurse staffing ratios on patient mortality in Taiwan acute care hospitals: a longitudinal study. J Nurs Res. (2012) 20:1–7. 10.1097/JNR.0b013e3182466ddc

  • 20.

    ChangH-LLinC-F. Taiwanese registered nurses' reasons for failure to practice. Int J Nurs Clin Pract. (2016) 3:5. 10.15344/2394-4978/2016/176

  • 21.

    BenjaminEJViraniSSCallawayCWChamberlainAMChangARChengSet al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. (2018) 137:e67–492. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558

  • 22.

    TranSDeaconNMinokadehAMalhotraADavisDPVillanuevaSet al. Frequency and survival pattern of in-hospital cardiac arrests: the impacts of etiology and timing. Resuscitation. (2016) 107:13–8. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.07.006

  • 23.

    BradleySMZhouYRamachandranSKEngorenMDonninoMGirotraS. Retrospective cohort study of hospital variation in airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest and the association with patient survival: insights from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation. Crit Care. (2019) 23:158. 10.1186/s13054-019-2426-5

  • 24.

    AndersenLWGranfeldtACallawayCWBradleySMSoarJNolanJPet al. Association between tracheal intubation during adult in-hospital cardiac arrest and survival. JAMA. (2017) 317:494–506. 10.1001/jama.2016.20165

  • 25.

    BradyWJGurkaKKMehringBPeberdyMAO'ConnorRE. In-hospital cardiac arrest: impact of monitoring and witnessed event on patient survival and neurologic status at hospital discharge. Resuscitation. (2011) 82:845–52. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.028

  • 26.

    LarkinGLCopesWSNathansonBHKayeW. Pre-resuscitation factors associated with mortality in 49,130 cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest: a report from the National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. (2010) 81:302–11. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.021

  • 27.

    PermanSMStantonESoarJBergRADonninoMWMikkelsenMEet al. Location of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States-variability in event rate and outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. (2016) 5:e003638. 10.1161/JAHA.116.003638

  • 28.

    SmithMEChiovaroJCO'NeilMKansagaraDQuinonesARFreemanMet al. Early warning system scores for clinical deterioration in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. (2014) 11:1454–65. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201403-102OC

Summary

Keywords

intensive care unit, in-hospital cardiac arrest, overnight shift, patient-to-nurse ratio, survival, targeted temperature management

Citation

Wang M-T, Huang W-C, Yen DH-T, Yeh E-H, Wu S-Y and Liao H-H (2021) The Potential Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Study. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8:630102. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.630102

Received

16 November 2020

Accepted

22 February 2021

Published

16 March 2021

Volume

8 - 2021

Edited by

Gen-Min Lin, Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital, Taiwan

Reviewed by

Christoph Sinning, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg (UHZ), Germany; Juha Sinisalo, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Hsun-Hsiang Liao Wei-Chun Huang

This article was submitted to Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics