CORRECTION article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 26 April 2024

Sec. Cardiac Rhythmology

Volume 11 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1404850

Corrigendum: Criteria for differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: a systematic review

  • 1. Department of Cardiology, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

  • 2. School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

Article metrics

View details

795

Views

443

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error. In the transition from NSLBBP to SLBBP and the transition from NSLBBP to LVSP, the description of RWPTV1 and Stim-LVAT was incorrect.

A correction has been made to The value of criteria for differentiating LBBP and LVSP, paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:

“The transition from NSLBBP to SLBBP prolonged the interval of stimulus artifact to late R-wave in lead V1 (RWPTV1; 120.7 ± 16.7 vs. 138.5 ± 21.5 ms, P < 0.001) and Stim-LVAT (119.3 ± 14.5 vs. 125.6 ± 13.8 ms, P < 0.001). The transition from NSLBBP to LVSP resulted in an increase in Stim-LVAT by ≥15 ms (78.4 ± 10.8 vs. 98.4 ± 13.9 ms) but only minimally influenced RWPTV1 (77.2 ± 13.6 vs. 76.6 ± 14.1 ms, P = 0.36)”.

The corrected sentence appears below:

“The transition from NSLBBP to SLBBP prolonged the interval of stimulus artifact to late R-wave in lead V1 (RWPTV1; 120.7 ± 16.7 vs. 138.5 ± 21.5 ms, P < 0.001), but had no significant effect on Stim-LVAT (77.2 ± 13.6 ms vs. 76.6 ± 14.1 ms, P = 0.36). The transition from NSLBBP to LVSP resulted in an increase in Stim-LVAT by ≥15 ms (78.4 ± 10.8 vs. 98.4 ± 13.9 ms), but only an increase of 6.2 ± 6.3 ms in RWPTV1 (119.3 ± 14.5 ms vs. 125.6 ± 13.8 ms, P < 0.001)”.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

left bundle branch pacing, left ventricular septal pacing, QRS complex, electrocardiogram, electrophysiology

Citation

Zhu K, Li L, Liu J, Chang D and Li Q (2024) Corrigendum: Criteria for differentiating left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing: a systematic review. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 11:1404850. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1404850

Received

21 March 2024

Accepted

09 April 2024

Published

26 April 2024

Volume

11 - 2024

Edited and reviewed by

Mate Vamos, University of Szeged, Hungary

Updates

Copyright

* Correspondence: Dong Chang Qiang Li

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics