ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Cardiac Rhythmology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1588716

Impact of the first-pass pulmonary vein isolation on ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation

Provisionally accepted
Chenxu  LuoChenxu Luo1,2,3Bing  LengBing Leng1,4Xinzhi  YuXinzhi Yu1,2,3Xianfeng  DuXianfeng Du1,2*Huimin  ChuHuimin Chu1,2*Shenyuan  ZhouShenyuan Zhou1,2,3Caijie  ShenCaijie Shen1,2Mingjun  FengMingjun Feng1,2Yongxing  JiangYongxing Jiang1,2Guohua  FuGuohua Fu1,2Lipu  YuLipu Yu1,2Binhao  WangBinhao Wang1,2YU  YIBOYU YIBO1,2Weidong  ZhuoWeidong Zhuo1,2Yin  XuYin Xu1,2Yijun  SunYijun Sun1,2,3Jiating  DaiJiating Dai1,2,3Luigi  Di BiaseLuigi Di Biase5
  • 1Arrhythmia Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Atherosclerotic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo, China
  • 3Health Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
  • 4Department of Cardiology, Ningbo Taikang Hospital, Ningbo, China
  • 5Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The achievement of first-pass isolation (FPI) during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) generally serves as a reliable marker of lesion quality in initial radiofrequency encirclement and predicts favorable procedural outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the impact of the FPI on the long-term clinical outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation.We conducted a retrospective analysis of 346 patients with PeAF who were divided into three groups: patients with FPI in bilateral PVs (BOTH group, n=197), those with FPI in either ipsilateral PVs (EITHER group, n=92), and those without FPI in bilateral PVs (NEITHER group, n=57). Achieving FPI in at least one of the two ipsilateral PVs (at least ipsilateral FPI, IFPI) was utilized as a metric for evaluation.The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) lasting longer than 30s beyond the blanking period. Baseline characteristics, procedural results and long-term clinical outcomes were compared among the groups.The FPI was effectively achieved in 251 left PVs (72.5%) and 235 right PVs (67.9%). After a median follow-up of 658(402, 970) days, the NEITHER group exhibited less freedom from ATAs recurrence than the BOTH group (57.9% vs 75.1%, P<0.001) or the EITHER group (57.9% vs 70.7%, P=0.036). IFPI was an independent predictor of freedom from ATAs recurrence in PeAF patients undergoing their initial ablation (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.74; P =0.001).Achieving FPI for PVI remained a significant association with improved ablation outcomes in PeAF patients, wherein IFPI served as an important determinant.

Keywords: AT, atrial tachycardia, ATAs, atrial tachyarrhythmias, FPI, first-pass isolation, PVI, pulmonary vein isolation, PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, PeAF, persistent atrial fibrillation, LSPAF, long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

Received: 06 Mar 2025; Accepted: 08 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Luo, Leng, Yu, Du, Chu, Zhou, Shen, Feng, Jiang, Fu, Yu, Wang, YIBO, Zhuo, Xu, Sun, Dai and Di Biase. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xianfeng Du, Arrhythmia Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
Huimin Chu, Arrhythmia Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.