ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Heart Valve Disease
This article is part of the Research TopicFuture of Heart Valve Surgery: Enhancing Outcomes with Innovative TechnologiesView all 6 articles
Outcomes of Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement with Dafodil™ Pericardial Bioprosthesis over 5-Years: Dafodil™-1 Trial
Provisionally accepted- 1Sri Madhusudan Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Sathya Sai Grama Muddenahalli, India
- 2Director, Heart Valve Bank & Academics CTVS Senior Consultant & Chief Cardiac Surgeon Sri Madhusudan Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Sri Sathya Sai Sarala Memorial Hospital, Bengaluru, India
- 3Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Bangalore, Bangalore, India
- 4Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, EPIC Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
- 5Dr D Y Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
- 6Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, India
- 7Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
- 8Nilratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, India
- 9Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, India
- 10Convenient Hospitals Limited, Indore, India
- 11Fortis Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
- 12Manipal Hospital, Delhi, Delhi, India
- 13Kovai Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore, India, Coimbatore, India
- 14Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, New Delhi, India
- 15Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
- 16The Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, India
- 17Epic Hospital , Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, India
- 18G Kuppuswamy Naidu Memorial Hospital, Coimbatore, India
- 19Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals Department of Microbiology, Pune, India
- 20Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences Whitefield, Bengaluru, India
- 21Care Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS), Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, India
- 22Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals New Delhi, New Delhi, India
- 23NewEra Hospital & Research Institute, Nagpur, nagpur, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
OBJECTIVES: The durability and performance of bioprosthetic valves are pivotal in managing valvular heart disease (VHD). This 5-year follow-up study evaluated the long-term clinical safety, haemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes of the Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis in patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve replacement (AVR/MVR). METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, first-in-human trial conducted across 19 Indian centers, 136 patients with advanced VHD (67 AVR, 69 MVR) were enrolled. Key endpoints were evaluated over 5 years. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in the AVR and MVR cohorts was 60.2 ± 8.3 years and 49.7 ± 14.4 years, respectively. A total of 124 patients (61 AVR, 63 MVR) completed the 5-year follow-up. In the AVR cohort, mean pressure gradients decreased from 51.2±24.1 mmHg at baseline to 11.3±5.3 mmHg at five years, while effective orifice area (EOA) increased from 0.88 ± 0.56 cm² to 1.72 ± 0.52 cm² (p<0.001). In the MVR group, the indexed EOA improved from 0.68 ± 0.4 cm²/m² to 1.28 ± 0.39 cm²/m² (p<0.001). Both cohorts exhibited significant improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and SF-12 QoL scores. There were no cases of hemolysis, structural valve deterioration (SVD), or myocardial infarction. At five years, the incidence of all cause of mortality was 9.8% in the AVR group and 22.2% in the MVR group. The major adverse cardiac event-free survival rates were 88.0% (AVR) and 76.7% (MVR). CONCLUSIONS: Over five years, the bioprosthesis demonstrated sustained haemodynamic performance, clinical safety, and QoL. The absence of SVD and low rates of adverse events encourage its use in young patients requiring surgical valve replacement. Furthermore, a long-term follow-up is warranted to evaluate its durability.
Keywords: Aortic Valve, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Mitral Valve, pericardial bioprosthesis, Quality of Life, Valvular Heart Disease
Received: 24 Jul 2025; Accepted: 08 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Channabasavaraj, Jain, Garg, Maslekar, Gupta, Sarkar, Bhat, Porwal, Singh Meharwal, Mishra, Vaijyanath, Grover, Choudhary, Rajput, Sethuratnam, Shastri, Padmanabhan, Thakur, J, Naik, Gupta and Sancheti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hiremath Shivalingaiah Channabasavaraj
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
