ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Sex and Gender in Cardiovascular Medicine

Sex Differences in LMR Ratio and Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity Among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

  • CangZhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in Hebei Province, Cangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have indicated that the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is associated with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, whether this association differs between sexes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LMR and Gensini score in patients with CAD, with a focus on potential sex differences. Methods: A total of 1,673 patients undergoing coronary angiography were included. The severity of CAD was assessed using the Gensini score, and patients were categorized into three groups based on Gensini score tertiles: T1 (≤10), T2 (>10 to <44), and T3 (≥44). Sex-stratified analyses and multivariable regression models were employed to assess the association between LMR and CAD severity. Results: LMR was significantly lower in patients with higher Gensini scores (P < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, LMR was independently and inversely associated with the Gensini score in the overall population. A significant sex–LMR interaction was observed (P < 0.05). In sex-stratified analyses, the inverse association between LMR and Gensini score was stronger in females than in males. Conclusion: LMR is independently and inversely associated with the severity of CAD, with a stronger association observed in female patients. These findings suggest that LMR may serve as a potential inflammatory marker for assessing CAD severity, and its clinical relevance may differ between sexes.

Summary

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, coronary artery stenosis severity, Gensini score, Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, sex differences

Received

17 December 2025

Accepted

17 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Cao, Pang, Lu, Zhao, Lu and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hongmin Zhao

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics