Abstract
Gushukang (GSK) is a traditional herbal compound used in Chinese medicine for the treatment of osteoporosis. Numerous studies have been conducted to elucidate the effects of GSK, but the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. In the present study, we cultured osteoblasts and osteoclasts with low and high doses of GSK, and also administered 3-month-old mice with 4 and 8 g/kg/day of GSK solution. Gushukang was found to promote osteoblast differentiation and inhibit osteoclast differentiation in vitro. In vivo, mice in the GSK treatment groups showed an increase in bone mass, as measured by micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT). Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and osteocalcin (OCN) staining experiments revealed decreased bone resorption and increased bone formation in the GSK treatment groups. In addition, we found a novel effect of GSK—it could induce type-H vessel formation in mice. The underlying mechanisms of these actions were further explored at the molecular level to investigate whether these effects were due to an overexpression of the hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1α). Our findings indicate the utility of GSK as a therapeutic for the prevention of osteoporosis.
Introduction
Primary osteoporosis is a bone disease characterized by decreased bone mass and bone density, resulting from estrogen deficiency and aging (Ng et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Su et al., 2019; Rendina-Ruedy and Rosen, 2020). The risk of fractures is increased in primary osteoporosis, with the potential for serious disability and increased mortality in afflicted patients (Schett and Bozec, 2014; Nevius et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2019). The current treatment for osteoporosis comprises antiresorptive and bone-forming medicines (Cao et al., 2018), including estrogens (Hayashi et al., 2019), parathyroid hormone (Fan et al., 2017), bisphosphonates (Wei et al., 2016), and drugs, which blockade follicular stimulating hormone (Sponton and Kajimura, 2017). Most of these treatments concentrate on a single aspect of the disease, and thorough assessments of their efficacy and safety is still needed (Rauch et al., 2010). Thus, an exploration of new safer and more effective therapies is warranted.
Traditional Chinese herbal medicines have recently gained interest among medical researchers due to their low cost and limited side effects, and this renewed interest includes Gushukang (GSK), a traditional medicine made up of several traditional herbs, including Herba Epimedii, Rehmannia glutinosa, and Rhizoma Drynariae (Li et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2020). Gushukang has already been approved for listing in the Chinese Pharmacopeia for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.
In clinical experiments, GSK–Herba Epimedii, an important GSK-containing formulation, has been reported to demonstrate positive effects on bone health (Indran et al., 2016). In a pharmacological study, GSK was demonstrated to increase bone density and promote the healing of bone fractures (Wang et al., 2007). Additionally, bone loss was prevented in hens fed with GSK, and an improvement in egg production was observed (Zhou et al., 2009), which suggests that the anti-osteoporosis effect of GSK is across species. In recent studies aimed at understanding the specific mechanisms underlying this action, Li et al. (2019) revealed that GSK modulates calcium homeostasis in OVX mice and that it has a favorable effect on bone formation (Li et al., 2019). In another study, this favorable effect was demonstrated to be related to the BMP-2/Smads signaling pathway (Chai et al., 2019). In summary, GSK is beneficial for bone mass development, although details of the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we reveal a new mechanism of GSK action that may pave the way for future osteoporosis treatments.
Materials and Methods
Experimental Animals
C57BL mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Central South University and raised in pathogen-free facilities, under a 12-h light/dark cycle as described previously (Li et al., 2018). The mice were provided with ample plastic bedding and clean water. All the experimental protocols were approved by the Subcommittee on Research and Animal Care (SRAC) of Central South University.
Tissue Collection
Drugs were administered daily at 9:00–11:00 AM for 3 months as in the study by Kondegowda et al. (2015). Next, 24, 3-month-old mice were randomly divided into three groups: the control group, the low-dose group, and the high-dose GSK treatment group. Gushukang was dissolved in PBS and then administered. Mice in the low-dose group were administered 4 g/kg/day of GSK solution, whereas mice in the high-dose group were administered 8 g/kg/day of GSK solution intragastrically each day (Li et al., 2019). Three months later, the mice were killed by euthanasia. The femurs were collected and dissected free of soft tissue, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution, and maintained in PBS until micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) analysis, histomorphometry, and immunohistochemistry (Goldberg and Dixit, 2019).
Osteoclast Differentiation
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) were cultured as described by Schmitz et al. (2015). C57BL/6 mice aged 4 weeks were used to obtain BMMs. Cells from the bone marrow cavity were flushed with PBS and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm at 37°C. After centrifugation, the cells were cultured overnight with 100 ng/ml macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF, 416-ML/CF, R&D, Minneapolis, MN, United States). Next, the unattached cells were gathered and further cultured for 48 h until sufficient BMMs were obtained. Gushukang serum was prepared as described previously (Zhao et al., 2019). Bone marrow-derived macrophages were cultured with 100 ng/ml macrophage colony-stimulating factor and 50 ng/ml receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL, 462-TR/CF, R&D, Minneapolis, MN, United States). Then, they were treated either with a low dose (20 μl/well) or a high dose (200 μl/well) of GSK serum. The osteoclasts were allowed to differentiate for 8 days, following which the effect of the GSK serum was evaluated by Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. An osteoclast was defined as a positively stained cell with more than three nuclei (Berger et al., 2019).
Osteoblast Differentiation
Osteoblasts were cultured as described in a previous study (Yu et al., 2019). The femurs were cut into small pieces and treated with 1 mg/ml collagenase solution, containing collagenase type I and collagenase type II at 1:3 ratio (Worthington, Newark, NJ, United States). Then, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were collected and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States), to which 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, New Zealand) and 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin (Invitrogen) were added. The cells were cultured with 50 μM ascorbic acid, 50 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 nM dexamethasone (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, United States), and GSK serum (a low dose of 200 μl/well or a high dose of 2 ml/well) for 14 days. Next, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution and then stained with 1% Alizarin red S (pH 4.2, Sigma-Aldrich, GmbH, Munich, Germany) for 10 min. After washing with PBS three times, four visual fields were randomly selected and from each slide and analyzed. The volume of mineralized bone nodules was quantified by image J software.
Immunohistochemistry Staining
Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described in previous studies (Albrecht et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2020). Fresh femurs were obtained and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution at 4°C for 24 h, and then they were placed in 10% ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid solution (pH 7.4) and decalcified for 21 days. Next, the bones were embedded in paraffin. Paraffin wax blocks were sliced into longitudinally oriented bone sections with a thickness of 4 μm. Osteocalcin staining was performed to determine the number of osteoblasts and study their surface characteristics. Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase staining was performed to determine the number of osteoclasts and study their surface characteristics. Both the staining kits were purchased from Sigma Company (St. Louis, MO, United States). The distal metaphysic area of each femur was chosen for counting the number of positive-stained cells in four random visual fields from five consecutive sections of each mouse. Then, they were normalized to the number per millimeter in the adjacent bone surface (N mm–1).
Immunofluorescence Staining
Immunofluorescence staining was conducted as described in previous studies (Rached et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2017). Fresh bone tissues were collected and fixed immediately in 4% paraformaldehyde solution at 4°C for 4 h. Subsequently, the bone tissues were placed in 0.5 M ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid solution (pH 7.4) for decalcification at 4°C for 48 h, followed by dehydration with 20% sucrose and 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solution for 1 day until they descended to the bottom. Next, 8% gelatin (porcine; Sigma, G2500), 20% sucrose, and 2% PVP (Sigma, PVP360) were mixed and dissolved with PBS at 60°C. Finally, the tissues were embedded as described above. Forty-micrometer-thick, longitudinally oriented bone sections were sliced and stained with primary antibodies of mouse CD31 (Abcam, ab28364, 1:100) and endomucin (Santa Cruz, V.7C7, 1:50) overnight at 4°C. Next, the sections were incubated with secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 415-605-166, 1:500; 315-545-003, 1:500) at 37°C for 1 h, away from light. Polyclonal goat IgG (R&D Systems, AB-108-C) and monoclonal rat IgG2A (R&D Systems, 54447) were used as negative controls. The specimens were observed using a confocal microscope (FLUOVIEW FV300, Olympus).
Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis
Bone structure was measured by high-resolution micro-CT as described in Mills et al.’s (2016) study. The femurs were scanned at 0.5 mm under the growth plate with a voltage of 70 kV and a current of 154 mA. The following software packages were used for the three-dimensional analysis of bones: image reconstruction software (NRecon v1.6), three-dimensional model visualization software (mCTVol v2.0), and data analysis software (CTAn v1.9). Bone parameters were expressed as trabecular bone volume per tissue volume (Tb. BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb. N), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), and trabecular separation (Tb. Sp).
Western Blotting
Protein levels were measured as described in Stier et al.’s (2018) study. The femurs were ground in a mortar after adding liquid nitrogen. The powders obtained from each bone sample were treated with a 500 μl RIPA buffer for 20 min. After centrifugation, protein lysates were obtained, which were then transferred to SDS at a ratio of 4:1 and boiled at 100°C for 10 min. The lysates were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto a PVDF membrane. After being blocked with milk for 60 min, the membrane was treated with primary antibodies against HIF-1α (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, United States) overnight at 4°C and then incubated with goat antirabbit immunoglobulin (1:2,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h at 37°C. Finally the bands were developed using ELC reagents.
QT-PCR
The femur and tibia were collected from each mice. mRNA levels were determined as described in Walter et al.’s (2014) study. Total RNA was extracted from bone tissues by using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States); this was followed by complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis using a cDNA Kit (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ, United States). QT-PCR was carried out by using a KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, United States) and an ABI PRISM® 7900HT System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States). The primer sequence of HIF-1a was shown as follows: forward (5′–3′) TCTGGAAGGTATGTGGCATT, reverse (5′–3′) AGGGTGGGCAGAACATTTAT. mRNA expression was determined by using the 2–Δ Δ CT method (Ouyang et al., 2018).
Statistical Analysis
All data are shown as mean ± SD for each group. One-way ANOVA was used for analyzing differences among the three groups (groups of control, low-dose, and high-dose GSK treatment) with PRISM, version 7.0 (GraphPad), as described in Wei et al.’s (2014) study. All experiments were conducted more than three times. Differences were considered to be significant only when P < 0.05.
Results
GSK Promoted Bone Formation in Mice
Micro-computed tomography is a commonly used method for the measurement of bone mass density (Hirose et al., 2014). We found that the GSK-treated mice had higher values of bone mineral density (BMD) than the control group mice (Figure 1A). Moreover, mice treated with a low dose of GSK had a lower BMD than mice treated with a high dose of GSK. Important 3D outcomes of micro-CT analysis including BV/TV, Tb.N, and Tb.Th were higher in the GSK treatment groups than in the control group (Figure 1B; P < 0.05). Moreover, these values were lower in the low-dose GSK treatment group than in the high-dose GSK group. In contrast, trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) was lower in the GSK treatment groups (Figure 1B; P < 0.05). These results indicate that GSK treatment had a positive effect on bone formation.
FIGURE 1
GSK Increased Osteoblastogenesis in vivo and in vitro
To determine whether GSK increased bone mass by affecting the process of osteoblastogenesis, we cultured osteoblasts in vitro. Alizarin red staining demonstrated that formation of mineralized bone nodules was increased in cells treated with GSK compared to that in the control cells, and that the formation of additional mineralized bone nodules was dose dependent (Figure 2A). The optical density of the mineralized bone nodules was quantified as illustrated in Figure 2B (P < 0.05). The results obtained in vivo following GSK treatment are consistent with these in vitro results. Immunohistochemistry staining showed that the femurs from GSK-treated mice expressed a higher ratio of osteocalcin (OCN)-positive area surface to bone area than femurs from control mice. Moreover, the high-dose GSK group showed a higher ratio than the low-dose GSK group (Figures 3A,B; P < 0.05). As OCN is an important osteogenic differentiation biomarker (Li et al., 2009), the results indicate that GSK could increase bone mass partly by inducing osteoblast differentiation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
GSK Inhibited Osteoclastogenesis in vivo and in vitro
We next investigated the influence of GSK on the process of osteoclastogenesis. Osteoclasts were induced from BMMs and quantified as shown in Figure 2D (P < 0.05). We observed that the number of osteoclasts was significantly suppressed in the GSK treatment groups, and that this inhibitory capacity increased with increasing doses of GSK (Figure 2C). This observation was subsequently confirmed in vivo, since TRAP-positive osteoclasts were significantly decreased in GSK treatment groups, with high-dose GSK treatment groups showing fewer positive cells than the low-dose groups (Figure 4A). When the ratio of OCs to%BS and the absolute number of OCs were quantified, the GSK treatment groups showed fewer osteoclasts per area than the control groups (Figures 4B,C; P < 0.05). Thus, our findings provide evidence that GSK treatment also increases bone mass by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis.
FIGURE 4
GSK Accelerated Type-H Vessels Formation in Mice
Type-H vessels are associated with the differentiation of perivascular osteoprogenitors and bone formation (Weber et al., 2015). The type-H vessels are characterized as CD31 positive and endomucin positive (Morrison et al., 2014). The GSK treatment groups had more type-H vessels, as revealed by the number of CD31hiEmcnhi endothelial cells, than the control group, and the formation of type-H vessels was higher in the high-dose GSK treatment group than in the low-dose group (Figure 5A). The ratio of type-H vessels to BS% was quantified as shown in Figure 5B (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 5
GSK Promoted the Activation of HIF-1a
The hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is an important transcription factor that is activated under hypoxic conditions (Dai et al., 2019) and during the process of angiogenesis (Zhang et al., 2010). Hypoxia inducible factor-1α expression levels were increased in the GSK treatment groups, and HIF-1α expression was dependent on the GSK dose (Figure 6A; P < 0.05). These results suggest that GSK was able to upregulate the expression of HIF-1α protein. Moreover, when qRT-PCR was performed to assess the mRNA expression levels of HIF-1α, the GSK treatment groups showed higher levels of HIF-1α mRNA expression than the control group, and the high-dose group showed higher mRNA levels than the low-dose group (Figure 6B; P < 0.05). Thus, our data suggest that GSK can induce HIF-1α activation.
FIGURE 6
Discussion
Gushukang, a traditional Chinese herbal medicine, has been used for the treatment of osteoporosis for many years, and the significant effects of this compound have been certified by clinical practices and approved by patients. Li et al. (2001) selected 197 male and female osteoporosis patients, and GSK was either administered (GSK treatment group) or not administered (control group) to patients randomly assigned to these groups (Li et al., 2001). Six months after GSK treatment, while BMD had decreased in the control group, the BMD decrease was slowed, and BMD even increased in some cases, in the GSK-treated group.
Here, we explored the underlying mechanism of GSK action and found that cells in the GSK treatment group demonstrated enhanced osteoblastogenesis during the period of osteoblast differentiation from BMSCs. In addition, the number of osteoclasts in the GSK treatment groups was lower than in the control groups, suggesting that the osteoclastogenesis ability of BMMs was inhibited by GSK. These results were found to be consistent with previous research (Wang et al., 2018). Thus, we conclude that GSK increases osteoblastogenesis and suppresses osteoclastogenesis in vitro.
To further understand the role of GSK in vivo, we evaluated bone mass and bone biochemical markers in mice. Using micro-CT, increased cortical and cancellous bone mass in the GSK treatment group could be inferred from the higher BV/TV, Tb.N, and Tb.Th and the lower Tb.Sp values observed in this group than in the control group. These results suggest that bone anabolism is greater than bone catabolism after GSK treatment, confirming that GSK enhances bone density and bone mass. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, produced by osteoclasts, and OCN, secreted by osteoblasts (Booth et al., 2016; Calvier et al., 2017), levels reflect the activity of osteoclasts and osteoblasts as well as the status of bone resorption and bone formation (Long et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2020). In our study, TRAP and OCN staining results suggest that GSK treatment increased bone mass by activating osteoblasts and suppressing osteoclasts. Thus, bone formation was promoted and bone resorption was inhibited. This result was consistent with the results we obtained in cells, verifying the osteogenesis activity of GSK in vivo.
Type-H vessels are a special subtype of vessel in bone characterized by high levels of endomucin and CD31 expression (Diebold et al., 2015). Type-H vessels have recently been shown to possess the ability to induce angiogenesis and bone formation (Peng et al., 2020). Our results show that GSK-treated mice have more CD31hiEmcnhi vessels than control mice, which suggests that GSK may have increased the abundance of type-H vessels. These results are consistent with the notion that angiogenesis and bone formation are coupled. This is the first study to report a role for GSK in angiogenesis and specifically in the formation of type-H vessels. This newfound action of GSK may find additional application in other diseases.
The mechanism underlying the effect of GSK on type-H vessels and coupling with angiogenesis were further investigated. Previous studies have shown that GSK upregulated calcium-binding protein-28k and the vitamin D receptor (Li et al., 2019), and also Osteirx and Runx2 (Wang et al., 2018). In this study, we reveal that HIF-1α, a factor produced under hypoxic conditions (Baik et al., 2019), may also play a regulatory role, with its overexpression contributing to angiogenesis and osteogenesis (Stegen et al., 2016; Hulea et al., 2018). The results of our western blot analyses show that bones from the GSK treatment group expressed higher HIF-1α protein levels and that this increase was dependent on the GSK dose. Similarly, HIF-1α mRNA levels measured by qRT-PCR were higher in the GSK treatment group than in the control group. These data suggest that GSK treatment may induce formation of type-H vessels and bone formation by enhancing the expression of HIF-1α.
Conclusion
In conclusion, GSK can increase bone mass by promoting bone formation and the formation of the type-H vessels, and by inhibiting bone resorption. These functions may be related to HIF-1α activity. The results of our study may advance new therapeutic treatments for the prevention of osteoporosis.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Subcommittee on Research and Animal Care (SRAC) of Central South University.
Author contributions
TW designed and guided the experiment. WL and XZ carried out the experiment. TJ analyzed the data. WL and HH wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
Gushukang was provided by Liaoningkangchen of China.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AlbrechtS. C.BarataA. G.GrosshansJ.TelemanA. A.DickT. P. (2011). In vivo mapping of hydrogen peroxide and oxidized glutathione reveals chemical and regional specificity of redox homeostasis.Cell Metab.14819–829. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.10.010
2
BaikS. H.KangS.LeeW.ChoiH.ChungS.KimJ. I.et al (2019). A Breakdown in Metabolic reprogramming causes microglia dysfunction in Alzheimers Disease.Cell Metab.30493.e6–507.e6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.005
3
BergerJ. M.SinghP.KhrimianL.MorganD. A.ChowdhuryS.Arteaga-SolisE.et al (2019). Mediation of the acute stress response by the skeleton.Cell Metab.30890.e8–902.e8. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.012
4
BoothF. W.RuegseggerG. N.OlverT. D. (2016). exercise has a bone to pick with skeletal muscle.Cell Metab.23961–962. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.016
5
CalvierL.ChouvarineP.LegchenkoE.HoffmannN.GeldnerJ.BorchertP.et al (2017). PPARgamma Links BMP2 and TGFbeta1 pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells, regulating cell proliferation and glucose metabolism.Cell Metab.251118.e7–1134.e7. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.011
6
CaoQ.ChenX.WuX.LiaoR.HuangP.TanY.et al (2018). Inhibition of UGT8 suppresses basal-like breast cancer progression by attenuating sulfatide-alphaVbeta5 axis.J. Exp. Med.2151679–1692. 10.1084/jem.20172048
7
ChaiS.WanL.WangJ. L.HuangJ. C.HuangH. X. (2019). Gushukang inhibits osteocyte apoptosis and enhances BMP-2/Smads signaling pathway in ovariectomized rats.Phytomedicine64:153063. 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153063
8
ChenH. J.TasS. W.de WintherM. (2020). Type-I interferons in atherosclerosis.J. Exp. Med.217:e20190459. 10.1084/jem.20190459
9
DaiJ.Escara-WilkeJ.KellerJ. M.JungY.TaichmanR. S.PientaK. J.et al (2019). Primary prostate cancer educates bone stroma through exosomal pyruvate kinase M2 to promote bone metastasis.J. Exp. Med.2162883–2899. 10.1084/jem.20190158
10
DieboldI.HennigsJ. K.MiyagawaK.LiC. G.NickelN. P.KaschwichM.et al (2015). BMPR2 preserves mitochondrial function and DNA during reoxygenation to promote endothelial cell survival and reverse pulmonary hypertension.Cell Metab.21596–608. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.03.010
11
FanY.HanaiJ. I.LeP. T.BiR.MaridasD.DeMambroV.et al (2017). Parathyroid hormone directs bone marrow mesenchymal cell fate.Cell Metab.25661–672. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.001
12
GoldbergE. L.DixitV. D. (2019). Bone marrow: an immunometabolic refuge during energy depletion.Cell Metab.30621–623. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.022
13
HayashiM.NakashimaT.YoshimuraN.OkamotoK.TanakaS.TakayanagiH. (2019). Autoregulation of osteocyte sema3a orchestrates estrogen action and counteracts bone aging.Cell Metab.29627.e5–637.e5. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.021
14
HiroseJ.MasudaH.TokuyamaN.OmataY.MatsumotoT.YasuiT.et al (2014). Bone resorption is regulated by cell-autonomous negative feedback loop of Stat5-Dusp axis in the osteoclast.J. Exp. Med.211153–163. 10.1084/jem.20130538
15
HuangY.XiaoY.LiuY.GuoM.GuoQ.ZhouF.et al (2020). MicroRNA-188 regulates aging-associated metabolic phenotype.Aging Cell19:e13077. 10.1111/acel.13077
16
HuleaL.GravelS. P.MoritaM.CargnelloM.UchenunuO.ImY. K.et al (2018). Translational and HIF-1alpha-dependent metabolic reprogramming underpin metabolic plasticity and responses to kinase inhibitors and biguanides.Cell Metab.28817.e8–832.e8. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.001
17
IndranI. R.LiangR. L.MinT. E.YongE. L. (2016). Preclinical studies and clinical evaluation of compounds from the genus Epimedium for osteoporosis and bone health.Pharmacol. Ther.162188–205. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.01.015
18
KondegowdaN. G.FenutriaR.PollackI. R.OrthoferM.Garcia-OcanaA.PenningerJ. M.et al (2015). Osteoprotegerin and denosumab stimulate human beta cell proliferation through inhibition of the receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand pathway.Cell Metab.2277–85. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.021
19
LiC. J.ChengP.LiangM. K.ChenY. S.LuQ.WangJ. Y.et al (2015). MicroRNA-188 regulates age-related switch between osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation.J. Clin. Invest.1251509–1522. 10.1172/JCI77716
20
LiC. J.XiaoY.YangM.SuT.SunX.GuoQ.et al (2018). Long noncoding RNA Bmncr regulates mesenchymal stem cell fate during skeletal aging.J. Clin. Invest.1285251–5266. 10.1172/JCI99044
21
LiH.XieH.LiuW.HuR.HuangB.TanY. F.et al (2009). A novel microRNA targeting HDAC5 regulates osteoblast differentiation in mice and contributes to primary osteoporosis in humans.J. Clin. Invest.1193666–3677. 10.1172/JCI39832
22
LiS. Q.PeiZ. G.LiuY. M. (2001). Clinical study on effect of gushukang granule in preventing and treating primary osteoporosis].Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi21265–268.
23
LiX. L.WangL.BiX. L.ChenB. B.ZhangY. (2019). Gushukang exerts osteopreserve effects by regulating vitamin D and calcium metabolism in ovariectomized mice.J. Bone Miner. Metab.37224–234. 10.1007/s00774-018-0924-1
24
LongJ. Z.SvenssonK. J.TsaiL.ZengX.RohH. C.KongX.et al (2014). A smooth muscle-like origin for beige adipocytes.Cell Metab.19810–820. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.025
25
MillsK. F.YoshidaS.SteinL. R.GrozioA.KubotaS.SasakiY.et al (2016). Long-Term administration of nicotinamide mononucleotide mitigates age-associated physiological decline in mice.Cell Metab.24795–806. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.013
26
MorrisonA. R.YarovinskyT. O.YoungB. D.MoraesF.RossT. D.CeneriN.et al (2014). Chemokine-coupled beta2 integrin-induced macrophage Rac2-Myosin IIA interaction regulates VEGF-A mRNA stability and arteriogenesis.J. Exp. Med.2111957–1968. 10.1084/jem.20132130
27
NeviusE.PinhoF.DhodapkarM.JinH.NadrahK.HorowitzM. C.et al (2015). Oxysterols and EBI2 promote osteoclast precursor migration to bone surfaces and regulate bone mass homeostasis.J. Exp. Med.2121931–1946. 10.1084/jem.20150088
28
NgK. S.KuncewiczT. M.KarpJ. M. (2015). Beyond hit-and-run: stem cells leave a lasting memory.Cell Metab.22541–543. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.019
29
OuyangX.HanS. N.ZhangJ. Y.DioletisE.NemethB. T.PacherP.et al (2018). Digoxin suppresses pyruvate kinase M2-promoted HIF-1alpha transactivation in steatohepatitis.Cell Metab.27:339.e3–350.e3. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.04.007
30
PengY.WuS.LiY.CraneJ. L. (2020). Type H blood vessels in bone modeling and remodeling.Theranostics10426–436. 10.7150/thno.34126
31
RachedM. T.KodeA.XuL.YoshikawaY.PaikJ. H.DepinhoR. A.et al (2010). FoxO1 is a positive regulator of bone formation by favoring protein synthesis and resistance to oxidative stress in osteoblasts.Cell Metab.11147–160. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.01.001
32
RauchA.SeitzS.BaschantU.SchillingA. F.IllingA.StrideB.et al (2010). Glucocorticoids suppress bone formation by attenuating osteoblast differentiation via the monomeric glucocorticoid receptor.Cell Metab.11517–531. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.05.005
33
Rendina-RuedyE.RosenC. J. (2020). Lipids in the bone marrow: an evolving perspective.Cell Metab.31219–231. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.09.015
34
SchettG.BozecA. (2014). Removing the bone brake.Cell Metab.20394–395. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.08.009
35
SchmitzF.RoscioniS.LickertH. (2015). Repurposing an osteoporosis drug for beta cell regeneration in diabetic patients.Cell Metab.2258–59. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.024
36
SpontonC. H.KajimuraS. (2017). Burning fat and building bone by FSH blockade.Cell Metab.26285–287. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.07.018
37
StegenS.van GastelN.EelenG.GhesquiereB.D’AnnaF.ThienpontB.et al (2016). HIF-1alpha promotes glutamine-mediated redox homeostasis and glycogen-dependent bioenergetics to support postimplantation bone cell survival.Cell Metab.23265–279. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.002
38
StierM. T.ZhangJ.GoleniewskaK.CephusJ. Y.RusznakM.WuL.et al (2018). IL-33 promotes the egress of group 2 innate lymphoid cells from the bone marrow.J. Exp. Med.215263–281. 10.1084/jem.20170449
39
SuT.XiaoY.XiaoY.GuoQ.LiC.HuangY.et al (2019). Bone Marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomal MiR-29b-3p regulates aging-associated insulin resistance.ACS Nano132450–2462. 10.1021/acsnano.8b09375
40
WalterK. M.SchonenbergerM. J.TrotzmullerM.HornM.ElsasserH. P.MoserA. B.et al (2014). Hif-2alpha promotes degradation of mammalian peroxisomes by selective autophagy.Cell Metab.20882–897. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.09.017
41
WangQ.ZhaoY.ShaN.ZhangY.LiC.ZhangH.et al (2018). The systemic bone protective effects of Gushukang granules in ovariectomized mice by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and stimulating osteoblastogenesis.J. Pharmacol. Sci.136155–164. 10.1016/j.jphs.2018.01.007
42
WangX.WeiW.KrzeszinskiJ. Y.WangY.WanY. (2015). A liver-bone endocrine relay by IGFBP1 promotes osteoclastogenesis and mediates fgf21-induced bone resorption.Cell Metab.22811–824. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.010
43
WangX. J.LiangR. X.ZhaoL. (2007). [Progress of study on prevention and treatment of osteoporosis by compound Gushukang].Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi27282–285.
44
WeberE. W.HanF.TauseefM.BirnbaumerL.MehtaD.MullerW. A. (2015). TRPC6 is the endothelial calcium channel that regulates leukocyte transendothelial migration during the inflammatory response.J. Exp. Med.2121883–1899. 10.1084/jem.20150353
45
WeiW.MotoikeT.KrzeszinskiJ. Y.JinZ.XieX. J.DechowP. C.et al (2014). Orexin regulates bone remodeling via a dominant positive central action and a subordinate negative peripheral action.Cell Metab.19927–940. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.016
46
WeiW.SchwaidA. G.WangX.WangX.ChenS.ChuQ.et al (2016). Ligand activation of ERRalpha by cholesterol mediates statin and bisphosphonate effects.Cell Metab.23479–491. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.010
47
XiaoY. Z.YangM.XiaoY.GuoQ.HuangY.LiC. J.et al (2020). Reducing hypothalamic stem cell senescence protects against aging-associated physiological decline.Cell Metab31534.e5–548.e5. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.01.002
48
YangM.GuoQ.PengH.XiaoY. Z.XiaoY.HuangY.et al (2019). Kruppel-like factor 3 inhibition by mutated lncRNA Reg1cp results in human high bone mass syndrome.J. Exp. Med.2161944–1964. 10.1084/jem.20181554
49
YangM.LiC. J.SunX.GuoQ.XiaoY.SuT.et al (2017). MiR-497 approximately 195 cluster regulates angiogenesis during coupling with osteogenesis by maintaining endothelial Notch and HIF-1alpha activity.Nat. Commun.8:16003. 10.1038/ncomms16003
50
YuV. W.SaezB.CookC.LotinunS.Pardo-SagantaA.WangY. H.et al (2015). Specific bone cells produce DLL4 to generate thymus-seeding progenitors from bone marrow.J. Exp. Med.212759–774. 10.1084/jem.20141843
51
YuY.NewmanH.ShenL.SharmaD.HuG.MirandoA. J.et al (2019). Glutamine metabolism regulates proliferation and lineage allocation in skeletal stem cells.Cell Metab.29966.e4–978.e4. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.01.016
52
ZhangN.FuZ.LinkeS.ChicherJ.GormanJ. J.ViskD.et al (2010). The asparaginyl hydroxylase factor inhibiting HIF-1alpha is an essential regulator of metabolism.Cell Metab.11364–378. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.001
53
ZhaoY.WangQ.LiuS.WangY.ShuB.ZhaoD. (2019). Preparation Of Gushukang (GSK) granules for in vivo and in vitro experiments.J. Vis. Exp.9:e59171. 10.3791/59171
54
ZhouZ. L.DengY. F.TaoQ. S.HuY. F.HouJ. F. (2009). Effects of Gushukang, a Chinese herbal medicine, on bone characteristics and osteoporosis in laying hens.Poult Sci.882342–2345. 10.3382/ps.2009-00285
Summary
Keywords
Gushukang, bone mass, bone formation, type-H vessel, HIF-1α
Citation
Li W, Zhou X, Jiang T, He H and Wen T (2020) Positive Effect of Gushukang on Type-H Vessel and Bone Formation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8:265. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00265
Received
19 January 2020
Accepted
30 March 2020
Published
21 May 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Chao Liang, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong
Reviewed by
ZhenLin Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China; Weiguo Zou, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Li, Zhou, Jiang, He and Wen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ting Wen, tingwen163@126.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Molecular Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.