Abstract
Gastric epithelium operates in a hazardous environment that curtails the lifespan of the constituent cells, imposing a requirement for continuous epithelial renewal. Stem cells that reside in the stomach are thus essential for regulating physiological tissue renewal and injury repair because of their self-renewal, high proliferation capacity and multiple differentiation potentials. Recent investigations using lineage tracing models have identified diverse populations of gastric stem cells and even fully differentiated cells that can regain stem cell capacity, so enriching our understanding on the identity and plasticity of gastric stem cells. These cell populations include the Villin promotor, Lgr5+, CCKR2+, Axin2+ and AQP5+ stem cells in the antrum, TFF2 mRNA, Mist1+ cells and Troy+ mature chief cells in the corpus, as well as Sox2, eR1, Lrig1, Bmi1-marked cell in both the antrum and the corpus. Establishment of gastric organoids derived from primary gastric tissues and pluripotent stem cells or embryonic stem cells characterizes niche factors required by the gastric stem cell populations, and further provides new insights into stomach development, host-Helicobacter pylori interactions and malignant transformation. Furthermore, focus on the gastric stem cells and their niches uncovers the initiation of stomach precancerous lesions and origin of gastric cancer, providing options for cancer prevention and intervention. In summary, with the development of stem cell research, gastric stem cells give us more opportunities to prevent and treat stomach diseases.
Introduction
The stomach epithelium is a hazardous environment that curtails the lifespan of constituent cells, imposing a requirement for continuous renewal of epithelium. Stems cells in our gut are, thus, essential for epithelial regeneration and damage repair owing to their ability for self-renewal, high proliferation capacity and potential for multiple differentiation. Gastric stem cells, a group of adult stem cells residing in the stomach, play a key role in maintaining the dynamic homeostasis of the gastric epithelium (). In recent years, advances have been made in the investigation of molecular markers identifying gastric stem cells. In addition, in vitro gastric stem cell models have been established, revealing the role of these cells in physiology and pathology. Although some sporadic reviews on this topic have been published in past years (; ), this present review aim to provide fresh and profound insights into stomach stem cells from physiological and pathological perspectives.
Properties of Gastric Stem Cells
Stems cells are a group of cells defined by their ability of self- renewal and multi-potency, which can be divided into embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells in terms of their development stage. Tissue-resident adult stem cells are a small population of adult stem cells, these specialized cells are particular important in the epithelium lining of the alimentary tracts and skin that require constant dynamic replacement of the epithelial population (). More importantly, given their ability of directional differentiation, tissue-resident stem cells are responsible for tissue homeostasis, injury repair, and even cancer development.
Gastric stem cells represent an adult stem cell population residing in the stomach tissues with high proliferative potential, which enables efficient stomach epithelium regeneration and repair. Following the comprehensive investigation of intestinal stems cells, the identity of gastric stem cells is being explored. In comparison with intestinal stems cells, gastric stem cells share many properties, but they differ in fundamental aspects regarding location, molecular cell markers and their specific growth niches.
Identity of Gastric Stem Cells
Location of Gastric Stem Cells
The mucosa in all parts of the human stomach is lined by a simple columnar epithelium that has numerous tubular invaginations in its lamina propria. These invaginations, termed gastric units, consists of a pit, isthmus, neck and the base regardless of different anatomical zone, although their cellular composition varies with the region of the stomach in which they are located (; ). Five types of differentiated mature cells, namely surface mucus cells, mucus neck cells, parietal cells, chief cells, enteroendocrine cells (including G cells, D cells, and ECL cells) and tuft cells, make up gastric glands. However, the mesenchymal compartment surrounding the glands is less studied and little understood. A schematic diagram depicting the structure and cell type of gastric glands in different regions is presented in Figure 1. Under physiological conditions, gastric epithelial cells undergo continuous dynamic renewal within as little as 3 days (). Consequently, gastric epithelial stem cells are essential for the regeneration of lost or damaged cells in stomach mucosa. An understanding of the location of adult stem cells in the stomach is, therefore, important to explore their function.
FIGURE 1
Previous studies, using nucleotide incorporation assays and ultrastructural analysis, have demonstrated that the isthmus might be the pool of stem-like cells in an adult stomach (; ; ). This group of cells produces descendants that undergo a complex bi-directional migration toward pit and base. However, direct evidence, describing their route of differentiation and migration, remains elusive. Then, , for the first time, used transgenic mice expressing a bacterial gene for β-galactosidase (lacZ) under a Rosa26 promotor (for visualization) and random chemical mutagenesis to demonstrate the existence of long-lived committed progenitors or stem cells in gastric epithelium. Cells at the base of the gastric glands were further identified as a second stem cell pool and were capable of self-renewing and differentiating. In addition, the emergence of lineage tracing models has made it possible for us to define the direction of differentiation of stomach stem cells in specific anatomic regions under normal or abnormal conditions.
Gastric Stem Cell Marker Candidates
In early studies, the identity of potential stem cells in the stomach was mainly based on their presumed morphological characteristics and cell proliferation kinetics. With the application of lineage tracing approaches combined with in situ hybridization or immunohistostaining, an array of biomarkers is being proposed for characterizing the population of adult stem cells in different anatomic regions of the stomach (Figure 1).
In the antral and pyloric glands, several markers are identified to be specific to this zone. Villin promotor is an epithelial cell-specific, calcium-regulated actin-binding protein that modulates reorganization of microvillar actin filaments. Qiao et al. showed that Villin promotor-marked cells represent a highly quiescent stem cell that only becomes apparent upon stimulation by interferon γ (Qiao et al., 2007). This group of stem cells is mainly located in the third part of the glands, with lineage tracing showing that they can differentiate into all types of cells in the antral glands. Lgr5 (leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5) is a widely-accepted marker of stem cells in the gastrointestinal tract (). Baker et al. demonstrated that Lgr5+ cells at the very base of pyloric glands were long-term, self-renewing and multipotent stem cells, responsible for maintaining gastric epithelial homeostasis (). They could differentiate into surface mucus cells, enteroendocrine cells and parietal cells. Lgr5 expression was also found in a subpopulation of chief cells at the antral base, where these Lgr5+ chief cells functioned as damage-induced stem cells for gland regeneration following injury (). In this same zone, a group of cells is Axin2+/Lgr5– stem cells that can give rise to Lgr5+ cells (Sigal et al., 2017). They are characterized by a high proliferation rate in the dependence of Wnt agonist-R spondin. Cholecystokinin type-B receptor (CCK2R)-positive cells are another set of stem cells which does not overlap with Lgr5+ cell population at the antral gastric units, and treatment with progastrin interconverts CCKR2+ Lgr5neg or low antral stem cells into typical antral Lgr5high cells that expand the active stem cells in the antrum (). More recently, AQP5 expressing populations are identified to overlap with Lgr5+ stem cells at the base of pyloric gland, where this population of stems cells comprises the pyloric lineages expressing Muc5AC, gastric intrinsic factor, gastrin and chromogranin A (Tan et al., 2020).
In contrast to the antral glands, TFF2 (trefoil factor family 2) transcript, Mist1 and Troy (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19) may be as the candidate of the adult stem cell markers in the oxygenic mucosa. Lineage tracing demonstrated that TFF2 mRNA-expressing cells above the neck region are the progenitors for mucus neck, parietal and chief cells but not for pit or ECL cell lineages in the corpus (Quante et al., 2010), while TFF2 protein is mainly expressed and secreted by mucus neck cells and deep antral gland mucus cells under normal condition (). Within the corpus isthmus, Mist1+/Lgr5– cells are also capable of giving rise to surface mucus cells, mucus neck cells, parietal cells, tuft cells and ECL cells (; Nienhüser et al., 2020). In vitro, Mist1+ isthmus cells can form corpus organoids, but Mist1+ chief cells remain single (). This evidence suggests that isthmus Mist1+ cells play a critical role in differentiation of corpus glands. In contrast to those with the properties of stemness and self-renewal, a subgroup of fully differentiated cells has been found capable of regaining stem cell capacity. Troy+ differentiated chief cells at the base of gastric corpus units are considered reserve quiescent stem cells that display plasticity in that they are capable of re-entering the cell cycle to give rise to all gastric units (Stange et al., 2013). This result provides the evidence that differentiated cells in the stomach also participate in maintaining epithelial renewal and homeostasis through dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation.
Some biomarkers are shared among gastric stem cells in both pyloric and corpus glands. Sox2 (Sex-determining region Y box protein 2)-positive cells are found in both the pylorus and corpus of the glandular stomach in mice, although no apparent overlap exists with Lgr5+ cells in the pylorus (). Cells labeled by eR1 (a Runx1 enhancer element) in the isthmus of corpus and the base of pyloric gland are reported to be involved in tissue regeneration and continuously give rise to mature cells that maintain gastric units (). Lrig1 (Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domain 1)-marked cells are known to give rise to daughter cells, and Lrig1-expressing isthmal cells can contribute to the regeneration of parietal cells following acute gastric injury (). Bmi1-expressing cells in the isthmus of gastric antrum and corpus also provide progeny bipolarly toward luminal and basal sides, although it is not clear whether they are colocalized with other reported stem cells (Yoshioka et al., 2019). These candidate markers mentioned above and their relevant studies are concisely summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1
| Markers | Location pattern | Differentiation by lineage tracing | Physiological characteristics | Organoid formation |
| Villin promotor (Qiao et al., 2007) | At or below the isthmus in the bottom third of pyloric glands | Mucus neck cells, mucus gland cells, parietal cells, enteroendocrine cells | Do not contribute to epithelial renewal under normal homeostatic conditions; respond to interferon γ | No |
| Lgr5 (; Stange et al., 2013; ) | Base of pyloric glands, a subpopulation of chief cells | Surface mucous cells, parietal cells, enteroendocrine cells | Maintain epithelial renewal in pyloric regions under normal homeostatic conditions; Lgr5+ adult stem cells originate from fetal Lgr5+ progenitors; neonate Lgr5+ cells contribute to the development of mature gastric epithelium in both pylorus and corpus regions; respond to Wnt agonist R-spondin; Be activated by acetylcholine-producing tuft cells through muscarinic receptor subtype 3 | Yes |
| TFF2 mRNA (Quante et al., 2010) | Isthmus of corpus gland | Mucous neck cells, chief cells, parietal cells | Amplified by DMP-777 (chemicals inducing acute parietal cells loss); not the cell of origin for SPEM | No |
| Sox2 () | Base of pyloric and corpus gland | Surface mucous cells, chief cells, parietal cells, enteroendocrine cells | Half of the Sox2+ cells is quiescent under homeostatic conditions; early Sox2+ fetal progenitor are the precursors for Sox2+ adult stem cells; no overlap with Lgr5+ cells in the pylorus | No |
| Troy (Stange et al., 2013) | Differentiated chief cells at the base of corpus gland | Surface mucous cells, mucous neck cells, chief cells, parietal cells, enteroendocrine cells | A reserve stem cell population; Wnt-driven stem cells | Yes |
| Mist1 (; Nienhüser et al., 2020) | Isthmus of corpus gland | Surface mucous cells, mucous neck cells, parietal cells, enteroendocrine cells, tuft cells | Most Mist1+ stem cells in isthmus are quiescent under normal condition; kras mutation promotes Mist1+ stem cells proliferation and division; give rise to the entire gland in the response to gastric injury caused by acute damage and chronic inflammation | Yes |
| CCK2R () | Above the Lgr5+ cells (+ 4) at the base of antral gland | Surface mucus cells, G cells, D cells, tuft cells | No overlap with Lgr5+ stem cells; more rapid cycling than Lgr5+ cells; CCK2R+Lgr5neg or low cells can convert to Lgr5high cells following progastrin treatment; gastrin secreted from antral G cells regulates CCK2R+ stem cell function in a paracrine manner | Yes |
| eR1 () | Isthmus in the corpus gland, base of antral gland | Surface mucous cells, mucous neck cells, chief cells, parietal cells | Maintain the integrity of gastric units; play a role in tissue regeneration following tamoxifen treatment | Yes |
| Axin2 (Sigal et al., 2017) | Base and lower isthmus of antral gland | Surface mucous cells, mucous neck cells, enteroendocrine cells, tuft cells | Overlap with Lgr5+ stem cells; repopulation time from Axin2+ cells are rapid than Lgr5 + cells; Axin2+Lgr5– cells can give rise to Lgr5+ cells; high proliferation rate of Axin2+ cells depend on Wnt agonist R spondin | Yes |
| Lrig1 () | Isthmus and base in the corpus and antral gland | Surface mucous cells, mucous neck cells, chief cells, parietal cells, G cells, tuft cells | Early Lrig1+ fetal progenitor are the precursors for Lrig1+ adult stem cells; reconstitutes gastric epithelium after acute oxyntic atrophy Do not give rise to metaplasia lineage | No |
| Bmi1 (Yoshioka et al., 2019) | Isthmus of pyloric and corpus gland | Surface mucous cells, mucous neck cells, chief cells, enteroendocrine cells, tuft cells | No overlap with Lgr5+ or eR1+ cells; provide progeny bidirectionally toward both the luminal and basal sides in the antrum and corpus; be required for the homeostasis and regeneration of gastric epithelium | Yes |
| AQP5 (Tan et al., 2020) | Base of pyloric gland | Surface mucous cells, parietal cells, enteroendocrine cells | Overlap with Lgr5+ populations | Yes |
Gastric stems cells labeled by candidate markers.
Lgr5 leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5, TFF2 trefoil factor 2, Sox2 sex-determining region Y box protein 2, CCK2R cholecystokinin type-B receptor, Lrig1 leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1, AQP5 aquaporin 5.
Current available studies reveal a varying pattern in locations of gastric stem cells across different anatomical regions, indicating the complicated nature of gastric gland organization (Table 2). A recent study using lineage-tracing assays confirmed that gastric corpus gland is compartmentalized, with isthmus and base zones supported by two separate independent groups of stem cell, suggesting their specific molecular identity and functional behavior (). Future studies will be warranted to define the true identity and origin of stem cells in different regions, and unveil their specific roles in gastric mucosa homeostasis.
TABLE 2
| Pyloric gland | Corpus gland | |
| Cell location | Isthmus, Gland base | Isthmus, Gland base, certain differentiated cells (chief cells) |
| Morphology | No evidence | No evidence |
| Direction of differentiation | Stem cells derived clones expand bidirectionally for isthmus stem cells. For stem cells at the gland base, they migrating upward from the basal zone | Stem cells derived clones expand bidirectionally for isthmus stem cells. For stem cells at the gland base, they migrating upward from the basal zone |
| Molecular markers | Isthmus: Villin promotor, Lrig1, Bmi1 Gland base: Lgr5, SOX2, CCK2R, eR1, Axin2, AQP5 | Isthmus: TFF2 mRNA, Mist1, eR1, Lrig1, Bmi1 Gland base: SOX2, TFF2, Lrig1, Troy+ chief cells |
| Offspring | Surface mucous cells, Mucous gland cells, G cells, Tuft cells | Surface mucous cells, Mucous neck cells, parietal cells, ECL cells |
| Known niche factors | Wnt, Notch, Gastrin, Ach, EGF, FGF10 | Wnt, BMPs, Shh, innate lymphoid cells, endothelial cells, EGF, FGF10 |
Comparison of gastric stem cells in the antrum and corpus.
Lgr5 leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein coupled receptor 5, TFF2 trefoil factor 2, Sox2 sex-determining region Y box protein 2, CCK2R cholecystokinin type-B receptor, Lrig1 leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1, AQP5 aquaporin 5, Ach acetylcholine, EGF epidermal growth factor, FGF10 fibroblast growth factor 10, BMPs bone morphogenetic proteins, Shh sonic hedgehog.
Gastric Stem Cells and Their Niche
A specific microenvironment is the key determinant to regulate biological behavior of stem cells. The niches consist of stem, stroma, and immune cells, as well as various growth signals, and extracellular matrices. Interactions between these components, therefore, contribute to proliferation of stem cells and directional differentiation. In the setting of gastric stem cell niche (Figure 3), little is known because of the complexity of gastric glands in different regions.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
Some of the major regulators of gastric stem cell proliferation and differentiation include sonic hedgehog (Shh) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) signaling pathways. These have been found to exert important effects on gastrointestinal development and differentiation (; Todisco, 2017). In the human stomach, Shh expression is restricted to the parietal cells and the glandular portion (van den Brink et al., 2001), where it controls epithelial cell proliferation and serves as a polarizing signal for fundic gland differentiation partially through autocrine (van den Brink et al., 2001, 2002). BMPs are regulatory peptides that are mainly secreted from interstitial myofibroblast-like cells (van den Brink et al., 2001; Takabayashi et al., 2014), the isthmus and neck of the glands are the targeted location receiving BMPs-generated signals (Takabayashi et al., 2014). A series studies have indicated that dysregulation of BMP signaling in the stomach can lead to perturbations of normal homeostatic mechanisms of the gastric mucosa, resulting in developing metaplasia, dysplasia and even neoplasia (Todisco, 2017). Notch signaling is another important signal in this microenvironment (). Activation of this pathway directly regulates proliferation of Lgr5+ antral stem cells via NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 receptors, but results in a decrease in antral cellular differentiation (; ). In the gastric antrum, therefore, Notch might affect the balance between stem cell proliferation and differentiation and maintain homeostasis of gastric epithelium. Thus, abnormal activation of Notch signals can promote the transformation of gastric stem cells to cancer stem cells (). Additionally, growth factors, such as Wnt, fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) (), and epidermal growth factor (EGF), also play an important role in regulation of self-renewal of gastric stem cells. The Wnt signaling pathway is essential in maintaining the undifferentiated state of progenitor cells in the isthmus region of the gastric corpus, but its activation increases the number of progenitor cells in antrum (Oshima et al., 2006). Antral Lgr5+ stem cells are supported and activated by Wnt signaling via at least in part a Frizzled-7 receptor (), corpus Mist1+ isthmus stem cells can also be activated in part through Wnt 5a pathway (Nienhüser et al., 2020). Wnt pathway activation in gastric stem cells have reported to be associated with gastric carcinogenesis in mice (Oshima et al., 2006; Radulescu et al., 2013).
Though the mesenchymal compartment surrounding the glands is less studied and little understood, immune or stroma cells residing in gastric epithelium also provide an additional environment for gastric stem cells. Cxcl12+ endothelial cells and Cxcr4+ innate lymphoid cells contributed to the corpus stem cell niche partly through production of Wnt5a from innate lymphoid cells (). Furthermore, as described above, R-spondin 3 secreted from myofibroblasts is an important component for the antral stem cell niches, and thus predominantly activating Axin2+/Lgr5– stem cells (Sigal et al., 2017). Gastrointestinal hormones, such as gastrin and acetylcholine (Ach), may also play unique roles in the antral stem cell niche. Gastrin is secreted from G cells residing near the antral isthmus region, and CCK2R is the receptor of gastrin and its precursor form-progastrin under normal condition. As aforementioned, CCK2R+ stem cells have been discovered in this same zone, and progastrin can stimulate the proliferation of CCK2R-expressing stem cells but gastrin dose not (). Ach generated from tuft cells in gastric epithelium regulates gastric epithelial proliferation and regeneration, as well as the clonal expansion of Lgr5+ stem cells via the muscarinic receptor subtype 3 (M3R) (Zhao et al., 2014; ).
Despite the importance of these growth factors and cell components in gastric stem cell niches, the identity of cells providing this niche factors and their interactions remain elusive. Meanwhile, knowledge about the niches surrounding the base of corpus gland is also not clear. Further efforts are needed to characterize the various components involved in the gastric stem cells niche and thus in gastric stem cell biology, in order to elucidate their roles in the regulation of gastric epithelium homeostasis.
In vitro Models of Gastric Stem Cells
Regarding the importance of these niche factors, in vitro reconstitution of this specific niche has led to the development of gastric stem cell culture. Some simplified techniques have been developed to build in vitro models to investigate stomach stem cells. For instance, Yang et al. built a gastric epithelial cell clone (named KMU-GI2) with sustained growth in a low-calcium medium supplemented with N-acetyl-L-cysteine and L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Yang et al., 2007). These clones were characterized by high proliferation and differentiation potential, ability of anchorage-independent growth, gap junctional intercellular communication as well as Oct4 expression (one of the key markers of adult stem cells). Recently, performed in vitro culture of adult gastric mucosal cells within a medium rich in growth factors such as EGF, FGF, and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). They observed that gastric spherical clones on the surface of gastric fibroblasts grow in a single layer. Those spherical cells harbored molecular markers capable of spontaneously differentiating and were unique to gastric stem cells. Nonetheless, these above models cannot achieve pure and long-lived culture in vitro after a number of cells divisions, and whether the identity of stem cells would be changed or not in this culture system is not well determined.
With the deepening understanding of the signals that govern stem cell self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation, tissue-specific organoid models were established successfully, allowing for extensive experimentation with stem cells and their niches (). In 2010, , firstly, found that gastric Lgr5+ cell isolated from the gastric glands of Lgr5-EGFP-ires-CreERT2 mice were capable of generating a single-layered epithelial structure, that was then called the gastric organoid. This in vitro culture system partially recapitulates the microenvironment of stomach stem cells in the body, and contains all necessary niche factors, including EGF, Noggin, R-spondin, Wnt3A, FGF10, and gastrin (ENRWFG). Specifically, these growth factors supplied in this system act different effects. EGF sustains the continuous self-renewal and proliferation of stem cells and long-term culture (; ). Noggin, an antagonist of BMPs, inhibits differentiation and induces an expansion of bud-domain. R-spondin and Wnt3A are the activators of Wnt pathway that promote growth and inhibits differentiation. FGF10 drives budding event and expansion of multiunit organoids. Gastrin has a mitogenic effect on gastric cells. The same group, further, developed a long-term culture system of human gastric organoids using surgical samples from gastric corpus (Figure 2A; ). Cultures from different anatomical regions of the stomach maintain the specific molecular characteristics of their site of origin, and the model conserves stable genetic characteristics and biological behaviors of stem cells during long-term culture. In addition to those growth factors we mentioned above (ENRWFG), nicotinamide (also named vitamin B3) and TGF-β inhibitor (A83-01) are necessary in culture human gastric organoids (ENRWFGNiTi), due to its role in promoting initial organoid formation and extending the life span of organoid, respectively (). Besides, ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 is an optional supplement that can avoid anoikis in the early culture time (Schlaermann et al., 2016). Further, gastric organoids described above can be directed into pit-type organoids with the withdrawal of Wnt activator (). Pit-type gastric organoids undergo changes in morphology (become more cystic with less bud domain) and molecular markers (increased Muc5AC, decreased PGC and MUC6). Applying this culture system, subsequent studies from different research groups have successfully established different gastric organoid models using various marker-labeled gastric stem cells as mentioned above (Troy+, Mist1+, CCK2R+, eR1+, Axin2+, Bmi1+, and AQP5+ stem cells) (Table 1). Key points that can be applied to confirm the formation of gastric organoid are summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3
| Index | Description | Method |
| Morphology | A sealed glandular lumen | Inverted microscope |
| Gland-domain buds surrounding a central lumen | Inverted microscope | |
| Single layer epithelial structure | E-cadherin staining/confocal microscope | |
| Self-renewal capacity | Detection of proliferating cells located at the base of the gland-like domain | EdU staining/fluorescence microscope |
| Positive for stem cell markers: Lgr5, CD44, OLFM4 | Immunofluorescence/confocal microscope/PCR | |
| Expression of gastric-specific markers | Positive: Organoid form Antrum: Muc5AC (surface mucous cell),TFF1 (surface mucous cell), PAS (surface mucous cell), Muc6 (mucus gland cell), SST (endocrine cell), Gastrin, PDX1 Organoid from Corpus: Muc5AC (surface mucous cell),TFF1 (surface mucous cell), PAS (surface mucous cell), GIF (parietal cell), PGC (chief cell), Muc6 (mucus gland cell), TFF2 (mucous neck cell), SST (endocrine cell) Negative for intestinal markers: Muc2, CDX1/2 | PCR, immunofluorescence |
Key points to confirm the formation of gastric organoids.
EdU 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine, Lgr5 leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor, OLFM4 Olfactomedin 4, Muc 5AC mucin 5AC, PAS Periodic acid-Schiff, GIF gastric intrinsic factor, PGC pepsinogen C, Muc 6 mucin 6, TFF1 trefoil factor 1, TFF2 trefoil factor 2, SST somatostatin, PDX1 pancreatic and duodenal homeobox1, Muc2 mucin 2, CDX1/2 caudal-type homeobox 1/2, PCR polymerase chain reaction.
In contrast to gastric organoid directly derived from stomach tissues, McCracken reported de novo generation of organoids from directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), through manipulation of stem cell niches targeting the FGF, Wnt, BMP, RA (retinoic acid) and EGF pathways (Figure 2B; ). A detailed protocol for the generation of human antral and fundic gastric organoids from PSCs can refer to Broda TR’s method (). Another research group established a method for generating stomach primordium-like spheroids (named e-ST) from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (Figure 2C; Noguchi et al., 2015). These spheroids were found to differentiate into mature stomach tissue cells in both the corpus and antrum in a three-dimensional culture system. Gastric organoids generated from PSCs or ESCs are, therefore, a valuable adjunct to in vitro studies of human stomach development.
Organoid culture system is a powerful method, but it is important to note its limitation. Current gastric organoids are unable to fully model the in vivo environment due to the lack of other cell components (such as mesenchymal cells and immune cells) which also exert an important role in stem cell niches, though coculture organoids with other cells type is a feasible and alternative approach. Considering the high cost of cultivation maintenance, it has become more common to culture organoids in medium with niche factors produced by various cell lines than to use commercial products; thus, experimental variation between scientific groups is inevitable.
Role of Gastric Stem Cells in Stomach Diseases
The stomach is the most important organ within the gastrointestinal tract, it not only initiates the digestive process but also as a first line of defense against food-borne microbes (). Stomach diseases, such as gastritis, peptic ulcer, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and gastric cancer, bothers a lot of people in the world. Gastritis is defined as any histologically confirmed inflammation of the gastric mucosa, and its epidemiology overlaps that of H. pylori infection. Longstanding mucosal inflammation leads to the loss of resident gland and the replacement of normal gland by inappropriate glandular unites, which terms as atrophy and metaplasia, respectively. Gastric atrophy and metaplasia are widely recognized as the precursor change for gastric carcinogenesis (; ). With regard to gastric cancer, it is the third leading cause of cancer mortality in the world and remains a major health threat in Asia-Pacific regions (; ). However, the mechanism behind gastric carcinogens is still undetermined. Thus, it is clinically important to understand the role of stem cells in stomach diseases. Currently, relevant studies mainly focus on H. pylori-associated gastritis and gastric cancer (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4
H. pylori Infection
Long-term infection of H. pylori is one of the key causes of stomach cancer. This might be attributed to persistent mucosal inflammation, epigenetic modification of oncogenes or antioncogenes, and activation of oncogenic signaling pathways following H. pylori infection (; ). In addition to its known damage to differentiated gastric epithelium, available studies have reported that H. pylori infection also disturbed homeostasis in the gastric stem cells niche, leading to malignant transformation.
In both mice model and human specimens infected with H. pylori, bacteria microcolonies could be visualized in the neck region and base of gastric antral glands. Gland-colonized bacteria directly accelerated Lgr5+ gastric stem cell-derived gland turnover at the early stage after infection in the dependence of CagA island (Sigal et al., 2015). The same group further revealed that in addition to directly acting on gastric stem cells, H. pylori infection increased expression of gastric myofibroblasts-derived R-spondin 3 expression and expanded the Axin2+/Lgr5– cell pool to cause hyperproliferation and gland hyperplasia (Sigal et al., 2017). However, it should be noted that an increase in R-spondin 3 from myofibroblasts was also important to restrict bacteria colonization and promote mucosal regeneration (Sigal et al., 2019). Additionally, apoptotic suppression induced by H. pylori CagA via MEK/ERK pathway also contributed to impaired self-renewal of the gastric epithelium (). On the other hand, it is well established that long-term infection of H. pylori induces a variety of histological changes in gastric mucosa, including oxyntic atrophy, metaplasia and dysplasia. Spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM) is proposed to encompass TFF2 (trefoil factor family 2)-expressing metaplasia, which is linked to mucosal injury associated with parietal and chief cell lose. Recent study documented that during chronic inflammation induced by this bacterium, some chief cells arising from Lrig1+ populations might contribute to SPEM development (Wroblewski et al., 2019). Collectively, the imbalance between gastric epithelial turnover and stem cells differentiation triggers the development of H. pylori-associated diseases.
In vitro assays with gastric organoid, microinjection of H. pylori was used for fundamental studies of H. pylori pathogenesis. Upregulation of NF-κB-driven inflammatory response was observed in H. pylori infected-organoids (; ; Schumacher et al., 2015), which validated previous results from immortalized gastric cancer cell lines. Meanwhile, in this gastroid system, Wroblewski reported that activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in a H. pylori CagA-dependent manner contributed to mis-localization of tight junction proteins (Claudin-7), leading to disrupted barrier function (Wroblewski et al., 2015). Additionally, application of gastric organoid/immune cell (cytotoxic T lymphocytes and dendritic cells) co-culture system further demonstrated the protective role of programmed death ligand (PD-L1) expression in gastric epithelium in response to H. pylori-induced immune injury (). Instead of 3D culture system, organoid-derived primary gastric epithelial cells cultured in collagen-coated dish (containing EGF, nicotinamide, Y-27632 and A83-01) were more easier to handle H. pylori infection without the usage of microinjection (Schlaermann et al., 2016). Therefore, these organoid models greatly simulate the interactions between H. pylori and the gastric epithelium or microenvironment, and provide opportunity to uncover mechanisms of malignant transformation induced by this bacterium.
Gastric Carcinogenesis
Gastric carcinogenesis is a multi-step process, which is correlated to host factors, environmental factors and some specific microbiotas (Tan and Yeoh, 2015; Schulz et al., 2019). Understanding the cells of origin involved in gastric cancer is of clinical significance for guiding development of effective strategies to prevent and treat this disease.
Gastric cancer is classified into intestinal, diffused and mixed types (Lauren classification) based on histological morphology of tumors (). Intestinal-type carcinoma undergoes non-atrophic gastritis, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and eventually forms cancer (known as Correa cascade) (). Metaplasia of the stomach, including spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM) and intestinal metaplasia (IM), is the tissue injury adaptation and a precursor to the dysplasia (). Cell populations contributing to SPEM formation is partially understood. Some evidence indicate a link between SPEM development and mucus neck cells, chief cell transdifferentiation and even the isthmus stem cells in the corpus (; ; ). During IM, expression of stem cell marker-Sox2 is reduced while intestinal marker (Cdx1 and Cdx2) emerges ectopically (Tsukamoto et al., 2004); and lineage tracing by following mutations in mitochondria DNA demonstrates the clonal expansion of IM by fission (). These findings raise the possibility that IM might be the consequence of abnormal differentiation in stem cells that can produce both gastric- and intestinal-type cells. Additionally, the stability and durability of metaplasia also propose that it might be maintained by a self-renewing stem cell. Regarding dysplastic lesions, more recent studies have shown that they were genetically related to metaplastic glands, indicating the clonal origin of dysplasia from metaplasia by field cancerization (). For diffuse-type gastric cancer, histopathological analyses also have shown that early hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) (with CDH1 mutation) seems to lie within the upper neck of the gastric epithelium (). These available evidence supports the implicit assumption that gastric cancer might arise from gastric stem cells that have potential for multi-directional differentiation potential.
Subsequent studies are identifying some candidate cells from which stomach cancer might originate. As earlier described, Lgr5+ gastric stem cells at the base of the antrum in lesser curvature that is a frequent anatomical site for human gastric cancer give rise to all types of epithelial cells. Thus, gastric stem cells in this region might be the potential origin of stomach cancer. Results from a TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) database analysis and immunohistologic staining revealed that intestinal adenocarcinomas of the gastric antrum and gastroesophageal junction were accompanied by the expansion of Lgr5 (Uehara et al., 2013). Ablation of Apc (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene in Lgr5-expressing cells leads to macroscopic adenomas and intramucosal well-differentiated carcinoma (). In line with this, antral stem cells expressing Sox2 or Mist1 may be among the gastric cancer origin cells in the context of Apc loss (Sarkar et al., 2016; Sakitani et al., 2017). Subsequent research identified that progression from microadenoma and macroscopic adenoma to invasive intestinal-type gastric cancer in Lgr5+ gastric stem cells were accompanied with the deletion of Smad4 and Pten in the gastric antrum, while Smad4 and Pten deletions in differentiated cells (including antral pit, parietal and corpus Lgr5+ chief cells) failed to initiate tumor growth (). However, whether Lgr5 expressing cells in acid-secreting corpus region are cancer cell origin is to be debatable. One study indicated that Lgr5+ cells were not the origin for SPEM following the treatment with DMP-777 or L-635 (two chemicals inducing acute loss of parietal cells) (Nam et al., 2012). But, inflammation and inhibition of BMP signaling induced activation of Lgr5+ cell in this anatomic region can lead to the development of metaplastic and dysplastic epithelial cell lineages (Ye et al., 2018). Leushacke et al. also found that a subpopulation of chief cells expressing Lgr5 functioned as damage-inducible stems cells effecting gland regeneration following injury and as a source of SPEM under the constitutive activation of Kras (). Besides Lgr5+ cells, Klf-4 (Kruppel-like factor 4) disruption or PPARD (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta) overexpression in Villin promoter-expressing stem cells spontaneously result in gastric carcinogenesis (; Zuo et al., 2019), CCK2R+ cells potentially explains the gastrin-mediated effects on gastric cancer progression (). More recently, AQP5+ stem cells are identified as a source of Wnt-driven gastric cancer, and AQP5+ tumor cells could reproducibly generate organoids in the absence of exogenous growth factors, indicating the stem potential of this cell populations (Tan et al., 2020). For gastric cancer occurred in the corpus, Mist1+ isthmus stem cells can serve as an origin. In combination with Helicobacter species infection, deletion of Cdh1 gene in Mist1+ isthmus stem cells is able to generate diffuse-type gastric cancer; whereas intestinal-type adenocarcinoma can be induced by ablation of Aps along with Kras mutation in this group of cells (). Another two groups of stem cells labeled by TFF2 mRNA and Lrig1, respectively, do not give rise to metaplasia linage in the corpus (Quante et al., 2010; ).
Regarding the development of neuroendocrine tumors in the stomach, enteroendocrine cells, especially the ECL cells, are generally regarded as the cell origin (Waldum and Fossmark, 2018). As stated before, some stem cells contribute to the production of enteroendocrine cells in the gastric epithelium (Table 1), but whether these stem cells can directly give rise to neuroendocrine tumors is not well determined. For example, results from animal models indicated that Lgr5+ cells may not be the origin cells for pyloric neuroendocrine carcinomas, though this subtype stem cells give rise to endocrine cells in this region (Vetter et al., 2016). Besides, evidence for the interaction between enteroendocrine cells and stem cells is limited. In small intestine, the enterochromaffin cell that is closely similar to the ECL cell in the stomach has been shown to participate in stem cell dynamics (Sei et al., 2018). For antral stem cells expressed the gastrin receptor CCK2R, they can be stimulated by progastrin but not by amidated gastrin, and this activation resulted in carcinogenesis ().
On the other hand, cancer initiation is generally thought to commence after mutation in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Renewal of the gastric epithelium is so rapid and frequent that differentiated epithelial cells would not survive for many decades required to achieve the mutational threshold for malignant transformation. In line with this notion, long-lived stem cells appear to the ideal cellular targets for the accumulation of mutations under the action of external environments (such as continuous inflammation and carcinogen stimulation) (Visvader, 2011; ). In gastric epithelium, study in mice have documented that Lgr5+ epithelial stem cell pool in the antrum was more susceptible to DNA damage than Lgr5– cells (Uehara et al., 2013). Thus, once DNA repair is impaired, increased mutagenesis of genome is possible to initiate carcinogenesis. Another evidence also showed that a deletion mutant of Apc in differentiated cells did not give rise to antral tumors, whereas Apc deletion in Lgr5+ cell did (). Nevertheless, exactly how gastric cancer is initiated remains unclear, but adult stem cells residing in the gastric epithelium might be the direct source of cancer, given their fundamental properties of multi-potentiality and longevity.
Implications for Management of Stomach Diseases
Since gastric stem cells in adult tissues can regenerate the resident cell types within a lineage, it might be introduced to harness their potential for regeneration of lost or damaged gastric mucosa. As aforementioned above, gastric stem cells can respond to mucosal injury caused by acute damage and chronic inflammation in animal models (; ; Nienhüser et al., 2020). But currently, there is no data assessing the dynamic changes of stem cells from clinical specimens. Besides, uncovering the effect of gastric mucosal protectants on gastric stem cells is also clinically practical. More importantly, gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia that is caused by chronic inflammation is commonly regarded as a point of no return (), targeted regulation of the differentiation of gastric stem cells might be an effective approach to reversing the damaged mucosa, and even reducing the risk of gastric carcinogenesis. In contrast to benign diseases in the stomach, treatment of patients with malignant poses greater challenges. Aberrant differentiation of gastric stem cells occur during tumorigenesis, development of new drugs (such as small molecule compounds) to inhibit aberrant differentiation might be an effective way to prevent gastric cancer. Additionally, understanding the mechanism behind the transformation from gastric stem cells to cancer stem cells may provide a new insight to solve the problem of tumor recurrence.
Conclusion and Future Direction
Gastric stem cells play a key role in the dynamic renewal of gastric mucosal epithelium. Linage tracing approach has made breakthroughs that enable understanding of the physiological characteristics of gastric stem cells in their niches, but further efforts are warranted for defining the various components involved in gastric stem cell niches. Establishment of gastric organoid models overcomes the defects associated with multiple-passaged cells lines derived from cancer specimens, thereby laying a foundation for further in-depth investigations into host-bacterial interactions and gastric carcinogenesis. Hyperproliferation of stomach stem cells, induced by H. pylori infection, might be one of the mechanisms of oncogenic transformation resulting from this bacterium. Furthermore, disturbance of gastric stem cell pool is involved in the multiple steps of gastric carcinogenesis. In the future, it is clinically significant to uncover the contribution of gastric stem cells to gastric mucosa homeostasis and the development of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and final gastric cancer. Further in-depth research is required to reveal the roles of gastric stem cells in stomach diseases and provide new insights for designing strategies to prevent gastric cancer.
Statements
Author contributions
SX researched data for this manuscript, made a substantial contribution to discussion of content designed the figures, and wrote the manuscript. LZ made a substantial contribution to discussion of content, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript submitted.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672410).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AmievaM.PeekR. M.Jr. (2016). Pathobiology of Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric cancer.Gastroenterology15064–78. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.004
2
AnnibaleB.EspositoG.LahnerE. (2020). A current clinical overview of atrophic gastritis.Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.1493–102. 10.1080/17474124.2020.1718491
3
ArnoldK.SarkarA.YramM. A.PoloJ. M.BronsonR.SenguptaS.et al (2011). Sox2+ adult stem and progenitor cells are important for tissue regeneration and survival of mice.Cell Stem Cell9317–329. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.09.001
4
BarkerN.BartfeldS.CleversH. (2010a). Tissue-resident adult stem cell populations of rapidly self-renewing organs.Cell Stem Cell7656–670. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.11.016
5
BarkerN.HuchM.KujalaP.van de WeteringM.SnippertH. J.van EsJ. H.et al (2010b). Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro.Cell Stem Cell625–36. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.013
6
BartfeldS.BayramT.van de WeteringM.HuchM.BegthelH.KujalaP.et al (2015). In vitro expansion of human gastric epithelial stem cells and their responses to bacterial infection.Gastroenterology148126–136. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.042
7
BartfeldS.KooB. K. (2017). Adult gastric stem cells and their niches.Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Dev. Biol.6:wdev.261. 10.1002/wdev.261
8
BjerknesM.ChengH. (2002). Multipotential stem cells in adult mouse gastric epithelium.Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.283G767–G777.
9
BlokzijlF.de LigtJ.JagerM.SasselliV.RoerinkS.SasakiN.et al (2016). Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life.Nature538260–264. 10.1038/nature19768
10
BrayF.FerlayJ.SoerjomataramI.SiegelR. L.TorreL. A.JemalA. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J. Clin.68394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492
11
BrodaT. R.McCrackenK. W.WellsJ. M. (2019). Generation of human antral and fundic gastric organoids from pluripotent stem cells.Nat. Protoc.1428–50. 10.1038/s41596-018-0080-z
12
BurclaffJ.WilletS. G.SáenzJ. B.MillsJ. C. (2020). Proliferation and differentiation of gastric mucous neck and chief cells during homeostasis and injury-induced Metaplasia.Gastroenterology158598–609. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.037
13
ChoiE.LantzT. L.VlacichG.KeeleyT. M.SamuelsonL. C.CoffeyR. J.et al (2018). Lrig1+ gastric isthmal progenitor cells restore normal gastric lineage cells during damage recovery in adult mouse stomach.Gut671595–1605. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313874
14
ChoiE.RolandJ. T.BarlowB. J.O’NealR.RichA. E.NamK. T.et al (2014). Cell lineage distribution atlas of the human stomach reveals heterogeneous gland populations in the gastric antrum.Gut631711–1720. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305964
15
CleversH. (2016). Modeling development and disease with organoids.Cell1651586–1597. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.082
16
ConteducaV.SansonnoD.LaulettaG.RussiS.IngravalloG.DammaccoF. (2013). H. pylori infection and gastric cancer: state of the art (review).Int. J. Oncol.425–18. 10.3892/ijo.2012.1701
17
CorpronR. E. (1966). The ultrastructure of the gastric mucosa in normal and hypophysectomized rats.Am. J. Anat.11853–90. 10.1002/aja.1001180105
18
CorreaP. (1992). Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process–first american cancer society award lecture on cancer epidemiology and prevention.Cancer Res.526735–6740.
19
CorreaP.PiazueloM. B.WilsonK. T. (2010). Pathology of gastric intestinal metaplasia: clinical implications.Am. J. Gastroenterol.105493–498. 10.1038/ajg.2009.728
20
DembinskiA. B.JohnsonL. R. (1985). Effect of epidermal growth factor on the development of rat gastric mucosa.Endocrinology11690–94. 10.1210/endo-116-1-90
21
DemitrackE. S.GiffordG. B.KeeleyT. M.HoritaN.TodiscoA.TurgeonD. K.et al (2017). NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 regulate epithelial cell proliferation in mouse and human gastric corpus.Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.312G133–G144. 10.1152/ajpgi.00325.2016
22
DemitrackE. S.SamuelsonL. C. (2016). Notch regulation of gastrointestinal stem cells.J. Physiol.5944791–4803. 10.1113/jp271667
23
FarrellJ. J.TaupinD.KohT. J.ChenD.ZhaoC. M.PodolskyD. K.et al (2002). TFF2/SP-deficient mice show decreased gastric proliferation, increased acid secretion, and increased susceptibility to NSAID injury.J. Clin. Invest.109193–204. 10.1172/jci12529
24
FlanaganD. J.BarkerN.NowellC.CleversH.ErnstM.PhesseT. J.et al (2017). Loss of the Wnt receptor frizzled 7 in the mouse gastric epithelium is deleterious and triggers rapid repopulation in vivo.Dis. Mod. Mech.10971–980. 10.1242/dmm.029876
25
GarciaM.ChomelJ.-C.MustaphaP.TranC. T.GarnierM.ParisI.et al (2017). In vitro culture and phenotypic and molecular characterization of gastric stem cells from human stomach.Helicobacter22:hel.12351. 10.1111/hel.12351
26
GBD 2017 Stomach Cancer Collaborators (2020). The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017.Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol.542–54.
27
GiffordG. B.DemitrackE. S.KeeleyT. M.TamA.La CunzaN.DedhiaP. H.et al (2017). Notch1 and Notch2 receptors regulate mouse and human gastric antral epithelial cell homoeostasis.Gut661001–1011. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310811
28
GirouxV.RustgiA. K. (2017). Metaplasia: tissue injury adaptation and a precursor to the dysplasia-cancer sequence.Nat. Rev. Cancer17594–604. 10.1038/nrc.2017.68
29
Gutierrez-GonzalezL.GrahamT. A.Rodriguez-JustoM.LeedhamS. J.NovelliM. R.GayL. J.et al (2011). The clonal origins of dysplasia from intestinal metaplasia in the human stomach.Gastroenterology1401251–1260.e12606. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.051
30
HanS.FinkJ.JorgD. J.LeeE.YumM. K.ChatzeliL.et al (2019). Defining the identity and dynamics of adult gastric isthmus stem cells.Cell Stem Cell25342–356.e7. 10.1016/j.stem.2019.07.008
31
HataM.HayakawaY.KoikeK. (2018). Gastric stem cell and cellular origin of cancer.Biomedicines6:100. 10.3390/biomedicines6040100
32
HayakawaY.AriyamaH.StancikovaJ.SakitaniK.AsfahaS.RenzB. W.et al (2015a). Mist1 expressing gastric stem cells maintain the normal and neoplastic gastric epithelium and are supported by a perivascular stem cell niche.Cancer Cell28800–814. 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.10.003
33
HayakawaY.JinG.WangH.ChenX.WestphalenC. B.AsfahaS.et al (2015b). CCK2R identifies and regulates gastric antral stem cell states and carcinogenesis.Gut64544–553. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307190
34
HayakawaY.FoxJ. G.WangT. C. (2017a). Isthmus stem cells are the origins of metaplasia in the gastric corpus.Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.489–94. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.02.009
35
HayakawaY.SakitaniK.KonishiM.AsfahaS.NiikuraR.TomitaH.et al (2017b). Nerve growth factor promotes gastric tumorigenesis through aberrant cholinergic signaling.Cancer Cell3121–34. 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.11.005
36
HolokaiL.ChakrabartiJ.BrodaT.ChangJ.HawkinsJ. A.SundaramN.et al (2019). Increased programmed death-ligand 1 is an early epithelial cell response to Helicobacter pylori infection.PLoS Pathog.15:e1007468. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007468
37
HumarB.FukuzawaR.BlairV.DunbierA.MoreH.CharltonA.et al (2007). Destabilized adhesion in the gastric proliferative zone and c-Src kinase activation mark the development of early diffuse gastric cancer.Cancer Res.672480–2489. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-06-3021
38
HuntR. H.CamilleriM.CroweS. E.El-OmarE. M.FoxJ. G.KuipersE. J.et al (2015). The stomach in health and disease.Gut641650–1668. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307595
39
JohnsonL. R.GuthrieP. D. (1980). Stimulation of rat oxyntic gland mucosal growth by epidermal growth factor.Am. J. Physiol.238G45–G49. 10.1152/ajpgi.1980.238.1.G45
40
KaramS. M.LeblondC. P. (1993a). Dynamics of epithelial cells in the corpus of the mouse stomach. I. Identification of proliferative cell types and pinpointing of the stem cell.Anat. Rec.236259–279. 10.1002/ar.1092360202
41
KaramS. M.LeblondC. P. (1993b). Dynamics of epithelial cells in the corpus of the mouse stomach. II. Outward migration of pit cells.Anat. Rec.236280–296. 10.1002/ar.1092360203
42
KimT. H.ShivdasaniR. A. (2011). Notch signaling in stomach epithelial stem cell homeostasis.J. Exper. Med.208677–688. 10.1084/jem.20101737
43
KooB. K.CleversH. (2014). Stem cells marked by the R-spondin receptor LGR5.Gastroenterology147289–302. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.05.007
44
LaurenP. (1965). The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma.Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand.6431–49. 10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31
45
LeblondC. P.StevensC. E.BogorochR. (1948). Histological localization of newly-formed desoxyribonucleic acid.Science108531–533. 10.1126/science.108.2811.531
46
LeeE. R.TraslerJ.DwivediS.LeblondC. P. (1982). Division of the mouse gastric mucosa into zymogenic and mucous regions on the basis of gland features.Am. J. Anat.164187–207. 10.1002/aja.1001640302
47
LeesC.HowieS.SartorR. B.SatsangiJ. (2005). The hedgehog signalling pathway in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for development, homeostasis, and disease.Gastroenterology1291696–1710. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.05.010
48
LeushackeM.TanS. H.WongA.SwathiY.HajamohideenA.TanL. T.et al (2017). Lgr5-expressing chief cells drive epithelial regeneration and cancer in the oxyntic stomach.Nat. Cell Biol.19774–786. 10.1038/ncb3541
49
LiQ.JiaZ.WangL.KongX.LiQ.GuoK.et al (2012). Disruption of Klf4 in villin-positive gastric progenitor cells promotes formation and progression of tumors of the antrum in mice.Gastroenterology142531–542. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.034
50
LiX. B.YangG.ZhuL.TangY. L.ZhangC.JuZ.et al (2016). Gastric Lgr5+ stem cells are the cellular origin of invasive intestinal-type gastric cancer in mice.Cell Res.26838–849. 10.1038/cr.2016.47
51
LvY. Q.WuJ.LiX. K.ZhangJ. S.BellusciS. (2019). Role of FGF10/FGFR2b signaling in mouse digestive tract development, repair and regeneration following injury.Front. Cell Dev. Biol.7:326. 10.3389/fcell.2019.00326
52
MatsuoJ.KimuraS.YamamuraA.KohC. P.HossainM. Z.HengD. L.et al (2017). Identification of stem cells in the epithelium of the stomach corpus and antrum of mice.Gastroenterology152218–231.e14. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.018
53
McCrackenK. W.CatáE. M.CrawfordC. M.SinagogaK. L.SchumacherM.RockichB. E.et al (2014). Modelling human development and disease in pluripotent stem-cell-derived gastric organoids.Nature516400–404. 10.1038/nature13863
54
McDonaldS. A. C.GreavesL. C.Gutierrez-GonzalezL.Rodriguez-JustoM.DeheragodaM.LeedhamS. J.et al (2008). Mechanisms of field cancerization in the human stomach: the expansion and spread of mutated gastric stem cells.Gastroenterology134500–510. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.035
55
MillsJ. C.GoldenringJ. R. (2017). Metaplasia in the stomach arises from gastric chief cells.Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.485–88. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.03.006
56
MillsJ. C.ShivdasaniR. A. (2011). Gastric epithelial stem cells.Gastroenterology140412–424. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.001
57
MimuroH.SuzukiT.NagaiS.RiederG.SuzukiM.NagaiT.et al (2007). Helicobacter pylori dampens gut epithelial self-renewal by inhibiting apoptosis, a bacterial strategy to enhance colonization of the stomach.Cell Host Microb.2250–263. 10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.005
58
NamK. T.O’NealR. L.CoffeyR. J.FinkeP. E.BarkerN.GoldenringJ. R. (2012). Spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM) in the gastric oxyntic mucosa does not arise from Lgr5-expressing cells.Gut611678–1685. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301193
59
NienhüserH.KimW.MalagolaE.RuanT.ValentiG.MiddelhoffM.et al (2020). Mist1+ gastric isthmus stem cells are regulated by Wnt5a and expand in response to injury and inflammation in mice.Gut10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320742[Epub ahead of print].
60
NoguchiT.-A. K.NinomiyaN.SekineM.KomazakiS.WangP.-C.AsashimaM.et al (2015). Generation of stomach tissue from mouse embryonic stem cells.Nat. Cell Biol.17984–993. 10.1038/ncb3200
61
OshimaH.MatsunagaA.FujimuraT.TsukamotoT.TaketoM. M.OshimaM. (2006). Carcinogenesis in mouse stomach by simultaneous activation of the Wnt signaling and prostaglandin E2 pathway.Gastroenterology1311086–1095. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.07.014
62
QiaoX. T.ZielJ. W.McKimpsonW.MadisonB. B.TodiscoA.MerchantJ. L.et al (2007). Prospective identification of a multilineage progenitor in murine stomach epithelium.Gastroenterology1331989–1998. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.031
63
QuanteM.MarracheF.GoldenringJ. R.WangT. C. (2010). TFF2 mRNA transcript expression marks a gland progenitor cell of the gastric oxyntic mucosa.Gastroenterology1392018–2027. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.003
64
RadulescuS.RidgwayR. A.CorderoJ.AthineosD.SalgueiroP.PoulsomR.et al (2013). Acute WNT signalling activation perturbs differentiation within the adult stomach and rapidly leads to tumour formation.Oncogene322048–2057. 10.1038/onc.2012.224
65
SakitaniK.HayakawaY.DengH.AriyamaH.KinoshitaH.KonishiM.et al (2017). CXCR4-expressing Mist1(+) progenitors in the gastric antrum contribute to gastric cancer development.Oncotarget8111012–111025. 10.18632/oncotarget.22451
66
SarkarA.HuebnerA. J.SulahianR.AnselmoA.XuX.FlatteryK.et al (2016). Sox2 suppresses gastric tumorigenesis in mice.Cell Rep.161929–1941. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.034
67
SchlaermannP.ToelleB.BergerH.SchmidtS. C.GlanemannM.OrdemannJ.et al (2016). A novel human gastric primary cell culture system for modelling Helicobacter pylori infection in vitro.Gut65202–213. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307949
68
SchulzC.SchütteK.MayerleJ.MalfertheinerP. (2019). The role of the gastric bacterial microbiome in gastric cancer: Helicobacter pylori and beyond.Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol.12:1756284819894062. 10.1177/1756284819894062
69
SchumacherM. A.FengR.AiharaE.EngevikA. C.MontroseM. H.OttemannK. M.et al (2015). Helicobacter pylori-induced Sonic Hedgehog expression is regulated by NFκB pathway activation: the use of a novel in vitro model to study epithelial response to infection.Helicobacter2019–28. 10.1111/hel.12152
70
SeiY.FengJ.SamselL.WhiteA.ZhaoX.YunS.et al (2018). Mature enteroendocrine cells contribute to basal and pathological stem cell dynamics in the small intestine.Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.315G495–G510. 10.1152/ajpgi.00036.2018
71
SigalM.LoganC. Y.KapalczynskaM.MollenkopfH. J.BergerH.WiedenmannB.et al (2017). Stromal R-spondin orchestrates gastric epithelial stem cells and gland homeostasis.Nature548451–455. 10.1038/nature23642
72
SigalM.ReinesM. D. M.MullerkeS.FischerC.KapalczynskaM.BergerH.et al (2019). R-spondin-3 induces secretory, antimicrobial Lgr5+ cells in the stomach.Nat. Cell Biol.21812–823. 10.1038/s41556-019-0339-9
73
SigalM.RothenbergM. E.LoganC. Y.LeeJ. Y.HonakerR. W.CooperR. L.et al (2015). Helicobacter pylori activates and expands Lgr5+ stem cells through direct colonization of the gastric glands.Gastroenterology1481392–1404. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.049
74
StangeD. E.KooB. K.HuchM.SibbelG.BasakO.LyubimovaA.et al (2013). Differentiated Troy+ chief cells act as reserve stem cells to generate all lineages of the stomach epithelium.Cell155357–368. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.008
75
TakabayashiH.ShinoharaM.MaoM.PhaosawasdiP.El-ZaatariM.ZhangM.et al (2014). Anti-inflammatory activity of bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways in stomachs of mice.Gastroenterology147396–406.e7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.015
76
TanP.YeohK. G. (2015). Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of gastric adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology1491153–1162.e3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.059
77
TanS. H.SwathiY.TanS.GohJ.SeishimaR.MurakamiK.et al (2020). AQP5 enriches for stem cells and cancer origins in the distal stomach.Nature578437–443. 10.1038/s41586-020-1973-x
78
TodiscoA. (2017). Regulation of gastric metaplasia, dysplasia, and neoplasia by bone morphogenetic protein signaling.Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.3339–347. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.01.014
79
TsukamotoT.InadaK.TanakaH.MizoshitaT.MiharaM.UshijimaT.et al (2004). Down-regulation of a gastric transcription factor, Sox2, and ectopic expression of intestinal homeobox genes, Cdx1 and Cdx2: inverse correlation during progression from gastric/intestinal-mixed to complete intestinal metaplasia.J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.130135–145. 10.1007/s00432-003-0519-6
80
UeharaT.MaD.YaoY.LynchJ. P.MoralesK.ZioberA.et al (2013). H. pylori infection is associated with DNA damage of Lgr5-positive epithelial stem cells in the stomach of patients with gastric cancer.Dig. Dis. Sci.58140–149. 10.1007/s10620-012-2360-8
81
van den BrinkG. R.HardwickJ. C.NielsenC.XuC.ten KateF. J.GlickmanJ.et al (2002). Sonic hedgehog expression correlates with fundic gland differentiation in the adult gastrointestinal tract.Gut51628–633. 10.1136/gut.51.5.628
82
van den BrinkG. R.HardwickJ. C.TytgatG. N.BrinkM. A.Ten KateF. J.Van DeventerS. J.et al (2001). Sonic hedgehog regulates gastric gland morphogenesis in man and mouse.Gastroenterology121317–328. 10.1053/gast.2001.26261
83
VetterE.KronastM.TolgeM.ZimmermannW. (2016). Lgr5-expressing stem cells are not the cells of origin of pyloric neuroendocrine carcinomas in mice.J. Pathol.23842–51. 10.1002/path.4629
84
VisvaderJ. E. (2011). Cells of origin in cancer.Nature469314–322. 10.1038/nature09781
85
WaldumH. L.FossmarkR. (2018). Types of gastric carcinomas.Int. J. Mol. Sci.19:109. 10.3390/ijms19124109
86
WroblewskiL. E.ChoiE.PetersenC.DelgadoA. G.PiazueloM. B.Romero-GalloJ.et al (2019). Targeted mobilization of Lrig1+ gastric epithelial stem cell populations by a carcinogenic Helicobacter pylori type IV secretion system.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.11619652–19658. 10.1073/pnas.1903798116
87
WroblewskiL. E.PiazueloM. B.ChaturvediR.SchumacherM.AiharaE.FengR.et al (2015). Helicobacter pylori targets cancer-associated apical-junctional constituents in gastroids and gastric epithelial cells.Gut64720–730. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307650
88
YangY. C.WangS. W.HungH. Y.ChangC. C.WuI. C.HuangY. L.et al (2007). Isolation and characterization of human gastric cell lines with stem cell phenotypes.J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.221460–1468. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05031.x
89
YeW.TakabayashiH.YangY.MaoM.HibdonE. S.SamuelsonL. C.et al (2018). Regulation of gastric Lgr5+ve cell homeostasis by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling and inflammatory stimuli.Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.5523–538. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.01.007
90
YoshiokaT.FukudaA.ArakiO.OgawaS.HanyuY.MatsumotoY.et al (2019). Bmi1 marks gastric stem cells located in the isthmus in mice.J. Pathol.248179–190. 10.1002/path.5244
91
ZhaoC. M.HayakawaY.KodamaY.MuthupalaniS.WestphalenC. B.AndersenG. T.et al (2014). Denervation suppresses gastric tumorigenesis.Sci. Transl. Med.6:250ra115. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009569
92
ZuoX.DeguchiY.XuW.LiuY.LiH. S.WeiD.et al (2019). PPARD and interferon gamma promote transformation of gastric progenitor cells and tumorigenesis in mice.Gastroenterology157163–178. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.018
Summary
Keywords
gastric stem cells, gastric mucosa homeostasis, stem cell niche, gastric organoid, Helicobacter pylori, stomach neoplasms
Citation
Xiao S and Zhou L (2020) Gastric Stem Cells: Physiological and Pathological Perspectives. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8:571536. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.571536
Received
11 June 2020
Accepted
20 August 2020
Published
17 September 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Tinte Itinteang, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Kiribati
Reviewed by
Gianandrea Pasquinelli, University of Bologna, Italy; Jangho Kim, Chonnam National University, South Korea
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Xiao and Zhou.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Liya Zhou, zhouly_bjmu@163.com
This article was submitted to Stem Cell Research, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.