Abstract
In some species of salmon, reproductive maturity triggers the development of massive pathology resulting from reproductive effort, leading to rapid post-reproductive death. Such reproductive death, which occurs in many semelparous organisms (with a single bout of reproduction), can be prevented by blocking reproductive maturation, and this can increase lifespan dramatically. Reproductive death is often viewed as distinct from senescence in iteroparous organisms (with multiple bouts of reproduction) such as humans. Here we review the evidence that reproductive death occurs in C. elegans and discuss what this means for its use as a model organism to study aging. Inhibiting insulin/IGF-1 signaling and germline removal suppresses reproductive death and greatly extends lifespan in C. elegans, but can also extend lifespan to a small extent in iteroparous organisms. We argue that mechanisms of senescence operative in reproductive death exist in a less catastrophic form in iteroparous organisms, particularly those that involve costly resource reallocation, and exhibit endocrine-regulated plasticity. Thus, mechanisms of senescence in semelparous organisms (including plants) and iteroparous ones form an etiological continuum. Therefore understanding mechanisms of reproductive death in C. elegans can teach us about some mechanisms of senescence that are operative in iteroparous organisms.
Introduction: C. Elegans as a Model for Understanding Human Aging
In its later stages, aging (senescence) manifests as an array of pathologies whose large number and complexity makes understanding its initial causes difficult. For this reason, simple animal models with the possibility of fully understanding senescence, such as Caenorhabditis elegans, are invaluable. Studies of this free-living nematode have yielded many insights into biological mechanisms of aging. These include acceleration of aging by insulin/IGF-1 signaling (IIS), germline signaling, mitochondrial function, loss of protein folding homeostasis, but not oxidative damage, and modulation of aging by steroid hormones and epigenetic changes (; Kenyon, 2010; Van Raamsdonk and Hekimi, 2010; ; Labbadia and Morimoto, 2014; Munkácsy and Rea, 2014).
The extent to which the primary causes of aging in C. elegans are the same or different to those in humans will only become clear once both are fully understood. However, it is already evident that C. elegans and mammals share some but not all senescent etiologies. For example, in mammals stem cell exhaustion (Shaw et al., 2010; ) and accumulation of senescent cells (van Deursen, 2014) (sensu Hayflick; note that there are two distinct meanings of the word senescence) contribute to senescence in the broad sense. By contrast, in adult C. elegans somatic cells are post-mitotic, and cellular senescence (sensu Hayflick) does not seem to occur. By contrast, interventions reducing insulin/IGF-1 or mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) signaling or supporting protein folding homeostasis protect against aging in C. elegans and mammals (Zhang and Cuervo, 2008; Kenyon, 2010; Labbadia and Morimoto, 2014). Moreover, interventions causing loss of antioxidant defense or mitochondrial impairment which cause death in mammals can increase lifespan in C. elegans (Rea, 2005; Van Raamsdonk and Hekimi, 2009).
We recently proposed that two forms of programmatic aging are major determinants of C. elegans lifespan: adaptive death, which promotes fitness (i.e., provides a fitness benefit) in a manner similar to apoptosis (Lohr et al., 2019; , ), and reproductive death (Kern et al., 2020, 2021). In this essay, we explore further the possibility that C. elegans undergoes semelparous reproductive death by comparing it with other organisms known to undergo reproductive death. We then discuss the implications of reproductive death in C. elegans, and argue that some mechanisms of senescence are operative in both semelparous and iteroparous organisms.
Antagonistic Pleiotropy and Programmatic Mechanisms as Conserved Causes of Aging
The predominant causes of aging are the ultimate, evolutionary processes that generate proximate biological mechanisms that cause senescent pathology (). One evolutionary cause of aging that is shared between C. elegans and humans is antagonistic pleiotropy (AP). Here gene variants that provide a fitness benefit in early life can be favored by natural selection, even where as a side effect they promote pathology in later life (Williams, 1957). How AP acts in terms of proximate mechanisms to cause aging remains unclear.
A traditional interpretation is that trade-offs promoting senescence involve physiological costs in terms of reduced allocation of resources to somatic maintenance (Kirkwood and Rose, 1991), but there are also other possibilities. For example, a different type of AP mechanism altogether, suggested in a hypothetical example by George Williams himself, is continued wild-type gene action in late life with pathogenic effects (Williams, 1957). A more recent elaboration of this idea, drawn in particular from the effects of mTOR, is that late-life action of regulators of growth and reproduction results in futile and pathogenic execution of complex biological programs (; ). Because the term program implies the presence of a function, while such late-life action is futile, Blagosklonny introduced the term quasi-program; in other words, programmed in the mechanistic sense but not the adaptive sense (). More broadly, one may accurately describe proximate mechanisms of this type as programmatic (; Maklakov and Chapman, 2019). As a primary mechanism of aging, this form of AP is distinct from damage accumulation and, in the case of IIS/mTOR for example, results not from a passive loss of function (or wearing out), but rather active gene function, or hyperfunction () (see Glossary for definition of key terms).
Our recent studies of several major C. elegans senescent pathologies imply that they originate predominantly from hyperfunction rather than molecular damage (; ; ; Wang et al., 2018b; Sornda et al., 2019). For example, physiological apoptosis (PA) in the hermaphrodite germline supports nascent oocyte growth, and apparently futile run-on of PA contributes to gonad atrophy and fragmentation (Figure 1A; ). In another example, activation of embryogenetic functions in unfertilized oocytes in the uterus leads to extreme polyploidy, cellular hypertrophy and teratoma-like tumors (Figure 1A; McGee et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2018a, b). In both cases, quasi-programs promoted by wild-type gene action contribute to the development of major senescent pathology.
FIGURE 1
As a further example, during hermaphrodite aging large pools of material that appears oily when viewed using Nomarski microscopy accumulate in the body cavity (Figure 1B), and contain vitellogenin (yolk protein) and lipid (
The C. elegans intestine is the largest somatic organ and serves multiple functions, including those played by the liver and adipose tissue in vertebrates (McGhee, 2007). It is a site of action of genes affecting lifespan (Lin et al., 2001; Libina et al., 2003; Venz et al., 2021). During aging in C. elegans hermaphrodites, the intestine undergoes major atrophy, losing most of its volume (Figure 1B;
These proximate, pathogenetic mechanisms are distinct from molecular damage accumulation, traditionally viewed as the predominant cause of aging; however, this does not rule out a contributory role for molecular damage in aging in general.
Yolk Venting Suggests That C. Elegans Could Be Semelparous
The interpretation of late-life yolk production as quasi-programmed is based on the reasonable assumption that it is futile, but is it really? Could later yolk accumulation somehow promote fitness? Our recent study of the phenomenon of yolk venting supports the latter possibility (Kern et al., 2021). Beginning at the end of egg laying, hermaphrodites vent substantial amounts of liquid rich in vitellogenins and lipid through the vulva and into their local vicinity. Notably, consumption by larvae of this vented yolky substance, present either as free pools or within unfertilized oocytes, can promote larval growth and increase fertility (Kern et al., 2021). This suggests a later function for vented yolky fluid similar to that of milk (we suggest the term yolk milk). Feeding of milk-like fluid by mothers to offspring has been observed before in various other invertebrates, such as the Pacific beetle cockroach, Diploptera punctata (Marchal et al., 2013) and the tsetse fly (Glossina spp.) (
FIGURE 2

Lactation by C. elegans hermaphrodites, and its implications. (A) Trophallaxis (“milk” provision) by C. elegans. Top left: schedule of production of eggs, unfertilized oocytes and vented yolk by wild-type C. elegans hermaphrodites (20°C); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA. Bottom left: L1 larva with ingested yolk in intestinal lumen (reproduced from Kern et al., 2021). Green: yolk marked with VIT-2:GFP (arrows); green dots are autofluorescent gut granules. Red, reflective confocal microscopy to highlight intestinal lumen (intestinal cell apices). Right: scheme showing transition from egg laying to yolk (milk) venting after hermaphrodite self-sperm depletion. (B) Implications: two interpretations of origins of intestinal atrophy. Left: After sperm depletion the program for yolk synthesis runs on to become a futile quasi-program (
If late-life yolk production provides a fitness benefit, then yolk steatosis and intestinal atrophy are not the result of a vitellogenic quasi-program. Instead, intestinal atrophy results from a life history trade-off involving physiological costs (Figure 2B). As previously defined, physiological costs can be either direct (e.g., the energy or nutrient requirements of reproduction) or indirect (Zera and Harshman, 2001; Speakman, 2008). Indirect costs include consequential costs, where harm occurs unavoidably as a consequence of the reproductive event, for example bone loss in mammals due to calcium remobilization during lactation (Speakman, 2008). In that example and in intestinal involution to support yolk milk production in C. elegans (
The existence of yolk milk venting as a means of resource transfer from post-reproductive mothers to larval kin could also resolve another puzzle, relating to the overall pattern of senescent pathogenesis in C. elegans. In humans, age-related diseases appear late in life after an extended period of optimal health (Niccoli and Partridge, 2012). However, in C. elegans hermaphrodites, development of senescent pathologies begins within days of reproductive maturity (
Semelparity and Reproductive Death
Comparer, c’est comprendre. Charles de Gaulle
Life histories may be broadly classified according to reproductive schedule, where semelparous species reproduce once and iteroparous species more than once (
The biology of animal semelparity has been explored in more detail in vertebrates than invertebrates. Semelparity in vertebrates is rare, but found in some fish (e.g., salmon, lampreys, eels), and a few reptiles (e.g., the aspic viper) (
FIGURE 3

Examples of semelparous organisms and their senescent pathologies. (A) Pacific salmon O. nerka. Top left: sexually mature adults (photo courtesy of Georgia Strait Alliance, www.georgiastrait.org© Olga Vasik—Adobe Stock). Bottom left: Immunoreactivity to Aβ1–42 antibody in the brain of spawning kokanee salmon (Maldonado et al., 2000), c.f. amyloid plaques associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Bar, 20 μm. Right: cross section of normal coronary artery (top); L, lumen, filled with nucleated red blood cells; MSM, medial layer of vascular smooth muscle; EM, elastic membrane; ISM; or (bottom) from mature adult with severe arteriosclerotic lesion, containing mainly intimal smooth muscle cells (ISM) (
Reproductive death is also seen in lampreys, jawless fish of the class Agnatha, such as the European river lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis (Figure 3B). Lampreys pass through larval and non-reproductive juvenile stages of variable duration before undergoing sexual maturation and spawning, usually after around 4–8 years. Prior to spawning in fresh water they cease feeding, and before and during sexual maturation undergo major anatomical changes including atrophy of many somatic organs, such as the body wall (including muscle), intestine and liver (but not the heart), and organism-wide loss of protein, glycogen, and fat, which supports both gonadal growth (including vitellogenesis by the liver) and swimming (
A number of dasyurid marsupials of the genera Antechinus, Phascogale, and Dasykaluta exhibit reproductive death (
A common feature of semelparous species is an extended pre-reproductive stage, with death following rapidly after reproductive maturation. For example, eels of the genus Anguilla typically spawn and die at 6–12 years of age (Tesch, 1977), and the bamboo Phyllostachys bambusoides flowers and dies after as much as 120 years (Janzen, 1976; Soderstrom and Calderon, 1979). As previously noted (
In conclusion, the pattern of pathological anatomical change seen C. elegans hermaphrodites resembles that seen in reproductive death, particularly in semelparous fish. Next we explore the similarities between C. elegans and semelparous organisms in terms of the possible proximate mechanisms of aging involved.
Destructive Resource Reallocation in Reproductive Death
Our working hypothesis is that C. elegans reproductive death results, at least partly, from the costs of consequential indirect physiological trade-offs, including one in which intestinal biomass is consumed to generate trophallactic fluid (yolk milk) that nourishes larval kin (Speakman, 2008;
FIGURE 4

Source-to-sink biomass conversion and physiological costs that cause pathology. (A) General form of source-to-sink biomass conversion (left) and three examples. In each case remobilization of resources lead to fitness benefits by supporting reproductive processes, but leads to atrophy and eventual pathology in source organs. (B) Autophagic processes and senescence in plants. Material from other organelles, particularly chloroplasts, is transported to the vacuole in several ways, including autophagosomes. First, via autophagosomes, double membrane-bound vesicles as found in animal and fungal autophagy pathways (Marshall and Vierstra, 2018). Second, via double membrane-bound rubisco-containing bodies (RCBs; rubisco is the most abundant stromal protein in chloroplasts) which contain fragments of chloroplast proteins (
The Role of Autophagy in Source-to-Sink Biomass Conversion
Source-to-sink biomass conversion implies the occurrence of bulk autolysis of biomass in the source tissue. This suggests a role of enzymatic degradation, which usually occurs within acidic compartments within the cell, including lysosomes in animals, and the vacuole in fungi and plants (Figure 4A). In animals, the major, regulated intracellular mechanism of bulk autolysis is autophagy (specifically macroautophagy). In C. elegans, inhibition of autophagy inhibits both intestinal atrophy and yolk steatosis (
Destructive Resource Reallocation and Senescence in Plants
Much more is known about the biology of source-to-sink biomass conversion in plants, in the context of semelparity (in plants, monocarpy), and also leaf senescence (Young and Augspurger, 1991;
In deciduous trees in autumn, leaf senescence occurs during which leaf biomass is broken down and remobilized (particularly nitrogen), and transported via the phloem to support tree survival, resulting in leaf death. In many monocarpic angiosperms, the entire soma is broken down during flowering and fruiting, largely to support seed production (Schippers et al., 2015;
Senescence-associated biomass conversion in plants is driven by action of a variety of proteases acting in different cellular compartments, but the final destination is mainly the large, acidic central vacuole (
If autophagy promotes plant senescence, then inhibiting autophagy should retard senescence, as seen in C. elegans intestinal senescence (
Autophagic Processes Maintain Homeostasis While They Destroy the Cell
Overall, studies of autophagy in plant senescence reveal its double-edged role in resource reallocation processes that lead to death. Here autophagy contributes to nutrient recycling and remobilization during leaf senescence, but also helps maintain homeostasis in the cell while it is being dismantled (
Leaf senescence provides a lucid illustration of the relationship between the ordered, programmed process by which the plant cell is dismantled, and the resulting homeostatic collapse leading to death. The entire senescence process is pathological (at least with respect to the leaf). Though the leaf loses functionality from the outset of senescence (e.g., photosynthetic), only in its later stages does loss of homeostasis contribute to pathogenesis. The same is the case for many diseases, where the initial impact of etiology may not cause dyshomeostasis, as in early stages of cancer development, or viral infections.
According to the demolition engineer principle outlined above, a general feature of source and sink biomass conversion processes that lead eventually to death is that cells, tissues, and organisms need to remain alive and functioning to be able to efficiently dismantle themselves. For example, during leaf senescence, chloroplasts are broken down early on but mitochondria remain intact and functional until the final stages of senescence (Peterson and Huffaker, 1975;
The ordered sequential nature of the destruction of organelles, cells and organs in semelparous organisms contrasts with aging in iteroparous organisms, such as mice or humans, where incidence of aging-related diseases varies greatly between individuals (
Source-to-Sink Biomass Conversion Is Not Disposable Soma
There is a superficial resemblance between biomass conversion and another mechanism proposed to underlie trade-offs between reproduction and lifespan, but they are not the same. The disposable soma theory proposes that stochastic molecular damage causes aging, and that aging rate is determined by the level of resource investment into somatic maintenance mechanisms that prevent that damage (Kirkwood, 1977, 2005; Figure 5A). By contrast, in biomass conversion mechanisms source tissues and organs are actively dismantled in the process of promoting function at the sink (Figure 5B). While it is true that this can involve utilization of somatic tissues in a disposable fashion, this is not the same as the disposable soma theory as set out. The primary etiology is programmatic, not stochastic damage.
FIGURE 5

Source-to-sink biomass conversion is not disposable soma. (A) Disposable soma. Here a primary cause of aging is stochastic molecular damage accumulation, prevented by somatic maintenance processes. Diversion of resources from somatic maintenance to reproduction provides a reproductive fitness benefit, but allows molecular damage to accumulation, causing aging. (B) Source-to-sink biomass conversion. Here a primary cause of aging is programmatic, active self-destruction of organs to release resources for reproduction.
Prevention of Reproductive Death Can Greatly Extend Lifespan
In C. elegans hermaphrodites, removal of the germline leaving the somatic gonad intact increases mean lifespan by some 60% (Hsin and Kenyon, 1999). One possibility is that this is due to suppression of reproductive death, which in other semelparous organisms increases lifespan substantially.
Life Extension by Suppression of Reproductive Death
Reproductive death in semelparous species is actively promoted by hormonal factors, for example corticosteroids in A. stuartii and salmon of the genus Oncorhynchus, and abscisic acid in monocarpic plants. Blocking production of such factors, e.g., by surgical removal of their source or by behavioral manipulation, can suppress reproductive death. As one would expect, this can cause large increases in lifespan. For example, in the salmon O. nerka castration before spawning prevented hypercorticism and increased maximum lifespan from 4.8 to 8.5 years (Robertson, 1961). It has also been suggested that parasitic mollusc larvae can suppress reproductive death and extend lifespan in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) (Ziuganov, 2005). Moreover, gonadectomy or hypophysectomy (removal of the pituitary gland equivalent) in the lamprey L. fluviatilis prior to sexual maturation inhibited body wall mobilization and intestinal atrophy (Larsen, 1974, 1980; Pickering, 1976) and instead of dying shortly after spawning, hypophysectomized animals survived for up to 11 months (Larsen, 1965; reviewed in Larsen, 1980).
In the eel Anguila anguila the bulk of pre-adult growth occurs in rivers, and after 6–12 years sexually mature adults make sea runs to spawn and die in the Sargasso Sea (
Looking beyond fish, in the octopus O. hummelincki removal of the optic gland just after spawning in females increased lifespan measured from onset of egg-laying by up to 5.4-fold (maximum lifespan, from 51 to 277 days) (Wodinsky, 1977). Reproductive death in A. stuartii can be prevented either by capture and cage maintenance prior to mating or by castration. If males are captured prior to mating and maintained in the lab they can survive for 3 years or more (Woolley, 1966; Olsen, 1971;
Removal of the germline can also increase lifespan in iteroparous species. For example, in Drosophila subobscura the grandchildless mutation, which causes germline loss, increased life expectancy (from day 10) by 15.1% (Maynard Smith, 1958). In Drosophila melanogaster loss of germ cells from late development or early adulthood extended median lifespan in both sexes by 21.0–50.0% (
In many mammals castration increases male lifespan while ovariectomy decreases female lifespan. For example, in studies of rats, castration increased male lifespan (Talbert and Hamilton, 1965;
Thus, although germline removal can increase lifespan in both semelparous and iteroparous species, the effects on lifespan are typically far larger and less condition dependent in the former (Table 1), consistent with prevention of reproductive death rather than of the far more modest reproductive costs typical of iteroparous organisms.
TABLE 1
| Lifespana | |||||||
| Species, genotype | Sex | Intervention | Conditions, strain | Control | Treated | % change | References |
| C. elegans | |||||||
| + | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 19.4 d | 31.8 d | +63.9 | Hsin and Kenyon, 1999 |
| daf-2(e1370) | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 43.2 d | 75.7 d | +75.2 | Hsin and Kenyon, 1999 |
| + | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, monoxenic liquid | 16.8 d | 35.0 d | +108 | McCulloch, 2003 |
| daf-2(e1368), daf-2 RNAi | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 51.0 d | 124.1 d | +143 | |
| Caenorhabditis species | |||||||
| C. elegans | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 16.7 d | 35 d | +109.4 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| C. inopinata | Female | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 23.5 d | 30.7 d | +30.6 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| C. tropicalis | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 18.8 d | 35.9 d | +91 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| C. wallacei | Female | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 28.7 d | 33.9 d | +18.5 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| C. briggsae | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 17.1 d | 31 d | +81.5 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| C. nigoni | Female | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 29.7 d | 34 d | +14.5 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| Pristionchus species | |||||||
| P. pacificus | Hermaphrodite | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 24.7 d | 40.5 d | +64 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| P. exspectatus | Female | Germline ablation (laser) | 20°C, agar plates | 43.1 d | 44.3 d | +2.7 | Kern et al., 2020 |
| Semelparous (with reproductive death) | |||||||
| Glycine max (soy bean) | Monoecious | Flower removal | 119 d | 179 d | +50.4 | Leopold et al., 1959 | |
| O. hummelincki (octopus) | Female | Optic gland removal | 51 d | 277 d | +443 | Wodinsky, 1977 | |
| A. anguila (eel) | Unknown | Prevention of sea run | Fresh water | 9 yb | 55 y | +511 | Tesch, 1977 |
| A. anguila (eel) | Unknown | Prevention of sea run | Fresh water | 9 yb | 88 y | +877 | Vladykov, 1956 |
| O. nerka (salmon) | Both sexes | Castration | 4.8 y | 8.5 y | +77.0 | Robertson, 1961 | |
| A. stuarti (marsupial) | Male | Lab capture prior to mating | 1 y | 3 y | +200 | Olsen, 1971 | |
| Iteroparous | |||||||
| D. subobscura | Female | grandchildless mutation | 20°C, virgin | 58.7 dc | 67.6 dc | +15.1d | Maynard Smith, 1958 |
| D. melanogaster | Female | germ cell-less mutation | 25°C, virgin | 44 d | 38 d | −13.6 | |
| D. melanogaster | Female | tudor mutation | 25°C, virgin | 71 d | 57 d | −19.7 | |
| D. melanogaster | Female | bag of marbles over-expression | 25°C | 32,28 d | 42 d | +31.3, 50.0 | |
| D. melanogaster | Male | bag of marbles over-expression | 25°C | 38,36 d | 46 d | +21.0, 27.8 | |
| R. microptera (grasshopper) | Female | Ovariectomy | 28°C | 167 d | 205 d | +22.7 | Hatle et al., 2008 |
| R. microptera (grasshopper) | Female | Ovariectomy | 32°C, 24°C | 245 d | 285 d | +16.3 | |
| M. musculus (mouse) | Female | Ovariectomy before puberty | CBA/J | 599 d | 540 d | −9.8 | |
| R. norwegicus (rat) | Male | Castration at birth | Inbred Lewis | 454 d | 521 d | +14.7 | Talbert and Hamilton, 1965 |
| R. norwegicus (rat) | Male | Castration just before puberty | Osborne-Mendel Yale | 615 d | 651 d | +5.8 | |
| R. norwegicus (rat) | Female | Ovariectomy just before puberty | Osborne-Mendel Yale | 742 d | 669 d | −9.8 | |
| R. norwegicus (rat) | Male | Castration just before puberty | Norway albino | 727 d | 817 d | +21.7 | |
| F. catus (cat) | Male | Castration | 4.9 y | 8.2 y | +67.3 | ||
| F. catus (cat) | Female | Spayed | 6.8 y | 8.4 y | +23.5 | ||
| F. catus (cat) | Both sexes | Gonadectomy | 11.0 y | 15.0 y | +36.3 | O’Neill et al., 2015 | |
| C. lupus familiaris (dog) | Both sexes | Gonadectomy | 7.9 y | 9.4 y | +18.9 | Hoffman et al., 2013 | |
| H. sapiens | Male | Castration | 55.7 y | 69.3 y | +24.4 | Hamilton and Mestler, 1969 | |
| H. sapiens | Female | Oophorectomy | 65.2 y | 65.2 y | +0 | Hamilton and Mestler, 1969 | |
| H. sapiens | Male | Castration | 50.9 y | 70.0 y | +37.5 | Min et al., 2012 | |
| H. sapiens | Male | Castration | 55.6 y | 70.0 y | +25.8 | Min et al., 2012 | |
Magnitude of increases in lifespan after gonadectomy or behavioral interventions that prevent reproductive death.
a Mean lifespan (median lifespan, italics; maximum lifespan, underlined). d, days. y, years.
b Eels normally live 6–12 y; the median value is taken here.
c Life expectancy at age 10 days.
d It might be significant that the strain of D. subobscura used in this study mated only once, in contrast to D. melanogaster which can remate multiple times (Partridge and Sibly, 1991). Also included here are behavioral interventions that prevent reproductive death. It is notable that the magnitude of reported experimentally induced increases in lifespan, expressed in terms of proportional increase in lifespan, are generally greater in semelparous than iteroparous organisms.
Suppression of Reproductive Death by Germline Ablation in C. elegans
Could germline ablation in C. elegans hermaphrodites extend lifespan by preventing reproductive death? Supporting this, intestinal atrophy is suppressed by germline removal (
The striking senescent changes in anatomy seen in hermaphrodites are largely absent from males (
We recently examined the pattern of senescent pathology in two additional Caenorhabditis species that are, like C. elegans, androdioecious (with hermaphrodites and males), C. briggsae and C. tropicalis, and found them to be similar to C. elegans, suggesting the occurrence of reproductive death in these species too (Kern et al., 2020). The majority of Caenorhabditis species are gonochoristic (with females and males), and C. elegans, C. briggsae and C. tropicalis represent three independent occurrences of the evolution of androdioecy (Kiontke et al., 2011). Gonochoristic sibling species of these three androdioecious species are, respectively, C. inopinata, C. nigoni, and C. wallacei. Notably, in females (unmated) of these three species the senescent degeneration seen in hermaphrodites does not occur. Moreover, for all three sibling species pairs, hermaphrodites vent yolk and lay unfertilized oocytes, while females do not. However, senescent degeneration was seen in females after mating (Kern et al., 2020). Taken together, these results suggest that after the appearance of hermaphroditism in each instance, reproductive death evolved from being facultative (mating induced) to constitutive. A possible adaptive significance of this change is that females but not hermaphrodites need to await an encounter with a male before commencing reproduction.
Semelparity in C. elegans implies a cost of reproduction. It was previously noted that prevention of self-fertilization by means of mutations that impair sperm function does not increase lifespan (Klass, 1977; Kenyon et al., 1993); i.e., the effort of egg production, fertilization and egg laying does not shorten life. This implies that the costly lactational program is active and generates life-shortening pathology whether or not fertilization takes place.
The occurrence of constitutive reproductive death in Caenorhabditis hermaphrodites but not females is supported by several further observations. First, for all three sibling species pairs, the females (unmated) are longer lived than the hermaphrodites (
Combining several of these observations suggests the following scenario: that hermaphrodites but not females undergo reproductive death constitutively, triggered by signals from the germline, leading to shorter lifespan in hermaphrodites. Consistent with this model, germline ablation causes large increases in lifespan in hermaphrodites but not females (Table 1), and abrogates the greater lifespan of females. Moreover, germline ablation suppresses intestinal atrophy in all hermaphroditic species (Kern et al., 2020; see Figure 6 for schematic summary).
FIGURE 6

Aging and death in Caenorhabditis females and hermaphrodites (simplified working model). In the absence of mating only hermaphrodites exhibit reproductive death, and this is triggered during reproductive maturation by signals from the germline. Removal of the germline by laser microsurgery blocks reproductive death, and markedly extends lifespan in hermaphrodites, removing the difference in lifespan between hermaphrodites and females. Germline ablation only modestly increases female lifespan (not depicted) (Kern et al., 2020).
Taken together, these observations imply that extension of lifespan by germline ablation in C. elegans is due to suppression of semelparous reproductive death, as seen e.g., in Pacific salmon.
Does Reduced Insulin/IGF-1 Signaling Suppress Reproductive Death?
While the discovery of single gene mutations that alter lifespan in C. elegans was important, what generated particular excitement was the large magnitude of increases in lifespan observed, particularly from reductions in insulin/IGF-1 signaling (IIS). The largest effects have been observed in mutants defective in the daf-2 insulin/IGF-1 receptor and the age-1 phosphatidyinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) catalytic subunit (Kenyon, 2010) with up to 10-fold increases in mean and maximum lifespan recorded (
There is some evidence that IIS promotes reproductive death. Mutation of daf-2 can suppress the dramatic morphological changes accompanying C. elegans hermaphrodite senescence (
But other observations argue against the idea that reduced IIS extends lifespan simply by blocking reproductive death. First, germline ablation increases lifespan in daf-2 mutants, seemingly more so than in wild type (+ ∼140% vs. + ∼60%) (Hsin and Kenyon, 1999;
A Continuum Between Semelparous and Iteroparous Aging
In this review, we have made the case that C. elegans undergo semelparous reproductive death; 12 items of evidence supporting this hypothesis are listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2
| (1) C. elegans hermaphrodites exhibit early, massive pathology affecting organs linked to reproduction ( |
| (2) Gut-to-yolk biomass conversion appears to be part of a suicidal reproductive effort that promotes fitness by feeding trophallactic fluid to larval kin (Kern et al., 2021). |
| (3) Blocking hermaphrodite reproductive maturation (e.g., by germline ablation) suppresses development of such pathologies, and leads to increases in lifespan of a large magnitude (Hsin and Kenyon, 1999; |
| (4) Germline removal in wild-type males, which do not exhibit semelparity-like pathology, does not increase lifespan (McCulloch, 2003). |
| (5) Caenorhabditis hermaphrodites, which exhibit senescent transformation, are shorter lived than (unmated) Caenorhabditis females, which do not, consistent with reproductive death in the former only (Kern et al., 2020). |
| (6) Caenorhabditis hermaphrodites vent yolk and lay unfertilized oocytes in large numbers, while Caenorhabditis females do not (Kern et al., 2020). |
| (7) Germline removal in unmated Caenorhabditis females, which do not exhibit semelparity-like pathology, produces much smaller increases in lifespan than in Caenorhabditis hermaphrodites (Kern et al., 2020). |
| (8) Germline removal removes the difference in lifespan between Caenorhabditis females and hermaphrodites (Kern et al., 2020). |
| (9) C. elegans senescent transformation involves source-to-sink type resource remobilization, as seen in semelparous animals and plants ( |
| (10) Autophagic processes that enable biomass conversion and resource remobilization contribute to senescent pathogenesis in C. elegans as in semelparous organisms (particularly plants) ( |
| (11) Semelparous senescence occurs earlier in cell compartments or organs that are non-essential for survival and behavior (e.g., the C. elegans intestine) ( |
| (12) Semelparous species often have an extended pre-reproductive stage, followed by a very brief reproductive stage (c.f. the dauer stage in C. elegans) (Klass and Hirsh, 1976). |
Features of C. elegans consistent with semelparous reproductive death.
Is C. elegans a Good Model Organism for Understanding Aging?
Caleb Finch said of semelparous dasyurid marsupials: “Their escape from ‘natural death’ under optimum conditions and their capacity to more than double their natural lifespan caution against overemphasizing lifespan and mortality rates as a basic index of cellular ‘aging’.” (
For C. elegans researchers: don’t panic. In the remainder of this essay, we propose a new perspective according to which C. elegans is a good model system for studying aging, despite its semelparity. Our key points are as follows. We have argued that C. elegans exhibits rapid senescence triggered by sexual maturation and coupled to reproductive effort, as seen in many other semelparous organisms. We postulate: (1) that this form of senescence involves exaggerated versions of mechanisms that are operative in iteroparous organisms, from which they evolved. (2) That such regulated mechanisms of senescence have a much larger effect on lifespan in semelparous organisms than iteroparous organisms. (3) That if such regulated mechanisms are blocked, pathologies that then become life limiting involve a wider spectrum of etiologies—both programmatic [e.g., involving antagonistic pleiotropy (AP) enacted in diverse ways] and stochastic (e.g., molecular damage accumulation, mechanical senescence). According to this view, a virtue of C. elegans is that one major form of senescent etiology (programmatic) plays a predominant role in aging, making it more experimentally tractable. This is also an argument for the potential value to understanding animal aging of studying senescence in other semelparous species, including plant models such as A. thaliana.
A Continuum of Semelparity and Iteroparity
Mechanisms in sexual maturation-triggered reproductive death are likely to be related to the subtler mechanisms operative in iteroparous species, consistent with the existing continuum between iteroparity and semelparity (Hughes, 2017). A plausible scenario is that semelparous etiologies evolved by amplification of mechanisms operative in iteroparous ancestors. This resulted in exaggerated and life-limiting senescent pathologies resulting from relatively simple causes. If this were true then semelparous vertebrates should show age-related diseases similar to those seen in iteroparous ones. In fact, this is the case in Pacific salmon, one of the few semelparous vertebrates in which senescent pathologies have been studied. For example in spawning O. tshawytscha the coronary arteries, among others, exhibit endothelial cell hyper-proliferation (Figure 3A; Robertson et al., 1961;
One broad difference between semelparous etiologies and the iteroparous etiologies from which they evolved is that while the former are irreversible the latter can be reversible. For example, intestinal atrophy in adult C. elegans hermaphrodites or spawning lampreys appears to be irreversible, whereas loss of muscle during starvation or bone during lactation is reversible (Speakman, 2008). In summary, the nature of the diseases of aging in Pacific salmon supports the existence of a continuum between semelparous and iteroparous species in terms of senescent pathophysiology.
Quasi-Programs vs. Costly Programs as Ubiquitous Causes of Senescence
As a broad approximation, in terms of primary mechanisms, senescence has been viewed either as a passive process of stochastic damage and breakdown (loss of function), or as an active process driven by late-life effects of gene action (hyperfunction) (Harman, 1956;
To understand the relevance of aging in C. elegans to that in iteroparous organisms we need to ask: What is the relationship between reproductive death and the quasi-program (hyperfunction) theory? Here the growing understanding of senescent pathophysiology in C. elegans is instructive. Several major senescent pathologies, including intestinal atrophy, yolk accumulation and teratoma-like uterine tumors, have been interpreted as resulting from hyperfunction rather than molecular damage, and from run-on type quasi-programs (Herndon et al., 2002;
Thus, late-life yolk production and the intestinal atrophy to which it is coupled does not conform to Blagosklonny’s definition of a quasi-program (futile program continuation). Instead it involves a physiological trade-off where intestinal senescence is a cost. However, in both cases, the mechanisms involved are programmatic, rather than relating to damage and maintenance.
Another difference between these two cases is the relative timing of benefits and costs. In the first account, a program that promotes fitness in early life becomes a harmful quasi-program in later life. By contrast, in the case of intestinal atrophy coupled to yolk production, benefit and harm are generated simultaneously.
Insofar as the term program implies complex function and promotion of fitness (Lohr et al., 2019), C. elegans intestinal resource reallocation may be referred to as a costly program. By contrast, development of uterine teratomas is the result of a quasi-program (Wang et al., 2018a, b; Figure 7A), since a fitness benefit from having tumors is difficult to envisage.
FIGURE 7

Conceptual models of aging in semelparous and iteroparous organisms. (A) Programmatic mechanisms of aging in semelparous and iteroparous organisms. These include costly programs and quasi-programs. A broad prediction is that costly programs contribute more to disease during reproductive death, and quasi-programs more in iteroparous aging. (B) Difference in senescent pathogenesis in semelparous and iteroparous organisms. The figure shows the degree of harmfulness of a range of pathologies with different types of etiology (indicated by different colors). Top, reproductive death. Here exaggeration of programmatic mechanisms leads to rapid development of gross pathologies leading to death. Bottom, typical animal senescence (iteroparous species). Here many more types of etiology contribute to life-limiting pathology, to which programmatic etiologies contribute to some degree, and senescence is more multifactorial. Preventing programmatic pathophysiology that causes reproductive death causes very large increases in lifespan, giving a false impression that the entire aging process has been suppressed. All images reproduced with permission.
To create an integrated conceptual framework we propose the following new account: that in both cases (quasi-programs and costly programs), pathology results primarily from hyperfunction rather than loss of function. In costly programs hyperfunction exists with respect to the pathology (e.g., intestinal atrophy) but not the benefit (yolk milk production) (Figure 7A). Similarly, the process of N remobilization from leaves is hyperfunctional as far as leaf health is concerned, but not seed provisioning. Thus, precise use of the term hyperfunction requires reference to the entity that it injures (cell, tissue, organ, organism).
According to this account, in iteroparous organisms resource reallocation can involve costly programs where the debts can be repaid, as in lactation-associated bone loss or starvation-induced muscle atrophy. Thus, C. elegans reproductive death, like mammalian aging, involves both quasi-programs and costly programs (Figure 7A). Understanding C. elegans aging should therefore provide fundamental insights into the pathophysiology of human senescence.
Neuroendocrine Promotion of Semelparous and Iteroparous Aging
Further evidence of conservation of mechanisms of aging between C. elegans and iteroparous species (e.g., Drosophila, rodents) is that insulin/IGF-1 and mTOR signaling promote aging in both (Kenyon, 2010; Weichhart, 2018). However, in C. elegans the magnitude (in relative terms) of life extension resulting from reduced IIS is typically far greater than in iteroparous species; for example, mutational reduction of PI3K increases median lifespan by up to ∼10-fold in C. elegans but only ∼1.07- and ∼1.02-fold in Drosophila and mice, respectively (
Such effects of IIS on aging are part of a broader neuroendocrine and steroid hormone signaling network affecting growth, reproduction and lifespan in both semelparous and iteroparous organisms (
Reproductive Death and Adaptive Death
Besides semelparous reproductive death and iteroparous senescence, another mode of life-limiting mechanism is programmed adaptive death. Here genetically determined mechanisms that actively cause death have evolved by natural selection because earlier death provides an inclusive fitness benefit, in a manner analogous to programmed cell death in metazoan organisms. Adaptive death is not expected to evolve in organisms with outbred, dispersed populations (e.g., most animal species), but can occur in those existing as compact (viscous) colonies of clonal individuals, such as the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and possibly C. elegans too (
FIGURE 8

Double death: Reproductive death and adaptive death combine to promote fitness. In both cases there is evidence for the existence of adaptive death, but its existence has not been definitively proven (
Perspectives
This essay presents an altered picture both of C. elegans as a model for aging research, and of aging more broadly. These changes imply some gains to the field, but also one grievous loss. The gains include an understanding that C. elegans is semelparous, and that the mechanisms involved in semelparous aging are a programmatic subset of those involved in iteroparous aging. This implies that C. elegans is an excellent model for studying programmatic mechanisms of senescence in a conveniently exaggerated and relatively pure form. Programmatic mechanisms potentially contribute to many diseases of human aging, for example those promoted by senescent cells, which are at least partly caused by quasi-programs (
Regarding the loss. Aging is now the main cause of disease and death worldwide, and yet its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The discovery over three decades ago that single gene mutations can greatly increase lifespan in C. elegans (Klass, 1983;
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
DG wrote the manuscript, with contributions from CK, JN, and ME. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (098565/Z/12/Z) and a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award (215574/Z/19/Z). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank M.V. Blagosklonny, B.P. Braeckman, C. Masclaux-Daubresse, T. Niccoli, L. Partridge, S. Sumner, E.R. Galimov, and other members of the Gems laboratory for useful discussion, and N. Alic, A.J. Dobson, K.C. Hsiung, J. Labbadia, J.N. Lohr, and Y. Zhao for comments on the manuscript. Figure 3A (right) was reprinted from
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Glossary
Adaptive death: Synonymous with programmed organismal death. Here death of an individual is a selected trait, providing a direct benefit in terms of inclusive or group fitness (Lohr et al., 2019).
Aging: In the context of this article, synonymous with senescence, i.e., the deteriorative changes that become progressively worse with advancing age, leading to multiple pathologies and death. We argue here that reproductive death is a form of rapid aging, since it involves mechanisms that also contribute to iteroparous aging. From this perspective, leaf senescence may be viewed as a form of aging.
Androdioecious: Where adults are male or hermaphrodite (as opposed, in the context of this essay, to male or female).
Antagonistic pleiotropy(AP): Where action of a given gene leads to both fitness benefits and fitness costs. If the latter occur later in life and are therefore subject to weaker selection, such a gene may be favored by natural selection, and promote aging (Williams, 1957).
Costly program(New term): A biological program that simultaneously causes fitness benefits, and costs in terms of pathological changes to tissues or organs where the program is executed. One form of programmatic mechanism involving hyperfunction by which AP causes senescence (cf. quasi-program).
Demolition engineer principle(New term): Dual function of autophagic processes during resource remobilization, to both effect destructive turnover of cellular components, and maintain cellular homeostasis.
Disposable soma: Theory proposing that natural selection favors investment of limited resources into reproduction rather than somatic maintenance, accelerating damage accumulation and, therefore, senescence (Kirkwood, 1977).
Fitness: The measure of how well a given species is able to survive and reproduce.
Gonochoristic: Where adults are male or female (as opposed, in the context of this essay, to male or hermaphrodite).
Hyperfunction: Where wild-type gene function actively leads to senescent pathology, as opposed to passive random damage or wear and tear (
Iteroparous: Where multiple reproductive cycles can occur over the course of a lifetime.
Programmed aging: Senescence caused by a relatively ordered series of biological processes that promotes fitness via inclusive fitness or group fitness.
Programmatic aging: Where complex biological processes contributes to senescence, but not necessarily to fitness (cf. quasi-programs, costly programs).
Quasi-programmed aging: Senescence caused by a relatively ordered series of biological processes that does not promote fitness; may occur due to futile run-on of wild-type programs that promote fitness earlier in life (
Reproductive death: A form of suicidal reproductive effort found in some semelparous species (e.g., Pacific salmon, monocarpic plants). Here, reproductive maturity triggers the rapid development of lethal pathologies and fast senescence coupled to reproductive success (
Resource reallocation: Where the building blocks of life (e.g., amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates) are transferred from one site (e.g., tissue, organ) to another, in a manner that typically involves breakdown (e.g., autophagic) of source biomass.
Run-on: Futile continuation of gene function or processes in later life, leading to pathology (
Semelparous: Organisms with a single reproductive episode before death. Also used to denote semelparity with reproductive death.
Senescence: The overall process of deterioration with age or the resulting pathological condition (not to be confused with cellular senescence, which is a particular form of cell cycle arrest affecting some vertebrate cell types). Although aging has several meanings, in the biological context it is usually synonymous with senescence.
Source-to-sink biomass conversion: Resource remobilization where autophagic processes break down cellular constituents in one tissue/organ to provide resources for another (cf. costly program).
References
1
AllardJ. B.DuanC. (2011). Comparative endocrinology of aging and longevity regulation.Front. Endocrinol.2:75. 10.3389/fendo.2011.00075
2
AmritF. R. G.BoehnischC. M. L.MayR. C. (2010). Phenotypic covariance of longevity, immunity and stress resistance in the Caenorhabditis nematodes.PLoS One5:e9978. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009978
3
AntebiA. (2013). Steroid regulation of C. elegans diapause, developmental timing, and longevity.Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.105181–212. 10.1016/b978-0-12-396968-2.00007-5
4
ApfeldJ.KenyonC. (1999). Regulation of lifespan by sensory perception in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nature402804–809. 10.1038/45544
5
Arantes-OliveiraN.ApfeldJ.DillinA.KenyonC. (2002). Regulation of life-span by germ-line stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans.Science295502–505. 10.1126/science.1065768
6
Arantes-OliveiraN.BermanJ. R.KenyonC. (2003). Healthy animals with extreme longevity.Science302:611. 10.1126/science.1089169
7
AsdellS. A.DoornenbalH.JoshiS. R.SperlingG. A. (1967). The effects of sex steroid hormones upon longevity in rats.J. Reprod. Fertil.14113–120. 10.1530/jrf.0.0140113
8
AtwoodC. S.HayashiK.MeethalS. V.GonzalesT.BowenR. L. (2017). Does the degree of endocrine dyscrasia post-reproduction dictate post-reproductive lifespan? lessons from semelparous and iteroparous species.Geroscience39103–116. 10.1007/s11357-016-9955-5
9
AustadS. N. (2004). Is aging programed?Aging Cell3249–251. 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00112.x
10
Avila-OspinaL.MoisonM.YoshimotoK.Masclaux-DaubresseC. (2014). Autophagy, plant senescence, and nutrient recycling.J. Exp. Botany653799–3811. 10.1093/jxb/eru039
11
AyyadevaraS.AllaR.ThadenJ. J.Shmookler ReisR. J. (2008). Remarkable longevity and stress resistance of nematode PI3K-null mutants.Aging Cell713–22. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00348.x
12
BarkerI. K.BeveridgeI.BradleyA. J.LeeA. K. (1978). Observations on spontaneous stress-related mortality among males of the dasyurid marsupial Antechinus stuartii Macleay.Aust. J. Zool.26435–447. 10.1071/zo9780435
13
BarnesA. I.BooneJ. M.JacobsonJ.PartridgeL.ChapmanT. (2006). No extension of lifespan by ablation of germ line in Drosophila.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.273939–947. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3388
14
BartkeA. (2019). Growth hormone and aging: updated review.World J. Mens Health3719–30. 10.5534/wjmh.180018
15
BenedettoA.GemsD. (2019). Autophagy promotes visceral aging in wild-type C. elegans.Autophagy15731–732. 10.1080/15548627.2019.1569919
16
BenedusiV.MartiniE.KallikourdisM.VillaA.MedaC.MaggiA. (2015). Ovariectomy shortens the life span of female mice.Oncotarget610801–10811. 10.18632/oncotarget.2984
17
BenoitJ.AttardoG.BaumannA.MichalkovaV.AksoyS. (2015). Adenotrophic viviparity in tsetse flies: potential for population control and as an insect model for lactation.Annu. Rev. Entomol.60351–371. 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020834
18
BentleyP. J.FollettB. K. (1965). Fat and carbohydrate reserves in the river lamprey during spawning migration.Life Sci.42003–2007. 10.1016/0024-3205(65)90058-5
19
BlagosklonnyM. V. (2006). Aging and immortality: quasi-programmed senescence and its pharmacologic inhibition.Cell Cycle52087–2102. 10.4161/cc.5.18.3288
20
BlagosklonnyM. V. (2008). Aging: ROS or TOR.Cell Cycle73344–3354.
21
BonnetX. (2011). “The evolution of semelparity,” in Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Snakes, edsAldridgeR.SeverD. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 645–672. 10.1201/b10879-18
22
BradleyA. J.McdonaldI. R.LeeA. K. (1980). Stress and mortality in a small marsupial (Antechinus stuartii. Macleay).Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.40188–200. 10.1016/0016-6480(80)90122-7
23
BraithwaiteR. W.LeeA. K. (1979). A mammalian example of semelparity.Am. Nat.113151–155. 10.1086/283372
24
CargillS. L.CareyJ. R.MullerH. G.AndersonG. (2003). Age of ovary determines remaining life expectancy in old ovariectomized mice.Aging Cell2185–190. 10.1046/j.1474-9728.2003.00049.x
25
CarruthL. L.JonesR. E.NorrisD. O. (2002). Cortisol and pacific salmon: a new look at the role of stress hormones in olfaction and home-stream migration.Integ. Comp. Biol.42574–581. 10.1093/icb/42.3.574
26
ChandrashekarV.ZaczekD.BartkeA. (2004). The consequences of altered somatotropic system on reproduction.Biol. Reprod.7117–27. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.027060
27
ChenW. W.YiY. H.ChienC. H.HsiungK. C.MaT. H.LinY. C.et al (2016). Specific polyunsaturated fatty acids modulate lipid delivery and oocyte development in C. elegans revealed by molecular-selective label-free imaging.Sci. Rep.6:32021.
28
ChenY.QiaoS.TuckermannJ.OkretS.JondalM. (2010). Thymus-derived glucocorticoids mediate androgen effects on thymocyte homeostasis.FASEB J.245043–5051. 10.1096/fj.10.168724
29
ChibaA.IshidaH.NishizawaN. K.MakinoA.MaeT. (2003). Exclusion of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from chloroplasts by specific bodies in naturally senescing leaves of wheat.Plant Cell Physiol.44914–921. 10.1093/pcp/pcg118
30
ColeL. C. (1954). The population consequences of life history phenomena.Q. Rev. Biol.29103–137. 10.1086/400074
31
ConboyI. M.RandoT. A. (2012). Heterochronic parabiosis for the study of the effects of aging on stem cells and their niches.Cell Cycle112260–2267. 10.4161/cc.20437
32
DaviesP. J.GanS. (2012). Towards an integrated view of monocarpic plant senescence.Russian J. Plant Physiol.59467–478. 10.1134/s102144371204005x
33
de la GuardiaY.GilliatA. F.HellbergJ.RennertP.CabreiroF.GemsD. (2016). Run-on of germline apoptosis promotes gonad senescence in C. elegans.Oncotarget739082–39096. 10.18632/oncotarget.9681
34
de MagalhãesJ. P.ChurchG. M. (2005). Genomes optimize reproduction: aging as a consequence of the developmental program.Physiology20252–259. 10.1152/physiol.00010.2005
35
DepinaA. S.IserW. B.ParkS. S.MaudsleyS.WilsonM. A.WolkowC. A. (2011). Regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans vitellogenesis by DAF-2/IIS through separable transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms.BMC Physiol.11:11. 10.1186/1472-6793-11-11
36
Diaz-MendozaM.Velasco-ArroyoB.SantamariaM. E.Gonzaìlez-MelendiP.MartinezM.DiazI. (2016). Plant senescence and proteolysis: two processes with one destiny.Genetics Mol. Biol.39329–338. 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0015
37
DolphinP. J.AnsariA. Q.LazierC. B.MundayK. A.AkhtarM. (1971). Studies on the induction and biosynthesis of vitellogenin, an oestrogen-induced glycolipophosphoprotein.Biochem. J.124751–758. 10.1042/bj1240751
38
DrewryM. D.WilliamsJ. M.HatleJ. D. (2011). Life-extending dietary restriction and ovariectomy result in similar feeding rates but different physiologic responses in grasshoppers.Exp. Gerontol.46781–786. 10.1016/j.exger.2011.06.003
39
DroriD.FolmanY. (1976). Environmental effects on longevity in the male rat: exercise, mating, castration and restricted feeding.Exp. Gerontol.1125–32. 10.1016/0531-5565(76)90007-3
40
EzcurraM.BenedettoA.SorndaT.GilliatA. F.AuC.ZhangQ.et al (2018). C. elegans eats its own intestine to make yolk leading to multiple senescent pathologies.Curr. Biol.282544–2556. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.035
41
FarrellA. P. (2002). Coronary arteriosclerosis in salmon: growing old or growing fast?Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol.132723–735. 10.1016/s1095-6433(02)00126-5
42
FinchC. E. (1990a). Longevity, Senescence and the Genome.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43
FinchC. E.(Ed.) (1990b). “Rapid senescence and sudden death,” in Longevity, Senescence and the Genome (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), 43–119.
44
FlattT.MinK. J.D’alterioC.Villa-CuestaE.CumbersJ.LehmannR.et al (2008). Drosophila germ-line modulation of insulin signaling and lifespan.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.1056368–6373. 10.1073/pnas.0709128105
45
FlattT.SchmidtP. S. (2009). Integrating evolutionary and molecular genetics of aging.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1790951–962. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.07.010
46
FoukasL. C.BilangesB.BettediL.PearceW.AliK.SanchoS.et al (2013). Long-term p110alpha PI3K inactivation exerts a beneficial effect on metabolism.EMBO Mol. Med.5563–571. 10.1002/emmm.201201953
47
FreeseM.Yokota RizzoL.PohlmannJ.-D.MarohnL.WittenP. E.GremseF.et al (2019). Bone resorption and body reorganization during maturation induce maternal transfer of toxic metals in anguillid eels.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.11611339–11344. 10.1073/pnas.1817738116
48
FriedmanD. B.JohnsonT. E. (1988). A mutation in the age-1 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans lengthens life and reduces hermaphrodite fertility.Genetics11875–86. 10.1093/genetics/118.1.75
49
GálikováM.KlepsatelP.SentiG.FlattT. (2011). Steroid hormone regulation of C. elegans and Drosophila aging and life history.Exp. Gerontol.46141–147. 10.1016/j.exger.2010.08.021
50
GalimovE. R.GemsD. (2020). Shorter life and reduced fecundity can increase colony fitness in virtual C. elegans.Aging Cell19:e13141.
51
GalimovE. R.GemsD. (2021). Death happy: adaptive death and its evolution by kin selection in organisms with colonial ecology.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B376:20190730. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0730
52
GalimovE. R.LohrJ. N.GemsD. (2019). When and how can death be an adaptation?Biochemistry (Moscow)841433–1437. 10.1134/s0006297919120010
53
GariganD.HsuA. L.FraserA. G.KamathR. S.AhringerJ.KenyonC. (2002). Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: a role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation.Genetics1611101–1112. 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1101
54
GelinoS.HansenM. (2012). Autophagy - an emerging anti-aging mechanism.J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.4:006.
55
GemsD.de la GuardiaY. (2013). Alternative perspectives on aging in C. elegans: reactive oxygen species or hyperfunction?Antioxid. Redox Signal.19321–329. 10.1089/ars.2012.4840
56
GemsD.PartridgeL. (2013). Genetics of longevity in model organisms: debates and paradigm shifts.Annu. Rev. Physiol.75621–644. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183712
57
GemsD.RiddleD. L. (2000). Genetic, behavioral and environmental determinants of male longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics1541597–1610. 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1597
58
GemsD.SuttonA. J.SundermeyerM. L.LarsenP. L.AlbertP. S.KingK. V.et al (1998). Two pleiotropic classes of daf-2 mutation affect larval arrest, adult behavior, reproduction and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics150129–155. 10.1093/genetics/150.1.129
59
GippsJ. H. W.JewellP. A. (1979). Maintaining populations of bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus, in large outdoor enclosures, and measuring the response of population variables to the castration of males.J. Anim. Ecol.48535–555. 10.2307/4179
60
GladyshevV. N. (2013). The origin of aging: imperfectness-driven non-random damage defines the aging process and control of lifespan.Trends Genet.29506–512. 10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.004
61
GoldenT. R.BeckmanK. B.LeeA. H.DudekN.HubbardA.SamperE.et al (2007). Dramatic age-related changes in nuclear and genome copy number in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.Aging Cell6179–188. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00273.x
62
GreerE. L.MauresT. J.HauswirthA. G.GreenE. M.LeemanD. S.MaroG. S.et al (2010). Members of the H3K4 trimethylation complex regulate lifespan in a germline-dependent manner in C. elegans.Nature466383–387. 10.1038/nature09195
63
GuiboileauA.Avila-OspinaL.YoshimotoK.SoulayF.AzzopardiM.MarmagneA.et al (2013). Physiological and metabolic consequences of autophagy deficiency for the management of nitrogen and protein resources in Arabidopsis leaves depending on nitrate availability.New Phytol.199683–694. 10.1111/nph.12307
64
GumiennyT. L.LambieE.HartwiegE.HorvitzH. R.HengartnerM. O. (1999). Genetic control of programmed cell death in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germline.Development1261011–1022. 10.1242/dev.126.5.1011
65
HamiltonJ. B. (1965). Relationship of castration, spaying, and sex to survival and duration of life in domestic cats.J. Gerontol.2096–104. 10.1093/geronj/20.1.96
66
HamiltonJ. B.HamiltonR. S.MestlerG. E. (1969). Duration of life and causes of death in domestic cats: influence of sex, gonadectomy, and inbreeding.J. Gerontol.24427–437. 10.1093/geronj/24.4.427
67
HamiltonJ. B.MestlerG. E. (1969). Mortality and survival: comparison of eunuchs with intact men in a mentally retarded population.J. Gerontol.24395–411. 10.1093/geronj/24.4.395
68
HaneS.RobertsonO. H. (1959). Changes in plasma 17-hydroxycorticosteroids accompanying sexual maturation and spawning of the Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdnerii).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.45886–893. 10.1073/pnas.45.6.886
69
HarmanD. (1956). Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry.J. Gerontol.11298–300. 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298
70
HatleJ. D.PatersonC. S.JawaidI.LentzC.WellsS. M.FronstinR. B. (2008). Protein accumulation underlying lifespan extension via ovariectomy in grasshoppers is consistent with the disposable soma hypothesis but is not due to dietary restriction.Exp. Gerontol.43900–908. 10.1016/j.exger.2008.08.005
71
HaveìM.BalliauT.Cottyn-BoitteB.DeìRondE.CueffG.SoulayF.et al (2018). Increases in activity of proteasome and papain-like cysteine protease in Arabidopsis autophagy mutants: back-up compensatory effect or cell-death promoting effect?J. Exp. Botany691369–1385. 10.1093/jxb/erx482
72
HayesG. L. T.SimmonsL. W.DugandR. J.MillsH. R.RobertsJ. D.TomkinsJ. L.et al (2019). Male semelparity and multiple paternity confirmed in an arid-zone dasyurid.J. Zool.308266–273. 10.1111/jzo.12672
73
HerndonL. A.SchmeissnerP. J.DudaronekJ. M.BrownP. A.ListnerK. M.SakanoY.et al (2002). Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans.Nature419808–814. 10.1038/nature01135
74
HigashiN.WakeK.SatoM.KojimaN.ImaiK.SenooH. (2005). Degradation of extracellular matrix by extrahepatic stellate cells in the intestine of the lamprey, Lampetra japonica.Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol.285668–675. 10.1002/ar.a.20200
75
HoffmanJ. M.CreevyK. E.PromislowD. E. L. (2013). Reproductive capability is associated with lifespan and cause of death in companion dogs.PLoS One8:e61082. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061082
76
HoffmanJ. M.O’NeillD. G.CreevyK. E.AustadS. N. (2018). Do female dogs age differently than male dogs?J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.73150–156. 10.1093/gerona/glx061
77
HotziB.KosztelnikM.HargitaiB.Takács-VellaiK.BarnaJ.BördénK.et al (2018). Sex-specific regulation of aging in Caenorhabditis elegans.Aging Cell17:e12724. 10.1111/acel.12724
78
HouseE. W.BendittE. P. (1981). The ultrastructure of spontaneous coronary arterial lesions in steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri).Am. J. Pathol.104250–257.
79
HsinH.KenyonC. (1999). Signals from the reproductive system regulate the lifespan of C. elegans.Nature399362–366. 10.1038/20694
80
HughesP. W. (2017). Between semelparity and iteroparity: empirical evidence for a continuum of modes of parity.Ecol. Evol.78232–8261. 10.1002/ece3.3341
81
IshidaH.YoshimotoK.IzumiM.ReisenD.YanoY.MakinoA.et al (2008). Mobilization of Rubisco and stroma- localized fluorescent proteins of chloroplasts to the vacuole by an ATG gene-dependent autophagic process.Plant Physiol.148142–155. 10.1104/pp.108.122770
82
JanzenD. H. (1976). Why bamboos wait so long to flower.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.7347–391. 10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.002023
83
Jaramillo-LambertA.EllefsonM.VilleneuveA. M.EngebrechtJ. (2007). Differential timing of S phases, X chromosome replication, and meiotic prophase in the C. elegans germ line.Dev. Biol.308206–221. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.05.019
84
JewellP. (1997). Survival and behaviour of castrated Soay sheep (Ovis aries) in a feral island population on Hirta, St. Kilda, Scotland.J. Zool.243623–636. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb02806.x
85
KenyonC. (2010). The genetics of ageing.Nature464504–512.
86
KenyonC.ChangJ.GenschE.RudenerA.TabtiangR. (1993). A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type.Nature366461–464. 10.1038/366461a0
87
KernC. C.SrivastavaS.EzcurraM.HuiN.TownsendS.MaczikD.et al (2020). C. elegans hermaphrodites undergo semelparous reproductive death.BioRxiv(Preprint). 10.1101/2020.1111.1116.384255
88
KernC. C.TownsendS.SalzmannA.RendellN.TaylorG.ComiselR. M.et al (2021). C. elegans feed yolk to their young in a form of primitive lactation.Nat. Commun.
89
KimbleJ.SharrockW. J. (1983). Tissue-specific synthesis of yolk proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans.Dev. Biol.96189–196. 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90322-6
90
KiontkeK.FeìLixM.-A.AilionM.RockmanM.BraendleC.PeìNigaultJ.-B.et al (2011). A phylogeny and molecular barcodes for Caenorhabditis, with numerous new species from rotting fruits.BMC Evol. Biol.11:339. 10.1186/1471-2148-11-339
91
KirkwoodT. B. (2005). Understanding the odd science of aging.Cell120437–447. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.027
92
KirkwoodT. B. L. (1977). Evolution of ageing.Nature270301–304.
93
KirkwoodT. B. L.RoseM. R. (1991). Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London33215–24. 10.1098/rstb.1991.0028
94
KlassM. R. (1977). Aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: major biological and environmental factors influencing life span.Mech. Ageing Dev.6413–429. 10.1016/0047-6374(77)90043-4
95
KlassM. R. (1983). A method for the isolation of longevity mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and initial results.Mech. Ageing Dev.22279–286. 10.1016/0047-6374(83)90082-9
96
KlassM. R.HirshD. I. (1976). Nonaging developmental variant of C. elegans.Nature260523–525. 10.1038/260523a0
97
KocsisovaZ.KornfeldK.SchedlT. (2019). Rapid population-wide declines in stem cell number and activity during reproductive aging in C. elegans.Development146:dev173195.
98
LabbadiaJ.MorimotoR. I. (2014). Proteostasis and longevity: when does aging really begin?F1000Prime Rep6:7.
99
LarsenL. O. (1965). Effects of hypophysectomy in the cyclostome, Lampetra fluviatilis (l.) gray.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.516–30. 10.1016/0016-6480(65)90064-x
100
LarsenL. O. (1969). Effects of hypophysectomy before and during sexual maturation in the cyclostome, Lampetra fluviatilis (L.) Gray.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.12200–208. 10.1016/0016-6480(69)90192-0
101
LarsenL. O. (1974). Effects of testosterone and oestradiol on gonadectomized and intact male and female river lampreys (Lampetra fluviatilis (L.) Gray).Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.24305–313. 10.1016/0016-6480(74)90184-1
102
LarsenL. O. (1980). Physiology of adult lampreys, with special regard to natural starvation, reproduction, and death after spawning.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.371762–1779. 10.1139/f80-221
103
LeBoeufA. C. (2017). Trophallaxis.Curr. Biol.27R1299–R1300.
104
LeopoldA. C.Niedergang-KamienE.JanickJ. (1959). Experimental modification of plant senescence.Plant Physiol.34570–573. 10.1104/pp.34.5.570
105
LibinaN.BermanJ. R.KenyonC. (2003). Tissue-specific activities of C. elegans DAF-16 in the regulation of lifespan.Cell115489–502. 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00889-4
106
LinK.HsinH.LibinaN.KenyonC. (2001). Regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans longevity protein DAF-16 by insulin/IGF-1 and germline signaling.Nat. Genet.28139–145. 10.1038/88850
107
LohrJ.GalimovE. R.GemsD. (2019). Does senescence promote fitness in Caenorhabditis elegans by causing death?Ageing Res. Rev.5058–71. 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.008
108
LuoS.KleemannG. A.AshrafJ. M.ShawW. M.MurphyC. T. (2010). TGF-beta and insulin signaling regulate reproductive aging via oocyte and germline quality maintenance.Cell143299–312. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.013
109
MaklakovA. A.ChapmanT. (2019). Evolution of ageing as a tangle of trade-offs: energy versus function.Proc. Biol. Sci.286:20191604. 10.1098/rspb.2019.1604
110
MaldonadoT. A.JonesR. E.NorrisD. O. (2000). Distribution of beta-amyloid and amyloid precursor protein in the brain of spawning (senescent) salmon: a natural, brain-aging model.Brain Res.858237–251. 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02328-8
111
MaldonadoT. A.JonesR. E.NorrisD. O. (2002). Intraneuronal amyloid precursor protein (APP) and appearance of extracellular beta-amyloid peptide (abeta) in the brain of aging kokanee salmon.J. Neurobiol.5311–20. 10.1002/neu.10086
112
MarchalE.HultE.HuangJ.StayB.TobeS. (2013). Diploptera punctata as a model for studying the endocrinology of arthropod reproduction and development.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.18885–93. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.04.018
113
MarshallR. S.VierstraR. D. (2018). Autophagy: the master of bulk and selective recycling.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.69173–208. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040606
114
MartinezD. E.CostaM. L.GuiametJ. J. (2008). Senescence-associated degradation of chloroplast proteins inside and outside the organelle.Plant Biol.1015–22. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00089.x
115
Maynard SmithJ. (1958). The effects of temperature and of egg-laying on the longevity of Drosophila subobscura.J. Exp. Biol.35832–842. 10.1242/jeb.35.4.832
116
McCullochD. (2003). Sex Differences in Ageing in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.London: University College London.
117
McCullochD.GemsD. (2007). Sex-specific effects of the DAF-12 steroid receptor on aging in Caenorhabditis elegans.Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.1119253–259. 10.1196/annals.1404.018
118
McGeeM. D.DayN.GrahamJ.MelovS. (2012). cep-1/p53-dependent dysplastic pathology of the aging C. elegans gonad.Aging4256–269. 10.18632/aging.100448
119
McGeeM. D.WeberD.DayN.VitelliC.CrippenD.HerndonL. A.et al (2011). Loss of intestinal nuclei and intestinal integrity in aging C. elegans.Aging Cell10699–710. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00713.x
120
McGheeJ. D. (2007). The C. elegans intestine.WormBook1–36. 10.1007/978-3-319-23534-9_1
121
McquillanH. J.LokmanP. M.YoungG. (2003). Effects of sex steroids, sex, and sexual maturity on cortisol production: an in vitro comparison of chinook salmon and rainbow trout interrenals.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.133154–163. 10.1016/s0016-6480(03)00163-1
122
MewesK. R.LatzM.GollaH.FischerA. (2002). Vitellogenin from female and estradiol-stimulated male river lampreys (Lampetra fluviatilis L.).J. Exp. Zool.29252–72. 10.1002/jez.1142
123
MichellA. R. (1999). Longevity of British breeds of dog and its relationships with sex, size, cardiovascular variables and disease.Vet. Rec.145625–629. 10.1136/vr.145.22.625
124
MinK.-J.LeeC.-K.ParkH.-N. (2012). The lifespan of Korean eunuchs.Curr. Biol.22R792–R793.
125
MunkácsyE.ReaS. L. (2014). The paradox of mitochondrial dysfunction and extended longevity.Exp. Gerontol.56221–233. 10.1016/j.exger.2014.03.016
126
NaylorR.RichardsonS. J.McallanB. M. (2008). Boom and bust: a review of the physiology of the marsupial genus Antechinus.J. Comp. Physiol. B178545–562. 10.1007/s00360-007-0250-8
127
NiccoliT.PartridgeL. (2012). Ageing as a risk factor for disease.Curr. Biol.22R741–R752.
128
OlsenP. D. (1971). Differential mortality of Antechinus stuartii (Macleay): nitrogen balance and somatic changes.Aust. J. Zool.19347–353. 10.1071/zo9710347
129
O’NeillD. G.ChurchD. B.McgreevyP. D.ThomsonP. C.BrodbeltD. C. (2013). Longevity and mortality of owned dogs in England.Vet. J.198638–643. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.020
130
O’NeillD. G.ChurchD. B.McgreevyP. D.ThomsonP. C.BrodbeltD. C. (2015). Longevity and mortality of cats attending primary care veterinary practices in England.J. Feline Med. Surg.17125–133. 10.1177/1098612x14536176
131
PalikarasK.MariM.PetanidouB.PasparakiA.FilippidisG.TavernarakisN. (2017). Ectopic fat deposition contributes to age-associated pathology in Caenorhabditis elegans.J. Lipid Res.5872–80. 10.1194/jlr.m069385
132
PankhurstN. W.SorensenP. W. (1984). Degeneration of the alimentary tract in sexually maturing European Anguilla anguilla (L.) and American eels Anguilla rostrata (LeSueur).Can. J. Zool.621143–1149. 10.1139/z84-165
133
ParkerW. H.BroderM. S.ChangE.FeskanichD.FarquharC.LiuZ.et al (2009). Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long- term health outcomes in the nurses’ health study.Obstet. Gynecol.1131027–1037. 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181a11c64
134
PartridgeL.GemsD. (2002). Mechanisms of ageing: public or private?Nat. Rev. Genet.3165–175.
135
PartridgeL.SiblyR. (1991). Constraints in the evolution of life histories.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B.3323–13.
136
PetersonL. W.HuffakerR. C. (1975). Loss of ribulose 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase in proteolytic activity during senescence of detached primary barley leaves.Plant Physiol.551009–1015. 10.1104/pp.55.6.1009
137
PickeringA. D. (1976). Stimulation of intestinal degeneration by oestradiol and testosterone implantation in the migrating river lamprey, Lampetra fluviatilis L.Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.30340–346. 10.1016/0016-6480(76)90085-x
138
QuinnT. P.FooteC. J. (1994). The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behaviour of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka.Anim. Behav.48751–761. 10.1006/anbe.1994.1300
139
ReaS. L. (2005). Metabolism in the Caenorhabditis elegans Mit mutants.Exp. Gerontol.40841–849. 10.1016/j.exger.2005.06.015
140
RobertsonO. H. (1961). Prolongation of the life span of kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka kennerlyi) by castration before the beginning of gonad development.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A.47609–621. 10.1073/pnas.47.4.609
141
RobertsonO. H.WexlerB. C. (1962). Histological changes in the organs and tissues of senile castrated kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka kennerlyi).Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.2458–472. 10.1016/0016-6480(62)90044-8
142
RobertsonO. H.WexlerB. C.MillerB. F. (1961). Degenerative changes in the cardiovascular system of the spawning Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).Circ. Res.9826–834. 10.1161/01.res.9.4.826
143
RoccaW.GrossardtB.De AndradeM.MalkasianG.MeltonL. J. (2006). Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: a population-based cohort study.Lancet Oncol.7821–828. 10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70869-5
144
SakurabaY.LeeS.-H.KimY.-S.ParkO.HörtensteinerS.PaekN.-C. (2014). Delayed degradation of chlorophylls and photosynthetic proteins in Arabidopsis autophagy mutants during stress- induced leaf yellowing.J. Exp. Botany653915–3925. 10.1093/jxb/eru008
145
SchippersJ.SchmidtR.WagstaffC.JingH.-C. (2015). Living to die and dying to live: the survival strategy behind leaf senescence.Plant Physiol.169914–930. 10.1104/pp.15.00498
146
ShawA. C.JoshiS.GreenwoodH.PandaA.LordJ. M. (2010). Aging of the innate immune system.Curr. Opin. Immunol.22507–513.
147
ShoreD. E.RuvkunG. (2013). A cytoprotective perspective on longevity regulation.Trends Cell. Biol.23409–420. 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.04.007
148
ShoupeD.ParkerW. H.BroderM. S.LiuZ.FarquharC.BerekJ. S. (2007). Elective oophorectomy for benign gynecological disorders.Menopause14580–585. 10.1097/gme.0b013e31803c56a4
149
SlackC.GiannakouM. E.FoleyA.GossM.PartridgeL. (2011). dFOXO-independent effects of reduced insulin-like signaling in Drosophila.Aging Cell10735–748. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00707.x
150
SoderstromT. R.CalderonC. E. (1979). A commentary on the bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae).Biotropica11161–172. 10.2307/2388036
151
SorndaT.EzcurraM.KernC.GalimovE. R.AuC.De La GuardiaY.et al (2019). Production of YP170 vitellogenins promotes intestinal senescence in C. elegans.J. Gerontol. A741180–1188. 10.1093/gerona/glz067
152
SpeakmanJ. R. (2008). The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.363375–398. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2145
153
TalbertG. B.HamiltonJ. B. (1965). Duration of life in Lewis strain of rats after gonadectomy at birth and at other ages.J. Gerontol.20489–491.
154
TangJ.BasshamD. C. (2018). Autophagy in crop plants: what’s new beyond Arabidopsis?Open Biol.8:180162. 10.1098/rsob.180162
155
TeschF.-W. (1977). The Eel.London: Chapman and Hall.
156
van DeursenJ. M. (2014). The role of senescent cells in ageing.Nature509439–446. 10.1038/nature13193
157
Van RaamsdonkJ. M.HekimiS. (2009). Deletion of the mitochondrial superoxide dismutase sod-2 extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans.PLoS Genet5:e1000361. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000361
158
Van RaamsdonkJ. M.HekimiS. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: causal or casual relationship?Antioxid. Redox Signal.131911–1953. 10.1089/ars.2010.3215
159
VenzR.PekecT.KaticI.CioskR.EwaldC. Y. (2021). End-of-life targeted auxin-mediated degradation of DAF-2 Insulin/IGF-1 receptor promotes longevity free from growth-related pathologies.BioRxiv[Preprint]10.1101/2021.1105.1131.446422
160
VladykovV. D. (1956). The eel.Quebec: Dept. de Pêcheries Province du Québec.
161
von der DeckenA. (1992). Physiological changes in skeletal muscle by maturation-spawning of non-migrating female atlantic salmon, Salmo salar.Comp. Biochem. Physiol.101B299–301. 10.1016/0305-0491(92)90002-9
162
WadaS.IshidaH.IzumiM.YoshimotoK.OhsumiY.MaeT.et al (2009). Autophagy plays a role in chloroplast degradation during senescence in individually darkened leaves.Plant Physiol.149885–893. 10.1104/pp.108.130013
163
WallaceR. A. (1985). “Vitellogenesis and oocyte growth in nonmammalian vertebrates,” in Developmental Biology, ed.BrowderL. W. (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 127–177. 10.1007/978-1-4615-6814-8_3
164
WangH.ZhangZ.GemsD. (2018a). Monsters in the uterus: teratoma-like tumors in senescent C. elegans result from a parthenogenetic quasi-program.Aging101188–1189. 10.18632/aging.101486
165
WangH.ZhaoY.EzcurraM.BenedettoA.GilliatA.HellbergJ.et al (2018b). A parthenogenetic quasi-program causes teratoma-like tumors during aging in wild-type C. elegans.NPJ Aging Mech. Dis.4:6. 10.1038/s41514-018-0025-3
166
WardS.CarrelJ. S. (1979). Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.Dev. Biol.73304–321. 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90069-1
167
WeichhartT. (2018). mTOR as regulator of lifespan, aging, and cellular senescence: a mini-review.Gerontology64127–134. 10.1159/000484629
168
WilliamsG. C. (1957). Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence.Evolution11398–411. 10.2307/2406060
169
WodinskyJ. (1977). Hormonal inhibition of feeding and death in octopus: control by optic gland secretion.Science198948–951. 10.1126/science.198.4320.948
170
WolkeU.JezuitE. A.PriessJ. R. (2007). Actin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming in C. elegans oogenesis.Development1342227–2236. 10.1242/dev.004952
171
WoodruffG. C.JohnsonE.PhillipsP. C. (2019). A large close relative of C. elegans is slow-developing but not long-lived.BMC Evol. Biol.19:74. 10.1186/s12862-019-1388-1
172
WoolleyP. (1966). “Reproduction in Antechinus spp. and other dasyurid marsupials,” in Proceedings of the Comparative Biology of Reproduction in Mammals. 15th Symposium of the Zoology Society, London (New York, NY: Academic Press), 281–294.
173
YiY.-H.ChienC.-H.ChenW.-W.MaT.-H.LiuK.-Y.ChangY.-S.et al (2014). Lipid droplet pattern and nondroplet-like structure in two fat mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans revealed by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy.J. Biomed. Optics19:011011. 10.1117/1.jbo.19.1.011011
174
YoungT. P.AugspurgerC. K. (1991). Ecology and evolution of long-lived semelparous plants.TREE6285–289. 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90006-j
175
ZeraA. J.HarshmanL. G. (2001). The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.3295–126. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114006
176
ZhangC.CuervoA. M. (2008). Restoration of chaperone-mediated autophagy in aging liver improves cellular maintenance and hepatic function.Nat. Med.14959–965. 10.1038/nm.1851
177
ZiuganovV. V. (2005). A paradox of parasite prolonging the life of its host. Pearl mussel can disable the accelerated senescence program in salmon.Biol. Bull.32360–365. 10.1007/s10525-005-0112-4
Summary
Keywords
aging, C. elegans, programmatic aging, reproductive death, semelparity, senescent pathology
Citation
Gems D, Kern CC, Nour J and Ezcurra M (2021) Reproductive Suicide: Similar Mechanisms of Aging in C. elegans and Pacific Salmon. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:688788. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.688788
Received
31 March 2021
Accepted
21 July 2021
Published
27 August 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Joris Deelen, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Germany
Reviewed by
Benjamin Towbin, University of Bern, Switzerland; Seung-Jae Lee, Pohang University of Science and Technology, South Korea
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Gems, Kern, Nour and Ezcurra.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: David Gems, david.gems@ucl.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Signaling, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.