Abstract
The effects of genotoxic stress can be mediated by activation of the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) kinase, under both DNA damage-dependent (including ionizing radiation), and independent (including hypoxic stress) conditions. ATM activation is complex, and primarily mediated by the lysine acetyltransferase Tip60. Epigenetic changes can regulate this Tip60-dependent activation of ATM, requiring the interaction of Tip60 with tri-methylated histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3). Under hypoxic stress, the role of Tip60 in DNA damage-independent ATM activation is unknown. However, epigenetic changes dependent on the methyltransferase Suv39H1, which generates H3K9me3, have been implicated. Our results demonstrate severe hypoxic stress (0.1% oxygen) caused ATM auto-phosphorylation and activation (pS1981), H3K9me3, and elevated both Suv39H1 and Tip60 protein levels in FTC133 and HCT116 cell lines. Exploring the mechanism of ATM activation under these hypoxic conditions, siRNA-mediated Suv39H1 depletion prevented H3K9me3 induction, and Tip60 inhibition (by TH1834) blocked ATM auto-phosphorylation. While MDM2 (Mouse double minute 2) can target Suv39H1 for degradation, it can be blocked by sirtuin-1 (Sirt1). Under severe hypoxia MDM2 protein levels were unchanged, and Sirt1 levels depleted. SiRNA-mediated depletion of MDM2 revealed MDM2 dependent regulation of Suv39H1 protein stability under these conditions. We describe a novel molecular circuit regulating the heterochromatic state (H3K9me3 positive) under severe hypoxic conditions, showing that severe hypoxia-induced ATM activation maintains H3K9me3 levels by downregulating MDM2 and preventing MDM2-mediated degradation of Suv39H1. This novel mechanism is a potential anti-cancer therapeutic opportunity, which if exploited could target the hypoxic tumor cells known to drive both tumor progression and treatment resistance.
Introduction
The genome is constantly exposed to exogenous and endogenous factors that can affect its function and stability. One of the most important cellular mechanisms that safeguards genome integrity is the DNA damage response pathway (DDR) (; ). DDR is a chromatin-associated process that is activated in response to different types of cellular stress. One of the key factors of DDR is the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)—like kinase Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) (; ).
The genome, through chromatin structure, is regulated by posttranscriptional modifications (PTM) of histones, including phosphorylation, methylation and acetylation (; ; ). Heterochromatic DNA is characterized by the presence of tri-methylation of lysine 9 of histone 3 (H3K9me3). ATM is essential for the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in the heterochromatic region of the genome (; ; ). Following DSB, ATM is activated by trans auto-phosphorylation at S1981 forming active ATM monomers. This event is mediated by lysine acetyltransferase Tip60-dependent acetylation of ATM (, ). Additionally, DSB induce direct interactions of Tip60 with the H3K9me3 (). ATM can be activated (independent of DDR signaling) in response to hypotonic stress, chromatin modifying agents, heat shock and hypoxia (; ; ). Hypoxia induced ATM activation has been associated with stalled replication forks, H3K9me3 and DDR gene expression (including BRCA1 and MLH1) (; , ; , ). Under hypoxic conditions Tip60 is catalytically active (). However, it is unknown if hypoxia-induced ATM activation remains Tip60-dependent. Interestingly, inducing chromatin relaxation using histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) increases DDR signaling, apoptosis and tumor regression in vivo ().
Hypoxia is a common feature of most solid tumors and is associated with poor prognosis, a more aggressive tumor phenotype, and radio- and chemo-resistance (). The cellular adaptation to hypoxic stress alters the histone epigenetic profile, contributing to tumorigenic genomic instability and resistance to therapy (; , ; ; ; ; ). Recently, H3K9me3 was identified as the most efficient barrier to cellular reprogramming, preventing cellular dedifferentiation (). H3K9me3 is catalyzed predominantly by the ubiquitously expressed methyltransferase Suv39H1 (; ). Aberrant Suv39H1 expression has been reported in a number of solid tumors (). The protein levels of Suv39H1 are regulated by posttranslational modifications (; ; ) and the ubiquitin E3 ligase murine double minute 2 (MDM2) (; ). It has been shown that Suv39H1 promotes heterochromatin formation in response to different types of stress, including ionizing radiation (IR) (; ; ). However, little is known about Suv39H1 regulation in response to hypoxic stress.
It has been demonstrated that hypoxia induces a global increase in H3K9 methylation in cancer cell lines (; ; ). Suv39H1 induction in response to hypoxia has been correlated with the levels of H3K9me3 in human fetal lung epithelial cells () as well as in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (). However, its role in regulating H3K9me3 in hypoxic cancer cells is unknown, and the molecular network(s) orchestrating potential correlations have not been elucidated.
Hypoxia is known to cause ATM activation that is independent of DNA damage (). Additionally, ATM has been implicated in suppressing MDM2 function (). However, whether these events coincide in hypoxia is currently unclear. Considering that the levels of Suv39H1 are regulated by MDM2 in normoxia, we propose that the same mechanism is operating in response to hypoxic stress. As such, the induction of ATM followed by MDM2 inactivation in hypoxia might lead to increased levels of Suv39H1 triggering H3K9me3. In this study the molecular mechanism regulating Suv39H1 stability and the subsequent induction of H3K9me3 were investigated. The effects of the ATM mediated regulation of MDM2 on Suv39H1 were monitored in hypoxia. The results support the view of the existence of a regulatory mechanism of chromatin remodeling under hypoxic conditions involving activation of ATM. This novel ATM dependent mechanism for the maintenance of the heterochromatic state in hypoxic conditions indicates that chromatin-modifying drugs targeting ATM function could be exploited to provide therapeutic benefits to late-stage tumors.
Materials and Methods
Cell Line and Reagents
HCT116 (colon carcinoma, p53 wild type) and FTC133 (Human follicular thyroid carcinoma, mutated p53) were grown in RPMI-1640 or DMEM media combined with HAM’s F12 (1:1) respectively (Sigma-Aldrich, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom). The media was supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (GIBCO PRL, Paisley, United Kingdom). Cell culture was performed using a class II laminar flow microbiological safety cabinet. Cells were treated with 10 μM of Ku55933 for 6 h. Cells were radiated with 4 Gy using a Faxitron X-ray (Faxitron Bioptics, AZ, United States). Cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37°C supplied with 5% CO2. Mycoplasma testing was carried out periodically using core facilities at The University of Manchester. All cell lines were obtained from ATCC and authenticated using service provided by Public Health England (last tested in September 2019, prior to completion of these studies).
Hypoxic Conditions
A Whitley H35 Hypoxystation (Don Whitley Scientific Limited, Shipley, United Kingdom) was used in order to create the hypoxic condition used. All experiments were carried out under severe hypoxic conditions (0.1% O2). Cells were seeded and allowed to adhere to the cell culture dish overnight before being transferred to the hypoxic chamber. Cells were incubated for 6 or 18 h in hypoxia and lysed inside the hypoxic chamber.
Western Blot
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM at pH 7.4, NaCl 150 mM, IGEPAL 1%, EDTA 1 mM) with phosphatase inhibitors (PMSF 1 mM, Na3VO4 1 mM and NaF 1 mM), sonicated and centrifuged for 10 min at 14 000 g and the insoluble debris was discarded. Cell lysate (10–35 μg of protein) was fractionated by gel electrophoresis using precast NuPAGETM gels (Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (BioRad, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom). The membrane was blocked for 1h with Tris Buffered Saline (Sigma Aldrich, United Kingdom) containing 5% non-fat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20, incubated with primary and secondary antibodies, and the membrane was developed using enhanced chemiluminesce (ECL) substrate (Bio-Rad). H3K9me3, H3, MDM2, p53, ATM and ATM-pSer1081 were detected using antibodies from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom). HIF-1α was detected using an antibody from BD Transduction. Anti-SUV39H1 and anti-Sirt1 antibody was from Millipore (Billerica, MA, United States). Anti- actin was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, United States). The specificity of two different MDM2 antibodies (anti-MDM2 EP16627 and anti-MDM2 2A10) were validated in FTC133 cells treated with MDM2 siRNA (Supplementary Figure 1).
Immunofluorescence Staining
Cells cultured onto a sterile coverslip were fixed using 10% formalin in PBS, blocked with 1% (w/v) BSA in PBS for 30 min and incubated with anti-H3K9me3 in blocking buffer for 1 h. Cover-slips were washed with PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100, incubated with anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488. Microscopy images were collected on a Zeiss Axio Imager.D2 upright microscope using a 40x/0.5 EC Plan-neofluar objective and captured using a Coolsnap HQ2 camera (Photometrics) through Micromanager software v1.4.23. Specific band pass filter sets for DAPI and FITC were used to prevent bleed through from one channel to the next. Images were then processed and analyzed using Fiji ImageJ software.
RNA Isolation and Quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted using the RNasey kit (Qiagen, Manchester, United Kingdom). cDNAs were prepared by reverse transcription of total RNA using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom). The products were used for real-time PCR using TaqMan probes for Suv39H1, CA9, MDM2, HRT1 and Actin-β (Dharmacon, Horizon Discovery, Cambridge, United Kingdom). RT-PCR was performed using TaqMan Fast Advance master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom) in a StepOnePlus RT-qPCR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom). The obtained data were analyzed using ΔΔCq method to quantify the relative gene expression as described in .
RNA Interference
Cells were transfected with control small interfering RNA (sc-37007), SMARTpool MDM2 siRNA (SO-2650613G), or Suv39H1 siRNA (Cy5GGUGAAAUGGCGUGGAUAUUU3′) from Dharmacon using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), according to instructions from the supplier. Cells were treated and analyzed after a total of 72 h post transfection.
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Inhibition
Cells were treated with 10 μM of Ku55933 for 6 h before lysis ().
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using Graphpad Prism version 7, once the data had been repeated at least three times. When comparing data obtained from experiments with only two different conditions (e.g., normoxia vs. hypoxia) an unpaired t-test was used to compare treated and untreated data. When comparing data obtained from experiments with more than one variable (e.g., normoxia with or without drug vs. hypoxia with or without drug) analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, and to identify individual differences Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was performed. The obtained P-values are represented as follows: a p-value of ≤ 0.05 is represented as ∗, a p-value of ≤ 0.01 is represented ∗∗, a p-value of ≤ 0.001 is represented ∗∗∗ and a P-value of ≤ 0.0001 is represented as ****.
Results
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Activation in Response to Hypoxia Coincides With Upregulation of Suv39H1 and H3K9me3
ATM activation in response to hypoxia has been previously reported (). Here we followed ATM activation, indicated by ATM-pS1981 (pATM), in response to hypoxia (18 h, 0.1% O2) in two different cancer cell lines (human follicular thyroid carcinoma cells FTC133 and human colorectal carcinoma HCT116 cells) and this was compared to ATM auto-phosphorylation in normoxia (21% O2) (Figure 1A). Cells irradiated at 4Gy were used as a positive control for ATM activation. Consistent with previously reported data, active pATM was observed in hypoxic conditions (Figure 1B), and this ATM activation was independent of DNA damage (Supplementary Figure 2). An upregulation of Suv39H1 protein levels was also evident in hypoxia (Figure 1C). Since ATM activation is associated with H3K9me3, the H3K9me3 levels were analyzed using immunofluorescence in normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Significantly higher H3K9me3 protein levels were observed in FTC133 cells following hypoxic treatment compared to normoxia (Figure 2A), in accordance with previously published reports (, ). Upregulation of Suv39H1 in hypoxia coincided with higher H3K9me3 protein levels suggesting that Suv39H1 may mediate H3K9 trimethylation under these conditions (; ). To assess whether Suv39H1 was involved in the upregulation of H3K9me3, siRNA-Suv39H1 or scrambled siRNA were transfected in FTC133 cells and the H3K9me3 protein levels were followed in the presence or absence of Suv39H1 expression (Figure 2B). Transient Suv39H1 knockdown in FTC133 cells in hypoxic conditions resulted in the downregulation of H3K9me3 (Figure 2B). Taken together, these results suggest Suv39H1 is involved in catalyzing H3K9me3 in hypoxia.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
Suv39H1 Is Regulated at the Protein Level in Hypoxia
To investigate the molecular mechanisms mediating Suv39H1 upregulation in hypoxia, Suv39H1 mRNA levels were investigated. No significant changes in Suv39H1 mRNA levels were detected following either 6 or 18 h hypoxic treatment (Figure 3A). In contrast, the mRNA expression of the known HIF-1α downstream target CA9 () increased in a time dependent manner (Figure 3A). This indicates that under hypoxic conditions the upregulation of Suv39H1 level is a result of a mechanism regulating its protein stability rather than its gene expression.
FIGURE 3
Existing literature suggests that the E3-ubiquitin ligase MDM2 regulates Suv39H1 protein stability in normoxia (; ). However, to the best of our knowledge, the mechanism regulating Suv39H1 protein stability in hypoxic conditions is unknown. Considering the involvement of MDM2 in Suv39H1 regulation in normoxia, we hypothesized that a similar mechanism exists under hypoxic conditions. To test this hypothesis MDM2 protein levels were recorded in FTC133 and HCT116 cells following 18 h hypoxia (compared to normoxia). No significant changes in the MDM2 protein levels were evident in response to hypoxia (Figure 3B), suggesting the existence of a more complex system preventing MDM2 dependent degradation of Suv39H1 in hypoxia. Sirt1 has been shown to increase the half-life of Suv39H1 by inhibiting MDM2 mediated polyubiquitination in response to oxidative stress (). To assess whether this mechanism was present under hypoxic conditions, Sirt1 protein levels were analyzed in FTC133 and HCT116 cells in normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Decreased Sirt1 protein levels were observed in hypoxic compared to normoxic conditions in both cell lines (Figure 3C). This suggests that Sirt1 is not involved in inhibiting MDM2 activity in hypoxia.
Tip60 Is Involved in Maintaining Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Activation in Hypoxia
The role of Tip60 in regulating cellular responses to hypoxic stress has previously been highlighted (). It is known that Sirt1 negatively regulates Tip60 protein levels and enzymatic activity (; ) as well as the interaction of Tip60 chromodomain with H3K9me3 (). We investigated the Tip60 protein levels in FTC133 and HCT116 cells in normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Figure 3D). An inverse correlation between Sirt1 (Figure 3C) and Tip60 (Figure 3D) protein levels was observed in response to hypoxia (Sirt1 downregulation and concomitant Tip60 upregulation). These results in combination with those shown in Figure 1A (ATM autophosphorylation in hypoxia) and Figure 2A (upregulation of H3K9me3 protein levels in hypoxic conditions) led to the hypothesis that ATM activation is Tip60-dependent in hypoxia. To test this hypothesis the activation of ATM was studied in hypoxic FTC133 and HCT116 cells treated with TH1834, a specific inhibitor of Tip60 acetyltransferase activity (). The results showed a significant reduction of pATM levels in a TH1834 dose dependent manner in FTC133 cells (Figure 4A). Reduced pATM protein levels were observed in both FTC133 and HCT116 hypoxic cells (18 h) treated with TH1834 (Figures 4B,C, lanes 5 and 6). Since Tip60 activity depends on H3K9me3 (, ), the mechanism governing H3K9me3 upregulation in hypoxic conditions was investigated next. Irradiated cells at 4 Gy were used as a positive control for Tip60 dependent activation of ATM in response to DNA damage (, ). Surprisingly, FTC133 cell lines required higher concentrations of TH1834 to inhibit ATM in response to IR (Supplementary Figure 3). FTC133 cell lines present higher protein levels of ATM than HCT116, which may explain the observed difference.
FIGURE 4
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Dependent Inhibition of Mouse Double Minute 2 Leads to Suv39H1 Upregulation in Hypoxia
ATM activation in response to severe hypoxia (≤ 0.1% O2), and ATM-mediated downregulation of MDM2 activity has been reported (; ). We hypothesized that Suv39H1 protein stabilization under hypoxic conditions could be a consequence of ATM mediated MDM2 inhibition. To test this hypothesis the Suv39H1 protein levels were followed in FTC133 and HCT116 cells in which ATM was activated by hypoxia or IR (4 Gy), in the presence or absence of the ATM inhibitor Ku55933 (; Figure 5A). Significant downregulation of Suv39H1 was observed in hypoxic conditions upon treatment with Ku55933 in both cell lines (Figure 5B). Furthermore, significantly reduced Suv39H1 protein levels were seen under normoxic conditions in irradiated FTC133 cells treated with Ku55933 (Figure 5B). No effect of Ku55933 treatment in normoxic conditions on Suv39H1 protein levels was evident in FTC133 cells. However, in normoxic HCT116 cells treated with Ku55933 reduced Suv39H1 protein levels were observed as well as an increase in MDM2 protein levels (Figure 5C). It is important to note that the basal pATM levels in untreated HCT116 is higher than in FTC133 which may explain the observed difference between the two cell lines (Supplementary Figure 4).
FIGURE 5
Interestingly, the inhibition of ATM (directly by Ku55933, or indirectly by TH1834), led to the downregulation of HIF-1α in FTC133 cells (Figures 4B, 5). However, the same effect was not observed in HCT116 cells, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in ATM mediated stabilization of HIF-1α is cell type specific. Contradicting results regarding ATM involvement in regulating HIF-1α stability has been previously reported (; ), which supports a cell type specific effect. A more detailed analysis of the correlation between the ATM and HIF-1 pathway is needed to shed light to these observations.
Increased MDM2 protein levels were seen following Ku55933 treatment in hypoxic conditions (Figure 5C), suggesting that ATM is involved in regulating MDM2 protein levels in hypoxia. To test MDM2 involvement in regulating Suv39H1 stability in hypoxia, siRNA was used to reduce MDM2 expression (Figure 5D). Knockdown of MDM2 increased Suv39H1 and p53 protein levels under hypoxic conditions (Figure 5E). Together, these results suggest that the presence of catalytically active ATM in hypoxia, leads to the upregulation of Suv39H1 by negatively regulating MDM2.
Discussion
Our results provide direct evidence demonstrating that hypoxic activation of ATM requires the presence of H3K9me3 and Tip60 activity. This adds additional complexity to the previous reports of ATM activation in hypoxia as a consequence of replication stress (). Silencing Suv39H1 expression led to a significant decrease in the levels of H3K9me3, demonstrating that Suv39H1 plays an essential role in the induction of H3K9me3 in hypoxia. The importance of Suv39H1 as part of the cellular response to hypoxic stress is emphasized by the involvement of HIF-1α in inducing the expression of methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (Mat2A) (). Mat2A regulates the homeostasis of the universal methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) which functions as the methyl donor for Suv39H1 catalytic reactions (). As such SAM promotes Suv39H1 activity, and hence the induction of H3K9me3, in response to hypoxic stress.
Here we show that Suv39H1 upregulation in hypoxia is a process regulated at the protein level by MDM2, supporting previous work (; ). In normoxic conditions, MDM2 dependent ubiquitination of Suv39H1 in response to oxidative stress is executed in a manner involving Sirt1 (). However, MDM2 levels were unaffected and Sirt1 levels downregulated in hypoxia, suggesting an alternative mechanism regulating MDM2 activity in this setting.
Existing data highlights that the direct interaction of Tip60 with H3K9me3 is essential for the activation of ATM in response to DNA damage (, , ). This notion together with observed upregulation of Tip60 (Figure 3D) led us to test if hypoxic ATM activation required Tip60 activity. The data provided in this study supports this concept, as Tip60 inhibition abolished ATM autophosphorylation. Additionally, this is substantiated by the downregulation of Sirt1 (Figure 3C), as Sirt1 is involved in negatively regulating Tip60 activity (; ). Sirt1 has been implicated in negatively regulating HIF-1α activity (; ), which is further supported by the presented data. Together our results suggest that ATM activation in hypoxia is Tip60 dependent, expanding the previously proposed model indicating replication stress as the triggering event of ATM activation in hypoxia (; ).
ATM has known roles in promoting heterochromatin formation (), adjusting MDM2 activity (; ) and protein stability () in response to DNA damage. In addition, ATM is known to be catalytically active in hypoxia, independently of DNA damage (; ). Therefore it was hypothesized that inhibition of MDM2 and consequent upregulation of Suv39H1 in hypoxia might be coordinated by ATM. Supporting this, the inhibition of ATM resulted in MDM2 upregulation, and significant downregulation of Suv39H1 protein levels in hypoxia. In addition, silencing MDM2 expression in hypoxia induced upregulation of Suv39H1, an effect that was eliminated in cells treated with the ATM inhibitor.
We propose that persistence of hypoxic conditions leads to sustained activation of ATM that directly regulates MDM2. This leads to the upregulation of Suv39H1 that helps maintain the methylation of H3K9, creating a positive feedback loop (Figure 6). This idea is further endorsed by data published by that shows that ATM dependent DDR activation is inhibited upon Suv39H1 knockdown (). Furthermore, additional data shows that ATM activation requires Suv39H1 recruitment to chromatin to promote H3K9me3 and Tip60 activation ().
FIGURE 6
Conclusion
In conclusion, the data presented in this study highlight a previously uncharacterized feedback regulatory loop under hypoxic conditions, and point to a more complex role for ATM in determining cell fate under low oxygen conditions. The results presented here endorse the notion that the prolonged activation of ATM in hypoxia promotes heterochromatin formation. Specifically the ATM-MDM2 axis is involved in the regulation of Suv39H1 protein stability and enzymatic activity promoting H3K9me3. Epigenetic modifications of H3K9 have been associated with ATM activity in different cellular contexts including hypoxia (; ; ). These findings advance our understanding of the pathways used by cancer cells to adapt to hypoxia and provide the platform for the design of novel potential therapeutic targets. The importance of this is emphasized by the increasing number of drugs targeting the DDR that are currently in different stages of development (). Particularly, the use of an ATM inhibitor, as a radiosensitizer, in malignancies known to have high levels of hypoxia, such as glioblastoma (), has shown striking results in vivo ().
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
ML: performed the experiments, data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. RGG, CD, KJW, and JB: experimental design, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. KJW: final approval of manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the international student fellowship granted by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) Mexico to ML (226081/381343).
Acknowledgments
The Bioimaging Facility microscopes used in this study were purchased with grants from BBSRC, Welcome and the University of Manchester Strategic Fund. We thank Peter March, Roger Meadows, and Steven Marsden for their help with the microscopy. We would also like to acknowledge Katherine Finegan for her technical support with some of the experiments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.720194/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1Antibody validation. The specificity of two different MDM2 antibodies (anti-MDM2 EP16627 and anti-MDM2 2A10) was validated in cells treated with MDM2 siRNA showing significant reduction of the MDM2 band in cells transfected with siRNA targeting MDM2 expression. FTC133 cells were transfected with 40 pmol of MDM2 siRNA or control siRNA and analyzed by Western blot.
Supplementary Figure 2ATM is activated in hypoxia in the absence of DNA damage. Cells were incubated in normoxia (N; 21% O2) or severe hypoxia (H; 0.1% O2) for 18 h prior to lysis and Western blotting. HIF-1α was used as a control for hypoxia and β-actin as a loading control (A) FTC133 cells were incubated for 18 h in normoxic (21% O2) or severe hypoxic (0.1% O2) conditions prior to fixation and staining. Cells irradiated with 4Gy cells were used as positive control (Nrmx + 4 Gy). Cells were stained for pATM-S1981 (green), 53BP1 (red) and DAPI (blue) (B).
Supplementary Figure 3The levels of ATM-pSer1981 in irradiated FTC133 cells treated with different concentrations of TH1834. Cells were incubated with 10, 20, or 30 μM of TH1834 or DMSO (marked with 0) in normoxia (21% O2) for 18 h and then irradiated at 4 Gy x-rays (N + 4Gy). Cells were lysed and analyzed by Western blot 1 h post radiation.
Supplementary Figure 4Effect of ATM inhibition on the levels of Suv39H1 and MDM2 in normoxia. Cells were seeded left to adder overnight and incubated in normoxia (N: 21% O2) with DMSO or 10 μM of Ku55933 for 4 h prior to lysis and Western blot analysis.
References
1
AllshireR. C.MadhaniH. D. (2018). Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.19229–244. 10.1038/nrm.2017.119
2
AyrapetovM. K.Gursoy-YuzugulluO.XuC.XuY.PriceB. D. (2014). DNA double-strand breaks promote methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and transient formation of repressive chromatin.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1119169–9174. 10.1073/pnas.1403565111
3
BannisterA. J.KouzaridesT. (2011). Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications.Cell Res.21381–395. 10.1038/cr.2011.22
4
BencokovaZ.KaufmannM. R.PiresI. M.LecaneP. S.GiacciaA. J.HammondE. M. (2009). ATM activation and signaling under hypoxic conditions.Mol. Cell. Biol.29526–537. 10.1128/mcb.01301-08
5
BenlhabibH.MendelsonC. R. (2011). Epigenetic regulation of surfactant protein A gene (SP-A) expression in fetal lung reveals a critical role for Suv39h methyltransferases during development and hypoxia.Mol. Cell. Biol.311949–1958. 10.1128/mcb.01063-10
6
BertoutJ. A.PatelS. A.SimonM. C. (2008). The impact of O2 availability on human cancer.Nat. Rev. Cancer8967–975. 10.1038/nrc2540
7
Bosch-PresegueL.Raurell-VilaH.Marazuela-DuqueA.Kane-GoldsmithN.ValleA.OliverJ.et al (2011). Stabilization of Suv39H1 by SirT1 is part of oxidative stress response and ensures genome protection.Mol. Cell42210–223. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.034
8
CamH.EastonJ. B.HighA.HoughtonP. J. (2010). mTORC1 signaling under hypoxic conditions is controlled by ATM-dependent phosphorylation of HIF-1alpha.Mol. Cell40509–520. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.030
9
CedarH.BergmanY. (2009). Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms.Nat. Rev. Genet.10295–304. 10.1038/nrg2540
10
ChenH.YanY.DavidsonT. L.ShinkaiY.CostaM. (2006). Hypoxic stress induces dimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 through histone methyltransferase G9a in mammalian cells.Cancer Res.669009–9016. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0101
11
ChengQ.ChenL.LiZ.LaneW. S.ChenJ. (2009). ATM activates p53 by regulating MDM2 oligomerization and E3 processivity.EMBO J.283857–3867. 10.1038/emboj.2009.294
12
CicciaA.ElledgeS. J. (2010). The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.Mol. Cell40179–204. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
13
Di MiccoR.FumagalliM.CicaleseA.PiccininS.GaspariniP.LuiseC.et al (2006). Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication.Nature444638–642.
14
Di MiccoR.SulliG.DobrevaM.LiontosM.BotrugnoO. A.GargiuloG.et al (2011). Interplay between oncogene-induced DNA damage response and heterochromatin in senescence and cancer.Nat. Cell Biol.13292–302. 10.1038/ncb2170
15
DurantS. T.ZhengL.WangY.ChenK.ZhangL.ZhangT.et al (2018). The brain-penetrant clinical ATM inhibitor AZD1390 radiosensitizes and improves survival of preclinical brain tumor models.Sci. Adv.4:eaat1719. 10.1126/sciadv.aat1719
16
FalkM.LukasovaE.KozubekS. (2008). Chromatin structure influences the sensitivity of DNA to gamma-radiation.Biochim. Biophys. Acta17832398–2414. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.07.010
17
FilipponiD.MullerJ.EmelyanovA.BulavinD. V. (2016). Wip1 controls global heterochromatin silencing via ATM/BRCA1-dependent DNA methylation.Cancer Cell30361–362. 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.07.016
18
GannonH. S.WodaB. A.JonesS. N. (2012). ATM phosphorylation of Mdm2 Ser394 regulates the amplitude and duration of the DNA damage response in mice.Cancer Cell21668–679. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.011
19
GaoC.BourkeE.ScobieM.FammeM. A.KoolmeisterT.HelledayT.et al (2014). Rational design and validation of a Tip60 histone acetyltransferase inhibitor.Sci. Rep.4:5372.
20
GoodarziA. A.NoonA. T.DeckbarD.ZivY.ShilohY.LobrichM.et al (2008). ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin.Mol. Cell31167–177. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.017
21
GuoZ.KozlovS.LavinM. F.PersonM. D.PaullT. T. (2010). ATM activation by oxidative stress.Science330517–521. 10.1126/science.1192912
22
HagemannT. L.MaresD.KwanS. (2000). Gene regulation of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein and the human homolog of the Drosophila Su(var)3-9: WASP and SUV39H1, two adjacent genes at Xp11.23.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1493368–372. 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00199-8
23
HammondE. M.DenkoN. C.DorieM. J.AbrahamR. T.GiacciaA. J. (2002). Hypoxia links ATR and p53 through replication arrest.Mol. Cell. Biol.221834–1843. 10.1128/mcb.22.6.1834-1843.2002
24
HicksonI.ZhaoY.RichardsonC. J.GreenS. J.MartinN. M.OrrA. I.et al (2004). Identification and characterization of a novel and specific inhibitor of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase ATM.Cancer Res.649152–9159. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-2727
25
HuangR. X.ZhouP. K. (2020). DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer.Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.5:60.
26
HuntC. R.PanditaR. K.LaszloA.HigashikuboR.AgarwalM.KitamuraT.et al (2007). Hyperthermia activates a subset of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated effectors independent of DNA strand breaks and heat shock protein 70 status.Cancer Res.673010–3017. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4328
27
JehannoC.FlouriotG.Le GoffP.MichelD. (2017). A model of dynamic stability of H3K9me3 heterochromatin to explain the resistance to reprogramming of differentiated cells.Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech.1860184–195. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.11.006
28
KanuN.BehrensA. (2007). ATMIN defines an NBS1-independent pathway of ATM signalling.EMBO J.262933–2941. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601733
29
KhoronenkovaS. V.DianovaI. I.TernetteN.KesslerB. M.ParsonsJ. L.DianovG. L. (2012). ATM-dependent downregulation of USP7/HAUSP by PPM1G activates p53 response to DNA damage.Mol. Cell45801–813. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.021
30
KimB. S.KoH. R.HwangI.ChoS. W.AhnJ. Y. (2021). EBP1 regulates Suv39H1 stability via the ubiquitin-proteasome system in neural development.BMB Rep.54, 413–418. 10.5483/BMBRep.2021.54.8.022
31
KriegA. J.RankinE. B.ChanD.RazorenovaO.FernandezS.GiacciaA. J. (2010). Regulation of the histone demethylase JMJD1A by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha enhances hypoxic gene expression and tumor growth.Mol. Cell. Biol.30344–353. 10.1128/mcb.00444-09
32
LimJ. H.LeeY. M.ChunY. S.ChenJ.KimJ. E.ParkJ. W. (2010). Sirtuin 1 modulates cellular responses to hypoxia by deacetylating hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha.Mol. Cell38864–878. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.023
33
LiuQ.LiuL.ZhaoY.ZhangJ.WangD.ChenJ.et al (2011). Hypoxia induces genomic DNA demethylation through the activation of HIF-1α and transcriptional upregulation of MAT2A in hepatoma cells.Mol. Cancer Ther.101113–1123. 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-10-1010
34
LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.Methods25402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
35
LuY.ChuA.TurkerM. S.GlazerP. M. (2011). Hypoxia-induced epigenetic regulation and silencing of the BRCA1 promoter.Mol. Cell. Biol.313339–3350. 10.1128/mcb.01121-10
36
LuY.WajapeyeeN.TurkerM. S.GlazerP. M. (2014). Silencing of the DNA mismatch repair gene MLH1 induced by hypoxic stress in a pathway dependent on the histone demethylase LSD1.Cell Rep.8501–513. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.035
37
MeyerB.FabbriziM. R.RajS.ZobelC. L.HallahanD. E.SharmaG. G. (2016). Histone H3 Lysine 9 Acetylation Obstructs ATM activation and promotes ionizing radiation sensitivity in normal stem cells.Stem Cell Rep.71013–1022. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.11.004
38
MonteiroA. R.HillR.PilkingtonG. J.MadureiraP. A. (2017). The role of hypoxia in Glioblastoma invasion.Cells6:45. 10.3390/cells6040045
39
MüllerM. M.FierzB.BittovaL.LiszczakG.MuirT. W. (2016). A two-state activation mechanism controls the histone methyltransferase Suv39h1.Nat. Chem. Biol.12188–193. 10.1038/nchembio.2008
40
MungamuriS. K.QiaoR. F.YaoS.ManfrediJ. J.GuW.AaronsonS. A. (2016). USP7 enforces heterochromatinization of p53 target promoters by protecting SUV39H1 from MDM2-mediated degradation.Cell Rep.142528–2537. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.049
41
NakayamaJ.RiceJ. C.StrahlB. D.AllisC. D.GrewalS. I. (2001). Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly.Science292110–113. 10.1126/science.1060118
42
OlcinaM. M.FoskolouI. P.AnbalaganS.SenraJ. M.PiresI. M.JiangY.et al (2013). Replication stress and chromatin context link ATM activation to a role in DNA replication.Mol. Cell52758–766. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.019
43
OlcinaM. M.LeszczynskaK. B.SenraJ. M.IsaN. F.HaradaH.HammondE. M. (2015). H3K9me3 facilitates hypoxia-induced p53-dependent apoptosis through repression of APAK.Oncogene35793–799. 10.1038/onc.2015.134
44
OussetM.BouquetF.FalloneF.BiardD.DrayC.ValetP.et al (2010). Loss of ATM positively regulates the expression of hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) through oxidative stress: role in the physiopathology of the disease.Cell Cycle92814–2822.
45
OzdağH.TeschendorffA. E.AhmedA. A.HylandS. J.BlenkironC.BobrowL.et al (2006). Differential expression of selected histone modifier genes in human solid cancers.BMC Genomics7:90. 10.1186/1471-2164-7-90
46
PengL.LingH.YuanZ.FangB.BloomG.FukasawaK.et al (2012). SIRT1 negatively regulates the activities, functions, and protein levels of hMOF and TIP60.Mol. Cell. Biol.322823–2836. 10.1128/mcb.00496-12
47
Perez-PerriJ. I.AcevedoJ. M.WappnerP. (2011). Epigenetics: new questions on the response to hypoxia.Int. J. Mol. Sci.124705–4721.
48
Perez-PerriJ. I.DenglerV. L.AudetatK. A.PandeyA.BonnerE. A.UrhM.et al (2016). The TIP60 complex is a conserved coactivator of HIF1A.Cell Rep.1637–47. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.082
49
QinB.YuJ.NowsheenS.ZhaoF.WangL.LouZ. (2020). STK38 promotes ATM activation by acting as a reader of histone H4 ufmylation.Sci. Adv.6:eaax8214.
50
ReaS.EisenhaberF.O’CarrollD.StrahlB. D.SunZ. W.SchmidM.et al (2000). Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases.Nature406593–599. 10.1038/35020506
51
ShilohY. (2003). ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity.Nat. Rev. Cancer3155–168. 10.1038/nrc1011
52
SidlerC.LiD.WangB.KovalchukI.KovalchukO. (2014). SUV39H1 downregulation induces deheterochromatinization of satellite regions and senescence after exposure to ionizing radiation.Front. Genet.5:411. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00411
53
SunY.JiangX.ChenS.FernandesN.PriceB. D. (2005). A role for the Tip60 histone acetyltransferase in the acetylation and activation of ATM.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10213182–13187. 10.1073/pnas.0504211102
54
SunY.JiangX.XuY.AyrapetovM. K.MoreauL. A.WhetstineJ. R.et al (2009). Histone H3 methylation links DNA damage detection to activation of the tumour suppressor Tip60.Nat. Cell Biol.111376–1382. 10.1038/ncb1982
55
SunY.XuY.RoyK.PriceB. D. (2007). DNA damage-induced acetylation of lysine 3016 of ATM activates ATM kinase activity.Mol. Cell. Biol.278502–8509. 10.1128/mcb.01382-07
56
TakataH.HanafusaT.MoriT.ShimuraM.IidaY.IshikawaK.et al (2013). Chromatin compaction protects genomic DNA from radiation damage.PLoS One8:e75622. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075622
57
TausendschonM.DehneN.BruneB. (2011). Hypoxia causes epigenetic gene regulation in macrophages by attenuating Jumonji histone demethylase activity.Cytokine53256–262. 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.11.002
58
WangD.ZhouJ.LiuX.LuD.ShenC.DuY.et al (2013). Methylation of SUV39H1 by SET7/9 results in heterochromatin relaxation and genome instability.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1105516–5521.
59
WangJ.ChenJ. (2010). SIRT1 regulates autoacetylation and histone acetyltransferase activity of TIP60.J. Biol. Chem.28511458–11464.
60
WatsonJ. A.WatsonC. J.McCannA.BaughJ. (2010). Epigenetics, the epicenter of the hypoxic response.Epigenetics5293–296.
61
WatsonJ. A.WatsonC. J.McCrohanA. M.WoodfineK.TosettoM.McDaidJ.et al (2009). Generation of an epigenetic signature by chronic hypoxia in prostate cells.Hum. Mol. Genet.183594–3604.
62
WengerR. H.StiehlD. P.CamenischG. (2005). Integration of oxygen signaling at the consensus HRE.Sci. STKE2005:re12.
63
XuY.XuC.PriceB. D. (2012). Mechanistic links between ATM and histone methylation codes during DNA repair.Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci.110263–288.
64
YuS.ZhouR.YangT.LiuS.CuiZ.QiaoQ.et al (2019). Hypoxia promotes colorectal cancer cell migration and invasion in a SIRT1-dependent manner.Cancer Cell Int.19:116.
65
ZhouV. W.GorenA.BernsteinB. E. (2011). Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes.Nat. Rev. Genet.127–18.
66
ZouL.ElledgeS. J. (2003). Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes.Science3001542–1548.
Summary
Keywords
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM), hypoxia, SUV39H1, Tip60, MDM2
Citation
Likhatcheva M, Gieling RG, Brown JAL, Demonacos C and Williams KJ (2021) A Novel Mechanism of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Mediated Regulation of Chromatin Remodeling in Hypoxic Conditions. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:720194. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.720194
Received
03 June 2021
Accepted
31 August 2021
Published
21 September 2021
Volume
9 - 2021
Edited by
Ann-Kristin Östlund Farrants, Stockholm University, Sweden
Reviewed by
Silvio Zaina, University of Guanajuato, Mexico; Janine M. LaSalle, University of California, Davis, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Likhatcheva, Gieling, Brown, Demonacos and Williams.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kaye J. Williams, kaye.williams@manchester.ac.uk
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work
†ORCID: James A. L. Brown, orcid.org/0000-0002-3155-0334
This article was submitted to Epigenomics and Epigenetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.