Abstract
With the explosion of gene editing tools in recent years, there has been a much greater demand for mouse embryo phenotyping, and traditional methods such as histology and histochemistry experienced a methodological renaissance as they became the principal tools for phenotyping. However, it is important to explore alternative phenotyping options to maximize time and resources and implement volumetric structural analysis for enhanced investigation of phenotypes. Cardiovascular phenotyping, in particular, is important to perform in vivo due to the dramatic structural and functional changes that occur in heart development over relatively short periods of time. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is one of the most exciting advanced imaging techniques emerging within the field of developmental biology, and this review provides a summary of how it is currently being implemented in mouse embryo investigations and phenotyping. This review aims to provide an understanding of the approaches used in optical coherence tomography and how they can be applied in embryology and developmental biology, with the overall aim of bridging the gap between biology and technology.
Introduction
The mouse embryo is an important mammalian model for basic genetic research because it is genetically similar to humans and has a completely mapped genome which is highly versatile for genetic manipulation (; ). Advances in genetic engineering have led to a plethora of genetically manipulated mouse models which are invaluable for enhancing our understanding of human developmental diseases (; ), but as a result, the market for mouse mutants of human diseases is saturated, and inefficient phenotyping tools cannot accommodate the demand (). Advanced imaging methods, which facilitate high-throughput phenotyping, will be critical to ensure that the field of developmental biology can capitalize on large-scale, genome-wide screens for new models of human disease. In this way, advanced imaging in embryology has the potential to unlock unprecedented insights into the origins of congenital abnormalities ().
Traditional structural phenotyping is carried out by histological and histochemical methods which are disadvantaged by their destructive nature, inability to capture live structure and dynamics, and the total loss of three-dimensional information (). Volumetric imaging techniques represent an exciting avenue of exploration for embryologists and developmental biologists (Wang et al., 2020). The most common non-destructive imaging modalities for phenotyping whole mouse embryos include ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and micro-magnetic resonance imaging (µMRI), both of which have remarkable capabilities for live, in utero imaging (; ). However, UBM is limited by its soft tissue contrast (), and neither UBM nor µMRI can provide the spatial resolution required for detailed phenotyping. Optical techniques expand the scale of resolution and imaging depth available for phenotyping of embryonic structures and functional features (Wang et al., 2020). Confocal, multiphoton, and light-sheet microscopy are examples of high-resolution optical microscopic methods that are capable of time-lapse imaging of early embryos in culture. However, the resulting sub-micron resolution is achieved at the expense of limited imaging depth (; ; Udan et al., 2014). Optical projection tomography (OPT) is an optical technique well suited for fluorescently labelled or label-free imaging of mouse embryos due to its relatively high resolution (5 µm) (; Singh et al., 2016; ). However, since OPT utilizes projection images acquired at different sample orientations, which is time consuming, the imaging speed is usually sacrificed for reconstruction quality. Therefore, OPT application for live embryonic imaging is challenging. Another promising imaging technique in embryology, photoacoustic tomography (PAT), has an advantage of non-invasive fast in utero mouse embryonic imaging (; ) and allows one to measure oxygen blood saturation in addition to structural imaging (). However, PAT imaging is performed at significantly lower spatial resolution (; ; ), which is insufficient to resolve cellular level details.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive, rapid imaging technique, which relies on natural tissue optical contrast and does not require the application of contrast agents. OCT is unique in that it offers higher spatial resolution than ultrasound or µMRI, while also having a greater imaging depth than confocal and multiphoton microscopy. With a spatial resolution of 2–10 µm and millimeter-level imaging depth (1–3 mm), the imaging capabilities of OCT are positioned between confocal microscopy and high-frequency ultrasound. Due to these specifications, OCT is uniquely suitable for mouse embryonic imaging and is capable of assessing structural dynamics in embryonic organs including the developing heart, which is only a few hundred microns in size during the early developmental stages (reviewed by ()). To capture the dynamics of the embryonic hearts in 4D (3D + time), multiple approaches for direct volumetric as well as sequential data acquisition, retrospective gating, and post-acquisition synchronization have been developed (; ; Wang et al., 2015b; Wang et al., 2016), which provide enhanced sampling rate and accuracy of the heartbeat reconstruction toward a time-resolved mechanistic investigation of cardiogenesis.
In addition to anatomical and morphological information, the power of OCT lies in its ability to capture functional information. One such functional extension is Doppler OCT, which detects axial blood flow velocity at the same spatiotemporal resolution as structural OCT. Doppler OCT was first established as a feasible approach to capture blood flow dynamics in the Xenopus embryo (Yazdanfar et al., 1997; Westphal et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2003) and with the advancement of technology, it has become an important tool to study cardiovascular development in mice (; ; ; ; Wang and Larina, 2020). Despite its advantages, Doppler OCT is not the optimal tool for vascular reconstruction due to its insensitivity to the transverse component of blood flow which prevents visualization of vessels that are perpendicular to the scanning laser beam. An alternative functional OCT approach is OCT angiography (OCTA) which highlights pixels in OCT images with higher temporal intensity fluctuations (speckle variance). Since the pixels associated with moving blood cells produce the highest fluctuations in comparison to the static tissue background, this approach allows for reconstruction of the circulatory network in live embryos regardless of the flow direction (Sudheendran et al., 2011; ). This method has been extended to 4D visualization of the blood flow in the embryonic heart (). The cardiac 4D OCTA method relies on the periodicity of the heartbeat, and assumes an identical position of the heart wall at the same phase of each heartbeat, while the blood cells do not return to the same spatial location. 4D OCTA is performed over the frames corresponding to the same phase of the cardiac cycle, but separated in time by the whole heartbeat. By performing this analysis for each spatial location and heartbeat phase, the flow of blood cells in the heart is revealed volumetrically and dynamically. Together, these structural and functional methods provide a unique phenotyping toolset for mouse embryologists.
As outlined in this review, OCT has been applied as a non-invasive imaging tool to interrogate mouse embryo development at early stages using advanced culturing techniques () (Wang et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017), as well as at later stages when the embryo is alive and in utero (Syed et al., 2011; ; ; ). A gap remains in the field with regards to integrating OCT imaging for phenotyping of transgenic and targeted mutant mice. This marriage of technology and biology has already revealed unparalleled information about the cardiac development (; ) that cannot be achieved by other techniques, and the potential for its application in other developing systems is limitless. This review aims to introduce the basics of optical coherence tomography and describe its application in biology, with the intention to encourage a more cross-disciplinary approach to answering questions in development and embryology.
Structural embryonic phenotyping
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was first implemented in developmental biology by imaging embryonic hearts in Xenopus-laevis (). In the mouse, initial OCT investigations were performed on whole embryonic day 10.5 (E10.5) embryos, as well as extracted hearts at E14.5 and E17.5 (). OCT was used for non-destructive optical sectioning of whole mouse embryos and the cardiovascular system, enabling visualization of embryological morphology with resolutions comparable to standard histology ().
Jenkins and colleagues demonstrated that OCT was capable of imaging extracted, exogenously paced embryonic hearts (). Developing hearts were dissected at E13.5 and placed in an electrode chamber that stabilized the heart in a temperature-controlled, oxygenated solution. The electrode chamber consisted of two platinum sheets embedded into a silicone pad which facilitated pacing of the heart at 1 Hz through field stimulation (). OCT imaging of E13.5 cardiac development revealed the four-chambered structure by this time; the trabeculations of the rough-walled ventricles were discriminated from the smooth-walled atria ().
Due to its high resolution, fast imaging speeds and non-destructive imaging capabilities, OCT quickly became recognized as a valuable phenotyping tool for mouse mutants of cardiac development. The very first OCT phenotyping of mouse embryonic hearts was performed in Hexim1 (hexamethylene-bis-acetamide-inducible protein) mutants (). Hexim1 is a tumor suppressor and a cyclic-dependent kinase inhibitor, and deletion of its C-terminal region leads to perinatal death, growth retardation, abnormal coronary patterning, ventricular wall thinning and increased ventricular cavity size (). Hexim1 mutant and wild-type embryonic hearts were excised at E12.5 and maintained in culture to facilitate exogenous pacing at 1 Hz. 3-D data of the end-relaxation phase in the cardiac cycle revealed that mutant hearts were smaller, less developed, and asymmetrical in comparison to the wild-types. OCT-derived ventricular measurements demonstrated that Hexim1 mutant hearts showed increased ventricular chamber volumes and decreased myocardial wall thickness (Figure 1). These findings were consistent with traditional histological phenotyping techniques used to study Hexim1 mutants and demonstrate how OCT may be applied to phenotype embryonic mutant hearts in a non-destructive manner, preserving 3-D architecture and facilitating subsequent tissue processing for genotyping or histology/histochemistry.
FIGURE 1
In addition to mouse mutants of cardiogenesis, OCT has been applied for structural phenotyping of a mouse model with limb defects. Pcgf3 mutants are known to exhibit defects in bone development, but structural OCT imaging facilitated the first 3-D assessment of embryonic limb anatomy (
OCT imaging of brain ventricular volume and blood vessel architecture demonstrate its potential as a phenotyping tool in other organ systems and mouse mutants. Specifically, the effect of maternal ethanol exposure on fetal brain development was investigated in E12.5 embryos fixed in paraformaldehyde, and OCT imaging revealed significantly increased brain ventricular volumes in the fetus (Sudheendran et al., 2013). Other studies investigating the susceptibility of fetal growth and development to maternal substance abuse have been performed using an in utero OCT imaging technique and will be discussed in detail later in this manuscript.
These studies demonstrate how structural OCT can be applied to generate detailed structural annotations of whole mouse embryo development, with unlimited potential regarding embryonic stage and organ system.
Live phenotyping in culture
The first attempt at dynamic OCT mouse embryo imaging was reported by Luo and colleagues (
The integration of OCT technology with static mouse embryo culture protocols was critical for enabling imaging under semi-physiological conditions. Static embryo culture involves skilled micro-dissection under a temperature-controlled microscope station, followed by embryo recovery in an environmentally controlled incubator for at least 1 hour before imaging (
This approach was applied to visualize the process of neural tube closure in mouse embryos for almost 17 h of culturing (Wang et al., 2017). The neural tube arises from the neural plate through a complex process of folding, and eventually gives rise to the spinal cord and brain. Failure of cranial neural tube closure results in anencephaly which is an absence of a major portion of the brain and results in postnatal death. In mice, cranial neural tube closure was visualized using time-lapse 3-D OCT imaging (Wang et al., 2017). At the beginning of the imaging period, E8.5 embryos had open head folds, but 13.75 h later, closure of the cranial neural tube was complete (Wang et al., 2017). OCT imaging was capable of visualizing and quantifying the zipper-like mechanism of hindbrain closure, supporting previous reports of sequential fusion of the neural folds within this region (
A similar approach was applied as a phenotyping tool to characterize a neural tube defect in the Wdr19 mutant mouse model (
FIGURE 2

Live phenotyping in culture of the Wdr19 mutant mouse embryo. 3-D OCT images of the forebrain region from (A) control and (B) Wdr19 mutant embryos at E8.5 show an obvious difference in neural tube phenotype. The red arrows indicate the forebrain region. The green lines in the ventral views indicate the locations where the anterior views are taken. The yellow lines in the anterior views indicate the positions of distance measurement (scale bar: 300 µm). (C) Quantification of the distance between the neural folds at the forebrain region in control and Wdr19 mutant embryos. The distance between the neural folds is significantly larger in Wdr19 mutant embryos compared to controls (p < 0.001, two-sample t test). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Reproduced from (Wang et al., 2017).
The combination of static embryo culture with OCT technology provides unprecedented resolution to capture the formation and function of the cardiovascular system in mouse embryos (
Wang and colleagues achieved the first live 4-D hemodynamic imaging of the beating heart in mouse embryos and demonstrated that this approach is capable of providing high resolution visualization and quantification of blood flow profiles (Wang et al., 2016) and cardiac pumping dynamics (Wang and Larina, 2020). This work revealed the first imaging and analysis of retrograde flows through the mouse embryonic heart, which have previously been demonstrated in zebrafish (
FIGURE 3

4D-OCT analysis of cardiac pumping in the right ventricle of E9.25 embryonic heart. (A) Structural and color-coded Doppler 4D-OCT flow images of the beating heart. The positions of the measurement planes where the analysis was performed are labeled as L1, L2, and L3. (Scale bar: 100 µm). (B) Corresponding quantitative analysis defining the relation between pressure gradient, resistance to flow, and volumetric flow rate toward the localized pumping investigation. Reproduced from (Wang and Larina, 2020).
The structural and dynamic cardiac imaging integrating OCT with static embryo culture was implemented for mouse embryo cardiac phenotyping. The first application was in Wdr19 (WD repeat-containing protein 19) mutants (
4-D OCT cardiodynamic imaging was also implemented as a phenotyping tool for Mlc2a (atrium specific myosin light chain 2) mutant embryos. Mlc2a is expressed in embryonic hearts from the initiation of contraction, and its deletion regionally affects contractility (Sheikh et al., 2015;
Integrated OCT imaging and mouse embryo culture systems have also been shown to assess blood profiles (
In utero imaging
The major limitation of embryonic OCT imaging in static culture described above is that the early embryos can only be cultured for 24–48 h, and embryos beyond the E10.5 stage do not survive in culture for prolonged time. In order to capture long-term developmental processes in the same embryo, a method for live imaging of embryos in utero has been developed which involves externalization of the uterine horn through an abdominal incision. This approach is appropriate for embryos beginning at E12.5 until the remainder of gestation. It is challenging to image embryos earlier than E12.5 in utero because of the thick decidual layer that surrounds each embryo which attenuates the signal. As the embryos grow, this layer becomes thinner and degenerates by E12.5 allowing for imaging through the uterine wall that also stretches and thins as development progresses. By sequential exposures, this method allows for repeated imaging of the same embryos in utero over different developmental stages with unprecedented resolution (
Toward investigation of limb development, in utero OCT can be used to depict morphological changes from E12.5 to E18.5 (Figures 4A–C) (Syed et al., 2011). The process of digit formation involves indentation of the interdigital zones, digital splaying and elongation, claw development, as well as programmed cell death of interdigital webbing (Figures 4D–G). Each of these milestones were visualized by OCT, therefore allowing specific phenotypes to be characterized at discrete developmental stages of the limbs (Syed et al., 2011). Furthermore, it was possible to distinguish the point of cartilage formation in the developing forelimb bones. OCT images at E13.5 showed digits that were uniform in structure, however, OCT scans demonstrated non-uniform structure of the digits and palms at E17.5 due to the appearance of the cartilage primordium (Figures 4F,G) (Syed et al., 2011). It is clear from this work that in utero OCT imaging is not only capable of characterizing the morphological milestones of limb development, but also provides detailed contrast of bone and cartilage (Figure 4G).
FIGURE 4

Live in utero phenotyping of mouse embryo limb development. (A–C) 3-D reconstructions of embryonic forelimb development at E12.5, E13.5 and E14.5 (scale bar: 500 µm). (D–G) 3-D reconstructions of digit formation at E15.5, E16.5, E17.5 and E18.5 (scale bar: 1 mm). Insets show scanning electron micrographs of the embryonic forelimb at the corresponding embryonic stages 1, cartilage primordium of distal phalanx; 2. Cartilage primordium of proximal phalanx; 3, cartilage primordium of metacarpal bones; 4, follicles of vibrissae. Reproduced from (Syed et al., 2011).
To date, in utero OCT has not been applied as a phenotyping tool for models of limb abnormalities, but it has the potential to replace standard phenotyping techniques such as alcian blue alizarine red staining, which is both time-consuming and laborious; and cannot be applied in live embryos (
This potential is further supported by using in utero OCT to study embryonic ocular structure at three different stages and thus, allowing for key morphological landmarks of eye development to be appreciated (
Another application includes in utero structural imaging of the embryonic brain, its vasculature, and the prenatal effects of pharmacological and toxicological agents (
FIGURE 5

Maximum intensity projection (MIP) of correlation mapping optical coherence angiography (cm-OCA) of murine fetal brain vasculature. (A) MIP cm-OCA of fetal brain vasculature before maternal exposure to ethanol. (B) MIP cm-OCA of fetal brain vasculature 45 min after maternal exposure to ethanol at a dose of 0.75 g/kg showing acute vasoconstriction. The dashed rectangle shows the main branch of the vessel on which quantifications were performed demonstrating the effect of ethanol. Reproduced from (
Prenatal exposure to nicotine (
The studies outlined above have all been performed by externalization of the uterine horn through an abdominal wall incision. Methods for intravital imaging are being developed which allow for prolonged and longitudinal embryonic imaging with fluorescence microscopy (
Summary and future perspectives
This review is intended as a reference for developmental biologists and embryologists interested in exploring the applications of OCT in the context of mouse embryonic phenotyping, and aims to inspire more interdisciplinary collaborations and investigations. Here we introduce the basics of OCT technology and its approaches, and provide a detailed account of how the technology is currently being applied within the field of developmental biology, paying particular attention to mouse embryonic development and phenotyping.
Structural OCT is especially useful for generating detailed anatomical atlases of whole mouse embryo development and embryonic cardiac phenotyping (
Later developmental events are well visualized in utero through externalization of uterine horns in anesthetized females which allows for repeated imaging of the same embryos (Syed et al., 2011). In utero OCT imaging enables visualization of developing embryonic structures in real-time with unprecedented resolution (Syed et al., 2011), allows for phenotypic characterization of developmental timelines (
While providing a superior volumetric imaging capability for developing mouse embryos at a micro-scale level, as with all imaging modalities, OCT is associated with some limitations. One of the limitations is imaging depth, which is restricted to approximately 1–2 mm in embryos. This is sufficient to resolve structures in cultured early stage embryos, but only allows for imaging of external layers at later stages and in utero (Syed et al., 2011). Optical clearing has been shown to enhance the OCT imaging depth in embryonic tissues (
Multimodal imaging is an attractive approach for embryonic phenotyping because of the diversity of developmental processes and the fact that a single type of imaging contrast can only provide limited information. The area of OCT embryonic phenotyping has great potential to benefit from the implementation of multimodality approaches, where each technology is providing unique complementary information. Structural OCT has previously been used in combination with spectrally encoded confocal microscopy (Yelin et al., 2007), Brillouin microscopy (measures tissue stiffness) (
In summary, OCT technology provides a unique toolset for structural and functional phenotyping of various aspects of embryonic development. We hope this review will inspire developmental biologists to expand their use of OCT imaging in their research. We also hope to encourage more biophotonic and optical engineers to lend their knowledge and expertise to the developmental biology community. The growing accessibility and relatively low cost of customizing OCT systems mean it will grow in popularity amongst developmental biologists as a viable and attractive approach to asking new questions about their experimental models, expanding the range of biological inquiry and promoting the development of multidisciplinary studies.
Statements
Author contributions
DS and IL performed joint conception, design, writing, and editing of the article.
Funding
The study is supported by the grants from the National Institutes of Health: T32HD098068-01A1, R01EB027099, R01HD096335.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BanS.ChoN. H.MinE.BaeJ. K.AhnY.ShinS.et al (2019). Label-free optical projection tomography for quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of mouse embryo. J. Biophot.12 (7), e201800481. 10.1002/jbio.201800481
2
BasakK.Luis Dean-BenX.GottschalkS.ReissM.RazanskyD. (2019). Non-invasive determination of murine placental and foetal functional parameters with multispectral optoacoustic tomography. Light Sci. Appl.8, 71. 10.1038/s41377-019-0181-7
3
BayerC. L.WlodarczykB. J.FinnellR. H.EmelianovS. Y. (2017). Ultrasound-guided spectral photoacoustic imaging of hemoglobin oxygenation during development. Biomed. Opt. Express8 (2), 757–763. 10.1364/BOE.8.000757
4
BhatS.LarinaI. V.LarinK. V.DickinsonM. E.LieblingM. (2013). 4D reconstruction of the beating embryonic heart from two orthogonal sets of parallel optical coherence tomography slice-sequences. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging32 (3), 578–588. 10.1109/TMI.2012.2231692
5
BoppartS. A.TearneyG. J.BoumaB. E.SouthernJ. F.BrezinskiM. E.FujimotoJ. G. (1997). Noninvasive assessment of the developing Xenopus cardiovascular system using optical coherence tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.94 (9), 4256–4261. 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4256
6
CacheiroP.HaendelM. A.SmedleyD. (2019). International mouse phenotyping, C., and the monarch, INew models for human disease from the international mouse phenotyping consortium. Mamm. Genome30 (5-6), 143–150. 10.1007/s00335-019-09804-5
7
ChenW.SudheendranN.ManmohanS.LarinaI. V.DickinsonM. E.LarinK. V. (2016). Rotational imaging optical coherence tomography for full-body mouse embryonic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt.21 (2). 10.1117/1.JBO.21.2.026002
8
ChoiW. J.MagaA. M.KimE. S.WangR. K. (2020). A feasibility study of OCT for anatomical and vascular phenotyping of mouse embryo. J. Biophot.13 (5), 1–7. 10.1002/jbio.201960225
9
CulverJ. C.DickinsonM. E. (2010). The effects of hemodynamic force on embryonic development. Microcirculation17 (3), 164–178. 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00025.x
10
DickinsonM. E.FlennikenA. M.JiX.TeboulL.WongM. D.WhiteJ. K.et al (2016). High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature537 (7621), 508–514. 10.1038/nature19356
11
DietrichW. F.MillerJ.SteenR.MerchantM. A.Damron-BolesD.HusainZ.et al (1996). A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome. Nature380, 149–152. 10.1038/380149a0
12
FengW.ZhangC.YuT.Semyachkina-GlushkovskayaO.ZhuD. (2019). In vivo monitoring blood-brain barrier permeability using spectral imaging through optical clearing skull window. J. Biophot.12 (4), e201800330. 10.1002/jbio.201800330
13
GarciaM. D.LarinaI. V. (2014). Vascular development and hemodynamic force in the mouse yolk sac. Front. Physiology5 (308), 1–10. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00308
14
GlaserA. K.RederN. P.ChenY.McCartyE. F.YinC.WeiL.et al (2017). Light-sheet microscopy for slide-free non-destructive pathology of large clinical specimens. Nat. Biomed. Eng.1 (7), 1–10. 10.1038/s41551-017-0084
15
GridleyT.MurrayS. A. (2022). Mouse mutagenesis and phenotyping to generate models of development and disease. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.148, 1–12. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2022.02.012
16
GrishinaO. A.WangS.LarinaI. V. (2017). Speckle variance optical coherence tomography of blood flow in the beating mouse embryonic heart. J. Biophot.10 (5), 735–743. 10.1002/jbio.201600293
17
GuS.JenkinsM. W.PetersonL. M.DoughmanY. Q.RollinsA. M.WatanabeM. (2012). Optical coherence tomography captures rapid hemodynamic responses to acute hypoxia in the cardiovascular system of early embryos. Dev. Dyn.241 (3), 534–544. 10.1002/dvdy.23727
18
HillmanH. (2000). Limitations of clinical and biological histology. Med. Hypotheses54 (4), 553–564. 10.1054/mehy.1999.0894
19
HuangQ.CohenM. A.AlsinaF. C.DevlinG.GarrettA.McKeyJ.et al (2020). Intravital imaging of mouse embryos. Science368 (6487), 181–186. 10.1126/science.aba0210
20
JenkinsM. W.RothenbergF.RoyD.NikolskiV. P.HuZ.WatanabeM.et al (2006). 4D embryonic cardiography using gated optical coherence tomography. Opt. Express14 (2), 736–748. 10.1364/opex.14.000736
21
JenkinsM. W.RoyD.WilsonD. L.DengH.MontanoM.WatanabeM.et al (2007). Phenotyping transgenic embryonic murine hearts using optical coherence tomography. Appl. Opt.46 (10), 1776–1781. 10.1364/bio.2006.we5
22
KulkarniP. M.Rey-VillamizarN.MerouaneA.SudheendranN.WangS.GarciaM.et al (2015). Algorithms for improved 3-D reconstruction of live mammalian embryo vasculature from optical coherence tomography data. Quantitative imaging Med. Surg.5 (1), 125–135. 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.11.33
23
LarinK. V.LarinaI. V.LieblingM.DickinsonM. E. (2009). Live imaging of early developmental processes in mammalian embryos with optical coherence tomography. J. Innovative Opt. Health Sci.2 (3), 253–259. 10.1142/S1793545809000619
24
LarinaI. V.CarbajalE. F.TuchinV. V.DickinsonM. E.LarinK. V. (2008a). Enhanced OCT imaging of embryonic tissue with optical clearing. Laser Phys. Lett.5 (6), 476–479. 10.1002/lapl.200810019
25
LarinaI. V.GarciaM. D.VadakkanT. J.LarinK. V.DickinsonM. E. (2012a). Imaging mouse embryonic cardiovascular development. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.10, 1035–1043. 10.1101/pdb.top071498
26
LarinaI. V.IversS.SyedS.DickinsonM. E.LarinK. V. (2009a). Hemodynamic measurements from individual blood cells in early mammalian embryos with Doppler swept source OCT. Opt. Lett.34 (7), 986. 10.1364/ol.34.000986
27
LarinaI. V.LarinK. V.DickinsonM. E.LieblingM. (2012b). Sequential Turning Acquisition and Reconstruction (STAR) method for four-dimensional imaging of cyclically moving structures. Biomed. Opt. Express3 (3), 650–660. 10.1364/BOE.3.000650
28
LarinaI. V.LarinK. V.JusticeM.DickinsonM. E. (2011). Optical Coherence Tomography for live imaging of mammalian development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.21 (5), 579–584. 10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.004
29
LarinaI. V.ShenW.KellyO. G.HadjantonakisA. K.BaronM. H.DickinsonM. E. (2009b). A membrane associated mCherry fluorescent reporter line for studying vascular remodeling and cardiac function during murine embryonic development. Anat. Rec. Hob.292 (3), 333–341. 10.1002/ar.20821
30
LarinaI. V.SudheendranN.GhosnM.JiangJ.CableA.LarinK. V.et al (2008b). Live imaging of blood flow in mammalian embryos using Doppler swept-source optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt.13 (6), 060506–060503. 10.1117/1.3046716
31
LarinaI. V.SyedS. H.DickinsonM. E.LarinK. V.SudheendranN.OverbeekP. A. (2012c). Optical coherence tomography for live phenotypic analysis of embryonic ocular structures in mouse models. J. Biomed. Opt.17 (8), 081410–081414. 10.1117/1.jbo.17.8.081410
32
LarinaI. V.SyedS. H.DickinsonM. E.OverbeekP.LarinK. V. (2012d). Prenatal imaging of distal limb abnormalities using OCT in mice. Opt. Coherence Tomogr. Coherence Domain Opt. Methods Biomed. XVI8213, 82130B–82134. 10.1117/12.909266
33
LauferJ.NorrisF.ClearyJ.ZhangE.TreebyB.CoxB.et al (2012). In vivo photoacoustic imaging of mouse embryos. J. Biomed. Opt.17 (6), 061220. 10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.061220
34
LeducR. Y.SinghP.McDermidH. E. (2017). Genetic backgrounds and modifier genes of NTD mouse models: An opportunity for greater understanding of the multifactorial etiology of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res.109 (2), 140–152. 10.1002/bdra.23554
35
LieblingM.ForouharA. S.WolleschenskyR.ZimmermannB.AnkerholdR.FraserS. E.et al (2006). Rapid three-dimensional imaging and analysis of the beating embryonic heart reveals functional changes during development. Dev. Dyn.235 (11), 2940–2948. 10.1002/dvdy.20926
36
LinA. E.TraumA. Z.SahaiI.Keppler-NoreuilK.KukolichM. K.AdamM. P.et al (2013). Sensenbrenner syndrome (cranioectodermal dysplasia): Clinical and molecular analyses of 39 patients including two new patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A161A (11), 2762–2776. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36265
37
LiuM.MaurerB.HermannB.ZabihianB.SandrianM. G.UnterhuberA.et al (2014). Dual modality optical coherence and whole-body photoacoustic tomography imaging of chick embryos in multiple development stages. Biomed. Opt. Express5 (9), 3150–3159. 10.1364/BOE.5.003150
38
LopezA. L.3rdLarinaI. V. (2019). Second harmonic generation microscopy of early embryonic mouse hearts. Biomed. Opt. Express10 (6), 2898–2908. 10.1364/BOE.10.002898
39
LopezA. L.WangS.LarinK. V.LarinaI. V. (2017). Live dynamic analysis of the developing cardiovascular system in mice. SPIE BIOS10043, 10043. 10.1117/12.2252694
40
LopezA. L.WangS.LarinK. V.OverbeekP. A.LarinaI. V. (2015). Live four-dimensional optical coherence tomography reveals embryonic cardiac phenotype in mouse mutant. J. Biomed. Opt.20 (09), 090501–090504. 10.1117/1.jbo.20.9.090501
41
LopezA. L.WangS.LarinaI. V. (2020a). Embryonic mouse cardiodynamic oct imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis.7 (4), 1–19. 10.3390/jcdd7040042
42
LopezA. L.WangS.LarinaI. V. (2020b). Optogenetic cardiac pacing in cultured mouse embryos under imaging guidance. J. Biophot.13 (11), 1–10. 10.1002/jbio.202000223
43
LuG. J.ChouL. D.MaloundaD.PatelA. K.WelsbieD. S.ChaoD. L.et al (2020). Genetically encodable contrast agents for optical coherence tomography. ACS Nano14 (7), 7823–7831. 10.1021/acsnano.9b08432
44
LucittiJ. L.JonesE. A.HuangC.ChenJ.FraserS. E.DickinsonM. E. (2007). Vascular remodeling of the mouse yolk sac requires hemodynamic force. Development134 (18), 3317–3326. 10.1242/dev.02883
45
LuoW.MarksD. L.RalstonT. S.BoppartS. A. (2006). Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography of the embryonic murine cardiovascular system. J. Biomed. Opt.11 (2).
46
MassarwaR.NiswanderL. (2013). In toto live imaging of mouse morphogenesis and new insights into neural tube closure. Development140 (1), 226–236. 10.1242/dev.085001
47
MidgettM.ChivukulaV. C.DornC.WallaceS.RugonyiS. (2015). Blood flow through the embryonic heart outflow tract during the cardiac looping in HH13-HH18 chicken embryos. J. R. Soc. Interface12 (2015065), 1–11. 10.1098/rsif.2015.0652
48
MontanoM. M.DoughmanY. Q.DengH.ChaplinL.WangN.ZhouQ.et al (2008). Mutation of the HEXIM1 gene results in defects during heart and vascular development partly through downregulation of VEGF. Circulation Res.102 (4), 415–422. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.157859
49
MoonA. M. (2006). Mouse models for investigating the developmental basis of human birth defects. Pediatr. Res.59 (6), 749–755. 10.1203/01.pdr.0000218420.00525.98
50
ParasoglouP.Berrios-OteroC. A.NiemanB. J.TurnbullD. H. (2013). High-resolution MRI of early-stage mouse embryos. NMR Biomed.26 (2), 224–231. 10.1002/nbm.2843
51
PetersonL. M.JenkinsM. W.GuS.BarwickL.WatanabeM.RollinsA. M. (2012). 4D shear stress maps of the developing heart using Doppler optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express3 (11), 3022. 10.1364/boe.3.003022
52
PhoonC. K. L.TurnbullD. H. (2003). Ultrasound biomicroscopy-Doppler in mouse cardiovascular development. Physiol. Genomics14, 3–15. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00008.2003
53
PiliszekA.KwonG. S.HadjantonakisA. K. (2011). Ex utero culture and live imaging of mouse embryos. Methods Mol. Biol.770, 243–257. 10.1007/978-1-61779-210-6_9
54
PyrgakiC.TrainorP.HadjantonakisA. K.NiswanderL. (2010). Dynamic imaging of mammalian neural tube closure. Dev. Biol.344 (2), 941–947. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.06.010
55
RaghunathanR.LiuC.-H.AmbekarY.SinghM.MirandaR.LarinK. V. (2020a). Optical coherence tomography angiography to evaluate murine fetal brain vasculature changes caused by prenatal exposure to nicotine. Biomed. Opt. Express11 (7), 3618–3632. 10.1364/boe.394905
56
RaghunathanR.LiuC.-H.KoukaA.SinghM.MirandaR. C.LarinK. V. (2020b). Dose-response analysis of microvasculature changes in the murine fetal brain and the maternal extremities due to prenatal ethanol exposure. J. Biomed. Opt.25 (12), 1–13. 10.1117/1.jbo.25.12.126001
57
RaghunathanR.LiuC.-H.KoukaA.SinghM.MirandaR.LarinK. V. (2019). Assessing the acute effects of prenatal synthetic cannabinoid exposure on murine fetal brain vasculature using optical coherence tomography. J. Biophot.12 (8), 1–8. 10.1002/jbio.201900050
58
RaghunathanR.WuC.SinghM.LiuC.-H.MirandaR.LarinK. V. (2018). Evaluating the effects of maternal alcohol consumption on murine fetal brain vasculature using optical coherence tomography. J. Biophot.11 (5), 1–16. 10.1002/jbio.201700238
59
RaghunathanR.ZhangJ.WuC.RippyJ.SinghM.LarinK. V.et al (2017). Evaluating biomechanical properties of murine embryos using Brillouin microscopy and optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt.22 (8), 1–6. 10.1117/1.JBO.22.8.086013
60
RingH. C.IsraelsenN. M.BangO.HaedersdalM.MogensenM. (2019). Potential of contrast agents to enhance in vivo confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography in dermatology: A review. J. Biophot.12 (6), e201800462. 10.1002/jbio.201800462
61
ShalabyF.HoJ.StanfordW. L.FischerK.SchuhA. C.SchwartzL.et al (1997). A requirement for Flk1 in primitive and definitive hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Cell89 (6), 981–990. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80283-4
62
SharpeJ. (2003). Optical projection tomography as a new tool for studying embryo anatomy. J. Anat.202 (2), 175–181. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00155.x
63
SheikhF.LyonR. C.ChenJ. (2015). Functions of myosin light chain-2 (MYL2) in cardiac muscle and disease. Gene569 (1), 14–20. 10.1016/j.gene.2015.06.027
64
SiP.YuanE.LibaO.WinetraubY.YousefiS.SoRelleE. D.et al (2018). Gold nanoprisms as optical coherence tomography contrast agents in the second near-infrared window for enhanced angiography in live animals. ACS Nano12 (12), 11986–11994. 10.1021/acsnano.8b03862
65
SinghM.RaghunathanR.PiazzaV.Davis-LoiaconoA. M.CableA.VedakkanT. J.et al (2016). Applicability, usability, and limitations of murine embryonic imaging with optical coherence tomography and optical projection tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express7 (6), 2295–2310. 10.1364/BOE.7.002295
66
SudheendranN.BakeS.MirandaR. C.LarinK. V. (2013). Comparative assessments of the effects of alcohol exposure on fetal brain development using optical coherence tomography and ultrasound imaging. J. Biomed. Opt.18 (2), 20506. 10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.020506
67
SudheendranN.MashiatullaM.RaghunathanR.SyedS. H.DickinsonM. E.LarinaI. V.et al (2015). Quantification of mouse embryonic eye development with OCT in utero. J. Biomed. Photonics & Eng.1 (1), 90–95. 10.18287/JBPE-2015-1-1-90
68
SudheendranN.SyedS. H.DickinsonM. E.LarinaI. V.LarinK. V. (2011). Speckle variance OCT imaging of the vasculature in live mammalian embryos. Laser Phys. Lett.8 (3), 247–252. 10.1002/lapl.201010120
69
SyedS. H.CoughlinA. J.GarciaM. D.WangS.WestJ. L.LarinK. V.et al (2015). Optical coherence tomography guided microinjections in live mouse embryos: High-resolution targeted manipulation for mouse embryonic research. J. Biomed. Opt.20 (5), 051020–051027. 10.1117/1.JBO.20.5.051020
70
SyedS. H.LarinK. V.DickinsonM. E.LarinaI. V. (2011). Optical coherence tomography for high-resolution imaging of mouse development in utero. J. Biomed. Opt.16 (4), 046004–046006. 10.1117/1.3560300
71
UdanR. S.PiazzaV. G.HsuC. W.HadjantonakisA. K.DickinsonM. E. (2014). Quantitative imaging of cell dynamics in mouse embryos using light-sheet microscopy. Development141 (22), 4406–4414. 10.1242/dev.111021
72
UmezuK.XiaT.LarinaI. V. (2022). Dynamic volumetric imaging and cilia beat mapping in the mouse male reproductive tract with optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express13 (6), 3672–3684. 10.1364/boe.459937
73
VermotJ.ForouharA. S.LieblingM.WuD.PlummerD.GharibM.et al (2009). Reversing blood flows act through klf2a to ensure normal valvulogenesis in the developing heart. PLoS Biol.7 (11), e1000246. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000246
74
WangS.BurtonJ. C.BehringerR. R.LarinaI. V. (2015a). In vivo micro-scale tomography of ciliary behavior in the mammalian oviduct. Sci. Rep.5, 13216. 10.1038/srep13216
75
WangS.GarciaM. D.LopezA. L.OverbeekP. A.LarinK. V.LarinaI. V. (2017). Dynamic imaging and quantitative analysis of cranial neural tube closure in the mouse embryo using optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express8 (1), 407. 10.1364/boe.8.000407
76
WangS.LakomyD. S.GarciaM. D.LopezA. L.LarinK. V.LarinaI. V. (2016). Four-dimensional live imaging of hemodynamics in mammalian embryonic heart with Doppler optical coherence tomography. J. Biophot.9 (8), 837–847. 10.1002/jbio.201500314
77
WangS.LarinK. V. (2015). Optical coherence elastography for tissue characterization: A review. J. Biophot.8 (4), 279–302. 10.1002/jbio.201400108
78
WangS.LarinaI. (2020). Live mechanistic assessment of localized cardiac pumping in mammalian tubular embryonic heart. J. Biomed. Opt.25 (8), 1–19. 10.1117/1.JBO.25.8.086001
79
WangS.LarinaI. V. (2021). In vivo dynamic 3D imaging of oocytes and embryos in the mouse oviduct. Cell Rep.36 (2), 109382. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109382
80
WangS.LarinaI. V.LarinK. V. (2020). Label-free optical imaging in developmental biology [Invited]. Biomed. Opt. Express11 (4), 2017–2040. 10.1364/BOE.381359
81
WangS.SinghM.LopezA. L.WuC.RaghunathanR.SchillA.et al (2015b). Direct four-dimensional structural and functional imaging of cardiovascular dynamics in mouse embryos with 1.5 MHz optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett.40 (20), 4791–4794.
82
WestphalV.YazdanfarS.RollinsA. M.IzattJ. A. (2002). Real-time, high velocity-resolution color Doppler optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett.27 (1), 34–36. 10.1364/ol.27.000034
83
WuC.LeH.RanS.SinghM.LarinaI. V.MayerichD.et al (2017). Comparison and combination of rotational imaging optical coherence tomography and selective plane illumination microscopy for embryonic study. Biomed. Opt. Express8 (10), 4629–4639. 10.1364/BOE.8.004629
84
YamaguchiY.ShinotsukaN.NonomuraK.TakemotoK.KuidaK.YosidaH.et al (2011). Live imaging of apoptosis in a novel transgenic mouse highlights its role in neural tube closure. J. Cell Biol.195 (6), 1047–1060. 10.1083/jcb.201104057
85
YangV.GordonM.Seng-YueE.LoS.QiB.PekarJ.et al (2003). High speed, wide velocity dynamic range Doppler optical coherence tomography (Part II): Imaging in vivo cardiac dynamics of Xenopus laevis. Opt. Express11 (14), 1650–1658. 10.1364/oe.11.001650
86
YazdanfarS.KulkarniM. D.IzattJ. A. (1997). High resolution imaging of in vivo cardiac dynamics using color Doppler optical coherence tomography. Opt. Express1 (13), 424–431. 10.1364/oe.1.000424
87
YelinR.YelinD.OhW. Y.YunS. H.BoudouxC.VakocB. J.et al (2007). Multimodality optical imaging of embryonic heart microstructure. J. Biomed. Opt.12 (6), 1–28. 10.1117/1.2822904
88
ZhangJ.RaghunathanR.RippyJ.WuC.FinnellR. H.LarinK. V.et al (2019). Tissue biomechanics during cranial neural tube closure measured by Brillouin microscopy and optical coherence tomography. Birth Defects Res.111 (14), 991–998. 10.1002/bdr2.1389
Summary
Keywords
mouse, embryo, development, optical coherence tomography, in vivo imaging, heart
Citation
Scully DM and Larina IV (2022) Mouse embryo phenotyping with optical coherence tomography. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:1000237. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1000237
Received
21 July 2022
Accepted
26 August 2022
Published
09 September 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Stefan H Geyer, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Reviewed by
Antonia Lichtenegger, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Jörg Männer, University of Göttingen, Germany
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Scully and Larina.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Irina V. Larina, larina@bcm.edu
This article was submitted to Morphogenesis and Patterning, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.