Abstract
Vital internal organs display a left-right (LR) asymmetric arrangement that is established during embryonic development. Disruption of this LR asymmetry—or laterality—can result in congenital organ malformations. Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a complete concordant reversal of internal organs that results in a low occurrence of clinical consequences. Situs ambiguous, which gives rise to Heterotaxy syndrome (HTX), is characterized by discordant development and arrangement of organs that is associated with a wide range of birth defects. The leading cause of health problems in HTX patients is a congenital heart malformation. Mutations identified in patients with laterality disorders implicate motile cilia in establishing LR asymmetry. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying SIT and HTX are not fully understood. In several vertebrates, including mouse, frog and zebrafish, motile cilia located in a “left-right organizer” (LRO) trigger conserved signaling pathways that guide asymmetric organ development. Perturbation of LRO formation and/or function in animal models recapitulates organ malformations observed in SIT and HTX patients. This provides an opportunity to use these models to investigate the embryological origins of laterality disorders. The zebrafish embryo has emerged as an important model for investigating the earliest steps of LRO development. Here, we discuss clinical characteristics of human laterality disorders, and highlight experimental results from zebrafish that provide insights into LRO biology and advance our understanding of human laterality disorders.
Introduction
The vertebrate body plan features an asymmetric layout of internal visceral organs along the left-right (LR) body axis. In humans, the heart, stomach and spleen are typically positioned on the left side, and the liver is on the right side of the body. In addition, the left lung has two lobes and the right lung has three lobes, the developing intestines undergo LR asymmetric rotations, and the pulmonary artery and aorta connect to the right and left cardiac ventricles, respectively. This typical asymmetric arrangement of organs is referred to as situs solitus (Figure 1A). Interruption of developmental processes involved in setting up organ laterality during embryogenesis can result in alterations in organ placement and/or morphogenesis (; Ramsdell 2005; Sutherland and Ware 2009; ). One type of laterality disorder is a complete mirror image reversal of visceral organs, which is known as situs inversus totalis (SIT) (Figure 1B). There is a relatively low frequency of clinical complications associated with SIT, since a concordant reversal of organs maintains the relative spatial connections between organs. Another possibility is mixed arrangement of the thoracic and/or abdominal organs along the LR axis, which can cause a broad range of organ malformations. These defects are collectively referred to as situs ambiguous and are clinically classified as heterotaxy (meaning ‘other arrangement’) syndrome (HTX) (Figure 1C). HTX is characterized by a spectrum of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal birth defects that range from mild to severe enough that approximately 25% of neonates who undergo corrective procedures die during or after surgery (). Organ laterality is a shared feature of the vertebrate body plan, and is also common in invertebrates (Speder et al., 2007; Namigai, Kenny, and Shimeld 2014; ; Hamada and Tam 2020). Work over the last three decades has elucidated mechanisms that control laterality during embryo development, but exactly how LR spatial information is established, propagated, and maintained at molecular, cellular, and organ scales is not completely understood. In this review, we provide an overview of human laterality disorders and our current understanding of embryonic LR axis determination, and then discuss in detail how recent work using zebrafish as a model vertebrate has provided insights into the development of the embryonic left-right organizer and the earliest steps in establishing laterality.
FIGURE 1
Human laterality disorders
Situs inversus totalis
The incidence of SIT is reported to range between 1:10,000 and 1:30,000 births (Lin et al., 2014; ). This condition results from reversed positioning of internal organs along the LR axis during embryonic development. It is estimated ∼3% of individuals with SIT have a congenital heart defect (Ramsdell 2005). Thus, many newborns with SIT are healthy and SIT can go undetected. In some of cases, SIT is a consequence of a broader syndrome called primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) (Praveen, Davis, and Katsanis 2015; Wallmeier et al., 2020; ). PCD is commonly caused by mutations that affect dynein arms of motile cilia (Lucas et al., 2020; Horani and Ferkol 2021; Hyland and Brody 2021). PCD patients have paralyzed cilia that cannot move mucus to clear airways (called mucociliary clearance), which leads to a buildup of mucus in craniofacial sinuses and in pulmonary airways that and ultimately affects lung function and cause bronchiectasis (Storm van’s Gravesande and Omran 2005; Leigh et al., 2019). During the first part of the 20th century, physicians Siewert (Siewert 1903) and Kartagener (Kartagener 1933) described patients with the combination of bronchiectasis and SIT, providing a link between these seemingly disparate abnormalities. Today, the triad of bronchiectasis, chronic sinusitis, and a laterality disorder is referred to as Kartagener syndrome (KS) (Leigh et al., 2009). KS is known to be caused by loss of cilia motility () and represent a subset of PCD. More recently, it has become clear that ∼50% of PCD patients have a laterality disorder that is often SIT and, in some cases, HTX (Kennedy et al., 2007; Shapiro et al., 2014; ; Nothe-Menchen et al., 2019). Most patients with SIT have a favorable prognosis and can live a normal life span.
Heterotaxy syndrome
Heterotaxy syndrome (HTX) collectively refers to a broad spectrum of organ malformations that result from defects in establishing laterality during embryogenesis. HTX can be an isolated disorder or a feature of a genetic syndrome (Saba et al., 2022). The frequency of HTX is estimated to be ∼1 in 10,000 births, and most patients (∼90%) have a congenital heart defect (Lin et al., 2014; ). The spectrum of congenital heart defects associated with HTX has been described in detail—including helpful diagrams and radiographs—in previous reviews (Ramsdell 2005; Maldjian and Saric 2007; ; ; Saba et al., 2022). Here, we highlight cardiac and extracardiac birth defects found in HTX patients with classifications as right or left isomerism (Jacobs et al., 2007). The term isomerism refers to cases in which right-sided structures or left-sided structures are found on both sides of the body. Patients with right isomerism typically present with the most severe phenotypes on the HTX spectrum (Yi et al., 2022). These patients often have bilaterally trilobed lungs, and the absence of a spleen (asplenia) that leaves them at risk for infections (Loomba et al., 2016a; ). Characteristic cardiac defects include atrioventricular canal defects, a single functional ventricle (or large ventricular septal defect), pulmonary valve stenosis or atresia, anomalous pulmonary venous return, and transposition of the great arteries (Saba et al., 2022; Yi et al., 2022). On the other hand, individuals with left isomerism will often have bilaterally bilobed lungs and multiple spleens (polyspenia). Although the spectrum of cardiac malformations shows substantial overlap between left and right isomerism, frequent defects in left isomerism include atrioventricular septal defects, double outlet right ventricle, interrupted inferior vena cava, and atrioventricular heart block (Loomba et al., 2016b; ). It is important to note that organ arrangement in some HTX cases deviates from these descriptions of left or right isomerism (Yim et al., 2018). An extracardiac defect common in both types of isomerism is malrotation of the intestine (Ryerson et al., 2018; Saba et al., 2022). Failure of the intestine to complete an asymmetric 270° rotation around the superior mesenteric artery during development can cause mispositioning and give rise to volvulus (Langer 2017), which can disrupt blood supply and cause obstruction. Additional presentations can include biliary atresia, duodenal atresia, and tracheo-esophogeal fistula (Kothari 2014). Taken together, clinical findings indicate that the altered arrangement of organs in HTX patients creates complications in cardiopulmonary function, immune response, and digestion that can have varying presentations throughout life.
Individuals with HTX typically require medical intervention (Saba et al., 2022). In an ideal situation, a prenatal diagnosis can be made with ultrasound and/or prenatal echocardiogram that can facilitate pre-planning for clinical care after delivery. Due to varying presentation, HTX treatment depends on the severity of the birth defect. Often, intervention includes surgery in infancy, after which patients will require lifelong care. The advancement of technology and introduction of new interventions has increased the life expectancy of affected individuals (Kim 2011). As the population of patients living with congenital malformations increases, scientists and physicians are challenged to better understand the genetic and mechanistic underpinnings of these disorders while also generating more effective treatment plans over an increased life span. Advances in these areas are needed to improve long-term outcomes for patients with laterality disorders.
Left-right patterning of vertebrate embryos
Asymmetric nodal signaling
The clinical impact of birth defects associated with laterality disorders has driven research efforts to identify and understand underlying causes. Copy number variant screens and genome sequencing of patients with laterality defects have provided candidate genes (; ; Hagen et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018; ). However, due to limitations of available human genetic data and experimental resources, the field has relied on several animal models—which include chicken, frog, mouse, medaka, and zebrafish—to provide mechanistic insights into organ laterality. These models have been instrumental in advancing our understanding of the process of developing LR asymmetry, which we refer to as LR patterning, in vertebrate embryos. For over two decades, it has been recognized that vertebrate LR patterning involves asymmetric expression of a highly conserved transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) family secreted signaling molecule called Nodal in the left lateral plate mesoderm during early somite stages of development (Levin et al., 1995; ; Meno et al., 1996). The Nodal signaling ligand binds type I and type II serine-threonine kinase receptors at the cell surface that then phosphorylate cytoplasmic Smad2 and/or Smad3 proteins, which facilitates their interaction with Smad4 and subsequent translocation into the nucleus to impact gene transcription (Shen 2007). In lateral plate mesoderm, Nodal signaling can activate its own transcription as well as other targets that include Lefty proteins that act as feedback inhibitors of Nodal signaling (Meno et al., 1996; Nakamura et al., 2006) and the homeobox transcription factor Pitx2 that can regulate genes involved in asymmetric morphogenesis of the heart and gastrointestinal tract (Logan et al., 1998; Piedra et al., 1998; Ryan et al., 1998; Yoshioka et al., 1998; Shiratori et al., 2001; Kurpios et al., 2008) (Figure 2A). Cellular and molecular details of this conserved asymmetric Nodal signaling pathway have been described in recent review articles (Shiratori and Hamada 2014; ; Zinski, Tajer, and Mullins 2018; Hamada, 2020). Importantly, genetic analyses in animal models and humans indicates that mutations that disrupt Nodal signaling can result in organ laterality disorders (; Montague, Gagnon, and Schier 2018; Li et al., 2019).
FIGURE 2
The left-right organizer
A key question in the field has been what mechanisms break bilateral symmetry in the vertebrate embryo? Motile cilia were associated with laterality disorders in patients with KS in the 1970s (), but when and where cilia function during LR patterning was not known. Work in the 1990s associated motile cilia in an embryonic structure referred to as the ventral node with establishing LR asymmetry of the mouse embryo (Sulik et al., 1994; Nonaka et al., 1998). Although this ciliated structure in the mouse embryo is conventionally referred to as the ‘ventral node’ or ‘node’ in the literature, a comparative analysis in the rabbit embryo found cilia and Nodal expression are located in the posterior notochord (PNC) that is distinct from the node (). Since it has been proposed that the PNC is also the site of laterality determination in the mouse embryo (), we refer to this structure as the node/PNC. The node/PNC is a transient structure during early somite stages that consists of epithelial cells that project a single cilium into a pit-like cavity filled with extraembryonic fluid and covered by a specialized basement membrane called Reichert’s membrane (Sulik et al., 1994; Lee and Anderson 2008) (Figure 2B). Central “pit cells” in the node/PNC have primarily motile cilia, whereas surrounding “crown cells” have primarily immotile cilia (McGrath et al., 2003; Yoshiba et al., 2012). Motile cilia become posteriorly tilted in response to planar cell polarity cues (Hashimoto et al., 2010; Hashimoto and Hamada 2010; Song et al., 2010) and beat with a unidirectional vortical motion (Nonaka et al., 1998; Shinohara et al., 2015). Posterior tilting of motile cilia creates an effective power stroke away from the cell surface and a recovery stroke near the surface that results in a leftward fluid flow across the node/PNC (; Nonaka et al., 2005; Okada et al., 2005) that is linked to asymmetric Nodal expression (Figures 2B,C). In a landmark study, knockout of Kif3b, a kinesin family motor protein, was found to abolish leftward flow in the mouse node/PNC due to loss of cilia, which correlated with bilateral or absent asymmetric Nodal signaling and organ laterality defects (Nonaka et al., 1998). Similar phenotypes were observed in mice with mutations that paralyze cilia, including inversus viscerum, which affects Dynein Axonemal Heavy Chain 11 (Dnah11; also referred to Left-Right Dynein) (Supp et al., 1997; Supp et al., 1999), and Dynein Axonemal Heavy Chain 5 (Dnah5) (Ibanez-Tallon, Gorokhova, and Heintz 2002), supporting the idea that loss of cilia-generated leftward flow alters asymmetric Nodal signaling. In complementary work, artificial flow applied across the node/PNC in cultured mouse embryos was found to be sufficient to direct laterality (Nonaka et al., 2002). Together, these studies provided evidence that cilia located in the node/PNC play an essential role in establishing asymmetric Nodal expression and organ laterality in the mouse embryo.
Shortly after the ciliated node/PNC was implicated in LR patterning of the mouse embryo, similar transient monociliated structures were identified in other vertebrate embryos—zebrafish, frog, and chicken—suggesting a conserved cilia-based mechanism regulates LR patterning in vertebrates (). Functional studies confirmed the presence of motile cilia and asymmetric fluid flow in Kupffer’s vesicle in zebrafish (; Kramer-Zucker et al., 2005) and the gastrocoel roof plate in frog (Schweickert et al., 2007). Genetic or embryological perturbation of these ciliated structures disrupted asymmetric Nodal pathway expression and organ laterality. Motile cilia and asymmetric fluid flows were also described in the posterior notochordal plate in rabbit, Kupffer’s vesicle in medaka, and the gastrocoel roof plate in axolotl embryos (Okada et al., 2005; ). These structures are now referred to as the ‘left-right organizer’ (LRO) in the embryo. Interestingly, cilia identified in Hensen’s node in the chicken embryo are likely immotile (Stephen et al., 2014), and Hensen’s node does not form a cavity to accommodate fluid flow (Manner 2001; ). Live imaging revealed that sonic hedgehog (Shh) expressing cells migrate asymmetrically around Hensen’s node (known as “node rotation”) to establish left-sided asymmetric Shh expression and an asymmetric node morphology (; Gros et al., 2009). Left-sided Nodal expression in lateral plate mesoderm depends on Shh, and has been proposed to be influenced by asymmetries in developing midline (notochord and floor plate) structures (Otto et al., 2014). Similar to chick, two mammalian embryos—pig and cow—have an asymmetric node/PNC morphology that lacks cilia and/or space for fluid flow (Gros et al., 2009; Schroder et al., 2016). Analysis of Nodal expression at the node/PNC in four mammals revealed two classes of embryos: bilaterally symmetric Nodal was observed in embryos with motile cilia and fluid flow (mouse and rabbit), whereas asymmetric (left-biased) Nodal expression was found in embryos that lack cilia and/or space for flow (pig and cow) (Schroder et al., 2016). Recent work with gecko and turtle embryos identified asymmetric (left-biased) Nodal expression and a lack of motile cilia at the blastopore (equivalent to Hensen’s node) of these embryos, suggesting LR patterning proceeds independent of cilia in reptiles (Kajikawa et al., 2020). Together, these findings challenge the idea of a single conserved mechanism for breaking LR symmetry in vertebrates and suggest that in addition to cilia-driven flows, other asymmetric cellular behaviors and/or cellular chirality may play important roles in LR patterning of vertebrate embryos (Inaki, Liu, and Matsuno 2016; McDowell, Rajadurai, and Levin 2016; Wan et al., 2016; ; Hamada, 2020; Rahman et al., 2020).
In embryos with ciliated LROs, the exact mechanism(s) by which cilia-driven fluid flow impacts LR patterning are not fully understood. Work from mouse indicates leftward flow leads to the degradation of mRNA encoding Dand5 (also called Cerl2), a Cerberus/Dan family protein that functions to inhibit Nodal, in crown cells on the left side of the LRO (Marques et al., 2004; Nakamura et al., 2012), which results in higher Nodal activity on the left (Figure 2B). Degradation of Dand5 mRNA is regulated by the RNA binding protein Bicc1 that binds the 3′-UTR of Dand5 mRNA (Minegishi et al., 2021). Similar post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms generate LR asymmetry of Dand5 homologs in fish and frog (Hojo et al., 2007; Schweickert et al., 2010; Maerker et al., 2021). A recent phylogenetic study comparing vertebrates with motile cilia in their LRO versus those without cilia elucidated a set of 5 proteins lost in animals without a ciliated LRO (Szenker-Ravi et al., 2022). Analyses of one of these proteins, a metalloprotease termed ciliated left right organizer metallopeptidase (CIROP), revealed that it functions as an upstream factor necessary for Dand5 asymmetry in mouse, frog and fish embryos, and that CIROP mutations are found in human laterality patients (Szenker-Ravi et al., 2022). How flow is sensed by LRO cells to asymmetrically impact CIROP, Bicc1, and potentially other regulators remains unclear. Multiple models have been proposed for how this may happen, and these have been recently reviewed in detail elsewhere (Hamada 2016; Schweickert et al., 2017; Shinohara and Hamada 2017; Little and Norris 2021). Briefly, it has been proposed that cilia-driven asymmetric fluid flow transports either secreted signaling molecules (Nonaka et al., 1998; Okada et al., 2005) or extracellular vesicles (Tanaka, Okada, and Hirokawa 2005; Solowiej-Wedderburn et al., 2019) to the left side of the LRO to induce asymmetric calcium ion (Ca2+) flux and downstream signaling events. On the other hand, non-motile mechanosensory cilia may sense flow by bending to open stretch-activated ion channels in the ciliary membrane that initiate asymmetric Ca2+ signaling (McGrath et al., 2003; Tabin and Vogan 2003) (Figure 2C). Over the last several years, this mechanosensory cilia mechanism has been favored based on evidence that includes 1) involvement of cilia-localized PKD (polycystic kidney disease) ion channels (composed of subunits Pkd2 and Pkd1l1) in LR patterning of vertebrate embryos (Pennekamp et al., 2002; ; ; ; Kamura et al., 2011), 2) a requirement for Pkd2 in non-motile cilia in the mouse LRO to respond to flow (Yoshiba et al., 2012), and 3) observation of flow-dependent asymmetric Ca2+ flux that initiates in immotile cilia and then propagates to cells preferentially on the left side of LROs in zebrafish and mouse embryos (Yuan et al., 2015; Mizuno et al., 2020). However, other experiments that visualized Ca2+ dynamics suggest non-motile LRO cilia in the mouse embryo do not function as Ca2+ mechanosensors (). Thus, understanding exactly how fluid flow is translated into molecular asymmetry in the LRO—via chemosensing, mechanosensing, or possibly both—is an active area of investigation.
Form and function studies in mouse, frog, and zebrafish have uncovered several intriguing features of ciliated LROs. First, analyses of cell size and shape suggest the cellular architecture of the LRO is critical for its function. In frog, monociliated LRO cells are smaller than flanking endodermal cells, and there is an asymmetric distribution of polarized (posteriorly tilted) cilia along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis with a lower density of polarized cilia in posterior region (Schweickert et al., 2007). In the mouse LRO, smaller pit cells are tightly packed in the posterior region, and larger cells are found at the anterior region (Nonaka et al., 1998; Lee and Anderson 2008). This creates an AP gradient of motile cilia that impacts flow dynamics. Leftward flow has the highest velocity across the posterior pole, which correlates with a high frequency of Ca2+ fluxes—the first known molecular asymmetry—in the left-posterior region of the LRO (Mizuno et al., 2020). The zebrafish LRO has a similar AP gradient of ciliated cells, except that smaller cells, more cilia, and higher flow velocities are found in the anterior region (Kreiling et al., 2007; Okabe et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2011; Sampaio et al., 2014; ). Perturbations in mouse or zebrafish that disrupt LRO cellular architecture alter asymmetric Nodal signaling and LR patterning [reviewed in (Lee and Anderson 2008; ; ]. Second, it appears that normal LR patterning does not depend on “full-strength” fluid flows generated by LRO cilia. In frog, paralyzing cilia on the entire right side of the LRO had no phenotypic consequence, indicating flow generated by the left side is sufficient for normal laterality (Vick et al., 2009). In the mouse LRO, mutations that paralyze cilia with variable penetrance revealed that only 2 motile cilia (out of 200–300) are needed to generate normal LR asymmetry (Shinohara et al., 2012). While these surprising results argue against a requirement for a strong flow across the entire LRO, leftward flows were maintained in both the frog and mouse experiments, and in mice with 2 motile cilia the weak flow was across the posterior LRO. Mathematical modeling and experimental perturbations in zebrafish also predict only a subset of motile cilia in the LRO is necessary to create flows needed to break symmetry (Sampaio et al., 2014; Tavares et al., 2017). A better understanding of the dynamics of weak flows may provide mechanistic insight into how the flow generates asymmetric signaling. Third, morphogenesis of the transient LRO is highly dynamic, which suggests precise developmental timing of flow creation and flow sensing is critical for generating asymmetric signals. In zebrafish, the number of motile cilia increases over developmental time in concert with cell shape changes and lumen expansion to create asymmetric flow (Oteiza et al., 2008; Wang, Manning, and Amack 2012; Yuan et al., 2015; ). At later somite stages of mouse development, the LRO changes shape and leftward flow is no longer detected even though cilia are still motile (Nonaka et al., 1998). Together, these findings indicate a tight temporal relationship between a dynamic LRO architecture and the generation of leftward flow and asymmetric signaling.
Zebrafish as a model system to understand left-right patterning
Zebrafish is a useful model organism to investigate the origins, regulators, and outcomes of left-right patterning events. External fertilization and rapid embryo development allows real-time analysis of the earliest stages of LR patterning without perturbing the embryo. Transparency of the embryo facilitates spatial analysis of gene expression and protein localization, and several transgenic strains that express fluorescent proteins in specific cell types relevant to LR development are readily available. In addition, genes and pathways can be modulated using a wide range of genetic and pharmacological approaches. The combination of these features has been used successfully to identify and test candidate genes and mechanisms for laterality defects in humans, and presents opportunities to develop new technologies to further understand LR patterning.
Zebrafish laterality
As in other vertebrates, a Nodal-related protein—called Southpaw (Spaw)—is asymmetrically activated in left-sided lateral plate mesoderm and induces left-sided expression of nodal, lefty and pitx2 genes during LR patterning of the zebrafish embryo that will generate asymmetries in the heart, gut, and brain (Long, Ahmad, and Rebagliati 2003; Matsui and Bessho 2012; Grimes and Burdine 2017; Montague, Gagnon, and Schier 2018). Similar to mouse, fluid flow generated by motile cilia in the LRO (Kupffer’s vesicle) during early somite stages results in elevation of the Dan family Nodal inhibitor Dand5 (also called Charon in zebrafish) (Hashimoto et al., 2004) on the right side of the LRO at the 8 somite stage (Lopes et al., 2010; Schneider et al., 2010; Juan et al., 2018). Asymmetric Spaw signaling at the LRO then activates spaw expression in the left lateral plate mesoderm at 10–12 somite stages, which expands anteriorly between the 12–23 somite stages (Long, Ahmad, and Rebagliati 2003; Wang and Yost 2008; Montague, Gagnon, and Schier 2018) (Figure 3A). Asymmetric expression of lefty1, lefty2, and pitx2 (pitx2c isoform) mRNA can be detected at 19–22 somite stages in lateral plate mesoderm, heart field, and diencephalon in the brain (; Thisse and Thisse 1999; ; ; ). Expression of lefty1 in the midline restricts Nodal signaling to the left lateral plate mesoderm (; Montague, Gagnon, and Schier 2018). Disruption of early LR patterning steps can alter spaw expression, such that it is right-sided (e.g., situs inversus) (Figure 3B) or bilaterally expressed (e.g., situs ambiguous) (Figure 3C). Left-sided expression of pitx2c (Figure 3D) is similarly altered in embryos with LR patterning defects (Figures 3E,F). It is interesting to note that mutations in spaw can alter LR asymmetry of the heart (Montague, Gagnon, and Schier 2018) and gut (Noel et al., 2013), but mutations in pitx2 have no such effect on gross heart or gut laterality (Ji, Buel, and Amack 2016). Recently, defects in spaw asymmetry were found to be uncoupled from heart and gut laterality defects in jnk mutants (). These findings suggest pathways and/or factors in addition to the Nodal-Pitx2 signaling axis can impact heart and gut LR morphogenesis. Along these lines, Nodal-independent actin cytoskeletal dynamics (Noel et al., 2013), BMP signaling (; Smith et al., 2011; Lenhart et al., 2013; Veerkamp et al., 2013; Lombardo et al., 2019), and right-sided asymmetric expression of the Prrx1a transcription factor (Ocana et al., 2017; Rago et al., 2019) have been implicated in regulating laterality. However, the function of Prrx1a has recently been challenged by zebrafish mutants that have normal cardiac laterality (; Tessadori et al., 2020). Defining precise mechanisms, interactions, crosstalks, and/or compensations among converging pathways are key areas for future investigation.
FIGURE 3
Details of known cellular and molecular mechanisms that control asymmetric organogenesis in zebrafish have been reviewed previously (; Grimes and Burdine 2017; Smith and Uribe 2021). Here, we briefly introduce these organ LR asymmetries, discuss when they develop, and describe methods to detect them. The zebrafish primitive heart tube forms between 22 and 26 h post-fertilization (hpf), and migrates (‘jogs’) to the left of the midline as it elongates () (Figure 3G). Imaging live transgenic embryos with fluorescently labeled cardiomyocytes revealed faster migration of left-sided cells, which is dependent on Bmp and Spaw signaling (; ; Smith et al., 2008). This process of heart jogging includes a rotation that transforms the initial left side of the heart field (e.g., marked by lefty2 expression) into the dorsal side of the elongating heart tube (; Rohr, Otten, and Abdelilah-Seyfried 2008; Smith et al., 2008). Perturbation of LR patterning can result in reversed heart jogging (Figure 3H), or extension along the midline (Figure 3I). After elongation and jogging, the zebrafish primitive heart tube undergoes the highly conserved process of rightward cardiac looping that occurs across vertebrates (; ) (Figure 3J). Cardiac looping morphogenesis occurs in zebrafish between 28 and 48 hpf, and relies on LR patterning cues and intrinsic activity of the actomyosin cytoskeleton (Noel et al., 2013; Montague, Gagnon, and Schier 2018). A second rotation between 28 and 30 hpf brings the dorsal side of the heart (the original left side of the heart field) back to the left side of the heart (). Live imaging identified a torque-like deformation at the arterial pole of the and anisotropic growth of ventricle and atrium during looping morphogenesis (Lombardo et al., 2019). Laterality defects can result in reversed heart looping (e.g., situs inversus) (Figure 3K) or lack of heart looping such that the heart remains symmetric along the midline (e.g., situs ambiguous) (Figure 3L). Although the direction of cardiac looping can be uncoupled from cardiac jogging, leftward jogging promotes robust rightward looping morphogenesis (Grimes et al., 2020).
The zebrafish gastrointestinal tract also undergoes LR asymmetric morphogenesis and endodermal organs take up asymmetric positions, with the liver and gall bladder developing on the left side and pancreas placed on the right (Figure 3M). In chicken and mouse embryos, asymmetric Pitx2 expression regulates asymmetric cellular behaviors to bend the dorsal mesentery that suspends the gut tube from the abdominal wall (), which in turn results in looping of the intestines. Intriguing recent work indicates nodal-independent asymmetric Pitx2 activity drives a mechanical feedback mechanism in the dorsal mesentery (Sanketi et al., 2022). Experiments in mouse and frog indicate asymmetry of the stomach may not depend on extrinsic forces (e.g., mediated by dorsal mesentery), but rather depends on development of asymmetric cellular architectures directed by intrinsic laterality cues that include Nodal and Pitx2 activity (). In zebrafish, the developing gut tube is not suspended by a dorsal mesentery, but rather receives directionality from the lateral plate mesoderm, located on either side of the endoderm (Horne-Badovinac, Rebagliati, and Stainier 2003). At 26 hpf, the lateral plate mesoderm asymmetrically migrates to forcing the gut tube to the left side of the embryo. Disruption of LR patterning signals can result in gastrointestinal laterality defects, which include reverse orientation of the gut (e.g., situs inversus) (Figure 3N), or situs ambiguous that is reminiscent of HTX in humans (Figure 3O).
Several methods are available to detect organ asymmetries in zebrafish. These include transgenic strains that use fluorescent protein expression to label cardiomyocytes, for example using the myl7 promoter (Huang et al., 2003), to visualize asymmetric heart morphogenesis. Similarly, promoters, including sequences from sox17, are used to label endoderm to observe gut asymmetries (). A searchable catalog of transgenic strains is available at http://zfin.org/action/fish/search. In addition, some asymmetric organ morphologies can be visualized in unlabeled transparent living embryos under a dissecting microscope. These include 1) the direction of heart jogging and looping, which is aided by observing heart contractility and blood flow (Moreno-Ayala et al., 2021) (Supplementary Movie S1), and 2) position of the gall bladder and pancreas that become auto-fluorescent by 7 days post fertilization (; Ji, Buel, and Amack 2016). As a complementary approach to live imaging, several RNA in situ hybridization probes are widely available to visualize LR asymmetries in lateral plate mesoderm, heart, brain, gut tube, pancreas, and liver in the zebrafish embryo (Supplementary Table S1). This set of tools provides multiple approaches to visualize and quantify morphometrics of cells and organs, and dissect mechanisms that underlie organ laterality.
Kupffer’s vesicle is the zebrafish left-right organizer
Work in the mid 2000s identified a transient fluid-filled structure called Kupffer’s vesicle (KV) as the zebrafish LRO. KV forms in the tailbud of the zebrafish embryo during early somitiogenesis and appears as a sphere-like cavity (Figures 4A, B). First described in the 19th century (Kupffer 1868), KV is a conserved transient structure in the teleost embryo. Electron microscopy of killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) embryos revealed a single cilium projecting from each KV cell into the lumen of the cavity (). However, the function of KV remained unknown for over 100 years and it was referred to as an “organ of ambiguity” (Warga and Stainier 2002). Subsequently, the discovery that KV cilia are motile and generate fluid flow inside the KV lumen, along with functional evidence that KV is required for LR patterning (; ; ; Kramer-Zucker et al., 2005), revealed KV to be an “organ of asymmetry” that is now referred to as the zebrafish LRO. The zebrafish KV has a simple structure: a single layer of ∼50 ciliated epithelial cells line the fluid-filled lumen (Figure 4C). High-speed videomicroscopy indicates most motile KV cilia beat in a vortical pattern at a frequency of ∼30 rotations per second (∼30 Hz) (Kramer-Zucker et al., 2005; Okabe et al., 2008; Sampaio et al., 2014) (Supplementary Movie S2). These cilia create a directional counterclockwise fluid flow when viewed dorsally (Supplementary Movie S3). Perturbations that disrupt motile KV cilia indicate the directional fluid flow is essential for directing Spaw/Nodal signaling on the left side of the embryo (; Kramer-Zucker et al., 2005; Lopes et al., 2010). Furthermore, mutations that disrupt KV form or function result in laterality defects in zebrafish (reviewed in (Matsui and Bessho 2012; )). Importantly, mechanical disruption or laser ablation of KV cells disrupts LR patterning in the zebrafish embryo without altering dorsal-ventral or anterior-posterior patterning (). This feature, in combination with rapid development and accessibility to high-resolution imaging, make the zebrafish KV a useful model system to investigate LRO biology.
FIGURE 4
Several developmental steps that build a functional KV have been identified. The precursor cells that give rise to KV—called dorsal forerunner cells (DFCs)—can be readily tracked and manipulated during development. Transgenic strains have been developed that label the DFC/KV cell lineage, which has facilitated live imaging studies to visualize KV development with high temporal and spatial resolution (; Wang et al., 2011; Woo et al., 2012; ). DFCs appear at mid-epiboly stages (∼5 hpf), migrate, proliferate, and then undergo a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition to form KV during early somite stages (Supplementary Movie S4; Figure 5). KV develops directional fluid flow and establishes LR signaling, and then breaks down ∼18 hpf when KV cells undergo a poorly understood epithelial to mesenchymal transition () and migrate away to incorporate into muscle and notochord (; Melby, Warga, and Kimmel 1996; Ikeda et al., 2022). While there are certainly species-specific differences in LRO architectures—including overall size, shape, and number of cells (Lee and Anderson 2008; ; )—there is a common overarching strategy in several vertebrates to form an LRO that places a mono-ciliated epithelium in a specific geometry that facilitates the creation and detection of directional cilia-driven fluid flow. It will be key to identify mechanisms that control LRO development in several vertebrates in order to construct an evolutionary history of the LRO and determine the underpinnings of LRO form and function.
FIGURE 5
Insights from zebrafish into mechanisms that control left-right organizer development
Work in zebrafish has made important contributions to our understanding of the vertebrate LRO and underlying causes of human laterality disorders. Specifically, the zebrafish embryo has provided insights into LRO cell biology, cilia function, and fluid flow dynamics. Here, we provide an overview of specific developmental steps of the zebrafish LRO (KV), and highlight recent findings that shed light on mechanisms that regulate LRO form and function.
Specification and movement of KV precursor cells
Fate-mapping studies show the KV precursor cells (DFCs) appear on the dorsal side of the embryo as a distinct population of ∼25 cells by the 50% epiboly stage (∼5 hpf) (
Recent insights
Recent lineage tracing experiments by Warga and Kane have extended our understanding of the origins of DFCs (Warga and Kane 2018). This work indicates DFCs are descendants of specific EVL cells termed “Wilson cells” that are the last cells to share cytoplasmic connections with the yolk cell (up to 512-cell stage) at the blastoderm margin. Wilson cells were found to undergo asymmetric division, with one daughter cell contributing to the yolk syncytial layer, and the other contributing to surface epithelial (EVL) cells. On the dorsal side of the embryo, surface epithelial cells derived from Wilson cells ingress to become DFCs. Consistent with previous reports, DFC specification from Wilson cells depends on Nodal signaling. The Wilson cell origin of DFCs advances our understanding of how LRO cells arise in vertebrate embryos. In addition, this study provides an explanation for previous observations that DFCs remain connected to the yolk cell longer than other cells (
How DFCs move in a developing embryo to get to the right place at the right time to form KV is not fully understood. A recent report by Pulgar, et al. described a mechanical dragging mechanism that guides DFC movement during epiboly stages (Pulgar et al., 2021). Live imaging of transgenic embryos revealed that DFCs delaminate from dorsal EVL cells using an apical constriction mechanism. In some cells this delamination process is incomplete, which results in physical connections that are maintained between DFCs and overlying EVL via apical attachments enriched with junctional proteins. Results from genetic and laser ablation experiments indicated these apical attachments between DFCs and EVL support a mechanism in which spreading of EVL during epiboly can physically drag the attached DFCs towards the posterior pole of the embryo. Strikingly, live imaging of individual DFCs unattached to EVL revealed these cells could migrate away from the DFC group. To follow up on this finding, the authors also identified cell-cell interactions between DFCs—mediated by E-cadherin—that are critical for linking EVL-attached DFCs with unattached DFCs to ensure DFCs move collectively. These results provide insights into mechanisms that connect, organize, and move DFCs during development.
In addition to biophysical dragging, an independent study by Jiang, et al. identified biochemical signaling involved in directing DFC movement during epiboly stages (Jiang et al., 2019). Migrasomes are a recently defined class of extracellular vesicles left at the trailing end of migrating cells that can burst to release signaling molecules (
KV precursor cell proliferation, clustering, and lumenogenesis
While moving during epiboly stages, DFCs proliferate at a rate that is higher than non-DFC cells in the embryo (Rathbun et al., 2020). The percentage of DFCs undergoing cell division peaks between 60 and 70% epiboly with a mitotic index between 5 and 10%, and then becomes reduced as mesenchymal DFCs differentiate into ciliated epithelial KV cells (
The initially loosely associated group of DFCs forms a tight cluster of cells by the 80% epiboly stage (∼8 hpf) (Figure 5C; Supplementary Movie S5). Defects in this clustering process disrupt KV formation, and several genes and pathways have been implicated in this process. These include E-cadherin (Cdh1) based cell-cell adhesion (Shibasaki et al., 1996), the transcription factor Tbx16 (
Recent insights
A recent study by Liu, et al. provided new molecular insights that connect cell proliferation and ciliogenesis during KV development (Liu et al., 2019). This work identified new functions for chemokine signaling—in addition to the roles in migrasome-mediated DFC movement described above—in regulating DFC proliferation and KV cilia length. Loss-of-function mutations in the chemokine receptor cxcr4a resulted in fewer KV cells, shorter KV cilia, and laterality defects. Genetic and biochemical studies indicated Cxcr4a signaling, mediated by an ERK1/2 pathway, activates Cyclin D1 expression in DFCs to stimulate G1/S progression during the cell cycle. In addition, Cyclin D1 was found to stabilize the transcription factor Foxj1a, a known regulator of genes that build motile cilia. The Cyclin D1-associated Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (Cdk4) was then shown to interact with and phosphorylate Foxj1a. This phosphorylation event prevented Foxj1a degradation to promote ciliogenesis. Thus, Cxcr4a signaling via Cyclin D1 regulates both cell cycle progression and ciliogenesis during KV development.
Using high-resolution live imaging and novel optical approaches, Rathbun, et al. identified a mechanistic link between cell division and KV lumenogenesis (Rathbun et al., 2020). Live imaging revealed that after DFC mitotic division, the two daughter cells remain connected via a cytokinetic bridge that becomes positioned at the center of rosette structures where KV lumens form. These bridges are then cleaved in the last stage of mitosis called abscission. Premature severing of DFC cytokinetic bridges using laser ablation was found to greatly reduce KV lumen size, suggesting an essential role for cytokinetic bridges in lumen formation. To block cytokintetic bridge severing, the authors developed an optogenetic approach targeting the GTPase Rab11, which is known to be present on endosomes necessary for the initiation of abscission, and has previously been implicated in KV lumen formation (Westlake et al., 2011; Tay et al., 2013). Light-mediated clustering of Rab11 + endosomes prevented abscission and blocked KV lumen formation. Furthermore, Cftr protein, which is needed for lumen expansion (Navis, Marjoram, and Bagnat 2013), was found to co-localize with clustered Rab11+ vesicles and failed to localize to apical membranes of KV cells. These results suggest a mechanism in which Rab11+ vesicles traffic Cftr, and potentially other proteins, to cytokintetic bridges that give rise to apical membranes of KV cells to mediate lumen formation and expansion.
KV cilia and flow dynamics
During lumen formation, each KV cell projects a cilium from its apical surface into the expanding lumen. Cilia genes are expressed early in DFCs, and make good markers for the DFC/KV cell lineage since KV is the first ciliated organ to form in the zebrafish embryo. KV cilia elongate between the tailbud stage and 8 somite stage to reach a final length of ∼5 microns, which is similar to other vertebrate LRO cilia (
Similar to mouse and frog LRO cilia, AP polarization of KV cilia is regulated by planar cell polarity (
Recent insights
Two studies have uncovered roles for the actin-dependent myosin motor protein Myo1d in KV development and LR patterning in the zebrafish embryo (Juan et al., 2018; Saydmohammed et al., 2018). Myo1d was first identified in genetic screens as a regulator of LR asymmetry in the invertebrate Drosophila melanogaster (Hozumi et al., 2006; Speder, Adam, and Noselli 2006), which does not use cilia to break bilateral symmetry. Myo1d interacts with the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway to mediate asymmetric looping of the hindgut in Drosophila (
As a complementary approach to biological experiments, mathematical models have provided important insights into fluid dynamics inside KV. Computational modeling of KV flow presented by Ferreira, et al. (
KV remodeling, KV cellular architecture, and LR signaling
LROs in vertebrate embryos develop a specific cellular architecture that is critical for generating fluid flow and LR asymmetry. The zebrafish KV at the 8 somite stage has an asymmetric architecture along the AP axis, such that more ciliated cells are placed in the anterior region, and fewer are positioned in the posterior pole (Kreiling et al., 2007; Okabe et al., 2008;
Live imaging determined that changes in KV cellular architecture occur with very precise developmental timing. At the 2-4 somite stages (12–13 hpf), all cells at the middle plane of the KV have similar cell shapes (Figure 5E). However, by the 6-somite stage (14 hpf), anterior KV cell shapes are morphologically different from posterior cells, and this difference persists until at least the 10-somite stage (Wang, Manning, and Amack 2012) (Figure 5F). We refer to this process of differential cell shape changes along the AP aixs as KV remodeling (Supplementary Movie S7). Several mechanisms have been identified that contribute to KV remodeling. First, treatments that alter contractility of the actomyosin cytoskeleton blocked KV remodeling and LR patterning without affecting lumen expansion or cilia motility (Wang et al., 2011; Wang, Manning, and Amack 2012). Results from antisense depletion of the Rho kinase rock2b specifically in KV cells suggests a cell autonomous function for contractility during KV remodeling. Genome-wide analyses in patients with laterality defects identified variants in ROCK2 (
LR signaling at KV is not fully understood. As in other vertebrate embryos, there is asymmetric Ca2+ flux on the left side of KV during early somite stages (Sarmah et al., 2005; Jurynec et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2015). The presence of immotile cilia in KV—albeit randomly distributed (Sampaio et al., 2014; Yuan et al., 2015)—supports a model for mechanosensory cilia detecting directional flow and triggering LR asymmetric signaling cascades. Recent work indicates the number of immotile cilia is controlled by Notch signaling (Tavares et al., 2017). In addition, stretch-activated PKD cation channels, composed of Pkd2 and Pkd1l1 subunits, localize to KV cilia and are necessary for LR pattering (Kamura et al., 2011;
Recent findings
Regulation of KV architecture has recently by linked to molecules involved in other steps of LR patterning. First, Jacinto, et al. (Jacinto et al., 2021) analyzed KV architecture in pkd2 mutants, called curly up (cup) (Schottenfeld, Sullivan-Brown, and Burdine 2007), and found defects in posterior KV cell shape changes that correlated with faster KV flow dynamics. The authors suggest that KV architecture defects in cup mutants could impact flow by altering the spacing between posterior KV cilia. Second, a recent study by Pelliccia, et al. (Pelliccia, Jindal, and Burdine 2017) implicates TGF-β/Nodal signaling, which is required for DFC specification and left-sided signaling in lateral plate mesoderm, in regulating KV cell shapes by studying the Nodal co-factor Gdf3. Maternal and zygotic gdf3 (mzgdf3) mutants develop pleiotropic developmental defects caused by reduced nodal signaling that are too severe to score LR asymmetry (
In addition to signaling pathways, biophysical forces have been recently implicated in mediating cell shape changes during KV remodeling. During KV remodeling stages KV is not static, but rather moves posteriorly in the tailbud of the elongating embryo. Erdemci-Tandogan, et al. (
Conclusion and future directions
Errors during early embryogenesis that disrupt the development and arrangement of internal organs along the LR body axis can result in a wide spectrum of birth defects and associated health problems. Research during the last several decades has made tremendous progress towards understanding the underlying biology of laterality defects. It is now clear that an evolutionarily conserved Nodal signaling cascade is asymmetrically activated at a transient left-right organizer to establish distinct left and right sides in developing vertebrate embryos. However, a number of questions remain about the mechanisms that generate appropriate asymmetric Nodal signals in vertebrate embryos, and how molecular asymmetries are translated in morphological asymmetries. Several animal models have played key roles in elucidating in vivo features and regulators of the LR patterning process. Among these, zebrafish has provided important insights into mechanisms that control the construction of a functional LRO.
The rapid advancement of high-resolution in vivo imaging approaches to visualize and quantify cell behaviors, fluid flows, and Ca2+ dynamics puts zebrafish in position to address open questions about the earliest steps of LR development. These include when, what, and where is the first break in bilateral symmetry? Previous work in the frog Xenopus leavis suggested the first molecular LR asymmetries appear at cleavages stages during very early development (Levin et al., 2002;
Statements
Author contributions
KF wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AB and SP contributed to the review of human laterality disorders. JA and AH contributed to the review of zebrafish asymmetry and the left-right organizer.
Funding
Work in the Amack lab is supported in part by NIH grant R01HD099031.
Acknowledgments
We thank Heidi Hehnly and M. Lisa Manning for helpful comments on this manuscript, and apologize to authors whose work was not cited here due to scope and space limitations. We also thank previous lab members Guangliang Wang and Yongchang Ji for contributing images and movies. Figures were created using BioRender.com and Affinity Photo software.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2022.1035513/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Movie S1Visualization of a normal rightward looped heart in a wild-type zebrafish embryo at 2 days post-fertilization. V = ventricle; A = atrium. Time scale = minutes:seconds.
Supplementary Movie S2Motile cilia in KV. Dorsal view of a wild-type embryo showing KV cilia beating in a vortical pattern at the 8-somite stage. The movie was captured at 117 frames per second (fps) and is played back at 10 fps. Time scale = hours:minutes:seconds:miliseconds.
Supplementary Movie S3Fluid flow in KV. Fluorescent microspheres were injected into a live wild-type embryo at the 6-somite stage. The brightfield channel shows KV lumen and the fluorescent channel shows microspheres moving with a directional counterclockwise fluid flow. Note a strong leftward flow in the anterior region of KV, and a slower rightward return flow in the posterior region. Dorsal view. Anterior is at the top.
Supplementary Movie S4Development of the DFC/KV cell lineage. Live timelapse imaging of a Tg (dusp6:memGFP) (Wang et al. 2011) embryo expressing membrane-localized GFP in DFC/KV cells from the 90% epiboly stage to the 2 somite stage. The GFP signal is superimposed on a brightfield image of the embryo. During the timelapse, clustered DFCs undergo a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition to differentiate into epithelial KV cells that form a rosette-like structure. Next, a fluid-filled lumen begins to expand at the center of the forming KV structure. Note that the DFC/KV cells are highly dynamic and continually moving in the embryo. Time scale = hours:minutes:seconds.
Supplementary Movie S5Cell behaviors of DFCs. Live timelapse imaging of a Tg (sox17:GFP-CAAX) (Dasgupta et al. 2018) embryo expressing membrane-localized GFP in DFCs (shown using an inverted thalium lookup table) captured DFC movement, proliferation, and clustering from the 60% epiboly stage to the 80% epiboly stage. The embryo was imaged in the chorion. Time scale = hours:minutes.
Supplementary Movie S6KV rosette-like structure and lumenogenesis. Live timelapse imaging of a Tg (sox17:GFP-CAAX) (Dasgupta et al. 2018) embryo expressing membrane-localized GFP in KV cells (shown using an inverted thalium lookup table) between tailbud stage and the 4-somite stage. KV lumen expansion initiates at the center of the rosette-like structure. The embryo was imaged in the chorion. Time scale = hours:minutes.
Supplementary Movie S7KV remodeling. Live timelapse imaging of a double transgenic embryo expressing Tg (sox17:DsRed) (Chung and Stainier 2008) that labels KV cells (shown in red) and TgBAC (cdh2:cdh2-sfGFP-TagRFP,crybb1:ECFP) (Revenu et al. 2014) that labels Cadherin2 at cell-cell junctions (shown in green) between the 4 and 6 somite stages. To adjust for KV movement, the movie was edited to place KV in the center for each timepoint. During this 1 h of morphogenesis, anterior and posterior KV cells undergo distinct cell shape changes. Time scale = hours:minutes:seconds.
Supplementary Table S1Useful molecular markers to visualize LR asymmetries in the zebrafish embryo using RNA in situ hybridization.
References
1
AbloogluA. J.TkachenkoE.KangJ.ShattilS. J. (2010). Integrin alphaV is necessary for gastrulation movements that regulate vertebrate body asymmetry. Development137, 3449–3458. 10.1242/dev.045310
2
AdamsD. S.RobinsonK. R.FukumotoT.YuanS.AlbertsonR. C.YelickP.et al (2006). Early, H+-V-ATPase-dependent proton flux is necessary for consistent left-right patterning of non-mammalian vertebrates. Development133, 1657–1671. 10.1242/dev.02341
3
AfzeliusB. A. (1976). A human syndrome caused by immotile cilia. Science193, 317–319. 10.1126/science.1084576
4
AgarwalR.VargheseR.JesudianV.MosesJ. (2021). 'The heterotaxy syndrome: Associated congenital heart defects and management. Indian J. Thorac. Cardiovasc Surg.37, 67–81. 10.1007/s12055-020-00935-y
5
AlbertsonR. C.YelickP. C. (2005). Roles for fgf8 signaling in left-right patterning of the visceral organs and craniofacial skeleton. Dev. Biol.283, 310–321. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.04.025
6
AlexanderJ.StainierD. Y. (1999). A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish. Curr. Biol.9, 1147–1157. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80016-0
7
AmackJ. D. (2021). Cellular dynamics of EMT: Lessons from live in vivo imaging of embryonic development. Cell. Commun. Signal19, 79. 10.1186/s12964-021-00761-8
8
AmackJ. D. (2014). Salient features of the ciliated organ of asymmetry. Bioarchitecture4, 6–15. 10.4161/bioa.28014
9
AmackJ. D. (2022). 'Structures and functions of cilia during vertebrate embryo development. Mol. Reprod. Dev.10.1002/mrd.23650
10
AmackJ. D.WangX.YostH. J. (2007). Two T-box genes play independent and cooperative roles to regulate morphogenesis of ciliated Kupffer's vesicle in zebrafish. Dev. Biol.310, 196–210. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.05.039
11
AmackJ. D.YostH. J. (2004). The T box transcription factor no tail in ciliated cells controls zebrafish left-right asymmetry. Curr. Biol.14, 685–690. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.002
12
AndreM.AndoS.BallagnyC.DurliatM.PoupardG.BrianconC.et al (2000). Intestinal fatty acid binding protein gene expression reveals the cephalocaudal patterning during zebrafish gut morphogenesis. Int. J. Dev. Biol.44, 249–252.
13
ArringtonC. B.PetersonA. G.YostH. J. (2013). Sdc2 and Tbx16 regulate Fgf2-dependent epithelial cell morphogenesis in the ciliated organ of asymmetry. Development140, 4102–4109. 10.1242/dev.096933
14
AylsworthA. S. (2001). Clinical aspects of defects in the determination of laterality. Am. J. Med. Genet.101, 345–355. 10.1002/ajmg.1219
15
BakerK.HoltzmanN. G.BurdineR. D. (2008). Direct and indirect roles for Nodal signaling in two axis conversions during asymmetric morphogenesis of the zebrafish heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 13924–13929. 10.1073/pnas.0802159105
16
BakkersJ.VerhoevenM. C.Abdelilah-SeyfriedS. (2009). Shaping the zebrafish heart: From left-right axis specification to epithelial tissue morphogenesis. Dev. Biol.330, 213–220. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.011
17
BarnesR. M.BlackB. L. (2016). “Nodal signaling and congenital heart defects,” in Etiology and morphogenesis of congenital heart disease: From gene function and cellular interaction to morphology. Editors NakanishiT.MarkwaldR. R.BaldwinH. S.KellerB. B.SrivastavaD.YamagishiH. (Tokyo.
18
BatailleS.DemoulinN.DevuystO.AudrezetM. P.DahanK.GodinM.et al (2011). Association of PKD2 (polycystin 2) mutations with left-right laterality defects. Am. J. Kidney Dis.58, 456–460. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.05.015
19
Becker-HeckA.ZohnI. E.OkabeN.PollockA.LenhartK. B.Sullivan-BrownJ.et al (2011). The coiled-coil domain containing protein CCDC40 is essential for motile cilia function and left-right axis formation. Nat. Genet.43, 79–84. 10.1038/ng.727
20
BeloJ. A.MarquesS.InacioJ. M. (2017). The role of Cerl2 in the establishment of left-right asymmetries during Axis formation and heart development. J. Cardiovasc Dev. Dis.4, 23. 10.3390/jcdd4040023
21
BestS.ShoemarkA.RubboB.PatelM. P.FassadM. R.DixonM.et al (2019). Risk factors for situs defects and congenital heart disease in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Thorax74, 203–205. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212104
22
BisgroveB. W.EssnerJ. J.YostH. J. (2000). Multiple pathways in the midline regulate concordant brain, heart and gut left-right asymmetry. Development127, 3567–3579. 10.1242/dev.127.16.3567
23
BisgroveB. W.EssnerJ. J.YostH. J. (1999). Regulation of midline development by antagonism of lefty and nodal signaling. Development126, 3253–3262. 10.1242/dev.126.14.3253
24
BisgroveB. W.SnarrB. S.EmrazianA.YostH. J. (2005). Polaris and Polycystin-2 in dorsal forerunner cells and Kupffer's vesicle are required for specification of the zebrafish left-right axis. Dev. Biol.287, 274–288. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.047
25
BisgroveB. W.SuY. C.YostH. J. (2017). Maternal Gdf3 is an obligatory cofactor in Nodal signaling for embryonic axis formation in zebrafish. Elife6, e28534. 10.7554/eLife.28534
26
BlueG. M.MekelM.DasD.TroupM.RathE.IpE.et al (2022). 'Whole genome sequencing in transposition of the great arteries and associations with clinically relevant heart, brain and laterality genes. Am. Heart J.244, 1–13. 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.10.185
27
BlumM.AndreP.MudersK.SchweickertA.FischerA.BitzerE.et al (2007). Ciliation and gene expression distinguish between node and posterior notochord in the mammalian embryo. Differentiation75, 133–146. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00124.x
28
BlumM.OttT. (2018). Animal left-right asymmetry. Curr. Biol.28, R301-R304–R04. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.073
29
BlumM.SchweickertA.VickP.WrightC. V.DanilchikM. V. (2014). Symmetry breakage in the vertebrate embryo: When does it happen and how does it work?Dev. Biol.393, 109–123. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.06.014
30
BlumM.WeberT.BeyerT.VickP. (2009). Evolution of leftward flow. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.20, 464–471. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.11.005
31
BorovinaA.SuperinaS.VoskasD.CirunaB. (2010). 'Vangl2 directs the posterior tilting and asymmetric localization of motile primary cilia. Nat. Cell. Biol.12, 407–412. 10.1038/ncb2042
32
BrummettA. R.DumontJ. N. (1978). Kupffer's vesicle in Fundulus heteroclitus: A scanning and transmission electron microscope study. Tissue Cell.10, 11–22. 10.1016/0040-8166(78)90003-4
33
BucaD. I. P.KhalilA.RizzoG.FamiliariA.Di GiovanniS.LiberatiM.et al (2018). Outcome of prenatally diagnosed fetal heterotaxy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.51, 323–330. 10.1002/uog.17546
34
BurkhalterM. D.FralishG. B.PremontR. T.CaronM. G.PhilippM. (2013). Grk5l controls heart development by limiting mTOR signaling during symmetry breaking. Cell. Rep.4, 625–632. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.036
35
BurkhalterM. D.SridharA.SampaioP.JacintoR.BurczykM. S.DonowC.et al (2019). Imbalanced mitochondrial function provokes heterotaxy via aberrant ciliogenesis. J. Clin. Investig.129, 2841–2855.Investigators Competence Network for Congenital Heart Defects
36
CampioneM.FrancoD. (2016). Current perspectives in cardiac laterality. J. Cardiovasc Dev. Dis.3, 34. 10.3390/jcdd3040034
37
CampioneM.SteinbeisserH.SchweickertA.DeisslerK.van BebberF.LoweL. A.et al (1999). The homeobox gene Pitx2: Mediator of asymmetric left-right signaling in vertebrate heart and gut looping. Development126, 1225–1234. 10.1242/dev.126.6.1225
38
CaronA.XuX.LinX. (2012). Wnt/β-catenin signaling directly regulates Foxj1 expression and ciliogenesis in zebrafish Kupffer's vesicle. Development139, 514–524. 10.1242/dev.071746
39
CartwrightJ. H. E.PiroO.TuvalI. (2020). Chemosensing versus mechanosensing in nodal and Kupffer's vesicle cilia and in other left-right organizer organs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.375, 20190566. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0566
40
CartwrightJ. H.PiroO.TuvalI. (2004). Fluid-dynamical basis of the embryonic development of left-right asymmetry in vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101, 7234–7239. 10.1073/pnas.0402001101
41
CastroviejoN.OcanaO. H.RagoL.CoskunH.ArcasA.GalceranJ.et al (2020). Reply to: Zebrafish prrx1a mutants have normal hearts. Nature585, E17-E19–E19. 10.1038/s41586-020-2675-0
42
ChambersJ. M.AddiegoA.Flores-MirelesA. L.WingertR. A. (2020). Ppargc1a controls ciliated cell development by regulating prostaglandin biosynthesis. Cell. Rep.33, 108370. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108370
43
ChenJ. N.FishmanM. C. (1996). Zebrafish tinman homolog demarcates the heart field and initiates myocardial differentiation. Development122, 3809–3816. 10.1242/dev.122.12.3809
44
ChenJ. N.van EedenF. J.WarrenK. S.ChinA.Nusslein-VolhardC.HaffterP.et al (1997). Left-right pattern of cardiac BMP4 may drive asymmetry of the heart in zebrafish. Development124, 4373–4382. 10.1242/dev.124.21.4373
45
ChenY.WuB.XuL.LiH.XiaJ.YinW.et al (2012). 'A SNX10/V-ATPase pathway regulates ciliogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Cell. Res.22, 333–345. 10.1038/cr.2011.134
46
ChocronS.VerhoevenM. C.RentzschF.HammerschmidtM.BakkersJ. (2007). 'Zebrafish Bmp4 regulates left-right asymmetry at two distinct developmental time points. Dev. Biol.305, 577–588. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.001
47
ChungW. S.StainierD. Y. (2008). 'Intra-endodermal interactions are required for pancreatic beta cell induction. Dev. Cell.14, 582–593. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.02.012
48
CollignonJ.VarletI.RobertsonE. J. (1996). 'Relationship between asymmetric nodal expression and the direction of embryonic turning. Nature381, 155–158. 10.1038/381155a0
49
CompagnonJ.BaroneV.RajshekarS.KottmeierR.Pranjic-FerschaK.BehrndtM.et al (2014). 'The notochord breaks bilateral symmetry by controlling cell shapes in the zebrafish laterality organ. Dev. Cell.31, 774–783. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.003
50
CooperM. S.D'AmicoL. A. (1996). 'A cluster of noninvoluting endocytic cells at the margin of the zebrafish blastoderm marks the site of embryonic shield formation. Dev. Biol.180, 184–198. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0294
51
CowanJ. R.TariqM.ShawC.RaoM.BelmontJ. W.LalaniS. R.et al (2016). 'Copy number variation as a genetic basis for heterotaxy and heterotaxy-spectrum congenital heart defects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.371, 20150406. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0406
52
CuiC.LittleC. D.RongishB. J. (2009). 'Rotation of organizer tissue contributes to left-right asymmetry. Anat. Rec. Hob.292, 557–561. 10.1002/ar.20872
53
da Rocha-AzevedoB.SchmidS. L. (2015). 'Migrasomes: A new organelle of migrating cells. Cell. Res.25, 1–2. 10.1038/cr.2014.146
54
DasguptaA.AmackJ. D. (2016). 'Cilia in vertebrate left-right patterning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.371, 20150410. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0410
55
DasguptaA.MerkelM.ClarkM. J.JacobA. E.DawsonJ. E.ManningM. L.et al (2018). Cell volume changes contribute to epithelial morphogenesis in zebrafish Kupffer's vesicle. Elife7.
56
DatheV.GamelA.MannerJ.Brand-SaberiB.ChristB. (2002). Morphological left-right asymmetry of Hensen's node precedes the asymmetric expression of Shh and Fgf8 in the chick embryo. Anat. Embryol. Berl.205, 343–354. 10.1007/s00429-002-0269-2
57
DavisA.AminN. M.JohnsonC.BagleyK.GhashghaeiH. T.Nascone-YoderN. (2017). Stomach curvature is generated by left-right asymmetric gut morphogenesis. Development144, 1477–1483. 10.1242/dev.143701
58
DavisN. M.KurpiosN. A.SunX.GrosJ.MartinJ. F.TabinC. J. (2008). The chirality of gut rotation derives from left-right asymmetric changes in the architecture of the dorsal mesentery. Dev. Cell.15, 134–145. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.001
59
de Campos-BaptistaM. I.HoltzmanN. G.YelonD.SchierA. F. (2008). Nodal signaling promotes the speed and directional movement of cardiomyocytes in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn.237, 3624–3633. 10.1002/dvdy.21777
60
DellingM.IndzhykulianA. A.LiuX.LiY.XieT.CoreyD. P.et al (2016). Primary cilia are not calcium-responsive mechanosensors. Nature531, 656–660. 10.1038/nature17426
61
DerrickC. J.Santos-LedoA.EleyL.ParamitaI. A.HendersonD. J.ChaudhryB. (2022). Sequential action of JNK genes establishes the embryonic left-right axis. Development149 (9), dev200136. 10.1242/dev.200136
62
DesgrangeA.Le GarrecJ. F.MeilhacS. M. (2018). Left-right asymmetry in heart development and disease: Forming the right loop. Development145 (22), dev162776. 10.1242/dev.162776
63
EitlerK.BibokA.TelkesG. (2022). Situs inversus totalis: A clinical review. Int. J. Gen. Med.15, 2437–2449. 10.2147/IJGM.S295444
64
EnglandS. J.CampbellP. C.BanerjeeS.SwansonA. J.LewisK. E. (2017). Identification and expression analysis of the complete family of zebrafish pkd genes. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol.5, 5. 10.3389/fcell.2017.00005
65
Erdemci-TandoganG.ClarkM. J.AmackJ. D.ManningM. L. (2018). Tissue flow induces cell shape changes during organogenesis. Biophys. J.115, 2259–2270. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.10.028
66
EssnerJ. J.AmackJ. D.NyholmM. K.HarrisE. B.YostH. J. (2005). Kupffer's vesicle is a ciliated organ of asymmetry in the zebrafish embryo that initiates left-right development of the brain, heart and gut. Development132, 1247–1260. 10.1242/dev.01663
67
EssnerJ. J.BranfordW. W.ZhangJ.YostH. J. (2000). Mesendoderm and left-right brain, heart and gut development are differentially regulated by pitx2 isoforms. Development127, 1081–1093. 10.1242/dev.127.5.1081
68
EssnerJ. J.VoganK. J.WagnerM. K.TabinC. J.YostH. J.BruecknerM. (2002). Conserved function for embryonic nodal cilia. Nature418, 37–38. 10.1038/418037a
69
FakhroK. A.ChoiM.WareS. M.BelmontJ. W.TowbinJ. A.LiftonR. P.et al (2011). Rare copy number variations in congenital heart disease patients identify unique genes in left-right patterning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108, 2915–2920. 10.1073/pnas.1019645108
70
FerreiraR. R.PakulaG.KlaeyleL.FukuiH.VilfanA.SupattoW.et al (2018). Chiral cilia orientation in the left-right organizer. Cell. Rep.25, 2008–2016. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069
71
FerreiraR. R.VilfanA.JulicherF.SupattoW.VermotJ. (2017). Physical limits of flow sensing in the left-right organizer. Elife6, e25078. 10.7554/eLife.25078
72
FieldS.RileyK. L.GrimesD. T.HiltonH.SimonM.Powles-GloverN.et al (2011). Pkd1l1 establishes left-right asymmetry and physically interacts with Pkd2. Development138, 1131–1142. 10.1242/dev.058149
73
FoxC.ManningM. L.AmackJ. D. (2015). Quantitative description of fluid flows produced by left-right cilia in zebrafish. Methods Cell. Biol.127, 175–187. 10.1016/bs.mcb.2014.12.010
74
FrancescattoL.RothschildS. C.MyersA. L.TombesR. M. (2010). The activation of membrane targeted CaMK-II in the zebrafish Kupffer's vesicle is required for left-right asymmetry. Development137, 2753–2762. 10.1242/dev.049627
75
FukumotoT.KemaI. P.LevinM. (2005). Serotonin signaling is a very early step in patterning of the left-right axis in chick and frog embryos. Curr. Biol.15, 794–803. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.044
76
GabrielG. C.LoC. W. (2020). Left-right patterning in congenital heart disease beyond heterotaxy. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet.184, 90–96. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31768
77
GamseJ. T.ThisseC.ThisseB.HalpernM. E. (2003). The parapineal mediates left-right asymmetry in the zebrafish diencephalon. Development130, 1059–1068. 10.1242/dev.00270
78
GokeyJ. J.DasguptaA.AmackJ. D. (2015). The V-ATPase accessory protein Atp6ap1b mediates dorsal forerunner cell proliferation and left-right asymmetry in zebrafish. Dev. Biol.407, 115–130. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.002
79
GokeyJ. J.JiY.TayH. G.LittsB.AmackJ. D. (2016). Kupffer's vesicle size threshold for robust left-right patterning of the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Dyn.245, 22–33. 10.1002/dvdy.24355
80
Gonzalez-MoralesN.GeminardC.LebretonG.CerezoD.CoutelisJ. B.NoselliS. (2015). The atypical cadherin dachsous controls left-right asymmetry in Drosophila. Dev. Cell.33, 675–689. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.026
81
GrimesD. T.BurdineR. D. (2017). Left-Right patterning: Breaking symmetry to asymmetric morphogenesis. Trends Genet.33, 616–628. 10.1016/j.tig.2017.06.004
82
GrimesD. T.PattersonV. L.Luna-ArvizuG.Schottenfeld-RoamesJ.IronsZ. H.BurdineR. D. (2020). Left-right asymmetric heart jogging increases the robustness of dextral heart looping in zebrafish. Dev. Biol.459, 79–86. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.11.012
83
GrosJ.FeistelK.ViebahnC.BlumM.TabinC. J. (2009). Cell movements at Hensen's node establish left/right asymmetric gene expression in the chick. Science324, 941–944. 10.1126/science.1172478
84
HagenE. M.SickoR. J.KayD. M.RiglerS. L.DimopoulosA.AhmadS.et al (2016). Copy-number variant analysis of classic heterotaxy highlights the importance of body patterning pathways. Hum. Genet.135, 1355–1364. 10.1007/s00439-016-1727-x
85
HamadaH. (2020). Molecular and cellular basis of left-right asymmetry in vertebrates. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci.96, 273–296. 10.2183/pjab.96.021
86
HamadaH. (2016). “Roles of motile and immotile cilia in left-right symmetry breaking,” in Etiology and morphogenesis of congenital heart disease: From gene function and cellular interaction to morphology. Editors NakanishiT.MarkwaldR. R.BaldwinH. S.KellerB. B.SrivastavaD.YamagishiH. (Tokyo.
87
HamadaH.TamP.2020. Diversity of left-right symmetry breaking strategy in animals, F1000Res, 9. 10.12688/f1000research.21670.1
88
HashimotoH.RebagliatiM.AhmadN.MuraokaO.KurokawaT.HibiM.et al (2004). The Cerberus/Dan-family protein Charon is a negative regulator of Nodal signaling during left-right patterning in zebrafish. Development131, 1741–1753. 10.1242/dev.01070
89
HashimotoM.HamadaH. (2010). Translation of anterior-posterior polarity into left-right polarity in the mouse embryo. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.20, 433–437. 10.1016/j.gde.2010.04.002
90
HashimotoM.ShinoharaK.WangJ.IkeuchiS.YoshibaS.MenoC.et al (2010). Planar polarization of node cells determines the rotational axis of node cilia. Nat. Cell. Biol.12, 170–176. 10.1038/ncb2020
91
Hochgreb-HageleT.YinC.KooD. E.BronnerM. E.StainierD. Y. (2013). Laminin β1a controls distinct steps during the establishment of digestive organ laterality. Development140, 2734–2745. 10.1242/dev.097618
92
HojoM.TakashimaS.KobayashiD.SumeragiA.ShimadaA.TsukaharaT.et al (2007). Right-elevated expression of charon is regulated by fluid flow in medaka Kupffer's vesicle. Dev. Growth Differ.49, 395–405. 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2007.00937.x
93
HongS. K.DawidI. B. (2009). FGF-dependent left-right asymmetry patterning in zebrafish is mediated by Ier2 and Fibp1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106, 2230–2235. 10.1073/pnas.0812880106
94
HoraniA.FerkolT. W. (2021). 'Understanding primary ciliary dyskinesia and other ciliopathies. J. Pediatr.230, 15–22 e1. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.11.040
95
Horne-BadovinacS.RebagliatiM.StainierD. Y. (2003). A cellular framework for gut-looping morphogenesis in zebrafish. Science302, 662–665. 10.1126/science.1085397
96
HozumiS.MaedaR.TaniguchiK.KanaiM.ShirakabeS.SasamuraT.et al (2006). An unconventional myosin in Drosophila reverses the default handedness in visceral organs. Nature440, 798–802. 10.1038/nature04625
97
HuangC. J.TuC. T.HsiaoC. D.HsiehF. J.TsaiH. J. (2003). 'Germ-line transmission of a myocardium-specific GFP transgene reveals critical regulatory elements in the cardiac myosin light chain 2 promoter of zebrafish. Dev. Dyn.228, 30–40. 10.1002/dvdy.10356
98
HylandR. M.BrodyS. L. (2021). Impact of motile ciliopathies on human development and clinical consequences in the newborn. Cells11, 125. 10.3390/cells11010125
99
Ibanez-TallonI.GorokhovaS.HeintzN. (2002). Loss of function of axonemal dynein Mdnah5 causes primary ciliary dyskinesia and hydrocephalus. Hum. Mol. Genet.11, 715–721. 10.1093/hmg/11.6.715
100
IkedaT.InamoriK.KawanishiT.TakedaH. (2022). Reemployment of Kupffer's vesicle cells into axial and paraxial mesoderm via transdifferentiation. Dev. Growth Differ.64, 163–177. 10.1111/dgd.12774
101
InakiM.LiuJ.MatsunoK. (2016). Cell chirality: Its origin and roles in left-right asymmetric development. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.371, 20150403. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0403
102
JacintoR.SampaioP.Roxo-RosaM.PestanaS.LopesS. S. (2021). Pkd2 affects cilia length and impacts LR flow dynamics and Dand5. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol.9, 624531. 10.3389/fcell.2021.624531
103
JacobsJ. P.AndersonR. H.WeinbergP. M.WaltersH. L.3rdTchervenkovC. I.Del DucaD.et al (2007). The nomenclature, definition and classification of cardiac structures in the setting of heterotaxy. Cardiol. Young17 (2), 1–28. 10.1017/S1047951107001138
104
JerberJ.BaasD.SoulavieF.ChhinB.CortierE.VesqueC.et al (2014). The coiled-coil domain containing protein CCDC151 is required for the function of IFT-dependent motile cilia in animals. Hum. Mol. Genet.23, 563–577. 10.1093/hmg/ddt445
105
JiY.BuelS. M.AmackJ. D. (2016). Mutations in zebrafish pitx2 model congenital malformations in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome but do not disrupt left-right placement of visceral organs. Dev. Biol.416, 69–81. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.06.010
106
JiangD.JiangZ.LuD.WangX.LiangH.ZhangJ.et al (2019). Migrasomes provide regional cues for organ morphogenesis during zebrafish gastrulation. Nat. Cell. Biol.21, 966–977. 10.1038/s41556-019-0358-6
107
JinD.NiT. T.SunJ.WanH.AmackJ. D.YuG.et al (2014). Prostaglandin signalling regulates ciliogenesis by modulating intraflagellar transport. Nat. Cell. Biol.16, 841–851. 10.1038/ncb3029
108
JuanT.GeminardC.CoutelisJ. B.CerezoD.PolesS.NoselliS.et al (2018). Myosin1D is an evolutionarily conserved regulator of animal left-right asymmetry. Nat. Commun.9, 1942. 10.1038/s41467-018-04284-8
109
JurynecM. J.XiaR.MackrillJ. J.GuntherD.CrawfordT.FlaniganK. M.et al (2008). Selenoprotein N is required for ryanodine receptor calcium release channel activity in human and zebrafish muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 12485–12490. 10.1073/pnas.0806015105
110
KajikawaE.HoroU.IdeT.MizunoK.MinegishiK.HaraY.et al (2020). Nodal paralogues underlie distinct mechanisms for visceral left-right asymmetry in reptiles and mammals. Nat. Ecol. Evol.4, 261–269. 10.1038/s41559-019-1072-2
111
KamuraK.KobayashiD.UeharaY.KoshidaS.IijimaN.KudoA.et al (2011). Pkd1l1 complexes with Pkd2 on motile cilia and functions to establish the left-right axis. Development138, 1121–1129. 10.1242/dev.058271
112
KartagenerM. A. N. E. S. (1933). Zur pathogenese der bronchiektasien. Beiträge zur Klin. Tuberk. spezifischen Tuberkulose-Forschung84, 73–85. 10.1007/bf02140428
113
KennedyM. P.OmranH.LeighM. W.DellS.MorganL.MolinaP. L.et al (2007). Congenital heart disease and other heterotaxic defects in a large cohort of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Circulation115, 2814–2821. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.649038
114
KimJ. G.BaeS. J.LeeH. S.ParkJ. H.KimK. W. (2017). Claudin5a is required for proper inflation of Kupffer's vesicle lumen and organ laterality. PLoS One12, e0182047. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182047
115
KimS. J. (2011). Heterotaxy syndrome. Korean Circ. J.41, 227–232. 10.4070/kcj.2011.41.5.227
116
KimS.ZaghloulN. A.BubenshchikovaE.OhE. C.RankinS.KatsanisN.et al (2011). Nde1-mediated inhibition of ciliogenesis affects cell cycle re-entry. Nat. Cell. Biol.13, 351–360. 10.1038/ncb2183
117
KothariS. S. (2014). Non-cardiac issues in patients with heterotaxy syndrome. Ann. Pediatr. Cardiol.7, 187–192. 10.4103/0974-2069.140834
118
Kramer-ZuckerA. G.OlaleF.HaycraftC. J.YoderB. K.SchierA. F.DrummondI. A. (2005). Cilia-driven fluid flow in the zebrafish pronephros, brain and Kupffer's vesicle is required for normal organogenesis. Development132, 1907–1921. 10.1242/dev.01772
119
KreilingJ. A.PrabhatWilliamsG.CretonR. (2007). Analysis of Kupffer's vesicle in zebrafish embryos using a cave automated virtual environment. Dev. Dyn.236, 1963–1969. 10.1002/dvdy.21191
120
KuhnsS.SeixasC.PestanaS.TavaresB.NogueiraR.JacintoR.et al (2019). Rab35 controls cilium length, function and membrane composition. EMBO Rep.20, e47625. 10.15252/embr.201847625
121
KupfferC. v. (1868). Beobachtungen über die Entwicklung der Knochenfische. Arch. für Mikrosk. Anat.4, 209–272. 10.1007/bf02955363
122
KurpiosN. A.IbanesM.DavisN. M.LuiW.KatzT.MartinJ. F.et al (2008). The direction of gut looping is established by changes in the extracellular matrix and in cell:cell adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 8499–8506. 10.1073/pnas.0803578105
123
LaiS. L.YaoW. L.TsaoK. C.HoubenA. J.AlbersH. M.OvaaH.et al (2012). Autotaxin/Lpar3 signaling regulates Kupffer's vesicle formation and left-right asymmetry in zebrafish. Development139, 4439–4448. 10.1242/dev.081745
124
LangerJ. C. (2017). Intestinal rotation abnormalities and midgut volvulus. Surg. Clin. North Am.97, 147–159. 10.1016/j.suc.2016.08.011
125
LeeJ. D.AndersonK. V. (2008). Morphogenesis of the node and notochord: The cellular basis for the establishment and maintenance of left-right asymmetry in the mouse. Dev. Dyn.237, 3464–3476. 10.1002/dvdy.21598
126
LeighM. W.HoraniA.KinghornB.O'ConnorM. G.ZariwalaM. A.KnowlesM. R. (2019). Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD): A genetic disorder of motile cilia. Transl. Sci. Rare Dis.4, 51–75. 10.3233/TRD-190036
127
LeighM. W.PittmanJ. E.CarsonJ. L.FerkolT. W.DellS. D.DavisS. D.et al (2009). Clinical and genetic aspects of primary ciliary dyskinesia/Kartagener syndrome. Genet. Med.11, 473–487. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181a53562
128
LenhartK. F.HoltzmanN. G.WilliamsJ. R.BurdineR. D. (2013). Integration of nodal and BMP signals in the heart requires FoxH1 to create left-right differences in cell migration rates that direct cardiac asymmetry. PLoS Genet.9, e1003109. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003109
129
LevinM.JohnsonR. L.SternC. D.KuehnM.TabinC. (1995). A molecular pathway determining left-right asymmetry in chick embryogenesis. Cell.82, 803–814. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90477-8
130
LevinM.PalmerA. R. (2007). Left-right patterning from the inside out: Widespread evidence for intracellular control. Bioessays29, 271–287. 10.1002/bies.20545
131
LevinM.ThorlinT.RobinsonK. R.NogiT.MercolaM. (2002). Asymmetries in H+/K+-ATPase and cell membrane potentials comprise a very early step in left-right patterning. Cell.111, 77–89. 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00939-x
132
LiA. H.HanchardN. A.AzamianM.D'AlessandroL. C. A.Coban-AkdemirZ.LopezK. N.et al (2019). 'Genetic architecture of laterality defects revealed by whole exome sequencing. Eur. J. Hum. Genet.27, 563–573. 10.1038/s41431-018-0307-z
133
LiY.YagiH.OnuohaE. O.DamerlaR. R.FrancisR.FurutaniY.et al (2016). DNAH6 and its interactions with PCD genes in heterotaxy and primary ciliary dyskinesia. PLoS Genet.12, e1005821. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005821
134
LinA. E.KrikovS.Riehle-ColarussoT.FriasJ. L.BelmontJ.AnderkaM.et alStudy National Birth Defects Prevention (2014). Laterality defects in the national birth defects prevention study (1998-2007): Birth prevalence and descriptive epidemiology. Am. J. Med. Genet. A164A, 2581–2591. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36695
135
LinJ. W.BiankinA. V.HorbM. E.GhoshB.PrasadN. B.YeeN. S.et al (2004). 'Differential requirement for ptf1a in endocrine and exocrine lineages of developing zebrafish pancreas. Dev. Biol.270, 491–503. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.07.001
136
LittleR. B.NorrisD. P. (2021). Right, left and cilia: How asymmetry is established. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.110, 11–18. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.06.003
137
LiuC.CaoR.XuY.LiT.LiF.ChenS.et al (2018). Rare copy number variants analysis identifies novel candidate genes in heterotaxy syndrome patients with congenital heart defects. Genome Med.10, 40. 10.1186/s13073-018-0549-y
138
LiuJ.ZhuC.NingG.YangL.CaoY.HuangS.et al (2019). Chemokine signaling links cell-cycle progression and cilia formation for left-right symmetry breaking. PLoS Biol.17, e3000203. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000203
139
LoganM.Pagan-WestphalS. M.SmithD. M.PaganessiL.TabinC. J. (1998). The transcription factor Pitx2 mediates situs-specific morphogenesis in response to left-right asymmetric signals. Cell.94, 307–317. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81474-9
140
LombardoV. A.HeiseM.MoghtadaeiM.BornhorstD.MannerJ.Abdelilah-SeyfriedS. (2019). Morphogenetic control of zebrafish cardiac looping by Bmp signaling. Development146, dev180091. 10.1242/dev.180091
141
LongS.AhmadN.RebagliatiM. (2003). The zebrafish nodal-related gene southpaw is required for visceral and diencephalic left-right asymmetry. Development130, 2303–2316. 10.1242/dev.00436
142
LoombaR. S.GeddesG. C.BaselD.BensonD. W.LeuthnerS. R.HehirD. A.et al (2016a). Bacteremia in patients with heterotaxy: A review and implications for management. Congenit. Heart Dis.11, 537–547. 10.1111/chd.12395
143
LoombaR. S.WillesR. J.KovachJ. R.AndersonR. H. (2016b). Chronic arrhythmias in the setting of heterotaxy: Differences between right and left isomerism. Congenit. Heart Dis.11, 7–18. 10.1111/chd.12288
144
LopesS. S.LourencoR.PachecoL.MorenoN.KreilingJ.SaudeL. (2010). Notch signalling regulates left-right asymmetry through ciliary length control. Development137, 3625–3632. 10.1242/dev.054452
145
LucasJ. S.DavisS. D.OmranH.ShoemarkA. (2020). Primary ciliary dyskinesia in the genomics age. Lancet Respir. Med.8, 202–216. 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30374-1
146
MaerkerM.GetwanM.DowdleM. E.McSheeneJ. C.GonzalezV.PellicciaJ. L.et al (2021). 'Bicc1 and Dicer regulate left-right patterning through post-transcriptional control of the Nodal inhibitor Dand5. Nat. Commun.12, 5482. 10.1038/s41467-021-25464-z
147
MaldjianP. D.SaricM. (2007). Approach to dextrocardia in adults: Review. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.188, S39–S49. 10.2214/AJR.06.1179
148
MannerJ. (2001). Does an equivalent of the "ventral node" exist in chick embryos? A scanning electron microscopic study. Anat. Embryol. Berl.203, 481–490. 10.1007/s004290100183
149
MarquesS.BorgesA. C.SilvaA. C.FreitasS.CordenonsiM.BeloJ. A. (2004). The activity of the Nodal antagonist Cerl-2 in the mouse node is required for correct L/R body axis. Genes. Dev.18, 2342–2347. 10.1101/gad.306504
150
MatsuiT.BesshoY. (2012). Left-right asymmetry in zebrafish. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.69, 3069–3077. 10.1007/s00018-012-0985-6
151
MatsuiT.IshikawaH.BesshoY. (2015). Cell collectivity regulation within migrating cell cluster during Kupffer's vesicle formation in zebrafish. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol.3, 27. 10.3389/fcell.2015.00027
152
MatsuiT.ThitamadeeS.MurataT.KakinumaH.NabetaniT.HirabayashiY.et al (2011). Canopy1, a positive feedback regulator of FGF signaling, controls progenitor cell clustering during Kupffer's vesicle organogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108, 9881–9886. 10.1073/pnas.1017248108
153
May-SimeraH. L.KaiM.HernandezV.OsbornD. P.TadaM.BealesP. L. (2010). Bbs8, together with the planar cell polarity protein Vangl2, is required to establish left-right asymmetry in zebrafish. Dev. Biol.345, 215–225. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.07.013
154
McDowellG.RajaduraiS.LevinM. (2016). From cytoskeletal dynamics to organ asymmetry: A nonlinear, regulative pathway underlies left-right patterning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.371, 20150409. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0409
155
McGrathJ.SomloS.MakovaS.TianX.BruecknerM. (2003). Two populations of node monocilia initiate left-right asymmetry in the mouse. Cell.114, 61–73. 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00511-7
156
MelbyA. E.WargaR. M.KimmelC. B. (1996). Specification of cell fates at the dorsal margin of the zebrafish gastrula. Development122, 2225–2237. 10.1242/dev.122.7.2225
157
MenoC.SaijohY.FujiiH.IkedaM.YokoyamaT.YokoyamaM.et al (1996). Left-right asymmetric expression of the TGF beta-family member lefty in mouse embryos. Nature381, 151–155. 10.1038/381151a0
158
MilewskiW. M.DuguayS. J.ChanS. J.SteinerD. F. (1998). Conservation of PDX-1 structure, function, and expression in zebrafish. Endocrinology139, 1440–1449. 10.1210/endo.139.3.5768
159
MinegishiK.RotheB.KomatsuK. R.OnoH.IkawaY.NishimuraH.et al (2021). 'Fluid flow-induced left-right asymmetric decay of Dand5 mRNA in the mouse embryo requires a Bicc1-Ccr4 RNA degradation complex. Nat. Commun.12, 4071. 10.1038/s41467-021-24295-2
160
MizunoK.ShiozawaK.KatohT. A.MinegishiK.IdeT.IkawaY.et al (2020). 'Role of Ca(2+) transients at the node of the mouse embryo in breaking of left-right symmetry. Sci. Adv.6, eaba1195. 10.1126/sciadv.aba1195
161
MontagueT. G.GagnonJ. A.SchierA. F. (2018). Conserved regulation of Nodal-mediated left-right patterning in zebrafish and mouse. Development145, dev171090. 10.1242/dev.171090
162
Montenegro-JohnsonT. D.BakerD. I.SmithD. J.LopesS. S. (2016). Three-dimensional flow in kupffer's vesicle. J. Math. Biol.73, 705–725. 10.1007/s00285-016-0967-7
163
Moreno-AyalaR.Olivares-ChauvetP.SchaferR.JunkerJ. P. (2021). Variability of an early developmental cell population underlies stochastic laterality defects. Cell. Rep.34, 108606. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108606
164
NakamuraT.MineN.NakaguchiE.MochizukiA.YamamotoM.YashiroK.et al (2006). 'Generation of robust left-right asymmetry in the mouse embryo requires a self-enhancement and lateral-inhibition system. Dev. Cell.11, 495–504. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.002
165
NakamuraT.SaitoD.KawasumiA.ShinoharaK.AsaiY.TakaokaK.et al (2012). Fluid flow and interlinked feedback loops establish left-right asymmetric decay of Cerl2 mRNA. Nat. Commun.3, 1322. 10.1038/ncomms2319
166
NamigaiE. K.KennyN. J.ShimeldS. M. (2014). Right across the tree of life: The evolution of left-right asymmetry in the bilateria. Genesis52, 458–470. 10.1002/dvg.22748
167
NarasimhanV.HjeijR.VijS.LogesN. T.WallmeierJ.Koerner-RettbergC.et al (2015). Mutations in CCDC11, which encodes a coiled-coil containing ciliary protein, causes situs inversus due to dysmotility of monocilia in the left-right organizer. Hum. Mutat.36, 307–318. 10.1002/humu.22738
168
NavisA.MarjoramL.BagnatM. (2013). Cftr controls lumen expansion and function of Kupffer's vesicle in zebrafish. Development140, 1703–1712. 10.1242/dev.091819
169
NeugebauerJ. M.AmackJ. D.PetersonA. G.BisgroveB. W.YostH. J. (2009). FGF signalling during embryo development regulates cilia length in diverse epithelia. Nature458, 651–654. 10.1038/nature07753
170
NoelE. S.MomenahT. S.Al-DagririK.Al-SuwaidA.Al-ShahraniS.JiangH.et al (2016). A zebrafish loss-of-function model for human CFAP53 mutations reveals its specific role in laterality organ function. Hum. Mutat.37, 194–200. 10.1002/humu.22928
171
NoelE. S.VerhoevenM.LagendijkA. K.TessadoriF.SmithK.ChoorapoikayilS.et al (2013). A Nodal-independent and tissue-intrinsic mechanism controls heart-looping chirality. Nat. Commun.4, 2754. 10.1038/ncomms3754
172
NonakaS.ShiratoriH.SaijohY.HamadaH. (2002). Determination of left-right patterning of the mouse embryo by artificial nodal flow. Nature418, 96–99. 10.1038/nature00849
173
NonakaS.TanakaY.OkadaY.TakedaS.HaradaA.KanaiY.et al (1998). Randomization of left-right asymmetry due to loss of nodal cilia generating leftward flow of extraembryonic fluid in mice lacking KIF3B motor protein. Cell.95, 829–837. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81705-5
174
NonakaS.YoshibaS.WatanabeD.IkeuchiS.GotoT.MarshallW. F.et al (2005). De novo formation of left-right asymmetry by posterior tilt of nodal cilia. PLoS Biol.3, e268. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030268
175
Nöthe-MenchenT.WallmeierJ.PennekampP.HöbenI. M.OlbrichH.LogesN. T.et al (2019). Randomization of left-right asymmetry and congenital heart defects: The role of DNAH5 in humans and mice. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002686
176
OberE. A.FieldH. A.StainierD. Y. (2003). From endoderm formation to liver and pancreas development in zebrafish. Mech. Dev.120, 5–18. 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00327-1
177
OcanaO. H.CoskunH.MinguillonC.MurawalaP.TanakaE. M.GalceranJ.et al (2017). A right-handed signalling pathway drives heart looping in vertebrates. Nature549, 86–90. 10.1038/nature23454
178
OdenthalJ.Nusslein-VolhardC. (1998). Fork head domain genes in zebrafish. Dev. Genes. Evol.208, 245–258. 10.1007/s004270050179
179
OishiI.KawakamiY.RayaA.Callol-MassotC.Izpisua BelmonteJ. C. (2006). Regulation of primary cilia formation and left-right patterning in zebrafish by a noncanonical Wnt signaling mediator, duboraya. Nat. Genet.38, 1316–1322. 10.1038/ng1892
180
OkabeN.XuB.BurdineR. D. (2008). Fluid dynamics in zebrafish Kupffer's vesicle. Dev. Dyn.237, 3602–3612. 10.1002/dvdy.21730
181
OkadaY.TakedaS.TanakaY.BelmonteJ. I.HirokawaN. (2005). 'Mechanism of nodal flow: A conserved symmetry breaking event in left-right axis determination. Cell.121, 633–644. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.008
182
OnjikoR. M.MorrisS. E.MoodyS. A.NemesP. (2016). Single-cell mass spectrometry with multi-solvent extraction identifies metabolic differences between left and right blastomeres in the 8-cell frog (Xenopus) embryo. Analyst141, 3648–3656. 10.1039/c6an00200e
183
OnjikoR. M.NemesP.MoodyS. A. (2021). Altering metabolite distribution at Xenopus cleavage stages affects left-right gene expression asymmetries. Genesis59, e23418. 10.1002/dvg.23418
184
OteizaP.KoppenM.ConchaM. L.HeisenbergC. P. (2008). Origin and shaping of the laterality organ in zebrafish. Development135, 2807–2813. 10.1242/dev.022228
185
OteizaP.KoppenM.KriegM.PulgarE.FariasC.MeloC.et al (2010). Planar cell polarity signalling regulates cell adhesion properties in progenitors of the zebrafish laterality organ. Development137, 3459–3468. 10.1242/dev.049981
186
OttoA.PieperT.ViebahnC.TsikoliaN. (2014). Early left-right asymmetries during axial morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Genesis52, 614–625. 10.1002/dvg.22773
187
PellicciaJ. L.JindalG. A.BurdineR. D. (2017). Gdf3 is required for robust Nodal signaling during germ layer formation and left-right patterning. Elife6, e28635. 10.7554/eLife.28635
188
PennekampP.KarcherC.FischerA.SchweickertA.SkryabinB.HorstJ.et al (2002). The ion channel polycystin-2 is required for left-right axis determination in mice. Curr. Biol.12, 938–943. 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00869-2
189
PetersonA. G.WangX.YostH. J. (2013). Dvr1 transfers left-right asymmetric signals from Kupffer's vesicle to lateral plate mesoderm in zebrafish. Dev. Biol.382, 198–208. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.06.011
190
PiedraM. E.IcardoJ. M.AlbajarM.Rodriguez-ReyJ. C.RosM. A. (1998). Pitx2 participates in the late phase of the pathway controlling left-right asymmetry. Cell.94, 319–324. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81475-0
191
PintadoP.SampaioP.TavaresB.Montenegro-JohnsonT. D.SmithD. J.LopesS. S. (2017). Dynamics of cilia length in left-right development. R. Soc. Open Sci.4, 161102. 10.1098/rsos.161102
192
PraveenK.DavisE. E.KatsanisN. (2015). Unique among ciliopathies: Primary ciliary dyskinesia, a motile cilia disorder. F1000Prime Rep.7, 36. 10.12703/P7-36
193
PulgarE.SchwayerC.GuerreroN.LopezL.MarquezS.HartelS.et al (2021). Apical contacts stemming from incomplete delamination guide progenitor cell allocation through a dragging mechanism. Elife10, e66483. 10.7554/eLife.66483
194
QianM.YaoS.JingL.HeJ.XiaoC.ZhangT.et al (2013). ENC1-like integrates the retinoic acid/FGF signaling pathways to modulate ciliogenesis of Kupffer's Vesicle during zebrafish embryonic development. Dev. Biol.374, 85–95. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.11.022
195
RagoL.CastroviejoN.FazilatyH.Garcia-AsencioF.OcanaO. H.GalceranJ.et al (2019). MicroRNAs establish the right-handed dominance of the heart laterality pathway in vertebrates. Dev. Cell.51, 446–459. 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.012
196
RahmanT.ZhangH.FanJ.WanL. Q. (2020). Cell chirality in cardiovascular development and disease. Apl. Bioeng.4, 031503. 10.1063/5.0014424
197
RamsdellA. F. (2005). Left-right asymmetry and congenital cardiac defects: Getting to the heart of the matter in vertebrate left-right axis determination. Dev. Biol.288, 1–20. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.038
198
RathbunL. I.ColicinoE. G.ManikasJ.O'ConnellJ.KrishnanN.ReillyN. S.et al (2020). Cytokinetic bridge triggers de novo lumen formation in vivo. Nat. Commun.11, 1269. 10.1038/s41467-020-15002-8
199
RebagliatiM. R.ToyamaR.HaffterP.DawidI. B. (1998). cyclops encodes a nodal-related factor involved in midline signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.95, 9932–9937. 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9932
200
RevenuC.StreichanS.DonaE.LecaudeyV.HufnagelL.GilmourD. (2014). 'Quantitative cell polarity imaging defines leader-to-follower transitions during collective migration and the key role of microtubule-dependent adherens junction formation. Development141, 1282–1291. 10.1242/dev.101675
201
RohrS.OttenC.Abdelilah-SeyfriedS. (2008). Asymmetric involution of the myocardial field drives heart tube formation in zebrafish. Circ. Res.102, e12–e19. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.165241
202
RyanA. K.BlumbergB.Rodriguez-EstebanC.Yonei-TamuraS.TamuraK.TsukuiT.et al (1998). Pitx2 determines left-right asymmetry of internal organs in vertebrates. Nature394, 545–551. 10.1038/29004
203
RyersonL. M.PharisS.PockettC.SoniR.FruitmanD.GuleserianK. J.et al (2018). Heterotaxy syndrome and intestinal rotation abnormalities. Pediatrics142, e20174267. 10.1542/peds.2017-4267
204
SabaT. G.GeddesG. C.WareS. M.SchidlowD. N.Del NidoP. J.RubalcavaN. S.et al (2022). A multi-disciplinary, comprehensive approach to management of children with heterotaxy. Orphanet J. Rare Dis.17, 351. 10.1186/s13023-022-02515-2
205
SampaioP.FerreiraR. R.GuerreroA.PintadoP.TavaresB.AmaroJ.et al (2014). Left-right organizer flow dynamics: How much cilia activity reliably yields laterality?Dev. Cell.29, 716–728. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.030
206
SampathK.RubinsteinA. L.ChengA. M.LiangJ. O.FekanyK.Solnica-KrezelL.et al (1998). Induction of the zebrafish ventral brain and floorplate requires cyclops/nodal signalling. Nature395, 185–189. 10.1038/26020
207
SanematsuP. C.Erdemci-TandoganG.PatelH.RetzlaffE. M.AmackJ. D.ManningM. L. (2021). '3D viscoelastic drag forces contribute to cell shape changes during organogenesis in the zebrafish embryo. Cells Dev.168, 203718. 10.1016/j.cdev.2021.203718
208
SanketiB. D.Zuela-SopilniakN.BundschuhE.GopalS.HuS.LongJ.et al (2022). Pitx2 patterns an accelerator-brake mechanical feedback through latent TGFβ to rotate the gut. Science377, eabl3921. 10.1126/science.abl3921
209
SarmahB.LatimerA. J.AppelB.WenteS. R. (2005). 'Inositol polyphosphates regulate zebrafish left-right asymmetry. Dev. Cell.9, 133–145. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.05.002
210
SasakiK.ShibaK.NakamuraA.KawanoN.SatouhY.YamaguchiH.et al (2019). Calaxin is required for cilia-driven determination of vertebrate laterality. Commun. Biol.2, 226. 10.1038/s42003-019-0462-y
211
SaydmohammedM.YagiH.CalderonM.ClarkM. J.FeinsteinT.SunM.et al (2018). Vertebrate myosin 1d regulates left-right organizer morphogenesis and laterality. Nat. Commun.9, 3381. 10.1038/s41467-018-05866-2
212
SchneiderI.HoustonD. W.RebagliatiM. R.SlusarskiD. C. (2008). Calcium fluxes in dorsal forerunner cells antagonize beta-catenin and alter left-right patterning. Development135, 75–84. 10.1242/dev.004713
213
SchneiderI.SchneiderP. N.DerryS. W.LinS.BartonL. J.WestfallT.et al (2010). Zebrafish Nkd1 promotes Dvl degradation and is required for left-right patterning. Dev. Biol.348, 22–33. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.040
214
SchottenfeldJ.Sullivan-BrownJ.BurdineR. D. (2007). Zebrafish curly up encodes a Pkd2 ortholog that restricts left-side-specific expression of southpaw. Development134, 1605–1615. 10.1242/dev.02827
215
SchroderS. S.TsikoliaN.WeizbauerA.HueI.ViebahnC. (2016). Paraxial nodal expression reveals a novel conserved structure of the left-right organizer in four mammalian species. Cells Tissues Organs201, 77–87. 10.1159/000440951
216
SchweickertA.OttT.KurzS.TinglerM.MaerkerM.FuhlF.et al (2017). Vertebrate left-right asymmetry: What can nodal cascade gene expression patterns tell us?J. Cardiovasc Dev. Dis.5, 1. 10.3390/jcdd5010001
217
SchweickertA.VickP.GetwanM.WeberT.SchneiderI.EberhardtM.et al (2010). The nodal inhibitor Coco is a critical target of leftward flow in Xenopus. Curr. Biol.20, 738–743. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.061
218
SchweickertA.WalentekP.ThumbergerT.DanilchikM. (2012). Linking early determinants and cilia-driven leftward flow in left-right axis specification of Xenopus laevis: A theoretical approach. Differentiation83, S67–S77. 10.1016/j.diff.2011.11.005
219
SchweickertA.WeberT.BeyerT.VickP.BoguschS.FeistelK.et al (2007). Cilia-driven leftward flow determines laterality in Xenopus. Curr. Biol.17, 60–66. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.067
220
ShapiroA. J.DavisS. D.FerkolT.DellS. D.RosenfeldM.OlivierK. N.et alConsortium Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance (2014). Laterality defects other than situs inversus totalis in primary ciliary dyskinesia: Insights into situs ambiguus and heterotaxy. Chest146, 1176–1186. 10.1378/chest.13-1704
221
ShenM. M. (2007). Nodal signaling: Developmental roles and regulation. Development134, 1023–1034. 10.1242/dev.000166
222
ShibasakiF.PriceE. R.MilanD.McKeonF. (1996). Role of kinases and the phosphatase calcineurin in the nuclear shuttling of transcription factor NF-AT4. Nature382, 370–373. 10.1038/382370a0
223
ShinoharaK.ChenD.NishidaT.MisakiK.YonemuraS.HamadaH. (2015). Absence of radial spokes in mouse node cilia is required for rotational movement but confers ultrastructural instability as a trade-off. Dev. Cell.35, 236–246. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.001
224
ShinoharaK.HamadaH. (2017). Cilia in left-right symmetry breaking. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.9, a028282. 10.1101/cshperspect.a028282
225
ShinoharaK.KawasumiA.TakamatsuA.YoshibaS.BotildeY.MotoyamaN.et al (2012). 'Two rotating cilia in the node cavity are sufficient to break left-right symmetry in the mouse embryo. Nat. Commun.3, 622. 10.1038/ncomms1624
226
ShiratoriH.HamadaH. (2014). TGFβ signaling in establishing left-right asymmetry. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.32, 80–84. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.029
227
ShiratoriH.SakumaR.WatanabeM.HashiguchiH.MochidaK.SakaiY.et al (2001). Two-step regulation of left-right asymmetric expression of Pitx2: Initiation by nodal signaling and maintenance by Nkx2. Mol. Cell.7, 137–149. 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00162-9
228
SiewertA. R. (1903). Ueber einen Fall von Bronchiectasis bei einem Patienten mit Situs viscerum inversus. Berl. Klin. Wchnschr.41, 139–141.
229
SmithK. A.ChocronS.von der HardtS.de PaterE.SoufanA.BussmannJ.et al (2008). Rotation and asymmetric development of the zebrafish heart requires directed migration of cardiac progenitor cells. Dev. Cell.14, 287–297. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.11.015
230
SmithK. A.NoelE.ThurlingsI.RehmannH.ChocronS.BakkersJ. (2011). Bmp and nodal independently regulate lefty1 expression to maintain unilateral nodal activity during left-right axis specification in zebrafish. PLoS Genet.7, e1002289. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002289
231
SmithK. A.UribeV. (2021). Getting to the heart of left-right asymmetry: Contributions from the zebrafish model. J. Cardiovasc Dev. Dis.8, 64. 10.3390/jcdd8060064
232
Solowiej-WedderburnJ.SmithD. J.LopesS. S.Montenegro-JohnsonT. D. (2019). Wall stress enhanced exocytosis of extracellular vesicles as a possible mechanism of left-right symmetry-breaking in vertebrate development. J. Theor. Biol.460, 220–226. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.10.015
233
SongH.HuJ.ChenW.ElliottG.AndreP.GaoB.et al (2010). Planar cell polarity breaks bilateral symmetry by controlling ciliary positioning. Nature466, 378–382. 10.1038/nature09129
234
SpederP.AdamG.NoselliS. (2006). Type ID unconventional myosin controls left-right asymmetry in Drosophila. Nature440, 803–807. 10.1038/nature04623
235
SpederP.PetzoldtA.SuzanneM.NoselliS. (2007). Strategies to establish left/right asymmetry in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.17, 351–358. 10.1016/j.gde.2007.05.008
236
StarkB. C.GaoY.SepichD. S.BelkL.CulverM. A.HuB.et al (2022). CARMIL3 is important for cell migration and morphogenesis during early development in zebrafish. Dev. Biol.481, 148–159. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2021.09.008
237
StephenL. A.JohnsonE. J.DavisG. M.McTeirL.PinkhamJ.JaberiN.et al (2014). The chicken left right organizer has nonmotile cilia which are lost in a stage-dependent manner in the talpid(3) ciliopathy. Genesis52, 600–613. 10.1002/dvg.22775
238
Storm van's GravesandeK.OmranH. (2005). 'Primary ciliary dyskinesia: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and genetics. Ann. Med.37, 439–449. 10.1080/07853890510011985
239
SulikK.DehartD. B.IangakiT.CarsonJ. L.VrablicT.GestelandK.et al (1994). 'Morphogenesis of the murine node and notochordal plate. Dev. Dyn.201, 260–278. 10.1002/aja.1002010309
240
Sun-WadaG. H.WadaY. (2015). 'Role of vacuolar-type proton ATPase in signal transduction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1847, 1166–1172. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.06.010
241
SupattoW.FraserS. E.VermotJ. (2008). An all-optical approach for probing microscopic flows in living embryos. Biophys. J.95, L29–L31. 10.1529/biophysj.108.137786
242
SuppD. M.BruecknerM.KuehnM. R.WitteD. P.LoweL. A.McGrathJ.et al (1999). 'Targeted deletion of the ATP binding domain of left-right dynein confirms its role in specifying development of left-right asymmetries. Development126, 5495–5504. 10.1242/dev.126.23.5495
243
SuppD. M.WitteD. P.PotterS. S.BruecknerM. (1997). 'Mutation of an axonemal dynein affects left-right asymmetry in inversus viscerum mice. Nature389, 963–966. 10.1038/40140
244
SutherlandM. J.WareS. M. (2009). 'Disorders of left-right asymmetry: Heterotaxy and situs inversus. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet.151C, 307–317. 10.1002/ajmg.c.30228
245
Szenker-RaviE.OttT.KhatooM.Moreau de BellaingA.GohW. X.ChongY. L.et al (2022). 'Discovery of a genetic module essential for assigning left-right asymmetry in humans and ancestral vertebrates. Nat. Genet.54, 62–72. 10.1038/s41588-021-00970-4
246
TabinC. J.VoganK. J. (2003). 'A two-cilia model for vertebrate left-right axis specification. Genes. Dev.17, 1–6. 10.1101/gad.1053803
247
TanakaY.OkadaY.HirokawaN. (2005). 'FGF-induced vesicular release of Sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid in leftward nodal flow is critical for left-right determination. Nature435, 172–177. 10.1038/nature03494
248
TavaresB.JacintoR.SampaioP.PestanaS.PintoA.VazA.et al (2017). Notch/Her12 signalling modulates, motile/immotile cilia ratio downstream of Foxj1a in zebrafish left-right organizer. Elife6, e25165. 10.7554/eLife.25165
249
TayH. G.SchulzeS. K.CompagnonJ.FoleyF. C.HeisenbergC. P.YostH. J.et al (2013). Lethal giant larvae 2 regulates development of the ciliated organ Kupffer's vesicle. Development140, 1550–1559. 10.1242/dev.087130
250
TessadoriF.de BakkerD. E. M.BarskeL.NelsonN.AlgraH. A.WillekersS.et al (2020). Zebrafish prrx1a mutants have normal hearts. Nature585, E14-E16–E16. 10.1038/s41586-020-2674-1
251
ThisseC.ThisseB. (1999). Antivin, a novel and divergent member of the TGFbeta superfamily, negatively regulates mesoderm induction. Development126, 229–240. 10.1242/dev.126.2.229
252
TinglerM.KurzS.MaerkerM.OttT.FuhlF.SchweickertA.et al (2018). A conserved role of the unconventional myosin 1d in laterality determination. Curr. Biol.28, 810–816. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.075
253
VandenbergL. N.LemireJ. M.LevinM. (2013). 'Serotonin has early, cilia-independent roles in Xenopus left-right patterning. Dis. Model. Mech.6, 261–268. 10.1242/dmm.010256
254
VeerkampJ.RudolphF.CseresnyesZ.PrillerF.OttenC.RenzM.et al (2013). Unilateral dampening of Bmp activity by nodal generates cardiac left-right asymmetry. Dev. Cell.24, 660–667. 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.01.026
255
VeleriS.BishopK.Dalle NogareD. E.EnglishM. A.FoskettT. J.ChitnisA.et al (2012). 'Knockdown of Bardet-Biedl syndrome gene BBS9/PTHB1 leads to cilia defects. PLoS One7, e34389. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034389
256
VickP.SchweickertA.WeberT.EberhardtM.MenclS.ShcherbakovD.et al (2009). Flow on the right side of the gastrocoel roof plate is dispensable for symmetry breakage in the frog Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol.331, 281–291. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.05.547
257
WallmeierJ.NielsenK. G.KuehniC. E.LucasJ. S.LeighM. W.ZariwalaM. A.et al (2020). Motile ciliopathies. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim.6, 77. 10.1038/s41572-020-0209-6
258
WanL. Q.ChinA. S.WorleyK. E.RayP. (2016). 'Cell chirality: Emergence of asymmetry from cell culture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.371, 20150413. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0413
259
WangG.CadwalladerA. B.JangD. S.TsangM.YostH. J.AmackJ. D. (2011). The Rho kinase Rock2b establishes anteroposterior asymmetry of the ciliated Kupffer's vesicle in zebrafish. Development138, 45–54. 10.1242/dev.052985
260
WangG.ManningM. L.AmackJ. D. (2012). 'Regional cell shape changes control form and function of Kupffer's vesicle in the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol.370, 52–62. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.07.019
261
WangG.YostH. J.AmackJ. D. (2013). 'Analysis of gene function and visualization of cilia-generated fluid flow in Kupffer's vesicle. J. Vis. Exp., 50038. 10.3791/50038
262
WangX.YostH. J. (2008). 'Initiation and propagation of posterior to anterior (PA) waves in zebrafish left-right development. Dev. Dyn.237, 3640–3647. 10.1002/dvdy.21771
263
WargaR. M.KaneD. A. (2018). Wilson cell origin for kupffer's vesicle in the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn.247, 1057–1069. 10.1002/dvdy.24657
264
WargaR. M.StainierD. Y. (2002). The guts of endoderm formation. Results Probl. Cell. Differ.40, 28–47. 10.1007/978-3-540-46041-1_3
265
WestlakeC. J.BayeL. M.NachuryM. V.WrightK. J.ErvinK. E.PhuL.et al (2011). 'Primary cilia membrane assembly is initiated by Rab11 and transport protein particle II (TRAPPII) complex-dependent trafficking of Rabin8 to the centrosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108, 2759–2764. 10.1073/pnas.1018823108
266
WooS.HousleyM. P.WeinerO. D.StainierD. Y. (2012). 'Nodal signaling regulates endodermal cell motility and actin dynamics via Rac1 and Prex1. J. Cell. Biol.198, 941–952. 10.1083/jcb.201203012
267
XieS.JinJ.XuZ.HuangY.ZhangW.ZhaoL.et al (2019). 'Centrosomal protein FOR20 is essential for cilia-dependent development in zebrafish embryos. FASEB J.33, 3613–3622. 10.1096/fj.201801235RR
268
YamaguchiH.OdaT.KikkawaM.TakedaH. (2018). Systematic studies of all PIH proteins in zebrafish reveal their distinct roles in axonemal dynein assembly. Elife7, e36979. 10.7554/eLife.36979
269
YelonD.HorneS. A.StainierD. Y. (1999). Restricted expression of cardiac myosin genes reveals regulated aspects of heart tube assembly in zebrafish. Dev. Biol.214, 23–37. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9406
270
YenH. J.TayehM. K.MullinsR. F.StoneE. M.SheffieldV. C.SlusarskiD. C. (2006). 'Bardet-Biedl syndrome genes are important in retrograde intracellular trafficking and Kupffer's vesicle cilia function. Hum. Mol. Genet.15, 667–677. 10.1093/hmg/ddi468
271
YiT.SunH.FuY.HaoX.SunL.ZhangY.et al (2022). 'Genetic and clinical features of heterotaxy in a prenatal cohort. Front. Genet.13, 818241. 10.3389/fgene.2022.818241
272
YimD.NagataH.LamC. Z.Grosse-WortmannL.SeedM.JaeggiE.et al (2018). Disharmonious patterns of heterotaxy and isomerism: How often are the classic patterns breached?. Circ. Cardiovasc Imaging11, e007931. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007931
273
YoshibaS.ShiratoriH.KuoI. Y.KawasumiA.ShinoharaK.NonakaS.et al (2012). 'Cilia at the node of mouse embryos sense fluid flow for left-right determination via Pkd2. Science338, 226–231. 10.1126/science.1222538
274
YoshiokaH.MenoC.KoshibaK.SugiharaM.ItohH.IshimaruY.et al (1998). 'Pitx2, a bicoid-type homeobox gene, is involved in a lefty-signaling pathway in determination of left-right asymmetry. Cell.94, 299–305. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81473-7
275
YuanS.LiJ.DienerD. R.ChomaM. A.RosenbaumJ. L.SunZ. (2012). 'Target-of-rapamycin complex 1 (Torc1) signaling modulates cilia size and function through protein synthesis regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.109, 2021–2026. 10.1073/pnas.1112834109
276
YuanS.ZhaoL.BruecknerM.SunZ. (2015). 'Intraciliary calcium oscillations initiate vertebrate left-right asymmetry. Curr. Biol.25, 556–567. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.051
277
ZhangJ.JiangZ.LiuX.MengA. (2016). 'Eph/ephrin signaling maintains the boundary of dorsal forerunner cell cluster during morphogenesis of the zebrafish embryonic left-right organizer. Development143, 2603–2615. 10.1242/dev.132969
278
ZhangM.ZhangJ.LinS. C.MengA. (2012). β-Catenin 1 and β-catenin 2 play similar and distinct roles in left-right asymmetric development of zebrafish embryos. Development139, 2009–2019. 10.1242/dev.074435
279
ZinskiJ.TajerB.MullinsM. C. (2018). TGF-beta family signaling in early vertebrate development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.10, a033274. 10.1101/cshperspect.a033274
Summary
Keywords
organ laterality, left-right asymmetry, birth defects, zebrafish, cilia, situs inversus, heterotaxy syndrome, left-right organizer
Citation
Forrest K, Barricella AC, Pohar SA, Hinman AM and Amack JD (2022) Understanding laterality disorders and the left-right organizer: Insights from zebrafish. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:1035513. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1035513
Received
02 September 2022
Accepted
12 December 2022
Published
23 December 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Myriam Roussigne, CNRS/Toulouse University UMR5077louse, France
Reviewed by
Nikoloz Tsikolia, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
Hiroshi Hamada, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), Japan
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Forrest, Barricella, Pohar, Hinman and Amack.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jeffrey D. Amack, amackj@upstate.edu
This article was submitted to Morphogenesis and Patterning, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.