Abstract
Metazoans exhibit two modes of primordial germ cell (PGC) specification that are interspersed across taxa. However, the evolutionary link between the two modes and the reproductive strategies of lecithotrophy and matrotrophy is poorly understood. As a first step to understand this, the spatio-temporal expression of teleostean germ plasm markers was investigated in Gambusia holbrooki, a poecilid with shared lecitho- and matrotrophy. A group of germ plasm components was detected in the ovum suggesting maternal inheritance mode of PGC specification. However, the strictly zygotic activation of dnd-β and nanos1 occurred relatively early, reminiscent of models with induction mode (e.g., mice). The PGC clustering, migration and colonisation patterns of G. holbrooki resembled those of zebrafish, medaka and mice at blastula, gastrula and somitogenesis, respectively—recapitulating features of advancing evolutionary nodes with progressive developmental stages. Moreover, the expression domains of PGC markers in G. holbrooki were either specific to teleost (vasa expression in developing PGCs), murine models (dnd spliced variants) or shared between the two taxa (germline and somatic expression of piwi and nanos1). Collectively, the results suggest that the reproductive developmental adaptations may reflect a transition from lecithotrophy to matrotrophy.
Introduction
Primordial germ cells are the stem cells of life; they give rise to gametes, safeguarding the reproductive function of an individual and transfer its genetic material to ensuing generations. Two patterns of germ cell development are known in sexually reproducing animals; 1) Induction mode, where epigenetic reprogramming in a group of pluripotent cells induces PGC identity (Wang and Cao, 2016) and 2) Preformation mode, in which pre-packaged molecules in gametes, i.e., germ plasm components, trigger PGC specification in early zygotes (Raz, 2002; Santos and Lehmann, 2004) which determine their germline fate and protect their identity against surrounding soma. Despite earlier thoughts, the germ plasm acquisition is not confined to primitive animals, but repeatedly shared in higher taxa (; Whittle and Extavour, 2017) particularly in those that exhibit lecithotrophy. With high species diversity, fish taxa have evolved both modes of PGC specification (Walvig, 1963; ; ). With majority of oviparous teleost including research models (Raz, 2002; ) and commercial species (Nagasawa et al., 2013; Su et al., 2014) following the preformation mode, while most chondrichthyans (i.e., cartilaginous fishes) following induction mode () that also typically exhibit a degree of matrotrophy. However, little is known in poeciliids, which interestingly share aspects of both lecitho- and matrotrophy such as in the G. holbrooki (Mousavi and Patil, 2021).
Typically, PGCs undergo several developmental stages before transforming into functional germ cells. These begin with PGC specification regulated by parental derivates (; Zhu et al., 2018) or epigenetic reprogramming (Yabuta et al., 2006; Saitou and Yamaji, 2012), followed by mobility acquisition to reach gonad anlage (Richardson and Lehmann, 2010; Paksa and Raz, 2015), and eventually attaining sexual identity, influenced by genetic/intrinsic (; Matsuda, 2005) or environmental/extrinsic () cues. Cumulative evidence suggests that each of these stages are governed by a group of molecules which recruit epigenetic machinery (), RNA interference apparatus () and/or signaling pathways () safeguarding PGCs from somatic differentiation (), ectopic migration and apoptosis (Lai et al., 2012). Despite shared biochemical pathways, fundamental differences in the mode of PGC specification (i.e., preformation vs induction) exists, as is obvious from spatio-temporal expression profiles of these molecules between taxa (; ). For instance, during zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryogenesis, the maternally supplied vasa () and nanos1 () maintain the specificity and quantity of PGCs, respectively. Similarly, dead end (dnd), a regulator of the RNA interference machinery, is well conserved in teleost, whose maternal transcripts mark PGC sequestration and migration () in models such as zebrafish (Weidinger et al., 2003), medaka () and Atlantic salmon (Nagasawa et al., 2013). However, in higher vertebrates with induction mode—e.g., axolotl () and mouse (Saitou and Yamaji, 2010)—germ plasm does not form and the maternal deposit is erased in early stages of embryonic development (i.e., cleavage). Instead, epigenetic machinery triggers PGC specification via bone-morphogenetic (BMP) signaling (Saitou et al., 2012; Seisenberger et al., 2012; ). Also, unlike medaka () and Xenopus (Taguchi et al., 2014), Dnd mutation (Sakurai et al., 1995; Youngren et al., 2005) and Nanos1 ablation () in mice do not affect PGC specification and fertility respectively. Therefore, despite the conserved regulatory pathways and set of molecules, PGC specification shows a shift in their developmental pattern in lecithotrophs with no maternal care (e.g., zebrafish) and low maternal care, e.g., medaka, (Morrison et al., 2017; Murata et al., 2020), to those distinct to matrotrophs (e.g., mouse). Hence models such as poeciliids, e.g., gambusia, with shared lecithotrophy (i.e., where embryos receive nutrients only through the yolk) and matrotrophy (i.e., where embryos receive nutrients from the mother) are likely to advance our current understanding as to how germline specification and maintenance evolve and function.
The ovo-viviparity of poeciliids is accompanied with interesting and complex alteration in their biology of reproduction including developing spermatozoa bundles () and an intromittent organ i.e., gonopodia for deposition of sperm () in males, and matrotrophy, intrafollicular gestation (Pollux et al., 2014; Roberts et al., 2016) and superfetation (Norazmi-Lokman et al., 2016; ) in females. Moreover, the pseudo-placenta which evolved in poeciliids provides a maternal-fetal interface (Olivera-Tlahuel et al., 2018) sharing reproductive traits with placentalia. However, the consequences of this evolutionary convergence on germ cell formation and gonadogenesis is poorly understood.
In this regard, G. holbrooki presents as a particularly attractive poeciliid on count of its now wide global distribution (Norazmi-Lokman et al., 2021), short reproductive cycle (Norazmi-Lokman et al., 2016), well-documented embryology (Mousavi and Patil, 2021), close evolutionary relatedness to higher vertebrates (; ) and notoriety as a pest fish (; Patil, 2012). A number of approaches to control its pest populations have been ineffective, particularly at large spatial scales. Hence, gaining insight into cellular and genetic pathways of germ cell development and gonadogenesis is expected to enhance our understanding of its reproductive biology to facilitate genetic control (Patil, 2012), whilst providing insights into comparative mechanisms of PGC development. This study for the first time examined PGC development across a range of embryonic stages of G. holbrooki, discerning shared features with other teleost and higher vertebrates, highlighting its utility to decipher comparative mechanisms of reproduction as well as direct application to control pest populations.
Methods
Wild Fish Collection and Housing
The fish were collected from the Tamar Island Wetland Reserve, Tasmania (41°23.1′S; 147°4.4′E) and reared in a dedicated small fish facility at Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), Taroona, University of Tasmania. The rearing conditions are summarized in the Supplementary Table S1. The fish were fed with commercial pellets (TetraMin1 tropical granules, Germany) and freshly hatched Artemia nauplii (INVE Aquaculture, United States). The experimental ova and developing embryos were obtained from gravid females (Norazmi-Lokman et al., 2016) and staged (Mousavi and Patil, 2021) as previously described. All experimental procedures were approved by the University of Tasmania Animal Ethics Committee (Permit No. A12787).
RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR
To evaluate the expression profile of key PGC markers during early development, total RNA from seven distinct developmental stages (Mousavi and Patil, 2021) including ovum (i.e., vitellogenic oocytes stage V obtained from virgin females), cleavage (i.e., mid-morula stage) blastula (i.e., 1000-cell stage), gastrula (i.e., the onset of embryonic shield elongation), early segmentation, late segmentation, and early pharyngula were isolated and used in quantitative PCR assay (n = 4-8 embryos/sex/developmental stage). To distinguish the spatial domains (i.e., anterior and/or posterior of the developing embryos) of expression using end-point PCR, somite stage embryos (n = 5) were used. For this, most of the yolk was removed by puncture using Dumont #5 fine forceps (F.S.T, Canada) and the tissue was partitioned as head (anterior to otic vesicle) and trunk halves (Figure 2C) using a fine straight tipped dissecting knife (10,055-12, F.S.T, Canada), with each half processed separately for RNA isolation. The expression of the target genes in adult liver, kidney, spleen, skeleton muscle, heart, eyes, brain, testis and ovary (n = 4 sex/tissue) were also tested.
Individual embryos and adult tissues were rinsed in cold PBS, infiltrated with RNAlater (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, United States) and stored at -80°C until nucleic acid extraction. The RNA and DNA from individual embryos and 15–25 mg of tissues were isolated using AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, United States). The residual genomic DNA in RNA extracts was removed using Ambion™ DNase (Thermo Scientific, United States) and RNA was purified by Monarch® RNA Clean-up Kit (New England Biolabs). The quantity of isolated RNA was measured by Qubit® four Fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, United States) and the RNA integrity was confirmed visually using agarose gel electrophoresis. The purified RNA was then reverse transcribed using MMLV Reverse Transcriptase (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan), with a final concentration of 6–230 and 250 ng/μl for embryos and tissues, respectively. The synthesised cDNA from adult tissues and somite embryos were later used in end-point PCR assays.
cDNA Cloning and Full-Length Sequencing
To obtain full length cDNA of the genes from G. holbrooki, the predicted cDNA sequences from different poeciliid species were extracted from the NCBI database and multiple sequence alignments were applied using MUSCLE (). Subsequently, degenerate primers were designed based on highly conserved regions of the target cDNA homologues using Geneious Prime® (version 2020.2.3). The primers were recruited to amplify target cDNA fragments through end-point PCR, the products were purified, cloned into pCR®2.1-TOPO® vectors using TOPO™ TA Cloning Kit (Life Technologies Corporation, CA, United States) and sequenced. The resulting sequences were used to design G. holbrooki specific primers that were used in Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE) PCR to obtain full-length cDNA using GeneRacer™ Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Design of qPCR Primers and Data Normalisation
The qPCR assay primers (Supplementary Table S2) were designed using Geneious Prime® (2020.2.3) with care to avoid self-dimer and secondary structures (Untergasser et al., 2012). Their efficiency was also tested at different dilutions for each gene, separately. The real time PCR mix (10 µl) comprised of 1X iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, NSW, Australia), 5–10 ng cDNA Template, 0.4 µM of each primer, and adjusted to 10 µl using MilliQ water. Duplicate reactions were run for each cDNA sample using CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, NSW, Australia). Melting curve analysis, gel visualisation and sequencing of qPCR products were subsequently performed to check unwanted products and gDNA contamination.
Four housekeeping genes, namely rps18, gapdh, pgk1 (Panina et al., 2018), and β-actin (Kwan and Patil, 2019) were tested for biological normalisation of qPCR data through geometric averaging of the candidate genes using geNorm algorithm (Vandesompele et al., 2002; ) in qbase + software (version 3.0, Biogazelle, Belgium). The β-actin with no sex-biased expression was selected to normalise qPCR data as the most stable housekeeping gene (M value 0.41). The relative transcription of target genes was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle (Cq) method with efficiency correction (Ruijter et al., 2009). Relative expression of genes of interest (∆Cq) was calculated against the selected reference gene and presented in plots. The expression fold changes presented were computed using the 2 (−∆∆Cq) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).
Statistical Analysis
The qPCR data was subject to analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify significant differences between experimental groups. When applicable, Tukey HSD test used to compare the significance level of differences treatments. Normality of the data was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test. The significance was set at p < 0.05.
Whole Mount in situ Hybridization
The WM-ISH was used to investigate the spatial expression of target genes in several embryonic stages (i.e., from late cleavage to early pharyngula). To ensure specificity, the sense and antisense RNA probes were generated from a less conserved domains such as untranslated regions (Thisse and Thisse, 2008). The respective cDNAs were first inserted into pCR®2.1-TOPO vector. DIG-labelled RNA probes were produced by in vitro transcription using T7/T3 RNA polymerase (NEB) and DIG RNA labelling mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Any traces of cDNA in the probe were eliminated using AmbionTM DNase (Thermo Scientific, United States), purified by ethanol precipitation and stored with RNase inhibitor, RNasein® Plus (Promega, United States) at -20°C.
The WM-ISH followed those described for small fish embryos (Thisse and Thisse, 2008) with modifications. Briefly, the dissected clutches of developing embryos were individually detached from placenta, rinsed with cold PBS, and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (Emgrid) overnight at 4°C. The fixed embryos were washed in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBT), progressively dehydrated with PBT-methanol, and stored in 100% methanol until use. The embryos at early and mid-pharyngula stages were depigmented before dehydration using 3% H2O2 and 1% KOH. On the day of hybridization, the embryos were sequentially rehydrated in four stages with progressively increasing concentrations of methanol-PBT, manually dechorionated, permeabilized with 10–25 μg/ml proteinase K (Bioline) and postfixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. The embryos were prehybridized at 68°C for 3 h in hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 5X SSC, 0.01% Tween 20, Torula Yeast tRNA, 50 μg/ml heparin) and hybridized in fresh buffer containing antisense RNA probes (100–250 ng/ml) at 67–69°C for 16–24 h, as required for target gene and developmental stage. This was followed by stringency washes in PBST, with progressively lower salt concentrations, to remove any non-specifically bound probes. For immuno-labelling, non-specific binding was first prevented using blocking solution (5% blocking reagent (Roche) in maleic acid buffer containing 0.1% Tween 20). The embryos were then treated with 1:3,000–1:5,000 anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase (AP) antibody (Roche) at 4°C for 16 h. The antibody-labelled embryos were washed with PBT 8 times, 30 min each, at room temperature, under gentle agitation. For staining, the embryos were first treated with staining buffer (100 mM Tris HCl pH 9.5, 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) three times by replacing with fresh buffer every 10 min and then incubated in BM-purple stain (Roche) at room temperature and protected from light. The optimum staining time was adjusted according to developmental stages and target genes ranging from 5 to 35 h. Following staining, the embryos were washed in PBT until all excess stain was removed and postfixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C. The fixed embryos were washed and stored in PBS for imaging using MZ16FA stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany).
Genetic Sexing of Embryos
The isolated DNA (co-extracted with RNA using AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit) were used for genetic testing as previously described for this species (Kwan and Patil, 2019; Patil et al., 2020). Briefly, PCR mix (10 µl) comprised of 1X MyTaq™ HS Red mix (Meridian Life Science, OH, United States), 0.4 µM of each primer and 50 ng of genomic DNA template. Thermal cycling (T100™ Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad Laboratories, NSW, Australia) consisted of 95°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 20 s. Female and male specific amplicons were visualised using gel electrophoresis.
Results
The Pattern of PGC Migration in G. holbrooki
The vasa mRNA signals were first detectable in late cleavage stages, emerging as a few tiny spots distributed throughout the blastomere (Figure 1A). At this stage, the signals were partially obscured by egg yolk (i.e., meroblastic cleavage) and buried deep in the cells mass, partially masked by glare of the large oil-droplets beneath. At early blastula (1000-cell stage), concurrent with increased blastoderm area (400–450 µm) and asynchronous cell divisions, the vasa signal was intense at three distinct spots that were asymmetrically distributed with one larger and darker than the other two (Figure 1B). At mid-blastula, four distinctive spots were detectable buried underneath the layer of cells at almost the same geometrical plane (Figure 1C). At late blastula, the vasa-positive signals had numerically increased and arranged peripherally to the blastodisc in four clusters (Figure 1D).
FIGURE 1
At the onset of the gastrula stage (i.e., corresponding to 50%-epiboly in zebrafish and egg cylinder in mice), the blastoderm had begun to expand within a crater-like depression over the surface of the yolk at the animal pole. Here, the dnd-α signals had coalesced and appeared as two compact clusters of cells located at the margin of the dome (Figure 1E) where both the dome and the yolk boundaries were difficult to distinguish and so were the anterior-posterior axis (Figure 1E). For the first time, from mid to late gastrula, the anterior-posterior axis of the embryo was distinguishable and the optic primordia began to form as the body-axis lengthened and thickened. Here, the vasa-positive cells appeared pellucid and were located at the posterior half of the embryo. At this stage, the PGCs were clustered at the junction of developing embryo and the yolk, close to posterior of the trunk, however, the individual germ cell precursors were distinguishable (Figure 1F).
At the onset of somitogenesis, concurrent with considerable expansion of the head, rudimentary brain formation and first visible somites, the two clusters of PGCs were still visible, one on either side of the body axis, forming narrow queue of cells (Figures 1G, 4D). Based on the spatial distribution of PGCs two directions of motility were discernible, with the two clusters beginning to 1) converge inwards, i.e., PGC clusters moved towards each other and 2) migrating anteriorly.
As evident from migrating signals at early to mid-somitogenesis, coinciding with significant body elongation, PGCs exhibited a relatively enhanced mobilisation compared to late gastrula stage. Specifically, at 12–14 somite stage, where solid optic capsule and otic vesicles were also visible, the two PGC clusters were clearly observed extending from the sixth to eighth somite (Figure 1G). The PGC clusters maintained their integrity (i.e., cells moving in a close vicinity to each other), however, the narrow queue of cells progressively clustered tightly (thickened and shortened cluster of cells), compared to preceding developmental stage. At late segmentation, PGC clusters were observed on either side of the body axis, directly underneath the somites and the spinal cord, in closest vicinity to each other (Figure 1H). At early pharyngula, the PGCs had migrated and coalesced at the genital ridge and remained in two distinctive clusters (Figure 3E).
Spatio-Temporal Expression of PGC Markers in G. holbrooki
Of all the PGC markers, only dnd had the two spliced variants; the longer variant, dnd-α, contained five exons with 1,122 bp CDS, while the shorter dnd-β (1,056 bp CDS) contained six exons. Based on end-point PCR, all the candidate PGC markers were expressed in adult ovary and testis, with additional expression of nanos1 in brain (Figure 2A). As for the embryonic expression, two of which were detected in the posterior (vasa and dnd-α) and anterior (nanos1 and dnd-β) halves of somitogenesis embryos, while piwiII and dazl were detected in both consistent with WMISH observation (Figures 2B,C). More specifically, vasa (Figure 1), dnd-α (Figures 3A,C,D), dazl (Figure 4B) and piwiII (Figure 4D) transcripts expressed in the posterior half overlapped with the location of nascent PGCs. While the anterior expression of dazl was found as strong signal in the otic vesicles with a weak signal in the eyes (Figure 4A). The anterior expression of piwiII corresponded to large part of the developing brain but restricted to mesencephalon and diencephalon (Figure 4C). The dnd-β was first detected at the anterior region at early gastrula (Figure 3B), then expanded on both sides of the developing brain at early segmentation (Figure 3D) and cerebellum during early pharyngula (Figure 3F).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
Quantitatively, four of these PGC markers (dnd-α, dazl, piwi II, and vasa) were detected in unfertilised egg (Figure 5), with nanos1 and dnd-β barely detectable or absent (Figure 6 and Table 1). The maternally expressed genes showed a comparable trend in cleavage and blastula (Table 1). However, the maternally silent genes were strongly upregulated (p < 0.05, Table 1) at early embryogenesis (i.e., cleavage). Comparing the quantitative expression of maternally inherited genes between stages (Table 1), a significantly transient surge was observed at gastrula stage (p < 0.05) with a female-biased trend (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
TABLE 1
| Genes | Spatio-temporal Expression | Ovum | Cleavage | Blastula | Gastrula | Early somitogenesis | Late somitogenesis | Figures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasa | Qualitative | — | - Tiny spots in blastomere (1A) | - Four clusters at the periphery of the blastodisc (1D) | - Two clusters at the margin of dome (1E and 1F) | - Posteriorly, at migrating PGC clusters (1G) | - PGR (1I) | Figures 1, 2B | |
| Quantitative | Between stages | −1.0 ± 1.0−0.94 ± 0.75−0.28 ± 1.06−3.69 ± 0.91**+0.14 ± 1.26 | Figure 5A | ||||||
| Between sex | — | 0.78 ± 0.08 F | 2.68 ± 1.02 F * | 5.12 ± 1.01 F ** | 1.53 ± 2.03 F | 0.11 ± 0.97 F | Figure 5B | ||
| dnd-α | Qualitative | — | - Tiny spots in blastomere | - Four clusters at the periphery of the blastodisc | - Two clusters at the margin of dome at vasa-positive cells (3A) | - Two PGC clusters close to the tail bud (3C) | - PGR (3E) | Figures 1, 2B, 3 | |
| Quantitative | Between stages | −1.38 ± 0.66−0.01 ± 0.52+2.4 ± 0.81 *−4.21 ± 0.92 ***−5.2 ± 0.89 *** | Figure 5C | ||||||
| Between sex | — | 0.36 ± 0.73 F | 1.70 ± 0.70 M | 4.25 ± 0.42 F *** | 2.15 ± 0.89 F * | 0.52 ± 0.38 F | Figure 5D | ||
| dnd-β | Qualitative | — | — | — | - Anterior region of the elongating body (3B) | - Both sides of the neural tube (3D) | - Metencephalon and cerebellum (3F) | Figures 2B, 3 | |
| Quantitative | Between stages | +6.71 ± 1.27 ***−0.74 ± 0.61−2.17 ± 0.61 *−2.32 ± 0.76 **−1.95 ± 0.78 * | Figure 6A | ||||||
| Dazl | Qualitative | — | - Tiny spots in blastomere | - Four clusters at the periphery of the blastodisc | - Two clusters at the margin of dome at vasa-positive cells | - Anteriorly, at optic lens and otic vesicles (4A). - Posteriorly, at PGC clusters (4B) | - Otic vesicles - Optic lens - PGR | Figures 2B, 4 | |
| Quantitative | Between stages | −0.96 ± 0.28−0.57 ± 0.39+0.56 ± 0.53−4.49 ± 0.70 ***−3.64 ± 0.75 ** | Figure 5E | ||||||
| Between sex | — | 0.28 ± 0.38 F | 0.02 ± 0.72 M | 3.01 ± 0.31 F *** | 2.39 ± 0.94 F * | 0.01 ± 0.93 M | Figure 5F | ||
| piwiII | Qualitative | — | — | - Four clusters at the periphery of the blastodisc | — | - Anteriorly, at diencephalon and mesencephalon (4C). - Posteriorly, at PGC clusters (4D) | - diencephalon and mesencephalon, - PGR | Figures 2B, 4 | |
| Quantitative | Between stages | −1.53 ± 0.62−0.63 ± 0.65+1.85 ± 0.86 *−3.9 ± 0.95 F ***−2.71 ± 0.75 ** | Figure 5G | ||||||
| Between sex | --- | 1.24 ± 0.83 M | 0.40 ± 0.65 F | 4.09 ± 0.67 F *** | 2.5 ± 1.36 F | 0.01 ± 0.80 F | Figure 5H | ||
| nanos1 | Qualitative | — | — | — | - A single cluster at the anterior half | - Neural tube (4E) - Otic vesicles (4E) | Figures 2B, 4 | ||
| Quantitative | Between stages | +7.02 ± 1.27 ***+2.16 ± 0.7 **−2.89 ± 0.55 ***−0.23 ± 0.61−0.15 ± 0.45 | Figure 6B | ||||||
Spatio-temporal expression of PGC-specific markers at select embryonic stages of G. holbrooki.
Level of significance between groups (∆∆Cq, Tuckey’s HSD): * = 0.05, ** = 0.01, *** = 0.001.
The ∆∆Cq between sexes were not significant for nanos1 and dnd-β at any stage.
Discussion
While a previous study (Pala, 1970) investigated PGCs in G. holbrooki, this was limited to late developmental stages and gross cell morphology. In contrast, a detailed PGC developmental dynamics presented here captures shared evolutionary features of both lecitho- and matrotrophic vertebrates.
Evidence for Maternal Inheritance of PGC Specification
The relatively high expression of PGC markers tested (dazl, dnd-α, piwi II, and vasa but not nanos1) in unfertilised eggs of G. holbrooki implies their maternal inheritance and suggests PGC specification is determined by preformation mode. This pattern is similar to those observed in oviparous species such as zebrafish () and medaka () as well as those of Drosophila (Rongo and Lehmann, 1996), and Xenopus (). However, in mice, mechanical ablation of vegetal or animal pole of the fertilised egg did not arrest the development of viable and fertile offspring (Zernicka-Goetz, 1998). This was later confirmed by the evidence that nuage was not detectable in unfertilised and fertilised murine eggs (Toyooka et al., 2000) suggesting PGC specification is governed by zygotic determinants in mice.
In teleosts, the maternal factors such as tdrd6 safeguards proper germ plasm segregation (Roovers et al., 2018), while, dnd (; Zhu et al., 2018) and dazl (Li et al., 2016) are necessary for maintaining PGC identity, with nanos1 (), and vasa (; Li et al., 2009) providing signals for their proliferation and correct migration. The maternal accumulation of these markers in ova supports early germline sequestration in G. holbrooki with comparable functions reported for other fish models.
Relatively Early Onset of Zygotic Activation Mimics Those of Mouse
The presence of nanos1 and dnd-β transcripts in post-fertilisation embryos, but not in ova suggests its zygotic origin. Their first appearance at mid-cleavage is a preliminary evidence of zygotic genome activation (ZGA) onset which is earlier compared to what occurs at mid-blastula in zebrafish (). By inference, this appears a relatively early model of global zygotic activation among teleosts. The timing of MZT is not conserved across species nor follows a pattern of evolutionary hierarchy. For example, the earliest ZGA has been reported in sea urchin (Tu et al., 2014) and mice () at first cell division, while in zebrafish (Pelegri, 2003; Lindeman and Pelegri, 2010; ) and Drosophila (), its activation is postponed until the 10th and eighth cycles, respectively. Typically, the onset of global ZGA are evaluated by an array of cellular events. For example, cell cycle intervals lengthen, as zygotic transcription interrupts DNA replication (Rothe et al., 1992), coinciding with the initiation of ZGA. However, in species with relatively early ZGA (e.g., mice and G. holbrooki), demarcation of ZGA with longer cell cycle intervals are less likely to be useful. Instead, more refined indicators such as the appearance of maternal transcript repressors (Ruzov et al., 2004), increased chromatin accessibility (Liu et al., 2018) and dilution of histone concentration () may provide greater precision.
Epigenetic Trigger May Explain PGC Markers Surge
Activation of PGC markers (dazl, piwi II, and dnd-α) at gastrula in G. holbrooki is similar to those in mice (Smith and Meissner, 2013) and zebrafish (Potok et al., 2013), known to be initiated via epigenetic mechanisms. Specifically, the second major wave of epigenetic reprogramming in mice triggers around E6.5 (at the onset of gastrula) where PGCs are liberated from methylation (). This is simultaneous with PGC extrusion from the epiblast, i.e., their specification from soma, en route to the genital ridge (Lee et al., 2014). In zebrafish, the pattern of DNA methylome is not fully comparable with those of mice (Potok et al., 2013), however, germ cell specific markers (e.g., piwi, dazl, and vasa) undergo hypomethylation post-ZGA during the sphere stage (Seisenberger et al., 2012; Potok et al., 2013; ). The timing of these two events is concurrent with the surge in expression of dazl and piwi II at gastrula in G. holbrooki, a likely consequence of demethylation wave in the germline. However, this needs verification.
Expression Profile of Germline Markers Imply Sex-Dimorphic Proliferation of PGCs
A transient female-biased expression of PGC markers in G. holbrooki is similar to those of zebrafish (Ye et al., 2019) where preferential PGC proliferation leads to female differentiation. In zebrafish, the timing of PGC proliferation is known to occur as early as gastrula () which begins between sphere and 50% epiboly (Wang et al., 2016). This parallels the evanescent upregulation of the markers in G. holbrooki, which likely corresponds to female-biased PGC proliferation.
PGC Migration Pattern Shares Features of Both Egg Laying Teleosts and Mouse
Consistent with the gene structure and content, the vasa and dnd-α expression in gambusia was restricted to the domains corresponding to PGCs. This was further supported by the restricted localisation of vasa transcript at the genital ridge of parturating embryos, where the newly formed gonad emerges. Although the molecular components and the machineries involved in PGC mobilisation are conserved among teleosts, the pattern of their migration varies between species (Saito et al., 2006). Typically, the early segregation of PGCs in teleosts relies on the localisation pattern of germ plasm, as the maternally inherited germ cell determinants (; Roovers et al., 2018). However, two types of germ plasm arrangements have so far been described in early embryonic development of teleosts where (Figure 7); 1) germ plasm components aggregate compactly in cleavage furrows (Yabe et al., 2009) until the 16-cell stage, subsequently segregating into proliferating cells eventuating in four clusters of germ plasm-positive cells at the dome stage as in zebrafish (Raz, 2002), Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua (Presslauer et al., 2012), and olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceous (Li et al., 2015) while in others, 2) the germ plasm signal is dissipated throughout the cell mass in early cell cycles with distinct germ plasm-positive cells first forming at the mid-gastrula stage, such as in medaka (). Although, the early cleavage stages could not be captured, the occurrence of four loosely aggregated clusters of vasa-positive cells at the periphery of blastodisc in G. holbrooki follows the former pattern (Figure 7).
FIGURE 7
The position of PGCs determines their migration start point which is defined in relation to cell collectivity and body patterning during blastula and gastrula stages, respectively (Raz, 2002). In zebrafish (), medaka (), and viviparous black rockfish (Zhou et al., 2020), prominent embryonic features (e.g., sphere, yolk cell doming, multiple stages of epiboly) during blastula stage pose broad somatic environment for cell motility. While in poeciliids including G. holbrooki (Tavolga and Rugh, 1947; Tavolga, 1949; Mousavi and Patil, 2021), the blastodisc is extremely thin and flat and the growing cells sink inwards into the emerging yolk cavity. Therefore, cell patterning occurs in a relatively limited environment independent of yolk as a scaffold (dissimilar to zebrafish and medaka and similar to mice) where blastodisc does not grow over yolk cell to form dome. Indeed, the embryonic shield in G. holbrooki is relatively compact and at early gastrula swiftly begins to elongate and form embryonic body axis in the growing but restricted cavity on the yolk surface (Mousavi and Patil, 2021). The dissimilarity in early embryonic body patterning (during blastula and gastrula) may affect the expression domain of chemokine signalling (e.g., Cxcl12a-Cxcr4 interaction) as the key regulator of PGC migration in vertebrates. The formation of two clusters at early gastrula in gambusia, is comparable to the initial patterning of nascent germ cells in medaka (Saito et al., 2006; Kurokawa et al., 2007) where the PGCs are first found dispersed on both sides of the dorsal axis ().
During somitogenesis, PGC clusters in teleosts show two spatial patterns while migrating towards PGR. In one group including zebrafish (Weidinger et al., 1999), loach (Saito et al., 2006), and medaka (), the PGCs form two clusters positioned on either side, of the trunk and moving separately towards the genital ridge. In the second group including herring and floating goby (Saito et al., 2006), the two clusters converge towards the medial axis and transiently merge under the trunk during early somitogenesis. However, the merged PGC clusters, thereafter, split to form two distinct clusters in mid-somitogenesis. In G. holbrooki, PGC cluster formation and their mobility resembles the former pattern. In most teleosts, following the localisation of two clusters at body mid-line, the PGCs are localised anterior to the putative gonadal ridge (PGR), thereafter, homing posteriorly reaching the PGR (Saito et al., 2006; ; ). In contrast, the first appearance of these two PGC clusters posterior to the PGR and their subsequent anterior migration towards PGR, in G. holbrooki, appears a developmental novelty in teleosts. Interestingly, this resembles the pattern of PGC migration in mouse, where they are first specified in the posterior primitive streak, move to subjacent endoderm and migrate anteriorly towards gonadal ridge (; Saitou and Yamaji, 2012). During somitogenesis, the route of these PGC cluster migration in some teleosts, e.g., medaka, loach and goldfish (Saito et al., 2006), are longer compared to those in zebrafish (), gobby and herring (Saito et al., 2006). In G. holbrooki, this migration from the posterior body cylinder to the PGR (i.e., homing at 4–7 somites) appears even longer than medaka (10–12 somites) and loach (15–17 somites). This cellular remodelling (i.e., migratory direction and relatively long migration path) may be attributed to the reproductive adaptation from lecithotrophy of egg layers to that of live-bearing. Conceivably, the organogenesis machinery directs the gonial stem cells to the far anterior part of the body in live-bearing fish to co-accommodate the complex anatomical novelty of a fused ovary and proto-uterus such as in G. holbrooki. This anterior location is perhaps reset more medially in mouse with the anatomical distinction of ovary and uterus. A comparative evaluation encompassing multiple poeciliids with increasing degree of matrotrophy will no doubt shed greater light on evolutionary relatedness of PGC development and lecitho-matrotrophy.
Only Vasa and Dnd-α Exclusively Mark PGCs in G. holbrooki
The exclusive occurrence of vasa and dnd-α in PGCs of G. holbrooki is comparable to vasa (Yoon et al., 1997; ; Su et al., 2014) and dnd (; Wargelius et al., 2016) of other teleosts and those vasa (Tanaka et al., 2000) and dnd-α (Youngren et al., 2005) of mice. Inferred from its maternal inheritance and exclusive detection in migrating PGCs, vasa likely underpins PGC formation and function in G. holbrooki. This is consistent across taxa with maternally inherited mode of germline determination (Styhler et al., 1998; Kuznicki et al., 2000; Tanaka et al., 2000; ). Functionally, the DEAD-box domain of VASA proteins underpin regulatory roles which restructure and remodel protein-coding RNAs to facilitate their translation (Linder, 2006; Sengoku et al., 2006). Thus, maternal vasa is likely to facilitate the translation of Gp markers (predominantly stored in RNA form) in early zygotes of gambusia, as also occurs in lecithotrophic teleosts such as zebrafish ().
The abundant expression of maternal dnd-α in ova is likely associated with its essential role for specification and maintenance of PGCs in teleosts (Liu and Collodi, 2010; ). However, its established role as an anchor for maternal RNAs in unfertilised eggs and polymerization of cortical microtubule arrays has been demonstrated in Xenopus (Mei et al., 2013) needs verification in teleost. The subsequent occurrence of dnd in the embryonic and postnatal germline of G. holbrooki is consistent with those reported for other vertebrates (Youngren et al., 2005; ) including teleosts (Su et al., 2014; ; Wargelius et al., 2016) maintaining germline identity by protecting transcripts from miRNA-mediated decay (; ), facilitating translation of essential germ plasm components for PGC development (), preventing PGCs from soma differentiation (Weidinger et al., 2003; ) and titrating the abundant mRNA through transcription silencing (Nousch et al., 2013; Yamaji et al., 2017). Taken together, the exclusive expression of dnd-α in gambusia germ cells encoding the essential regulatory domains suggests a conserved role for it in germline maintenance in this species and likely in other poeciliids.
Somatic Expression of Germline Markers May Confer Their Stemness
The non-germ cell-specific expression of dazl, piwiII, and dnd-β, in G. holbrooki is in accordance with the broader expression domain of these markers in invertebrates and higher vertebrates. For example, Piwi in invertebrates is also expressed in soma. Hence, it’s a suggested role beyond germline maintenance, assisting in somatic cell cycles (Ma et al., 2014), tissue regeneration and homeostasis (Palakodeti et al., 2008), adaptive immunity (Miesen et al., 2015) and sex determination (). Also, the expression domain of piwi in PGC and CNS of G. holbrooki is in agreement with those of zebrafish (Tan et al., 2002), medaka (Li et al., 2012), and mammals ().
This study, for the first time, reports the presence of an alternately spliced variant of dnd (dnd-β) in any teleost during its embryonic development. Interestingly, the somatic expression of dnd-β mostly resembles those reported () in pre-natal stages of mice. However, the content and expression domain of the variants in mice (Youngren et al., 2005) and gambusia are different. Specifically, in mice, the larger variant (Dnd-α) is detected in prenatal stages, both in PGCs and soma (e.g., neuroectoderm, head mesenchyme, neural tube, and hindgut), while the shorter variant (dnd-β) takes over post-natal function in a germline-specific manner (). Whereas in G. holbrooki, both variants are expressed in prenatal embryos albeit in different domains, with the shorter dnd-β retaining germ cell-specific expression as in mice.
More broadly, the study presents evidence for an expansion (dnd-β, dazl) in expression domains of germ cell-specific markers to soma in G. holbrooki. Indeed, these genes encode RBPs that facilitate cell differentiation and maintenance of early cell lineages in vertebrates (; Shigunov and Dallagiovanna, 2015) and invertebrates () via silencing, protecting and/or enhancing translation. (Tsui et al., 2000), (Xu et al., 2013). Similarly, in G. holbrooki, the expression of germline-RBP genes in CNS represents an evolutionary diversification of function, likely associated with maintaining somatic stemness and its renewal (; Tsuboi et al., 2018).
Conclusion
As a result of this study, our understanding of germ cell development in poeciliids has been markedly enhanced yielding insights shared with lecithotrophic teleosts as well as matrotrophic mammals. Specifically, the PGC-marker genes allowed the mode of PGC sequestration and position of germline to be determined. Remarkably, G. holbrooki retained preformation mode (i.e., maternal inheritance) of specification (like teleosts) with a relatively early zygotic activation. Also, the early spatial pattern of PGCs resembled that of zebrafish, while the later migration pattern reminiscent of medaka and mouse, sharing the features of both lecithotrophy and matrotrophy. Consistent with this adaptation, the expression of teleostean germ cell markers in somatic cells confers stemness of the latter. Regardless, it is yet unclear if the shift in these molecular and cellular patterns led to evolution of the reproductive strategies or vice versa. In part, the adaptations in spatial patterns could be related to geometric restriction on developing embryo in matrotrophy compared to those of lecithotrophic teleosts, an aspect that needs verification. Showing the previously unsuspected conservation of elements specific to both lecithotrophic and matrotrophic organisms in G. holbrooki, lends itself as an excellent system to understand the evolutionary connectedness of germline development modes, reproductive adaptations and functional diversity of the germline markers. Like zebrafish, G. holbrooki is easy and relatively inexpensive to maintain, but display greater similarity to higher vertebrates, making it far more attractive system to study and understand mechanism of reproductive development and associated disease conditions of higher vertebrates. Also, a knowledge of PGC markers and functions is likely to provide pathways to develop species-specific solution for managing pest populations of this invasive species.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI [accession: MZ542286-MZ542293].
Ethics statement
The study was reviewed and approved by the University of Tasmania Animal Ethics Committee (Permit No. A12787).
Author contributions
KR: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, data curation and analysis, validation, visualisation, resources, preparing original draft, review, and editing. JP: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration, writing-review, and editing.
Funding
This research was funded by the Australian Research Council (LP140100428) and Inland Fisheries Service, Tasmania.
Acknowledgments
KR acknowledges Professor Chris Carter and Associate Professor G. John Purser for administrative supervision. We thank Seyed Ehsan Mousavi, Lisette Robertson, Ian Walsh and Jochen Wilhelm for imaging assistance, laboratory support, in situ hybridization and data analysis advise, respectively.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2022.793498/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AanesH.WinataC. L.LinC. H.ChenJ. P.SrinivasanK. G.LeeS. G. P.et al (2011). Zebrafish mRNA Sequencing Deciphers Novelties in Transcriptome Dynamics during Maternal to Zygotic Transition. Genome Res.21, 1328–1338. 10.1101/gr.116012.110
2
AbeK. I.YamamotoR.FrankeV.CaoM.SuzukiY.SuzukiM. G.et al (2015). The First Murine Zygotic Transcription Is Promiscuous and Uncoupled from Splicing and 3′ Processing. EMBO J.34, 1523–1537. 10.15252/embj.201490648
3
AgueroT.JinZ.ChorghadeS.KalsotraA.KingM. L.YangJ. (2017). Maternal Dead-End 1 Promotes Translation of Nanos1 by Binding the eIF3 Complex. Development144, 3755–3765. 10.1242/dev.152611
4
AndersenI. S.ReinerA. H.AanesH.AleströmP.CollasP. (2012). Developmental Features of DNA Methylation during Activation of the Embryonic Zebrafish Genome. Genome Biol.13, R65. 10.1186/gb-2012-13-7-r65
5
AndersonR.CopelandT. K.SchölerH.HeasmanJ.WylieC. (2000). The Onset of Germ Cell Migration in the Mouse Embryo. Mech. Dev.91, 61–68. 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00271-3
6
AramakiS.SatoF.KatoT.SohT.KatoY.HattoriM. A. (2007). Molecular Cloning and Expression of Dead End Homologue in Chicken Primordial Germ Cells. Cell Tissue Res330, 45–52. 10.1007/s00441-007-0435-1
7
AtallahJ.LottS. E. (2018). Evolution of Maternal and Zygotic mRNA Complements in the Early Drosophila Embryo. Plos Genet.14, e1007838. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007838
8
AyresR. M.PettigroveV. J.HoffmannA. A. (2012). Genetic Structure and Diversity of Introduced Eastern Mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in South-Eastern Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res.63. 10.1071/mf11279
9
BaroillerJ. F.D’CottaH.SaillantE. (2009). Environmental Effects on Fish Sex Determination and Differentiation. Sex. Dev.3, 118–135. 10.1159/000223077
10
BhattacharyaC.AggarwalS.ZhuR.KumarM.ZhaoM.MeistrichM. L.et al (2007). The Mouse Dead-End Gene Isoform α Is Necessary for Germ Cell and Embryonic Viability. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.355, 194–199. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.138
11
BhattacharyaC.AggarwalS.KumarM.AliA.MatinA. (2008). Mouse Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3 (APOBEC3) Is Expressed in Germ Cells and Interacts with Dead-End (DND1). PLoS One3, e2315. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002315
12
BoldajipourB.MahabaleshwarH.KardashE.Reichman-FriedM.BlaserH.MininaS.et al (2008). Control of Chemokine-Guided Cell Migration by Ligand Sequestration. Cell132, 463–473. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.034
13
BontemsF.SteinA.MarlowF.LyauteyJ.GuptaT.MullinsM. C.et al (2009). Bucky ball Organizes Germ Plasm Assembly in Zebrafish. Curr. Biol.19, 414–422. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.038
14
BraatA. K.Van De WaterS.KorvingJ.ZivkovicD. (2001). A Zebrafish Vasa Morphant Abolishes Vasa Protein but Does Not Affect the Establishment of the Germline. Genesis30, 183–185. 10.1002/gene.1060
15
ChanA. P.KlocM.LarabellC. A.LegrosM.EtkinL. D. (2007). The Maternally Localized RNA Fatvg Is Required for Cortical Rotation and Germ Cell Formation. Mech. Dev.124, 350–363. 10.1016/j.mod.2007.02.001
16
ChatfieldJ.O'ReillyM.-A.BachvarovaR. F.FerjentsikZ.RedwoodC.WalmsleyM.et al (2014). Stochastic Specification of Primordial Germ Cells from Mesoderm Precursors in Axolotl Embryos. Development141, 2429–2440. 10.1242/dev.105346
17
CrotherB. I.WhiteM. E.JohnsonA. D. (2016). Diversification and Germ-Line Determination Revisited: Linking Developmental Mechanism with Species Richness. Front. Ecol. Evol.4, 26. 10.3389/fevo.2016.00026
18
DevlinR. H.NagahamaY. (2002). Sex Determination and Sex Differentiation in Fish: an Overview of Genetic, Physiological, and Environmental Influences. Aquaculture208, 191–364. 10.1016/s0044-8486(02)00057-1
19
DoitsidouM.Reichman-FriedM.SteblerJ.KöprunnerM.DörriesJ.MeyerD.et al (2002). Guidance of Primordial Germ Cell Migration by the Chemokine SDF-1. Cell111, 647–659. 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01135-2
20
DonougheS.NakamuraT.Ewen-CampenB.GreenD. A.HendersonL.ExtavourC. G. (2014). BMP Signaling Is Required for the Generation of Primordial Germ Cells in an Insect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.111, 4133–4138. 10.1073/pnas.1400525111
21
DuanJ.FengG.ChangP.ZhangX.ZhouQ.ZhongX.et al (2015). Germ Cell-specific Expression of Dead End (Dnd) in Rare Minnow (Gobiocypris Rarus). Fish. Physiol. Biochem.41, 561–571. 10.1007/s10695-015-0029-x
22
EdgarR. C. (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment with High Accuracy and High Throughput. Nucleic Acids Res.32, 1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340
23
EnoC.PelegriF. (2013). Gradual Recruitment and Selective Clearing Generate Germ Plasm Aggregates in the Zebrafish Embryo. Bioarchitecture3, 125–132. 10.4161/bioa.26538
24
EvansT.WadeC. M.ChapmanF. A.JohnsonA. D.LooseM. (2014). Acquisition of Germ Plasm Accelerates Vertebrate Evolution. Science344, 200–203. 10.1126/science.1249325
25
Ewen-CampenB.SchwagerE. E.ExtavourC. G. M. (2010). The Molecular Machinery of Germ Line Specification. Mol. Reprod. Dev.77, 3–18. 10.1002/mrd.21091
26
ExtavourC. G.AkamM. (2003). Mechanisms of Germ Cell Specification across the Metazoans: Epigenesis and Preformation. Development130, 5869–5884. 10.1242/dev.00804
27
FengK.CuiX.SongY.TaoB.ChenJ.WangJ.et al (2020). Gnrh3 Regulates PGC Proliferation and Sex Differentiation in Developing Zebrafish. Endocrinology161, bqz024. 10.1210/endocr/bqz024
28
FurnessA. I.PolluxB. J. A.MeredithR. W.SpringerM. S.ReznickD. N. (2019). How Conflict Shapes Evolution in Poeciliid Fishes. Nat. Commun.10, 3335. 10.1038/s41467-019-11307-5
29
FurnessA. I.AviseJ. C.PolluxB. J. A.ReynosoY.ReznickD. N. (2021). The Evolution of the Placenta in Poeciliid Fishes. Curr. Biol.31, 2004–2011. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.02.008
30
GaoF.DasS. K. (2014). Epigenetic Regulations through DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation: Clues for Early Pregnancy in Decidualization. Biomol. Concepts5, 95–107. 10.1515/bmc-2013-0036
31
GaspariniC.PilastroA.EvansJ. P. (2011). Male Genital Morphology and its Influence on Female Mating Preferences and Paternity success in Guppies. PLoS One6, e22329. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022329
32
GiraldezA. J.MishimaY.RihelJ.GrocockR. J.Van DongenS.InoueK.et al (2006). Zebrafish MiR-430 Promotes Deadenylation and Clearance of Maternal mRNAs. Science312, 75–79. 10.1126/science.1122689
33
GoudarziM.StrateI.PaksaA.LagendijkA.-K.BakkersJ.RazE. (2013). On the Robustness of Germ Cell Migration and microRNA-Mediated Regulation of Chemokine Signaling. Nat. Genet.45, 1264–1265. 10.1038/ng.2793
34
GrierH. J.BurnsJ. R.FloresJ. A. (1981). Testis Structure in Three Species of Teleosts with Tubular Gonopodia. Copeia1981, 797–801. 10.2307/1444180
35
Gross-ThebingT.YigitS.PfeifferJ.Reichman-FriedM.BandemerJ.RuckertC.et al (2017). The Vertebrate Protein Dead End Maintains Primordial Germ Cell Fate by Inhibiting Somatic Differentiation. Dev. Cel43, 704–715. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.11.019
36
GuallarD.WangJ. (2014). RNA-binding Proteins in Pluripotency, Differentiation, and Reprogramming. Front. Biol.9, 389–409. 10.1007/s11515-014-1326-y
37
Guzmán-BárcenasM. G.UribeM. C. (2019). Superfetation in the Viviparous Fish Heterandria Formosa (Poeciliidae). J. Morphol.280, 756–770. 10.1002/jmor.20982
38
HansenC. L.PelegriF. (2021). Primordial Germ Cell Specification in Vertebrate Embryos: Phylogenetic Distribution and Conserved Molecular Features of Preformation and Induction. Front. Cel Dev. Biol.9, 730332. 10.3389/fcell.2021.730332
39
HaraguchiS.TsudaM.KitajimaS.SasaokaY.Nomura-KitabayashidA.KurokawaK.et al (2003). nanos1: a Mouse Nanos Gene Expressed in the central Nervous System Is Dispensable for normal Development. Mech. Dev.120, 721–731. 10.1016/s0925-4773(03)00043-1
40
HartungO.ForbesM. M.MarlowF. L. (2014). Zebrafish Vasa Is Required for Germ-Cell Differentiation and Maintenance. Mol. Reprod. Dev.81, 946–961. 10.1002/mrd.22414
41
HellemansJ.MortierG.De PaepeA.SpelemanF.VandesompeleJ. (2007). qBase Relative Quantification Framework and Software for Management and Automated Analysis of Real-Time Quantitative PCR Data. Genome Biol.8, R19. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19
42
HerpinA.RohrS.RiedelD.KlueverN.RazE.SchartlM. (2007). Specification of Primordial Germ Cells in Medaka (Oryzias latipes). BMC Dev. Biol.7, 3. 10.1186/1471-213x-7-3
43
HerpinA.FischerP.LiedtkeD.KlueverN.NeunerC.RazE.et al (2008). Sequential SDF1a and B-Induced Mobility Guides Medaka PGC Migration. Dev. Biol.320, 319–327. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.030
44
HickfordD. E.FrankenbergS.PaskA. J.ShawG.RenfreeM. B. (2011). DDX4 (VASA) Is Conserved in Germ Cell Development in Marsupials and Monotremes. Biol. Reprod.85, 733–743. 10.1095/biolreprod.111.091629
45
HillP. W. S.LeitchH. G.RequenaC. E.SunZ.AmourouxR.Roman-TruferoM.et al (2018). Epigenetic Reprogramming Enables the Transition from Primordial Germ Cell to Gonocyte. Nature555, 392–396. 10.1038/nature25964
46
HongN.LiM.YuanY.WangT.YiM.XuH.et al (2016). Dnd Is a Critical Specifier of Primordial Germ Cells in the Medaka Fish. Stem Cel Rep.6, 411–421. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.01.002
47
IslerK. (2013). Brain Size Evolution: How Fish Pay for Being Smart. Curr. Biol.23, R63–R65. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.042
48
IwamatsuT. (2004). Stages of normal Development in the Medaka Oryzias latipes. Mech. Dev.121, 605–618. 10.1016/j.mod.2004.03.012
49
JosephS. R.PálfyM.HilbertL.KumarM.KarschauJ.ZaburdaevV.et al (2017). Competition between Histone and Transcription Factor Binding Regulates the Onset of Transcription in Zebrafish Embryos. Elife6, e23326. 10.7554/eLife.23326
50
JukamD.ShariatiS. A. M.SkotheimJ. M. (2017). Zygotic Genome Activation in Vertebrates. Dev. Cel42, 316–332. 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.07.026
51
KaufmanO. H.MarlowF. L. (2016). Methods to Study Maternal Regulation of Germ Cell Specification in Zebrafish. Methods Cel Biol.134, 1–32. 10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.02.001
52
KernerP.DegnanS. M.MarchandL.DegnanB. M.VervoortM. (2011). Evolution of RNA-Binding Proteins in Animals: Insights from Genome-wide Analysis in the Sponge Amphimedon Queenslandica. Mol. Biol. Evol.28, 2289–2303. 10.1093/molbev/msr046
53
KettingR. F. (2007). A Dead End for microRNAs. Cell131, 1226–1227. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.004
54
KimK. W. (2019). PIWI Proteins and piRNAs in the Nervous System. Mol. Cell42, 828–835. 10.14348/molcells.2019.0241
55
KimmelC. B.BallardW. W.KimmelS. R.UllmannB.SchillingT. F. (1995). Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish. Dev. Dyn.203, 253–310. 10.1002/aja.1002030302
56
KiuchiT.KogaH.KawamotoM.ShojiK.SakaiH.AraiY.et al (2014). A Single Female-specific piRNA Is the Primary Determiner of Sex in the Silkworm. Nature509, 633–636. 10.1038/nature13315
57
KnautH.PelegriF.BohmannK.SchwarzH.Nüsslein-VolhardC. (2000). Zebrafish Vasa RNA but Not its Protein Is a Component of the Germ Plasm and Segregates Asymmetrically before Germline Specification. J. Cel Biol.149, 875–888. 10.1083/jcb.149.4.875
58
KnautH.SteinbeisserH.SchwarzH.Nüsslein-VolhardC. (2002). An Evolutionary Conserved Region in the Vasa 3′UTR Targets RNA Translation to the Germ Cells in the Zebrafish. Curr. Biol.12, 454–466. 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00723-6
59
KöprunnerM.ThisseC.ThisseB.RazE. (2001). A Zebrafish Nanos-Related Gene Is Essential for the Development of Primordial Germ Cells. Genes Dev.15, 2877–2885. 10.1101/gad.212401
60
KurokawaH.SaitoD.NakamuraS.Katoh-FukuiY.OhtaK.BabaT.et al (2007). Germ Cells Are Essential for Sexual Dimorphism in the Medaka Gonad. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.104, 16958–16963. 10.1073/pnas.0609932104
61
KuznickiK. A.SmithP. A.Leung-ChiuW. M.EstevezA. O.ScottH. C.BennettK. L. (2000). Combinatorial RNA Interference Indicates GLH-4 Can Compensate for GLH-1; These Two P Granule Components Are Critical for Fertility in C. elegans. Development127, 2907–2916. 10.1242/dev.127.13.2907
62
KwanT. N.PatilJ. G. (2019). Sex Biased Expression of Anti-mullerian Hormone (Amh) Gene in a Live Bearing Fish, Gambusia holbrooki: Evolutionary Implications and Potential Role in Sex Differentiation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol.231, 59–66. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2019.02.004
63
LaiF.SinghA.KingM. L. (2012). XenopusNanos1 Is Required to Prevent Endoderm Gene Expression and Apoptosis in Primordial Germ Cells. Development139, 1476–1486. 10.1242/dev.079608
64
LeeH. J.HoreT. A.ReikW. (2014). Reprogramming the Methylome: Erasing Memory and Creating Diversity. Cell Stem Cell14, 710–719. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.008
65
LiM.HongN.XuH.YiM.LiC.GuiJ.et al (2009). Medaka Vasa Is Required for Migration but Not Survival of Primordial Germ Cells. Mech. Dev.126, 366–381. 10.1016/j.mod.2009.02.004
66
LiM.HongN.GuiJ.HongY. (2012). Medaka Piwi Is Essential for Primordial Germ Cell Migration. Curr. Mol. Med.12, 1040–1049. 10.2174/156652412802480853
67
LiM.TanX.JiaoS.WangQ.WuZ.YouF.et al (2015). A New Pattern of Primordial Germ Cell Migration in Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) Identified Using Nanos3. Dev. Genes Evol.225, 195–206. 10.1007/s00427-015-0503-6
68
LiM.ZhuF.LiZ.HongN.HongY. (2016). Dazl Is a Critical Player for Primordial Germ Cell Formation in Medaka. Sci. Rep.6, 28317. 10.1038/srep28317
69
LindemanR. E.PelegriF. (2010). Vertebrate Maternal-Effect Genes: Insights into Fertilization, Early Cleavage Divisions, and Germ Cell Determinant Localization from Studies in the Zebrafish. Mol. Reprod. Dev.77, 299–313. 10.1002/mrd.21128
70
LinderP. (2006). Dead-box Proteins: a Family Affair-Active and Passive Players in RNP-Remodeling. Nucleic Acids Res.34, 4168–4180. 10.1093/nar/gkl468
71
LiuW.CollodiP. (2010). Zebrafish Dead End Possesses ATPase Activity that Is Required for Primordial Germ Cell Development. FASEB J.24, 2641–2650. 10.1096/fj.09-148403
72
LiuG.WangW.HuS.WangX.ZhangY. (2018). Inherited DNA Methylation Primes the Establishment of Accessible Chromatin during Genome Activation. Genome Res.28, 998–1007. 10.1101/gr.228833.117
73
LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods25, 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
74
MaX.WangS.DoT.SongX.InabaM.NishimotoY.et al (2014). Piwi Is Required in Multiple Cell Types to Control Germline Stem Cell Lineage Development in the Drosophila Ovary. PLoS One9, e90267. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090267
75
MatsudaM. (2005). Sex Determination in the Teleost Medaka, Oryzias latipes. Annu. Rev. Genet.39, 293–307. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.110304.095800
76
MeiW.JinZ.LaiF.SchwendT.HoustonD. W.KingM. L.et al (2013). Maternal Dead-End1 Is Required for Vegetal Cortical Microtubule Assembly during Xenopus axis Specification. Development140, 2334–2344. 10.1242/dev.094748
77
MiesenP.GirardiE.van RijR. P. (2015). Distinct Sets of PIWI Proteins Produce Arbovirus and Transposon-Derived piRNAs inAedes Aegyptimosquito Cells. Nucleic Acids Res.43, 6545–6556. 10.1093/nar/gkv590
78
MorrisonK. R.NgoV.CardulloR. A.ReznickD. N. (2017). How Fish Eggs Are Preadapted for the Evolution of Matrotrophy. Proc. Biol. Sci.284, 20171342. 10.1098/rspb.2017.1342
79
MousaviS. E.PatilJ. G. (2021). Stages of Embryonic Development in the Live-Bearing Fish, Gambusia holbrooki. Dev. Dyn, 1–34. 10.1002/dvdy.388
80
MurataK.KinoshitaM.NaruseK.TanakaM.KameiY. (2020). “Reproductive Behavior of Wild Japanese Medaka,” in Medaka: Biology, Management, and Experimental Protocols. Editors MurataK.KinoshitaM.NaruseK.TanakaM.KameiY.. First ed. (New York; John Wiley & Sons).
81
NagasawaK.FernandesJ. M. O.YoshizakiG.MiwaM.BabiakI. (2013). Identification and Migration of Primordial Germ Cells in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar : Characterization of Vasa , Dead End , and Lymphocyte Antigen 75 Genes. Mol. Reprod. Dev.80, 118–131. 10.1002/mrd.22142
82
Norazmi-LokmanN. H.PurserG. J.PatilJ. G. (2016). Gravid Spot Predicts Developmental Progress and Reproductive Output in a Livebearing Fish, Gambusia holbrooki. PLoS One11, e0147711. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147711
83
Norazmi-LokmanN. H.PurserG. J.PatilJ. G. (2021). Efficacy of Estradiol in Feminising the Eastern Mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki: advance towards Developing a Genetic Control Option. Mar. Freshw. Res. 72, 1657–1666. 10.1071/mf21104
84
NouschM.TechritzN.HampelD.MilloniggS.EckmannC. R. (2013). The Ccr4-Not Deadenylase Complex Constitutes the Main Poly(A) Removal Activity in C. elegans. J. Cel Sci.126, 4274–4285. 10.1242/jcs.132936
85
Olivera-TlahuelC.Moreno-MendozaN. A.Villagrán-Santa CruzM.Zúñiga-VegaJ. J. (2018). Placental Structures and Their Association with Matrotrophy and Superfetation in Poeciliid Fishes. Acta Zool.100, 167–181. 10.1111/azo.12244
86
PaksaA.RazE. (2015). Zebrafish Germ Cells: Motility and Guided Migration. Curr. Opin. Cel Biol.36, 80–85. 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.07.007
87
PalaM. (1970). The Embryonic History of the Primordial Germ Cells inGambusia Holbrookii(Grd). Bolletino di Zool.37, 49–62. 10.1080/11250007009440098
88
PalakodetiD.SmielewskaM.LuY.-C.YeoG. W.GraveleyB. R. (2008). The PIWI Proteins SMEDWI-2 and SMEDWI-3 Are Required for Stem Cell Function and piRNA Expression in Planarians. RNA14, 1174–1186. 10.1261/rna.1085008
89
PaninaY.GermondA.MasuiS.WatanabeT. M. (2018). Validation of Common Housekeeping Genes as Reference for qPCR Gene Expression Analysis during iPS Reprogramming Process. Sci. Rep.8, 8716. 10.1038/s41598-018-26707-8
90
PatilJ. G.Norazmi-LokmanN. H.KwanT. N. (2020). Reproductive Viability of Paradoxically Masculinised Gambusia holbrooki Generated Following Diethylstilbestrol (DES) Treatment. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol.248-249, 110468–110477. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2020.110468
91
PatilJ. G. (2012). An Adaptive Genetic Management Plan for Eradication of Gambusia holbrooki from Tasmania Australia. New Norfolk, Tasmania: Inland Fisheries Service.
92
PelegriF. (2003). Maternal Factors in Zebrafish Development. Dev. Dyn.228, 535–554. 10.1002/dvdy.10390
93
PolluxB. J. A.MeredithR. W.SpringerM. S.GarlandT.ReznickD. N. (2014). The Evolution of the Placenta Drives a Shift in Sexual Selection in Livebearing Fish. Nature513, 233–236. 10.1038/nature13451
94
PotokM. E.NixD. A.ParnellT. J.CairnsB. R. (2013). Reprogramming the Maternal Zebrafish Genome after Fertilization to Match the Paternal Methylation Pattern. Cell153, 759–772. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.030
95
PresslauerC.NagasawaK.FernandesJ. M. O.BabiakI. (2012). Expression of Vasa and Nanos3 during Primordial Germ Cell Formation and Migration in Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua L.). Theriogenology78, 1262–1277. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.05.022
96
RazE. (2002). Primordial Germ Cell Development in Zebrafish. Semin. Cel Dev. Biol.13, 489–495. 10.1016/s1084952102001027
97
RazE. (2003). Primordial Germ-Cell Development: the Zebrafish Perspective. Nat. Rev. Genet.4, 690–700. 10.1038/nrg1154
98
RichardsonB. E.LehmannR. (2010). Mechanisms Guiding Primordial Germ Cell Migration: Strategies from Different Organisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cel Biol.11, 37–49. 10.1038/nrm2815
99
RobertsR. M.GreenJ. A.SchulzL. C. (2016). The Evolution of the Placenta. Reproduction152, R179–R189. 10.1530/rep-16-0325
100
RongoC.LehmannR. (1996). Regulated Synthesis, Transport and Assembly of the Drosophila Germ Plasm. Trends Genet.12, 102–109. 10.1016/0168-9525(96)81421-1
101
RooversE. F.KaaijL. J. T.RedlS.BronkhorstA. W.WiebrandsK.De Jesus DominguesA. M.et al (2018). Tdrd6a Regulates the Aggregation of Buc into Functional Subcellular Compartments that Drive Germ Cell Specification. Dev. Cel46, 285–301. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.07.009
102
RotheM.PehlM.TaubertH.JäckleH. (1992). Loss of Gene Function through Rapid Mitotic Cycles in the Drosophila Embryo. Nature359, 156–159. 10.1038/359156a0
103
RuijterJ. M.RamakersC.HoogaarsW. M. H.KarlenY.BakkerO.Van Den HoffM. J. B.et al (2009). Amplification Efficiency: Linking Baseline and Bias in the Analysis of Quantitative PCR Data. Nucleic Acids Res.37, e45. 10.1093/nar/gkp045
104
RuzovA.DunicanD. S.ProkhortchoukA.PenningsS.StanchevaI.ProkhortchoukE.et al (2004). Kaiso Is a Genome-wide Repressor of Transcription that Is Essential for Amphibian Development. Development131, 6185–6194. 10.1242/dev.01549
105
SaitoT.FujimotoT.MaegawaS.InoueK.TanakaM.AraiK.et al (2006). Visualization of Primordial Germ Cells In Vivo Using GFP-Nos1 3'UTR mRNA. Int. J. Dev. Biol.50, 691–699. 10.1387/ijdb.062143ts
106
SaitouM.YamajiM. (2010). Germ Cell Specification in Mice: Signaling, Transcription Regulation, and Epigenetic Consequences. Reproduction139, 931–942. 10.1530/rep-10-0043
107
SaitouM.YamajiM. (2012). Primordial Germ Cells in Mice. Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol.4, a008375. 10.1101/cshperspect.a008375
108
SaitouM.KagiwadaS.KurimotoK. (2012). Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mouse Pre-implantation Development and Primordial Germ Cells. Development139, 15–31. 10.1242/dev.050849
109
SakuraiT.IguchiT.MoriwakiK.NoguchiM. (1995). The Ter Mutation First Causes Primordial Germ Cell Deficiency in Ter/ter Mouse Embryos at 8 Days of Gestation. Dev. Growth Differ.37, 293–302. 10.1046/j.1440-169x.1995.t01-2-00007.x
110
SantosA. C.LehmannR. (2004). Germ Cell Specification and Migration in Drosophila and beyond. Curr. Biol.14, R578–R589. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.018
111
SeisenbergerS.AndrewsS.KruegerF.ArandJ.WalterJ.SantosF.et al (2012). The Dynamics of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells. Mol. Cel48, 849–862. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001
112
SengokuT.NurekiO.NakamuraA.KobayashiS.YokoyamaS. (2006). Structural Basis for RNA Unwinding by the DEAD-Box Protein Drosophila Vasa. Cell125, 287–300. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.054
113
ShigunovP.DallagiovannaB. (2015). Stem Cell Ribonomics: RNA-Binding Proteins and Gene Networks in Stem Cell Differentiation. Front. Mol. Biosci.2, 74. 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00074
114
SmithZ. D.MeissnerA. (2013). DNA Methylation: Roles in Mammalian Development. Nat. Rev. Genet.14, 204–220. 10.1038/nrg3354
115
StyhlerS.NakamuraA.SwanA.SuterB.LaskoP. (1998). Vasa Is Required for GURKEN Accumulation in the Oocyte, and Is Involved in Oocyte Differentiation and Germline Cyst Development. Development125, 1569–1578. 10.1242/dev.125.9.1569
116
SuB.PeatmanE.ShangM.ThresherR.GreweP.PatilJ.et al (2014). Expression and Knockdown of Primordial Germ Cell Genes, Vasa, Nanos and Dead End in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Embryos for Transgenic Sterilization and Reduced Sexual Maturity. Aquaculture420-421, S72–S84. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.07.008
117
TaguchiA.WatanabeK.OriiH. (2014). Intracellular Localizations of the Dead End Protein in Xenopus Primordial Germ Cells. Int. J. Dev. Biol.58, 793–798. 10.1387/ijdb.140308ho
118
TanC.-H.LeeT.-C.WeeraratneS. D.KorzhV.LimT.-M.GongZ. (2002). Ziwi, the Zebrafish Homologue of the Drosophila Piwi: Co-localization with Vasa at the Embryonic Genital ridge and Gonad-specific Expression in the Adults. Mech. Dev.119, S221–S224. 10.1016/s0925-4773(03)00120-5
119
TanakaS. S.ToyookaY.AkasuR.Katoh-FukuiY.NakaharaY.SuzukiR.et al (2000). The Mouse Homolog of Drosophila Vasa Is Required for the Development of Male Germ Cells. Genes Dev.14, 841–853. 10.1101/gad.14.7.841
120
TavolgaW. N.RughR. (1947). Development of the Platyfish, Platypoecilus Maculatus. Zool. Sci. Contrib. N. Y Zool. Soc.32, 1–15. 10.5962/p.206634
121
TavolgaW. N. (1949). Embryonic Development of the Platyfish (Platypoecilus), the Swordtail (Xiphophorus), and Their Hybrids. Bull. AMNH94, 165–229.
122
ThisseC.ThisseB. (2008). High-resolution In Situ Hybridization to Whole-Mount Zebrafish Embryos. Nat. Protoc.3, 59–69. 10.1038/nprot.2007.514
123
ToyookaY.TsunekawaN.TakahashiMATSUIY.MatsuiY.SatohM.NoceT. (2000). Expression and Intracellular Localization of Mouse Vasa -homologue Protein during Germ Cell Development. Mech. Dev.93, 139–149. 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00283-5
124
TsuboiM.Van Der BijlW.KopperudB. T.ErritzøeJ.VojeK. L.KotrschalA.et al (2018). Breakdown of Brain-Body Allometry and the Encephalization of Birds and Mammals. Nat. Ecol. Evol.2, 1492–1500. 10.1038/s41559-018-0632-1
125
TsuiS.DaiT.WarrenS. T.SalidoE. C.YenP. H. (2000). Association of the Mouse Infertility Factor DAZL1 with Actively Translating Polyribosomes. Biol. Reprod.62, 1655–1660. 10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1655
126
TuQ.CameronR. A.DavidsonE. H. (2014). Quantitative Developmental Transcriptomes of the Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev. Biol.385, 160–167. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.11.019
127
UntergasserA.CutcutacheI.KoressaarT.YeJ.FairclothB. C.RemmM.et al (2012). Primer3-new Capabilities and Interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res.40, e115. 10.1093/nar/gks596
128
VandesompeleJ.De PreterK.PattynF.PoppeB.Van RoyN.De PaepeA.et al (2002). Accurate Normalization of Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR Data by Geometric Averaging of Multiple Internal Control Genes. Genome Biol.3, RESEARCH0034. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034
129
WalvigF. (1963). “The Gonads and the Formation of the Sexual Cells,” in The Biology Of Myxine. Editors BrodalA.FangeR. (Norway: Oslo Universitetsforlaget).
130
WangJ. Q.CaoW. G. (2016). Key Signaling Events for Committing Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cells to the Germline Fate. Biol. Reprod.94, 24. 10.1095/biolreprod.115.135095
131
WangH.LiuY.YeD.LiJ.LiuJ.DengF. (2016). Knockdown of Zebrafish Nanog Increases Primordial Germ Cells during Early Embryonic Development. Develop. Growth Differ.58, 355–366. 10.1111/dgd.12279
132
WargeliusA.LeiningerS.SkaftnesmoK. O.KleppeL.AnderssonE.TarangerG. L.et al (2016). Dnd Knockout Ablates Germ Cells and Demonstrates Germ Cell Independent Sex Differentiation in Atlantic salmon. Sci. Rep.6, 21284. 10.1038/srep21284
133
WeidingerG.WolkeU.KöprunnerM.KlingerM.RazE. (1999). Identification of Tissues and Patterning Events Required for Distinct Steps in Early Migration of Zebrafish Primordial Germ Cells. Development126, 5295–5307. 10.1242/dev.126.23.5295
134
WeidingerG.SteblerJ.SlanchevK.DumstreiK.WiseC.Lovell-BadgeR.et al (2003). Dead End, a Novel Vertebrate Germ Plasm Component, Is Required for Zebrafish Primordial Germ Cell Migration and Survival. Curr. Biol.13, 1429–1434. 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00537-2
135
WhittleC. A.ExtavourC. G. (2017). Causes and Evolutionary Consequences of Primordial Germ-Cell Specification Mode in Metazoans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA114, 5784–5791. 10.1073/pnas.1610600114
136
XuX.TanX.LinQ.SchmidtB.EngelW.PantakaniD. V. K. (2013). Mouse Dazl and its Novel Splice Variant Functions in Translational Repression of Target mRNAs in Embryonic Stem Cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech.1829, 425–435. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.12.010
137
YabeT.GeX.LindemanR.NairS.RunkeG.MullinsM. C.et al (2009). The Maternal-Effect Gene Cellular Island Encodes aurora B Kinase and Is Essential for Furrow Formation in the Early Zebrafish Embryo. Plos Genet.5, e1000518. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000518
138
YabutaY.KurimotoK.OhinataY.SekiY.SaitouM. (2006). Gene Expression Dynamics during Germline Specification in Mice Identified by Quantitative Single-Cell Gene Expression Profiling1. Biol. Reprod.75, 705–716. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.053686
139
YamajiM.JishageM.MeyerC.SuryawanshiH.DerE.YamajiM.et al (2017). DND1 Maintains Germline Stem Cells via Recruitment of the CCR4-Not Complex to Target mRNAs. Nature543, 568–572. 10.1038/nature21690
140
YeD.ZhuL.ZhangQ.XiongF.WangH.WangX.et al (2019). Abundance of Early Embryonic Primordial Germ Cells Promotes Zebrafish Female Differentiation as Revealed by Lifetime Labeling of Germline. Mar. Biotechnol. (NY)21 (2), 217–228. 10.1007/s10126-019-09874-1
141
YoonC.KawakamiK.HopkinsN. (1997). Zebrafish Vasa Homologue RNA Is Localized to the Cleavage Planes of 2- and 4-Cell-Stage Embryos and Is Expressed in the Primordial Germ Cells. Development124, 3157–3165. 10.1242/dev.124.16.3157
142
YoungrenK. K.CoveneyD.PengX.BhattacharyaC.SchmidtL. S.NickersonM. L.et al (2005). The Ter Mutation in the Dead End Gene Causes Germ Cell Loss and Testicular Germ Cell Tumours. Nature435, 360–364. 10.1038/nature03595
143
Zernicka-GoetzM. (1998). Fertile Offspring Derived from Mammalian Eggs Lacking Either Animal or Vegetal Poles. Development125, 4803–4808. 10.1242/dev.125.23.4803
144
ZhouL.WangX.DuS.WangY.ZhaoH.DuT.et al (2020). Germline Specific Expression of a Vasa Homologue Gene in the Viviparous Fish Black Rockfish (Sebastes Schlegelii) and Functional Analysis of the Vasa 3′ Untranslated Region. Front. Cel Dev. Biol.8, 575788. 10.3389/fcell.2020.575788
145
ZhuT.GuiL.ZhuY.LiY.LiM. (2018). Dnd Is Required for Primordial Germ Cell Specification in Oryzias celebensis. Gene679, 36–43. 10.1016/j.gene.2018.08.068
Summary
Keywords
germline development, germ plasm, invasive species, evolutionary adaptation, viviparity
Citation
Razmi K and Patil JG (2022) Primordial Germ Cell Development in the Poeciliid, Gambusia holbrooki, Reveals Shared Features Between Lecithotrophs and Matrotrophs. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:793498. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.793498
Received
12 October 2021
Accepted
03 January 2022
Published
01 March 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Karuna Sampath, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Andreas Zaucker, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Sreelaja Nair, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Razmi and Patil.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Komeil Razmi, komeil.razmi@utas.edu.au; Jawahar G. Patil, jawahar.patil@utas.edu.au
This article was submitted to Molecular and Cellular Reproduction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.