MINI REVIEW article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 01 July 2025

Sec. Membrane Traffic and Organelle Dynamics

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1527083

Cellular mechanisms of hormone secretion in neuroendocrine tumors: what goes wrong?

  • 1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, Strasbourg, France

  • 2. Département de Chirurgie Viscérale, Métabolique et Cancérologique (CVMC), INSERM NGERE-U1256, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, Hôpital Brabois adultes, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from hormone-releasing cells. Secretion of hormones stored in vesicles occurs through calcium-regulated exocytosis, a process that needs to be tightly controlled to avoid unbalanced levels of hormones. A critical feature shared by most of the NETs is a dysfunctional secretory pathway mainly leading to hypersecretion, which often induces clinical complications. In this review, we focus on the cellular process of hormone exocytosis and discuss the potential molecular mechanisms leading to deregulated hormone secretion in various NETs. Particular attention is paid to expression level modifications for genes and proteins involved in the exocytic pathway in NETs.

1 Introduction

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are derived from neuroendocrine cells that control pleiotropic physiological functions by releasing various hormones and neuropeptides. NETs constitute a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms in terms of function and morphology, mainly because neuroendocrine cells are spread all over the body as dispersed cells (diffuse neuroendocrine system) or concentrated in organs (Figure 1A). However, one of the most common physiological features of these NET family members is the dysfunction of hormone and neuropeptide secretion, leading to hypersecretion and eventually to clinical symptoms. For example, acromegaly often results from excessive secretion of growth hormone by pituitary adenoma (). Hypersecretion of serotonin by carcinoid tumors from the gastro-intestinal tract can trigger carcinoid syndrome, which is associated with flushing, diarrhea, bronchoconstriction and cardiac valvular disease (Onaitis et al., 2000). Excessive levels of circulating catecholamines in patients with pheochromocytoma, a NET derived from the adrenal medulla chromaffin cells, induce hypertension potentially leading to cardiomyopathies and stroke (Zhang et al., 2017; Y-Hassan and Falhammar, 2020). Moreover, enhanced secretory activity of NET cells may develop over time with negative impact on prognosis. For instance, a silent pituitary adenoma may progress into an actively secreting form, while a non-functional pancreatic tumor can start secreting excessive levels of hormones, thus evolving to a more aggressive tumor phenotype (; ). In small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a high-grade malignant cancer, the progressive neuroendocrine nature of cancer cells enhances secretion of a variety of neuropeptides, together with growth factors that significantly accelerate the invasive growth by their autocrine action. Dysfunction of hormone secretion in NETs has been known from the clinical point of view for a long time, but the cellular and molecular mechanisms disturbing secretory pathways in tumor cells are rarely explored and remain poorly understood.

FIGURE 1

The first idea that usually comes in mind is that the increased level of secreted molecules results from an increased number of hormone-secreting cells within the tumor. However, the simplistic view of “the more secreting cells, the more secreted hormones” fails to consider alternative mechanisms. For example, in human pheochromocytoma, we recently reported using carbon fiber amperometry that individual tumor cells release significantly higher amounts of catecholamines compared to non-tumor chromaffin cells (Houy et al., 2022). The obvious conclusion from these observations is that the process of hormone release itself may be dysregulated in NET cells.

Hormone and neuropeptide secretion by neuroendocrine cells occurs through calcium-regulated exocytosis, a process that has been the subject of extensive studies over the past 3 decades (). In these cells, hormones are synthesized and then stored in large dense core vesicles (LDCV) also known as secretory granules. Exocytosis is triggered by extracellular stimuli that increase intracellular calcium level and involves several tightly regulated steps including, i) the recruitment of the secretory granules to the cell periphery, ii) their docking to exocytic sites, which physically attaches them to the plasma membrane, iii) their priming, which prepares the granules for fusion, and finally iv) the fusion of the secretory granule membrane with the plasma membrane, leading to the release of luminal content of secretory granules (Figure 1B). The key questions arising from the observation of hypersecretion at the single cell level are which specific steps of the exocytic pathway are dysregulated in NETs and which proteins might be involved in this amplified secretory activity? Most of the limited data available today comes from “omics” approaches, which reveal changes in gene and protein expression across different NETs. These data are primarily from NETs derived from adrenal medulla, thyroid and pituitary gland. In this review, we focus on studies that investigate gene or protein expression changes specifically in human tumor biopsies. From this literature, we summarize the expression of key proteins involved in distinct steps of the hormone secretion pathway. Table 1 lists these main proteins and genes, highlighting their function in exocytosis and their expression changes in NETs. In the following sections, we examine each step of the hormone secretory pathway, from granule formation and cargo loading to vesicle fusion and membrane remodeling, highlighting the alterations observed in human NET samples.

TABLE 1

GeneProteinFunctionsUniprot entryVariation in tumorsReferences
ANO6Anoctamin-6Plasma membrane phospholipid scrambling, lipid reorganization of the plasma membraneQ4KMQ2↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Unpublished data
↘ lactotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
ANXA2Annexin-A2Calcium-dependent protein binding, cytoskeleton reorganization, vesicle fusion, vesicle budding from membraneP07355↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ MTC vs. normal thyroid (protein)Kurczyk et al. (2020)
↘ GH-secreting pitNET vs. respective normal pituitary (protein)Ribeiro-Oliveira et al. (2008)
↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein)
ATP8A1Phospholipid-transporting ATPase IAPhospholipid flippase, lipid reorganization and control of vesicle trafficking at the plasma membraneQ9Y2Q0↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↘ lactotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
ATP9AProbable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIAPhospholipid flippase, lipid reorganization and control of vesicle trafficking at the plasma membraneO75110↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Unpublished data
CADPSCalcium-dependent secretion activator 1Priming, fusion, calcium binding, plasma membrane bindingQ9ULU8↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein)
CADPS2Calcium-dependent secretion activator 2Priming, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE bindingQ86UW7↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
CHGAChromogranin AGranule biogenesis, secretory granule organization, peptide hormone processingP10645↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↗ MTC vs. normal thyroid (protein)Kurczyk et al. (2020)
↗ siNENs vs. normal human enterochromaffin cells (gene and protein)
CHGBSecretogranin-1Secretory granule biogenesis and organization, peptide hormone processingP05060↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
CPLX2Complexin-2Positively regulates a late step in exocytosis of various cytoplasmic vesicles, such as synaptic vesicles and other secretory vesiclesQ6PUV4↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
DBHDopamine beta-hydroxylaseAdrenaline and noradrenaline synthesis pathwayP09172↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein)Houy et al. (2022)
DDCAromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylaseCatecholamine metabolic process, dopamine biosynthetic processP20711↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein)Houy et al. (2022)
FARP1FERM, ARHGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1Guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Cdc42 and Rac1, actin cytoskeleton organisationQ9Y4F1↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein)
MAOAAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] ACatecholamine catabolic processP21397↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein)Houy et al. (2022)
MAOBAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BCatecholamine catabolic processP27338↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein)Houy et al. (2022)
MYO5AUnconventional myosin-VaVesicle transport, actin filament organizationQ9Y4I1↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
PCSK1Neuroendocrine convertase 1Peptide hormone processingP29120↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ functioning corticotroph piNET vs. silent corticotroph piNET (gene)Zhang et al. (2022)
PCSK1NProSAASPeptide hormone processingQ9UHG2↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
PCSK2Neuroendocrine convertase 2Peptide hormone processingP16519↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
PFN2Profilin-2Actin reorganizationP35080↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
PLCB2Phosphoinositide phospholipase C-beta-2Lipid metabolism: production of DAG and IP3 from PIP2Q00722↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein)
PLCB3Phosphoinositide phospholipase C-beta-3Lipid metabolism: production of DAG and IP3 from PIP2Q01970↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein)
PLCB4Phosphoinositide phospholipase C-beta-4Lipid metabolism: production of DAG and IP3 from PIP2Q15147↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Unpublished data
↘ lactotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
RAB27ARas-related protein Rab-27AInteracts with granuphilin to regulate exocytosis, granule maturation, docking, primingP51159↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein)
RAB27B
Ras-related protein Rab-27B
Exosome secretion regulation, multivesicular endosomes docking, regulation of the number and secretion of platelet dense granules, delivery of granules near the exocytic siteO00194↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein)
RAB3ARas-related protein Rab-3ASynaptic vesicle maturation, priming, docking, trafficking, recyclingP20336↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein)
RAB3BRas-related protein Rab-3BVesicle trafficking, vesicle biogenesis, regulates vesicle docking, priming, vesicle size, synaptic vesicle cycleP20337↗ functioning corticotroph pitNETs vs. silent corticotroph PitNETs (gene)Zhang et al. (2022)
RAB3CRas-related protein Rab-3CPriming, docking, trafficking, recyclingQ96E17↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
RAB3DRas-related protein Rab-3DVesicle trafficking, dockingO95716↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
SCAMP1Secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 1Protein transport, fusion pore dynamicsO15126↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↗ GH-secreting pitNET vs. respective normal pituitary (protein)Ribeiro-Oliveira et al. (2008)
SCG2Secretogranin-2Granule biogenesis, peptide hormone processingP13521↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
SCG3Secretogranin-3Granule biogenesis, peptide hormone processingQ8WXD2↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
SCG5Neuroendocrine protein 7B2Regulation of pituitary hormone secretion, peptide hormone processingP05408↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↗ functioning corticotroph piNET vs. silent corticotroph piNET (gene)Zhang et al. (2022)
↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
SLC18A1Chromaffin granule amine transporterAmine transporter, loading of catecholamines in secretory granulesP54219↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
SLC18A2Synaptic vesicular amine transporterAmine transporter, loading of catecholamines in secretory granulesQ05940↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
SNAP25Synaptosomal-associated protein 25Vesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE bindingP60880↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
SMPD1Sphingomyelin phosphodiesteraseGlycosphingolipid metabolic processP17405↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
STX1ASyntaxin-1AVesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE binding, SNARE complex assemblyQ16623↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
STX3Syntaxin-3Potentially involved in docking of synaptic vesicles at presynaptic active zones, apical receptor involved in membrane fusion of apical vesiclesQ13277↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
STXBP1Syntaxin-binding protein 1Vesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE binding, SNARE complex assemblyP61764↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
SV2ASynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2APlays a role in the control of regulated secretion in neural and endocrine cells, enhancing selectively low-frequency neurotransmission, positively regulates vesicle fusionQ7L0J3↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene)
SYT1Synaptotagmin-1Vesicle docking, priming, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE binding, vesicle mediated transportP21579↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein)
SYT2Synaptotagmin-2Calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE binding, vesicle-mediated transport, fusionQ8N9I0↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein)Zhan et al. (2018)
SYT7Synaptotagmin-7Priming, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE bindingO43581↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
SYTL4Synaptotagmin-like protein 4Docking, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE bindingQ96C24↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein)Houy et al. (2022)
↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein)
THTyrosine HydroxylaseDopamine biosynthetic processP07101↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein)Houy et al. (2022)
VAMP2Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2Vesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE binding, SNARE complex assemblyP63027↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein)
↗ functioning corticotroph pitNETs vs. silent corticotroph PitNETs (gene)Zhang et al. (2022)

List of up- and downregulated proteins or genes in neuroendocrine tumors.

Abbreviations: MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; pitNET, pituitary neuroendocrine tumor; siNEN, small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm.

2 Secretory granules biogenesis and maturation

Biogenesis of secretory granules begins at the trans-Golgi network, where prohormones and granin-family proteins (e.g., chromogranins and secretogranins) are selectively sorted and packaged into immature granules (Kim et al., 2006). These granules then undergo a maturation process involving luminal acidification, condensation of their content, proteolytic processing of prohormones, and removal of non-regulated proteins via clathrin-coated vesicles (Tooze et al., 1991; ; Kim et al., 2006; ). During this maturation phase, small-molecule hormones such as catecholamines and serotonin are actively transported, from the cytosol into the granules, by vesicular monoamine transporters (VMATs). This uptake is powered by the proton gradients generated by V-ATPases. In parallel, peptide hormones are proteolytically processed within granules by enzymes such as the prohormone convertases PC1/3 and PC2, assisted by the chaperones like secretogranin V (Morvan and Tooze, 2008; Ma et al., 2021). Together, these steps generate mature granules that are competent for stimulus-dependent exocytosis.

The increase in single cell hormone secretion in NETs could arise from the dysregulation of various step of granule biogenesis and maturation. First, it could be the consequence of secretory granules contents overloading. Several studies reported upregulation of mRNAs or proteins involved in hormone synthesis (Table 1). For example, enzymes involved in catecholamines synthesis (Tyrosine Hydroxylase (TH), Dopamine-β-Hydroxylase (DBH), DOPA decarboxylase (DCC)) are overexpressed in pheochromocytoma (Jarrott and Louis, 1977; Isobe et al., 1998; ; Houy et al., 2022). Conversely, reduced expression of enzymes catabolizing catecholamines may further contribute to increase their levels. Accordingly, the monoamine oxydases (MAO-A/B), which deaminate cytosolic catecholamines, are downregulated in pheochromocytoma potentially leading to increased cytoplasmic catecholamine level (; Houy et al., 2022). Finally, expression of transporters such as VMAT1/2 (SLC18A1/A2) responsible for monoamines loading, is also increased (Table 1; Houy et al., 2022). It is, however, currently unknown whether increasing the number of hormone transporter molecules per granule actually leads to a higher hormone content, as there is a physical constraint beyond which additional filling is not possible.

Second, modulating the expression level of prohormone-processing enzymes that convert prohormones into their active forms can also lead to excessive active hormone production in NETs. This is often the case, for example, with neuroendocrine convertases (PCSK-1/2/1N), which are found upregulated in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022), medullary thyroid carcinoma (Zhan et al., 2018) and pituitary tumor (; Zhang et al., 2022). Interestingly, secretogranin V, a chaperone for prohormone convertase is also overexpressed in various NETs (Table 1).

Third, the overexpression of secretory granule-resident proteins could reflect an increase in the number of secretory granules per cell. Notably, various chromogranin proteins (CHGA/B, SCG2/3; Table 1) or chromogranin-derived peptides, which are key proteins required for granule biogenesis (Kim et al., 2001; ; ; ) have also been found to be overexpressed in various NETs (; ; Zhan et al., 2018; Kurczyk et al., 2020; ; Houy et al., 2022). Whether this reflects an increase of the granin content per granule or an increase of the number of granules per cell or both requires further investigations.

3 Docking, priming and fusion

Our work in pheochromocytoma cells demonstrated that both the number of exocytic events and the kinetic of secretion were enhanced suggesting that late phases of exocytosis (docking, priming and/or fusion) could be modulated (Houy et al., 2022). The core machinery controlling docking, priming and fusion involves SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins, as well as SNARE-regulating proteins. Fusion between the secretory granule and plasma membrane is energetically unfavorable and requires the assembly of a membrane-bridging complex formed by the SNAREs (Jahn et al., 2024). In most neuroendocrine cells, the SNARE complex mediating the regulated exocytosis of LDCVs typically include SNAP25, Syntaxin1, and VAMP2. The number of SNARE complexes formed at the site of vesicle docking is correlated with the likelihood and speed of vesicle fusion (Mohrmann et al., 2010). Therefore, increasing the number of SNARE proteins can lead to more SNARE complexes, potentially enhancing the exocytosis rate. Accordingly, SNAP25 as well as various Syntaxins and VAMPs are upregulated in several NETs (Table 1) (Lu et al., 2008; Zhan et al., 2018; ; Houy et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; ).

The assembly of the SNARE complex is not calcium sensitive, even though calcium is the main trigger of exocytosis. Synaptotagmins (Syts), a family of transmembrane vesicular proteins, confer Ca2+ sensitivity to membrane fusion in neuroendocrine cells by sensing changes in intracellular Ca2+ over a wide dynamic range (Pinheiro et al., 2016). Upon Ca2+ binding, synaptotagmins promote SNARE-mediated fusion by lowering the energy barrier primarily through the binding of their C2-domains to anionic phospholipids in the target membrane, which induces local positive curvature and membrane apposition to facilitate membrane merging. Among Syt family members, Syt1 and Syt7 have been implicated in neuroendocrine secretion (Schonn et al., 2008; Mohrmann et al., 2013; ; Tawfik et al., 2021). Syt1 is a low-affinity, fast-responding isoform that mediate synchronous exocytosis, whereas Syt7 has higher calcium affinity and contributes to sustained or asynchronous release. Interestingly, Syt 1, 2 or 7 are upregulated in pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma and in somatotroph pituitary tumor (Table 1) (Zhan et al., 2018; Houy et al., 2022; ).

Altogether these observations suggest that hormone release might be enhanced either by increasing the number of SNARE complexes, or by modulating calcium sensitivity. Alternatively, the efficiency of exocytosis could also be influenced by proteins that tightly regulate the assembly or disassembly of the SNARE complex such as proteins from Sec1/Munc18-1 family, or even by tethering factors such as Rab GTPases that mediate the initial contact between the secretory granule and the plasma membrane (). For example, syntaxin binding protein 1 (STXBP1, commonly named Munc18-1) is overexpressed in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022), whereas expression level of the GTPases Rab3a-c or Rab27a-b and granuphilin (sytl4) is modified in pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma and in somatotroph or corticotroph pituitary tumor (Table 1), (Zhan et al., 2018; Houy et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; ).

4 Actin cytoskeleton remodelling

In addition to the essential and minimal core machinery mediating secretory granule recruitment, docking, priming and fusion, an important extra-layer of regulation finely tunes calcium-regulated exocytosis, and consequently, the amount of hormone released. Notably, the functional importance of the actin cytoskeleton in regulated exocytosis has been recognized for several decades. Early studies revealed a dense cortical actin layer beneath the plasma membrane in secretory cells such as pancreatic β-cells and adrenal chromaffin cells (Orci et al., 1972; Trifaro et al., 1985; ). These observations initially led to the view that cortical actin served primarily as a physical barrier restricting granule access to fusion sites. Accordingly, numerous studies demonstrated that remodeling of this cortical actin barrier facilitates secretory granules transport and fusion during calcium-regulated exocytosis in a variety of secretory cell models (Koffer et al., 1990; Vitale et al., 1991; Vitale et al., 1995; ; Lang et al., 2000; ; Kalwat et al., 2013; Uenishi et al., 2013). Subsequent investigations, also demonstrated that actin filaments not only exert inhibitory control but can also play facilitatory roles, depending on the specific step of secretory granule exocytic process. This evolving concept has been discussed in several comprehensive review articles (Trifaro et al., 2008; Papadopulos, 2017; Li et al., 2018; Wu and Chan, 2022). Therefore, actin reorganization is now recognized as a dynamic and tightly regulated process that both constrains and facilitates exocytosis, depending on context and timing.

Members of the Rho GTPases family regulate exocytosis through actin reorganization. Seminal work from our team has demonstrated that the GTPases RhoA and Cdc42 play key regulatory roles on catecholamine release from adrenal chromaffin cells, by differentially influencing actin organization (; Malacombe et al., 2006a; Momboisse et al., 2011). RhoA has been proposed to actively control the organization of the cortical actin network, which regulates granule positioning and their access to the plasma membrane. In contrast Cdc42 promotes de novo actin nucleation and polymerization at the secretory granule fusion sites, likely controlling the final step of exocytosis such as membrane fusion (Malacombe et al., 2006b; ). Interestingly, we previously showed that Cdc42 activity is inhibited in human pheochromocytoma, suggesting that actin reorganization at the exocytic sites may be affected (; ). Although Cdc42 expression remains unchanged compared to non-tumor tissue, we have found that its activity is directly correlated to reduced expression of FARP1, a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF), that activates Cdc42 (). Moreover, the expression of several GEFs for Rho-GTPases members is modulated in various NETs (for details, see Table 2 in (Streit et al., 2020)). However, whether these changes in Rho-GTPases activity are directly linked to altered hormone release in NETs has not been thoroughly explored.

Annexin-A2 is another important protein that regulates hormone release, and organizes the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 1B). Its expression is altered in various cancers including NETs (). In adrenal chromaffin cells, annexin-A2 promotes the formation of actin bundles required for efficient secretory granule docking and fusion (). Changes in annexin-A2 expression have been documented in several NETs, though with some differences. For instance, expression of annexin-A2 is decreased in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022) and pituitary adenoma (Ribeiro-Oliveira et al., 2008; ), but increased in medullary thyroid carcinoma (Kurczyk et al., 2020) and in parathyroid adenoma (). It would be valuable to study the relationship between the bundling activity of annexin-A2, its expression level and the secretory activity of NET cells. How these actin bundles participate to the exocytic process requires further investigations.

Actin cables may serve to tether, displace secretory granules at the correct location or provide forces to deform membranes. To do so, actin filaments need molecular motors such as myosin proteins (Figure 1B). Myosin II, V and VI constitute the main myosins involved in hormone release by neuroendocrine cells (Papadopulos et al., 2013; ). We found that expression of unconventional myosin-Va is increased in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022). Interestingly cancer-associated mutations in the MYO5B gene have been described in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (Wilzen et al., 2016). Moreover, metastatic pheochromocytoma displays significantly higher expression of Myo5B compared to non-metastatic tumor (Tomic et al., 2020). To our knowledge, no data regarding the expression of Myosins II and VI in human NETs samples has been documented so far.

5 Lipid modifying enzymes

Lipids, with their vast diversity encompassing tens of thousands of species, are essential to cellular function, serving structural, metabolic, and signaling roles (van Meer et al., 2008). Early studies demonstrated that the synthesis, metabolism or transport of various lipids species play a fundamental role in hormone secretion by altering membrane biophysical properties and modulating the activity proteins that governs each step of vesicle transport and fusion; for review see (Tanguy et al., 2016; ). Among these lipids, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) (Martin, 2012), certain fatty acids (), anionic lipid such as phosphatidic acid (PA) (Tanguy et al., 2020), or cholesterol (Lang, 2007) regulate the activity or recruitment at exocytic sites of more than twenty proteins involved in regulated exocytosis (Koch and Holt, 2012). These targets include synaptotagmin (Schiavo et al., 1996), syntaxin (Lam et al., 2008), Ca2+-dependent activator protein for secretion (CAPS) (Loyet et al., 1998), and actin-binding proteins such as scinderin and gelsolin (Trifaro et al., 2008).

Although comprehensive lipidomics for NETs are still lacking, transcriptomic and proteomic studies revealed dysregulation of multiple lipid-metabolic enzymes and lipid transporters, whose activity can influence hormone secretion. For instance, phospholipase C enzymes, which hydrolyze (PtdIns(4,5)P2) to generate diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 3-phosphate, are upregulated in NET subtypes. PLC-β2 and -β3 isoforms are overexpressed in parathyroid adenomas, whereas PLC-β4 expression is elevated in pheochromocytoma and in pituitary NETs, suggesting an imbalance in these lipids in tumor cells (; ; ). In pheochromocytoma the sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, which catalyzes the conversion of sphingomyelin into ceramide and phosphatidylcholine is overexpressed, increasing the pool of phosphatidylcholine potentially available to phospholipase-D1 and thereby potentially augmenting PA-driven exocytosis (Vitale et al., 2001; Zeniou-Meyer et al., 2007; Tanguy et al., 2020).

Hormone secretion is further modulated by the asymmetric distribution of phospholipids across the plasma membrane bilayer. Notably, we have shown that calcium-regulated exocytosis requires a transient disruption of the plasma membrane asymmetry near vesicle fusion sites in adrenal chromaffin cells (Ory et al., 2013). This process is regulated by scramblases, which catalyze the bidirectional transport of phospholipids between plasma membrane leaflets. Interestingly, several transbilayer lipid transporters are overexpressed in pituitary NETs and pheochromocytoma, including the scramblase ANO6 and the P4-type ATPases ATP8A1 (; Houy et al., 2022) and ATP9A (unpublished).

Overall, lipid metabolism and transport appear to be altered in several NETs, which could directly affect hormone secretion. However, further investigations are needed to understand how changes in plasma membrane lipid composition and asymmetry precisely affect exocytosis efficiency.

6 Conclusion

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a unique class of neoplasms characterized by their aberrant and unregulated hormone secretion, leading to significant clinical consequences. While our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying this hypersecretion is still evolving, recent advances, particularly through “omics” technologies, have begun to shed light on key alterations within the secretory pathway. Current data suggest that disruptions in hormone metabolism and secretory granule trafficking, as well as changes in expression of the regulatory proteins involved in this process, might contribute to the dysfunctional hormone release observed in NETs. Despite this progress, significant gaps in knowledge remain and the next challenge will be to better understand the precise mechanisms by which NET cells acquire such hypersecretory phenotypes. Over the past decade, “omics” technologies have advanced tremendously, enabling extremely fine levels of analysis.

These data, along with the future “omics” research, will be crucial in paving the way for novel therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting the secretory machinery to alleviate the clinical burden of NETs. From a clinical perspective, hormone hypersecretion in NETs is managed through various strategies designed to reduce hormone levels, control tumor growth, and relieve symptoms. Core treatments include somatostatin analogs (SSA), which inhibit hormone release by targeting somatostatin receptors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), which delivers targeted radiotherapy to receptor-expressing tumor cells. Surgical resection remains the treatment of choice when feasible, while chemotherapy and targeted agents such as everolimus or sunitinib are used in more advanced stages. Numerous in-depth reviews have covered these therapeutic options extensively (Stueven et al., 2019; ; Zappi et al., 2023; ), including specifically in the NET types discussed in this review, which show significant changes in the expression of proteins controlling exocytosis, such as pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and pituitary adenomas (Varlamov et al., 2019; Kim and Kim, 2021; ; Petersenn et al., 2023; Sharma and Fishbein, 2023; ). However, these treatments rarely target the secretory pathway itself, and their efficacy can diminish over time. By focusing on the molecular mechanisms of hormone secretion, this review complements the clinical literature and highlights the potential of directly targeting secretory machinery to reduce hormone burden in patients with persistent or refractory symptoms. Finally, despite the availability of several biochemical and imaging biomarkers such as Chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), the diagnosis of NETs remains challenging. For instance, CgA is the most widely used serum marker, but its limited specificity and frequent false negatives reduce its diagnostic value (Nobels et al., 1997; Nehar et al., 2004). Identifying changes in the expression of secretory granule cargo proteins will certainly help the discovery of new accurate biomarkers.

Statements

Author contributions

LS: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. ET: Writing – review and editing. LB: Resources, Writing – review and editing. PT: Writing – review and editing. NV: Writing – review and editing. SO: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing. SG: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Part of the author’s work performed in pheochromocytoma and discussed here has been supported by grants from ITMO Cancer AVIESAN (Alliance Nationale pour les Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé, National Alliance for Life Sciences & Health) within the framework of the Cancer Plan to SG and LB (Single Cell 2018 N◦ 19CS004-00); by the University of Strasbourg Institute for Advanced Study (USIAS) for a Fellowship, within the French national programme “Investment for the future” (IdEx-Unistra) and by Ligue Contre le Cancer (CCIR-GE) to SG.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AnantharamA.KreutzbergerA. J. B. (2019). Unraveling the mechanisms of calcium-dependent secretion. J. Gen. Physiol.151, 417434. 10.1085/jgp.201812298

  • 2

    ArvanP.CastleD. (1998). Sorting and storage during secretory granule biogenesis: looking backward and looking forward. Biochem. J.332 (Pt 3), 593610. 10.1042/bj3320593

  • 3

    AryaA. K.BhadadaS. K.SinghP.DahiyaD.KaurG.SharmaS.et al (2019). Quantitative proteomics analysis of sporadic parathyroid adenoma tissue samples. J. Endocrinol. Invest42, 577590. 10.1007/s40618-018-0958-1

  • 4

    AunisD.BaderM. F. (1988). The cytoskeleton as a barrier to exocytosis in secretory cells. J. Exp. Biol.139, 253266. 10.1242/jeb.139.1.253

  • 5

    BakerR. W.HughsonF. M. (2016). Chaperoning SNARE assembly and disassembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.17, 465479. 10.1038/nrm.2016.65

  • 6

    BauerC. S.WoolleyR. J.TeschemacherA. G.SewardE. P. (2007). Potentiation of exocytosis by phospholipase C-coupled G-protein-coupled receptors requires the priming protein Munc13-1. J. Neurosci.27, 212219. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4201-06.2007

  • 7

    BendahmaneM.MoralesA.KreutzbergerA. J. B.SchenkN. A.MohanR.BakshiS.et al (2020). Synaptotagmin-7 enhances calcium-sensing of chromaffin cell granules and slows discharge of granule cargos. J. Neurochem.154, 598617. 10.1111/jnc.14986

  • 8

    BeuretN.StettlerH.RenoldA.RutishauserJ.SpiessM. (2004). Expression of regulated secretory proteins is sufficient to generate granule-like structures in constitutively secreting cells. J. Biol. Chem.279, 2024220249. 10.1074/jbc.M310613200

  • 9

    BihainF.Nomine-CriquiC.GuerciP.GasmanS.KleinM.BrunaudL. (2022). Management of patients with treatment of pheochromocytoma: a critical appraisal. Cancers (Basel)14, 3845. 10.3390/cancers14163845

  • 10

    BretouM.JouannotO.FangetI.PierobonP.LarochetteN.GestraudP.et al (2014). Cdc42 controls the dilation of the exocytotic fusion pore by regulating membrane tension. Mol. Biol. Cell25, 31953209. 10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1229

  • 11

    BrownR. L.MuzzafarT.WollmanR.WeissR. E. (2006). A pituitary carcinoma secreting TSH and prolactin: a non-secreting adenoma gone awry. Eur. J. Endocrinol.154, 639643. 10.1530/eje.1.02141

  • 12

    CarmonO.LaguerreF.RiachyL.Delestre-DelacourC.WangQ.TanguyE.et al (2020). Chromogranin A preferential interaction with Golgi phosphatidic acid induces membrane deformation and contributes to secretory granule biogenesis. FASEB J.34, 67696790. 10.1096/fj.202000074R

  • 13

    CaseyR. T.HendriksE.DealC.WaguespackS. G.WiegeringV.RedlichA.et al (2024). International consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children and adolescents. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.20, 729748. 10.1038/s41574-024-01024-5

  • 14

    ChenM.DuanL.SunW.GuoZ.MiaoH.YuN.et al (2023). Clinical and proteomic-based molecular characterizations of invasive and noninvasive somatotroph PitNETs. Neuroendocrinology113, 971986. 10.1159/000531200

  • 15

    ChristensenM. V.HogdallC. K.JochumsenK. M.HogdallE. V. S. (2018). Annexin A2 and cancer: a systematic review. Int. J. Oncol.52, 518. 10.3892/ijo.2017.4197

  • 16

    CroiseP.BrunaudL.TothP.GasmanS.OryS. (2017). Inhibition of Cdc42 and Rac1 activities in pheochromocytoma, the adrenal medulla tumor. Small GTPases8, 122127. 10.1080/21541248.2016.1202634

  • 17

    CroiseP.HouyS.GandM.LanoixJ.CalcoV.TothP.et al (2016). Cdc42 and Rac1 activity is reduced in human pheochromocytoma and correlates with FARP1 and ARHGEF1 expression. Endocr. Relat. Cancer23, 281293. 10.1530/ERC-15-0502

  • 18

    CuiY.LiC.JiangZ.ZhangS.LiQ.LiuX.et al (2021). Single-cell transcriptome and genome analyses of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Neuro Oncol.23, 18591871. 10.1093/neuonc/noab102

  • 19

    DaemsT.VerhelstJ.MichotteA.AbramsP.De RidderD.AbsR. (2009). Modification of hormonal secretion in clinically silent pituitary adenomas. Pituitary12, 8086. 10.1007/s11102-008-0085-7

  • 20

    DariosF.ConnellE.DavletovB. (2007). Phospholipases and fatty acid signalling in exocytosis. J. Physiol.585, 699704. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136812

  • 21

    DasS.Al-ToubahT.StrosbergJ. (2021). Chemotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors. Cancers (Basel)13, 4872. 10.3390/cancers13194872

  • 22

    DemblaE.BechererU. (2021). Biogenesis of large dense core vesicles in mouse chromaffin cells. Traffic22, 7893. 10.1111/tra.12783

  • 23

    DineenR.StewartP. M.SherlockM. (2017). Acromegaly. QJM110, 411420. 10.1093/qjmed/hcw004

  • 24

    EisenhoferG.HuynhT. T.ElkahlounA.MorrisJ. C.BratslavskyG.LinehanW. M.et al (2008). Differential expression of the regulated catecholamine secretory pathway in different hereditary forms of pheochromocytoma. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.295, E1223E1233. 10.1152/ajpendo.90591.2008

  • 25

    EliasS.DelestreC.OryS.MaraisS.CourelM.Vazquez-MartinezR.et al (2012). Chromogranin A induces the biogenesis of granules with calcium- and actin-dependent dynamics and exocytosis in constitutively secreting cells. Endocrinology153, 44444456. 10.1210/en.2012-1436

  • 26

    FaggianoA. (2024). Long-acting somatostatin analogs and well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a 20-year-old story. J. Endocrinol. Invest47, 3546. 10.1007/s40618-023-02170-9

  • 27

    GabelM.DelavoieF.DemaisV.RoyerC.BaillyY.VitaleN.et al (2015). Annexin A2-dependent actin bundling promotes secretory granule docking to the plasma membrane and exocytosis. J. Cell Biol.210, 785800. 10.1083/jcb.201412030

  • 28

    GasmanS.Chasserot-GolazS.PopoffM. R.AunisD.BaderM. F. (1997). Trimeric G proteins control exocytosis in chromaffin cells. Go regulates the peripheral actin network and catecholamine secretion by a mechanism involving the small GTP-binding protein Rho. J. Biol. Chem.272, 2056420571. 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20564

  • 29

    GasmanS.Chasserot-GolazS.PopoffM. R.AunisD.BaderM. F. (1999). Involvement of Rho GTPases in calcium-regulated exocytosis from adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Cell Sci.112 (Pt 24), 47634771. 10.1242/jcs.112.24.4763

  • 30

    GasmanS.VitaleN. (2017). Lipid remodelling in neuroendocrine secretion. Biol. Cell109, 381390. 10.1111/boc.201700030

  • 31

    GinerD.LopezI.VillanuevaJ.TorresV.ViniegraS.GutierrezL. M. (2007). Vesicle movements are governed by the size and dynamics of F-actin cytoskeletal structures in bovine chromaffin cells. Neuroscience146, 659669. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.02.039

  • 32

    GiovinazzoF.SchimmackS.SvejdaB.AlaimoD.PfragnerR.ModlinI.et al (2013). Chromogranin A and its fragments as regulators of small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm proliferation. PLoS One8, e81111. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081111

  • 33

    GiustiL.CetaniF.CiregiaF.Da ValleY.DonadioE.GiannacciniG.et al (2011). A proteomic approach to study parathyroid glands. Mol. Biosyst.7, 687699. 10.1039/c0mb00191k

  • 34

    GrouzmannE.MatterM.BilzS.HerrenA.TriponezF.HenzenC.et al (2012). Monoamine oxidase A down-regulation contributes to high metanephrine concentration in pheochromocytoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.97, 27732781. 10.1210/jc.2012-1557

  • 35

    GuerinM.GuillemotJ.ThouennonE.PierreA.El-YamaniF. Z.Montero-HadjadjeM.et al (2010). Granins and their derived peptides in normal and tumoral chromaffin tissue: implications for the diagnosis and prognosis of pheochromocytoma. Regul. Pept.165, 2129. 10.1016/j.regpep.2010.06.003

  • 36

    GuillemotJ.AnouarY.Montero-HadjadjeM.GrouzmannE.GrumolatoL.Roshmaninho-SalgadoJ.et al (2006). Circulating EM66 is a highly sensitive marker for the diagnosis and follow-up of pheochromocytoma. Int. J. Cancer118, 20032012. 10.1002/ijc.21571

  • 37

    GuillemotJ.ThouennonE.GuerinM.Vallet-ErdtmannV.RavniA.Montero-HadjadjeM.et al (2012). Differential expression and processing of secretogranin II in relation to the status of pheochromocytoma: implications for the production of the tumoral marker EM66. J. Mol. Endocrinol.48, 115127. 10.1530/JME-11-0077

  • 38

    GutierrezL. M.VillanuevaJ. (2018). The role of F-actin in the transport and secretion of chromaffin granules: an historic perspective. Pflugers Arch.470, 181186. 10.1007/s00424-017-2040-9

  • 39

    HouyS.StreitL.DrissaI.RameM.DecraeneC.MoogS.et al (2022). Dysfunction of calcium-regulated exocytosis at a single-cell level causes catecholamine hypersecretion in patients with pheochromocytoma. Cancer Lett.543, 21576510.1016/j.canlet.2022.215765

  • 40

    IsobeK.NakaiT.YukimasaN.NanmokuT.TakekoshiK.NomuraF. (1998). Expression of mRNA coding for four catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes in human adrenal pheochromocytomas. Eur. J. Endocrinol.138, 383387. 10.1530/eje.0.1380383

  • 41

    JahnR.CafisoD. C.TammL. K. (2024). Mechanisms of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.25, 101118. 10.1038/s41580-023-00668-x

  • 42

    JarrottB.LouisW. J. (1977). Abnormalities in enzymes involved in catecholamine synthesis and catabolism in phaeochromocytoma. Clin. Sci. Mol. Med.53, 529535. 10.1042/cs0530529

  • 43

    KalwatM. A.YoderS. M.WangZ.ThurmondD. C. (2013). A p21-activated kinase (PAK1) signaling cascade coordinately regulates F-actin remodeling and insulin granule exocytosis in pancreatic beta cells. Biochem. Pharmacol.85, 808816. 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.12.003

  • 44

    KimM.KimB. H. (2021). Current guidelines for management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol. Metab. Seoul.36, 514524. 10.3803/EnM.2021.1082

  • 45

    KimT.Gondre-LewisM. C.ArnaoutovaI.LohY. P. (2006). Dense-core secretory granule biogenesis. Physiol. (Bethesda)21, 124133. 10.1152/physiol.00043.2005

  • 46

    KimT.Tao-ChengJ. H.EidenL. E.LohY. P. (2001). Chromogranin A, an “on/off” switch controlling dense-core secretory granule biogenesis. Cell106, 499509. 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00459-7

  • 47

    KochM.HoltM. (2012). Coupling exo- and endocytosis: an essential role for PIP₂ at the synapse. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1821, 11141132. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.02.008

  • 48

    KofferA.TathamP. E.GompertsB. D. (1990). Changes in the state of actin during the exocytotic reaction of permeabilized rat mast cells. J. Cell Biol.111, 919927. 10.1083/jcb.111.3.919

  • 49

    KurczykA.GawinM.ChekanM.WilkA.LakomiecK.MrukwaG.et al (2020). Classification of thyroid tumors based on mass spectrometry imaging of tissue microarrays; a single-pixel approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 6289. 10.3390/ijms21176289

  • 50

    LamA. D.Tryoen-TothP.TsaiB.VitaleN.StuenkelE. L. (2008). SNARE-catalyzed fusion events are regulated by Syntaxin1A-lipid interactions. Mol. Biol. Cell19, 485497. 10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0148

  • 51

    LangT. (2007). SNARE proteins and 'membrane rafts. J. Physiol.585, 693698. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134346

  • 52

    LangT.WackerI.WunderlichI.RohrbachA.GieseG.SoldatiT.et al (2000). Role of actin cortex in the subplasmalemmal transport of secretory granules in PC-12 cells. Biophys. J.78, 28632877. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76828-7

  • 53

    LiP.BademosiA. T.LuoJ.MeunierF. A. (2018). Actin remodeling in regulated exocytosis: toward a mesoscopic view. Trends Cell Biol.28, 685697. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.04.004

  • 54

    LoyetK. M.KowalchykJ. A.ChaudharyA.ChenJ.PrestwichG. D.MartinT. F. (1998). Specific binding of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to calcium-dependent activator protein for secretion (CAPS), a potential phosphoinositide effector protein for regulated exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem.273, 83378343. 10.1074/jbc.273.14.8337

  • 55

    LuM.ForsbergL.HoogA.JuhlinC. C.VukojevicV.LarssonC.et al (2008). Heterogeneous expression of SNARE proteins SNAP-23, SNAP-25, Syntaxin1 and VAMP in human parathyroid tissue. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.287, 7280. 10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.028

  • 56

    MaC. J.BurgessJ.BrillJ. A. (2021). Maturing secretory granules: where secretory and endocytic pathways converge. Adv. Biol. Regul.80, 100807. 10.1016/j.jbior.2021.100807

  • 57

    MalacombeM.BaderM. F.GasmanS. (2006a). Exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells: new tasks for actin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1763, 11751183. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.09.004

  • 58

    MalacombeM.CeridonoM.CalcoV.Chasserot-GolazS.McphersonP. S.BaderM. F.et al (2006b). Intersectin-1L nucleotide exchange factor regulates secretory granule exocytosis by activating Cdc42. Embo J.25, 34943503. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601247

  • 59

    MartinT. F. (2012). Role of PI(4,5)P(2) in vesicle exocytosis and membrane fusion. Subcell. Biochem.59, 111130. 10.1007/978-94-007-3015-1_4

  • 60

    MohrmannR.De WitH.ConnellE.PinheiroP. S.LeeseC.BrunsD.et al (2013). Synaptotagmin interaction with SNAP-25 governs vesicle docking, priming, and fusion triggering. J. Neurosci.33, 1441714430. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1236-13.2013

  • 61

    MohrmannR.De WitH.VerhageM.NeherE.SorensenJ. B. (2010). Fast vesicle fusion in living cells requires at least three SNARE complexes. Science330, 502505. 10.1126/science.1193134

  • 62

    MomboisseF.HouyS.OryS.CalcoV.BaderM. F.GasmanS. (2011). How important are Rho GTPases in neurosecretion?J. Neurochem.117, 623631. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07241.x

  • 63

    MorvanJ.ToozeS. A. (2008). Discovery and progress in our understanding of the regulated secretory pathway in neuroendocrine cells. Histochem Cell Biol.129, 243252. 10.1007/s00418-008-0377-z

  • 64

    NeharD.Lombard-BohasC.OlivieriS.ClaustratB.ChayvialleJ. A.PenesM. C.et al (2004). Interest of Chromogranin A for diagnosis and follow-up of endocrine tumours. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf)60, 644652. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02030.x

  • 65

    NobelsF. R.KwekkeboomD. J.CoopmansW.SchoenmakersC. H.LindemansJ.De HerderW. W.et al (1997). Chromogranin A as serum marker for neuroendocrine neoplasia: comparison with neuron-specific enolase and the alpha-subunit of glycoprotein hormones. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.82, 26222628. 10.1210/jcem.82.8.4145

  • 66

    OnaitisM. W.KirshbomP. M.HaywardT. Z.QuayleF. J.FeldmanJ. M.SeiglerH. F.et al (2000). Gastrointestinal carcinoids: characterization by site of origin and hormone production. Ann. Surg.232, 549556. 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00010

  • 67

    OrciL.GabbayK. H.MalaisseW. J. (1972). Pancreatic beta-cell web: its possible role in insulin secretion. Science175, 11281130. 10.1126/science.175.4026.1128

  • 68

    OryS.CeridonoM.MomboisseF.HouyS.Chasserot-GolazS.HeintzD.et al (2013). Phospholipid scramblase-1-induced lipid reorganization regulates compensatory endocytosis in neuroendocrine cells. J. Neurosci.33, 35453556. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3654-12.2013

  • 69

    PapadopulosA. (2017). Membrane shaping by actin and myosin during regulated exocytosis. Mol. Cell Neurosci.84, 9399. 10.1016/j.mcn.2017.05.006

  • 70

    PapadopulosA.TomatisV. M.KasulaR.MeunierF. A. (2013). The cortical acto-myosin network: from diffusion barrier to functional gateway in the transport of neurosecretory vesicles to the plasma membrane. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)4, 153. 10.3389/fendo.2013.00153

  • 71

    PetersennS.FleseriuM.CasanuevaF. F.GiustinaA.BiermaszN.BillerB. M. K.et al (2023). Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.19, 722740. 10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5

  • 72

    PinheiroP. S.HouyS.SorensenJ. B. (2016). C2-domain containing calcium sensors in neuroendocrine secretion. J. Neurochem.139, 943958. 10.1111/jnc.13865

  • 73

    Ribeiro-OliveiraA.Jr.FranchiG.KolaB.DalinoP.PinheiroS. V.SalahuddinN.et al (2008). Protein western array analysis in human pituitary tumours: insights and limitations. Endocr. Relat. Cancer15, 10991114. 10.1677/ERC-08-0003

  • 74

    SchiavoG.GuQ. M.PrestwichG. D.SollnerT. H.RothmanJ. E. (1996). Calcium-dependent switching of the specificity of phosphoinositide binding to synaptotagmin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.93, 1332713332. 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13327

  • 75

    SchonnJ. S.MaximovA.LaoY.SudhofT. C.SorensenJ. B. (2008). Synaptotagmin-1 and -7 are functionally overlapping Ca2+ sensors for exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 39984003. 10.1073/pnas.0712373105

  • 76

    SharmaS.FishbeinL. (2023). Diagnosis and management of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a guide for the clinician. Endocr. Pract.29, 9991006. 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.07.027

  • 77

    StreitL.BrunaudL.VitaleN.OryS.GasmanS. (2020). Hormones secretion and Rho GTPases in neuroendocrine tumors. Cancers (Basel)12, 1859. 10.3390/cancers12071859

  • 78

    StuevenA. K.KayserA.WetzC.AmthauerH.WreeA.TackeF.et al (2019). Somatostatin analogues in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: past, present and future. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 3049. 10.3390/ijms20123049

  • 79

    TanguyE.CarmonO.WangQ.JeandelL.Chasserot-GolazS.Montero-HadjadjeM.et al (2016). Lipids implicated in the journey of a secretory granule: from biogenesis to fusion. J. Neurochem.137, 904912. 10.1111/jnc.13577

  • 80

    TanguyE.Coste De BagneauxP.KassasN.AmmarM. R.WangQ.HaeberleA. M.et al (2020). Mono- and poly-unsaturated phosphatidic acid regulate distinct steps of regulated exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells. Cell Rep.32, 108026. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108026

  • 81

    TawfikB.MartinsJ. S.HouyS.ImigC.PinheiroP. S.WojcikS. M.et al (2021). Synaptotagmin-7 places dense-core vesicles at the cell membrane to promote Munc13-2- and Ca(2+)-dependent priming. Elife10, e64527. 10.7554/eLife.64527

  • 82

    TomicT. T.OlaussonJ.RehammarA.DelandL.MuthA.EjeskarK.et al (2020). MYO5B mutations in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma promote cancer progression. PLoS Genet.16, e1008803. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008803

  • 83

    ToozeS. A.FlatmarkT.ToozeJ.HuttnerW. B. (1991). Characterization of the immature secretory granule, an intermediate in granule biogenesis. J. Cell Biol.115, 14911503. 10.1083/jcb.115.6.1491

  • 84

    TrifaroJ. M.BaderM. F.DoucetJ. P. (1985). Chromaffin cell cytoskeleton: its possible role in secretion. Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.63, 661679. 10.1139/o85-084

  • 85

    TrifaroJ. M.GasmanS.GutierrezL. M. (2008). Cytoskeletal control of vesicle transport and exocytosis in chromaffin cells. Acta Physiol. (Oxf)192, 165172. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01808.x

  • 86

    UenishiE.ShibasakiT.TakahashiH.SekiC.HamaguchiH.YasudaT.et al (2013). Actin dynamics regulated by the balance of neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) and cofilin activities determines the biphasic response of glucose-induced insulin secretion. J. Biol. Chem.288, 2585125864. 10.1074/jbc.M113.464420

  • 87

    Van MeerG.VoelkerD. R.FeigensonG. W. (2008). Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.9, 112124. 10.1038/nrm2330

  • 88

    VarlamovE. V.MccartneyS.FleseriuM. (2019). Functioning pituitary adenomas - current treatment options and emerging medical therapies. Eur. Endocrinol.15, 3040. 10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.30

  • 89

    VitaleM. L.Rodriguez Del CastilloA.TchakarovL.TrifaroJ. M. (1991). Cortical filamentous actin disassembly and scinderin redistribution during chromaffin cell stimulation precede exocytosis, a phenomenon not exhibited by gelsolin. J. Cell Biol.113, 10571067. 10.1083/jcb.113.5.1057

  • 90

    VitaleM. L.SewardE. P.TrifaroJ. M. (1995). Chromaffin cell cortical actin network dynamics control the size of the release-ready vesicle pool and the initial rate of exocytosis. Neuron14, 353363. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90291-0

  • 91

    VitaleN.CaumontA. S.Chasserot-GolazS.DuG.WuS.SciorraV. A.et al (2001). Phospholipase D1: a key factor for the exocytotic machinery in neuroendocrine cells. Embo J.20, 24242434. 10.1093/emboj/20.10.2424

  • 92

    WilzenA.RehammarA.MuthA.NilssonO.Tesan TomicT.WangbergB.et al (2016). Malignant pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas harbor mutations in transport and cell adhesion genes. Int. J. Cancer138, 22012211. 10.1002/ijc.29957

  • 93

    WuL. G.ChanC. Y. (2022). Multiple roles of actin in exo- and endocytosis. Front. Synaptic Neurosci.14, 841704. 10.3389/fnsyn.2022.841704

  • 94

    Y-HassanS.FalhammarH. (2020). Cardiovascular manifestations and complications of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J. Clin. Med.9, 2435. 10.3390/jcm9082435

  • 95

    ZappiA.PersanoI.GalvaniL.ParlagrecoE.AndriniE.CampanaD.et al (2023). Chemotherapy in well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G1, G2, and G3: a narrative review. J. Clin. Med.12, 717. 10.3390/jcm12020717

  • 96

    Zeniou-MeyerM.ZabariN.AsheryU.Chasserot-GolazS.HaeberleA. M.DemaisV.et al (2007). Phospholipase D1 production of phosphatidic acid at the plasma membrane promotes exocytosis of large dense-core granules at a late stage. J. Biol. Chem.282, 2174621757. 10.1074/jbc.M702968200

  • 97

    ZhanS.LiJ.WangT.GeW. (2018). Quantitative proteomics analysis of sporadic medullary thyroid cancer reveals FN1 as a potential novel candidate prognostic biomarker. Oncologist23, 14151425. 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0399

  • 98

    ZhangD.HugoW.BergsneiderM.WangM. B.KimW.VintersH. V.et al (2022). Single-cell RNA sequencing in silent corticotroph tumors confirms impaired POMC processing and provides new insights into their invasive behavior. Eur. J. Endocrinol.187, 4964. 10.1530/EJE-21-1183

  • 99

    ZhangR.GuptaD.AlbertS. G. (2017). Pheochromocytoma as a reversible cause of cardiomyopathy: analysis and review of the literature. Int. J. Cardiol.249, 319323. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.014

Summary

Keywords

neuroendocrine tumors, hormone, secretion, vesicular trafficking, exocytosis, dysregulated genes and proteins

Citation

Streit L, Tanguy E, Brunaud L, Tóth P, Vitale N, Ory S and Gasman S (2025) Cellular mechanisms of hormone secretion in neuroendocrine tumors: what goes wrong?. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:1527083. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1527083

Received

12 November 2024

Accepted

05 June 2025

Published

01 July 2025

Volume

13 - 2025

Edited by

Georg Haase, Aix Marseille Université, France

Reviewed by

Cedric Asensio, University of Denver, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Stéphane Gasman,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics