Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from hormone-releasing cells. Secretion of hormones stored in vesicles occurs through calcium-regulated exocytosis, a process that needs to be tightly controlled to avoid unbalanced levels of hormones. A critical feature shared by most of the NETs is a dysfunctional secretory pathway mainly leading to hypersecretion, which often induces clinical complications. In this review, we focus on the cellular process of hormone exocytosis and discuss the potential molecular mechanisms leading to deregulated hormone secretion in various NETs. Particular attention is paid to expression level modifications for genes and proteins involved in the exocytic pathway in NETs.
1 Introduction
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are derived from neuroendocrine cells that control pleiotropic physiological functions by releasing various hormones and neuropeptides. NETs constitute a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms in terms of function and morphology, mainly because neuroendocrine cells are spread all over the body as dispersed cells (diffuse neuroendocrine system) or concentrated in organs (Figure 1A). However, one of the most common physiological features of these NET family members is the dysfunction of hormone and neuropeptide secretion, leading to hypersecretion and eventually to clinical symptoms. For example, acromegaly often results from excessive secretion of growth hormone by pituitary adenoma (). Hypersecretion of serotonin by carcinoid tumors from the gastro-intestinal tract can trigger carcinoid syndrome, which is associated with flushing, diarrhea, bronchoconstriction and cardiac valvular disease (Onaitis et al., 2000). Excessive levels of circulating catecholamines in patients with pheochromocytoma, a NET derived from the adrenal medulla chromaffin cells, induce hypertension potentially leading to cardiomyopathies and stroke (Zhang et al., 2017; Y-Hassan and Falhammar, 2020). Moreover, enhanced secretory activity of NET cells may develop over time with negative impact on prognosis. For instance, a silent pituitary adenoma may progress into an actively secreting form, while a non-functional pancreatic tumor can start secreting excessive levels of hormones, thus evolving to a more aggressive tumor phenotype (; ). In small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a high-grade malignant cancer, the progressive neuroendocrine nature of cancer cells enhances secretion of a variety of neuropeptides, together with growth factors that significantly accelerate the invasive growth by their autocrine action. Dysfunction of hormone secretion in NETs has been known from the clinical point of view for a long time, but the cellular and molecular mechanisms disturbing secretory pathways in tumor cells are rarely explored and remain poorly understood.
FIGURE 1
The first idea that usually comes in mind is that the increased level of secreted molecules results from an increased number of hormone-secreting cells within the tumor. However, the simplistic view of “the more secreting cells, the more secreted hormones” fails to consider alternative mechanisms. For example, in human pheochromocytoma, we recently reported using carbon fiber amperometry that individual tumor cells release significantly higher amounts of catecholamines compared to non-tumor chromaffin cells (Houy et al., 2022). The obvious conclusion from these observations is that the process of hormone release itself may be dysregulated in NET cells.
Hormone and neuropeptide secretion by neuroendocrine cells occurs through calcium-regulated exocytosis, a process that has been the subject of extensive studies over the past 3 decades (). In these cells, hormones are synthesized and then stored in large dense core vesicles (LDCV) also known as secretory granules. Exocytosis is triggered by extracellular stimuli that increase intracellular calcium level and involves several tightly regulated steps including, i) the recruitment of the secretory granules to the cell periphery, ii) their docking to exocytic sites, which physically attaches them to the plasma membrane, iii) their priming, which prepares the granules for fusion, and finally iv) the fusion of the secretory granule membrane with the plasma membrane, leading to the release of luminal content of secretory granules (Figure 1B). The key questions arising from the observation of hypersecretion at the single cell level are which specific steps of the exocytic pathway are dysregulated in NETs and which proteins might be involved in this amplified secretory activity? Most of the limited data available today comes from “omics” approaches, which reveal changes in gene and protein expression across different NETs. These data are primarily from NETs derived from adrenal medulla, thyroid and pituitary gland. In this review, we focus on studies that investigate gene or protein expression changes specifically in human tumor biopsies. From this literature, we summarize the expression of key proteins involved in distinct steps of the hormone secretion pathway. Table 1 lists these main proteins and genes, highlighting their function in exocytosis and their expression changes in NETs. In the following sections, we examine each step of the hormone secretory pathway, from granule formation and cargo loading to vesicle fusion and membrane remodeling, highlighting the alterations observed in human NET samples.
TABLE 1
| Gene | Protein | Functions | Uniprot entry | Variation in tumors | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANO6 | Anoctamin-6 | Plasma membrane phospholipid scrambling, lipid reorganization of the plasma membrane | Q4KMQ2 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Unpublished data |
| ↘ lactotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| ANXA2 | Annexin-A2 | Calcium-dependent protein binding, cytoskeleton reorganization, vesicle fusion, vesicle budding from membrane | P07355 | ↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ MTC vs. normal thyroid (protein) | Kurczyk et al. (2020) | ||||
| ↘ GH-secreting pitNET vs. respective normal pituitary (protein) | Ribeiro-Oliveira et al. (2008) | ||||
| ↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| ↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein) | |||||
| ATP8A1 | Phospholipid-transporting ATPase IA | Phospholipid flippase, lipid reorganization and control of vesicle trafficking at the plasma membrane | Q9Y2Q0 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↘ lactotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| ATP9A | Probable phospholipid-transporting ATPase IIA | Phospholipid flippase, lipid reorganization and control of vesicle trafficking at the plasma membrane | O75110 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Unpublished data |
| CADPS | Calcium-dependent secretion activator 1 | Priming, fusion, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding | Q9ULU8 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein) | |||||
| CADPS2 | Calcium-dependent secretion activator 2 | Priming, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE binding | Q86UW7 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| CHGA | Chromogranin A | Granule biogenesis, secretory granule organization, peptide hormone processing | P10645 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↗ MTC vs. normal thyroid (protein) | Kurczyk et al. (2020) | ||||
| ↗ siNENs vs. normal human enterochromaffin cells (gene and protein) | |||||
| CHGB | Secretogranin-1 | Secretory granule biogenesis and organization, peptide hormone processing | P05060 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| CPLX2 | Complexin-2 | Positively regulates a late step in exocytosis of various cytoplasmic vesicles, such as synaptic vesicles and other secretory vesicles | Q6PUV4 | ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) |
| DBH | Dopamine beta-hydroxylase | Adrenaline and noradrenaline synthesis pathway | P09172 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| DDC | Aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase | Catecholamine metabolic process, dopamine biosynthetic process | P20711 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| FARP1 | FERM, ARHGEF and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 1 | Guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Cdc42 and Rac1, actin cytoskeleton organisation | Q9Y4F1 | ↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein) | |
| MAOA | Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] A | Catecholamine catabolic process | P21397 | ↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| MAOB | Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] B | Catecholamine catabolic process | P27338 | ↘ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| MYO5A | Unconventional myosin-Va | Vesicle transport, actin filament organization | Q9Y4I1 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| PCSK1 | Neuroendocrine convertase 1 | Peptide hormone processing | P29120 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ functioning corticotroph piNET vs. silent corticotroph piNET (gene) | Zhang et al. (2022) | ||||
| PCSK1N | ProSAAS | Peptide hormone processing | Q9UHG2 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| PCSK2 | Neuroendocrine convertase 2 | Peptide hormone processing | P16519 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| PFN2 | Profilin-2 | Actin reorganization | P35080 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| PLCB2 | Phosphoinositide phospholipase C-beta-2 | Lipid metabolism: production of DAG and IP3 from PIP2 | Q00722 | ↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein) | |
| PLCB3 | Phosphoinositide phospholipase C-beta-3 | Lipid metabolism: production of DAG and IP3 from PIP2 | Q01970 | ↗ parathyroid adenoma vs. normal parathyroid (protein) | |
| PLCB4 | Phosphoinositide phospholipase C-beta-4 | Lipid metabolism: production of DAG and IP3 from PIP2 | Q15147 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Unpublished data |
| ↘ lactotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| RAB27A | Ras-related protein Rab-27A | Interacts with granuphilin to regulate exocytosis, granule maturation, docking, priming | P51159 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein) | |||||
| RAB27B | Ras-related protein Rab-27B | Exosome secretion regulation, multivesicular endosomes docking, regulation of the number and secretion of platelet dense granules, delivery of granules near the exocytic site | O00194 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein) | |||||
| RAB3A | Ras-related protein Rab-3A | Synaptic vesicle maturation, priming, docking, trafficking, recycling | P20336 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein) | |||||
| RAB3B | Ras-related protein Rab-3B | Vesicle trafficking, vesicle biogenesis, regulates vesicle docking, priming, vesicle size, synaptic vesicle cycle | P20337 | ↗ functioning corticotroph pitNETs vs. silent corticotroph PitNETs (gene) | Zhang et al. (2022) |
| RAB3C | Ras-related protein Rab-3C | Priming, docking, trafficking, recycling | Q96E17 | ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) |
| RAB3D | Ras-related protein Rab-3D | Vesicle trafficking, docking | O95716 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| SCAMP1 | Secretory carrier-associated membrane protein 1 | Protein transport, fusion pore dynamics | O15126 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↗ GH-secreting pitNET vs. respective normal pituitary (protein) | Ribeiro-Oliveira et al. (2008) | ||||
| SCG2 | Secretogranin-2 | Granule biogenesis, peptide hormone processing | P13521 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | |||||
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| SCG3 | Secretogranin-3 | Granule biogenesis, peptide hormone processing | Q8WXD2 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| SCG5 | Neuroendocrine protein 7B2 | Regulation of pituitary hormone secretion, peptide hormone processing | P05408 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↗ functioning corticotroph piNET vs. silent corticotroph piNET (gene) | Zhang et al. (2022) | ||||
| ↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| SLC18A1 | Chromaffin granule amine transporter | Amine transporter, loading of catecholamines in secretory granules | P54219 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| SLC18A2 | Synaptic vesicular amine transporter | Amine transporter, loading of catecholamines in secretory granules | Q05940 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| SNAP25 | Synaptosomal-associated protein 25 | Vesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE binding | P60880 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| SMPD1 | Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase | Glycosphingolipid metabolic process | P17405 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| STX1A | Syntaxin-1A | Vesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE binding, SNARE complex assembly | Q16623 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| STX3 | Syntaxin-3 | Potentially involved in docking of synaptic vesicles at presynaptic active zones, apical receptor involved in membrane fusion of apical vesicles | Q13277 | ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) |
| STXBP1 | Syntaxin-binding protein 1 | Vesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE binding, SNARE complex assembly | P61764 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| SV2A | Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A | Plays a role in the control of regulated secretion in neural and endocrine cells, enhancing selectively low-frequency neurotransmission, positively regulates vesicle fusion | Q7L0J3 | ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) |
| ↗ somatotroph pitNET vs. normal cells (gene) | |||||
| SYT1 | Synaptotagmin-1 | Vesicle docking, priming, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE binding, vesicle mediated transport | P21579 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| ↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein) | |||||
| SYT2 | Synaptotagmin-2 | Calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE binding, vesicle-mediated transport, fusion | Q8N9I0 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↗ sporadic MTC vs. paired normal thyroid tissue (protein) | Zhan et al. (2018) | ||||
| SYT7 | Synaptotagmin-7 | Priming, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE binding | O43581 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| SYTL4 | Synaptotagmin-like protein 4 | Docking, calcium binding, plasma membrane binding, SNARE binding | Q96C24 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| ↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein) | |||||
| TH | Tyrosine Hydroxylase | Dopamine biosynthetic process | P07101 | ↗ pheochromocytoma vs. non tumor (gene and protein) | Houy et al. (2022) |
| VAMP2 | Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 | Vesicle docking, priming, fusion, SNARE binding, SNARE complex assembly | P63027 | ↘ somatotroph invasive pitNET (secreting) vs. non invasive (less secreting) (protein) | |
| ↗ functioning corticotroph pitNETs vs. silent corticotroph PitNETs (gene) | Zhang et al. (2022) |
List of up- and downregulated proteins or genes in neuroendocrine tumors.
Abbreviations: MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; pitNET, pituitary neuroendocrine tumor; siNEN, small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm.
2 Secretory granules biogenesis and maturation
Biogenesis of secretory granules begins at the trans-Golgi network, where prohormones and granin-family proteins (e.g., chromogranins and secretogranins) are selectively sorted and packaged into immature granules (Kim et al., 2006). These granules then undergo a maturation process involving luminal acidification, condensation of their content, proteolytic processing of prohormones, and removal of non-regulated proteins via clathrin-coated vesicles (Tooze et al., 1991; ; Kim et al., 2006; ). During this maturation phase, small-molecule hormones such as catecholamines and serotonin are actively transported, from the cytosol into the granules, by vesicular monoamine transporters (VMATs). This uptake is powered by the proton gradients generated by V-ATPases. In parallel, peptide hormones are proteolytically processed within granules by enzymes such as the prohormone convertases PC1/3 and PC2, assisted by the chaperones like secretogranin V (Morvan and Tooze, 2008; Ma et al., 2021). Together, these steps generate mature granules that are competent for stimulus-dependent exocytosis.
The increase in single cell hormone secretion in NETs could arise from the dysregulation of various step of granule biogenesis and maturation. First, it could be the consequence of secretory granules contents overloading. Several studies reported upregulation of mRNAs or proteins involved in hormone synthesis (Table 1). For example, enzymes involved in catecholamines synthesis (Tyrosine Hydroxylase (TH), Dopamine-β-Hydroxylase (DBH), DOPA decarboxylase (DCC)) are overexpressed in pheochromocytoma (Jarrott and Louis, 1977; Isobe et al., 1998; ; Houy et al., 2022). Conversely, reduced expression of enzymes catabolizing catecholamines may further contribute to increase their levels. Accordingly, the monoamine oxydases (MAO-A/B), which deaminate cytosolic catecholamines, are downregulated in pheochromocytoma potentially leading to increased cytoplasmic catecholamine level (; Houy et al., 2022). Finally, expression of transporters such as VMAT1/2 (SLC18A1/A2) responsible for monoamines loading, is also increased (Table 1; Houy et al., 2022). It is, however, currently unknown whether increasing the number of hormone transporter molecules per granule actually leads to a higher hormone content, as there is a physical constraint beyond which additional filling is not possible.
Second, modulating the expression level of prohormone-processing enzymes that convert prohormones into their active forms can also lead to excessive active hormone production in NETs. This is often the case, for example, with neuroendocrine convertases (PCSK-1/2/1N), which are found upregulated in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022), medullary thyroid carcinoma (Zhan et al., 2018) and pituitary tumor (; Zhang et al., 2022). Interestingly, secretogranin V, a chaperone for prohormone convertase is also overexpressed in various NETs (Table 1).
Third, the overexpression of secretory granule-resident proteins could reflect an increase in the number of secretory granules per cell. Notably, various chromogranin proteins (CHGA/B, SCG2/3; Table 1) or chromogranin-derived peptides, which are key proteins required for granule biogenesis (Kim et al., 2001; ; ; ) have also been found to be overexpressed in various NETs (; ; Zhan et al., 2018; Kurczyk et al., 2020; ; Houy et al., 2022). Whether this reflects an increase of the granin content per granule or an increase of the number of granules per cell or both requires further investigations.
3 Docking, priming and fusion
Our work in pheochromocytoma cells demonstrated that both the number of exocytic events and the kinetic of secretion were enhanced suggesting that late phases of exocytosis (docking, priming and/or fusion) could be modulated (Houy et al., 2022). The core machinery controlling docking, priming and fusion involves SNARE (Soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins, as well as SNARE-regulating proteins. Fusion between the secretory granule and plasma membrane is energetically unfavorable and requires the assembly of a membrane-bridging complex formed by the SNAREs (Jahn et al., 2024). In most neuroendocrine cells, the SNARE complex mediating the regulated exocytosis of LDCVs typically include SNAP25, Syntaxin1, and VAMP2. The number of SNARE complexes formed at the site of vesicle docking is correlated with the likelihood and speed of vesicle fusion (Mohrmann et al., 2010). Therefore, increasing the number of SNARE proteins can lead to more SNARE complexes, potentially enhancing the exocytosis rate. Accordingly, SNAP25 as well as various Syntaxins and VAMPs are upregulated in several NETs (Table 1) (Lu et al., 2008; Zhan et al., 2018; ; Houy et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; ).
The assembly of the SNARE complex is not calcium sensitive, even though calcium is the main trigger of exocytosis. Synaptotagmins (Syts), a family of transmembrane vesicular proteins, confer Ca2+ sensitivity to membrane fusion in neuroendocrine cells by sensing changes in intracellular Ca2+ over a wide dynamic range (Pinheiro et al., 2016). Upon Ca2+ binding, synaptotagmins promote SNARE-mediated fusion by lowering the energy barrier primarily through the binding of their C2-domains to anionic phospholipids in the target membrane, which induces local positive curvature and membrane apposition to facilitate membrane merging. Among Syt family members, Syt1 and Syt7 have been implicated in neuroendocrine secretion (Schonn et al., 2008; Mohrmann et al., 2013; ; Tawfik et al., 2021). Syt1 is a low-affinity, fast-responding isoform that mediate synchronous exocytosis, whereas Syt7 has higher calcium affinity and contributes to sustained or asynchronous release. Interestingly, Syt 1, 2 or 7 are upregulated in pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma and in somatotroph pituitary tumor (Table 1) (Zhan et al., 2018; Houy et al., 2022; ).
Altogether these observations suggest that hormone release might be enhanced either by increasing the number of SNARE complexes, or by modulating calcium sensitivity. Alternatively, the efficiency of exocytosis could also be influenced by proteins that tightly regulate the assembly or disassembly of the SNARE complex such as proteins from Sec1/Munc18-1 family, or even by tethering factors such as Rab GTPases that mediate the initial contact between the secretory granule and the plasma membrane (). For example, syntaxin binding protein 1 (STXBP1, commonly named Munc18-1) is overexpressed in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022), whereas expression level of the GTPases Rab3a-c or Rab27a-b and granuphilin (sytl4) is modified in pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma and in somatotroph or corticotroph pituitary tumor (Table 1), (Zhan et al., 2018; Houy et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; ).
4 Actin cytoskeleton remodelling
In addition to the essential and minimal core machinery mediating secretory granule recruitment, docking, priming and fusion, an important extra-layer of regulation finely tunes calcium-regulated exocytosis, and consequently, the amount of hormone released. Notably, the functional importance of the actin cytoskeleton in regulated exocytosis has been recognized for several decades. Early studies revealed a dense cortical actin layer beneath the plasma membrane in secretory cells such as pancreatic β-cells and adrenal chromaffin cells (Orci et al., 1972; Trifaro et al., 1985; ). These observations initially led to the view that cortical actin served primarily as a physical barrier restricting granule access to fusion sites. Accordingly, numerous studies demonstrated that remodeling of this cortical actin barrier facilitates secretory granules transport and fusion during calcium-regulated exocytosis in a variety of secretory cell models (Koffer et al., 1990; Vitale et al., 1991; Vitale et al., 1995; ; Lang et al., 2000; ; Kalwat et al., 2013; Uenishi et al., 2013). Subsequent investigations, also demonstrated that actin filaments not only exert inhibitory control but can also play facilitatory roles, depending on the specific step of secretory granule exocytic process. This evolving concept has been discussed in several comprehensive review articles (Trifaro et al., 2008; Papadopulos, 2017; Li et al., 2018; Wu and Chan, 2022). Therefore, actin reorganization is now recognized as a dynamic and tightly regulated process that both constrains and facilitates exocytosis, depending on context and timing.
Members of the Rho GTPases family regulate exocytosis through actin reorganization. Seminal work from our team has demonstrated that the GTPases RhoA and Cdc42 play key regulatory roles on catecholamine release from adrenal chromaffin cells, by differentially influencing actin organization (; Malacombe et al., 2006a; Momboisse et al., 2011). RhoA has been proposed to actively control the organization of the cortical actin network, which regulates granule positioning and their access to the plasma membrane. In contrast Cdc42 promotes de novo actin nucleation and polymerization at the secretory granule fusion sites, likely controlling the final step of exocytosis such as membrane fusion (Malacombe et al., 2006b; ). Interestingly, we previously showed that Cdc42 activity is inhibited in human pheochromocytoma, suggesting that actin reorganization at the exocytic sites may be affected (; ). Although Cdc42 expression remains unchanged compared to non-tumor tissue, we have found that its activity is directly correlated to reduced expression of FARP1, a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF), that activates Cdc42 (). Moreover, the expression of several GEFs for Rho-GTPases members is modulated in various NETs (for details, see Table 2 in (Streit et al., 2020)). However, whether these changes in Rho-GTPases activity are directly linked to altered hormone release in NETs has not been thoroughly explored.
Annexin-A2 is another important protein that regulates hormone release, and organizes the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 1B). Its expression is altered in various cancers including NETs (). In adrenal chromaffin cells, annexin-A2 promotes the formation of actin bundles required for efficient secretory granule docking and fusion (). Changes in annexin-A2 expression have been documented in several NETs, though with some differences. For instance, expression of annexin-A2 is decreased in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022) and pituitary adenoma (Ribeiro-Oliveira et al., 2008; ), but increased in medullary thyroid carcinoma (Kurczyk et al., 2020) and in parathyroid adenoma (). It would be valuable to study the relationship between the bundling activity of annexin-A2, its expression level and the secretory activity of NET cells. How these actin bundles participate to the exocytic process requires further investigations.
Actin cables may serve to tether, displace secretory granules at the correct location or provide forces to deform membranes. To do so, actin filaments need molecular motors such as myosin proteins (Figure 1B). Myosin II, V and VI constitute the main myosins involved in hormone release by neuroendocrine cells (Papadopulos et al., 2013; ). We found that expression of unconventional myosin-Va is increased in pheochromocytoma (Houy et al., 2022). Interestingly cancer-associated mutations in the MYO5B gene have been described in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (Wilzen et al., 2016). Moreover, metastatic pheochromocytoma displays significantly higher expression of Myo5B compared to non-metastatic tumor (Tomic et al., 2020). To our knowledge, no data regarding the expression of Myosins II and VI in human NETs samples has been documented so far.
5 Lipid modifying enzymes
Lipids, with their vast diversity encompassing tens of thousands of species, are essential to cellular function, serving structural, metabolic, and signaling roles (van Meer et al., 2008). Early studies demonstrated that the synthesis, metabolism or transport of various lipids species play a fundamental role in hormone secretion by altering membrane biophysical properties and modulating the activity proteins that governs each step of vesicle transport and fusion; for review see (Tanguy et al., 2016; ). Among these lipids, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) (Martin, 2012), certain fatty acids (), anionic lipid such as phosphatidic acid (PA) (Tanguy et al., 2020), or cholesterol (Lang, 2007) regulate the activity or recruitment at exocytic sites of more than twenty proteins involved in regulated exocytosis (Koch and Holt, 2012). These targets include synaptotagmin (Schiavo et al., 1996), syntaxin (Lam et al., 2008), Ca2+-dependent activator protein for secretion (CAPS) (Loyet et al., 1998), and actin-binding proteins such as scinderin and gelsolin (Trifaro et al., 2008).
Although comprehensive lipidomics for NETs are still lacking, transcriptomic and proteomic studies revealed dysregulation of multiple lipid-metabolic enzymes and lipid transporters, whose activity can influence hormone secretion. For instance, phospholipase C enzymes, which hydrolyze (PtdIns(4,5)P2) to generate diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 3-phosphate, are upregulated in NET subtypes. PLC-β2 and -β3 isoforms are overexpressed in parathyroid adenomas, whereas PLC-β4 expression is elevated in pheochromocytoma and in pituitary NETs, suggesting an imbalance in these lipids in tumor cells (; ; ). In pheochromocytoma the sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, which catalyzes the conversion of sphingomyelin into ceramide and phosphatidylcholine is overexpressed, increasing the pool of phosphatidylcholine potentially available to phospholipase-D1 and thereby potentially augmenting PA-driven exocytosis (Vitale et al., 2001; Zeniou-Meyer et al., 2007; Tanguy et al., 2020).
Hormone secretion is further modulated by the asymmetric distribution of phospholipids across the plasma membrane bilayer. Notably, we have shown that calcium-regulated exocytosis requires a transient disruption of the plasma membrane asymmetry near vesicle fusion sites in adrenal chromaffin cells (Ory et al., 2013). This process is regulated by scramblases, which catalyze the bidirectional transport of phospholipids between plasma membrane leaflets. Interestingly, several transbilayer lipid transporters are overexpressed in pituitary NETs and pheochromocytoma, including the scramblase ANO6 and the P4-type ATPases ATP8A1 (; Houy et al., 2022) and ATP9A (unpublished).
Overall, lipid metabolism and transport appear to be altered in several NETs, which could directly affect hormone secretion. However, further investigations are needed to understand how changes in plasma membrane lipid composition and asymmetry precisely affect exocytosis efficiency.
6 Conclusion
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a unique class of neoplasms characterized by their aberrant and unregulated hormone secretion, leading to significant clinical consequences. While our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying this hypersecretion is still evolving, recent advances, particularly through “omics” technologies, have begun to shed light on key alterations within the secretory pathway. Current data suggest that disruptions in hormone metabolism and secretory granule trafficking, as well as changes in expression of the regulatory proteins involved in this process, might contribute to the dysfunctional hormone release observed in NETs. Despite this progress, significant gaps in knowledge remain and the next challenge will be to better understand the precise mechanisms by which NET cells acquire such hypersecretory phenotypes. Over the past decade, “omics” technologies have advanced tremendously, enabling extremely fine levels of analysis.
These data, along with the future “omics” research, will be crucial in paving the way for novel therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting the secretory machinery to alleviate the clinical burden of NETs. From a clinical perspective, hormone hypersecretion in NETs is managed through various strategies designed to reduce hormone levels, control tumor growth, and relieve symptoms. Core treatments include somatostatin analogs (SSA), which inhibit hormone release by targeting somatostatin receptors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), which delivers targeted radiotherapy to receptor-expressing tumor cells. Surgical resection remains the treatment of choice when feasible, while chemotherapy and targeted agents such as everolimus or sunitinib are used in more advanced stages. Numerous in-depth reviews have covered these therapeutic options extensively (Stueven et al., 2019; ; Zappi et al., 2023; ), including specifically in the NET types discussed in this review, which show significant changes in the expression of proteins controlling exocytosis, such as pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and pituitary adenomas (Varlamov et al., 2019; Kim and Kim, 2021; ; Petersenn et al., 2023; Sharma and Fishbein, 2023; ). However, these treatments rarely target the secretory pathway itself, and their efficacy can diminish over time. By focusing on the molecular mechanisms of hormone secretion, this review complements the clinical literature and highlights the potential of directly targeting secretory machinery to reduce hormone burden in patients with persistent or refractory symptoms. Finally, despite the availability of several biochemical and imaging biomarkers such as Chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), the diagnosis of NETs remains challenging. For instance, CgA is the most widely used serum marker, but its limited specificity and frequent false negatives reduce its diagnostic value (Nobels et al., 1997; Nehar et al., 2004). Identifying changes in the expression of secretory granule cargo proteins will certainly help the discovery of new accurate biomarkers.
Statements
Author contributions
LS: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. ET: Writing – review and editing. LB: Resources, Writing – review and editing. PT: Writing – review and editing. NV: Writing – review and editing. SO: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing. SG: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Part of the author’s work performed in pheochromocytoma and discussed here has been supported by grants from ITMO Cancer AVIESAN (Alliance Nationale pour les Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé, National Alliance for Life Sciences & Health) within the framework of the Cancer Plan to SG and LB (Single Cell 2018 N◦ 19CS004-00); by the University of Strasbourg Institute for Advanced Study (USIAS) for a Fellowship, within the French national programme “Investment for the future” (IdEx-Unistra) and by Ligue Contre le Cancer (CCIR-GE) to SG.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AnantharamA.KreutzbergerA. J. B. (2019). Unraveling the mechanisms of calcium-dependent secretion. J. Gen. Physiol.151, 417–434. 10.1085/jgp.201812298
2
ArvanP.CastleD. (1998). Sorting and storage during secretory granule biogenesis: looking backward and looking forward. Biochem. J.332 (Pt 3), 593–610. 10.1042/bj3320593
3
AryaA. K.BhadadaS. K.SinghP.DahiyaD.KaurG.SharmaS.et al (2019). Quantitative proteomics analysis of sporadic parathyroid adenoma tissue samples. J. Endocrinol. Invest42, 577–590. 10.1007/s40618-018-0958-1
4
AunisD.BaderM. F. (1988). The cytoskeleton as a barrier to exocytosis in secretory cells. J. Exp. Biol.139, 253–266. 10.1242/jeb.139.1.253
5
BakerR. W.HughsonF. M. (2016). Chaperoning SNARE assembly and disassembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.17, 465–479. 10.1038/nrm.2016.65
6
BauerC. S.WoolleyR. J.TeschemacherA. G.SewardE. P. (2007). Potentiation of exocytosis by phospholipase C-coupled G-protein-coupled receptors requires the priming protein Munc13-1. J. Neurosci.27, 212–219. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4201-06.2007
7
BendahmaneM.MoralesA.KreutzbergerA. J. B.SchenkN. A.MohanR.BakshiS.et al (2020). Synaptotagmin-7 enhances calcium-sensing of chromaffin cell granules and slows discharge of granule cargos. J. Neurochem.154, 598–617. 10.1111/jnc.14986
8
BeuretN.StettlerH.RenoldA.RutishauserJ.SpiessM. (2004). Expression of regulated secretory proteins is sufficient to generate granule-like structures in constitutively secreting cells. J. Biol. Chem.279, 20242–20249. 10.1074/jbc.M310613200
9
BihainF.Nomine-CriquiC.GuerciP.GasmanS.KleinM.BrunaudL. (2022). Management of patients with treatment of pheochromocytoma: a critical appraisal. Cancers (Basel)14, 3845. 10.3390/cancers14163845
10
BretouM.JouannotO.FangetI.PierobonP.LarochetteN.GestraudP.et al (2014). Cdc42 controls the dilation of the exocytotic fusion pore by regulating membrane tension. Mol. Biol. Cell25, 3195–3209. 10.1091/mbc.E14-07-1229
11
BrownR. L.MuzzafarT.WollmanR.WeissR. E. (2006). A pituitary carcinoma secreting TSH and prolactin: a non-secreting adenoma gone awry. Eur. J. Endocrinol.154, 639–643. 10.1530/eje.1.02141
12
CarmonO.LaguerreF.RiachyL.Delestre-DelacourC.WangQ.TanguyE.et al (2020). Chromogranin A preferential interaction with Golgi phosphatidic acid induces membrane deformation and contributes to secretory granule biogenesis. FASEB J.34, 6769–6790. 10.1096/fj.202000074R
13
CaseyR. T.HendriksE.DealC.WaguespackS. G.WiegeringV.RedlichA.et al (2024). International consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children and adolescents. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.20, 729–748. 10.1038/s41574-024-01024-5
14
ChenM.DuanL.SunW.GuoZ.MiaoH.YuN.et al (2023). Clinical and proteomic-based molecular characterizations of invasive and noninvasive somatotroph PitNETs. Neuroendocrinology113, 971–986. 10.1159/000531200
15
ChristensenM. V.HogdallC. K.JochumsenK. M.HogdallE. V. S. (2018). Annexin A2 and cancer: a systematic review. Int. J. Oncol.52, 5–18. 10.3892/ijo.2017.4197
16
CroiseP.BrunaudL.TothP.GasmanS.OryS. (2017). Inhibition of Cdc42 and Rac1 activities in pheochromocytoma, the adrenal medulla tumor. Small GTPases8, 122–127. 10.1080/21541248.2016.1202634
17
CroiseP.HouyS.GandM.LanoixJ.CalcoV.TothP.et al (2016). Cdc42 and Rac1 activity is reduced in human pheochromocytoma and correlates with FARP1 and ARHGEF1 expression. Endocr. Relat. Cancer23, 281–293. 10.1530/ERC-15-0502
18
CuiY.LiC.JiangZ.ZhangS.LiQ.LiuX.et al (2021). Single-cell transcriptome and genome analyses of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Neuro Oncol.23, 1859–1871. 10.1093/neuonc/noab102
19
DaemsT.VerhelstJ.MichotteA.AbramsP.De RidderD.AbsR. (2009). Modification of hormonal secretion in clinically silent pituitary adenomas. Pituitary12, 80–86. 10.1007/s11102-008-0085-7
20
DariosF.ConnellE.DavletovB. (2007). Phospholipases and fatty acid signalling in exocytosis. J. Physiol.585, 699–704. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136812
21
DasS.Al-ToubahT.StrosbergJ. (2021). Chemotherapy in neuroendocrine tumors. Cancers (Basel)13, 4872. 10.3390/cancers13194872
22
DemblaE.BechererU. (2021). Biogenesis of large dense core vesicles in mouse chromaffin cells. Traffic22, 78–93. 10.1111/tra.12783
23
DineenR.StewartP. M.SherlockM. (2017). Acromegaly. QJM110, 411–420. 10.1093/qjmed/hcw004
24
EisenhoferG.HuynhT. T.ElkahlounA.MorrisJ. C.BratslavskyG.LinehanW. M.et al (2008). Differential expression of the regulated catecholamine secretory pathway in different hereditary forms of pheochromocytoma. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.295, E1223–E1233. 10.1152/ajpendo.90591.2008
25
EliasS.DelestreC.OryS.MaraisS.CourelM.Vazquez-MartinezR.et al (2012). Chromogranin A induces the biogenesis of granules with calcium- and actin-dependent dynamics and exocytosis in constitutively secreting cells. Endocrinology153, 4444–4456. 10.1210/en.2012-1436
26
FaggianoA. (2024). Long-acting somatostatin analogs and well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a 20-year-old story. J. Endocrinol. Invest47, 35–46. 10.1007/s40618-023-02170-9
27
GabelM.DelavoieF.DemaisV.RoyerC.BaillyY.VitaleN.et al (2015). Annexin A2-dependent actin bundling promotes secretory granule docking to the plasma membrane and exocytosis. J. Cell Biol.210, 785–800. 10.1083/jcb.201412030
28
GasmanS.Chasserot-GolazS.PopoffM. R.AunisD.BaderM. F. (1997). Trimeric G proteins control exocytosis in chromaffin cells. Go regulates the peripheral actin network and catecholamine secretion by a mechanism involving the small GTP-binding protein Rho. J. Biol. Chem.272, 20564–20571. 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20564
29
GasmanS.Chasserot-GolazS.PopoffM. R.AunisD.BaderM. F. (1999). Involvement of Rho GTPases in calcium-regulated exocytosis from adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Cell Sci.112 (Pt 24), 4763–4771. 10.1242/jcs.112.24.4763
30
GasmanS.VitaleN. (2017). Lipid remodelling in neuroendocrine secretion. Biol. Cell109, 381–390. 10.1111/boc.201700030
31
GinerD.LopezI.VillanuevaJ.TorresV.ViniegraS.GutierrezL. M. (2007). Vesicle movements are governed by the size and dynamics of F-actin cytoskeletal structures in bovine chromaffin cells. Neuroscience146, 659–669. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.02.039
32
GiovinazzoF.SchimmackS.SvejdaB.AlaimoD.PfragnerR.ModlinI.et al (2013). Chromogranin A and its fragments as regulators of small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm proliferation. PLoS One8, e81111. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081111
33
GiustiL.CetaniF.CiregiaF.Da ValleY.DonadioE.GiannacciniG.et al (2011). A proteomic approach to study parathyroid glands. Mol. Biosyst.7, 687–699. 10.1039/c0mb00191k
34
GrouzmannE.MatterM.BilzS.HerrenA.TriponezF.HenzenC.et al (2012). Monoamine oxidase A down-regulation contributes to high metanephrine concentration in pheochromocytoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.97, 2773–2781. 10.1210/jc.2012-1557
35
GuerinM.GuillemotJ.ThouennonE.PierreA.El-YamaniF. Z.Montero-HadjadjeM.et al (2010). Granins and their derived peptides in normal and tumoral chromaffin tissue: implications for the diagnosis and prognosis of pheochromocytoma. Regul. Pept.165, 21–29. 10.1016/j.regpep.2010.06.003
36
GuillemotJ.AnouarY.Montero-HadjadjeM.GrouzmannE.GrumolatoL.Roshmaninho-SalgadoJ.et al (2006). Circulating EM66 is a highly sensitive marker for the diagnosis and follow-up of pheochromocytoma. Int. J. Cancer118, 2003–2012. 10.1002/ijc.21571
37
GuillemotJ.ThouennonE.GuerinM.Vallet-ErdtmannV.RavniA.Montero-HadjadjeM.et al (2012). Differential expression and processing of secretogranin II in relation to the status of pheochromocytoma: implications for the production of the tumoral marker EM66. J. Mol. Endocrinol.48, 115–127. 10.1530/JME-11-0077
38
GutierrezL. M.VillanuevaJ. (2018). The role of F-actin in the transport and secretion of chromaffin granules: an historic perspective. Pflugers Arch.470, 181–186. 10.1007/s00424-017-2040-9
39
HouyS.StreitL.DrissaI.RameM.DecraeneC.MoogS.et al (2022). Dysfunction of calcium-regulated exocytosis at a single-cell level causes catecholamine hypersecretion in patients with pheochromocytoma. Cancer Lett.543, 21576510.1016/j.canlet.2022.215765
40
IsobeK.NakaiT.YukimasaN.NanmokuT.TakekoshiK.NomuraF. (1998). Expression of mRNA coding for four catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes in human adrenal pheochromocytomas. Eur. J. Endocrinol.138, 383–387. 10.1530/eje.0.1380383
41
JahnR.CafisoD. C.TammL. K. (2024). Mechanisms of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.25, 101–118. 10.1038/s41580-023-00668-x
42
JarrottB.LouisW. J. (1977). Abnormalities in enzymes involved in catecholamine synthesis and catabolism in phaeochromocytoma. Clin. Sci. Mol. Med.53, 529–535. 10.1042/cs0530529
43
KalwatM. A.YoderS. M.WangZ.ThurmondD. C. (2013). A p21-activated kinase (PAK1) signaling cascade coordinately regulates F-actin remodeling and insulin granule exocytosis in pancreatic beta cells. Biochem. Pharmacol.85, 808–816. 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.12.003
44
KimM.KimB. H. (2021). Current guidelines for management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol. Metab. Seoul.36, 514–524. 10.3803/EnM.2021.1082
45
KimT.Gondre-LewisM. C.ArnaoutovaI.LohY. P. (2006). Dense-core secretory granule biogenesis. Physiol. (Bethesda)21, 124–133. 10.1152/physiol.00043.2005
46
KimT.Tao-ChengJ. H.EidenL. E.LohY. P. (2001). Chromogranin A, an “on/off” switch controlling dense-core secretory granule biogenesis. Cell106, 499–509. 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00459-7
47
KochM.HoltM. (2012). Coupling exo- and endocytosis: an essential role for PIP₂ at the synapse. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1821, 1114–1132. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.02.008
48
KofferA.TathamP. E.GompertsB. D. (1990). Changes in the state of actin during the exocytotic reaction of permeabilized rat mast cells. J. Cell Biol.111, 919–927. 10.1083/jcb.111.3.919
49
KurczykA.GawinM.ChekanM.WilkA.LakomiecK.MrukwaG.et al (2020). Classification of thyroid tumors based on mass spectrometry imaging of tissue microarrays; a single-pixel approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 6289. 10.3390/ijms21176289
50
LamA. D.Tryoen-TothP.TsaiB.VitaleN.StuenkelE. L. (2008). SNARE-catalyzed fusion events are regulated by Syntaxin1A-lipid interactions. Mol. Biol. Cell19, 485–497. 10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0148
51
LangT. (2007). SNARE proteins and 'membrane rafts. J. Physiol.585, 693–698. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134346
52
LangT.WackerI.WunderlichI.RohrbachA.GieseG.SoldatiT.et al (2000). Role of actin cortex in the subplasmalemmal transport of secretory granules in PC-12 cells. Biophys. J.78, 2863–2877. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76828-7
53
LiP.BademosiA. T.LuoJ.MeunierF. A. (2018). Actin remodeling in regulated exocytosis: toward a mesoscopic view. Trends Cell Biol.28, 685–697. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.04.004
54
LoyetK. M.KowalchykJ. A.ChaudharyA.ChenJ.PrestwichG. D.MartinT. F. (1998). Specific binding of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to calcium-dependent activator protein for secretion (CAPS), a potential phosphoinositide effector protein for regulated exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem.273, 8337–8343. 10.1074/jbc.273.14.8337
55
LuM.ForsbergL.HoogA.JuhlinC. C.VukojevicV.LarssonC.et al (2008). Heterogeneous expression of SNARE proteins SNAP-23, SNAP-25, Syntaxin1 and VAMP in human parathyroid tissue. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.287, 72–80. 10.1016/j.mce.2008.01.028
56
MaC. J.BurgessJ.BrillJ. A. (2021). Maturing secretory granules: where secretory and endocytic pathways converge. Adv. Biol. Regul.80, 100807. 10.1016/j.jbior.2021.100807
57
MalacombeM.BaderM. F.GasmanS. (2006a). Exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells: new tasks for actin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1763, 1175–1183. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.09.004
58
MalacombeM.CeridonoM.CalcoV.Chasserot-GolazS.McphersonP. S.BaderM. F.et al (2006b). Intersectin-1L nucleotide exchange factor regulates secretory granule exocytosis by activating Cdc42. Embo J.25, 3494–3503. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601247
59
MartinT. F. (2012). Role of PI(4,5)P(2) in vesicle exocytosis and membrane fusion. Subcell. Biochem.59, 111–130. 10.1007/978-94-007-3015-1_4
60
MohrmannR.De WitH.ConnellE.PinheiroP. S.LeeseC.BrunsD.et al (2013). Synaptotagmin interaction with SNAP-25 governs vesicle docking, priming, and fusion triggering. J. Neurosci.33, 14417–14430. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1236-13.2013
61
MohrmannR.De WitH.VerhageM.NeherE.SorensenJ. B. (2010). Fast vesicle fusion in living cells requires at least three SNARE complexes. Science330, 502–505. 10.1126/science.1193134
62
MomboisseF.HouyS.OryS.CalcoV.BaderM. F.GasmanS. (2011). How important are Rho GTPases in neurosecretion?J. Neurochem.117, 623–631. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07241.x
63
MorvanJ.ToozeS. A. (2008). Discovery and progress in our understanding of the regulated secretory pathway in neuroendocrine cells. Histochem Cell Biol.129, 243–252. 10.1007/s00418-008-0377-z
64
NeharD.Lombard-BohasC.OlivieriS.ClaustratB.ChayvialleJ. A.PenesM. C.et al (2004). Interest of Chromogranin A for diagnosis and follow-up of endocrine tumours. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf)60, 644–652. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2004.02030.x
65
NobelsF. R.KwekkeboomD. J.CoopmansW.SchoenmakersC. H.LindemansJ.De HerderW. W.et al (1997). Chromogranin A as serum marker for neuroendocrine neoplasia: comparison with neuron-specific enolase and the alpha-subunit of glycoprotein hormones. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.82, 2622–2628. 10.1210/jcem.82.8.4145
66
OnaitisM. W.KirshbomP. M.HaywardT. Z.QuayleF. J.FeldmanJ. M.SeiglerH. F.et al (2000). Gastrointestinal carcinoids: characterization by site of origin and hormone production. Ann. Surg.232, 549–556. 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00010
67
OrciL.GabbayK. H.MalaisseW. J. (1972). Pancreatic beta-cell web: its possible role in insulin secretion. Science175, 1128–1130. 10.1126/science.175.4026.1128
68
OryS.CeridonoM.MomboisseF.HouyS.Chasserot-GolazS.HeintzD.et al (2013). Phospholipid scramblase-1-induced lipid reorganization regulates compensatory endocytosis in neuroendocrine cells. J. Neurosci.33, 3545–3556. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3654-12.2013
69
PapadopulosA. (2017). Membrane shaping by actin and myosin during regulated exocytosis. Mol. Cell Neurosci.84, 93–99. 10.1016/j.mcn.2017.05.006
70
PapadopulosA.TomatisV. M.KasulaR.MeunierF. A. (2013). The cortical acto-myosin network: from diffusion barrier to functional gateway in the transport of neurosecretory vesicles to the plasma membrane. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)4, 153. 10.3389/fendo.2013.00153
71
PetersennS.FleseriuM.CasanuevaF. F.GiustinaA.BiermaszN.BillerB. M. K.et al (2023). Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.19, 722–740. 10.1038/s41574-023-00886-5
72
PinheiroP. S.HouyS.SorensenJ. B. (2016). C2-domain containing calcium sensors in neuroendocrine secretion. J. Neurochem.139, 943–958. 10.1111/jnc.13865
73
Ribeiro-OliveiraA.Jr.FranchiG.KolaB.DalinoP.PinheiroS. V.SalahuddinN.et al (2008). Protein western array analysis in human pituitary tumours: insights and limitations. Endocr. Relat. Cancer15, 1099–1114. 10.1677/ERC-08-0003
74
SchiavoG.GuQ. M.PrestwichG. D.SollnerT. H.RothmanJ. E. (1996). Calcium-dependent switching of the specificity of phosphoinositide binding to synaptotagmin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.93, 13327–13332. 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13327
75
SchonnJ. S.MaximovA.LaoY.SudhofT. C.SorensenJ. B. (2008). Synaptotagmin-1 and -7 are functionally overlapping Ca2+ sensors for exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 3998–4003. 10.1073/pnas.0712373105
76
SharmaS.FishbeinL. (2023). Diagnosis and management of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a guide for the clinician. Endocr. Pract.29, 999–1006. 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.07.027
77
StreitL.BrunaudL.VitaleN.OryS.GasmanS. (2020). Hormones secretion and Rho GTPases in neuroendocrine tumors. Cancers (Basel)12, 1859. 10.3390/cancers12071859
78
StuevenA. K.KayserA.WetzC.AmthauerH.WreeA.TackeF.et al (2019). Somatostatin analogues in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: past, present and future. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 3049. 10.3390/ijms20123049
79
TanguyE.CarmonO.WangQ.JeandelL.Chasserot-GolazS.Montero-HadjadjeM.et al (2016). Lipids implicated in the journey of a secretory granule: from biogenesis to fusion. J. Neurochem.137, 904–912. 10.1111/jnc.13577
80
TanguyE.Coste De BagneauxP.KassasN.AmmarM. R.WangQ.HaeberleA. M.et al (2020). Mono- and poly-unsaturated phosphatidic acid regulate distinct steps of regulated exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells. Cell Rep.32, 108026. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108026
81
TawfikB.MartinsJ. S.HouyS.ImigC.PinheiroP. S.WojcikS. M.et al (2021). Synaptotagmin-7 places dense-core vesicles at the cell membrane to promote Munc13-2- and Ca(2+)-dependent priming. Elife10, e64527. 10.7554/eLife.64527
82
TomicT. T.OlaussonJ.RehammarA.DelandL.MuthA.EjeskarK.et al (2020). MYO5B mutations in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma promote cancer progression. PLoS Genet.16, e1008803. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008803
83
ToozeS. A.FlatmarkT.ToozeJ.HuttnerW. B. (1991). Characterization of the immature secretory granule, an intermediate in granule biogenesis. J. Cell Biol.115, 1491–1503. 10.1083/jcb.115.6.1491
84
TrifaroJ. M.BaderM. F.DoucetJ. P. (1985). Chromaffin cell cytoskeleton: its possible role in secretion. Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.63, 661–679. 10.1139/o85-084
85
TrifaroJ. M.GasmanS.GutierrezL. M. (2008). Cytoskeletal control of vesicle transport and exocytosis in chromaffin cells. Acta Physiol. (Oxf)192, 165–172. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01808.x
86
UenishiE.ShibasakiT.TakahashiH.SekiC.HamaguchiH.YasudaT.et al (2013). Actin dynamics regulated by the balance of neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) and cofilin activities determines the biphasic response of glucose-induced insulin secretion. J. Biol. Chem.288, 25851–25864. 10.1074/jbc.M113.464420
87
Van MeerG.VoelkerD. R.FeigensonG. W. (2008). Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.9, 112–124. 10.1038/nrm2330
88
VarlamovE. V.MccartneyS.FleseriuM. (2019). Functioning pituitary adenomas - current treatment options and emerging medical therapies. Eur. Endocrinol.15, 30–40. 10.17925/EE.2019.15.1.30
89
VitaleM. L.Rodriguez Del CastilloA.TchakarovL.TrifaroJ. M. (1991). Cortical filamentous actin disassembly and scinderin redistribution during chromaffin cell stimulation precede exocytosis, a phenomenon not exhibited by gelsolin. J. Cell Biol.113, 1057–1067. 10.1083/jcb.113.5.1057
90
VitaleM. L.SewardE. P.TrifaroJ. M. (1995). Chromaffin cell cortical actin network dynamics control the size of the release-ready vesicle pool and the initial rate of exocytosis. Neuron14, 353–363. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90291-0
91
VitaleN.CaumontA. S.Chasserot-GolazS.DuG.WuS.SciorraV. A.et al (2001). Phospholipase D1: a key factor for the exocytotic machinery in neuroendocrine cells. Embo J.20, 2424–2434. 10.1093/emboj/20.10.2424
92
WilzenA.RehammarA.MuthA.NilssonO.Tesan TomicT.WangbergB.et al (2016). Malignant pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas harbor mutations in transport and cell adhesion genes. Int. J. Cancer138, 2201–2211. 10.1002/ijc.29957
93
WuL. G.ChanC. Y. (2022). Multiple roles of actin in exo- and endocytosis. Front. Synaptic Neurosci.14, 841704. 10.3389/fnsyn.2022.841704
94
Y-HassanS.FalhammarH. (2020). Cardiovascular manifestations and complications of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J. Clin. Med.9, 2435. 10.3390/jcm9082435
95
ZappiA.PersanoI.GalvaniL.ParlagrecoE.AndriniE.CampanaD.et al (2023). Chemotherapy in well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G1, G2, and G3: a narrative review. J. Clin. Med.12, 717. 10.3390/jcm12020717
96
Zeniou-MeyerM.ZabariN.AsheryU.Chasserot-GolazS.HaeberleA. M.DemaisV.et al (2007). Phospholipase D1 production of phosphatidic acid at the plasma membrane promotes exocytosis of large dense-core granules at a late stage. J. Biol. Chem.282, 21746–21757. 10.1074/jbc.M702968200
97
ZhanS.LiJ.WangT.GeW. (2018). Quantitative proteomics analysis of sporadic medullary thyroid cancer reveals FN1 as a potential novel candidate prognostic biomarker. Oncologist23, 1415–1425. 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0399
98
ZhangD.HugoW.BergsneiderM.WangM. B.KimW.VintersH. V.et al (2022). Single-cell RNA sequencing in silent corticotroph tumors confirms impaired POMC processing and provides new insights into their invasive behavior. Eur. J. Endocrinol.187, 49–64. 10.1530/EJE-21-1183
99
ZhangR.GuptaD.AlbertS. G. (2017). Pheochromocytoma as a reversible cause of cardiomyopathy: analysis and review of the literature. Int. J. Cardiol.249, 319–323. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.014
Summary
Keywords
neuroendocrine tumors, hormone, secretion, vesicular trafficking, exocytosis, dysregulated genes and proteins
Citation
Streit L, Tanguy E, Brunaud L, Tóth P, Vitale N, Ory S and Gasman S (2025) Cellular mechanisms of hormone secretion in neuroendocrine tumors: what goes wrong?. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:1527083. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1527083
Received
12 November 2024
Accepted
05 June 2025
Published
01 July 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Georg Haase, Aix Marseille Université, France
Reviewed by
Cedric Asensio, University of Denver, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Streit, Tanguy, Brunaud, Tóth, Vitale, Ory and Gasman.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Stéphane Gasman, gasman@unistra.fr
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.