Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol.

Sec. Molecular and Cellular Pathology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1613634

This article is part of the Research TopicArtificial Intelligence Applications in Chronic Ocular Diseases, Volume IIView all 53 articles

Artificial intelligence applications facilitate decision-making on cataract surgery for high myopic patients

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Eye and Ent Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital, Wuhan, Hebei Province, China
  • 3Shanghai Heping Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Surgical decision-making for highly myopic cataracts demands high expertise from doctors. We therefore aimed to develop a preliminary AI model for surgical decision-making in highly myopic cataracts based on previous deep-learning models. Materials and Methods: We first established a highly myopic cataract decision-making AI model by integrating cataract grading and postoperative visual acuity prediction models of highly myopic eyes we developed before with the surgical decision logic. The outcomes of the surgical decision-making were classified into four categories: surgery not advised, cataract surgery recommended, retinal surgery recommended, and combined cataract-retinal surgery recommended. The gold standard for the surgical decision is defined as the decision made by 2 professional ophthalmologists together (X.Z. and Y.W.). If the decision-makings on the highly myopic cataract surgery are not fully consistent, a final judgment will be made by the third expert (Y.L.). Subsequently, we evaluated AI model's surgical decision-making accuracy with gold standard and doctors in different levels in both internal (107 highly myopic eyes from Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University) and external (55 highly myopic eyes from Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital) test datasets. Results: In the internal and external datasets, according to the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III international standards of cataract grading, 99.07% and 87.27% of automatic nuclear grading, and 88.79% and 61.82% of automatic cortical grading, respectively had an absolute prediction error ≤1.0 with gold standard. Then, the mean postoperative visual acuity prediction error was 0.1560 and 0.3057 logMAR in the internal and external datasets, respectively. Finally, the consistency of AI model's and the gold standard's surgical decisions on highly myopic cataract patients in the internal and external dataset was 96.26% and 81.82% respectively. The AI demonstrated substantial agreement with the gold standard (Kappa value = 0.811, 0.556 in the internal, external dataset respectively). Conclusion: The AI decision-making model for highly myopic cataracts based on two deep learning models demonstrated good performance, which is helpful for doctors in complex highly myopic cataract surgical decision-making.

Keywords: machine learning, surgical decision making, High myopia, Cataract, artificial intelligence

Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Su, He, Jiang, Zhang, Qi, Meng, Du, Cheng, Hu, Guo, Guo, Wang, Lu and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Haike Guo, Shanghai Heping Eye Hospital, Shanghai, China
Yong Wang, Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital, Wuhan, Hebei Province, China
Yi Lu, Eye and Ent Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Xiangjia Zhu, Eye and Ent Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.