Abstract
Dysfunction of mitochondrial complex I (MCI) has been implicated in the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease. Here, we report the effect of expressing MitoLbNOX, a mitochondrial-targeted version of the bacterial enzyme LbNOX, which increases regeneration of NAD+ in the mitochondria to maintain the NAD+/NADH ratio, in dopaminergic neurons with impaired MCI (MCI-Park mice). MitoLbNOX expression did not ameliorate the cellular or behavioral deficits observed in MCI-Park mice, suggesting that alteration of the mitochondrial NAD+/NADH ratio alone is not sufficient to compensate for loss of MCI function in dopaminergic neurons.
Introduction
Dopaminergic neurons are key modulators of brain function. They are implicated in the regulation of mood, reward circuits, motivation, and voluntary movements (). Previous research has suggested that dopaminergic neurons are more metabolically demanding than other neuronal subtypes, and thus more vulnerable to disruptions in mitochondrial function ().
Mitochondrial complex I (MCI) of the electron transport chain has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) through various known genetic and environmental contributors to the disease (; ; ; ). MCI serves three primary functions: proton pumping, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and regeneration of NAD+ from NADH (). Recently, a mouse model with conditional loss of MCI in dopaminergic neurons was developed (i.e., MCI-Park mice) (). This model crosses Ndufs2-floxed mice with a dopaminergic neuron-specific Cre (DAT-Cre). NDUFS2 is a catalytic subunit necessary for the function of the forty-five subunit mammalian MCI (). MCI-Park mice develop a progressive, levodopa-responsive Parkinsonism, characterized by early loss of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and progressive motor disability. In these MCI-Park mice, fine motor function is disrupted at postnatal day 30 (P30), while gross motor dysfunction begins around P60. These motor deficits are paralleled by a progressive loss of tyrosine hydroxylase expression, which starts in axons and later becomes evident in cell bodies. This phenotypic downregulation is followed by frank neurodegeneration, weight loss, and mortality.
Previous work has attempted to mitigate the loss of MCI function, notably through expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae NADH dehydrogenase protein NDI1 (). NDI1 localizes to the inner mitochondrial membrane where it acts as a homodimer to oxidize NADH to regenerate NAD+ and donate two electrons directly to the CoQ pool of the electron transport chain (; ; ). Importantly, NDI1 cannot pump protons or generate superoxide, and thus, NDI1 does not directly contribute to ATP generation or ROS production, respectively. The donation of the two electrons to the CoQ pool by NDI1 supports proton pumping of mitochondrial complex III and IV which ultimately contributes to ATP synthesis. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that NDI1 expression protects dopaminergic neurons in toxin-based models of PD (; ; ; ), and our ongoing work indicates that NDI1 expression protects dopaminergic neurons in MCI-Park mice. () The impact of NDI1 expression on dopaminergic neurons is attributable either to the regeneration of NAD+ from NADH or to its ability to support electron transport. In support of the former possibility, NAD+ supplementation via administration of precursor nicotinamide riboside protects dopaminergic neurons, suggesting that alteration of the NAD+/NADH ratio may be sufficient to ameliorate neurodegeneration (). Phase I clinical trials of NAD+ precursor supplementation were conducted in patients with PD ().
To test the hypothesis that NAD+ regeneration is sufficient to prevent neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons due to MCI loss, an NADH oxidase from Lactobacillus brevis that regenerates NAD+ from NADH and is localized to the mitochondrial matrix (MitoLbNOX) was expressed in the MCI-Park mouse (). Unlike NDI1, MitoLbNOX does not restore electron transport chain function, but does regenerate mitochondrial NAD+ from NADH (). Contrary to our hypothesis, the expression of MitoLbNOX did not prevent the loss of dopaminergic neurons and Parkinsonism in MCI-Park mice.
Results
To test whether increasing mitochondrial NAD+ regeneration alone in dopaminergic neurons in MCI-Park mice would ameliorate their Parkinsonian phenotype, we designed a targeting construct containing Rosa26 homology arms and a Lox-STOP-Lox (LSL) cassette upstream of the MitoLbNOX gene. Thus, MitoLbNOX is only expressed following Cre-mediated removal of the LSL cassette. Our lab previously used this targeting construct to develop NDI1-LSL and CytoLbNOX-LSL mice, which have been previously described in the literature (; ). We crossed MitoLbNOX-LSL mice with MCI-Park mice, which utilize Cre recombinase driven by the DAT promoter to restrict expression to DAT-expressing cells only, to induce MitoLbNOX expression and NDUFS2 loss specifically in dopaminergic neurons (Figure 1a). MCI-Park mice have been reported to have a median survival of ∼21.5 weeks (). We found MCI-Park mice to have a median survival of 28 weeks. Expression of one allele of MitoLbNOX in MCI-Park mice increased their median survival to 44 weeks, but this effect was not statistically significant (Figure 1b). Expression of two alleles of MitoLbNOX in MCI-Park mice did not significantly alter the survival of mice compared to expression of one allele. Mice expressing MitoLbNOX without the concomitant loss of NDUFS2 (DAT-Cre + MitoLbNOX-LSL mice) had a similar median survival as control DAT-Cre mice (Figure 1c).
FIGURE 1
Next, we performed an open field assay to measure the motor phenotype at 30, 60, and 100 days of age. In agreement with previous work (), both distance and velocity traveled were significantly lower in MCI-Park mice compared to DAT-Cre controls at P30, P60, and P100 (Figures 2a–c; Supplementary Figures 1a-d). MitoLbNOX expression, one or two alleles, in MCI-Park mice did not improve open field behavior at any timepoint, nor did it exacerbate the phenotype compared to MCI-Park mice (Figures 2a–c; Supplementary Figures 1a-d). Rotarod testing was also performed to further quantify motor phenotype. MCI-Park mice exhibit a significantly shorter fall latency compared to DAT-Cre mice at all timepoints (Figure 2d; Supplementary Figures 1e,f), consistent with previous findings that show fine motor function is disrupted in MCI-Park mice as early as P30 (). Expression of MitoLbNOX, one or two alleles, in MCI-Park mice did not improve performance on the rotarod task at any time point (Figure 2d; Supplementary Figures 1e,f). Importantly, expression of MitoLbNOX in DAT-Cre mice did not negatively affect motor phenotype (Supplementary Figures 2a-i).
FIGURE 2
To determine whether MitoLbNOX expression in MCI-Park mice induces metabolic changes, we performed bulk metabolomics via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) on microdissected SNc samples at P45-60. Because the number of copies of the MitoLbNOX-LSL allele did not have a significant impact on phenotypic output, and to simplify breeding, minimize variability, and reduce animal use, we performed our bulk metabolomics study on mice containing one MitoLbNOX-LSL allele. Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) revealed that DAT-Cre, MCI-Park, and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL mice were distinct; however, MCI-Park and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL mice were closer to each other than to DAT-Cre mice (Figure 3a).
FIGURE 3
Next, we examined NAD+ -associated metabolites to determine if expression of MitoLbNOX in our MCI-Park mice alters the NADH/NAD+ ratio. Direct NADH/NAD + measurement is not specific to subcellular pools, so we examined β-hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate ratio instead. β-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate are ketone bodies that serve as fuel sources in brain mitochondria (). Acetoacetate conversion to β-hydroxybutyrate is coupled to a reduction of NADH to produce NAD+. Thus, an increase in the β-hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate ratio reflects a high mitochondrial NADH/NAD+ ratio. Similarly, the conversion of 2-ketobutyrate to 2-hydroxybutyrate is coupled to the NADH/NAD+ ratio. An increase in the 2-hydroxybutyrate/2-ketobutyrate ratio also suggests an elevated mitochondrial NADH/NAD+ ratio. Examination of these metabolite ratios have previously been used as a proxy for mitochondrial NADH/NAD+ ratio in other models, including those caused by loss-of-function mutations in MCI subunits (; ; ). Both the β-hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate and the 2-hydroxybutyrate/2-ketobutyrate ratios were elevated in the MCI-Park mice compared to the DAT-Cre mice, which was reduced by expression of MitoLbNOX, though not significantly (Figures 3b,c). These data indicate that MitoLbNOX was functional and able to lower the mitochondrial NADH/NAD+ ratio observed in MCI-Park mice.
To functionally determine if these motor impairments were due to the loss of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), we performed immunocytochemistry at P45-60, when MCI-Park mice were previously reported to show reduced TH expression in the SNc. At P45-60, the MCI-Park mice had significantly fewer TH + SNc neurons than DAT-Cre control mice (Figures 4a,b). Expression of one allele of MitoLbNOX in MCI-Park mice was not sufficient to restore the number of TH + neurons as compared to DAT-Cre control mice (Figures 4a,b). TH + levels in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of MCI-Park and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL mice were not significantly lower than those of DAT-Cre mice at this time point (Figures 4a,c).
FIGURE 4
As MCI-Park mice age, the number of SNc dopaminergic neurons decreases (). We performed neuronal nuclei (NeuN) immunostaining in the SNc of P120-150 aged mice to quantify neuronal death. MCI-Park mice expressing MitoLbNOX had an increased number of NeuN-positive neurons in the SNc (i.e., less neuronal cell death) compared to MCI-Park mice; however, this difference was not statistically significant (Figures 4d,e)., At this age, MCI-Park mice expressing MitoLbNOX also showed an increase in NeuN-positive neurons in the VTA, although this was not statistically significant when compared to DAT-Cre control mice (Figures 4d,f). Of note, some MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL animals exhibited greater NeuN expression than DAT-Cre control. While not statistically significant, we surmise this is likely due to biological or technical variability (e.g., sectioning plane or ROI boundaries).
Discussion
Our findings suggest that enhancing mitochondrial NAD+ regeneration to maintain the NAD+/NADH balance is insufficient to prevent the loss of dopaminergic neurons and onset of Parkinsonian symptoms in MCI-Park mice. MitoLbNOX expression did not prevent the onset of Parkinsonism, downregulation in the dopaminergic neuron phenotype, or eventual neurodegeneration in MCI-Park mice. The modest, though not statistically significant, extension in lifespan and increased NeuN staining observed in P120-150 mice suggest that MitoLbNOX might slightly delay cell loss. Importantly, while behavioral and lifespan assays were adequately powered, the samples sizes for immunocytochemistry were limited, which may have impacted statistical significance.
One important limitation of this study was our inability to directly measure the NADH/NAD+ ratio in SNc dopaminergic neurons due to low dopaminergic neuron abundance, subcellular compartmentalization of NAD+ pools, and rapid degradation of NADH and NAD+ during tissue harvesting. This prevented an accurate assessment of the extent to which the NADH/NAD+ ratio was restored by MitoLbNOX in MCI-Park mice. We used β-hydroxybutyrate/acetoacetate ratio in microdissected SNc as surrogate of NADH/NAD ratio, which trended towards a decrease due to expression of MitoLbNOX in MCI-Park mice. Additionally, MitoLbNOX may be unable to sustain mitochondrial NAD+ regeneration at levels comparable to those of endogenous MCI in dopaminergic neurons in vivo. Another important limitation is the use of MitoLbNOX LSL/w mice for metabolomics and histological analysis. Further experimentation is needed to determine if the effect of MitoLbNOX expression is dose-dependent in MCI-Park mice in these assays.
Methods
Animals
Ndufs2 floxed mice were provided by J. López-Barneo (Universidad de Sevilla, Spain). DAT-Cre mice (B6.SJL-Slc6a3tm1.1(cre)Bkmn/J) were provided by D. James Surmeier (Northwestern University). MitoLbNOX mice were generated at Northwestern University’s Transgenic and Targeted Mutagenesis Laboratory. The MitoLbNOX gene from Lactobacillus brevis (Addgene plasmid #74448) was cloned into our previously published targeting construct (; ).
For Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, mice were considered events (deaths) if they lost >10% of their maximum body weight, exhibited decreased responsiveness, and appeared lethargic. Data was censored for animals euthanized due to unrelated health issues and for experimental analysis prior to reaching a terminal state.
Mice were maintained in Northwestern University’s Center for Comparative Medicine (CCM) in individually ventilated microisolator cages and were provided ad libitum access to standard rodent chow (Envigo/Teklad LM-485), automatic water dispenser, and long sipper tube water bottles. Mice were additionally provided with moist chow on the cage bed beginning at P30. Housing conditions included a 12-h light/dark cycle, humidity of 30%–70%, ambient temperature of 72 ± 2 degrees Fahrenheit, and biweekly cage changes, in accordance with CCM and Northwestern University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee’s (IACUC’s) guidelines. Mice were monitored three times weekly and weighed once weekly to ensure animal welfare. Males and females were used for all studies. Subgroup analysis did not reveal sex-specific differences on any of the quantified metrics.
All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the IACUC at Northwestern University.
Open field test
Mice were placed in an open field chamber (56 cm × 56 cm) within a soundproof box and spontaneous activity was recorded for 300 s. Distance traveled from time 0–299 s and average velocity traveled from 0 to 299 s were recorded and analyzed using the Limelight (v5) software. Open field testing was performed at +/- 5 days from each timepoint depending on instrument availability. Open field testing was performed using equipment at Northwestern University’s Behavioral Phenotyping Core.
Rotarod test
For rotarod testing, mice were placed onto a spinning cylindrical rod device (RotaRod) upon which constant forward movement was required to prevent falling. The maximum length of time spent on the RotaRod based on the day of protocol and latency to fall was recorded using Rod software. The rotarod protocol involved 5 consecutive days of testing. For the first 3 days (habituation), mice were placed on the rod that was rotating a constant speed of 12 rotations/min for a maximum of 60 s. For the last 2 days of the protocol (acceleration), mice were placed on the rod which was accelerating at a constant rate from 4 to 40 rotations/min for a maximum of 300 s. Testing was repeated four times each day per mouse with a 5–10-min rest period between trials. A trial was repeated if a mouse had a latency to fall of less than one second. Rotarod testing was performed at +/- 5 days from each timepoint depending on instrument availability. Rotarod testing was performed using equipment at Northwestern University’s Behavioral Phenotyping Core.
LC-MS
SNc tissue was micro-dissected, snap-frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80 °C until extraction. Polar metabolites were extracted on ice with 40:40:20 acetonitrile:methanol:HPLC-grade water with 0.1M formic acid (−20 °C) containing 200 ng/mL isotope-labeled internal standards (thymine-d4 and inosine- () N4 for negative ion mode; valine-d8 and phenylalanine-d8 for positive ion mode).Tissue was mechanically dissociated via pipetting up and down, vortexed briefly, and incubated on ice for 10 min. Another extraction buffer was then added of HPLC-grade water with 15% w/v ammonium bicarbonate. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (14,000 x g, 25 min, 4 °C). 100 μL of the clarified extracts were transferred to autosampler vials for LC-MS.
Chromatographic separation was achieved on an XBridge BEH Amide HILIC column (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.5 µm; Waters) using an UltiMate 3000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mobile phase A was 95% H2O/5% acetonitrile with 20 mM ammonium acetate and 20 mM ammonium hydroxide, adjusted to pH 9.4; mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The gradient (0.3 mL/min, 25 °C column temperature, 10 µL injection) was: 0–2 min 90% B; 2–3 min 75% B; 3–7 min 75% B; 7–8 min 70% B; 8–10 min 70→50% B; 10–12 min 50% B; 12–13 min 25% B; 13–16 min 25→0% B; 16–21 min 0% B; 21–25 min re-equilibration at 90% B.
Mass spectra were acquired on an Orbitrap Exploris 240 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated in polarity-switching full-scan mode (m/z 70-1,000 Da, resolution 60,000 FWHM at m/z 200; spray voltage 2.8 kV for negative ionization, 3.2 kV for positive ionization; capillary temperature 320 °C; source temperature 30 °C; sheath/aux/sweep gas 35/10/0 arb).
Raw files were processed in El-MAVEN (Elucidata.io). Peak areas were normalized to the corresponding isotope-labeled internal standard whenever available; metabolites lacking a dedicated standard were normalized to total ion current (TIC). Normalized data were exported for downstream statistical analysis.
Immunocytochemistry
Mice were perfused with ice cold PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and brains were dissected. Following dissection, brains were stored in 4% PFA solution for 12–16 h before being placed in 15% sucrose diluted in Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS) for 12–16 h. Brains were then stored in 30% sucrose until sectioning. Brains were sectioned coronally into 30 µm thick sections by vibratome (Leica VT1200S) and stored in 0.1% sodium azide diluted in DPBS before staining.
For tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) staining, sections containing the region of interest were selected and rinsed in DPBS followed by washes in PBS with Triton. Sections were then incubated in a PBS with Triton solution containing donkey serum for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C in Tyrosine Hydroxylase Antibody (Immunostar, 22941) at a 1:1000 ratio. Following this incubation in primary antibody, sections were again washed in PBS with Triton and then incubated at room temperature in Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 594 (ThermoFisher Scientific, A-11005) for 60 min at a 1:400 ratio. Sections were then rinsed with PBS with Triton, then DPBS before mounting on slides (Fisher Scientific, 12-550-15). Once dry, sections were coverslipped using ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant with DNA Stain DAPI (ThermoFisher Scientific, P36935). Slides were stored at room temperature in dark conditions overnight to allow the mountant to harden before being transferred to 4 °C until imaging.
For NeuN staining, selected sections were rinsed in DPBS followed by washes in PBS with Triton. Sections were then incubated in a PBS with Triton solution containing donkey serum for 2 h at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C in anti-NeuN antibody (Millipore Sigma, ABN78) at a 1:200 ratio. Following this incubation in primary antibody, sections were again washed in PBS with Triton and then incubated at room temperature in Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ Plus 488 (Invitrogen, A32790) for 60 min at a 1:1000 ratio. Sections were then rinsed in PBS with Triton, then DPBS before mounting on slides. Once dry, sections were coverslipped using ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant with DNA Stain DAPI (ThermoFisher Scientific, P36935). Slides were stored at room temperature in dark conditions overnight to allow the mountant to harden before being transferred to 4 °C until imaging.
Imaging
Slides stored at 4 °C were allowed to equilibrate to room temperature before imaging. Slides were imaged using an inverted microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti2) with a Nikon Plan Fluor 10X Ph1 NA = 0.30 Air objective using Nikon Elements software. Large area image acquisition was used to image the entirety of each brain section. Imaging was performed at Northwestern University’s Center for Advanced Microscopy.
Imaging analysis
Images were analyzed using FIJI software (version 2.16.0/1.54p). For analysis of images in the tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) staining cohort, red and blue channels were split, and red channel images were processed for analysis. For image processing, contrast was enhanced using 0.35% with normalization enabled. The image was then converted to 8-bit and Shanbhag Thresholding was applied. The resulting image was made binary, and watershed was applied to separate adjacent particles. FIJI’s Region of interest (ROI) manager was used to outline the left and right SNc and left and right VTA. FIJI’s “analyze particles” function was then used to count the number of particles in each region of interest with size set to 50–2000 square microns and circularity set at 0-1. Left and right SNc were combined for a single SNc value per section, as were the left and right VTA. ROI was defined by author D’Alessandro and sizing was kept consistent across sections. Two technical replicates were used for each biological replicate, and the technical replicates for each region (SNc and VTA) were averaged.
For analysis of images in the neuronal nuclei cohort, green and blue channels were split, and green channel images were processed for analysis. For image processing, the image was then converted to 8-bit and Moments Thresholding was applied. The resulting image was made binary, and watershed was applied to separate adjacent particles. ROI manager was used to outline the left and right SNc and left and right VTA. FIJI’s “analyze particles” function was then used to count the number of particles in each region of interest with size set to 50–30000 square microns and circularity set at 0.4-1. Left and right SNc were combined for a single SNc value per section, as were the left and right VTA. ROI was defined by author D’Alessandro and sizing was kept consistent across sections. Two technical replicates were used for each biological replicate, and the technical replicates for each region (SNc and VTA) were averaged.
For both tyrosine hydroxylase and neuronal nuclei groups, DAT-cre mouse cell counts for SNc and VTA were averaged across biological replicates. Using Excel, the average of the two technical replicates for each biological replicate in the MCI-Park and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL groups were calculated as a percentage of average DAT-Cre mouse expression. GraphPad Prism was then used to calculate p-values between groups.
For the representative images shown in Figure 4, contrast was enhanced using 0.35% with normalization enabled.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 10.4.2). For metabolite ratios, peak intensities were compared within each sample. For the calculation of p-values, t-test with Welch’s correction was used. Multiple unpaired t-tests were used to calculate p-value for rotarod experiments. Grubbs’ test was applied to metabolomics and immunofluorescence data to determine any statistically significant outliers, which were removed. For survival analysis, log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to determine p-values.
Data visualization
Figure 1a was created with BioRender.com. GraphPad Prism and Excel were used for data visualization.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data presented in the study are available on Figshare DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30142555.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by Northwestern University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
KD: Project administration, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Conceptualization, Validation, Investigation. EZ: Writing – review and editing, Investigation. JB: Writing – review and editing, Investigation. BK: Writing – review and editing, Investigation. AP: Data curation, Visualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. SD: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis, Resources. CR: Writing – review and editing, Resources. DS: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review and editing. NC: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant P01AG049665 (NC); Cellular and Molecular Basis of Disease grant T32GM008061 (KD); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant T32HL076139-11 (CR); National Institutes of Health grant NS121174 (DS); National Institutes of Health grant 1R01NS119690-01 (EZ); the Flanagan Foundation (EZ); Michael J. Fox Foundation (NC and DS); and the Freedom Together Foundation (EZ and DS).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Transgenic and Targeted Mutagenesis Laboratory, the Center for Advanced Microscopy, and the Behavioral Phenotyping Core at Northwestern University. We want to thank Craig Weiss and Jason Zysk from the Behavioral Phenotyping Core for their assistance. Imaging work was performed at the Northwestern University Center for Advanced Microscopy generously supported by NCI CCSG P30-CA060553 awarded to the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. We would also like to thank the staff at the Center for Comparative Medicine at Northwestern University. Additionally, we thank Dr. José López-Barneo and Lin Gao for providing our lab access to Ndufs2 floxed mice.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2025.1650462/full#supplementary-material
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1MitoLbNOX does not alter the behavioral phenotype of MCI-Park mice at P30 or P100. (a) MitoLbNOX expression in MCI-Park mice does not restore open field distance traveled at P30 to the distance traveled in DAT-Cre mice (n=7-17 mice, Welch’s t-test p<0.05 for DAT-Cre mice compared to each other group, not significant for comparisons between MCI-Park, MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX, and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL/LSL). (b) MitoLbNOX expression in MCI-Park mice does not restore open field velocity traveled at P30 to the velocity traveled in DAT-Cre mice (n=7-17 mice, Welch’s t-test p<0.05 for DAT-Cre mice compared to each other group, not significant for comparisons between MCI-Park, MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX, and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL/LSL). (c) MitoLbNOX expression in MCI-Park mice does not restore open field distance traveled at P100 to the distance traveled in DAT-Cre mice (n=8-14 mice, Welch’s t-test p=0.0002 for DAT-Cre mice compared to each other group, not significant for comparisons between MCI-Park, MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX, and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL/LSL). (d) MitoLbNOX expression in MCI-Park mice does not restore open field velocity traveled at P100 to the velocity traveled in DAT-Cre mice (n=8-14 mice, Welch’s t-test p=0.0002 for DAT-Cre mice compared to each other group, not significant for comparisons between MCI-Park, MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX, and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL/LSL). (e) MitoLbNOX expression in MCI-Park mice does not restore rotarod performance at P30 to the performance levels of DAT-Cre mice (n=9-18 mice, multiple unpaired t-tests p<0.05 for DAT-Cre mice compared to each other group on all days, not significant for comparisons between MCI-Park, MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX, and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL/LSL on any day). (f) MitoLbNOX expression in MCI-Park mice does not restore rotarod performance at P100 to the performance levels of DAT-Cre mice (n=7-13 mice, multiple unpaired t-tests p<0.000001 for DAT-Cre mice compared to each other group on all days, not significant for comparisons between MCI-Park, MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX, and MCI-Park + MitoLbNOX LSL/LSL on any day).
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S2MitoLbNOX expression in DAT-Cre positive mice does not affect its motor phenotype. (a) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter open field distance traveled at P30 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=10-12 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (b) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter open field velocity traveled at P30 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=10-12 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (c) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter open field distance traveled at P60 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=11-13 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (d) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter open field velocity traveled at P60 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=11-13 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (e) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter open field distance traveled at P100 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=9-10 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (f) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter open field velocity traveled at P100 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=9-10 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (g) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter rotarod performance at P30 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=10 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (h) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter rotarod performance at P60 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=12-14 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant). (i) MitoLbNOX expression does not alter rotarod performance at P100 compared to DAT-Cre control mice (n=9-11 mice, Welch’s t-test not significant).
References
1
Barber-SinghJ.SeoB. B.Nakamaru-OgisoE.LauY. S.Matsuno-YagiA.YagiT. (2009). Neuroprotective effect of long-term NDI1 gene expression in a chronic mouse model of parkinson disorder. Rejuvenation Res.12, 259–267. 10.1089/rej.2009.0854
2
BrakedalB.DölleC.RiemerF.MaY.NidoG. S.SkeieG. O.et al (2022). The NADPARK study: a randomized phase I trial of nicotinamide riboside supplementation in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Metab.34, 396–407.e6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.02.001
3
ChandelN. S. (2015). Navigating Metabolism. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
4
ChintaS. J.AndersenJ. K. (2005). Dopaminergic neurons. Int. J. Biochem. & Cell Biol.37, 942–946. 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.09.009
5
ChintaS. J.MallajosyulaJ. K.RaneA.AndersenJ. K. (2010). Mitochondrial α-synuclein accumulation impairs complex I function in dopaminergic neurons and results in increased mitophagy in vivo. Neurosci. Lett.486, 235–239. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.061
6
DeviL.RaghavendranV.PrabhuB. M.AvadhaniN. G.AnandatheerthavaradaH. K. (2008). Mitochondrial import and accumulation of alpha-synuclein impair complex I in human dopaminergic neuronal cultures and parkinson disease brain. J. Biol. Chem.283, 9089–9100. 10.1074/jbc.M710012200
7
D’AlessandroK.Rodriguez-GonzalezP.
8
FlønesI. H.TokerL.SandnesD. A.CastelliM.MostafaviS.LuraN.et al (2024). Mitochondrial complex I deficiency stratifies idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Commun.15, 3631. 10.1038/s41467-024-47867-4
9
González-RodríguezP.ZampeseE.StoutK. A.GuzmanJ. N.IlijicE.YangB.et al (2021). Disruption of mitochondrial complex I induces progressive parkinsonism. Nature599, 650–656. 10.1038/s41586-021-04059-0
10
HuiS.CowanA. J.ZengX.YangL.TeSlaaT.LiX.et al (2020). Quantitative fluxomics of circulating metabolites. Cell Metab.32, 676–688.e4. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.013
11
IwataM.LeeY.YamashitaT.YagiT.IwataS.CameronA. D.et al (2012). The structure of the yeast NADH dehydrogenase (Ndi1) reveals overlapping binding sites for water- and lipid-soluble substrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.109, 15247–15252. 10.1073/pnas.1210059109
12
KrebsH. A.GascoyneT. (1968). The redox state of the nicotinamide–adenine dinucleotides in rat liver homogenates. Biochem. J.108, 513–520. 10.1042/bj1080513
13
LiH.SunB.HuangY.ZhangJ.XuX.ShenY.et al (2022). Gene therapy of yeast NDI1 on mitochondrial complex I dysfunction in rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease models in vitro and vivo. Mol. Med.28, 29. 10.1186/s10020-022-00456-x
14
MarellaM.SeoB. B.Nakamaru-OgisoE.GreenamyreJ. T.Matsuno-YagiA.YagiT. (2008). Protection by the NDI1 gene against neurodegeneration in a rotenone rat model of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One3, e1433. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001433
15
Martínez-ReyesI.CardonaL. R.KongH.VasanK.McElroyG. S.WernerM.et al (2020). Mitochondrial ubiquinol oxidation is necessary for tumour growth. Nature585, 288–292. 10.1038/s41586-020-2475-6
16
McElroyG. S.ReczekC. R.ReyfmanP. A.MithalD. S.HorbinskiC. M.ChandelN. S. (2020). NAD+ regeneration rescues lifespan, but not ataxia, in a mouse model of brain mitochondrial complex I dysfunction. Cell Metab.32, 301–308. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.003
17
McElroyG. S.ChakrabartyR. P.D'AlessandroK. B.HuY. S.VasanK.TanJ.et al (2022). Reduced expression of mitochondrial complex I subunit Ndufs2 does not impact healthspan in mice. Sci. Rep.12, 5196. 10.1038/s41598-022-09074-3
18
NewmanJ. C.VerdinE. (2017). β-Hydroxybutyrate: a signaling metabolite. Annu. Rev. Nutr.37, 51–76. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064916
19
SchöndorfD. C.IvanyukD.BadenP.Sanchez-MartinezA.De CiccoS.YuC.et al (2018). The NAD+ precursor nicotinamide riboside rescues mitochondrial defects and neuronal loss in iPSC and fly models of parkinson’s disease. Cell Rep.23, 2976–2988. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.009
20
SeoB. B.Kitajima-IharaT.ChanE. K.SchefflerI. E.Matsuno-YagiA.YagiT. (1998). Molecular remedy of complex I defects: rotenone-Insensitive internal NADH-Quinone oxidoreductase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria restores the NADH oxidase activity of complex I-deficient Mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.95, 9167–9171. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9167
21
SeoB. B.Nakamaru-OgisoE.CruzP.FlotteT. R.YagiT.Matsuno-YagiA. (2004). Functional expression of the single subunit NADH dehydrogenase in mitochondria in vivo: a potential therapy for complex I deficiencies. Hum. Gene Ther.15, 887–895. 10.1089/hum.2004.15.887
22
SeoB. B.Nakamaru-OgisoE.FlotteT. R.Matsuno-YagiA.YagiT. (2006). In vivo complementation of complex I by the yeast Ndi1 enzyme. Possible application for treatment of parkinson disease. J. Biol. Chem.281, 14250–14255. 10.1074/jbc.M600922200
23
SulzerD.SurmeierD. J. (2013). Neuronal vulnerability, pathogenesis, and Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord.28, 715–724. 10.1002/mds.25187
24
SummaK. C.JiangP.González-RodríguezP.HuangX.LinX.VitaternaM. H.et al (2024). Disrupted sleep-wake regulation in the MCI-park mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Park. Dis.10, 54. 10.1038/s41531-024-00670-w
25
ThomasR. R.KeeneyP. M.BennettJ. P. (2012). Impaired complex-I mitochondrial biogenesis in parkinson disease frontal cortex. J. Park. Dis.2, 67–76. 10.3233/JPD-2012-11074
26
TitovD. V.CracanV.GoodmanR. P.PengJ.GrabarekZ.MoothaV. K. (2016). Complementation of mitochondrial electron transport chain by manipulation of the NAD+/NADH ratio. Science352, 231–235. 10.1126/science.aad4017
27
von MorzeC.OhligerM. A.Marco-RiusI.WilsonD. M.FlavellR. R.PearceD.et al (2018). Direct assessment of renal mitochondrial redox state using hyperpolarized 13 C-acetoacetate. Magn. Reson Med.79, 1862–1869. 10.1002/mrm.27054
28
ZhuP.PfrenderE. M.SteffeckA. W. T.ReczekC. R.ZhouY.ThakkarA. V.et al (2025). Immunomodulatory role of the stem cell circadian clock in muscle repair. Sci. Adv.11, eadq8538. 10.1126/sciadv.adq8538
Summary
Keywords
Parkinson’s disease, NAD+, neurometabolism, neurodegeneration, mitochondrial complex I, dopaminergic neurons
Citation
D’Alessandro KB, Zampese E, Blum JLE, Kuusik B, Palmiotti A, Davidson SM, Reczek CR, Surmeier DJ and Chandel NS (2025) Genetic modulation of mitochondrial NAD+ regeneration does not prevent dopaminergic neuron dysfunction caused by mitochondrial complex I impairment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:1650462. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1650462
Received
19 June 2025
Accepted
09 September 2025
Published
25 September 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Ruben Torregrosa, University of Helsinki, Finland
Reviewed by
Sergey Yaklichkin, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
Christian Dölle, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 D’Alessandro, Zampese, Blum, Kuusik, Palmiotti, Davidson, Reczek, Surmeier and Chandel.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Navdeep S. Chandel, nav@northwestern.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.